Jump to content

Chloe (2009 film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
budget = $12 million
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 40: Line 40:
}}
}}
| language = English
| language = English
| budget = $12 million<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.zamm.com/articles/movie-mania/q-and-a/q-and-a-with-director-atom-egoyan.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928121613/http://www.zamm.com/articles/movie-mania/q-and-a/q-and-a-with-director-atom-egoyan.html |archive-date=September 28, 2018 |title=Q & A with Director Atom Egoyan |website=Zamm.com |access-date=January 11, 2018}}</ref>
| budget = $12–14 million<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.zamm.com/articles/movie-mania/q-and-a/q-and-a-with-director-atom-egoyan.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928121613/http://www.zamm.com/articles/movie-mania/q-and-a/q-and-a-with-director-atom-egoyan.html |archive-date=September 28, 2018 |title=Q & A with Director Atom Egoyan |website=Zamm.com |access-date=January 11, 2018}}</ref>
| gross = $13.6 million<ref name="mojo">{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=chloe.htm |title=Chloe (2010) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |access-date=February 3, 2012}}</ref>
| gross = $13.6 million<ref name="mojo"/>
}}
}}
'''''Chloe''''' is a 2009 [[erotic thriller]] film directed by [[Atom Egoyan]], a [[remake]] of the 2003 French film ''[[Nathalie...]]''. It stars [[Julianne Moore]], [[Liam Neeson]], and [[Amanda Seyfried]] in the title role. Its screenplay was written by [[Erin Cressida Wilson]], based on the earlier French film, written by [[Anne Fontaine (filmmaker)|Anne Fontaine]].
'''''Chloe''''' is a 2009 [[erotic thriller]] film directed by [[Atom Egoyan]], a [[remake]] of the 2003 French film ''[[Nathalie...]]''. It stars [[Julianne Moore]], [[Liam Neeson]], and [[Amanda Seyfried]] in the title role. Its screenplay was written by [[Erin Cressida Wilson]], based on the earlier French film, written by [[Anne Fontaine (filmmaker)|Anne Fontaine]].
Line 48: Line 48:


==Plot==
==Plot==
Catherine is a gynecologist, her husband David is a [[college professor]], and they have a teenage son, Michael. Catherine suspects David of having an [[Extramarital affair|affair]] after she sees a cell-phone picture of him with a female student.
Catherine is a [[Gynaecology|gynecologist]], her husband David is a [[college professor]], and they have a teenage son, Michael. Catherine suspects David of having an [[Extramarital affair|affair]] after she sees a cell-phone picture of him with a female student.


At a restaurant, Catherine encounters a young woman named Chloe and realizes she is a [[call girl]]. One day, she also notices Chloe from her office window, entering an upscale bar, and surmises that they work in the same neighborhood and Chloe goes there to meet clients. Catherine goes there to meet Chloe and tells her that she wants to hire her to test David's loyalty. Chloe reports back that David kissed her, saddening Catherine. She asks that Chloe show her the results of her tests for sexually transmitted diseases. Chloe brings the test results to Catherine's office, where she meets Michael and flirts with him.
At a restaurant, Catherine encounters a young woman named Chloe and realizes she is a [[call girl]]. One day, she also notices Chloe from her office window, entering an upscale bar, and surmises that they work in the same neighborhood and Chloe goes there to meet clients. Catherine goes there to meet Chloe and tells her that she wants to hire her to test David's loyalty. Chloe reports back that David kissed her, saddening Catherine. She asks that Chloe show her the results of her tests for sexually transmitted diseases. Chloe brings the test results to Catherine's office, where she meets Michael and flirts with him.


Catherine and Chloe meet multiple times, and Chloe describes in explicit detail her sexual encounters with David, which [[Sexual arousal|arouses]] Catherine. During a meeting at a hotel where Chloe says she had a tryst with David, Chloe kisses Catherine. Catherine, surprised by this, abruptly leaves. Later, she is taken aback by David's awareness of the scent of her lotion; it is the same lotion that Chloe wears. Upset by this, Catherine leaves and meets with Chloe again at a hotel, where she undresses Chloe and asks how David touches her. Realizing that Catherine wants her, Chloe has sex with her. After having amazing sex with Chloe, Catherine gets home very late, leading David to ask if she has been unfaithful. Catherine tells him he has been unfaithful as well, and the two argue.
Catherine and Chloe meet multiple times, and Chloe describes in explicit detail her sexual encounters with David, which [[Sexual arousal|arouses]] Catherine. During a meeting at a hotel where Chloe says she had a tryst with David, Chloe kisses Catherine. Catherine, surprised by this, abruptly leaves. Later, she is taken aback by David's awareness of the scent of her lotion; it is the same lotion that Chloe wears. Upset by this, Catherine leaves and meets with Chloe again at a hotel, where she asks how David touches her while undressing her. Realising that she is heartbroken and needs to hookup, Chloe seduces and undresses Catherine, and dominates her, having sex with her.


Chloe confronts Catherine and tells her what they shared together is real, but Catherine insists their relationship was a business transaction and asks her to please leave. She calls off their relationship, but when Chloe mentions that David called Chloe again, Catherine decides to settle this once and for all: she calls Chloe to meet at a coffee house, where she also calls David. David arrives first and she angrily demands that he admit he is having an affair. Chloe walks in, and it is clear that David does not recognize her. Chloe quickly leaves without speaking to either of them and Catherine realizes that Chloe made up all the stories of her encounters with David.
After having an amazing time with Chloe, Catherine gets home very late, leading David to ask if she has been unfaithful. Catherine tells him he has been unfaithful as well, and the two argue. Chloe confronts Catherine and tells her what they shared together is real, but Catherine insists their relationship was a business transaction and asks her to please leave. She calls off their relationship, but when Chloe mentions that David called Chloe again, Catherine decides to settle this once and for all: she calls Chloe to meet at a coffee house, where she also calls David. David arrives first and she angrily demands that he admit he is having an affair. Chloe walks in, and it is clear that David does not recognize her. Chloe quickly leaves without speaking to either of them and Catherine realizes that Chloe made up all the stories of her encounters with David.


David admits that he has flirted and been tempted but has never been unfaithful to her. Upset, Catherine reveals everything about Chloe and that they slept together. She apologizes, saying that she felt she had become invisible to David as she aged, while David became more attractive to her. David comforts and kisses her and the couple reconciles.
David admits that he has flirted and been tempted but has never been unfaithful to her. Upset, Catherine reveals everything about Chloe and that they slept together. She apologizes, saying that she felt she had become invisible to David as she aged, while David became more attractive to her. David comforts and kisses her, and the couple reconciles.


Chloe goes to Catherine's house and has sex with Michael in Catherine's bed. Catherine arrives home, and Chloe tells Catherine that she is in love with her and that she only had sex with Michael because Michael reminds her of Catherine. She threatens to hurt Catherine, requesting a kiss, and Catherine complies. Michael sees, startling Catherine and causing her to push Chloe into the bedroom window. Chloe grabs hold of the frame, but [[Suicide|intentionally lets go]] and falls to her death. Sometime later, at Michael's graduation party, Catherine is seen wearing Chloe's hairpin; the family is reconciled.
Chloe goes to Catherine's house and has sex with Michael in Catherine's bed. Catherine arrives home, and Chloe tells Catherine that she is in love with her and that she only had sex with Michael because Michael reminds her of Catherine. She threatens to hurt Catherine, requesting a kiss, and Catherine complies. Michael sees, startling Catherine and causing her to push Chloe into the bedroom window. Chloe grabs hold of the frame, but [[Suicide|intentionally lets go]] and falls to her death. Sometime later, at Michael's graduation party, Catherine is seen wearing Chloe's hairpin; the family is reconciled.
Line 75: Line 75:
''Chloe'' was the first film produced by the director [[Atom Egoyan]] that was not written by himself.
''Chloe'' was the first film produced by the director [[Atom Egoyan]] that was not written by himself.


The entire filming time was only 35 days.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.zamm.com/articles/movie-mania/q-and-a/q-and-a-with-director-atom-egoyan.html |title=Q & A with Director Atom Egoyan - Zamm.com &#124; My Movies |website=www.zamm.com |access-date=12 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928121613/http://www.zamm.com/articles/movie-mania/q-and-a/q-and-a-with-director-atom-egoyan.html |archive-date=28 September 2018 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
The film, shot in only 35 days,<ref>{{cite web |title=Q & A with Director Atom Egoyan - Zamm.com &#124; My Movies |url=http://www.zamm.com/articles/movie-mania/q-and-a/q-and-a-with-director-atom-egoyan.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928121613/http://www.zamm.com/articles/movie-mania/q-and-a/q-and-a-with-director-atom-egoyan.html |archive-date=28 September 2018 |access-date=12 January 2022 |website=www.zamm.com}}</ref> was financed solely in [[France]] and was shot in [[Toronto]] and [[Lake Ontario]], Canada. Some local restaurants and scenic spots appear in the film under actual names, such as [[Allan Gardens]], Cafe Diplomatico, [[The Rivoli]], the [[Windsor Arms Hotel]], the [[Fairmount Royal York|Royal York Hotel]], the [[Royal Ontario Museum]], [[The Royal Conservatory of Music]], the [[CN Tower]], the [[Art Gallery of Ontario]] and the [[Ontario College of Art]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sonyclassics.com/chloe/|title=Official website of Chloe|access-date=December 3, 2010}}</ref>

The film was financed solely in [[France]] and was shot in [[Toronto]] and [[Lake Ontario]], Canada. Some local restaurants and scenic spots appear in the film under actual names, such as [[Allan Gardens]], Cafe Diplomatico, [[The Rivoli]], the [[Windsor Arms Hotel]], the [[Fairmount Royal York|Royal York Hotel]], the [[Royal Ontario Museum]], [[The Royal Conservatory of Music]], the [[CN Tower]], the [[Art Gallery of Ontario]] and the [[Ontario College of Art]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sonyclassics.com/chloe/|title=Official website of Chloe|access-date=December 3, 2010}}</ref>


Producer [[Jason Reitman]] helped persuade Amanda Seyfried to star in this film.<ref>{{cite web|last=Seguin |first=Denis |url=http://www.screendaily.com/reports/interviews/the-great-entertainer/5006120.article |title=The great entertainer &#124; Features &#124; Screen |publisher=Screendaily.com |date=September 25, 2009 |access-date=October 23, 2010}}</ref> Seyfried accepted the role of Chloe after a friend of hers withdrew from consideration due to discomfort with the nudity.<ref>{{cite news |first=Jeanne |last=Wolf |title=Amanda Seyfried |work=Parade.com |date=March 22, 2010 |access-date=July 12, 2015 |url=http://parade.com/40248/jeannewolf/0322-amanda-seyfriend-chloe/}}</ref> Julianne Moore described Seyfried as a "very dependable" acting partner and claimed that they were largely comfortable with the intimacy in the film. In describing her view of Catherine's relationship with Chloe, Moore noted "an emotional quality to their intimacy that has to do with their conversation and their basic receptivity to one another. Now what they turn into personally obviously is very different. They are having completely subjective experiences, but that doesn't mean [they're] not incredibly receptive to one another and it clearly creates something in-between them. And that's what love and sex and intimacy and all that is. Someone who is listening to you, hearing you, there for you, that's the person you end up having a relationship with, sexual or just emotional or whatever. I don't know if that has to do with gender necessarily".<ref>{{cite news |first=Rocco |last=Passafuime |title=Julianne Moore Interview for Chloe |work=thecinemasource.com |date=March 29, 2010 |access-date=July 12, 2015 |url=http://www.thecinemasource.com/blog/interviews/julianne-moore-interview-for-chloe/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130526161606/http://www.thecinemasource.com/blog/interviews/julianne-moore-interview-for-chloe/ |archive-date=May 26, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Producer [[Jason Reitman]] helped persuade Amanda Seyfried to star in this film.<ref>{{cite web|last=Seguin |first=Denis |url=http://www.screendaily.com/reports/interviews/the-great-entertainer/5006120.article |title=The great entertainer &#124; Features &#124; Screen |publisher=Screendaily.com |date=September 25, 2009 |access-date=October 23, 2010}}</ref> Seyfried accepted the role of Chloe after a friend of hers withdrew from consideration due to discomfort with the nudity.<ref>{{cite news |first=Jeanne |last=Wolf |title=Amanda Seyfried |work=Parade.com |date=March 22, 2010 |access-date=July 12, 2015 |url=http://parade.com/40248/jeannewolf/0322-amanda-seyfriend-chloe/}}</ref> Julianne Moore described Seyfried as a "very dependable" acting partner and claimed that they were largely comfortable with the intimacy in the film. In describing her view of Catherine's relationship with Chloe, Moore noted "an emotional quality to their intimacy that has to do with their conversation and their basic receptivity to one another. Now what they turn into personally obviously is very different. They are having completely subjective experiences, but that doesn't mean [they're] not incredibly receptive to one another and it clearly creates something in-between them. And that's what love and sex and intimacy and all that is. Someone who is listening to you, hearing you, there for you, that's the person you end up having a relationship with, sexual or just emotional or whatever. I don't know if that has to do with gender necessarily".<ref>{{cite news |first=Rocco |last=Passafuime |title=Julianne Moore Interview for Chloe |work=thecinemasource.com |date=March 29, 2010 |access-date=July 12, 2015 |url=http://www.thecinemasource.com/blog/interviews/julianne-moore-interview-for-chloe/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130526161606/http://www.thecinemasource.com/blog/interviews/julianne-moore-interview-for-chloe/ |archive-date=May 26, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Line 84: Line 82:
Canadian [[indie rock]] band [[Raised by Swans]] has two songs featured in the movie and the band is mentioned several times by Chloe.
Canadian [[indie rock]] band [[Raised by Swans]] has two songs featured in the movie and the band is mentioned several times by Chloe.


[[Anne Fontaine]] (the writer/director of ''[[Nathalie...]]'') said that she was interested in Egoyan's take on it. Fontaine also said that she was not happy with ''Nathalie...'' because the two lead actresses of the film objected to her original intention for a [[lesbian]] relationship to develop between their characters.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tiff/story/2009/09/14/egoyan-chloe-press-conference.html |title=Egoyan's Chloe a reinvention of sexy French drama |publisher=Cbc.ca |date=September 15, 2009 |access-date=July 26, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604191455/http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tiff/story/2009/09/14/egoyan-chloe-press-conference.html |archive-date=June 4, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref>
[[Anne Fontaine]], the writer/director of ''[[Nathalie...]],'' said that she was interested in Egoyan's take on it. Fontaine also said that she was not happy with ''Nathalie...'' because the two lead actresses of the film objected to her original intention for a [[lesbian]] relationship to develop between their characters.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/egoyan-s-chloe-a-reinvention-of-sexy-french-drama-1.847165 |title=Egoyan's Chloe a reinvention of sexy French drama |publisher=Cbc.ca |date=September 15, 2009 |access-date=July 26, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604191455/http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tiff/story/2009/09/14/egoyan-chloe-press-conference.html |archive-date=June 4, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref>


[[Atom Egoyan]] studied at the University of Toronto, and [[Joe Medjuck]], one of the film's producers, was a teacher of Egoyan at the University of Toronto.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Johnson |first=Brian|url=http://www.macleans.ca/culture/odd-couple/ |title= Odd Couple |magazine=Maclean's |date=March 20, 2009 |access-date=March 28, 2018}}</ref>
[[Atom Egoyan]] studied at the University of Toronto, and [[Joe Medjuck]], one of the film's producers, was a teacher of Egoyan at the University of Toronto.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Johnson |first=Brian|url=http://www.macleans.ca/culture/odd-couple/ |title= Odd Couple |magazine=Maclean's |date=March 20, 2009 |access-date=March 28, 2018}}</ref>
Line 101: Line 99:


==Financing and distribution==
==Financing and distribution==
[[StudioCanal]] fully financed ''Chloe'' and was able to fully recoup the film's budget via international [[Film finance|pre-sales]].<ref name="horowitz1">{{cite web|last=Horowitz |first=Lisa |url=https://www.thewrap.com/sony-picks-egoyans-chloe-8453/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180922211832/http://www.thewrap.com/sony-picks-egoyans-chloe-8453/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 22, 2018 |title=Sony Picks Up Egoyan's 'Chloe' |publisher=TheWrap.com |date=October 9, 2009 |access-date=July 26, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Canada |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/egoyan-closes-us-deal-for-chloe/article1318927/ |title=Egoyan closes U.S. deal for Chloe |newspaper=The Globe and Mail |date=October 9, 2009 |access-date=July 26, 2010 |location=Toronto |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100424033310/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/egoyan-closes-us-deal-for-chloe/article1318927/ |archive-date=24 April 2010 |url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2009, the film was screened in special presentation at the [[2009 Toronto International Film Festival]],<ref name="McCarthy"/> and at the [[BFI London Film Festival|London Film Festival]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Heron |first=Ambrose |date=9 September 2009 |title=Lineup for London Film Festival 2009 |url=http://www.filmdetail.com/2009/09/09/lineup-for-london-film-festival-2009/ |website=FILMdetail}}</ref> and was also the opening film at the [[San Sebastián International Film Festival]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Evans |first=Chris |date=21 August 2009 |title=Egoyan’s Chloe to open San Sebastian |url=https://www.screendaily.com/egoyans-chloe-to-open-san-sebastian/5004753.article |website=[[Screen Daily]]}}</ref>
[[StudioCanal]] fully financed ''Chloe'' and was able to fully recoup the film's budget via international [[Film finance|pre-sales]].<ref name="horowitz1">{{cite web|last=Horowitz |first=Lisa |url=https://www.thewrap.com/sony-picks-egoyans-chloe-8453/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180922211832/http://www.thewrap.com/sony-picks-egoyans-chloe-8453/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 22, 2018 |title=Sony Picks Up Egoyan's 'Chloe' |publisher=TheWrap.com |date=October 9, 2009 |access-date=July 26, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Canada |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/egoyan-closes-us-deal-for-chloe/article1318927/ |title=Egoyan closes U.S. deal for Chloe |newspaper=The Globe and Mail |date=October 9, 2009 |access-date=July 26, 2010 |location=Toronto |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100424033310/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/egoyan-closes-us-deal-for-chloe/article1318927/ |archive-date=24 April 2010 |url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2009, the film was screened in special presentation at the [[2009 Toronto International Film Festival]],<ref name="McCarthy"/> and at the [[BFI London Film Festival|London Film Festival]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Heron |first=Ambrose |date=9 September 2009 |title=Lineup for London Film Festival 2009 |url=http://www.filmdetail.com/2009/09/09/lineup-for-london-film-festival-2009/ |website=FILMdetail}}</ref> and was also the opening film at the [[San Sebastián International Film Festival]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Evans |first=Chris |date=21 August 2009 |title=Egoyan's Chloe to open San Sebastian |url=https://www.screendaily.com/egoyans-chloe-to-open-san-sebastian/5004753.article |website=[[Screen Daily]]}}</ref>


[[Sony Pictures Worldwide Acquisitions Group]] paid a low seven-figure sum to acquire the [[United States]] distribution rights of ''Chloe'',<ref name="horowitz1"/><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://variety.com/2009/biz/markets-festivals/sony-seduced-by-chloe-1118009736/ |title=Sony seduced by 'Chloe' – Entertainment News, Film News, Media |magazine=Variety |date=October 8, 2009 |access-date=July 26, 2010}}</ref> and the group opened this film in [[limited release|limited theatrical release]] in the United States on March 26, 2010 through [[Sony Pictures Classics]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sonyclassics.com/chloe/ |title=CHLOE &#124; a film by Atom Egoyan |publisher=Sonyclassics.com |access-date=July 26, 2010}}</ref> In the United States, this film grossed $3 million theatrically,<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=chloe.htm |title=Chloe |access-date=February 18, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100613200848/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=chloe.htm |archive-date=June 13, 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref> which was generally considered as a respectful result for an [[arthouse film]] release in early 2010's.<ref>{{cite news| work=[[Filmmaker (magazine)|Filmmaker]] | title=Crash (or Requiem for a Dream) | first=Mary | last=Glucksman | date=Winter 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://variety.com/article/VR1118018219.html?categoryid=3768&cs=1 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100430060632/http://variety.com/article/VR1118018219.html?categoryid=3768&cs=1 | url-status=dead | archive-date=April 30, 2010 | work=Variety | title=Specialty pics face reduced expectations | first=Andrew | last=Stewart | date=April 24, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.questia.com/magazine/1P3-2813572781/hits-misses | work=[[Filmmaker (magazine)|Filmmaker]] | title=Hits & Misses | first=Anthony | last=Kaufman | date=Winter 2012}}</ref>
[[Sony Pictures Worldwide Acquisitions Group]] paid a low seven-figure sum to acquire the [[United States]] distribution rights of ''Chloe'',<ref name="horowitz1"/><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://variety.com/2009/biz/markets-festivals/sony-seduced-by-chloe-1118009736/ |title=Sony seduced by 'Chloe' – Entertainment News, Film News, Media |magazine=Variety |date=October 8, 2009 |access-date=July 26, 2010}}</ref> and the group opened this film in [[limited release|limited theatrical release]] in the United States on March 26, 2010 through [[Sony Pictures Classics]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sonyclassics.com/chloe/ |title=CHLOE &#124; a film by Atom Egoyan |publisher=Sonyclassics.com |access-date=July 26, 2010}}</ref> In the United States, this film grossed $3 million theatrically,<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=chloe.htm |title=Chloe |access-date=February 18, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100613200848/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=chloe.htm |archive-date=June 13, 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref> which was generally considered as a respectful result for an [[arthouse film]] release in early 2010's.<ref>{{cite news| work=[[Filmmaker (magazine)|Filmmaker]] | title=Crash (or Requiem for a Dream) | first=Mary | last=Glucksman | date=Winter 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://variety.com/2010/film/features/specialty-pics-face-reduced-expectations-1118018219/ | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100430060632/http://variety.com/article/VR1118018219.html?categoryid=3768&cs=1 | url-status=live | archive-date=April 30, 2010 | work=Variety | title=Specialty pics face reduced expectations | first=Andrew | last=Stewart | date=April 24, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.questia.com/magazine/1P3-2813572781/hits-misses | work=[[Filmmaker (magazine)|Filmmaker]] | title=Hits & Misses | first=Anthony | last=Kaufman | date=Winter 2012}}</ref>


In the wake of ''Chloe'', Egoyan had since received many scripts of erotic thrillers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100713/100713_chloe_DVD/20100713/ |title=Atom Egoyan sifts through sex thriller scripts in wake of 'Chloe' – CTV News, Shows and Sports – Canadian Television |date=July 13, 2010 |publisher=CP24 |access-date=October 23, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120305161715/http://www.cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100713/100713_chloe_DVD/20100713/ |archive-date=March 5, 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> Amanda Seyfried's performance in this film also helped her to gain industry acclaim and become considered for more roles.<ref>{{cite web|last=Barshad |first=Amos |url=https://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/03/star_market_can_amanda_seyfrie.html |title=Star Market: Can Amanda Seyfried Live Out a Hollywood Fairy Tale? – Vulture |date=March 11, 2011 |publisher=Nymag.com |access-date=February 3, 2012}}</ref>
In the wake of ''Chloe'', Egoyan had since received many scripts of erotic thrillers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100713/100713_chloe_DVD/20100713/ |title=Atom Egoyan sifts through sex thriller scripts in wake of 'Chloe' – CTV News, Shows and Sports – Canadian Television |date=July 13, 2010 |publisher=CP24 |access-date=October 23, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120305161715/http://www.cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100713/100713_chloe_DVD/20100713/ |archive-date=March 5, 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> Amanda Seyfried's performance in this film also helped her to gain industry acclaim and become considered for more roles.<ref>{{cite web|last=Barshad |first=Amos |url=https://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/03/star_market_can_amanda_seyfrie.html |title=Star Market: Can Amanda Seyfried Live Out a Hollywood Fairy Tale? – Vulture |date=March 11, 2011 |publisher=Nymag.com |access-date=February 3, 2012}}</ref>
Line 114: Line 112:
==Reception==
==Reception==
===Critical response===
===Critical response===
On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], the film has an approval rating of 51% based on 163 reviews, with an average rating of 5.71/10. The site's consensus is that "Despite its promising pedigree and a titillating premise, ''Chloe'' ultimately fails to deliver the heat—or the thrills—expected of a sexual thriller."<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10011774-chloe | title=Chloe | website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] | date=March 26, 2010 | access-date=July 26, 2010}}</ref> [[Metacritic]], which assigns a score from major reviewers, gave the film a 48 out of 100, based on 33 reviews, indicating "Mixed or average reviews."<ref name="metacritic">{{cite web | url=https://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/chloe | title=Chloe Reviews | publisher=[[CBS Interactive]] |website= [[Metacritic]] | access-date=July 26, 2010 }}</ref>
On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], the film has an approval rating of 51% based on 163 reviews, with an average rating of 5.71/10. The site's consensus is that "Despite its promising pedigree and a titillating premise, ''Chloe'' ultimately fails to deliver the heat—or the thrills—expected of a sexual thriller."<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10011774-chloe | title=Chloe | website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] | date=March 26, 2010 | access-date=July 26, 2010}}</ref> [[Metacritic]], which assigns a score from major reviewers, gave the film a 48 out of 100, based on 33 reviews, indicating "Mixed or average reviews."<ref name="metacritic">{{cite web | url=https://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/chloe | title=Chloe Reviews | publisher=[[CBS Interactive]] | website=[[Metacritic]] | access-date=July 26, 2010 | archive-date=May 15, 2010 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100515162914/http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/chloe/ | url-status=dead }}</ref>


[[Roger Ebert]] of the ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' gave the film three and a half out of four stars and wrote: "It's not the kind of movie that depends on the certainty of an ending. It's more about how things continue."<ref>{{cite web |date=2010 |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |title=Chloe movie review & film summary (2010) |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/chloe-2010 |website=[[Chicago Sun-Times]] }}{{Rating|3.5|4}}</ref>
[[Roger Ebert]] of the ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' gave the film three and a half out of four stars and wrote: "It's not the kind of movie that depends on the certainty of an ending. It's more about how things continue."<ref>{{cite web |date=2010 |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |title=Chloe movie review & film summary (2010) |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/chloe-2010 |website=[[Chicago Sun-Times]] }}{{Rating|3.5|4}}</ref>


[[Todd McCarthy]] of [[Variety (magazine)|''Variety'']] gave the film a mixed review: "Sexual suspicion and game-playing spiral down from the exotically intriguing to outright silliness in Chloe."<ref name="McCarthy">{{cite web |date=17 September 2009 |last=McCarthy |first=Todd |author-link=Todd McCarthy |title=Chloe |url=https://variety.com/review/VE1117941106 |website=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] }}</ref>
[[Todd McCarthy]] of [[Variety (magazine)|''Variety'']] gave the film a mixed review: "Sexual suspicion and game-playing spiral down from the exotically intriguing to outright silliness in Chloe."<ref name="McCarthy">{{cite web |date=17 September 2009 |last=McCarthy |first=Todd |author-link=Todd McCarthy |title=Chloe |url=https://variety.com/review/VE1117941106 |website=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] }}</ref>


[[Anthony Lane]] of ''[[The New Yorker]]'' compared the film to the French original: "The movie--directed by Atom Egoyan, who should know better--is closely adapted from ''[[Nathalie...]]'', a French film of 2004, with Gérard Depardieu and Emmanuelle Béart, but what seemed like standard practice for Parisians comes across here as unsmiling porno-farce.<ref>{{cite magazine |date=2010 |last=Lane |first=Anthony |title=Mystery Women |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/03/29/mystery-women |magazine=[[The New Yorker]] }}</ref>
[[Anthony Lane]] of ''[[The New Yorker]]'' compared the film to the French original: "The movie--directed by Atom Egoyan, who should know better--is closely adapted from ''[[Nathalie...]]'', a French film of 2004, with Gérard Depardieu and Emmanuelle Béart, but what seemed like standard practice for Parisians comes across here as unsmiling porno-farce″.<ref>{{cite magazine |date=2010 |last=Lane |first=Anthony |title=Mystery Women |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/03/29/mystery-women |magazine=[[The New Yorker]] }}</ref>


===Accolades===
===Accolades===
Line 171: Line 169:
* {{Official website|http://www.sonyclassics.com/chloe/}}
* {{Official website|http://www.sonyclassics.com/chloe/}}
* {{IMDb title|1352824}}
* {{IMDb title|1352824}}
* {{Rotten Tomatoes|2=Chloe}}
* {{AllMovie title|483668}}
* {{AllMovie title|483668}}
* {{Mojo title|chloe}}
* {{Mojo title|chloe}}
Line 177: Line 176:
{{Atom Egoyan}}
{{Atom Egoyan}}
{{Ivan Reitman}}
{{Ivan Reitman}}
{{Portal bar|LGBT|Film|United States|Canada|France}}
{{Portal bar|LGBTQ|Film|United States|Canada|France}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


Line 183: Line 182:
[[Category:2000s erotic thriller films]]
[[Category:2000s erotic thriller films]]
[[Category:2009 independent films]]
[[Category:2009 independent films]]
[[Category:2009 LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:2009 LGBTQ-related films]]
[[Category:2009 psychological thriller films]]
[[Category:2009 psychological thriller films]]
[[Category:2009 films]]
[[Category:2009 films]]
[[Category:Adultery in films]]
[[Category:Films about adultery]]
[[Category:American erotic thriller films]]
[[Category:American erotic thriller films]]
[[Category:American independent films]]
[[Category:American independent films]]
[[Category:American LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:American LGBTQ-related films]]
[[Category:American psychological thriller films]]
[[Category:American psychological thriller films]]
[[Category:American remakes of French films]]
[[Category:American remakes of French films]]
[[Category:Canadian erotic thriller films]]
[[Category:Canadian erotic thriller films]]
[[Category:Canadian independent films]]
[[Category:Canadian independent films]]
[[Category:Canadian LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:Canadian LGBTQ-related films]]
[[Category:Canadian psychological thriller films]]
[[Category:Canadian psychological thriller films]]
[[Category:2000s English-language films]]
[[Category:2000s English-language films]]
[[Category:English-language Canadian films]]
[[Category:English-language Canadian films]]
[[Category:English-language French films]]
[[Category:English-language French films]]
[[Category:Female bisexuality in film]]
[[Category:Films about female bisexuality]]
[[Category:Films about prostitution in Canada]]
[[Category:Films about prostitution in Canada]]
[[Category:Films about threesomes]]
[[Category:Films about threesomes]]
Line 210: Line 209:
[[Category:Remakes of French films]]
[[Category:Remakes of French films]]
[[Category:French independent films]]
[[Category:French independent films]]
[[Category:French LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:French LGBTQ-related films]]
[[Category:French psychological thriller films]]
[[Category:French psychological thriller films]]
[[Category:LGBT-related thriller films]]
[[Category:LGBTQ-related thriller films]]
[[Category:The Montecito Picture Company films]]
[[Category:The Montecito Picture Company films]]
[[Category:Sony Pictures Classics films]]
[[Category:Sony Pictures Classics films]]
Line 219: Line 218:
[[Category:2000s Canadian films]]
[[Category:2000s Canadian films]]
[[Category:2000s French films]]
[[Category:2000s French films]]
[[Category:English-language independent films]]
[[Category:English-language erotic thriller films]]

Latest revision as of 19:02, 11 November 2024

Chloe
US theatrical release poster
Directed byAtom Egoyan
Screenplay byErin Cressida Wilson
Based onNathalie...
by Anne Fontaine
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyPaul Sarossy
Edited bySusan Shipton
Music byMychael Danna
Production
companies
Distributed by
Release dates
  • September 13, 2009 (2009-09-13) (TIFF)
  • March 10, 2010 (2010-03-10) (France)
  • March 26, 2010 (2010-03-26) (United States and Canada)
Running time
96 minutes[2]
Countries
  • United States
  • Canada
  • France
LanguageEnglish
Budget$12–14 million[3]
Box office$13.6 million[2]

Chloe is a 2009 erotic thriller film directed by Atom Egoyan, a remake of the 2003 French film Nathalie.... It stars Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson, and Amanda Seyfried in the title role. Its screenplay was written by Erin Cressida Wilson, based on the earlier French film, written by Anne Fontaine.

Despite receiving mixed reviews from critics,[4] the film was a commercial success and it grossed more at the worldwide box office than any of Egoyan's previous films.[5][6]

Plot

[edit]

Catherine is a gynecologist, her husband David is a college professor, and they have a teenage son, Michael. Catherine suspects David of having an affair after she sees a cell-phone picture of him with a female student.

At a restaurant, Catherine encounters a young woman named Chloe and realizes she is a call girl. One day, she also notices Chloe from her office window, entering an upscale bar, and surmises that they work in the same neighborhood and Chloe goes there to meet clients. Catherine goes there to meet Chloe and tells her that she wants to hire her to test David's loyalty. Chloe reports back that David kissed her, saddening Catherine. She asks that Chloe show her the results of her tests for sexually transmitted diseases. Chloe brings the test results to Catherine's office, where she meets Michael and flirts with him.

Catherine and Chloe meet multiple times, and Chloe describes in explicit detail her sexual encounters with David, which arouses Catherine. During a meeting at a hotel where Chloe says she had a tryst with David, Chloe kisses Catherine. Catherine, surprised by this, abruptly leaves. Later, she is taken aback by David's awareness of the scent of her lotion; it is the same lotion that Chloe wears. Upset by this, Catherine leaves and meets with Chloe again at a hotel, where she asks how David touches her while undressing her. Realising that she is heartbroken and needs to hookup, Chloe seduces and undresses Catherine, and dominates her, having sex with her.

After having an amazing time with Chloe, Catherine gets home very late, leading David to ask if she has been unfaithful. Catherine tells him he has been unfaithful as well, and the two argue. Chloe confronts Catherine and tells her what they shared together is real, but Catherine insists their relationship was a business transaction and asks her to please leave. She calls off their relationship, but when Chloe mentions that David called Chloe again, Catherine decides to settle this once and for all: she calls Chloe to meet at a coffee house, where she also calls David. David arrives first and she angrily demands that he admit he is having an affair. Chloe walks in, and it is clear that David does not recognize her. Chloe quickly leaves without speaking to either of them and Catherine realizes that Chloe made up all the stories of her encounters with David.

David admits that he has flirted and been tempted but has never been unfaithful to her. Upset, Catherine reveals everything about Chloe and that they slept together. She apologizes, saying that she felt she had become invisible to David as she aged, while David became more attractive to her. David comforts and kisses her, and the couple reconciles.

Chloe goes to Catherine's house and has sex with Michael in Catherine's bed. Catherine arrives home, and Chloe tells Catherine that she is in love with her and that she only had sex with Michael because Michael reminds her of Catherine. She threatens to hurt Catherine, requesting a kiss, and Catherine complies. Michael sees, startling Catherine and causing her to push Chloe into the bedroom window. Chloe grabs hold of the frame, but intentionally lets go and falls to her death. Sometime later, at Michael's graduation party, Catherine is seen wearing Chloe's hairpin; the family is reconciled.

Cast

[edit]

Production

[edit]

Chloe was the first film produced by the director Atom Egoyan that was not written by himself.

The film, shot in only 35 days,[7] was financed solely in France and was shot in Toronto and Lake Ontario, Canada. Some local restaurants and scenic spots appear in the film under actual names, such as Allan Gardens, Cafe Diplomatico, The Rivoli, the Windsor Arms Hotel, the Royal York Hotel, the Royal Ontario Museum, The Royal Conservatory of Music, the CN Tower, the Art Gallery of Ontario and the Ontario College of Art.[8]

Producer Jason Reitman helped persuade Amanda Seyfried to star in this film.[9] Seyfried accepted the role of Chloe after a friend of hers withdrew from consideration due to discomfort with the nudity.[10] Julianne Moore described Seyfried as a "very dependable" acting partner and claimed that they were largely comfortable with the intimacy in the film. In describing her view of Catherine's relationship with Chloe, Moore noted "an emotional quality to their intimacy that has to do with their conversation and their basic receptivity to one another. Now what they turn into personally obviously is very different. They are having completely subjective experiences, but that doesn't mean [they're] not incredibly receptive to one another and it clearly creates something in-between them. And that's what love and sex and intimacy and all that is. Someone who is listening to you, hearing you, there for you, that's the person you end up having a relationship with, sexual or just emotional or whatever. I don't know if that has to do with gender necessarily".[11]

Liam Neeson's wife, Natasha Richardson, had a skiing accident during filming. Neeson decided to leave the set to take care of his wife, who died from her injury a few days later. The filmmakers re-arranged the shooting schedule accordingly for Neeson's absence.[1] Just a few days after his wife's death, Neeson returned to the set and filmed the remainder of his scenes in two days.[12] Canadian indie rock band Raised by Swans has two songs featured in the movie and the band is mentioned several times by Chloe.

Anne Fontaine, the writer/director of Nathalie..., said that she was interested in Egoyan's take on it. Fontaine also said that she was not happy with Nathalie... because the two lead actresses of the film objected to her original intention for a lesbian relationship to develop between their characters.[13]

Atom Egoyan studied at the University of Toronto, and Joe Medjuck, one of the film's producers, was a teacher of Egoyan at the University of Toronto.[14]

Behind the scenes

[edit]

Creative process

[edit]

After determining the plan for the remake of the film Nathalie..., the investor StudioCanal believed that it was necessary to find a reliable screenwriter to write a script for the film because it tells a relatively complicated family and emotional story. Erin Cressida Wilson was chosen, in part because of her experience writing erotic films such as Secretary (2002). This script took Wilson a lot of time and energy to create, and many times she couldn't figure out what real life was and what was the story in the script. Wilson found it easier to write for Chloe than for Catherine, later saying, "I related to Chloe, the young woman who loved to seduce people".[15]

Making photography

[edit]

Chloe's director Egoyan insisted on using 35 mm film to shoot the film. This is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process, but Egoyan enjoys it. The photographer Paul Sarossy thinks filming this film is symbolic. In this digital age, choosing to use film to shoot a movie is more of a feeling of escape from digital electronics. Although the film eventually uses some digital technology, it is not a digitally produced film.[16]

Costume design

[edit]

The film also took great pains in the art design and costume design. In the movie, mirrors and glass were used as props for reflection and refraction. The costume design of the film also pays attention to the concept of mirroring. In order to complement the artwork, costume designer Debra Hanson specifically used a layered mirror effect on the costume design. Those repeated laces, structures and decorations are also mirrored images. The effect is the same as showing the heart of a character. In addition, the relationship between clothing and the external environment has also been deliberately taken care of. In the film, Chloe's scene in the greenhouse was decorated with a lot of leaves and patterns on the clothes she wore, which could reflect some of her inner unrest. Similarly, Catherine's clothes are in part echoed by Chloe's clothing, and their relationship in the film is complex and subtle.[17]

Financing and distribution

[edit]

StudioCanal fully financed Chloe and was able to fully recoup the film's budget via international pre-sales.[18][19] In 2009, the film was screened in special presentation at the 2009 Toronto International Film Festival,[20] and at the London Film Festival,[21] and was also the opening film at the San Sebastián International Film Festival.[22]

Sony Pictures Worldwide Acquisitions Group paid a low seven-figure sum to acquire the United States distribution rights of Chloe,[18][23] and the group opened this film in limited theatrical release in the United States on March 26, 2010 through Sony Pictures Classics.[24] In the United States, this film grossed $3 million theatrically,[25] which was generally considered as a respectful result for an arthouse film release in early 2010's.[26][27][28]

In the wake of Chloe, Egoyan had since received many scripts of erotic thrillers.[29] Amanda Seyfried's performance in this film also helped her to gain industry acclaim and become considered for more roles.[30]

Home media

[edit]

Chloe was released in the United States on July 13, 2010 in both DVD and Blu-ray Disc. The disc includes an audio commentary, making-of featurette, and deleted scenes. The film did especially well in Home Video rentals; for instance, the film stayed in Redbox Top 10 DVD rentals chart for three straight weeks (very good result for an arthouse release in the United States).[31][32][33][34]

Several months following the DVD and Blu-ray release of Chloe, Egoyan said that Chloe had made more money than any of his previous films.[5][6]

Reception

[edit]

Critical response

[edit]

On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 51% based on 163 reviews, with an average rating of 5.71/10. The site's consensus is that "Despite its promising pedigree and a titillating premise, Chloe ultimately fails to deliver the heat—or the thrills—expected of a sexual thriller."[35] Metacritic, which assigns a score from major reviewers, gave the film a 48 out of 100, based on 33 reviews, indicating "Mixed or average reviews."[4]

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film three and a half out of four stars and wrote: "It's not the kind of movie that depends on the certainty of an ending. It's more about how things continue."[36]

Todd McCarthy of Variety gave the film a mixed review: "Sexual suspicion and game-playing spiral down from the exotically intriguing to outright silliness in Chloe."[20]

Anthony Lane of The New Yorker compared the film to the French original: "The movie--directed by Atom Egoyan, who should know better--is closely adapted from Nathalie..., a French film of 2004, with Gérard Depardieu and Emmanuelle Béart, but what seemed like standard practice for Parisians comes across here as unsmiling porno-farce″.[37]

Accolades

[edit]
Award Date of ceremony Category Recipients Result Ref.
Canadian Society of Cinematographers 2 April 2011 Theatrical Feature Cinematography Paul Sarossy Nominated [38]
Directors Guild of Canada September 25, 2010 Best Feature Film Nominated [39][40]
Best Direction – Feature Film Atom Egoyan Nominated
Best Production Design – Feature Film Phillip Barker Nominated
Best Picture Editing – Feature Film Susan Shipton Won
Best Sound Editing – Feature Film Steve Munro, David Drainie Taylor, Paul Shikata, Richard Cadger, John Loranger Won

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Onstad, Katrina (August 30, 2009). "Adapting to Life's Change, on Screen and Off". The New York Times.
  2. ^ a b "Chloe (2010)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved February 3, 2012.
  3. ^ "Q & A with Director Atom Egoyan". Zamm.com. Archived from the original on September 28, 2018. Retrieved January 11, 2018.
  4. ^ a b "Chloe Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on May 15, 2010. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  5. ^ a b Pevere, Geoff (December 7, 2010). "The Digital Revolution: Part 1". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on December 20, 2013.
  6. ^ a b "Atom Egoyan : "Ryan Reynolds m'a semblé une évidence"". MYTF1News. Archived from the original on May 9, 2015. Retrieved September 10, 2015.
  7. ^ "Q & A with Director Atom Egoyan - Zamm.com | My Movies". www.zamm.com. Archived from the original on September 28, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  8. ^ "Official website of Chloe". Retrieved December 3, 2010.
  9. ^ Seguin, Denis (September 25, 2009). "The great entertainer | Features | Screen". Screendaily.com. Retrieved October 23, 2010.
  10. ^ Wolf, Jeanne (March 22, 2010). "Amanda Seyfried". Parade.com. Retrieved July 12, 2015.
  11. ^ Passafuime, Rocco (March 29, 2010). "Julianne Moore Interview for Chloe". thecinemasource.com. Archived from the original on May 26, 2013. Retrieved July 12, 2015.
  12. ^ CA. "Director Atom Egoyan praises grieving Liam Neesons professionalism – Entertainment – Arts". The Journal Pioneer. Archived from the original on January 3, 2013. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  13. ^ "Egoyan's Chloe a reinvention of sexy French drama". Cbc.ca. September 15, 2009. Archived from the original on June 4, 2011. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  14. ^ Johnson, Brian (March 20, 2009). "Odd Couple". Maclean's. Retrieved March 28, 2018.
  15. ^ Weinreich, Regina (May 25, 2011). "Erin Cressida Wilson's Sex Education: Chloe". Huffington Post. Retrieved March 29, 2018.
  16. ^ "Chloé : Notes de production". Commeaucinema.com. Retrieved March 30, 2018.
  17. ^ "The art and design of "Chloe" – interview with Phillip Barker". Pushing-pixels.org. April 22, 2011. Retrieved March 31, 2018.
  18. ^ a b Horowitz, Lisa (October 9, 2009). "Sony Picks Up Egoyan's 'Chloe'". TheWrap.com. Archived from the original on September 22, 2018. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  19. ^ Canada (October 9, 2009). "Egoyan closes U.S. deal for Chloe". The Globe and Mail. Toronto. Archived from the original on April 24, 2010. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  20. ^ a b McCarthy, Todd (September 17, 2009). "Chloe". Variety.
  21. ^ Heron, Ambrose (September 9, 2009). "Lineup for London Film Festival 2009". FILMdetail.
  22. ^ Evans, Chris (August 21, 2009). "Egoyan's Chloe to open San Sebastian". Screen Daily.
  23. ^ "Sony seduced by 'Chloe' – Entertainment News, Film News, Media". Variety. October 8, 2009. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  24. ^ "CHLOE | a film by Atom Egoyan". Sonyclassics.com. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  25. ^ "Chloe". Archived from the original on June 13, 2010. Retrieved February 18, 2020.
  26. ^ Glucksman, Mary (Winter 2009). "Crash (or Requiem for a Dream)". Filmmaker.
  27. ^ Stewart, Andrew (April 24, 2010). "Specialty pics face reduced expectations". Variety. Archived from the original on April 30, 2010.
  28. ^ Kaufman, Anthony (Winter 2012). "Hits & Misses". Filmmaker.
  29. ^ "Atom Egoyan sifts through sex thriller scripts in wake of 'Chloe' – CTV News, Shows and Sports – Canadian Television". CP24. July 13, 2010. Archived from the original on March 5, 2012. Retrieved October 23, 2010.
  30. ^ Barshad, Amos (March 11, 2011). "Star Market: Can Amanda Seyfried Live Out a Hollywood Fairy Tale? – Vulture". Nymag.com. Retrieved February 3, 2012.
  31. ^ "Tops at Redbox: 'The Bounty Hunter' leads all Redbox kiosk rentals | Archive | pressofatlanticcity.com". September 1, 2020. Archived from the original on September 1, 2020. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
  32. ^ "Tops at Redbox: 'The Bounty Hunter' again dominates rentals from the kiosks | Archive | pressofatlanticcity.com". September 1, 2020. Archived from the original on September 1, 2020. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
  33. ^ "Tops at Redbox: 'Hot Tub Time Machine' leads all rentals at Redbox kiosks | Archive | pressofatlanticcity.com". September 1, 2020. Archived from the original on September 1, 2020. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
  34. ^ McBride, Sarah (December 11, 2008). "Universal Challenges Video Kiosks". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
  35. ^ "Chloe". Rotten Tomatoes. March 26, 2010. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  36. ^ Ebert, Roger (2010). "Chloe movie review & film summary (2010)". Chicago Sun-Times.
  37. ^ Lane, Anthony (2010). "Mystery Women". The New Yorker.
  38. ^ "CSC Awards - Annual". Canadian Society of Cinematographers. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  39. ^ "2010 DGC AWARDS". Directors Guild of Canada. Archived from the original on September 18, 2010.
  40. ^ "2010 DGC Awards Winners". CNW Group. September 25, 2010. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
[edit]