History of writing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 02:50, 22 December 2024

The history of writing traces the development of writing systems^[1] and how their use transformed and was transformed by different societies. The use of writing prefigures various social and psychological consequences associated with literacy and literary culture.

Each historical invention of writing emerged from systems of proto-writing that used ideographic and mnemonic symbols but were not capable of fully recording spoken language. True writing, where the content of linguistic utterances can be accurately reconstructed by later readers, is a later development. As proto-writing is not capable of fully reflecting the grammar and lexicon used in languages, it is often difficult or impossible to deduce what the author intended to communicate.

Early uses of writing included documenting agricultural transactions and contracts, but it was soon used in the areas of finance, religion, government, and law. Writing allowed the spread of these social modalities and their associated knowledge, and ultimately the further centralization of political power.^[2]

Terminology

Writing systems typically satisfy three criteria. Firstly, the writing must have some purpose or meaning to it, and a point must be communicated by the text. Secondly, writing systems make use of specific symbols which may be recorded on some writing medium. Thirdly, the symbols used in writing generally correspond to elements of spoken language.^[3] In general, systems of symbolic communication like signage, painting, maps, and mathematics are distinguished from writing systems, which require knowledge of an associated spoken language to read a text.

The norms of writing generally evolve more slowly than those of speech; as a result, linguistic features are frequently preserved in the written form of a language after they cease to appear in the corresponding spoken language.^[4]

Emergence

Before the 20th century, most scholarly theories of the origins of writing involved some form of monogenesis,^[5] the assumption that writing had been invented only once as cuneiform in ancient Sumer, and spread across the world from there via cultural diffusion.^[6] According to these theories, writing was such a particular technology that exposure through activities like trade was a much more likely means of acquisition than independent reinvention. Specifically, many theories were dependent on a literal account of the Book of Genesis, including the emphases it placed on Mesopotamia.^[7] Over time, greater awareness of the systems of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica conclusively established that writing had been independently invented multiple times. Four independent inventions of writing are most commonly recognized^[8]—in Mesopotamia (c. 3400–3100 BC), Egypt (c. 3250 BC),^[9]^[10]^[6] China (before c. 1250 BC),^[11] and Mesoamerica (before c. 1 AD).^[12]

Sumerian cuneiform and Egyptian hieroglyphs both gradually evolved from proto-writing between 3400 and 3100 BC. The Proto-Elamite script is also believed to have been in use during this period.^[13] Regarding Egyptian hieroglyphs,^[9]^[14]^[15] scholars point to very early differences with Sumerian cuneiform "in structure and style" as to why the two systems "(must) have developed independently," and if any "stimulus diffusion" of writing did occur, it only served to transmit the bare idea of writing between cultures.^[9]^[16] Due to the lack of direct evidence for the transfer of writing, "no definitive determination has been made as to the origin of hieroglyphics in ancient Egypt."^[17]

During the 1990s, symbols originally inscribed between 3400 and 3200 BC were discovered at Abydos, which shed some doubt on the previous notion that the Mesopotamian sign system predated the Egyptian one.^[18] However, scholars have noted that the attestation at Abydos is singular and sudden, while the gradual evolution of the Mesopotamian system is lengthy and well-documented, with its predecessor token system used in agriculture and accounting attested as early as 8000 BC.^[19]

As there is no evidence of contact between the Chinese Shang dynasty (c. 1600 – c. 1050 BC) and the literate civilizations of the Near East,^[20] and the methods of logographic and phonetic representation in Chinese characters are distinct from those used in cuneiform and hieroglyphs, written Chinese is considered to be an independent development.^[8]

Proto-writing

Accounting tokens

Clay bulla and tokens – Susa (4000–3100 BC)

Numerical tablet – Khafajah, Uruk V (3500–3350 BC)

Pre-cuneiform tags depicting a goat or sheep alongside a numeral, likely "10" – Al-Hasakah (3300–3100 BC)^[21]^[22]

In each case where writing was invented independently, it emerged from systems of proto-writing, which used ideographic and mnemonic symbols to communicate information, but did not record human language directly. Historically, most proto-writing systems did not produce writing systems; the earliest writing dates to the Early Bronze Age (3300–2100 BC), but proto-writing is attested as early as the 7th millennium BC. Examples of proto-writing during the Neolithic and Bronze Age include:

The Jiahu symbols carved into tortoise shells, found in 24 Neolithic graves excavated at Jiahu in northern China and dated to the 7th millennium BC.^[23] The majority of the signs uncovered were inscribed individually or in small groups on different shells.^[24]^[25] Most archaeologists consider the Jiahu symbols as not directly linked to the emergence of true writing.^[26]
The Vinča symbols found on artefacts of the Vinča culture of central and southeastern Europe, dated to the 6th–5th millennia BC.^[27]
The Indus script attested in short inscriptions between 2600 and 2000 BC.^[28]

Later examples include quipu, a system of knotted cords used as mnemonic devices within the Inca Empire (15th century AD).^[29]

Recording history

The origins of writing are more generally attributed to the start of the Late Neolithic, when clay tokens were used to record specific amounts of livestock or commodities. These tokens were initially impressed on the surface of round clay envelopes and then stored in them. The tokens were then progressively replaced by flat tablets, on which signs were recorded with a stylus. Actual writing is first recorded in Uruk (modern Iraq), at the end of the 4th millennium BC, and soon after in various parts of the Near East.^[30]

An ancient Sumerian poem gives the first known story of the invention of writing:

Because the messenger's mouth was heavy and he couldn't repeat (the message), the Lord of Kulaba patted some clay and put words on it, like a tablet. Until then, there had been no putting words on clay.
— Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta (c. 1800 BC)^[31]^[32]

The emergence of writing in a given area is usually followed by several centuries of fragmentary inscriptions. Historians mark the "historicity" of a culture by the presence of coherent texts written by the culture.^[33] Scholars have disagreed concerning when prehistory becomes history and when proto-writing became true writing.^[34]

Bronze Age

Cuneiform

Sumerian writing evolved from a system of clay tokens used to represent commodities. By the end of the 4th millennium BC, this had evolved into a method of keeping accounts, which recorded numbers using a round stylus pressed into the clay at different angles. This system was gradually augmented with pictographic marks indicating what was being counted, which were made using a sharp stylus. By the 29th century BC, writing used a wedge-shaped stylus and included phonetic elements representing syllables of the Sumerian language, and gradually replaced round-stylus and sharp-stylus markings during the 27th and 26th centuries BC.^[35] Finally, cuneiform became a general-purpose writing system with logograms, syllables, and numerals. From the 26th century BC, the system was adapted to write the Akkadian language, and from there to others, such as Hurrian and Hittite. Scripts similar in appearance to this writing system include those for Ugaritic and Old Persian.

Egyptian hieroglyphs

Geoffrey Sampson states that Egyptian hieroglyphs "came into existence a little after Sumerian script, and, probably [were], invented under the influence of the latter",^[38] and that it is "probable that the general idea of expressing words of a language in writing was brought to Egypt from Sumerian Mesopotamia".^[39]^[40]^[17] However, more recent scholars have held that the evidence for direct influence is sparse. During the 1990s, the discovery of glyphs at Abydos dated between 3400 and 3200 BC has challenged the hypothesis that writing diffused from Mesopotamia to Egypt, pointing instead to the independent development of writing within Egypt. The Abydos glyphs, found in tomb U-J, are written on ivory and are likely labels for other goods found in the grave.^[41] While sign usage in Mesopotamian tokens is attested c. 8000 BC, Egyptian writing appears suddenly in the late 4th millennium BC.^[18]^[32]^[42]

Frank J. Yurco states that depictions of pharaonic iconography such as the royal crowns, Horus falcons and victory scenes were concentrated in the Upper Egyptian Naqada and A-Group cultures. He further elaborates that "Egyptian writing arose in Naqadan Upper Egypt and A-Group Nubia, and not in the Delta cultures, where the direct Western Asian contact was made, [which] further vitiates the Mesopotamian-influence argument".^[43]

Egyptian scholar Gamal Mokhtar argues that the inventory of hieroglyphic symbols derived from "fauna and flora used in the signs [which] are essentially African" and in "regards to writing, we have seen that a purely Nilotic, hence African origin not only is not excluded, but probably reflects the reality", although he acknowledges the geographical location of Egypt made it a receptacle for many influences.^[44]

Writing was of political importance to the Egyptian empire, and literacy was concentrated among an educated elite of scribes.^[45] Only people from certain backgrounds were allowed to train as scribes, in the service of temple, royal, and military authorities.

Early Semitic alphabets

The first alphabetic writing was developed by workers in the Sinai Peninsula to write Semitic languages c. 2000 BC. This script worked by giving Egyptian hieratic letters Semitic sound values. The Geʽez script native to Ethiopia and Eritrea descends from the Ancient South Arabian script, which had initially been used to write early Geʽez texts.^[46]

Most alphabetic writing systems presently in use either descended from Proto-Sinaitic—usually via the Phoenician alphabet—or were directly inspired by its descendants. In Italy, about 500 years separated the early Old Italic scripts from the time of Plautus (c. 750 – c. 250 BC), and in the case of the Germanic peoples, the corresponding time span is again similar, from the first Elder Futhark inscriptions to early texts like the Abrogans (c. 200–750 AD). These early abjads remained of marginal importance for several centuries, and it is only towards the end of the Bronze Age that forms of Proto-Sinaitic script split into the Proto-Canaanite alphabet (c. 1400 BC), the undeciphered Byblos syllabary, and the South Arabian alphabet (c. 1200 BC). Proto-Canaanite, which was probably influenced by the Byblos syllabary, in turn inspired the Ugaritic alphabet (c. 1300 BC).

Anatolian hieroglyphs

Anatolian hieroglyphs are an indigenous script native to western Anatolia, used to record the Hieroglyphic Luwian language. It first appeared on Luwian royal seals from the 13th century BC.^[47]

Chinese characters

The earliest attested Chinese writing comprise the body of inscriptions on oracle bones and bronze vessels dating to the Late Shang period (c. 1200 – c. 1050 BC), with the earliest of these dated c. 1250 BC.^[48]^[49]

Aegean systems

Several syllabic and logographic writing systems were used in the Bronze Age Aegean civilizations (the Mycenaean civilization on the Greek mainland and the Minoan civilization on Crete), which ultimately fell out of use and were forgotten centuries prior to the introduction of the alphabet to the region by the Phoenicians:^[50]^[51]

Cretan hieroglyphs (c. 2100−1700 BC), on Crete
Linear A (c. 1800−1450 BC), yet to be deciphered—on Crete, Aegean Islands, and Laconia
Linear B (c. 1450−1200 BC), in Knossos on Crete, Pylos, Mycenae, Thebes, and Tiryns on the Greek mainland

Mesoamerican systems

Of several symbol systems used in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, the Maya script appears to be the best developed, and has been fully deciphered. The earliest inscriptions identifiable as Maya date to the 3rd century BC, and writing was in continuous use from the 1st century AD until shortly after the arrival of the Spanish conquistadors in the 16th century. Maya writing used logograms complemented by a set of syllabic glyphs.^[52]

Iron Age

The Phoenician alphabet is the continuation of the Proto-Canaanite alphabet into the Iron Age; it in turn gave rise to the Aramaic and Greek alphabets. To date, most of the writing systems used throughout Afro-Eurasia descend from either Aramaic or Greek. The Greek alphabet was the first to introduce letters representing vowel sounds.^[53] It and its descendant in the Latin alphabet gave rise to several European scripts in the first several centuries AD, including the runic, Gothic, and Cyrillic alphabets. The Aramaic alphabet evolved into the Brahmic scripts of India, as well as the Hebrew, Arabic and Syriac abjads—with descendants spread as far as the Mongolian script. The South Arabian alphabet gave rise to the Geʽez abugida.^[54]

Greek alphabets

The history of the Greek alphabet began as early as the 8th century BC, when the Greeks adapted the Phoenician alphabet for their own use.^[55] The letters of the Greek alphabet generally visually correspond to those of the Phoenician alphabet, and both came to be arranged using the same alphabetical order.^[55] Those adapting the Phoenician system added three letters to the end of the series, called the "supplementals". Several varieties of the Greek alphabet developed. One, known as the Cumae alphabet, was used west of Athens and in southern Italy. The other variation, known as Eastern Greek, was used in present-day Turkey and by the Athenians, and eventually the rest of the world that spoke Greek adopted this variation. After first writing right to left, like the Phoenicians, the Greeks eventually chose to write from left to right. Occasionally however, the writer would start the next line where the previous line finished, so that the lines would read alternately left to right, then right to left, and so on. This is known as boustrophedon writing, which imitated the path of an ox-drawn plough, and was used until the 6th century.^[56]

Italic and Latin alphabets

The Greek alphabet is the progenitor of each script currently used to write the languages of Europe.^[57] The most widespread descendant of Greek is the Latin script, named for the Latins, a central Italian people who came to dominate Europe with the rise of Rome. Around the 5th century BC, the Romans adopted writing from the Etruscan civilization, who wrote in a number of Italic scripts derived from the western Greeks. Due to the cultural dominance of the Roman state, the other Old Italic scripts have not survived in any great quantity, and the Etruscan language is mostly lost.^[58]

Medieval era and modernity

After the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century, the production and transmission of literature that had previously been widespread across the Roman world became largely confined to the Byzantine and Sasanian empires, where the primary literary languages were Greek and Persian respectively—though other languages such as Syriac and Coptic were also important.^[59]

The spread of Islam in the 7th century brought about the rapid establishment of Arabic as a major literary language in much of the Mediterranean and Central Asia. Arabic and Persian quickly began to overshadow Greek's role as a language of scholarship. Arabic script was adopted to write the Persian and Old Turkic languages. This script also heavily influenced the development of the cursive scripts of Greek, the Slavic languages, Latin, and other languages.^[60] The influence of Arabic writing during the Crusades also resulted in the Hindu–Arabic numeral system being adopted throughout Europe.^[61] By the 11th century, the city of Córdoba, Andalusia in what is now southern Spain had become one of the world's foremost intellectual centres, and was the site of the largest library in Europe.^[62]

By the 14th century, the Renaissance in Europe led to a revival of the importance of Greek, as well as of Latin as a significant literary language.^[60] A similar though smaller emergence occurred in Eastern Europe, especially in Russia. At the same time Arabic and Persian began a slow decline in importance as the Islamic Golden Age ended. The revival of literacy development in Western Europe led to many innovations in the Latin alphabet and the diversification of the alphabet to codify the spoken forms of the various languages.

Technology and materials

The mediums, materials, and technologies used by literate societies for writing help determine how writing systems work, what writing is used for, and what social impact it has.^[63] For example, the physical durability of the materials used directly determines what historical examples of writing have survived for later analysis: while bodies of inscriptions in stone, bone, or metal are attested from each ancient literate society, much manuscript culture is attested only indirectly.^[64]^[65]

The common materials in the Mesopotamian world were the tablet and the roll, the former probably having a Chaldean origin, the latter an Egyptian. The tablets of the Chaldeans are small pieces of clay, somewhat crudely shaped into a form resembling a pillow, and thickly inscribed with cuneiform characters. Similar use has been seen in hollow cylinders, or prisms of six or eight sides, formed of fine terracotta, sometimes glazed, on which the characters were traced with a small stylus, in some specimens so minutely as to require the aid of a magnifying glass.^[66]

In Egypt the principal writing material was of quite a different sort. Wooden tablets are found pictured on the monuments, while papyrus was also used as early as the 4th millennium BC.^[67] The papyrus reed grew chiefly in Lower Egypt and had various economic means for writing. The pith was taken out and divided by a pointed instrument into the thin pieces of which it is composed; it was then flattened by pressure, and the strips glued together, other strips being placed at right angles to them, so that a roll of any length might be manufactured. Writing seems to have become more widespread with the invention of papyrus in Egypt. That this material was in use in Egypt from a very early period is evidenced by still existing papyrus of the earliest Theban dynasties.^[68]

As the papyrus, being in great demand, and exported to all parts of the world, became very costly, other materials were often used instead of it, among which is mentioned leather, a few leather mills of an early period having been found in the tombs.^[66] Parchment, using sheepskins left after the wool was removed for cloth, was sometimes cheaper than papyrus, which had to be imported outside Egypt. With the invention of wood-pulp paper, the cost of writing material began a steady decline. Efforts to improve the bond strength of wood-pulp paper fibres through the 20th century, with two areas of examination being "dry strength of paper" and "wet web strength".^[69] The former involves examination of the physical properties of the paper itself, while the latter involves using additives to improve strength.

Uses and applications

Commerce

According to Denise Schmandt-Besserat, writing had its origins in the counting, cataloguing, and trade of agricultural produce.^[70] Government tax rolls followed thereafter. Written documents became essential for the accumulation and accounting of wealth by individuals, the state, and religious organizations as well as the transactions of trade, loans, inheritance, and documentation of ownership.^[71] With such documentation and accounting larger accumulations of wealth became more possible, along with the power that accompanied wealth, most prominently to the benefit of royalty, the state, and religions. Contracts and loans supported the growth of long-distance international trade with accompanying networks for import and export, supporting the rise of capitalism.^[72] Paper money was first used in China during the 11th century;^[73] it and other financial instruments relied on writing, initially in the form of letters and later as specialized genres designed to facilitate specific types of transactions and guarantees of value between individuals, banks, or governments.^[74] With the growth of economic activity in late Medieval and Renaissance Europe, sophisticated methods of accounting and calculating value emerged, with such calculations both carried out in writing and explained in manuals.^[75] The creation of corporations then proliferated documents surrounding organization, management, the distribution of shares, and records management.^[76]

During the late 18th century, François Quesnay and Adam Smith developed systematic theories of economics for the first time. The works of Quesnay, Smith, and their colleagues introduced the concept of an economy as such—as well as the concept of a national economy.^[77] Economics has since developed as a field with many authors contributing texts to the professional literature, and governments collecting data, instituting policies and creating institutions to manage and advance their economies. Deirdre McCloskey has examined the rhetorical strategies and discursive construction of modern economic theory.^[78]^[79]^[80] Graham Smart has examined in depth how the Bank of Canada uses writing to cooperatively produce policies based on economic data and then to communicate strategically with relevant publics.^[81]

Law, governance, and journalism

Private legal documents for the sale of land appeared in Mesopotamia in the early 3rd millennium BC, not long after the appearance of cuneiform writing.^[82] The first codes of law were written in Mesopotamia c. 2100 BC, exemplified in the Code of Hammurabi (c. 1750 BC) that was inscribed on stone stelae throughout the Old Babylonian Empire.^[83] While the ancient Egyptian state did not codify its laws, legal documents such as official decrees and private contracts were used during the Old Kingdom c. 2150 BC. The Torah, comprising the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, codified the laws of Ancient Israel. Laws were frequently codified in ancient Greek and Roman polities, with Roman law ultimately serving as a model for both church canon law and secular law used throughout much of Europe during the Middle Ages.^[84]^[85]

In China, the earliest evidence for the codification of laws or punishments are bronze inscriptions made in 536 BC.^[86] The earliest law codes to be preserved in their entirety were those of the Qin and Western Han dynasties (221–9 BC), which articulated a full system of social control and governance, with criminal procedures and accountability for both government officials and citizens. These laws required complex reporting and documenting procedures to facilitate hierarchical supervision from the village up to the imperial centre.^[87]

While common law developed in a mostly oral environment in England after the Roman period, with the return of the church and the Norman conquest, customary law began to be inscribed as were precedents of the courts; however, many elements remained oral, with documents only memorializing public oaths, wills, land transfers, court judgements, and ceremonies. During the late medieval period, however, documents gained authority for agreements, transactions, and laws.^[88]

Writing has been central to expanding many of the core functions of governance through law, regulation, taxation, and documentary surveillance of citizens; all dependent on growth of bureaucracy which elaborates and administers rules and policies and maintains records. These developments which rely on writing increase the power and extent of states.^[89] At the same time writing has increased the ability of citizens to become informed about the operations of the state, to become more organized in expressing needs and concerns, to identify with regions and states, and to form constituencies with particular views and interests; the history of journalism is closely linked to citizen information, regional and national identity, and expression of interests. These changes have greatly influenced the nature of states, increasing the visibility of people and their views no matter what the form of governance is.

Extensive bureaucracies arose in the ancient Near East^[90] and China^[91]^[92] which relied on a literate class of scribes and bureaucrats. In the Ancient Near East this was carried out through the formation of scribal schools;^[93] in China, this led to the institution of written imperial examinations based on classic texts that effectively defined traditional Chinese education for millennia.^[94] Literacy was associated with the government bureaucracy; following its emergence, printing was tightly controlled by the government, with texts written in vernacular Chinese being comparatively rare until the written vernacular Chinese movement that followed the end of the Qing dynasty (1644–1912).^[95] In ancient Greece and Rome, class distinctions between citizen and slave, wealthy and poor limited education and participation. During the Middle Ages and early modern period, the church dominated education in Europe, reflecting the central role religious life had in the maintenance of state power and bureaucracy.^[96]

In Europe and its American colonies, the introduction of the printing press and decreasing cost of paper and printing allowed for greater access of ordinary citizens to gain information about the government and conditions in other regions within the jurisdictions.^[97] The Reformation's emphasis on the individual reading of sacred texts eventually increased the spread of literacy beyond the ruling classes, and opened the door to a wider awareness and criticism of government policy. Growing divisions along confessional and political lines in English society during 16th and 17th centuries culminated in the English Civil War that resulted in the sovereignty of Parliament being prioritized over the prerogatives of the British monarchy.^[98] The conflict featured pamphlet wars where opposing political factions attempted to utilize the medium of print to shape opinion among the general public for the first time.

Newspaper publishing and journalism, having origins in commercial information, soon was to offer political information and was instrumental to the formation of a public sphere.^[99]^[100] Newspapers were instrumental in the spread of information, fostering discussion and the formation of political identities in the American Revolution. During the late 19th century, the circulation of regional newspapers encouraged adoption and articulation of urban or localized identities by readers. A focus on national news that followed telegraphy and the emergence of newspapers with national circulation along with scripted national radio and television news broadcasts also created horizons of attention through the 20th century, with both benefits and costs.^[101]

Literary culture

Much of what is considered knowledge is inscribed in written text and is the result of communal processes of production, sharing, and evaluation among social groups and institutions bound together with the aim of producing and disseminating knowledge-bearing texts; the contemporary world identifies such social groups as disciplines and their products as disciplinary literatures. The invention of writing facilitated the sharing, comparing, criticizing, and evaluating of texts, resulting in knowledge becoming a more communal property across wider geographic and temporal domains. Religious texts formed the common knowledge of scriptural religions, and knowledge of those sacred scriptures became the focus of institutions of religious belief, interpretation, and schooling.^[102]

Scholars have disagreed concerning when written record-keeping became more like literature, but the oldest surviving literary texts date from a full millennium after the invention of writing. The earliest literary author known by name is Enheduanna, who is credited as the author of a number of works of Sumerian literature, including Exaltation of Inanna, in the Sumerian language during the 24th century BC.^[103]^[104] The next earliest named author is Ptahhotep, who is credited with authoring The Maxims of Ptahhotep, an instructional book for young men in Old Egyptian composed in the 23rd century BC.^[105] The Epic of Gilgamesh is a notable early poem, but it can also be seen as a political glorification of the historical King Gilgamesh of Sumer whose natural and supernatural accomplishments are recounted.

The identification of sacred religious texts codified distinct belief systems, and became the basis of the modern concept of religion.^[106] The reproduction and spread of these texts became associated with these scriptural religions and their spread, and thus were central to proselytizing.^[107] Their status created expectations that believers either read or otherwise respect their contents; priests charged with reading, interpretation and application of texts were especially vital in societies prior to the advent of mass literacy.

Mesopotamia, Egypt, India, and Mesoamerica

In Mesopotamia and Egypt, scribes became important for roles beyond the initiating roles in the economy, governance and law. They became the producers and stewards of astronomy and calendars, divination, and literary culture. Schools developed in tablet houses, which also archived repositories of knowledge.^[108] In ancient India, the Brahman caste became stewards of texts that aggregated and codified oral knowledge.^[109] Those texts then became the authoritative basis for a continuing tradition of oral education. A case in point is the work of Pāṇini, a linguist who analysed and codified knowledge of Sanskrit syntax, prosody, and grammar. Mathematics, astronomy, and medicine were also subjects of classic Indian learning and were codified in classic texts.^[110] Less is known about Mayan, Aztec, and other Mesoamerican learning because of the destruction of texts by the conquistadors, but it is known that scribes were revered, elite children attended schools, and the study of astronomy, map making, historical chronicles, and genealogy flourished.^[111]^[112]

China

In China, after the Qin dynasty attempted to remove all traces of the competing Confucian tradition, the Han dynasty made philological knowledge the qualification for the government bureaucracy, so as to restore knowledge that was in danger of vanishing. The imperial examination system for the civil service functioned for two millennia, and consisted of a written exam based on knowledge of classical texts. To support students obtaining government positions through the written examination, schools focused on those same texts and the associated philological knowledge.^[94] These texts covered philosophical, religious, legal, astronomical, hydrological, mathematical, military, and medical knowledge.^[113] Printing as it emerged largely served the knowledge needs of the bureaucracy and the monastery, with substantial vernacular printing only emerging around the 15th century.^[95]

Ancient Greece and Rome

While Socrates thought writing an inferior means of transmission of learning (recounted in the Phaedrus), we know of his works through Plato's written accounts of his dialogues. Havelock also connects the philosophical work of Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle with literacy, as it enabled the development of critical thinking via the analysis of permanent texts written both by the author and their peers.^[114]^[115]^[116] Aristotle wrote treatises and lectures which were the core of education at the Lyceum, along with the may volumes collected in the Lyceum's library. The Stoics and Epicureans also wrote and taught during the same period in Athens, although we now have only fragments of their works.

Greek writers were the founders of many other fields of knowledge. Herodotus and Thucydides, who wrote during the 5th century BC in Athens, are considered founders of the Western historiographical tradition, incorporating genealogy and mythic accounts into systematic investigations of events. Thucydides developed a more critical, neutral history through greater examination of documents, transcription of speeches, and interviews.^[117] During the same period, Hippocrates authored several works codifying what was known within the field of medicine. The works of Galen, a Greek physician living in Rome during the 2nd century AD, were important in European medical practice through the Renaissance. Hellenized writers in Egypt also produced compendia of knowledge using the resources of the Library of Alexandria, such as Euclid's Elements, which remains a standard reference work in geometry. Ptolemy's Almagest, an astronomy treatise, was used throughout the Middle Ages.

Roman scholars continued the practice of writing compendia of knowledge, including Varro, Pliny the Elder, and Strabo. While much of Roman accomplishment was in material culture of construction, Vitruvius documented much of the contemporary practice to influence design until today. Agriculture also became an important area for manuals, such as Palladius's compendium. Numerous manuals of rhetoric and rhetorical education that were to influence future generations also appeared, such as the anonymous Rhetorica ad Herennium, Cicero's De Oratore and Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria.

Islamic world

With the fall of Rome, the Middle East became the crossroads for learning, with knowledge bearing texts from the West and East meeting in Constantinople, Damascus, and then Baghdad. The House of Wisdom with a large library was founded, where Greek works of medicine, philosophy, mathematics and astronomy were translated into Arabic, along with Indian works on mathematics and therapeutics.^[118] To these texts, philosophers such as Al-Kindi and Avicenna and astronomers such as Al-Farghani made new contributions. Al-Khwarizmi authored the first work on algebra, drawing on both Greek and Indian resources. The centrality of the Quran within Islam also led to growth of Arabic linguistics.^[119] From Baghdad, knowledge and texts were to flow back to South Asia and down through Africa, with a large collection of books and an educational center around the Sankoré Madrasah in Timbuktu, the seat of the Songhai Empire. During this period the deposed Abbasid Caliphate moved its seat of power and learning to Córdoba, now in Spain, where they founded a major library which reintroduced many of the classic texts back into Europe along with texts of Arab learning.

Early universities in Europe

The reintroduction of classical texts into Europe through the library and intercultural intellectual culture in Córdoba, including the classical Greek canon, as well as Arabic texts by Avicenna and Al-Khwarizmi, created a need for interpretation and scholarship to make those works more accessible to scholars in monasteries and urban centres. During the 12th century, universities emerged from clusters of scholars in Italy at Bologna, in Spain at Salamanca, in France at Paris and in England at Oxford.^[120]^[121] By 1500, there were at least 60 universities throughout Europe^[122] enrolling at least 750,000 students.^[123] Each of the four faculties—liberal arts, theology, law, and medicine—was oriented around transmission of and commentary on classical texts, rather than the production of new knowledge. This form of scholastic education continued well into the 17th century in some locations and disciplines.^[124]^[125]^[126]^[127]^[128]

Printing in Europe

Johannes Gutenberg's introduction of the moveable type printing press to Europe c. 1450 created new opportunities for the production and widespread distribution of books, fostering much new writing, with particular consequences for the development of knowledge, as documented by Elizabeth Eisenstein.^[129] The production and distribution of knowledge was no longer tied to monasteries or universities with their libraries and collections of scribal copies. In the ensuing centuries a politically and increasingly religiously divided Europe, no single authority was able to censor or control the production of books. While universities remained attached to disseminating traditional texts, publishing houses became the new centres of knowledge production, and publishing houses in different jurisdictions led to a diversity of ideas becoming available as books moved across borders and scholars came to see themselves as citizens of the Republic of Letters.^[130]

The comparison of multiple editions of traditional texts led to improved textual scholarship.^[131] The ability to share and compare results from many regions and enlist more people into the production of science soon led to the development of early modern science.^[132] Books of medicine began to incorporate observations from contemporary surgery and dissections, including printed plates providing illustrations, to improve knowledge of anatomy.^[133] With many copies of traditional books and new books appearing, debates arose over the value of each in what became known as the "battle of the books".^[134] Maps and discoveries of exploration and colonization also were recorded in books and governmental records,^[135] often with the purpose of economic exploitation as in the General Archive of the Indies in Seville but also to satisfy curiosity about the world.^[136]

Printing also made possible the invention and development of scientific journals, with the Journal des sçavans appearing in France and the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in England, both in 1665.^[137] Over the years, these journals proliferated and became the basis of disciplines and disciplinary literature.^[138] Genres reporting experiments and other scientific observations and theories developed over the ensuing centuries to produce modern practices of disciplinary publication with the extensive intertexts which represent the collective pursuits of disciplinary knowledge. The availability of scientific and disciplinary books and journals also facilitated the development of modern practices of scientific reference and citation. These developments from the impact of printing on the growth of knowledge contributed to the Scientific Revolution, science in the Renaissance and during the Enlightenment.

Modern academia

In the 18th century, dissident Scottish and English universities began offering practical instruction in rhetoric and writing to enable non-elite students to influence contemporary events. Only in the 19th century did the universities in some countries begin making place for the writing of new knowledge, turning them in the ensuing years from primarily disseminating knowledge through the reading of classical texts to becoming institutions devoted to both reading and writing. The creation of research seminars and the associated seminar papers in history and philology in German universities were a significant starting point for the reform of the university.^[139] Professorships in philology, history, economy, theology, psychology, sociology, mathematics and the sciences were to emerge over the century, and the German model of disciplinary research university was to influence the organization of universities in England and the United States, with another model developing in France. Both emphasized production of new knowledge by faculty and acquisition thereof by students. In elite British universities, writing instruction was supported by the tutorial system with weekly writing by students for their tutors, while in the United States regular courses in writing were often required starting in the late 19th century, with writing across the curriculum becoming an increasing focus, particularly towards the end of the 20th century.

Psychological implications

Walter J. Ong, Jack Goody, and Eric A. Havelock were among the earliest to systematically argue for the psychological and intellectual consequences of literacy. Ong argued that the introduction of writing changed the form of human consciousness from sensing the immediacy of the spoken word to the critical distance and systematization of words, which could be graphically displayed and ordered,^[140]^[141] such as in the works of Petrus Ramus.^[142] Havelock attributed the emergence of Greek philosophic thought to the use of the written word which allowed the comparison of beliefs and belief systems and the critical examination of concepts.^[143]^[144] Jack Goody argued that written language fostered such practices as categorization, making lists, following formulas, developing recipes and prescriptions, and ultimately making and recording experiments. These practices changed the intellectual and psychological orientation of those who engaged with them.^[145]^[146]

While recognizing the possibilities of all these psychological and intellectual changes that accompanied these literate practices, Sylvia Scribner and Michael Cole argued that these changes did not come universally or automatically with literacy, but rather were dependent on the social uses made of literacy in their local contexts.^[147] They carried out field observation and experiments among the Vai people of West Africa, for whom the psychological impacts of literacy vary due to the three different contexts in which locals learn to read and write the Vai language, English, and Arabic—practical skills, secular education, and religious education, respectively. European literacy was associated with European-style schooling, and fostered among other things syllogistic reasoning and logical problem solving. Arabic literacy was associated with the religious training of madrasas and fostered, among other things, heightened rote memory. Literacy in the written forms of Vai associated with daily practices of making requests and explaining tasks, increased anticipation of audience knowledge and needs along with rebus solving (as the written language used rebus-like icons).

References

^ Daniels (1996), p. 3.
^ Goody (1986), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Fischer (2003), pp. 15–16.
^ Fischer (2003), p. 8.
^ Olson & Torrance (2009), p. 59; Condorelli (2022), p. 19.
^ ^a ^b Olson & Torrance (2009), p. 59.
^ Daniels (1996), p. 24.
^ ^a ^b Condorelli (2022), p. 19.
^ ^a ^b ^c Regulski (2016).
^ Wengrow (2011), pp. 99–103.
^ Boltz (1994), p. 31.
^ Fagan et al. (1996), p. 762.
^ Walker (1989), pp. 7–9.
^ Baines (2004).
^ Dreyer, Günter (1998). Umm el-Qaab I. Das prädynastische Königsgrab U-j und seine frühen Schriftzeugnisse [Umm el-Qaab I. The predynastic royal tomb U-j and its early written evidence] (in German). Mainz: Philip von Zabern. ISBN 978-3-8053-2486-1.
^ Woods (2010), pp. 15–25.
^ ^a ^b Krebs & Krebs (2003), p. 91.
^ ^a ^b ^c Mitchell, Larkin (March–April 1999). "Earliest Egyptian Glyphs". Archaeology. Archaeological Institute of America. The seal impressions, from various tombs, date even further back, to 3400 B.C. These dates challenge the commonly held belief that early logographs, pictographic symbols representing a specific place, object, or quantity, first evolved into more complex phonetic symbols in Mesopotamia.
^ Schmandt-Besserat (1992a), p. 7; Condorelli (2022), p. 21.
^ Keightley & Barnard (1983), pp. 415–416.
^ Cast; tablet. British Museum. C.206.
^ Walker, C. B. F. (1987). Cuneiform. University of California Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-520-06115-6 – via Google Books.
^ "Archaeologists Rewrite History". China Daily. 12 June 2003. Archived from the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 21 August 2006.
^ Pilcher, Helen R. (30 April 2003). "Earliest Handwriting Found? Chinese Relics Hint at Neolithic Rituals". Nature. doi:10.1038/news030428-7. Symbols carved into tortoise shells more than 8,000 years ago ... unearthed at a mass-burial site at Jiahu in the Henan Province of western China
^ Li, X.; Harbottle, G.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C. (2003). "The Earliest Writing? Sign Use in the Seventh Millennium BCE at Jiahu, Henan Province, China". Antiquity. 77 (295): 31–44. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00061329. S2CID 162602307.
^ Houston (2004), pp. 245–246.
^ Haarmann (2002), ch. 10: 5300–3200 BC.
^ Sproat (2010), p. 110.
^ Coulmas (2002), p. 20.
^ Hallo, William W.; Simpson, William Kelly (1971). The Ancient Near East. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-15-502755-8. Beginning in the pottery-phase of the Neolithic, clay tokens are widely attested as a system of counting and identifying specific amounts of specified livestock or commodities. The tokens, enclosed in clay envelopes after being impressed on their rounded surface, were gradually replaced by impressions on flat or plano-convex tablets, and these in turn by more or less conventionalized pictures of the tokens incised on the clay with a reed stylus. That final step completed the transition to full writing, and with it the consequent ability to record contemporary events for posterity
^ Daniels (1996), p. 45.
^ ^a ^b Boudreau (2004), p. 71.
^ Shotwell, James Thomson (1922). An Introduction to the History of History: Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies. New York: Columbia University Press.
^ Smail, Daniel Lord (2008). On Deep History and the Brain: An Ahmanson Foundation Book in the Humanities. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-25812-9.
^ Schmandt-Besserat (1992a), pp. 55–71.
^ The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty-first Century: The William Foxwell Albright Centennial Conference. Eisenbrauns. 1996. pp. 24–25. ISBN 978-0-931464-96-6 – via Google Books.
^ Scarre, Chris; Fagan, Brian M. (2016). Ancient Civilizations. Routledge. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-317-29608-9 – via Google Books.
^ Sampson (1990), p. 78.
^ Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (1995). "Writing". The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. William B. Eerdmans. p. 1150. ISBN 978-0-8028-3784-4 – via Google Books.
^ Edwards, Iorwerth Eiddon Stephen (1970). The Cambridge Ancient History (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 43–44.
^ Baines (2007), p. 118.
^ Allen, James P. (2010). Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs. Cambridge University Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-1-139-48635-4 – via Google Books. Although it was once thought that the idea of writing came to Egypt from Mesopotamia, recent discoveries indicate that writing arose first in Egypt.
^ Yurco, Frank J. (1996). "The Origin and Development of Ancient Nile Valley Writing". In Celenko, Theodore (ed.). Egypt in Africa. Indianapolis Museum of Art. pp. 34–35. ISBN 0-936260-64-5.
^ Mokhtar, G., ed. (1990). Ancient Civilizations of Africa. UNESCO General History of Africa. Vol. 2 (Abridged ed.). London: UNESCO. pp. 11–12. ISBN 0-85255-092-8.
^ Lipson, Carol S. (2004). "Ancient Egyptian Rhetoric: It All Comes Down to Maat". In Lipson, Carol S.; Binkley, Roberta A. (eds.). Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks. State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-6099-3.
^ Fattovich, Rodolfo (2003). Uhlig, Siegbert; Bausi, Alessandro (eds.). Encyclopaedia Aethiopica. Vol. A–C. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. p. 169. ISBN 978-3-447-04746-3.
^ Cammarosano (2024), p. 170.
^ Bagley (2004), p. 190.
^ Boltz, William G. (1999). "Language and Writing". In Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-521-47030-8 – via Google Books.
^ Salgarella (2023), p. 396.
^ Olivier (1986), p. 377.
^ DeFrancis (1989), pp. 50, 121–128.
^ Millard (1986), p. 396.
^ Salomon (1996), Brahmi and Kharoshthi.
^ ^a ^b McCarter (1974), p. 62.
^ Lyons, Martyn (2011). Books: A Living History. Los Angeles: Getty. p. 24. ISBN 978-1-60606-083-4.
^ Fischer (2001), p. 131.
^ Fischer (2001), pp. 137–144.
^ Condorelli (2022), pp. 27–28.
^ ^a ^b Condorelli (2022), p. 27.
^ Fischer (2001), p. 250.
^ Campo, Juan Eduardo; Melton, J. Gordon (2009). "Cordoba". Encyclopedia of Islam. New York: Facts On File. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-8160-5454-1.
^ Piquette & Whitehouse (2013), pp. 2–5.
^ Friedrich, Michael. "Introduction: Towards a Holistic Study of Written Artefacts in Ancient History". In Betrò, Friedrich & Michel (2024), pp. 12–13.
^ Subačius (2023), p. 305.
^ ^a ^b McClintock, J.; Strong, J. (1885). Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature: Supplement. New York: Harper. pp. 990–997 – via Google Books.^{[better source needed]}
^ Morenz (2020), p. 465.
^ Mark, Joshua J. "Egyptian Papyrus". World History Encyclopedia.^{[better source needed]}
^ Lindström, Tom (2005). "On the Nature of Joint Strength in paper-A Review of Dry and Wet Strength Resins Used in Paper Manufacturing". 13th Fundamental Research Symposium. 1: 457–562 – via ResearchGate.^{[better source needed]}
^ Schmandt-Besserat (1992b).
^ van de Mieroop, M. "The invention of interest: Sumerian loans". In Goetzmann & Rouwenhorst (2005), pp. 17–30.
^ Goody (2004), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Glahn, R. "The origins of paper money in China". In Goetzmann & Rouwenhorst (2005), pp. 65–89.
^ Pezzolo, L. "Bonds and government debt in Italian city-states, 1250–1650". In Goetzmann & Rouwenhorst (2005), pp. 145–163.
^ Goetzmann, William N. "Fibonacci and the financial revolution". In Goetzmann & Rouwenhorst (2005), pp. 123–143.
^ Yates, JoAnne (1993). Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-8018-4613-7.
^ Smart (2008).
^ McCloskey, Deirdre N. (1985). The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-299-10380-4.
^ McCloskey, Deirdre N. (1987). The Writing of Economics. London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-02-379520-6.
^ McCloskey, Deirdre N. (1990). If You're So Smart: The Narrative of Economic Expertise. University of Chicago Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-226-55670-3.
^ Smart, Graham (2006). Writing the Economy: Activity, Genre And Technology in the World of Banking. London: Equinox. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-1-84553-066-2.
^ Ellickson, Robert; Thorland, Charles (1995). "Ancient Land Law: Mesopotamia, Egypt, Israel". Chicago-Kent Law Review. 71: 328–331. hdl:20.500.13051/3557.
^ VerSteeg, Russ (2000). Early Mesopotamian Law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-89089-977-9.
^ Tiersma (2008), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Meyer (2004), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Bodde, Derk; Morris, Clarence (1967). Law in Imperial China: Exemplified by 190 Ch'ing Dynasty Cases, With Historical, Social, and Juridical Commentaries. Harvard University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674733213. ISBN 978-0-674-73319-0.
^ Barbieri-Low, Anthony J.; Yates, Robin D. S. (2015). Law, state, and society in early imperial China: a study with critical edition and translation of the legal texts from Zhangjiashan tomb no. 247. Sinica Leidensia. Vol. 126. Leiden: Brill. pp. 1084–1085. ISBN 978-90-04-29283-3.
^ Tiersma, Peter M. (1999). Legal Language. University of Chicago Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-226-80302-9.
^ Goody (1986), pp. 92–93.
^ Goody (1986), pp. 89–92.
^ Connery (1998), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Lewis (1999), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Radner & Robson (2011), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ ^a ^b Lee, Thomas H. C. (2000). Education in Traditional China: A History. Handbook of Oriental Studies. Vol. 13. Leiden: Brill. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-90-04-10363-4.
^ ^a ^b Luo Shubao (罗树宝); Chan Sin-Wai (陈善伟), eds. (1998). 中国古代印刷史图册 [An Illustrated History of Printing in Ancient China] (in Chinese). Hong Kong City University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-962-937-032-9.
^ Stock (1987), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Chartier, Roger (1994). The Order of Books: Readers, Authors, and Libraries in Europe Between the Fourteenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Stanford University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-8047-2266-7.
^ Hill, Christopher (1972). The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution. New York: Viking. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-670-78975-7.
^ Habermas (1999), pp. 187–189.
^ Anderson, Benedict Richard O'Gorman (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Rev. ed.). London: Verso. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-86091-059-6.
^ Starr (2004), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Bazerman (2004), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Lipson & Binkley (2012).
^ Salami, Minna (2020). "Of Liberation". Sensuous Knowledge: A Black Feminist Approach For Everyone. Amistad. ISBN 978-0-06-287706-2.
^ The Teachings of Ptahhotep: The Oldest Book in the World. Martino Fine. 2016. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-1-61427-930-3 – via Google Books.
^ Goody (1986), pp. 3–4, 12.
^ Goody (1986), pp. 5, 12.
^ Radner & Robson (2011).
^ Perrett, Roy W. (1999). "History, Time, and Knowledge in Ancient India". History and Theory. 38 (3): 307–321. doi:10.1111/0018-2656.00094.
^ Mookerji, Radha Kumud (1998) [1951]. Ancient Indian education: brahmanical and Buddhist. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-81-208-0423-4.
^ Boone, Elizabeth Hill (2000). Stories in Red and Black. Austin: University of Texas Press. p. 26. ISBN 978-0-292-70876-1.
^ Berdan, Frances F. (2005). The Aztecs of Central Mexico: An Imperial Society. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-534-62728-7.
^ Bodde, Derk (1991). Chinese Thought, Society, and Science: The Intellectual and Social Background of Science and Technology in Pre-Modern China. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. pp. 213–214. ISBN 978-0-8248-1334-5.
^ Havelock (1963), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Havelock (1978), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Havelock (1981), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^
- Boedeker, Deborah (2011). "Early Greek Poetry as/and History". In Feldherr, Andrew; Hardy, Grant (eds.). The Oxford History of Historical Writing: Beginnings to AD 600. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 122, 134–135. ISBN 978-0-19-921815-8.
- Harris, William V. (1989). Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 80–81. ISBN 978-0-674-03837-0.
^ Makdisi (1981).
^ Versteegh (1995).
^ Verger (1992), pp. 47–54.
^ Ridder-Symoens (1992a), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Verger (1992), p. 57.
^ Schwinges (1992), p. 188.
^ Verger (1992), pp. 41–44.
^ Leff (1992), p. 307.
^ North (1992), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Garcia (1992), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Siraisi (1992), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Eisenstein (1979), p. 3.
^ Bazerman & Rogers (2008), pp. 190–191.
^ Grafton (1991), pp. 226–227.
^ Eisenstein (1979), pp. 269–277.
^ Pedersen (1996), pp. 453–454; Eisenstein (1979), pp. 566–573.
^ Jones (1965), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Ruegg (1996), pp. 3–4.
^ Impey, O.; MacGregor, A., eds. (1985). The origins of museums: the cabinet of curiosities in sixteenth and seventeenth-century Europe. Oxford: Clarendon. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 0-19-952108-5.
^ Steinberg, S. H. (2017) [1955]. Five Hundred Years of Printing. Mineola, NY: Dover. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-486-81445-2.
^ Kronick (1976), pp. 44–45.
^ Kruse (2006), pp. 331–334.
^ Ong (1977).
^ Ong (1982).
^ Ong (2004).
^ Havelock (1963).
^ Havelock (1981).
^ Goody (1975), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Goody (1977), p. ^{[page needed]}.
^ Scribner, Sylvia; Cole, Michael (1981). The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-674-72114-2.

Works cited

Baines, John (2007). Visual and Written Culture in Ancient Egypt. Oxford University Press. p. 118. ISBN 978-0-19-815250-7.
Bagley, Robert (2004). "Anyang writing and the origin of the Chinese writing system". In Houston, Stephen (ed.). The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83861-0 – via Google Books.
Betrò, Marilina; Friedrich, Michael; Michel, Cécile, eds. (2024). The Ancient World Revisited: Material Dimensions of Written Artefacts. Studies in Manuscript Cultures. Vol. 37. Berlin: De Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-135902-1. ISSN 2365-9696.
- Cammarosano, Michele. "Writing on Wood in Hittite Anatolia". In Betrò, Friedrich & Michel (2024), pp. 165–206.
Boltz, William G. (1994). The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society. ISBN 978-0-940490-78-9.
Boudreau, Vincent, ed. (2004). The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83861-0 – via Google Books.
- Baines, John. "The earliest Egyptian writing: Development, context, purpose". In Boudreau (2004), pp. 150–189.
Bazerman, Charles (2004). "Speech Acts, Genres, and Activity Systems: How Texts Organize Activity and People". In Bazerman, Charles; Prior, Paul A. (eds.). What Writing Does and How It Does It. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 309–339. ISBN 0-8058-3805-8.
———, ed. (2008). "Writing, Text, and the Law". Handbook of Research on Writing. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-8058-4870-0.
- ———; Rogers, Paul. "Writing and Secular Knowledge Outside Modern European Institutions". In Bazerman (2008), pp. 138–189.
- Smart, Graham. "Writing and the Social Formation of Economy". In Bazerman (2008), pp. 123–135.
- Tiersma, Peter. "Writing, Text, and the Law". In Bazerman (2008), pp. 156–170.
Condorelli, Marco (2022). Introducing Historical Orthography. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-00-910073-1.
———; Rutkowska, Hanna, eds. (2023). The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Orthography. Cambridge handbooks in language and linguistics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-48731-3.
- Salgarella, Ester. "Reconstructing a Prehistoric Writing System". In Condorelli & Rutkowska (2023), pp. 395–416.
- Subačius, Giedrius. "Materiality of Writing". In Condorelli & Rutkowska (2023), pp. 305–324.
Connery, Christopher Leigh (1998). The Empire of the Text: Writing and Authority in Early Imperial China. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-8476-8738-1.
Cook, Vivian; Ryan, Des, eds. (2016). The Routledge Handbook of the English Writing System. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-315-67000-3.
Coulmas, Florian (2002). Writing Systems: An Introduction to Their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-78217-3.
Daniels, Peter T. (1996). Daniels, Peter T.; Bright, William (eds.). The World's Writing Systems. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507993-7.
DeFrancis, John (1989). Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-1207-2.
Eisenstein, Elizabeth (1979). The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-39290-8.
Fagan, Brian M.; Beck, Charlotte; Michaels, George; Scarre, Chris; Silberman, Neil Asher, eds. (1996). "Writing: Introduction". The Oxford Companion to Archaeology. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref/9780195076189.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-507618-9.
Fischer, Steven Roger (2001). A History of Writing. Globalities. Reaktion. ISBN 978-1-86189-101-3.
——— (2003). A History of Reading. Globalities. Reaktion. ISBN 978-1-86189-160-0.
Goetzmann, William N.; Rouwenhorst, K. Geert, eds. (2005). The origins of value: the financial innovations that created modern capital markets. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-517571-4.
Goody, Jack (1975) [1968]. Literacy in Traditional Societies (Rev. ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29005-0.
——— (1977). The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29242-9.
——— (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-511-62159-8.
——— (2004). Capitalism and Modernity: The Great Debate (Repr. ed.). Cambridge: Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-3191-2.
Grafton, Anthony (1991). Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-19545-5.
Habermas, Jürgen (1999) [1991]. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Translated by Burger, T.; Lawrence, F. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-58108-0.
Haarmann, Harald (2002). Geschichte der Schrift [History of Writing] (in German). C. H. Beck. ISBN 3-406-47998-7.
Havelock, Eric A. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-69906-9.
——— (1978). The Greek Concept of Justice: From Its Shadow in Homer to Its Substance in Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-36220-9.
——— (1981). The Literate Revolution in Greece and Its Cultural Consequences. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00026-8.
Houston, Stephen D. (2004). The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83861-0.
Jones, Richard F. (1965) [1936]. Ancients and Moderns: A Study of the Background of the Battle of the Books (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. OCLC 877465393.
Keightley, David N.; Barnard, Noel (1983). The Origins of Chinese Civilization. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-04229-2 – via Google Books.
Krebs, Robert E.; Krebs, Carolyn A. (2003). Groundbreaking Scientific Experiments, Inventions, and Discoveries of the Ancient World. Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-313-31342-4 – via Google Books.
Kronick, David A. (1976) [1962]. A History of Scientific & Technical Periodicals: The Origins and Development of the Scientific and Technical Press, 1665–1790 (2nd ed.). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow. ISBN 978-0-8108-0844-7.
Kruse, Otto (2006). "The Origins of Writing in the Disciplines: Traditions of Seminar Writing and the Humboldtian Ideal of the Research University". Written Communication. 23 (3): 331–352. doi:10.1177/0741088306289259. ISSN 0741-0883.
Lewis, Mark Edward (1999). Writing and Authority in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-4113-8.
Lipson, Carol S.; Binkley, Roberta A. (2012). Rhetoric Before and Beyond the Greeks. State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-8503-3 – via Google Books.
Makdisi, George (1981). The Rise of Colleges: Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-85224-375-6.
McCarter, P. Kyle (1974). "The Early Diffusion of the Alphabet". The Biblical Archaeologist. 37 (3): 54–68. JSTOR 3210965. S2CID 126182369.
Meyer, Elizabeth A. (2004). Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511482861. ISBN 978-0-521-49701-5.
Millard, A. R. (1986). "The Infancy of the Alphabet". World Archaeology. 17 (3): 390–398. doi:10.1080/00438243.1986.9979978.
Morenz, Ludwig (2020). "Palaeography between Normalization, Standardization, and Stylization versus Formal Plasticity and Openness". In Davies, Vanessa; Laboury, Dimitri (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 465. ISBN 978-0-19-060465-3.
Olivier, J.-P. (1986). "Cretan Writing in the Second Millennium B.C". World Archaeology. 17 (3): 377–389. doi:10.1080/00438243.1986.9979977.
Olson, David R.; Torrance, Nancy (2009). The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86220-2 – via Google Books.
Ong, Walter J. (2004) [1958]. Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue (Repr. ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-62976-6.
——— (1977). Interfaces of the Word. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-1105-2.
——— (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. Methuen. ISBN 978-0-416-71380-0.
Radner, Karen; Robson, Eleanor, eds. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-955730-1.
Regulski, Ilona (2016). "The Origins and Early Development of Writing in Egypt". Archaeology. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935413.013.61. ISBN 978-0-19-993541-3 – via Oxford Handbooks Online.
Ridder-Symoens, Hilde, ed. (1992). Universities In The Middle Ages. A History of the University in Europe. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-36105-7.
- Garcia. "The Faculties of Law". In Ridder-Symoens (1992), pp. 388–408.
- Leff, G. "The Trivium and the Three Philosophies". In Ridder-Symoens (1992), pp. 307–336.
- North, J. "The Quadrivium". In Ridder-Symoens (1992), pp. 337–359.
- Ridder-Symoens, Hilde (1992a). "Mobility". In Ridder-Symoens (1992), pp. 280–304.
- Schwinges. "Admission". In Ridder-Symoens (1992), pp. 171–194.
- Siraisi, N. "The Faculty of Medicine". In Ridder-Symoens (1992), pp. 360–387.
- Verger, J. "Patterns". In Ridder-Symoens (1992), pp. 35–74.
———, ed. (1996). Universities In Early Modern Europe. A History of the University in Europe. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-36106-4.
- Pedersen, O. "Tradition and Innovation". In Ridder-Symoens (1996), pp. 451–488.
- Ruegg, W. "Themes". In Ridder-Symoens (1996), pp. 3–4.
Salomon, Richard (1996). "Brahmi and Kharoshthi". The World's Writing Systems. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507993-7.
Sampson, Geoffrey (1990). Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-1756-4 – via Google Books.
Piquette, Kathryn E.; Whitehouse, Ruth D., eds. (2013). Writing as Material Practice: Substance, surface and medium. Ubiquity. doi:10.5334/bai. ISBN 978-1-909188-24-2.
Schmandt-Besserat, Denise (1996) [1992a]. How Writing Came About. Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 978-0-292-77704-0.
——— (1992b). Counting to Cuneiform. Before Writing. Vol. 1. Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 978-0-292-70783-2.
Sproat, Richard (2010). Language, Technology, and Society. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-954938-2.
Starr, Paul (2004). The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-08193-6.
Stock, Brian (1987). The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries (Repr. ed.). Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-10227-6.
Versteegh, Kees (1995). The Arabic Linguistic Tradition. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought. Vol. 3. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-15757-5.
Wengrow, David (2011). "The Invention of Writing in Egypt". In Teeter, Emily (ed.). Before the Pyramids: Origin of Egyptian Civilization. Oriental Institute, University of Chicago. ISBN 978-1-885923-82-0.
Walker, C. B. F. (1989). Cuneiform: Reading The Past. British Museum. ISBN 978-0-7141-8059-5.
Woods, Christopher (2010). "Visible language: the earliest writing systems". In Woods, Christopher; Teeter, Emily; Emberling, Geoff (eds.). Visible Language: Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond. Oriental Institute Museum Publications. Vol. 32. University of Chicago. pp. 15–25. ISBN 978-1-885923-76-9.

External links

The World's Writing Systems – all 294 known writing systems, each with a typographic reference glyph and Unicode status
Cracking the Maya Code – NOVA, Public Broadcasting Service

[FOOTNOTEDaniels19963-1] Daniels (1996), p. 3.

[FOOTNOTEGoody1986[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-2] Goody (1986), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTEFischer200315–16-3] Fischer (2003), pp. 15–16.

[FOOTNOTEFischer20038-4] Fischer (2003), p. 8.

[FOOTNOTEOlsonTorrance200959Condorelli202219-5] Olson & Torrance (2009), p. 59; Condorelli (2022), p. 19.

[FOOTNOTEOlsonTorrance200959-6] Olson & Torrance (2009), p. 59.

[FOOTNOTEDaniels199624-7] Daniels (1996), p. 24.

[FOOTNOTECondorelli202219-8] Condorelli (2022), p. 19.

[FOOTNOTERegulski2016-9] Regulski (2016).

[FOOTNOTEWengrow201199–103-10] Wengrow (2011), pp. 99–103.

[FOOTNOTEBoltz199431-11] Boltz (1994), p. 31.

[FOOTNOTEFaganBeckMichaelsScarre1996762-12] Fagan et al. (1996), p. 762.

[FOOTNOTEWalker19897–9-13] Walker (1989), pp. 7–9.

[FOOTNOTEBaines2004-14] Baines (2004).

[15] Dreyer, Günter (1998). Umm el-Qaab I. Das prädynastische Königsgrab U-j und seine frühen Schriftzeugnisse [Umm el-Qaab I. The predynastic royal tomb U-j and its early written evidence] (in German). Mainz: Philip von Zabern. ISBN 978-3-8053-2486-1.

[FOOTNOTEWoods201015–25-16] Woods (2010), pp. 15–25.

[FOOTNOTEKrebsKrebs200391-17] Krebs & Krebs (2003), p. 91.

[Mitchell1999-18] Mitchell, Larkin (March–April 1999). "Earliest Egyptian Glyphs". Archaeology. Archaeological Institute of America. The seal impressions, from various tombs, date even further back, to 3400 B.C. These dates challenge the commonly held belief that early logographs, pictographic symbols representing a specific place, object, or quantity, first evolved into more complex phonetic symbols in Mesopotamia.

[FOOTNOTESchmandt-Besserat1992a7Condorelli202221-19] Schmandt-Besserat (1992a), p. 7; Condorelli (2022), p. 21.

[FOOTNOTEKeightleyBarnard1983415–416-20] Keightley & Barnard (1983), pp. 415–416.

[21] Cast; tablet. British Museum. C.206.

[22] Walker, C. B. F. (1987). Cuneiform. University of California Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-520-06115-6 – via Google Books.

[23] "Archaeologists Rewrite History". China Daily. 12 June 2003. Archived from the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 21 August 2006.

[24] Pilcher, Helen R. (30 April 2003). "Earliest Handwriting Found? Chinese Relics Hint at Neolithic Rituals". Nature. doi:10.1038/news030428-7. Symbols carved into tortoise shells more than 8,000 years ago ... unearthed at a mass-burial site at Jiahu in the Henan Province of western China

[25] Li, X.; Harbottle, G.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C. (2003). "The Earliest Writing? Sign Use in the Seventh Millennium BCE at Jiahu, Henan Province, China". Antiquity. 77 (295): 31–44. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00061329. S2CID 162602307.

[FOOTNOTEHouston2004245–246-26] Houston (2004), pp. 245–246.

[FOOTNOTEHaarmann2002ch._10:_5300–3200_BC-27] Haarmann (2002), ch. 10: 5300–3200 BC.

[FOOTNOTESproat2010110-28] Sproat (2010), p. 110.

[FOOTNOTECoulmas200220-29] Coulmas (2002), p. 20.

[30] Hallo, William W.; Simpson, William Kelly (1971). The Ancient Near East. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-15-502755-8. Beginning in the pottery-phase of the Neolithic, clay tokens are widely attested as a system of counting and identifying specific amounts of specified livestock or commodities. The tokens, enclosed in clay envelopes after being impressed on their rounded surface, were gradually replaced by impressions on flat or plano-convex tablets, and these in turn by more or less conventionalized pictures of the tokens incised on the clay with a reed stylus. That final step completed the transition to full writing, and with it the consequent ability to record contemporary events for posterity

[FOOTNOTEDaniels199645-31] Daniels (1996), p. 45.

[FOOTNOTEBoudreau200471-32] Boudreau (2004), p. 71.

[33] Shotwell, James Thomson (1922). An Introduction to the History of History: Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies. New York: Columbia University Press.

[34] Smail, Daniel Lord (2008). On Deep History and the Brain: An Ahmanson Foundation Book in the Humanities. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-25812-9.

[FOOTNOTESchmandt-Besserat1992a55–71-35] Schmandt-Besserat (1992a), pp. 55–71.

[36] The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty-first Century: The William Foxwell Albright Centennial Conference. Eisenbrauns. 1996. pp. 24–25. ISBN 978-0-931464-96-6 – via Google Books.

[37] Scarre, Chris; Fagan, Brian M. (2016). Ancient Civilizations. Routledge. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-317-29608-9 – via Google Books.

[FOOTNOTESampson199078-38] Sampson (1990), p. 78.

[39] Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (1995). "Writing". The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. William B. Eerdmans. p. 1150. ISBN 978-0-8028-3784-4 – via Google Books.

[40] Edwards, Iorwerth Eiddon Stephen (1970). The Cambridge Ancient History (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 43–44.

[FOOTNOTEBaines2007118-41] Baines (2007), p. 118.

[42] Allen, James P. (2010). Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs. Cambridge University Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-1-139-48635-4 – via Google Books. Although it was once thought that the idea of writing came to Egypt from Mesopotamia, recent discoveries indicate that writing arose first in Egypt.

[43] Yurco, Frank J. (1996). "The Origin and Development of Ancient Nile Valley Writing". In Celenko, Theodore (ed.). Egypt in Africa. Indianapolis Museum of Art. pp. 34–35. ISBN 0-936260-64-5.

[44] Mokhtar, G., ed. (1990). Ancient Civilizations of Africa. UNESCO General History of Africa. Vol. 2 (Abridged ed.). London: UNESCO. pp. 11–12. ISBN 0-85255-092-8.

[45] Lipson, Carol S. (2004). "Ancient Egyptian Rhetoric: It All Comes Down to Maat". In Lipson, Carol S.; Binkley, Roberta A. (eds.). Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks. State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-6099-3.

[46] Fattovich, Rodolfo (2003). Uhlig, Siegbert; Bausi, Alessandro (eds.). Encyclopaedia Aethiopica. Vol. A–C. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. p. 169. ISBN 978-3-447-04746-3.

[FOOTNOTECammarosano2024170-47] Cammarosano (2024), p. 170.

[FOOTNOTEBagley2004190-48] Bagley (2004), p. 190.

[49] Boltz, William G. (1999). "Language and Writing". In Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-521-47030-8 – via Google Books.

[FOOTNOTESalgarella2023396-50] Salgarella (2023), p. 396.

[FOOTNOTEOlivier1986377-51] Olivier (1986), p. 377.

[FOOTNOTEDeFrancis198950,_121–128-52] DeFrancis (1989), pp. 50, 121–128.

[FOOTNOTEMillard1986396-53] Millard (1986), p. 396.

[FOOTNOTESalomon1996Brahmi_and_Kharoshthi-54] Salomon (1996), Brahmi and Kharoshthi.

[FOOTNOTEMcCarter197462-55] McCarter (1974), p. 62.

[56] Lyons, Martyn (2011). Books: A Living History. Los Angeles: Getty. p. 24. ISBN 978-1-60606-083-4.

[FOOTNOTEFischer2001131-57] Fischer (2001), p. 131.

[FOOTNOTEFischer2001137–144-58] Fischer (2001), pp. 137–144.

[FOOTNOTECondorelli202227–28-59] Condorelli (2022), pp. 27–28.

[FOOTNOTECondorelli202227-60] Condorelli (2022), p. 27.

[FOOTNOTEFischer2001250-61] Fischer (2001), p. 250.

[62] Campo, Juan Eduardo; Melton, J. Gordon (2009). "Cordoba". Encyclopedia of Islam. New York: Facts On File. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-8160-5454-1.

[FOOTNOTEPiquetteWhitehouse20132–5-63] Piquette & Whitehouse (2013), pp. 2–5.

[64] Friedrich, Michael. "Introduction: Towards a Holistic Study of Written Artefacts in Ancient History". In Betrò, Friedrich & Michel (2024), pp. 12–13.

[FOOTNOTESubačius2023305-65] Subačius (2023), p. 305.

[McClintock1885-66] McClintock, J.; Strong, J. (1885). Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature: Supplement. New York: Harper. pp. 990–997 – via Google Books.^{[better source needed]}

[FOOTNOTEMorenz2020465-67] Morenz (2020), p. 465.

[68] Mark, Joshua J. "Egyptian Papyrus". World History Encyclopedia.^{[better source needed]}

[69] Lindström, Tom (2005). "On the Nature of Joint Strength in paper-A Review of Dry and Wet Strength Resins Used in Paper Manufacturing". 13th Fundamental Research Symposium. 1: 457–562 – via ResearchGate.^{[better source needed]}

[FOOTNOTESchmandt-Besserat1992b-70] Schmandt-Besserat (1992b).

[71] van de Mieroop, M. "The invention of interest: Sumerian loans". In Goetzmann & Rouwenhorst (2005), pp. 17–30.

[FOOTNOTEGoody2004[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-72] Goody (2004), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[73] Glahn, R. "The origins of paper money in China". In Goetzmann & Rouwenhorst (2005), pp. 65–89.

[74] Pezzolo, L. "Bonds and government debt in Italian city-states, 1250–1650". In Goetzmann & Rouwenhorst (2005), pp. 145–163.

[75] Goetzmann, William N. "Fibonacci and the financial revolution". In Goetzmann & Rouwenhorst (2005), pp. 123–143.

[76] Yates, JoAnne (1993). Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-8018-4613-7.

[FOOTNOTESmart2008-77] Smart (2008).

[78] McCloskey, Deirdre N. (1985). The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-299-10380-4.

[79] McCloskey, Deirdre N. (1987). The Writing of Economics. London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-02-379520-6.

[80] McCloskey, Deirdre N. (1990). If You're So Smart: The Narrative of Economic Expertise. University of Chicago Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-226-55670-3.

[81] Smart, Graham (2006). Writing the Economy: Activity, Genre And Technology in the World of Banking. London: Equinox. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-1-84553-066-2.

[82] Ellickson, Robert; Thorland, Charles (1995). "Ancient Land Law: Mesopotamia, Egypt, Israel". Chicago-Kent Law Review. 71: 328–331. hdl:20.500.13051/3557.

[83] VerSteeg, Russ (2000). Early Mesopotamian Law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-89089-977-9.

[FOOTNOTETiersma2008[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-84] Tiersma (2008), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTEMeyer2004[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-85] Meyer (2004), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[86] Bodde, Derk; Morris, Clarence (1967). Law in Imperial China: Exemplified by 190 Ch'ing Dynasty Cases, With Historical, Social, and Juridical Commentaries. Harvard University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674733213. ISBN 978-0-674-73319-0.

[87] Barbieri-Low, Anthony J.; Yates, Robin D. S. (2015). Law, state, and society in early imperial China: a study with critical edition and translation of the legal texts from Zhangjiashan tomb no. 247. Sinica Leidensia. Vol. 126. Leiden: Brill. pp. 1084–1085. ISBN 978-90-04-29283-3.

[88] Tiersma, Peter M. (1999). Legal Language. University of Chicago Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-226-80302-9.

[FOOTNOTEGoody198692–93-89] Goody (1986), pp. 92–93.

[FOOTNOTEGoody198689–92-90] Goody (1986), pp. 89–92.

[FOOTNOTEConnery1998[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-91] Connery (1998), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTELewis1999[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-92] Lewis (1999), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTERadnerRobson2011[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-93] Radner & Robson (2011), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[Lee2000-94] Lee, Thomas H. C. (2000). Education in Traditional China: A History. Handbook of Oriental Studies. Vol. 13. Leiden: Brill. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-90-04-10363-4.

[HKCUP1998-95] Luo Shubao (罗树宝); Chan Sin-Wai (陈善伟), eds. (1998). 中国古代印刷史图册 [An Illustrated History of Printing in Ancient China] (in Chinese). Hong Kong City University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-962-937-032-9.

[FOOTNOTEStock1987[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-96] Stock (1987), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[97] Chartier, Roger (1994). The Order of Books: Readers, Authors, and Libraries in Europe Between the Fourteenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Stanford University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-8047-2266-7.

[98] Hill, Christopher (1972). The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution. New York: Viking. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-670-78975-7.

[FOOTNOTEHabermas1999187–189-99] Habermas (1999), pp. 187–189.

[100] Anderson, Benedict Richard O'Gorman (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Rev. ed.). London: Verso. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-86091-059-6.

[FOOTNOTEStarr2004[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-101] Starr (2004), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTEBazerman2004[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-102] Bazerman (2004), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTELipsonBinkley2012-103] Lipson & Binkley (2012).

[104] Salami, Minna (2020). "Of Liberation". Sensuous Knowledge: A Black Feminist Approach For Everyone. Amistad. ISBN 978-0-06-287706-2.

[105] The Teachings of Ptahhotep: The Oldest Book in the World. Martino Fine. 2016. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-1-61427-930-3 – via Google Books.

[FOOTNOTEGoody19863–4,_12-106] Goody (1986), pp. 3–4, 12.

[FOOTNOTEGoody19865,_12-107] Goody (1986), pp. 5, 12.

[FOOTNOTERadnerRobson2011-108] Radner & Robson (2011).

[109] Perrett, Roy W. (1999). "History, Time, and Knowledge in Ancient India". History and Theory. 38 (3): 307–321. doi:10.1111/0018-2656.00094.

[110] Mookerji, Radha Kumud (1998) [1951]. Ancient Indian education: brahmanical and Buddhist. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-81-208-0423-4.

[111] Boone, Elizabeth Hill (2000). Stories in Red and Black. Austin: University of Texas Press. p. 26. ISBN 978-0-292-70876-1.

[112] Berdan, Frances F. (2005). The Aztecs of Central Mexico: An Imperial Society. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-534-62728-7.

[113] Bodde, Derk (1991). Chinese Thought, Society, and Science: The Intellectual and Social Background of Science and Technology in Pre-Modern China. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. pp. 213–214. ISBN 978-0-8248-1334-5.

[FOOTNOTEHavelock1963[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-114] Havelock (1963), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTEHavelock1978[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-115] Havelock (1978), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTEHavelock1981[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-116] Havelock (1981), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[117] 
Boedeker, Deborah (2011). "Early Greek Poetry as/and History". In Feldherr, Andrew; Hardy, Grant (eds.). The Oxford History of Historical Writing: Beginnings to AD 600. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 122, 134–135. ISBN 978-0-19-921815-8.
Harris, William V. (1989). Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 80–81. ISBN 978-0-674-03837-0.

[118] Boedeker, Deborah (2011). "Early Greek Poetry as/and History". In Feldherr, Andrew; Hardy, Grant (eds.). The Oxford History of Historical Writing: Beginnings to AD 600. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 122, 134–135. ISBN 978-0-19-921815-8.

[119] Harris, William V. (1989). Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 80–81. ISBN 978-0-674-03837-0.

[FOOTNOTEMakdisi1981-118] Makdisi (1981).

[FOOTNOTEVersteegh1995-119] Versteegh (1995).

[FOOTNOTEVerger199247–54-120] Verger (1992), pp. 47–54.

[FOOTNOTERidder-Symoens1992a[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-121] Ridder-Symoens (1992a), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTEVerger199257-122] Verger (1992), p. 57.

[FOOTNOTESchwinges1992188-123] Schwinges (1992), p. 188.

[FOOTNOTEVerger199241–44-124] Verger (1992), pp. 41–44.

[FOOTNOTELeff1992307-125] Leff (1992), p. 307.

[FOOTNOTENorth1992[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-126] North (1992), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTEGarcia1992[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-127] Garcia (1992), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTESiraisi1992[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-128] Siraisi (1992), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTEEisenstein19793-129] Eisenstein (1979), p. 3.

[FOOTNOTEBazermanRogers2008190–191-130] Bazerman & Rogers (2008), pp. 190–191.

[FOOTNOTEGrafton1991226–227-131] Grafton (1991), pp. 226–227.

[FOOTNOTEEisenstein1979269–277-132] Eisenstein (1979), pp. 269–277.

[FOOTNOTEPedersen1996453–454Eisenstein1979566–573-133] Pedersen (1996), pp. 453–454; Eisenstein (1979), pp. 566–573.

[FOOTNOTEJones1965[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_November_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(November_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-134] Jones (1965), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTERuegg19963–4-135] Ruegg (1996), pp. 3–4.

[136] Impey, O.; MacGregor, A., eds. (1985). The origins of museums: the cabinet of curiosities in sixteenth and seventeenth-century Europe. Oxford: Clarendon. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 0-19-952108-5.

[137] Steinberg, S. H. (2017) [1955]. Five Hundred Years of Printing. Mineola, NY: Dover. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-486-81445-2.

[FOOTNOTEKronick197644–45-138] Kronick (1976), pp. 44–45.

[FOOTNOTEKruse2006331–334-139] Kruse (2006), pp. 331–334.

[FOOTNOTEOng1977-140] Ong (1977).

[FOOTNOTEOng1982-141] Ong (1982).

[FOOTNOTEOng2004-142] Ong (2004).

[FOOTNOTEHavelock1963-143] Havelock (1963).

[FOOTNOTEHavelock1981-144] Havelock (1981).

[FOOTNOTEGoody1975[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-145] Goody (1975), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[FOOTNOTEGoody1977[[Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_page_number_citations_from_August_2024]]<sup_class="noprint_Inline-Template_"_style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i>[[Wikipedia:Citing_sources|<span_title="This_citation_requires_a_reference_to_the_specific_page_or_range_of_pages_in_which_the_material_appears.&#32;(August_2024)">page&nbsp;needed</span>]]</i>&#93;</sup>-146] Goody (1977), p. ^{[page needed]}.

[147] Scribner, Sylvia; Cole, Michael (1981). The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. ^{[page needed]}. ISBN 978-0-674-72114-2.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

[42]

[43]

[44]

[45]

[46]

[47]

[48]

[49]

[50]

[51]

[52]

[53]

[54]

[55]

[56]

[57]

[58]

[59]

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64]

[65]

[66]

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

[71]

[72]

[73]

[74]

[75]

[76]

[77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84]

[85]

[86]

[87]

[88]

[89]

[90]

[91]

[92]

[93]

[94]

[95]

[96]

[97]

[98]

[99]

[100]

v t e Writing systems
Index of language articles
Overview	Language History of writing History of the alphabet Graphemes Scripts in Unicode
Lists	Writing systems Languages by writing system / by first written account Ancient languages corpuses by size Undeciphered writing systems Creators of writing systems
Types	Abjads Abugidas Alphabets Featural Ideogrammic Logographic Numeral Phonogrammic Pictographic Semi-syllabaries Shorthand Syllabaries
Current examples	Arabic Canadian syllabics Chinese Devanagari Hangul Kana Latin Mongolian
Related topics	In Africa In Southeast Asia

v t e World history
Overviews	Human history Recorded history List of historical periods Timelines of world history Major concepts: Cradle of civilization World regions: History of Western civilization Eastern civilization
Topical	History of agriculture History of government History of law History of communication History of economics History of trade History of war History of philosophy Science/Technology: History of medicine History of science History of writing History of technology History of navigation Arts: History of art History of drama History of literature History of music History of painting
Historical eras	Chronological world eras: Prehistory Three-age system Ancient history Post-classical history Middle Ages Early modern period Modern history Societal eras: Renaissance Age of Enlightenment Age of Discovery Agricultural Revolution Second Agricultural Revolution Industrial Revolution Second Industrial Revolution Britain's Imperial Century American Century Digital Age
Types of societies	Society Pre-industrial Hunter-gatherer Montane Circumpolar Subarctic Nomadic Pastoral Horticultural Agricultural/Agrarian Feudal Complex Industrial Post-industrial
Related	Historiography