Review aggregator: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} |
||
A '''review aggregator''' is a system that collects reviews and ratings of products and services such as films, books, video games, music, software, hardware, |
A '''review aggregator''' is a system that collects reviews and ratings of products and services, such as films, books, video games, music, software, hardware, or cars. This system then stores the reviews to be used for supporting a [[website]] where users can view the reviews, selling information to third parties about consumer tendencies, and creating databases for companies to learn about their actual and potential customers. The system enables users to easily compare many different reviews of the same work. Many of these systems calculate an approximate average assessment, usually based on assigning a numeric value to each review related to its degree of positive rating of the work.{{fact|date=June 2024}} |
||
Review aggregation sites have begun to have economic effects on the companies that create or manufacture items under review, especially in certain categories such as electronic games, which are expensive to purchase. Some companies have tied royalty payment rates and employee bonuses to aggregate scores, and stock prices have been seen to reflect ratings, as related to potential sales.<ref name=wsj>{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119024844874433247|title=High Scores Matter To Game Makers, Too|access-date=15 February 2008|author=Nick Wingfield|date=20 September 2007|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/movies/liam-lacey/the-studios-wake-up-to-the-power-of-rotten-tomatoes/article2142069/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110826142834/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/movies/liam-lacey/the-studios-wake-up-to-the-power-of-rotten-tomatoes/article2142069/|archive-date=26 August 2011|title=The studios wake up to the power of Rotten Tomatoes|access-date=24 September 2011|author=Liam Lacey|date=26 August 2011|work=[[The Globe and Mail]]}}</ref> It is widely accepted in the literature that there is a strong correlation between sales and aggregated scores.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=On the Validity of Metacritic in Assessing Game Value|date=2013|journal=Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture|volume=7|issue=1|pages=101–127|last1=Greenwood-Ericksen|first1=Adams|last2=Poorman|first2=Scott R.|last3=Papp|first3=Roy|doi=10.7557/23.6150 |s2cid=59385017 |doi-access=free}}</ref> |
Review aggregation sites have begun to have economic effects on the companies that create or manufacture items under review, especially in certain categories such as electronic games, which are expensive to purchase. Some companies have tied royalty payment rates and employee bonuses to aggregate scores, and stock prices have been seen to reflect ratings, as related to potential sales.<ref name=wsj>{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119024844874433247|title=High Scores Matter To Game Makers, Too|access-date=15 February 2008|author=Nick Wingfield|date=20 September 2007|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/movies/liam-lacey/the-studios-wake-up-to-the-power-of-rotten-tomatoes/article2142069/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110826142834/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/movies/liam-lacey/the-studios-wake-up-to-the-power-of-rotten-tomatoes/article2142069/|archive-date=26 August 2011|title=The studios wake up to the power of Rotten Tomatoes|access-date=24 September 2011|author=Liam Lacey|date=26 August 2011|work=[[The Globe and Mail]]}}</ref> It is widely accepted in the literature that there is a strong correlation between sales and aggregated scores.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=On the Validity of Metacritic in Assessing Game Value|date=2013|journal=Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture|volume=7|issue=1|pages=101–127|last1=Greenwood-Ericksen|first1=Adams|last2=Poorman|first2=Scott R.|last3=Papp|first3=Roy|doi=10.7557/23.6150 |s2cid=59385017 |doi-access=free}}</ref> |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* [[Review site]] |
* [[Review site]] |
||
* [[TestFreaks]], product review aggregator company |
* [[TestFreaks]], product review aggregator company |
||
* [[ReviewsBlender.com]], An affordable alternative to reviews aggregation, reputation/brand monitoring & social listening. |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Latest revision as of 11:05, 7 November 2024
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2018) |
A review aggregator is a system that collects reviews and ratings of products and services, such as films, books, video games, music, software, hardware, or cars. This system then stores the reviews to be used for supporting a website where users can view the reviews, selling information to third parties about consumer tendencies, and creating databases for companies to learn about their actual and potential customers. The system enables users to easily compare many different reviews of the same work. Many of these systems calculate an approximate average assessment, usually based on assigning a numeric value to each review related to its degree of positive rating of the work.[citation needed]
Review aggregation sites have begun to have economic effects on the companies that create or manufacture items under review, especially in certain categories such as electronic games, which are expensive to purchase. Some companies have tied royalty payment rates and employee bonuses to aggregate scores, and stock prices have been seen to reflect ratings, as related to potential sales.[1][2] It is widely accepted in the literature that there is a strong correlation between sales and aggregated scores.[3]
Due to the influence reviews have over sales decisions, manufacturers are often interested in measuring these reviews for their own products. This is often done using a business-facing product review aggregator.[4] In the film industry, according to Reuters, big studios pay attention to aggregators but "they don't always like to assign much importance to them".[5] Movie Review Intelligence was a review aggregator website, which collated and analyzed movie reviews.[6]
See also
[edit]- Rating site
- Review site
- TestFreaks, product review aggregator company
- ReviewsBlender.com, An affordable alternative to reviews aggregation, reputation/brand monitoring & social listening.
References
[edit]- ^ Nick Wingfield (20 September 2007). "High Scores Matter To Game Makers, Too". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 15 February 2008.
- ^ Liam Lacey (26 August 2011). "The studios wake up to the power of Rotten Tomatoes". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 26 August 2011. Retrieved 24 September 2011.
- ^ Greenwood-Ericksen, Adams; Poorman, Scott R.; Papp, Roy (2013). "On the Validity of Metacritic in Assessing Game Value". Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture. 7 (1): 101–127. doi:10.7557/23.6150. S2CID 59385017.
- ^ e-Pedia: Captain America: Civil War: Captain America: Civil War is a 2016 American superhero film based on the Marvel Comics character Captain America, produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures. e-artnow. 11 February 2017. ISBN 978-80-268-6088-4.
- ^ "Movie review aggregators popular, but do they matter?". Reuters. 17 February 2012. Retrieved 8 January 2019.
- ^ Williams, Joe (10 August 2010). "While 3-d falls flat, arthouse movies soar". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved 20 August 2010.
Bibliography
[edit]- Needleman, Rafe (20 September 2006). "Wize: tallies user feedback". cnet.com. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on 17 August 2010. Retrieved 18 July 2010.
- Needleman, Rafe (19 October 2006). "Still more reviews aggregators: Retrevo, DigitalAdvisor, and TheFind". cnet.com. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on 16 August 2010. Retrieved 18 July 2010.