Jump to content

User talk:The local bishop: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m huh: new section
Tag: Reverted
Decline
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
:Well duh! What else am I supposed to do if you won't unblock me?! [[User:The local bishop|The local bishop]] ([[User talk:The local bishop#top|talk]]) 10:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
:Well duh! What else am I supposed to do if you won't unblock me?! [[User:The local bishop|The local bishop]] ([[User talk:The local bishop#top|talk]]) 10:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)


==huh==
==Proposal==


{{unblock reviewed |1=I tell you what, I'm prepared to cut a deal. If you unblock me and allow me to edit with a clean sheet, I PROMISE I will abandon [[User:Snowy of Wyoming|Snowy of Wyoming]] ([[User talk:Snowy of Wyoming|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Contribs/Snowy of Wyoming|contribs]]) and any other accounts I MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE. Does that sound reasonable? I think it does, and it would say much bout the likes of you lot if you were to refuse. [[User:The local bishop|The local bishop]] ([[User talk:The local bishop#top|talk]]) 10:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = You are confused, this isn't a negotiation. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 11:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)}}
new section

Latest revision as of 11:42, 9 March 2024

March 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 05:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfair

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The local bishop (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes I was making legal threats, but I was making them ON BEHALF OF Wikipedia, not against Wikipedia. An anonymous editor was vandalizing and bringing the encyclopedia into considerable disrepute, so only action via the appropriate legal channels would rectify that. On this basis, please unblock me The local bishop (talk) 05:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, you don’t get to threaten anybody with legal action on anybody’s behalf, apart from the fact that the threats were silly. You were also removing content for no reason. Acroterion (talk) 06:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why on Earth not? The local bishop (talk) 08:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second attempt at an unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The local bishop (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'd like a second opinion and a second chance please! The local bishop (talk) 09:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You made a clear legal threat. That you did so by altering a warning template is particularly disturbing to me, making it seem more official. Making legal threats is not how vandalism or any issue is handled here. You will need to withdraw any and all legal threats. You also have not addressed your seeming random removal of content. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Socking with User:Snowy of Wyoming. Both accounts were created within a week in 2016. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well duh! What else am I supposed to do if you won't unblock me?! The local bishop (talk) 10:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The local bishop (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I tell you what, I'm prepared to cut a deal. If you unblock me and allow me to edit with a clean sheet, I PROMISE I will abandon Snowy of Wyoming (talk · contribs) and any other accounts I MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE. Does that sound reasonable? I think it does, and it would say much bout the likes of you lot if you were to refuse. The local bishop (talk) 10:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are confused, this isn't a negotiation. Yamla (talk) 11:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.