Antenna (biology): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 17:13, 1 June 2024

Antennae (sg.: antenna), sometimes referred to as "feelers", are paired appendages used for sensing in arthropods.

Antennae are connected to the first one or two segments of the arthropod head. They vary widely in form but are always made of one or more jointed segments. While they are typically sensory organs, the exact nature of what they sense and how they sense it is not the same in all groups. Functions may variously include sensing touch, air motion, heat, vibration (sound), and especially smell or taste.^[1]^[2] Antennae are sometimes modified for other purposes, such as mating, brooding, swimming, and even anchoring the arthropod to a substrate.^[2] Larval arthropods have antennae that differ from those of the adult. Many crustaceans, for example, have free-swimming larvae that use their antennae for swimming. Antennae can also locate other group members if the insect lives in a group, like the ant. The common ancestor of all arthropods likely had one pair of uniramous (unbranched) antenna-like structures, followed by one or more pairs of biramous (having two major branches) leg-like structures, as seen in some modern crustaceans and fossil trilobites.^[3] Except for the chelicerates and proturans, which have none, all non-crustacean arthropods have a single pair of antennae.^[4]

Crustaceans

Crustaceans bear two pairs of antennae. The pair attached to the first segment of the head are called primary antennae or antennules. This pair is generally uniramous, but is biramous in crabs and lobsters and remipedes. The pair attached to the second segment are called secondary antennae or simply antennae. The second antennae are plesiomorphically biramous, but many species later evolved uniramous pairs.^[2] The second antennae may be significantly reduced (e.g. remipedes) or apparently absent (e.g. barnacles).

The subdivisions of crustacean antennae have many names, including flagellomeres (a shared term with insects), annuli, articles, and segments. The terminal ends of crustacean antennae have two major categorizations: segmented and flagellate. An antenna is considered segmented if each of the annuli is separate from those around it and has individual muscle attachments. Flagellate antennae, on the other hand, have muscle attachments only around the base, acting as a hinge for the flagellum—a flexible string of annuli with no muscle attachment.^[5]

There are several notable non-sensory uses of antennae in crustaceans. Many crustaceans have a mobile larval stage called a nauplius, which is characterized by its use of antennae for swimming. Barnacles, a highly modified crustacean, use their antennae to attach to rocks and other surfaces.^[2] The second antennae in the burrowing Hippoidea and Corystidae have setae that interlock to form a tube or "snorkel" which funnels filtered water over the gills.^[6]

A spiny lobster, showing the enlarged second antennae

The large flattened plates in front of the eyes of a slipper lobster are the modified second antennae.

The crab Cancer pagurus, showing its reduced antennae

Antennules of the Caribbean hermit crab

The nauplius larvae of a shrimp with antennae used for swimming

Examples of crustacean antennae
	Copepoda	Isopoda	Amphipoda	Decapoda	Decapoda	Remipedia	Cirrepedia
Primary antennae
Secondary antennae

Insects

Some claim insects evolved from prehistoric crustaceans, and they have secondary antennae like crustaceans, but not primary antennae. Antennae are the primary olfactory sensors of insects^[7] and are accordingly well-equipped with a wide variety of sensilla (singular: sensillum). Paired, mobile, and segmented, they are located between the eyes on the forehead. Embryologically, they represent the appendages of the second head segment.^[8]

All insects have antennae, however they may be greatly reduced in the larval forms. Amongst the non-insect classes of the Hexapoda, both Collembola and Diplura have antenna, but Protura do not.^[9]

Antennal fibrillae play an important role in Culex pipiens mating practices. The erection of these fibrillae is considered to be the first stage in reproduction. These fibrillae serve different functions across the sexes. As antennal fibrillae are used by female C. pipiens to locate hosts to feed on, male C. pipiens utilize them to locate female mates.^{[citation needed]}

Structure

The three basic segments of the typical insect antenna are the scape or scapus (base), the pedicel or pedicellus (stem), and finally the flagellum, which often comprises many units known as flagellomeres.^[10] The pedicel (the second segment) contains the Johnston's organ which is a collection of sensory cells.^[11]

The scape is mounted in a socket in a more or less ring-shaped sclerotised region called the torulus, often a raised portion of the insect's head capsule. The socket is closed off by the membrane into which the base of the scape is set. However, the antenna does not hang free on the membrane, but pivots on a rigidly sprung projection from the rim of the torulus. That projection on which the antenna pivots is called the antennifer. The whole structure enables the insect to move the antenna as a whole by applying internal muscles connected to the scape. The pedicel is flexibly connected to the distal end of the scape and its movements in turn can be controlled by muscular connections between the scape and pedicel. The number of flagellomeres can vary greatly between insect species, and often is of diagnostic importance.^{[citation needed]}

True flagellomeres are connected by membranous linkage that permits movement, though the flagellum of "true" insects does not have any intrinsic muscles. Some other Arthropoda do however have intrinsic muscles throughout the flagellum. Such groups include the Symphyla, Collembola and Diplura. In many true insects, especially the more primitive groups such as Thysanura and Blattodea, the flagellum partly or entirely consists of a flexibly connected string of small ring-shaped annuli. The annuli are not true flagellomeres, and in a given insect species the number of annuli generally is not as consistent as the number of flagellomeres in most species.^[10]

In many beetles and in the chalcidoid wasps, the apical flagellomeres form a club shape, called the clava. The collective term for the segments between the club and the antennal base is the funicle; traditionally in describing beetle anatomy, the term "funicle" refers to the segments between the club and the scape. However, traditionally in working on wasps the funicle is taken to comprise the segments between the club and the pedicel.^[10]

Quite commonly the funicle beyond the pedicel is quite complex in Endopterygota such as beetles, moths and Hymenoptera, and one common adaptation is the ability to fold the antenna in the middle, at the joint between the pedicel and the flagellum. This gives an effect like a "knee bend", and such an antenna is said to be geniculate. Geniculate antennae are common in the Coleoptera and Hymenoptera. They are important for insects like ants that follow scent trails, for bees and wasps that need to "sniff" the flowers that they visit, and for beetles such as Scarabaeidae and Curculionidae that need to fold their antennae away when they self-protectively fold up all their limbs in defensive attitudes.^{[citation needed]}

Because the funicle is without intrinsic muscles, it generally must move as a unit, in spite of being articulated. However, some funicles are complex and very mobile. For example, the Scarabaeidae have lamellate antennae that can be folded tightly for safety or spread openly for detecting odours or pheromones. The insect manages such actions by changes in blood pressure, by which it exploits elasticity in walls and membranes in the funicles, which are in effect erectile.^[12]

In the groups with more uniform antennae (for example: millipedes), all segments are called antennomeres. Some groups have a simple or variously modified apical or subapical bristle called an arista (this may be especially well-developed in various Diptera).^[13]

Functions

Olfactory receptors (scales and holes) on the antenna of the butterfly *Aglais io*, electron micrograph

Olfactory receptors on the antennae bind to free-floating molecules, such as water vapour, and odours including pheromones. The neurons that possess these receptors signal this binding by sending action potentials down their axons to the antennal lobe in the brain. From there, neurons in the antennal lobes connect to mushroom bodies that identify the odour. The sum of the electrical potentials of the antennae to a given odour can be measured using an electroantennogram.^[14]

In the monarch butterfly, antennae are necessary for proper time-compensated solar compass orientation during migration. Antennal clocks exist in monarchs, and they are likely to provide the primary timing mechanism for sun compass orientation.^[15]

In the African cotton leafworm, antennae have an important function in signaling courtship. Specifically, antennae are required for males to answer the female mating call. Although females do not require antennae for mating, a mating that resulted from a female without antennae was abnormal.^[16]

In the diamondback moth, antennae serve to gather information about a host plant's taste and odor. After the desired taste and odor has been identified, the female moth will deposit her eggs onto the plant.^[17] Giant swallowtail butterflies also rely on antenna sensitivity to volatile compounds to identify host plants. It was found that females are actually more responsive with their antenna sensing, most likely because they are responsible for oviposition on the correct plant.^[18]

In the crepuscular hawk moth (Manduca sexta), antennae aid in flight stabilization. Similar to halteres in Dipteran insects, the antennae transmit coriolis forces through the Johnston's organ that can then be used for corrective behavior. A series of low-light, flight stability studies in which moths with flagellae amputated near the pedicel showed significantly decreased flight stability over those with intact antennae.^[19] To determine whether there may be other antennal sensory inputs, a second group of moths had their antennae amputated and then re-attached, before being tested in the same stability study. These moths showed slightly decreased performance from intact moths, indicating there are possibly other sensory inputs used in flight stabilization. Re-amputation of the antennae caused a drastic decrease in flight stability to match that of the first amputated group.^{[citation needed]}

References

^ Chapman, R.F. (1998). The Insects: Structure and Function (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 8–11. ISBN 978-0521570480.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Boxshall, Geoff; Jaume, D. (2013). Functional Morphology and Diversity: Antennules and Antennae in the Crustacea. Oxford University Press. pp. 199–236. doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195398038.003.0007.
^ Fortey, Richard A.; Thomas, Richard H . (1998). Arthropod Relationships: Phylogenetic Analysis (1st ed.). The Systematics Association. p. 117. ISBN 978-94-011-4904-4.
^ Cotton, Trevor J.; Braddy, Simon J. (2004). "The phylogeny of arachnomorph arthropods and the origin of the Chelicerata". Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 94 (3): 169–193. doi:10.1017/S0263593300000596. S2CID 54841296.
^ Boxshall, G.A. (2004). "The evolution of arthropod limbs". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 79 (2): 253–300. doi:10.1017/s1464793103006274. PMID 15191225. S2CID 25339728.
^ Luque, J.; Feldmann, R. M.; Vernygora, O.; Schweitzer, C. E.; Cameron, C. B.; Kerr, K. A.; Vega, F. J.; Duque, A.; Strange, M.; Palmer, A. R.; Jaramillo, C. (2019). "Exceptional preservation of mid-Cretaceous marine arthropods and the evolution of novel forms via heterochrony". Science Advances. 5 (4): eaav3875. Bibcode:2019SciA....5.3875L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav3875. PMC 6482010. PMID 31032408.
^ Darby, Gene (1958). What is a butterfly?. Chicago: Benefic Press. p. 8. OCLC 1391997.
^ Gullan, Penny J.; Cranston, Peter S. (2005). The Insects: an Outline of Entomology (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-4051-1113-3.
^ Chapman, Reginald Frederick (1998). The Insects: Structure and Function (4th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-521-57890-5.
^ ^a ^b ^c Thomas A. Keil (1999). "Morphology and development of the peripheral olfactory organs". In Hansson, Bill S. (ed.). Insect Olfaction (1st ed.). Springer. pp. 5–48. ISBN 978-3-540-65034-8.
^ The Insects: An Outline of Entomology, Fourth Edition
^ Pass, Guenther. The Anatomy and Ultrastructure of the Antennal Circulatory Organs in the Cockchafer Beetle Melolontha melolontha L. (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) Zoomorphology 01/1980; 96(1):77-89. doi:10.1007/BF00310078
^ Lawrence, Eleanor, ed. (2005). Henderson's Dictionary of Biological Terms (13th ed.). Pearson Education. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-13-127384-9.
^ "Electroantennography (EAG)". Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. Retrieved March 27, 2010.
^ Merlin, Christine; Gegear, Robert J.; Reppert, Steven M. (September 2009). "Antennal circadian clocks coordinate sun compass orientation in migratory monarch butterflies". Science. 325 (5948): 1700–1704. Bibcode:2009Sci...325.1700M. doi:10.1126/science.1176221. PMC 2754321. PMID 19779201.
^ Ellis, Peggy; Brimacombe, Linda (1980). "The mating behaviour of the egyptian cotton leafworm moth, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.)". Animal Behaviour. 28 (4): 1239–1248. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(80)80112-6. S2CID 53188823.
^ Justus, K. A.; Mitchell, B. K. (November 1996). "Oviposition site selection by the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)". Journal of Insect Behavior. 9 (6): 887–898. Bibcode:1996JIBeh...9..887J. doi:10.1007/BF02208976. S2CID 28455636.
^ MI), Scriber, J.M. (Michigan State University, East Lansing; R.V., Dowell (1991). "Host plant suitability and a test of the feeding specialization hypothesis using Papilio cresphontes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)". The Great Lakes Entomologist (USA). ISSN 0090-0222.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Sane, Sanjay P.; Dieudonné, Alexandre; Willis, Mark A.; Daniel, Thomas L. (2007-02-09). "Antennal mechanosensors mediate flight control in moths". Science. 315 (5813): 863–866. Bibcode:2007Sci...315..863S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.205.7318. doi:10.1126/science.1133598. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17290001. S2CID 2429129.

[The_Insects-1] Chapman, R.F. (1998). The Insects: Structure and Function (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 8–11. ISBN 978-0521570480.

[Crustacea-2] Boxshall, Geoff; Jaume, D. (2013). Functional Morphology and Diversity: Antennules and Antennae in the Crustacea. Oxford University Press. pp. 199–236. doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195398038.003.0007.

[3] Fortey, Richard A.; Thomas, Richard H . (1998). Arthropod Relationships: Phylogenetic Analysis (1st ed.). The Systematics Association. p. 117. ISBN 978-94-011-4904-4.

[4] Cotton, Trevor J.; Braddy, Simon J. (2004). "The phylogeny of arachnomorph arthropods and the origin of the Chelicerata". Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 94 (3): 169–193. doi:10.1017/S0263593300000596. S2CID 54841296.

[5] Boxshall, G.A. (2004). "The evolution of arthropod limbs". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 79 (2): 253–300. doi:10.1017/s1464793103006274. PMID 15191225. S2CID 25339728.

[6] Luque, J.; Feldmann, R. M.; Vernygora, O.; Schweitzer, C. E.; Cameron, C. B.; Kerr, K. A.; Vega, F. J.; Duque, A.; Strange, M.; Palmer, A. R.; Jaramillo, C. (2019). "Exceptional preservation of mid-Cretaceous marine arthropods and the evolution of novel forms via heterochrony". Science Advances. 5 (4): eaav3875. Bibcode:2019SciA....5.3875L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav3875. PMC 6482010. PMID 31032408.

[7] Darby, Gene (1958). What is a butterfly?. Chicago: Benefic Press. p. 8. OCLC 1391997.

[Gullan&Cranston-8] Gullan, Penny J.; Cranston, Peter S. (2005). The Insects: an Outline of Entomology (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-4051-1113-3.

[chapman-9] Chapman, Reginald Frederick (1998). The Insects: Structure and Function (4th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-521-57890-5.

[Hansson-10] Thomas A. Keil (1999). "Morphology and development of the peripheral olfactory organs". In Hansson, Bill S. (ed.). Insect Olfaction (1st ed.). Springer. pp. 5–48. ISBN 978-3-540-65034-8.

[11] The Insects: An Outline of Entomology, Fourth Edition

[PassG-12] Pass, Guenther. The Anatomy and Ultrastructure of the Antennal Circulatory Organs in the Cockchafer Beetle Melolontha melolontha L. (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) Zoomorphology 01/1980; 96(1):77-89. doi:10.1007/BF00310078

[13] Lawrence, Eleanor, ed. (2005). Henderson's Dictionary of Biological Terms (13th ed.). Pearson Education. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-13-127384-9.

[14] "Electroantennography (EAG)". Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. Retrieved March 27, 2010.

[15] Merlin, Christine; Gegear, Robert J.; Reppert, Steven M. (September 2009). "Antennal circadian clocks coordinate sun compass orientation in migratory monarch butterflies". Science. 325 (5948): 1700–1704. Bibcode:2009Sci...325.1700M. doi:10.1126/science.1176221. PMC 2754321. PMID 19779201.

[16] Ellis, Peggy; Brimacombe, Linda (1980). "The mating behaviour of the egyptian cotton leafworm moth, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.)". Animal Behaviour. 28 (4): 1239–1248. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(80)80112-6. S2CID 53188823.

[Justus-17] Justus, K. A.; Mitchell, B. K. (November 1996). "Oviposition site selection by the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)". Journal of Insect Behavior. 9 (6): 887–898. Bibcode:1996JIBeh...9..887J. doi:10.1007/BF02208976. S2CID 28455636.

[18] MI), Scriber, J.M. (Michigan State University, East Lansing; R.V., Dowell (1991). "Host plant suitability and a test of the feeding specialization hypothesis using Papilio cresphontes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)". The Great Lakes Entomologist (USA). ISSN 0090-0222.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[19] Sane, Sanjay P.; Dieudonné, Alexandre; Willis, Mark A.; Daniel, Thomas L. (2007-02-09). "Antennal mechanosensors mediate flight control in moths". Science. 315 (5813): 863–866. Bibcode:2007Sci...315..863S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.205.7318. doi:10.1126/science.1133598. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17290001. S2CID 2429129.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 '''Antennae''' ({{singular}}: '''antenna'''), sometimes referred to as "feelers", are paired [[appendage]]s used for [[Sensory system|sensing]] in [[arthropod]]s.
-Antennae are connected to the first one or two [[Segmentation (biology)|segments]] of the arthropod head. BIG BALLLS They vary widely in form but are always made of one or more jointed segments. While they are typically [[sensory organ]]s, the exact nature of what they sense and how they sense it is not the same in all groups. Functions may variously include sensing [[tactition|touch]], air motion, heat, vibration (sound), and especially [[insect olfaction|smell]] or [[gustation|taste]].<ref name="The Insects">{{cite book |last1=Chapman |first1=R.F. |pages=[https://archive.org/details/insectsstructure0000chap/page/8 8–11] |title=The Insects: Structure and Function |date=1998 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0521570480 |edition=4th |url=https://archive.org/details/insectsstructure0000chap/page/8 }}</ref><ref name="Crustacea">{{cite book |last1=Boxshall |first1=Geoff |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/4028/chapter-abstract/145678846 |title=Functional Morphology and Diversity: Antennules and Antennae in the Crustacea |last2=Jaume |first2=D. |date=2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |pages=199–236 |doi=10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195398038.003.0007}}</ref> Antennae are sometimes modified for other purposes, such as mating, brooding, swimming, and even anchoring the arthropod to a [[substrate (biology)|substrate]].<ref name="Crustacea"/> Larval arthropods have antennae that differ from those of the adult. Many crustaceans, for example, have free-swimming [[larvae]] that use their antennae for swimming. Antennae can also locate other group members if the insect lives in a group, like the [[ant]].
+Antennae are connected to the first one or two [[Segmentation (biology)|segments]] of the arthropod head. They vary widely in form but are always made of one or more jointed segments. While they are typically [[sensory organ]]s, the exact nature of what they sense and how they sense it is not the same in all groups. Functions may variously include sensing [[tactition|touch]], air motion, heat, vibration (sound), and especially [[insect olfaction|smell]] or [[gustation|taste]].<ref name="The Insects">{{cite book |last1=Chapman |first1=R.F. |pages=[https://archive.org/details/insectsstructure0000chap/page/8 8–11] |title=The Insects: Structure and Function |date=1998 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0521570480 |edition=4th |url=https://archive.org/details/insectsstructure0000chap/page/8 }}</ref><ref name="Crustacea">{{cite book |last1=Boxshall |first1=Geoff |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/4028/chapter-abstract/145678846 |title=Functional Morphology and Diversity: Antennules and Antennae in the Crustacea |last2=Jaume |first2=D. |date=2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |pages=199–236 |doi=10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195398038.003.0007}}</ref> Antennae are sometimes modified for other purposes, such as mating, brooding, swimming, and even anchoring the arthropod to a [[substrate (biology)|substrate]].<ref name="Crustacea"/> Larval arthropods have antennae that differ from those of the adult. Many crustaceans, for example, have free-swimming [[larvae]] that use their antennae for swimming. Antennae can also locate other group members if the insect lives in a group, like the [[ant]].
 The common ancestor of all arthropods likely had one pair of [[uniramous]] (unbranched) antenna-like structures, followed by one or more pairs of [[biramous]] (having two major branches) leg-like structures, as seen in some modern [[crustacean]]s and fossil [[trilobite]]s.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fortey |first1=Richard A. |last2=Thomas |first2=Richard H .|title=Arthropod Relationships: Phylogenetic Analysis |date=1998 |publisher=The Systematics Association |isbn=978-94-011-4904-4 |page=117 |edition=1st}}</ref> Except for the [[Chelicerata|chelicerates]] and [[protura]]ns, which have none, all non-crustacean arthropods have a single pair of antennae.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Cotton |first1=Trevor J.|last2=Braddy |first2=Simon J. |title=The phylogeny of arachnomorph arthropods and the origin of the Chelicerata |journal=Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh |date=2004 |volume=94 |issue=3|pages=169–193 |doi=10.1017/S0263593300000596|s2cid=54841296}}</ref>
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 The subdivisions of crustacean antennae have many names, including flagellomeres (a shared term with insects), annuli, articles, and segments. The terminal ends of crustacean antennae have two major categorizations: segmented and flagellate. An antenna is considered segmented if each of the annuli is separate from those around it and has individual muscle attachments. Flagellate antennae, on the other hand, have muscle attachments only around the base, acting as a hinge for the [[flagellum]]—a flexible string of annuli with no muscle attachment.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Boxshall|first1=G.A.|title=The evolution of arthropod limbs|journal=Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society|date=2004|volume=79|issue=2|pages=253–300|pmid=15191225|doi=10.1017/s1464793103006274|s2cid=25339728}}</ref>
-There are several notable non-sensory uses of antennae in crustaceans. Many crustaceans have a mobile [[larva]]l stage called a [[nauplius (larva)|nauplius]], which is characterized by its use of antennae for swimming. [[Barnacles]], a highly modified crustacean, use their antennae to attach to rocks and other surfaces.<ref name="Crustacea"/> The second antennae in the burrowing [[Hippoidea]] and [[Corystidae]] have setae that interlock to form a tube or "snorkel" which funnels filtered water over the gills.<ref>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482010/ Exceptional preservation of mid-Cretaceous marine arthropods and the evolution of novel forms via heterochrony - NCBI]</ref>
+There are several notable non-sensory uses of antennae in crustaceans. Many crustaceans have a mobile [[larva]]l stage called a [[nauplius (larva)|nauplius]], which is characterized by its use of antennae for swimming. [[Barnacles]], a highly modified crustacean, use their antennae to attach to rocks and other surfaces.<ref name="Crustacea"/> The second antennae in the burrowing [[Hippoidea]] and [[Corystidae]] have setae that interlock to form a tube or "snorkel" which funnels filtered water over the gills.<ref>{{cite journal | pmc=6482010 | date=2019 | last1=Luque | first1=J. | last2=Feldmann | first2=R. M. | last3=Vernygora | first3=O. | last4=Schweitzer | first4=C. E. | last5=Cameron | first5=C. B. | last6=Kerr | first6=K. A. | last7=Vega | first7=F. J. | last8=Duque | first8=A. | last9=Strange | first9=M. | last10=Palmer | first10=A. R. | last11=Jaramillo | first11=C. | title=Exceptional preservation of mid-Cretaceous marine arthropods and the evolution of novel forms via heterochrony | journal=Science Advances | volume=5 | issue=4 | pages=eaav3875 | doi=10.1126/sciadv.aav3875 | pmid=31032408 | bibcode=2019SciA....5.3875L }}</ref>
 {{Multiple image
@@ Line 99: / Line 99: @@
 In the [[Spodoptera littoralis|African cotton leafworm]], antennae have an important function in signaling courtship. Specifically, antennae are required for males to answer the female mating call. Although females do not require antennae for mating, a mating that resulted from a female without antennae was abnormal.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Ellis|first1=Peggy|last2=Brimacombe|first2=Linda|title=The mating behaviour of the egyptian cotton leafworm moth, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.)|journal=Animal Behaviour|date=1980|volume=28|issue=4|pages=1239–1248|doi=10.1016/s0003-3472(80)80112-6|s2cid=53188823}}</ref>
-In the [[diamondback moth]], antennae serve to gather information about a host plant's taste and odor. After the desired taste and odor has been identified, the female moth will deposit her eggs onto the plant.<ref name="Justus">{{cite journal|last1=Justus|first1=K. A.|last2=Mitchell|first2=B. K.|title=Oviposition site selection by the diamondback moth, ''Plutella xylostella'' (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)|journal=Journal of Insect Behavior |date=November 1996|volume=9|issue=6|pages=887–898|doi=10.1007/BF02208976|s2cid=28455636}}</ref> [[Papilio cresphontes|Giant swallowtail]] butterflies also rely on antenna sensitivity to volatile compounds to identify host plants. It was found that females are actually more responsive with their antenna sensing, most likely because they are responsible for oviposition on the correct plant.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=MI)|first1=Scriber, J.M. (Michigan State University, East Lansing|last2=R.V.|first2=Dowell|date=1991|title=Host plant suitability and a test of the feeding specialization hypothesis using Papilio cresphontes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)|url=http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US9180365|journal=The Great Lakes Entomologist (USA)|language=en|issn=0090-0222}}</ref>
+In the [[diamondback moth]], antennae serve to gather information about a host plant's taste and odor. After the desired taste and odor has been identified, the female moth will deposit her eggs onto the plant.<ref name="Justus">{{cite journal|last1=Justus|first1=K. A.|last2=Mitchell|first2=B. K.|title=Oviposition site selection by the diamondback moth, ''Plutella xylostella'' (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)|journal=Journal of Insect Behavior |date=November 1996|volume=9|issue=6|pages=887–898|doi=10.1007/BF02208976|bibcode=1996JIBeh...9..887J |s2cid=28455636}}</ref> [[Papilio cresphontes|Giant swallowtail]] butterflies also rely on antenna sensitivity to volatile compounds to identify host plants. It was found that females are actually more responsive with their antenna sensing, most likely because they are responsible for oviposition on the correct plant.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=MI)|first1=Scriber, J.M. (Michigan State University, East Lansing|last2=R.V.|first2=Dowell|date=1991|title=Host plant suitability and a test of the feeding specialization hypothesis using Papilio cresphontes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)|url=http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US9180365|journal=The Great Lakes Entomologist (USA)|language=en|issn=0090-0222}}</ref>
 In the crepuscular hawk moth (''[[Manduca sexta]]''), antennae aid in flight stabilization. Similar to [[halteres]] in Dipteran insects, the antennae transmit [[coriolis force]]s through the Johnston's organ that can then be used for corrective behavior. A series of low-light, flight stability studies in which moths with flagellae amputated near the pedicel showed significantly decreased flight stability over those with intact antennae.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Sane|first1=Sanjay P.|last2=Dieudonné|first2=Alexandre|last3=Willis|first3=Mark A.|last4=Daniel|first4=Thomas L.|date=2007-02-09|title=Antennal mechanosensors mediate flight control in moths|journal=Science|language=en|volume=315|issue=5813|pages=863–866|doi=10.1126/science.1133598|issn=0036-8075|pmid=17290001|bibcode=2007Sci...315..863S|citeseerx=10.1.1.205.7318|s2cid=2429129}}</ref> To determine whether there may be other antennal sensory inputs, a second group of moths had their antennae amputated and then re-attached, before being tested in the same stability study. These moths showed slightly decreased performance from intact moths, indicating there are possibly other sensory inputs used in flight stabilization. Re-amputation of the antennae caused a drastic decrease in flight stability to match that of the first amputated group.{{Citation needed|date=January 2021}}