Talk:Nile crocodile: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
OneClickArchived "Carnivore?" to Talk:Nile Crocodile/Archive 1 |
→Etymology: new section |
||
(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DYK talk|18 December|2004|entry=...that the largest [[Africa]]n [[crocodile]], the '''[[Nile crocodile]]''', is both hated and revered, especially in [[Ancient Egypt]] where crocodiles were [[mummy|mummified]], and worshipped as [[deity|god]]s?}} |
{{DYK talk|18 December|2004|entry=...that the largest [[Africa]]n [[crocodile]], the '''[[Nile crocodile]]''', is both hated and revered, especially in [[Ancient Egypt]] where crocodiles were [[mummy|mummified]], and worshipped as [[deity|god]]s?}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Vital article|topic=Biology|subpage=Animals|level=5|class=B}} |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Africa|Egypt=yes|Sudan=yes|importance=Top |Egypt-importance=Top}} |
||
{{WikiProject Africa|class=B |importance=Top |Egypt-importance=Top}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
| algo = old(90d) |
| algo = old(90d) |
||
| archive = Talk:Nile |
| archive = Talk:Nile crocodile/Archive %(counter)d |
||
| counter = 1 |
| counter = 1 |
||
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
||
Line 15: | Line 13: | ||
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Archive box| |
{{Archive box|auto=yes}} |
||
== What I have heard == |
|||
== Etymology == |
|||
i heard on tv maybe a few years ago that the nile crocodile is nearly extinct. what i heard is that there wasnt enough of them left for the species to survive. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.208.75.209|84.208.75.209]] ([[User talk:84.208.75.209|talk]]) 20:15, 24 July 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I think this etymology is incorrect and should be changed. The word "crocodile" and romance language equivalents is very old and certainly predates binomial nomenclature. The most parsimonious explanation for the genus name "Crocodylus" is that it was already the Latin word for crocodile. The Online Etymology Dictionary says the word can be traced back to Greek, but origins within Greek are unknown unless you accept Herodotus as a source. [[User:Theflashisgone|Theflashisgone]] ([[User talk:Theflashisgone|talk]]) 01:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Endangered Status == |
|||
Pretty sure that crocs aren't least concern, and somebody forgot to capatalize the LC, so it was probably an intended mess-up. Someone please correct it? I can't because Im no expert on crocs. xP. |
|||
[[User:Andrew6111|Andrew6111]] ([[User talk:Andrew6111|talk]]) 13:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Fix case== |
|||
I've changed ''Nile Crocodile'' to ''Nile crocodile'' at several places in this article. There seemed no consistency. Please, if you decide to revert, do it selectively, some of them are arguable but others are ridiculous. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 23:57, 22 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
==Desert Crocodiles== |
|||
Here is the complete study that a Spanish team carried on in 2008 http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0014734 They unveiled the conditions of Saharan crocodiles attesting that they aren't extinct yet, at least in some parts of the desert. |
|||
A map: http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0014734.g001&representation=PNG_M |
|||
--[[User:Bentaguayre|Bentaguayre]] ([[User talk:Bentaguayre|talk]]) 22:52, 15 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Split with ''C. suchus'' == |
|||
Something to keep an eye on and at least mention in the article: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/09/14/nile-crocodile-is-actually-two-species-and-the-egyptians-knew-it/ |
|||
:Not only is it two, what we've been calling the "Nile crocodile" is [[paraphyly|paraphyletic]]! I've made the split; there's still more to put into the [[Desert Crocodile]] article as I haven't finished reading the paper yet. [[User:Bob the Wikipedian|<span style="font-family:linux libertine o, times; font-variant:small-caps">Bob the WikipediaN</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bob the Wikipedian|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bob the Wikipedian|contribs]]) </sup> 06:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Range map is outdated == |
|||
It was made in 2004, before the west African species was acknowledged as separate. [[User:FunkMonk|FunkMonk]] ([[User talk:FunkMonk|talk]]) 03:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==File:PloverCrocodileSymbiosis.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion== |
|||
<!--TSTAMP:{{{4}}}--> |
|||
{| |
|||
|- |
|||
| [[File:Image-x-generic.svg|100px]] |
|||
| <!--IMAGES--> |
|||
An image used in this article, [[:File:PloverCrocodileSymbiosis.jpg|File:PloverCrocodileSymbiosis.jpg]], has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: ''All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status'' |
|||
<!--/IMAGES--> |
|||
;What should I do? |
|||
''Don't panic''; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review [[WP:CSD|deletion guidelines]] before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. |
|||
* If the image is [[WP:NFCC|non-free]] then you may need to provide a [[WP:FUR|fair use rationale]] |
|||
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. |
|||
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try [[WP:DRV|Deletion Review]] |
|||
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant [[:File:PloverCrocodileSymbiosis.jpg|image page (File:PloverCrocodileSymbiosis.jpg)]] |
|||
''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 09:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Nile crocodile]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=712971046 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wildliferanching.com/content/nile-crocodile-crocodylus-niloticus |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 03:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Regarding sizes of extant crocodilians == |
|||
Recently, there has been a disagreement on the sizes of extant crocodilians and how the scientific community classifies this data and publishes them. It concerns this article as well, as I see some users are reverting edits, purely with good intensions (goodwill edits). However as these edits are inconsistent and etymologically incorrect, they are harming the article(s). I have listed some crucial points taking one user's edits as a starting point. It is on [[Talk:Saltwater crocodile]], please read carefully before reverting edits on this subject matter. [[User:Berkserker|Berkserker]] ([[User talk:Berkserker|talk]]) 04:35, 22 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:WelcometoJurassicPark]] listen carefully. First of all you need to learn to respect other people. Second you don't know if I'm a scientist or not. Third, what I said has nothing to do with me being a scientist, my discussion was about the already existing information and data excepted by herpetology. If you can't comprehend the discussion this isn't my problem, if you keep vandalising these pages, you will be blocked. Even though I saw your talk page full of vandalism complaints, in my discussion I had respectfully stated your reverts as good faith edits, now you are making it clear it was vandalism. [[User:Berkserker|Berkserker]] ([[User talk:Berkserker|talk]]) 05:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
::I missed one point, you claim it is "my opinion" that the given species weighs this much, however all are from published work of scientists, unlike your claim in which you say a single Guinness record of a single animal holds true for the weight/length ratio for the entire species (you at least need a sample size of 40...). Plus it was you to claim species A weighs more than species B without backing these claims. In the following paper already presented in the article (which you needed to read before reverting, but you didn't), you will see the C. porosus and C. niloticus have similar length/weight ratios, even though the author notes that the ratio of Lake Rudolf crocodiles with and empty stomach was far higher compared to populations elsewhere, hinting to a lower weight/length ratio, as the habitat suitability and prey availability is inferior to other habitats occupied by other populations. A similar study was made in Australia following new laws prohibiting hunting of saltwater crocodiles in the 80s (See Webb and Manolis (1989)). Despite the habitat and prey availability issue, you will see that weight/length ratio is very similar to that of C. porosus. According to the regression analysis on the article (Graham, A. D. (1968). The Lake Rudolf Crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti) Population. Masters of Science Thesis, The University of East Africa.), you will see 4.5 meters corresponds to slightly over 400kg, 5 meters corresponds to slightly under 600 kg (compared to the 4.8 meter individual weighed at 680 kg by Graham and Beard (1973), from another habitat/population - more than 25% difference in body weight to length ratio), and 6-6.1 meters corresponds to 1000 kg, according to the Lake Rudolf sample. This puts the 6.45 m. individual shot in Tanzania either at a starving state, loss of blood after being shot or it shows the people measuring the animal made an error, possibly measuring over curves (I didn't read anywhere it was measured accurately by scientists, which you claim), or a combination of these reasons. [[User:Berkserker|Berkserker]] ([[User talk:Berkserker|talk]]) 06:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
You can also find a bunch of reliable sources saying that 20 ft (6.1 m) Nile crocodiles usually weigh about 2000 lb (910 kg), and saying that Nile crocodiles are proportionally lighter than Saltwater crocodiles (so lighter at the same length, or even if they are slightly longer), and why are you just talk about that 5 meters corresponds to slightly under 600 kg, compared to the 4.8 meter individual weighed at 680 kg by Graham and Beard (1973), from another habitat/population - more than 25% difference in body weight to length ratio, the opposite can happen, too (so it can be more than 25% lower than expected, too), and you don't have sources for being at a starving state, loss of blood of for a measirung error, but I let you be in the way you want, because I don't wanna be blocked. [[User:WelcometoJurassicPark]] ([[User talk:WelcometoJurassicPark|talk]]) 10:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:It isn't really about how I want to be or not. I'm just putting together the best evidence to present the most accurate information for the good of the article. It isn't my goal to get you blocked either, you know how subtle and polite I approached your discussions, in order not to offend you, until I was offended myself that is. My point is, a single specimen can not be taken reference for an entire species' weight/length ratio. This is why I advised to use the data for this specimen only. [[User:Berkserker|Berkserker]] ([[User talk:Berkserker|talk]]) 15:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Humans in 'Hunting and diet' Section? == |
|||
Given the Nile Croc's extensive predation of humans, would it not make sense to list them among its prey in the appropriate section under the 'Mammals' sub-heading under 'Hunting and diet'?[[User:Sɑk pʰʌpəʔ|Sɑk pʰʌpəʔ]] ([[User talk:Sɑk pʰʌpəʔ|talk]]) 02:17, 15 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:No, we're just biased in that we notice when humans are eaten, but now wildebeest or fish. Even if you restrict to adult crocs, the fraction of calories the total crocodile population acquires from humans is insignificant. [[User:HCA|HCA]] ([[User talk:HCA|talk]]) 16:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
::The same is likely true of the Saltwater Crocodile, but there (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saltwater_crocodile#Hunting_and_diet) humans are listed as prey under the 'Hunting and diet' section.[[User:Sɑk pʰʌpəʔ|Sɑk pʰʌpəʔ]] ([[User talk:Sɑk pʰʌpəʔ|talk]]) 14:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Deaths == |
|||
The Nile Crocodile is considered to be one of the most dangerous reptiles in the world and is responsible for nearly to over 1,000 deaths in Africa every year. One study posited the number of attacks by Nile crocodiles per year as 275 to 745, of which 63% are known to be fatal. |
|||
Because these reptiles live in close proximity to humans, attacks are frequent which can lead to more possible fatal attacks. [[User:Mariofan 520|Mariofan 520]] ([[User talk:Mariofan 520|talk]]) 02:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, we can read the article too. What's your purpose in copying chunks of it to the talkpage? [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 07:10, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Miocene fossil record? == |
|||
While many of the fossil specimens assigned to the nile crocodile come from the Quarternary, these papers imply that fossil Nile crocodiles have been found as far back as the Miocene. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature00880, https://www.nature.com/articles/318173a0--[[User:Bubblesorg|Bubblesorg]] ([[User talk:Bubblesorg|talk]]) 20:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:47, 23 September 2024
A fact from Nile crocodile appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 December 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Etymology
[edit]I think this etymology is incorrect and should be changed. The word "crocodile" and romance language equivalents is very old and certainly predates binomial nomenclature. The most parsimonious explanation for the genus name "Crocodylus" is that it was already the Latin word for crocodile. The Online Etymology Dictionary says the word can be traced back to Greek, but origins within Greek are unknown unless you accept Herodotus as a source. Theflashisgone (talk) 01:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Mid-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- B-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Mid-importance
- Amphibian and reptile articles needing attention
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- B-Class Africa articles
- Top-importance Africa articles
- B-Class Egypt articles
- Top-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles
- B-Class Sudan articles
- Unknown-importance Sudan articles
- WikiProject Sudan articles
- WikiProject Africa articles