Talk:Court of labour (Belgium): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
+Discussion |
Closing requested move; not moved using Move+ |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{WikiProject Law|importance=mid}} |
{{WikiProject Law|importance=mid}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{old move|date=28 November 2024|destination=Court of labour|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1261214715#Requested move 28 November 2024}} |
|||
== Requested move 28 November 2024 == |
== Requested move 28 November 2024 == |
||
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #efe); color: var(--color-base, inherit); margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|||
{{requested move/dated|multiple=yes |
|||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color: var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.'' |
|||
|current1=Court of labour (Belgium)|new1=Court of labour|current2=Tribunal of first instance (Belgium)|new2=Tribunal of first instance|}} |
|||
The result of the move request was: '''not moved.''' <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small> [[User talk:Frost|<span style="color: #9cbfe8; font-family: Bahnschrift">Frost</span>]] 00:52, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
* [[:Court of labour (Belgium)]] → {{no redirect|Court of labour}} |
* [[:Court of labour (Belgium)]] → {{no redirect|Court of labour}} |
||
* [[:Tribunal of first instance (Belgium)]] → {{no redirect|Tribunal of first instance}} |
* [[:Tribunal of first instance (Belgium)]] → {{no redirect|Tribunal of first instance}} |
||
– Unnecessary disambiguations; no other country has these English names. [[User:Santiago Claudio|Santiago Claudio]] ([[User talk:Santiago Claudio|talk]]) 00:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
– Unnecessary disambiguations; no other country has these English names. [[User:Santiago Claudio|Santiago Claudio]] ([[User talk:Santiago Claudio|talk]]) 00:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' - both could be used as alternate terms for [[Labor court]] and [[Trial court]], respectively. Thus, the proposal fails [[WP:PRECISION]]. [[User:Estar8806|estar8806]] ([[User talk:Estar8806|talk]]) [[Special:Contributions/Estar8806 |★]] 02:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per estar8806. Too generic. See also the French [[Tribunal d'instance]]. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 11:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' both are ambiguous terms and thus the disambiguation is required. [[User:Raladic|Raladic]] ([[User talk:Raladic|talk]]) 22:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: var(--color-error, red);">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] --> |
|||
</div><div style="clear:both;" class=></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 00:52, 5 December 2024
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 28 November 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Court of labour. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 28 November 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost 00:52, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Court of labour (Belgium) → Court of labour
- Tribunal of first instance (Belgium) → Tribunal of first instance
– Unnecessary disambiguations; no other country has these English names. Santiago Claudio (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - both could be used as alternate terms for Labor court and Trial court, respectively. Thus, the proposal fails WP:PRECISION. estar8806 (talk) ★ 02:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per estar8806. Too generic. See also the French Tribunal d'instance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose both are ambiguous terms and thus the disambiguation is required. Raladic (talk) 22:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.