Jump to content

Talk:Endemic COVID-19: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Endemic COVID-19/Archive 2) (bot
 
(152 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talkheader|archive_age=30|archive_bot=Lowercase Sigmabot III}}
{{Talkheader}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(60d)
| algo = old(60d)
Line 9: Line 9:
| minthreadsleft = 4
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|covid}}
{{WikiProject banner shell |1=
{{FailedGA|02:34, 26 November 2022 (UTC)|topic=Biology and medicine|page=1|oldid=1123857070}}
{{WikiProject COVID-19 |class=C |importance=High |listas=Endemic phase of COVID-19 |attention=no |needs-infobox=no |needs-photo=no |unref=no}}
{{WikiProject Medicine |class=C |importance=Mid |listas=Endemic phase of COVID-19 |needs-infobox=no |needs-photo=no}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Endemic phase of COVID-19|
{{WikiProject Politics |class=C |importance=Low |listas=Endemic phase of COVID-19 |attention=no |needs-infobox=no |needs-image=no}}
{{WikiProject COVID-19 |importance=High |attention=no |needs-infobox=no |needs-photo=no |unref=no}}
{{WikiProject Medicine |importance=Mid |needs-infobox=no |needs-photo=no}}
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Low |attention=no |needs-infobox=no |needs-image=no}}
{{WikiProject Skepticism |importance=Low}}
}}
}}
{{Ds/talk notice|covid}}
{{FailedGA|02:34, 26 November 2022 (UTC)|topic=Biology and medicine|page=1|oldid=1123857070}}

== Providing context ==

I had previously added this information, citing a source already being used in the article:

----
Not all infectious diseases become endemic.<ref name="Katzourakis">{{doi|10.1038/d41586-022-00155-x}}</ref> Common infectious disease patterns include:

* [[Disease eradication]] – an unlikely outcome for COVID-19
* Sporadic spread<ref name="Katzourakis" /> – unpredictable outbreaks that tend to die out relatively quickly
* Local or regional spread<ref name="Katzourakis" /> – unpredictable outbreaks, or [[epidemics]], that are sustained for a significant period of time in local or regional areas, without global spread
* Pandemic<ref name="Katzourakis" /> – global outbreaks
* Endemic<ref name="Katzourakis" /> – steady, predictable infection levels, including seasonal patterns.


== Again ==
----


The recent spate of "pandemic's over, so it's obviously endemic" edits makes me think that we are being unclear. Perhaps we should think about putting a sentence in the first paragraph that says something like:
I think, if you want people to understand what an endemic disease is, it is important to understand what it's not. This is not unusual in medicine-related articles. For example, the second sentence of [[Cancer]] provides information on what cancer is not.


"Endemic COVID-19 is not the only possible outcome of the COVID-19 pandemic, as a new virus could remain a pandemic indefinitely, be reduced to sporadic outbreaks, or be seen in local or regional epidemics rather than becoming endemic."
Crossroads has [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Endemic_COVID-19&diff=prev&oldid=1155397206 removed it], saying "This is way beyond what that source says, and even if not, it is excessive use of a lower quality "world view" article. It's also undue emphasis on outcomes that do not apply to Covid, the topic of this article."


I've also been thinking about turning the bullet list in [[Endemic COVID-19#Definition and characteristics]] into a table with a suitable graph showing each item, in the hope that if we put in a few color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one that people might notice them, and if they notice the colorful pictures, they might read the words next to them, and then they ''might'', possibly, just ''perhaps'' notice that it's a little bit more complicated than "I feel like the pandemic's over and therefore it's endemic".
Taking the concerns in order:


Alternatively (or additionally), we could put a {{tl|FAQ}} at the top of the talk page that says something like:
* I don't think it goes beyond what the source says (at all, much less "way beyond"). Did you get access to the source again? I was actually a little concerned when I was writing this that I was getting too close to the line for [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism]]. {{pb}}Perhaps more importantly, this is basic information in epidemiology. These definitions can be found in textbooks such as [https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_COVID_19_Pandemic/l_z0DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PP17&printsec=frontcover this one], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Primary_Care/fsnXBgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA40&printsec=frontcover this one], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Bennett_Brachman_s_Hospital_Infections/UIuWEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PT41&printsec=frontcover this one], [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Veterinary_Epidemiology/56NMDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA58&printsec=frontcover chapter 4 in this one], with little variation beyond whether the author prefers to call unpredictable outbreak below the global level ''local/regional spread'' or an ''epidemic'', with both labels being understood to mean the same thing. The advantage to the cited source is (a) it's already used in the article and (b) it explicitly connects these basic definitions to COVID-19. The first book I link in this paragraph also explicitly connects these concepts to COVID-19. Perhaps you'd prefer that one? Or if you want something more accessible to the average person, Bill Gates' book about COVID-19, says in its early pages that "A good rule of thumb is that an outbreak is when a disease spikes in a local area, an epidemic is when an outbreak spreads more broadly within a country or region, and a pandemic is when an epidemic goes global, affecting more than one continent. And some diseases don’t come and go, but stay consistently in a specific location—those are known as endemic diseases. Malaria, for instance, is endemic to many equatorial regions."
* If you are concerned about these undisputed facts being followed by a "lower quality" source, then I've just provided multiple textbooks that contain the same basic information, so that problem is easily solved.
* I wonder why you believe that these are "outcomes that do not apply to Covid". We actually don't know whether COVID-19 will become endemic (=steady rate) or a series of epidemics (=variable rate) or something else. Obviously, the "pandemic" item applies, because that's either what we have now or what we hopefully have finally stopped having. It is unlikely to be eradicated or sporadic (though [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Biomedical_Innovations_to_Combat_COVID_1/zcwnEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA53&printsec=frontcover this source] says that New Zealand and Thailand achieved the enviable state of sporadic transmission in the early days), but I think the main point is that knowing what endemic ''is'' ''not'' helps people understand what it ''actually is''. You can't really understand endemic (=like malaria) if you don't understand sporadic (=like gastroenteritis) and epidemic (=like measles). It is, consequently, appropriate to include information about contrasting disease prevalence states, because that helps people understand the contours of the main subject here. Or, to put it another way, how can you know what "endemic COVID-19" is, if you don't know what both "endemic" and "COVID-19" are? You don't actually know what endemic COVID-19 is unless you also know that it's different from pandemic COVID-19, different from epidemic COVID-19, etc. Therefore we need to provide enough information about what endemicity is, that we can comply with the rule that [[Wikipedia:Summary style#Technique|"Each article on Wikipedia must be able to stand alone as a self-contained unit"]]. Readers should not have to go to a different article to find out what this one is actually about. Also, lots of sources ([https://www.google.com/books/edition/COVID_19_Public_Health_Measures/RkUrEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PT17&printsec=frontcover here's another book] and [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Epidemics/-LqFEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PT43&printsec=frontcover another]) provide this kind of compare-and-contrast information, so it's a normal way for sources to present this information.


;When is Wikipedia going to admit that the pandemic is over and COVID-19 is endemic already?
I therefore suggest that this information be returned to the article, perhaps with additional sources.
:Just as soon as multiple major medical journal articles directly investigate the subject, define what they mean by 'endemic', and make a clear and direct statement that COVID-19 has entered an endemic phase. Note, for the record:
<references />
:* Multiple sources, not just one;
[[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 01:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:* Major journals, not a predatory journal that will print anything as long as they get paid;
:* Medical journal articles (sources that are both [[peer-reviewed]] ''and'' [[review article]]s or [[meta-analyses]] are preferred), not newspapers, magazines, or social media;
:* Directly investigate the subject, not just a passing mention like 'now that the pandemic is over'. Direct investigations sound like "Based on the last six pages of data and calculations, we conclude that COVID-19 has become endemic in Europe";
:* Define their terms, because there are multiple valid definitions for ''endemic'' (e.g. one that includes seasonal flu and another that doesn't), and we need to know exactly what to say in this article without misrepresenting the sources;
:* Clear and direct statement, not just 'they said that "the pandemic ''was'' something", so that obviously proves that it is endemic instead of sporadic or epidemic or any of the other options'. A clear and direct statement will likely sound something like "COVID-19 entered a hyperendemic phase with moderate semi-annual seasonal variation in late 2022".


What do you think? [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 04:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:Here's another source, {{PMID|35771775}} (review from a year ago), saying {{xt|We distinguish between 4 possible paths of an emerging pathogen, including “sporadic spread,” “local or regional spread,” “pandemicity,” and “endemicity.”}} They predict endemicity: {{xt|We contend that endemicity is the most plausible route for SARS-CoV-2 in the foreseeable future, with SARS-CoV-2 poised to eventually become the fifth endemic seasonal coronavirus (HCoV) along with HKU1, NL63, OC43, and 229E}} and suggest that age distribution is a good way to detect when COVID-19 has transitioned from pandemic to endemic. (They decline to predict how long this will take, but they most of the timespans they give as examples are a couple of years.) [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 03:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
:I'm not convinced that "a new virus could remain a pandemic indefinitely" is sourceable or true, nor that the above is necessary. As noted previously at the [[Talk:COVID-19_pandemic/Archive_49#End_of_Pandemic|pandemic's talk page]], some experts and published papers ''have'' said it is endemic already, or that the concept is so vaguely/inconsistently defined such that it depends on the definition. This should be consistent with that, if nothing else. However, at this point I honestly think we should just redirect this to [[COVID-19_pandemic#Transition_to_later_phases]]. Most of what's here is already covered better there, or from poor sources like old commentary pieces in journals that we can just get rid of anyway. If people want to have content about different definitions of endemic in detail, and whether different diseases technically meet such and such threshold, that can go at [[Endemic (epidemiology)]], which is still pretty short, and can cover various diseases all at once. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]</sup> 21:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
::Well, I liked it. More scholarly sourcing for this article is what is needed. [[User:Bon courage|Bon courage]] ([[User talk:Bon courage|talk]]) 03:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::As we frequently say about blocks, [[Wikipedia:Indefinite is not infinite]]. If someone knows the ending date in advance for every pandemic, then I'm sure that would be interesting to researchers, but it doesn't sound very plausible.
::I'm happy for you to add something from e.g. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35771775/ PMID 35771775], and I think using it to explain possible paths and their predictions are a good use of it, but I stand by my edit summary earlier for that particular material. Nobody thinks sporadic-spread is going to happen again for Covid, it only happened in a few places with strict border controls and on-and-off lockdowns as part of a now-defunct "[[zero COVID]]" policy and prior to the rise of more transmissible variants. Mentioning such possibilities in the article as though they are still plausible can be misleading. I also don't think "like malaria" is at all a helpful comparison for this particular virus; it's not a comparison we see expert sources really making, rather they make comparisons to other respiratory viruses like the flu and the other four endemic coronaviruses. That said, bottom line is that I think we should move on from trying to bleed dry that one particular "world view" article, and that we will benefit from using better sources as mentioned, and including what is actually predicted for Covid specifically. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]</sup> 23:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
::Can you give me some links to articles in medical journals that directly address the question of COVID-19's endemicity? I'm not looking for a history paper like the "Historiographical article", written in 2020 and published in a special issue (a [[Supplement (publishing)]]? MEDRS warns against those), which is cited in [[COVID-19 pandemic#Transition to later phases]]. I'm not even sure that was peer-reviewed. The issue says that the history journal "''[[Centaurus (journal)|Centaurus]]'' contains articles, historiographical articles, book reviews and editorial communications. Articles must report original research and will be subjected to review by referees" – with the obvious-to-me implication that "historiographical articles, book reviews and editorial communications" are ''not'' peer-reviewed.) I'm specifically looking for papers that say something like "Here's our definition of endemic, here are the metrics for it, here's the data, and the end result is that we are/aren't in an endemic phase right now". It doesn't matter to me whether the metrics are "prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 virus detection in wastewater" or "proportion of public services operating at pre-pandemic capacity"; I just want something that chooses a definition and determines whether or not we are there yet. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 22:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I wrote "Common infectious disease patterns include:" which is not at all like "maybe sporadic-spread could happen again for Covid".
:::The particular diseases given for comparison depends on which part of the world the speaker comes from, and also whether the speaker prefers an especially strict definition of endemicity. There's a POV in the field that says the common cold and influenza is too variable to be endemic. Also, even if you believe influenza is endemic, it is at best only sometimes endemic. Pandemic and epidemic flu are real, too. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 04:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


== Long Covid ==
== Endemic overview ==


COVID-19 was predicted to become an endemic disease by many experts. The observed behavior of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, suggests it is unlikely it will die out, and the lack of a COVID-19 vaccine that provides long-lasting immunity against infection means it cannot immediately be eradicated; thus, the transition to an endemic phase was probable. In the current endemic phase, people continue to become infected and ill, but in numbers that we will accept like we do for the flu as an example. Such a transition took until 2023 but there is no specific date or month for when the pandemic ended. We can clearly see from Boston University that we see that the number of the COVID-19 hospitalizations from January 2023 and January 2024 were similar and that they were nearly the same. COVID-19 is here to stay and not growing milder, so we can see that this virus is clearly endemic.
The Lancet talked about "a pandemic of [[Long COVID]]", but this is a metaphorical use of the term pandemic, and I think that is unnecessarily confusing for this article. Consequently, I've removed it. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 15:20, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
:I support this. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]</sup> 18:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


COVID-19 endemicity is distinct from the COVID-19 public health emergency of international concern, which was ended by the World Health Organization on 5 May 2023. Endemic is a frequently misunderstood and misused word outside the realm of epidemiology. Endemic does not mean mild, or that COVID-19 must become a less hazardous disease. Malaria is endemic and that does not mean it is not dangerous and it is sad that it may never end. Some politicians and commentators have conflated what they termed endemic COVID-19 with the lifting of public health restrictions or a comforting return to pre-pandemic normality that guidelines were lifted in early 2022. This was called "the pandemic phase" that restrictions for masks and vaccines were lifted. People may have taken it less seriously, but this is before the pandemic ended. The severity of endemic disease would be dependent on various factors, including the evolution of the virus, population immunity, and vaccine development and rollout, number of deaths. [[User:BenSchmidt7439|BenSchmidt7439]] ([[User talk:BenSchmidt7439|talk]]) 18:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
== Navbox ==


== Seasonal pattern ==
The sidebar navbox lists endemic COVID as a type of "international response", which is kind of silly. (Endemicity is a situation that either happens or doesn't.) I'm not sure that there's a good section for it, though. Maybe "variants"? (A mutation could push us into endemicity, or out of it.) Or at the top? Or something else? [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 09:47, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


COVID-19 became seasonal in 2023. We noticed that the virus acted strange, as it did have a seasonal pattern. COVID-19 peaks in winter, have a sharp decline in spring, another peak in summer but not as bad in winter, and another decline of cases in fall but not as high as spring. The reason COVID-19 peaks in winter is because we are all inside and gathering and that is why we all catch each other's germs. Also, other germs are going around like COVID-19. The reason it goes up in summer is because of all the traveling and being around so many people outside. And the pool causes a lot of COVID-19 to spread. People generally are around each other less in spring and everything is less crowded. COVID-19 peaks in December through February. Cases start slightly going down in March. COVID-19 has a sharp decline of cases in April and May, peaks again in June through August, and has a decline of cases in September through November. April and May seem to be the months where COVID-19 is the safest. Even though COVID-19 does get high in summer, that does not mean you cannot enjoy life in summer. COVID-19 seems to be at epidemic levels in summer and winter, but it seems to still be overall lower than it was before 2023. But because we know it is seasonal and occurs high in winter and summer, it is not considered an epidemic. COVID-19 seems to be an overall less common virus. In 2022, herd immunity and natural immunity seemed to make COVID-19 less common. In summer and winter, the virus seems to be not common, but not uncommon. Your chance of catching COVID-19 in winter and summer is still low, but not zero. Most people will not catch COVID-19 more than a few times and the quickest anyone has ever caught COVID-19 was in 14 days and you are not likely to get it again until a while. This is not because it provides long-term immunity, but because COVID-19 is not an everyday virus you are around. [[User:BenSchmidt7439|BenSchmidt7439]] ([[User talk:BenSchmidt7439|talk]]) 18:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
== Over time ==


:It appears that the enthusiastic new editor has been blocked for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry]] this time. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 00:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
So... we have a section that amounts to a chronological proseline of changing expert opinions: "A March 2022 [[Review article|review]] declared... A June 2022 review predicted that... In October 2022, a report [...] assessed that... As of March 2023, it was not possible to predict..."


== CDC spokesman ==
It previously began with a rather bland introductory statement, "The view of experts developed over time, as more information became available." @[[User:Crossroads|Crossroads]] removed it, saying that it was unsourced and probably something made up by Wikipedia editors for which we could not expect to find any published reliable source. For myself, I consider it amply verified by the sentences that follow it – the equivalent of "COVID-19 has a variety of symptoms" followed by a list of a variety of symptoms. I also assume Crossroads didn't attempt to find a source.


A interview with a reporter [[Science by press conference|isn't scientific evidence]], but I thought I'd note that Aron Hall of the US CDC said COVID-19 is [https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2024/08/09/nx-s1-5060398/covid-endemic-cdc-summer-surge "endemic throughout the world" and that "The best way to describe COVID right now is as endemic but with these periodic epidemics"].
This section needs an introductory statement so that readers know what to expect in this section. Dumping an unlabeled list of events on readers with no explanation is both bad writing style and unencyclopedic. What can we add to this paragraph that will tell readers what to expect from this section? [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 14:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


The other main points in the news article are that ''endemic'' isn't another way to say ''good'' – an epidemiologist compares it to malaria and tuberculosis – and that some scientists think it will take a decade for endemicity to be reached.
== Deleting or changing the article entire structure ==


Overall, this makes me think that our article is in approximately the right place. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 22:04, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
This article was written in a time when endemic management of COVID-19 was a future idea. Now all countries, bar a fraction tiny dependencies and pacific island countries, around the world manage Covid in an endemic way. That is different country to country but politicians and health officials all refer to their current management as 'living with Covid' or 'endemic management.'
:Thank you for sharing this. [[Ashish Jha]] also seems to support that it is endemic right now (not all agree as you note). I still think that this article should add material stating something like "As of 2024, experts were in disagreement as to whether or not COVID-19 had yet become endemic.", citing that source as well as [https://time.com/6898943/is-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024/][https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-covid-19-still-a-pandemic/]. We can also say, "The transition point of a pandemic into an endemic state is not well-defined, and whether or not this has occurred differs according to the definitions used.", citing [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014506]. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]</sup> 21:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
The drafts of this article I have as a past/present tense instead of a future tense feel silly.
::I agree with those (as appropriate facts), but we probably need to think about the sources. Something more "science-y" might be an easier sell. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 00:12, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
I believe the best course of action is either deleting this article or re-writing it entirely as a historic article, talking about early failed attempts to 'live with Covid', and how countries manage Covid nowdays. Pending discussion I've tried to update the article. [[User:AndrewRG10|AndrewRG10]] ([[User talk:AndrewRG10|talk]]) 01:22, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:38, 15 August 2024

Again

[edit]

The recent spate of "pandemic's over, so it's obviously endemic" edits makes me think that we are being unclear. Perhaps we should think about putting a sentence in the first paragraph that says something like:

"Endemic COVID-19 is not the only possible outcome of the COVID-19 pandemic, as a new virus could remain a pandemic indefinitely, be reduced to sporadic outbreaks, or be seen in local or regional epidemics rather than becoming endemic."

I've also been thinking about turning the bullet list in Endemic COVID-19#Definition and characteristics into a table with a suitable graph showing each item, in the hope that if we put in a few color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one that people might notice them, and if they notice the colorful pictures, they might read the words next to them, and then they might, possibly, just perhaps notice that it's a little bit more complicated than "I feel like the pandemic's over and therefore it's endemic".

Alternatively (or additionally), we could put a {{FAQ}} at the top of the talk page that says something like:

When is Wikipedia going to admit that the pandemic is over and COVID-19 is endemic already?
Just as soon as multiple major medical journal articles directly investigate the subject, define what they mean by 'endemic', and make a clear and direct statement that COVID-19 has entered an endemic phase. Note, for the record:
  • Multiple sources, not just one;
  • Major journals, not a predatory journal that will print anything as long as they get paid;
  • Medical journal articles (sources that are both peer-reviewed and review articles or meta-analyses are preferred), not newspapers, magazines, or social media;
  • Directly investigate the subject, not just a passing mention like 'now that the pandemic is over'. Direct investigations sound like "Based on the last six pages of data and calculations, we conclude that COVID-19 has become endemic in Europe";
  • Define their terms, because there are multiple valid definitions for endemic (e.g. one that includes seasonal flu and another that doesn't), and we need to know exactly what to say in this article without misrepresenting the sources;
  • Clear and direct statement, not just 'they said that "the pandemic was something", so that obviously proves that it is endemic instead of sporadic or epidemic or any of the other options'. A clear and direct statement will likely sound something like "COVID-19 entered a hyperendemic phase with moderate semi-annual seasonal variation in late 2022".

What do you think? WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that "a new virus could remain a pandemic indefinitely" is sourceable or true, nor that the above is necessary. As noted previously at the pandemic's talk page, some experts and published papers have said it is endemic already, or that the concept is so vaguely/inconsistently defined such that it depends on the definition. This should be consistent with that, if nothing else. However, at this point I honestly think we should just redirect this to COVID-19_pandemic#Transition_to_later_phases. Most of what's here is already covered better there, or from poor sources like old commentary pieces in journals that we can just get rid of anyway. If people want to have content about different definitions of endemic in detail, and whether different diseases technically meet such and such threshold, that can go at Endemic (epidemiology), which is still pretty short, and can cover various diseases all at once. Crossroads -talk- 21:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As we frequently say about blocks, Wikipedia:Indefinite is not infinite. If someone knows the ending date in advance for every pandemic, then I'm sure that would be interesting to researchers, but it doesn't sound very plausible.
Can you give me some links to articles in medical journals that directly address the question of COVID-19's endemicity? I'm not looking for a history paper like the "Historiographical article", written in 2020 and published in a special issue (a Supplement (publishing)? MEDRS warns against those), which is cited in COVID-19 pandemic#Transition to later phases. I'm not even sure that was peer-reviewed. The issue says that the history journal "Centaurus contains articles, historiographical articles, book reviews and editorial communications. Articles must report original research and will be subjected to review by referees" – with the obvious-to-me implication that "historiographical articles, book reviews and editorial communications" are not peer-reviewed.) I'm specifically looking for papers that say something like "Here's our definition of endemic, here are the metrics for it, here's the data, and the end result is that we are/aren't in an endemic phase right now". It doesn't matter to me whether the metrics are "prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 virus detection in wastewater" or "proportion of public services operating at pre-pandemic capacity"; I just want something that chooses a definition and determines whether or not we are there yet. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Endemic overview

[edit]

COVID-19 was predicted to become an endemic disease by many experts. The observed behavior of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, suggests it is unlikely it will die out, and the lack of a COVID-19 vaccine that provides long-lasting immunity against infection means it cannot immediately be eradicated; thus, the transition to an endemic phase was probable. In the current endemic phase, people continue to become infected and ill, but in numbers that we will accept like we do for the flu as an example. Such a transition took until 2023 but there is no specific date or month for when the pandemic ended. We can clearly see from Boston University that we see that the number of the COVID-19 hospitalizations from January 2023 and January 2024 were similar and that they were nearly the same. COVID-19 is here to stay and not growing milder, so we can see that this virus is clearly endemic.

COVID-19 endemicity is distinct from the COVID-19 public health emergency of international concern, which was ended by the World Health Organization on 5 May 2023. Endemic is a frequently misunderstood and misused word outside the realm of epidemiology. Endemic does not mean mild, or that COVID-19 must become a less hazardous disease. Malaria is endemic and that does not mean it is not dangerous and it is sad that it may never end. Some politicians and commentators have conflated what they termed endemic COVID-19 with the lifting of public health restrictions or a comforting return to pre-pandemic normality that guidelines were lifted in early 2022. This was called "the pandemic phase" that restrictions for masks and vaccines were lifted. People may have taken it less seriously, but this is before the pandemic ended. The severity of endemic disease would be dependent on various factors, including the evolution of the virus, population immunity, and vaccine development and rollout, number of deaths. BenSchmidt7439 (talk) 18:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal pattern

[edit]

COVID-19 became seasonal in 2023. We noticed that the virus acted strange, as it did have a seasonal pattern. COVID-19 peaks in winter, have a sharp decline in spring, another peak in summer but not as bad in winter, and another decline of cases in fall but not as high as spring. The reason COVID-19 peaks in winter is because we are all inside and gathering and that is why we all catch each other's germs. Also, other germs are going around like COVID-19. The reason it goes up in summer is because of all the traveling and being around so many people outside. And the pool causes a lot of COVID-19 to spread. People generally are around each other less in spring and everything is less crowded. COVID-19 peaks in December through February. Cases start slightly going down in March. COVID-19 has a sharp decline of cases in April and May, peaks again in June through August, and has a decline of cases in September through November. April and May seem to be the months where COVID-19 is the safest. Even though COVID-19 does get high in summer, that does not mean you cannot enjoy life in summer. COVID-19 seems to be at epidemic levels in summer and winter, but it seems to still be overall lower than it was before 2023. But because we know it is seasonal and occurs high in winter and summer, it is not considered an epidemic. COVID-19 seems to be an overall less common virus. In 2022, herd immunity and natural immunity seemed to make COVID-19 less common. In summer and winter, the virus seems to be not common, but not uncommon. Your chance of catching COVID-19 in winter and summer is still low, but not zero. Most people will not catch COVID-19 more than a few times and the quickest anyone has ever caught COVID-19 was in 14 days and you are not likely to get it again until a while. This is not because it provides long-term immunity, but because COVID-19 is not an everyday virus you are around. BenSchmidt7439 (talk) 18:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the enthusiastic new editor has been blocked for Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry this time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CDC spokesman

[edit]

A interview with a reporter isn't scientific evidence, but I thought I'd note that Aron Hall of the US CDC said COVID-19 is "endemic throughout the world" and that "The best way to describe COVID right now is as endemic but with these periodic epidemics".

The other main points in the news article are that endemic isn't another way to say good – an epidemiologist compares it to malaria and tuberculosis – and that some scientists think it will take a decade for endemicity to be reached.

Overall, this makes me think that our article is in approximately the right place. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:04, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing this. Ashish Jha also seems to support that it is endemic right now (not all agree as you note). I still think that this article should add material stating something like "As of 2024, experts were in disagreement as to whether or not COVID-19 had yet become endemic.", citing that source as well as [1][2]. We can also say, "The transition point of a pandemic into an endemic state is not well-defined, and whether or not this has occurred differs according to the definitions used.", citing [3]. Crossroads -talk- 21:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with those (as appropriate facts), but we probably need to think about the sources. Something more "science-y" might be an easier sell. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]