Talk:Waluigi/GA2: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: review |
promote Waluigi to good article (GANReviewTool) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==GA Review== |
==GA Review== |
||
{{atopg |
|||
| status = |
|||
| result = Passed. [[User:Pi.1415926535|Pi.1415926535]] ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|talk]]) 20:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Good article tools}} |
{{Good article tools}} |
||
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Waluigi/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Waluigi/GA2]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Waluigi/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Waluigi/GA2]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
||
Line 36: | Line 40: | ||
*The lede mentions Waluigi being an internet meme, but that's not discussed in this section. |
*The lede mentions Waluigi being an internet meme, but that's not discussed in this section. |
||
*I'd add a wiktionary link to [[wikt:colorway]], since that's not a terribly common term. |
*I'd add a wiktionary link to [[wikt:colorway]], since that's not a terribly common term. |
||
{{done}} I think all of the above are fixed, but let me know if I have missed anything. Thanks for reviewing. [[User:Fieryninja|Fieryninja]] ([[User talk:Fieryninja|talk]]) 12:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
===Overall=== |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|here]] for what the criteria are, and [[Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not|here]] for what they are not) |
|||
<hr width=50%>Happy to pass this now. Good work! [[User:Pi.1415926535|Pi.1415926535]] ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|talk]]) 20:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#It is '''reasonably well written'''. |
|||
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''. |
|||
#:a ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Notes and references|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(inline citations to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''. |
|||
#:a ''([[WP:Out of scope|major aspects]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Article size|focused]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It follows the '''[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] policy'''. |
|||
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is '''stable'''. |
|||
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' and other media, where possible and appropriate. |
|||
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free content have [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|non-free use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|appropriate use]] with [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#'''Overall''': |
|||
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: <!-- Template:GAList --> |
|||
{{abot}} |
Latest revision as of 20:46, 23 February 2024
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs) 22:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this review. Waah! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is very close to GA - just some small changes. My comments are below. Please respond with {{done}} when completed, or reply to the item if you have questions/disagree. I'll place on hold to give you time. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Infobox and lede
[edit]- I would remove the final sentence of the first paragraph: the information about him being Wario's tennis partner and sidekick can be moved to the next paragraph, since it's more about his first appearance than a general statement, while the second half of the sentence is redundant.
- Add a sentence about his most noticeable features (tall and lanky, purple, upside-down L) to the lede.
Concept and creation
[edit]- Absolutely perfect photo choice in this section.
- The second paragraph should be moved later in this section, probably before the last paragraph.
Waluigi's appearance was designed...
: This sentence should be split in two- Address the "better source needed" tag
Characteristics
[edit]- Consider moving this above the "concept and creation" section
(gamma)
→(an upside-down "L")
evil-looking
is subjective - stick to neutral descriptors unless quoting a source.His original role was to be the tennis partner of Wario, but their relationship is ambiguous.
: move this to the middle of the next paragraphIn various Mario sports games...
: split this sentence in two
Appearances
[edit]- Clarify that he did not appear in any 2023 games
After Mario Party 3, he returned as a playable character in every subsequent game in the Mario Party series,
: remove the comma afterseries
and move citation to the end of the sentence.- Make sure that the verb tense matches - some are in past tense here, others in present tense.
- No need to mention the shutdown date for Dr. Mario World
Reception
[edit]- The lede mentions Waluigi being an internet meme, but that's not discussed in this section.
- I'd add a wiktionary link to wikt:colorway, since that's not a terribly common term.
Done I think all of the above are fixed, but let me know if I have missed anything. Thanks for reviewing. Fieryninja (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Overall
[edit]Happy to pass this now. Good work! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.