Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Yaxley (Harry Potter): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sorry, but why was the result of the debate redirect if the deletes outnumbered the redirects? Was the redirect reasoning stronger than that of the delete? I think NTK's reason is pretty good: nobody's going to type in "Yaxley (Harry Potter)" considering that he's a minor character with '''one''' mention in the entire series. The only article that linked the to page prior to the movement (thus excluding the Articles for deletion pages) was the [[Minor Dark wizards in Harry Potter]] page, where I found [[Yaxley (Harry Potter)]] linked as a "main article." I'm just a bit confused. Thanks. --'''[[User:Fbv65edel|Fbv]]'''< |
Sorry, but why was the result of the debate redirect if the deletes outnumbered the redirects? Was the redirect reasoning stronger than that of the delete? I think NTK's reason is pretty good: nobody's going to type in "Yaxley (Harry Potter)" considering that he's a minor character with '''one''' mention in the entire series. The only article that linked the to page prior to the movement (thus excluding the Articles for deletion pages) was the [[Minor Dark wizards in Harry Potter]] page, where I found [[Yaxley (Harry Potter)]] linked as a "main article." I'm just a bit confused. Thanks. --'''[[User:Fbv65edel|Fbv]]'''[[User:Fbv65edel|<span style="color:red;">65</span>]]''[[User:Fbv65edel|edel]]'' <sup>([[User_talk:Fbv65edel|discuss]] | [[Special:Contributions/Fbv65edel|contribs]])</sup> 04:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
Well I have typed in Yaxley |
Well I have typed in "Yaxley Harry Potter" in Google since he is mentioned again in the first pages of book seven :( |
||
I'm very sorry for JK Rowling, but it appears the book has leaked :( (written on July 17th 2007) |
I'm very sorry for JK Rowling, but it appears the book has leaked :( (written on July 17th 2007) |
||
Latest revision as of 09:19, 27 November 2021
Sorry, but why was the result of the debate redirect if the deletes outnumbered the redirects? Was the redirect reasoning stronger than that of the delete? I think NTK's reason is pretty good: nobody's going to type in "Yaxley (Harry Potter)" considering that he's a minor character with one mention in the entire series. The only article that linked the to page prior to the movement (thus excluding the Articles for deletion pages) was the Minor Dark wizards in Harry Potter page, where I found Yaxley (Harry Potter) linked as a "main article." I'm just a bit confused. Thanks. --Fbv65edel (discuss | contribs) 04:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Well I have typed in "Yaxley Harry Potter" in Google since he is mentioned again in the first pages of book seven :(
I'm very sorry for JK Rowling, but it appears the book has leaked :( (written on July 17th 2007)