Jump to content

Talk:Kristi Noem: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jbcuba (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
{{WikiProject South Dakota |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject South Dakota |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject United States |importance=Mid |USSL=yes |USSL-importance=Mid |USgovernors=yes |USgovernors-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject United States |importance=Mid |USSL=yes |USSL-importance=Mid |USgovernors=yes |USgovernors-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject United States Presidents |trump=yes |trump-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress |importance=Low |subject=person}}
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress |importance=Low |subject=person}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
Line 26: Line 27:
}}
}}


== Suggested Edit: Add that she shot her goat twice in the gravel pit ==
== Affair with Corey Lewandowski ==


In the article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristi_Noem#No_Going_Back it states that Governor Noem decided to kill her goat. However according to the sources listed she then took her goat to the gravel pit where she shot her dog and shot her goat twice as well. Seems prurient to add that she followed through on her decision. [[Special:Contributions/2601:2C3:800:B080:94FC:772:A71D:F5B8|2601:2C3:800:B080:94FC:772:A71D:F5B8]] ([[User talk:2601:2C3:800:B080:94FC:772:A71D:F5B8|talk]]) 19:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Published reports on 9/15/2023 suggest that she has been having a longstanding affair with [[Corey Lewandowski]]. This is significant because she portrays herself as a family values politician and because it might affect a decision to nominate her as Trump's VP running mate in 2024. This should be added. [[Special:Contributions/24.151.28.29|24.151.28.29]] ([[User talk:24.151.28.29|talk]]) 18:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
:OK. Someone else already added two shots, I added the location. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 06:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
:I'll be honest, I thought this was just a joke and I was about to revert - but whoa, this seems to actually be a thing. Per Wiki policy of course we'll have to wait for more reliable sources to come out before adding it to the article though, as it seems only non-reliable and deprecated ones have published it so far. '''[[User:Ser!|ser!]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ser!|chat to me]] - [[Special:Contributions/Ser!|see my edits]])</sup> 18:36, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
::Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/2601:2C3:800:B080:B08D:2B9F:6F81:A0D9|2601:2C3:800:B080:B08D:2B9F:6F81:A0D9]] ([[User talk:2601:2C3:800:B080:B08D:2B9F:6F81:A0D9|talk]]) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:This story is being extensively reported on. It’s in [https://uproxx.com/viral/kristi-noem-affair-corey-lewandowski-family-values/ UpRoxx], [https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/us-news/2023/09/16/6504d38f22601d5c108b4577.html Marca], [https://www.queerty.com/kristi-noems-bid-to-be-trumps-vp-just-blew-up-in-her-face-we-all-know-who-is-responsible-20230915 Queerty], and [https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/governor-kristi-noem-god-fearing-family-woman-and-corey-lewandowski-trump-creep-reportedly-had-yearslong-affair Vanity Fair], among others. Time to add. —[[Special:Contributions/2601:8C0:A83:87F0:1C49:C788:A9E3:F168|2601:8C0:A83:87F0:1C49:C788:A9E3:F168]] ([[User talk:2601:8C0:A83:87F0:1C49:C788:A9E3:F168|talk]]) 04:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
::This other stories all sourced from the same tabloid sources, Daily Mail and NYP. These stories specifically refer to them as tabloids. These are not acceptable sources. Not sure why this isn't super clear and is being discussed. [[User:Helpingtoclarify|Helpingtoclarify]] ([[User talk:Helpingtoclarify|talk]]) 04:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
::Why is this in the article? It adds zero value, even the banner above the excerpt asks to trim it down due to it being only appreciated by a small very specific audience. Just because she said it in her book does not give it notability to be on this page. Please remove this entire entry. [[User:MaximusEditor|MaximusEditor]] ([[User talk:MaximusEditor|talk]]) 19:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
:looks like [https://meaww.com/who-is-kristi-noems-husband-bombshell-report-claims-south-dakota-governor-has-been-having-affair-with-corey-lewandowski MEAWW] and [https://www.rawstory.com/amp/sick-and-disturbing-critics-slam-family-values-gop-governor-over-alleged-affair-with-former-top-trump-aide-2665447996 Raw Story] picked it up too. [[Special:Contributions/2601:8C0:A83:87F0:1C49:C788:A9E3:F168|2601:8C0:A83:87F0:1C49:C788:A9E3:F168]] ([[User talk:2601:8C0:A83:87F0:1C49:C788:A9E3:F168|talk]]) 04:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
:This is definitely relevant for reasons already stated. The Lincoln Project has a short piece of it today (6 hours ago), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP4dN8-Ci40, contrasting "portrayal" vs "actuality" or "alternative facts" vs "facts" of both these people. [[User:KREX68|KREX68]] ([[User talk:KREX68|talk]]) 04:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
::It's relevant, but so far it's only the Daily Mail, all other sources are just re-reporting their story. I would wait until a better source comes out with its own story, or at least until one good source independently confirms it. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 17:46, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
:::Yeah, only rags seem to be covering it so far. If it turns out to be verifiable, I'm confident every perennially reliable source will be on it right away. We can hold out til then. '''[[User:Ser!|ser!]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ser!|chat to me]] - [[Special:Contributions/Ser!|see my edits]])</sup> 19:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
::::Even if the claim is not solid enough to be made in wikivoice, ''the fact that it was alleged publicly'' has garnered significant media attention, and thus warrants inclusion. [[User:Peter L Griffin|Peter L Griffin]] ([[User talk:Peter L Griffin|talk]]) 03:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::You are not correct. This is not following WP policy to include allegations from a tabloid deemed not reliable. [[User:Helpingtoclarify|Helpingtoclarify]] ([[User talk:Helpingtoclarify|talk]]) 01:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::It has been covered by sources other than what you dismiss as tabloids and attributed to those tabloids. [[User:Peter L Griffin|Peter L Griffin]] ([[User talk:Peter L Griffin|talk]]) 01:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::{{re|Peter L Griffin}} - what are the most reliable sources reporting this story? '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 02:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::A quick search turns up CNN [https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/30/politics/corey-lewandowski-kristi-noem-2024/index.html] and Washington Post [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/kristi-noem-affair-allegations-lewandowski/2021/09/29/859ad8da-2154-11ec-9309-b743b79abc59_story.html] to name a few. Reliable local SD news outlets were also sourced at this page before someone removed them.
::::::::My claim is not so much that the rumors are definitely true but that the rumors are inherently noteworthy for inclusion as an attributed claim as a result of having been covered prominently. [[User:Peter L Griffin|Peter L Griffin]] ([[User talk:Peter L Griffin|talk]]) 05:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Vanity Fair too [https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/governor-kristi-noem-god-fearing-family-woman-and-corey-lewandowski-trump-creep-reportedly-had-yearslong-affair] [[User:Peter L Griffin|Peter L Griffin]] ([[User talk:Peter L Griffin|talk]]) 05:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Politico [https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/02/kristi-noem-dog-trump-2024-00155856] [[User:Peter L Griffin|Peter L Griffin]] ([[User talk:Peter L Griffin|talk]]) 05:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::As for local:
:::::::::::South Dakota Searchlight [https://southdakotasearchlight.com/2023/10/13/noem-lewandowski-relationship-doesnt-have-to-be-an-affair-to-be-inappropriate/#:~:text=The%20article%20alleges%20that%20Noem,source's%20observations%20of%20their%20behavior.] and Sioux Falls Live [https://www.siouxfallslive.com/news/south-dakota/stories-of-gov-kristi-noems-personal-life-distracting-from-real-challenges-insiders-say] [[User:Peter L Griffin|Peter L Griffin]] ([[User talk:Peter L Griffin|talk]]) 05:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::{{re|Peter L Griffin}} - CNN, Washington Post and Politico are good national-level sources, I would use those. Vanity Fair is a bit iffy, it's reliable for popculture, but personally I'd say it's less [[WP:DUE]] for politics. The Searchlight opinion article is unusable. [https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/30/south-dakota-gov-kristi-noem-wont-use-corey-lewandowski-as-advisor.html CNBC] also reported on it. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 07:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


== Create a "Controversy" section? ==
== Family farm ==


Given the prominence of the dog and goat shooting incident on her public image, as well as false claims about meeting North Korea's leader, etc., do you think it would be advisable to move these details from "Personal Life" to a new section that can broadly encapsulate these controversies? There has already been some support to give the episode with the dog its own section. [[User:ChthonicSweetie|ChthonicSweetie]] ([[User talk:ChthonicSweetie|talk]]) 01:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
It's odd that Noem and her defenders like to talk up her "farm", but there is little to nothing said about it here except that her father died there. It was apparently a 9,700-acre ranch that Noem inherited. She received more than $4 million in government subsidies for the ranch before she "cashed out" in 2017 so it isn't even clear that the claims about her running a "farm" where she killed her dog and goat are even true. ("Between 1995 and 2016, her family-owned Racota Valley Ranch in Hazel, S.D. cashed $3,704,415 million in government farm subsidies. In 2012 alone, they accepted $232,707 in subsidies.") I wonder what South Dakota taxpayers would think about the millions Noem received in a state where the minimum wage is $11.20 per hour. For what it is worth, it appears that Noem is on record as being against subsidies for anyone other than herself. Once again, the same story plays out: socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 20:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)


:We should not create a [[WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION]]. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 01:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
:Multiple legal experts have poked holes in Noem's story about her farm and the IRS.[https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/12/11/kristi-noem-poster-child-estate-tax-repeal-but-sad-tale-doesnt-add-up-chuck-collins-column/930472001/] [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 21:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
::These statements, in order for them to be considered for inclusion in this article, must be backed by specific Reliable sources. Also, Moral opinions may not be helpful for factual discussion. Wikipedia is for neutral factual information (WP:NPOV), as much as possible. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 22:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you, this is helpful to me as a new editor. Would "Public Image" be more admissible, as suggested in the link you included? [[User:ChthonicSweetie|ChthonicSweetie]] ([[User talk:ChthonicSweetie|talk]]) 01:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
:::I did not realize how new you are here. Welcome. Glad I didn't [[WP:BITE]] you. A "public image" section could work, but would have to put the focus on how she is perceived for those things. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 01:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)


== Military service ==
== I would argue that the recent dog killing incident deserves its own section ==


civil Air patrol does not qualify as military service. This needs to be removed as it is borderline stolen valor. Civil Air Patrol is not authorized to wear the GWOT medal because they are not part of the military. [[Special:Contributions/2601:18C:8600:DA10:9C79:309A:395F:6D96|2601:18C:8600:DA10:9C79:309A:395F:6D96]] ([[User talk:2601:18C:8600:DA10:9C79:309A:395F:6D96|talk]]) 00:19, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
This incident seems much more relevant than others that have a dedicated section. Including Conflict of interest action to professionally benefit daughter, Fireworks at Mount Rushmore lawsuit, Governor's mansion spending, "Meth. We're on It" campaign and others. While all sections have seemingly shaped her stances and gave insight to character, this appears to be defining a part of her career and possibly losing the chance at a VP nod. Obviously if it doesn't revisions can be made then but for now it seems to be very much front facing in all media. [[Special:Contributions/2604:2D80:5907:C400:F9F1:AFC5:3BDC:B240|2604:2D80:5907:C400:F9F1:AFC5:3BDC:B240]] ([[User talk:2604:2D80:5907:C400:F9F1:AFC5:3BDC:B240|talk]]) 00:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


:I agree with the significant and widespread media coverage of the "Dog Killing incident", it can no longer be just a detail in the Personal life section, and deserves a new section, or sub-section along with other related issues from her book, such as goat killings. Given the significant WP:RS sources, this is the most reported story on Kristi Noem, and hence needs a brief mention in the lead. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 05:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
:I agree this should be removed. The language is provided without citation, and I can't find any source to support this. At best, it appears that the CAP makes legislators honorary members. So you might have at best an honorary member of a civilian auxiliary group. This should be deleted. [[User:Athoughtforyou|Athoughtforyou]] ([[User talk:Athoughtforyou|talk]]) 12:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
::I agree, and I see its Done, deleted by [[User:Athoughtforyou|Athoughtforyou]] ([[User talk:Athoughtforyou|talk]]). Thanks. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 03:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
:Effective September 11, 2022, the GWOT-SM is now awarded to service members only serving in the area of effect for approved campaigns related to the Global War on Terrorism. [https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2022/07/29/no-more-automatic-gwot-service-medals-dod-says/] This has nothing to do with her service as an officer in the Civil Air Patrol. [[User:ZebulonMorn|ZebulonMorn]] ([[User talk:ZebulonMorn|talk]]) 07:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)


== Remove "Author" from the Firstsentence ==
: As per the discussion, a '''sub-sectio'''n within "Personal life" section, as '''Dog shooting incident''' has been added. Since, it broadly falls more under Personal life, as compared to other major sections sections on Career. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 06:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


Most WP:RS sources do not introduce Noem as an author, and it is not a very notable aspect. Hence it should be removed from firstsentence per WP:Firstsentance. Thanks. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 03:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
:Indeed, this incident has caused the third highest page views of this article during its lifetime. [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=all-time&pages=Kristi_Noem] '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 08:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


:Done. Thanks. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 06:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
:: Brief mention in Lead, including the overall context of Farm life, along with her autobiographies:
Living in rural South Dakota, Noem is also a farmer and a rancher.[2] Noem published first autobiography, Not My First Rodeo: Lessons from the Heartland in 2022.[3] Later in 2024, in her second autobiography, No Going Back, Noem mentioned about an incident involving shooting her untrainable dog [2][4] and defended it as a "tough decision".[4][5]


== Include Secretary of Homeland Security in First para ==
:: Please discuss here for any relevant updates to the brief lead mention. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]])


It has been widely reported in WP:RS sources. It is very notable that it should be included in the first paragraph of the lead. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 03:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
:::Changed to {{tq|Noem reportedly discussed killing her "untrainable" 14-month old dog that she "hated", while publicly defending her action as being that of a "responsible owner"}}. (1) "reportedly" because the book chapter has not been publicly released yet, this is the Guardian's reporting. (2) changed "tough decision" because it was vague, perhaps "responsible owner" is more descriptive. (3) provided age of dog and feeling towards dog. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 08:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
:::"age" of dog and "feeling towards dog" are probably details not neccecary in the lead. They are mentioned in the body.. "Hated" is a strong word for lead.
:::We need to make lead more neutral to avoid frequent edits & reverts in the lead by different editors [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 08:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


:Done. Thanks. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 06:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
::::{{re|RogerYg}} - I respect your input and have changed the lede accordingly to remove "hated", I still feel that the age of the dog is needed to clarify that this is not an old dog that needed euthanasia from old age. {{tq|Noem reportedly discussed killing her aggressive and "untrainable" 14-month old dog, while publicly defending her action as being that of a "responsible owner".}} '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 08:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Okay, looks fine for now. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 08:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::I think we need to mention briefly about the criticism, when including her defence Updated with neutral language:
::::::Responding to the criticism, Noem defended it as a tough decision of a "responsible owner". [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 09:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::The initial coverage was based only on the ''Guardian's'' report of her disclosure. It may be heavily covered, but all of the sources that detail the story are based on the ''Guardian'' report. The book is out on Tuesday and we can edit accordingly; its publication will generate more coverage.[[User:JSFarman|JSFarman]] ([[User talk:JSFarman|talk]]) 17:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Yeah, okay with above. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 01:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::''As per WP:RS sources, "Untrainable" is Noem's opinion and not factual enough to include in lead.''
::::::::::Also, as it was currently stated in the lead, it was not clear whether it was Noem's opinion or fact. Therefore, it had be deleted, or re-stated in different language [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 06:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


== Civil Air Patrol ==
:::::: Restated to clarify that these are Noem's opinions: "responsible owner" and "untrainable." Noem recounted an incident in which she shot and killed her young dog that seemed "untrainable".[4][5] Responding to widespread criticism, Noem argued that she was a "responsible owner" who made a tough decision.[6][5] [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 06:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::OK. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 06:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
{{od}} [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2015-07&end=2024-04&pages=Kristi_Noem Monthly views] - April 2024 is the month with the most views dating to the start of counting in 2015. Meanwhile May 2024 is already the third or fourth highest viewed month, and will probably become the most viewed month in less than a week. ''No Going Back'' certainly seems like the biggest thing of her political career so far. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 14:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

== Cricket story placement ==

{{user|Cpotisch}} has made the decision to move the Cricket story from the "personal life" section to the "guns" section under her gubernatorial tenure. This to me seems very misguided. Yes, the story does involve a gun but it has nothing to do with her positions or actions on gun rights as a governor. If anything it would be more relevant to animal rights, but I don't see it as being really related to her governorship at all. [[Special:Contributions/203.211.79.75|203.211.79.75]] ([[User talk:203.211.79.75|talk]]) 05:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

:Agree with your argument, its not about Gun rights. [[User:RogerYg|RogerYg]] ([[User talk:RogerYg|talk]]) 05:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

::Agreed, restored in personal life. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 08:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

== Suggested Edit: Add that she shot her goat twice in the gravel pit ==

In the article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristi_Noem#No_Going_Back it states that Governor Noem decided to kill her goat. However according to the sources listed she then took her goat to the gravel pit where she shot her dog and shot her goat twice as well. Seems prurient to add that she followed through on her decision. [[Special:Contributions/2601:2C3:800:B080:94FC:772:A71D:F5B8|2601:2C3:800:B080:94FC:772:A71D:F5B8]] ([[User talk:2601:2C3:800:B080:94FC:772:A71D:F5B8|talk]]) 19:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
:OK. Someone else already added two shots, I added the location. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|RUN]])''' 06:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/2601:2C3:800:B080:B08D:2B9F:6F81:A0D9|2601:2C3:800:B080:B08D:2B9F:6F81:A0D9]] ([[User talk:2601:2C3:800:B080:B08D:2B9F:6F81:A0D9|talk]]) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
::Why is this in the article? It adds zero value, even the banner above the excerpt asks to trim it down due to it being only appreciated by a small very specific audience. Just because she said it in her book does not give it notability to be on this page. Please remove this entire entry. [[User:MaximusEditor|MaximusEditor]] ([[User talk:MaximusEditor|talk]]) 19:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)


Kristi Noem posted a picture on her social media about her promotion to [[Lieutenant colonel (United States)|Lieutenant Colonel]] in the [[Civil Air Patrol]]. [https://www.tmz.com/photos/image_jpg_20240426_8ae99004479c40508a66dc1528c679ab/] She joined during her tenure in the state legislature. "State legislative member" are honorary members unless they choose to continue as a full active member.[https://group2tx.cap.gov/join/legislative#:~:text=%E2%96%BA%20State%20Legislative%20Member&text=State%20Legislative%20members%20are%20assigned,the%20honorary%20grade%20of%20major.] As she hasn't been a state legislator in over a decade, and the expiration date on her [[Common Access Card|CAC]] reads "31 December 2024", she is an active member of the [[Civil Air Patrol]]. Additionally, "on Aug. 28, 2015, Gen. Mark A. Welsh III, Air Force chief of staff, announced CAP officially as a member of the U.S. Air Force’s Total Force, joining the regular, guard and reserve forces as American airmen." [https://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/about/history-of-civil-air-patrol] This should absolutely be included on her infobox and intro, as she is an [[Officer (armed forces)|officer]] in the [[United States Armed Forces]]. [[User:ZebulonMorn|ZebulonMorn]] ([[User talk:ZebulonMorn|talk]]) 07:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
It is amazing how biased and one-sided the publications are against conservatives, republicans and anyone on the other opposite side of the political spectrum. Ever so critical, manipulative and purposely pointing out the bad and the ugly and not the good. On the other hand the liberals get outstanding reports and representation from editors. [[User:Jbcuba|Jbcuba]] ([[User talk:Jbcuba|talk]]) 19:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
:Wikipedia needs a secondary source that mentions her membership in this organization and views her as a miliary officer with the rank of lieutenant colonel. Editors original research is not enough. Issues of "stolen valor" are highly problematic for politicians. The only source provided at the moment is an image of her membership card [https://www.tmz.com/photos/image_jpg_20240426_8ae99004479c40508a66dc1528c679ab/ https://www.tmz.com/photos/image_jpg_20240426_8ae99004479c40508a66dc1528c679ab/]. --[[User:Guest2625|Guest2625]] ([[User talk:Guest2625|talk]]) 08:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
::As was widely reported, [https://apnews.com/article/kristi-noem-south-dakota-social-media-62164d4bc288befd2f0f36629ffedde7] [https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/south-dakota/articles/2024-07-08/south-dakota-gov-noems-official-social-media-accounts-seem-to-disappear-without-explanation] [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/08/kristi-noem-social-media-deleted] [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kristi-noem-quietly-deletes-two-state-affiliated-social-media-accounts-over-holiday-weekend-report] Kristi Noem deleted her social media accounts, making this information very difficult to procure. The only known public source has been provided. [[User:ZebulonMorn|ZebulonMorn]] ([[User talk:ZebulonMorn|talk]]) 08:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
:::Here is the original post https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrFDga8r1ZnBwIA2gtXNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9zAzIEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1734943932/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.facebook.com%2fgovnoem%2fposts%2fwhat-ive-been-made-a-lt-col-in-the-civil-air-patrol-boom-day-made-%25EF%25B8%258F-thank-you-to%2f938828534265777%2f/RK=2/RS=cJ6UDV2yg.B9PODprQiPSz2yG54- [[User:ZebulonMorn|ZebulonMorn]] ([[User talk:ZebulonMorn|talk]]) 08:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
::::I am unable to see that link. It is blocked. --[[User:Guest2625|Guest2625]] ([[User talk:Guest2625|talk]]) 10:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
:::I just found [https://wikimili.com/en/Kristi_Noem this], but I'm not sure its [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|WK:RS]]. [[User:ZebulonMorn|ZebulonMorn]] ([[User talk:ZebulonMorn|talk]]) 08:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
::::That's funny. You want to cite yourself? --[[User:Guest2625|Guest2625]] ([[User talk:Guest2625|talk]]) 09:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:06, 9 December 2024

Suggested Edit: Add that she shot her goat twice in the gravel pit

[edit]

In the article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristi_Noem#No_Going_Back it states that Governor Noem decided to kill her goat. However according to the sources listed she then took her goat to the gravel pit where she shot her dog and shot her goat twice as well. Seems prurient to add that she followed through on her decision. 2601:2C3:800:B080:94FC:772:A71D:F5B8 (talk) 19:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Someone else already added two shots, I added the location. starship.paint (RUN) 06:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. 2601:2C3:800:B080:B08D:2B9F:6F81:A0D9 (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why is this in the article? It adds zero value, even the banner above the excerpt asks to trim it down due to it being only appreciated by a small very specific audience. Just because she said it in her book does not give it notability to be on this page. Please remove this entire entry. MaximusEditor (talk) 19:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create a "Controversy" section?

[edit]

Given the prominence of the dog and goat shooting incident on her public image, as well as false claims about meeting North Korea's leader, etc., do you think it would be advisable to move these details from "Personal Life" to a new section that can broadly encapsulate these controversies? There has already been some support to give the episode with the dog its own section. ChthonicSweetie (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We should not create a WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this is helpful to me as a new editor. Would "Public Image" be more admissible, as suggested in the link you included? ChthonicSweetie (talk) 01:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not realize how new you are here. Welcome. Glad I didn't WP:BITE you. A "public image" section could work, but would have to put the focus on how she is perceived for those things. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Military service

[edit]

civil Air patrol does not qualify as military service. This needs to be removed as it is borderline stolen valor. Civil Air Patrol is not authorized to wear the GWOT medal because they are not part of the military. 2601:18C:8600:DA10:9C79:309A:395F:6D96 (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this should be removed. The language is provided without citation, and I can't find any source to support this. At best, it appears that the CAP makes legislators honorary members. So you might have at best an honorary member of a civilian auxiliary group. This should be deleted. Athoughtforyou (talk) 12:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, and I see its Done, deleted by Athoughtforyou (talk). Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 03:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Effective September 11, 2022, the GWOT-SM is now awarded to service members only serving in the area of effect for approved campaigns related to the Global War on Terrorism. [1] This has nothing to do with her service as an officer in the Civil Air Patrol. ZebulonMorn (talk) 07:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove "Author" from the Firstsentence

[edit]

Most WP:RS sources do not introduce Noem as an author, and it is not a very notable aspect. Hence it should be removed from firstsentence per WP:Firstsentance. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 03:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 06:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Include Secretary of Homeland Security in First para

[edit]

It has been widely reported in WP:RS sources. It is very notable that it should be included in the first paragraph of the lead. RogerYg (talk) 03:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 06:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Civil Air Patrol

[edit]

Kristi Noem posted a picture on her social media about her promotion to Lieutenant Colonel in the Civil Air Patrol. [2] She joined during her tenure in the state legislature. "State legislative member" are honorary members unless they choose to continue as a full active member.[3] As she hasn't been a state legislator in over a decade, and the expiration date on her CAC reads "31 December 2024", she is an active member of the Civil Air Patrol. Additionally, "on Aug. 28, 2015, Gen. Mark A. Welsh III, Air Force chief of staff, announced CAP officially as a member of the U.S. Air Force’s Total Force, joining the regular, guard and reserve forces as American airmen." [4] This should absolutely be included on her infobox and intro, as she is an officer in the United States Armed Forces. ZebulonMorn (talk) 07:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia needs a secondary source that mentions her membership in this organization and views her as a miliary officer with the rank of lieutenant colonel. Editors original research is not enough. Issues of "stolen valor" are highly problematic for politicians. The only source provided at the moment is an image of her membership card https://www.tmz.com/photos/image_jpg_20240426_8ae99004479c40508a66dc1528c679ab/. --Guest2625 (talk) 08:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As was widely reported, [5] [6] [7] [8] Kristi Noem deleted her social media accounts, making this information very difficult to procure. The only known public source has been provided. ZebulonMorn (talk) 08:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the original post https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrFDga8r1ZnBwIA2gtXNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9zAzIEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1734943932/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.facebook.com%2fgovnoem%2fposts%2fwhat-ive-been-made-a-lt-col-in-the-civil-air-patrol-boom-day-made-%25EF%25B8%258F-thank-you-to%2f938828534265777%2f/RK=2/RS=cJ6UDV2yg.B9PODprQiPSz2yG54- ZebulonMorn (talk) 08:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to see that link. It is blocked. --Guest2625 (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just found this, but I'm not sure its WK:RS. ZebulonMorn (talk) 08:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's funny. You want to cite yourself? --Guest2625 (talk) 09:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]