Jump to content

Talk:Supply and demand: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m top: Task 24: banner removal following a TFD
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Supply and demand/Archive 3) (bot
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Top}}
{{Vital article|level=3|topic=Society|class=B}}
{{WikiProject Business|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Capitalism|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Capitalism|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Economics|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Economics|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Trade|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Trade|class=B|importance=Top}}
}}
}}
{{Old merge full
{{Old merge full
Line 43: Line 42:
| minthreadstoarchive=1
| minthreadstoarchive=1
}}
}}

== Consider Adding section: "Human Subject experiments with Supply and Demand" ==

In the 1960s, [[Vernon L. Smith]] developed market experiments based on inducing known Supply and Demand curves into a group of human subjects through conditional cash payments, and then observing the patterns of bids, asks, and trades in a market setting (1962, American Economic Review). For this and other work based strongly on supply/demand experiments and competitive market models that rely upon rational profit-seeking behavior, he shared the 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. His work, along with numerous others, helped to found the specialty of Experimental Economics.

== Merge proposal ==
{{Discussion top|result=
{{Stale-small}} No discussion in over 10 months. Any user, including the user who first proposed the merger, may move forward with this merge due to no opposition. <small>([[Wikipedia:Non-admin closure|non-admin closure]])</small>{{spaces|1|type}}{{highlight round|[[User:FormalDude|<span style="color: #0151D2;font-size:90%">𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲</span>]]|bc=#FFFFFF}}{{highlight round|[[User talk:FormalDude|<b style=";color:#FFFFFF;font-size:81%"><u>𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸</u></b>]]|bc=#0151D2}} 20:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)}}
Arising from an earlier discussion, it has suggested that [[Demand curve]] is best merged here, on the grounds that {{tq|discussing supply and demand curves separately rather misses the point of them}} (see [[Talk:Demand curve]]). I agree. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 17:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
{{Discussion bottom}}

== Rename to "Supply and demand curves" ==

I'd like to point out ''supply and demand'' is not limited to the neoclassical school, only price determination using Marshall's curves is. Indeed, as the history section points out, classical economists like Smith and Ricardo made frequent reference to supply and demand. As did Marx. [[User:KetchupSalt|KetchupSalt]] ([[User talk:KetchupSalt|talk]]) 11:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


== Element of economic ==
== Element of economic ==
Line 75: Line 60:
2
2
{\displaystyle Q(P)=3P^{-2}} seems imho to be a poor choice since it has Q decreasing as P increases. [[User:JdelaF|JdelaF]] ([[User talk:JdelaF|talk]])
{\displaystyle Q(P)=3P^{-2}} seems imho to be a poor choice since it has Q decreasing as P increases. [[User:JdelaF|JdelaF]] ([[User talk:JdelaF|talk]]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 17:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)</small>
:This is entirely in line with the theory. What is more suspect is the supply curve, that price should increase with increasing supply despite economies of scale. This is brought up in the criticism section. [[User:KetchupSalt|KetchupSalt]] ([[User talk:KetchupSalt|talk]]) 12:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
:This is entirely in line with the theory. What is more suspect is the supply curve, that price should increase with increasing supply despite economies of scale. This is brought up in the criticism section. [[User:KetchupSalt|KetchupSalt]] ([[User talk:KetchupSalt|talk]]) 12:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

== Would You Please Restore the Content on "A positive feedback supply and demand model" ==

I reverted [[User:Avatar317|<bdi>Avatar317</bdi>]] 's removed content on "A positive feedback supply and demand model" because I have found several good references on that model. Before I could add those references [[User:MrOllie|<bdi>MrOllie</bdi>]] undid my revision. [[User:MrOllie|<bdi>MrOllie</bdi>]] suggested me to post here, so that other editors can see and take necessary action accordingly.

I am listing the references for your consideration to restore the content.

<big>Some examples of positive feedback is that popular products tend to become even more popular:</big>

* <small>Altszyler, E; Berbeglia, F.; Berbeglia, G.; Van Hentenryck, P. (2017). [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5528888 "Transient dynamics in trial-offer markets with social influence: Trade-offs between appeal and quality"]. ''PLOS ONE''. 12 (7): [[Doi (identifier)|doi]]:[[doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180040|10.1371/journal.pone.0180040]]</small>

* <small>Same as the concept of reflexivity theory in asset bubbles in which prices influcend expections that in turn influence prices as argued by financier George Soros. [[George Soros|George Soros - Wikipedia]] [[Reflexivity (social theory)|Reflexivity (social theory) - Wikipedia]] Azzopardi, Paul V. (2010), [https://books.google.com/books?id=04Ay8qviuwgC&pg=PA116 ''Behavioural Technical Analysis''], Harriman House Limited, p. 116, [[ISBN (identifier)|ISBN]] [[Special:BookSources/9780857190680|9780857190680]],</small>

* <small>Another example is programs such as Facebook and X that depend on positive feedback to create interest in topics and drive the take-up of the media. In the age of smartphones and social media, the feedback loop has created a craze for virtual validation in the form of likes. Burghardt, Keith; Lerman, Kristina (18 Jan 2022). Emergent Instabilities in Algorithmic Feedback Loops (Report). Cornell University. [[ArXiv (identifier)|arXiv]]:[[arxiv:2201.07203|2201.07203]] Benewaa, Dorcas (May 7, 2021). [https://www.digitaltimes.africa/social-media-and-the-dopamine-feedback-loop-heres-how-it-affects-you/ "Social Media And The Dopamine Feedback Loop: Here's How It Affects You"]. Digital Times. Reardon, Jayne (Dec 14, 2017). [https://www.2civility.org/avoid-feedback-loop-social-media/ "Can We Avoid the Feedback Loop of Social Media?"]. 2Civility.</small>

* <small>W. Brian Arthur has also writtn about positive feedback in the economy. Arthur, W. Brian (1990). "Positive Feedbacks in the Economy". ''Scientific American''. 262 (2): 80. [[Bibcode (identifier)|Bibcode]]:[https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990SciAm.262b..92A 1990SciAm.262b..92A]. [[Doi (identifier)|doi]]:[[doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0290-92|10.1038/scientificamerican0290-92]]</small>

* <small>Lutz, Arnold and Stephan Bruner, „The economics of rational speculation in the prsence of positive feedback trading,” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 57(2015) 161-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2014.11.005</small>
* <small>Cheng, Po-Keng ; Kim, Young Shin, [https://hollis.harvard.edu/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_23322039_2017_1381370&context=PC&vid=HVD2&lang=en_US&search_scope=everything&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=everything&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cpositive%20feedback%20economics&offset=0 Speculative bubbles and crashes: Fundamentalists and positive-feedback trading],” Cogent economics & finance, 2017-01, Vol.5 (1), p.1-28, Article 1381370</small>
* <small>Lu, Zhou ; Bao, Te ; Yu, Xiaohua, [https://hollis.harvard.edu/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s10614_020_10020_6&context=PC&vid=HVD2&lang=en_US&search_scope=everything&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=everything&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cpositive%20feedback%20economics&offset=0 Gender and Bubbles in Experimental Markets with Positive and Negative Expectation Feedback] Computational economics, 2021-04, Vol.57 (4), p.1307-1326.</small>
* <small>Liu, Xufeng ; Wan, Die, [https://hollis.harvard.edu/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000807233300012CitationCount&context=PC&vid=HVD2&lang=en_US&search_scope=everything&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=everything&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cpositive%20feedback%20economics&offset=0 Asymmetric positive feedback trading and stock pricing in China] The North American journal of economics and finance, 2022-04, Vol.60, p.101658, Article 101658</small>
* <small>Bao, Te ; Hommes, Cars [https://hollis.harvard.edu/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jedc_2019_103730&context=PC&vid=HVD2&lang=en_US&search_scope=everything&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=everything&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cpositive%20feedback%20economics&offset=0 When speculators meet suppliers: Positive versus negative feedback in experimental housing markets] Journal of economic dynamics & control, 2019-10, Vol.107, p.103730, Article 103730</small>
* <small>Journal of Economic Dynamics & control, 2019-10, Vol.107, p.103730, Article 103730</small>

[[User:Bradelykooper|Bradelykooper]] ([[User talk:Bradelykooper|talk]]) 20:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

:The problem here is that you are trying to write this content [[WP:BACKWARDS]]. Wikipedia articles should be written by reading and summarizing sources, and that's clearly NOT what you are trying to do here. For example, the source: "Gender and Bubbles in Experimental Markets with Positive and Negative Expectation Feedback" is about (from their abstract) "We investigate the effect of gender on the price deviation..." which is NOT a source that discusses a positive supply and demand model. ---'''[[User:Avatar317|<span style="background:#8A2BE2; color:white; padding:2px;">Avatar317</span>]][[User talk:Avatar317|<sup><span style="background:#7B68EE; color:white; padding:2px;">(talk)</span></sup>]]''' 20:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
:Please also see (for your own edification) [[Correlation is not causation]] in stating "popular products tend to become even more popular" - this does NOT mean that this effect is occurring BECAUSE OF greater economic supply. Here you could also read [[WP:OR]]. ---'''[[User:Avatar317|<span style="background:#8A2BE2; color:white; padding:2px;">Avatar317</span>]][[User talk:Avatar317|<sup><span style="background:#7B68EE; color:white; padding:2px;">(talk)</span></sup>]]''' 20:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

== Tax is another determinate of supply ==

The article says nothing about taxation of suppliers affecting supply. [[Special:Contributions/80.42.150.131|80.42.150.131]] ([[User talk:80.42.150.131|talk]]) 10:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

== Economics for lowersixth Art ==

Decrease in demand when supply condition are constant [[Special:Contributions/129.0.102.6|129.0.102.6]] ([[User talk:129.0.102.6|talk]]) 18:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:49, 15 November 2024

Former featured articleSupply and demand is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 15, 2004.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 4, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
November 24, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
November 30, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Element of economic

[edit]

What demand and supply 41.204.146.210 (talk) 19:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poor example

[edit]

smooth curve

Q ( P ) = 3 P − 2 {\displaystyle Q(P)=3P^{-2}} seems imho to be a poor choice since it has Q decreasing as P increases. JdelaF (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is entirely in line with the theory. What is more suspect is the supply curve, that price should increase with increasing supply despite economies of scale. This is brought up in the criticism section. KetchupSalt (talk) 12:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would You Please Restore the Content on "A positive feedback supply and demand model"

[edit]

I reverted Avatar317 's removed content on "A positive feedback supply and demand model" because I have found several good references on that model. Before I could add those references MrOllie undid my revision. MrOllie suggested me to post here, so that other editors can see and take necessary action accordingly.

I am listing the references for your consideration to restore the content.

Some examples of positive feedback is that popular products tend to become even more popular:

Bradelykooper (talk) 20:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem here is that you are trying to write this content WP:BACKWARDS. Wikipedia articles should be written by reading and summarizing sources, and that's clearly NOT what you are trying to do here. For example, the source: "Gender and Bubbles in Experimental Markets with Positive and Negative Expectation Feedback" is about (from their abstract) "We investigate the effect of gender on the price deviation..." which is NOT a source that discusses a positive supply and demand model. ---Avatar317(talk) 20:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please also see (for your own edification) Correlation is not causation in stating "popular products tend to become even more popular" - this does NOT mean that this effect is occurring BECAUSE OF greater economic supply. Here you could also read WP:OR. ---Avatar317(talk) 20:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tax is another determinate of supply

[edit]

The article says nothing about taxation of suppliers affecting supply. 80.42.150.131 (talk) 10:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Economics for lowersixth Art

[edit]

Decrease in demand when supply condition are constant 129.0.102.6 (talk) 18:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]