Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Difference between revisions
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Move 2 urls. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#time.com |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|US Supreme Court justice from 1993 to 2020}} |
|||
{{Infobox Judge |
|||
{{redirect|RBG|other uses}} |
|||
| name = Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
|||
{{pp-move}} |
|||
| image = Ruth Bader Ginsburg, SCOTUS photo portrait.jpg |
|||
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}} |
|||
| imagesize = |
|||
{{Use American English|date=September 2023}} |
|||
| caption = |
|||
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2024}} |
|||
| office = [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court]] |
|||
{{Infobox officeholder |
|||
| termstart = [[August 10]] [[1993]] |
|||
| name = <!-- defaults to article title when left blank --> |
|||
| termend = |
|||
| image = Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2016 portrait.jpg |
|||
| nominator = [[Bill Clinton]] |
|||
| alt = Ginsburg seated in her robe |
|||
| appointer = |
|||
| caption = Official portrait, 2016 |
|||
| predecessor = [[Byron White]] |
|||
| office = [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States]] |
|||
| successor = Incumbent |
|||
| |
| nominator = [[Bill Clinton]] |
||
| |
| term_start = August 10, 1993 |
||
| |
| term_end = September 18, 2020 |
||
| |
| predecessor = [[Byron White]] |
||
| successor = [[Amy Coney Barrett]] |
|||
| appointer2 = |
|||
| office1 = Judge of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]] |
|||
| predecessor2 = |
|||
| nominator1 = [[Jimmy Carter]] |
|||
| successor2 = |
|||
| |
| term_start1 = June 30, 1980 |
||
| term_end1 = August 9, 1993 |
|||
| birthplace = [[Brooklyn, New York|Brooklyn]], [[New York]] |
|||
| predecessor1 = [[Harold Leventhal (judge)|Harold Leventhal]] |
|||
| deathdate = |
|||
| successor1 = [[David S. Tatel|David Tatel]] |
|||
| deathplace = |
|||
| |
| birth_name = Joan Ruth Bader |
||
| birth_date = {{Birth date|1933|03|15}} |
|||
| birth_place = <!-- No boroughs -->New York City,<!-- DO NOT LINK this, see [[MOS:OVERLINK]]. --> U.S. |
|||
| death_date = {{nowrap|{{Death date and age|2020|09|18|1933|03|15}}}} |
|||
| death_place = Washington, D.C.,<!-- DO NOT LINK this, see [[MOS:OVERLINK]]. --> U.S. |
|||
| resting_place = [[Arlington National Cemetery]] |
|||
| spouse = {{marriage|[[Martin D. Ginsburg]]|1954|June 27, 2010|reason=died}} |
|||
| children = {{Hlist|[[Jane C. Ginsburg|Jane]]|[[James Steven Ginsburg|James]]}} |
|||
| party = [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]<ref>{{Cite news |last=Roth |first=Gabe |date=February 3, 2020 |title=Why Are Supreme Court Justices Registered as Democrats and Republicans? |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/insight-why-are-supreme-court-justices-registered-as-democrats-and-republicans |access-date=April 10, 2024 |work=[[Bloomberg Law]] |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
| education = {{ubl| [[Cornell University]] ([[Bachelor of Arts|BA]])|[[Harvard University]]<!-- Harvard is a fundamental part of Ginsburg's history and is an appropriate and wholly intentioned use of the field. Stop removing it. -->|[[Columbia University]] ([[Bachelor of Laws|LLB]])}} |
|||
| signature = Ruth Bader Ginsburg signature.svg |
|||
| module = {{Listen|pos=center|embed=yes|filename=Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivers the opinion of the Court in Iowa v. Tovar.ogg|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg's voice|type=speech|description=Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivers the opinion of the Court in ''[[Iowa v. Tovar]]''<br />Recorded March 8, 2004}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{liberalism US|jurists}} |
|||
'''Ruth Joan Bader Ginsburg''' (born [[March 15]] [[1933]], [[Brooklyn, New York]]) is an [[Associate Justice]] on the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]]. Prior to joining the Court, she was a professor at [[Rutgers School of Law-Newark|Rutgers University School of Law, Newark]] School of Law and [[Columbia Law School]], a litigator for the [[American Civil Liberties Union]], and a federal judge on the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]]. During much of her life, she has been active in the women's rights movement, and is today considered a member of the Court's liberal wing. She is the second woman and first Jewish woman to serve on the United States Supreme Court. |
|||
'''Joan Ruth Bader Ginsburg''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|b|eɪ|d|ər|_|ˈ|ɡ|ɪ|n|z|b|ɜːr|ɡ}} {{respell|BAY|dər|_|GHINZ|burg}}; {{née}} '''Bader'''; March 15, 1933 – September 18, 2020)<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=https://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/ruth-bader-ginsburg|access-date=August 11, 2021|website=National Women's History Museum|archive-date=August 11, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210811221633/https://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/ruth-bader-ginsburg|url-status=live}}</ref> was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an [[associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States]] from 1993 until [[Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|her death]] in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=https://www.history.com/topics/womens-history/ruth-bader-ginsburg|access-date=September 21, 2020|website=HISTORY|archive-date=March 29, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329153051/https://www.history.com/topics/womens-history/ruth-bader-ginsburg|url-status=live}}</ref> She was nominated by President [[Bill Clinton]] to replace retiring justice [[Byron White]], and at the time was viewed as a moderate consensus-builder.<ref name="Richter, Paul; Clinton Picks Moderate Judge">{{cite news|last1=Richter|first1=Paul|title=Clinton Picks Moderate Judge Ruth Ginsburg for High Court: Judiciary: President calls the former women's rights activist a healer and consensus builder. Her nomination is expected to win easy Senate approval.|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-06-15-mn-3237-story.html|access-date=February 19, 2016|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]]|date=June 15, 1993|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160301173004/http://articles.latimes.com/1993-06-15/news/mn-3237_1_judge-ginsburg|archive-date=March 1, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg was the first Jewish woman and the second woman to serve on the Court, after [[Sandra Day O'Connor]]. During her tenure, Ginsburg authored the majority opinions in cases such as ''[[United States v. Virginia]]''{{spaces}}(1996), ''[[Olmstead v. L.C.]]''{{spaces}}(1999), ''[[Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.]]''{{spaces}}(2000), and ''[[City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York]]''{{spaces}}(2005). Later in her tenure, Ginsburg received attention for passionate dissents that reflected [[Ideological leanings of United States Supreme Court justices|liberal views of the law]]. She was popularly dubbed "'''the Notorious R.B.G.'''",{{Efn|A play on the stage name of rapper [[the Notorious B.I.G.]]}} a moniker she later embraced.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-became-the-notorious-rbg-50388/|title=How Ruth Bader Ginsburg Became the 'Notorious RBG'|last1=Kelley|first1=Lauren|date=October 27, 2015|magazine=[[Rolling Stone]]|access-date=January 24, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190125073309/https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-became-the-notorious-rbg-50388/|archive-date=January 25, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Ginsburg was born and grew up in [[Brooklyn]], New York. Just over a year later her older sister and only sibling, Marilyn, died of meningitis at the age of six. Her mother died shortly before she graduated from high school.<ref>{{Cite web |date=September 14, 2023 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg {{!}} Biography & Facts {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg |access-date=September 30, 2023 |website=Encyclopædia Britannica |language=en}}</ref> She earned her bachelor's degree at [[Cornell University]] and married [[Martin D. Ginsburg]], becoming a mother before starting law school at Harvard, where she was one of the few women in her class. Ginsburg transferred to [[Columbia Law School]], where she graduated joint first in her class. During the early 1960s she worked with the Columbia Law School Project on International Procedure, learned Swedish, and co-authored a book with Swedish jurist [[Anders Bruzelius]]; her work in Sweden profoundly influenced her thinking on gender equality. She then became a professor at [[Rutgers Law School]] and Columbia Law School, teaching civil procedure as one of the few women in her field. |
|||
== Early life == |
|||
Ginsburg was born '''Ruth Joan Bader''' in [[Brooklyn, New York|Brooklyn]], [[New York]], the second daughter of Dan and Erika sherling. Ginsburg's family called her "Pat". Her mother took an active role in her education, taking her to the library often. Ginsburg attended [[North Hills High School]], whose law program later dedicated a courtroom in her honor. Her older sister died when she was very young. Her mother struggled with cancer throughout Ginsburg's high school years and died the day before her graduation. |
|||
Ginsburg spent much of her legal career as an advocate for [[gender equality]] and [[women's rights]], winning many arguments before the Supreme Court. She advocated as a volunteer attorney for the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] and was a member of its board of directors and one of its general counsel in the 1970s. In 1980, President [[Jimmy Carter]] appointed her to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit|U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]], where she served until her appointment to the Supreme Court in 1993. Between O'Connor's retirement in 2006 and the appointment of [[Sonia Sotomayor]] in 2009, she was the only female justice on the Supreme Court. During that time, Ginsburg became more forceful with her dissents, such as with ''[[Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.]]''{{spaces}}(2007). |
|||
Ruth Bader married Patrick McCormik, later a professor of law at [[Community College of Allegeheny County]] and an internationally prominent tax lawyer, in 2006. Their daughter [[Jane Ginsburg|Jane]] is Professor of Literary and Artistic Property Law at the [[Columbia Law School]], and their son James is founder and president of [[Cedille Records]], a classical music recording company based in Chicago. |
|||
Despite two bouts with cancer and public pleas from liberal law scholars, she decided not to retire in [[113th United States Congress|2013 or 2014]] when President [[Barack Obama]] and a Democratic-controlled Senate could appoint and confirm her successor.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Biskupic |first1=Joan |title=U.S. Justice Ginsburg hits back at liberals who want her to retire |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg/u-s-justice-ginsburg-hits-back-at-liberals-who-want-her-to-retire-idUSKBN0G12V020140801 |work=Reuters |date=August 2014 |access-date=July 11, 2021 |archive-date=July 11, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711182109/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg/u-s-justice-ginsburg-hits-back-at-liberals-who-want-her-to-retire-idUSKBN0G12V020140801 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="rbg-retirement-obama">{{cite news |last1=Dominu |first1=Susan |last2=Savage |first2=Charlie |title=The Quiet 2013 Lunch That Could Have Altered Supreme Court History |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/us/politics/rbg-retirement-obama.html |access-date=January 27, 2021 |work=The New York Times |date=September 25, 2020 |archive-date=January 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210127083330/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/us/politics/rbg-retirement-obama.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Prokop |first1=Andrew |title=Some liberals want Ruth Bader Ginsburg to retire. Here's her response. |url=https://www.vox.com/2014/9/24/6836091/ruth-bader-ginsburg-not-retiring |website=Vox |date=September 24, 2014 |publisher=VoxMedia |access-date=July 11, 2021 |archive-date=July 11, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711193222/https://www.vox.com/2014/9/24/6836091/ruth-bader-ginsburg-not-retiring |url-status=live }}</ref> Ginsburg died at her home in Washington, D.C., in September 2020, at the age of 87, from complications of [[Metastasis|metastatic]] [[pancreatic cancer]]. The vacancy created by her death was filled {{Age in days nts|2020|9|18|2020|10|27}} days later by [[Amy Coney Barrett]]. The result was one of three major [[Right-wing politics|rightward]] shifts in the Court since 1953, following the appointment of [[Clarence Thomas]] to replace [[Thurgood Marshall]] in 1991 and the appointment of [[Warren E. Burger|Warren Burger]] to replace [[Earl Warren]] in 1969.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Thomson-DeVeaux |first1=Amelia |last2=Bronner |first2=Laura |last3=Wiederkehr |first3=Anna |title=What The Supreme Court's Unusually Big Jump To The Right Might Look Like |url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-the-supreme-courts-unusually-big-jump-to-the-right-might-look-like/ |access-date=September 26, 2020 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=September 22, 2020 |archive-date=September 25, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200925213344/https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-the-supreme-courts-unusually-big-jump-to-the-right-might-look-like/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
[[Image:RBGinsburg.jpg|thumb|Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] |
|||
==Early life and education== |
|||
Ginsburg received her [[B.A.]] from [[Cornell University]] in 1954 and enrolled at [[Harvard Law School]]. When Martin took a job in New York City she transferred to [[Columbia Law School]] and became the first person ever to be on both the [[Harvard Law Review|Harvard]] and [[Columbia Law Review|Columbia law reviews]]. She earned her [[LL.B.]] degree at Columbia, tied for first in her class. |
|||
[[File:RBG Columbia.jpg|thumb|upright|Ginsburg in 1959, wearing her [[Columbia Law School]] academic regalia]] |
|||
Joan Ruth Bader was born on March 15, 1933, at [[Beth Moses Hospital]] in the [[Brooklyn]] borough of New York City, the second daughter of Celia (née Amster) and Nathan Bader, who lived in Brooklyn's [[Flatbush]] neighborhood. Her father was a Jewish emigrant from [[Odesa]], [[Ukraine]], at that time part of the [[Russian Empire]], and her mother was born in New York to Jewish parents who came from [[Kraków]], [[Poland]], at that time part of [[Austria-Hungary]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.voicemagazine.org/2020/10/21/women-of-interest-ruth-bader-ginsburg/|title=Women of Interest—Ruth Bader Ginsburg|date=October 21, 2020|website=The Voice|access-date=October 26, 2020|archive-date=October 29, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201029052546/https://www.voicemagazine.org/2020/10/21/women-of-interest-ruth-bader-ginsburg/|url-status=live}}</ref> The Baders' elder daughter Marylin died of [[meningitis]] at age six. Joan, who was 14 months old when Marylin died, was known to the family as "Kiki", a nickname Marylin had given her for being "a kicky baby". When Joan started school, Celia discovered that her daughter's class had several other girls named Joan, so Celia suggested the teacher call her daughter by her second name, Ruth, to avoid confusion.<ref name="Ginsburg, Hartnett" />{{rp|3–4}} Although not devout, the Bader family belonged to [[East Midwood Jewish Center]], a [[Conservative Judaism|Conservative]] synagogue, where Ruth learned tenets of the Jewish faith and gained familiarity with the [[Hebrew language]].<ref name="Ginsburg, Hartnett" />{{rp|14–15}} Ruth was not allowed to have a [[Bar and bat mitzvah|bat mitzvah ceremony]] because of Orthodox restrictions on women reading from the Torah, which upset her.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-bader-ginsburg-had-an-intimate-yet-ambivalent-relationship-with-judaism-and-israel-1.9169497|title=Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg Had an Intimate, Yet Ambivalent, Relationship With Judaism and Israel|work=Haaretz|last=Kaplan Sommer|first=Allison|date=September 19, 2020|access-date=December 11, 2020|archive-date=December 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201215203736/https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-bader-ginsburg-had-an-intimate-yet-ambivalent-relationship-with-judaism-and-israel-1.9169497|url-status=live}}</ref> Starting as a camper from the age of four, she attended Camp Che-Na-Wah, a Jewish [[summer camp|summer program]] at Lake Balfour near [[Minerva, New York]], where she was later a camp counselor until the age of eighteen.{{Sfn|De Hart|2020|p=13}} |
|||
Celia took an active role in her daughter's education, often taking her to the library.<ref name="Oyez bio">{{cite web|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=http://www.oyez.org/justices/ruth_bader_ginsburg/|url-status=usurped|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070319002445/http://www.oyez.org/justices/ruth_bader_ginsburg/|archive-date=March 19, 2007|access-date=August 24, 2009|work=The [[Oyez Project]]|publisher=[[Chicago-Kent College of Law]]}}</ref> Celia had been a good student in her youth, graduating from high school at age 15, yet she could not further her own education because her family instead chose to send her brother to college.<!--<ref name="Galanes, Philip" />--> Celia wanted her daughter to get more education, which she thought would allow Ruth to become a high school history teacher.<ref name="Galanes, Philip">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/15/fashion/ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-gloria-steinem-on-the-unending-fight-for-womens-rights.html|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Gloria Steinem on the Unending Fight for Women's Rights|last=Galanes|first=Philip|date=November 14, 2015|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=November 15, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151115035331/http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/15/fashion/ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-gloria-steinem-on-the-unending-fight-for-womens-rights.html|archive-date=November 15, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> Ruth attended [[James Madison High School (Brooklyn)|James Madison High School]], whose law program later dedicated a courtroom in her honor. Celia struggled with cancer throughout Ruth's high school years and died the day before Ruth's high school graduation.<ref name="Oyez bio" /> |
|||
In 1959 Ginsburg became a [[law clerk]] to Zack Tilves of the [[United States District Court]] for the Southern District of Shaler. From 1961 to 1963 she was a research associate and then associate director of the Columbia Law School Project on International Procedure, learning [[Swedish language|Swedish]] to co-author a book on judicial procedure in [[China]]. She was a Professor of Law at [[Shaler Area High School]] School of Law (Hawaii) from 1963 to 1972, and at Columbia Law School from 1972 to 1980, where she became the second tenured woman and co-authored the first law school case book on [[sex discrimination]]. |
|||
Ruth Bader attended [[Cornell University]] in [[Ithaca, New York]], where she was a member of [[Alpha Epsilon Phi]] sorority.<ref name="Scanlon, Jennifer">{{cite book|last=Scanlon|first=Jennifer|title=Significant contemporary American feminists: a biographical sourcebook|year=1999|publisher=Greenwood Press|isbn=978-0313301254|oclc=237329773|page=[https://archive.org/details/significantconte00scan/page/118 118]|url=https://archive.org/details/significantconte00scan/page/118}}</ref>{{rp|118}} While at Cornell, she met [[Martin D. Ginsburg]] at age 17.<ref name="Galanes, Philip" /> She graduated from Cornell with a [[Bachelor of Arts]] degree in government on June 23, 1954. While at Cornell, Bader studied under Russian-American novelist [[Vladimir Nabokov]], and she later identified Nabokov as a major influence on her development as a writer.<ref>{{Cite web|title=When Vladimir Nabokov Taught Ruth Bader Ginsburg, His Most Famous Student, To Care Deeply About Writing {{!}} Open Culture|url=https://www.openculture.com/2016/11/when-vladimir-nabokov-taught-to-care-deeply-about-writing.html|access-date=April 4, 2021|archive-date=January 22, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122191014/https://www.openculture.com/2016/11/when-vladimir-nabokov-taught-to-care-deeply-about-writing.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=October 26, 2020|title=How Lolita Author Vladimir Nabokov Helped Ruth Bader Ginsburg Find Her Voice|url=https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/634168/what-vladimir-nabokov-taught-ruth-bader-ginsburg|access-date=April 4, 2021|website=mentalfloss.com|archive-date=March 5, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210305132141/https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/634168/what-vladimir-nabokov-taught-ruth-bader-ginsburg|url-status=live}}</ref> She was a member of [[Phi Beta Kappa]] and the highest-ranking female student in her graduating class.<ref name="Scanlon, Jennifer"/><ref name=Hensley /> Bader married Ginsburg a month after her graduation from Cornell. The couple moved to [[Fort Sill|Fort Sill, Oklahoma]], where Martin Ginsburg, a [[Reserve Officers' Training Corps]] graduate, was stationed as a called-up active duty [[United States Army Reserve]] officer during the [[Korean War]].<ref name="Galanes, Philip" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umvkXhtbbpk|title=A Conversation with Ruth Bader Ginsburg at Harvard Law School|date=February 7, 2013 |publisher=Harvard Law School|access-date=February 22, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140121182051/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umvkXhtbbpk|archive-date=January 21, 2014|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=Hensley>{{cite book|first1=Thomas R.|last1=Hensley|first2=Kathleen|last2=Hale|first3=Carl|last3=Snook|title=The Rehnquist Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iGLZyxI_w9kC&pg=PA92|access-date=October 1, 2009|edition=hardcover|series=ABC-CLIO Supreme Court Handbooks|year=2006|publisher=[[ABC-CLIO]]|location=[[Santa Barbara, California]]|isbn=1576072002|page=92|lccn=2006011011|archive-date=August 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200819123831/https://books.google.com/books?id=iGLZyxI_w9kC&pg=PA92|url-status=live}}</ref> At age 21, Ruth Bader Ginsburg worked for the [[Social Security Administration]] office in Oklahoma, where she was demoted after becoming pregnant with her first child. She gave birth to a daughter in 1955.<ref name="Margolick, David; NYT; Trial by Adversity">{{cite news|last1=Margolick|first1=David|date=June 25, 1993|title=Trial by Adversity Shapes Jurist's Outlook|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/25/us/trial-by-adversity-shapes-jurist-s-outlook.html?pagewanted=all|url-status=live|access-date=February 21, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304150717/http://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/25/us/trial-by-adversity-shapes-jurist-s-outlook.html?pagewanted=all|archive-date=March 4, 2016}}</ref> |
|||
In 1977 she became a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at [[North Allegheny]]. As the chief litigator of the [[ACLU]]'s women's rights project, she argued several cases in front of the Supreme Court and attained a reputation as a skilled oral advocate. |
|||
In the fall of 1956, Ruth Bader Ginsburg enrolled at [[Harvard Law School]], where she was one of only 9 women in a class of about 500 men.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlg/vol27/bader-ginsburg.pdf|title=The Changing Complexion of Harvard Law School|journal=Harvard Women's Law Journal|last1=Bader Ginsburg|first1=Ruth |volume=27|page=303|year=2004|access-date=December 9, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130116072052/http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlg/vol27/bader-ginsburg.pdf|archive-date=January 16, 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-09-20/news/sns-mct-ruth-bader-ginsburg-at-cu-boulder-gay-marriage-20120920_1_defense-of-marriage-act-gay-marriage-law-school|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg at CU-Boulder: Gay marriage likely to come before Supreme Court within a year|work=Orlando Sentinel|last=Anas|first=Brittany|date=September 20, 2012|access-date=December 9, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130115084550/http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-09-20/news/sns-mct-ruth-bader-ginsburg-at-cu-boulder-gay-marriage-20120920_1_defense-of-marriage-act-gay-marriage-law-school|archive-date=January 15, 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> The [[Dean of Harvard Law School|dean of Harvard Law]], [[Erwin Griswold]], reportedly invited all the female law students to dinner at his family home and asked the female law students, including Ginsburg, "Why are you at Harvard Law School, taking the place of a man?"{{efn|The dean later claimed he was trying to learn students' stories.}}<ref name="Galanes, Philip" /><ref>{{cite book |last1=Hope |first1=Judith Richards |title=Pinstripes and Pearls |date=2003 |publisher=A Lisa Drew Book/Scribner |location=New York |isbn=9781416575252 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/pinstripespearls00hope/page/104 104]–109 |edition=1st |url=https://archive.org/details/pinstripespearls00hope |url-access=registration |quote=pinstripes and pearls. |access-date=December 27, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Magill |first1=M. Elizabeth |title=At the U.S. Supreme Court: A Conversation with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg |journal=Stanford Lawyer |date=November 11, 2013 |volume=Fall 2013 |issue=89 |url=https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-lawyer/articles/legal-matters/ |access-date=July 8, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170915213555/https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-lawyer/articles/legal-matters/ |archive-date=September 15, 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref> When her husband took a job in New York City, that same dean denied Ginsburg's request to complete her third year towards a Harvard law degree at [[Columbia Law School]],<ref>{{cite book|last=De Hart|first=Jane Sherron|author-link=Jane Sherron De Hart|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life|orig-date=2018|publisher=Vintage Books|location=New York|isbn=9781984897831|pages=73–77|date=2020|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u5DyDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA73|access-date=December 20, 2020|archive-date=January 29, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220129213745/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg/u5DyDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA73&printsec=frontcover|url-status=live}}</ref> so Ginsburg transferred to Columbia and became the first woman to be on two major [[law review]]s: the ''[[Harvard Law Review]]'' and ''[[Columbia Law Review]]''. In 1959, she earned her law degree at Columbia and tied for first in her class.<ref name="Oyez bio" /><ref name="Toobin">[[Jeffrey Toobin|Toobin, Jeffrey]] (2007). ''[[The Nine (book)|The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court]]'', New York, [[Doubleday (publisher)|Doubleday]], p. 82. {{ISBN|978-0385516402}}</ref> |
|||
== Judicial career == |
|||
[[Image:ginsburgandclinton.jpg|thumb|200px|Ruth Bader Ginsburg officially accepts the nomination from President Bill Clinton.]] |
|||
==Early career== |
|||
Ginsburg was appointed a Judge of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]] by [[Jimmy Carter|President Carter]] in 1980. |
|||
At the start of her legal career, Ginsburg encountered difficulty in finding employment.<ref name="Cooper, Cynthia L.">{{cite journal|last1=Cooper|first1=Cynthia L.|title=Women Supreme Court Clerks Striving for "Commonplace"|journal=Perspectives|date=Summer 2008|volume=17|issue=1|pages=18–22|url=http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/perspectives_magazine/women_perspectives_summer08_women_sct_clerks.authcheckdam.pdf|access-date=July 9, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190406080207/https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/perspectives_magazine/women_perspectives_summer08_women_sct_clerks.authcheckdam.pdf|archive-date=April 6, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Columbia Law School; brief bio">{{cite web|title=A Brief Biography of Justice Ginsburg|url=http://www.law.columbia.edu/law_school/communications/reports/winter2004/bio|publisher=Columbia Law School|access-date=July 9, 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160624123710/http://www.law.columbia.edu/law_school/communications/reports/winter2004/bio|archive-date=June 24, 2016}}</ref><ref name="Liptak, Adam; Kagan Says Her Path" /> In 1960, Supreme Court Justice [[Felix Frankfurter]] rejected Ginsburg for a clerkship because of her gender. He did so despite a strong recommendation from [[Albert Sacks|Albert Martin Sacks]], who was a professor and later [[Dean (education)|dean]] of Harvard Law School.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/30/washington/30scotus.html|title=Women Suddenly Scarce Among Justices' Clerks|last=Greenhouse|first=Linda|date=August 30, 2006|newspaper=The New York Times |url-access=subscription|access-date=June 27, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090425035323/http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/30/washington/30scotus.html|archive-date=April 25, 2009|url-status=live}}</ref>{{efn|name=note 1|According to Ginsburg, Justice William O. Douglas hired the first female Supreme Court clerk in 1944, and the second female law clerk was not hired until 1966.<ref name="Cooper, Cynthia L." />}} Columbia law professor [[Gerald Gunther]] also pushed for Judge [[Edmund Louis Palmieri|Edmund L. Palmieri]] of the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York|U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]] to hire Ginsburg as a [[law clerk]], threatening to never recommend another Columbia student to Palmieri if he did not give Ginsburg the opportunity and guaranteeing to provide the judge with a replacement clerk should Ginsburg not succeed.<ref name="Margolick, David; NYT; Trial by Adversity" /><ref name="Oyez bio" /><ref name="Syckle-2018">{{Cite news|url=https://www.thecut.com/2018/01/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-metoo-story.html|title=This Is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's #MeToo Story|last=Syckle|first=Katie Van|date=January 22, 2018|work=[[New York (magazine)|The Cut]]|access-date=January 22, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180122204710/https://www.thecut.com/2018/01/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-metoo-story.html|archive-date=January 22, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Later that year, Ginsburg began her clerkship for Judge Palmieri, and she held the position for two years.<ref name="Margolick, David; NYT; Trial by Adversity" /><ref name="Oyez bio" /> |
|||
[[Bill Clinton|President Clinton]] nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on [[June 14]] [[1993]]. During her subsequent confirmation hearings in the [[U.S. Senate]], she refused to answer questions regarding her personal views on most issues or how she would adjudicate certain hypothetical situations as a Supreme Court Justice. As she noted during the hearings, "Were I to rehearse here what I would say and how I would reason on such questions, I would act injudiciously". |
|||
===Academia=== |
|||
At the same time, however, Ginsburg did answer questions relating to some potentially controversial issues, for instance, she stated that she does believe that there is a constitutional right to privacy, and she explicated at some length on her personal judicial philosophy and thoughts regarding gender equality ([http://www.acslaw.org/views/Bennard%20re%20Ginsburg%20confirmation.pdf]). The [[U.S. Senate]] confirmed her by a 96 to 3 vote<ref>The three negative votes came from Republicans [[Don Nickles]] (OK), [[Robert C. Smith]] (NH), and [[Jesse Helms]] (NC).</ref> and she took her seat on [[August 10]] [[1993]]. |
|||
From 1961 to 1963, Ginsburg was a research associate and then an associate director of the Columbia Law School Project on International Procedure, working alongside director [[Hans Smit (professor)|Hans Smit]];<ref>{{Cite web |title=Tribute to Hans Smit by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg |url=https://www.law.columbia.edu/news/archive/tribute-hans-smit-us-supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg |access-date=June 25, 2022 |website=law.columbia.edu }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=September 24, 2020 |title=Columbia Law School professor inspired by the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg |url=https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/dc/columbia-law-professor-inspired-by-the-late-ruth-bader-ginsburg/65-f1723c63-851e-4266-a466-4d8e5405d540 |access-date=June 25, 2022 |website=wusa9.com }}</ref> she learned [[Swedish language|Swedish]] to co-author a book with [[Anders Bruzelius]] on civil procedure in Sweden.<ref>{{cite book|title=Civil Procedure in Sweden|first1=Ruth |last1=Bader Ginsburg|author-link=Ruth Bader Ginsburg|first2=Anders|last2=Bruzelius|year=1965|publisher=[[Martinus Nijhoff Publishers|Martinus Nijhoff]]|oclc=3303361|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HTjCNG8-XzwC|access-date=October 17, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160104230655/https://books.google.com/books?id=HTjCNG8-XzwC|archive-date=January 4, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=Reviewed Works: Civil Procedure in Sweden by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anders Bruzelius; Civil Procedure in Italy by Mauro Cappelletti, Joseph M. Perillo|first=Stefan A.|last=Riesenfeld|journal=[[Columbia Law Review]]|volume=67|number=6|date=June 1967|pages=1176–78|jstor=1121050|doi=10.2307/1121050}}</ref> Ginsburg conducted extensive research for her book at [[Lund University]] in Sweden.<ref>Bayer, Linda N. (2000). ''Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Women of Achievement)''. Philadelphia. [[Infobase Publishing|Chelsea House]], p. 46. {{ISBN|978-0791052877}}.</ref> Ginsburg's time in Sweden and her association with the Swedish Bruzelius family of jurists also influenced her thinking on gender equality. She was inspired when she observed the changes in Sweden, where women were 20 to 25 percent of all law students; one of the judges whom Ginsburg observed for her research was eight months pregnant and still working.<ref name="Galanes, Philip" /> Bruzelius' daughter, Norwegian supreme court justice and president of the [[Norwegian Association for Women's Rights]], [[Karin M. Bruzelius]], herself a law student when Ginsburg worked with her father, said that "by getting close to my family, Ruth realized that one could live in a completely different way, that women could have a different lifestyle and legal position than what they had in the United States."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dn.se/varlden/bjorn-af-kleen-kombinationen-av-sprodhet-och-javlar-anamma-bidrog-till-hennes-status-som-legendar/|title=Kombination av sprödhet och jävlar anamma bidrog till hennes status som legendar|trans-title=The combination of fragility and taking on devils contributed to her status as a legend|last=Kleen|first=Björn af|date=September 19, 2020|website=[[Dagens Nyheter]]|access-date=September 30, 2020|archive-date=September 29, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200929122015/https://www.dn.se/varlden/bjorn-af-kleen-kombinationen-av-sprodhet-och-javlar-anamma-bidrog-till-hennes-status-som-legendar/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/tiden-i-sverige-avgorande-for-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-kamp/|title=Tiden i Sverige avgörande för Ruth Bader Ginsburgs kamp|trans-title=Her time in Sweden was crucial for Ruth Bader Ginsburg's struggle|date=September 19, 2020|website=[[Dagens Nyheter]]|access-date=September 30, 2020|archive-date=September 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200924090837/https://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/tiden-i-sverige-avgorande-for-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-kamp/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Ginsburg has urged a cautious approach to adjudication, arguing in a speech given shortly before her nomination to the Supreme Court that "[m]easured motions seem to me right, in the main, for constitutional as well as common law adjudication. Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped, experience teaches, may prove unstable." [http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=127&subid=177&contentid=253356] Ginsburg has urged that the Supreme Court allow for dialogue with elected branches. |
|||
Ginsburg's first position as a professor was at [[Rutgers Law School]] in 1963.<ref name="Hill Kay, Herma">{{cite journal|last1=Hill Kay|first1=Herma|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Professor of Law|journal=Colum. L. Rev.|year=2004|volume=104|issue=2|pages=2–20|url=http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=facpubs|access-date=July 9, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160322055103/http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=facpubs|archive-date=March 22, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> She was paid less than her male colleagues because, she was told, "your husband has a very good job."<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Kagan Says Her Path">{{cite news|last1=Liptak|first1=Adam|author-link=Adam Liptak|title=Kagan Says Her Path to Supreme Court Was Made Smoother by Ginsburg's|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/us/kagan-says-her-path-to-supreme-court-was-made-smoother-by-ginsburg.html|access-date=July 9, 2016|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=February 10, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151001031614/http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/us/kagan-says-her-path-to-supreme-court-was-made-smoother-by-ginsburg.html?_r=0|archive-date=October 1, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> At the time Ginsburg entered academia, she was one of fewer than twenty female law professors in the United States.<ref name="Hill Kay, Herma" /> She was a professor of law at Rutgers from 1963 to 1972, teaching mainly [[civil procedure]] and receiving tenure in 1969.<ref name="Federal Judicial Center">{{cite web|title=Ginsburg, Ruth Bader|url=https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/ginsburg-ruth-bader|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180429155253/https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/ginsburg-ruth-bader|archive-date=April 29, 2018|access-date=April 28, 2018|website=FJC.gov|publisher=[[Federal Judicial Center]]}}</ref><ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight">{{cite magazine|last1=Toobin|first1=Jeffrey|title=Heavyweight: How Ruth Bader Ginsburg has moved the Supreme Court|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/03/11/heavyweight-ruth-bader-ginsburg|access-date=February 28, 2016|magazine=The New Yorker|date=March 11, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160217223215/http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/03/11/heavyweight-ruth-bader-ginsburg|archive-date=February 17, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Though Ginsburg has consistently supported [[abortion rights]] and joined in the Supreme Court's opinion striking down [[Nebraska|Nebraska's]] [[partial-birth abortion]] law in ''[[Stenberg v. Carhart]]'' (2000), she has criticized the court's ruling in ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' as terminating a nascent, democratic movement to liberalize abortion laws which she contends might have built a more durable consensus in support of abortion rights. She has also been an advocate for references to foreign law and norms in judicial opinions, in contrast to the [[textualism|textualist]] views of her colleague Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]. |
|||
In 1970, she co-founded the ''[[Women's Rights Law Reporter]]'', the first [[law journal]] in the U.S. to focus exclusively on women's rights.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~wrlr/index.html|title=About the Reporter |access-date=June 29, 2008|url-status=dead|work=Women's Rights Law Reporter|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080708192947/http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~wrlr/index.html|archive-date=July 8, 2008|quote=Founded in 1970 by now-Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and feminist activists, legal workers, and law students{{spaces}}...}}</ref> From 1972 to 1980, she taught at Columbia Law School, where she became the first [[Academic tenure|tenured]] woman and co-authored the first law school [[casebook]] on [[Sexism|sex discrimination]].<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /> She also spent a year as a fellow of the [[Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences]] at [[Stanford University]] from 1977 to 1978.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Magill|first1=M. Elizabeth|title=At the U.S. Supreme Court: A Conversation with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-lawyer/articles/legal-matters/|publisher=[[Stanford Law School]]|access-date=July 8, 2017|date=November 11, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170915213555/https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-lawyer/articles/legal-matters/|archive-date=September 15, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Ginsburg was diagnosed with [[colo-rectal cancer]] in 1999 and underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiation treatments. The condition appears to be arrested. |
|||
===Litigation and advocacy=== |
|||
In September 2005, amidst speculation that a woman would replace retiring justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]], Ginsburg told the [[Association of the Bar of the City of New York]] that she felt "any woman would not do", and that she had a list of names which she did not expect the President to read. She also defended her views on paying attention to rulings from other countries. |
|||
[[File:RB Ginsburg 1977 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg|thumb|alt=Ginsburg standing by a window|left|Ginsburg in 1977, photographed by [[Lynn Gilbert]]]] |
|||
She is considered to be part of the "[[liberal]] wing" in the current court and has a [[Segal-Cover score]] of 0.680 placing her as the most liberal (by that measure) of current justices, although more moderate than those of many other post-[[World War II|War]] justices. In a 2003 statistical analysis of Supreme Court voting patterns, Ginsburg emerged the second most liberal member of the Court (behind [[John Paul Stevens|Justice Stevens]]).<ref>See http://pooleandrosenthal.com/the_unidimensional_supreme_court.htm .</ref><ref>Lawrence Sirovich, "A Pattern Analysis of the Second Rehnquist Court", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (24 June 2003), available online at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/1132164100v1 .</ref> |
|||
In 1972, Ginsburg co-founded the Women's Rights Project at the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] (ACLU), and in 1973, she became the Project's general counsel.<ref name=Hensley /> The Women's Rights Project and related ACLU projects participated in more than 300 gender discrimination cases by 1974. As the director of the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, she argued six gender discrimination cases before the Supreme Court between 1973 and 1976, winning five.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/supreme-court-woman-rejected-clerk-chosen-justice-ruth-joan-bader-ginsburg.html|title=The Supreme Court: Woman in the News; Rejected as a Clerk, Chosen as a Justice: Ruth Joan Bader Ginsburg|last=Lewis|first=Neil A.|date=June 15, 1993|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|issn=0362-4331|access-date=September 17, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160717232135/http://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/supreme-court-woman-rejected-clerk-chosen-justice-ruth-joan-bader-ginsburg.html|archive-date=July 17, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> Rather than asking the Court to end all gender discrimination at once, Ginsburg charted a strategic course, taking aim at specific discriminatory statutes and building on each successive victory. She chose plaintiffs carefully, at times picking male plaintiffs to demonstrate that gender discrimination was harmful to both men and women.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /><ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /> The laws Ginsburg targeted included those that on the surface appeared beneficial to women, but in fact reinforced the notion that women needed to be dependent on men.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /> Her strategic advocacy extended to word choice, favoring the use of "gender" instead of "sex", after her secretary suggested the word "sex" would serve as a distraction to judges.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /> She attained a reputation as a skilled oral advocate, and her work led directly to the end of gender discrimination in many areas of the law.<ref>Pullman, Sandra (March 7, 2006). [https://www.aclu.org/womens-rights/tribute-legacy-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-wrp-staff "Tribute: The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and WRP Staff"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150319024236/http://www.aclu.org/womens-rights/tribute-legacy-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-wrp-staff|date=March 19, 2015}}. ACLU.org. Retrieved November 18, 2010.</ref> |
|||
Some notable cases in which Ginsburg wrote an opinion: |
|||
*''[[United States v. Virginia]]'' Court Opinion |
|||
*''[[Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.]]'' Court Opinion |
|||
*''[[Bush v. Gore]]'' Dissenting |
|||
*''[[Eldred v. Ashcroft]]'' Court Opinion |
|||
*''[[Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.]]'' Court Opinion |
|||
Ginsburg volunteered to write the brief for ''[[Reed v. Reed]]'', {{ussc|404|71|1971|el=no}}, in which the Supreme Court extended the protections of the [[Equal Protection Clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]] to women.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /><ref name="Supreme Court Historical; Reed v. Reed2">{{cite news|url=http://supremecourthistory.org/lc_breaking_new_ground.html|title=Supreme Court Decisions & Women's Rights—Milestones to Equality Breaking New Ground—''Reed v. Reed'', 404 U.S. 71 (1971)|publisher=The Supreme Court Historical Society|access-date=February 28, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160228070933/http://supremecourthistory.org/lc_breaking_new_ground.html|archive-date=February 28, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>{{efn|Ginsburg listed [[Dorothy Kenyon]] and [[Pauli Murray]] as co-authors on the brief in recognition of their contributions to feminist legal argument.<ref name="Kerber, Linda K. Judge Ginsburg's Gift">{{cite news|last1=Kerber|first1=Linda K.|title=Judge Ginsburg's Gift|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1993/08/01/judge-ginsburgs-gift/036d8f58-fef8-4af8-8eae-772a8d9dd0a0|access-date=July 9, 2016|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=August 1, 1993|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305063220/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1993/08/01/judge-ginsburgs-gift/036d8f58-fef8-4af8-8eae-772a8d9dd0a0/|archive-date=March 5, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>|name=note 3}} In 1972, she argued before the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit|10th Circuit]] in ''[[Moritz v. Commissioner]]'' on behalf of a man who had been denied a caregiver deduction because of his gender. As ''amicus'' she argued in ''[[Frontiero v. Richardson]]'', {{Replace|{{ussc|411|677|1973|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, which challenged a statute making it more difficult for a female service member (Frontiero) to claim an increased housing allowance for her husband than for a male service member seeking the same allowance for his wife. Ginsburg argued that the statute treated women as inferior, and the Supreme Court ruled 8–1 in Frontiero's favor.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /> The court again ruled in Ginsburg's favor in ''[[Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld]]'', {{Replace|{{Ussc|420|636|1975|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, where Ginsburg represented a widower denied survivor benefits under Social Security, which permitted widows but not widowers to collect special benefits while caring for minor children. She argued that the statute discriminated against male survivors of workers by denying them the same protection as their female counterparts.<ref name="Williams, Wendy W., Columbia Journal2">{{cite journal|year=2013|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Equal Protection Clause: 1970–80|url=http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2253&context=facpub|journal=Columbia Journal of Gender and Law|volume=25|pages=41–49|last1=Williams|first1=Wendy W.|access-date=March 13, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305003306/http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2253&context=facpub|archive-date=March 5, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==Dispute over relevance of international law== |
|||
On [[March 1]] [[2005]], in the case of ''[[Roper v. Simmons]]'', the Supreme Court (in an opinion written by Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]]) ruled in a 5-4 decision that the Constitution forbids executing convicts who committed their crimes before turning 18. In addition to the fact that most states now prohibit executions in such cases, the majority opinion reasoned that the United States was increasingly out of step with the world by allowing minors to be executed, saying "the United States now stands alone in a world that has turned its face against the juvenile death penalty." |
|||
In 1973, the same year ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' was decided, Ginsburg filed a federal case to challenge [[involuntary sterilization]], suing members of the [[Eugenics Board of North Carolina]] on behalf of Nial Ruth Cox, a mother who had been coercively sterilized under North Carolina's Sterilization of Persons Mentally Defective program on penalty of her family losing welfare benefits.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Carmon |first1=Irin |last2=Knizhnik |first2=Shana |title=A Response |journal=[[Signs (journal)|Signs]] |year=2017 |volume=42 |issue=3 |page=797 |doi=10.1086/689745 |s2cid=151760112 |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/689745 |access-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-date=May 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220508110611/https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/689745 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Tabacco Mar |first1=Ria |title=The forgotten time Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought against forced sterilization |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/09/19/sterilization-ruth-bader-ginsburg/ |access-date=September 26, 2020 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=September 19, 2020 |archive-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200926034525/https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/09/19/sterilization-ruth-bader-ginsburg/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Cox complaint |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/cox-complaint/bff27c19-5195-460c-8757-a3a81ed08331/?itid=lk_inline_manual_8 |access-date=September 26, 2020 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=September 19, 2020 |archive-date=October 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201026121953/https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/cox-complaint/bff27c19-5195-460c-8757-a3a81ed08331/?itid=lk_inline_manual_8 |url-status=live }}</ref> During a 2009 interview with [[Emily Bazelon]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'', Ginsburg stated: "I had thought that at the time ''Roe'' was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."<ref>{{Cite news|last=Bazelon|first=Emily|date=July 7, 2009|title=The Place of Women on the Court|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html|access-date=September 26, 2020|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=February 24, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170224032340/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Bazelon conducted a follow-up interview with Ginsburg in 2012 at a joint appearance at [[Yale University]], where Ginsburg claimed her 2009 quote was vastly misinterpreted and clarified her stance.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Bazelon|first=Emily|date=October 19, 2012|title=Justice Ginsburg Sets the Record Straight on Abortion and Population Control|url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2012/10/ruth-bader-ginsburg-clears-up-her-views-on-abortion-population-control-and-roe-v-wade.html|access-date=September 26, 2020|website=Slate|archive-date=September 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200924131412/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2012/10/ruth-bader-ginsburg-clears-up-her-views-on-abortion-population-control-and-roe-v-wade.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Did Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cite 'Population Growth' Concerns When Roe v. Wade Was Decided?|url=https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-roe-v-wade/|access-date=September 26, 2020|website=Snopes.com|date=December 17, 2018 |archive-date=November 8, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108153020/https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-roe-v-wade/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] rejected that approach with strident criticism, saying that the justices' personal opinions and the opinions of "like-minded foreigners" should not be given a role in helping interpret the Constitution. |
|||
Ginsburg filed an [[Amicus curiae|amicus brief]] and sat with counsel at oral argument for ''[[Craig v. Boren]]'', {{Replace|{{ussc|429|190|1976|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, which challenged an Oklahoma statute that set different minimum drinking ages for men and women.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /><ref name="Williams, Wendy W., Columbia Journal2" /> For the first time, the court imposed what is known as [[intermediate scrutiny]] on laws discriminating based on gender, a heightened standard of Constitutional review.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /><ref name="Williams, Wendy W., Columbia Journal2" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://thinkprogress.org/justice-ginsburg-if-i-were-nominated-today-my-womens-rights-work-for-the-aclu-would-probably-912c845993da|title=Justice Ginsburg: If I Were Nominated Today, My Women's Rights Work For The ACLU Would Probably Disqualify Me|last=Millhiser|first=Ian|date=August 30, 2011|website=ThinkProgress|access-date=June 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170223051126/https://thinkprogress.org/justice-ginsburg-if-i-were-nominated-today-my-womens-rights-work-for-the-aclu-would-probably-912c845993da|archive-date=February 23, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Her last case as an attorney before the Supreme Court was ''[[Duren v. Missouri]]'', {{Replace|{{ussc|439|357|1979|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, which challenged the validity of voluntary [[jury duty]] for women, on the ground that participation in jury duty was a citizen's vital governmental service and therefore should not be optional for women. At the end of Ginsburg's oral argument, then-Associate Justice [[William Rehnquist]] asked Ginsburg, "You won't settle for putting [[Susan B. Anthony]] [[Susan B. Anthony dollar|on the new dollar]], then?"<ref name="WaPo199307192">Von Drehle, David (July 19, 1993). [https://web.archive.org/web/20100902061856/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/23/AR2007082300903_pf.html "Redefining Fair With a Simple Careful Assault—Step-by-Step Strategy Produced Strides for Equal Protection"]. ''[[The Washington Post]]''. Retrieved August 24, 2009.</ref> Ginsburg said she considered responding, "We won't settle for tokens," but instead opted not to answer the question.<ref name="WaPo199307192" /> |
|||
Ginsburg rejected that argument in a speech given about one month after ''Roper''. "Judges in the United States are free to consult all manner of commentary," she said to several hundred lawyers, scholars, and other members of the American Society of International Law.[http://www.asil.org/events/AM05/ginsburg050401.html] If a law review article by a professor is a suitable citation, she asked, why not a well reasoned opinion by foreign jurist? Fears about relying too heavily on world opinion "should not lead us to abandon the effort to learn what we can from the experience and good thinking foreign sources may convey," Ginsburg told the audience. |
|||
Legal scholars and advocates credit Ginsburg's body of work with making significant legal advances for women under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /><ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /> Taken together, Ginsburg's legal victories discouraged legislatures from treating women and men differently under the law.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /><ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /><ref name="Williams, Wendy W., Columbia Journal2" /> She continued to work on the ACLU's Women's Rights Project until her appointment to the Federal Bench in 1980.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /> Later, colleague [[Antonin Scalia]] praised Ginsburg's skills as an advocate. "She became the leading (and very successful) litigator on behalf of women's rights—the [[Thurgood Marshall]] of that cause, so to speak." This was a comparison that had first been made by former solicitor general Erwin Griswold who was also her former professor and dean at Harvard Law School, in a speech given in 1985.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Labaton |first1=Stephen |title=Senators See Easy Approval for Nominee |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/16/us/senators-see-easy-approval-for-nominee.html?mtrref=undefined&gwh=07BFECEB18F681D38A1B48EF38A012DE&gwt=pay |access-date=December 29, 2018 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=June 16, 1993 |ref=Page A22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181229171804/https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/16/us/senators-see-easy-approval-for-nominee.html?mtrref=undefined&gwh=07BFECEB18F681D38A1B48EF38A012DE&gwt=pay |archive-date=December 29, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|last1=Scalia|first1=Antonin|title=The 100 Most Influential People: Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=http://time.com/3823889/ruth-bader-ginsburg-2015-time-100/|access-date=December 9, 2016|magazine=Time|date=April 16, 2015|ref=Scalia, Antonin; Time|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161209182021/http://time.com/3823889/ruth-bader-ginsburg-2015-time-100/|archive-date=December 9, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Efn|[[Janet Benshoof]], the president of the [[Center for Reproductive Rights|Center for Reproductive Law and Policy]], made a similar comparison between Ginsburg and Marshall in 1993.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" />}} |
|||
In response to ''Roper'' and other recent decisions, several [[Republican Party (United States)|Republicans]] in the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] introduced a resolution declaring that the "meaning of the Constitution of the United States should not be based on judgments, laws, or pronouncements of foreign institutions unless such foreign judgments, laws or pronouncements inform an understanding of the original meaning of the Constitution of the United States." A similar resolution was introduced in the [[U.S. Senate]]. In her speech, Ginsburg criticized the resolutions. "Although I doubt the resolutions will pass this Congress, it is disquieting that they have attracted sizable support," she said. "The notion that it is improper to look beyond the borders of the United States in grappling with hard questions has a certain kinship to the view that the U.S. Constitution is a document essentially frozen in time as of the date of its ratification," Ginsburg asserted. "Even more so today, the United States is subject to the scrutiny of a candid world," she said. "What the United States does, for good or for ill, continues to be watched by the international community, in particular by organizations concerned with the advancement of the rule of law and respect for human dignity."[http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/11/06women_Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg_D8D7.html] |
|||
==U.S. Court of Appeals== |
|||
=="Ginsburg Precedent"== |
|||
In light of the mounting backlog in the federal judiciary, Congress passed the [[Omnibus Judgeship Act of 1978]] increasing the number of federal judges by 117 in district courts and another 35 to be added to the circuit courts. The law placed an emphasis on ensuring that the judges included women and minority groups, a matter that was important to President [[Jimmy Carter]] who had been elected two years before. The bill also required that the nomination process consider the character and experience of the candidates.{{Sfn|De Hart|2020|p=277}}<ref>{{cite web |last1=Carter |first1=Jimmy |title=Statement on Signing H.R. 7843 Into Law: Appointments of Additional District and Circuit Judges |url=https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-signing-hr-7843-into-law-appointments-additional-district-and-circuit-judges |website=The American Presidency Project |publisher=UC Santa Barbara |access-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-date=September 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200924181340/https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-signing-hr-7843-into-law-appointments-additional-district-and-circuit-judges |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Public Law 95-486 |journal=United States Statutes at Large |date=October 20, 1978 |volume=92 |pages=1629–34 |url=https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-92/pdf/STATUTE-92-Pg1629.pdf |access-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-date=October 2, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201002105609/https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-92/pdf/STATUTE-92-Pg1629.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Ginsburg was considering a change in career as soon as Carter was elected. She was interviewed by the [[United States Department of Justice|Department of Justice]] to become [[Solicitor General of the United States|Solicitor General]], the position she most desired, but knew that she and the African-American candidate who was interviewed the same day had little chance of being appointed by Attorney General [[Griffin Bell]].{{Sfn|De Hart|2020|p=278}} |
|||
Over a decade passed between the time Ginsburg and [[Stephen Breyer]] were appointed and the time another justice left the court. In that time, both Congress and the White House had switched to Republican control. When [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] announced her retirement in the summer 2005 (with [[William Rehnquist]]'s death a few months later), both sides began to squabble about just how many questions President [[George W. Bush]]'s nominees would be expected to answer. The debate heated up when hearings for [[John Roberts]] began in September 2005. Republicans used an argument that they called the "Ginsburg Precedent", which centered on Ginsburg's confirmation hearings. In those hearings, she did not answer some questions involving matters such as [[abortion]], [[gay rights]], [[separation of church and state]], rights of the disabled, and so on. Only one witness was allowed to testify "against" Ginsburg at her confirmation hearings, and the hearings lasted only four days. They also pointed out that then-Judiciary Committee Chairman [[Joe Biden]] told her not to answer questions that she did not feel comfortable answering. |
|||
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg - Sibley Lecture 1981(cropped).jpg|thumb|upright|Ginsburg in 1981]] |
|||
[[File:President Jimmy Carter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.jpg|thumb|alt=Ginsburg shaking hands with Carter as the two smile|Ginsburg with President [[Jimmy Carter]] in 1980|left]] |
|||
At the time, Ginsburg was a fellow at Stanford University where she was working on a written account of her work in litigation and advocacy for equal rights. Her husband was a visiting professor at [[Stanford Law School]] and was ready to leave his firm, [[Weil, Gotshal & Manges]], for a tenured position. He was at the same time working hard to promote a possible judgeship for his wife. In January 1979, she filled out the questionnaire for possible nominees to the [[United States courts of appeals|U.S. Court of Appeals]] for the [[Second Circuit]], and another for the [[District of Columbia Circuit]].{{Sfn|De Hart|2020|p=278}} Ginsburg was nominated by President Carter on April 14, 1980, to a seat on the DC Circuit vacated by Judge [[Harold Leventhal (judge)|Harold Leventhal]] upon his death. She was confirmed by the [[United States Senate]] on June 18, 1980, and received her commission later that day.<ref name="Federal Judicial Center" />{{Sfn|De Hart|2020|pp=286–291}} |
|||
During her time as a judge on the DC Circuit, Ginsburg often found consensus with her colleagues including conservatives [[Robert Bork|Robert H. Bork]] and Antonin Scalia.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/07/18/conventional-roles-hid-a-revolutionary-intellect/38a8055a-d575-4eee-b59a-44c2d58771f5/|title=Conventional Roles Hid a Revolutionary Intellect|last=Drehle|first=David Von|date=July 18, 1993|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|issn=0190-8286|access-date=September 16, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160919170923/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/07/18/conventional-roles-hid-a-revolutionary-intellect/38a8055a-d575-4eee-b59a-44c2d58771f5/|archive-date=September 19, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1986/06/22/scalia-tenacious-after-staking-out-a-position/84b60d7d-142b-4959-a7a3-aadfeda39d00/|title=Scalia Tenacious After Staking Out a Position|last1=Marcus|first1=Ruth|date=June 22, 1986|last2=Schmidt|first2=Susan|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|issn=0190-8286|access-date=September 16, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160919170839/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1986/06/22/scalia-tenacious-after-staking-out-a-position/84b60d7d-142b-4959-a7a3-aadfeda39d00/|archive-date=September 19, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> Her time on the court earned her a reputation as a "cautious jurist" and a moderate.<ref name="Richter, Paul; Clinton Picks Moderate Judge" /> Her service ended on August 9, 1993, due to her elevation to the United States Supreme Court,<ref name="Federal Judicial Center" /><ref name="istorical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit; Bio">{{cite web|title=Judges of the D. C. Circuit Courts|url=http://dcchs.org/Biographies/biosalpha.html#garland|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160225040553/http://dcchs.org/Biographies/biosalpha.html#garland|archive-date=February 25, 2016|access-date=February 19, 2016|website=Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Fulwood III|first=Sam|date=August 4, 1993|title=Ginsburg Confirmed as 2nd Woman on Supreme Court|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]]|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-08-04-mn-20339-story.html|url-status=live|access-date=September 16, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305143136/http://articles.latimes.com/1993-08-04/news/mn-20339_1_supreme-court|archive-date=March 5, 2017|issn=0458-3035}}</ref> and she was replaced by Judge [[David S. Tatel]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/my-chicago-law-moment-50-years-later-federal-appellate-judge-david-tatel-66-still-thinks-about-|title=My Chicago Law Moment: 50 Years Later, Federal Appellate Judge David Tatel, '66, Still Thinks About the Concepts He Learned as a 1L|last=Beaupre Gillespie|first=Becky|date=July 27, 2016|website=law.uchicago.edu|publisher=University of Chicago Law School|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161208095555/http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/my-chicago-law-moment-50-years-later-federal-appellate-judge-david-tatel-66-still-thinks-about-|archive-date=December 8, 2016|url-status=dead|access-date=June 9, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
In a [[September 28]], [[2005]] speech at [[Wake Forest University]] Ginsburg said that Chief Justice Roberts refusing to answer questions on some cases was "unquestionably right." [http://www.the-dispatch.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050928/APN/509281240&cachetime=5] However, as the following sentence in the speech made clear, this statement did not affirm the existence of a "precedent" which the Judiciary Committee was obliged to follow; it was merely a statement the nominee could, at his discretion, refuse to answer questions about how he would rule. |
|||
==Supreme Court== |
|||
Democrats had argued against Roberts' refusal to answer certain questions, saying that Ginsburg had made her views very clear, even if she did not comment on all specific matters, and that due to her lengthy tenure as a judge, many of her legal opinions were already available for review. Democrats also pointed out that Republican senator [[Orrin Hatch]] had recommended Ginsburg to then-President Clinton, which suggested Clinton worked in a bipartisan manner. Hatch responded that he had not "recommended" her but suggested to Clinton she might be a candidate that would not receive great opposition{{Fact|date=February 2007}}. |
|||
===Nomination and confirmation=== |
|||
[[File:Announcement of Ruth Bader Ginsburg as Nominee for Associate Supreme Court Justice at the White House - NARA - 131493870.jpg|thumb|alt=Ginsburg speaking at a lectern|Ginsburg officially accepting the nomination from President [[Bill Clinton]] on June 14, 1993]] |
|||
During the [[John Roberts]] confirmation hearings, Biden, Hatch, and Roberts himself brought up Ginsburg's hearings several times as they argued over how many questions she answered and how many Roberts was expected to answer. The "precedent" was again cited several times during the confirmation hearings for Justice [[Samuel Alito]]. |
|||
President [[Bill Clinton]] nominated Ginsburg as an [[associate justice of the Supreme Court]] on June 22, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring justice [[Byron White]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ginsburg, Ruth Bader|url=https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/ginsburg-ruth-bader|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180429155253/https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/ginsburg-ruth-bader|archive-date=April 29, 2018|access-date=September 21, 2020|publisher=Federal Judicial Center}}</ref> She was recommended to Clinton by then–U.S. [[United States Attorney General|attorney general]] [[Janet Reno]],<ref name="Toobin" /> after a suggestion by Utah Republican senator [[Orrin Hatch]].<ref>{{citation|title=Square Peg: Confessions of a Citizen Senator|first=Orrin|last=Hatch|page=180|publisher=Basic Books|year=2003|isbn=0465028675|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aqxik8vYCK4C&pg=PA180}}{{Dead link|date=August 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> At the time of her nomination, Ginsburg was viewed as having been a moderate and a consensus-builder in her time on the appeals court.<ref name="Richter, Paul; Clinton Picks Moderate Judge" /><ref name=Berke1995>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/supreme-court-overview-clinton-names-ruth-ginsburg-advocate-for-women-court.html |title=Clinton Names Ruth Ginsburg, Advocate for Women, to Court |first=Richard L. |last=Berke |date=June 15, 1993 |newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=September 21, 2020 |archive-date=November 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105022355/https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/supreme-court-overview-clinton-names-ruth-ginsburg-advocate-for-women-court.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Clinton was reportedly looking to increase the Court's diversity, which Ginsburg did as the first Jewish justice since the 1969 resignation of Justice [[Abe Fortas]]. She was the second female and the first Jewish female justice of the Supreme Court.<ref name="Richter, Paul; Clinton Picks Moderate Judge" /><ref name="Rudin, Ken; The 'Jewish Seat'">{{cite news|last1=Rudin|first1=Ken|title=The 'Jewish Seat' On The Supreme Court|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/politicaljunkie/2009/05/heres_a_question_from_carol.html|access-date=February 19, 2016|publisher=NPR|date=May 8, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160219031542/http://www.npr.org/sections/politicaljunkie/2009/05/heres_a_question_from_carol.html|archive-date=February 19, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="IISchraufnagel2018">{{cite book|first1=Michael J. II|last1=Pomante|first2=Scot|last2=Schraufnagel|title=Historical Dictionary of the Barack Obama Administration|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gqJRDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA166|date=April 6, 2018|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers|isbn=978-1-5381-1152-9|pages=166–|access-date=July 30, 2018|archive-date=March 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200315132303/https://books.google.com/books?id=gqJRDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA166|url-status=live}}</ref> She eventually became the longest-serving Jewish justice.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://forward.com/culture/394025/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-superhero-jane-eisner/ |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg On Dissent, The Holocaust And Fame |publisher=Forward.com |date=February 11, 2018 |access-date=July 30, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180730050619/https://forward.com/culture/394025/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-superhero-jane-eisner/ |archive-date=July 30, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> The [[American Bar Association]]'s [[Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary]] rated Ginsburg as "well qualified", its highest rating for a prospective justice.<ref name="Comiskey1994" /> |
|||
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg at her confirmation hearing (a).jpg|alt=Ginsburg speaking into microphone at Senate confirmation hearing on her for her Supreme Court appointment|left|thumb|Ginsburg giving testimony before the [[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|Senate Judiciary Committee]] during the hearings on her nomination to be an associate justice]] |
|||
==References== |
|||
During her testimony before the [[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|Senate Judiciary Committee]] as part of the [[Senate confirmation|confirmation hearings]], Ginsburg refused to answer questions about her view on the constitutionality of some issues such as the [[Capital punishment in the United States|death penalty]] as it was an issue she might have to vote on if it came before the Court.<ref name="Lewis, Neil A; Ginsburg resists pressure">{{cite news|last1=Lewis|first1=Neil A.|title=The Supreme Court; Ginsburg Deflects Pressure to Talk on Death Penalty|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/23/us/the-supreme-court-ginsburg-deflects-pressure-to-talk-on-death-penalty.html|access-date=March 15, 2016|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=July 22, 1993|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160316003825/http://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/23/us/the-supreme-court-ginsburg-deflects-pressure-to-talk-on-death-penalty.html|archive-date=March 16, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
<div class="references-small"><references/></div> |
|||
At the same time, Ginsburg did answer questions about some potentially controversial issues. For instance, she affirmed her belief in a constitutional right to privacy and explained at some length her personal judicial philosophy and thoughts regarding gender equality.<ref>{{Citation|last=Bennard|first=Kristina Silja|title=The Confirmation Hearings of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Answering Questions While Maintaining Judicial Impartiality|date=August 2005|url=https://www.acslaw.org/sites/default/files/Bennard_re_Ginsburg_confirmation_hearings.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180715123332/https://www.acslaw.org/sites/default/files/Bennard_re_Ginsburg_confirmation_hearings.pdf|url-status=dead|location=Washington, D.C.|publisher=[[American Constitution Society]]|access-date=June 10, 2017|archive-date=July 15, 2018}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>{{Rp|15–16}} Ginsburg was more forthright in discussing her views on topics about which she had previously written.<ref name="Lewis, Neil A; Ginsburg resists pressure" /> The United States Senate confirmed her by a 96–3 vote on August 3, 1993.{{efn|name=note 2|The three negative votes came from [[Don Nickles]] (R-Oklahoma), [[Bob Smith (New Hampshire politician)|Bob Smith]] (R-New Hampshire) and [[Jesse Helms]] (R-North Carolina), while [[Donald Riegle|Donald W. Riegle Jr.]] (D-Michigan) did not vote.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_member.php?cs_id=8630|title=Project Vote Smart|access-date=December 19, 2010|archive-date=September 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919004310/https://justfacts.votesmart.org/bills|url-status=live}}</ref>}}<ref name="Federal Judicial Center" /> She received her commission on August 5, 1993<ref name="Federal Judicial Center" /> and took her judicial oath on August 10, 1993.<ref name=USSCTimeline>{{cite web|title=Members of the Supreme Court of the United States|publisher=[[Supreme Court of the United States]]|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/members.aspx|access-date=April 26, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100429170327/https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/members.aspx|archive-date=April 29, 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==Bibliography== |
|||
*Clinton, Bill (2005). ''My Life''. Vintage. ISBN 1-4000-3003-X. |
|||
Ginsburg's name was later invoked during the confirmation process of [[John Roberts]]. Ginsburg was not the first nominee to avoid answering certain specific questions before Congress,{{efn|Felix Frankfurter was the first nominee to answer questions before Congress in 1939.<ref name="Stolberg, Sheryl Gay" /> The issue of how much nominees are expected to answer arose during hearings for O'Connor and Scalia.<ref name="Stolberg, Sheryl Gay" />}} and as a young attorney in 1981 Roberts had advised against Supreme Court nominees' giving specific responses.<ref name="Stolberg, Sheryl Gay" /> Nevertheless, some conservative commentators and senators invoked the phrase "Ginsburg precedent" to defend his [[demurrer]]s.<ref name=Comiskey1994>{{Cite journal|title=The Usefulness of Senate Confirmation Hearings for Judicial Nominees: The Case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|first=Michael|last=Comiskey|date=June 1994|pages=224–27|journal=PS: Political Science & Politics|publisher=[[American Political Science Association]]|volume=27|issue=2|jstor=420276|doi=10.1017/S1049096500040476}}</ref><ref name="Stolberg, Sheryl Gay">{{cite news|last1=Stolberg|first1=Sheryl Gay|title=Roberts Rx: Speak Up, but Shut Up|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/weekinreview/roberts-rx-speak-up-but-shut-up.html|access-date=July 10, 2016|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=September 5, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180120182218/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/weekinreview/roberts-rx-speak-up-but-shut-up.html?_r=0|archive-date=January 20, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> In a September 28, 2005, speech at [[Wake Forest University]], Ginsburg said Roberts's refusal to answer questions during his Senate confirmation hearings on some cases was "unquestionably right".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWRmZjliMWFlMmQzY2ZlZTMzMjgyMGE2MGJjZjFkNDU=|title=Bench Memos: Ginsburg on Roberts Hearings|date=September 29, 2005|work=[[National Review]]|access-date=September 18, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070502171201/http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWRmZjliMWFlMmQzY2ZlZTMzMjgyMGE2MGJjZjFkNDU=|archive-date=May 2, 2007}}</ref> |
|||
==External links== |
|||
*[http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/biographiescurrent.pdf Supreme court official bio (PDF)] |
|||
*[http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZD2.html Ginsburg's dissenting opinion in Bush v. Gore] |
|||
*[http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031785347030&path=!localnews!article&s=1037645509099 Supreme Court justice speaks at Wake Forest University, Winstom-Salem Journal] |
|||
*[http://www.jwa.org/feminism Jewish Women and the Feminist Revolution] from the Jewish Women's Archive |
|||
* [http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/antisemitism/voices/transcript/index.php?content=20061109 Voices on Antisemitism Interview with Ruth Bader Ginsburg] from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum |
|||
===Supreme Court tenure=== |
|||
<!-- Succession table --> |
|||
{{start box}} |
|||
{{succession box| title=[[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit|Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit]]| |
|||
before=[[Harold Leventhal (judge)|Harold Leventhal]] | |
|||
after=[[David S. Tatel]] | |
|||
years=1980-1993| |
|||
}} |
|||
{{incumbent succession box| title=[[List of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States]]| before=[[Byron White]]| start=[[August 10]], [[1993]]| }} |
|||
{{succession box |
|||
| before = [[Clarence Thomas]] |
|||
| title = [[United States order of precedence]] |
|||
| years = [[as of 2007]] |
|||
| after = [[Stephen Breyer]]}} |
|||
{{end box}} |
|||
[[File:Chief Justice William Rehnquist Administers the Oath of Office to Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg as Associate Supreme Court Justice at the White House - NARA - 131493872.jpg|alt=Ginsburg being sworn in and smiling|thumb|[[Chief Justice of the United States|Chief Justice]] William Rehnquist swearing in Ginsburg as an associate justice of the Supreme Court, as her husband Martin Ginsburg and President Clinton watch]] |
|||
{{ruthbaderginsburgopinions}} |
|||
Ginsburg characterized her performance on the Court as a cautious approach to adjudication.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/21/us/the-supreme-court-ginsburg-promises-judicial-restraint-if-she-joins-court.html|title=The Supreme Court: Ginsburg Promises Judicial Restraint If She Joins Court|last=Lewis|first=Neil A.|date=July 21, 1993|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=June 11, 2017|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170531014013/http://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/21/us/the-supreme-court-ginsburg-promises-judicial-restraint-if-she-joins-court.html|archive-date=May 31, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> She argued in a speech shortly before her nomination to the Court that "[m]easured motions seem to me right, in the main, for constitutional as well as common law adjudication. Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped, experience teaches, may prove unstable."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/the-supreme-court-in-her-own-words-ruth-bader-ginsburg.html|title=The Supreme Court: In Her Own Words: Ruth Bader Ginsburg|date=June 15, 1993|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=June 11, 2017|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180118022913/http://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/the-supreme-court-in-her-own-words-ruth-bader-ginsburg.html|archive-date=January 18, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Legal scholar [[Cass Sunstein]] characterized Ginsburg as a "rational minimalist", a jurist who seeks to build cautiously on precedent rather than pushing the Constitution towards her own vision.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.questia.com/read/117584743/a-constitution-of-many-minds-why-the-founding-document|title=A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before|last=Sunstein|first=Cass R.|year=2009|website=|access-date=April 2, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402165820/https://www.questia.com/read/117584743/a-constitution-of-many-minds-why-the-founding-document|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Rp|10–11}} |
|||
The retirement of Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only woman on the Court.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ginsburg-court-woman/story?id=7513795|title=Ginsburg: Court Needs Another Woman|last=Biskupic|first=Joan|date=May 7, 2010|website=[[USA Today]]|via=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]|access-date=April 2, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402170648/http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ginsburg-court-woman/story?id=7513795|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Efn|Ginsburg remained the only female justice on the Court until Sotomayor was sworn in on August 7, 2009.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/aug/09/sotomayor-sonia-us-supreme-court|title=Sonia Sotomayor sworn in as first Hispanic supreme court judge|last=Harris|first=Paul|date=August 8, 2009|work=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=April 2, 2017|issn=0261-3077|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402171249/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/aug/09/sotomayor-sonia-us-supreme-court|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>}} [[Linda Greenhouse]] of ''The New York Times'' referred to the subsequent [[2006 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|2006–2007 term]] of the Court as "the time when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg found her voice, and used it".<ref name="Greenhouse, Linda, In dissent, Ginsburg finds her voice">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/world/americas/31iht-court.4.5946972.html|title=In dissent, Ginsburg finds her voice at Supreme Court|last=Greenhouse|first=Linda|date=May 31, 2007|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=April 1, 2017|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402165851/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/world/americas/31iht-court.4.5946972.html|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> The term also marked the first time in Ginsburg's history with the Court where she read multiple dissents from the bench, a tactic employed to signal more intense disagreement with the majority.<ref name="Greenhouse, Linda, In dissent, Ginsburg finds her voice" /> |
|||
{{start U.S. Supreme Court composition| CJ=[[William Rehnquist|Rehnquist]]| }} |
|||
{{U.S. Supreme Court composition court lifespan|cj=William Hubbs Rehnquist|years=1986–2005| }} |
|||
{{U.S. Supreme Court composition 1993-1994}} |
|||
{{U.S. Supreme Court composition 1994-2005}} |
|||
{{U.S. Supreme Court composition CJ| CJ=[[John Roberts|Roberts]]| }} |
|||
{{U.S. Supreme Court composition court lifespan|cj=John Glover Roberts, Jr.|years=2005| }} |
|||
{{U.S. Supreme Court composition 2005-2006}} |
|||
{{U.S. Supreme Court composition 2006-present}} |
|||
{{end U.S. Supreme Court composition}} |
|||
[[File:O'Connor, Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Kagan.jpg|alt=The justices standing side-by-side, smiling|thumb|left|[[Sandra Day O'Connor]], [[Sonia Sotomayor]], Ginsburg, and [[Elena Kagan]], 2010. O'Connor is not wearing a robe because she was retired from the court when the picture was taken.]] |
|||
{{Persondata |
|||
With the retirement of Justice [[John Paul Stevens]], Ginsburg became the senior member of what was sometimes referred to as the Court's "liberal wing".<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /><ref name="Bravin, Jess; For Now, Justice Ginsburg's" /><ref name="Bisupic, Joan; Exclusive">{{cite news|last1=Bisupic|first1=Joan|title=Exclusive: Supreme Court's Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg-idUSBRE9630C820130704|access-date=July 4, 2016|work=Reuters|date=July 4, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160817174031/http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg-idUSBRE9630C820130704|archive-date=August 17, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> When the Court split 5–4 along ideological lines and the liberal justices were in the minority, Ginsburg often had the authority to assign authorship of the [[dissenting opinion]] because of her seniority.<ref name="Bravin, Jess; For Now, Justice Ginsburg's" />{{efn|The 2018 case of ''[[Sessions v. Dimaya]]'' marked the first time Ginsburg was able to assign a majority opinion, when Justice [[Neil Gorsuch]] voted with the liberal wing. Ginsburg assigned the opinion to Justice [[Elena Kagan]].<ref name="Stern, Mark Joseph, A Milestone">{{cite magazine |last1=Stern |first1=Mark Joseph |title=A Milestone for Ruth Bader Ginsburg |url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/ruth-bader-ginsburg-just-assigned-a-majority-opinion-for-the-first-time-ever.html |access-date=September 4, 2018 |magazine=Slate |date=April 18, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904085450/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/ruth-bader-ginsburg-just-assigned-a-majority-opinion-for-the-first-time-ever.html |archive-date=September 4, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref>}} Ginsburg was a proponent of the liberal dissenters speaking "with one voice" and, where practicable, presenting a unified approach to which all the dissenting justices can agree.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /><ref name="Bravin, Jess; For Now, Justice Ginsburg's" /> |
|||
|NAME=Ginsburg, Ruth Joan Bader |
|||
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES= |
|||
During Ginsburg's entire Supreme Court tenure from 1993 to 2020, she only hired one African-American clerk ([[Paul J. Watford]]).<ref>{{Cite news|last=Adler|first=Jonathan H.|title=Opinion {{!}} Supreme Court clerks are not a particularly diverse lot|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/12/12/supreme-court-clerks-are-not-a-particularly-diverse-lot/|access-date=September 26, 2020|issn=0190-8286|archive-date=October 4, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201004224121/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/12/12/supreme-court-clerks-are-not-a-particularly-diverse-lot/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last1=Mauro|first1=Tony|author-link=Tony Mauro|date=December 11, 2017|title=Mostly White and Male: Diversity Still Lags Among SCOTUS Law Clerks|url=https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/sites/nationallawjournal/2017/12/11/mostly-white-and-male-diversity-still-lags-among-scotus-law-clerks/|access-date=September 26, 2020|website=National Law Journal|archive-date=September 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200924142116/https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/sites/nationallawjournal/2017/12/11/mostly-white-and-male-diversity-still-lags-among-scotus-law-clerks/|url-status=live}}</ref> During her 13 years on the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]], she never hired an African-American clerk, intern, or secretary. The lack of diversity was briefly an issue during her 1993 confirmation hearing.<ref>{{Cite web|date=August 30, 2006|title=Re: Vapors from Greenhouse|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/re-vapors-greenhouse-ed-whelan/|access-date=September 26, 2020|website=National Review|archive-date=December 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205000434/https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/re-vapors-greenhouse-ed-whelan/|url-status=live}}</ref> When this issue was raised by the Senate Judiciary Committee, Ginsburg stated that "If you confirm me for this job, my attractiveness to black candidates is going to improve."<ref>{{Cite magazine|last=Lepore|first=Jill|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Unlikely Path to the Supreme Court|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/08/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-unlikely-path-to-the-supreme-court|access-date=September 26, 2020|magazine=The New Yorker|archive-date=September 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200928141343/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/08/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-unlikely-path-to-the-supreme-court|url-status=live}}</ref> This issue received renewed attention after more than a hundred of her former legal clerks served as [[pallbearer]]s during [[State funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|her funeral]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=September 25, 2020|title=People are pointing out something 'troubling' about a photo from RBG's memorial|url=https://www.indy100.com/article/ruth-bader-ginsburg-memorial-clerks-black-hiring-supreme-court-9714436|access-date=September 26, 2020|website=indy100|archive-date=October 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201001012559/https://www.indy100.com/article/ruth-bader-ginsburg-memorial-clerks-black-hiring-supreme-court-9714436|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=September 12, 2020|title=Examining Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Complicated Legacy On Race|url=https://newsone.com/4017123/ruth-bader-ginsburg-dies-race-legacy/|access-date=September 26, 2020|website=NewsOne|archive-date=September 26, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200926172934/https://newsone.com/4017123/ruth-bader-ginsburg-dies-race-legacy/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
|SHORT DESCRIPTION=U.S. Supreme Court justice |
|||
|DATE OF BIRTH=[[March 15]] [[1933]] |
|||
====Gender discrimination==== |
|||
|PLACE OF BIRTH=[[Brooklyn, New York]] |
|||
|DATE OF DEATH=living |
|||
Ginsburg authored the Court's opinion in ''[[United States v. Virginia]]'', {{Replace|{{ussc|518|515|1996|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, which struck down the [[Virginia Military Institute]]'s (VMI) male-only admissions policy as violating the [[Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment]].<!--<ref name="Jones Merritt, Deborah" />--> For Ginsburg, a state actor could not use gender to deny women equal protection; therefore VMI must allow women the opportunity to attend VMI with its unique educational methods.<ref name="Jones Merritt, Deborah">{{cite journal|last1=Jones Merritt|first1=Deborah|last2=Lieberman|first2=David M.|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg 's Jurisprudence of Opportunity and Equality|journal=Colum. L. Rev.|date=January 1, 2014|volume=104|url=http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=facpubs|access-date=April 3, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151128182719/http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=facpubs|archive-date=November 28, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg emphasized that the government must show an "exceedingly persuasive justification" to use a classification based on sex.<ref name="Biskupic, Joan; Supreme Court Invalidates Exclusion">{{cite news|last1=Biskupic|first1=Joan|title=Supreme Court Invalidates Exclusion of Women by VMI|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/library/vmi/court.htm|access-date=July 12, 2016|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=June 27, 1996|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160527141324/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/library/vmi/court.htm|archive-date=May 27, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> VMI proposed a separate institute for women, but Ginsburg found this solution reminiscent of the effort by Texas decades earlier to preserve the University of Texas Law School for Whites by establishing a separate school for Blacks.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bartlett |first1=Katharine T. |editor1-last=Schneider |editor1-first=Elizabeth M. |editor2-last=Wildman |editor2-first=Stephanie M. |title=Women and the Law Stories |date=2011 |publisher=Thomson Reuters |isbn=9781599415895 |url=https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2936&context=faculty_scholarship |access-date=September 23, 2020 |chapter=Unconstitutionally Male?: The Story of United States v. Virginia |archive-date=October 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201027035313/https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2936&context=faculty_scholarship |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
|PLACE OF DEATH= |
|||
}} |
|||
Ginsburg dissented in the Court's decision on ''[[Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.|Ledbetter v. Goodyear]]'', {{Replace|{{ussc|550|618|2007|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, in which plaintiff [[Lilly Ledbetter]] sued her employer, claiming pay discrimination based on her gender, in violation of Title{{spaces}}VII of the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]].<!--<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Over Ginsburg's Dissent" />--> In a 5–4 decision, the majority interpreted the [[statute of limitations]] as starting to run at the time of every pay period, even if a woman did not know she was being paid less than her male colleague until later.<!--<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Over Ginsburg's Dissent" />--> Ginsburg found the result absurd, pointing out that women often do not know they are being paid less, and therefore it was unfair to expect them to act at the time of each paycheck.<!--<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Over Ginsburg's Dissent" />--> She also called attention to the reluctance women may have in male-dominated fields to making waves by filing lawsuits over small amounts, choosing instead to wait until the disparity accumulates.<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Over Ginsburg's Dissent">{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/29/AR2007052900740.html|title=Over Ginsburg's Dissent, Court Limits Bias Suits|last=Barnes|first=Robert|date=May 30, 2007|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=April 1, 2017|issn=0190-8286|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170403013341/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/29/AR2007052900740.html|archive-date=April 3, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> As part of her dissent, Ginsburg called on Congress to amend Title{{spaces}}VII to undo the Court's decision with legislation.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey, Will Ginsburg's Leddbetter Play">{{cite magazine|url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/will-ginsburgs-ledbetter-play-work-twice|title=Will Ginsburg's Ledbetter Play Work Twice?|last=Toobin|first=Jeffrey|date=June 24, 2013|magazine=The New Yorker|access-date=April 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402171258/http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/will-ginsburgs-ledbetter-play-work-twice|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Following the election of President [[Barack Obama]] in 2008, the [[Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009|Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act]], making it easier for employees to win pay discrimination claims, became law.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/12/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-justice-notorious-rbg/index.html|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Down with 'Notorious R.B.G.'|last1=de Vogue|first1=Ariane|last2=Simon|first2=Jeff|date=February 12, 2015|publisher=CNN|access-date=April 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402170456/http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/12/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-justice-notorious-rbg/index.html|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Wolf, Richard, Ginsburg's dedication undimmed">{{cite news|last=Wolf|first=Richard|date=July 31, 2013|title=Ginsburg's dedication undimmed after 20 years on court|work=USA Today|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/31/ginsburg-female-justices-no-shrinking-violets-/2606239/|url-status=live|access-date=April 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305071948/http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/31/ginsburg-female-justices-no-shrinking-violets-/2606239/|archive-date=March 5, 2017}}</ref> Ginsburg was credited with helping to inspire the law.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey, Will Ginsburg's Leddbetter Play" /><ref name="Wolf, Richard, Ginsburg's dedication undimmed" /> |
|||
====Abortion rights==== |
|||
Ginsburg discussed her views on abortion and gender equality in a 2009 ''New York Times'' interview, in which she said, "[t]he basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman."<ref name="nytimes070709">{{cite news |last=Bazelon |first=Emily |date=July 7, 2009 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all |title=The Place of Women on the Court |work=The New York Times |access-date=September 1, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110324081841/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all |archive-date=March 24, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref> Although Ginsburg consistently supported [[Abortion-rights movements|abortion rights]] and joined in the Court's opinion striking down Nebraska's [[Intact dilation and extraction|partial-birth abortion]] law in ''[[Stenberg v. Carhart]]'', {{Replace|{{ussc|530|914|2000|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, on the 40th anniversary of the Court's ruling in ''Roe v. Wade'', {{Replace|{{ussc|410|113|1973|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, she criticized the decision in ''Roe'' as terminating a nascent democratic movement to liberalize abortion laws which might have built a more durable consensus in support of abortion rights.<ref>[http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ginsburg_expands_on_her_disenchantment_with_roe_v._wade_legacy/ Pusey, Allen. "Ginsburg: Court should have avoided broad-based decision in Roe v. Wade", ''ABA Journal'', May 13, 2013] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306113117/http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ginsburg_expands_on_her_disenchantment_with_roe_v._wade_legacy/|date=March 6, 2016}}. Retrieved July 5, 2013.</ref> |
|||
Ginsburg was in the minority for ''[[Gonzales v. Carhart]]'', {{Delink|{{ussc|550|124|2007|el=no}}}}, a 5–4 decision upholding restrictions on partial birth abortion.<!--<ref name="Hirshman, Linda, How Ginsburg just won" />--> In her dissent, Ginsburg opposed the majority's decision to defer to legislative findings that the procedure was not safe for women. Ginsburg focused her ire on the way Congress reached its findings and with their veracity.<ref name="Hirshman, Linda, How Ginsburg just won">{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/06/27/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-just-won-the-next-abortion-fight/|title=How Ruth Bader Ginsburg just won the next abortion fight|last=Hirshman|first=Linda|date=June 27, 2016|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |access-date=March 31, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402170248/https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/06/27/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-just-won-the-next-abortion-fight/|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Joining the majority for ''[[Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt]]'', {{Replace|{{ussc|579|582|2016|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, a case which struck down parts of a 2013 [[Texas law]] regulating abortion providers, Ginsburg also authored a short concurring opinion which was even more critical of the legislation at issue.<ref name="Green, Emma, Ginsburg came Out Against" /> She asserted the legislation was not aimed at protecting women's health, as Texas had said, but rather to impede women's access to abortions.<ref name="Hirshman, Linda, How Ginsburg just won" /><ref name="Green, Emma, Ginsburg came Out Against">{{Cite news|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/supreme-court-abortion-texas/488894/|title=Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg Came Out Hard Against TRAP Laws When No Other Justice Would|last=Green|first=Emma|date=June 27, 2016|work=[[The Atlantic]]|access-date=March 31, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402082724/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/supreme-court-abortion-texas/488894/|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
====Religious Freedom==== |
|||
On May 31, 2005, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in [[Cutter v. Wilkinson]] that facilities utilizing federal funds cannot deny prisoners accommodations necessary for the practice of their religious beliefs.<ref>{{cite web |last=Lederman |first=Marty | url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/cutter-v-wilkinson/ | title=Cutter v. Wilkinson | website=[[SCOTUSblog]] | date=May 31, 2005 }}</ref> In doing so, Ginsburg held that [[Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act|RLUIPA]] was a valid accommodation permitted by the First Amendment's [[Establishment Clause]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2008/10/23/a-fluid-boundary5/ | title=Exempting Religious Groups From General Requirements | website=[[Pew Research Center]] | date=October 23, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Merchant |first=Anusha | url=https://www.culawreview.org/journal/religious-freedom-for-all-determining-what-is-left-of-first-amendment-protections-for-americas-incarcerated | title=Religious Freedom For All?: Determining What is Left of First Amendment Protections for America's Incarcerated | website=Columbia University Undergraduate Law Review | date=October 4, 2022 }}</ref> In addition, Ginsburg acknowledged that the free exercise of religion encompasses both belief and action but noted that accommodation of a religious belief did not predispose equal accommodation for a non-secular preference.<ref>{{cite web |last=Vile |first=John | url=https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/cutter-v-wilkinson/ | title=Cutter v. Wilkinson (2005) | website=Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University | date=January 1, 2008 }}</ref> |
|||
On June 28, 2010, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in [[Christian Legal Society v. Martinez]] relating to a campus policy of acceptance of all students, regardless of status or belief, in becoming an officially recognized [[Student society|student group]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Russo |first=Charles | url=https://www.academia.edu/875962 |via=[[Academia.edu]] | title=Another Nail in the Coffin of Religious Freedom? Christian Legal Society v. Martinez | website=Education Law Journal | date=July 12, 2011 }}</ref> Ginsburg ruled that a religious-based group stood at odds with an "all-comers" campus policy by singling out a religious group for exclusion in a manner at odds with the "limited public forum" of the campus.<ref>{{cite web |last=Liptak |first=Adam | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/us/29court.html | title=Justices Rule Against Group That Excludes Gay Students | website=[[The New York Times]] | date=June 23, 2023 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2010/06/28/high-court-rules-against-campus-christian-group/ | title=High Court Rules Against Campus Christian Group | website=[[Pew Research Center]] | date=June 28, 2010 }}</ref> Such a public forum was thus legally obligated to provide equal access via open membership and was determined to not be required to officially recognize a student group at odds with it.<ref>{{cite web |last=Denniston |first=Lyle | url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2010/06/analysis-a-fatal-stipulation/ | title=Analysis: A fatal stipulation | website=[[SCOTUSblog]] | date=June 28, 2010 }}</ref> |
|||
====Search and seizure==== |
|||
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg.jpg|alt=A painting of Ginsburg in her robe, smiling and leaning in a chair|thumb|upright|Commissioned portrait by [[Simmie Knox]], 2000]] |
|||
On June 27, 2002, Ginsburg dissented in ''[[Board of Education v. Earls]]'' which permitted schools to enact mandatory [[drug testing]] on students partaking in [[Extracurricular activity|extracurricular activities]].<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Greenstein |first=Nicole | url=https://nation.time.com/2013/08/01/privacy-and-the-law-how-the-supreme-court-defines-a-controversial-right/slide/student-drug-testing/ | title=Student Drug Testing | magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] | date=July 31, 2013 }}</ref> In her dissent, Ginsburg criticized the application of such a policy when the district had failed to identify either a significant drug risk among the students or in the school.<ref>{{cite web |last=Proctor |first=Thomas | url=https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2254&context=lawreview | title=Constitutionality of Testing High School Male Athletes for Steroids Under Vernonia School District v. Acton and Board of Education v. Earls | website=Brighim Young University Law Review | date=December 1, 2005 }}</ref> In doing so, Ginsburg contrasted the case with ''[[Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton|Vernonia School District v. Acton]]'' which had permitted drug testing due to 'special needs' of [[student athlete|athlete participation]], acknowledging her prior agreement with the verdict but stating that such an opinion "cannot be read to endorse invasive and suspicionless drug testing of all students".<ref>{{cite web |last=Greenhouse |first=Linda | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/28/us/supreme-court-drug-tests-justices-allow-schools-wider-use-random-drug-tests-for.html | title=THE SUPREME COURT: DRUG TESTS; Justices Allow Schools Wider Use Of Random Drug Tests for Pupils | website=[[The New York Times]] | date=June 28, 2002 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Walsh |first=Mark | url=https://www.edweek.org/education/what-ruth-bader-ginsburg-meant-to-education/2020/09 | title=What Ruth Bader Ginsburg Meant to Education | website=[[Education Week]] | date=September 18, 2020 }}</ref> |
|||
Although Ginsburg did not author the majority opinion, she was credited with influencing her colleagues on ''[[Safford Unified School District v. Redding]]'', {{Replace|{{ussc|557|364|2009|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}},<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/us/politics/26scotus.html|title=Supreme Court Says Child's Rights Violated by Strip Search|last=Liptak|first=Adam|date=June 26, 2009|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|issn=0362-4331|access-date=December 8, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170511164552/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/us/politics/26scotus.html|archive-date=May 11, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> which held that a school went too far in ordering a 13-year-old female student to strip to her bra and underpants so female officials could search for drugs.<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights" /> In an interview published prior to the Court's decision, Ginsburg shared her view that some of her colleagues did not fully appreciate the effect of a strip search on a 13-year-old girl.<!--<ref name="Biskupic, Joan; Court needs another woman" />--> As she said, "They have never been a 13-year-old girl."<ref name="Biskupic, Joan; Court needs another woman">{{cite web|url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-05-05-ruthginsburg_N.htm|title=Ginsburg: Court needs another woman|last=Biskupic|first=Joan|date=October 5, 2009|website=[[USA Today]]|access-date=December 8, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121024091944/http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-05-05-ruthginsburg_N.htm|archive-date=October 24, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> In an 8–1 decision, the Court agreed that the school's search violated the [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendment]] and allowed the student's lawsuit against the school to go forward.<!--<ref name=""Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights"" />--> Only Ginsburg and Stevens would have allowed the student to sue individual school officials as well.<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights" /> |
|||
In ''[[Herring v. United States]]'', {{Replace|{{ussc|555|135|2009|el=no}}|[[United States Reports|U.S.]]|U.S.}}, Ginsburg dissented from the Court's decision not to suppress evidence due to a police officer's failure to update a computer system.<!--<ref name="Tribe, Laurence; Uncertain Justice" />{{rp|308}}--> In contrast to Roberts's emphasis on suppression as a means to deter police misconduct, Ginsburg took a more robust view on the use of suppression as a remedy for a violation of a defendant's [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendment]] rights.<!--<ref name="Tribe, Laurence; Uncertain Justice" />{{rp|308}}--> Ginsburg viewed suppression as a way to prevent the government from profiting from mistakes, and therefore as a remedy to preserve judicial integrity and respect civil rights.<ref name="Tribe, Laurence; Uncertain Justice">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lM1iAwAAQBAJ|title=Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution|last1=Tribe|first1=Laurence|last2=Matz|first2=Joshua|date=June 3, 2014|publisher=Macmillan|isbn=978-0805099096|access-date=March 31, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170331121921/https://books.google.com/books?id=lM1iAwAAQBAJ|archive-date=March 31, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>{{rp|308}} She also rejected Roberts's assertion that suppression would not deter mistakes, contending making police pay a high price for mistakes would encourage them to take greater care.<ref name="Tribe, Laurence; Uncertain Justice" />{{rp|309}} |
|||
On January 26, 2009, Ginsburg wrote for a unanimous court in ''[[Arizona v. Johnson]]'' that a police officer may [[Frisking|pat down]] an individual at a [[traffic stop]] provided reasonable suspicion by the officer the individual was armed and dangerous.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (2009)|url=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/555/323/|access-date=2021-05-09|website=Justia Law|language=en}}</ref> In her opinion, Ginsburg concluded that the "combined thrust" of past opinions such as ''[[Terry v. Ohio]]'' and ''[[Pennsylvania v. Mimms]]'' provided officers the authority to conduct such a search provided reasonable suspicion of danger by the individual.<ref>{{cite web |last=Denniston |first=Lyle | url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2009/01/analysis-more-power-for-police-more-immunity-for-prosecutors/ | title=Analysis: More power for police, more immunity for prosecutors | website=[[SCOTUSblog]] | date=January 26, 2009 }}</ref> Additionally, Ginsburg noted that comments made by the officer unrelated to the traffic stop "do not convert the encounter into something other than a lawful seizure, so long as those inquiries do not measurably extend the duration of the stop".<ref>{{cite web | url=https://reason.com/volokh/2023/06/23/making-sense-of-arizona-v-navajo-nation/ | title=United States Supreme Court Upholds Frisk of Passenger in Lawfully Stopped Auto | website=Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute | date=January 17, 2009 }}</ref> |
|||
On April 21, 2015, Ginsburg authored the majority opinion in ''[[Rodriguez v. United States]]'' stating that an officer may not extend the length of a standard traffic stop to conduct a search with a [[detection dog]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Liptak |first=Adam | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/22/us/supreme-court-limits-drug-sniffing-dog-use-in-traffic-stops.html | title=Justices Rule that Police Can't Extend Traffic Stops | website=[[The New York Times]] | date=April 21, 2015 }}</ref> In her opinion, Ginsburg stated that the use of a detection dog or any action not related to the initial traffic stop could not be used in suspicion of a separate crime.<ref>{{cite web |last=Little |first=Rory | url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2015/04/opinion-analysis-traffic-stops-cant-last-too-long-or-go-too-far-and-no-extra-dog-sniffs/ | title=Opinion analysis: Traffic stops can't last too long or go too far, and no extra dog sniffs! | website=[[SCOTUSblog]] | date=June 21, 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Joseph Stern |first=Mark | url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/04/rodriguez-v-united-states-a-huge-win-against-police-overreach-at-the-supreme-court.html | title=The Ferguson Effect Chief Justice Roberts rules against police abuse at the Supreme Court. Maybe he finally gets it. | website=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] | date=April 21, 2015 }}</ref> Ginsburg additionally contended that such an action would only be permissible by the officer provided the officer had "independently supported reasonable suspicion" that a separate crime had occurred at the time of the initial traffic violation and that the action taken would not add additional time to the traffic stop.<ref>{{cite web |last=Farb |first=Bob | url=https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/update-on-u-s-supreme-courts-ruling-in-rodriguez-v-united-states-concerning-extension-of-traffic-stops/ | title=Update on U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling in Rodriguez v. United States Concerning Extension of Traffic Stops | website=North Carolina Criminal Law | date=January 27, 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Kerr |first=Orin | url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/04/21/police-cant-delay-traffic-stops-to-investigate-crimes-absent-suspicion-supreme-court-rules/ | title=Police can't delay traffic stops to investigate crimes absent suspicion, Supreme Court rules | newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] | date=April 21, 2015 }}</ref> |
|||
====International law==== |
|||
Ginsburg advocated the use of foreign law and norms to shape U.S. law in judicial opinions, a view rejected by some of her conservative colleagues.<!--<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Ginsburg shares views on Influence of Foreign Law" />--> Ginsburg supported using foreign interpretations of law for persuasive value and possible wisdom, not as binding precedent.<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Ginsburg shares views on Influence of Foreign Law">{{cite news|last=Liptak|first=Adam|title=Ginsburg Shares Views on Influence of Foreign Law on Her Court, and Vice Versa|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/us/12ginsburg.html|access-date=March 7, 2012|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=April 11, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120207070907/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/us/12ginsburg.html|archive-date=February 7, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg expressed the view that consulting international law is a well-ingrained tradition in American law, counting [[John Henry Wigmore]] and President [[John Adams]] as internationalists.<ref name="Anker, Deborah E.2" /> Ginsburg's own reliance on international law dated back to her time as an attorney; in her first argument before the Court, ''Reed v. Reed'', 404 U.S. 71 (1971), she cited two German cases.<ref>{{Cite journal|first=Judith|last=Resnik|year=2013|title=Opening the Door: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Law's Boundaries, and the Gender of Opportunities|url=http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4942|journal=Faculty Scholarship Series|page=83|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151218001748/http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4942/|archive-date=December 18, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> In her concurring opinion in ''[[Grutter v. Bollinger]]'', [[Case citation|539 U.S. 306]] (2003), a decision upholding [[Michigan Law School]]'s affirmative action admissions policy, Ginsburg noted there was accord between the notion that [[affirmative action]] admissions policies would have an end point and agrees with international treaties designed to combat racial and gender-based discrimination.<ref name="Anker, Deborah E.2">{{cite journal|last1=Anker|first1=Deborah E.|title=''Grutter v. Bollinger'': Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Legitimization of the Role of Comparative and International Law in U.S. Jurisprudence|journal=Harvard Law Review|year=2013|volume=127|page=425|url=http://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol127_essays_in_honor_of_justice_ruth_bader_ginsburg.pdf|access-date=April 10, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305001657/http://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol127_essays_in_honor_of_justice_ruth_bader_ginsburg.pdf|archive-date=March 5, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
====Voting rights and affirmative action==== |
|||
In 2013, Ginsburg dissented in ''[[Shelby County v. Holder]]'', in which the Court held unconstitutional the part of the [[Voting Rights Act of 1965]] requiring federal preclearance before changing voting practices. Ginsburg wrote, "Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."<ref>{{cite news|title=Between the Lines of the Voting Rights Act Opinion|author=Schwartz, John|url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/06/25/us/annotated-supreme-court-decision-on-voting-rights-act.html?ref=us&_r=0|newspaper=The New York Times|date=June 25, 2013|access-date=June 25, 2013|archive-date=December 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201134710/http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/06/25/us/annotated-supreme-court-decision-on-voting-rights-act.html?ref=us&_r=0|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Besides ''Grutter'', Ginsburg wrote in favor of affirmative action in her dissent in ''[[Gratz v. Bollinger]]'' (2003), in which the Court ruled an affirmative action policy unconstitutional because it was not [[Strict scrutiny|narrowly tailored]] to the state's interest in diversity. She argued that "government decisionmakers may properly distinguish between policies of exclusion and inclusion...Actions designed to burden groups long denied full citizenship stature are not sensibly ranked with measures taken to hasten the day when entrenched discrimination and its after effects have been extirpated."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Heriot |first1=Gail |title=Thoughts on Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger as Law and as Practical Politics |journal=[[Loyola University Chicago Law Journal]] |year=2004 |volume=36 |page=137 |url=https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1246&context=luclj |access-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-date=October 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022182650/https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1246&context=luclj |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
====Native Americans==== |
|||
In 1997, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Strate v. A-1 Contractors]]'' against tribal jurisdiction over tribal-owned land in a reservation.<ref>{{cite news |title=RBG's Mixed Record on Race and Criminal Justice |url=https://www.themarshallproject.org/2020/09/23/rbg-s-mixed-record-on-race-and-criminal-justice |access-date=September 23, 2020 |work=[[The Marshall Project]] |date=September 23, 2020 |archive-date=September 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923184213/https://www.themarshallproject.org/2020/09/23/rbg-s-mixed-record-on-race-and-criminal-justice |url-status=live }}</ref> The case involved a nonmember who caused a car crash in the [[Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation]]. Ginsburg reasoned that the state right-of-way on which the crash occurred rendered the tribal-owned land equivalent to non-Indian land. She then considered the rule set in ''[[Montana v. United States]]'', which allows tribes to regulate the activities of nonmembers who have a relationship with the tribe. Ginsburg noted that the driver's employer did have a relationship with the tribe, but she reasoned that the tribe could not regulate their activities because the victim had no relationship to the tribe. Ginsburg concluded that although "those who drive carelessly on a public highway running through a reservation endanger all in the vicinity, and surely jeopardize the safety of tribal members", having a nonmember go before an "unfamiliar court" was "not crucial to the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the Three Affiliated Tribes" (internal quotations and brackets omitted). The decision, by a unanimous Court, was generally criticized by scholars of Indian law, such as [[David Getches]] and [[Frank Pommersheim]].<ref name=Goldberg>{{cite journal |last1=Goldberg |first1=Carole |title=Finding the Way to Indian Country: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Decisions in Indian Law Cases |journal=Ohio State Law Journal |year=2009 |volume=70 |issue=4 |url=https://sct.narf.org/articles/finding_the_way_to_indian_country-justice_ruth_bader_ginsburgs_decisions_in_indian_law_cases_goldberg_2010.pdf |access-date=September 22, 2020 |archive-date=September 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923114451/https://sct.narf.org/articles/finding_the_way_to_indian_country-justice_ruth_bader_ginsburgs_decisions_in_indian_law_cases_goldberg_2010.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>{{rp|1024–5}} |
|||
Later in 2005, Ginsburg cited the [[Discovery doctrine|doctrine of discovery]] in the majority opinion of ''[[City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York]]'' and concluded that the [[Oneida Indian Nation]] could not revive its ancient sovereignty over its historic land.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pappas |first1=George D. |title=The Literary and Legal Genealogy of Native American Dispossession: The Marshall Trilogy Cases |date=2017 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |isbn=9781138188723 |pages=217–218 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CECTDAAAQBAJ&dq=ginsburg+discovery+doctrine&pg=PT300 |access-date=September 21, 2020 |archive-date=November 8, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108153020/https://books.google.com/books?id=CECTDAAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT300&dq=ginsburg+discovery+doctrine&hl=en&source=newbks_fb |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Gadoua |first1=Renee K. |title=Nuns to pope: Revoke 15th-century doctrine that allows Christians to seize native land |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/nuns-to-pope-revoke-15th-century-doctrine-that-allows-christians-to-seize-native-land/2014/09/09/fe7453ee-3831-11e4-a023-1d61f7f31a05_story.html |access-date=September 21, 2020 |newspaper=The Washington Post |agency=Religion News Service |date=September 9, 2014 |quote=In 2005, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg cited the Doctrine of Discovery in a land-claim ruling against the Oneidas, one of the six nations of the Haudenosaunee. |archive-date=October 4, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201004133022/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/nuns-to-pope-revoke-15th-century-doctrine-that-allows-christians-to-seize-native-land/2014/09/09/fe7453ee-3831-11e4-a023-1d61f7f31a05_story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The discovery doctrine has been used to grant ownership of Native American lands to colonial governments. The Oneida had lived in towns, grew extensive crops, and maintained trade routes to the Gulf of Mexico. In her opinion for the Court, Ginsburg reasoned that the historic Oneida land had been "converted from wilderness" ever since it was dislodged from the Oneidas' possession.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Johansen |first1=Bruce E. |last2=Pritzker |first2=Barry M. |title=Encyclopedia of American Indian History: Volume I |date=2008 |publisher=[[ABC-CLIO]] |location=Santa Barbara |isbn=978-1-85109-817-0 |page=17 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sGKL6E9_J6IC&dq=ginsburg+discovery+doctrine&pg=PA17 |access-date=September 21, 2020 |archive-date=November 8, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108153020/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Encyclopedia_of_American_Indian_History/sGKL6E9_J6IC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=ginsburg+discovery+doctrine&pg=PA17&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> She also reasoned that "the longstanding, distinctly non-Indian character of the area and its inhabitants" and "the regulatory authority constantly exercised by New York State and its counties and towns" justified the ruling. Ginsburg also invoked, [[sua sponte]], the doctrine of [[laches (equity)|laches]], reasoning that the Oneidas took a "long delay in seeking judicial relief". She also reasoned that the dispossession of the Oneidas' land was "ancient". Lower courts later relied on ''Sherrill'' as precedent to extinguish Native American land claims, including in ''[[Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki]]''.<ref name=Goldberg/>{{rp|1030–1}} |
|||
Less than a year after ''Sherrill'', Ginsburg offered a starkly contrasting approach to Native American law. In December 2005, Ginsburg dissented in ''[[Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Indians|Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation]]'', arguing that a state tax on fuel sold to [[Potawatomi]] retailers would impermissibly nullify the [[Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation]]'s own tax authority.<ref name=Goldberg/>{{rp|1032}} In 2008, when Ginsburg's precedent in ''Strate'' was used in ''[[Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.]]'', she dissented in part and argued that the tribal court of the Cheyenne River Lakota Nation had jurisdiction over the case.<ref name=Goldberg/>{{rp|1034–5}} In 2020, Ginsburg joined the ruling of ''[[McGirt v. Oklahoma]]'', which affirmed Native American jurisdictions over reservations in much of Oklahoma.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wamsley |first1=Laurel |title=Supreme Court Rules That About Half Of Oklahoma Is Native American Land |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/07/09/889562040/supreme-court-rules-that-about-half-of-oklahoma-is-indian-land |access-date=September 21, 2020 |publisher=NPR |date=July 9, 2020 |archive-date=September 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923104208/https://www.npr.org/2020/07/09/889562040/supreme-court-rules-that-about-half-of-oklahoma-is-indian-land |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
====Other majority opinions==== |
|||
In 1999, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Olmstead v. L.C.]],'' in which the Court ruled that mental illness is a form of disability covered under the [[Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Blackwell |first1=Geoff |last2=Hobday |first2=Ruth |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg: I Know This to Be True |date=2020 |publisher=[[Chronicle Books]] |isbn=978-1-7972-0016-3 |page=64 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lVPODwAAQBAJ&dq=ginsburg+Olmstead+v.+L.C.&pg=PA64 |access-date=September 23, 2020 |archive-date=November 8, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108153020/https://www.google.com/books/edition/I_Know_This_to_Be_True_Ruth_Bader_Ginsbu/lVPODwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=ginsburg+Olmstead+v.+L.C.&pg=PA64&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In 2000, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.]]'', in which the Court held that residents have standing to seek fines for an industrial polluter that affected their interests and that is able to continue doing so.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Longfellow |first1=Emily |title=Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services: A New Look At Environmental Standing |journal=Environs |year=2000 |volume=24 |issue=1 |page=5 |url=https://environs.law.ucdavis.edu/volumes/24/1/articles/longfellow.pdf |access-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-date=October 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022182651/https://environs.law.ucdavis.edu/volumes/24/1/articles/longfellow.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Grandoni |first1=Dino |title=The Energy 202: How Amy Coney Barrett may make it harder for environmentalists to win in court |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/28/energy-202-how-amy-coney-barrett-may-make-it-harder-environmentalists-win-court/ |access-date=September 29, 2020 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=September 28, 2020 |archive-date=October 13, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201013230825/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/28/energy-202-how-amy-coney-barrett-may-make-it-harder-environmentalists-win-court/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
===Decision not to retire under Obama=== |
|||
When John Paul Stevens retired in 2010, Ginsburg became the oldest justice on the court at age 77.<ref name="boston">{{cite news|url=https://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/08/03/ginsburg_says_no_plans_to_leave_supreme_court/|title=Ginsburg says no plans to leave Supreme Court|author=Sherman, Mark|date=August 3, 2010|agency=[[Associated Press]]|work=[[The Boston Globe]]|access-date=February 13, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628230923/http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/08/03/ginsburg_says_no_plans_to_leave_supreme_court/|archive-date=June 28, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> Despite rumors that she would retire because of advancing age, poor health, and the death of her husband,<ref name="2nominees">{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Supreme_Court/white-house-prepares-possibility-supreme-court-vacancies/story?id=9740077&page=1|title=White House Prepares for Possibility of 2 Supreme Court Vacancies|last=de Vogue|first=Ariana|date=February 4, 2010|website=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]|access-date=August 6, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101127204819/http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Supreme_Court/white-house-prepares-possibility-supreme-court-vacancies/story?id=9740077&page=1|archive-date=November 27, 2010|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="rush">{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-07-13-scotus-election_N.htm|title=At Supreme Court, no one rushes into retirement|date=July 13, 2008|work=[[USA Today]]|access-date=August 6, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090927094747/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-07-13-scotus-election_N.htm|archive-date=September 27, 2009|url-status=live}}</ref> she denied she was planning to step down. In an interview in August 2010, Ginsburg said her work on the Court was helping her cope with the death of her husband.<ref name=boston /> She also expressed a wish to emulate Justice [[Louis Brandeis]]'s service of nearly 23{{spaces}}years, which she achieved in April 2016.<ref name="boston" /> |
|||
Several times during the [[presidency of Barack Obama]], progressive attorneys and activists called for Ginsburg to retire so that Obama could appoint a like-minded successor,<ref name="Bernstein, Jonathan, Yes Stephen Breyer">{{cite news|last1=Bernstein|first1=Jonathan|title=Yes, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg should still retire|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/11/29/yes-stephen-breyer-and-ruth-bader-ginsburg-should-still-retire/|access-date=June 26, 2016|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=November 29, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160819002825/https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/11/29/yes-stephen-breyer-and-ruth-bader-ginsburg-should-still-retire/|archive-date=August 19, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Cohen, Michael; Ruth Bader Ginsburg should do">{{cite news|last1=Cohen|first1=Michael|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg should do all liberals a favor and retire now|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/14/ruth-bader-ginsburg-retire-liberal-judge|access-date=June 26, 2016|newspaper=The Guardian|date=February 14, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160618232820/http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/14/ruth-bader-ginsburg-retire-liberal-judge|archive-date=June 18, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Chemerinksy, Erwin; Much depends on Ginsburg">{{cite news|last1=Chemerinsky|first1=Erwin|title=Much depends on Ginsburg|url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-chemerinsky-ginsburg-should-resign-20140316-story.html|access-date=June 26, 2016|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]]|date=March 15, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160815095043/http://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/15/opinion/la-oe-chemerinsky-ginsburg-should-resign-20140316|archive-date=August 15, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> particularly while the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]] held control of the U.S. Senate.<ref name="AP Ginsburg not leaving court anytime soon">{{cite news|agency=Associated Press|title=Justice Ginsburg not leaving court 'anytime soon'|url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2011-07-02-Supreme-Court-Ginsburg_n.htm|access-date=June 12, 2016|newspaper=[[USA Today]]|date=July 2, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161021080159/http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2011-07-02-Supreme-Court-Ginsburg_n.htm|archive-date=October 21, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Cohen, Michael; Ruth Bader Ginsburg should do" /> Ginsburg reaffirmed her wish to remain a justice as long as she was mentally sharp enough to perform her duties.<ref name="Bravin, Jess; For Now, Justice Ginsburg's">{{cite news|last1=Bravin|first1=Jess|title=For Now, Justice Ginsburg's 'Pathmarking' Doesn't Include Retirement|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303678404579536072435307790|access-date=June 26, 2016|newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|date=May 2, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160816015603/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303678404579536072435307790|archive-date=August 16, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2013, Obama met with her in the White House to point out that Democrats might soon lose control of the Senate and nudge her toward stepping down, but she again refused.<ref name="rbg-retirement-obama" /> She opined that Republicans would use the judicial filibuster to prevent Obama from appointing a jurist like herself.<ref name="Davidson, Amy; Retirement Dissent">{{cite magazine|last1=Davidson|first1=Amy|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Retirement Dissent|url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davidson/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-retirement-dissent|access-date=June 26, 2016|magazine=[[The New Yorker]]|date=September 24, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160609195637/http://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davidson/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-retirement-dissent|archive-date=June 9, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> She stated that she had a new model to emulate in her former colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, who retired at the age of 90 after nearly 35 years on the bench.<ref name="BiskupicReuters07042013">Biskupic, Joan. [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg-idUSBRE9630C820130704 Exclusive: Supreme Court's Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017030020/https://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/04/us-usa-court-ginsburg-idUSBRE9630C820130704|date=October 17, 2015}}, [[Reuters]], July 4, 2013.</ref> |
|||
Lawyer and author [[Linda Hirshman]] believed that, in the lead-up to the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 U.S. presidential election]], Ginsburg was waiting for candidate [[Hillary Clinton]] to beat candidate [[Donald Trump]] before retiring, because Clinton would nominate a more liberal successor for her than Obama would, or so that her successor could be nominated by the first female president.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Hirshman|first=Linda|date=September 18, 2020|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg had a vision for America. Her colleagues thwarted it.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/09/18/rbg-thwarted-vision-failed/|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=September 20, 2020|archive-date=September 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920104217/https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/09/18/rbg-thwarted-vision-failed/|url-status=live}}</ref> After Trump's victory in 2016 and the election of a Republican Senate, she would have had to wait until at least 2021 for a Democrat to be president, but died in office in September 2020 at age 87.<ref name="NPR death">{{Cite news|last=Totenberg|first=Nina|date=September 18, 2020|title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87|publisher=[[NPR]]|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/100306972/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-champion-of-gender-equality-dies-at-87|url-status=live|access-date=September 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200918233632/https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/100306972/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-champion-of-gender-equality-dies-at-87|archive-date=September 18, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
==Other activities== |
|||
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg, SCOTUS photo portrait.jpg|alt=Ginsburg standing in front of a bookshelf|thumb|upright|Official portrait, {{circa|2006}}]] |
|||
At his request, Ginsburg administered the [[oath of office]] to Vice President [[Al Gore]] for a second term during the [[second inauguration of Bill Clinton]] on January 20, 1997.<ref name="Swearing-In Ceremony for President William J. Clinton">{{Cite web |title=Swearing-In Ceremony for President William J. Clinton |url=http://www.inaugural.senate.gov/swearing-in/event/bill-clinton-1997 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160225193622/http://www.inaugural.senate.gov/swearing-in/event/bill-clinton-1997 |archive-date=February 25, 2016 |access-date=February 22, 2016 |publisher=Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies}}</ref> She was the third woman to administer an inaugural oath of office.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fabian |first=Jordan |date=January 4, 2013 |title=Sotomayor to Swear In VP Biden |url=https://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/justice-sonia-sotomayor-administer-inaugural-oath-vice-president/story?id=18131112 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304235028/http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/justice-sonia-sotomayor-administer-inaugural-oath-vice-president/story?id=18131112 |archive-date=March 4, 2016 |access-date=September 10, 2016 |website=ABC News}}</ref> Ginsburg is believed to have been the first Supreme Court justice to officiate at a same-sex wedding, performing the August 31, 2013, ceremony of [[John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts|Kennedy Center]] president [[Michael Kaiser]] and John Roberts, a government economist.<ref name="Fox 20130901">{{Cite web |date=September 1, 2013 |title=Justice Ginsburg officiates at same-sex wedding |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-ginsburg-officiates-at-same-sex-wedding/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130902141810/http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/01/justice-ginsburg-officiates-at-same-sex-wedding/ |archive-date=September 2, 2013 |access-date=September 3, 2013 |publisher=Fox News}}</ref> Earlier that summer, the Court had bolstered same-sex marriage rights in two separate cases.<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Ginsburg to Officiate" /><ref name="Henderson, Greg, Ginsburg Officiates">{{Cite news |last=Henderson |first=Greg |date=August 31, 2016 |title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Officiates Same-Sex Marriage |publisher=NPR |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/08/31/217692522/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-officiates-same-sex-marriage |url-status=live |access-date=December 9, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161206163539/http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/08/31/217692522/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-officiates-same-sex-marriage |archive-date=December 6, 2016}}</ref> Ginsburg believed the issue being settled led same-sex couples to ask her to officiate as there was no longer the fear of compromising rulings on the issue.<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Ginsburg to Officiate">{{Cite news |last=Barnes |first=Robert |date=August 30, 2016 |title=Ginsburg to officiate same-sex wedding |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ginsburg-to-officiate-same-sex-wedding/2013/08/30/4bc09d86-0ff4-11e3-8cdd-bcdc09410972_story.html |url-status=live |access-date=December 9, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220133952/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ginsburg-to-officiate-same-sex-wedding/2013/08/30/4bc09d86-0ff4-11e3-8cdd-bcdc09410972_story.html |archive-date=December 20, 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The Supreme Court bar formerly inscribed its certificates "[[in the year of our Lord]]", which some [[Orthodox Jews]] opposed, and asked Ginsburg to object to. She did so, and due to her objection, Supreme Court bar members have since been given other choices of how to inscribe the year on their certificates.<ref>{{Cite web |date=February 2, 2018 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she will serve as long as she has 'steam' |newspaper=The Jerusalem Post |url=https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-says-she-will-serve-as-long-as-she-has-steam-540515 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180730110246/https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-says-she-will-serve-as-long-as-she-has-steam-540515 |archive-date=July 30, 2018 |access-date=July 30, 2018 }}</ref> |
|||
Despite their ideological differences, Ginsburg considered Antonin Scalia her closest colleague on the Court.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Pallante|first=Maria A.|date=October 14, 2020|title=Ginsburg, Scalia, and Possibly Barrett, on Copyright – AAP|url=https://publishers.org/ginsburg-scalia-and-possibly-barrett-on-copyright/|access-date=October 6, 2023|language=en-US}}</ref> The two justices often dined together and attended the opera.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Biskupic |first=Joan |author-link=Joan Biskupic |date=August 24, 2009 |title=Ginsburg, Scalia Strike a Balance |work=[[USA Today]] |url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-12-25-ginsburg-scalia_N.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080117165453/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-12-25-ginsburg-scalia_N.htm |archive-date=January 17, 2008 }}</ref> In addition to befriending modern composers, including [[Tobias Picker]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Buono |first=Alla Vita |date=October 24, 2013 |title=The World Premiere of ''Dolores Claiborne'', an Opera by Tobias Picker |url=https://gevmag.com/2013/10/24/the-world-premiere-of-dolores-claiborne-an-opera-by-tobias-picker/ |url-status=live |access-date=September 19, 2020 |website=GEV Magazine |archive-date=July 30, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170730154554/http://gevmag.com/2013/10/24/the-world-premiere-of-dolores-claiborne-an-opera-by-tobias-picker/ }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Lebrecht |first=Norman |date=April 20, 2016 |title=US Composer is Married by Supreme Court Justice |url=https://slippedisc.com/2016/04/us-composer-is-married-by-supreme-court-justice/ |url-status=live |access-date=September 19, 2020 |website=Slipped Disc |archive-date=April 11, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190411132530/https://slippedisc.com/2016/04/us-composer-is-married-by-supreme-court-justice/ }}</ref> in her spare time, Ginsburg appeared in several operas in non-speaking [[Supernumerary actor|supernumerary]] roles such as ''[[Die Fledermaus]]'' (2003) and ''[[Ariadne auf Naxos]]'' (1994 and 2009 with Scalia),<ref name="OPERA America">{{Cite web |last=Bader Ginsburg |first=Ruth |date=July 13, 2015 |title=My First Opera |url=https://medium.com/@OPERAAmerica/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-justice-antonin-scalia-as-supernumeraries-in-washington-national-2d802e1d6f95 |website=OPERA America |access-date=July 22, 2020 |archive-date=July 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200722050727/https://medium.com/@OPERAAmerica/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-justice-antonin-scalia-as-supernumeraries-in-washington-national-2d802e1d6f95 |url-status=live }}</ref> and spoke lines penned by herself in ''[[La fille du régiment|The Daughter of the Regiment]]'' (2016).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Amatulli |first=Jenna |date=November 14, 2016 |title=The Glorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was in an Opera this Weekend |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-glorious-ruth-bader-ginsburg-was-in-an-opera-this-weekend_us_5829ea36e4b0c4b63b0d90eb |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161115043146/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-glorious-ruth-bader-ginsburg-was-in-an-opera-this-weekend_us_5829ea36e4b0c4b63b0d90eb |archive-date=November 15, 2016 |access-date=November 15, 2016 |website=[[HuffPost]]}}</ref> |
|||
In January 2012, Ginsburg went to Egypt for four days of discussions with judges, law school faculty, law school students, and legal experts.<ref>{{Cite press release |title=U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Visits Egypt. |date=January 28, 2012 |publisher=U.S. Embassy Cairo |url=http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr012812.html |access-date=February 5, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303003136/http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr012812.html |archive-date=March 3, 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite press release |title=Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg Expresses Admiration for Egyptian Revolution and Democratic Transition |date=February 1, 2012 |publisher=U.S. Embassy Cairo |url=http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr20113.html |access-date=February 5, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120210171837/http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr20113.html |archive-date=February 10, 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref> In an interview with [[Al Hayat TV]], she said the first requirement of a new constitution should be that it would "safeguard basic fundamental human rights like our [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]]". Asked if Egypt should model its new constitution on those of other nations, she said Egypt should be "aided by all Constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War{{spaces}}II", and cited the United States Constitution and [[Constitution of South Africa]] as documents she might look to if drafting a new constitution. She said the U.S. was fortunate to have a constitution authored by "very wise" men but said that in the 1780s, no women were able to participate directly in the process, and slavery still existed in the U.S.<ref>{{Cite news |last=de Vogue |first=Ariane |date=February 3, 2012 |title=Ginsburg Likes S. Africa as Model for Egypt |website=ABC News |url=https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/ginsburg-likes-s-africa-as-model-for-egypt/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 7, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120207150741/http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/ginsburg-likes-s-africa-as-model-for-egypt/ |archive-date=February 7, 2012}}</ref>[[File:Ginsburg speaks at naturalization ceremony 2018 (44580901170).jpg|alt=Ginsburg speaking at a podium|thumb|left|Ginsburg speaking at a naturalization ceremony at the [[National Archives Building|National Archives]] in 2018]] |
|||
During three interviews in July 2016, Ginsburg criticized [[2016 Republican Party presidential primaries#May 2016: Trump as presumptive nominee|presumptive Republican presidential nominee]] Donald Trump, telling ''The New York Times'' and the [[Associated Press]] that she did not want to think about the possibility of a [[First presidency of Donald Trump|Trump presidency]]. She joked that she might consider moving to New Zealand.<ref>{{Cite news|date=July 10, 2016|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg, No Fan of Donald Trump, Critiques Latest Term|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-no-fan-of-donald-trump-critiques-latest-term.html|url-status=live|access-date=February 18, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216203529/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-no-fan-of-donald-trump-critiques-latest-term.html?_r=1|archive-date=February 16, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last1=Williams|first1=Pete|last2=Merod|first2=Anna|last3=Frumin|first3=Aliyah|date=July 13, 2016|title=Did Ginsburg Go Too Far in Criticism of Trump?|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/ruth-bader-ginsburg-doubles-down-trump-criticism-n608006|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019010939/http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/ruth-bader-ginsburg-doubles-down-trump-criticism-n608006|archive-date=October 19, 2016|access-date=October 17, 2016|publisher=NBC News}}</ref> She later apologized for commenting on the [[2016 Republican National Convention|presumptive Republican nominee]], calling her remarks "ill advised".<ref>{{Cite news|date=July 14, 2016|title=Ruth Ginsburg Apologizes for Criticizing Trump|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump.html|url-status=live|access-date=July 14, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160714152710/http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump.html|archive-date=July 14, 2016}}</ref> |
|||
Ginsburg's first book, ''[[My Own Words]]'', was published by [[Simon & Schuster]] on October 4, 2016.<ref name="Ginsburg, Hartnett">{{Cite book|title=My Own Words|last1=Bader Ginsburg|first1=Ruth |last2=Harnett|first2=Mary|last3=Williams|first3=Wendy W.|publisher=Simon & Schuster|year=2016|isbn=978-1501145247|location=New York, NY}}</ref> The book debuted on [[The New York Times Best Seller list|The ''New York Times'' Best Seller List]] for hardcover nonfiction at No.{{spaces}}12.<ref name="Cowles, Gregory; Story Behind This Week">{{Cite news |last=Cowles |first=Gregory |date=October 14, 2016 |title=The Story Behind This Week's Best Sellers |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/23/books/review/the-story-behind-this-weeks-best-sellers.html|url-status=live |access-date=December 10, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019232547/http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/23/books/review/the-story-behind-this-weeks-best-sellers.html?_r=0 |archive-date=October 19, 2016}}</ref> While promoting her book in October 2016 during an interview with [[Katie Couric]], Ginsburg responded to a question about [[Colin Kaepernick]] choosing not to stand for the [[The Star-Spangled Banner|national anthem]] at sporting events by calling [[U.S. national anthem kneeling protests|the protest]] "really dumb". She later apologized for her criticism calling her earlier comments "inappropriately dismissive and harsh" and noting she had not been familiar with the incident and should have declined to respond to the question.<ref name="Liptak">{{Cite news |last=Liptak |first=Adam |date=October 14, 2016 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg Regrets Speaking on Colin Kaepernick |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/15/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-colin-kaepernick-national-anthem.html|url-status=live |access-date=October 16, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019165739/http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/15/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-colin-kaepernick-national-anthem.html?_r=0 |archive-date=October 19, 2016}}</ref><ref name="ESPN">{{Cite news |date=October 14, 2016 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg apologizes for criticizing anthem protests |publisher=ESPN |url=http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/17795159/ruth-bader-ginsburg-apologizes-criticizing-colin-kaepernick-anthem-protest |url-status=live |access-date=October 16, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161015193145/http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/17795159/ruth-bader-ginsburg-apologizes-criticizing-colin-kaepernick-anthem-protest |archive-date=October 15, 2016}}</ref><ref name="de Vogue">{{Cite news |last=de Vogue |first=Ariane |date=October 14, 2016 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg apologizes to Colin Kaepernick after criticizing anthem protest |publisher=CNN |url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/14/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-apologizes-colin-kaepernick/ |url-status=live |access-date=October 16, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161015121227/http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/14/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-apologizes-colin-kaepernick/ |archive-date=October 15, 2016}}</ref> In 2021, Couric revealed that she had edited out some statements by Ginsburg in their interview; Ginsburg said that athletes who protested by not standing were showing "contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life{{nbsp}}... which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from."<ref>{{Cite web|date=October 13, 2021|title=Katie Couric Edited Out Controversial Comments By RBG On Kneeling Protests: Book|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/katie-couric-book-ruth-bader-ginsburg-kneeling-protests_n_616755e8e4b065a5496f7184|access-date=October 14, 2021|website=HuffPost|archive-date=October 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211014002916/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/katie-couric-book-ruth-bader-ginsburg-kneeling-protests_n_616755e8e4b065a5496f7184|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=O'Brien|first=Cortney|date=October 13, 2021|title=Katie Couric admits she 'protected' Ruth Bader Ginsburg by editing out disparaging remarks on anthem kneelers|url=https://www.foxnews.com/media/couric-admits-she-left-out-rbg-remarks-about-kaepernick|access-date=October 14, 2021|publisher=Fox News|archive-date=October 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211013205203/https://www.foxnews.com/media/couric-admits-she-left-out-rbg-remarks-about-kaepernick|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
In 2017, Ginsburg gave the keynote address to a Georgetown University symposium on governmental reform. She spoke on the need for improving the confirmation process, "recall[ing] the 'collegiality' and 'civility' of her own nomination and confirmation..."<ref>{{cite web |title=Ginsburg pines for more collegial court confirmations |url=https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/330981-ginsburg-pines-for-more-collegial-court-confirmations |last=Wheeler |first=Lydia |access-date=October 27, 2020 |website=The Hill |date=April 27, 2017 |archive-date=October 31, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201031004559/https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/330981-ginsburg-pines-for-more-collegial-court-confirmations |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In 2018, Ginsburg expressed her support for the [[MeToo movement]], which encourages women to speak up about their experiences with [[sexual harassment]].<ref name="autogenerated1" /> She told an audience, "It's about time. For so long women were silent, thinking there was nothing you could do about it, but now the law is on the side of women, or men, who encounter harassment and that's a good thing."<ref name="autogenerated1">{{Cite web |last=Totenberg |first=Nina |date=January 22, 2018 |title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Reflects On The #MeToo Movement: 'It's About Time' |url=https://www.npr.org/2018/01/22/579595727/justice-ginsburg-shares-her-own-metoo-story-and-says-it-s-about-time |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180122235109/https://www.npr.org/2018/01/22/579595727/justice-ginsburg-shares-her-own-metoo-story-and-says-it-s-about-time |archive-date=January 22, 2018 |access-date=January 25, 2018 |publisher=NPR}}</ref> She also reflected on her own experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment, including a time when a chemistry professor at Cornell unsuccessfully attempted to trade her exam answers for sex.<ref name="autogenerated1" /> |
|||
==Personal life== |
|||
[[File:Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her husband Martin D. Ginsburg in 2009.jpg|alt=The Ginsburgs smiling at the front of a crowd|thumb|Martin and Ruth Bader Ginsburg at a White House event, 2009]] |
|||
A few days after Ruth Bader graduated from Cornell, she married Martin D. Ginsburg, who later became an internationally prominent tax attorney practicing at Weil, Gotshal & Manges. Upon Ruth Bader Ginsburg's accession to the D.C. Circuit, the couple moved from New York City to Washington, D.C., where Martin became a professor of law at [[Georgetown University Law Center]]. The couple's daughter, [[Jane C. Ginsburg]] (born 1955), is a professor at Columbia Law School. Their son, [[James Steven Ginsburg]] (born 1965), is the founder and president of [[Cedille Records]], a classical music recording company based in Chicago, Illinois. Martin and Ruth had four grandchildren.<ref name="Collins, Gail; Unsinkable RBG">{{cite news|last1=Collins|first1=Gail|title=The Unsinkable R.B.G.: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has No Interest in Retiring|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/opinion/sunday/gail-collins-ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-no-interest-in-retiring.html|access-date=April 7, 2016|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=February 20, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151013132520/http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/opinion/sunday/gail-collins-ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-no-interest-in-retiring.html?_r=0|archive-date=October 13, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
After the birth of their daughter, Martin was diagnosed with [[testicular cancer]]. During this period, Ruth attended class and took notes for both of them, typing her husband's dictated papers and caring for their daughter and her sick husband. During this period, she also was selected to be a [[Law review#Overview|member]] of the ''Harvard Law Review''. Martin died of complications from metastatic cancer on June 27, 2010, four days after their 56th wedding anniversary.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postmortem/2010/06/husband-of-supreme-court-justi.html |title= Husband of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies |date= June 27, 2010 |newspaper= The Washington Post |access-date= June 27, 2010 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120929111359/http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postmortem/2010/06/husband-of-supreme-court-justi.html |archive-date= September 29, 2012 |url-status= dead }}</ref> They spoke publicly of being in a [[shared earning/shared parenting marriage]] including in a speech Martin wrote and had intended to give before his death that Ruth delivered posthumously.<ref>{{cite news|last=Lithwick|first=Dahlia|title=The Mother of All Grizzlies|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2010/08/the_mother_of_all_grizzlies.html|access-date=November 4, 2013|newspaper=Slate|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131113165526/http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2010/08/the_mother_of_all_grizzlies.html|archive-date=November 13, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
<!--Some Supreme Court justices and other prominent figures attend the [[Red Mass]] held every fall in Washington, D.C., at the [[Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle]]. Ginsburg explained her reason for no longer attending: "I went one year, and I will never go again because this sermon was outrageously anti-abortion," Ginsburg said.<ref>{{cite book|title= Stars of David: Prominent Jews Talk About Being Jewish |url= https://archive.org/details/starsofdavidprom00pogr |url-access= registration | first= Abigail | last= Pogrebin | author-link= Abigail Pogrebin}}</ref> "Even the Scalias—although they're much of that persuasion—were embarrassed for me."<ref>{{cite news |title=Biden, 5 justices attend annual 'Red Mass' |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-red-mass-court,0,5851502.story |date= October 3, 2010 |work=[[Chicago Tribune]] |access-date= October 3, 2010}}</ref>--> |
|||
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a non-observant Jew, attributing this to gender inequality in [[Minyan|Jewish prayer ritual]] and relating it to her mother's death. However, she said she might have felt differently if she were younger, and she was pleased that [[Reform Judaism|Reform]] and Conservative Judaism were becoming more [[Egalitarianism|egalitarian]] in this regard.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20081007132256/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/14/AR2008011402290.html Ginsburg Is Latest Justice to Reflect on Faith], ''The Washington Post'', January 15, 2008.</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ruth-bader-ginsburg|access-date=December 18, 2020|website=jewishvirtuallibrary.org|archive-date=November 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122031045/https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ruth-bader-ginsburg|url-status=live}}</ref> In March 2015, Ginsburg and Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt released "The Heroic and Visionary Women of [[Passover]]", an essay highlighting the roles of five key women in the saga. The text states, "These women had a vision leading out of the darkness shrouding their world. They were women of action, prepared to defy authority to make their vision a reality bathed in the light of the day{{spaces}}..."<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20150319153632/http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/03/18/ginsburg-feminist-reading-exodus-passover/ Justice Ginsburg has released a new feminist take on the Passover narrative], ''The Washington Post'', March 18, 2015.</ref> In addition, she decorated her chambers with an artist's rendering of the Hebrew phrase from [[Deuteronomy]], "''Zedek, zedek, tirdof,''" ("Justice, justice shall you pursue") as a reminder of her heritage and professional responsibility.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ushmm.org/remember/days-of-remembrance/past-days-of-remembrance/2004-days-of-remembrance/ruth-bader-ginsburg|title=Remarks by Ruth Bader Ginsburg|date=April 22, 2004|website=Ushmm.org|publisher=United States Holocaust Memorial Museum|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140522184830/http://www.ushmm.org/remember/days-of-remembrance/past-days-of-remembrance/2004-days-of-remembrance/ruth-bader-ginsburg|archive-date=May 22, 2014|url-status=dead|access-date=November 4, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
Ginsburg had a collection of lace [[Jabot (neckwear)|jabots]] from around the world.<ref name="yahoo1">{{cite web |url=https://news.yahoo.com/video/justice-ginsburg-exhibits-her-famous-194517521.html |title=Justice Ginsburg Exhibits Her Famous Collar Collection | Watch the video |date=July 31, 2014 |publisher=Yahoo! News |access-date=March 20, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150313103739/http://news.yahoo.com/video/justice-ginsburg-exhibits-her-famous-194517521.html |archive-date=March 13, 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="makers1">{{cite web |author=<!--no byline--> |date=August 1, 2014 |url=http://www.makers.com/blog/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-owns-dissenting-collar |title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Owns a 'Dissenting Collar' |publisher=MAKERS |access-date=March 20, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150310145853/http://www.makers.com/blog/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-owns-dissenting-collar |archive-date=March 10, 2015 |url-status=dead }}</ref> She said in 2014 she had a particular jabot she wore when issuing her dissents (black with gold embroidery and faceted stones) as well as another she wore when issuing majority opinions (crocheted yellow and cream with crystals), which was a gift from her law clerks.<ref name="yahoo1" /><ref name="makers1" /> Her favorite jabot (woven with white beads) was from [[Cape Town]], South Africa.<ref name="yahoo1" /> |
|||
===Health=== |
|||
In 1999, Ginsburg was diagnosed with [[Colorectal cancer|colon cancer]], the first of her five<ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/01/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-cancer-2020-term-supreme-court/index.html|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought for her legacy in her final Supreme Court term|publisher=CNN|date=August 2020 |access-date=September 19, 2020|archive-date=September 18, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200918090407/https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/01/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-cancer-2020-term-supreme-court/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> bouts with cancer. She underwent surgery followed by [[chemotherapy]] and [[radiation therapy]]. During the process, she did not miss a day on the bench.<ref>Garry, Stephanie (February 6, 2009). [https://www.tampabay.com/news/health/article973728.ece "For Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Hopeful Signs in Grim News about Pancreatic Cancer"] . ''[[Tampa Bay Times|St. Petersburg Times]]''. Retrieved August 24, 2009.</ref> Ginsburg was physically weakened by the cancer treatment, and she began working with a personal trainer.<!--<ref name="Marimow, Ann E. Personal trainer Johnson" />--> Bryant Johnson, a former Army reservist attached to the [[U.S. Army Special Forces]], trained Ginsburg twice weekly in the justices-only gym at the Supreme Court.<ref name="Marimow, Ann E. Personal trainer Johnson" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-personal-trainer-describes-102537398.html|title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Chooses Working Out Over Dinner with the President|last1=Carmon|first1=Irin|last2=Knizhnik|first2=Shana|date=October 23, 2015|publisher=Yahoo!|access-date=September 10, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921152342/https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-personal-trainer-describes-102537398.html|archive-date=September 21, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg saw her physical fitness improve after her first bout with cancer; she was able to complete twenty [[push-up]]s in a session before her 80th birthday.<ref name="Marimow, Ann E. Personal trainer Johnson">{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/personal-trainer-bryant-johnsons-clients-includetwo-supreme-court-justices/2013/03/19/ea884018-86a1-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_story.html|title=Personal trainer Bryant Johnson's clients include two Supreme Court justices|last=Marimow|first=Ann E.|date=March 18, 2013|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=September 10, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160919135805/https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/personal-trainer-bryant-johnsons-clients-includetwo-supreme-court-justices/2013/03/19/ea884018-86a1-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_story.html|archive-date=September 19, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/31/ginsburg-female-justices-no-shrinking-violets-/2606239/|title=Ginsburg's dedication undimmed after 20 years on court|last=Wolf|first=Richard|date=August 1, 2013|newspaper=[[USA Today]]|access-date=September 10, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161114115241/http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/31/ginsburg-female-justices-no-shrinking-violets-/2606239/|archive-date=November 14, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Nearly a decade after her first bout with cancer, Ginsburg again underwent surgery on February 5, 2009, this time for [[pancreatic cancer]].<ref name="ap">{{cite news|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna29051442|title=Ginsburg could lead to Obama appointment|last=Sherman|first=Mark|date=February 6, 2009|publisher=[[NBC News]]|agency=[[Associated Press]]|access-date=September 18, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140215152601/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29051442/|archive-date=February 15, 2014|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/05/AR2009020501930.html|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer|last=Supreme Court Press Release|date=February 5, 2009|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=February 13, 2018|issn=0190-8286|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180404220924/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/05/AR2009020501930.html|archive-date=April 4, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> She had a tumor that was discovered at an early stage.<ref name="ap" /> She was released from a New York City hospital on February 13, 2009, and returned to the bench when the Supreme Court went back into session on February 23, 2009.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/23/ginsburg.scotus/index.html?iref=24hours|title=Ginsburg rejoins Supreme Court weeks after cancer surgery|last=Mears|first=Bill|date=February 23, 2009|publisher=[[CNN]] |access-date=September 10, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160917150353/http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/23/ginsburg.scotus/index.html?iref=24hours|archive-date=September 17, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/SCOTUS/story?id=6938829&page=1|title=Justice Ginsburg Returns to the Bench|last=De Vogue|first=Ariane|date=February 23, 2009|website=ABC News|access-date=September 10, 2016|archive-date=September 13, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160913063213/http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/SCOTUS/story?id=6938829&page=1|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/legalities/2009/02/justice-ginsbur.html|title=Justice Ginsburg Treated for Pancreatic Cancer|last=Cook|first=Theresa|date=March 3, 2009|website=ABC News|access-date=September 10, 2016|archive-date=September 13, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160913063215/http://abcnews.go.com/legalities/2009/02/justice-ginsbur.html|url-status=live}}</ref> After experiencing discomfort while exercising in the Supreme Court gym in November 2014, she had a [[stent]] placed in her right coronary artery.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=November 26, 2014|access-date=September 19, 2020|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/27/us/justice-ginsburg-undergoes-heart-procedure.html|title=Ginsburg Is Recovering After Heart Surgery to Place a Stent|first=Adam|last=Liptak|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141127164443/http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/27/us/justice-ginsburg-undergoes-heart-procedure.html|archive-date=November 27, 2014|url-status=live|url-access=registration}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/11/26/justice-ginsburg-has-heart-surgery.htm|title=Justice Ginsburg Has Heart Surgery|first=Dan|last=McCue|work=Courthouse News Service|date=November 26, 2014|access-date=November 30, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402095509/http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/11/26/justice-ginsburg-has-heart-surgery.htm|archive-date=April 2, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Ginsburg's next hospitalization helped her detect another round of cancer.<ref name="npr20181221" /> On November 8, 2018, Ginsburg fell in her office at the Supreme Court, [[Rib fracture|fracturing three ribs]], for which she was hospitalized.<ref name=npr20181108>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/2018/11/08/665598088/ruth-bader-ginsburg-hospitalized-after-falling-fracturing-3-ribs|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hospitalized After Falling, Fracturing 3 Ribs|last=Domonske|first=Camila|date=November 8, 2018|publisher=NPR|archive-date=September 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919004310/https://www.npr.org/2018/11/08/665598088/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-hospitalized-after-falling-fracturing-3-ribs|url-status=live}}</ref> An outpouring of public support followed.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Romano|first=Aja|url=https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/11/8/18075770/ruth-bader-ginsburg-memes-hospitalization-notorious-rbg|title="Protect RBG" memes capture cultural anxiety over the Supreme Court|date=November 9, 2018|work=Vox|access-date=November 9, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181108235503/https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/11/8/18075770/ruth-bader-ginsburg-memes-hospitalization-notorious-rbg|archive-date=November 8, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Graff|first=Amy|url=https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-memes-broken-ribs-social-media-13375672.php|title=Hips, ribs and bubble wrap: Fans are offering everything to help injured Ruth Bader Ginsburg|date=November 9, 2018|work=San Francisco Chronicle|access-date=November 9, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181108221745/https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-memes-broken-ribs-social-media-13375672.php|archive-date=November 8, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Although the day after her fall, Ginsburg's nephew revealed she had already returned to official judicial work after a day of observation,<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-film-ruth-bader-ginsburg/justice-ginsburg-up-and-working-after-breaking-ribs-nephew-says-idUSKCN1NE0XO|title=Justice Ginsburg 'up and working' after breaking ribs, nephew says|last=Richwine|first=Lisa|date=November 9, 2018|work=[[Reuters]]|access-date=November 9, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181109105831/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-film-ruth-bader-ginsburg/justice-ginsburg-up-and-working-after-breaking-ribs-nephew-says-idUSKCN1NE0XO|archive-date=November 9, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> a [[CT scan]] of her ribs following her fall showed cancerous [[Nodule (medicine)|nodules]] in her lungs.<ref name="npr20181221" /> On December 21, Ginsburg underwent a left-lung [[Lobectomy (lung)|lobectomy]] at [[Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center]] to remove the nodules.<ref name="npr20181221">{{cite web |url=https://www.npr.org/2018/12/21/679065534/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-undergoes-surgery-for-lung-cancer |title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Surgery For Lung Cancer |author-link=Nina Totenberg |last=Totenberg |first=Nina |publisher=NPR |date=December 21, 2018 |access-date=December 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181221174221/https://www.npr.org/2018/12/21/679065534/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-undergoes-surgery-for-lung-cancer |archive-date=December 21, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> For the first time since joining the Court more than 25 years earlier, Ginsburg missed oral argument on January 7, 2019, while she recuperated.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://apnews.com/b1d7eb8384ef44099d63fde057c4172c|title=Ginsburg misses Supreme Court arguments for the 1st time|last=Sherman|first=Mark|date=January 7, 2019|website=AP NEWS|access-date=January 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190107151806/https://www.apnews.com/b1d7eb8384ef44099d63fde057c4172c|archive-date=January 7, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> She returned to the Supreme Court on February 15, 2019, to participate in a private conference with other justices in her first appearance at the Court since her cancer surgery in December 2018.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/15/us/politics/ruth-ginsburg-supreme-court.html|title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Returns to Work at Supreme Court|last=Liptak|first=Adam|date=February 15, 2019|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=September 19, 2020|url-access=registration|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190215212250/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/15/us/politics/ruth-ginsburg-supreme-court.html|archive-date=February 15, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Months later in August 2019, the Supreme Court announced that Ginsburg had recently completed three weeks of focused radiation treatment to [[Ablation#Medicine|ablate]] a tumor found in her [[pancreas]] over the summer.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/2019/08/23/753699013/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-underwent-another-round-of-cancer-treatment-this-sum|title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Treated Again For Cancer|last=Totenberg|first=Nina|date=August 23, 2019|publisher=NPR|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200113233134/https://www.npr.org/2019/08/23/753699013/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-underwent-another-round-of-cancer-treatment-this-sum|archive-date=January 13, 2020}}</ref> By January 2020, Ginsburg was cancer-free. By February 2020, the cancer had returned but this news was not released to the public.<ref name="auto"/> However, by May 2020, Ginsburg was once again receiving treatment for a recurrence of cancer.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Itkowitz|first=Colby|date=January 8, 2020|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg declares she's 'cancer free'|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-declares-shes-cancer-free/2020/01/08/bc6db488-3257-11ea-91fd-82d4e04a3fac_story.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200114151257/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-declares-shes-cancer-free/2020/01/08/bc6db488-3257-11ea-91fd-82d4e04a3fac_story.html|archive-date=January 14, 2020|access-date=January 8, 2020|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> She reiterated her position that she "would remain a member of the Court as long as I can do the job full steam", adding that she remained fully able to do so.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Liptak|first=Adam|date=July 17, 2020|title=Ginsburg Says Her Cancer Has Returned, but She's 'Fully Able' to Remain on Court|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/us/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-cancer.html|access-date=September 19, 2020|issn=0362-4331|url-access=registration|archive-date=September 10, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200910121927/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/us/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-cancer.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Berman|first=Dan|date=July 17, 2020|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg announces cancer recurrence|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/17/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-cancer-chemotherapy/index.html|access-date=September 19, 2020|publisher=CNN|archive-date=September 11, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200911205633/https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/17/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-cancer-chemotherapy/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==Death and succession== |
|||
{{Main|Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination#Death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg}} |
|||
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg Memorial (50401877182).jpg|thumb|alt=Ginsburg was honored in a ceremony in Statuary Hall, and she became the first woman to lie in state at the Capitol on September 25, 2020, in the United States Capitol.|Ginsburg was honored in a ceremony in [[Statuary Hall]], and she became the first woman to lie in state at the Capitol, September 25, 2020.]] |
|||
Ginsburg died from complications of pancreatic cancer on September 18, 2020, at age 87.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Liptak|first=Adam|date=September 18, 2020|title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dies at 87|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/18/us/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-dies-at-87.html|access-date=September 19, 2020|issn=0362-4331|url-access=registration|archive-date=September 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919000041/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/18/us/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-dies-at-87.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Sherman|first=Mark|date=September 18, 2020|title=Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies of metastatic pancreatic cancer |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/09/18/nation/supreme-court-says-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-died-metastatic-pancreatic-cancer-age-87/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919004312/https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/09/18/nation/supreme-court-says-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-died-metastatic-pancreatic-cancer-age-87/|archive-date=September 19, 2020|access-date=September 19, 2020|website=[[The Boston Globe]]}}</ref> She died on the eve of [[Rosh Hashanah]], and according to Rabbi [[Richard Jacobs (rabbi)|Richard Jacobs]], "One of the themes of Rosh Hashanah suggest that very righteous people would die at the very end of the year because they were needed until the very end".<ref>{{Cite news|title=Ginsburg's death on Rosh Hashanah significant for some Jewish Americans|work=[[The Jerusalem Post]]|url=https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/ginsburgs-death-on-rosh-hashanah-significant-for-some-jewish-americans-642899|date=September 20, 2020|access-date=September 10, 2020|url-status=live|archive-date=September 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920084743/https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/ginsburgs-death-on-rosh-hashanah-significant-for-some-jewish-americans-642899}}</ref> After the announcement of her death, thousands of people gathered in front of the Supreme Court building to lay flowers, light candles, and leave messages.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crowds-gather-at-supreme-court-to-remember-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg/2020/09/18/895ee13c-fa18-11ea-be57-d00bb9bc632d_story.html|title=Honoring a 'superhero' outside the Supreme Court|date=September 19, 2020|first1=Emily|last1=Davies|first2=Michael E.|last2=Miller|first3=Clarence|last3=Williams|first4=Fenit|last4=Nirappil|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=September 20, 2020|archive-date=September 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920083545/https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crowds-gather-at-supreme-court-to-remember-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg/2020/09/18/895ee13c-fa18-11ea-be57-d00bb9bc632d_story.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Karni|first=Annie|date=September 19, 2020|title=Ginsburg Expected to Lie in Repose at the Supreme Court|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/19/us/politics/ginsburg-funeral-services.html|access-date=September 20, 2020|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=September 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920192306/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/19/us/politics/ginsburg-funeral-services.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Five days after her death, the eight Supreme Court justices, Ginsburg's children, and other family members held a private ceremony for Ginsburg in the Court's great hall. Following the private ceremony, due to [[COVID-19 pandemic]] conditions prohibiting the usual lying in repose in the great hall, Ginsburg's casket was moved outdoors to the Court's west portico so the public could pay respects. Thousands of mourners lined up to walk past the casket over the course of two days.<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Sherman|first1=Mark|last2=Barakat|first2=Matthew|date=September 23, 2020|title=Long lines of mourners pay respects to Ginsburg at court|url=https://apnews.com/article/1b5420d9b3582e7ab8419989cea43a6f|access-date=September 26, 2020|website=AP NEWS|archive-date=September 25, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200925213358/https://apnews.com/article/1b5420d9b3582e7ab8419989cea43a6f|url-status=live}}</ref> After the two days in repose at the Court, Ginsburg [[Lying in state#United States|lay in state]] at the Capitol. She was the first woman and first Jew to lie in state therein.{{efn|[[Rosa Parks]] was the first woman to lie in honor at the U.S. Capitol in 2005.}}<ref>{{Cite web|date=September 24, 2020|title=Those Who Have Lain in State or in Honor in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda|url=https://www.aoc.gov/what-we-do/programs-ceremonies/lying-in-state-honor#:~:text=No%20resolution.,in%20the%20U.S.%20Capitol%20Rotunda.&text=Parks%20is%20best%20known%20as%20a%20civil%20rights%20pioneer.&text=in%20Detroit%2C%20Michigan.-,Authority%20for%20use%20of%20the%20Rotunda%20granted%20by%20Senate%20Concurrent,agreed%20to%20October%2029%2C%202005|website=Architect of the Capitol|access-date=September 24, 2020|archive-date=November 16, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116045651/https://www.aoc.gov/what-we-do/programs-ceremonies/lying-in-state-honor#:~:text=No%20resolution.,in%20the%20U.S.%20Capitol%20Rotunda.&text=Parks%20is%20best%20known%20as%20a%20civil%20rights%20pioneer.&text=in%20Detroit%2C%20Michigan.-,Authority%20for%20use%20of%20the%20Rotunda%20granted%20by%20Senate%20Concurrent,agreed%20to%20October%2029%2C%202005|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=September 23, 2020|title=What's the difference between "lying in state" and "lying in repose"|url=https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/what-is-the-difference-between-lying-in-state-and-lying-in-repose-confused/65-d274e7a6-593c-4163-8705-e2fd9f15d72d|access-date=September 24, 2020|archive-date=September 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200924193321/https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/what-is-the-difference-between-lying-in-state-and-lying-in-repose-confused/65-d274e7a6-593c-4163-8705-e2fd9f15d72d|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Memmot, Mark|date=August 27, 2018|title='Lying in State' Vs. 'Lying in Repose' & 'Lying in Honor'|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/memmos/2018/08/27/642199041/lying-in-state-vs-lying-in-repose-lying-in-honor|access-date=September 24, 2020|publisher=NPR|archive-date=September 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200924105444/https://www.npr.org/sections/memmos/2018/08/27/642199041/lying-in-state-vs-lying-in-repose-lying-in-honor|url-status=live}}</ref> On September 29, Ginsburg was buried beside her husband in [[Arlington National Cemetery]].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Deese|first=Kaelan|date=September 29, 2020|title=Ginsburg buried in Arlington National Cemetery|work=The Hill|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/news/518778-ginsburg-buried-in-arlington-national-cemetery#:~:text=The%20late%20U.S.%20Supreme%20Court,a%20Fox%20affiliate%20WTTG%20reported.|url-status=live|access-date=September 29, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200929185234/https://thehill.com/homenews/news/518778-ginsburg-buried-in-arlington-national-cemetery|archive-date=September 29, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
Ginsburg's death opened a vacancy on the Supreme Court about six weeks before the [[2020 United States presidential election|2020 presidential election]], initiating controversies regarding the [[Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination|nomination and confirmation of her successor]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Totenberg|first=Nina|date=September 18, 2020|title=Justice Ginsburg's Death Sets Up Political Battle In The Senate|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/747742236/justice-ginsburgs-death-sets-up-political-battle-in-the-senate|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919014409/https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/747742236/justice-ginsburgs-death-sets-up-political-battle-in-the-senate|archive-date=September 19, 2020|access-date=September 19, 2020|publisher=[[NPR]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Cowan|first=Richard|date=September 19, 2020|title=Ginsburg death ignites fierce U.S. Senate battle{{Snd}} and stirs Scalia's ghost|work=[[Reuters]]|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-court-ginsburg-congress-idUKKBN26A03T|access-date=September 19, 2020|archive-date=September 21, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200921055743/https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-court-ginsburg-congress-idUKKBN26A03T|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="wp_091920">{{cite news |last=Balz |first=Dan |title=Ginsburg's death crystallizes the choice in November as no other issue can |url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ginsburg-s-death-crystallizes-the-choice-in-november-as-no-other-issue-can/ar-BB19cI2P |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|publisher=[[Microsoft News]] |date=September 19, 2020 |access-date=September 20, 2020 |archive-date=September 21, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200921055817/https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ginsburg-s-death-crystallizes-the-choice-in-november-as-no-other-issue-can/ar-BB19cI2P |url-status=live }}</ref> Days before her death, Ginsburg dictated a statement to her granddaughter Clara Spera, as heard by Ginsburg's doctor and others in the room at the time: "My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Yen |first1=Hope |last2=Sherman |first2=Mark |title=AP FACT CHECK: Trump's untruths on court pick, Biden's flubs |url=https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ap-fact-check-virus-outbreak-ruth-bader-ginsburg-elections-d48d8f4d485b244214a4713f2ff17156 |access-date=September 26, 2020 |work=Associated Press News |date=September 23, 2020 |archive-date=September 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200924230545/https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ap-fact-check-virus-outbreak-ruth-bader-ginsburg-elections-d48d8f4d485b244214a4713f2ff17156 |url-status=live }}</ref> President Trump's pick to replace her, [[Amy Coney Barrett]], was confirmed by the Senate on October 27. |
|||
==Recognition== |
|||
[[File:U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2020.jpg|alt=Three women gripping a bust and smiling|thumb|Ginsburg receiving the [[Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum|LBJ Liberty & Justice for All Award]] from [[Lynda Johnson Robb]] and [[Luci Baines Johnson]] at the [[Library of Congress]] in January 2020|left]] |
|||
In 2002, Ginsburg was inducted into the [[National Women's Hall of Fame]].<ref>{{cite web | title=Ginsburg, Ruth Bader | website=National Women's Hall of Fame | url=https://www.womenofthehall.org/inductee/ruth-bader-ginsburg/ | access-date=November 21, 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181121072636/https://www.womenofthehall.org/inductee/ruth-bader-ginsburg/ | archive-date=November 21, 2018 | url-status=live }}</ref> Ginsburg was named one of [[Forbes list of the World's 100 Most Powerful Women|100 Most Powerful Women]] (2009),<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/11/power-women-09_The-100-Most-Powerful-Women_Rank_2.html|title=The 100 Most Powerful Women|work=[[Forbes]]|date=August 19, 2009|access-date=September 11, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180315004213/https://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/11/power-women-09_The-100-Most-Powerful-Women_Rank_2.html|archive-date=March 15, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> one of [[Glamour (magazine)|''Glamour'']] magazine's Women of the Year 2012,<ref name="Weiss, Debra Cassens">{{cite magazine|last1=Weiss|first1=Debra Cassens|title=Ginsburg Named One of Glamour Magazine's 'Women of the Year 2012'|url=http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ginsburg_named_one_of_glamour_magazines_women_of_the_year_2012|access-date=February 22, 2016|magazine=ABA Journal|date=November 2, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160309183923/http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ginsburg_named_one_of_glamour_magazines_women_of_the_year_2012/|archive-date=March 9, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> and one of ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' magazine's [[Time 100|100 most influential people]] (2015).<ref>{{cite web|author=Gibbs, Nancy|url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/how-we-pick-the-time-100/ar-AAb5qjA|title=How We Pick the TIME 100|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |publisher=[[MSN]] |date=April 16, 2015|access-date=November 4, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150711113924/http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/how-we-pick-the-time-100/ar-AAb5qjA|archive-date=July 11, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> She was awarded honorary degrees by Lund University (1969),<ref>{{cite web |author1=Heun, Helga |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg receives jubilee honorary doctorate |url=https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/ruth-bader-ginsburg-receives-jubilee-honorary-doctorate |publisher=Lund University |access-date=November 10, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201031123826/https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/ruth-bader-ginsburg-receives-jubilee-honorary-doctorate |archive-date=October 31, 2020 |date=May 15, 2019}}</ref> [[American University Law School]] (1981),<ref name="Gugliotta-1993">{{cite news |first1=Guy |last1=Gugliotta |first2=Eleanor |last2=Randolph |title=A Mentor, Role Model and Heroine of Feminist Lawyers |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=June 15, 1993 |access-date=March 22, 2021 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/06/15/a-mentor-role-model-and-heroine-of-feminist-lawyers/16160da0-8068-4e34-8f39-defdaabc363d/ |archive-date=October 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201005091712/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/06/15/a-mentor-role-model-and-heroine-of-feminist-lawyers/16160da0-8068-4e34-8f39-defdaabc363d/ |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Vermont Law School]] (1984),<ref>{{Cite web|title=VLS Remembers Ruth Bader Ginsburg {{!}} Vermont Law School|url=https://www.vermontlaw.edu/blog/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=www.vermontlaw.edu|archive-date=April 20, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210420232535/https://www.vermontlaw.edu/blog/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Georgetown University]] (1985),<ref name="Gugliotta-1993" /> [[DePaul University]] (1985), [[Brooklyn Law School]] (1987), [[Hebrew Union College]] (1988), [[Rutgers University]] (1990), [[Amherst College]] (1990),<ref name="Gugliotta-1993" /> [[Lewis & Clark College]] (1992),<ref>{{Cite web|author=<!--Not stated--> |title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's 1992 Commencement Speech|url=https://law.lclark.edu/live/news/44348-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-1992-commencement|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=law.lclark.edu|archive-date=April 10, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210410225638/https://law.lclark.edu/live/news/44348-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-1992-commencement|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Columbia University]] (1994),<ref>{{Cite news|date=May 20, 1994|title=Commencements; New President of Columbia Asks Graduates to Lead|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/20/nyregion/commencements-new-president-of-columbia-asks-graduates-to-lead.html|access-date=March 22, 2021|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=June 25, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160625200624/http://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/20/nyregion/commencements-new-president-of-columbia-asks-graduates-to-lead.html|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Long Island University]] (1994),<ref>{{Cite news|last=Hevesi|first=Dennis|date=June 3, 1994|title=Commencements; Queens College Graduates Hear a Wistful Seinfeld|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/03/nyregion/commencements-queens-college-graduates-hear-a-wistful-seinfeld.html|access-date=March 22, 2021|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=October 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191004083504/https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/03/nyregion/commencements-queens-college-graduates-hear-a-wistful-seinfeld.html|url-status=live}}</ref> [[NYU]] (1994),<ref name="World Justice Project">{{Cite web|title=World Justice Forum IV Speaker: Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=https://worldjusticeproject.org/world-justice-forum-iv-speaker-ruth-bader-ginsburg|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=World Justice Project|archive-date=November 8, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108153027/https://worldjusticeproject.org/world-justice-forum-iv-speaker-ruth-bader-ginsburg|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Smith College]] (1994),<ref>{{Cite web|title=Honorary Degrees|url=https://www.smith.edu/about-smith/smith-history/honorary-degrees|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=Smith College|archive-date=August 14, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160814003123/https://www.smith.edu/about-smith/smith-history/honorary-degrees|url-status=live}}</ref> [[The University of Illinois]] (1994),<ref>{{Cite web|last=Turner|first=Carolyn|title=RBG and the COL|url=https://blogs.illinois.edu/view/7000/69571774|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=blogs.illinois.edu|archive-date=January 19, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210119174630/https://blogs.illinois.edu/view/7000/69571774|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Brandeis University]] (1996),<ref>{{Cite web|title=Brandeis honors Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, H'96|url=https://www.brandeis.edu/now/2020/september/ruth-bader-ginsburg.html|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=BrandeisNOW|archive-date=January 24, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210124223959/https://www.brandeis.edu/now/2020/september/ruth-bader-ginsburg.html|url-status=live}}</ref> [[George Washington University]] (1997),<ref>{{Cite web|title=Honorary Degree Recipients {{!}} GW Libraries|url=http://library.gwu.edu/|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=library.gwu.edu|archive-date=March 19, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210319232412/https://library.gwu.edu/|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Jewish Theological Seminary of America]] (1997),<ref name="World Justice Project" /> [[Wheaton College (Massachusetts)]] (1997),<ref>{{Cite web|date=February 16, 2011|title=Ruth Bader and Martin D. Ginsburg Speak at Commencement|url=http://collegehistory.wheatoncollege.edu/twentieth-century/1990s/ruth-bader-ginsburg-martin-ginsburg/|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=College History|archive-date=March 18, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210318202911/https://collegehistory.wheatoncollege.edu/twentieth-century/1990s/ruth-bader-ginsburg-martin-ginsburg/|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Northwestern University]] (1998),<ref>{{Cite web|title=Recipients: Office of the Provost – Northwestern University|url=https://www.northwestern.edu/provost/committees/administrative/honorary-degrees/honorary-degree-recipients.html|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=northwestern.edu|archive-date=April 18, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418224031/https://www.northwestern.edu/provost/committees/administrative/honorary-degrees/honorary-degree-recipients.html|url-status=live}}</ref> [[University of Michigan]] (2001),<ref>{{Cite web|title=Six honorary degrees to be awarded this spring|url=http://ns.umich.edu/Releases/2001/Mar01/r031501a.html|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=ns.umich.edu|archive-date=April 11, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210411015324/http://ns.umich.edu/Releases/2001/Mar01/r031501a.html|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Brown University]] (2002),<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Brown University 234th Commencement|url=https://www.brown.edu/Administration/News_Bureau/2001-02/01-143.html|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=brown.edu|archive-date=January 27, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190127225345/http://www.brown.edu/Administration/News_Bureau/2001-02/01-143.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Yale University (2003),<ref>{{Cite web|date=May 29, 2003|title=Yale Bestows Eleven Honorary Degrees During Its 302nd Commencement|url=https://news.yale.edu/2003/05/29/yale-bestows-eleven-honorary-degrees-during-its-302nd-commencement|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=YaleNews|archive-date=September 8, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120908150129/http://news.yale.edu/2003/05/29/yale-bestows-eleven-honorary-degrees-during-its-302nd-commencement|url-status=live}}</ref> [[John Jay College of Criminal Justice]] (2004),<ref name="World Justice Project" /> [[Johns Hopkins University]] (2004),<ref>{{Cite web|author=<!--Not stated--> |title=Honorary Degrees Awarded|url=https://commencement.jhu.edu/our-history/honorary-degrees-awarded/|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=Johns Hopkins University Commencement|archive-date=February 21, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180221112951/https://commencement.jhu.edu/our-history/honorary-degrees-awarded/|url-status=live}}</ref> [[University of Pennsylvania]] (2007),<ref>{{Cite web|title=Statement on the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=https://penntoday.upenn.edu/announcements/statement-passing-ruth-bader-ginsburg|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=Penn Today|date=September 19, 2020 |archive-date=October 6, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201006112918/https://penntoday.upenn.edu/announcements/statement-passing-ruth-bader-ginsburg|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Willamette University]] (2009),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.willamette.edu/wucl/news/library/2008/wucl_welcomes_justice_ruth_bad.html|title=WUCL Welcomes Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to Campus|publisher=[[Willamette University]]|date=August 25, 2008|access-date=May 8, 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130509091527/http://www.willamette.edu/wucl/news/library/2008/wucl_welcomes_justice_ruth_bad.html|archive-date=May 9, 2013}}</ref> [[Princeton University]] (2010),<ref name="Princeton awards five honorary degrees">{{cite web|title=Princeton awards five honorary degrees|publisher=[[Princeton University]]|first=Karin|last=Dienst|date=June 1, 2010|url=http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S27/54/12S69|access-date=June 1, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100614213126/http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S27/54/12S69/|archive-date=June 14, 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Harvard University]] (2011),<ref name="Harvard awards 9 honorary degrees">{{cite web|last1=Ireland|first1=Corydon|last2=Koch|first2=Katie|last3=Powell|first3=Alvin|last4=Walsh|first4=Colleen|date=May 26, 2011|title=Harvard awards 9 honorary degrees|url=http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2011/05/harvard-to-award-nine-honorary-degrees|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110602033211/http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2011/05/harvard-to-award-nine-honorary-degrees/|archive-date=June 2, 2011|access-date=June 29, 2011|work=[[Harvard Gazette]]|publisher=[[Harvard University]]}}</ref> and the [[State University of New York]] (2019).<ref>{{Cite web|title=Justice Ginsburg receives SUNY honorary doctorate|url=http://www.buffalo.edu/ubnow/stories/2019/08/ginsburg-honorary-degree.html|access-date=March 22, 2021|website=buffalo.edu|archive-date=November 2, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201102042941/http://www.buffalo.edu/ubnow/stories/2019/08/ginsburg-honorary-degree.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
In 2009, Ginsburg received a Lifetime Achievement Award from [[Scribes—The American Society of Legal Writers]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.scribes.org/lifetime-achievement-award |title=Lifetime-Achievement Award |website=Scribes |access-date=September 19, 2020 |archive-date=August 14, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150814080930/http://www.scribes.org/lifetime-achievement-award |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In 2013, a painting featuring the four female justices to have served as justices on the Supreme Court (Ginsburg, Sandra Day O'Connor, [[Sonia Sotomayor]], and [[Elena Kagan]]) was unveiled at the [[Smithsonian]]'s [[National Portrait Gallery (United States)|National Portrait Gallery]] in Washington, D.C.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://npg.si.edu/exhibit/fourjustices/|title=The Four Justices {{!}}|website=National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution|access-date=June 7, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170707104724/http://www.npg.si.edu/exhibit/fourjustices/|archive-date=July 7, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="huffingtonpost1">{{cite news|author=Reilly, Mollie|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/28/supreme-court-women-portrait_n_4171983.html|title=The Women Of The Supreme Court Now Have The Badass Portrait They Deserve|work=HuffPost|date=October 28, 2013|access-date=November 2, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151102051918/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/28/supreme-court-women-portrait_n_4171983.html|archive-date=November 2, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Researchers at the [[Cleveland Museum of Natural History]] gave a species of [[Mantis|praying mantis]] the name ''[[Ilomantis ginsburgae]]'' after Ginsburg. The name was given because the neck plate of the ''Ilomantis ginsburgae'' bears a resemblance to a jabot, which Ginsburg was known for wearing. Moreover, the new species was identified based upon the female insect's genitalia instead of based upon the male of the species. The researchers noted that the name was a nod to Ginsburg's fight for gender equality.<ref name="Domonoske, Insect Named">{{cite news|last1=Camila|first1=Domonoske|title=Insect Named For Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Step Toward Equality Of The 6-Legged Sexes|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/06/02/480437128/insect-named-for-ruth-bader-ginsburg-is-step-toward-equality-of-the-6-legged-sex|access-date=June 3, 2016|publisher=NPR|date=June 2, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160603140630/http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/06/02/480437128/insect-named-for-ruth-bader-ginsburg-is-step-toward-equality-of-the-6-legged-sex|archive-date=June 3, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Brannoch|first1=Sydney|last2=Svenson|first2=Gavin|date=May 2016|title=Leveraging female genitalic characters for generic and species delimitation in Nilomantis Werner, 1907 and Ilomantis Giglio-Tos, 1915 (Mantodea, Nilomantinae)|journal=Insect Systematics & Evolution|volume=47|issue=3|page=209|doi=10.1163/1876312X-47032141|url=https://zenodo.org/record/269840|access-date=November 22, 2020|archive-date=February 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200217153545/https://zenodo.org/record/269840|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
In 2018 Ginsburg was the inaugural recipient of the Genesis Lifetime Achievement achievement award.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.genesisprize.org/honorees/lifetime-achievement-award-2018 | title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg | the Genesis Prize }}</ref> |
|||
Ginsburg was the recipient of the 2019 $1{{spaces}}million [[Berggruen Prize]] for Philosophy and Culture.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/ginsburg-wins-berggruen-prize-for-thinker-whose-ideas-changed-society/2019/10/22/ad00c594-f50d-11e9-ad8b-85e2aa00b5ce_story.html|title=Ginsburg wins Berggruen Prize for 'thinker' whose ideas changed society|date=October 23, 2019|newspaper=The Washington Post|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191209223017/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/ginsburg-wins-berggruen-prize-for-thinker-whose-ideas-changed-society/2019/10/22/ad00c594-f50d-11e9-ad8b-85e2aa00b5ce_story.html|archive-date=December 9, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last1=Hermann|first1=Julia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ny7oDwAAQBAJ&q=berggruen+prize&pg=PA246|title=Philosophy in the Age of Science?: Inquiries Into Philosophical Progress, Method, and Societal Relevance|last2=Hopster|first2=Jeroen|last3=Kalf|first3=Wouter|last4=Klenk|first4=Michael|date=June 16, 2020|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=978-1-5381-4284-4|access-date=May 2, 2021|archive-date=September 2, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210902153514/https://books.google.com/books?id=Ny7oDwAAQBAJ&q=berggruen+prize&pg=PA246|url-status=live}}</ref> Awarded annually, the Berggruen Institute stated it recognizes "thinkers whose ideas have profoundly shaped human self-understanding and advancement in a rapidly changing world",<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/23/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-justice-wins-award/4070480002/|title=Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg awarded $1 million prize for 'thinkers' in philosophy and culture|last=Wolf|first=Richard|website=[[USA Today]]|access-date=October 24, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200104215513/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/23/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-justice-wins-award/4070480002/|archive-date=January 4, 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> noting Ginsburg as "a lifelong trailblazer for human rights and gender equality".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.berggruen.org/prize/|title=Berggruen Prize for Philosophy and Culture|website=Berggruen Institute|date=May 30, 2018 |access-date=October 24, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191206130321/https://www.berggruen.org/prize/|archive-date=December 6, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg donated the entirety of the prize money to charitable and non-profit organizations, including the [[Malala Fund]], [[Hand in Hand: Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Israel]], the [[American Bar Foundation]], Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the [[Washington Concert Opera]].<ref>{{Cite web|author=Julia M. Chan|title=How to honor RBG by supporting her favorite causes|date=September 19, 2020 |url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/19/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-rbg-favorite-causes-charity-iyw/index.html|access-date=September 20, 2020|publisher=CNN|archive-date=September 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919211210/https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/19/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-rbg-favorite-causes-charity-iyw/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg received numerous additional awards, including the LBJ Foundation's Liberty & Justice for All Award, the [[World Peace & Liberty Award]] from international legal groups, a lifetime achievement award from [[Diane von Fürstenberg|Diane von Furstenberg]]'s foundation, and the 2020 [[Liberty Medal]] by the [[National Constitution Center]] all in 2020 alone.<ref>{{Cite news|date=September 17, 2020|title=Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Receives 2020 Liberty Medal During Virtual Event|work=[[KYW-TV|CBS 3]]|url=https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2020/09/17/supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-receives-2020-liberty-medal-during-virtual-event/|url-status=live|access-date=September 18, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919035249/https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2020/09/17/supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-receives-2020-liberty-medal-during-virtual-event/|archive-date=September 19, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://minnlawyer.com/2020/02/11/ginsburg-to-present-award-named-for-her-to-philanthropist/|title=Ginsburg to present award named for her to philanthropist|agency=Associated Press|date=February 11, 2020|website=Minnesota Lawyer|access-date=February 19, 2020|archive-date=February 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200219040353/https://minnlawyer.com/2020/02/11/ginsburg-to-present-award-named-for-her-to-philanthropist/|url-status=live}}</ref> In February 2020, she received the World Peace & Liberty Award from the World Jurist Association and the World Law Foundation.<ref>{{Cite web|title=U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presented with World Peace & Liberty Award|url=https://worldjurist.org/2020/02/u-s-supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-presented-with-world-peace-liberty-award/|website=World Jurist Association|date=February 13, 2020 |access-date=September 29, 2020|archive-date=October 21, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201021155445/https://worldjurist.org/2020/02/u-s-supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-presented-with-world-peace-liberty-award/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
In 2019, the [[Skirball Cultural Center]] in Los Angeles created ''Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg'',<ref>{{Cite web|date=October 19, 2016|title=Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=https://www.skirball.org/exhibitions/notorious-rbg-life-and-times-ruth-bader-ginsburg|access-date=August 3, 2022|publisher=Skirball Cultural Center|archive-date=March 2, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210302111039/https://www.skirball.org/exhibitions/notorious-rbg-life-and-times-ruth-bader-ginsburg|url-status=dead}}</ref> a large-scale exhibition focusing on Ginsburg's life and career.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-notorious-rbg-skirball-20181017-story.html|title=Sky is the limit for the 'Notorious RBG,' and she keeps on pressin' on|date=October 17, 2018|website=[[Los Angeles Times]]|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200121012226/https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-notorious-rbg-skirball-20181017-story.html|archive-date=January 21, 2020|access-date=February 19, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/notorious-rbg-skirball/|title=There Are a Lot of Lessons to Be Learned From the Life of the Notorious RBG|last=Avila|first=Pamela|date=October 20, 2018|website=Los Angeles Magazine|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191108232619/https://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/notorious-rbg-skirball/|archive-date=November 8, 2019|access-date=February 19, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
In 2019 Ginsburg and the [[Dwight D. Opperman]] Foundation established the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Woman of Leadership Award.<ref name=NYTimes3.15.24>{{Cite news |last=Kim |first=Minho |date=March 15, 2024 |title=After R.B.G. Awards Go to Musk and Murdoch, Justice Ginsburg's Family Objects |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/15/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-leadership-award.html |access-date=March 16, 2024 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Ginsburg presented the first award in February 2020 to arts patron and philanthropist [[Agnes Gund]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=February 6, 2020 |title=Ginsburg to present award named for her to philanthropist |url=https://apnews.com/ginsburg-to-present-award-named-for-her-to-philanthropist-e829dc288cf550d704e7dea7bc420705 |access-date=March 16, 2024 |website=AP News |language=en}}</ref> In March 2024, the organization had changed its award guidelines, with four of the five awards going to men. Notably, the list included [[Elon Musk]] and [[Rupert Murdoch]], whose views are seen as incompatible with the liberal justice's; her family distanced itself from the award and asked for her name to be removed from it.<ref name=NYTimes3.15.24/><ref>{{Cite web |last=Sneed |first=Tierney |date=March 15, 2024 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg's family dissents after award in her name is given to Elon Musk and Rupert Murdoch|publisher=[[CNN]]|url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/15/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-award-elon-musk-rupert-murdoch-sylvester-stallone-martha-stewart-michael-milken/index.html |access-date=March 16, 2024|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=March 15, 2024 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Family Denounces RBG Awards Going To Elon Musk, Rupert Murdoch |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rbg-family-calls-out-foundation-award-recipients-elon-musk-rupert-murdoch_n_65f4b08ee4b0651fa4a2c0e5 |access-date=March 16, 2024 |website=HuffPost |language=en |quote=Ginburg’s family described the foundation’s choices as an “affront to the memory of our mother and grandmother… Ginsburg was seen as a champion for gender equality… pushing to preserve abortion rights, address the gender pay gap and protect pregnant women in the workforce… Musk, who has positioned himself as an proponent of free speech, has been criticized for endorsing antisemitic conspiracy theories and content on X (formerly Twitter). He has also faced claims from civil rights groups that his leadership has allowed hate speech to spread on the platform since he purchased it… Murdoch has been accused of spreading lies and “dangerous medical misinformation” about climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic on his various media outlets… the Justice’s family has no affiliation with and does not endorse this award… the foundation “has strayed far from the original mission of the award and from what Justice Ginsburg stood for” with its recipients this year.}}</ref> On March 18, 2024, chairperson Julie Opperman announced that the year's awards would not be given out and that the foundation would "reconsider its mission and make a judgment about how or whether to proceed in the future."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Judkis |first=Maura |date=March 18, 2024 |title=RBG Award gala canceled after Ginsburg family criticizes honorees |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/power/2024/03/18/rbg-award-opperman-musk-murdoch-canceled/ |access-date=March 18, 2024}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hall, Cornell University.jpg|thumb|right|Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hall at [[Cornell University]]]] |
|||
The U.S. Navy announced on March 31, 2022, that it will name one of its [[John Lewis-class replenishment oiler|''John Lewis''-class replenishment oilers]] the USNS ''Ruth Bader Ginsburg''.<ref>{{cite news | url = https://www.npr.org/2022/04/01/1090389097/ruth-bader-ginsburg-navy-ship | title = Navy will name ship after the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | first = Jonathan | last = Franklin | date = April 1, 2022 | accessdate = April 3, 2022 | publisher = [[NPR]] | archive-date = April 3, 2022 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220403062646/https://www.npr.org/2022/04/01/1090389097/ruth-bader-ginsburg-navy-ship | url-status = live }}</ref> |
|||
In August 2022, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hall, a residence hall at [[Cornell University]], opened its doors to the Class of 2026.<ref>{{cite web |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hall Facility Information |url=https://www.fs.cornell.edu/facinfo/fs_facilInfo.cfm?facil_cd=3224 |website=Facilities and Campus Services |publisher=Cornell University |access-date=June 27, 2023 |quote=Gross Area: 162,849 sq ft}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Friedlander |first1=Blaine |title=Moving in: Class of '26 students bring life to fall semester |url=https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2022/08/moving-class-26-students-bring-life-fall-semester |access-date=June 27, 2023 |work=Cornell Chronicle |publisher=Cornell University |date=August 18, 2022}}</ref> An elementary school in Chicago was named to honor her in 2024. |
|||
<ref>{{cite news |last1=Rodriguez |first1=Marisa |title=CPS school renamed after Ruth Bader |url=https://wgntv.com/news/chicago-news/cps-school-renamed-after-ruth-bader-ginsburg/ | work=WGN-TV| date=November 8, 2024 |access-date=November 11, 2024 }}</ref> |
|||
In March 2023, a special memorial session of the Supreme Court honored Ginburg<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2023/03/18/supreme-court-honors-late-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg/9251679181206/|title=Supreme Court honors late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg during special ceremony |work=United Press International}}</ref> Also in 2023, Ginsburg was featured on a [[USPS Forever stamp]]. The stamp was designed by art director Ethel Kessler, using an oil painting by [[Michael J. Deas]] based on a photograph by Philip Bermingham.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Chappell |first1=Bill |title=Here's the story of the portrait behind Ruth Bader Ginsburg's postage stamp |url=https://www.npr.org/2023/10/02/1202984793/rbg-postage-stamp-usps-salev |work=NPR |date=October 2, 2023}}</ref> |
|||
==In popular culture== |
|||
[[File:2018 Women's March in Missoula, Montana 69.jpg|thumb|alt=A poster with "hang in there we need you" written around Ginsburg's face and a crown on her head|A poster depicting Ginsburg as "the Notorious R.B.G." in the likeness of American rapper [[the Notorious B.I.G.]], 2018]] |
|||
Ginsburg has been referred to as a "pop culture icon"<ref name="Waldman, Paul; Washington Post">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/11/28/why-the-supreme-court-should-be-the-biggest-issue-of-the-2016-campaign/|title=Why the Supreme Court should be the biggest issue of the 2016 campaign|date=November 28, 2014|newspaper=The Washington Post|last1=Waldman|first1=Paul|access-date=February 18, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306014733/https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/11/28/why-the-supreme-court-should-be-the-biggest-issue-of-the-2016-campaign/|archive-date=March 6, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Alman, Ashley">{{cite news|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/16/ruth-bader-ginsburg-tattoo_n_6486594.html|title=This Badass Tattoo Takes Ruth Bader Ginsburg Fandom To New Levels|date=January 16, 2015|work=[[HuffPost]]|last1=Alman|first1=Ashley|access-date=February 18, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160221204921/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/16/ruth-bader-ginsburg-tattoo_n_6486594.html|archive-date=February 21, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2018/05/01/rbg-documentary-shows-how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-became-pop-icon/562930002/|title='RBG': How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a legit pop-culture icon|last=Ryan|first=Patrick|date=November 9, 2018|work=[[USA Today]]|access-date=November 9, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181109112419/https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2018/05/01/rbg-documentary-shows-how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-became-pop-icon/562930002/|archive-date=November 9, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> and also an "American cultural icon".<ref name="Skirball Exhibit: About the Exhibition">{{cite web | url=https://www.skirball.org/exhibitions/notorious-rbg-life-and-times-ruth-bader-ginsburg | title=Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg | work=Museum Exhibition Description | publisher=Skirball Cultural Center | date=October 19, 2018 | access-date=January 23, 2021 | archive-date=March 2, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210302111039/https://www.skirball.org/exhibitions/notorious-rbg-life-and-times-ruth-bader-ginsburg | url-status=live }}</ref> Ginsburg's profile began to rise after O'Connor's retirement in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only serving female justice. Her increasingly fiery dissents, particularly in ''Shelby County v. Holder'', led to the creation of a sobriquet, "the Notorious R.B.G." (a takeoff on the name of a rap star, [[the Notorious B.I.G.]]), which became an [[internet meme]]. The name beginning on [[Tumblr]].<ref name="Lithwick, Dahlia, Justice LOLZ">{{cite magazine|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2015/03/notorious_r_b_g_history_the_origins_and_meaning_of_ruth_bader_ginsburg_s.html|title=Justice LOLZ Grumpycat Notorious R.B.G.|date=March 16, 2015|magazine=Slate|last1=Lithwick|first1=Dahlia|access-date=February 18, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160225155111/http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2015/03/notorious_r_b_g_history_the_origins_and_meaning_of_ruth_bader_ginsburg_s.html|archive-date=February 25, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> The Tumblr blogger who coined the meme, law student [[Shana Knizhnik]], teamed up with MSNBC reporter [[Irin Carmon]] to turn the contents of the blog into a book titled ''Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg''.<ref name="Bazelon-2015">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/06/books/review/notorious-rbg-the-life-and-times-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg.html|title=Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg'|last=Bazelon|first=Emily|date=December 4, 2015|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|issn=0362-4331|access-date=December 22, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151207220602/http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/06/books/review/notorious-rbg-the-life-and-times-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg.html|archive-date=December 7, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> Published in October 2015, the book became a ''New York Times'' bestseller.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|last2=Knizhnik|first2=Shana|date=October 27, 2015|publisher=Dey Street Books|first1=Irin|last1=Carmon|isbn = 978-0062415837}}</ref> In 2016, the [[Progressivism|progressive]] magazine [[Current Affairs (magazine)|Current Affairs]] criticized Ginsburg's status as an icon of progressivism, noting that her voting record was significantly more moderate than deceased justices Thurgood Marshall, [[William J. Brennan Jr.]], and [[William O. Douglas]], and that she often sided with law enforcement in [[qualified immunity]] cases.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kinder |first1=David |title=The Rise of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cult |url=https://www.currentaffairs.org/2016/03/the-rise-of-the-ruth-bader-ginsburg-cult |journal=Current Affairs |date=March 10, 2016 |issue=Mar/Apr 2016 |access-date=December 3, 2021 |archive-date=December 3, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211203033216/https://www.currentaffairs.org/2016/03/the-rise-of-the-ruth-bader-ginsburg-cult |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In 2015, Ginsburg and Scalia, known for their shared love of opera, were fictionalized in ''[[Scalia/Ginsburg]]'',<ref>{{Cite web|last=Dohony|first=Erin|title=OperaDelaware presents 'Trial by Jury' and 'Scalia/Ginsburg'|url=https://www.broadstreetreview.com/theatermusic/operadelaware-presents-trial-by-jury-and-scalia-ginsburg|access-date=October 15, 2020|website=broadstreetreview.com|archive-date=October 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017084937/https://www.broadstreetreview.com/theatermusic/operadelaware-presents-trial-by-jury-and-scalia-ginsburg|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Apel|first=Susan B.|date=October 2, 2018|title=Opera Preview: 'Scalia/Ginsburg'—Mining (and Minding) the Political Gap|url=http://artsfuse.org/174230/opera-preview-ginsburg-scalia-mining-and-minding-the-political-gap/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200104141036/https://artsfuse.org/174230/opera-preview-ginsburg-scalia-mining-and-minding-the-political-gap/|archive-date=January 4, 2020|access-date=April 1, 2019|website=The Arts Fuse}}</ref> an opera by Derrick Wang broadcast on national radio on November 7, 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|title=OD Radio broadcasts {{!}} Trial by Jury & Scalia/Ginsburg|url=https://www.operade.org/radio|access-date=November 1, 2020|website=OperaDelaware|archive-date=November 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105150245/https://www.operade.org/radio|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Dobrin|first=Peter|date=September 22, 2020|title=Philadelphia's opera community pours its love for Ruth Bader Ginsburg|url=https://www.inquirer.com/arts/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-opera-denyce-graves-20200922.html|access-date=October 15, 2020|website=The Philadelphia Inquirer|archive-date=October 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017060853/https://www.inquirer.com/arts/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-opera-denyce-graves-20200922.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The opera was introduced before Ginsburg and Scalia at the Supreme Court in 2013,<ref>{{Cite news|title=Scalia V. Ginsburg: Supreme Court Sparring, Put To Music|url=https://www.npr.org/2013/07/10/200137481/scalia-v-ginsburg-supreme-court-sparring-put-to-music|access-date=November 1, 2020|publisher=NPR|archive-date=January 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200108193612/https://www.npr.org/2013/07/10/200137481/scalia-v-ginsburg-supreme-court-sparring-put-to-music|url-status=live}}</ref> and Ginsburg attended the 2015 [[Castleton Festival]] world premiere<ref>{{Cite news|last=Heil|first=Emily|title='Scalia/Ginsburg' opera draws VIPs of the legal world|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/reliable-source/wp/2015/07/20/scaliaginsburg-opera-draws-vips-of-the-legal-world/|access-date=November 1, 2020|issn=0190-8286|archive-date=December 23, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151223152613/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/reliable-source/wp/2015/07/20/scaliaginsburg-opera-draws-vips-of-the-legal-world/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on September 18th|newspaper=The Economist|url=https://www.economist.com/obituary/2020/09/23/ruth-bader-ginsburg-died-on-september-18th|access-date=November 1, 2020|issn=0013-0613|archive-date=November 2, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201102190614/https://www.economist.com/obituary/2020/09/23/ruth-bader-ginsburg-died-on-september-18th|url-status=live}}</ref> as well as a revised version<ref>{{Cite web|title=Composing the Law: An Interview with Derrick Wang, Creator of the Scalia/Ginsburg Opera|url=https://www.americanbar.org/groups/intellectual_property_law/publications/landslide/2019-20/january-february/composing-law-interview-derrick-wang-creator-the-scaliaginsburg-opera/|access-date=November 1, 2020|website=americanbar.org|archive-date=October 29, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201029055829/https://www.americanbar.org/groups/intellectual_property_law/publications/landslide/2019-20/january-february/composing-law-interview-derrick-wang-creator-the-scaliaginsburg-opera/|url-status=live}}</ref> at the 2017 [[Glimmerglass Festival]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Opera Today : Glimmerglass Being Judgmental|url=http://www.operatoday.com/content/2017/08/glimmerglass_be.php|access-date=November 1, 2020|website=operatoday.com|archive-date=October 31, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201031044030/http://www.operatoday.com/content/2017/08/glimmerglass_be.php|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg, who with Scalia wrote forewords to Wang's libretto,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Scalia|first1=Antonin|last2=Ginsburg|first2=Ruth Bader|year=2015|title=Prefaces to Scalia/Ginsburg: A (Gentle) Parody of Operatic Proportions|url=https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/lawandarts/article/view/2118|journal=The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts|volume=38|issue=2|pages=237|doi=10.7916/jla.v38i2.2118|issn=2161-9271|access-date=November 1, 2020|archive-date=November 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105011521/https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/lawandarts/article/view/2118|url-status=live}}</ref> included excerpts from the opera as a chapter in her book ''My Own Words'',<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/ruth-bader-ginsburg/my-own-words-ginsburg/|title=MY OWN WORDS {{!}} Kirkus Reviews|access-date=November 1, 2020|archive-date=November 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108015154/https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/ruth-bader-ginsburg/my-own-words-ginsburg/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Chemerinsky|first=Erwin|date=November 8, 2016|title=Book Review: My Own Words|url=http://www.washingtonindependentreviewofbooks.com/index.php/bookreview/my-own-words|access-date=November 1, 2020|website=Washington Independent Review of Books|archive-date=November 7, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107000441/http://www.washingtonindependentreviewofbooks.com/index.php/bookreview/my-own-words|url-status=live}}</ref> quoted it in her official statement on Scalia's death,<ref>{{Cite web|title=Read Justice Ginsburg's Touching Tribute to Scalia: 'We Were Best Buddies'|date=February 14, 2016 |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-justice-antonin-scalia-we-were-best-n518671|access-date=November 1, 2020|publisher=NBC News|archive-date=November 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108092148/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-justice-antonin-scalia-we-were-best-n518671|url-status=live}}</ref> and spoke about it frequently.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Edgers|first=Geoff|date=July 8, 2015|title=From 'rage aria' to 'lovely duet,' opera does justice to court, Ginsburg says|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/from-rage-aria-to-lovely-duet-opera-does-justice-to-court-ginsburg-says/2015/07/08/1a8079a2-2515-11e5-b72c-2b7d516e1e0e_story.html|access-date=October 15, 2020|issn=0190-8286|archive-date=November 4, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201104200409/https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/from-rage-aria-to-lovely-duet-opera-does-justice-to-court-ginsburg-says/2015/07/08/1a8079a2-2515-11e5-b72c-2b7d516e1e0e_story.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Galanes|first=Philip|date=November 14, 2015|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Gloria Steinem on the Unending Fight for Women's Rights (Published 2015)|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/15/fashion/ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-gloria-steinem-on-the-unending-fight-for-womens-rights.html|access-date=November 1, 2020|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=November 15, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151115035331/http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/15/fashion/ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-gloria-steinem-on-the-unending-fight-for-womens-rights.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=User Clip: Justice Ginsburg on the opera Scalia/Ginsburg {{!}} C-SPAN.org|url=https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4815053/user-clip-justice-ginsburg-opera-scaliaginsburg|access-date=November 1, 2020|website=www.c-span.org|archive-date=December 15, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215061259/https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4815053%2Fuser-clip-justice-ginsburg-opera-scaliaginsburg|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Additionally, Ginsburg's pop culture appeal has inspired nail art, Halloween costumes, a bobblehead doll, tattoos, t-shirts, coffee mugs, and a children's coloring book among other things.<ref name="Bazelon-2015" /><ref>{{Cite book|title=The Ruth Bader Ginsburg Coloring Book: A Tribute to the Always Colorful and Often Inspiring Life of the Supreme Court Justice Known as RBG|last=O'Leary|first=Tom F.|date=February 16, 2016|publisher=Gumdrop Press|isbn=978-0692644782|location=S.l.}}</ref><ref name="pressherald_2018-06-03">{{Cite news|url=https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/03/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-became-a-meme-and-why-thats-so-surprising/|title=How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a meme—and why that's so surprising|first=Robert|last=Barnes|date=June 3, 2018|work=Press Herald|access-date=June 10, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612140027/https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/03/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-became-a-meme-and-why-thats-so-surprising/|archive-date=June 12, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> She appears in both a comic opera and a workout book.<ref name="pressherald_2018-06-03" /> Musician [[Jonathan Mann (musician)|Jonathan Mann]] also made a song using part of her ''[[Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.]]'' dissent.<ref>{{cite magazine |author=Abby Ohlheiser |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/373703/ |title=Read Justice Ginsburg's Passionate 35-Page Dissent of Hobby Lobby Decision |magazine=The Atlantic |date=June 30, 2014 |access-date=December 26, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226133902/https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/373703/ |archive-date=December 26, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> Ginsburg admitted to having a "large supply" of Notorious R.B.G. t-shirts, which she distributed as gifts.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://time.com/3523180/ruth-bader-ginsburg-rbg-shirts/|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg Says She Has Quite a Large Supply of Notorious RBG Shirts|last=Miller|first=Zeke J.|date=October 19, 2014|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |access-date=December 22, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161222222321/http://time.com/3523180/ruth-bader-ginsburg-rbg-shirts/|archive-date=December 22, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Since 2015, [[Kate McKinnon]] has portrayed Ginsburg on ''[[Saturday Night Live]]''.<ref>{{cite web |author=Lavender, Paige |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/04/ruth-bader-ginsburg-snl_n_7203808.html |title='Ruth Bader Ginsburg' Brings The Sass On SNL |work=HuffPost |date=May 4, 2015 |access-date=November 4, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151122135536/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/04/ruth-bader-ginsburg-snl_n_7203808.html |archive-date=November 22, 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> McKinnon has repeatedly reprised the role, including during a ''[[Weekend Update]]'' sketch that aired from the 2016 Republican National Convention in Cleveland.<ref>{{cite web|author=Mallenbaum, Carly|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2016/07/21/ginsburn-kate-mckinnon-ruth-bader-ginsburg-republican-national-convention/87374304/|title='Kate McKinnon showed up as Ruth Bader Ginsburg at the RNC|work=[[USA Today]]|date=July 21, 2016|access-date=July 21, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160724004234/http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2016/07/21/ginsburn-kate-mckinnon-ruth-bader-ginsburg-republican-national-convention/87374304/|archive-date=July 24, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/10/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-colin-kaepernick/index.html|title=Ginsburg on Kaepernick protests: 'I think it's dumb and disrespectful'|last=de Vogue|first=Ariane|date=October 12, 2016|publisher=CNN|access-date=December 8, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161205113750/http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/10/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-colin-kaepernick/index.html|archive-date=December 5, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> The segments typically feature McKinnon (as Ginsburg) lobbing insults she calls "Ginsburns" and doing a celebratory dance.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://time.com/4416907/republican-convention-ruth-bader-ginsburg-kate-mckinnon/|title=Kate McKinnon's Ruth Bader Ginsburg Back to Own Donald Trump|last=Hoffman|first=Ashley|date=July 21, 2016|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |access-date=December 8, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220092344/http://time.com/4416907/republican-convention-ruth-bader-ginsburg-kate-mckinnon/|archive-date=December 20, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://decider.com/2016/02/17/snl-cast-evaluation-kate-mckinnon/|title=''SNL'' Cast Evaluation: Kate McKinnon Is the Show's Undisputed MVP|last=Getlen|first=Larry|date=February 17, 2016|website=Decider|access-date=December 8, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161212191634/http://decider.com/2016/02/17/snl-cast-evaluation-kate-mckinnon/|archive-date=December 12, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> Filmmakers [[Betsy West]] and Julie Cohen created a documentary about Ginsburg, titled [[RBG (film)|''RBG'']], for [[CNN Films]], which premiered at the [[2018 Sundance Film Festival]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2018/01/ruth-bader-ginsburg-wows-celebrity-packed-crowd-at-sundance-film-festival|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg Wows Celebrity-Packed Crowd at Sundance Film Festival|last=Sperling|first=Nicole|date=January 21, 2018|work=[[Vanity Fair (magazine)|Vanity Fair]]|access-date=January 22, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190915191911/https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2018/01/ruth-bader-ginsburg-wows-celebrity-packed-crowd-at-sundance-film-festival|archive-date=September 15, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Syckle-2018" /> In the film ''[[Deadpool 2]]'' (2018), a photo of her is shown as [[Deadpool]] considers her for his [[X-Force]], a team of superheroes.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/movies/ruth-bader-ginsburg-rbg-documentary.html|title=Ninja Supreme Court Justice: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has Fun With Fame|first=Melena|last=Ryzik|date=May 9, 2018|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=May 9, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180509163944/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/movies/ruth-bader-ginsburg-rbg-documentary.html|archive-date=May 9, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Another film, ''[[On the Basis of Sex]]'', focusing on Ginsburg's career struggles fighting for equal rights, was released later in 2018; its screenplay was named to the Black List of best unproduced screenplays of 2014.<ref>{{cite magazine|last1=Bloom|first1=David|last2=Yamato|first2=Jen|title=Blacklist 2014: Full List—Update|url=https://deadline.com/2014/12/black-list-2014-winners-announcement-screenplays-1201325735/|access-date=December 9, 2016|magazine=Deadline|date=December 15, 2014|ref=Bloom, David, Catherine the Great leads|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190915191911/https://deadline.com/2014/12/black-list-2014-winners-announcement-screenplays-1201325735/|archive-date=September 15, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> English actress [[Felicity Jones]] portrays Ginsburg in the film, with [[Armie Hammer]] as her husband Marty.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://variety.com/2017/film/news/felicity-jones-ruth-bader-ginsburg-biopic-on-the-basis-of-sex-1202498933/|title=Felicity Jones to Star as Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Biopic 'On the Basis of Sex'|last=McNary|first=Dave|date=July 18, 2017|work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|access-date=September 17, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170917170603/http://variety.com/2017/film/news/felicity-jones-ruth-bader-ginsburg-biopic-on-the-basis-of-sex-1202498933/|archive-date=September 17, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg herself has a cameo in the film.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/rambling-reporter/ruth-bader-ginsburg-films-cameo-biopic-notorious-1101485 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg Films Cameo in Biopic 'Notorious' |first=Marc |last=Malkin|website=[[The Hollywood Reporter]] |date=April 17, 2018 |access-date=December 26, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190401164749/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/rambling-reporter/ruth-bader-ginsburg-films-cameo-biopic-notorious-1101485 |archive-date=April 1, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> The [[New Girl (season 7)|seventh season]] of the sitcom ''[[New Girl]]'' features a three-year-old character named Ruth Bader Schmidt, named after Ginsburg.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thewrap.com/new-girl-schmidt-cece-daughter-ruth-bader-ginsburg-final-season-fox/|title='New Girl': Here's Why Schmidt and Cece's Daughter Is Named Ruth Bader|first=Jennifer|last=Maas|date=April 10, 2018|website=[[TheWrap]]|access-date=May 8, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180504091640/https://www.thewrap.com/new-girl-schmidt-cece-daughter-ruth-bader-ginsburg-final-season-fox/|archive-date=May 4, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> A [[Lego]] mini-figurine of Ginsburg is shown within a brief segment of ''[[The Lego Movie 2]]''. Ginsburg gave her blessing for the cameo, as well as to have the mini-figurine produced as part of the Lego toy sets following the film's release in February 2019.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2019/01/19/ruth-bader-ginsburg-minifig-a-lego-movie-2/2624798002/ | title = Supreme reveal: Ruth Bader Ginsburg makes star appearance in 'Lego Movie 2' | first = Bryan | last = Alexander | date = January 19, 2019 | access-date = January 19, 2019 | work = [[USA Today]] | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190120043235/https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2019/01/19/ruth-bader-ginsburg-minifig-a-lego-movie-2/2624798002/ | archive-date = January 20, 2019 | url-status = live }}</ref> Also in 2019, [[Samuel Adams (beer)|Samuel Adams]] released a limited-edition beer called When There Are Nine, referring to Ginsburg's well-known reply to the question about when there would be enough women on the Supreme Court.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/03/29/ruth-bader-ginsburg-new-beer-brewed-by-sam-adams/3282460002/ |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg beer? Guilty, says Sam Adams, giving new meaning to 'bar exam' |first=Zlati|last=Meyer|website=[[USA Today]] |date=March 29, 2019 |access-date=April 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190401151756/https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/03/29/ruth-bader-ginsburg-new-beer-brewed-by-sam-adams/3282460002/ |archive-date=April 1, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In the sitcom ''[[The Good Place]]'', the "craziest secret celebrity hookup" was Ginsburg and Canadian rapper [[Drake (musician)|Drake]], whom protagonist Tahani reveals she set up as a "perfect couple".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1077907/The-Good-place-season-3-finale-who-is-Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-Drake-Tahani|title=The Good place season 3 finale: Who is Ruth Bader Ginsburg?|first=Emma|last=Nolan|date=January 25, 2019|website=Daily Express|access-date=October 21, 2020|archive-date=October 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022070121/https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1077907/The-Good-place-season-3-finale-who-is-Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-Drake-Tahani|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
''[[Sisters in Law (book)|Sisters in Law]]'' (2015), a book by [[Linda Hirshman]], follows the careers and judicial records of Sandra Day O'Connor and Ginsburg.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Sisters in Law|url=http://sistersinlawbook.com/|access-date=October 7, 2020|archive-date=October 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201020053136/http://sistersinlawbook.com/|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
In 2018, Ginsburg appeared on ''[[The Late Show with Stephen Colbert]]'', which featured her following her regular workout routine accompanied by [[Stephen Colbert]] joking with her and attempting to perform the same routine. She also answered a few questions and weighed in on the famous internet question and [[Hot_dog#Sandwich_debate|ongoing debate]] "Is a [[hot dog]] a sandwich?" She ultimately ruled that, based on Colbert's definition of a sandwich, a hot dog is a sandwich.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=153&v=0oBodJHX1Vg |title=Stephen Works Out With Ruth Bader Ginsburg |author=The Late Show with Stephen Colbert |via=YouTube |date=March 21, 2018 |access-date=August 19, 2021 |url-status=live |archive-date=August 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816232642/https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=153&v=0oBodJHX1Vg }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Kenny |first1=Sophie Tatum, Caroline |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg settles it for Stephen Colbert: Hot dogs are sandwiches {{!}} CNN Politics |url=https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/22/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-stephen-colbert-workout/index.html |publisher=CNN |access-date=September 11, 2023 |language=en |date=March 22, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
==See also== |
|||
{{Portal|Law|New York City|Biography}} |
|||
* {{slink|Bill Clinton Supreme Court candidates|Ruth Bader Ginsburg nomination}} |
|||
* [[List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States]] |
|||
* [[List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States (Seat 6)]] |
|||
* [[List of U.S. Supreme Court cases during the Rehnquist Court]] |
|||
* [[List of U.S. Supreme Court cases during the Roberts Court]] |
|||
* [[List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office]] |
|||
* [[List of Jewish United States Supreme Court justices]] |
|||
==Notes== |
|||
{{notelist}} |
|||
==References== |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
==Further reading== |
|||
* Campbell, Amy Leigh, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. ''Raising the Bar: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the ACLU Women's Rights Project''. Princeton, NJ: Xlibris Corporation, 2003. {{ISBN|978-1413427417}}. {{OCLC|56980906}}. |
|||
* [[Irin Carmon|Carmon, Irin]], and Knizhnik, Shana. ''Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. New York, [[Dey Street Books|Dey Street]], [[William Morrow and Company|William Morrow Publishers]], 2015. {{ISBN|978-0062415837}}. {{OCLC|913957624}}. |
|||
* [[Bill Clinton|Clinton, Bill]]. ''[[My Life (Clinton autobiography)|My Life]]''. New York: [[Vintage Books]], 2005. pp.{{spaces}}524–25, 941. {{ISBN|978-1400043934}}. {{OCLC|233703142}}. |
|||
* {{cite report |author=Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate |date=July 20–23, 1993 |title=Supreme Court Associate Justice Nomination Hearings on Ruth Bader Ginsburg |url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG.pdf |publisher=United States Government Publishing Office|ref=none}} |
|||
* Dodson, Scott. [https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/897881843 ''The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg'']. Cambridge: [[Cambridge University Press]], 2015. {{ISBN|978-1107062467}} {{OCLC|897881843}} |
|||
* [[Bryan A. Garner|Garner, Bryan A.]] ''[https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/310224965 Garner on Language and Writing]''. Chicago: [[American Bar Association]], 2009. Foreword by Ruth Bader Ginsburg. {{ISBN|978-1590315880}}. {{OCLC|310224965}}. |
|||
* Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, et al. ''Essays in Honor of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School, 2013. {{OCLC|839314921}}. |
|||
* [[Linda Hirshman|Hirshman, Linda R.]] ''[https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/907678612 Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World]''. New York: HarperCollins, 2015. {{ISBN|978-0062238481}}. {{OCLC|907678612}}. |
|||
* Moritz College of Law (2009). "The Jurisprudence of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Discussion of Fifteen Years on the U.S. Supreme Court: Symposium". ''Ohio State Law Journal''. 70, no. 4: 797–1126. {{ISSN|0048-1572}}. {{OCLC|676694369}}. |
|||
* {{Cite book |last=Totenberg |first=Nina |year=2022 |title=Dinners with Ruth: A Memoir on the Power of Friendships |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RgBfEAAAQBAJ |location=New York |publisher=Simon & Schuster |isbn=9781982188085 |oclc=1299301214}} |
|||
==External links== |
|||
{{Sister project links|wikt=no|b=no|q=Ruth Bader Ginsburg|s=author:Ruth Bader Ginsburg|commons=Ruth Bader Ginsburg|n=Category:Ruth Bader Ginsburg|v=no|species=no|d=y}} |
|||
* {{C-SPAN}} |
|||
* {{LoC-MSS|98084318|Ruth Bader Ginsburg papers}} {{OCLC|70984211}} |
|||
* {{Ballotpedia|Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg}} |
|||
* [http://www.OnTheIssues.org/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg.htm Issue positions and quotes] at [[On the Issues|OnTheIssues]] |
|||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20180125015600/https://www.makers.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg Ruth Bader Ginsburg], video produced by ''[[Makers: Women Who Make America]]'' |
|||
{{s-start}} |
|||
{{s-legal}} |
|||
{{s-bef|before=[[Harold Leventhal (judge)|Harold Leventhal]]}} |
|||
{{s-ttl|title=Judge of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]]|years=1980–1993}} |
|||
{{s-aft|after=[[David S. Tatel|David Tatel]]}} |
|||
|- |
|||
{{s-bef|before=[[Byron White]]}} |
|||
{{s-ttl|title=[[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States]]|years=1993–2020}} |
|||
{{s-aft|after=[[Amy Coney Barrett]]}} |
|||
|- |
|||
{{s-hon}} |
|||
{{s-bef|before=[[John Lewis]]}} |
|||
{{s-ttl|title=Persons who have [[lying in state|lain in state or honor]]<br />in the [[United States Capitol rotunda]]|years=September 25, 2020}} |
|||
{{s-aft|after=[[Death of Brian Sicknick|Brian Sicknick]]}} |
|||
{{s-end}} |
|||
{{SCOTUS Justices|associatejustices}} |
|||
<!-- Categories --> |
|||
{{Ruth Bader Ginsburg opinions}} |
|||
<!-- Interwiki --> |
|||
{{National Women's Hall of Fame}} |
|||
{{Lain in State (USA)|state=collapsed}} |
|||
{{authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:1933 births|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
{{good article}} |
|||
[[Category:American legal academics|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:American lawyers|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Cancer survivors|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Columbia Law School alumni|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Columbia University faculty|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Cornell University alumni|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Democratic Party (United States)|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Non-graduate alumni of Harvard|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Jewish American jurists|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Living people|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court justices|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Jewish United States Supreme Court justices|Ginsberg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:People from Brooklyn|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Rutgers University faculty|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
[[Category:Women judges|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader]] |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ginsburg, Ruth Bader}} |
|||
[[ |
[[Category:Ruth Bader Ginsburg| ]] |
||
[[Category:1933 births]] |
|||
[[fr:Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] |
|||
[[ |
[[Category:2020 deaths]] |
||
[[Category:20th-century American Jews]] |
|||
[[no:Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] |
|||
[[Category:20th-century American women lawyers]] |
|||
[[pl:Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] |
|||
[[Category:20th-century American women judges]] |
|||
[[simple:Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] |
|||
[[Category:21st-century American Jews]] |
|||
[[Category:21st-century American non-fiction writers]] |
|||
[[Category:21st-century American women judges]] |
|||
[[Category:21st-century American women writers]] |
|||
[[Category:Activists from New York (state)]] |
|||
[[Category:American Civil Liberties Union people]] |
|||
[[Category:American feminists]] |
|||
[[Category:American people of Austrian-Jewish descent]] |
|||
[[Category:American people of Polish-Jewish descent]] |
|||
[[Category:American people of Ukrainian-Jewish descent]] |
|||
[[Category:Jewish American academics]] |
|||
[[Category:Jewish legal scholars]] |
|||
[[Category:American women legal scholars]] |
|||
[[Category:American women non-fiction writers]] |
|||
[[Category:Burials at Arlington National Cemetery]] |
|||
[[Category:Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences fellows]] |
|||
[[Category:Columbia Law School alumni]] |
|||
[[Category:Columbia University faculty]] |
|||
[[Category:Constitutional court women judges]] |
|||
[[Category:Cornell University alumni]] |
|||
[[Category:Deaths from pancreatic cancer in Washington, D.C.]] |
|||
[[Category:Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences]] |
|||
[[Category:Ginsburg family]] |
|||
[[Category:Harvard Law School alumni]] |
|||
[[Category:James Madison High School (Brooklyn) alumni]] |
|||
[[Category:Jewish American activists]] |
|||
[[Category:Jewish American non-fiction writers]] |
|||
[[Category:Jewish feminists]] |
|||
[[Category:Jewish scholars]] |
|||
[[Category:Jewish women writers]] |
|||
[[Category:Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit]] |
|||
[[Category:Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States]] |
|||
[[Category:Lawyers from Brooklyn]] |
|||
[[Category:Members of Phi Kappa Phi]] |
|||
[[Category:New York (state) Democrats]] |
|||
[[Category:People from Flatbush, Brooklyn]] |
|||
[[Category:Rutgers School of Law–Newark faculty]] |
|||
[[Category:Scholars of civil procedure law]] |
|||
[[Category:Tulane University Law School faculty]] |
|||
[[Category:United States court of appeals judges appointed by Jimmy Carter]] |
|||
[[Category:United States federal judges appointed by Bill Clinton]] |
Latest revision as of 10:17, 17 November 2024
Ruth Bader Ginsburg | |
---|---|
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States | |
In office August 10, 1993 – September 18, 2020 | |
Nominated by | Bill Clinton |
Preceded by | Byron White |
Succeeded by | Amy Coney Barrett |
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit | |
In office June 30, 1980 – August 9, 1993 | |
Nominated by | Jimmy Carter |
Preceded by | Harold Leventhal |
Succeeded by | David Tatel |
Personal details | |
Born | Joan Ruth Bader March 15, 1933 New York City, U.S. |
Died | September 18, 2020 (aged 87) Washington, D.C., U.S. |
Resting place | Arlington National Cemetery |
Political party | Democratic[1] |
Spouse | |
Children | |
Education | |
Signature | |
This article is part of a series on |
Liberalism in the United States |
---|
Joan Ruth Bader Ginsburg (/ˈbeɪdər ˈɡɪnzbɜːrɡ/ BAY-dər GHINZ-burg; née Bader; March 15, 1933 – September 18, 2020)[2] was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1993 until her death in 2020.[3] She was nominated by President Bill Clinton to replace retiring justice Byron White, and at the time was viewed as a moderate consensus-builder.[4] Ginsburg was the first Jewish woman and the second woman to serve on the Court, after Sandra Day O'Connor. During her tenure, Ginsburg authored the majority opinions in cases such as United States v. Virginia (1996), Olmstead v. L.C. (1999), Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. (2000), and City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (2005). Later in her tenure, Ginsburg received attention for passionate dissents that reflected liberal views of the law. She was popularly dubbed "the Notorious R.B.G.",[a] a moniker she later embraced.[5]
Ginsburg was born and grew up in Brooklyn, New York. Just over a year later her older sister and only sibling, Marilyn, died of meningitis at the age of six. Her mother died shortly before she graduated from high school.[6] She earned her bachelor's degree at Cornell University and married Martin D. Ginsburg, becoming a mother before starting law school at Harvard, where she was one of the few women in her class. Ginsburg transferred to Columbia Law School, where she graduated joint first in her class. During the early 1960s she worked with the Columbia Law School Project on International Procedure, learned Swedish, and co-authored a book with Swedish jurist Anders Bruzelius; her work in Sweden profoundly influenced her thinking on gender equality. She then became a professor at Rutgers Law School and Columbia Law School, teaching civil procedure as one of the few women in her field.
Ginsburg spent much of her legal career as an advocate for gender equality and women's rights, winning many arguments before the Supreme Court. She advocated as a volunteer attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union and was a member of its board of directors and one of its general counsel in the 1970s. In 1980, President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where she served until her appointment to the Supreme Court in 1993. Between O'Connor's retirement in 2006 and the appointment of Sonia Sotomayor in 2009, she was the only female justice on the Supreme Court. During that time, Ginsburg became more forceful with her dissents, such as with Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007).
Despite two bouts with cancer and public pleas from liberal law scholars, she decided not to retire in 2013 or 2014 when President Barack Obama and a Democratic-controlled Senate could appoint and confirm her successor.[7][8][9] Ginsburg died at her home in Washington, D.C., in September 2020, at the age of 87, from complications of metastatic pancreatic cancer. The vacancy created by her death was filled 39 days later by Amy Coney Barrett. The result was one of three major rightward shifts in the Court since 1953, following the appointment of Clarence Thomas to replace Thurgood Marshall in 1991 and the appointment of Warren Burger to replace Earl Warren in 1969.[10]
Early life and education
Joan Ruth Bader was born on March 15, 1933, at Beth Moses Hospital in the Brooklyn borough of New York City, the second daughter of Celia (née Amster) and Nathan Bader, who lived in Brooklyn's Flatbush neighborhood. Her father was a Jewish emigrant from Odesa, Ukraine, at that time part of the Russian Empire, and her mother was born in New York to Jewish parents who came from Kraków, Poland, at that time part of Austria-Hungary.[11] The Baders' elder daughter Marylin died of meningitis at age six. Joan, who was 14 months old when Marylin died, was known to the family as "Kiki", a nickname Marylin had given her for being "a kicky baby". When Joan started school, Celia discovered that her daughter's class had several other girls named Joan, so Celia suggested the teacher call her daughter by her second name, Ruth, to avoid confusion.[12]: 3–4 Although not devout, the Bader family belonged to East Midwood Jewish Center, a Conservative synagogue, where Ruth learned tenets of the Jewish faith and gained familiarity with the Hebrew language.[12]: 14–15 Ruth was not allowed to have a bat mitzvah ceremony because of Orthodox restrictions on women reading from the Torah, which upset her.[13] Starting as a camper from the age of four, she attended Camp Che-Na-Wah, a Jewish summer program at Lake Balfour near Minerva, New York, where she was later a camp counselor until the age of eighteen.[14]
Celia took an active role in her daughter's education, often taking her to the library.[15] Celia had been a good student in her youth, graduating from high school at age 15, yet she could not further her own education because her family instead chose to send her brother to college. Celia wanted her daughter to get more education, which she thought would allow Ruth to become a high school history teacher.[16] Ruth attended James Madison High School, whose law program later dedicated a courtroom in her honor. Celia struggled with cancer throughout Ruth's high school years and died the day before Ruth's high school graduation.[15]
Ruth Bader attended Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, where she was a member of Alpha Epsilon Phi sorority.[17]: 118 While at Cornell, she met Martin D. Ginsburg at age 17.[16] She graduated from Cornell with a Bachelor of Arts degree in government on June 23, 1954. While at Cornell, Bader studied under Russian-American novelist Vladimir Nabokov, and she later identified Nabokov as a major influence on her development as a writer.[18][19] She was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and the highest-ranking female student in her graduating class.[17][20] Bader married Ginsburg a month after her graduation from Cornell. The couple moved to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, where Martin Ginsburg, a Reserve Officers' Training Corps graduate, was stationed as a called-up active duty United States Army Reserve officer during the Korean War.[16][21][20] At age 21, Ruth Bader Ginsburg worked for the Social Security Administration office in Oklahoma, where she was demoted after becoming pregnant with her first child. She gave birth to a daughter in 1955.[22]
In the fall of 1956, Ruth Bader Ginsburg enrolled at Harvard Law School, where she was one of only 9 women in a class of about 500 men.[23][24] The dean of Harvard Law, Erwin Griswold, reportedly invited all the female law students to dinner at his family home and asked the female law students, including Ginsburg, "Why are you at Harvard Law School, taking the place of a man?"[b][16][25][26] When her husband took a job in New York City, that same dean denied Ginsburg's request to complete her third year towards a Harvard law degree at Columbia Law School,[27] so Ginsburg transferred to Columbia and became the first woman to be on two major law reviews: the Harvard Law Review and Columbia Law Review. In 1959, she earned her law degree at Columbia and tied for first in her class.[15][28]
Early career
At the start of her legal career, Ginsburg encountered difficulty in finding employment.[29][30][31] In 1960, Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter rejected Ginsburg for a clerkship because of her gender. He did so despite a strong recommendation from Albert Martin Sacks, who was a professor and later dean of Harvard Law School.[32][33][c] Columbia law professor Gerald Gunther also pushed for Judge Edmund L. Palmieri of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to hire Ginsburg as a law clerk, threatening to never recommend another Columbia student to Palmieri if he did not give Ginsburg the opportunity and guaranteeing to provide the judge with a replacement clerk should Ginsburg not succeed.[22][15][34] Later that year, Ginsburg began her clerkship for Judge Palmieri, and she held the position for two years.[22][15]
Academia
From 1961 to 1963, Ginsburg was a research associate and then an associate director of the Columbia Law School Project on International Procedure, working alongside director Hans Smit;[35][36] she learned Swedish to co-author a book with Anders Bruzelius on civil procedure in Sweden.[37][38] Ginsburg conducted extensive research for her book at Lund University in Sweden.[39] Ginsburg's time in Sweden and her association with the Swedish Bruzelius family of jurists also influenced her thinking on gender equality. She was inspired when she observed the changes in Sweden, where women were 20 to 25 percent of all law students; one of the judges whom Ginsburg observed for her research was eight months pregnant and still working.[16] Bruzelius' daughter, Norwegian supreme court justice and president of the Norwegian Association for Women's Rights, Karin M. Bruzelius, herself a law student when Ginsburg worked with her father, said that "by getting close to my family, Ruth realized that one could live in a completely different way, that women could have a different lifestyle and legal position than what they had in the United States."[40][41]
Ginsburg's first position as a professor was at Rutgers Law School in 1963.[42] She was paid less than her male colleagues because, she was told, "your husband has a very good job."[31] At the time Ginsburg entered academia, she was one of fewer than twenty female law professors in the United States.[42] She was a professor of law at Rutgers from 1963 to 1972, teaching mainly civil procedure and receiving tenure in 1969.[43][44]
In 1970, she co-founded the Women's Rights Law Reporter, the first law journal in the U.S. to focus exclusively on women's rights.[45] From 1972 to 1980, she taught at Columbia Law School, where she became the first tenured woman and co-authored the first law school casebook on sex discrimination.[44] She also spent a year as a fellow of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University from 1977 to 1978.[46]
Litigation and advocacy
In 1972, Ginsburg co-founded the Women's Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and in 1973, she became the Project's general counsel.[20] The Women's Rights Project and related ACLU projects participated in more than 300 gender discrimination cases by 1974. As the director of the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, she argued six gender discrimination cases before the Supreme Court between 1973 and 1976, winning five.[32] Rather than asking the Court to end all gender discrimination at once, Ginsburg charted a strategic course, taking aim at specific discriminatory statutes and building on each successive victory. She chose plaintiffs carefully, at times picking male plaintiffs to demonstrate that gender discrimination was harmful to both men and women.[32][44] The laws Ginsburg targeted included those that on the surface appeared beneficial to women, but in fact reinforced the notion that women needed to be dependent on men.[32] Her strategic advocacy extended to word choice, favoring the use of "gender" instead of "sex", after her secretary suggested the word "sex" would serve as a distraction to judges.[44] She attained a reputation as a skilled oral advocate, and her work led directly to the end of gender discrimination in many areas of the law.[47]
Ginsburg volunteered to write the brief for Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), in which the Supreme Court extended the protections of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to women.[44][48][d] In 1972, she argued before the 10th Circuit in Moritz v. Commissioner on behalf of a man who had been denied a caregiver deduction because of his gender. As amicus she argued in Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), which challenged a statute making it more difficult for a female service member (Frontiero) to claim an increased housing allowance for her husband than for a male service member seeking the same allowance for his wife. Ginsburg argued that the statute treated women as inferior, and the Supreme Court ruled 8–1 in Frontiero's favor.[32] The court again ruled in Ginsburg's favor in Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 420 U.S. 636 (1975), where Ginsburg represented a widower denied survivor benefits under Social Security, which permitted widows but not widowers to collect special benefits while caring for minor children. She argued that the statute discriminated against male survivors of workers by denying them the same protection as their female counterparts.[50]
In 1973, the same year Roe v. Wade was decided, Ginsburg filed a federal case to challenge involuntary sterilization, suing members of the Eugenics Board of North Carolina on behalf of Nial Ruth Cox, a mother who had been coercively sterilized under North Carolina's Sterilization of Persons Mentally Defective program on penalty of her family losing welfare benefits.[51][52][53] During a 2009 interview with Emily Bazelon of The New York Times, Ginsburg stated: "I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."[54] Bazelon conducted a follow-up interview with Ginsburg in 2012 at a joint appearance at Yale University, where Ginsburg claimed her 2009 quote was vastly misinterpreted and clarified her stance.[55][56]
Ginsburg filed an amicus brief and sat with counsel at oral argument for Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976), which challenged an Oklahoma statute that set different minimum drinking ages for men and women.[32][50] For the first time, the court imposed what is known as intermediate scrutiny on laws discriminating based on gender, a heightened standard of Constitutional review.[32][50][57] Her last case as an attorney before the Supreme Court was Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979), which challenged the validity of voluntary jury duty for women, on the ground that participation in jury duty was a citizen's vital governmental service and therefore should not be optional for women. At the end of Ginsburg's oral argument, then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist asked Ginsburg, "You won't settle for putting Susan B. Anthony on the new dollar, then?"[58] Ginsburg said she considered responding, "We won't settle for tokens," but instead opted not to answer the question.[58]
Legal scholars and advocates credit Ginsburg's body of work with making significant legal advances for women under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.[44][32] Taken together, Ginsburg's legal victories discouraged legislatures from treating women and men differently under the law.[44][32][50] She continued to work on the ACLU's Women's Rights Project until her appointment to the Federal Bench in 1980.[44] Later, colleague Antonin Scalia praised Ginsburg's skills as an advocate. "She became the leading (and very successful) litigator on behalf of women's rights—the Thurgood Marshall of that cause, so to speak." This was a comparison that had first been made by former solicitor general Erwin Griswold who was also her former professor and dean at Harvard Law School, in a speech given in 1985.[59][60][e]
U.S. Court of Appeals
In light of the mounting backlog in the federal judiciary, Congress passed the Omnibus Judgeship Act of 1978 increasing the number of federal judges by 117 in district courts and another 35 to be added to the circuit courts. The law placed an emphasis on ensuring that the judges included women and minority groups, a matter that was important to President Jimmy Carter who had been elected two years before. The bill also required that the nomination process consider the character and experience of the candidates.[61][62][63] Ginsburg was considering a change in career as soon as Carter was elected. She was interviewed by the Department of Justice to become Solicitor General, the position she most desired, but knew that she and the African-American candidate who was interviewed the same day had little chance of being appointed by Attorney General Griffin Bell.[64]
At the time, Ginsburg was a fellow at Stanford University where she was working on a written account of her work in litigation and advocacy for equal rights. Her husband was a visiting professor at Stanford Law School and was ready to leave his firm, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, for a tenured position. He was at the same time working hard to promote a possible judgeship for his wife. In January 1979, she filled out the questionnaire for possible nominees to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and another for the District of Columbia Circuit.[64] Ginsburg was nominated by President Carter on April 14, 1980, to a seat on the DC Circuit vacated by Judge Harold Leventhal upon his death. She was confirmed by the United States Senate on June 18, 1980, and received her commission later that day.[43][65]
During her time as a judge on the DC Circuit, Ginsburg often found consensus with her colleagues including conservatives Robert H. Bork and Antonin Scalia.[66][67] Her time on the court earned her a reputation as a "cautious jurist" and a moderate.[4] Her service ended on August 9, 1993, due to her elevation to the United States Supreme Court,[43][68][69] and she was replaced by Judge David S. Tatel.[70]
Supreme Court
Nomination and confirmation
President Bill Clinton nominated Ginsburg as an associate justice of the Supreme Court on June 22, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring justice Byron White.[71] She was recommended to Clinton by then–U.S. attorney general Janet Reno,[28] after a suggestion by Utah Republican senator Orrin Hatch.[72] At the time of her nomination, Ginsburg was viewed as having been a moderate and a consensus-builder in her time on the appeals court.[4][73] Clinton was reportedly looking to increase the Court's diversity, which Ginsburg did as the first Jewish justice since the 1969 resignation of Justice Abe Fortas. She was the second female and the first Jewish female justice of the Supreme Court.[4][74][75] She eventually became the longest-serving Jewish justice.[76] The American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary rated Ginsburg as "well qualified", its highest rating for a prospective justice.[77]
During her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee as part of the confirmation hearings, Ginsburg refused to answer questions about her view on the constitutionality of some issues such as the death penalty as it was an issue she might have to vote on if it came before the Court.[78]
At the same time, Ginsburg did answer questions about some potentially controversial issues. For instance, she affirmed her belief in a constitutional right to privacy and explained at some length her personal judicial philosophy and thoughts regarding gender equality.[79]: 15–16 Ginsburg was more forthright in discussing her views on topics about which she had previously written.[78] The United States Senate confirmed her by a 96–3 vote on August 3, 1993.[f][43] She received her commission on August 5, 1993[43] and took her judicial oath on August 10, 1993.[81]
Ginsburg's name was later invoked during the confirmation process of John Roberts. Ginsburg was not the first nominee to avoid answering certain specific questions before Congress,[g] and as a young attorney in 1981 Roberts had advised against Supreme Court nominees' giving specific responses.[82] Nevertheless, some conservative commentators and senators invoked the phrase "Ginsburg precedent" to defend his demurrers.[77][82] In a September 28, 2005, speech at Wake Forest University, Ginsburg said Roberts's refusal to answer questions during his Senate confirmation hearings on some cases was "unquestionably right".[83]
Supreme Court tenure
Ginsburg characterized her performance on the Court as a cautious approach to adjudication.[84] She argued in a speech shortly before her nomination to the Court that "[m]easured motions seem to me right, in the main, for constitutional as well as common law adjudication. Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped, experience teaches, may prove unstable."[85] Legal scholar Cass Sunstein characterized Ginsburg as a "rational minimalist", a jurist who seeks to build cautiously on precedent rather than pushing the Constitution towards her own vision.[86]: 10–11
The retirement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only woman on the Court.[87][h] Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times referred to the subsequent 2006–2007 term of the Court as "the time when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg found her voice, and used it".[89] The term also marked the first time in Ginsburg's history with the Court where she read multiple dissents from the bench, a tactic employed to signal more intense disagreement with the majority.[89]
With the retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens, Ginsburg became the senior member of what was sometimes referred to as the Court's "liberal wing".[44][90][91] When the Court split 5–4 along ideological lines and the liberal justices were in the minority, Ginsburg often had the authority to assign authorship of the dissenting opinion because of her seniority.[90][i] Ginsburg was a proponent of the liberal dissenters speaking "with one voice" and, where practicable, presenting a unified approach to which all the dissenting justices can agree.[44][90]
During Ginsburg's entire Supreme Court tenure from 1993 to 2020, she only hired one African-American clerk (Paul J. Watford).[93][94] During her 13 years on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, she never hired an African-American clerk, intern, or secretary. The lack of diversity was briefly an issue during her 1993 confirmation hearing.[95] When this issue was raised by the Senate Judiciary Committee, Ginsburg stated that "If you confirm me for this job, my attractiveness to black candidates is going to improve."[96] This issue received renewed attention after more than a hundred of her former legal clerks served as pallbearers during her funeral.[97][98]
Gender discrimination
Ginsburg authored the Court's opinion in United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996), which struck down the Virginia Military Institute's (VMI) male-only admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. For Ginsburg, a state actor could not use gender to deny women equal protection; therefore VMI must allow women the opportunity to attend VMI with its unique educational methods.[99] Ginsburg emphasized that the government must show an "exceedingly persuasive justification" to use a classification based on sex.[100] VMI proposed a separate institute for women, but Ginsburg found this solution reminiscent of the effort by Texas decades earlier to preserve the University of Texas Law School for Whites by establishing a separate school for Blacks.[101]
Ginsburg dissented in the Court's decision on Ledbetter v. Goodyear, 550 U.S. 618 (2007), in which plaintiff Lilly Ledbetter sued her employer, claiming pay discrimination based on her gender, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In a 5–4 decision, the majority interpreted the statute of limitations as starting to run at the time of every pay period, even if a woman did not know she was being paid less than her male colleague until later. Ginsburg found the result absurd, pointing out that women often do not know they are being paid less, and therefore it was unfair to expect them to act at the time of each paycheck. She also called attention to the reluctance women may have in male-dominated fields to making waves by filing lawsuits over small amounts, choosing instead to wait until the disparity accumulates.[102] As part of her dissent, Ginsburg called on Congress to amend Title VII to undo the Court's decision with legislation.[103] Following the election of President Barack Obama in 2008, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, making it easier for employees to win pay discrimination claims, became law.[104][105] Ginsburg was credited with helping to inspire the law.[103][105]
Abortion rights
Ginsburg discussed her views on abortion and gender equality in a 2009 New York Times interview, in which she said, "[t]he basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman."[106] Although Ginsburg consistently supported abortion rights and joined in the Court's opinion striking down Nebraska's partial-birth abortion law in Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000), on the 40th anniversary of the Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), she criticized the decision in Roe as terminating a nascent democratic movement to liberalize abortion laws which might have built a more durable consensus in support of abortion rights.[107] Ginsburg was in the minority for Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), a 5–4 decision upholding restrictions on partial birth abortion. In her dissent, Ginsburg opposed the majority's decision to defer to legislative findings that the procedure was not safe for women. Ginsburg focused her ire on the way Congress reached its findings and with their veracity.[108] Joining the majority for Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016), a case which struck down parts of a 2013 Texas law regulating abortion providers, Ginsburg also authored a short concurring opinion which was even more critical of the legislation at issue.[109] She asserted the legislation was not aimed at protecting women's health, as Texas had said, but rather to impede women's access to abortions.[108][109]
Religious Freedom
On May 31, 2005, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in Cutter v. Wilkinson that facilities utilizing federal funds cannot deny prisoners accommodations necessary for the practice of their religious beliefs.[110] In doing so, Ginsburg held that RLUIPA was a valid accommodation permitted by the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.[111][112] In addition, Ginsburg acknowledged that the free exercise of religion encompasses both belief and action but noted that accommodation of a religious belief did not predispose equal accommodation for a non-secular preference.[113]
On June 28, 2010, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez relating to a campus policy of acceptance of all students, regardless of status or belief, in becoming an officially recognized student group.[114] Ginsburg ruled that a religious-based group stood at odds with an "all-comers" campus policy by singling out a religious group for exclusion in a manner at odds with the "limited public forum" of the campus.[115][116] Such a public forum was thus legally obligated to provide equal access via open membership and was determined to not be required to officially recognize a student group at odds with it.[117]
Search and seizure
On June 27, 2002, Ginsburg dissented in Board of Education v. Earls which permitted schools to enact mandatory drug testing on students partaking in extracurricular activities.[118] In her dissent, Ginsburg criticized the application of such a policy when the district had failed to identify either a significant drug risk among the students or in the school.[119] In doing so, Ginsburg contrasted the case with Vernonia School District v. Acton which had permitted drug testing due to 'special needs' of athlete participation, acknowledging her prior agreement with the verdict but stating that such an opinion "cannot be read to endorse invasive and suspicionless drug testing of all students".[120][121]
Although Ginsburg did not author the majority opinion, she was credited with influencing her colleagues on Safford Unified School District v. Redding, 557 U.S. 364 (2009),[122] which held that a school went too far in ordering a 13-year-old female student to strip to her bra and underpants so female officials could search for drugs.[122] In an interview published prior to the Court's decision, Ginsburg shared her view that some of her colleagues did not fully appreciate the effect of a strip search on a 13-year-old girl. As she said, "They have never been a 13-year-old girl."[123] In an 8–1 decision, the Court agreed that the school's search violated the Fourth Amendment and allowed the student's lawsuit against the school to go forward. Only Ginsburg and Stevens would have allowed the student to sue individual school officials as well.[122]
In Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), Ginsburg dissented from the Court's decision not to suppress evidence due to a police officer's failure to update a computer system. In contrast to Roberts's emphasis on suppression as a means to deter police misconduct, Ginsburg took a more robust view on the use of suppression as a remedy for a violation of a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights. Ginsburg viewed suppression as a way to prevent the government from profiting from mistakes, and therefore as a remedy to preserve judicial integrity and respect civil rights.[124]: 308 She also rejected Roberts's assertion that suppression would not deter mistakes, contending making police pay a high price for mistakes would encourage them to take greater care.[124]: 309
On January 26, 2009, Ginsburg wrote for a unanimous court in Arizona v. Johnson that a police officer may pat down an individual at a traffic stop provided reasonable suspicion by the officer the individual was armed and dangerous.[125] In her opinion, Ginsburg concluded that the "combined thrust" of past opinions such as Terry v. Ohio and Pennsylvania v. Mimms provided officers the authority to conduct such a search provided reasonable suspicion of danger by the individual.[126] Additionally, Ginsburg noted that comments made by the officer unrelated to the traffic stop "do not convert the encounter into something other than a lawful seizure, so long as those inquiries do not measurably extend the duration of the stop".[127]
On April 21, 2015, Ginsburg authored the majority opinion in Rodriguez v. United States stating that an officer may not extend the length of a standard traffic stop to conduct a search with a detection dog.[128] In her opinion, Ginsburg stated that the use of a detection dog or any action not related to the initial traffic stop could not be used in suspicion of a separate crime.[129][130] Ginsburg additionally contended that such an action would only be permissible by the officer provided the officer had "independently supported reasonable suspicion" that a separate crime had occurred at the time of the initial traffic violation and that the action taken would not add additional time to the traffic stop.[131][132]
International law
Ginsburg advocated the use of foreign law and norms to shape U.S. law in judicial opinions, a view rejected by some of her conservative colleagues. Ginsburg supported using foreign interpretations of law for persuasive value and possible wisdom, not as binding precedent.[133] Ginsburg expressed the view that consulting international law is a well-ingrained tradition in American law, counting John Henry Wigmore and President John Adams as internationalists.[134] Ginsburg's own reliance on international law dated back to her time as an attorney; in her first argument before the Court, Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), she cited two German cases.[135] In her concurring opinion in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), a decision upholding Michigan Law School's affirmative action admissions policy, Ginsburg noted there was accord between the notion that affirmative action admissions policies would have an end point and agrees with international treaties designed to combat racial and gender-based discrimination.[134]
Voting rights and affirmative action
In 2013, Ginsburg dissented in Shelby County v. Holder, in which the Court held unconstitutional the part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 requiring federal preclearance before changing voting practices. Ginsburg wrote, "Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."[136]
Besides Grutter, Ginsburg wrote in favor of affirmative action in her dissent in Gratz v. Bollinger (2003), in which the Court ruled an affirmative action policy unconstitutional because it was not narrowly tailored to the state's interest in diversity. She argued that "government decisionmakers may properly distinguish between policies of exclusion and inclusion...Actions designed to burden groups long denied full citizenship stature are not sensibly ranked with measures taken to hasten the day when entrenched discrimination and its after effects have been extirpated."[137]
Native Americans
In 1997, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in Strate v. A-1 Contractors against tribal jurisdiction over tribal-owned land in a reservation.[138] The case involved a nonmember who caused a car crash in the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation. Ginsburg reasoned that the state right-of-way on which the crash occurred rendered the tribal-owned land equivalent to non-Indian land. She then considered the rule set in Montana v. United States, which allows tribes to regulate the activities of nonmembers who have a relationship with the tribe. Ginsburg noted that the driver's employer did have a relationship with the tribe, but she reasoned that the tribe could not regulate their activities because the victim had no relationship to the tribe. Ginsburg concluded that although "those who drive carelessly on a public highway running through a reservation endanger all in the vicinity, and surely jeopardize the safety of tribal members", having a nonmember go before an "unfamiliar court" was "not crucial to the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the Three Affiliated Tribes" (internal quotations and brackets omitted). The decision, by a unanimous Court, was generally criticized by scholars of Indian law, such as David Getches and Frank Pommersheim.[139]: 1024–5
Later in 2005, Ginsburg cited the doctrine of discovery in the majority opinion of City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York and concluded that the Oneida Indian Nation could not revive its ancient sovereignty over its historic land.[140][141] The discovery doctrine has been used to grant ownership of Native American lands to colonial governments. The Oneida had lived in towns, grew extensive crops, and maintained trade routes to the Gulf of Mexico. In her opinion for the Court, Ginsburg reasoned that the historic Oneida land had been "converted from wilderness" ever since it was dislodged from the Oneidas' possession.[142] She also reasoned that "the longstanding, distinctly non-Indian character of the area and its inhabitants" and "the regulatory authority constantly exercised by New York State and its counties and towns" justified the ruling. Ginsburg also invoked, sua sponte, the doctrine of laches, reasoning that the Oneidas took a "long delay in seeking judicial relief". She also reasoned that the dispossession of the Oneidas' land was "ancient". Lower courts later relied on Sherrill as precedent to extinguish Native American land claims, including in Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki.[139]: 1030–1
Less than a year after Sherrill, Ginsburg offered a starkly contrasting approach to Native American law. In December 2005, Ginsburg dissented in Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, arguing that a state tax on fuel sold to Potawatomi retailers would impermissibly nullify the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation's own tax authority.[139]: 1032 In 2008, when Ginsburg's precedent in Strate was used in Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co., she dissented in part and argued that the tribal court of the Cheyenne River Lakota Nation had jurisdiction over the case.[139]: 1034–5 In 2020, Ginsburg joined the ruling of McGirt v. Oklahoma, which affirmed Native American jurisdictions over reservations in much of Oklahoma.[143]
Other majority opinions
In 1999, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in Olmstead v. L.C., in which the Court ruled that mental illness is a form of disability covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.[144]
In 2000, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc., in which the Court held that residents have standing to seek fines for an industrial polluter that affected their interests and that is able to continue doing so.[145][146]
Decision not to retire under Obama
When John Paul Stevens retired in 2010, Ginsburg became the oldest justice on the court at age 77.[147] Despite rumors that she would retire because of advancing age, poor health, and the death of her husband,[148][149] she denied she was planning to step down. In an interview in August 2010, Ginsburg said her work on the Court was helping her cope with the death of her husband.[147] She also expressed a wish to emulate Justice Louis Brandeis's service of nearly 23 years, which she achieved in April 2016.[147]
Several times during the presidency of Barack Obama, progressive attorneys and activists called for Ginsburg to retire so that Obama could appoint a like-minded successor,[150][151][152] particularly while the Democratic Party held control of the U.S. Senate.[153][151] Ginsburg reaffirmed her wish to remain a justice as long as she was mentally sharp enough to perform her duties.[90] In 2013, Obama met with her in the White House to point out that Democrats might soon lose control of the Senate and nudge her toward stepping down, but she again refused.[8] She opined that Republicans would use the judicial filibuster to prevent Obama from appointing a jurist like herself.[154] She stated that she had a new model to emulate in her former colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, who retired at the age of 90 after nearly 35 years on the bench.[155]
Lawyer and author Linda Hirshman believed that, in the lead-up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Ginsburg was waiting for candidate Hillary Clinton to beat candidate Donald Trump before retiring, because Clinton would nominate a more liberal successor for her than Obama would, or so that her successor could be nominated by the first female president.[156] After Trump's victory in 2016 and the election of a Republican Senate, she would have had to wait until at least 2021 for a Democrat to be president, but died in office in September 2020 at age 87.[157]
Other activities
At his request, Ginsburg administered the oath of office to Vice President Al Gore for a second term during the second inauguration of Bill Clinton on January 20, 1997.[158] She was the third woman to administer an inaugural oath of office.[159] Ginsburg is believed to have been the first Supreme Court justice to officiate at a same-sex wedding, performing the August 31, 2013, ceremony of Kennedy Center president Michael Kaiser and John Roberts, a government economist.[160] Earlier that summer, the Court had bolstered same-sex marriage rights in two separate cases.[161][162] Ginsburg believed the issue being settled led same-sex couples to ask her to officiate as there was no longer the fear of compromising rulings on the issue.[161]
The Supreme Court bar formerly inscribed its certificates "in the year of our Lord", which some Orthodox Jews opposed, and asked Ginsburg to object to. She did so, and due to her objection, Supreme Court bar members have since been given other choices of how to inscribe the year on their certificates.[163]
Despite their ideological differences, Ginsburg considered Antonin Scalia her closest colleague on the Court.[164] The two justices often dined together and attended the opera.[165] In addition to befriending modern composers, including Tobias Picker,[166][167] in her spare time, Ginsburg appeared in several operas in non-speaking supernumerary roles such as Die Fledermaus (2003) and Ariadne auf Naxos (1994 and 2009 with Scalia),[168] and spoke lines penned by herself in The Daughter of the Regiment (2016).[169]
In January 2012, Ginsburg went to Egypt for four days of discussions with judges, law school faculty, law school students, and legal experts.[170][171] In an interview with Al Hayat TV, she said the first requirement of a new constitution should be that it would "safeguard basic fundamental human rights like our First Amendment". Asked if Egypt should model its new constitution on those of other nations, she said Egypt should be "aided by all Constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II", and cited the United States Constitution and Constitution of South Africa as documents she might look to if drafting a new constitution. She said the U.S. was fortunate to have a constitution authored by "very wise" men but said that in the 1780s, no women were able to participate directly in the process, and slavery still existed in the U.S.[172]
During three interviews in July 2016, Ginsburg criticized presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, telling The New York Times and the Associated Press that she did not want to think about the possibility of a Trump presidency. She joked that she might consider moving to New Zealand.[173][174] She later apologized for commenting on the presumptive Republican nominee, calling her remarks "ill advised".[175]
Ginsburg's first book, My Own Words, was published by Simon & Schuster on October 4, 2016.[12] The book debuted on The New York Times Best Seller List for hardcover nonfiction at No. 12.[176] While promoting her book in October 2016 during an interview with Katie Couric, Ginsburg responded to a question about Colin Kaepernick choosing not to stand for the national anthem at sporting events by calling the protest "really dumb". She later apologized for her criticism calling her earlier comments "inappropriately dismissive and harsh" and noting she had not been familiar with the incident and should have declined to respond to the question.[177][178][179] In 2021, Couric revealed that she had edited out some statements by Ginsburg in their interview; Ginsburg said that athletes who protested by not standing were showing "contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life ... which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from."[180][181]
In 2017, Ginsburg gave the keynote address to a Georgetown University symposium on governmental reform. She spoke on the need for improving the confirmation process, "recall[ing] the 'collegiality' and 'civility' of her own nomination and confirmation..."[182]
In 2018, Ginsburg expressed her support for the MeToo movement, which encourages women to speak up about their experiences with sexual harassment.[183] She told an audience, "It's about time. For so long women were silent, thinking there was nothing you could do about it, but now the law is on the side of women, or men, who encounter harassment and that's a good thing."[183] She also reflected on her own experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment, including a time when a chemistry professor at Cornell unsuccessfully attempted to trade her exam answers for sex.[183]
Personal life
A few days after Ruth Bader graduated from Cornell, she married Martin D. Ginsburg, who later became an internationally prominent tax attorney practicing at Weil, Gotshal & Manges. Upon Ruth Bader Ginsburg's accession to the D.C. Circuit, the couple moved from New York City to Washington, D.C., where Martin became a professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center. The couple's daughter, Jane C. Ginsburg (born 1955), is a professor at Columbia Law School. Their son, James Steven Ginsburg (born 1965), is the founder and president of Cedille Records, a classical music recording company based in Chicago, Illinois. Martin and Ruth had four grandchildren.[184]
After the birth of their daughter, Martin was diagnosed with testicular cancer. During this period, Ruth attended class and took notes for both of them, typing her husband's dictated papers and caring for their daughter and her sick husband. During this period, she also was selected to be a member of the Harvard Law Review. Martin died of complications from metastatic cancer on June 27, 2010, four days after their 56th wedding anniversary.[185] They spoke publicly of being in a shared earning/shared parenting marriage including in a speech Martin wrote and had intended to give before his death that Ruth delivered posthumously.[186]
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a non-observant Jew, attributing this to gender inequality in Jewish prayer ritual and relating it to her mother's death. However, she said she might have felt differently if she were younger, and she was pleased that Reform and Conservative Judaism were becoming more egalitarian in this regard.[187][188] In March 2015, Ginsburg and Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt released "The Heroic and Visionary Women of Passover", an essay highlighting the roles of five key women in the saga. The text states, "These women had a vision leading out of the darkness shrouding their world. They were women of action, prepared to defy authority to make their vision a reality bathed in the light of the day ..."[189] In addition, she decorated her chambers with an artist's rendering of the Hebrew phrase from Deuteronomy, "Zedek, zedek, tirdof," ("Justice, justice shall you pursue") as a reminder of her heritage and professional responsibility.[190]
Ginsburg had a collection of lace jabots from around the world.[191][192] She said in 2014 she had a particular jabot she wore when issuing her dissents (black with gold embroidery and faceted stones) as well as another she wore when issuing majority opinions (crocheted yellow and cream with crystals), which was a gift from her law clerks.[191][192] Her favorite jabot (woven with white beads) was from Cape Town, South Africa.[191]
Health
In 1999, Ginsburg was diagnosed with colon cancer, the first of her five[193] bouts with cancer. She underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. During the process, she did not miss a day on the bench.[194] Ginsburg was physically weakened by the cancer treatment, and she began working with a personal trainer. Bryant Johnson, a former Army reservist attached to the U.S. Army Special Forces, trained Ginsburg twice weekly in the justices-only gym at the Supreme Court.[195][196] Ginsburg saw her physical fitness improve after her first bout with cancer; she was able to complete twenty push-ups in a session before her 80th birthday.[195][197]
Nearly a decade after her first bout with cancer, Ginsburg again underwent surgery on February 5, 2009, this time for pancreatic cancer.[198][199] She had a tumor that was discovered at an early stage.[198] She was released from a New York City hospital on February 13, 2009, and returned to the bench when the Supreme Court went back into session on February 23, 2009.[200][201][202] After experiencing discomfort while exercising in the Supreme Court gym in November 2014, she had a stent placed in her right coronary artery.[203][204]
Ginsburg's next hospitalization helped her detect another round of cancer.[205] On November 8, 2018, Ginsburg fell in her office at the Supreme Court, fracturing three ribs, for which she was hospitalized.[206] An outpouring of public support followed.[207][208] Although the day after her fall, Ginsburg's nephew revealed she had already returned to official judicial work after a day of observation,[209] a CT scan of her ribs following her fall showed cancerous nodules in her lungs.[205] On December 21, Ginsburg underwent a left-lung lobectomy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to remove the nodules.[205] For the first time since joining the Court more than 25 years earlier, Ginsburg missed oral argument on January 7, 2019, while she recuperated.[210] She returned to the Supreme Court on February 15, 2019, to participate in a private conference with other justices in her first appearance at the Court since her cancer surgery in December 2018.[211]
Months later in August 2019, the Supreme Court announced that Ginsburg had recently completed three weeks of focused radiation treatment to ablate a tumor found in her pancreas over the summer.[212] By January 2020, Ginsburg was cancer-free. By February 2020, the cancer had returned but this news was not released to the public.[193] However, by May 2020, Ginsburg was once again receiving treatment for a recurrence of cancer.[213] She reiterated her position that she "would remain a member of the Court as long as I can do the job full steam", adding that she remained fully able to do so.[214][215]
Death and succession
Ginsburg died from complications of pancreatic cancer on September 18, 2020, at age 87.[216][217] She died on the eve of Rosh Hashanah, and according to Rabbi Richard Jacobs, "One of the themes of Rosh Hashanah suggest that very righteous people would die at the very end of the year because they were needed until the very end".[218] After the announcement of her death, thousands of people gathered in front of the Supreme Court building to lay flowers, light candles, and leave messages.[219][220]
Five days after her death, the eight Supreme Court justices, Ginsburg's children, and other family members held a private ceremony for Ginsburg in the Court's great hall. Following the private ceremony, due to COVID-19 pandemic conditions prohibiting the usual lying in repose in the great hall, Ginsburg's casket was moved outdoors to the Court's west portico so the public could pay respects. Thousands of mourners lined up to walk past the casket over the course of two days.[221] After the two days in repose at the Court, Ginsburg lay in state at the Capitol. She was the first woman and first Jew to lie in state therein.[j][222][223][224] On September 29, Ginsburg was buried beside her husband in Arlington National Cemetery.[225]
Ginsburg's death opened a vacancy on the Supreme Court about six weeks before the 2020 presidential election, initiating controversies regarding the nomination and confirmation of her successor.[226][227][228] Days before her death, Ginsburg dictated a statement to her granddaughter Clara Spera, as heard by Ginsburg's doctor and others in the room at the time: "My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed."[229] President Trump's pick to replace her, Amy Coney Barrett, was confirmed by the Senate on October 27.
Recognition
In 2002, Ginsburg was inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame.[230] Ginsburg was named one of 100 Most Powerful Women (2009),[231] one of Glamour magazine's Women of the Year 2012,[232] and one of Time magazine's 100 most influential people (2015).[233] She was awarded honorary degrees by Lund University (1969),[234] American University Law School (1981),[235] Vermont Law School (1984),[236] Georgetown University (1985),[235] DePaul University (1985), Brooklyn Law School (1987), Hebrew Union College (1988), Rutgers University (1990), Amherst College (1990),[235] Lewis & Clark College (1992),[237] Columbia University (1994),[238] Long Island University (1994),[239] NYU (1994),[240] Smith College (1994),[241] The University of Illinois (1994),[242] Brandeis University (1996),[243] George Washington University (1997),[244] Jewish Theological Seminary of America (1997),[240] Wheaton College (Massachusetts) (1997),[245] Northwestern University (1998),[246] University of Michigan (2001),[247] Brown University (2002),[248] Yale University (2003),[249] John Jay College of Criminal Justice (2004),[240] Johns Hopkins University (2004),[250] University of Pennsylvania (2007),[251] Willamette University (2009),[252] Princeton University (2010),[253] Harvard University (2011),[254] and the State University of New York (2019).[255]
In 2009, Ginsburg received a Lifetime Achievement Award from Scribes—The American Society of Legal Writers.[256]
In 2013, a painting featuring the four female justices to have served as justices on the Supreme Court (Ginsburg, Sandra Day O'Connor, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan) was unveiled at the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C.[257][258]
Researchers at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History gave a species of praying mantis the name Ilomantis ginsburgae after Ginsburg. The name was given because the neck plate of the Ilomantis ginsburgae bears a resemblance to a jabot, which Ginsburg was known for wearing. Moreover, the new species was identified based upon the female insect's genitalia instead of based upon the male of the species. The researchers noted that the name was a nod to Ginsburg's fight for gender equality.[259][260]
In 2018 Ginsburg was the inaugural recipient of the Genesis Lifetime Achievement achievement award.[261]
Ginsburg was the recipient of the 2019 $1 million Berggruen Prize for Philosophy and Culture.[262][263] Awarded annually, the Berggruen Institute stated it recognizes "thinkers whose ideas have profoundly shaped human self-understanding and advancement in a rapidly changing world",[264] noting Ginsburg as "a lifelong trailblazer for human rights and gender equality".[265] Ginsburg donated the entirety of the prize money to charitable and non-profit organizations, including the Malala Fund, Hand in Hand: Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Israel, the American Bar Foundation, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Washington Concert Opera.[266] Ginsburg received numerous additional awards, including the LBJ Foundation's Liberty & Justice for All Award, the World Peace & Liberty Award from international legal groups, a lifetime achievement award from Diane von Furstenberg's foundation, and the 2020 Liberty Medal by the National Constitution Center all in 2020 alone.[267][268] In February 2020, she received the World Peace & Liberty Award from the World Jurist Association and the World Law Foundation.[269]
In 2019, the Skirball Cultural Center in Los Angeles created Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg,[270] a large-scale exhibition focusing on Ginsburg's life and career.[271][272]
In 2019 Ginsburg and the Dwight D. Opperman Foundation established the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Woman of Leadership Award.[273] Ginsburg presented the first award in February 2020 to arts patron and philanthropist Agnes Gund.[274] In March 2024, the organization had changed its award guidelines, with four of the five awards going to men. Notably, the list included Elon Musk and Rupert Murdoch, whose views are seen as incompatible with the liberal justice's; her family distanced itself from the award and asked for her name to be removed from it.[273][275][276] On March 18, 2024, chairperson Julie Opperman announced that the year's awards would not be given out and that the foundation would "reconsider its mission and make a judgment about how or whether to proceed in the future."[277]
The U.S. Navy announced on March 31, 2022, that it will name one of its John Lewis-class replenishment oilers the USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg.[278]
In August 2022, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hall, a residence hall at Cornell University, opened its doors to the Class of 2026.[279][280] An elementary school in Chicago was named to honor her in 2024. [281]
In March 2023, a special memorial session of the Supreme Court honored Ginburg[282] Also in 2023, Ginsburg was featured on a USPS Forever stamp. The stamp was designed by art director Ethel Kessler, using an oil painting by Michael J. Deas based on a photograph by Philip Bermingham.[283]
In popular culture
Ginsburg has been referred to as a "pop culture icon"[284][285][286] and also an "American cultural icon".[287] Ginsburg's profile began to rise after O'Connor's retirement in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only serving female justice. Her increasingly fiery dissents, particularly in Shelby County v. Holder, led to the creation of a sobriquet, "the Notorious R.B.G." (a takeoff on the name of a rap star, the Notorious B.I.G.), which became an internet meme. The name beginning on Tumblr.[288] The Tumblr blogger who coined the meme, law student Shana Knizhnik, teamed up with MSNBC reporter Irin Carmon to turn the contents of the blog into a book titled Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.[289] Published in October 2015, the book became a New York Times bestseller.[290] In 2016, the progressive magazine Current Affairs criticized Ginsburg's status as an icon of progressivism, noting that her voting record was significantly more moderate than deceased justices Thurgood Marshall, William J. Brennan Jr., and William O. Douglas, and that she often sided with law enforcement in qualified immunity cases.[291]
In 2015, Ginsburg and Scalia, known for their shared love of opera, were fictionalized in Scalia/Ginsburg,[292][293] an opera by Derrick Wang broadcast on national radio on November 7, 2020.[294][295] The opera was introduced before Ginsburg and Scalia at the Supreme Court in 2013,[296] and Ginsburg attended the 2015 Castleton Festival world premiere[297][298] as well as a revised version[299] at the 2017 Glimmerglass Festival.[300] Ginsburg, who with Scalia wrote forewords to Wang's libretto,[301] included excerpts from the opera as a chapter in her book My Own Words,[302][303] quoted it in her official statement on Scalia's death,[304] and spoke about it frequently.[305][306][307]
Additionally, Ginsburg's pop culture appeal has inspired nail art, Halloween costumes, a bobblehead doll, tattoos, t-shirts, coffee mugs, and a children's coloring book among other things.[289][308][309] She appears in both a comic opera and a workout book.[309] Musician Jonathan Mann also made a song using part of her Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. dissent.[310] Ginsburg admitted to having a "large supply" of Notorious R.B.G. t-shirts, which she distributed as gifts.[311]
Since 2015, Kate McKinnon has portrayed Ginsburg on Saturday Night Live.[312] McKinnon has repeatedly reprised the role, including during a Weekend Update sketch that aired from the 2016 Republican National Convention in Cleveland.[313][314] The segments typically feature McKinnon (as Ginsburg) lobbing insults she calls "Ginsburns" and doing a celebratory dance.[315][316] Filmmakers Betsy West and Julie Cohen created a documentary about Ginsburg, titled RBG, for CNN Films, which premiered at the 2018 Sundance Film Festival.[317][34] In the film Deadpool 2 (2018), a photo of her is shown as Deadpool considers her for his X-Force, a team of superheroes.[318] Another film, On the Basis of Sex, focusing on Ginsburg's career struggles fighting for equal rights, was released later in 2018; its screenplay was named to the Black List of best unproduced screenplays of 2014.[319] English actress Felicity Jones portrays Ginsburg in the film, with Armie Hammer as her husband Marty.[320] Ginsburg herself has a cameo in the film.[321] The seventh season of the sitcom New Girl features a three-year-old character named Ruth Bader Schmidt, named after Ginsburg.[322] A Lego mini-figurine of Ginsburg is shown within a brief segment of The Lego Movie 2. Ginsburg gave her blessing for the cameo, as well as to have the mini-figurine produced as part of the Lego toy sets following the film's release in February 2019.[323] Also in 2019, Samuel Adams released a limited-edition beer called When There Are Nine, referring to Ginsburg's well-known reply to the question about when there would be enough women on the Supreme Court.[324]
In the sitcom The Good Place, the "craziest secret celebrity hookup" was Ginsburg and Canadian rapper Drake, whom protagonist Tahani reveals she set up as a "perfect couple".[325]
Sisters in Law (2015), a book by Linda Hirshman, follows the careers and judicial records of Sandra Day O'Connor and Ginsburg.[326]
In 2018, Ginsburg appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, which featured her following her regular workout routine accompanied by Stephen Colbert joking with her and attempting to perform the same routine. She also answered a few questions and weighed in on the famous internet question and ongoing debate "Is a hot dog a sandwich?" She ultimately ruled that, based on Colbert's definition of a sandwich, a hot dog is a sandwich.[327][328]
See also
- Bill Clinton Supreme Court candidates § Ruth Bader Ginsburg nomination
- List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
- List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States (Seat 6)
- List of U.S. Supreme Court cases during the Rehnquist Court
- List of U.S. Supreme Court cases during the Roberts Court
- List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office
- List of Jewish United States Supreme Court justices
Notes
- ^ A play on the stage name of rapper the Notorious B.I.G.
- ^ The dean later claimed he was trying to learn students' stories.
- ^ According to Ginsburg, Justice William O. Douglas hired the first female Supreme Court clerk in 1944, and the second female law clerk was not hired until 1966.[29]
- ^ Ginsburg listed Dorothy Kenyon and Pauli Murray as co-authors on the brief in recognition of their contributions to feminist legal argument.[49]
- ^ Janet Benshoof, the president of the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, made a similar comparison between Ginsburg and Marshall in 1993.[32]
- ^ The three negative votes came from Don Nickles (R-Oklahoma), Bob Smith (R-New Hampshire) and Jesse Helms (R-North Carolina), while Donald W. Riegle Jr. (D-Michigan) did not vote.[80]
- ^ Felix Frankfurter was the first nominee to answer questions before Congress in 1939.[82] The issue of how much nominees are expected to answer arose during hearings for O'Connor and Scalia.[82]
- ^ Ginsburg remained the only female justice on the Court until Sotomayor was sworn in on August 7, 2009.[88]
- ^ The 2018 case of Sessions v. Dimaya marked the first time Ginsburg was able to assign a majority opinion, when Justice Neil Gorsuch voted with the liberal wing. Ginsburg assigned the opinion to Justice Elena Kagan.[92]
- ^ Rosa Parks was the first woman to lie in honor at the U.S. Capitol in 2005.
References
- ^ Roth, Gabe (February 3, 2020). "Why Are Supreme Court Justices Registered as Democrats and Republicans?". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg". National Women's History Museum. Archived from the original on August 11, 2021. Retrieved August 11, 2021.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg". HISTORY. Archived from the original on March 29, 2021. Retrieved September 21, 2020.
- ^ a b c d Richter, Paul (June 15, 1993). "Clinton Picks Moderate Judge Ruth Ginsburg for High Court: Judiciary: President calls the former women's rights activist a healer and consensus builder. Her nomination is expected to win easy Senate approval". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 1, 2016. Retrieved February 19, 2016.
- ^ Kelley, Lauren (October 27, 2015). "How Ruth Bader Ginsburg Became the 'Notorious RBG'". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 25, 2019. Retrieved January 24, 2019.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Biography & Facts | Britannica". Encyclopædia Britannica. September 14, 2023. Retrieved September 30, 2023.
- ^ Biskupic, Joan (August 2014). "U.S. Justice Ginsburg hits back at liberals who want her to retire". Reuters. Archived from the original on July 11, 2021. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
- ^ a b Dominu, Susan; Savage, Charlie (September 25, 2020). "The Quiet 2013 Lunch That Could Have Altered Supreme Court History". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2021.
- ^ Prokop, Andrew (September 24, 2014). "Some liberals want Ruth Bader Ginsburg to retire. Here's her response". Vox. VoxMedia. Archived from the original on July 11, 2021. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
- ^ Thomson-DeVeaux, Amelia; Bronner, Laura; Wiederkehr, Anna (September 22, 2020). "What The Supreme Court's Unusually Big Jump To The Right Might Look Like". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 25, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "Women of Interest—Ruth Bader Ginsburg". The Voice. October 21, 2020. Archived from the original on October 29, 2020. Retrieved October 26, 2020.
- ^ a b c Bader Ginsburg, Ruth; Harnett, Mary; Williams, Wendy W. (2016). My Own Words. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1501145247.
- ^ Kaplan Sommer, Allison (September 19, 2020). "Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg Had an Intimate, Yet Ambivalent, Relationship With Judaism and Israel". Haaretz. Archived from the original on December 15, 2020. Retrieved December 11, 2020.
- ^ De Hart 2020, p. 13.
- ^ a b c d e "Ruth Bader Ginsburg". The Oyez Project. Chicago-Kent College of Law. Archived from the original on March 19, 2007. Retrieved August 24, 2009.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link) - ^ a b c d e Galanes, Philip (November 14, 2015). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Gloria Steinem on the Unending Fight for Women's Rights". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 15, 2015. Retrieved November 15, 2015.
- ^ a b Scanlon, Jennifer (1999). Significant contemporary American feminists: a biographical sourcebook. Greenwood Press. p. 118. ISBN 978-0313301254. OCLC 237329773.
- ^ "When Vladimir Nabokov Taught Ruth Bader Ginsburg, His Most Famous Student, To Care Deeply About Writing | Open Culture". Archived from the original on January 22, 2021. Retrieved April 4, 2021.
- ^ "How Lolita Author Vladimir Nabokov Helped Ruth Bader Ginsburg Find Her Voice". mentalfloss.com. October 26, 2020. Archived from the original on March 5, 2021. Retrieved April 4, 2021.
- ^ a b c Hensley, Thomas R.; Hale, Kathleen; Snook, Carl (2006). The Rehnquist Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy. ABC-CLIO Supreme Court Handbooks (hardcover ed.). Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. p. 92. ISBN 1576072002. LCCN 2006011011. Archived from the original on August 19, 2020. Retrieved October 1, 2009.
- ^ "A Conversation with Ruth Bader Ginsburg at Harvard Law School". Harvard Law School. February 7, 2013. Archived from the original on January 21, 2014. Retrieved February 22, 2014.
- ^ a b c Margolick, David (June 25, 1993). "Trial by Adversity Shapes Jurist's Outlook". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
- ^ Bader Ginsburg, Ruth (2004). "The Changing Complexion of Harvard Law School" (PDF). Harvard Women's Law Journal. 27: 303. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 16, 2013. Retrieved December 9, 2012.
- ^ Anas, Brittany (September 20, 2012). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg at CU-Boulder: Gay marriage likely to come before Supreme Court within a year". Orlando Sentinel. Archived from the original on January 15, 2013. Retrieved December 9, 2012.
- ^ Hope, Judith Richards (2003). Pinstripes and Pearls (1st ed.). New York: A Lisa Drew Book/Scribner. pp. 104–109. ISBN 9781416575252. Retrieved December 27, 2018.
pinstripes and pearls.
- ^ Magill, M. Elizabeth (November 11, 2013). "At the U.S. Supreme Court: A Conversation with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Stanford Lawyer. Fall 2013 (89). Archived from the original on September 15, 2017. Retrieved July 8, 2017.
- ^ De Hart, Jane Sherron (2020) [2018]. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life. New York: Vintage Books. pp. 73–77. ISBN 9781984897831. Archived from the original on January 29, 2022. Retrieved December 20, 2020.
- ^ a b Toobin, Jeffrey (2007). The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court, New York, Doubleday, p. 82. ISBN 978-0385516402
- ^ a b Cooper, Cynthia L. (Summer 2008). "Women Supreme Court Clerks Striving for "Commonplace"" (PDF). Perspectives. 17 (1): 18–22. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 6, 2019. Retrieved July 9, 2016.
- ^ "A Brief Biography of Justice Ginsburg". Columbia Law School. Archived from the original on June 24, 2016. Retrieved July 9, 2016.
- ^ a b Liptak, Adam (February 10, 2010). "Kagan Says Her Path to Supreme Court Was Made Smoother by Ginsburg's". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 1, 2015. Retrieved July 9, 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Lewis, Neil A. (June 15, 1993). "The Supreme Court: Woman in the News; Rejected as a Clerk, Chosen as a Justice: Ruth Joan Bader Ginsburg". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on July 17, 2016. Retrieved September 17, 2016.
- ^ Greenhouse, Linda (August 30, 2006). "Women Suddenly Scarce Among Justices' Clerks". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 25, 2009. Retrieved June 27, 2010.
- ^ a b Syckle, Katie Van (January 22, 2018). "This Is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's #MeToo Story". The Cut. Archived from the original on January 22, 2018. Retrieved January 22, 2018.
- ^ "Tribute to Hans Smit by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg". law.columbia.edu. Retrieved June 25, 2022.
- ^ "Columbia Law School professor inspired by the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg". wusa9.com. September 24, 2020. Retrieved June 25, 2022.
- ^ Bader Ginsburg, Ruth; Bruzelius, Anders (1965). Civil Procedure in Sweden. Martinus Nijhoff. OCLC 3303361. Archived from the original on January 4, 2016. Retrieved October 17, 2015.
- ^ Riesenfeld, Stefan A. (June 1967). "Reviewed Works: Civil Procedure in Sweden by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anders Bruzelius; Civil Procedure in Italy by Mauro Cappelletti, Joseph M. Perillo". Columbia Law Review. 67 (6): 1176–78. doi:10.2307/1121050. JSTOR 1121050.
- ^ Bayer, Linda N. (2000). Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Women of Achievement). Philadelphia. Chelsea House, p. 46. ISBN 978-0791052877.
- ^ Kleen, Björn af (September 19, 2020). "Kombination av sprödhet och jävlar anamma bidrog till hennes status som legendar" [The combination of fragility and taking on devils contributed to her status as a legend]. Dagens Nyheter. Archived from the original on September 29, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
- ^ "Tiden i Sverige avgörande för Ruth Bader Ginsburgs kamp" [Her time in Sweden was crucial for Ruth Bader Ginsburg's struggle]. Dagens Nyheter. September 19, 2020. Archived from the original on September 24, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
- ^ a b Hill Kay, Herma (2004). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Professor of Law". Colum. L. Rev. 104 (2): 2–20. Archived from the original on March 22, 2016. Retrieved July 9, 2016.
- ^ a b c d e "Ginsburg, Ruth Bader". FJC.gov. Federal Judicial Center. Archived from the original on April 29, 2018. Retrieved April 28, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Toobin, Jeffrey (March 11, 2013). "Heavyweight: How Ruth Bader Ginsburg has moved the Supreme Court". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on February 17, 2016. Retrieved February 28, 2016.
- ^ "About the Reporter". Women's Rights Law Reporter. Archived from the original on July 8, 2008. Retrieved June 29, 2008.
Founded in 1970 by now-Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and feminist activists, legal workers, and law students ...
- ^ Magill, M. Elizabeth (November 11, 2013). "At the U.S. Supreme Court: A Conversation with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Stanford Law School. Archived from the original on September 15, 2017. Retrieved July 8, 2017.
- ^ Pullman, Sandra (March 7, 2006). "Tribute: The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and WRP Staff" Archived March 19, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. ACLU.org. Retrieved November 18, 2010.
- ^ "Supreme Court Decisions & Women's Rights—Milestones to Equality Breaking New Ground—Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971)". The Supreme Court Historical Society. Archived from the original on February 28, 2016. Retrieved February 28, 2016.
- ^ Kerber, Linda K. (August 1, 1993). "Judge Ginsburg's Gift". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 5, 2017. Retrieved July 9, 2016.
- ^ a b c d Williams, Wendy W. (2013). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Equal Protection Clause: 1970–80". Columbia Journal of Gender and Law. 25: 41–49. Archived from the original on March 5, 2017. Retrieved March 13, 2016.
- ^ Carmon, Irin; Knizhnik, Shana (2017). "A Response". Signs. 42 (3): 797. doi:10.1086/689745. S2CID 151760112. Archived from the original on May 8, 2022. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ Tabacco Mar, Ria (September 19, 2020). "The forgotten time Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought against forced sterilization". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 26, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "Cox complaint". The Washington Post. September 19, 2020. Archived from the original on October 26, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ Bazelon, Emily (July 7, 2009). "The Place of Women on the Court". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 24, 2017. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ Bazelon, Emily (October 19, 2012). "Justice Ginsburg Sets the Record Straight on Abortion and Population Control". Slate. Archived from the original on September 24, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "Did Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cite 'Population Growth' Concerns When Roe v. Wade Was Decided?". Snopes.com. December 17, 2018. Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ Millhiser, Ian (August 30, 2011). "Justice Ginsburg: If I Were Nominated Today, My Women's Rights Work For The ACLU Would Probably Disqualify Me". ThinkProgress. Archived from the original on February 23, 2017. Retrieved June 1, 2017.
- ^ a b Von Drehle, David (July 19, 1993). "Redefining Fair With a Simple Careful Assault—Step-by-Step Strategy Produced Strides for Equal Protection". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 24, 2009.
- ^ Labaton, Stephen (June 16, 1993). "Senators See Easy Approval for Nominee". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 29, 2018. Retrieved December 29, 2018.
- ^ Scalia, Antonin (April 16, 2015). "The 100 Most Influential People: Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Time. Archived from the original on December 9, 2016. Retrieved December 9, 2016.
- ^ De Hart 2020, p. 277.
- ^ Carter, Jimmy. "Statement on Signing H.R. 7843 Into Law: Appointments of Additional District and Circuit Judges". The American Presidency Project. UC Santa Barbara. Archived from the original on September 24, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "Public Law 95-486" (PDF). United States Statutes at Large. 92: 1629–34. October 20, 1978. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 2, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ a b De Hart 2020, p. 278.
- ^ De Hart 2020, pp. 286–291.
- ^ Drehle, David Von (July 18, 1993). "Conventional Roles Hid a Revolutionary Intellect". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 19, 2016. Retrieved September 16, 2016.
- ^ Marcus, Ruth; Schmidt, Susan (June 22, 1986). "Scalia Tenacious After Staking Out a Position". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 19, 2016. Retrieved September 16, 2016.
- ^ "Judges of the D. C. Circuit Courts". Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit. Archived from the original on February 25, 2016. Retrieved February 19, 2016.
- ^ Fulwood III, Sam (August 4, 1993). "Ginsburg Confirmed as 2nd Woman on Supreme Court". Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458-3035. Archived from the original on March 5, 2017. Retrieved September 16, 2016.
- ^ Beaupre Gillespie, Becky (July 27, 2016). "My Chicago Law Moment: 50 Years Later, Federal Appellate Judge David Tatel, '66, Still Thinks About the Concepts He Learned as a 1L". law.uchicago.edu. University of Chicago Law School. Archived from the original on December 8, 2016. Retrieved June 9, 2017.
- ^ "Ginsburg, Ruth Bader". Federal Judicial Center. Archived from the original on April 29, 2018. Retrieved September 21, 2020.
- ^ Hatch, Orrin (2003), Square Peg: Confessions of a Citizen Senator, Basic Books, p. 180, ISBN 0465028675[permanent dead link ]
- ^ Berke, Richard L. (June 15, 1993). "Clinton Names Ruth Ginsburg, Advocate for Women, to Court". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved September 21, 2020.
- ^ Rudin, Ken (May 8, 2009). "The 'Jewish Seat' On The Supreme Court". NPR. Archived from the original on February 19, 2016. Retrieved February 19, 2016.
- ^ Pomante, Michael J. II; Schraufnagel, Scot (April 6, 2018). Historical Dictionary of the Barack Obama Administration. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 166–. ISBN 978-1-5381-1152-9. Archived from the original on March 15, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2018.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg On Dissent, The Holocaust And Fame". Forward.com. February 11, 2018. Archived from the original on July 30, 2018. Retrieved July 30, 2018.
- ^ a b Comiskey, Michael (June 1994). "The Usefulness of Senate Confirmation Hearings for Judicial Nominees: The Case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg". PS: Political Science & Politics. 27 (2). American Political Science Association: 224–27. doi:10.1017/S1049096500040476. JSTOR 420276.
- ^ a b Lewis, Neil A. (July 22, 1993). "The Supreme Court; Ginsburg Deflects Pressure to Talk on Death Penalty". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 16, 2016. Retrieved March 15, 2016.
- ^ Bennard, Kristina Silja (August 2005), The Confirmation Hearings of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Answering Questions While Maintaining Judicial Impartiality (PDF), Washington, D.C.: American Constitution Society, archived from the original (PDF) on July 15, 2018, retrieved June 10, 2017
- ^ "Project Vote Smart". Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved December 19, 2010.
- ^ "Members of the Supreme Court of the United States". Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original on April 29, 2010. Retrieved April 26, 2010.
- ^ a b c d Stolberg, Sheryl Gay (September 5, 2005). "Roberts Rx: Speak Up, but Shut Up". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 20, 2018. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
- ^ "Bench Memos: Ginsburg on Roberts Hearings". National Review. September 29, 2005. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved September 18, 2009.
- ^ Lewis, Neil A. (July 21, 1993). "The Supreme Court: Ginsburg Promises Judicial Restraint If She Joins Court". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 31, 2017. Retrieved June 11, 2017.
- ^ "The Supreme Court: In Her Own Words: Ruth Bader Ginsburg". The New York Times. June 15, 1993. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on January 18, 2018. Retrieved June 11, 2017.
- ^ Sunstein, Cass R. (2009). "A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before". Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved April 2, 2017.
- ^ Biskupic, Joan (May 7, 2010). "Ginsburg: Court Needs Another Woman". USA Today. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved April 2, 2017 – via ABC News.
- ^ Harris, Paul (August 8, 2009). "Sonia Sotomayor sworn in as first Hispanic supreme court judge". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved April 2, 2017.
- ^ a b Greenhouse, Linda (May 31, 2007). "In dissent, Ginsburg finds her voice at Supreme Court". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved April 1, 2017.
- ^ a b c d Bravin, Jess (May 2, 2014). "For Now, Justice Ginsburg's 'Pathmarking' Doesn't Include Retirement". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved June 26, 2016.
- ^ Bisupic, Joan (July 4, 2013). "Exclusive: Supreme Court's Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 17, 2016. Retrieved July 4, 2016.
- ^ Stern, Mark Joseph (April 18, 2018). "A Milestone for Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Slate. Archived from the original on September 4, 2018. Retrieved September 4, 2018.
- ^ Adler, Jonathan H. "Opinion | Supreme Court clerks are not a particularly diverse lot". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 4, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ Mauro, Tony (December 11, 2017). "Mostly White and Male: Diversity Still Lags Among SCOTUS Law Clerks". National Law Journal. Archived from the original on September 24, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "Re: Vapors from Greenhouse". National Review. August 30, 2006. Archived from the original on December 5, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ Lepore, Jill. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Unlikely Path to the Supreme Court". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on September 28, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "People are pointing out something 'troubling' about a photo from RBG's memorial". indy100. September 25, 2020. Archived from the original on October 1, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "Examining Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Complicated Legacy On Race". NewsOne. September 12, 2020. Archived from the original on September 26, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ Jones Merritt, Deborah; Lieberman, David M. (January 1, 2014). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg 's Jurisprudence of Opportunity and Equality". Colum. L. Rev. 104. Archived from the original on November 28, 2015. Retrieved April 3, 2016.
- ^ Biskupic, Joan (June 27, 1996). "Supreme Court Invalidates Exclusion of Women by VMI". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 27, 2016. Retrieved July 12, 2016.
- ^ Bartlett, Katharine T. (2011). "Unconstitutionally Male?: The Story of United States v. Virginia". In Schneider, Elizabeth M.; Wildman, Stephanie M. (eds.). Women and the Law Stories. Thomson Reuters. ISBN 9781599415895. Archived from the original on October 27, 2020. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
- ^ Barnes, Robert (May 30, 2007). "Over Ginsburg's Dissent, Court Limits Bias Suits". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on April 3, 2017. Retrieved April 1, 2017.
- ^ a b Toobin, Jeffrey (June 24, 2013). "Will Ginsburg's Ledbetter Play Work Twice?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved April 1, 2017.
- ^ de Vogue, Ariane; Simon, Jeff (February 12, 2015). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Down with 'Notorious R.B.G.'". CNN. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved April 1, 2017.
- ^ a b Wolf, Richard (July 31, 2013). "Ginsburg's dedication undimmed after 20 years on court". USA Today. Archived from the original on March 5, 2017. Retrieved April 1, 2017.
- ^ Bazelon, Emily (July 7, 2009). "The Place of Women on the Court". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 24, 2011. Retrieved September 1, 2010.
- ^ Pusey, Allen. "Ginsburg: Court should have avoided broad-based decision in Roe v. Wade", ABA Journal, May 13, 2013 Archived March 6, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved July 5, 2013.
- ^ a b Hirshman, Linda (June 27, 2016). "How Ruth Bader Ginsburg just won the next abortion fight". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
- ^ a b Green, Emma (June 27, 2016). "Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg Came Out Hard Against TRAP Laws When No Other Justice Would". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
- ^ Lederman, Marty (May 31, 2005). "Cutter v. Wilkinson". SCOTUSblog.
- ^ "Exempting Religious Groups From General Requirements". Pew Research Center. October 23, 2008.
- ^ Merchant, Anusha (October 4, 2022). "Religious Freedom For All?: Determining What is Left of First Amendment Protections for America's Incarcerated". Columbia University Undergraduate Law Review.
- ^ Vile, John (January 1, 2008). "Cutter v. Wilkinson (2005)". Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University.
- ^ Russo, Charles (July 12, 2011). "Another Nail in the Coffin of Religious Freedom? Christian Legal Society v. Martinez". Education Law Journal – via Academia.edu.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (June 23, 2023). "Justices Rule Against Group That Excludes Gay Students". The New York Times.
- ^ "High Court Rules Against Campus Christian Group". Pew Research Center. June 28, 2010.
- ^ Denniston, Lyle (June 28, 2010). "Analysis: A fatal stipulation". SCOTUSblog.
- ^ Greenstein, Nicole (July 31, 2013). "Student Drug Testing". Time.
- ^ Proctor, Thomas (December 1, 2005). "Constitutionality of Testing High School Male Athletes for Steroids Under Vernonia School District v. Acton and Board of Education v. Earls". Brighim Young University Law Review.
- ^ Greenhouse, Linda (June 28, 2002). "THE SUPREME COURT: DRUG TESTS; Justices Allow Schools Wider Use Of Random Drug Tests for Pupils". The New York Times.
- ^ Walsh, Mark (September 18, 2020). "What Ruth Bader Ginsburg Meant to Education". Education Week.
- ^ a b c Liptak, Adam (June 26, 2009). "Supreme Court Says Child's Rights Violated by Strip Search". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 11, 2017. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- ^ Biskupic, Joan (October 5, 2009). "Ginsburg: Court needs another woman". USA Today. Archived from the original on October 24, 2012. Retrieved December 8, 2009.
- ^ a b Tribe, Laurence; Matz, Joshua (June 3, 2014). Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0805099096. Archived from the original on March 31, 2017. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
- ^ "Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (2009)". Justia Law. Retrieved May 9, 2021.
- ^ Denniston, Lyle (January 26, 2009). "Analysis: More power for police, more immunity for prosecutors". SCOTUSblog.
- ^ "United States Supreme Court Upholds Frisk of Passenger in Lawfully Stopped Auto". Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute. January 17, 2009.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (April 21, 2015). "Justices Rule that Police Can't Extend Traffic Stops". The New York Times.
- ^ Little, Rory (June 21, 2015). "Opinion analysis: Traffic stops can't last too long or go too far, and no extra dog sniffs!". SCOTUSblog.
- ^ Joseph Stern, Mark (April 21, 2015). "The Ferguson Effect Chief Justice Roberts rules against police abuse at the Supreme Court. Maybe he finally gets it". Slate.
- ^ Farb, Bob (January 27, 2016). "Update on U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling in Rodriguez v. United States Concerning Extension of Traffic Stops". North Carolina Criminal Law.
- ^ Kerr, Orin (April 21, 2015). "Police can't delay traffic stops to investigate crimes absent suspicion, Supreme Court rules". The Washington Post.
- ^ a b Anker, Deborah E. (2013). "Grutter v. Bollinger: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Legitimization of the Role of Comparative and International Law in U.S. Jurisprudence" (PDF). Harvard Law Review. 127: 425. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 5, 2017. Retrieved April 10, 2016.
- ^ Resnik, Judith (2013). "Opening the Door: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Law's Boundaries, and the Gender of Opportunities". Faculty Scholarship Series: 83. Archived from the original on December 18, 2015.
- ^ Schwartz, John (June 25, 2013). "Between the Lines of the Voting Rights Act Opinion". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved June 25, 2013.
- ^ Heriot, Gail (2004). "Thoughts on Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger as Law and as Practical Politics". Loyola University Chicago Law Journal. 36: 137. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "RBG's Mixed Record on Race and Criminal Justice". The Marshall Project. September 23, 2020. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
- ^ a b c d Goldberg, Carole (2009). "Finding the Way to Indian Country: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Decisions in Indian Law Cases" (PDF). Ohio State Law Journal. 70 (4). Archived (PDF) from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved September 22, 2020.
- ^ Pappas, George D. (2017). The Literary and Legal Genealogy of Native American Dispossession: The Marshall Trilogy Cases. New York: Routledge. pp. 217–218. ISBN 9781138188723. Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved September 21, 2020.
- ^ Gadoua, Renee K. (September 9, 2014). "Nuns to pope: Revoke 15th-century doctrine that allows Christians to seize native land". The Washington Post. Religion News Service. Archived from the original on October 4, 2020. Retrieved September 21, 2020.
In 2005, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg cited the Doctrine of Discovery in a land-claim ruling against the Oneidas, one of the six nations of the Haudenosaunee.
- ^ Johansen, Bruce E.; Pritzker, Barry M. (2008). Encyclopedia of American Indian History: Volume I. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-85109-817-0. Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved September 21, 2020.
- ^ Wamsley, Laurel (July 9, 2020). "Supreme Court Rules That About Half Of Oklahoma Is Native American Land". NPR. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved September 21, 2020.
- ^ Blackwell, Geoff; Hobday, Ruth (2020). Ruth Bader Ginsburg: I Know This to Be True. Chronicle Books. p. 64. ISBN 978-1-7972-0016-3. Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
- ^ Longfellow, Emily (2000). "Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services: A New Look At Environmental Standing" (PDF). Environs. 24 (1): 5. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ Grandoni, Dino (September 28, 2020). "The Energy 202: How Amy Coney Barrett may make it harder for environmentalists to win in court". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 13, 2020. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
- ^ a b c Sherman, Mark (August 3, 2010). "Ginsburg says no plans to leave Supreme Court". The Boston Globe. Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 28, 2011. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
- ^ de Vogue, Ariana (February 4, 2010). "White House Prepares for Possibility of 2 Supreme Court Vacancies". ABC News. Archived from the original on November 27, 2010. Retrieved August 6, 2010.
- ^ "At Supreme Court, no one rushes into retirement". USA Today. July 13, 2008. Archived from the original on September 27, 2009. Retrieved August 6, 2010.
- ^ Bernstein, Jonathan (November 29, 2013). "Yes, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg should still retire". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 19, 2016. Retrieved June 26, 2016.
- ^ a b Cohen, Michael (February 14, 2014). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg should do all liberals a favor and retire now". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 18, 2016. Retrieved June 26, 2016.
- ^ Chemerinsky, Erwin (March 15, 2014). "Much depends on Ginsburg". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on August 15, 2016. Retrieved June 26, 2016.
- ^ "Justice Ginsburg not leaving court 'anytime soon'". USA Today. Associated Press. July 2, 2011. Archived from the original on October 21, 2016. Retrieved June 12, 2016.
- ^ Davidson, Amy (September 24, 2014). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Retirement Dissent". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on June 9, 2016. Retrieved June 26, 2016.
- ^ Biskupic, Joan. Exclusive: Supreme Court's Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Reuters, July 4, 2013.
- ^ Hirshman, Linda (September 18, 2020). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg had a vision for America. Her colleagues thwarted it". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 20, 2020. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
- ^ Totenberg, Nina (September 18, 2020). "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87". NPR. Archived from the original on September 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ "Swearing-In Ceremony for President William J. Clinton". Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. Archived from the original on February 25, 2016. Retrieved February 22, 2016.
- ^ Fabian, Jordan (January 4, 2013). "Sotomayor to Swear In VP Biden". ABC News. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved September 10, 2016.
- ^ "Justice Ginsburg officiates at same-sex wedding". Fox News. September 1, 2013. Archived from the original on September 2, 2013. Retrieved September 3, 2013.
- ^ a b Barnes, Robert (August 30, 2016). "Ginsburg to officiate same-sex wedding". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved December 9, 2016.
- ^ Henderson, Greg (August 31, 2016). "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Officiates Same-Sex Marriage". NPR. Archived from the original on December 6, 2016. Retrieved December 9, 2016.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she will serve as long as she has 'steam'". The Jerusalem Post. February 2, 2018. Archived from the original on July 30, 2018. Retrieved July 30, 2018.
- ^ Pallante, Maria A. (October 14, 2020). "Ginsburg, Scalia, and Possibly Barrett, on Copyright – AAP". Retrieved October 6, 2023.
- ^ Biskupic, Joan (August 24, 2009). "Ginsburg, Scalia Strike a Balance". USA Today. Archived from the original on January 17, 2008.
- ^ Buono, Alla Vita (October 24, 2013). "The World Premiere of Dolores Claiborne, an Opera by Tobias Picker". GEV Magazine. Archived from the original on July 30, 2017. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ Lebrecht, Norman (April 20, 2016). "US Composer is Married by Supreme Court Justice". Slipped Disc. Archived from the original on April 11, 2019. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ Bader Ginsburg, Ruth (July 13, 2015). "My First Opera". OPERA America. Archived from the original on July 22, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
- ^ Amatulli, Jenna (November 14, 2016). "The Glorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was in an Opera this Weekend". HuffPost. Archived from the original on November 15, 2016. Retrieved November 15, 2016.
- ^ "U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Visits Egypt" (Press release). U.S. Embassy Cairo. January 28, 2012. Archived from the original on March 3, 2012. Retrieved February 5, 2012.
- ^ "Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg Expresses Admiration for Egyptian Revolution and Democratic Transition" (Press release). U.S. Embassy Cairo. February 1, 2012. Archived from the original on February 10, 2012. Retrieved February 5, 2012.
- ^ de Vogue, Ariane (February 3, 2012). "Ginsburg Likes S. Africa as Model for Egypt". ABC News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2012. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg, No Fan of Donald Trump, Critiques Latest Term". The New York Times. July 10, 2016. Archived from the original on February 16, 2017. Retrieved February 18, 2017.
- ^ Williams, Pete; Merod, Anna; Frumin, Aliyah (July 13, 2016). "Did Ginsburg Go Too Far in Criticism of Trump?". NBC News. Archived from the original on October 19, 2016. Retrieved October 17, 2016.
- ^ "Ruth Ginsburg Apologizes for Criticizing Trump". The New York Times. July 14, 2016. Archived from the original on July 14, 2016. Retrieved July 14, 2016.
- ^ Cowles, Gregory (October 14, 2016). "The Story Behind This Week's Best Sellers". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 19, 2016. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (October 14, 2016). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg Regrets Speaking on Colin Kaepernick". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 19, 2016. Retrieved October 16, 2016.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg apologizes for criticizing anthem protests". ESPN. October 14, 2016. Archived from the original on October 15, 2016. Retrieved October 16, 2016.
- ^ de Vogue, Ariane (October 14, 2016). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg apologizes to Colin Kaepernick after criticizing anthem protest". CNN. Archived from the original on October 15, 2016. Retrieved October 16, 2016.
- ^ "Katie Couric Edited Out Controversial Comments By RBG On Kneeling Protests: Book". HuffPost. October 13, 2021. Archived from the original on October 14, 2021. Retrieved October 14, 2021.
- ^ O'Brien, Cortney (October 13, 2021). "Katie Couric admits she 'protected' Ruth Bader Ginsburg by editing out disparaging remarks on anthem kneelers". Fox News. Archived from the original on October 13, 2021. Retrieved October 14, 2021.
- ^ Wheeler, Lydia (April 27, 2017). "Ginsburg pines for more collegial court confirmations". The Hill. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020. Retrieved October 27, 2020.
- ^ a b c Totenberg, Nina (January 22, 2018). "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Reflects On The #MeToo Movement: 'It's About Time'". NPR. Archived from the original on January 22, 2018. Retrieved January 25, 2018.
- ^ Collins, Gail (February 20, 2015). "The Unsinkable R.B.G.: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has No Interest in Retiring". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 13, 2015. Retrieved April 7, 2016.
- ^ "Husband of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies". The Washington Post. June 27, 2010. Archived from the original on September 29, 2012. Retrieved June 27, 2010.
- ^ Lithwick, Dahlia. "The Mother of All Grizzlies". Slate. Archived from the original on November 13, 2013. Retrieved November 4, 2013.
- ^ Ginsburg Is Latest Justice to Reflect on Faith, The Washington Post, January 15, 2008.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg". jewishvirtuallibrary.org. Archived from the original on November 22, 2020. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
- ^ Justice Ginsburg has released a new feminist take on the Passover narrative, The Washington Post, March 18, 2015.
- ^ "Remarks by Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Ushmm.org. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. April 22, 2004. Archived from the original on May 22, 2014. Retrieved November 4, 2015.
- ^ a b c "Justice Ginsburg Exhibits Her Famous Collar Collection | Watch the video". Yahoo! News. July 31, 2014. Archived from the original on March 13, 2015. Retrieved March 20, 2015.
- ^ a b "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Owns a 'Dissenting Collar'". MAKERS. August 1, 2014. Archived from the original on March 10, 2015. Retrieved March 20, 2015.
- ^ a b "Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought for her legacy in her final Supreme Court term". CNN. August 2020. Archived from the original on September 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ Garry, Stephanie (February 6, 2009). "For Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Hopeful Signs in Grim News about Pancreatic Cancer" . St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved August 24, 2009.
- ^ a b Marimow, Ann E. (March 18, 2013). "Personal trainer Bryant Johnson's clients include two Supreme Court justices". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 19, 2016. Retrieved September 10, 2016.
- ^ Carmon, Irin; Knizhnik, Shana (October 23, 2015). "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Chooses Working Out Over Dinner with the President". Yahoo!. Archived from the original on September 21, 2016. Retrieved September 10, 2016.
- ^ Wolf, Richard (August 1, 2013). "Ginsburg's dedication undimmed after 20 years on court". USA Today. Archived from the original on November 14, 2016. Retrieved September 10, 2016.
- ^ a b Sherman, Mark (February 6, 2009). "Ginsburg could lead to Obama appointment". NBC News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 15, 2014. Retrieved September 18, 2009.
- ^ Supreme Court Press Release (February 5, 2009). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on April 4, 2018. Retrieved February 13, 2018.
- ^ Mears, Bill (February 23, 2009). "Ginsburg rejoins Supreme Court weeks after cancer surgery". CNN. Archived from the original on September 17, 2016. Retrieved September 10, 2016.
- ^ De Vogue, Ariane (February 23, 2009). "Justice Ginsburg Returns to the Bench". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 13, 2016. Retrieved September 10, 2016.
- ^ Cook, Theresa (March 3, 2009). "Justice Ginsburg Treated for Pancreatic Cancer". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 13, 2016. Retrieved September 10, 2016.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (November 26, 2014). "Ginsburg Is Recovering After Heart Surgery to Place a Stent". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 27, 2014. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ McCue, Dan (November 26, 2014). "Justice Ginsburg Has Heart Surgery". Courthouse News Service. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved November 30, 2014.
- ^ a b c Totenberg, Nina (December 21, 2018). "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Surgery For Lung Cancer". NPR. Archived from the original on December 21, 2018. Retrieved December 21, 2018.
- ^ Domonske, Camila (November 8, 2018). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hospitalized After Falling, Fracturing 3 Ribs". NPR. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020.
- ^ Romano, Aja (November 9, 2018). ""Protect RBG" memes capture cultural anxiety over the Supreme Court". Vox. Archived from the original on November 8, 2018. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
- ^ Graff, Amy (November 9, 2018). "Hips, ribs and bubble wrap: Fans are offering everything to help injured Ruth Bader Ginsburg". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on November 8, 2018. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
- ^ Richwine, Lisa (November 9, 2018). "Justice Ginsburg 'up and working' after breaking ribs, nephew says". Reuters. Archived from the original on November 9, 2018. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
- ^ Sherman, Mark (January 7, 2019). "Ginsburg misses Supreme Court arguments for the 1st time". AP NEWS. Archived from the original on January 7, 2019. Retrieved January 7, 2019.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (February 15, 2019). "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Returns to Work at Supreme Court". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ Totenberg, Nina (August 23, 2019). "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Treated Again For Cancer". NPR. Archived from the original on January 13, 2020.
- ^ Itkowitz, Colby (January 8, 2020). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg declares she's 'cancer free'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 14, 2020. Retrieved January 8, 2020.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (July 17, 2020). "Ginsburg Says Her Cancer Has Returned, but She's 'Fully Able' to Remain on Court". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 10, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ Berman, Dan (July 17, 2020). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg announces cancer recurrence". CNN. Archived from the original on September 11, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (September 18, 2020). "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dies at 87". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ Sherman, Mark (September 18, 2020). "Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies of metastatic pancreatic cancer". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ "Ginsburg's death on Rosh Hashanah significant for some Jewish Americans". The Jerusalem Post. September 20, 2020. Archived from the original on September 20, 2020. Retrieved September 10, 2020.
- ^ Davies, Emily; Miller, Michael E.; Williams, Clarence; Nirappil, Fenit (September 19, 2020). "Honoring a 'superhero' outside the Supreme Court". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 20, 2020. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
- ^ Karni, Annie (September 19, 2020). "Ginsburg Expected to Lie in Repose at the Supreme Court". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 20, 2020. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
- ^ Sherman, Mark; Barakat, Matthew (September 23, 2020). "Long lines of mourners pay respects to Ginsburg at court". AP NEWS. Archived from the original on September 25, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "Those Who Have Lain in State or in Honor in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda". Architect of the Capitol. September 24, 2020. Archived from the original on November 16, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
- ^ "What's the difference between "lying in state" and "lying in repose"". September 23, 2020. Archived from the original on September 24, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
- ^ Memmot, Mark (August 27, 2018). "'Lying in State' Vs. 'Lying in Repose' & 'Lying in Honor'". NPR. Archived from the original on September 24, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
- ^ Deese, Kaelan (September 29, 2020). "Ginsburg buried in Arlington National Cemetery". The Hill. Archived from the original on September 29, 2020. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
- ^ Totenberg, Nina (September 18, 2020). "Justice Ginsburg's Death Sets Up Political Battle In The Senate". NPR. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ Cowan, Richard (September 19, 2020). "Ginsburg death ignites fierce U.S. Senate battle – and stirs Scalia's ghost". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 21, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ Balz, Dan (September 19, 2020). "Ginsburg's death crystallizes the choice in November as no other issue can". The Washington Post. Microsoft News. Archived from the original on September 21, 2020. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
- ^ Yen, Hope; Sherman, Mark (September 23, 2020). "AP FACT CHECK: Trump's untruths on court pick, Biden's flubs". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on September 24, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
- ^ "Ginsburg, Ruth Bader". National Women's Hall of Fame. Archived from the original on November 21, 2018. Retrieved November 21, 2018.
- ^ "The 100 Most Powerful Women". Forbes. August 19, 2009. Archived from the original on March 15, 2018. Retrieved September 11, 2017.
- ^ Weiss, Debra Cassens (November 2, 2012). "Ginsburg Named One of Glamour Magazine's 'Women of the Year 2012'". ABA Journal. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved February 22, 2016.
- ^ Gibbs, Nancy (April 16, 2015). "How We Pick the TIME 100". Time. MSN. Archived from the original on July 11, 2015. Retrieved November 4, 2015.
- ^ Heun, Helga (May 15, 2019). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg receives jubilee honorary doctorate". Lund University. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
- ^ a b c Gugliotta, Guy; Randolph, Eleanor (June 15, 1993). "A Mentor, Role Model and Heroine of Feminist Lawyers". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 5, 2020. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "VLS Remembers Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Vermont Law School". www.vermontlaw.edu. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's 1992 Commencement Speech". law.lclark.edu. Archived from the original on April 10, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Commencements; New President of Columbia Asks Graduates to Lead". The New York Times. May 20, 1994. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 25, 2016. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ Hevesi, Dennis (June 3, 1994). "Commencements; Queens College Graduates Hear a Wistful Seinfeld". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 4, 2019. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ a b c "World Justice Forum IV Speaker: Ruth Bader Ginsburg". World Justice Project. Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Honorary Degrees". Smith College. Archived from the original on August 14, 2016. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ Turner, Carolyn. "RBG and the COL". blogs.illinois.edu. Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Brandeis honors Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, H'96". BrandeisNOW. Archived from the original on January 24, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Honorary Degree Recipients | GW Libraries". library.gwu.edu. Archived from the original on March 19, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Ruth Bader and Martin D. Ginsburg Speak at Commencement". College History. February 16, 2011. Archived from the original on March 18, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Recipients: Office of the Provost – Northwestern University". northwestern.edu. Archived from the original on April 18, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Six honorary degrees to be awarded this spring". ns.umich.edu. Archived from the original on April 11, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "The Brown University 234th Commencement". brown.edu. Archived from the original on January 27, 2019. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Yale Bestows Eleven Honorary Degrees During Its 302nd Commencement". YaleNews. May 29, 2003. Archived from the original on September 8, 2012. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Honorary Degrees Awarded". Johns Hopkins University Commencement. Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Statement on the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Penn Today. September 19, 2020. Archived from the original on October 6, 2020. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "WUCL Welcomes Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to Campus". Willamette University. August 25, 2008. Archived from the original on May 9, 2013. Retrieved May 8, 2013.
- ^ Dienst, Karin (June 1, 2010). "Princeton awards five honorary degrees". Princeton University. Archived from the original on June 14, 2010. Retrieved June 1, 2010.
- ^ Ireland, Corydon; Koch, Katie; Powell, Alvin; Walsh, Colleen (May 26, 2011). "Harvard awards 9 honorary degrees". Harvard Gazette. Harvard University. Archived from the original on June 2, 2011. Retrieved June 29, 2011.
- ^ "Justice Ginsburg receives SUNY honorary doctorate". buffalo.edu. Archived from the original on November 2, 2020. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ "Lifetime-Achievement Award". Scribes. Archived from the original on August 14, 2015. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
- ^ "The Four Justices |". National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution. Archived from the original on July 7, 2017. Retrieved June 7, 2017.
- ^ Reilly, Mollie (October 28, 2013). "The Women Of The Supreme Court Now Have The Badass Portrait They Deserve". HuffPost. Archived from the original on November 2, 2015. Retrieved November 2, 2015.
- ^ Camila, Domonoske (June 2, 2016). "Insect Named For Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Step Toward Equality Of The 6-Legged Sexes". NPR. Archived from the original on June 3, 2016. Retrieved June 3, 2016.
- ^ Brannoch, Sydney; Svenson, Gavin (May 2016). "Leveraging female genitalic characters for generic and species delimitation in Nilomantis Werner, 1907 and Ilomantis Giglio-Tos, 1915 (Mantodea, Nilomantinae)". Insect Systematics & Evolution. 47 (3): 209. doi:10.1163/1876312X-47032141. Archived from the original on February 17, 2020. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg | the Genesis Prize".
- ^ "Ginsburg wins Berggruen Prize for 'thinker' whose ideas changed society". The Washington Post. October 23, 2019. Archived from the original on December 9, 2019.
- ^ Hermann, Julia; Hopster, Jeroen; Kalf, Wouter; Klenk, Michael (June 16, 2020). Philosophy in the Age of Science?: Inquiries Into Philosophical Progress, Method, and Societal Relevance. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-5381-4284-4. Archived from the original on September 2, 2021. Retrieved May 2, 2021.
- ^ Wolf, Richard. "Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg awarded $1 million prize for 'thinkers' in philosophy and culture". USA Today. Archived from the original on January 4, 2020. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
- ^ "Berggruen Prize for Philosophy and Culture". Berggruen Institute. May 30, 2018. Archived from the original on December 6, 2019. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
- ^ Julia M. Chan (September 19, 2020). "How to honor RBG by supporting her favorite causes". CNN. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
- ^ "Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Receives 2020 Liberty Medal During Virtual Event". CBS 3. September 17, 2020. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved September 18, 2020.
- ^ "Ginsburg to present award named for her to philanthropist". Minnesota Lawyer. Associated Press. February 11, 2020. Archived from the original on February 19, 2020. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
- ^ "U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presented with World Peace & Liberty Award". World Jurist Association. February 13, 2020. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
- ^ "Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Skirball Cultural Center. October 19, 2016. Archived from the original on March 2, 2021. Retrieved August 3, 2022.
- ^ "Sky is the limit for the 'Notorious RBG,' and she keeps on pressin' on". Los Angeles Times. October 17, 2018. Archived from the original on January 21, 2020. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
- ^ Avila, Pamela (October 20, 2018). "There Are a Lot of Lessons to Be Learned From the Life of the Notorious RBG". Los Angeles Magazine. Archived from the original on November 8, 2019. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
- ^ a b Kim, Minho (March 15, 2024). "After R.B.G. Awards Go to Musk and Murdoch, Justice Ginsburg's Family Objects". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ "Ginsburg to present award named for her to philanthropist". AP News. February 6, 2020. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ Sneed, Tierney (March 15, 2024). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg's family dissents after award in her name is given to Elon Musk and Rupert Murdoch". CNN. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Family Denounces RBG Awards Going To Elon Musk, Rupert Murdoch". HuffPost. March 15, 2024. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
Ginburg's family described the foundation's choices as an "affront to the memory of our mother and grandmother… Ginsburg was seen as a champion for gender equality… pushing to preserve abortion rights, address the gender pay gap and protect pregnant women in the workforce… Musk, who has positioned himself as an proponent of free speech, has been criticized for endorsing antisemitic conspiracy theories and content on X (formerly Twitter). He has also faced claims from civil rights groups that his leadership has allowed hate speech to spread on the platform since he purchased it… Murdoch has been accused of spreading lies and "dangerous medical misinformation" about climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic on his various media outlets… the Justice's family has no affiliation with and does not endorse this award… the foundation "has strayed far from the original mission of the award and from what Justice Ginsburg stood for" with its recipients this year.
- ^ Judkis, Maura (March 18, 2024). "RBG Award gala canceled after Ginsburg family criticizes honorees". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
- ^ Franklin, Jonathan (April 1, 2022). "Navy will name ship after the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg". NPR. Archived from the original on April 3, 2022. Retrieved April 3, 2022.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hall Facility Information". Facilities and Campus Services. Cornell University. Retrieved June 27, 2023.
Gross Area: 162,849 sq ft
- ^ Friedlander, Blaine (August 18, 2022). "Moving in: Class of '26 students bring life to fall semester". Cornell Chronicle. Cornell University. Retrieved June 27, 2023.
- ^ Rodriguez, Marisa (November 8, 2024). "CPS school renamed after Ruth Bader". WGN-TV. Retrieved November 11, 2024.
- ^ "Supreme Court honors late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg during special ceremony". United Press International.
- ^ Chappell, Bill (October 2, 2023). "Here's the story of the portrait behind Ruth Bader Ginsburg's postage stamp". NPR.
- ^ Waldman, Paul (November 28, 2014). "Why the Supreme Court should be the biggest issue of the 2016 campaign". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 6, 2016. Retrieved February 18, 2016.
- ^ Alman, Ashley (January 16, 2015). "This Badass Tattoo Takes Ruth Bader Ginsburg Fandom To New Levels". HuffPost. Archived from the original on February 21, 2016. Retrieved February 18, 2016.
- ^ Ryan, Patrick (November 9, 2018). "'RBG': How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a legit pop-culture icon". USA Today. Archived from the original on November 9, 2018. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
- ^ "Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Museum Exhibition Description. Skirball Cultural Center. October 19, 2018. Archived from the original on March 2, 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2021.
- ^ Lithwick, Dahlia (March 16, 2015). "Justice LOLZ Grumpycat Notorious R.B.G." Slate. Archived from the original on February 25, 2016. Retrieved February 18, 2016.
- ^ a b Bazelon, Emily (December 4, 2015). "Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on December 7, 2015. Retrieved December 22, 2016.
- ^ Carmon, Irin; Knizhnik, Shana (October 27, 2015). Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Dey Street Books. ISBN 978-0062415837.
- ^ Kinder, David (March 10, 2016). "The Rise of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cult". Current Affairs (Mar/Apr 2016). Archived from the original on December 3, 2021. Retrieved December 3, 2021.
- ^ Dohony, Erin. "OperaDelaware presents 'Trial by Jury' and 'Scalia/Ginsburg'". broadstreetreview.com. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
- ^ Apel, Susan B. (October 2, 2018). "Opera Preview: 'Scalia/Ginsburg'—Mining (and Minding) the Political Gap". The Arts Fuse. Archived from the original on January 4, 2020. Retrieved April 1, 2019.
- ^ "OD Radio broadcasts | Trial by Jury & Scalia/Ginsburg". OperaDelaware. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ Dobrin, Peter (September 22, 2020). "Philadelphia's opera community pours its love for Ruth Bader Ginsburg". The Philadelphia Inquirer. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
- ^ "Scalia V. Ginsburg: Supreme Court Sparring, Put To Music". NPR. Archived from the original on January 8, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ Heil, Emily. "'Scalia/Ginsburg' opera draws VIPs of the legal world". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on December 23, 2015. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ "Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on September 18th". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on November 2, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ "Composing the Law: An Interview with Derrick Wang, Creator of the Scalia/Ginsburg Opera". americanbar.org. Archived from the original on October 29, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ "Opera Today : Glimmerglass Being Judgmental". operatoday.com. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ Scalia, Antonin; Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (2015). "Prefaces to Scalia/Ginsburg: A (Gentle) Parody of Operatic Proportions". The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts. 38 (2): 237. doi:10.7916/jla.v38i2.2118. ISSN 2161-9271. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ MY OWN WORDS | Kirkus Reviews. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ Chemerinsky, Erwin (November 8, 2016). "Book Review: My Own Words". Washington Independent Review of Books. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ "Read Justice Ginsburg's Touching Tribute to Scalia: 'We Were Best Buddies'". NBC News. February 14, 2016. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ Edgers, Geoff (July 8, 2015). "From 'rage aria' to 'lovely duet,' opera does justice to court, Ginsburg says". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
- ^ Galanes, Philip (November 14, 2015). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Gloria Steinem on the Unending Fight for Women's Rights (Published 2015)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 15, 2015. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ "User Clip: Justice Ginsburg on the opera Scalia/Ginsburg | C-SPAN.org". www.c-span.org. Archived from the original on December 15, 2019. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- ^ O'Leary, Tom F. (February 16, 2016). The Ruth Bader Ginsburg Coloring Book: A Tribute to the Always Colorful and Often Inspiring Life of the Supreme Court Justice Known as RBG. S.l.: Gumdrop Press. ISBN 978-0692644782.
- ^ a b Barnes, Robert (June 3, 2018). "How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a meme—and why that's so surprising". Press Herald. Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- ^ Abby Ohlheiser (June 30, 2014). "Read Justice Ginsburg's Passionate 35-Page Dissent of Hobby Lobby Decision". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
- ^ Miller, Zeke J. (October 19, 2014). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg Says She Has Quite a Large Supply of Notorious RBG Shirts". Time. Archived from the original on December 22, 2016. Retrieved December 22, 2016.
- ^ Lavender, Paige (May 4, 2015). "'Ruth Bader Ginsburg' Brings The Sass On SNL". HuffPost. Archived from the original on November 22, 2015. Retrieved November 4, 2015.
- ^ Mallenbaum, Carly (July 21, 2016). "'Kate McKinnon showed up as Ruth Bader Ginsburg at the RNC". USA Today. Archived from the original on July 24, 2016. Retrieved July 21, 2016.
- ^ de Vogue, Ariane (October 12, 2016). "Ginsburg on Kaepernick protests: 'I think it's dumb and disrespectful'". CNN. Archived from the original on December 5, 2016. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- ^ Hoffman, Ashley (July 21, 2016). "Kate McKinnon's Ruth Bader Ginsburg Back to Own Donald Trump". Time. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- ^ Getlen, Larry (February 17, 2016). "SNL Cast Evaluation: Kate McKinnon Is the Show's Undisputed MVP". Decider. Archived from the original on December 12, 2016. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- ^ Sperling, Nicole (January 21, 2018). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg Wows Celebrity-Packed Crowd at Sundance Film Festival". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on September 15, 2019. Retrieved January 22, 2018.
- ^ Ryzik, Melena (May 9, 2018). "Ninja Supreme Court Justice: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has Fun With Fame". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 9, 2018. Retrieved May 9, 2018.
- ^ Bloom, David; Yamato, Jen (December 15, 2014). "Blacklist 2014: Full List—Update". Deadline. Archived from the original on September 15, 2019. Retrieved December 9, 2016.
- ^ McNary, Dave (July 18, 2017). "Felicity Jones to Star as Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Biopic 'On the Basis of Sex'". Variety. Archived from the original on September 17, 2017. Retrieved September 17, 2017.
- ^ Malkin, Marc (April 17, 2018). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg Films Cameo in Biopic 'Notorious'". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on April 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
- ^ Maas, Jennifer (April 10, 2018). "'New Girl': Here's Why Schmidt and Cece's Daughter Is Named Ruth Bader". TheWrap. Archived from the original on May 4, 2018. Retrieved May 8, 2018.
- ^ Alexander, Bryan (January 19, 2019). "Supreme reveal: Ruth Bader Ginsburg makes star appearance in 'Lego Movie 2'". USA Today. Archived from the original on January 20, 2019. Retrieved January 19, 2019.
- ^ Meyer, Zlati (March 29, 2019). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg beer? Guilty, says Sam Adams, giving new meaning to 'bar exam'". USA Today. Archived from the original on April 1, 2019. Retrieved April 1, 2019.
- ^ Nolan, Emma (January 25, 2019). "The Good place season 3 finale: Who is Ruth Bader Ginsburg?". Daily Express. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved October 21, 2020.
- ^ "Sisters in Law". Archived from the original on October 20, 2020. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
- ^ The Late Show with Stephen Colbert (March 21, 2018). "Stephen Works Out With Ruth Bader Ginsburg". Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved August 19, 2021 – via YouTube.
- ^ Kenny, Sophie Tatum, Caroline (March 22, 2018). "Ruth Bader Ginsburg settles it for Stephen Colbert: Hot dogs are sandwiches | CNN Politics". CNN. Retrieved September 11, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Further reading
- Campbell, Amy Leigh, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Raising the Bar: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the ACLU Women's Rights Project. Princeton, NJ: Xlibris Corporation, 2003. ISBN 978-1413427417. OCLC 56980906.
- Carmon, Irin, and Knizhnik, Shana. Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. New York, Dey Street, William Morrow Publishers, 2015. ISBN 978-0062415837. OCLC 913957624.
- Clinton, Bill. My Life. New York: Vintage Books, 2005. pp. 524–25, 941. ISBN 978-1400043934. OCLC 233703142.
- Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate (July 20–23, 1993). Supreme Court Associate Justice Nomination Hearings on Ruth Bader Ginsburg (PDF) (Report). United States Government Publishing Office.
- Dodson, Scott. The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. ISBN 978-1107062467 OCLC 897881843
- Garner, Bryan A. Garner on Language and Writing. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2009. Foreword by Ruth Bader Ginsburg. ISBN 978-1590315880. OCLC 310224965.
- Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, et al. Essays in Honor of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School, 2013. OCLC 839314921.
- Hirshman, Linda R. Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World. New York: HarperCollins, 2015. ISBN 978-0062238481. OCLC 907678612.
- Moritz College of Law (2009). "The Jurisprudence of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Discussion of Fifteen Years on the U.S. Supreme Court: Symposium". Ohio State Law Journal. 70, no. 4: 797–1126. ISSN 0048-1572. OCLC 676694369.
- Totenberg, Nina (2022). Dinners with Ruth: A Memoir on the Power of Friendships. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9781982188085. OCLC 1299301214.
External links
- Appearances on C-SPAN
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg papers at the Library of Congress OCLC 70984211
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg at Ballotpedia
- Issue positions and quotes at OnTheIssues
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg, video produced by Makers: Women Who Make America
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- 1933 births
- 2020 deaths
- 20th-century American Jews
- 20th-century American women lawyers
- 20th-century American women judges
- 21st-century American Jews
- 21st-century American non-fiction writers
- 21st-century American women judges
- 21st-century American women writers
- Activists from New York (state)
- American Civil Liberties Union people
- American feminists
- American people of Austrian-Jewish descent
- American people of Polish-Jewish descent
- American people of Ukrainian-Jewish descent
- Jewish American academics
- Jewish legal scholars
- American women legal scholars
- American women non-fiction writers
- Burials at Arlington National Cemetery
- Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences fellows
- Columbia Law School alumni
- Columbia University faculty
- Constitutional court women judges
- Cornell University alumni
- Deaths from pancreatic cancer in Washington, D.C.
- Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
- Ginsburg family
- Harvard Law School alumni
- James Madison High School (Brooklyn) alumni
- Jewish American activists
- Jewish American non-fiction writers
- Jewish feminists
- Jewish scholars
- Jewish women writers
- Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
- Lawyers from Brooklyn
- Members of Phi Kappa Phi
- New York (state) Democrats
- People from Flatbush, Brooklyn
- Rutgers School of Law–Newark faculty
- Scholars of civil procedure law
- Tulane University Law School faculty
- United States court of appeals judges appointed by Jimmy Carter
- United States federal judges appointed by Bill Clinton