Talk:Vladislaus III of Moravia: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Bot (Plugin) Tag Category:Nobility stubs. class=Stub, auto=yes, royalty-work-group=yes. |
Tag: |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Old AfD multi |date=30 March 2023 |result='''keep''' |page=Vladislaus III of Moravia}} |
|||
{{WPBiography |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|blp=no|listas=Vladislaus| |
|||
|living=no |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
|class=Stub |
|||
{{WikiProject Czech Republic|importance=low}} |
|||
|priority= |
|||
|auto=yes |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
== Requested move 25 December 2015 == |
|||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[WP:requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
The result of the move request was: '''moved'''. Old page to be turned into a dab. [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 09:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
[[:Vladislaus, Margrave of Moravia]] → {{no redirect|Vladislaus III of Moravia}} – I'm proposing move to [[Vladislaus III of Moravia]] or [[Vladislaus III, Margrave of Moravia]], cause he was not the only margrave of Moravia of this name. In fact he was third (after [[Vladislaus III, Duke of Bohemia]] (Vladislaus I as margrave of Moravia) and [[Vladislaus II of Moravia]]) so the current name could refer to all three of them (and may be reworked to disambig?). [[User:Silesianus|Silesianus]] ([[User talk:Silesianus|talk]]) 12:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''<s>Support</s>''': This move seems quite logical.[[User:TheJack15|TheJack15]] ([[User talk:TheJack15|talk]]) 10:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC) |
|||
**Striking confirmed sock [[User:Tiggerjay|Tiggerjay]] ([[User talk:Tiggerjay|talk]]) 22:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - I agree if the current page name is used for the disambig as discussed in the proposal [[User:1bandsaw|1bandsaw]] ([[User talk:1bandsaw|talk]]) 21:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
|||
Latest revision as of 07:26, 1 February 2024
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 30 March 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 25 December 2015
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Old page to be turned into a dab. Jenks24 (talk) 09:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Vladislaus, Margrave of Moravia → Vladislaus III of Moravia – I'm proposing move to Vladislaus III of Moravia or Vladislaus III, Margrave of Moravia, cause he was not the only margrave of Moravia of this name. In fact he was third (after Vladislaus III, Duke of Bohemia (Vladislaus I as margrave of Moravia) and Vladislaus II of Moravia) so the current name could refer to all three of them (and may be reworked to disambig?). Silesianus (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Support: This move seems quite logical.TheJack15 (talk) 10:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)- Striking confirmed sock Tiggerjay (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I agree if the current page name is used for the disambig as discussed in the proposal 1bandsaw (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.