Talk:World Press Freedom Index: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:33, 2 June 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World Press Freedom Index article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Freedom of speech High‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalization Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Israel

Why does Israel ranked so low?

I don’t understand. דולב חולב (talk) 04:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Legend

I’m changing the colors. It should go- yellow green blue, not yellow blue green. 48JCL (talk • contribs) 15:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OECS

OECS (Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States) has 68 place in RSF rating. I understand difference between country and organization, but if it in the ranking, maybe we should add OECS to the ranking? MrDogit (talk) 21:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would say so. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 |archive = Talk:World Press Freedom Index/Archive %(counter)d
 }}
-== Copyright problem ==
-Since they use their own criteria as to how to arrive at the rankings, the resulting list is copyright. For this type of list we usually only show the top ten, or perhaps for a list of this type we might show the top ten for each year or even a few from the top ten and bottom ten for each year. I will list this at [[WP:CP]] so interested editors will have a little time to modify the article if there's anyone prepared to do that.— [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 13:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
-:No, the data content of tables is not copyrightable, unless it's presented in a particular style, in which case presenting the data in that particular style, if it's arbitrary rather than necessary, is copyrightable. I recommend that you revert your edit. I think that despite the warning in the tag, anyone who wishes should feel free to revert the tag, because you've given no evidence at all of any copyright violation. The fact that RSF calculated the numbers doesn't give them copyright over the numbers that they've published. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 23:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
-:* [https://dupdet.toolforge.org/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fw%2Fapi.php%3Faction%3Dquery%26prop%3Drevisions%26titles%3DPress_Freedom_Index%26rvlimit%3D1%26rvprop%3Dcontent%26rvstart%3D20210218133453&url2=https%3A%2F%2Frsf.org%2Fen%2Franking%2F2020+and+prior+ranking+tables+from+the+website&minwords=2&minchars=13&removequotations=&removenumbers= Duplication detector] gives ''Matching phrases found: 0''
-:* [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Press_Freedom_Index&url=https://rsf.org/en/ranking/2020_and_prior_ranking_tables_from_the_website Earwig's detector] gives ''Violation Unlikely 0.0% similarity''
-:As I expected, not even a hint of any copyright violation. Given the long backlog, I think that anyone should feel free to revert the edit, despite the warning. This is obviously not a copyright violation. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 23:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
-::Earwig's tool and the Duplication Detector are not useful for this particular type of article. Please don't remove the copyvio core template; an administrator needs to assess. I have commented at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2021 February 18]]. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 23:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
-:::Administrators implement community decisions and have no more right in making editorial decisions than ordinary Wikipedians; there is no special reason for an administrator to assess this - all we need is community consensus. The two detectors above fail because there is no copyright violation. [[Wikidata]] has been accepted as a WMF project and the project is not a copyright violation. Please remove the copyright notice since there is no evidence of any copyright violation. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 19:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
-::::The place to discuss this is at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2021 February 18]], not here. I see you've already commented there, so that's good. Please don't conduct a parallel discussion here. Thanks,— [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 20:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
-:::::No copyright violation; keeping material in place pending further investigation. -- [[User:Somedifferentstuff|Somedifferentstuff]] ([[User talk:Somedifferentstuff|talk]]) 21:27, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
-== Color coding discrepancy ==
-The colour coding in the side infobox, and the color coding in the main table do not match. What's worse, the breakdown of sections do not match either. The infobox has 70 points as a break point for 'Satifactory' but the main table has 65 to 75 in the same color... ???
-  Good: 85–100 points
-  Satisfactory: 70–85 points
-  Problematic: 55–70 points
-  Difficult: 40–55 points
-  Very serious <40 points
-[[Special:Contributions/123.205.19.162|123.205.19.162]] ([[User talk:123.205.19.162|talk]]) 03:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 == Israel  ==
@@ Line 45: / Line 24: @@
 I’m changing the colors. It should go- yellow green blue, not yellow blue green. <span style="text-shadow:#000000 0px 1px 2px;">[[User:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">'''48JCL'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">contribs</span>]])</span> 15:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
+== OECS ==
+OECS ([[Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States]]) has [https://rsf.org/en/country-oecs 68 place in RSF rating]. I understand difference between country and organization, but if it in the ranking, maybe we should add OECS to the ranking? [[User:MrDogit|MrDogit]] ([[User talk:MrDogit|talk]]) 21:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
+:Yes, I would say so. [[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 21:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)