Jump to content

Talk:2011 Germany E. coli O104:H4 outbreak: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 9 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Keep 3 different ratings in {{WikiProject Europe}}, {{WikiProject Food and drink}}, {{WikiProject Medicine}}.
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{ITN talk|31 May|2011}}
{{ITN talk|31 May|2011}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=mid|b1=y|b2=y|b3=yb4y|b5=y}}
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Europe|class=C|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Europe|class=C|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Food and drink|class=C|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Food and drink|class=C|importance=mid}}
Line 10: Line 10:
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=c|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=c|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Death|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Death|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Twenty-Tens decade|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject 2010s|importance=mid}}
}}
}}
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}

Latest revision as of 23:52, 10 March 2024

Ban on Egyptian seeds

[edit]

Hasn't the time come for an "Aftermath" section to start wrapping up this story? The blame-Egypt position is gaining more and more consensus, with an official EU ban on Egyptian seeds entering into effect yesterday. Right now, though, there's no place in the article where it would be logical to add a report on that development.—Biosketch (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NEJM articles

[edit]

The New England Journal of Medicine had 2 articles on this outbreak in the 25 August 2011 issue http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1106920 http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1107643 probably the best report to date. I just read them through once, but I have to read them more carefully before I add them to the article.

This article now requires a complete rewrite, since we now have answers to a lot of the questions that were raised at the time, and a lot of the issues are no longer important.

The important issues according to the NEJM articles include the unusual toxicity of the strain, and the novel molecular methods used to analyze it.

I don't see the point of the long list of the "Affected countries". Can anyone give a reason for not deleting it? --Nbauman (talk) 00:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Nbauman, the long list of "Affected countries" should be deleted. An accurate final tabulation of cases by country would suffice. --Zeamays (talk) 01:28, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Probably 800-1200 EHEC infections

[edit]

Not E.coli infections. E.coli is responsible for app 80% of all UTIs and as such should probably be in the range of hundred thousands per year in germany though the source is very vague... --Bjotn (talk) 21:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cause?

[edit]

"A farm in Bienenbuettel, Lower Saxony, was announced as the probable source".

I wonder what did they do different there at that farm? I have seen articles claiming that the outbreak appeared because the feces were spread on the land without transforming it into compost first. But I recently discovered that with only 4 months before the outbreak, a group of scientists created a variety of E.coli, designed to be sprayed on farm fields:

A group of students from Bristol University used a DNA sequence, specially created in the laboratory to change E. coli bacteria for the benefit of agriculture. This newly created micro-organism, entitled “agrEcoli” will be useful for farmers around the world. Thus, microcapsules containing E. coli bacteria will be sprayed on cultivated land. Modified bacteria was “programmed” to detect the level of nutrients in the soil, reacting with a fluorescent glow that shows the grower, if the area requires more fertilizer, or if there is sufficient nutrients. [1] [2] - 22 january 2011.

I wouldn't be surprised if the outbreak appeared because the farmers tested such engineered bacteria. Especially because E. coli is the most studied bacteria. I think its worth to investigate such a possibility. —  Ark25  (talk) 09:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2011 Germany E. coli O104:H4 outbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on 2011 Germany E. coli O104:H4 outbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011 Germany E. coli O104:H4 outbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]