Dinka language: Difference between revisions
The citation for the date is wrong its supposed to be from 1982 not 2008 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Nilotic dialect cluster spoken by the Dinka people of South Sudan}} |
{{short description|Nilotic dialect cluster spoken by the Dinka people of South Sudan}} |
||
{{for|a language that was often mentioned as Padang language|Minangkabau language}} |
|||
{{redirect|Padang language|the language of Phadāng village in NE India|Phadāng language}} |
{{redirect|Padang language|the language of Phadāng village in NE India|Phadāng language}} |
||
{{distinguish|Mandinka language}} |
{{distinguish|Mandinka language}} |
||
{{Infobox language |
{{Infobox language |
||
| name |
| name = Dinka |
||
| nativename |
| nativename = <!-- Comment -->Thuɔŋjäŋ |
||
| pronunciation |
| pronunciation = {{IPA|[t̪uɔŋ.ɟa̤ŋ]}} |
||
| states |
| states = [[South Sudan]] |
||
| region |
| region = |
||
| ethnicity |
| ethnicity = [[Dinka people|Dinka]] |
||
| speakers |
| speakers = {{sigfig|4.238400|2}} million |
||
| date = 2017 |
|||
| date = 1982–2016; some figures undated |
|||
| dateprefix |
| dateprefix = |
||
| ref |
| ref = e26 |
||
| familycolor |
| familycolor = Nilo-Saharan |
||
| fam2 |
| fam2 = [[Eastern Sudanic languages|Eastern Sudanic]] |
||
| fam3 |
| fam3 = [[Southern Eastern Sudanic languages|Southern Eastern]] |
||
| fam4 |
| fam4 = [[Nilotic languages|Nilotic]] |
||
| fam5 |
| fam5 = [[Western Nilotic languages|Western]] |
||
| fam6 = [[Western Nilotic languages|Dinka–Nuer]] |
|||
| script |
| script = [[Latin script|Latin]] |
||
| iso2 = din |
|||
| |
| iso2 = din |
||
| |
| iso3 = din |
||
| lc1 = dip |
|||
| ld1 |
| ld1 = Northeastern (Padang) |
||
| lc2 |
| lc2 = diw |
||
| ld2 |
| ld2 = Northwestern (Ruweng) |
||
| lc3 |
| lc3 = dib |
||
| ld3 |
| ld3 = South Central (Gok, Agar, Ciec, Apaak and Aliap) |
||
| lc4 |
| lc4 = dks |
||
| ld4 = Southeastern: Bor, which also includes |
|||
Nyarweng, |
| ld4 = Southeastern: (Bor, Nyarweng, Hol, Twi) |
||
⚫ | |||
Hol, Twi |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Dinka''' (natively {{lang|din|Thuɔŋjäŋ}}, {{lang|din|Thoŋ ë Jieng}} or simply {{lang|din|Jieng}}) is a [[Nilotic languages|Nilotic]] [[dialect cluster]] spoken by the [[Dinka people]], |
'''Dinka''' (natively {{lang|din|Thuɔŋjäŋ}}, {{lang|din|Thoŋ ë Jieng}} or simply {{lang|din|Jieng}}) is a [[Nilotic languages|Nilotic]] [[dialect cluster]] spoken by the [[Dinka people]], a major ethnic group of [[South Sudan]]. There are several main varieties, such as Padang, Rek, Agaar, Ciec, Malual, Apaak, Aliab, Bor, Hol, Nyarweng, Twic East and Twic Mayardit, which are distinct enough (though mutually intelligible) to require separate literary standards. Jaang, Jieng or Muonyjieng is used as a general term to cover all Dinka languages. Recently ''Akutmɛ̈t Latueŋ Thuɔŋjäŋ'' (the Dinka Language Development Association) has proposed a unified written grammar of Dinka. |
||
The language most closely related to Dinka is the [[Nuer language]]. The [[Luo languages]] are also closely related. The Dinka vocabulary shows considerable proximity to [[Nubian languages|Nubian]], which is probably due to medieval interactions between the Dinka people and the kingdom of [[Alodia]].{{sfn|Beswick|2004|p=21}} |
The language most closely related to Dinka is the [[Nuer language]]. The [[Luo languages]] are also closely related. The Dinka vocabulary shows considerable proximity to [[Nubian languages|Nubian]], which is probably due to medieval interactions between the Dinka people and the kingdom of [[Alodia]].{{sfn|Beswick|2004|p=21}} |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
===Phonology=== |
===Phonology=== |
||
====Consonants==== |
====Consonants==== |
||
There are 20 consonant phonemes: |
There are 20 consonant phonemes: |
||
Line 62: | Line 61: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
! <small>[[Nasal consonant|Nasal]]</small> |
! <small>[[Nasal consonant|Nasal]]</small> |
||
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{ |
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|m}} |
||
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{ |
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|n̪}} |
||
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{ |
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|n}} |
||
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{ |
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|ɲ}} |
||
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{ |
|width=20px style="border-right: 0;"| ||width=20px style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|ŋ}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! <small>[[Stop consonant|Stop]]</small> |
! <small>[[Stop consonant|Stop]]</small> |
||
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{ |
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|p}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|b}} |
||
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{ |
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|t̪}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|d̪}} |
||
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{ |
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|t}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|d}} |
||
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{ |
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|c}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|ɟ}} |
||
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{ |
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|k}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|ɡ}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! <small>[[Fricative consonant|Fricative]]</small> |
! <small>[[Fricative consonant|Fricative]]</small> |
||
Line 80: | Line 79: | ||
|colspan=2| |
|colspan=2| |
||
|colspan=2| |
|colspan=2| |
||
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{ |
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|ɣ}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
!rowspan=2| <small>[[Approximant consonant|Approximant]]<br>([[Lateral consonant#Approximants|Lateral]])</small> |
!rowspan=2| <small>[[Approximant consonant|Approximant]]<br>([[Lateral consonant#Approximants|Lateral]])</small> |
||
Line 86: | Line 85: | ||
|colspan=2| |
|colspan=2| |
||
|colspan=2| |
|colspan=2| |
||
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{ |
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|j}} |
||
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{ |
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|w}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|colspan=2| |
|colspan=2| |
||
|colspan=2| |
|colspan=2| |
||
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{ |
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|l}} |
||
|colspan=2| |
|colspan=2| |
||
|colspan=2| |
|colspan=2| |
||
Line 118: | Line 117: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
! [[Close vowel|Close]] |
! [[Close vowel|Close]] |
||
| {{IPA link|i}} || {{IPA|i̤}} || {{IPA link|u}} || |
| {{IPA link|i}} || {{IPA link|i̤}} || {{IPA link|u}} || |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! [[Close-mid vowel|Close-mid]] |
! [[Close-mid vowel|Close-mid]] |
||
| {{IPA link|e}} || {{IPA|e̤}} || {{IPA link|o}} || {{IPA|o̤}} |
| {{IPA link|e}} || {{IPA link|e̤}} || {{IPA link|o}} || {{IPA link|o̤}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! [[Open-mid vowel|Open-mid]] |
! [[Open-mid vowel|Open-mid]] |
||
| {{IPA link|ɛ}} || {{IPA|ɛ̤}} || {{IPA link|ɔ}} || {{IPA|ɔ̤}} |
| {{IPA link|ɛ}} || {{IPA link|ɛ̤}} || {{IPA link|ɔ}} || {{IPA link|ɔ̤}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! [[Open vowel|Open]] |
! [[Open vowel|Open]] |
||
| colspan=2 | || {{IPA link|ɑ|a}} || {{IPA|a̤}} |
| colspan=2 | || {{IPA link|ɑ|a}} || {{IPA link|a̤}} |
||
|} |
|} |
||
Line 134: | Line 133: | ||
On top of this, there are three phonemically contrastive [[vowel length]]s, a feature found in very few languages.<ref name=Remijsen>{{cite journal|last1=Remijsen|first1=Bert|title=Tonal alignment is contrastive in falling contours in Dinka|journal=Language|date=2013|volume=89|issue=2|pages=297–327|doi=10.1353/lan.2013.0023|s2cid=144514695|url=https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/19691543/89.2.remijsen.pdf|hdl=20.500.11820/1a385cb5-78ab-44d7-adec-93744524bc3d|hdl-access=free}}</ref> |
On top of this, there are three phonemically contrastive [[vowel length]]s, a feature found in very few languages.<ref name=Remijsen>{{cite journal|last1=Remijsen|first1=Bert|title=Tonal alignment is contrastive in falling contours in Dinka|journal=Language|date=2013|volume=89|issue=2|pages=297–327|doi=10.1353/lan.2013.0023|s2cid=144514695|url=https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/19691543/89.2.remijsen.pdf|hdl=20.500.11820/1a385cb5-78ab-44d7-adec-93744524bc3d|hdl-access=free}}</ref> |
||
Most Dinka verb roots are single, closed syllables with either a short or a long vowel. Some inflections lengthen that vowel: |
Most Dinka verb roots are single, closed syllables with either a short or a long vowel. Some inflections lengthen that vowel: |
||
* {{IPA|/lèl/}} 'isolate\{{gcl|2SG}}' |
|||
* {{IPA|/ |
* {{IPA|/lèːl/}} 'isolate\{{gcl|3SG}}' |
||
* {{IPA|/ |
* {{IPA|/léːl/}} 'provoke\{{gcl|2SG}}' |
||
* {{IPA|/ |
* {{IPA|/lèːːl/}} 'provoke\{{gcl|3SG}}' |
||
* {{IPA|/lèːːl/}} 'provoke\3sg' |
|||
{| |
{| |
||
Line 152: | Line 150: | ||
The extensive use of [[tonal language|tone]] and its interaction with morphology is a notable feature of all dialects of Dinka. The Bor dialects all have four tonemes at the syllable level: Low, High, Mid, and Fall.<ref name=Remijsen /> |
The extensive use of [[tonal language|tone]] and its interaction with morphology is a notable feature of all dialects of Dinka. The Bor dialects all have four tonemes at the syllable level: Low, High, Mid, and Fall.<ref name=Remijsen /> |
||
In Bor proper, falling tone is not found on short vowels except as an inflection for the passive in the present tense. In Nyaarweng and Twïc<ref>{{Cite book |last=Sudan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ACsMAQAAIAAJ&dq=Eastern+Twi+Dinka&pg=PA179 |title=Reports on the Finance, Administration, and Condition of the Sudan |date=1912 |publisher=F. Nimr |language=en |
In Bor proper, falling tone is not found on short vowels except as an inflection for the passive in the present tense. In Nyaarweng and Twïc<ref>{{Cite book |last=Sudan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ACsMAQAAIAAJ&dq=Eastern+Twi+Dinka&pg=PA179 |title=Reports on the Finance, Administration, and Condition of the Sudan |date=1912 |publisher=F. Nimr |language=en}}</ref> it is not found at all. In Bor proper, and perhaps in other dialects as well, Fall is only realized as such at the end of a prosodic phrase. Elsewhere it becomes High. |
||
In Bor proper and perhaps other dialects, a Low tone is phonetically low only after another low tone. Elsewhere it is falling, but not identical to Fall: It does not become High in the middle of a phrase, and speakers can distinguish the two falling tones despite the fact that they have the same range of pitch. The difference appears to be in the timing: with Fall one hears a high level tone that then falls, whereas the falling allophone of Low starts falling and then levels out. (That is, one falls on the first mora of the vowel, whereas the other falls on the second mora.) This is unusual because it has been theorized that such timing differences are never phonemic.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Silverman |first1=Daniel |title=Tone sandhi in Comaltepec Chinantec |journal=Language |date=1997 |volume=73 |issue=3 |pages=473–92 |doi=10.2307/415881|jstor=415881 }}</ref> |
In Bor proper and perhaps other dialects, a Low tone is phonetically low only after another low tone. Elsewhere it is falling, but not identical to Fall: It does not become High in the middle of a phrase, and speakers can distinguish the two falling tones despite the fact that they have the same range of pitch. The difference appears to be in the timing: with Fall one hears a high level tone that then falls, whereas the falling allophone of Low starts falling and then levels out. (That is, one falls on the first mora of the vowel, whereas the other falls on the second mora.) This is unusual because it has been theorized that such timing differences are never phonemic.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Silverman |first1=Daniel |title=Tone sandhi in Comaltepec Chinantec |journal=Language |date=1997 |volume=73 |issue=3 |pages=473–92 |doi=10.2307/415881|jstor=415881 }}</ref> |
||
Line 178: | Line 176: | ||
==Dialects== |
==Dialects== |
||
Linguists divide Dinka into five languages or dialect clusters corresponding to their geographic location with respect to each other: |
Linguists divide Dinka into five languages or dialect clusters corresponding to their geographic location with respect to each other: |
||
Northeastern and western: |
Northeastern and western: |
||
Line 207: | Line 205: | ||
Southwestern: |
Southwestern: |
||
* Malual-Jiɛrnyaaŋ (Abiëm, Paliëët, Aroyo, Paliëupiny ku Pajok) |
* Malual-Jiɛrnyaaŋ (Abiëm, Paliëët, Aroyo, Paliëupiny ku Pajok) |
||
*Luänyjäŋ |
*Luänyjäŋ |
||
*Twic Bol |
*Twic Bol |
||
Line 237: | Line 234: | ||
*Adöör Mabior |
*Adöör Mabior |
||
*Bäc |
*Bäc |
||
These would be largely mutually intelligible if it were not for the importance of tone in grammatical inflection, as the grammatical function of tone differs from one variety to another. |
These would be largely mutually intelligible if it were not for the importance of tone in grammatical inflection, as the grammatical function of tone differs from one variety to another. |
||
Line 244: | Line 240: | ||
==Writing system== |
==Writing system== |
||
{{main|Dinka alphabet}} |
{{main|Dinka alphabet}} |
||
Line 264: | Line 259: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
A Dinka alphabet based on the [[Nilerian script]]{{ |
A Dinka alphabet based on the [[Nilerian script]]{{clarify|date=June 2023}} has been created by Aleu Majok Aleu.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Majok |first1=Aleu |title=The New Muonyjang (Dinka) Script |url=https://pioockuthuongjangda.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/the-new-muonyjang-dinka-script.pdf}}</ref> |
||
In 2020 a new Dinka writing system (Nilotic Script) was introduced by Deng Chol, the new script is developed from ancient Meroëtic writing system. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Article 1 of the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Omniglot| url=https://www.omniglot.com/writing/dinka.php|access-date=2023-08-13}}</ref> |
Article 1 of the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Omniglot| url=https://www.omniglot.com/writing/dinka.php|access-date=2023-08-13}}</ref> |
||
Dinka:'' '' |
Dinka:'' '' Raan thök eben aye dhëëth ka lau nhöm kua thöŋ nhiim eyithiic, kua thɛ̈kic, kua ci yëknhiethku puou, ku bik cëŋ ka ke ye mith etik. |
||
English:'' '' All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. |
English:'' '' All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. |
||
Line 300: | Line 296: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{InterWiki |code =din}} |
{{InterWiki |code =din}} |
||
{{wiktionarycat}} |
|||
*[https://pioockuthuongjangda.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/the-new-muonyjang-dinka-script.pdf Nilerian Dinka Alphabet] |
*[https://pioockuthuongjangda.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/the-new-muonyjang-dinka-script.pdf Nilerian Dinka Alphabet] |
||
*[http://www.kasahorow.org/dinka kasahorow page on Dinka] |
*[http://www.kasahorow.org/dinka kasahorow page on Dinka] |
Latest revision as of 20:04, 18 November 2024
Dinka | |
---|---|
Thuɔŋjäŋ | |
Pronunciation | [t̪uɔŋ.ɟa̤ŋ] |
Native to | South Sudan |
Ethnicity | Dinka |
Native speakers | 4.2 million (2017)[1] |
Latin | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-2 | din |
ISO 639-3 | din – inclusive codeIndividual codes: dip – Northeastern (Padang)diw – Northwestern (Ruweng)dib – South Central (Gok, Agar, Ciec, Apaak and Aliap)dks – Southeastern: (Bor, Nyarweng, Hol, Twi)dik – Southwestern (Rek & Twic) |
Glottolog | dink1262 |
Dinka (natively Thuɔŋjäŋ, Thoŋ ë Jieng or simply Jieng) is a Nilotic dialect cluster spoken by the Dinka people, a major ethnic group of South Sudan. There are several main varieties, such as Padang, Rek, Agaar, Ciec, Malual, Apaak, Aliab, Bor, Hol, Nyarweng, Twic East and Twic Mayardit, which are distinct enough (though mutually intelligible) to require separate literary standards. Jaang, Jieng or Muonyjieng is used as a general term to cover all Dinka languages. Recently Akutmɛ̈t Latueŋ Thuɔŋjäŋ (the Dinka Language Development Association) has proposed a unified written grammar of Dinka.
The language most closely related to Dinka is the Nuer language. The Luo languages are also closely related. The Dinka vocabulary shows considerable proximity to Nubian, which is probably due to medieval interactions between the Dinka people and the kingdom of Alodia.[2]
The Dinka are found mainly along the Nile, specifically the west bank of the White Nile, a major tributary flowing north from Uganda, north and south of the Sudd marsh in South Kordofan state of Sudan as well as Bahr el Ghazal region and Upper Nile state of South Sudan.
Linguistic features
[edit]Phonology
[edit]Consonants
[edit]There are 20 consonant phonemes:
Labial | Dental | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nasal | m | n̪ | n | ɲ | ŋ | |||||
Stop | p | b | t̪ | d̪ | t | d | c | ɟ | k | ɡ |
Fricative | ɣ | |||||||||
Approximant (Lateral) |
j | w | ||||||||
l | ||||||||||
Rhotic | ɾ |
Vowels
[edit]Dinka has a rich vowel system, with thirteen phonemically contrastive short vowels. There are seven vowel qualities plus a two-way distinction in phonation. The underdots, [◌̤], mark the breathy voice series, represented in Dinka orthography by diaereses, ⟨◌̈⟩. Unmarked vowels are modal or creaky voiced.
Front | Back | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
plain | breathy | plain | breathy | |
Close | i | i̤ | u | |
Close-mid | e | e̤ | o | o̤ |
Open-mid | ɛ | ɛ̤ | ɔ | ɔ̤ |
Open | a | a̤ |
Four phonetic phonations have been described in Dinka vowels: modal voice, breathy voice, faucalized voice, and harsh voice. The modal series has creaky or harsh voice realizations in certain environments, while the breathy vowels are centralized and have been described as being hollow voiced (faucalized). This is independent of tone.[3]
On top of this, there are three phonemically contrastive vowel lengths, a feature found in very few languages.[3] Most Dinka verb roots are single, closed syllables with either a short or a long vowel. Some inflections lengthen that vowel:
- /lèl/ 'isolate\2SG'
- /lèːl/ 'isolate\3SG'
- /léːl/ 'provoke\2SG'
- /lèːːl/ 'provoke\3SG'
short | ràaan ā-lèl | "You are isolating a person (ràaan)." |
long | ràaan ā-lèel | "He is isolating a person." |
overlong | lràaan ā-lèeel | "He is provoking a person." |
Tone
[edit]The extensive use of tone and its interaction with morphology is a notable feature of all dialects of Dinka. The Bor dialects all have four tonemes at the syllable level: Low, High, Mid, and Fall.[3]
In Bor proper, falling tone is not found on short vowels except as an inflection for the passive in the present tense. In Nyaarweng and Twïc[4] it is not found at all. In Bor proper, and perhaps in other dialects as well, Fall is only realized as such at the end of a prosodic phrase. Elsewhere it becomes High.
In Bor proper and perhaps other dialects, a Low tone is phonetically low only after another low tone. Elsewhere it is falling, but not identical to Fall: It does not become High in the middle of a phrase, and speakers can distinguish the two falling tones despite the fact that they have the same range of pitch. The difference appears to be in the timing: with Fall one hears a high level tone that then falls, whereas the falling allophone of Low starts falling and then levels out. (That is, one falls on the first mora of the vowel, whereas the other falls on the second mora.) This is unusual because it has been theorized that such timing differences are never phonemic.[5]
Morphology
[edit]This language exhibits vowel ablaut or apophony, the change of internal vowels (similar to English goose/geese):[6]
Singular | Plural | gloss | vowel alternation |
---|---|---|---|
dom | dum | 'field/fields' | (o–u) |
kat | kɛt | 'frame/frames' | (a–ɛ) |
Dialects
[edit]Linguists divide Dinka into five languages or dialect clusters corresponding to their geographic location with respect to each other:
Northeastern and western:
- Padaŋ de Ayuël jiel (Abiliang, Nyiël, Ageer, Döŋjɔl).
- Luäc (Akook, Wieu, Aguer)
- Ŋɔŋ de Jok (Upper Nile)
- Rut
- Thoi
Western:
- Ŋɔŋ de Jok Athuorkok (Abiei)
- Ŋɔŋ de Jok de Awet
- Kuel de Ruweeng (Panaru, Aloor ku Paweny)
South Central:
- Aliap
- Ciëc (Jang)
- Gɔ̈k
- Agaar
- Apääk de Yirol west.
Southeastern:
- Bor
- Twic (Twi)
- Nyarweng
- Hol
Southwestern:
- Malual-Jiɛrnyaaŋ (Abiëm, Paliëët, Aroyo, Paliëupiny ku Pajok)
- Luänyjäŋ
- Twic Bol
Rek
- Aguɔɔk
- Apuk
- Awan Cän ku Awan Mɔ̈u
- Kuac Ayɔɔk
- Abiëm Mayar
- Abiɔŋ Ayɔɔm
- Nöi Ayii
- Nyaŋ Aköc
- Atok Buk
- Ler Akën
- Awan Parek
- Lɔn Ariik
- Lɔn Paɣer
- Kɔŋgör Arop
- Apuk Padɔc
- Muɔk Aköt Wut
- Yär Ayiɛɛi
- Apuk Jurwïïr
- Thɔny Amɔ̈u
- Luäny Malek
- Aköök Deŋ
- Thïïk/Thïŋ Majɔk
- Kɔŋ-ŋör Akuëcbɛ̈ny
- Pakɔɔr
- Adöör Mabior
- Bäc
These would be largely mutually intelligible if it were not for the importance of tone in grammatical inflection, as the grammatical function of tone differs from one variety to another.
See Ethnologue online map of Sudan for locations of dialects.
Writing system
[edit]Dinka has been written with several Latin alphabets since the early 20th century. The current alphabet is:
- a ä b c d dh e ë ɛ ɛ̈ g ɣ i ï j k l m n nh ny ŋ t th u w o ö ɔ ɔ̈ p r y
Variants in other alphabets include:
Current letter | Alternatives |
ɛ |
ė ("e" with a dot on top) |
ɣ |
h, x, q |
ŋ |
ng |
ɔ |
ȯ ("o" with a dot on top) |
A Dinka alphabet based on the Nilerian script[clarification needed] has been created by Aleu Majok Aleu.[7]
In 2020 a new Dinka writing system (Nilotic Script) was introduced by Deng Chol, the new script is developed from ancient Meroëtic writing system.
Sample Text
[edit]Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights[8]
Dinka: Raan thök eben aye dhëëth ka lau nhöm kua thöŋ nhiim eyithiic, kua thɛ̈kic, kua ci yëknhiethku puou, ku bik cëŋ ka ke ye mith etik.
English: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Dinka at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
Northeastern (Padang) at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
Northwestern (Ruweng) at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
South Central (Gok, Agar, Ciec, Apaak and Aliap) at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
Southeastern: (Bor, Nyarweng, Hol, Twi) at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
Southwestern (Rek & Twic) at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023) - ^ Beswick 2004, p. 21.
- ^ a b c Remijsen, Bert (2013). "Tonal alignment is contrastive in falling contours in Dinka" (PDF). Language. 89 (2): 297–327. doi:10.1353/lan.2013.0023. hdl:20.500.11820/1a385cb5-78ab-44d7-adec-93744524bc3d. S2CID 144514695.
- ^ Sudan (1912). Reports on the Finance, Administration, and Condition of the Sudan. F. Nimr.
- ^ Silverman, Daniel (1997). "Tone sandhi in Comaltepec Chinantec". Language. 73 (3): 473–92. doi:10.2307/415881. JSTOR 415881.
- ^ After Bauer 2003:35
- ^ Majok, Aleu. "The New Muonyjang (Dinka) Script" (PDF).
- ^ "Omniglot". Retrieved 2023-08-13.
Other resources
[edit]- Andersen, Torben (1987). "The phonemic system of Agar Dinka". Journal of African Languages and Linguistics. 9: 1–27. doi:10.1515/jall.1987.9.1.1. S2CID 143964845.
- Andersen, Torben (1990). "Vowel length in Western Nilotic languages". Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. 22 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1080/03740463.1990.10411520.
- Andersen, Torben (1991). "Subject and topic in Dinka". Studies in Language. 15 (2): 265–294. doi:10.1075/sl.15.2.02and.
- Andersen, Torben (1993). "Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb inflection". Phonology. 10 (1): 1–42. doi:10.1017/S095267570000172X. JSTOR 4615426. S2CID 62712266.
- Beltrame, G. (1870). Grammatica della lingua denka. Firenze: G. Civelli.
- Beswick, Stephanie (2004). Sudan's Blood Memory. University of Rochester. ISBN 1580462316.
- Malou, Job (1988). Dinka Vowel System. Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics. Vol. 82. ISBN 0-88312-008-9.
- Mitterrutzner, J. C. (1866). Die Dinka-Sprache in Central-Afrika; Kurze Grammatik, Text und Worterbuch. Brixen: A. Weger.
- Nebel, A. (1979). Dinka–English, English–Dinka dictionary (2nd ed.). Bologna: Editrice Missionaria Italiana.
- Nebel, A. (1948). Dinka Grammar (Rek-Malual dialect) with texts and vocabulary. Verona: Instituto Missioni Africane.
- Trudinger, R. (1942–44). English-Dinka Dictionary. Sudan Interior Mission.
- Turhan, Sedat; Hagin, Sally (2005). Milet Picture Dictionary English-Dinka. Milet.
External links
[edit]- Nilerian Dinka Alphabet
- kasahorow page on Dinka
- OpenRoad page on Dinka
- Dinka Language Institute (Australia) (DLIA) multilingual site on Dinka, including in Dinka
- PanAfrican L10n page on Dinka
- Dinka alphabet on Answer.com
- Kitap De Duɔr Prayer Book with Hymns, in Dinka, Bor dialect (1956) digitized by Richard Mammana in 2015
- din:Wikipedia:Apam këdït Wikipedia in Dinka