Jump to content

Talk:Patent: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
AM13prime (talk | contribs)
62 edits
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Society|class=B}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Capitalism}}
{{WikiProject Business |class=B |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Business |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Invention|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Invention|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Law |class=B |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Law Enforcement |class=B |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Law Enforcement |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Computing |class=B |importance=mid |free-software=yes |free-software-importance=low |software=yes}}
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=mid |free-software=yes |free-software-importance=low |software=yes}}
{{WikiProject Intellectual property |class=B}}
{{WikiProject Intellectual property }}
}}
}}
{{connected contributor|User1=Russkrajec}}
{{connected contributor|User1=Russkrajec}}
Line 22: Line 22:
{{clear}}
{{clear}}


== Requesting an edit ==
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-10-19">19 October 2020</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-12-18">18 December 2020</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Indiana_University/Entrepreneurship_Law_(Winter)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:IHardlyKnowHerName|IHardlyKnowHerName]], [[User:Ethmitch|Ethmitch]].


{{edit COI|ans=y}}
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 06:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
I think it would be relevant to add in the “Benefits” section the following findings from a reliable source (scholarly papers). What do you think? I have a COI with de Rassenfosse. (See my userpage).
== Exclusive right to ... ==
{{ping|White whirlwind}} I have reverted your edit and have added a reference. The added reference comes from the section titled "Effects". The answer to your question: "''Which is encompassed in the term "exclusive right", though, isn't it?''" is definitely 'no', i.e. not "the exclusive right '''to make, use, or sell ...'''", as stated. A patent does not give its proprietor the right to practice the claimed invention because the claimed invention may be more specific that the invention claimed in another patent. Besides, even if there is no such patent claiming a more generic invention, a market authorization may be required in order to be entitled to make, use, or sell the claimed invention. I hope this is clearer now. Cheers --[[User:Edcolins|Edcolins]] ([[User talk:Edcolins|talk]]) 20:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
:{{replyto|Edcolins}} Ok, thanks for the explanation. I was just trying to fight the good fight in our age-old battle to clarify legal prose. <small><b><span style="border:1px solid;background:#030303">&nbsp;[[User:White_whirlwind|<span style="color:white">White&nbsp;Whirlwind&nbsp;</span>]]</span></b></small> 21:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
::You're welcome! --[[User:Edcolins|Edcolins]] ([[User talk:Edcolins|talk]]) 06:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)


Reasoning for inclusion: This empirical evidence contributes to a better understanding of how patent protection can impact the long-term value and durability of innovations. By referencing this study, the article gains credibility and depth, enriching the information available to readers seeking insights into the advantages of patents in terms of innovation sustainability and economic impact.
== Wokism strikes again ==


Requested edit:
The data about women's underrepresentation in patents is of dubious relevance to the article; its inclusion in the 'history' is not particularly justified. I propose its deletion. [[User:Ender&#39;s Shadow Snr|Ender&#39;s Shadow Snr]] ([[User talk:Ender&#39;s Shadow Snr|talk]]) 00:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)


A 2018 study using data from the Australian Inventor Survey (AIS) found that patented inventions experience a lower depreciation rate of 1-2% compared to non-patented ones. <ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = de Rassenfosse | first1 = Gaétan | last2 = Jaffe| first2 = Adam| title = Econometric evidence on the depreciation of innovations | journal = European Economic Review | volume = 101 | year = 2018 | pages = 625,626,637 | url = https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.11.005 |author-link=Gaétan de Rassenfosse }}</ref> [[User:AM13prime|AM13prime]] ([[User talk:AM13prime|talk]]) 13:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
:I disagree. I think the information is both relevant and appears to be well sourced. Per [[WP:NPOV]], "all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic" have to be represented "fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias". [[User:Edcolins|Edcolins]] ([[User talk:Edcolins|talk]]) 05:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

⚫
{{reflist-talk}}


== Requesting an edit ==
== Requesting an edit ==


{{edit COI|ans=n}}
{{edit COI|ans=y}}
I think it would be relevant to add in the “Non-national treatment in the application procedure” section the following findings emerging from a combination of multiple reliable sources (scholarly papers of authors specialized in this domain). What do you think? I have a COI with de Rassenfosse. (See my userpage). Text to potentially add at the end of the section:
I think it would be relevant to add in the “Costs” section the following findings from a reliable source (scholarly papers). What do you think? I have a COI with de Rassenfosse. (See my userpage)


Reasoning for inclusion: This inclusion helps address concerns surrounding the proliferation of low-quality patents and their potential negative effects on litigation costs and innovation incentives. The study's results provide concrete evidence that the fee adjustment played a role in improving patent quality by reducing the issuance of lower-quality patents. As the patent landscape evolves, these findings offer insights into the potential effectiveness of using fees as a policy tool to enhance patent system efficiency.
However, some governments are still biased (intentionally or unintentionally) towards foreign inventors. For example, scholars have found that in the U.S. and Chinese patent systems, inventions of foreign origin are about 10 percentage points less likely to be granted a patent than domestic inventions. In the United States, no intentional discrimination of foreigners was found. Rather, the evidence shows an unintentional discrimination of foreign inventors (i.e., disparate impact of rules and practices). <ref>{{Cite Web|last= de Rassenfosse|first=Gaétan|last2=Raiteri|first2=Emilio|last3=Bekkers|first3=Rudi|title=Discrimination in the Patent System: Evidence from Standard-Essential Patents|date=2023|website=SSRN|url=https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3007699|author-link=Gaétan de Rassenfosse}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite Journal|last=de Rassenfosse|first=Gaétan|last2=Raiteri|first2=Emilio|title=Technology Protectionism and the Patent System: Evidence from China|date=2022|journal=The Journal of Industrial Economics|volume=70|url=https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12261|author-link=Gaétan de Rassenfosse}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite Journal|last=de Rassenfosse|first=Gaétan|last2=Hosseini|first2=Reza|title=Discrimination against foreigners in the U.S. patent system|date=2020|journal=Journal of International Business Policy|volume=3|page=349,350,363|url=https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00058-6|author-link=Gaétan de Rassenfosse}}</ref> <ref name="deRassenfosse2019">{{Cite Journal|last=de Rassenfosse |first=Gaétan |last2=Jensen |first2=Paul H.|last3=Julius|first3=T'Mir|last4=Palangkaraya|first4=Alfons|last5=Webster|first5=Elizabeth|title=Are Foreigners Treated Equally under the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement?|date=2019|page=2,21|journal=Journal of Law and Economics|volume=62|url=https://doi.org/10.1086/705801|author-link=Gaétan de Rassenfosse}}</ref> Additional evidence points to the fact that filing international patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) mitigates some of this bias.<ref name="deRassenfosse2019"/> [[User:AM13prime|AM13prime]] ([[User talk:AM13prime|talk]]) 09:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
⚫
{{reflist-talk}}


Requested edit:
===Reply 30-JUN-2023===

{{border |[[File:Breezeicons-emblems-8-emblem-remove.svg|20px]]{{nbsp|2}}'''Unable to review'''{{nbsp|2}}|display=table |width=1px |style=double |style2=dotted |color=black |lh=1}}
Scholars have discovered that increased patent fees, resulting from the Patent Law Amendment Act of 1982, filtered out roughly 10% of the lowest quality patents, which may address concerns about the rise of low-quality patents leading to increased litigation costs and reduced innovation incentives. <ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = de Rassenfosse | first1 = Gaétan | last2 = Jaffe | first2 = Adam B. | title = Are patent fees effective at weeding out low-quality patents? | journal = Journal of Economics & Management Strategy | date = 2017 | url = https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12219 | pages = 134,141,144 |author-link = Gaétan de Rassenfosse }}</ref> [[User:AM13prime|AM13prime]] ([[User talk:AM13prime|talk]]) 13:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
* Page numbers have not been provided with the proposed sources, indicating the page number where the confirming information exists.
Regards, <span style="font-size:75%;border:3px solid red;border-radius:60px">[[User:Spintendo|<span style="color:#f00;">&nbsp;<b>Spintendo</b>&nbsp;</span>]]</span> 23:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
: {{declined}} Placing this author's articles in several different Wikipedia pages is stretching it. One has already been placed. Regards, <span style="font-size:85%;border:3px solid red;border-radius:15px">[[User:Spintendo|<span style="color:#f00;">&nbsp;<b>Spintendo</b>&nbsp;</span>]]</span> 14:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}


I would like to see the cost of a patent (including search and attorney fees) included as one of the main reasons for a decline in patents in the US. It is one of the major limitations for deciding on whether or not to choose this route. [[Special:Contributions/24.50.25.147|24.50.25.147]] ([[User talk:24.50.25.147|talk]]) 13:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Spintendo|Spintendo]] I hope this message finds you well. I'd like to inform you that I've incorporated the page numbers into the proposed sources and I changed the parameter to |ans=n, I hope that it is okay. Specifically, I've included the page numbers for the most critical information and findings.
:It's important to note that the four references collectively and conclusively address the very content I intended to add. The inclusion of these page numbers further supports the relevance and accuracy of the information being presented, but are not the only important and relevant ones.
:With the updated page numbers now in place, I kindly request your review of the revised materials.
:Best regards, [[User:AM13prime|AM13prime]] ([[User talk:AM13prime|talk]]) 07:57, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:43, 8 July 2024

Requesting an edit

[edit]

I think it would be relevant to add in the “Benefits” section the following findings from a reliable source (scholarly papers). What do you think? I have a COI with de Rassenfosse. (See my userpage).

Reasoning for inclusion: This empirical evidence contributes to a better understanding of how patent protection can impact the long-term value and durability of innovations. By referencing this study, the article gains credibility and depth, enriching the information available to readers seeking insights into the advantages of patents in terms of innovation sustainability and economic impact.

Requested edit:

A 2018 study using data from the Australian Inventor Survey (AIS) found that patented inventions experience a lower depreciation rate of 1-2% compared to non-patented ones. [1] AM13prime (talk) 13:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ de Rassenfosse, Gaétan; Jaffe, Adam (2018). "Econometric evidence on the depreciation of innovations". European Economic Review. 101: 625, 626, 637.

Requesting an edit

[edit]

I think it would be relevant to add in the “Costs” section the following findings from a reliable source (scholarly papers). What do you think? I have a COI with de Rassenfosse. (See my userpage)

Reasoning for inclusion: This inclusion helps address concerns surrounding the proliferation of low-quality patents and their potential negative effects on litigation costs and innovation incentives. The study's results provide concrete evidence that the fee adjustment played a role in improving patent quality by reducing the issuance of lower-quality patents. As the patent landscape evolves, these findings offer insights into the potential effectiveness of using fees as a policy tool to enhance patent system efficiency.

Requested edit:

Scholars have discovered that increased patent fees, resulting from the Patent Law Amendment Act of 1982, filtered out roughly 10% of the lowest quality patents, which may address concerns about the rise of low-quality patents leading to increased litigation costs and reduced innovation incentives. [1] AM13prime (talk) 13:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined Placing this author's articles in several different Wikipedia pages is stretching it. One has already been placed. Regards,  Spintendo  14:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ de Rassenfosse, Gaétan; Jaffe, Adam B. (2017). "Are patent fees effective at weeding out low-quality patents?". Journal of Economics & Management Strategy: 134, 141, 144.

I would like to see the cost of a patent (including search and attorney fees) included as one of the main reasons for a decline in patents in the US. It is one of the major limitations for deciding on whether or not to choose this route. 24.50.25.147 (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Patent&oldid=1233324289"