Talk:Saddam Hussein: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 12:36, 24 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Saddam Hussein article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: 30 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about views on politics or personal points of view. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about views on politics or personal points of view at the Reference desk.

Saddam Hussein is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 2, 2004	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
May 9, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 16, 2004, July 16, 2005, July 16, 2006, July 16, 2007, and July 16, 2008.

Current status: Former featured article candidate

Arab world High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

Cold War Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers / Terrorism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as High-importance).

Iraq Top‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Middle East / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism High‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Shendruk, Amanda (July 18, 2014). "Which Wikipedia pages have been edited the most from inside the Houses of Parliament?". The Guardian.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2007.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on Saddam Hussein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.

Ad Nauseam, not Nasuem

"...which stages the story ad nasuem..." is incorrect; the term is "ad nauseam." If the word is misspelled in the passage being quoted, there should be a [sic] after "nasuem." ~~Mpaniello~~

citations needed

"Hussein's rule was a repressive dictatorship[12] notorious for it's human rights abuses." You cite that he was a dictator but not that he was notorious for human rights abuses. While it may seem obvious (sic) to westerners it needs a solid citation. -thanks

Infobox image dispute

@Skornezy Since you seem unwilling to familiarize yourself with WP:BRD, let me make this clear. Once your edit is disputed or reverted, you're expected to refrain from edit warring over it. Instead, you should seek consensus by initiating a discussion to explain why you think your changes are appropriate. Now is your chance to do that. Skitash (talk) 23:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is one of many optional strategies that editors may use to seek consensus. This process is not mandated by Wikipedia policy, but it can be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. In other situations, you may have better success with alternatives to this approach. Care and diplomacy should be exercised. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient."

I guess you're not familiar with the things you cite.

Anyways, @Local Mandaean, @Wcamp9, @Kharbaan Ghaltaan, @Comitialbulb561, and @Tansley the Transformer: do you prefer this photo over the current one? Skornezy (talk) 08:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is not bad but this one is more better jpg Kharbaan Ghaltaan (talk) 09:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer this over the other one. It is high quality, and the other one is worse quality — I most definitely think we should use this image Wcamp9 (talk) 12:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you mean the one which is this section right now.. Kharbaan Ghaltaan (talk) 12:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you're dismissing BRD as a mere "optional" strategy shows how reluctant you are to working towards reaching consensus instead of edit warring. Furthermore, what you've just done is WP:CANVASSING, and that's not how an RfC is conducted. I will initiate one below. Skitash (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't "dismiss" anything. I just pointed out what WP:BRD says, since you seem to be having trouble with that. Anyways, I'm not sure what you mean by "WP:CANVASS," there's nothing against me tagging recent editors for their views and Comitialbulb561 was part of the previous discussion I tried to hold last year. Skornezy (talk) 00:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Option A (1998)

Option B (1987)

Option C (1979)

Option D (late 1960s)

What image should this article use in the infobox?

Option A We should retain the 1998 image in the infobox as it represents Saddam at the peak of his power and global notoriety (following the Gulf War and just before the invasion of Iraq). I don't see a compelling reason to replace it, especially considering that the sole argument presented by Skornezy for changing the image is their subjective claim that the alternative is "objectively better". Skitash (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Option C It looks clearer and represents Saddam at beginning of his powerful and prosperous days in Iraq Kharbaan Ghaltaan (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Kharbaan Ghaltaan (talk) 22:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Option B but willing to accept C: Option B is objectively the better image in terms of image quality, so not sure why that's in dispute. Option A is grainy and pixelated, and Saddam has a massive grin on his face which doesn't look very official. Option D is too small and has no colour. Option C is pretty clear, although not as clear as the Option B, and it's a painting portrait rather than a photographic portrait. Skornezy (talk) 00:47, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pinging other recent editors for their input: @Local Mandaean, @Wcamp9, @Tansley the Transformer. Skornezy (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Option B - Saddam’s face clearly in a high quality image, and Skornezy is right when he says that Image A should definitely not be used because of the low, grainy, quality and the fake looking smile. Just because it’s from an important time of his life, doesn’t mean it should be the image used. For example, we’re not using an image of Saddam on trial or captured by the U.S. despite both being in an important parts of his life. Wcamp9 (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Option D, A, or C. Local Mandaean (talk) 07:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Correction, Option A, open for option D and C Local Mandaean (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kharbaan Ghaltaan @Local Mandaean @Skitash @Wcamp9 @Tansley the Transformer I'm going to change the picture to Option C. Are you for or against? Skornezy (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't how RfCs work. Consensus hasn't been reached yet. Skitash (talk) 18:04, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm asking. Skornezy (talk) 19:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am for option C if it was between all four. Local Mandaean (talk) 11:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree with Option C Kharbaan Ghaltaan (talk) 20:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I changed it to C per the consensus of this discussion. Skornezy (talk) 07:21, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It looks much better Kharbaan Ghaltaan (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:RFC. Skitash (talk) 12:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you familiarize yourself with the fact that the consensus is against you and (Personal attack removed). If this conversation is still dead, the consensus is that Option C should be the image. Skornezy (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly agree on option C. But no Option A at all. Option is C more clearer than A. Look at Richard Nixon's article. Where the infobox image is same like Option C Kharbaan Ghaltaan (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Local Mandaean @Skitash @Wcamp9@Skornezy Someone change the infobox image with another unsuitable photo... I changed it to Option C Kharbaan Ghaltaan (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mass murderer category

Would the mass murderer category be suitable here or would that be more towards those directly involved? 2600:100C:A218:9A7B:BC5E:E0AD:C8F9:553 (talk) 15:36, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 December 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the section discussing Saddam Hussein's presidency, subsection discussing Kurdish autonomy and rights, Mustafa Barzani's name is misspelled as Mustafa Barazani which prevents his mention from being hyperlinked to his respective wikipedia page. My edit request is to correct this spelling to Barzani and link his wikipedia page:

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustafa_Barzani) Qwaezar (talk) 14:08, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Thanks for the suggestion - Arjayay (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox criminal

Should Saddam's infobox feature an infobox criminal module for his conviction and execution for crimes against humanity? This would be consistent with other articles like that of Hermann Goering, Hideki Tojo, and Nicolae Ceaușescu for example. 80.189.57.149 (talk) 13:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 December 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Replace "<br/>" immediately before the voiceclip in the infobox with "|module2 =" so that the clip is center instead of aligned to the left. 80.189.57.230 (talk) 01:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for pointing it out. Skitash (talk) 01:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please checkout my diverted Wikipedia article

I ask the English Wikipedia editors why my article about Saddam's proclamation doesn't get published? this article exists in 4 other languages (Arabic, Persian, Hebrew and Kurdish), then why not it doesn't get published in English? the article's name is: "Three things that God should not have created: Persians, Jews and flies" please tell me the reason of "not publishing" it to know.

the link of the Arabic Wikipedia of this article is : https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AB%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AB%D8%A9_%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87_%D8%A3%D9%86_%D9%84%D8%A7_%D9%8A%D8%AE%D9%84%D9%82%D9%87%D9%85:_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%B3_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%87%D9%88%D8%AF_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B0%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A8 Mamad100s (talk) 13:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assume it's because there isn't much content to fill a Wikipedia article. Mention of the pamphlet could easily be inserted into the article on its author, Khairallah Talfah (whose article does in fact mention it) or in the article on Saddam. --Ismail (talk) 23:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]