Jump to content

Freemasonry: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lestervee (talk | contribs)
Fix punctuation formatting
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Group of fraternal organizations}}
{{otheruses2|Freemasons}}
{{Redirect2|Masonic|Freemason|the ghost town|Masonic, California|other uses|Freemason (disambiguation)}}
[[Image:Square compasses.svg|thumb|right|220px|The Masonic [[Square and Compasses]].<br>(''Found with or without the letter [[G]]'')]]
{{Redirect|Freemasons|the house music producers|Freemasons (DJs)}}
{{Freemasonry2}}
{{Good article}}
'''Freemasonry''' is a [[fraternal organization]]. Arising from obscure origins claimed to be anywhere from the mid-1600s to the time of the building of [[Solomon's Temple|King Solomon's Temple]], it now exists in various forms all over the world, and claims millions of members. All of these various forms share [[Morality|moral]] and [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] ideals, which include in most cases a constitutional declaration of belief in a [[Supreme Being]].<ref name="FMreligion">{{cite web | url = http://www.grandlodge-england.org/masonry/freemasonry-and-religion.htm | title = Freemasonry and Religion | first = Mark | last = Griffin | year = 2002 | accessdate = 2007-05-08 | publisher = United Grand Lodge of England}}</ref>
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}
{{Use British English|date=March 2016}}<!-- By consensus stating that Freemasonry originated in the UK and is therefore a Commonwealth-related topic, this article uses Commonwealth (or British) English spelling. Please do not change it to American usage. See MOS:RETAIN. Note also MOS:TIES regarding Oxford English (noting that -ize spelling is acceptable in as it predates the more recent spelling usage of -ise in British English), q.v.-->
[[File:Square_and_Compasses.svg|thumb|alt=Standard image of masonic square and compasses|The main [[emblem]] of the Freemasons.]]
{{Freemasonry}}


'''Freemasonry''' (sometimes spelled '''Free-Masonry''')<ref>{{cite web |title=Jachin and Boaz; or, an Authentic Key to the Door of Free-Masonry, Both Ancient and Modern. |url=https://linfordresearch.info/fordownload/Other%20Books/J%20and%20B%20exposure%201797%20edn.pdf |website=Linford Lodge of Research |access-date=10 October 2024 |date=September 1797}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=History of Free Masonry |url=https://www.mtnebo91wv.org/history-of-free-masonry |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=mtnebo91wv.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Paine |first=Thomas |date=1818-01-02 |title=Thomas Paine Origin Free Masonry » Internet Infidels |url=https://infidels.org/library/historical/thomas-paine-origin-free-masonry/ |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=Internet Infidels |language=en-US}}</ref> or simply '''Masonry''' includes various [[Fraternity|fraternal organisations]] that trace their origins to the local [[guild]]s of [[Stonemasonry|stonemasons]] that, from the end of the 14th century, regulated the qualifications of stonemasons and their interaction with authorities and clients. Freemasonry is the oldest fraternity in the world and among the oldest continued organizations in history.<ref>{{Cite web |title=History of Freemasonry {{!}} United Grand Lodge of England |url=https://www.ugle.org.uk/discover-freemasonry/history-freemasonry |access-date=2024-09-06 |website=www.ugle.org.uk}}</ref>
The fraternity is administratively organized into [[Grand Lodge]]s (or sometimes Orients) that each govern their own [[jurisdiction]], which consists of subordinate (or ''constituent'') Lodges. There can be hundreds or thousands of subordinate Lodges in a jurisdiction, but only one recognized Grand Lodge. Grand Lodges recognize each other through a process of [[Masonic Landmarks|landmarks]] and [[Regular Masonic jurisdictions|regularity]]. There are also [[Masonic bodies|appendant bodies]], which are organizations related to the main branch of Freemasonry, but with their own independent administration.


Modern Freemasonry broadly consists of two main recognition groups: [[Regular Masonic jurisdiction|Regular Freemasonry]], which insists that a "volume of sacred law", such as the [[Bible]], the [[Quran]], or other religious [[scripture]] be open in a working lodge, that every member professes belief in a [[God|Supreme Being]], that no women be admitted, and that the discussion of religion and politics do not take place within the lodge; and [[Continental Freemasonry]], which consists of the jurisdictions that have removed some, or all, of these restrictions.
Freemasonry uses the [[metaphor]]s of operative [[stonemason]]s' tools and implements, against the [[allegory|allegorical]] backdrop of the building of King Solomon's Temple, to convey what is most generally defined as "''a system of morality veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols.''"<ref>{{cite encyclopedia | last = Gruber | first = Hermann | editor = Remy Lafort, Censor | encyclopedia = The Catholic encyclopedia: an international work of reference on the constitution, doctrine, discipline, and history of the Catholic Church | title = Masonry (Freemasonry) | url = http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09771a.htm | accessdate = 2007-05-08 | date = [[1910-10-01]] | publisher = Robert Appleton Company | volume = IX | location = New York | id = {{oclc|1017058}} }}</ref>


The basic, local organisational unit of Freemasonry is the [[Masonic Lodge|Lodge]]. These private Lodges are usually supervised at the regional level (usually coterminous with a state, province, or national border) by a [[Grand Lodge]] or Grand Orient. There is no international, worldwide Grand Lodge that supervises all of Freemasonry; each Grand Lodge is independent, and they do not necessarily recognise each other as being legitimate. Lodges are found around the world and on all populated continents; however due to [[anti-Masonry]] and laws that effectively ban the tradition, it does not have a presence in every country. In the spirit of brotherhood and hopefulness, however, Freemasons usually presume that clandestine lodges may nonetheless exist in those countries in which it is banned, even if they may not actually exist.
While Freemasonry has often been called a "[[secret society]]", Freemasons themselves argue that it is more correct to say that it is an [[Esotericism|esoteric]] society, in that certain aspects are private.<ref name="Aims and Relationships">{{cite book | title = Constitutions of the Antient Fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons | url = http://www.grandlodge-england.org/pdf/cr-rule-update2-141205.pdf | format=pdf | accessdate = 2007-05-08 | origyear = 1815 | year = 2005 | author = United Grand Lodge of England | location = London | publisher = Freemason's Hall | chapter = Aims and Relationships of the Craft | pages = pp. x–xii | oclc = 18976592 }}</ref> The most common phrasing being that Freemasonry has, in the 21st century, become less a secret society and more of a "society with secrets".<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.grandlodge-nc.org/freemasonryrevealed/secrets.htm | title = Freemasonry Revealed: The Secrets of Freemasonry | publisher = Grand Lodge of North Carolina | year = 1997 | accessdate = 2006-06-12 }}</ref> The private aspects of modern Freemasonry are the modes of [[recognition]] amongst members and particular elements within the [[ritual]].<ref name="Ritual">{{cite book | title = Emulation Ritual | author = Freemasons. Emulation Lodge of Improvement (London, England) | location = London | publisher = Lewis Masonic | year = 1991 | isbn = 9780853181873 | oclc = 40357899 }}</ref>


{{Anchor|degrees}}The degrees of Freemasonry are the three grades of medieval craft [[guild]]s: [[Apprenticeship|Entered Apprentice]], [[Journeyman]] or Fellow of the craft<ref name=":8">{{Cite web |title=The Second Degree: Fellow Craft |url=https://www.freemason.com/fellow-craft/ |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=Freemasonry |language=en-US}}</ref> (now called either "Fellowcraft" or "Fellow Craft"<ref name=":8" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Fellow Craft Degree Fee (NewMember) |url=https://www.paulreveremasons.org/product-page/fellow-craft-degree-fee |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=Paul Revere Lodge |language=en}}</ref> in English speaking jurisdictions, and "Companion" in non-English speaking jurisdictions), and [[Master craftsman|Master Mason]]. The candidate of these three degrees is progressively taught the meanings of the symbols of Freemasonry and entrusted with grips, signs, and words to signify to other members that he has been so initiated. The degrees are part allegorical [[morality play]] and part lecture. These three degrees form Craft (or Blue Lodge) Freemasonry, and members of any of these degrees are known as '''Free-Masons''',<ref>{{Cite web |title=General Regulations of a Free Mason 1723 – The Square Magazine |url=https://www.thesquaremagazine.com/mag/article/202303general-regulations-of-a-free-mason-1723/ |access-date=2024-11-07 |language=en-GB}}</ref> '''Freemasons''' or '''Masons'''. Once the Craft degrees have been conferred upon a Mason, he is qualified to join various "Concordant bodies" which offer additional degrees. These organisations are usually administered separately from the Grand Lodges who administer the Craft degrees. The extra degrees vary with locality and [[jurisdiction]]. In addition to these bodies, there are further organizations outside of the more traditional [[List of Masonic rites|Rites]] of Freemasonry, that require an individual to be a Master Mason before they can join (such as the [[Rosicrucian Society of England]]).
There have been many disclosures and exposés dating as far back as the eighteenth century. These often lack the proper context for true understanding of the content,<ref>{{cite book | first = S. Brent | last = Morris | title = The Complete Idiot's Guide to Freemasonry' | location = New York | publisher = Alpha Books | year = 2006 | pages = p. 85 (also discussed in chapters 13 and 16) | isbn = 9781592574902 | oclc = 68042376 }}</ref> may be outdated for various reasons,<ref name="changes">{{cite book | first = John J. | last = Robinson | title = A Pilgrim's Path | publisher = M. Evans | location = New York | year = 1993 | pages = p. 129 | isbn = 9780871317322 | oclc = 27381296 }}</ref> or could be outright [[hoax]]es on the part of the author, as in the case of the [[Taxil hoax]].<ref>{{cite web | first = Arturo | last = de Hoyos | date = [[2002-08-18]] | coauthors = S. Brent Morris | url = http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/taxilhoax.html | title = Leo Taxil Hoax - Bibliography | publisher = Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon | accessdate = 2007-07-07 }} Lists many books which perpetuate Masonic ritual hoaxes.</ref>
These hoaxes and exposures have often become the basis for criticism of Masonry, usually of a religious (mainly Roman Catholic and evangelical Christian) or political (usually Socialist or Communist dictatorial objections, but also the historical [[Anti-Masonic Party]] in the United States) in nature. The political opposition that arose after the [[William Morgan (anti-Mason)#The Morgan affair|"Morgan Affair"]] in 1826 gave rise to the term "[[Anti-Masonry]]", which is still in use today, both by Masons in referring to their critics and as a self-descriptor by the critics themselves.


Throughout its history, Freemasonry has received [[Anti-Masonry|criticism and opposition]] on religious and political grounds. The Catholic Church, some Protestant denominations, and certain Islamic countries or entities have expressed opposition to or banned membership in Free-Masonry. Opposition to Freemasonry is sometimes rooted in [[anti-Semitism]] or [[conspiracy theories]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=Freemasonry |url=https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/freemasonry |access-date=2024-08-19 |website=encyclopedia.ushmm.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schreiber |first=Jean-Philippe |date=2010-11-09 |title=Jews and Freemasonry in the nineteenth century: An overview of current knowledge |url=https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_AJ_432_0030--jews-and-freemasonry-in-the-nineteenth.htm |journal=Archives Juives |language=fr |volume=43 |issue=2 |pages=30–48 |doi=10.3917/aj.432.0030 |issn=0003-9837}}</ref> and Freemasons have historically been persecuted by authoritarian states.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Önnerfors |first=Andreas |title=Freemasonry: A Very Short Introduction |date=2017-01-24 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780198796275 |pages=105 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ruiz |first=Julius |date=June 2011 |title=Fighting the International Conspiracy: The Francoist Persecution of Freemasonry, 1936–1945 |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21567689.2011.591981 |journal=Politics, Religion & Ideology |language=en |volume=12 |issue=2 |pages=179–196 |doi=10.1080/21567689.2011.591981 |issn=2156-7689}}</ref>
==History==
{{main|History of Freemasonry}}
[[Image:Goose and Gridiron.jpg|thumb|Goose and Gridiron, Home to a London Lodge forming GLE]]


==Masonic lodge==
The origins and early development of Freemasonry are a matter of some debate and conjecture. There is some evidence to suggest that there were Masonic Lodges in existence in [[Scotland]] as early as the late sixteenth century,<ref>{{cite book | last = Stevenson | first = David | month = November | year = 1988 | title = The Origins of Freemasonry: Scotland's Century 1590-1710 | location = Cambridge | publisher = Cambridge University Press | isbn = 9780521353267 | oclc = 17546610 }}</ref> and clear references to their existence in [[England]] by the mid seventeenth century.<ref name="coil_encyc">{{cite encyclopedia | last = Coil | first = Henry Wilson | year = 1961 | encyclopedia = Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia | editor = William M. Brown, William L. Cummings, Harold Van Buren Voorhes | edition = Revised and Updated by Allen E. Roberts, 1995 | location = Richmond, Va | publisher = Macoy Pub. & Masonic Supply Co. | isbn = 9780880530545 | oclc = }}</ref>
{{Main|Masonic lodge}}
[[File:Palazzo Roffia, galleria 00.JPG|thumb|alt=Italian lodge at Palazzo Roffia, Florence|Lodge in Palazzo Roffia, [[Florence]], set out for French (Premiere Grand Lodge) ritual]]
The [[Masonic lodge]] is the basic organisational unit of Freemasonry.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.chevalierramsay.be/what-is-freemasonry/|title=What is Freemasonry|website=www.chevalierramsay.be|access-date=14 June 2017}}</ref> The Lodge meets regularly and conducts the usual formal business of any small organisation (approve [[minutes]], elect new members, appoint officers and take their reports, consider correspondence, bills and annual accounts, organise social and charitable events, etc.). In addition to such business, the meeting may perform a ceremony to confer a [[Masonic ritual and symbolism|Masonic degree]]<ref name="UGLEFAQ">[http://www.ugle.org.uk/what-is-freemasonry/frequently-asked-questions "Frequently Asked Questions"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131022154544/http://ugle.org.uk/what-is-freemasonry/frequently-asked-questions |date=22 October 2013 }} ''United Grand Lodge of England'' retrieved 30 October 2013</ref> or receive a lecture, which is usually on some aspect of Masonic history or ritual.<ref name=":5">[http://www.pglel.co.uk/Education&Development/materials/MasonicLecturersAndTopics.asp "Materials: Papers and Speakers"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161111133930/http://www.pglel.co.uk/Education%26Development/materials/MasonicLecturersAndTopics.asp |date=11 November 2016 }} ''Provincial Grand Lodge of East Lancashire'', retrieved 30 October 2013</ref> At the conclusion of the meeting, the Lodge may hold a [[formal dinner]], or ''festive board'', sometimes involving toasting and song.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |title=Toasts for the Festive Board |url=https://freemasonry.bcy.ca/texts/toasts.html |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=freemasonry.bcy.ca}}</ref> These meetings are typically held in a [[Masonic Temple|Masonic temple]], though other venues may occasionally be used.


The bulk of [[Masonic ritual]] consists of degree ceremonies. Candidates for Freemasonry are progressively ''initiated'' into Freemasonry, first in the degree of '''Entered Apprentice'''. At some later time, in separate ceremonies, they will be ''passed'' to the degree of '''Fellowcraft'''; and then ''raised'' to the degree of '''Master Mason'''. In each of these ceremonies, the candidate must first take the new obligations of the degree, and is then entrusted with secret knowledge including passwords, signs and grips ([[secret handshake]]s) confined to his new rank.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |title=Symbolical Masonry: Part One: The First Step: Chapter XVIII. Words, Grips and Tokens |url=https://sacred-texts.com/mas/syma/syma22.htm |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=sacred-texts.com}}</ref> Although these symbols and gestures are nominally secret, they are readily found in public sources, including those published by Masonic organizations themselves.<ref>{{Cite web |title=AAONMS Ritual Book |url=https://www.shrinersinternational.org/en/news-and-events/news/2022/05/aaonms-ritual-book |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=www.shrinersinternational.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Learn about freemasonry: What is the freemason handshake? |url=https://museumfreemasonry.org.uk/blog/learn-about-freemasonry-what-freemason-handshake |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=Museum of Freemasonry |language=en}}</ref>
The first Grand Lodge, the [[Grand Lodge of England]] (GLE), was founded in 1717, when four existing [[London]] Lodges met for a joint dinner. This rapidly expanded into a regulatory body, which almost all English Lodges joined. From the 1750s onwards, two competing English Grand Lodges vied for supremacy - the "Moderns" (GLE) and the "Ancients" (or "Antients"). They finally united in 1813 to form the UGLE.


Another ceremony is the annual installation of the Master of the Lodge and his appointed or elected officers.<ref name="UGLEFAQ"/> In some jurisdictions, an ''Installed Master'' elected, obligated, and invested to preside over a Lodge, is valued as a separate rank with its own secrets and distinctive title and attributes; after each full year in the chair the Master invests his elected successor and becomes a Past Master with privileges in the Lodge and Grand Lodge.<ref>{{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20150711032730/http://www.masonicdictionary.com/past.html "Past Master"]}} ''Masonic Dictionary'', retrieved 31 October 2013</ref> In other jurisdictions, the grade is not recognised, and no inner ceremony conveys new secrets during the installation of a new Master of the Lodge.<ref>[http://www.gadlu.info/macon-celebre-le-maitre-installe.html "Maçon célèbre : le Maître Installé"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181004062533/http://www.gadlu.info/macon-celebre-le-maitre-installe.html |date=4 October 2018 }} ''GADLU blog Maçonnique'', 3 March 2013, retrieved 2 November 2013</ref>
The Grand Lodges of [[Ireland]] and Scotland were formed in 1725 and 1736 respectively. Freemasonry was exported to the British Colonies in [[North America]] by the 1730s - with both the "Ancients" and the "Moderns" (as well as the Grand Lodges of Ireland and Scotland) chartering offspring ("daughter") Lodges, and organizing various Provincial Grand Lodges. After the [[American Revolution]], independent U.S. Grand Lodges formed themselves within the State boundaries. Some thought was briefly given to organizing an over-arching "Grand Lodge of the [[United States]]", with [[George Washington]] as the first Grand Master, but the idea was short-lived. The various State Grand Lodges did not wish to diminish their own authority by agreeing to such a body.<ref>{{cite book | title = Revolutionary brotherhood: Freemasonry and the transformation of the American social order, 1730-1840 | first = Steven C. | last = Bullock | coauthors = Institute of Early American History and Culture (Williamsburg, Va.) | location = Chapel Hill | publisher = University of North Carolina Press | year = 1996 | isbn = 9780807847503 | oclc = 33334015 }}</ref>


Most Lodges have some sort of social functions, allowing members, their partners, and non-Masonic guests to meet openly.<ref>For instance [http://www.pglherts.org/about-freemasonry/introduction/ "Introduction into Freemasonry"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131109023055/http://www.pglherts.org/about-freemasonry/introduction/ |date=9 November 2013 }}, ''Provincial Grand Lodge of Hertfordshire'', retrieved 8 November 2013</ref> Often coupled with these events is the discharge of every Mason's and Lodge's collective obligation to contribute to charity. This occurs at many levels, including in annual dues, subscriptions, fundraising events, Lodges and Grand Lodges. Masons and their charities contribute for the relief of need in many fields, such as education, health and old age.<ref>[http://www.ugle.org.uk/charity "Charitable work"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131022081813/http://www.ugle.org.uk/charity |date=22 October 2013}}, ''UGLE'', retrieved 8 November 2013</ref><ref>(editors) John Hamill and Robert Gilbert, ''Freemasonry'', Angus, 2004, pp 214–220</ref>
Although there are no real differences in the Freemasonry practiced by one or the other, the remnants of this division can still be seen in the names of most Lodges: F.& A.M. being ''Free and Accepted Masons'' vs. A.F.& A.M. being ''Antient Free and Accepted Masons''.


Private Lodges form the backbone of Freemasonry, with the sole right to elect their own candidates for initiation as Masons or admission as joining Masons, and sometimes with exclusive rights over residents local to their premises. There are non-local Lodges where Masons meet for wider or narrower purposes, such or in association with some hobby, sport, Masonic research, business, profession, regiment or college. The rank of Master Mason also entitles a Freemason to explore Masonry further through other degrees, administered separately from the basic Craft or "Blue Lodge" degrees described here, but generally having a similar structure and meetings.<ref name="Johnstone">Michael Johnstone, ''The Freemasons'', Arcturus, 2005, pp. 101–120</ref>
The oldest jurisdiction on the continent of [[Europe]], the [[Grand Orient de France]] (GOdF), was founded in 1728. Most English-speaking jurisdictions cut formal relations with the GOdF around 1877, however, when the GOdF removed the requirement that its members have a belief in Deity and accepted atheists.<ref name=Dummies/> The [[Grande Loge Nationale Française]] (GLNF)<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.glnf.asso.fr/ | title = GLNF : Grande Loge Nationale Francaise| publisher = The Grande Loge Nationale Francaise (GLNF) | accessdate = 2006-02-06 | language = French }}</ref> is currently the only [[France|French]] Grand Lodge that is in ''regular amity'' with the UGLE and its many concordant jurisdictions worldwide.


There is much diversity and little consistency in Freemasonry because each Masonic jurisdiction is independent and sets its own rules and procedures while Grand Lodges have limited jurisdiction over their constituent member Lodges, which are ultimately private clubs. The wording of the ritual, the number of officers present, the layout of the meeting room, etc. varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.<ref name="Johnstone"/><ref name="Maconnieke">[http://www.vrijmetselaarsgilde.eu/Maconnieke%20Encyclopedie/RMAP~1/Russmixte/officiers.htm "Les Officiers de Loge"] ''Maconnieke Encyclopedie'', retrieved 31 October 2013</ref>
Due to the above history, Freemasonry is often said to consist of two branches ''not in mutual regular amity'':


Almost all [[Masonic Lodge Officers|officers of a Lodge]] are elected or appointed annually. Every Masonic Lodge has a Master, two Wardens, a treasurer and a secretary. There is also always a [[Tyler (Masonic)|Tyler]], or outer guard, outside the door of a working Lodge, who may be paid to secure its privacy. Other offices vary between jurisdictions.<ref name="Johnstone" />
* the UGLE and concordant tradition of jurisdictions (termed Grand Lodges) in amity, and
* the GOdF, European Continental, tradition of jurisdictions (often termed Grand Orients) in amity.


Each Masonic Lodge exists and operates according to ancient principles known as the [[Landmarks of Freemasonry]], which elude any universally accepted definition.<ref>{{Cite web |title=PS Review of Freemasonry |url=http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/bernheim27.html |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=PS Review of Freemasonry |language=en-US}}</ref>
In most [[Latin Europe|Latin]] countries, the GOdF-style of European Continental Freemasonry predominates, although in most of these Latin countries there are also Grand Lodges that are in ''regular amity'' with the UGLE and the worldwide community of Grand Lodges that share regular "fraternal relations" with the UGLE. The rest of the world, accounting for the bulk of Freemasonry, tends to follow more closely to the UGLE style, although minor variations exist.


===Joining a lodge===
== Organizational structure ==
[[File:Washington Masonic print.jpg|thumb|alt=Worshipful Master George Washington|Print from 1870 portraying [[George Washington]] as Master of his Lodge]]
[[Image:freemasons.hall.london.arp.750pix.jpg|thumb|right|220px|Freemasons Hall, London, home of the United Grand Lodge of England.]]
{{main|Grand Lodge}}


Candidates for Freemasonry will usually have met the most active members of the Lodge they are joining before being elected for initiation. The process varies among Grand Lodges, but in modern times interested people often look up a local Lodge through the Internet and will typically be introduced to a Lodge social function or open evening. The onus is upon candidates to ask to join; while they may be encouraged to ask, they may not be invited. Once the initial inquiry is made, a formal application may be proposed and seconded or announced in open Lodge and a more or less formal interview usually follows. If the candidate wishes to proceed, references are taken up during a period of notice so that members may enquire into the candidate's suitability and discuss it. Finally, the Lodge takes an officially secret ballot on each application before a candidate is either initiated or rejected.<ref name="MLoE">[http://www.masonic-lodge-of-education.com/become-a-free-mason.html "How to become a Freemason"], ''Masonic Lodge of Education'', retrieved 20 November 2013</ref> The exact number of adverse ballots ("blackballs") required to reject a candidate varies between Masonic jurisdictions. As an example, the [[United Grand Lodge of England]] only requires a single "blackball", while the [[Grand Lodge of New York]] requires three.
Grand Lodges and Grand Orients are independent and [[Sovereignty|sovereign]] bodies that govern Masonry in a given country, state, or geographical area (termed a ''jurisdiction'').<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.grandlodge-nc.org/education/code/000.html | year = 2007 | title = Constitution | publisher = Grand Lodge of North Carolina | accessdate = 2007-04-09 }} See Preamble.</ref> There is no single overarching governing body that presides over world-wide Freemasonry; connections between different jurisdictions depend solely on mutual recognition.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://bessel.org/dcrecreq.htm | publisher = Grand Lodge FAAM (Free And Accepted Masons) of Washington, D.C. (the District of Columbia), Committee on Masonic Recognition | title = Form letter to request mutual recognition | accessdate = 2007-04-09}} Example letter to request recognition.</ref>


A minimum requirement of every body of Freemasons is that each candidate must be "free and of good reputation".<ref>[http://grande-loge.lu/?id=20&a=52 "Comment devenir franc-maçon?"], Grande Loge de Luxembourg, retrieved 23 November 2013</ref> The question of freedom, a standard feudal requirement of mediaeval guilds, is nowadays one of independence: the object is that every Mason should be a proper and responsible person.<ref name="MLoE"/> Thus, each Grand Lodge has a standard minimum age, varying greatly and often subject to dispensation in particular cases. (For example, in those jurisdictions where the minimum age is normally 21, lodges can often be given dispensations to initiate the sons of Masons at age 18.)
=== Regularity ===
{{main|Regular Masonic jurisdictions}}
Additionally, most Grand Lodges require a candidate to declare a belief in a [[God|Supreme Being]] (although every candidate must interpret this condition in his own way, as all religious discussion is commonly prohibited). In a few cases, the candidate may be required to be of a specific religion. The form of Freemasonry most common in [[Scandinavia]] (known as the [[Swedish Rite]]), for example, accepts only Christians.<ref>[http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/texts/swedish_faq.html "Swedish Rite FAQ"], ''Grand Lodge of British Columbia & Yukon'', Accessed 19 November 2013</ref> At the other end of the spectrum, "Liberal" or [[Continental Freemasonry]], exemplified by the [[Grand Orient de France]], does not require a declaration of belief in any deity and accepts atheists (the cause of the distinction from the rest of Freemasonry).<ref name=":1">[http://www.godf.org/index.php/pages/details/slug/foire-aux-questions "Faut-il croire en Dieu?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928021420/http://www.godf.org/index.php/pages/details/slug/foire-aux-questions |date=28 September 2013 }}, Foire aux Questions, ''Grand Orient de France'', Retrieved 23 November 2013</ref><ref name="Buta">[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/masonic_foreign_recognitions.html Jack Buta, "The God Conspiracy, The Politics of Grand Lodge Foreign Relations"], ''Pietre-Stones'', retrieved 23 November 2013</ref>


During the ceremony of initiation, the candidate is required to undertake an obligation, swearing on the religious volume sacred to his personal faith to do good as a Mason. In the course of three degrees, Masons will promise to keep the secrets of their degree from lower degrees and outsiders, as far as practicality and the law permit, and to support a fellow Mason in distress.<ref name="Johnstone"/> There is formal instruction as to the duties of a Freemason, but on the whole, Freemasons are left to explore the craft in the manner they find most satisfying. Some will simply enjoy the dramatics, or the management and administration of the lodge, others will explore the history, ritual and symbolism of the craft, others will focus their involvement on their Lodge's sociopolitical side, perhaps in association with other lodges, while still others will concentrate on the lodge's charitable functions.<ref>[http://www.hampshirefreemasonry.com/social-events-and-activities "Social events and activities"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140109021223/http://www.hampshirefreemasonry.com/social-events-and-activities |date=9 January 2014 }}, ''Hampshire Province'', retrieved 20 November 2013</ref><ref>[http://www.masonic-lodges.com/masons.html "Who are Masons, and what do they do?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200104220210/http://www.masonic-lodges.com/masons.html |date=4 January 2020 }}, ''MasonicLodges.com'', retrieved 20 November 2013</ref>
There are two major branches of Freemasonry: "regular"<ref name="Aims and Relationships"/> Grand Lodges that are recognized by the [[United Grand Lodge of England]] (UGLE) and "liberal" or ''irregular'' Grand Orients that are recognized by the Grand Orient de France (GOdF). Irregular also encompasses any other Masonic group not recognized by the UGLE.<ref>{{cite web | last = Bey | first = Ezekiel M. | url = http://www.phylaxis.org/bogusmasonry/definition.htm | title = Why the Word Bogus When Speaking of Illegal Freemasonry? | publisher = Joseph A. Walkes Jr. Commission on Bogus Masonic Practices, Phylaxis Society | date = 2006-10-03 | accessdate = 2007-04-09 }}</ref> However, the usage of "Lodge" versus "Orient" alone is not an indicator of regularity.


==Organisation==
''Regularity'' is a constitutional mechanism by which Grand Lodges or Grand Orients give one another mutual recognition. This recognition allows formal interaction at the Grand Lodge level, and gives individual Freemasons the opportunity to attend meetings at Lodges in other recognized jurisdictions. Conversely, regularity [[wikt:proscribe|proscribes]] interaction with Lodges that are ''irregular''. A Mason who visits an irregular Lodge may have his membership suspended for a time, or he may be [[Expulsion|expelled]]. For this reason, all Grand Lodges maintain lists of other jurisdictions and lodges they consider regular.<ref>{{cite book | title = Handbook for Candidate’s Coaches | first = Donald G. | last = Campbell | coauthors = Committee on Ritual | publisher = Grand Lodge F.&A.M. of California | chapterurl = http://mastersjewel.com/masons/mm/MM07.htm | format = excerpt | chapter = The Master Mason; Irregular and Clandestine Lodges | accessdate = 2007-05-08 | quote = The solution of the problem [of irregular Masonry] lies in the publication furnished every California lodge. Entitled "List of Regular Lodges Masonic", it is issued by the Grand Lodge of California to its constituent lodges, with the admonition that this book is to be kept in each lodge for reference in receiving visitors and on applications for affiliation. There may well be an old copy which you can use, for it is re-issued every year.}}</ref>


===Grand Lodges===
Grand Lodges that afford mutual recognition and allow intervisitation are said to be ''[[wikt:amity|in amity]]''. As far as the UGLE is concerned, regularity is predicated upon a number of ''landmarks'', set down in the UGLE Constitution and the Constitutions of those Grand Lodges with which they are in amity. Even within this definition there are some variations with the quantity and content of the Landmarks from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Other Masonic groups organise differently.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.phylaxis.org/bogusmasonry/regularitypha.htm | title = Report From The United Grand Lodge of England: Prince Hall Masonry and the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts | format = Annex A: Regularity | publisher = Joseph A. Walkes Jr. Commission on Bogus Masonic Practices, Phylaxis Society | date = 2006-10-03 | accessdate = 2007-04-07 }}</ref>
{{Main|Grand Lodge}}
[[File:Freemasons' Hall, London.JPG|thumb|alt=Freemason's Hall, London|[[Freemasons' Hall, London|Freemasons Hall]], London, home of the [[United Grand Lodge of England]]]]
[[File:Grand Orient de France 2.jpg|thumb|right|The Historical Grand Lodge of the [[Grand Orient de France]]]]
Grand Lodges and Grand Orients are independent and sovereign bodies that govern Masonry in a given country, state or geographical area (termed a ''jurisdiction''). There is no single overarching governing body that presides over worldwide Freemasonry; connections between different jurisdictions depend solely on mutual recognition.<ref>(editors) John Hamill and Robert Gilbert, ''Freemasonry'', Angus, 2004, Glossary, p. 247</ref><ref>[http://mastermason.com/rfire/masonry/difficult.html#conspiracy "Difficult Questions; Is Freemasonry a Global Conspiracy?"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150603033856/http://mastermason.com/rfire/masonry/difficult.html |date=3 June 2015 }} ''MasterMason.com'', retrieved 18 November 2013</ref>


Estimates of the worldwide membership of Freemasonry in the early 21st century ranged from about two million to more than six million.<ref>{{cite web |title=Freemasonry {{!}} Definition, History, Stages, Lodges, & Facts {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Freemasonry |website=www.britannica.com |access-date=17 December 2023 |language=en |date=16 November 2023}}</ref>{{Better source needed|date=November 2024}}
=== The Masonic Lodge ===
{{main|Masonic Lodge}}


The fraternity is administratively organised <!-- NOTE: THIS ARTICLE USES UK SPELLING ... which spells this word with an "s" and not a "z". --> into independent [[Grand Lodge]]s (or sometimes Grand Orients), each of which governs its own Masonic jurisdiction, which consists of subordinate (or ''constituent'') Lodges.
A Lodge (often termed a ''Private Lodge'' or ''Constituent Lodge'' in Masonic constitutions) is the basic organizational unit of Freemasonry. Every new Lodge must be warranted by a Grand Lodge, but is subject to its direction only in enforcing the published [[Constitution]] of the jurisdiction. A Lodge must hold full meetings regularly at published dates and places. It will elect, initiate and promote its own members and officers; it will own, occupy or share premises; and will normally build up a collection of minutes, records and equipment. Like any other organization, it will have formal business, annual general meetings (AGMs), [[Charitable organization|charity funds]], [[committee]]s, reports, bank accounts and tax returns, and so forth.


The [[United Grand Lodge of England]] remains the largest Masonic jurisdiction worldwide. However, its membership has declined dramatically, from about 500,000 members in the 1960s to approximately 175,000 in 2021.<ref>{{cite web |title=Who we are {{!}} United Grand Lodge of England |url=https://www.ugle.org.uk/about-us/about-ugle |website=www.ugle.org.uk |access-date=17 December 2023}}</ref><ref>https://www.cheshiremasons.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/UGLE-Annual-Report-2021-2.pdf</ref> The organization is structured into various Provincial Grand Lodges at the local level. Similarly, the [[Grand Lodge of Ireland]] has experienced a steep decline, with membership falling from 100,000 in 1960 to around 19,000 members currently.<ref>{{cite web |title=About Grand Lodge {{!}} Grand Lodge of Ireland |url=https://freemason.ie/about-grand-lodge/ |access-date=17 December 2023}}</ref>
A man can only be initiated, or made a Mason, in a Lodge, of which he may well remain a subscribing member for life. A Master Mason is generally entitled to visit any Lodge meeting under any jurisdiction in amity with his own, and a Lodge may well offer hospitality to such a visitor after the formal meeting. He is first usually required to check the regularity of that Lodge, and must be able to satisfy that Lodge of his own regularity; and he may be refused admission if adjudged likely to disrupt the harmony of the Lodge. If he wishes to visit the same Lodge repeatedly, he may be expected to join it, and pay a membership subscription.


In the [[United States]], Masonic membership is organized in two systems, first through 51 Conservative Grand Lodges &mdash; one for each state plus the [[Washington, D.C.|District of Columbia]]. While these Grand Lodges once boasted over 4 million members in 1957, membership has declined sharply. According to the Masonic Service Association of North America, current combined membership across these jurisdictions stands at approximately 875,000 members.<ref>{{cite web |title=Jurisdictional Membership Statistics – Masonic Service Association of North America |url=https://msana.com/services/jurisdictional-totals/ |website=msana.com |access-date=17 December 2023}}</ref>
Freemasons ''correctly'' meet ''as'' a Lodge, not ''in'' a Lodge, although Masonic premises may be called ''Lodges'' or ''Temples'' ("of [[Philosophy]] and [[The arts|the Arts]]"). In many countries, ''Masonic Centre'' or ''Hall'' has replaced ''Temple'' to avoid arousing prejudice and suspicion. Several different Lodges, as well as other Masonic organisations, often use the same premises at different times.


Additionally, there are 46 Prince Hall Grand Lodges in amity with UGLE, operating across various U.S. states. [[Prince Hall Freemasonry]] is a historically [[African Americans|African-American]] branch of Freemasonry that maintains its own separate Grand Lodge system parallel to the state Grand Lodge system.<ref>{{Cite web |title=U.S. Membership Statistics – Masonic Service Association of North America |url=https://msana.com/services/u-s-membership-statistics/ |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=msana.com}}</ref>
Early Lodges often met in a [[tavern]] or any other convenient fixed place with a private room.<ref name=Dummies>{{cite book | first=Christopher |last=Hodapp | authorlink=Christopher L. Hodapp| title =Freemasons For Dummies | publisher =John Wiley and Sons | month = September | year = 2005 | location =Hoboken, NJ | pages = | url =http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0764597965.html | doi = | id =ISBN 978-0-7645-9796-1 | oclc = 61302442 }}</ref> According to Masonic tradition, the Lodge of medieval stonemasons was on the southern side of the building site, with the sun warming the stones during the day. The social ''Festive Board'' (or ''Social Board''),<ref>{{cite web | last = Bourne | first = W.J. | title = The Festive Board | year = 1997 | format = abridged portion | url = http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/godolphin.lodge/html/festive_board.html | publisher = Godolphin Lodge No. 7790 | accessdate = 2007-04-09 }}</ref> part of the meeting is thus sometimes called ''the South''.<ref>{{cite book | last = Mackey | first = Albert Gallatin | authorlink = Albert Mackey | chapter = South | title = Lexicon of Freemasonry | location = New York | publisher = Barnes & Noble | year = 2004 | isbn = 0760760039 | oclc = 58654158 | pages = p. 445 | quote = ...but when <nowiki>[the sun]</nowiki> reaches the south, the hour is high twelve, and we are summoned to refreshment. }}</ref>


Together, these two systems &mdash; the conservative Grand Lodges and Prince Hall Grand Lodges &mdash; make up for a total of 97 [[United Grand Lodge of England|UGLE]] recognized Grand Lodges, sharing jurisdictions in the United States. They represent the main bodies of Masonic governance in the United States, though both have experienced significant membership declines since their mid-20th century peaks.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hodapp |first=Christopher |date=2022-03-26 |title=Freemasons For Dummies: Flash! GL of Louisiana Votes in Favor of Prince Hall Recognition... Sort Of |url=https://freemasonsfordummies.blogspot.com/2022/03/flash-gl-of-louisiana-votes-in-favor-of.html |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=Freemasons For Dummies}}</ref>
Most Lodges consist of Freemasons living or working within a given town or neighbourhood. Other Lodges are composed of Masons with a particular shared interest, [[profession]] or background. Shared [[school]]s, [[university|universities]], [[military unit]]s, Masonic appointments or degrees, arts, professions and [[hobby|hobbies]] have all been the qualifications for such Lodges. In some Lodges, the foundation and name may now be only of historic interest, as over time the membership evolves beyond that envisaged by its "founding brethren"; in others, the membership remains exclusive.


[[Grand Orient de France]], the largest jurisdiction in Continental or Liberal Freemasonry in terms of membership, has over 53,000 members spread across approximately 1,381 lodges for an average of 38 members per Lodges. The Grand Orient de France has been growing in membership since [[World War II]] from 33,000 in 1960 to 53,000 in 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |last=BOISSELIER |first=Alexis |date=2023-11-08 |title=Emmanuel Macron se rend au Grand Orient de France : trois questions sur cette loge maçonnique |url=https://www.ouest-france.fr/societe/emmanuel-macron-visite-le-grand-orient-de-france-trois-questions-sur-la-loge-maconnique-52d15996-7d7e-11ee-9e40-5131acac1bc0 |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=Ouest-France.fr |language=fr}}</ref>
There are also specialist Lodges of Research, with membership drawn from Master Masons only, with interests in Masonic Research (of [[history]], [[philosophy]], etc.). Lodges of Research are fully warranted but, generally, do not initiate new candidates. Lodges of Instruction in UGLE may be warranted by any ordinary Lodge for the learning and rehearsal of Masonic [[Ritual]].


=== Lodge Officers ===
===Recognition, amity and regularity===
Relations between Grand Lodges are determined by the concept of ''Recognition''. Each Grand Lodge maintains a list of other Grand Lodges that it recognises.<ref>{{Cite book
{{main|Masonic Lodge Officers}}
| title = Handbook for Candidate's Coaches
| first = Donald G.
| last = Campbell
| author2 = Committee on Ritual
| publisher = Grand Lodge F.&A.M. of California
| url = http://mastersjewel.com/masons/mm/MM07.htm
| format = excerpt
| chapter = The Master Mason; Irregular and Clandestine Lodges
| access-date = 8 May 2007
| archive-date = 21 August 2007
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070821165005/http://www.mastersjewel.com/masons/mm/MM07.htm
| url-status = dead
}}</ref> When two Grand Lodges recognise and are in Masonic communication with each other, they are said to be ''[[wikt:amity|in amity]]'', and the brethren of each may visit each other's Lodges and interact Masonically. When two Grand Lodges are not in amity, inter-visitation is not allowed. There are many reasons one Grand Lodge will withhold or withdraw recognition from another, but the two most common are ''Exclusive Jurisdiction'' and ''Regularity''.<ref>[http://www.pilarlodge3freemasonry.freeservers.com/about_1.html Jim Bantolo, "On Recognition"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080314135120/http://www.pilarlodge3freemasonry.freeservers.com/about_1.html |date=14 March 2008 }}, Masonic Short Talk, ''Pilar lodge'', 2007, retrieved 25 November 2013</ref>


====Exclusive Jurisdiction====
Every Masonic Lodge elects certain officers to execute the necessary functions of the lodge's work. The Worshipful Master (essentially the lodge President) is always an elected officer. Most jurisdictions will also elect the Senior and Junior Wardens (Vice Presidents), the Secretary and the Treasurer. All lodges will have a Tyler, sometimes elected and sometimes appointed by the Master. In addition to these elected officers, lodges will have various appointed officers such as Deacons, Stewards, and a Chaplain (appointed to lead a non-denominational prayer at the convocation of meetings or activities - often, but not necessarily, a clergyman). The specific offices and their functions vary between jurisdictions.
Exclusive Jurisdiction is a concept whereby normally only one Grand Lodge will be recognised in any geographical area. If two Grand Lodges claim jurisdiction over the same area, the other Grand Lodges will have to choose between them, and they may not all decide to recognise the same one. (In 1849, for example, the Grand Lodge of New York split into two rival factions, each claiming to be the legitimate Grand Lodge. Other Grand Lodges had to choose between them until the schism was healed.<ref>[http://www.themasonictrowel.com/ebooks/fm_freemasonry/Lang_-_History_Of_Freemasonry_in_NewYork_1922_raw.pdf Ossian Lang, "History of Freemasonry in the State of New York" (pdf)], 1922, pp. 135–140, ''Masonic Trowel eBooks'', {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101201003501/http://www.themasonictrowel.com/ebooks/fm_freemasonry/Lang_-_History_Of_Freemasonry_in_NewYork_1922_raw.pdf|date=1 December 2010}}</ref>) Exclusive Jurisdiction can be waived when the two overlapping Grand Lodges are themselves in amity and agree to share jurisdiction. For example, since the Grand Lodge of Connecticut is in amity with the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Connecticut, the principle of Exclusive Jurisdiction does not apply, and other Grand Lodges may recognise both.<ref>[http://www.bessel.org/exclartl.htm "Exclusive Jurisdiction"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203002511/http://www.bessel.org/exclartl.htm |date=3 December 2013 }}, ''Paul M. Bessel'', 1998, retrieved 25 November 2013</ref> Likewise, the five distinct kinds of lodges in Germany have nominally united under one Grand Lodge in order to obtain international recognition.


==== Modern Challenges and Evolution ====
Many offices are replicated at Provincial and Grand Lodge levels, but with the addition of the word 'Grand' somewhere in the title. For example, where every lodge has a 'Junior Warden', each Grand Lodge has a 'Grand Junior Warden'. In addition there are a number of offices that exist only at the Grand Lodge level.<ref name=Dummies>pp. 97-104.</ref>
The concept of Exclusive Jurisdiction has been significantly challenged in the United States with the increasing recognition of [[Prince Hall Masonry|Prince Hall Grand Lodges]], a branch of Freemasonry created for African Americans. Historically, many "mainstream" or conservative U.S. Grand Lodges refused to recognize Prince Hall Grand Lodges operating in their states, citing Exclusive Jurisdiction. However, this began to change in 1989 when the [[Grand Lodge of Connecticut]] extended recognition to its Prince Hall counterpart.<ref>{{cite web |author1=Sueanna Smith |title=Reimagining Prince Hall: Race, Freemasonry, and Material Culture In Boston, 1775-1870 |url=https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7385&context=etd |website=[[University of South Carolina]] |access-date=4 November 2024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last= |first= |title=Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Connecticut |url=https://mwphgl-ct.org/ |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Connecticut |language=en-US}}</ref>


This initial recognition created a precedent for "shared jurisdiction" between mainstream and Prince Hall Grand Lodges, effectively modifying the traditional interpretation of Exclusive Jurisdiction. By 2024, most U.S. Grand Lodges have recognized their Prince Hall counterparts, establishing a new norm where two Grand Lodges can legitimately operate within the same geographical area, provided they maintain mutual recognition and amity.<ref>{{Cite web |last= |title=The Grand Lodge of Connecticut |url=https://gwmemorial.org/blogs/gl-of-the-month/the-grand-lodge-of-connecticut |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=GWMNMA |language=en}}</ref>
=== Prince Hall Freemasonry ===
{{main|Prince Hall Freemasonry}}


The evolution of this practice demonstrates how traditional Masonic principles can adapt to accommodate social progress while maintaining the fundamental aims of regular Freemasonry. Some jurisdictions have formalized this arrangement through written agreements that specifically outline the terms of shared jurisdiction.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Prince Hall Freemasonry archives |url=https://bmrc.lib.uchicago.edu/portal/view/?id=BMRC.HARSH.PRINCE_HALL.xml#:~:text=Today,%20Prince%20Hall%20Lodges%20are,their%20names%20to%20avoid%20confusion |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=bmrc.lib.uchicago.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=John B. Williams Web Page |url=https://thephylaxis.org/williams/recognition.php |access-date=2024-11-07 |website=thephylaxis.org}}</ref>
Prince Hall Freemasonry derives from historical events in the early United States that led to a tradition of separate, predominantly [[African-American]] Freemasonry in North America.


====Regularity====
In 1775, an African-American named [[Prince Hall]]<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.mindspring.com/~johnsonx/whoisph.htm | title = Who is Prince Hall? And other well known Prince Hall Masons | first = Lawrence | last = Johnson | year = 1996 | accessdate = 2005-11-14 }}</ref> was initiated into an Irish Constitution Military Lodge then in Boston, Massachusetts, along with fourteen other African-Americans, all of whom were free-born. When the Military Lodge left North America, those fifteen men were given the authority to meet as a Lodge, form Processions on the days of the Saints John, and conduct Masonic funerals, but not to confer degrees, nor to do other Masonic work. In 1784, these individuals applied for, and obtained, a Lodge Warrant from the Premier Grand Lodge of England and formed African Lodge, Number 459 ([[Premier Grand Lodge of England]]). When the UGLE was formed in 1813, all U.S. based Lodges were stricken from their rolls – due largely to the [[War of 1812|U.S. and British War, 1812 to 1815]]. Thus, separated from both UGLE and any concordantly recognised U.S. Grand Lodge, African Lodge re-titled itself as the African Lodge, Number 1—and became a ''de facto'' "Grand Lodge" (this Lodge is not to be confused with the various Grand Lodges on the Continent of [[Africa]]). As with the rest of U.S. Freemasonry, Prince Hall Freemasonry soon grew and organised on a Grand Lodge system for each state.
{{Main|Regular Masonic jurisdictions}}
[[File:Microcosm of London Plate 038 - Freemasons' Hall (tone).jpg|thumb|alt=First Freemason's Hall, 1809|Freemasons' Hall, London, c. 1809]]
Regularity is a concept based on adherence to [[Masonic Landmarks]], the basic membership requirements, tenets and rituals of the craft. Each Grand Lodge sets its own definition of what these landmarks are, and thus what is Regular and what is Irregular (and the definitions do not necessarily agree between Grand Lodges). Essentially, every Grand Lodge will hold that ''its'' landmarks (its requirements, tenets and rituals) are Regular, and judge other Grand Lodges based on those. If the differences are significant, one Grand Lodge may declare the other "Irregular" and withdraw or withhold recognition.<ref>[http://www.masonicum.lv/index.php?p=8857&lang=1506&pp=13574 "Regularity in Freemasonry and its Meaning"], ''Grand Lodge of Latvia'', retrieved 25 November 2013</ref><ref>[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/pope4.html Tony Pope, "Regularity and Recognition"], from ''Freemasonry Universal'', by Kent Henderson & Tony Pope, 1998, ''Pietre Stones'' website, retrieved 25 November 2013</ref>


The most commonly shared rules for Recognition (based on Regularity) are those given by the United Grand Lodge of England in 1929:
Widespread [[Racial segregation|segregation]], in the 19th- and early 20th-century North America, made it difficult for African-Americans to join Lodges outside of Prince Hall jurisdictions—and impossible for inter-jurisdiction recognition between the parallel U.S. Masonic authorities.
* The Grand Lodge should be established by an existing regular Grand Lodge, or by at least three regular Lodges.
* A belief in a supreme being and scripture is a condition of membership.
* Initiates should take their vows on that scripture.
* Only men can be admitted, and no relationship exists with mixed Lodges.
* The Grand Lodge has complete control over the first three degrees and is not subject to another body.
* All Lodges shall display a volume of scripture with the square and compasses while in session.
* There is no discussion of politics or religion.
* "Ancient landmarks, customs and usages" observed.<ref name=":0">''UGLE Book of Constitutions'', "Basic Principles for Grand Lodge Recognition", any year since 1930, page numbers may vary.</ref>


==Other degrees, orders, and bodies==
Prince Hall Masonry has always been ''regular'' in all respects except constitutional separation, and this separation has diminished in recent years. At present, Prince Hall Grand Lodges are recognized by some UGLE Concordant Grand Lodges and not by others, but appear to be working toward full recognition, with UGLE granting at least some degree of recognition.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://bessel.org/masrec/phamapshistorical.htm | title = Prince Hall Masonry Recognition details: Historical Maps | first = Paul M. | last = Bessel | accessdate = 2005-11-14 }}</ref> There are a growing number of both Prince Hall Lodges and non-Prince Hall Lodges that have ethnically diverse membership.
{{See also|Masonic bodies|List of Masonic rites}}
Blue Lodges, known as Craft Lodges in the United Kingdom, offer only the three traditional degrees. In most jurisdictions, the rank of past or installed master is also conferred in Blue/Craft Lodges. Master Masons are able to extend their Masonic experience by taking further degrees, in appendant or other bodies whether or not approved by their own Grand Lodge.<ref>Robert L.D. Cooper, ''Cracking the Freemason's Code'', Rider 2006, p. 229</ref>


The Ancient and Accepted [[Scottish Rite]] is a system of 33 degrees, including the three Blue Lodge degrees administered by a local or national Supreme Council. This system is popular in North America, South America and in [[Continental Europe]]. In America, the [[York Rite]], with a similar range, administers three orders of Masonry, namely the [[Royal Arch Masonry|Royal Arch]], [[Cryptic Masonry]], and [[Knights Templar (Freemasonry)|Knights Templar]].<ref>Michael Johnstone, ''The Freemasons'', Arcturus, 2005, pp. 95–98</ref>
=== Other degrees, orders and bodies ===
{{main|Masonic appendant bodies}}


In Britain, separate bodies administer each order. Freemasons are encouraged to join the [[Holy Royal Arch]], which is linked to [[Order of Mark Master Masons|Mark Masonry]] in Scotland and Ireland, but completely separate in England. In England, the Royal Arch is closely associated with the Craft, automatically having many Grand Officers in common, including H.R.H the [[Duke of Kent]] as both Grand Master of the Craft and First Grand Principal of the Royal Arch. The English Knights Templar and Cryptic Masonry share the Mark Grand Lodge offices and staff at Mark Masons Hall.<ref>[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/ward_HD_handbookfr.html J S M Ward, "The Higher Degrees Handbook"], ''Pietre Stones'', retrieved 11 November 2013</ref> The Ancient and Accepted Rite (similar to the Scottish Rite), requires a member to proclaim the Trinitarian Christian faith, and is administered from Duke Street in London.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Supreme Council|url=http://www.sc33.org.uk/|access-date=2021-06-17|website=www.sc33.org.uk}}</ref> Conversely, the [[Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia]] is a fully independent [[esoteric]] organization that requires members be [[United Grand Lodge of England]] [[Master Masons]].
There is no degree in Freemasonry higher than that of Master Mason.<ref name="Aims and Relationships"/> There are, however, a number of organizations that require being a Master Mason as a prerequisite for membership.<ref name="Beyond">{{cite book | title = Beyond the Craft | first = Keith B. | last = Jackson | publisher = Lewis Masonic | location = London | year = 1980 | isbn = 9780853181187 | oclc = 16542250 }}</ref> These bodies have no authority over the Craft.<ref name="Aims and Relationships"/> These orders or degrees may be described as additional or ''appendant'', and often provide a further perspective on some of the allegorical, moral and philosophical content of Freemasonry.


In the [[Nordic countries]], the [[Swedish Rite]] is dominant; a variation of it is also used in parts of Germany.
Appendant bodies are administered separately from Craft Grand Lodges but are styled ''Masonic'' since every member must be a Mason. However, Craft Masonic jurisdictions vary in their relationships with such bodies, if a relationship exists at all. The Articles of Union of the "Modern" and "Antient" craft Grand Lodges (into UGLE in 1813) limited recognition to certain degrees, such as the [[York Rite|Royal Arch]] and the "chivalric degrees", but there were and are many other degrees that have been worked since before the Union. Some bodies are not universally considered to be appendant bodies, but rather separate organizations that happen to require prior Masonic affiliation for membership. Some of these organizations have additional requirements, such as religious adherence (e.g. requiring members to profess Trinitarian Christian beliefs) or membership of other bodies.


==Ritual and symbolism==
Quite apart from these, there are organisations that are often thought of as related to Freemasonry, but which are in fact not related at all and are not accorded recognition as Masonic, such as the [[Orange Institution|Orange Order]], which originated in Ireland, or the [[Independent Order of Odd Fellows]].
{{Main|Masonic ritual and symbolism}}
[[File:Ahmad nami.jpg|thumb|[[Ottoman dynasty|Ottoman]] noble [[Ahmad Nami]] dressed in full Masonic attire in 1925]]
[[File:Masonic symbols in Szprotawa Poland.jpg|thumb|Example of Masonic symbols in [[Szprotawa]] Poland]]
[[File:Emblematic Structure of Freemasonry.gif|thumb|Freemasonry structure showing the symbols associated with the organization]]
{{Esotericism}}
Freemasonry describes itself as a "beautiful system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols".<ref>[http://www.mhebf.com/freemasonry.html "What is Freemasonry?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140109020434/http://www.mhebf.com/freemasonry.html |date=9 January 2014 }} ''Grand Lodge of Alberta'' retrieved 7 November 2013</ref> The symbolism is mainly, but not exclusively, drawn from the tools of stonemasons – the [[square and compasses]], the level and plumb rule, the [[trowel]], the rough and smooth [[ashlar]]s, among others. Moral lessons are attributed to each of these tools, although the assignment is by no means consistent. The meaning of the symbolism is taught and explored through ritual,<ref name="Johnstone" /> and in lectures and articles by individual Masons who offer their personal insights and opinions.


According to the [[Academic study of Western esotericism|scholar of Western esotericism]] Jan A. M. Snoek: "the best way to characterize Freemasonry is in terms of what it is not, rather than what it is".<ref name="Theokritoff 2016">{{cite book |author-last=Snoek |author-first=Jan A. M. |year=2016 |chapter=Part III: The Renaissance and Early Modernity – Freemasonry |editor-last=Magee |editor-first=Glenn A. |title=The Cambridge Handbook of Western Mysticism and Esotericism |location=[[Cambridge]] and New York City |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |pages=200–210 |doi=10.1017/CBO9781139027649.018 |isbn=978-1139027649}}</ref> All Freemasons begin their journey in the "craft" by being progressively "initiated", "passed" and "raised" into the three degrees of Craft, or Blue Lodge Masonry. During these three rituals, the candidate is progressively taught the Masonic symbols, and entrusted with grips or tokens, signs, and words to signify to other Masons which degrees he has taken. The dramatic allegorical ceremonies include explanatory lectures and revolve around the construction of the [[Temple of Solomon]], and the artistry and death of the chief architect, [[Hiram Abiff]]. The degrees are those of "Entered apprentice", "Fellowcraft" and "Master Mason". While many different versions of these rituals exist, with various lodge layouts and versions of the Hiramic legend, each version is recognizable to any Freemason from any jurisdiction.<ref name="Johnstone" />
== Principles and activities ==
=== Ritual, symbolism, and morality ===
Masonic ritual makes use of the [[architecture|architectural]] symbolism of the tools of the [[medieval]] ''operative'' stonemason. Freemasons, as ''speculative'' masons (meaning philosophical building rather than actual building), use this symbolism to teach moral and ethical lessons of the principles of "Brotherly Love, Relief, and Truth" — or as related in France: "[[Liberté, égalité, fraternité|Liberty, Equality, Fraternity]]".<ref name=Dummies/>


In some jurisdictions, the main themes of each degree are illustrated by [[tracing board]]s. These painted depictions of Masonic themes are exhibited in the lodge according to which degree is being worked and are explained to the candidate to illustrate the legend and symbolism of each degree.<ref>[http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/texts/gmd1999/tb_history01.html Mark S. Dwor, "Some thoughts on the history of the Tracing Boards"], ''Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon'', 1999, retrieved 7 November 2013</ref>
Two of the principal symbols always found in a Lodge are the ''[[steel square|square]]'' and ''[[Compass (drafting)|compasses]]''. Some Lodges and rituals explain these symbols as lessons in conduct: for example, that Masons should "square their actions by the square of virtue" and to learn to "circumscribe their desires and keep their passions within due bounds toward all mankind". However, as Freemasonry is non-dogmatic, there is no general interpretation for these symbols (or any Masonic symbol) that is used by Freemasonry as a whole.<ref name="spoilt">{{cite journal | last = Gilkes | first = Peter | year = 2004 | month = July | title = Masonic ritual: Spoilt for choice | journal = Masonic Quarterly Magazine | issue = 10 | url = http://www.mqmagazine.co.uk/issue-10/p-61.php | accessdate = 2007-05-07 }}</ref>


The idea of Masonic brotherhood probably descends from a 16th-century legal definition of a "brother" as one who has taken an oath of mutual support to another. Accordingly, Masons swear at each degree to support and protect their brethren unless they have broken the law.<ref>Robert L.D. Cooper, ''Cracking the Freemason's Code'', Rider 2006, p. 79</ref> In most Lodges, the oath or obligation is taken on a ''[[Volume of Sacred Law]]'', whichever book of divine revelation is appropriate to the religious beliefs of the individual brother (usually the Bible in the Anglo-American tradition). In ''Progressive'' continental Freemasonry, books other than scripture are permissible, a cause of rupture between Grand Lodges.<ref>[http://bessel.org/masrec/france.htm "Masonic U.S. Recognition of French Grand Lodges in the 20th century"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060410074658/http://bessel.org/masrec/france.htm |date=10 April 2006 }}, ''Paul M. Bessel''. retrieved 8 November 2013</ref>
These moral lessons are communicated in performance of allegorical ritual. A candidate progresses through ''degrees''<ref name="Aims and Relationships"/> gaining knowledge and understanding of himself, his relationship with others and his relationship with the Supreme Being (as per his own interpretation). While the philosophical aspects of Freemasonry tend to be discussed in Lodges of Instruction or Research, and sometimes informal groups, Freemasons, and others, frequently publish — to varying degrees of competence — studies that are available to the public. Any mason may speculate on the symbols and purpose of Freemasonry, and indeed all masons are required to some extent to speculate on masonic meaning as a condition of advancing through the [[#Degrees|degrees]]. It is well noted, however, that no one person "speaks" for the whole of Freemasonry.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.masonicinfo.com/leader.htm | title = Top Leader speaks | year = 2007 | first = Edward L. | last = King | accessdate = 2007-04-09 }}</ref>


==History==
The ''Volume of the Sacred Law'' is always displayed in an open Lodge. In English-speaking countries, this is frequently the [[King James Version of the Bible]] or another standard translation; there is no such thing as an exclusive "Masonic Bible".<ref name="UGLE home">{{cite web | url = http://www.grandlodge-england.org/index.htm | title = The United Grand Lodge of England - Home Page | publisher = United Grand Lodge of England | year = 2002 | accessdate = 2006-02-23 }}</ref> In many French Lodges, the Masonic Constitutions are used instead. Furthermore, a candidate is given his choice of religious text for his Obligation, according to his beliefs. UGLE alludes to similarities to legal practice in the UK, and to a common source with other oath taking processes.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.cjsonline.gov.uk/defendant/walkthrough/the_trial/faqs/index.html#2642 | title = UK Government information on Courts system | publisher = Criminal Justice System for England and Wales | date = | accessdate = 2006-03-08 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.grandlodge-england.org/masonry/A2L-promises.htm | title = What promises do Freemasons take? | year = 2002 | accessdate = 2007-05-08 | publisher = United Grand Lodge of England }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | title = The origins of freemasonry : facts & fictions | first =
{{Main|History of Freemasonry}}
Margaret C. | last = Jacob | publisher = University of Pennsylvania Press | location = Philadelphia | year = 2005 | isbn = 9780812239010 | oclc = 61478025 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/feudal.htm | first = Chris | last = Trueman | title = Feudalism | accessdate = 2006-03-08 | archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20060421024923/http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/feudal.htm | archivedate = 2006-04-21 | quote = They had to swear an oath of loyalty to William… a sworn oath on the Bible was a very important thing and one which few men would dare to break as it would condemn them to Hell. }}</ref> In Lodges with a membership of mixed religions it is common to find more than one sacred text displayed.


===Origins===
In keeping with the geometrical and architectural theme of Freemasonry, the Supreme Being is referred to in Masonic ritual by the titles of the ''[[Great Architect of the Universe]]'', ''Grand Geometrician'' or similar, to make clear that the reference is generic, and not tied to a particular religion's conception of God.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.masonicinfo.com/gaotu.htm | title = GAOTU | year = 2007 | first = Edward L. | last = King | accessdate = 2007-04-09 }}</ref>
Since the middle of the 19th century, Masonic historians have sought the origins of the movement in a series of similar documents known as the [[Old Charges]], dating from the [[Regius Poem]] in about 1425<ref>[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/prescott07.html Andrew Prescott, "The Old Charges Revisited"], from Transactions of the Lodge of Research No. 2429 (Leicester), 2006, ''Pietre-Stones Masonic Papers'', retrieved 12 October 2013</ref> to the beginning of the 18th century. Alluding to the membership of a lodge of [[Operative Freemasonry|operative masons]], they relate it to a [[Masonic myths|mythologised history]] of the craft, the duties of its grades, and the manner in which oaths of fidelity are to be taken on joining.<ref>A. F. A. Woodford, preface to William James Hughan, ''The Old Charges of British Freemasons'', London, 1872</ref> The 15th century also sees the first evidence of ceremonial regalia.<ref>{{Cite book | author = John Yarker | title = The Arcane Schools | location = Manchester | year = 1909 | pages = 341–342}}</ref>


There is no clear mechanism by which these local trade organisations became today's Masonic Lodges. The earliest rituals and passwords known, from operative lodges around the turn of the 17th–18th centuries, show continuity with the rituals developed in the later 18th century by accepted or speculative Masons, as those members who did not practice the physical craft gradually came to be known.<ref>Robert L.D. Cooper, ''Cracking the Freemason's Code'', Rider 2006, Chapter 4, p. 53</ref> The minutes of the [[Lodge of Edinburgh (Mary's Chapel) No. 1]] in Scotland show a continuity from an operative lodge in 1598 to a modern speculative Lodge.<ref>David Murray Lyon, ''History of the Lodge of Edinburgh (Mary's Chapel) No 1'', Blackwood 1873, Preface</ref> It is reputed to be the oldest Masonic Lodge in the world.<ref>{{cite book|last=Stevenson|first=David|title=The Origins of Freemasonry|year=1988|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0521396549|pages=38–44}}</ref>
=== Degrees ===
[[File:Room at Masonic Hall Bury St Edmunds Suffolk England.jpg|thumb|left|alt=Royal Arch Chapter in England, beginning of c20|View of room at the Masonic Hall, [[Bury St Edmunds]], Suffolk, England, early 20th century, set up for a Holy Royal Arch convocation]]
The three degrees of ''Craft'' or ''Blue Lodge'' Freemasonry are those of:
Alternatively, [[Thomas De Quincey]] in his work titled ''Rosicrucians and Freemasonry'' put forward the theory that suggested that Freemasonry may have been an outgrowth of [[Rosicrucianism]]. The theory had also been postulated in 1803 by German professor; [[Johann Gottlieb Buhle|J. G. Buhle]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.masonicdictionary.com/rosicrucian.html|title=Rosicrucians and Freemasonry {{!}} Masonic Dictionary |last=Dafoe|first=Stephen|website=www.masonicdictionary.com|language=en|access-date=14 June 2017|archive-date=28 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200128202245/http://www.masonicdictionary.com/rosicrucian.html|url-status=usurped}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-ffW5P6NW1kC&q=Freemasonry+is+an+outgrowth+of+rosicrucians&pg=PA395|title=The Secret Teachings of All Ages: An Encyclopedic Outline of Masonic, Hermetic, Qabbalistic and Rosicrucian Symbolical Philosophy|last=Hall|first=Manly P.|date=2010|publisher=Courier Corporation|isbn=978-0486471433|language=en}}</ref>


The first Grand Lodge, the Grand Lodge of London and Westminster, later called the [[Premier Grand Lodge of England|Grand Lodge of England]], was founded on [[St. John's Day, Masonic feast|St John's Day]], 24 June 1717,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ugle.org.uk/about-freemasonry/history-of-freemasonry |title=History of Freemasonry timeline |publisher=United Grand Lodge of England |access-date=12 June 2018}}</ref> when four existing London Lodges met for a joint dinner. Over the next decade, most of the existing Lodges in England joined the new regulatory body, which itself entered a period of self-publicity and expansion. New lodges were created, and the fraternity began to grow.
# ''Entered Apprentice'' — the degree of an Initiate, which makes one a Mason;
# ''Fellow Craft'' — an intermediate degree, involved with learning;
# ''Master Mason'' — the "third degree", a necessity for participation in most aspects of Masonry.


During the course of the 18th century, as aristocrats and artists crowded out the craftsmen originally associated with the organization, Freemasonry became fashionable throughout Europe and the [[European colonization of the Americas|American colonies]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Greer |first=John Michael |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c-T7DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA26 |title=Druidry Handbook: Spiritual Practice Rooted in the Living Earth |date=2021|publisher=Weiser Books |isbn=978-1-63341-224-8 |pages=26 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Bergreen |first=Laurence |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3B6zCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA119 |title=Casanova: The World of a Seductive Genius |date=2016 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-1-4767-1652-7 |page=119 |language=en}}</ref>
The degrees represent stages of personal development. No Freemason is told that there is only one meaning to the allegories; as a Freemason works through the degrees and studies their lessons, he interprets them for himself, his personal interpretation being bounded only by the Constitution within which he works.<ref name="UGLE home"/> A common symbolic structure and universal archetypes provide a means for each Freemason to come to his own answers to life's important philosophical questions.


Between 1730 and 1750, the Grand Lodge endorsed several significant changes that some Lodges could not endorse. A rival Grand Lodge was formed on 17 July 1751, which called itself the "[[Antient Grand Lodge of England]]" to signify that, in their opinion, these lodges were maintaining older traditions and rejected changes that the Premiere Grand Lodge had adopted. As an insult, the self proclaimed "Antient Grand Lodge" coined the term "modern" to designate the Premiere Grand Lodge (historians now use Premiere Grand Lodge and Antient Grand Lodge – to differentiate the two bodies).<ref>{{cite web |title=Ars Quatuor Coronatorum – A Revised Style Guide |url=https://www.quatuorcoronati.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/AQC-Revised-Style-Guide-5-August-2011-2.pdf |website=[[Quatuor Coronati Lodge|Quatuor Coronati Lodge No. 2076]] |access-date=19 November 2024 |pages=12–13}}</ref> These two Grand Lodges vied for supremacy until the Premiere Grand Lodge made a [[Emulation Lodge of Improvement|compromise]] with the antient Grand Lodge to return to a ritual that worked for both Grand Lodges. They re-united on 27 December 1813 to form the [[United Grand Lodge of England]].<ref>{{Cite book|author=[[S. Brent Morris]]|title=The Complete Idiot's Guide to Freemasonry|publisher=Alpha/Penguin Books|isbn=1-59257-490-4|page=[https://archive.org/details/completeidiotsgu00morr/page/27 27]|year=2006|url=https://archive.org/details/completeidiotsgu00morr/page/27}}</ref><ref name="Clarke">[http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/aqc/ancients.html I. R. Clarke, "The Formation of the Grand Lodge of the Antients"], Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, vol 79 (1966), pp. 270–273, ''Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon'', retrieved 28 June 2012</ref>
As previously stated, there is no degree of Craft Freemasonry higher than that of Master Mason.<ref name="Aims and Relationships"/> Although some Masonic bodies and orders have further degrees named with higher numbers, these degrees may be considered to be supplements to the Master Mason degree rather than promotions from it.<ref name="Beyond" /> An example is the [[Scottish Rite]], conferring degrees numbered from 4° up to 33°.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.supremecouncil.org/faq/wwfaq.asp |title=Scottish Rite Freemasonry F.A.Q. | accessdate = 2007-05-08 | publisher = Scottish Rite Freemasonry, Northern Jurisdiction – United States of America }}</ref> It is essential to be a Master Mason in order to qualify for these further degrees. They are administered on a parallel system to ''Craft'' or ''Blue Lodge'' Freemasonry; within each organization there is a system of offices, which confer rank within that degree or order alone.


The [[Grand Lodge of Ireland]] and the [[Grand Lodge of Scotland]] were formed in 1725 and 1736, respectively, although neither persuaded all of the existing lodges in their countries to join for many years.<ref>[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/uk_grand_lodges.html H. L. Haywood, "Various Grand Lodges"], ''The Builder'', vol X no 5, May 1924, ''Pietre Stones'' website, retrieved 9 January 2014</ref><ref>Robert L.D. Cooper, ''Cracking the Freemason's Code'', Rider 2006, Chapter 1, p. 17</ref>
In some jurisdictions, especially those in continental Europe, Freemasons working through the degrees may be asked to prepare papers on related philosophical topics, and present these papers in open Lodge. There is an enormous bibliography of Masonic papers, magazines and publications ranging from fanciful abstractions which construct spiritual and moral lessons of varying value, through practical handbooks on organisation, management and ritual performance, to serious historical and philosophical papers entitled to academic respect.


===North America===
=== Signs, grips and words ===
[[File:Erasmus James Philipps, Old Burying Ground, Halifax, Nova Scotia.jpg|thumb|[[Erasmus James Philipps]], first Freemason in present-day Canada, [[Old Burying Ground (Halifax, Nova Scotia)]]]]
Freemasons use ''signs'' (gestures), ''grips'' or ''tokens'' (handshakes) and ''words'' to gain admission to meetings and identify legitimate visitors.
The earliest known American lodges were in [[Pennsylvania]]. The collector for the port of Pennsylvania, John Moore, wrote of attending lodges there in 1715, two years before the putative formation of the first Grand Lodge in London. The [[Premier Grand Lodge of England|Grand Lodge of England]] appointed a Provincial Grand Master for North America in 1731, based in Pennsylvania,<ref>[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/pennsylvania_freemasonry.html Francis Vicente, An Overview of Early Freemasonry in Pennsylvania], ''Pietre-Stones'', retrieved 15 November 2013</ref> leading to the creation of the [[Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania]].


In Canada, [[Erasmus James Philipps]] became a Freemason while working on a commission to resolve boundaries in [[New England]] and, in 1739, he became provincial Grand Master for [[Nova Scotia]]; Philipps founded the first Masonic lodge in Canada at [[Annapolis Royal, Nova Scotia]].<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.grandlodgens.org/content/chapter-1-beginnings| title = History of Freemasons in Nova Scotia}}</ref>
From the early 18th century onwards, many exposés have been written claiming to reveal these signs, grips and passwords to the uninitiated. However, as Masonic scholar Christopher Hodapp states, since each Grand Lodge is free to create its own rituals,<ref name="spoilt"/> the signs, grips and passwords can and do differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.<ref name=Dummies/> Furthermore, historian John J. Robinson states that Grand Lodges can and do change their rituals frequently, updating the language used, adding or omitting sections.<ref name="changes">John J. Robinson, ''A Pilgrim's Path'', M. Evans and Co., Inc. New York, p.129 </ref> Therefore, any exposé is only valid for a particular jurisdiction at a particular time. Today, an unknown visitor is usually required to produce a dues card or other documentation of membership in addition to demonstrating knowledge of the signs, grips and passwords.


Other lodges in the colony of Pennsylvania obtained authorisations from the later [[Antient Grand Lodge of England]], the [[Grand Lodge of Scotland]], and the [[Grand Lodge of Ireland]], which was particularly well represented in the travelling lodges of the British Army.<ref>[http://www.stjohns1.org/portal/lodge_history Werner Hartmann, "History of St. John's Lodge No. 1"], ''St. John's Lodge No. 1, A.Y.M.'', 2012, retrieved 16 November 2013</ref><ref>M. Baigent and R. Leigh, ''The Temple and the Lodge'', Arrow 1998, Appendix 2, pp. 360–362, "Masonic Field Lodges in Regiments in America", 1775–77</ref> Many lodges came into existence with no warrant from any Grand Lodge, applying and paying for their authorisation only after they were confident of their own survival.<ref>Robert L.D. Cooper, ''Cracking the Freemason's Code'', Rider 2006, p. 190</ref>
===Obligations===


After the [[American Revolution]], independent U.S. Grand Lodges developed within each state. Some thought was briefly given to organising<!-- NOTE: THIS ARTICLE USES UK SPELLING ... which spells this word with an "s" and not a "z." --> an overarching "Grand Lodge of the United States," with [[George Washington]], who was a member of a Virginian lodge, as the first Grand Master, but the idea was short-lived. The various state Grand Lodges did not wish to diminish their own authority by agreeing to such a body.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book
Obligations are those elements of ritual in which a candidate swears to protect the ''"secrets of Freemasonry"'', which are the various signs, tokens and words associated with recognition in each degree,<ref name="Ritual" /> as well as to perform certain duties and to avoid doing those things which are prohibited by his Obligation. In regular jurisdictions these obligations are sworn on the aforementioned ''Volume of the Sacred Law'' and in the witness of the Supreme Being and often with assurance that it is of the candidate's own free will.
| title = Revolutionary brotherhood: Freemasonry and the transformation of the American social order, 1730–1840
| first1 = Steven C.
| last1 = Bullock
| author2 = Institute of Early American History and Culture (Williamsburg, Va.)
| location = Chapel Hill
| publisher = University of North Carolina Press
| year = 1996
| isbn = 978-0-8078-4750-3
| oclc = 33334015 }}</ref>


On April 30, 1789, George Washington took his [[Oath of office of the president of the United States|oath of office]] at his [[First inauguration of George Washington|first inauguration]] upon a bible belonging to [[St. John's Lodge (New York)|St. John's Lodge No. 1]] of New York. Originally, it was expected that Washington would bring his own Bible upon which to swear his oath of office, and there was some consternation when it turned out that no one had informed Washington to bring one. Thinking quickly, [[Jacob Morton]], the Marshal of the Inauguration (and Master of St. John's Lodge), borrowed the Lodge's Bible for use in the ceremony. That bible has been known since as the [[George Washington Inaugural Bible]], and is still in possession of St. John's Lodge No. 1 of the Grand Lodge of New York.<ref>{{Cite web |title=George Washington Inaugural Bible |url=https://stjohns1.org/the-lodge/george-washington-inaugural-bible/ |access-date=2024-04-28 |website=St. John's Lodge No. 1 A.Y.M. |language=en-US}}</ref> [[Robert R. Livingston|Robert Livingston]], [[New York Court of Chancery|Chancellor]] of the State of New York, also the first [[Grand Lodge of New York|Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the State of New York]], administered the oath.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-05-18 |title=President George Washington's First Inaugural Speech (1789) |url=https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-george-washingtons-first-inaugural-speech |access-date=2024-05-26 |website=National Archives |language=en}}</ref> This event effectuated the establishment of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government of the United States, which had until then existed only virtually after the US Constitution become operational almost two months earlier, on March 4, 1789.<ref>{{Cite web |title=On this day, government begins under our Constitution |url=https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/march-4-a-forgotten-huge-day-in-american-politics-2 |access-date=2024-05-26 |website=National Constitution Center – constitutioncenter.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Today in History - March 4 |url=https://www.loc.gov/item/today-in-history/march-04/ |access-date=2024-05-26 |website=Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA}}</ref>
Details of the obligations vary; some versions are published<ref name="Ritual" /> while others are privately printed in books of coded text. Still other jurisdictions rely on oral transmission of ritual, and thus have no ritual books at all.<ref>{{cite web | last = Bessel | first = Paul M. | url = http://bessel.org/writrits.htm | title = Printed Rituals | date = [[2006-11-29]] | accessdate = 2007-03-15 }}</ref> Moreover, not all printed rituals are authentic — Leo Taxil's exposure is a proven hoax, and there are others.


====Jamaican Freemasonry====
The obligations are historically known amongst various sources critical of Freemasonry for their so-called "bloody penalties",<ref>{{cite web | author = Cassiel Sophia | publisher = Metareligion | url = http://www.meta-religion.com/Secret_societies/Groups/Masonry/masonry.htm | title = Masonry | accessdate = 2007-07-08 }}</ref> an allusion to the apparent physical penalties associated with each degree. This leads to some descriptions of the Obligations as "Oaths". The corresponding text, with regard to the penalties, does not appear in authoritative, endorsed sources,<ref name="Ritual" /> following a decision "that all references to physical penalties be omitted from the obligations taken by Candidates in the three Degrees and by a Master Elect at his Installation but retained elsewhere in the respective ceremonies".<ref name=preface>{{cite book | title = Emulation Ritual | author = Freemasons. Emulation Lodge of Improvement (London, England) | location = London | publisher = Lewis Masonic | edition = 8th edition | isbn = | oclc = | url = http://web.mit.edu/dryfoo/Masonry/Misc/emu-pref.html | pages = Preface | accessdate = 2007-07-08 }}</ref> The penalties are interpreted symbolically, and are not applied in actuality by a Lodge or by any other body of Masonry. The descriptive nature of the penalties alludes to how the candidate should feel about himself should he knowingly violate his obligation.<ref>{{cite web | first = Roger | last = Firestone | url = http://web.mit.edu/dryfoo/www/Masonry/Questions/difficult.html | title = Difficult Questions About Freemasonry | date = [[2001-12-01]] | accessdate = 2007-07-08 }}</ref> Modern penalties may include suspension, expulsion or reprimand.
Whilst no single obligation is representative of Freemasonry as a whole, a number of common themes appear when considering a range of potential texts. Content which may appear in at least one of the three obligations includes: the candidate promises to act in a manner befitting a member of civilized society, promises to obey the law of his Supreme Being, promises to obey the law of his sovereign state, promises to attend his lodge if he is able, promises not to wrong, cheat nor defraud the Lodge or the brethren, and promises aid or charity to brethren and their families in times of need if it can be done without causing financial harm to himself.<ref name="Ritual" /><ref>{{cite book | title = Bristol Masonic Ritual: The Oldest and Most Unique Craft Ritual Used in England | first = Charles E. | last = Cohoughlyn-Burroughs | origyear = 1996 | year = 2004 | location = Kila, Mont. | publisher = Kessinger | isbn = 9781417915668 | oclc = 78368255 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | title = Craft Ritual | publisher = Privately published | year = 1990 }}<!-- please expand this reference so that it might be verified --></ref>


Freemasonry was imported to [[Jamaica]] by British immigrants who colonized the island for over 300 years. In 1908, there were eleven recorded Masonic lodges, which included three Grand Lodges, two Craft lodges, and two Rose Croix chapters.<ref name="Handbook of Jamaica">{{cite book |date=1908 |title=Handbook of Jamaica |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-LwCAAAAYAAJ |location=Google Books |publisher=Jamaica Government |page=449 }}</ref> During slavery, the lodges were open to all "freeborn" men. According to the Jamaican 1834 census, that potentially included 5,000 free black men and 40,000 free people of colour (mixed race).<ref>{{cite book |date=1908 |title=Handbook of Jamaica |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-LwCAAAAYAAJ |location=Google Books |publisher=Jamaica Government |page=33 }}</ref> After the [[Slavery Abolition Act 1833|full abolition of slavery in 1838]], the Lodges were open to all Jamaican men of any race.<ref name="Jamaica Gleaner Newspaper">{{cite news |date=10 December 2017 |title=Charting The History Of Freemasons In Jamaica |url=http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/art-leisure/20171210/charting-history-freemasons-jamaica |work=Jamaica Gleaner Newspaper}}</ref> Jamaica also kept close relationships with Masons from other countries. Jamaican Freemasonry historian Jackie Ranston, noted that:
=== Landmarks ===
{{main|Masonic Landmarks}}
The Landmarks of Masonry are defined as ancient and unchangeable precepts; standards by which the regularity of Lodges and Grand Lodges are judged. Each Grand Lodge is self-governing and no single authority exists over the whole of Freemasonry. The interpretation of these principles therefore can and does vary, leading to controversies of recognition.


{{Blockquote
The concept of Masonic Landmarks appears in Masonic regulations as early as 1723, and seem to be adopted from the regulations of operative masonic guilds. In 1858, [[Albert Mackey|Albert G. Mackey]] attempted to set down 25 Landmarks.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Mackey | first = Albert G. | authorlink = Albert Mackey | year = 1858 | month = October | title = Landmarks of Freemasonry | journal = American Quarterly Review of Freemasonry and its kindred sciences | volume = ii | pages = 230 | issn = 0741-790X | id = {{oclc|1480641}} | url = http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/grandlodge/landmarks.html | accessdate = 2007-04-09 }} (Transcribed by Eugene Goldman, [[10 September]] [[1998]].)</ref> In 1863, George Oliver published a Freemason's Treasury in which he listed 40 Landmarks. A number of American Grand Lodges have attempted the task of enumerating the Landmarks; numbers differing from West Virginia (7) and New Jersey (10) to Nevada (39) and Kentucky (54).<ref>{{cite journal | last = Botelho | first = Michael A. | year = 2002 | month = February | title = Masonic Landmarks | journal = The Scottish Rite Journal | url = http://www.srmason-sj.org/web/journal-files/Issues/Feb02/botelho.htm | issn = 1076-8572 | id = {{oclc|21360724}} | accessdate = 2007-05-08 }}</ref>
|text=Jamaica served as an arms depot for the revolutionary forces when two Kingston Freemasons, Wellwood and Maxwell Hyslop, financed the campaigns of Simón Bolívar, the Liberator, to whom six Latin American Republics owe their independence". Bolívar himself was a Mason, enjoying contacts with Brethren in Spain, England, France, and Venezuela until after gaining power in Venezuela, he prohibited all secret societies in 1828 and included the Freemasons.<ref name="Jamaica Gleaner Newspaper"/> }}


On 25 May 2017, Masons around the world celebrated the 300th anniversary of the fraternity. Jamaica hosted one of the regional gatherings for this celebration.<ref>{{cite news |date=18 April 2017 |title=English Freemasons To Celebrate Their 300th Year In Jamaica |url=http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/news/20170418/english-freemasons-celebrate-their-300th-year-jamaica |work=Jamaica Gleaner Newspaper}}</ref><ref name="Handbook of Jamaica"/>
=== Charitable effort ===
The fraternity is widely involved in charity and community service activities. In contemporary times, money is collected ''only'' from the membership, and is to be devoted to ''charitable'' purposes. Freemasonry worldwide disburses substantial charitable amounts to non-Masonic charities, locally, nationally and internationally. In earlier centuries, however, charitable funds were collected more on the basis of a Provident or [[Friendly Society]], and there were elaborate regulations to determine a petitioner's eligibility for consideration for charity, according to strictly Masonic criteria.


====Prince Hall Freemasonry====
Some examples of Masonic charities include:
{{Main|Prince Hall Freemasonry}}


Prince Hall Freemasonry exists because of the refusal of early American lodges to admit African Americans. In 1775, an African American named [[Prince Hall]],<ref>
*Homes<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rmbi.org.uk/ |title=Royal Masonic Benevolent Institute |accessdate=2007-05-08}}</ref> that provide sheltered housing or nursing care.
{{cite web
*Education with both educational grants<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rmtgb.org/ |title=Royal Masonic Trust for Girls and Boys |accessdate=2007-05-08}}</ref> or [[Royal Masonic School|residential education]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.royalmasonic.herts.sch.uk/pages/default.asp |title=Royal Masonic School for Girls |accessdate=2007-05-08}}</ref> which are open to all and not limited to the families of Freemasons.
| url = http://www.mindspring.com/~johnsonx/whoisph.htm
*Medical assistance.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nmsf.org |title=New Masonic Samaritan Fund |accessdate=2007-05-08}}</ref>
| title = Who is Prince Hall? And other well known Prince Hall Masons
| first = Lawrence
| last = Johnson
| year = 1996
| access-date = 14 November 2005
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070602065851/http://www.mindspring.com/~johnsonx/whoisph.htm
| archive-date = 2 June 2007
| url-status=dead
| df = dmy-all
}}
</ref> along with 14 other African American men, was initiated into a British military lodge with a warrant from the [[Grand Lodge of Ireland]], having failed to obtain admission from the other lodges in [[Boston]]. When the British military Lodge left North America after the end of the Revolution, those 15 men were given the authority to meet as a Lodge, but not to initiate Masons. In 1784, these individuals obtained a Warrant from the Grand Lodge of England (Premiere Grand Lodge) and formed [[African Lodge No. 459|African Lodge, Number 459]]. When the two English grand lodges united in 1813, all U.S.-based Lodges were stricken from their rolls&nbsp;– largely because of the [[War of 1812]]. Thus, separated from both English jurisdiction and any concordantly recognised U.S. Grand Lodge, African Lodge retitled itself as the African Lodge, Number 1&nbsp;– and became a ''de facto'' Grand Lodge. (This lodge is not to be confused with the various Grand Lodges in Africa.) As with the rest of U.S. Freemasonry, Prince Hall Freemasonry soon grew and organised <!-- NOTE: THIS ARTICLE USES UK SPELLING ... which spells this word with an "s" and not a "z". --> on a Grand Lodge system for each state.<ref>[http://www.princehall.org/History/Ray%20Colemans%20History.pdf "Prince Hall History Education Class" by Raymond T. Coleman(pdf)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303223554/http://www.princehall.org/History/Ray%20Colemans%20History.pdf |date=3 March 2016 }} retrieved 13 October 2013</ref>


Unlike other fraternal orders, there was never any blanket rule against the admission of men based on their race. Each lodge and grand lodge had their own rules, both written and unwritten. A few non-Prince Hall lodges did admit Blacks, with [[Angelo Soliman]] being one notable Masonic personality of African descent. Nonetheless, widespread [[racial segregation]] in 19th- and early 20th-century North America made it difficult for African Americans to join Lodges outside of Prince Hall jurisdictions. Even if a lodge was willing to entertain non-White applicants, generally only a single anonymous vote could prevent someone from being admitted. Inter-jurisdiction recognition between traditional and Prince Hall U.S. Masonic authorities was also not forthcoming. As demonstrated by the case of the famous black boxer [[Jack Johnson (boxer)|Jack Johnson]], if word spread that a mainstream lodge had admitted a Black person, that lodge could potentially face sanction from other discriminatory lodges.{{citation needed|date=June 2024}}
== Membership requirements ==
[[Image:Freimaurer Initiation.jpg|thumb|350px|Freemasonry initiation. 18th century]]


Today most (but not all) U.S. Grand Lodges recognise their Prince Hall counterparts, and the authorities of both traditions are working towards full recognition.<ref>{{cite web
A candidate for Freemasonry must apply to a lodge in his community, obtaining an introduction by asking an existing member, who then becomes the candidate's sponsor. In some jurisdictions, it is required that the petitioner ask three times, however this is becoming less prevalent.<ref>{{cite journal | year = 2001 | month = January | title =Ill. Ernest Borgnine, 33°, G.C., Receives 50-Year Pin | journal = The Scottish Rite Journal | url = http://www.srmason-sj.org/council/journal/jan01/cijan.html | issn = 1076-8572 | id = {{oclc|21360724}} | accessdate = 2006-07-12 | quote = Illustrious Borgnine also told of the difficulties he had in becoming a Mason. He did not know that, at the time, it was necessary to ask three times. }}</ref> In other jurisdictions, more open advertising is utilized to inform potential candidates where to go for more information. Regardless of how a potential candidate receives his introduction to a Lodge, he must be freely elected by secret ballot in open Lodge. Members approving his candidacy will vote with "white balls" in the voting box. Adverse votes by "black balls" will exclude a candidate. The number of adverse votes necessary to reject a candidate, which in some jurisdictions is as few as one, is set out in the governing Constitution of the presiding Grand Lodge.
| url = http://bessel.org/masrec/phamapshistorical.htm
| title = Prince Hall Masonry Recognition details: Historical Maps
| first = Paul M.
| last = Bessel
| access-date = 14 November 2005 }}</ref> The United Grand Lodge of England has no problem with recognising Prince Hall Grand Lodges.<ref>[http://www.ugle.org.uk/about/foreign-grand-lodges "Foreign Grand Lodges"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131022100731/http://ugle.org.uk/about/foreign-grand-lodges |date=22 October 2013 }}, ''UGLE Website'', retrieved 25 October 2013</ref> While celebrating their heritage as lodges of African Americans, Prince Hall is open to all men regardless of race or religion.<ref>[http://www.princehall-pa.org/GrandLodge/glhist.htm "History of Prince Hall Masonry: What is Freemasonry"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131119011047/http://www.princehall-pa.org/grandlodge/glhist.htm |date=19 November 2013 }}, ''Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge Free and Accepted Masons Jurisdiction of Pennsylvania'', retrieved 25 October 2013</ref>


===Emergence of Continental Freemasonry===
=== General requirements ===
[[File:Freimaurer Initiation.jpg|thumb|alt=Masonic initiation, Paris, 1745|Masonic initiation, Paris, 1745]]
English Freemasonry spread to France in the 1720s, first as lodges of expatriates and exiled [[Jacobitism|Jacobites]], and then as distinctively French lodges that still follow the ritual of the [[Premier Grand Lodge of England|Moderns]]. From France and England, Freemasonry spread to most of Continental Europe during the course of the 18th century. The Grande Loge de France was formed under the Grand Mastership of the Duke of Clermont, who exercised only nominal authority. His successor, the [[Louis Philippe II, Duke of Orléans|Duke of Orléans]], reconstituted the central body as the Grand Orient de France in 1773. Briefly eclipsed during the [[French Revolution]], French Freemasonry continued to grow in the next century,<ref>[http://www.godf.org/index.php/pages/details/slug/histoire-de-la-franc-maconnerie ''Histoire de la Franc-maçonnerie''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151226065508/http://www.godf.org/index.php/pages/details/slug/histoire-de-la-franc-maconnerie |date=26 December 2015 }}, Grand Orient de France, retrieved 12 November 2013</ref> at first under the leadership of [[Alexandre Francois Auguste de Grasse]], Comte de Grassy-Tilly. A career Army officer, he lived with his family in [[Charleston, South Carolina]] from 1793 to the early 1800s, after leaving [[Saint-Domingue]], now Haiti, during the years of the [[Haitian Revolution]].


=== Freemasonry in the Middle East ===
Generally, to be a regular Freemason, a candidate must:<ref name="Aims and Relationships"/>
{{Further|History of Freemasonry#Freemasonry in the Middle East|label1=Freemasonry in the Middle East}}
After the failure of the [[Revolutions of 1830#In Italy|1830 Italian revolution]], a number of Italian Freemasons were forced to flee. They secretly set up an approved chapter of [[Scottish Rite]] in [[Alexandria]], a town already inhabited by a large Italian community. Meanwhile, the French Freemasons publicly organised a local chapter in Alexandria in 1845.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=M. Landau|first=Jacob|date=1965|title=Prolegomena to a study of secret societies in modern Egypt|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00263206508700010?journalCode=fmes20|journal=Middle Eastern Studies|publisher=Routledge|volume=1|issue=2|page=139|doi=10.1080/00263206508700010|via=Tandfonline | issn = 0026-3206}}</ref> During the 19th and 20th century [[Ottoman Empire]], Masonic lodges operated widely across all parts of the empire and numerous [[Tariqa|Sufi orders]] shared a close relationship with them. Many [[Young Turks]] affiliated with the [[Bektashi Order|Bektashi order]] were members and patrons of Freemasonry. They were also closely allied against [[European imperialism]]. Many Ottoman intellectuals believed that [[Sufism]] and Freemasonry shared close similarities in doctrines, spiritual outlook and mysticism.<ref>{{Cite book|last=De Poli|first=Barbara|title=Freemansonry and the Orient: Esotericisms between the East and the West|publisher=Edizioni Ca' Foscari-Digital publishing|year=2019|isbn=978-8869693397|pages=75–86|chapter=Chapter 6: Sufi and Freemasons in the Ottoman Empire 6.1 ʿAbd Al-Qādir Al-Jazāʾirī}}</ref>


=== Schism ===
* Be a [[man]] who comes of his own free will.
The ritual form on which the Grand Orient of France was based was abolished in England in the events leading to the formation of the [[United Grand Lodge of England]] in 1813. However, the two jurisdictions continued in amity, or mutual recognition, until events of the 1860s and 1870s drove a seemingly permanent wedge between them. In 1868 the ''Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of the State of Louisiana'' appeared in the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge of Louisiana, recognised by the Grand Orient de France, but regarded by the older body as an invasion of their jurisdiction. The new Scottish Rite body admitted Black people. The resolution of the Grand Orient the following year that neither colour, race, nor religion could disqualify a man from Masonry prompted the Grand Lodge to withdraw recognition, and it persuaded other American Grand Lodges to do the same.<ref>[http://bessel.org/masrec/france.htm Paul Bessel, "U.S. Recognition of French Grand Lodges in the 1900s"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060410074658/http://bessel.org/masrec/france.htm |date=10 April 2006 }}, from ''Heredom: The Transactions of the Scottish Rite Research Society'', vol 5, 1996, pp. 221–244, ''Paul Bessel'' website, retrieved 12 November 2013</ref>
* Believe in a Supreme Being.
* Be at least the minimum age (18&ndash;25 years old depending on the jurisdiction).
* Be of sound mind and body (Lodges do not deny membership to a man because of a physical disability; this is largely a historical holdover, and if a potential candidate says there will be no problem, he will be taken at his word).
* Be of good morals, and of good reputation.
* Be free-born (or "born free", ''i.e.'' not born a [[Slavery|slave]] or [[Serfdom|bondsman]]).<ref>{{cite book | last = Robinson | first = John J. | title = Born in Blood: The Lost Secrets of Freemasonry | location = New York | publisher = Evans | year = 1989 | pages = p. 56 | isbn = 9780871316028 | oclc = 20419501 | quote = …by the late fifteenth century virtually every man in England was free. }} Robinson also states that the presence of the requirement meant that Freemasonry was organizationally much older than the 1717 founding of the Premier Grand Lodge of England.</ref> As with the previous, this is entirely an historical anachronism, and can be interpreted in the same manner as it is in the context of being entitled to write a [[Will (law)|will]]. Some jurisdictions have removed this requirement.
* Have character references, as well as one or two references from current Masons, depending on jurisdiction.


A dispute during the [[Lausanne Congress of Supreme Councils of 1875]] prompted the Grand Orient de France to commission a report by a Protestant pastor, which concluded that, as Freemasonry was not a religion, it should not require a religious belief. The new constitutions read, "Its principles are absolute liberty of conscience and human solidarity", the [[existence of God]] and the [[immortality of the soul]] being struck out. It is possible that the immediate objections of the United Grand Lodge of England were at least partly motivated by the political tension between France and Britain at the time. The result was the withdrawal of recognition of the Grand Orient of France by the United Grand Lodge of England, a situation that continues today.<ref name="Buta"/>
Deviation from one or more of these requirements is generally the barometer of Masonic regularity or irregularity. However, an accepted deviation in some regular jurisdictions is to allow a ''Lewis'' (the son of a Mason),<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/falclewis.html | title = Freemasonry: The Lewis | publisher = Pietre-Stones Review of Freemasonry | first = Dan | last = Falconer | date = [[2003-04-16]] | accessdate=2007-04-22 }}</ref> to be initiated earlier than the normal minimum age for that jurisdiction, although no earlier than the age of 18.


Not all French lodges agreed with the new wording. In 1894, lodges favouring the compulsory recognition of the [[Great Architect of the Universe]] formed the [[Grande Loge de France]].<ref>[http://www.gldf.org/gldf-obedience-maconnique/gldf-qui-sommes-nous/historique-de-la-gldf.html ''Historique de la GLDF''], Grande Loge de France, retrieved 14 November 2013</ref> In 1913, the United Grand Lodge of England recognised a new Grand Lodge of Regular Freemasons, a Grand Lodge that follows a similar rite to Anglo-American Freemasonry with a mandatory belief in a deity.<ref>[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/bernheim27.html Alain Bernheim, "My approach to Masonic History"], Manchester 2011, ''Pietre-Stones'', retrieved 14 November 2013</ref>
Some Grand Lodges in the United States have an additional residence requirement, candidates being expected to have lived within the jurisdiction for certain period of time, typically six months.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ilmason.org/requirements.html | title = Become a Mason: Requirements | accessdate = 2007-05-08 | publisher = Grand Lodge of Illinois, Anciennt Free & Accepted Masons }}</ref>


There are now three strands of Freemasonry in France, which extend into the rest of Continental Europe: –
=== Membership and religion ===
* Liberal, also called adogmatic or progressive – Principles of liberty of conscience, and laicity, particularly the separation of the Church and State.<ref>[http://www.frenchfreemasonry.org/grand-lodges/liberal-freemasonry "Liberal Grand Lodges"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150120051953/http://www.frenchfreemasonry.org/grand-lodges/liberal-freemasonry |date=20 January 2015 }}, ''French Freemasonry'', retrieved 14 November 2013</ref>
Freemasonry explicitly and openly states that it is neither a religion nor a substitute for one. "There is no separate Masonic God", nor a separate proper name for a deity in any branch of Freemasonry.<ref name="a religion?">{{cite web | url = http://www.grandlodge-england.org/masonry/A2L-religion.htm | title = Is Freemasonry a religion? | year = 2002 | accessdate=2007-05-08 | publisher = United Grand Lodge of England }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last = Smart | first = Earnest | year = 2005 | month = April | title = Faith and Freemasonry | journal = Masonic Quarterly Magazine | issue = 13 | url = http://www.mqmagazine.co.uk/issue-13/p-46.php | accessdate = 2007-05-07 }}</ref>
* Traditional – Old French ritual with a requirement for a belief in a Supreme Being.<ref>[http://www.frenchfreemasonry.org/grand-lodges/traditional-grand-lodges "Traditional Grand Lodges"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714115355/http://www.frenchfreemasonry.org/grand-lodges/traditional-grand-lodges |date=14 July 2014 }}, ''French Freemasonry'', retrieved 14 November 2013</ref> (This strand is typified by the [[Grande Loge de France]]).
* Regular – Standard Anglo-American ritual, mandatory belief in Supreme Being.<ref>[http://www.frenchfreemasonry.org/grand-lodges/regular-grand-lodges "Regular Grand Lodges"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150120052209/http://www.frenchfreemasonry.org/grand-lodges/regular-grand-lodges |date=20 January 2015 }}, ''French Freemasonry'', retrieved 14 November 2013</ref>


The term [[Continental Freemasonry]] was used in Mackey's 1873 ''Encyclopedia of Freemasonry'' to "designate the Lodges on the Continent of Europe which retain many usages which have either been abandoned by, or never were observed in, the Lodges of England, Ireland, and Scotland, as well as the United States of America".<ref>[http://encyclopediaoffreemasonry.com/c/continental-lodges/ "Continental Lodges"],''Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry'', retrieved 30 November 2013</ref> Today, it is frequently used to refer to only the Liberal jurisdictions typified by the Grand Orient de France.<ref>For instance [http://cornwineoil.blogspot.co.uk/2009/06/women-in-freemasonry-and-oriental.html "Women in Freemasonry, and Continental Freemasonry"], ''Corn Wine and Oil'', June 2009, retrieved 30 November 2013</ref>
Regular Freemasonry requires that its candidates believe in a ''Supreme Being'', but the interpretation of the term is subject to the conscience of the candidate. This means that men from a wide range of faiths, including [[Christianity]], [[Judaism]], [[Islam]], [[Deism]], [[Buddhism]], [[Sikhism]], and [[Hinduism]] can and have become Masons.


The majority of Freemasonry considers the Liberal (Continental) strand to be Irregular, and thus withhold recognition. The Continental lodges, however, did not want to sever masonic ties. In 1961, an umbrella organisation, [[Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg]] (CLIPSAS) was set up, which provides a forum for most of these Grand Lodges and Grand Orients worldwide. Included in the list of over 70 Grand Lodges and Grand Orients are representatives of all three of the above categories, including mixed and women's organisations. The United Grand Lodge of England does not communicate with any of these jurisdictions and expects its allies to follow suit. This creates the distinction between Anglo-American and Continental Freemasonry.<ref>[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/pope7.html Tony Pope, "At a Perpetual Distance: Liberal and Adogmatic Grand Lodges"], Presented to Waikato Lodge of Research No 445 at Rotorua, New Zealand, on 9 November 2004, as the annual Verrall Lecture, and subsequently published in the ''Transactions'' of the lodge, vol 14 #1, March 2005, ''Pietre-Stones'', retrieved 13 November 2013</ref><ref>[http://www.clipsas.com/en/membros-do-clipsas/ "Current members"] ''CLIPSAS'', retrieved 14 November 2014</ref>
Since the early 19th Century, in the ''irregular'' Continental European tradition (meaning ''irregular'' to those Grand Lodges in amity with the United Grand Lodge of England), a very broad interpretation has been given to a (non-dogmatic) Supreme Being; in the tradition of [[Baruch Spinoza]] and [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]] — or views of [[The Ultimate]] Cosmic Oneness — along with Western atheistic [[idealism]] and agnosticism.


===Freemasonry and women===
Freemasonry in [[Scandinavia]], known as the [[Swedish Rite]], on the other hand, accepts only Christians.<ref name=Dummies /> Some of the appendant bodies (or portions thereof) in some jurisdictions also have religious requirements, but have no restrictions at the lodge level.
{{Main|Freemasonry and women|Co-Freemasonry}}


The status of women in the old guilds and corporations of medieval masons remains uncertain. The principle of "femme sole" allowed a widow to continue the trade of her husband, but its application had wide local variations, such as full membership of a trade body or limited trade by deputation or approved members of that body.<ref>Antonia Frazer, ''The Weaker Vessel'', Mandarin paperbacks, 1989, pp. 108–109</ref> In masonry, the small available evidence points to the less empowered end of the scale.<ref>for example, see David Murray Lyon, ''History of the lodge of Edinburgh'', Blackwood, Edinburgh, 1873, pp. 121–123</ref>
== Opposition to and criticism of Freemasonry ==
{{main|Anti-Masonry}}
{{seealso|Masonic conspiracy theories}}
''Anti-Masonry'' (alternatively called ''Anti-Freemasonry'') is defined as "Avowed opposition to Freemasonry".<ref name="antimasonrydef">{{OED|Anti-Masonry}}</ref> However, there is no homogeneous anti-Masonic movement. Anti-Masonry consists of radically differing criticisms from sometimes incompatible groups who are hostile to Freemasonry in some form.


At the dawn of the [[History of Freemasonry#Early Grand Lodge period|Grand Lodge era]], during the 1720s, [[James Anderson (Freemason)|James Anderson]] composed the [[Anderson's Constitutions|first printed constitutions for Freemasons]], the basis for most subsequent constitutions, which specifically excluded women from Freemasonry.<ref name=AndersonCharge3>
=== Religious opposition ===
{{cite book
|url= http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=libraryscience
|access-date= 12 August 2013
|title= The Constitutions of the Free-Masons
|first= James
|last= Anderson
|publisher= [[Benjamin Franklin]]
|location= [[Philadelphia]], Pennsylvania
|editor= Paul Royster
|edition= Philadelphia
|year= 1734
|orig-year= 1723
|page= 49
|quote= The Persons admitted Members of a Lodge must be good and true Men, free-born, and of mature and discreet Age, no Bondmen, no Women, no immoral or scandalous Men, but of good Report.
}}</ref> As Freemasonry spread, women began to be added to the [[Rite of Adoption|Lodges of Adoption]] by their husbands who were continental masons, which worked three degrees with the same names as the men's but different content. The French officially abandoned the experiment in the early 19th century.<ref>[http://www.themasonictrowel.com/books/lexicon_of_freemasonry_by_Albert_Mackey/files/AMAP1/Amac-9.htm "Adoptive Freemasonry"] Entry from ''Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry''</ref><ref name="Thames">[http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/masonicmuseum/Cabinet_Card_Woman_in_Masonic_Regalia.htm Barbara L. Thames, "A History of Women's Masonry"], ''Phoenix Masonry'', retrieved 5 March 2013</ref> Later organisations with a similar aim emerged in the United States but distinguished the names of the degrees from those of male masonry.<ref>{{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20200222093053/http://www.masonicdictionary.com/oes.html "Order of the Eastern Star"]}} ''Masonic Dictionary'', retrieved 9 January 2013</ref>


[[Maria Deraismes]] was initiated into Freemasonry in 1882, then resigned to allow her lodge to rejoin their Grand Lodge. Having failed to achieve acceptance from any masonic governing body, she and [[Georges Martin (freemason)|Georges Martin]] started a mixed masonic lodge that worked masonic ritual.<ref>[http://www.droithumain-france.org/node/151 "Maria Deraismes (1828–1894)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004224129/http://www.droithumain-france.org/node/151 |date=4 October 2013 }}, ''Droit Humain'', retrieved 5 March 2013. (French Language)</ref> [[Annie Besant]] spread the phenomenon to the English-speaking world.<ref>[http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/history_of_co-freemasonry.htm Jeanne Heaslewood, "A Brief History of the Founding of Co-Freemasonry"], 1999, ''Phoenix Masonry'', retrieved 12 August 2013</ref> Disagreements over ritual led to the formation of exclusively female bodies of Freemasons in England, which spread to other countries. Meanwhile, the French had re-invented Adoption as an all-female lodge in 1901, only to cast it aside again in 1935. The lodges, however, continued to meet, which gave rise, in 1959, to a body of women practising continental Freemasonry.<ref name="Thames" />
Freemasonry has a record of persecuting religion and religous persons. Millions of religious persons and tens of thousands of Priests and religious have been murdered at the hands of Masonic Totalitarian Governments.


In general, Continental Freemasonry is sympathetic to Freemasonry among women, dating from the 1890s when French lodges assisted the emergent co-masonic movement by promoting enough of their members to the 33rd degree of the [[Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite]] to allow them, in 1899, to form their own grand council, recognised by the other Continental Grand Councils of that Rite.<ref name="DHHistoire">[https://web.archive.org/web/20111021235404/http://www.droithumain-france.org/contenu/identite-histoire/histoire/les-grandes-figures/histoire-du-droit-humain "Histoire du Droit Humain"], ''Droit Humain'', retrieved 12 August 2013</ref> The United Grand Lodge of England issued a statement in 1999 recognising the two women's grand lodges there, The Order of Women Freemasons<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Order of Women Freemasons {{!}} Womens Freemasonry {{!}} Nationwide|url=https://www.owf.org.uk/|access-date=2021-06-17|website=www.owf.org.uk|language=en-gb}}</ref> and The Honourable Fraternity of Ancient Freemasons,<ref>{{Cite web|title=HFAF {{!}} Freemasonry for Women|url=https://hfaf.org/|access-date=2021-06-17|language=en}}</ref> to be regular in all but the participants. While they were not, therefore, recognised as regular, they were part of Freemasonry "in general".<ref name="UGLEFAQ" /><ref>[http://www.hfaf.org/ugle.htm "Text of UGLE statement"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130604174900/http://www.hfaf.org/ugle.htm |date=4 June 2013 }}, ''Honourable Fraternity of Ancient Freemasons – Freemasonry For Women'', retrieved 12 August 2012</ref> The attitude of most regular Anglo-American grand lodges remains that women Freemasons are not legitimate Masons.<ref>Karen Kidd, ''Haunted Chambers: the Lives of Early Women Freemasons'', Cornerstone, 2009, pp. 204–205</ref>


In 2018, guidance was released by the [[United Grand Lodge of England]] stating that, in regard to transgender women, "A Freemason who after initiation ceases to be a man does not cease to be a Freemason".<ref name="trans">{{cite news|author=Damien Gayle |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/01/freemasons-to-admit-women-but-only-if-they-first-joined-as-men |title=Freemasons to admit women – but only if they first joined as men {{pipe}} UK news |newspaper=The Guardian |date=2018 |access-date=1 August 2018}}</ref> The guidance also states that transgender men are allowed to apply to become Freemasons.<ref name="trans"/>
==== Christian anti-Masonry ====
{{main|Christianity and Freemasonry|Catholicism and Freemasonry}}


==Development and expansion==
Although members of various faiths cite objections, certain [[Christian]] [[religious denomination|denominations]] have had high profile negative attitudes to Masonry, banning or discouraging their members from being Freemasons.
===18th century Enlightenment===
[[File:Goose and Gridiron.jpg|thumb|220px|Goose and Gridiron, where the Grand Lodge of London and Westminster, later called the [[Premier Grand Lodge of England|Grand Lodge of England]], was founded.]]
During the [[Age of the Enlightenment]] in the 18th century, Freemasons comprised an international network of like-minded men, often meeting in secret in ritualistic programs at their lodges. They promoted the ideals of the Enlightenment and helped diffuse these values across Britain and France and other places. British Freemasonry offered a systematic creed with its own myths, values and set of rituals. It fostered new codes of conduct – including a communal understanding of liberty and equality inherited from guild sociability – "liberty, fraternity, and equality"<ref>Margaret C. Jacob's seminal work on Enlightenment freemasonry, Margaret C. Jacob, ''Living the Enlightenment: Free masonry and Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe'' (Oxford University Press, 1991) p. 49.</ref> Scottish soldiers and Jacobite Scots brought to the Continent ideals of fraternity which reflected not the local system of Scottish customs but the institutions and ideals originating in the English Revolution against royal absolutism.<ref>Margaret C. Jacob, "Polite worlds of Enlightenment", in Martin Fitzpatrick and Peter Jones, eds. ''The Enlightenment World'' (Routledge, 2004) pp. 272–287.</ref> Freemasonry was particularly prevalent in France – by 1789, there were between 50,000 and 100,000 French Masons, making Freemasonry the most popular of all Enlightenment associations.<ref>Daniel Roche, ''France in the Enlightenment'' (Harvard U.P. 1998)) p. 436.</ref>


Jacob argues that Masonic lodges probably had an effect on society as a whole, for they "reconstituted the polity and established a constitutional form of self-government, complete with constitutions and laws, elections and representatives". In other words, the micro-society set up within the lodges constituted a normative model for society as a whole. This was especially true on the Continent: when the first lodges began to appear in the 1730s, their embodiment of British values was often seen as threatening by state authorities. For example, the Parisian lodge that met in the mid-1720s was composed of English [[Jacobitism|Jacobite]] exiles.<ref>Jacob, ''Living the Enlightenment,'' pp. 20, 73, 89.</ref> Furthermore, freemasons all across Europe made reference to the Enlightenment in general in the 18th century. In French lodges, for example, the line "As the means to be enlightened I search for the enlightened" was a part of their initiation rites. British lodges assigned themselves the duty to "initiate the unenlightened". Many lodges praised the Grand Architect, the masonic terminology for the divine being who created a scientifically ordered universe.<ref>Jacob, ''Living the Enlightenment,'' pp. 145–147.</ref>
The denomination with the longest history of objection to Freemasonry is the Catholic Church. The objections raised by the Catholic Church are based on the allegation that Masonry teaches a naturalistic [[deistic]] religion which is in conflict with Church dogma.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.catholicculture.org/library/view.cfm?recnum=5285 | title = Letter of April 19, 1985 to U.S. Bishops Concerning Masonry | last = Cardinal Law | first = Bernard | authorlink = Bernard Francis Law | accessdate = 2007-07-09 | date = [[1985-04-19]] | work = CatholicCulture.org }}</ref>


On the other hand, historian [[Robert Roswell Palmer]] noted that lodges operated separately and Masons politically did not act together as a group.<ref>Robert R. Palmer, ''The Age of the Democratic Revolution: The struggle'' (1970) p. 53</ref> American historians note that [[Benjamin Franklin]] and [[George Washington]] were leading Masons, but the significance of freemasonry in the revolution is a topic of debate.<ref>Neil L. York, "Freemasons and the American Revolution", ''The Historian'' 55#2 (1993), pp 315+.</ref> Daniel Roche contests freemasonry's claims for egalitarianism, writing that "the real equality of the lodges was elitist", only attracting men of similar social backgrounds.<ref>Roche, 437.</ref>
A number of Papal pronouncements have been issued against Freemasonry. The first was [[Pope Clement XII|Pope Clement XII's]] ''[[In Eminenti]]'', [[April 28]] [[1738]]; the most recent was [[Pope Leo XIII|Pope Leo XIII's]] ''[[Ab Apostolici]]'', [[October 15]] [[1890]]. The [[1917]] [[Canon law (Catholic Church)|Code of Canon Law]] explicitly declared that joining Freemasonry entailed automatic [[excommunication]].<ref name="canon2335"> Canon 2335, 1917 Code of Canon Law from {{cite web | url = http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/canon.html | title = Canon Law regarding Freemasonry, 1917-1983 | publisher = Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon }}</ref> The 1917 Code of Canon Law also forbid books friendly to Freemasonry.


In long-term historical perspective, [[Norman Davies]] has argued that Freemasonry was a powerful force in Europe, from about 1700 to the twentieth century. It expanded rapidly during the Age of Enlightenment, reaching practically every country in Europe, as well as the European colonies in the New World and Asia. Davies states, "In the nineteenth century and beyond it would be strongly associated with the cause of Liberalism."<ref>{{cite book|author=Norman Davies|title=Europe: A History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jrVW9W9eiYMC&pg=PA634|year=1996|publisher=Oxford UP|pages=634|isbn=978-0-19-820171-7 }}</ref> In Catholic lands it was anti-clerical and came under heavy attack from the Catholic Church. In the 20th century, it was suppressed by Fascist and Communist regimes. It was especially attractive to royalty, aristocrats and politicians and businessmen, as well as intellectuals, artists and political activists. Davies notes that prominent members included [[Montesquieu]], [[Voltaire]], [[Robert Walpole|Sir Robert Walpole]], [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]], [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], [[Benjamin Franklin]], and [[George Washington]].<ref>Davis, ''Europe'' p. 634.</ref> Steven Bullock notes that in the late 18th century, English lodges were headed by the Prince of Wales, Prussian lodges by king [[Frederick the Great]], and French lodges by royal princes. Emperor Napoleon selected his own brother as the Grand Master of France.<ref>Steven C. Bullock, "Initiating the enlightenment?: recent scholarship on European freemasonry." ''Eighteenth-Century Life'' 20#1 (1996): 80–92. [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/10377/summary online]</ref>
In 1983, the Church issued a new Code of Canon Law. Unlike its predecessor, it did not explicitly name Masonic orders among the [[secret societies]] it condemns. It states in part: "''A person who joins an association which plots against the Church is to be punished with a just penalty; one who promotes or takes office in such an association is to be punished with an [[interdict]]."'' This omission caused both Catholics and Freemasons to believe that the ban on Catholics becoming Freemasons may have been lifted, especially after the perceived liberalization of Vatican II.<ref name="RCLaw">{{cite journal | last = McInvale | first = Reid | year = 1991 | title = Roman Catholic Church Law Regarding Freemasonry | journal = Transactions of Texas Lodge of Research | volume = 27 | pages = pp. 86–97 | url = http://www.io.com/~janebm/churchlaw.html | issn = | id = {{oclc|47204246}} }}</ref> However, the matter was clarified when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later [[Pope Benedict XVI]]), as the Prefect of the [[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith]], issued ''[[Quaesitum est]]'', which states: "...the Church’s negative judgment in regard to Masonic association remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and therefore membership in them remains forbidden. The faithful who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive [[Holy Communion]]."


===France===
Thus, from a Catholic perspective, there is still a ban on Catholics joining Masonic Lodges. For its part, Freemasonry has never objected to Catholics joining their fraternity. Those Grand Lodges in amity with UGLE deny the Church's claims and state that they explicitly adhere to the principle that "Freemasonry is not a religion, nor a substitute for religion."<ref name="a religion?"/>
{{Further|Freemasonry in France}}
In the 18th century, liberal French politicians met together in Masonic lodges to develop some of the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] ideas that dominated the [[French Revolution]] of 1789.<ref>Margaret C. Jacob, ''Living the Enlightenment: Freemasonry & Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe'' (1992).</ref> Avner Halpern has traced French Freemasonry's major role in building France's first modern political party in 1901, [[Radical Party (France)|the Radical Party]]. It used two Masonic devices: the "civil leadership model", which Freemasonry developed in late 19th century France, and the local Masonic congresses of the Grand Orient of France federations.<ref>Avner Halpern, "Freemasonry and party building in late 19th-Century France." ''Modern & Contemporary France'' 10.2 (2002): 197–210.</ref>


===Russia===
In contrast to Catholic allegations of rationalism and naturalism, Protestant objections are more likely to be based on allegations of mysticism, occultism, and even devil worship. [[Albert Pike]] is often cited by Protestant anti-masons as an authority for the position of Masonry on these issues. However, Pike, although undoubtedly learned, was not a spokesman for Freemasonry and was controversial among freemasons in general, representing his personal opinion only, and furthermore an opinion grounded in the attitudes and understandings of late 19th-century Southern Freemasonry of the USA alone. Indeed his book carries in the preface a form of disclaimer from his own Grand Lodge. No one voice has ever spoken for the whole of Freemasonry.<ref>{{cite book | last = Pike | first = Albert | authorlink = Albert Pike | coauthors = T. W. Hugo; Scottish Rite (Masonic order). Supreme Council of the Thirty-Third Degree for the Southern Jurisdiction | title = Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry | location = Washington, DC | publisher = House of the Temple | year = 1950 | origyear = 1871 | oclc = 12870276 | quote = In preparing this work [Pike] has been about equally Author and Compiler. (p. iii.) … The teachings of these Readings are not sacramental, so far as they go beyond the realm of Morality into those of other domains of Thought and Truth. The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite uses the word "Dogma" in its true sense of doctrine, or teaching; and is not dogmatic in the odious sense of that term. Everyone is entirely free to to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may seem to him to be untrue or unsound (p. iv) }}</ref>
{{Further|History of Freemasonry in Russia}}
Freemasons had been active in Russia in the 18th century, working to introduce [[Russian Enlightenment|Enlightenment ideals]]; however, they were increasingly suppressed by the government.<ref>Douglas Smith, "Freemasonry and the public in eighteenth-century Russia." ''Eighteenth-century studies'' 29.1 (1995): 25–44.</ref> According to Ludwick Hass, Freemasonry was officially illegal in Tsarist Russia, but would later be introduced by exiles who returned after the 1905 revolution. These individuals had been active Masons in Paris, where lodges were politically active in the new Radical Party. In Russia, the Freemasons supported constitutional liberalism, and maintained ties with France while simplifying many of the ceremonial rituals. Their secret meetings became a centre of progressive ideals, attracting politicians and activists. The lodges initially supported World War I, promoting close ties with France. [[Alexander Kerensky]] was an important Masonic activist who came to political power with the overthrow of the tsars, in 1917. The organization collapsed as the Bolsheviks took power and was again outlawed.<ref>Ludwik Hass, "The Russian Masonic Movement in the Years 1906–1918." ''Acta Poloniae Historica'' 48 (1983): 95–131.</ref>


===Italy===
Since the founding of Freemasonry, many Bishops of the [[Church of England]] have been Freemasons, such as [[Archbishop]] [[Geoffrey Fisher]].<ref>{{cite journal | last = Beresiner | first = Yasha | year = 2006 | month = July | title = Archbishop Fisher – A Godly man and a Brother | journal = Masonic Quarterly Magazine | issue = 18 | url = http://www.mqmagazine.co.uk/issue-18/p-07.php?PHPSESSID=c59cd231db419873a6a6 | accessdate = 2007-05-07 }}</ref> In the past, few members of the Church of England would have seen any incongruity in concurrently adhering to Anglican Christianity and practicing Freemasonry. In recent decades, however, reservations about Freemasonry have increased within Anglicanism, perhaps due to the increasing prominence of the evangelical wing of the church. The current [[Archbishop of Canterbury]], [[Rowan Williams|Dr Rowan Williams]], appears to harbour some reservations about Masonic ritual, whilst being anxious to avoid causing offence to Freemasons inside and outside the Church of England. In 2003 he felt it necessary to apologise to British Freemasons after he said that their beliefs were incompatible with Christianity and that he had barred the appointment of Freemasons to senior posts in his diocese when he was Bishop of Monmouth.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/20/nmason20.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/20/ixhome.html | title = Rowan Williams apologises to Freemasons | first = Chris | last = Hastings | coauthors = Elizabeth Day | work = [[The Daily Telegraph]] | date = [[2003-04-20]] | accessdate = 2007-07-09 }}</ref>
{{Further|Freemasonry in Italy}}
According to Adrian Lyttelton, in the early 20th century, Freemasonry was an influential but semi-secret force in Italian politics; with a strong presence among professionals and the middle class across Italy, its appeal spread to the leadership of the parliament, public administration, and the army. The two main organisations were the Grand Orient and the Grand Lodge of Italy. They had around 25,000 members in some 500 lodges. Freemasons typically espoused [[anticlericalism]] and promoted unification. The Catholic Church was a vigorous opponent of unification, and thus of the Freemasons; various national governments would repeatedly alternate and backpedal between the anticlerical side and the Church side.<ref>Adrian Lyttelton, "An Old Church and a New State: Italian Anticlericalism 1876–1915." ''European Studies Review'' 13.2 (1983): 225–248.</ref> Politically, they promoted [[Italian nationalism]] focused on unification and undermining the power of the Catholic Church. Freemasons took on the challenge of mobilizing the press, encouraging public opinion and the leading political parties in support of [[Italian entry into World War I|Italy's joining of the Allies]] of the First World War in 1914–1915. In 1919, they favoured a [[League of Nations]] to promote a new post-war, universal order based upon the peaceful coexistence of independent and democratic nations.<ref>Fulvio Conti, "From Universalism to Nationalism: Italian Freemasonry and the Great War." ''Journal of Modern Italian Studies'' 20.5 (2015): 640–662.</ref> In the early 1920s, many of [[Benito Mussolini|Mussolini]]'s collaborators, especially the leaders in organizing the [[March on Rome]], were Masons. The lodges hailed [[fascism]] as the saviour of Italy from [[Bolshevism]]; however, Mussolini decided he needed to come to terms with the Catholic Church, in the mid-1920s, outlawing Freemasonry.<ref>Martin Clark, ''Modern Italy 1871–1995'' (1996) p. 254.</ref>


===Latin America===
Regular Freemasonry has traditionally not responded to these claims, beyond the often repeated statement that those Grand Lodges in amity with UGLE explicitly adhere to the principle that "Freemasonry is not a religion, nor a substitute for religion. There is no separate 'Masonic deity', and there is no separate proper name for a deity in Freemasonry".<ref name="a religion?"/> In recent years, however, this has begun to change. Many Masonic websites and publications now address these criticisms specifically.
The Spanish government outlawed Freemasonry in its overseas empire in the mid-18th century, and energetically enforced the ban. Nevertheless, many Freemasons were active in planning and plotting for independence.<ref>Miriam Erickson, "Don José Rossi y Rubí and Spanish Freemasonry in the Revolutionary Atlantic, 1785–1798." ''Latin Americanist'' 63.1 (2019): 25–47.</ref> Leaders with Freemason membership included Grand Master [[Francisco de Miranda]], [[José de San Martin]], [[Simón Bolivar]], [[Bernardo O'Higgins]], and many others.<ref>Karen Racine, "Freemasonry" in Michael S. Werner, ed. ''Encyclopedia of Mexico: History, Society, and Culture'' (Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997) 1:538–540.</ref> The movement was important after independence was achieved in the 1820s.<ref>Bogdan and Snoek, eds., ''Handbook of Freemasonry'' (2014) pp. 439–440.</ref> In [[Freemasonry in Brazil|Brazil]], many prominent men were Freemasons, and they played a leading role in the abolition of slavery.<ref>Renata Ribeiro Francisco, "Os heróis maçônicos na historiografia da abolição em São Paulo" [Masonic heroes in the historiography of abolition in São Paulo] ''História da Historiografia'' (2020), 13#34 pp. 271–302.</ref>


==== Muslim anti-Masonry ====
====Mexico====
Freemasons were leaders in liberalism and anti-clericalism in 19th and 20th-century Mexico. Members included numerous top leaders.<ref>Karen Racine, "Freemasonry" in Michael S. Werner, ed. ''Encyclopedia of Mexico'' (1997) 1:538–540.</ref> The Freemasons were divided regarding relations with the United States, with a pro-U.S. faction supported by the American ambassador [[Joel Poinsett]] known as the "Yorkinos."<ref>Lillian Estelle Fisher, "Early Masonry in Mexico (1806–1828)." ''Southwestern Historical Quarterly'' 42.3 (1939): 198–214. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/30235836 online]</ref><ref>Watson Smith, "Influences from the United States on the Mexican Constitution of 1824." ''Arizona and the West'' 4.2 (1962): 113–126.</ref> According to historian Karen Racine, Freemasons in [[List of heads of state of Mexico|the presidency of Mexico]] included: [[Guadalupe Victoria]], [[Valentín Gómez Farías]], [[Antonio López de Santa Anna]], [[Benito Juárez]], [[Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada]], [[Porfirio Díaz]], [[Francisco I. Madero]], [[Venustiano Carranza]], [[Plutarco Elías Calles]], [[Lázaro Cárdenas]], [[Emilio Portes Gil]], [[Pascual Ortiz Rubio]], [[Abelardo L. Rodríguez]], and [[Miguel Alemán Valdés]].<ref>Racine, p. 1:540.</ref>
{{Further|[[Hamas#The Covenant of Hamas|The Covenant of Hamas]]}}


=== China ===
Many [[Islamic]] anti-Masonic arguments are closely tied with [[Anti-Semitism]] and [[Anti-Zionism]], though other criticisms are made such as linking Freemasonry to [[Dajjal]].<ref name="SFMNAD">{{cite book | url = http://freemasonry.dept.shef.ac.uk/pdf/ovn.pdf?PHPSESSID=bf5645aae288a112e6c99cacdca85a90 | format = pdf | title = The Study of Freemasonry as a New Academic Discipline | pages = pp. 13–14 | first = Andrew | last = Prescott | accessdate = 2006-05-21 }}</ref> Some Muslim anti-masons argue that Freemasonry promotes the interests of the [[Jews]] around the world and that one of its aims is to rebuild the [[Temple of Solomon]] in [[Jerusalem]] after destroying the [[Al-Aqsa Mosque]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.islamonline.com/cgi-bin/news_service/fatwah_story.asp?service_id=365 |title=Can a Muslim be a freemason? |accessdate=2007-05-08 |format=asp |work=Islamonline.com }}</ref> In its Covenant, in article 28, the [[Palestinian people|Palestinian]] [[Islamist]] organization [[Hamas]] states that Freemasonry "work in the interest of Zionism and according to its instructions..."
The first lodge formed in China was the Amity Lodge which constituted at Canton in 1767. In 1875, District Grand Lodge of China split into two Districts, Northern China, and Hong Kong and South China. During the second world war, All Masonic activity in Hong Kong was brought to a halt due to the Japanese invasion. After the 1949, the new China government (Communist) established, some lodges in China moved to Hong Kong or closed due to lack of new candidates.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hamill |first=John |title=The Craft: a history of English freemasonry |date=1986 |publisher=Crucible |isbn=978-0-85030-460-2 |location=Wellingborough, GB}}</ref>


=== Political opposition ===
==== Hong Kong ====
Royal Sussex Lodge No. 501 was the first lodge established in [[Victoria, Hong Kong|Victoria City]] of Hong Kong on 29 April 1844.
{{See also|Anti-Masonry|Freemasonry under totalitarian regimes|Anti-Masonry#Iraqi Baathist Anti-Masonry}}


For the English Constitution, Provincial or District Grand Lodge name in Hong Kong Changed as following:<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |title=Chinese Masonic Society |url=http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/chinese-masonic-society.html |access-date=2024-09-02 |website=www.freemasons-freemasonry.com}}</ref>
Regular Freemasonry has in its core ritual a formal obligation: to be quiet and peaceable citizens, true to the lawful government of the country in which they live, and not to countenance disloyalty or rebellion.<ref name="UGLE home"/> A Freemason makes a further obligation, before being made Master of his Lodge, to pay a proper respect to the civil [[magistrate]]s.<ref name="UGLE home"/> The words may be varied across Grand Lodges, but the sense in the obligation taken is always there. Nevertheless, much of the political opposition to Freemasonry is based upon the idea that Masonry will foment (or sometimes prevent) rebellion.


* 1847–1866, Provincial Grand Lodge of China
Conspiracy theorists have long associated Freemasonry with the [[New World Order (conspiracy)|New World Order]] and the [[Illuminati]], and state that Freemasonry as an organization is either bent on world domination or already secretly in control of world politics. Historically, Freemasonry has attracted criticism - and suppression - from both the politically [[Far right|extreme right]] (e.g. [[Nazi Germany]])<ref>{{cite book | first = James | last = Wilkenson | coauthors = H. Stuart Hughes | title = Contemporary Europe: A History | location = Englewood Cliffs, N.J. | publisher = Prentice Hall | year = 1995 | pages = p. 237 | isbn = 9780132918404 | oclc = 31009810 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | first = Otto | last = Zierer | title = Concise History of Great Nations: History of Germany | location = New York | publisher = Leon Amiel Publisher | year = 1976 | pages = p. 104 | isbn = 9780814806739 | oclc = 3250405 }}</ref> and the [[Far left|extreme left]] (e.g. the former [[Communist]] states in [[Eastern Europe]]). The Fraternity has encountered both applause for supposedly founding, and opposition for supposedly thwarting, [[liberal democracy]] (such as the United States of America).{{Fact|date=June 2007}}
* 1866–1875, District Grand Lodge of China
* 1875–1963, District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and South China
* 1963–present, District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and the Far East


For the Scottish Constitution, District Grand Lodge name in Hong Kong Changed as following:<ref name=":4" />
In some countries anti-Masonry is often related to [[anti-Semitism]] and [[anti-Zionism]]. For example, In 1980, the Iraqi legal and penal code was changed by [[Saddam Hussein|Saddam Hussein's]] ruling [[Ba'ath Party]], making it a felony to "promote or acclaim Zionist principles, including Freemasonry, or who associate [themselves] with Zionist organizations."<ref name="freemasonryinSHIraq">{{cite news | url = http://washingtontimes.com/world/20040701-120129-6565r.htm | title = Saddam to be formally charged | first = David R | last = Sands | work = [[The Washington Times]] | date = [[2004-07-01]] | accessdate = 2006-06-18 }}</ref> Professor [http://www.shef.ac.uk/history/staff/research_fellows/andrew_prescott.html Andrew Prescott], of the University of Sheffield, writes: "Since at least the time of the [[The Protocols of the Elders of Zion|Protocols of the Elders of Zion]], anti-semitism has gone hand in hand with anti-masonry, so it is not surprising that allegations that [[September 11, 2001 attacks|11 September]] was a Zionist plot have been accompanied by suggestions that the attacks were inspired by a masonic world order."<ref name="SFMNAD_opcit">Prescott, op. cit., pp. 13-14, 30, 33</ref>
* 1905–1958, District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and South China
* 1958–present, District Grand Lodge of the Far East


For the Irish Constitution, Provincial or District Grand Lodge name in Hong Kong Changed as following:<ref name=":4" />
In 1799 English Freemasonry almost came to a halt due to Parliamentary proclamation. In the wake of the [[French Revolution]], the ''Unlawful Societies Act, 1799'' banned any meetings of groups that required their members to take an [[oath]] or obligation.<ref name="UGLE history" >{{cite web | url = http://www.grandlodge-england.org/ugle/the-history-of-grand-lodge-1.htm | title = The United Grand Lodge of England - Two Grand Lodges | publisher = United Grand Lodge of England | year = 2002 | accessdate = 2006-03-08 }}</ref> The Grand Masters of both the Moderns and the Antients Grand Lodges called on the Prime Minister William Pitt, (who was not a Freemason) and explained to him that Freemasonry was a supporter of the law and lawfully constituted authority and was much involved in charitable work. As a result Freemasonry was specifically exempted from the terms of the Act, provided that each Private Lodge's Secretary placed with the local "Clerk of the Peace" a list of the members of his Lodge once a year.<ref name="UGLE history" /> This continued until 1967 when the obligation of the provision was rescinded by [[Parliament of the United Kingdom|Parliament]].<ref name="UGLE history" />
* 1933–1938, District Grand Inspector
* 1938–1947, Grand Inspector
* 1947–1954, Grand Inspector for Hong Kong and China
* 1954–1967, Grand Inspector for Hong Kong, China and Malaya
* 1967–1988, Grand Inspector for the Far East
* 1988–present, Provincial Grand Lodge of the Far East


Now, there are 19 (English Constitution) lodges under the District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and Far East, United Grand Lodge of England and meet at [[Zetland Hall]], Hong Kong:<ref>{{Cite web |title=HOME |url=https://www.zetlandhall.com/ |access-date=2024-09-11 |website=Zetland Hall Website |language=en}}</ref>
Freemasonry in the United States faced political pressure following the disappearance of anti-Masonic agitator [[William Morgan (anti-Mason)|William Morgan]] in 1826. Reports of the "Morgan Affair" helped fuel an Anti-Masonic movement, culminating in the formation of a short lived Anti-Masonic Party which fielded candidates for the Presidential elections of 1828 and 1832.


* Cathay Lodge No. 4373
Even in modern democracies, Freemasonry is still sometimes accused of being a network where individuals engage in [[cronyism]], using their Masonic connections for political influence and shady business dealings. This is officially and explicitly deplored in Freemasonry.<ref name="UGLE home" /> It is also charged that men become Freemasons through [[patronage]] or that they are offered incentives to join. This is not the case; no one lodge member may control membership in the lodge and in order to start the process of becoming a Freemason, an individual must ask to join the Fraternity "freely and without persuasion."<ref name="UGLE home" />
* Corinthian Lodge of Amoy No. 1806
* Foochow Lodge No. 1912
* Harriers Lodge No. 9882
* Hong Kong and Far East District Grand Stewards Lodge No. 9879
* Lodge of Lu Pan No. 9387
* Lodge Star of Southern China No. 2013
* Paul Chater Lodge of Installed Masters No. 5391
* Perseverance Lodge of Hong Kong No. 1165
* Rotarian Lodge of Hong Kong No. 9378
* Royal Sussex Lodge No. 501
* St. Paul's Lodge No. 9718
* St Joseph's & La Salle No. 10050
* Swatow Lodge No. 3705
* The Club Lodge No. 9880
* United Service Lodge No. 1341
* University Lodge of Hong Kong No. 3666
* Victoria Lodge of Hong Kong No. 1026
* Zetland Lodge No. 525
The Rising Sun Lodge No. 1401 is the lodge meeting in Kobe, Japan and under the jurisdiction of District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and Far East rather than Grand Lodge of Japan. As a result, there are 20 lodges currently under the District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and Far East.


==Anti-Masonry==
In Italy, Freemasonry has become linked to a scandal concerning the [[Propaganda Due]] Lodge (aka P2). This Lodge was Chartered by the [[Grande Oriente d'Italia]] in 1877, as a Lodge for visiting Masons unable to attend their own lodges. Under Licio Gelli’s leadership, in the late 1970s, the P2 Lodge became involved in the financial scandals that nearly bankrupted the [[Vatican Bank]]. However, by this time the lodge was operating independently and irregularly; as the Grand Lodge d'Italia had revoked its charter in 1976.<ref>{{cite web | first = Edward L. | last = King | url = http://www.masonicinfo.com/p2_lodge.htm | title = P2 Lodge | year = 2007 | accessdate = 2006-10-31 }}</ref> By 1982 the scandal became public knowledge and Gelli was formally expelled from Freemasonry.
{{Main|Anti-Masonry}}
[[File:Templo masónico histórico, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 03.jpg|thumb|[[Masonic Temple of Santa Cruz de Tenerife]], one of the few Masonic temples that survived the [[Franco dictatorship]] in Spain]]
''Anti-Masonry'' (alternatively called ''Anti-Freemasonry'') has been defined as "opposition to Freemasonry",<ref>"Anti-Masonry" – ''Oxford English Dictionary (Compact Edition)'', Oxford University Press, 1979, p. 369</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.webster-dictionary.net/d.aspx?w=Antimasonry |title= Definition of Antimasonry |publisher=Webster Dictionary |access-date=8 September 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110928031636/http://www.webster-dictionary.net/d.aspx?w=Antimasonry |archive-date= Sep 28, 2011 }}</ref> but there is no homogeneous anti-Masonic movement. Anti-Masonry consists of widely differing criticisms from diverse (and often incompatible) groups who are hostile to Freemasonry in some form. Critics have included religious groups, political groups, and [[conspiracy theorists]], in particular, those espousing [[Masonic conspiracy theories]] or the [[Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory]]. Certain prominent Anti-Masons, such as [[Nesta Helen Webster]], exclusively criticized "Continental Masonry", while considering "Regular Masonry" to be an honourable association.<ref>{{Cite book
| first1 = S. Craig
| last1 = Heimbichner
| first2 = Adam
| last2 = Parfrey
| title = Ritual America: Secret Brotherhoods and Their Influence on American Society: A Visual Guide
| publisher = Feral House
| year = 2012
| pages = 187
| isbn = 978-1936239153
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sVRjCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA187
}}</ref>


There have been many disclosures and exposés dating as far back as the 18th century. These often lack context,<ref>{{Cite book
The [[United Kingdom|UK]] [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] government, in the late [[1990s]] and early [[2000s]], attempted to require all members of fraternal organisations who are public officials to make their affiliation public.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldhansrd/vo020513/text/20513w03.htm | title = Lord Sainsbury of Turville’s reply, Lords Hansard, 13 May 2002: Column WA9 (UK House of Lords Daily Debates) | publisher = Parliament of the United Kingdom | accessdate = 2006-03-04 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.charlton.demon.co.uk/masonic/report.html | title = UK House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, 3rd Report on FM in the Police & Judiciary | publisher = Alex Charlton | date = [[1997-03-19]] | accessdate = 2006-03-04 }}</ref> This was challenged under [[European]] [[human rights]] legislation, and the government in enacting the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law,<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/19980042.htm | title = Human Rights Act, 1998 | publisher = [[Office of Public Sector Information]] | date = [[1998-11-13]] | accessdate = 2006-03-05 }}</ref> had to curtail the scope of their requirements.<ref name="UGLE Statement ">{{cite web | author = R.W. Sro. G.R.G. Purser, PSGW | url = http://www.charlton.demon.co.uk/masonic/statement.html | title = Freemasonry in the Police and the Judiciary| date = [[1998-03-11]] | publisher = Alex Charlton | accessdate = 2006-03-04 }}</ref> Arrangements for the declaration of Freemasonry membership have been established for the current Lay Magistracy, Judiciary, and voluntary registration was introduced in 1999 for the Police Service.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/vo030224/text/30224w85.htm#30224w85.html_wqn6 | title = Mr. Denham's reply], Hansard, 24 February 2003 : Column 329W (UK House of Commons Daily Debates) | publisher = Parliament of the United Kingdom | accessdate = 2006-05-12 }}</ref> Decisions on whether information should be released are the responsibility of the public authority receiving the request, on a case-by-case basis, acting in accordance with the principles of the ''Freedom of Information Act, 2000''.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm050721/text/50721w69.htm | title = Hazel Blears’ reply, Hansard, 21 July 2005: Column 2191W (UK House of Commons Daily Debates) | publisher = Parliament of the United Kingdom | date = [[2005-07-21]] | accessdate = 2006-05-12 }}</ref>
| first = S. Brent
| last = Morris
| title = The Complete Idiot's Guide to Freemasonry
| location = New York
| publisher = Alpha Books
| year = 2006
| pages = [https://archive.org/details/completeidiotsgu00morr/page/85 85 (also discussed in chapters 13 and 16)]
| isbn = 978-1-59257-490-2
| oclc = 68042376
| url = https://archive.org/details/completeidiotsgu00morr/page/85
}}</ref> may be outdated for various reasons,<ref name="changes">{{Cite book
| first = John J.
| last = Robinson
| title = A Pilgrim's Path
| publisher = M. Evans
| location = New York
| year = 1993
| page = [https://archive.org/details/pilgrimspathfree00robi/page/129 129]
| isbn = 978-0-87131-732-2
| oclc = 27381296
| url = https://archive.org/details/pilgrimspathfree00robi/page/129
}}</ref> or could be outright [[hoax]]es on the part of the author, as in the case of the [[Taxil hoax]].<ref>{{cite web
| first = Arturo
| last = de Hoyos
| date = 18 August 2002
|author2=S. Brent Morris
| url = http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/taxilhoax.html
| title = Leo Taxil Hoax&nbsp;–Bibliography
| publisher = Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon
| access-date = 7 July 2007 }} Lists many books which perpetuate Masonic ritual hoaxes.</ref>


These hoaxes and exposés have often become the basis for criticism of Masonry, often religious or political in nature or are based on suspicion of corrupt conspiracy of some form. The political opposition that arose after the American "[[William Morgan (anti-Mason)#Disappearance|Morgan Affair]]" in 1826 gave rise to the term ''Anti-Masonry'', which is still in use in America today, both by Masons in referring to their critics and as a self-descriptor by the critics themselves.<ref>[http://dictionary.infoplease.com/anti-mason "Anti-mason"] ''infoplease.com'' retrieved 9 January 2014</ref>
==== The Holocaust ====
[[Image:Forgetmenotflower.JPG|thumb|right|120px|[[Forget-me-not]]]]
{{main|Holocaust}}
{{see also|Freemasonry under totalitarian regimes|Liberté chérie (Freemasonry)}}


===Religious opposition===
The preserved records of the ''[[RSHA|Reichssicherheitshauptamt]]'' (the Reich Security Main Office) show the persecution of Freemasons.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://mill-valley.freemasonry.biz/persecution.htm | title = World War II Documents showing the persecution of Freemasonry | publisher = Mill Valley Lodge #356 | accessdate = 2006-05-21 }}</ref> RSHA Amt VII (Written Records) was overseen by Professor [[Franz Six]] and was responsible for "ideological" tasks, by which was meant the creation of anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic propaganda. While the number is not accurately known, it is estimated that between 80,000 and 200,000 Freemasons were exterminated under the [[Nacht und Nebel|Nazi regime]].<ref name=Dummies/> Masonic concentration camp inmates were graded as political prisoners and wore an inverted [[Nazi concentration camp badges|red triangle]].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia | encyclopedia = The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust | page = vol. 2, p. 531 | last = Katz | editor = Israel Gutman | article = Jews and Freemasons in Europe | id = ISBN 9780028971667 {{oclc|20594356}} }}</ref>
Freemasonry has attracted criticism from [[theocracy|theocratic]] states and organised religions that believe it is in competition with religion or perceive the fraternity's views or practices as [[heterodox]]; it has also long been the target of [[Masonic conspiracy theories|conspiracy theories]] that assert Freemasonry to be an [[occult]] and evil power.<ref>Morris, S. Brent; ''The Complete Idiot's Guide to Freemasonry,'' Alpha books, 2006, p. 204.</ref>


====Christianity and Freemasonry====
The small blue [[forget-me-not]] flower was first used by the Grand Lodge ''Zur Sonne'', in 1926, as a Masonic emblem at the annual convention in [[Bremen (city)|Bremen]], Germany. In 1938 the forget-me-not badge – made by the same factory as the Masonic badge – was chosen for the annual Nazi Party ''[[Winterhilfswerk]]''; a Nazi charitable organization, which collected money so that other state funds could be freed up and used for rearmament. This coincidence enabled Freemasons to wear the forget-me-not badge as a secret sign of membership.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.internetloge.de/arst/forgetd.htm | title = Das Vergißmeinnicht-Abzeichen und die Freimaurerei, Die wahre Geschichte | language = German | publisher = Internetloge.de | accessdate = 2006-07-08 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/bernheim3.html | first = Alain | last = Bernheim | title = The Blue Forget-Me-Not": Another Side Of The Story | work = Pietre-Stones Review of Freemasonry | publisher = | date = [[2004-09-10]] | accessdate = 2006-07-08 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | title = Die Freimaurer-Logen Deutschlands und deren Grosslogen 1737-1972 | first = Karl Heinz | last = Francke | coauthors = Ernst-Günther Geppert | location = Bayreuth | publisher = Quatuor Coronati | year = 1974 | language = German | isbn = | oclc = | edition = Second rev. ed.}}Also in: {{cite book | title = Die Freimaurer-Logen Deutschlands und deren Grosslogen 1737 - 1985 : Matrikel und Stammbuch ; Nachschlagewerk über 248 Jahre Geschichte der Freimaurerei in Deutschland | first = Karl Heinz | last = Francke | coauthors = Ernst-Günther Geppert | location = Bayreuth | publisher = Quatuor Coronati | year = 1988 | language = German | isbn = 9783925749056 | oclc = 75446479 }}</ref>
{{Main|Christian attitudes towards Freemasonry}}


Although members of various faiths cite objections, certain Christian [[religious denomination|denominations]] have had high-profile negative attitudes to Masonry, banning or discouraging their members from being Freemasons. The denomination with the longest history of objection to Freemasonry is the [[Catholic Church]]. The objections raised by the Catholic Church are based on the allegation that Masonry teaches a naturalistic [[deistic]] religion which is in conflict with Church [[doctrine]].<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=5285 | title = Letter of 19 April 1985 to U.S. Bishops Concerning Masonry | last = Cardinal Law | first = Bernard | author-link = Bernard Francis Law | access-date = 9 July 2007 | date = 19 April 1985 | work = CatholicCulture.org }}</ref> More than 600 Papal pronouncements have been issued against Freemasonry.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ansa.it/oltretevere/notizie/2023/06/26/da-clemente-xii-a-ratzinger-i-papi-contro-la-massoneria_8f26e8e6-17c6-4e6a-b0ab-8ae0e21d039a.html|title=From Clement XII to Ratzinger, the Popes and Freemasonry|author=Emanuela Tulli|language=it|author2=Angela Pellicciari|author2-link=:it:Angela Pellicciari|publisher=[[Agenzia Nazionale Stampa Associata|ANSA]]|date=26 June 2023|archive-url=https://archive.today/20231209224543/https://www.ansa.it/oltretevere/notizie/2023/06/26/da-clemente-xii-a-ratzinger-i-papi-contro-la-massoneria_8f26e8e6-17c6-4e6a-b0ab-8ae0e21d039a.html|archive-date=9 December 2023|url-status=live}}</ref> The first was [[Pope Clement XII]]'s ''[[In eminenti apostolatus]],'' 28 April 1738; the most recent was [[Pope Francis]] in a letter by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith 13 November 2023.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2023-11/vatican-catholics-still-forbidden-masonic-lodge.html | title = Vatican confirms Catholics still forbidden to join Masonic lodges| date = 15 November 2023}}</ref>
After [[World War II]], the forget-me-not<ref name=Galen_forget-me-not>{{cite web | url = http://www.galenlodge.co.uk/forgetmenot.htm | title = Das Vergissmeinnicht The Forget-Me-Not: The True Story Behind This Beloved
 Emblem of the Craft in Germany | publisher = Galen Lodge, No. 2394 | date = [[2001-02-08]] | accessdate = 2006-02-06 }}</ref> flower was again used as a Masonic emblem at the first Annual Convention of the United Grand Lodges of Germany in 1948. The badge is now worn in the coat lapel by Freemasons around the world to remember all those that have suffered in the name of Freemasonry, especially those during the Nazi era.<ref name=Galen_forget-me-not /><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.mastermason.com/monlou522/forget~me~not.html | title = About the… Forget-Me-Not | publisher = Monitor Lousbury Lodge, No. 522 | accessdate=2006-03-04 }}</ref>


The ''[[1917 Code of Canon Law]]'' explicitly declared that joining Freemasonry entailed automatic [[excommunication]] and banned books favouring Freemasonry.<ref name="canon2335">Canon 2335, 1917 Code of Canon Law from {{cite web| url = http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/canon.html | title = Canon Law regarding Freemasonry, 1917–1983 | publisher = Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon }}</ref>
=== Women and Freemasonry ===
{{main|Women and Freemasonry|Co-Freemasonry}}
Since the adoption of Anderson's constitution in 1723, it has been widely believed, and indeed accepted as fact by the orders, themselves that only men can be made Masons. Many Grand Lodges do not admit women because they believe it would violate the ancient Landmarks. However, there is good and ample evidence that women were operative Masons working within the medieval guilds throughout Europe, and indeed that they were initiated into speculative lodges prior to 1723. Evidence of this includes several Masonic manuscripts from the time, as well as the guilds' membership rolls, as well as the monuments on which they worked.
In more recent times, women have maintained separate Lodges, working the same rituals, around the world, and these continue to gain membership.


In 1983, the Church issued a new code of [[Canon law (Catholic Church)|canon law]]. Unlike its predecessor, the ''[[1983 Code of Canon Law]]'' did not explicitly name Masonic orders among the [[secret societies]] it condemns. It states: "A person who joins an association which plots against the Church is to be punished with a just penalty; one who promotes or takes office in such an association is to be punished with an [[Interdict (Roman Catholic Church)|interdict]]." This named omission of Masonic orders caused both Catholics and Freemasons to believe that the ban on Catholics becoming Freemasons may have been lifted, especially after the perceived liberalisation of [[Second Vatican Council|Vatican II]].<ref name="RCLaw">{{Cite journal| last = McInvale | first = Reid | year = 1991 | title = Roman Catholic Church Law Regarding Freemasonry | journal = Transactions of Texas Lodge of Research | volume = 27 | pages = 86–97 | url = http://bessel.org/cathtlor.htm | oclc = 47204246 }}</ref> However, the matter was clarified when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later [[Pope Benedict XVI]]), [[Joseph Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith|as the Prefect]] of the [[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith]], issued a [[Declaration on Masonic Associations]], which states: "...&nbsp;the Church's negative judgment in regard to Masonic association remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and therefore membership in them remains forbidden. The faithful who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive [[Holy Communion]]."<ref>[https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19831126_declaration-masonic_en.html Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, Declaration on Masonic Associations] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010314042333/https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19831126_declaration-masonic_en.html |date=14 March 2001 }}, 26 November 1983, retrieved 26 November 2015</ref> In 2023, [[Pope Francis]] reaffirmed the ban on Catholics becoming Freemasons stating the «[...] irreconcilability between Catholic doctrine and Freemasonry [...]»<ref>''Franciscus'', [https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20231113_richiesta-cortes-massoneria_en.pdf Dicasterium Pro Doctrina Fidei]: Note for the audience with the Holy Father, Vatican City, 13 November 2023.</ref> in response to [[Julito Cortes]], [[Roman Catholic Diocese of Dumaguete|Bishop of]] [[Dumaguete|Dumanguete]], who stated concerns over the growing number of Freemasons in the [[Philippines]].<ref name=":7">{{Cite news |date=15 November 2023 |title=Vatican confirms Catholics still forbidden to join Masonic lodges |work=Vatican News |url=https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2023-11/vatican-catholics-still-forbidden-masonic-lodge.html }}</ref> The renewed ban cited both the ''1983 Code of Canon Law'', as well as the ''Guidelines'' made by a Bishops Conference in 2003.<ref name=":7" /><ref>{{Cite news |last=Rojas |first=Jose R. |date=20 February 2020 |title=Pastoral guidelines in dealing with individual Catholics – members of Masonry |work=CBCPNews |url=https://cbcpnews.net/cbcpnews/pastoral-guidelines-in-dealing-with-individual-catholics-members-of-masonry/}}</ref> For its part, Freemasonry has never objected to Catholics joining their fraternity. Those Grand Lodges in amity with the United Grand Lodge of England deny the Church's claims, stating that "Freemasonry does not seek to replace a Mason's religion or provide a substitute for it."<ref name="UGLEFAQ" />
The appendant bodies which are now closely associated with male Masonry in the United States, themselves, mark the history of women's interaction with the order from which they have now been expelled, and were not always embraced by their male counterparts. What are now Eastern Star and Amaranth were once two of three degrees in a single organization, and male Masons' support of Job's Daughters, now the leading Masonic organization for girls, has at times been weak, due to concerns about the organization's "regularity" stemming, no doubt, from certain similarities within the two rituals. Indeed, in at least one jurisdiction, Job's Daughter's Bethels had '''female''' associate guardians for the first twenty years of the group's existence.


In contrast to Catholic allegations of rationalism and naturalism, Protestant objections are more likely to be based on allegations of [[mysticism]], [[occultism]], and even [[Satanism]].<ref name=Satanism >{{cite web|url=http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0093/0093_01.asp |title=The Curse of Baphomet |access-date=29 September 2007 |author=Jack Chick }}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=Chick is a primary source for Protestant beliefs and may not represent all Protestants, causing reliability and due weight issues|date=June 2024}} Masonic scholar [[Albert Pike]] is often quoted (in some cases misquoted) by Protestant anti-Masons as an authority for the position of Masonry on these issues.<ref>{{cite book|author=Arturo de Hoyos and S. Brent Morris|title=Is it True What They Say About Freemasonry, 2nd edition (revised), chapter 1|publisher=M. Evans & Company|year=2004|url=http://204.3.136.66/web/SRpublications/DeHoyos.htm#i8|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202094337/http://204.3.136.66/web/SRpublications/DeHoyos.htm#i8|archive-date=2 December 2013}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=Book was written by Freemasons in defense of Freemasonry, leading to risk of bias; should be replaced with neutral academic source|date=June 2024}} However, Pike, although undoubtedly learned, was not a spokesman for Freemasonry and was also controversial among Freemasons in general. His writings represented his personal opinion only, and furthermore, an opinion grounded in the attitudes and understandings of late 19th century Southern Freemasonry of the US. Notably, his book carries in the preface a form of disclaimer from his own Grand Lodge. No one voice has ever spoken for the whole of Freemasonry.<ref>{{Cite book| last1 = Pike | first1 = Albert | author-link1 = Albert Pike | author2 = T. W. Hugo; Scottish Rite (Masonic order). Supreme Council of the Thirty-Third Degree for the Southern Jurisdiction | title = Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry | location = Washington, DC | publisher = House of the Temple | year = 1950 | orig-year = 1871 | oclc = 12870276 | quote = In preparing this work [Pike] has been about equally Author and Compiler. (p. iii.) ... The teachings of these Readings are not sacramental, so far as they go beyond the realm of Morality into those of other domains of Thought and Truth. The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite uses the word "Dogma" in its true sense of doctrine, or teaching; and is not dogmatic in the odious sense of that term. Everyone is entirely free to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may seem to him to be untrue or unsound (p. iv) }}</ref>
However, mainly within the borders of the US of America, there are many female orders associated with regular Freemasonry and its appendant bodies, such as the [[Order of the Eastern Star]], the [[Order of the Amaranth]], the White Shrine of Jerusalem, the Social Order of Beauceant and the Daughters of the Nile. In addition, there are many non-mainstream Masonic bodies that do admit both men and women or exclusively women. Co-Freemasonry admits both men and women, but it is held to be irregular because it admits women. The systematic admission of women into International Co-Freemasonry began in France in 1882.


In 1993, the [[Southern Baptist Convention]]'s Home Mission Board determined that some parts of freemasonry are incompatible with Christianity, while others are compatible, concluding that participation in freemasonry should be considered "a matter of personal conscience".<ref>{{cite web | url=https://jeffstraub.net/baptists-and-freemasonry-can-a-christian-be-a-faithful-believer-and-be-a-freemason/ | title=Baptists and Freemasonry? Can a Christian be a Faithful Believer and be a Freemason? &#124; Jeff Straub }}</ref> The topic of Freemasonry remains controversial within the convention. James L. Holly, president of Mission and Ministry to Men, published a three volume book series titled "The Southern Baptist Convention and Freemasonry," critiquing the report to the [[Southern Baptist Convention]] in addition to the influence of Gary Leazer, then Director of the Interfaith Witness Department of the [[North American Mission Board]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.ericbarger.com/articles/fmasonry-sbc.2.htm | title=FREEMASONRY AND THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH Part 2 }}</ref> Gary Leazer published "Fundamentalism and Freemasonry", arguing that the convention's discussion of Freemasonry was influenced by [[Southern Baptist Convention conservative resurgence]].
== See also ==
{{commonscat}}
{{wiktionary}}


[[Free Methodist Church]] founder [[B.T. Roberts]] was a vocal opponent of Freemasonry in the mid 19th century. Roberts opposed the society on moral grounds and stated, "The god of the lodge is not the [[God in Abrahamic religions|God of the Bible]]." Roberts believed Freemasonry was a "[[Greco-Roman mysteries|mystery]]" or "alternate" religion and encouraged his church not to support ministers who were Freemasons. Freedom from secret societies is one of the "frees" upon which the Free Methodist Church was founded.<ref>{{Cite book| last = Snyder | first = Howard | title = Populist Saints | location = [[Grand Rapids, Michigan]]| publisher = William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company | year = 2006| page = 727}}</ref>
* [[Freemasonry and the Latter Day Saint movement]]
* [[Hiram Abiff]]
* [[Humanum Genus]] - Pope Leo XIII condemns Freemasonry
* [[List of Freemasons]]
* [[Masonic Knights Templar]]
* [[Pigpen cipher]]
* [[Prince Hall Freemasonry]]
* [[Shriners]]


Since the founding of Freemasonry, many Bishops of the [[Church of England]] have been Freemasons, including [[Archbishop]] [[Geoffrey Fisher]].<ref>{{Cite journal| last = Beresiner | first = Yasha |date=July 2006 | title = Archbishop Fisher&nbsp;– A Godly man and a Brother | journal = Masonic Quarterly Magazine | issue = 18 | url = http://www.mqmagazine.co.uk/issue-18/p-07.php?PHPSESSID=c59cd231db419873a6a6 | access-date = 7 May 2007 }}</ref> In the past, few members of the Church of England would have seen any incongruity in concurrently adhering to Anglican Christianity and practising Freemasonry. In recent decades, however, reservations about Freemasonry have increased within Anglicanism, perhaps due to the increasing prominence of the evangelical wing of the church. The former [[archbishop of Canterbury]], [[Rowan Williams|Dr Rowan Williams]], appeared to harbour some reservations about Masonic ritual, while being anxious to avoid causing offence to Freemasons inside and outside the Church of England. In 2003 he felt it necessary to apologise to British Freemasons after he said that their beliefs were incompatible with Christianity and that he had barred the appointment of Freemasons to senior posts in his diocese when he was Bishop of Monmouth.<ref>{{Cite news | url = https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/20/nmason20.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/04/20/ixhome.html | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071123132655/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F04%2F20%2Fnmason20.xml&sSheet=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F04%2F20%2Fixhome.html | archive-date = 23 November 2007 | title = Rowan Williams apologises to Freemasons | first = Chris | last = Hastings | author2 = Elizabeth Day | work = [[The Daily Telegraph]] | date = 20 April 2003 | access-date = 9 July 2007 | url-status=dead | df = dmy-all }}</ref>
==Notes==

<div class="references-small" style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;"><references/></div>
In 1933, the [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Orthodox]] [[Church of Greece]] officially declared that being a Freemason constitutes an act of [[Apostasy in Christianity|apostasy]] and thus, until he repents, the person involved with Freemasonry cannot partake of the [[Eucharist]]. This has been generally affirmed throughout the whole Eastern Orthodox Church. The Orthodox critique of Freemasonry agrees with both the Catholic and Protestant versions: "Freemasonry cannot be at all compatible with Christianity as far as it is a secret organisation, acting and teaching in mystery and secret and deifying rationalism."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/masonry.aspx |title=Freemasonry: Official Statement of the Church of Greece (1933) |publisher=Orthodoxinfo.com |date=12 October 1933 |access-date=15 January 2011}}</ref>

Regular Freemasonry has traditionally not responded to these claims, beyond the often-repeated statement that Freemasonry explicitly adheres to the principle that "Freemasonry is not a religion, nor a substitute for religion. There is no separate 'Masonic deity,' and there is no separate proper name for a deity in Freemasonry."<ref name="a religion?">{{cite web|url=http://grandlodgeofiowa.org/docs/Freemasonry_Religion/FreemasonryAndReligion.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105085828/http://grandlodgeofiowa.org/docs/Freemasonry_Religion/FreemasonryAndReligion.pdf |archive-date=2013-11-05 |url-status=live |title=Freemasonry and Religion |access-date=2 November 2013 |publisher=United Grand Lodge of England}}</ref>

Christian men, who were discouraged from joining the Freemasons by their Churches or who wanted a more religiocentric society, joined similar fraternal organisations, such as the [[Knights of Columbus]] and [[Knights of Peter Claver]] for Catholics, and the [[Royal Black Institution]] for Protestants,<ref name="Fields1980">{{cite book|last=Fields|first=Rona M.|title=Northern Ireland: Society Under Siege|date=1980|publisher=Transaction Publishers|isbn=978-1412845090|page=113}}<!--|access-date=11 August 2015--></ref> although these fraternal organisations have been "organized in part on the style of and use many symbols of Freemasonry".<ref name="Fields1980"/>

There are some elements of Freemasonry within the [[temple (Latter Day Saints)|temple]] [[Endowment (Mormonism)|rituals]] of [[Freemasonry and Mormonism|Mormonism]].

====Islam and Freemasonry====
{{Unreliable sources section|date=December 2022}}

Ottoman Caliph [[Mahmud I]] outlawed Freemasonry in the [[Ottoman Empire]] in 1748 CE and since that time Freemasonry was equated with [[atheism]] in the [[Ottoman Empire]] and the broader Islamic world.<ref name=FitIW>Layiktez, Cecil "[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/layiktez1.html Freemasonry in the Islamic World]", Pietre-Stones Review of Freemasonry, 1996</ref>

Many [[Islamic]] anti-Masonic arguments are closely tied to [[Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory|antisemitic conspiracy theories]], though other criticisms are made, such as linking Freemasonry to [[Al-Masih ad-Dajjal]] (the false Messiah in Islamic Scripture).<ref name="freemasonryinSHIraq"/><ref name="SFMNAD">{{Cite book| url = http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/prescott03.html| title = The Study of Freemasonry as a New Academic Discipline | pages = 13–14 | first = Andrew | last = Prescott | access-date = 18 December 2008 }}</ref> [[Syrians|Syrian]]-[[Egyptians|Egyptian]] Islamic theologian [[Rashid Rida|Mūhammād Rashīd Ridâ]] (1865–1935) played the crucial role in leading the opposition to Freemasonry across the [[Muslim world|Islamic world]] during the early twentieth century.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Rickenbacher|first=Daniel|date=6 December 2019|title=The 'War Against Islam': How a Conspiracy Theory Drove and Shaped the Islamist Movement|url=https://eeradicalization.com/the-war-against-islam-how-a-conspiracy-theory-drove-and-shaped-the-islamist-movement/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210818054514/https://eeradicalization.com/the-war-against-islam-how-a-conspiracy-theory-drove-and-shaped-the-islamist-movement/|archive-date=18 August 2021}}</ref> Influenced by Rida, Islamic anti-Masons argue that Freemasonry promotes the interests of the Jews around the world and that one of its aims is to destroy the [[Al-Aqsa|Al-Aqsa Mosque compound]] in order to rebuild the [[Temple of Solomon]] in [[Jerusalem]].<ref>[http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/4119 "Can a Muslim be a Freemason"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140329180953/http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/4119 |date=29 March 2014 }} ''Wake up from your slumber'', 2007, retrieved 8 January 2014</ref> Through his popular [[Pan-Islamism|pan-Islamic]] journal ''[[Al-Manār (magazine)|Al-Manar]]'', Rashid Rida spread anti-Masonic ideas which would directly influence the [[Muslim Brotherhood]] and subsequent Islamist movements, such as [[Hamas]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Rickenbacher|first=Daniel|date=6 December 2019|title=The 'War Against Islam': How a Conspiracy Theory Drove and Shaped the Islamist Movement|url=https://eeradicalization.com/the-war-against-islam-how-a-conspiracy-theory-drove-and-shaped-the-islamist-movement/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210818054514/https://eeradicalization.com/the-war-against-islam-how-a-conspiracy-theory-drove-and-shaped-the-islamist-movement/|archive-date=18 August 2021 }}</ref> In article 28 of its Covenant, [[Hamas]] states that Freemasonry, [[Rotary International|Rotary]], and other similar groups "work in the interest of Zionism and according to its instructions ..."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp |title=Hamas Covenant 1988 |publisher=Avalon.law.yale.edu |date=18 August 1988 |access-date=15 January 2011}}</ref>

Several predominantly Muslim countries have banned Freemasonry within their borders, while others have not. [[Turkey]] and [[Morocco]] have established Grand Lodges,<ref>Leyiktez, Celil. [http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/layiktez1.html "Freemasonry in the Islamic World"], ''Pietre-Stones'' Retrieved 2 October 2007.</ref> while in countries such as [[Malaysia]]<ref>[http://dglea.org/ "Home Page", ''District Grand Lodge of the Eastern Archipelago''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140109161530/http://dglea.org/ |date=9 January 2014 }}, retrieved 9 January 2014</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thestar.com.my/Story.aspx/?file=%2F2005%2F4%2F17%2Ffocus%2F10649415&sec=focus |date=17 April 2005 |access-date=13 February 2014 |title=Mystery unveiled |work=The Star Online |archive-date=27 February 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140227051801/http://www.thestar.com.my/Story.aspx/?file=%2F2005%2F4%2F17%2Ffocus%2F10649415&sec=focus |url-status=dead }}</ref> and [[Lebanon]],<ref>[https://archive.today/20130822221554/http://freemasonlb.net/Lodges.html ''Freemasonry in Lebanon''] Lodges linked to the Grand Lodge of Scotland, retrieved 22 August 2013</ref> there are District Grand Lodges operating under a warrant from an established Grand Lodge. In 1972, in [[Pakistan]], [[Zulfikar Ali Bhutto|Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto]], then [[Prime Minister of Pakistan]], placed a ban on Freemasonry. Lodge buildings were confiscated by the government.<ref>[http://www.dawn.com/news/508406/masonic-mystique Peerzada Salman, "Masonic Mystique"], December 2009, ''Dawn.com'' (News site), retrieved 3 January 2012</ref>

Masonic lodges existed in [[Iraq]] as early as 1917, when the first lodge under the [[United Grand Lodge of England]] (UGLE) was opened. Nine lodges under UGLE existed by the 1950s, and a Scottish lodge was formed in 1923. However, the position changed following the revolution, and all lodges were forced to close in 1965.<ref>[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/freemasonry-islamic-countries.html Kent Henderson, "Freemasonry in Islamic Countries"], 2007 paper, ''Pietre Stones'', retrieved 4 January 2014</ref> This position was later reinforced under [[Saddam Hussein]]; the death penalty was "prescribed" for those who "promote or acclaim Zionist principles, including freemasonry, or who associate [themselves] with Zionist organisations."<ref name="freemasonryinSHIraq" />

===Political opposition===
{{See also|Anti-Masonry}}

In 1799, English Freemasonry almost came to a halt due to Parliamentary proclamation. In the wake of the [[French Revolution]], the [[Unlawful Societies Act]] banned any meetings of groups that required their members to take an [[oath]] or obligation.<ref name="USA1799">[http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/prescott15.html Andrew Prescott, "The Unlawful Societies Act"], First published in M. D. J. Scanlan, ed., ''The Social Impact of Freemasonry on the Modern Western World'', The Canonbury Papers I (London: Canonbury Masonic Research Centre, 2002), pp. 116–34, ''Pietre-Stones'' website, retrieved 9 January 2014</ref>

The Grand Masters of both the Moderns and the Antients Grand Lodges called on Prime Minister [[William Pitt the Younger|William Pitt]] (who was not a Freemason) and explained to him that Freemasonry was a supporter of the law and lawfully constituted authority and was much involved in charitable work. As a result, Freemasonry was specifically exempted from the terms of the Act, provided that each private lodge's Secretary placed with the local "Clerk of the Peace" a list of the members of his lodge once a year. This continued until 1967, when the obligation of the provision was rescinded by [[Parliament of the United Kingdom|Parliament]].<ref name="USA1799" />

Freemasonry in the United States faced political pressure following the 1826 kidnapping of [[William Morgan (anti-Mason)|William Morgan]] by Freemasons and his subsequent disappearance. Reports of the "Morgan Affair", together with opposition to [[Jacksonian democracy]] (Andrew Jackson was a prominent Mason), helped fuel an Anti-Masonic movement. The short-lived [[Anti-Masonic Party]] was formed, which fielded candidates for the presidential elections of 1828 and 1832.<ref>[http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/texts/morgan_affair.html "The Morgan Affair"], Reprinted from ''The Short Talk Bulletin'' – Vol. XI, March 1933 No. 3, ''Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon'', retrieved 4 January 2014</ref>

[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-W1028-507, Erlangen, Freimaurer bei Zeremonie.jpg|thumb|alt=Erlangen Lodge revival, meeting in 1948|Lodge in Erlangen, Germany. First meeting after World War II with guests from US, France and Czechoslovakia, 1948.]]
In Italy, Freemasonry has become linked to a scandal concerning the [[Propaganda Due]] lodge (a.k.a. P2). This lodge was chartered by the [[Grande Oriente d'Italia]] in 1877, as a lodge for visiting Masons unable to attend their own lodges. Under [[Licio Gelli]]'s leadership, in the late 1970s, P2 became involved in the financial scandals that nearly bankrupted the [[Vatican Bank]]. However, by this time the lodge was operating independently and irregularly, as the Grand Orient had revoked its charter and expelled Gelli in 1976.<ref>{{cite web | first = Edward L. | last = King | url = http://www.masonicinfo.com/p2_lodge.htm | title = P2 Lodge | year = 2007 | access-date = 31 October 2006 | archive-date = 3 February 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210203135205/http://www.masonicinfo.com/p2_lodge.htm | url-status = dead }}</ref>

[[Conspiracy theorists]] have long associated Freemasonry with the [[New World Order (conspiracy theory)|New World Order]] and the [[Illuminati]], and state that Freemasonry as an organisation is either bent on world domination or already secretly in control of world politics. Historically Freemasonry has attracted criticism, and suppression from both the politically far right (e.g., [[Nazi Germany]])<ref>{{Cite book | first = James | last = Wilkenson | author2 = H. Stuart Hughes | title = Contemporary Europe: A History | location = Englewood Cliffs, NJ | publisher = Prentice Hall | year = 1995 | page = [https://archive.org/details/contemporaryeuro00wilk/page/237 237] | isbn = 978-0-13-291840-4 | oclc = 31009810 | url = https://archive.org/details/contemporaryeuro00wilk/page/237 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book | first = Otto | last = Zierer | title = Concise History of Great Nations: History of Germany | location = New York | publisher = Leon Amiel Publisher | year = 1976 | page = [https://archive.org/details/germany0000zier/page/104 104] | isbn = 978-0-8148-0673-9 | oclc = 3250405 | url = https://archive.org/details/germany0000zier/page/104 }}</ref> and the far left (e.g., the former [[Communist state]]s in Eastern Europe).<ref>Michael Johnstone, ''The Freemasons'', Arcturus, 2005, pp 73–75</ref>

Freemasonry is viewed with distrust even in some modern democracies.<ref name=Hodapp86>Hodapp, Christopher. ''Freemasons for Dummies''. Indianapolis: Wiley, 2005. p. 86.</ref> In the UK, Masons working in the justice system, such as judges and police officers, were required to disclose their membership from 1999 to 2009.<ref name=GuardianMP>Bright, Martin (12 June 2005). "[https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/jun/12/uk.freedomofinformation1 MPs told to declare links to Masons]", ''[[The Guardian]]''</ref> While a parliamentary inquiry found that there had been no evidence of wrongdoing, the government believed that Masons' potential loyalties to support fellow Masons should be transparent to the public.<ref name=Hodapp86 /><ref name=GuardianMP /><ref>Cusick, James (27 December 1996). [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/police-want-judges-and-mps-to-reveal-masonic-links-too-1316095.html Police want judges and MPs to reveal Masonic links too], ''[[The Independent]]''</ref> The policy of requiring a declaration of masonic membership by applicants for judicial office (judges and magistrates) was ended in 2009 by [[Secretary of State for Justice|Justice Secretary]] [[Jack Straw]] (who had initiated the requirement in the 1990s). Straw stated that the rule was considered disproportionate since no impropriety or malpractice had been shown as a result of judges being Freemasons.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2009/nov/05/jack-straw-judges-masons |title=Jack Straw scraps rule saying judges must declare if they are masons |work=guardian.co.uk |date=5 November 2009 |author=Sparrow, Andrew |access-date=7 November 2009}}</ref>

Freemasonry is both successful and controversial in France. As of the early 21st century, membership is rising, but reporting of it in popular media is often negative.<ref name=Hodapp86 />

In some countries, anti-Masonry is often related to [[antisemitism]] and anti-[[Zionism]]. For example, in 1980, the Iraqi [[Law of Iraq|legal]] and [[Iraqi Penal Code|penal code]] was changed by [[Saddam Hussein]]'s ruling [[Ba'ath Party (Iraq)|Ba'ath Party]], making it a felony to "promote or acclaim Zionist principles, including Freemasonry, or who associate [themselves] with Zionist organisations".<ref name="freemasonryinSHIraq">{{Cite news| url = http://washingtontimes.com/world/20040701-120129-6565r.htm | title = Saddam to be formally charged | first = David R | last = Sands | work = [[The Washington Times]] | date = 1 July 2004 | access-date = 18 June 2006 }}</ref> Professor Andrew Prescott of the [[University of Sheffield]] writes: "Since at least the time of the [[The Protocols of the Elders of Zion|Protocols of the Elders of Zion]], antisemitism has gone hand in hand with anti-masonry, so it is not surprising that allegations that [[11 September 2001 attacks|11 September]] was a Zionist plot have been accompanied by suggestions that the attacks were inspired by a masonic world order".<ref>Prescott, pp. 13–14, 30, 33.</ref>

====The Holocaust====
{{Main|Holocaust victims#Freemasons}}
{{See also|Liberté chérie|Suppression of Freemasonry}}
[[File:Forgetmenotflower.JPG|thumb|upright|alt=[[Forget-me-not]]|[[Myosotis|Forget-me-not]]]]

The preserved records of the ''[[Reich Security Main Office|Reichssicherheitshauptamt]]'' (the Reich Security Main Office) show the persecution of Freemasons during [[the Holocaust]].<ref>{{cite web | url = http://mill-valley.freemasonry.biz/persecution.htm | title = World War II Documents showing the persecution of Freemasonry | publisher = Mill Valley Lodge #356 | access-date = 21 May 2006 | url-status=dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121210071945/http://mill-valley.freemasonry.biz/persecution.htm | archive-date = 10 December 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> RSHA Amt VII (Written Records), overseen by Professor [[Franz Six]], was responsible for "ideological" tasks, by which was meant the creation of antisemitic and anti-Masonic propaganda. While the number of victims is not accurately known, historians estimate that between 80,000 and 200,000 Freemasons were killed under the [[Nacht und Nebel|Nazi regime]].<ref name="holocaust">''Freemasons for Dummies'', by Christopher Hodapp, Wiley Publishing Inc., Indianapolis, 2005, p. 85, sec. "Hitler and the Nazi"</ref> Masonic concentration camp inmates were classified as political prisoners and wore an inverted [[Nazi concentration camp badge|red triangle]].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia | encyclopedia = The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust | page = [https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofho0000unse_l4l4/page/ vol. 2, p. 531] | last = Katz | year = 1990 | editor = Israel Gutman | article = Jews and Freemasons in Europe | isbn = 978-0-02-897166-7 | oclc = 20594356 | url = https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofho0000unse_l4l4/page/ }}</ref> Hitler believed Freemasons had succumbed to Jews conspiring against Germany.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007186|title=Freemasonry}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/hitler.html|title=Hitler and Freemasonry|first=Trevor W.|last=McKeown}}</ref>

The small blue [[Myosotis|forget-me-not]] flower was first used by the Grand Lodge ''Zur Sonne'' in 1926, as a Masonic emblem at the annual convention in [[Bremen]], Germany. In 1938, a forget-me-not badge, made by the same factory as the Masonic badge, was chosen for the Nazi Party's ''[[Winterhilfswerk]]'', the annual charity drive of the [[National Socialist People's Welfare]] (the welfare branch of the Nazi party). This coincidence enabled Freemasons to wear the forget-me-not badge as a secret sign of membership.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.internetloge.de/arst/forgetd.htm | title = Das Vergißmeinnicht-Abzeichen und die Freimaurerei, Die wahre Geschichte | language = de | publisher = Internetloge.de | access-date = 8 July 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/bernheim3.html | first = Alain | last = Bernheim | title = The Blue Forget-Me-Not: Another Side Of The Story | work = Pietre-Stones Review of Freemasonry | date = 10 September 2004 | access-date = 8 July 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book| title = Die Freimaurer-Logen Deutschlands und deren Grosslogen 1737–1972 | first = Karl Heinz | last = Francke |author2=Ernst-Günther Geppert | location = Bayreuth | publisher = Quatuor Coronati | year = 1974 | language = de | edition = Second rev.}}Also in: {{Cite book| title = Die Freimaurer-Logen Deutschlands und deren Grosslogen 1737–1985 : Matrikel und Stammbuch; Nachschlagewerk über 248 Jahre Geschichte der Freimaurerei in Deutschland | first = Karl Heinz | last = Francke |author2=Ernst-Günther Geppert | location = Bayreuth | publisher = Quatuor Coronati | year = 1988 | language = de | isbn = 978-3-925749-05-6 | oclc = 75446479 }}</ref>

After [[World War II]], the forget-me-not flower was used again as a Masonic emblem in 1948 at the first Annual Convention of the [[United Grand Lodges of Germany]] in 1948. The badge is now sometimes worn in the coat lapel by Freemasons around the world to remember all who suffered in the name of Freemasonry, especially those during the Nazi era.<ref name=Galen_forget-me-not>{{cite news|title=The Story Behind Forget Me Not Emblem!|url=http://www.masonicnetwork.org/blog/2009/the-story-behind-forget-me-not-emblem/|newspaper=Masonic Network|date=11 December 2009|access-date=19 May 2013|archive-date=6 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306011314/http://www.masonicnetwork.org/blog/2009/the-story-behind-forget-me-not-emblem/|url-status=dead}}</ref>

==See also==
* {{annotated link|List of Freemasons}}
* [[List of general fraternities]]
* {{annotated link|Fraternal order}}
* [[Secret society]]
* [[Co-Freemasonry]]
* [[Freemasonry during World War I]]
* [[Freemasonry under the Second French Empire]]
* [[Freemasonry in Latin America]]
* [[Freemasonry in the French Third Republic]]
* [[Freemasonry in Brazil]]
* [[DeMolay International]], Masonic youth organization

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==Further reading==
{{Further|Freemasonry in France#Bibliography}}
* Belton, John L., et al. ''Freemasonry in context: history, ritual, controversy'' (Lexington Books, 2004) [https://books.google.com/books?id=hXq4lJeX_DUC&dq=History+of+freemasonry+symbols&pg=PR7 online].
* Berger, Joachim. "The great divide: Transatlantic brothering and masonic internationalism, c. 1870–c. 1930." ''Atlantic Studies'' 16.3 (2019): 405–422.
* Dickie, John. ''The Craft: How the Freemasons Made the Modern World'' (PublicAffairs, 2020).
* Fozdar, Vahid. "'That Grand Primeval and Fundamental Religion': The Transformation of Freemasonry into a British Imperial Cult." ''Journal of World History'' 22#3 (2011), pp.&nbsp;493–525. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/23011747 online]
* Hamill, John. ''The Craft: A History of English Freemasonry'' (1986)
* Harland-Jacobs, Jessica L. ''Builders of Empire: Freemasons and British Imperialism, 1717–1927'' (2007)
* Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig. ''Freemasonry and German Civil Society, 1840–1918'' (U of Michigan Press, 2007).
* Jacob, Margaret C. ''Living the Enlightenment: Freemasonry and Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe'' (1991)
* Jacob, Margaret C. ''The Origins of Freemasonry: Facts and Fictions'' (U of Pennsylvania Press, 2007).
* Jacob, Margaret, and Matthew Crow. "Freemasonry and the Enlightenment." in ''Handbook of Freemasonry'' (Brill, 2014) pp.&nbsp;100–116. [https://milwaukeefreemasonryformenandwomen.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Handbook-of-Freemasonry-Henrik-Bogdan-Jan-A.-M.-Snoek.pdf#page=121 online]
* Loiselle, Kenneth. "Freemasonry and the Catholic Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century France." ''Journal of Modern History'' 94.3 (2022): 499–536. [https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=hist_faculty online]
* Önnerfors, Andreas. ''Freemasonry: a very short introduction'' (Oxford University Press, 2017) [https://books.google.com/books?id=P3AuDwAAQBAJ&dq=History+of+freemasonry+symbols&pg=PP1 excerpt].
* Racine, Karen. "Freemasonry" in Michael S. Werner, ed. ''Encyclopedia of Mexico: History, Society, and Culture'' (Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997) 1:538–540.
* Ridley, Jasper. ''The Freemasons'' (1999), wide-ranging global popular history.
* Snoek Jan A.M. and Henrik Bogdan. "The History of Freemasonry: An Overview" in Bogdan and Snoek, eds. ''Handbook of Freemasonry'' (Brill, 2014) ch. 2 pp 13–32. [http://milwaukeefreemasonryformenandwomen.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Handbook-of-Freemasonry-Henrik-Bogdan-Jan-A.-M.-Snoek.pdf#page=34 online]
* Stevenson, David. "Four Hundred Years of Freemasonry in Scotland." ''Scottish Historical Review,'' 90#230 (2011), pp.&nbsp;280–295. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/23073288 online]
* Stevenson, David. ''The First Freemasons. Scotland's Early Lodges and Their Members'' (1988)
* Weisberger, R. William et al.'' Freemasonry on Both Sides of the Atlantic: Essays concerning the Craft in the British Isles, Europe, the United States, and Mexico'' (2002), 969 pp
* Weisberger, R. William. ''Speculative Freemasonry and the Enlightenment: A Study of the Craft in London, Paris, Prague and Vienna'' (Columbia University Press, 1993) 243 pp.

===United States===
* Bullock, Steven C. ''Revolutionary brotherhood: Freemasonry and the transformation of the American social order, 1730–1840'' (UNC Press Books, 2011).
* Formisano, Ronald P., and Kathleen Smith Kutolowski. "Antimasonry and Masonry: The Genesis of Protest, 1826–1827." ''American Quarterly'' 29.2 (1977): 139–165. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2712356 online]
* Hackett, David G. ''That Religion in Which All Men Agree : Freemasonry in American Culture'' (U of California Press, 2015)
* Hinks, Peter P. et al. ''All Men Free and Brethren: Essays on the History of African American Freemasonry'' (Cornell UP, 2013).
* Kantrowitz, Stephen. "'Intended for the Better Government of Man': The Political History of African American Freemasonry in the Era of Emancipation." ''Journal of American History'' 96#4, (2010), pp.&nbsp;1001–1026. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/40661823 online].
* Weisberger, R. William et al. ''Freemasonry on Both Sides of the Atlantic: Essays concerning the Craft in the British Isles, Europe, the United States, and Mexico'' (2002), 969pp
* York, Neil L. "Freemasons and the American Revolution." ''Historian'' 55#2 (1993), pp.&nbsp;315–330. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/24449525 online]

===Historiography and memory===
* Jacob, Margaret. "The Radical Enlightenment and Freemasonry: where we are now." ''REHMLAC: Revista de Estudios Históricos de la Masonería Latinoamericana y Caribeña'' 1 (2013): 11–25.[https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5285155.pdf online].


==External links==
==External links==
{{Sister project links}}
* [http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/FRA_GAE/FREEMASONRY.html Freemasonry] article from the 1911 (11th Ed.) Encyclopedia Britannica.
* {{Cite EB1911|wstitle=Freemasonry |short=x}}
* [http://www.brad.ac.uk/webofhiram/ Web of Hiram] at the University of Bradford. A database of donated Masonic material.
* [http://www.brad.ac.uk/webofhiram/ Web of Hiram] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929054435/http://www.brad.ac.uk/webofhiram/ |date=29 September 2007 }} at the University of Bradford. A database of donated Masonic material.
* [http://www.geocities.com/stlaasr/masonic-books-online.html Masonic Books Online] of the St. Louis Scottish Rite.
* [http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/masonic_books_online.html Masonic Books Online] of the ''Pietre-Stones Review of Freemasonry''
* [http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/masonic_books_online.html Masonic Books Online] of the ''Pietre-Stones Review of Freemasonry''
*[http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/25/ ''The Constitutions of the Free-Masons''] (1734), James Anderson, Benjamin Franklin, Paul Royster. Hosted by the Libraries at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
* [http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/25/ ''The Constitutions of the Free-Masons''] (1734), James Anderson, Benjamin Franklin, Paul Royster. Hosted by the Libraries at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
*[http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18136/18136-h/18136-h.htm ''The Mysteries of Free Masonry''], by William Morgan, from [[Project Gutenberg]]
* [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18136/18136-h/18136-h.htm ''The Mysteries of Free Masonry''], by William Morgan, from [[Project Gutenberg]]
* {{Internet Archive|alegislativeinv00hallgoog|A Legislative Investigation into Masonry (1832)}}, {{oclc|1560509}}
* [http://www.ugle.org.uk/library-museum/ The United Grand Lodge of England's Library and Museum of Freemasonry] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190527152317/https://www.ugle.org.uk/library-museum/ |date=27 May 2019 }}, London
* [http://www.oztorah.com/category/freemasonry/ Articles on Judaism and Freemasonry]
* [http://masonicinfo.com/ Anti-Masonry: Points of View] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190519134436/http://www.masonicinfo.com/ |date=19 May 2019 }} – Edward L. King's Masonic website
*[https://ledroithumain.international/?lang=en The International Order of Co-Freemasonry ''Le Droit Humain'']

{{Freemasonry footer}}


{{Authority control}}
[[be-x-old:Масонства]]
[[Category:Freemasonry|*]]
[[Category:Religion and politics]]
[[Category:Sociology]]
[[Category:Fraternal and service organizations]]


[[Category:Freemasonry| ]]
{{Link FA|ar}}
{{Link FA|he}}
{{Link FA|pl}}
[[af:Vrymesselary]]
[[ar:ماسونية]]
[[bs:Slobodno zidarstvo]]
[[bg:Масонство]]
[[ca:Francmaçoneria]]
[[cs:Svobodné zednářství]]
[[da:Frimureri]]
[[de:Freimaurerei]]
[[et:Vabamüürlus]]
[[el:Τεκτονισμός]]
[[es:Francmasonería]]
[[eo:Framasonismo]]
[[fa:فراماسونری]]
[[fr:Franc-maçonnerie]]
[[ko:프리메이슨]]
[[hr:Slobodno zidarstvo]]
[[id:Freemasonry]]
[[is:Frímúrarareglan]]
[[it:Massoneria]]
[[he:הבונים החופשיים]]
[[lv:Brīvmūrnieki]]
[[lt:Masonai]]
[[hu:Szabadkőművesség]]
[[ms:Pergerakan Freemasonry]]
[[nl:Vrijmetselarij]]
[[ja:フリーメイソン]]
[[no:Frimureri]]
[[pl:Wolnomularstwo]]
[[pt:Maçonaria]]
[[ro:Francmasonerie]]
[[ru:Масонство]]
[[sk:Slobodomurárstvo]]
[[sl:Prostozidarstvo]]
[[sr:Слободно зидарство]]
[[fi:Vapaamuurarit]]
[[sv:Frimureri]]
[[ta:இலவசக் கொத்தனாரியல்]]
[[tr:Masonluk]]
[[uk:Масонство]]
[[zh:共济会]]

Latest revision as of 13:14, 4 January 2025

Standard image of masonic square and compasses
The main emblem of the Freemasons.

Freemasonry (sometimes spelled Free-Masonry)[1][2][3] or simply Masonry includes various fraternal organisations that trace their origins to the local guilds of stonemasons that, from the end of the 14th century, regulated the qualifications of stonemasons and their interaction with authorities and clients. Freemasonry is the oldest fraternity in the world and among the oldest continued organizations in history.[4]

Modern Freemasonry broadly consists of two main recognition groups: Regular Freemasonry, which insists that a "volume of sacred law", such as the Bible, the Quran, or other religious scripture be open in a working lodge, that every member professes belief in a Supreme Being, that no women be admitted, and that the discussion of religion and politics do not take place within the lodge; and Continental Freemasonry, which consists of the jurisdictions that have removed some, or all, of these restrictions.

The basic, local organisational unit of Freemasonry is the Lodge. These private Lodges are usually supervised at the regional level (usually coterminous with a state, province, or national border) by a Grand Lodge or Grand Orient. There is no international, worldwide Grand Lodge that supervises all of Freemasonry; each Grand Lodge is independent, and they do not necessarily recognise each other as being legitimate. Lodges are found around the world and on all populated continents; however due to anti-Masonry and laws that effectively ban the tradition, it does not have a presence in every country. In the spirit of brotherhood and hopefulness, however, Freemasons usually presume that clandestine lodges may nonetheless exist in those countries in which it is banned, even if they may not actually exist.

The degrees of Freemasonry are the three grades of medieval craft guilds: Entered Apprentice, Journeyman or Fellow of the craft[5] (now called either "Fellowcraft" or "Fellow Craft"[5][6] in English speaking jurisdictions, and "Companion" in non-English speaking jurisdictions), and Master Mason. The candidate of these three degrees is progressively taught the meanings of the symbols of Freemasonry and entrusted with grips, signs, and words to signify to other members that he has been so initiated. The degrees are part allegorical morality play and part lecture. These three degrees form Craft (or Blue Lodge) Freemasonry, and members of any of these degrees are known as Free-Masons,[7] Freemasons or Masons. Once the Craft degrees have been conferred upon a Mason, he is qualified to join various "Concordant bodies" which offer additional degrees. These organisations are usually administered separately from the Grand Lodges who administer the Craft degrees. The extra degrees vary with locality and jurisdiction. In addition to these bodies, there are further organizations outside of the more traditional Rites of Freemasonry, that require an individual to be a Master Mason before they can join (such as the Rosicrucian Society of England).

Throughout its history, Freemasonry has received criticism and opposition on religious and political grounds. The Catholic Church, some Protestant denominations, and certain Islamic countries or entities have expressed opposition to or banned membership in Free-Masonry. Opposition to Freemasonry is sometimes rooted in anti-Semitism or conspiracy theories,[8][9] and Freemasons have historically been persecuted by authoritarian states.[10][11]

Masonic lodge

[edit]
Italian lodge at Palazzo Roffia, Florence
Lodge in Palazzo Roffia, Florence, set out for French (Premiere Grand Lodge) ritual

The Masonic lodge is the basic organisational unit of Freemasonry.[12] The Lodge meets regularly and conducts the usual formal business of any small organisation (approve minutes, elect new members, appoint officers and take their reports, consider correspondence, bills and annual accounts, organise social and charitable events, etc.). In addition to such business, the meeting may perform a ceremony to confer a Masonic degree[13] or receive a lecture, which is usually on some aspect of Masonic history or ritual.[14] At the conclusion of the meeting, the Lodge may hold a formal dinner, or festive board, sometimes involving toasting and song.[15] These meetings are typically held in a Masonic temple, though other venues may occasionally be used.

The bulk of Masonic ritual consists of degree ceremonies. Candidates for Freemasonry are progressively initiated into Freemasonry, first in the degree of Entered Apprentice. At some later time, in separate ceremonies, they will be passed to the degree of Fellowcraft; and then raised to the degree of Master Mason. In each of these ceremonies, the candidate must first take the new obligations of the degree, and is then entrusted with secret knowledge including passwords, signs and grips (secret handshakes) confined to his new rank.[16] Although these symbols and gestures are nominally secret, they are readily found in public sources, including those published by Masonic organizations themselves.[17][18]

Another ceremony is the annual installation of the Master of the Lodge and his appointed or elected officers.[13] In some jurisdictions, an Installed Master elected, obligated, and invested to preside over a Lodge, is valued as a separate rank with its own secrets and distinctive title and attributes; after each full year in the chair the Master invests his elected successor and becomes a Past Master with privileges in the Lodge and Grand Lodge.[19] In other jurisdictions, the grade is not recognised, and no inner ceremony conveys new secrets during the installation of a new Master of the Lodge.[20]

Most Lodges have some sort of social functions, allowing members, their partners, and non-Masonic guests to meet openly.[21] Often coupled with these events is the discharge of every Mason's and Lodge's collective obligation to contribute to charity. This occurs at many levels, including in annual dues, subscriptions, fundraising events, Lodges and Grand Lodges. Masons and their charities contribute for the relief of need in many fields, such as education, health and old age.[22][23]

Private Lodges form the backbone of Freemasonry, with the sole right to elect their own candidates for initiation as Masons or admission as joining Masons, and sometimes with exclusive rights over residents local to their premises. There are non-local Lodges where Masons meet for wider or narrower purposes, such or in association with some hobby, sport, Masonic research, business, profession, regiment or college. The rank of Master Mason also entitles a Freemason to explore Masonry further through other degrees, administered separately from the basic Craft or "Blue Lodge" degrees described here, but generally having a similar structure and meetings.[24]

There is much diversity and little consistency in Freemasonry because each Masonic jurisdiction is independent and sets its own rules and procedures while Grand Lodges have limited jurisdiction over their constituent member Lodges, which are ultimately private clubs. The wording of the ritual, the number of officers present, the layout of the meeting room, etc. varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.[24][25]

Almost all officers of a Lodge are elected or appointed annually. Every Masonic Lodge has a Master, two Wardens, a treasurer and a secretary. There is also always a Tyler, or outer guard, outside the door of a working Lodge, who may be paid to secure its privacy. Other offices vary between jurisdictions.[24]

Each Masonic Lodge exists and operates according to ancient principles known as the Landmarks of Freemasonry, which elude any universally accepted definition.[26]

Joining a lodge

[edit]
Worshipful Master George Washington
Print from 1870 portraying George Washington as Master of his Lodge

Candidates for Freemasonry will usually have met the most active members of the Lodge they are joining before being elected for initiation. The process varies among Grand Lodges, but in modern times interested people often look up a local Lodge through the Internet and will typically be introduced to a Lodge social function or open evening. The onus is upon candidates to ask to join; while they may be encouraged to ask, they may not be invited. Once the initial inquiry is made, a formal application may be proposed and seconded or announced in open Lodge and a more or less formal interview usually follows. If the candidate wishes to proceed, references are taken up during a period of notice so that members may enquire into the candidate's suitability and discuss it. Finally, the Lodge takes an officially secret ballot on each application before a candidate is either initiated or rejected.[27] The exact number of adverse ballots ("blackballs") required to reject a candidate varies between Masonic jurisdictions. As an example, the United Grand Lodge of England only requires a single "blackball", while the Grand Lodge of New York requires three.

A minimum requirement of every body of Freemasons is that each candidate must be "free and of good reputation".[28] The question of freedom, a standard feudal requirement of mediaeval guilds, is nowadays one of independence: the object is that every Mason should be a proper and responsible person.[27] Thus, each Grand Lodge has a standard minimum age, varying greatly and often subject to dispensation in particular cases. (For example, in those jurisdictions where the minimum age is normally 21, lodges can often be given dispensations to initiate the sons of Masons at age 18.)

Additionally, most Grand Lodges require a candidate to declare a belief in a Supreme Being (although every candidate must interpret this condition in his own way, as all religious discussion is commonly prohibited). In a few cases, the candidate may be required to be of a specific religion. The form of Freemasonry most common in Scandinavia (known as the Swedish Rite), for example, accepts only Christians.[29] At the other end of the spectrum, "Liberal" or Continental Freemasonry, exemplified by the Grand Orient de France, does not require a declaration of belief in any deity and accepts atheists (the cause of the distinction from the rest of Freemasonry).[30][31]

During the ceremony of initiation, the candidate is required to undertake an obligation, swearing on the religious volume sacred to his personal faith to do good as a Mason. In the course of three degrees, Masons will promise to keep the secrets of their degree from lower degrees and outsiders, as far as practicality and the law permit, and to support a fellow Mason in distress.[24] There is formal instruction as to the duties of a Freemason, but on the whole, Freemasons are left to explore the craft in the manner they find most satisfying. Some will simply enjoy the dramatics, or the management and administration of the lodge, others will explore the history, ritual and symbolism of the craft, others will focus their involvement on their Lodge's sociopolitical side, perhaps in association with other lodges, while still others will concentrate on the lodge's charitable functions.[32][33]

Organisation

[edit]

Grand Lodges

[edit]
Freemason's Hall, London
Freemasons Hall, London, home of the United Grand Lodge of England
The Historical Grand Lodge of the Grand Orient de France

Grand Lodges and Grand Orients are independent and sovereign bodies that govern Masonry in a given country, state or geographical area (termed a jurisdiction). There is no single overarching governing body that presides over worldwide Freemasonry; connections between different jurisdictions depend solely on mutual recognition.[34][35]

Estimates of the worldwide membership of Freemasonry in the early 21st century ranged from about two million to more than six million.[36][better source needed]

The fraternity is administratively organised into independent Grand Lodges (or sometimes Grand Orients), each of which governs its own Masonic jurisdiction, which consists of subordinate (or constituent) Lodges.

The United Grand Lodge of England remains the largest Masonic jurisdiction worldwide. However, its membership has declined dramatically, from about 500,000 members in the 1960s to approximately 175,000 in 2021.[37][38] The organization is structured into various Provincial Grand Lodges at the local level. Similarly, the Grand Lodge of Ireland has experienced a steep decline, with membership falling from 100,000 in 1960 to around 19,000 members currently.[39]

In the United States, Masonic membership is organized in two systems, first through 51 Conservative Grand Lodges — one for each state plus the District of Columbia. While these Grand Lodges once boasted over 4 million members in 1957, membership has declined sharply. According to the Masonic Service Association of North America, current combined membership across these jurisdictions stands at approximately 875,000 members.[40]

Additionally, there are 46 Prince Hall Grand Lodges in amity with UGLE, operating across various U.S. states. Prince Hall Freemasonry is a historically African-American branch of Freemasonry that maintains its own separate Grand Lodge system parallel to the state Grand Lodge system.[41]

Together, these two systems — the conservative Grand Lodges and Prince Hall Grand Lodges — make up for a total of 97 UGLE recognized Grand Lodges, sharing jurisdictions in the United States. They represent the main bodies of Masonic governance in the United States, though both have experienced significant membership declines since their mid-20th century peaks.[42]

Grand Orient de France, the largest jurisdiction in Continental or Liberal Freemasonry in terms of membership, has over 53,000 members spread across approximately 1,381 lodges for an average of 38 members per Lodges. The Grand Orient de France has been growing in membership since World War II from 33,000 in 1960 to 53,000 in 2023.[43]

Recognition, amity and regularity

[edit]

Relations between Grand Lodges are determined by the concept of Recognition. Each Grand Lodge maintains a list of other Grand Lodges that it recognises.[44] When two Grand Lodges recognise and are in Masonic communication with each other, they are said to be in amity, and the brethren of each may visit each other's Lodges and interact Masonically. When two Grand Lodges are not in amity, inter-visitation is not allowed. There are many reasons one Grand Lodge will withhold or withdraw recognition from another, but the two most common are Exclusive Jurisdiction and Regularity.[45]

Exclusive Jurisdiction

[edit]

Exclusive Jurisdiction is a concept whereby normally only one Grand Lodge will be recognised in any geographical area. If two Grand Lodges claim jurisdiction over the same area, the other Grand Lodges will have to choose between them, and they may not all decide to recognise the same one. (In 1849, for example, the Grand Lodge of New York split into two rival factions, each claiming to be the legitimate Grand Lodge. Other Grand Lodges had to choose between them until the schism was healed.[46]) Exclusive Jurisdiction can be waived when the two overlapping Grand Lodges are themselves in amity and agree to share jurisdiction. For example, since the Grand Lodge of Connecticut is in amity with the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Connecticut, the principle of Exclusive Jurisdiction does not apply, and other Grand Lodges may recognise both.[47] Likewise, the five distinct kinds of lodges in Germany have nominally united under one Grand Lodge in order to obtain international recognition.

Modern Challenges and Evolution

[edit]

The concept of Exclusive Jurisdiction has been significantly challenged in the United States with the increasing recognition of Prince Hall Grand Lodges, a branch of Freemasonry created for African Americans. Historically, many "mainstream" or conservative U.S. Grand Lodges refused to recognize Prince Hall Grand Lodges operating in their states, citing Exclusive Jurisdiction. However, this began to change in 1989 when the Grand Lodge of Connecticut extended recognition to its Prince Hall counterpart.[48][49]

This initial recognition created a precedent for "shared jurisdiction" between mainstream and Prince Hall Grand Lodges, effectively modifying the traditional interpretation of Exclusive Jurisdiction. By 2024, most U.S. Grand Lodges have recognized their Prince Hall counterparts, establishing a new norm where two Grand Lodges can legitimately operate within the same geographical area, provided they maintain mutual recognition and amity.[50]

The evolution of this practice demonstrates how traditional Masonic principles can adapt to accommodate social progress while maintaining the fundamental aims of regular Freemasonry. Some jurisdictions have formalized this arrangement through written agreements that specifically outline the terms of shared jurisdiction.[51][52]

Regularity

[edit]
First Freemason's Hall, 1809
Freemasons' Hall, London, c. 1809

Regularity is a concept based on adherence to Masonic Landmarks, the basic membership requirements, tenets and rituals of the craft. Each Grand Lodge sets its own definition of what these landmarks are, and thus what is Regular and what is Irregular (and the definitions do not necessarily agree between Grand Lodges). Essentially, every Grand Lodge will hold that its landmarks (its requirements, tenets and rituals) are Regular, and judge other Grand Lodges based on those. If the differences are significant, one Grand Lodge may declare the other "Irregular" and withdraw or withhold recognition.[53][54]

The most commonly shared rules for Recognition (based on Regularity) are those given by the United Grand Lodge of England in 1929:

  • The Grand Lodge should be established by an existing regular Grand Lodge, or by at least three regular Lodges.
  • A belief in a supreme being and scripture is a condition of membership.
  • Initiates should take their vows on that scripture.
  • Only men can be admitted, and no relationship exists with mixed Lodges.
  • The Grand Lodge has complete control over the first three degrees and is not subject to another body.
  • All Lodges shall display a volume of scripture with the square and compasses while in session.
  • There is no discussion of politics or religion.
  • "Ancient landmarks, customs and usages" observed.[55]

Other degrees, orders, and bodies

[edit]

Blue Lodges, known as Craft Lodges in the United Kingdom, offer only the three traditional degrees. In most jurisdictions, the rank of past or installed master is also conferred in Blue/Craft Lodges. Master Masons are able to extend their Masonic experience by taking further degrees, in appendant or other bodies whether or not approved by their own Grand Lodge.[56]

The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite is a system of 33 degrees, including the three Blue Lodge degrees administered by a local or national Supreme Council. This system is popular in North America, South America and in Continental Europe. In America, the York Rite, with a similar range, administers three orders of Masonry, namely the Royal Arch, Cryptic Masonry, and Knights Templar.[57]

In Britain, separate bodies administer each order. Freemasons are encouraged to join the Holy Royal Arch, which is linked to Mark Masonry in Scotland and Ireland, but completely separate in England. In England, the Royal Arch is closely associated with the Craft, automatically having many Grand Officers in common, including H.R.H the Duke of Kent as both Grand Master of the Craft and First Grand Principal of the Royal Arch. The English Knights Templar and Cryptic Masonry share the Mark Grand Lodge offices and staff at Mark Masons Hall.[58] The Ancient and Accepted Rite (similar to the Scottish Rite), requires a member to proclaim the Trinitarian Christian faith, and is administered from Duke Street in London.[59] Conversely, the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia is a fully independent esoteric organization that requires members be United Grand Lodge of England Master Masons.

In the Nordic countries, the Swedish Rite is dominant; a variation of it is also used in parts of Germany.

Ritual and symbolism

[edit]
Ottoman noble Ahmad Nami dressed in full Masonic attire in 1925
Example of Masonic symbols in Szprotawa Poland
Freemasonry structure showing the symbols associated with the organization

Freemasonry describes itself as a "beautiful system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols".[60] The symbolism is mainly, but not exclusively, drawn from the tools of stonemasons – the square and compasses, the level and plumb rule, the trowel, the rough and smooth ashlars, among others. Moral lessons are attributed to each of these tools, although the assignment is by no means consistent. The meaning of the symbolism is taught and explored through ritual,[24] and in lectures and articles by individual Masons who offer their personal insights and opinions.

According to the scholar of Western esotericism Jan A. M. Snoek: "the best way to characterize Freemasonry is in terms of what it is not, rather than what it is".[61] All Freemasons begin their journey in the "craft" by being progressively "initiated", "passed" and "raised" into the three degrees of Craft, or Blue Lodge Masonry. During these three rituals, the candidate is progressively taught the Masonic symbols, and entrusted with grips or tokens, signs, and words to signify to other Masons which degrees he has taken. The dramatic allegorical ceremonies include explanatory lectures and revolve around the construction of the Temple of Solomon, and the artistry and death of the chief architect, Hiram Abiff. The degrees are those of "Entered apprentice", "Fellowcraft" and "Master Mason". While many different versions of these rituals exist, with various lodge layouts and versions of the Hiramic legend, each version is recognizable to any Freemason from any jurisdiction.[24]

In some jurisdictions, the main themes of each degree are illustrated by tracing boards. These painted depictions of Masonic themes are exhibited in the lodge according to which degree is being worked and are explained to the candidate to illustrate the legend and symbolism of each degree.[62]

The idea of Masonic brotherhood probably descends from a 16th-century legal definition of a "brother" as one who has taken an oath of mutual support to another. Accordingly, Masons swear at each degree to support and protect their brethren unless they have broken the law.[63] In most Lodges, the oath or obligation is taken on a Volume of Sacred Law, whichever book of divine revelation is appropriate to the religious beliefs of the individual brother (usually the Bible in the Anglo-American tradition). In Progressive continental Freemasonry, books other than scripture are permissible, a cause of rupture between Grand Lodges.[64]

History

[edit]

Origins

[edit]

Since the middle of the 19th century, Masonic historians have sought the origins of the movement in a series of similar documents known as the Old Charges, dating from the Regius Poem in about 1425[65] to the beginning of the 18th century. Alluding to the membership of a lodge of operative masons, they relate it to a mythologised history of the craft, the duties of its grades, and the manner in which oaths of fidelity are to be taken on joining.[66] The 15th century also sees the first evidence of ceremonial regalia.[67]

There is no clear mechanism by which these local trade organisations became today's Masonic Lodges. The earliest rituals and passwords known, from operative lodges around the turn of the 17th–18th centuries, show continuity with the rituals developed in the later 18th century by accepted or speculative Masons, as those members who did not practice the physical craft gradually came to be known.[68] The minutes of the Lodge of Edinburgh (Mary's Chapel) No. 1 in Scotland show a continuity from an operative lodge in 1598 to a modern speculative Lodge.[69] It is reputed to be the oldest Masonic Lodge in the world.[70]

Royal Arch Chapter in England, beginning of c20
View of room at the Masonic Hall, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England, early 20th century, set up for a Holy Royal Arch convocation

Alternatively, Thomas De Quincey in his work titled Rosicrucians and Freemasonry put forward the theory that suggested that Freemasonry may have been an outgrowth of Rosicrucianism. The theory had also been postulated in 1803 by German professor; J. G. Buhle.[71][72]

The first Grand Lodge, the Grand Lodge of London and Westminster, later called the Grand Lodge of England, was founded on St John's Day, 24 June 1717,[73] when four existing London Lodges met for a joint dinner. Over the next decade, most of the existing Lodges in England joined the new regulatory body, which itself entered a period of self-publicity and expansion. New lodges were created, and the fraternity began to grow.

During the course of the 18th century, as aristocrats and artists crowded out the craftsmen originally associated with the organization, Freemasonry became fashionable throughout Europe and the American colonies.[74][75]

Between 1730 and 1750, the Grand Lodge endorsed several significant changes that some Lodges could not endorse. A rival Grand Lodge was formed on 17 July 1751, which called itself the "Antient Grand Lodge of England" to signify that, in their opinion, these lodges were maintaining older traditions and rejected changes that the Premiere Grand Lodge had adopted. As an insult, the self proclaimed "Antient Grand Lodge" coined the term "modern" to designate the Premiere Grand Lodge (historians now use Premiere Grand Lodge and Antient Grand Lodge – to differentiate the two bodies).[76] These two Grand Lodges vied for supremacy until the Premiere Grand Lodge made a compromise with the antient Grand Lodge to return to a ritual that worked for both Grand Lodges. They re-united on 27 December 1813 to form the United Grand Lodge of England.[77][78]

The Grand Lodge of Ireland and the Grand Lodge of Scotland were formed in 1725 and 1736, respectively, although neither persuaded all of the existing lodges in their countries to join for many years.[79][80]

North America

[edit]
Erasmus James Philipps, first Freemason in present-day Canada, Old Burying Ground (Halifax, Nova Scotia)

The earliest known American lodges were in Pennsylvania. The collector for the port of Pennsylvania, John Moore, wrote of attending lodges there in 1715, two years before the putative formation of the first Grand Lodge in London. The Grand Lodge of England appointed a Provincial Grand Master for North America in 1731, based in Pennsylvania,[81] leading to the creation of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania.

In Canada, Erasmus James Philipps became a Freemason while working on a commission to resolve boundaries in New England and, in 1739, he became provincial Grand Master for Nova Scotia; Philipps founded the first Masonic lodge in Canada at Annapolis Royal, Nova Scotia.[82]

Other lodges in the colony of Pennsylvania obtained authorisations from the later Antient Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Lodge of Scotland, and the Grand Lodge of Ireland, which was particularly well represented in the travelling lodges of the British Army.[83][84] Many lodges came into existence with no warrant from any Grand Lodge, applying and paying for their authorisation only after they were confident of their own survival.[85]

After the American Revolution, independent U.S. Grand Lodges developed within each state. Some thought was briefly given to organising an overarching "Grand Lodge of the United States," with George Washington, who was a member of a Virginian lodge, as the first Grand Master, but the idea was short-lived. The various state Grand Lodges did not wish to diminish their own authority by agreeing to such a body.[86]

On April 30, 1789, George Washington took his oath of office at his first inauguration upon a bible belonging to St. John's Lodge No. 1 of New York. Originally, it was expected that Washington would bring his own Bible upon which to swear his oath of office, and there was some consternation when it turned out that no one had informed Washington to bring one. Thinking quickly, Jacob Morton, the Marshal of the Inauguration (and Master of St. John's Lodge), borrowed the Lodge's Bible for use in the ceremony. That bible has been known since as the George Washington Inaugural Bible, and is still in possession of St. John's Lodge No. 1 of the Grand Lodge of New York.[87] Robert Livingston, Chancellor of the State of New York, also the first Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the State of New York, administered the oath.[88] This event effectuated the establishment of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government of the United States, which had until then existed only virtually after the US Constitution become operational almost two months earlier, on March 4, 1789.[89][90]

Jamaican Freemasonry

[edit]

Freemasonry was imported to Jamaica by British immigrants who colonized the island for over 300 years. In 1908, there were eleven recorded Masonic lodges, which included three Grand Lodges, two Craft lodges, and two Rose Croix chapters.[91] During slavery, the lodges were open to all "freeborn" men. According to the Jamaican 1834 census, that potentially included 5,000 free black men and 40,000 free people of colour (mixed race).[92] After the full abolition of slavery in 1838, the Lodges were open to all Jamaican men of any race.[93] Jamaica also kept close relationships with Masons from other countries. Jamaican Freemasonry historian Jackie Ranston, noted that:

Jamaica served as an arms depot for the revolutionary forces when two Kingston Freemasons, Wellwood and Maxwell Hyslop, financed the campaigns of Simón Bolívar, the Liberator, to whom six Latin American Republics owe their independence". Bolívar himself was a Mason, enjoying contacts with Brethren in Spain, England, France, and Venezuela until after gaining power in Venezuela, he prohibited all secret societies in 1828 and included the Freemasons.[93]

On 25 May 2017, Masons around the world celebrated the 300th anniversary of the fraternity. Jamaica hosted one of the regional gatherings for this celebration.[94][91]

Prince Hall Freemasonry

[edit]

Prince Hall Freemasonry exists because of the refusal of early American lodges to admit African Americans. In 1775, an African American named Prince Hall,[95] along with 14 other African American men, was initiated into a British military lodge with a warrant from the Grand Lodge of Ireland, having failed to obtain admission from the other lodges in Boston. When the British military Lodge left North America after the end of the Revolution, those 15 men were given the authority to meet as a Lodge, but not to initiate Masons. In 1784, these individuals obtained a Warrant from the Grand Lodge of England (Premiere Grand Lodge) and formed African Lodge, Number 459. When the two English grand lodges united in 1813, all U.S.-based Lodges were stricken from their rolls – largely because of the War of 1812. Thus, separated from both English jurisdiction and any concordantly recognised U.S. Grand Lodge, African Lodge retitled itself as the African Lodge, Number 1 – and became a de facto Grand Lodge. (This lodge is not to be confused with the various Grand Lodges in Africa.) As with the rest of U.S. Freemasonry, Prince Hall Freemasonry soon grew and organised on a Grand Lodge system for each state.[96]

Unlike other fraternal orders, there was never any blanket rule against the admission of men based on their race. Each lodge and grand lodge had their own rules, both written and unwritten. A few non-Prince Hall lodges did admit Blacks, with Angelo Soliman being one notable Masonic personality of African descent. Nonetheless, widespread racial segregation in 19th- and early 20th-century North America made it difficult for African Americans to join Lodges outside of Prince Hall jurisdictions. Even if a lodge was willing to entertain non-White applicants, generally only a single anonymous vote could prevent someone from being admitted. Inter-jurisdiction recognition between traditional and Prince Hall U.S. Masonic authorities was also not forthcoming. As demonstrated by the case of the famous black boxer Jack Johnson, if word spread that a mainstream lodge had admitted a Black person, that lodge could potentially face sanction from other discriminatory lodges.[citation needed]

Today most (but not all) U.S. Grand Lodges recognise their Prince Hall counterparts, and the authorities of both traditions are working towards full recognition.[97] The United Grand Lodge of England has no problem with recognising Prince Hall Grand Lodges.[98] While celebrating their heritage as lodges of African Americans, Prince Hall is open to all men regardless of race or religion.[99]

Emergence of Continental Freemasonry

[edit]
Masonic initiation, Paris, 1745
Masonic initiation, Paris, 1745

English Freemasonry spread to France in the 1720s, first as lodges of expatriates and exiled Jacobites, and then as distinctively French lodges that still follow the ritual of the Moderns. From France and England, Freemasonry spread to most of Continental Europe during the course of the 18th century. The Grande Loge de France was formed under the Grand Mastership of the Duke of Clermont, who exercised only nominal authority. His successor, the Duke of Orléans, reconstituted the central body as the Grand Orient de France in 1773. Briefly eclipsed during the French Revolution, French Freemasonry continued to grow in the next century,[100] at first under the leadership of Alexandre Francois Auguste de Grasse, Comte de Grassy-Tilly. A career Army officer, he lived with his family in Charleston, South Carolina from 1793 to the early 1800s, after leaving Saint-Domingue, now Haiti, during the years of the Haitian Revolution.

Freemasonry in the Middle East

[edit]

After the failure of the 1830 Italian revolution, a number of Italian Freemasons were forced to flee. They secretly set up an approved chapter of Scottish Rite in Alexandria, a town already inhabited by a large Italian community. Meanwhile, the French Freemasons publicly organised a local chapter in Alexandria in 1845.[101] During the 19th and 20th century Ottoman Empire, Masonic lodges operated widely across all parts of the empire and numerous Sufi orders shared a close relationship with them. Many Young Turks affiliated with the Bektashi order were members and patrons of Freemasonry. They were also closely allied against European imperialism. Many Ottoman intellectuals believed that Sufism and Freemasonry shared close similarities in doctrines, spiritual outlook and mysticism.[102]

Schism

[edit]

The ritual form on which the Grand Orient of France was based was abolished in England in the events leading to the formation of the United Grand Lodge of England in 1813. However, the two jurisdictions continued in amity, or mutual recognition, until events of the 1860s and 1870s drove a seemingly permanent wedge between them. In 1868 the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of the State of Louisiana appeared in the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge of Louisiana, recognised by the Grand Orient de France, but regarded by the older body as an invasion of their jurisdiction. The new Scottish Rite body admitted Black people. The resolution of the Grand Orient the following year that neither colour, race, nor religion could disqualify a man from Masonry prompted the Grand Lodge to withdraw recognition, and it persuaded other American Grand Lodges to do the same.[103]

A dispute during the Lausanne Congress of Supreme Councils of 1875 prompted the Grand Orient de France to commission a report by a Protestant pastor, which concluded that, as Freemasonry was not a religion, it should not require a religious belief. The new constitutions read, "Its principles are absolute liberty of conscience and human solidarity", the existence of God and the immortality of the soul being struck out. It is possible that the immediate objections of the United Grand Lodge of England were at least partly motivated by the political tension between France and Britain at the time. The result was the withdrawal of recognition of the Grand Orient of France by the United Grand Lodge of England, a situation that continues today.[31]

Not all French lodges agreed with the new wording. In 1894, lodges favouring the compulsory recognition of the Great Architect of the Universe formed the Grande Loge de France.[104] In 1913, the United Grand Lodge of England recognised a new Grand Lodge of Regular Freemasons, a Grand Lodge that follows a similar rite to Anglo-American Freemasonry with a mandatory belief in a deity.[105]

There are now three strands of Freemasonry in France, which extend into the rest of Continental Europe: –

  • Liberal, also called adogmatic or progressive – Principles of liberty of conscience, and laicity, particularly the separation of the Church and State.[106]
  • Traditional – Old French ritual with a requirement for a belief in a Supreme Being.[107] (This strand is typified by the Grande Loge de France).
  • Regular – Standard Anglo-American ritual, mandatory belief in Supreme Being.[108]

The term Continental Freemasonry was used in Mackey's 1873 Encyclopedia of Freemasonry to "designate the Lodges on the Continent of Europe which retain many usages which have either been abandoned by, or never were observed in, the Lodges of England, Ireland, and Scotland, as well as the United States of America".[109] Today, it is frequently used to refer to only the Liberal jurisdictions typified by the Grand Orient de France.[110]

The majority of Freemasonry considers the Liberal (Continental) strand to be Irregular, and thus withhold recognition. The Continental lodges, however, did not want to sever masonic ties. In 1961, an umbrella organisation, Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg (CLIPSAS) was set up, which provides a forum for most of these Grand Lodges and Grand Orients worldwide. Included in the list of over 70 Grand Lodges and Grand Orients are representatives of all three of the above categories, including mixed and women's organisations. The United Grand Lodge of England does not communicate with any of these jurisdictions and expects its allies to follow suit. This creates the distinction between Anglo-American and Continental Freemasonry.[111][112]

Freemasonry and women

[edit]

The status of women in the old guilds and corporations of medieval masons remains uncertain. The principle of "femme sole" allowed a widow to continue the trade of her husband, but its application had wide local variations, such as full membership of a trade body or limited trade by deputation or approved members of that body.[113] In masonry, the small available evidence points to the less empowered end of the scale.[114]

At the dawn of the Grand Lodge era, during the 1720s, James Anderson composed the first printed constitutions for Freemasons, the basis for most subsequent constitutions, which specifically excluded women from Freemasonry.[115] As Freemasonry spread, women began to be added to the Lodges of Adoption by their husbands who were continental masons, which worked three degrees with the same names as the men's but different content. The French officially abandoned the experiment in the early 19th century.[116][117] Later organisations with a similar aim emerged in the United States but distinguished the names of the degrees from those of male masonry.[118]

Maria Deraismes was initiated into Freemasonry in 1882, then resigned to allow her lodge to rejoin their Grand Lodge. Having failed to achieve acceptance from any masonic governing body, she and Georges Martin started a mixed masonic lodge that worked masonic ritual.[119] Annie Besant spread the phenomenon to the English-speaking world.[120] Disagreements over ritual led to the formation of exclusively female bodies of Freemasons in England, which spread to other countries. Meanwhile, the French had re-invented Adoption as an all-female lodge in 1901, only to cast it aside again in 1935. The lodges, however, continued to meet, which gave rise, in 1959, to a body of women practising continental Freemasonry.[117]

In general, Continental Freemasonry is sympathetic to Freemasonry among women, dating from the 1890s when French lodges assisted the emergent co-masonic movement by promoting enough of their members to the 33rd degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite to allow them, in 1899, to form their own grand council, recognised by the other Continental Grand Councils of that Rite.[121] The United Grand Lodge of England issued a statement in 1999 recognising the two women's grand lodges there, The Order of Women Freemasons[122] and The Honourable Fraternity of Ancient Freemasons,[123] to be regular in all but the participants. While they were not, therefore, recognised as regular, they were part of Freemasonry "in general".[13][124] The attitude of most regular Anglo-American grand lodges remains that women Freemasons are not legitimate Masons.[125]

In 2018, guidance was released by the United Grand Lodge of England stating that, in regard to transgender women, "A Freemason who after initiation ceases to be a man does not cease to be a Freemason".[126] The guidance also states that transgender men are allowed to apply to become Freemasons.[126]

Development and expansion

[edit]

18th century Enlightenment

[edit]
Goose and Gridiron, where the Grand Lodge of London and Westminster, later called the Grand Lodge of England, was founded.

During the Age of the Enlightenment in the 18th century, Freemasons comprised an international network of like-minded men, often meeting in secret in ritualistic programs at their lodges. They promoted the ideals of the Enlightenment and helped diffuse these values across Britain and France and other places. British Freemasonry offered a systematic creed with its own myths, values and set of rituals. It fostered new codes of conduct – including a communal understanding of liberty and equality inherited from guild sociability – "liberty, fraternity, and equality"[127] Scottish soldiers and Jacobite Scots brought to the Continent ideals of fraternity which reflected not the local system of Scottish customs but the institutions and ideals originating in the English Revolution against royal absolutism.[128] Freemasonry was particularly prevalent in France – by 1789, there were between 50,000 and 100,000 French Masons, making Freemasonry the most popular of all Enlightenment associations.[129]

Jacob argues that Masonic lodges probably had an effect on society as a whole, for they "reconstituted the polity and established a constitutional form of self-government, complete with constitutions and laws, elections and representatives". In other words, the micro-society set up within the lodges constituted a normative model for society as a whole. This was especially true on the Continent: when the first lodges began to appear in the 1730s, their embodiment of British values was often seen as threatening by state authorities. For example, the Parisian lodge that met in the mid-1720s was composed of English Jacobite exiles.[130] Furthermore, freemasons all across Europe made reference to the Enlightenment in general in the 18th century. In French lodges, for example, the line "As the means to be enlightened I search for the enlightened" was a part of their initiation rites. British lodges assigned themselves the duty to "initiate the unenlightened". Many lodges praised the Grand Architect, the masonic terminology for the divine being who created a scientifically ordered universe.[131]

On the other hand, historian Robert Roswell Palmer noted that lodges operated separately and Masons politically did not act together as a group.[132] American historians note that Benjamin Franklin and George Washington were leading Masons, but the significance of freemasonry in the revolution is a topic of debate.[133] Daniel Roche contests freemasonry's claims for egalitarianism, writing that "the real equality of the lodges was elitist", only attracting men of similar social backgrounds.[134]

In long-term historical perspective, Norman Davies has argued that Freemasonry was a powerful force in Europe, from about 1700 to the twentieth century. It expanded rapidly during the Age of Enlightenment, reaching practically every country in Europe, as well as the European colonies in the New World and Asia. Davies states, "In the nineteenth century and beyond it would be strongly associated with the cause of Liberalism."[135] In Catholic lands it was anti-clerical and came under heavy attack from the Catholic Church. In the 20th century, it was suppressed by Fascist and Communist regimes. It was especially attractive to royalty, aristocrats and politicians and businessmen, as well as intellectuals, artists and political activists. Davies notes that prominent members included Montesquieu, Voltaire, Sir Robert Walpole, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington.[136] Steven Bullock notes that in the late 18th century, English lodges were headed by the Prince of Wales, Prussian lodges by king Frederick the Great, and French lodges by royal princes. Emperor Napoleon selected his own brother as the Grand Master of France.[137]

France

[edit]

In the 18th century, liberal French politicians met together in Masonic lodges to develop some of the Enlightenment ideas that dominated the French Revolution of 1789.[138] Avner Halpern has traced French Freemasonry's major role in building France's first modern political party in 1901, the Radical Party. It used two Masonic devices: the "civil leadership model", which Freemasonry developed in late 19th century France, and the local Masonic congresses of the Grand Orient of France federations.[139]

Russia

[edit]

Freemasons had been active in Russia in the 18th century, working to introduce Enlightenment ideals; however, they were increasingly suppressed by the government.[140] According to Ludwick Hass, Freemasonry was officially illegal in Tsarist Russia, but would later be introduced by exiles who returned after the 1905 revolution. These individuals had been active Masons in Paris, where lodges were politically active in the new Radical Party. In Russia, the Freemasons supported constitutional liberalism, and maintained ties with France while simplifying many of the ceremonial rituals. Their secret meetings became a centre of progressive ideals, attracting politicians and activists. The lodges initially supported World War I, promoting close ties with France. Alexander Kerensky was an important Masonic activist who came to political power with the overthrow of the tsars, in 1917. The organization collapsed as the Bolsheviks took power and was again outlawed.[141]

Italy

[edit]

According to Adrian Lyttelton, in the early 20th century, Freemasonry was an influential but semi-secret force in Italian politics; with a strong presence among professionals and the middle class across Italy, its appeal spread to the leadership of the parliament, public administration, and the army. The two main organisations were the Grand Orient and the Grand Lodge of Italy. They had around 25,000 members in some 500 lodges. Freemasons typically espoused anticlericalism and promoted unification. The Catholic Church was a vigorous opponent of unification, and thus of the Freemasons; various national governments would repeatedly alternate and backpedal between the anticlerical side and the Church side.[142] Politically, they promoted Italian nationalism focused on unification and undermining the power of the Catholic Church. Freemasons took on the challenge of mobilizing the press, encouraging public opinion and the leading political parties in support of Italy's joining of the Allies of the First World War in 1914–1915. In 1919, they favoured a League of Nations to promote a new post-war, universal order based upon the peaceful coexistence of independent and democratic nations.[143] In the early 1920s, many of Mussolini's collaborators, especially the leaders in organizing the March on Rome, were Masons. The lodges hailed fascism as the saviour of Italy from Bolshevism; however, Mussolini decided he needed to come to terms with the Catholic Church, in the mid-1920s, outlawing Freemasonry.[144]

Latin America

[edit]

The Spanish government outlawed Freemasonry in its overseas empire in the mid-18th century, and energetically enforced the ban. Nevertheless, many Freemasons were active in planning and plotting for independence.[145] Leaders with Freemason membership included Grand Master Francisco de Miranda, José de San Martin, Simón Bolivar, Bernardo O'Higgins, and many others.[146] The movement was important after independence was achieved in the 1820s.[147] In Brazil, many prominent men were Freemasons, and they played a leading role in the abolition of slavery.[148]

Mexico

[edit]

Freemasons were leaders in liberalism and anti-clericalism in 19th and 20th-century Mexico. Members included numerous top leaders.[149] The Freemasons were divided regarding relations with the United States, with a pro-U.S. faction supported by the American ambassador Joel Poinsett known as the "Yorkinos."[150][151] According to historian Karen Racine, Freemasons in the presidency of Mexico included: Guadalupe Victoria, Valentín Gómez Farías, Antonio López de Santa Anna, Benito Juárez, Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada, Porfirio Díaz, Francisco I. Madero, Venustiano Carranza, Plutarco Elías Calles, Lázaro Cárdenas, Emilio Portes Gil, Pascual Ortiz Rubio, Abelardo L. Rodríguez, and Miguel Alemán Valdés.[152]

China

[edit]

The first lodge formed in China was the Amity Lodge which constituted at Canton in 1767. In 1875, District Grand Lodge of China split into two Districts, Northern China, and Hong Kong and South China. During the second world war, All Masonic activity in Hong Kong was brought to a halt due to the Japanese invasion. After the 1949, the new China government (Communist) established, some lodges in China moved to Hong Kong or closed due to lack of new candidates.[153]

Hong Kong

[edit]

Royal Sussex Lodge No. 501 was the first lodge established in Victoria City of Hong Kong on 29 April 1844.

For the English Constitution, Provincial or District Grand Lodge name in Hong Kong Changed as following:[154]

  • 1847–1866, Provincial Grand Lodge of China
  • 1866–1875, District Grand Lodge of China
  • 1875–1963, District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and South China
  • 1963–present, District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and the Far East

For the Scottish Constitution, District Grand Lodge name in Hong Kong Changed as following:[154]

  • 1905–1958, District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and South China
  • 1958–present, District Grand Lodge of the Far East

For the Irish Constitution, Provincial or District Grand Lodge name in Hong Kong Changed as following:[154]

  • 1933–1938, District Grand Inspector
  • 1938–1947, Grand Inspector
  • 1947–1954, Grand Inspector for Hong Kong and China
  • 1954–1967, Grand Inspector for Hong Kong, China and Malaya
  • 1967–1988, Grand Inspector for the Far East
  • 1988–present, Provincial Grand Lodge of the Far East

Now, there are 19 (English Constitution) lodges under the District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and Far East, United Grand Lodge of England and meet at Zetland Hall, Hong Kong:[155]

  • Cathay Lodge No. 4373
  • Corinthian Lodge of Amoy No. 1806
  • Foochow Lodge No. 1912
  • Harriers Lodge No. 9882
  • Hong Kong and Far East District Grand Stewards Lodge No. 9879
  • Lodge of Lu Pan No. 9387
  • Lodge Star of Southern China No. 2013
  • Paul Chater Lodge of Installed Masters No. 5391
  • Perseverance Lodge of Hong Kong No. 1165
  • Rotarian Lodge of Hong Kong No. 9378
  • Royal Sussex Lodge No. 501
  • St. Paul's Lodge No. 9718
  • St Joseph's & La Salle No. 10050
  • Swatow Lodge No. 3705
  • The Club Lodge No. 9880
  • United Service Lodge No. 1341
  • University Lodge of Hong Kong No. 3666
  • Victoria Lodge of Hong Kong No. 1026
  • Zetland Lodge No. 525

The Rising Sun Lodge No. 1401 is the lodge meeting in Kobe, Japan and under the jurisdiction of District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and Far East rather than Grand Lodge of Japan. As a result, there are 20 lodges currently under the District Grand Lodge of Hong Kong and Far East.

Anti-Masonry

[edit]
Masonic Temple of Santa Cruz de Tenerife, one of the few Masonic temples that survived the Franco dictatorship in Spain

Anti-Masonry (alternatively called Anti-Freemasonry) has been defined as "opposition to Freemasonry",[156][157] but there is no homogeneous anti-Masonic movement. Anti-Masonry consists of widely differing criticisms from diverse (and often incompatible) groups who are hostile to Freemasonry in some form. Critics have included religious groups, political groups, and conspiracy theorists, in particular, those espousing Masonic conspiracy theories or the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory. Certain prominent Anti-Masons, such as Nesta Helen Webster, exclusively criticized "Continental Masonry", while considering "Regular Masonry" to be an honourable association.[158]

There have been many disclosures and exposés dating as far back as the 18th century. These often lack context,[159] may be outdated for various reasons,[160] or could be outright hoaxes on the part of the author, as in the case of the Taxil hoax.[161]

These hoaxes and exposés have often become the basis for criticism of Masonry, often religious or political in nature or are based on suspicion of corrupt conspiracy of some form. The political opposition that arose after the American "Morgan Affair" in 1826 gave rise to the term Anti-Masonry, which is still in use in America today, both by Masons in referring to their critics and as a self-descriptor by the critics themselves.[162]

Religious opposition

[edit]

Freemasonry has attracted criticism from theocratic states and organised religions that believe it is in competition with religion or perceive the fraternity's views or practices as heterodox; it has also long been the target of conspiracy theories that assert Freemasonry to be an occult and evil power.[163]

Christianity and Freemasonry

[edit]

Although members of various faiths cite objections, certain Christian denominations have had high-profile negative attitudes to Masonry, banning or discouraging their members from being Freemasons. The denomination with the longest history of objection to Freemasonry is the Catholic Church. The objections raised by the Catholic Church are based on the allegation that Masonry teaches a naturalistic deistic religion which is in conflict with Church doctrine.[164] More than 600 Papal pronouncements have been issued against Freemasonry.[165] The first was Pope Clement XII's In eminenti apostolatus, 28 April 1738; the most recent was Pope Francis in a letter by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith 13 November 2023.[166]

The 1917 Code of Canon Law explicitly declared that joining Freemasonry entailed automatic excommunication and banned books favouring Freemasonry.[167]

In 1983, the Church issued a new code of canon law. Unlike its predecessor, the 1983 Code of Canon Law did not explicitly name Masonic orders among the secret societies it condemns. It states: "A person who joins an association which plots against the Church is to be punished with a just penalty; one who promotes or takes office in such an association is to be punished with an interdict." This named omission of Masonic orders caused both Catholics and Freemasons to believe that the ban on Catholics becoming Freemasons may have been lifted, especially after the perceived liberalisation of Vatican II.[168] However, the matter was clarified when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI), as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued a Declaration on Masonic Associations, which states: "... the Church's negative judgment in regard to Masonic association remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and therefore membership in them remains forbidden. The faithful who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion."[169] In 2023, Pope Francis reaffirmed the ban on Catholics becoming Freemasons stating the «[...] irreconcilability between Catholic doctrine and Freemasonry [...]»[170] in response to Julito Cortes, Bishop of Dumanguete, who stated concerns over the growing number of Freemasons in the Philippines.[171] The renewed ban cited both the 1983 Code of Canon Law, as well as the Guidelines made by a Bishops Conference in 2003.[171][172] For its part, Freemasonry has never objected to Catholics joining their fraternity. Those Grand Lodges in amity with the United Grand Lodge of England deny the Church's claims, stating that "Freemasonry does not seek to replace a Mason's religion or provide a substitute for it."[13]

In contrast to Catholic allegations of rationalism and naturalism, Protestant objections are more likely to be based on allegations of mysticism, occultism, and even Satanism.[173][better source needed] Masonic scholar Albert Pike is often quoted (in some cases misquoted) by Protestant anti-Masons as an authority for the position of Masonry on these issues.[174][better source needed] However, Pike, although undoubtedly learned, was not a spokesman for Freemasonry and was also controversial among Freemasons in general. His writings represented his personal opinion only, and furthermore, an opinion grounded in the attitudes and understandings of late 19th century Southern Freemasonry of the US. Notably, his book carries in the preface a form of disclaimer from his own Grand Lodge. No one voice has ever spoken for the whole of Freemasonry.[175]

In 1993, the Southern Baptist Convention's Home Mission Board determined that some parts of freemasonry are incompatible with Christianity, while others are compatible, concluding that participation in freemasonry should be considered "a matter of personal conscience".[176] The topic of Freemasonry remains controversial within the convention. James L. Holly, president of Mission and Ministry to Men, published a three volume book series titled "The Southern Baptist Convention and Freemasonry," critiquing the report to the Southern Baptist Convention in addition to the influence of Gary Leazer, then Director of the Interfaith Witness Department of the North American Mission Board.[177] Gary Leazer published "Fundamentalism and Freemasonry", arguing that the convention's discussion of Freemasonry was influenced by Southern Baptist Convention conservative resurgence.

Free Methodist Church founder B.T. Roberts was a vocal opponent of Freemasonry in the mid 19th century. Roberts opposed the society on moral grounds and stated, "The god of the lodge is not the God of the Bible." Roberts believed Freemasonry was a "mystery" or "alternate" religion and encouraged his church not to support ministers who were Freemasons. Freedom from secret societies is one of the "frees" upon which the Free Methodist Church was founded.[178]

Since the founding of Freemasonry, many Bishops of the Church of England have been Freemasons, including Archbishop Geoffrey Fisher.[179] In the past, few members of the Church of England would have seen any incongruity in concurrently adhering to Anglican Christianity and practising Freemasonry. In recent decades, however, reservations about Freemasonry have increased within Anglicanism, perhaps due to the increasing prominence of the evangelical wing of the church. The former archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, appeared to harbour some reservations about Masonic ritual, while being anxious to avoid causing offence to Freemasons inside and outside the Church of England. In 2003 he felt it necessary to apologise to British Freemasons after he said that their beliefs were incompatible with Christianity and that he had barred the appointment of Freemasons to senior posts in his diocese when he was Bishop of Monmouth.[180]

In 1933, the Orthodox Church of Greece officially declared that being a Freemason constitutes an act of apostasy and thus, until he repents, the person involved with Freemasonry cannot partake of the Eucharist. This has been generally affirmed throughout the whole Eastern Orthodox Church. The Orthodox critique of Freemasonry agrees with both the Catholic and Protestant versions: "Freemasonry cannot be at all compatible with Christianity as far as it is a secret organisation, acting and teaching in mystery and secret and deifying rationalism."[181]

Regular Freemasonry has traditionally not responded to these claims, beyond the often-repeated statement that Freemasonry explicitly adheres to the principle that "Freemasonry is not a religion, nor a substitute for religion. There is no separate 'Masonic deity,' and there is no separate proper name for a deity in Freemasonry."[182]

Christian men, who were discouraged from joining the Freemasons by their Churches or who wanted a more religiocentric society, joined similar fraternal organisations, such as the Knights of Columbus and Knights of Peter Claver for Catholics, and the Royal Black Institution for Protestants,[183] although these fraternal organisations have been "organized in part on the style of and use many symbols of Freemasonry".[183]

There are some elements of Freemasonry within the temple rituals of Mormonism.

Islam and Freemasonry

[edit]

Ottoman Caliph Mahmud I outlawed Freemasonry in the Ottoman Empire in 1748 CE and since that time Freemasonry was equated with atheism in the Ottoman Empire and the broader Islamic world.[184]

Many Islamic anti-Masonic arguments are closely tied to antisemitic conspiracy theories, though other criticisms are made, such as linking Freemasonry to Al-Masih ad-Dajjal (the false Messiah in Islamic Scripture).[185][186] Syrian-Egyptian Islamic theologian Mūhammād Rashīd Ridâ (1865–1935) played the crucial role in leading the opposition to Freemasonry across the Islamic world during the early twentieth century.[187] Influenced by Rida, Islamic anti-Masons argue that Freemasonry promotes the interests of the Jews around the world and that one of its aims is to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in order to rebuild the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem.[188] Through his popular pan-Islamic journal Al-Manar, Rashid Rida spread anti-Masonic ideas which would directly influence the Muslim Brotherhood and subsequent Islamist movements, such as Hamas.[189] In article 28 of its Covenant, Hamas states that Freemasonry, Rotary, and other similar groups "work in the interest of Zionism and according to its instructions ..."[190]

Several predominantly Muslim countries have banned Freemasonry within their borders, while others have not. Turkey and Morocco have established Grand Lodges,[191] while in countries such as Malaysia[192][193] and Lebanon,[194] there are District Grand Lodges operating under a warrant from an established Grand Lodge. In 1972, in Pakistan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, then Prime Minister of Pakistan, placed a ban on Freemasonry. Lodge buildings were confiscated by the government.[195]

Masonic lodges existed in Iraq as early as 1917, when the first lodge under the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) was opened. Nine lodges under UGLE existed by the 1950s, and a Scottish lodge was formed in 1923. However, the position changed following the revolution, and all lodges were forced to close in 1965.[196] This position was later reinforced under Saddam Hussein; the death penalty was "prescribed" for those who "promote or acclaim Zionist principles, including freemasonry, or who associate [themselves] with Zionist organisations."[185]

Political opposition

[edit]

In 1799, English Freemasonry almost came to a halt due to Parliamentary proclamation. In the wake of the French Revolution, the Unlawful Societies Act banned any meetings of groups that required their members to take an oath or obligation.[197]

The Grand Masters of both the Moderns and the Antients Grand Lodges called on Prime Minister William Pitt (who was not a Freemason) and explained to him that Freemasonry was a supporter of the law and lawfully constituted authority and was much involved in charitable work. As a result, Freemasonry was specifically exempted from the terms of the Act, provided that each private lodge's Secretary placed with the local "Clerk of the Peace" a list of the members of his lodge once a year. This continued until 1967, when the obligation of the provision was rescinded by Parliament.[197]

Freemasonry in the United States faced political pressure following the 1826 kidnapping of William Morgan by Freemasons and his subsequent disappearance. Reports of the "Morgan Affair", together with opposition to Jacksonian democracy (Andrew Jackson was a prominent Mason), helped fuel an Anti-Masonic movement. The short-lived Anti-Masonic Party was formed, which fielded candidates for the presidential elections of 1828 and 1832.[198]

Erlangen Lodge revival, meeting in 1948
Lodge in Erlangen, Germany. First meeting after World War II with guests from US, France and Czechoslovakia, 1948.

In Italy, Freemasonry has become linked to a scandal concerning the Propaganda Due lodge (a.k.a. P2). This lodge was chartered by the Grande Oriente d'Italia in 1877, as a lodge for visiting Masons unable to attend their own lodges. Under Licio Gelli's leadership, in the late 1970s, P2 became involved in the financial scandals that nearly bankrupted the Vatican Bank. However, by this time the lodge was operating independently and irregularly, as the Grand Orient had revoked its charter and expelled Gelli in 1976.[199]

Conspiracy theorists have long associated Freemasonry with the New World Order and the Illuminati, and state that Freemasonry as an organisation is either bent on world domination or already secretly in control of world politics. Historically Freemasonry has attracted criticism, and suppression from both the politically far right (e.g., Nazi Germany)[200][201] and the far left (e.g., the former Communist states in Eastern Europe).[202]

Freemasonry is viewed with distrust even in some modern democracies.[203] In the UK, Masons working in the justice system, such as judges and police officers, were required to disclose their membership from 1999 to 2009.[204] While a parliamentary inquiry found that there had been no evidence of wrongdoing, the government believed that Masons' potential loyalties to support fellow Masons should be transparent to the public.[203][204][205] The policy of requiring a declaration of masonic membership by applicants for judicial office (judges and magistrates) was ended in 2009 by Justice Secretary Jack Straw (who had initiated the requirement in the 1990s). Straw stated that the rule was considered disproportionate since no impropriety or malpractice had been shown as a result of judges being Freemasons.[206]

Freemasonry is both successful and controversial in France. As of the early 21st century, membership is rising, but reporting of it in popular media is often negative.[203]

In some countries, anti-Masonry is often related to antisemitism and anti-Zionism. For example, in 1980, the Iraqi legal and penal code was changed by Saddam Hussein's ruling Ba'ath Party, making it a felony to "promote or acclaim Zionist principles, including Freemasonry, or who associate [themselves] with Zionist organisations".[185] Professor Andrew Prescott of the University of Sheffield writes: "Since at least the time of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, antisemitism has gone hand in hand with anti-masonry, so it is not surprising that allegations that 11 September was a Zionist plot have been accompanied by suggestions that the attacks were inspired by a masonic world order".[207]

The Holocaust

[edit]
Forget-me-not
Forget-me-not

The preserved records of the Reichssicherheitshauptamt (the Reich Security Main Office) show the persecution of Freemasons during the Holocaust.[208] RSHA Amt VII (Written Records), overseen by Professor Franz Six, was responsible for "ideological" tasks, by which was meant the creation of antisemitic and anti-Masonic propaganda. While the number of victims is not accurately known, historians estimate that between 80,000 and 200,000 Freemasons were killed under the Nazi regime.[209] Masonic concentration camp inmates were classified as political prisoners and wore an inverted red triangle.[210] Hitler believed Freemasons had succumbed to Jews conspiring against Germany.[211][212]

The small blue forget-me-not flower was first used by the Grand Lodge Zur Sonne in 1926, as a Masonic emblem at the annual convention in Bremen, Germany. In 1938, a forget-me-not badge, made by the same factory as the Masonic badge, was chosen for the Nazi Party's Winterhilfswerk, the annual charity drive of the National Socialist People's Welfare (the welfare branch of the Nazi party). This coincidence enabled Freemasons to wear the forget-me-not badge as a secret sign of membership.[213][214][215]

After World War II, the forget-me-not flower was used again as a Masonic emblem in 1948 at the first Annual Convention of the United Grand Lodges of Germany in 1948. The badge is now sometimes worn in the coat lapel by Freemasons around the world to remember all who suffered in the name of Freemasonry, especially those during the Nazi era.[216]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Jachin and Boaz; or, an Authentic Key to the Door of Free-Masonry, Both Ancient and Modern" (PDF). Linford Lodge of Research. September 1797. Retrieved 10 October 2024.
  2. ^ "History of Free Masonry". mtnebo91wv.org. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  3. ^ Paine, Thomas (2 January 1818). "Thomas Paine Origin Free Masonry » Internet Infidels". Internet Infidels. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  4. ^ "History of Freemasonry | United Grand Lodge of England". www.ugle.org.uk. Retrieved 6 September 2024.
  5. ^ a b "The Second Degree: Fellow Craft". Freemasonry. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  6. ^ "Fellow Craft Degree Fee (NewMember)". Paul Revere Lodge. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  7. ^ "General Regulations of a Free Mason 1723 – The Square Magazine". Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  8. ^ "Freemasonry". encyclopedia.ushmm.org. Retrieved 19 August 2024.
  9. ^ Schreiber, Jean-Philippe (9 November 2010). "Jews and Freemasonry in the nineteenth century: An overview of current knowledge". Archives Juives (in French). 43 (2): 30–48. doi:10.3917/aj.432.0030. ISSN 0003-9837.
  10. ^ Önnerfors, Andreas (24 January 2017). Freemasonry: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 9780198796275.
  11. ^ Ruiz, Julius (June 2011). "Fighting the International Conspiracy: The Francoist Persecution of Freemasonry, 1936–1945". Politics, Religion & Ideology. 12 (2): 179–196. doi:10.1080/21567689.2011.591981. ISSN 2156-7689.
  12. ^ "What is Freemasonry". www.chevalierramsay.be. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
  13. ^ a b c d "Frequently Asked Questions" Archived 22 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine United Grand Lodge of England retrieved 30 October 2013
  14. ^ "Materials: Papers and Speakers" Archived 11 November 2016 at the Wayback Machine Provincial Grand Lodge of East Lancashire, retrieved 30 October 2013
  15. ^ "Toasts for the Festive Board". freemasonry.bcy.ca. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  16. ^ "Symbolical Masonry: Part One: The First Step: Chapter XVIII. Words, Grips and Tokens". sacred-texts.com. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  17. ^ "AAONMS Ritual Book". www.shrinersinternational.org. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  18. ^ "Learn about freemasonry: What is the freemason handshake?". Museum of Freemasonry. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  19. ^ "Past Master"[usurped] Masonic Dictionary, retrieved 31 October 2013
  20. ^ "Maçon célèbre : le Maître Installé" Archived 4 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine GADLU blog Maçonnique, 3 March 2013, retrieved 2 November 2013
  21. ^ For instance "Introduction into Freemasonry" Archived 9 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Provincial Grand Lodge of Hertfordshire, retrieved 8 November 2013
  22. ^ "Charitable work" Archived 22 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine, UGLE, retrieved 8 November 2013
  23. ^ (editors) John Hamill and Robert Gilbert, Freemasonry, Angus, 2004, pp 214–220
  24. ^ a b c d e f Michael Johnstone, The Freemasons, Arcturus, 2005, pp. 101–120
  25. ^ "Les Officiers de Loge" Maconnieke Encyclopedie, retrieved 31 October 2013
  26. ^ "PS Review of Freemasonry". PS Review of Freemasonry. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  27. ^ a b "How to become a Freemason", Masonic Lodge of Education, retrieved 20 November 2013
  28. ^ "Comment devenir franc-maçon?", Grande Loge de Luxembourg, retrieved 23 November 2013
  29. ^ "Swedish Rite FAQ", Grand Lodge of British Columbia & Yukon, Accessed 19 November 2013
  30. ^ "Faut-il croire en Dieu?" Archived 28 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Foire aux Questions, Grand Orient de France, Retrieved 23 November 2013
  31. ^ a b Jack Buta, "The God Conspiracy, The Politics of Grand Lodge Foreign Relations", Pietre-Stones, retrieved 23 November 2013
  32. ^ "Social events and activities" Archived 9 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Hampshire Province, retrieved 20 November 2013
  33. ^ "Who are Masons, and what do they do?" Archived 4 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine, MasonicLodges.com, retrieved 20 November 2013
  34. ^ (editors) John Hamill and Robert Gilbert, Freemasonry, Angus, 2004, Glossary, p. 247
  35. ^ "Difficult Questions; Is Freemasonry a Global Conspiracy?" Archived 3 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine MasterMason.com, retrieved 18 November 2013
  36. ^ "Freemasonry | Definition, History, Stages, Lodges, & Facts | Britannica". www.britannica.com. 16 November 2023. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
  37. ^ "Who we are | United Grand Lodge of England". www.ugle.org.uk. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
  38. ^ https://www.cheshiremasons.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/UGLE-Annual-Report-2021-2.pdf
  39. ^ "About Grand Lodge | Grand Lodge of Ireland". Retrieved 17 December 2023.
  40. ^ "Jurisdictional Membership Statistics – Masonic Service Association of North America". msana.com. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
  41. ^ "U.S. Membership Statistics – Masonic Service Association of North America". msana.com. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  42. ^ Hodapp, Christopher (26 March 2022). "Freemasons For Dummies: Flash! GL of Louisiana Votes in Favor of Prince Hall Recognition... Sort Of". Freemasons For Dummies. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  43. ^ BOISSELIER, Alexis (8 November 2023). "Emmanuel Macron se rend au Grand Orient de France : trois questions sur cette loge maçonnique". Ouest-France.fr (in French). Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  44. ^ Campbell, Donald G.; Committee on Ritual. "The Master Mason; Irregular and Clandestine Lodges". Handbook for Candidate's Coaches. Grand Lodge F.&A.M. of California. Archived from the original (excerpt) on 21 August 2007. Retrieved 8 May 2007.
  45. ^ Jim Bantolo, "On Recognition" Archived 14 March 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Masonic Short Talk, Pilar lodge, 2007, retrieved 25 November 2013
  46. ^ Ossian Lang, "History of Freemasonry in the State of New York" (pdf), 1922, pp. 135–140, Masonic Trowel eBooks, Archived 1 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  47. ^ "Exclusive Jurisdiction" Archived 3 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Paul M. Bessel, 1998, retrieved 25 November 2013
  48. ^ Sueanna Smith. "Reimagining Prince Hall: Race, Freemasonry, and Material Culture In Boston, 1775-1870". University of South Carolina. Retrieved 4 November 2024.
  49. ^ "Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Connecticut". Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Connecticut. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  50. ^ "The Grand Lodge of Connecticut". GWMNMA. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  51. ^ "Prince Hall Freemasonry archives". bmrc.lib.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  52. ^ "John B. Williams Web Page". thephylaxis.org. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  53. ^ "Regularity in Freemasonry and its Meaning", Grand Lodge of Latvia, retrieved 25 November 2013
  54. ^ Tony Pope, "Regularity and Recognition", from Freemasonry Universal, by Kent Henderson & Tony Pope, 1998, Pietre Stones website, retrieved 25 November 2013
  55. ^ UGLE Book of Constitutions, "Basic Principles for Grand Lodge Recognition", any year since 1930, page numbers may vary.
  56. ^ Robert L.D. Cooper, Cracking the Freemason's Code, Rider 2006, p. 229
  57. ^ Michael Johnstone, The Freemasons, Arcturus, 2005, pp. 95–98
  58. ^ J S M Ward, "The Higher Degrees Handbook", Pietre Stones, retrieved 11 November 2013
  59. ^ "The Supreme Council". www.sc33.org.uk. Retrieved 17 June 2021.
  60. ^ "What is Freemasonry?" Archived 9 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine Grand Lodge of Alberta retrieved 7 November 2013
  61. ^ Snoek, Jan A. M. (2016). "Part III: The Renaissance and Early Modernity – Freemasonry". In Magee, Glenn A. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Western Mysticism and Esotericism. Cambridge and New York City: Cambridge University Press. pp. 200–210. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139027649.018. ISBN 978-1139027649.
  62. ^ Mark S. Dwor, "Some thoughts on the history of the Tracing Boards", Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon, 1999, retrieved 7 November 2013
  63. ^ Robert L.D. Cooper, Cracking the Freemason's Code, Rider 2006, p. 79
  64. ^ "Masonic U.S. Recognition of French Grand Lodges in the 20th century" Archived 10 April 2006 at the Wayback Machine, Paul M. Bessel. retrieved 8 November 2013
  65. ^ Andrew Prescott, "The Old Charges Revisited", from Transactions of the Lodge of Research No. 2429 (Leicester), 2006, Pietre-Stones Masonic Papers, retrieved 12 October 2013
  66. ^ A. F. A. Woodford, preface to William James Hughan, The Old Charges of British Freemasons, London, 1872
  67. ^ John Yarker (1909). The Arcane Schools. Manchester. pp. 341–342.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  68. ^ Robert L.D. Cooper, Cracking the Freemason's Code, Rider 2006, Chapter 4, p. 53
  69. ^ David Murray Lyon, History of the Lodge of Edinburgh (Mary's Chapel) No 1, Blackwood 1873, Preface
  70. ^ Stevenson, David (1988). The Origins of Freemasonry. Cambridge University Press. pp. 38–44. ISBN 0521396549.
  71. ^ Dafoe, Stephen. "Rosicrucians and Freemasonry | Masonic Dictionary". www.masonicdictionary.com. Archived from the original on 28 January 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
  72. ^ Hall, Manly P. (2010). The Secret Teachings of All Ages: An Encyclopedic Outline of Masonic, Hermetic, Qabbalistic and Rosicrucian Symbolical Philosophy. Courier Corporation. ISBN 978-0486471433.
  73. ^ "History of Freemasonry timeline". United Grand Lodge of England. Retrieved 12 June 2018.
  74. ^ Greer, John Michael (2021). Druidry Handbook: Spiritual Practice Rooted in the Living Earth. Weiser Books. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-63341-224-8.
  75. ^ Bergreen, Laurence (2016). Casanova: The World of a Seductive Genius. Simon and Schuster. p. 119. ISBN 978-1-4767-1652-7.
  76. ^ "Ars Quatuor Coronatorum – A Revised Style Guide" (PDF). Quatuor Coronati Lodge No. 2076. pp. 12–13. Retrieved 19 November 2024.
  77. ^ S. Brent Morris (2006). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Freemasonry. Alpha/Penguin Books. p. 27. ISBN 1-59257-490-4.
  78. ^ I. R. Clarke, "The Formation of the Grand Lodge of the Antients", Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, vol 79 (1966), pp. 270–273, Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon, retrieved 28 June 2012
  79. ^ H. L. Haywood, "Various Grand Lodges", The Builder, vol X no 5, May 1924, Pietre Stones website, retrieved 9 January 2014
  80. ^ Robert L.D. Cooper, Cracking the Freemason's Code, Rider 2006, Chapter 1, p. 17
  81. ^ Francis Vicente, An Overview of Early Freemasonry in Pennsylvania, Pietre-Stones, retrieved 15 November 2013
  82. ^ "History of Freemasons in Nova Scotia".
  83. ^ Werner Hartmann, "History of St. John's Lodge No. 1", St. John's Lodge No. 1, A.Y.M., 2012, retrieved 16 November 2013
  84. ^ M. Baigent and R. Leigh, The Temple and the Lodge, Arrow 1998, Appendix 2, pp. 360–362, "Masonic Field Lodges in Regiments in America", 1775–77
  85. ^ Robert L.D. Cooper, Cracking the Freemason's Code, Rider 2006, p. 190
  86. ^ Bullock, Steven C.; Institute of Early American History and Culture (Williamsburg, Va.) (1996). Revolutionary brotherhood: Freemasonry and the transformation of the American social order, 1730–1840. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-4750-3. OCLC 33334015.
  87. ^ "George Washington Inaugural Bible". St. John's Lodge No. 1 A.Y.M. Retrieved 28 April 2024.
  88. ^ "President George Washington's First Inaugural Speech (1789)". National Archives. 18 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
  89. ^ "On this day, government begins under our Constitution". National Constitution Center – constitutioncenter.org. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
  90. ^ "Today in History - March 4". Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
  91. ^ a b Handbook of Jamaica. Google Books: Jamaica Government. 1908. p. 449.
  92. ^ Handbook of Jamaica. Google Books: Jamaica Government. 1908. p. 33.
  93. ^ a b "Charting The History Of Freemasons In Jamaica". Jamaica Gleaner Newspaper. 10 December 2017.
  94. ^ "English Freemasons To Celebrate Their 300th Year In Jamaica". Jamaica Gleaner Newspaper. 18 April 2017.
  95. ^ Johnson, Lawrence (1996). "Who is Prince Hall? And other well known Prince Hall Masons". Archived from the original on 2 June 2007. Retrieved 14 November 2005.
  96. ^ "Prince Hall History Education Class" by Raymond T. Coleman(pdf) Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine retrieved 13 October 2013
  97. ^ Bessel, Paul M. "Prince Hall Masonry Recognition details: Historical Maps". Retrieved 14 November 2005.
  98. ^ "Foreign Grand Lodges" Archived 22 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine, UGLE Website, retrieved 25 October 2013
  99. ^ "History of Prince Hall Masonry: What is Freemasonry" Archived 19 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge Free and Accepted Masons Jurisdiction of Pennsylvania, retrieved 25 October 2013
  100. ^ Histoire de la Franc-maçonnerie Archived 26 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Grand Orient de France, retrieved 12 November 2013
  101. ^ M. Landau, Jacob (1965). "Prolegomena to a study of secret societies in modern Egypt". Middle Eastern Studies. 1 (2). Routledge: 139. doi:10.1080/00263206508700010. ISSN 0026-3206 – via Tandfonline.
  102. ^ De Poli, Barbara (2019). "Chapter 6: Sufi and Freemasons in the Ottoman Empire 6.1 ʿAbd Al-Qādir Al-Jazāʾirī". Freemansonry and the Orient: Esotericisms between the East and the West. Edizioni Ca' Foscari-Digital publishing. pp. 75–86. ISBN 978-8869693397.
  103. ^ Paul Bessel, "U.S. Recognition of French Grand Lodges in the 1900s" Archived 10 April 2006 at the Wayback Machine, from Heredom: The Transactions of the Scottish Rite Research Society, vol 5, 1996, pp. 221–244, Paul Bessel website, retrieved 12 November 2013
  104. ^ Historique de la GLDF, Grande Loge de France, retrieved 14 November 2013
  105. ^ Alain Bernheim, "My approach to Masonic History", Manchester 2011, Pietre-Stones, retrieved 14 November 2013
  106. ^ "Liberal Grand Lodges" Archived 20 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine, French Freemasonry, retrieved 14 November 2013
  107. ^ "Traditional Grand Lodges" Archived 14 July 2014 at the Wayback Machine, French Freemasonry, retrieved 14 November 2013
  108. ^ "Regular Grand Lodges" Archived 20 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine, French Freemasonry, retrieved 14 November 2013
  109. ^ "Continental Lodges",Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, retrieved 30 November 2013
  110. ^ For instance "Women in Freemasonry, and Continental Freemasonry", Corn Wine and Oil, June 2009, retrieved 30 November 2013
  111. ^ Tony Pope, "At a Perpetual Distance: Liberal and Adogmatic Grand Lodges", Presented to Waikato Lodge of Research No 445 at Rotorua, New Zealand, on 9 November 2004, as the annual Verrall Lecture, and subsequently published in the Transactions of the lodge, vol 14 #1, March 2005, Pietre-Stones, retrieved 13 November 2013
  112. ^ "Current members" CLIPSAS, retrieved 14 November 2014
  113. ^ Antonia Frazer, The Weaker Vessel, Mandarin paperbacks, 1989, pp. 108–109
  114. ^ for example, see David Murray Lyon, History of the lodge of Edinburgh, Blackwood, Edinburgh, 1873, pp. 121–123
  115. ^ Anderson, James (1734) [1723]. Paul Royster (ed.). The Constitutions of the Free-Masons (Philadelphia ed.). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Benjamin Franklin. p. 49. Retrieved 12 August 2013. The Persons admitted Members of a Lodge must be good and true Men, free-born, and of mature and discreet Age, no Bondmen, no Women, no immoral or scandalous Men, but of good Report.
  116. ^ "Adoptive Freemasonry" Entry from Mackey's Lexicon of Freemasonry
  117. ^ a b Barbara L. Thames, "A History of Women's Masonry", Phoenix Masonry, retrieved 5 March 2013
  118. ^ "Order of the Eastern Star"[usurped] Masonic Dictionary, retrieved 9 January 2013
  119. ^ "Maria Deraismes (1828–1894)" Archived 4 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Droit Humain, retrieved 5 March 2013. (French Language)
  120. ^ Jeanne Heaslewood, "A Brief History of the Founding of Co-Freemasonry", 1999, Phoenix Masonry, retrieved 12 August 2013
  121. ^ "Histoire du Droit Humain", Droit Humain, retrieved 12 August 2013
  122. ^ "The Order of Women Freemasons | Womens Freemasonry | Nationwide". www.owf.org.uk. Retrieved 17 June 2021.
  123. ^ "HFAF | Freemasonry for Women". Retrieved 17 June 2021.
  124. ^ "Text of UGLE statement" Archived 4 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Honourable Fraternity of Ancient Freemasons – Freemasonry For Women, retrieved 12 August 2012
  125. ^ Karen Kidd, Haunted Chambers: the Lives of Early Women Freemasons, Cornerstone, 2009, pp. 204–205
  126. ^ a b Damien Gayle (2018). "Freemasons to admit women – but only if they first joined as men | UK news". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2018.
  127. ^ Margaret C. Jacob's seminal work on Enlightenment freemasonry, Margaret C. Jacob, Living the Enlightenment: Free masonry and Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe (Oxford University Press, 1991) p. 49.
  128. ^ Margaret C. Jacob, "Polite worlds of Enlightenment", in Martin Fitzpatrick and Peter Jones, eds. The Enlightenment World (Routledge, 2004) pp. 272–287.
  129. ^ Daniel Roche, France in the Enlightenment (Harvard U.P. 1998)) p. 436.
  130. ^ Jacob, Living the Enlightenment, pp. 20, 73, 89.
  131. ^ Jacob, Living the Enlightenment, pp. 145–147.
  132. ^ Robert R. Palmer, The Age of the Democratic Revolution: The struggle (1970) p. 53
  133. ^ Neil L. York, "Freemasons and the American Revolution", The Historian 55#2 (1993), pp 315+.
  134. ^ Roche, 437.
  135. ^ Norman Davies (1996). Europe: A History. Oxford UP. p. 634. ISBN 978-0-19-820171-7.
  136. ^ Davis, Europe p. 634.
  137. ^ Steven C. Bullock, "Initiating the enlightenment?: recent scholarship on European freemasonry." Eighteenth-Century Life 20#1 (1996): 80–92. online
  138. ^ Margaret C. Jacob, Living the Enlightenment: Freemasonry & Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe (1992).
  139. ^ Avner Halpern, "Freemasonry and party building in late 19th-Century France." Modern & Contemporary France 10.2 (2002): 197–210.
  140. ^ Douglas Smith, "Freemasonry and the public in eighteenth-century Russia." Eighteenth-century studies 29.1 (1995): 25–44.
  141. ^ Ludwik Hass, "The Russian Masonic Movement in the Years 1906–1918." Acta Poloniae Historica 48 (1983): 95–131.
  142. ^ Adrian Lyttelton, "An Old Church and a New State: Italian Anticlericalism 1876–1915." European Studies Review 13.2 (1983): 225–248.
  143. ^ Fulvio Conti, "From Universalism to Nationalism: Italian Freemasonry and the Great War." Journal of Modern Italian Studies 20.5 (2015): 640–662.
  144. ^ Martin Clark, Modern Italy 1871–1995 (1996) p. 254.
  145. ^ Miriam Erickson, "Don José Rossi y Rubí and Spanish Freemasonry in the Revolutionary Atlantic, 1785–1798." Latin Americanist 63.1 (2019): 25–47.
  146. ^ Karen Racine, "Freemasonry" in Michael S. Werner, ed. Encyclopedia of Mexico: History, Society, and Culture (Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997) 1:538–540.
  147. ^ Bogdan and Snoek, eds., Handbook of Freemasonry (2014) pp. 439–440.
  148. ^ Renata Ribeiro Francisco, "Os heróis maçônicos na historiografia da abolição em São Paulo" [Masonic heroes in the historiography of abolition in São Paulo] História da Historiografia (2020), 13#34 pp. 271–302.
  149. ^ Karen Racine, "Freemasonry" in Michael S. Werner, ed. Encyclopedia of Mexico (1997) 1:538–540.
  150. ^ Lillian Estelle Fisher, "Early Masonry in Mexico (1806–1828)." Southwestern Historical Quarterly 42.3 (1939): 198–214. online
  151. ^ Watson Smith, "Influences from the United States on the Mexican Constitution of 1824." Arizona and the West 4.2 (1962): 113–126.
  152. ^ Racine, p. 1:540.
  153. ^ Hamill, John (1986). The Craft: a history of English freemasonry. Wellingborough, GB: Crucible. ISBN 978-0-85030-460-2.
  154. ^ a b c "Chinese Masonic Society". www.freemasons-freemasonry.com. Retrieved 2 September 2024.
  155. ^ "HOME". Zetland Hall Website. Retrieved 11 September 2024.
  156. ^ "Anti-Masonry" – Oxford English Dictionary (Compact Edition), Oxford University Press, 1979, p. 369
  157. ^ "Definition of Antimasonry". Webster Dictionary. Archived from the original on 28 September 2011. Retrieved 8 September 2011.
  158. ^ Heimbichner, S. Craig; Parfrey, Adam (2012). Ritual America: Secret Brotherhoods and Their Influence on American Society: A Visual Guide. Feral House. p. 187. ISBN 978-1936239153.
  159. ^ Morris, S. Brent (2006). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Freemasonry. New York: Alpha Books. pp. 85 (also discussed in chapters 13 and 16). ISBN 978-1-59257-490-2. OCLC 68042376.
  160. ^ Robinson, John J. (1993). A Pilgrim's Path. New York: M. Evans. p. 129. ISBN 978-0-87131-732-2. OCLC 27381296.
  161. ^ de Hoyos, Arturo; S. Brent Morris (18 August 2002). "Leo Taxil Hoax –Bibliography". Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon. Retrieved 7 July 2007. Lists many books which perpetuate Masonic ritual hoaxes.
  162. ^ "Anti-mason" infoplease.com retrieved 9 January 2014
  163. ^ Morris, S. Brent; The Complete Idiot's Guide to Freemasonry, Alpha books, 2006, p. 204.
  164. ^ Cardinal Law, Bernard (19 April 1985). "Letter of 19 April 1985 to U.S. Bishops Concerning Masonry". CatholicCulture.org. Retrieved 9 July 2007.
  165. ^ Emanuela Tulli; Angela Pellicciari [in Italian] (26 June 2023). "From Clement XII to Ratzinger, the Popes and Freemasonry" (in Italian). ANSA. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023.
  166. ^ "Vatican confirms Catholics still forbidden to join Masonic lodges". 15 November 2023.
  167. ^ Canon 2335, 1917 Code of Canon Law from "Canon Law regarding Freemasonry, 1917–1983". Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon.
  168. ^ McInvale, Reid (1991). "Roman Catholic Church Law Regarding Freemasonry". Transactions of Texas Lodge of Research. 27: 86–97. OCLC 47204246.
  169. ^ Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, Declaration on Masonic Associations Archived 14 March 2001 at the Wayback Machine, 26 November 1983, retrieved 26 November 2015
  170. ^ Franciscus, Dicasterium Pro Doctrina Fidei: Note for the audience with the Holy Father, Vatican City, 13 November 2023.
  171. ^ a b "Vatican confirms Catholics still forbidden to join Masonic lodges". Vatican News. 15 November 2023.
  172. ^ Rojas, Jose R. (20 February 2020). "Pastoral guidelines in dealing with individual Catholics – members of Masonry". CBCPNews.
  173. ^ Jack Chick. "The Curse of Baphomet". Retrieved 29 September 2007.
  174. ^ Arturo de Hoyos and S. Brent Morris (2004). Is it True What They Say About Freemasonry, 2nd edition (revised), chapter 1. M. Evans & Company. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013.
  175. ^ Pike, Albert; T. W. Hugo; Scottish Rite (Masonic order). Supreme Council of the Thirty-Third Degree for the Southern Jurisdiction (1950) [1871]. Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Washington, DC: House of the Temple. OCLC 12870276. In preparing this work [Pike] has been about equally Author and Compiler. (p. iii.) ... The teachings of these Readings are not sacramental, so far as they go beyond the realm of Morality into those of other domains of Thought and Truth. The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite uses the word "Dogma" in its true sense of doctrine, or teaching; and is not dogmatic in the odious sense of that term. Everyone is entirely free to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may seem to him to be untrue or unsound (p. iv){{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  176. ^ "Baptists and Freemasonry? Can a Christian be a Faithful Believer and be a Freemason? | Jeff Straub".
  177. ^ "FREEMASONRY AND THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH Part 2".
  178. ^ Snyder, Howard (2006). Populist Saints. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 727.
  179. ^ Beresiner, Yasha (July 2006). "Archbishop Fisher – A Godly man and a Brother". Masonic Quarterly Magazine (18). Retrieved 7 May 2007.
  180. ^ Hastings, Chris; Elizabeth Day (20 April 2003). "Rowan Williams apologises to Freemasons". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 23 November 2007. Retrieved 9 July 2007.
  181. ^ "Freemasonry: Official Statement of the Church of Greece (1933)". Orthodoxinfo.com. 12 October 1933. Retrieved 15 January 2011.
  182. ^ "Freemasonry and Religion" (PDF). United Grand Lodge of England. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
  183. ^ a b Fields, Rona M. (1980). Northern Ireland: Society Under Siege. Transaction Publishers. p. 113. ISBN 978-1412845090.
  184. ^ Layiktez, Cecil "Freemasonry in the Islamic World", Pietre-Stones Review of Freemasonry, 1996
  185. ^ a b c Sands, David R (1 July 2004). "Saddam to be formally charged". The Washington Times. Retrieved 18 June 2006.
  186. ^ Prescott, Andrew. The Study of Freemasonry as a New Academic Discipline. pp. 13–14. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
  187. ^ Rickenbacher, Daniel (6 December 2019). "The 'War Against Islam': How a Conspiracy Theory Drove and Shaped the Islamist Movement". Archived from the original on 18 August 2021.
  188. ^ "Can a Muslim be a Freemason" Archived 29 March 2014 at the Wayback Machine Wake up from your slumber, 2007, retrieved 8 January 2014
  189. ^ Rickenbacher, Daniel (6 December 2019). "The 'War Against Islam': How a Conspiracy Theory Drove and Shaped the Islamist Movement". Archived from the original on 18 August 2021.
  190. ^ "Hamas Covenant 1988". Avalon.law.yale.edu. 18 August 1988. Retrieved 15 January 2011.
  191. ^ Leyiktez, Celil. "Freemasonry in the Islamic World", Pietre-Stones Retrieved 2 October 2007.
  192. ^ "Home Page", District Grand Lodge of the Eastern Archipelago Archived 9 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 9 January 2014
  193. ^ "Mystery unveiled". The Star Online. 17 April 2005. Archived from the original on 27 February 2014. Retrieved 13 February 2014.
  194. ^ Freemasonry in Lebanon Lodges linked to the Grand Lodge of Scotland, retrieved 22 August 2013
  195. ^ Peerzada Salman, "Masonic Mystique", December 2009, Dawn.com (News site), retrieved 3 January 2012
  196. ^ Kent Henderson, "Freemasonry in Islamic Countries", 2007 paper, Pietre Stones, retrieved 4 January 2014
  197. ^ a b Andrew Prescott, "The Unlawful Societies Act", First published in M. D. J. Scanlan, ed., The Social Impact of Freemasonry on the Modern Western World, The Canonbury Papers I (London: Canonbury Masonic Research Centre, 2002), pp. 116–34, Pietre-Stones website, retrieved 9 January 2014
  198. ^ "The Morgan Affair", Reprinted from The Short Talk Bulletin – Vol. XI, March 1933 No. 3, Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon, retrieved 4 January 2014
  199. ^ King, Edward L. (2007). "P2 Lodge". Archived from the original on 3 February 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2006.
  200. ^ Wilkenson, James; H. Stuart Hughes (1995). Contemporary Europe: A History. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. p. 237. ISBN 978-0-13-291840-4. OCLC 31009810.
  201. ^ Zierer, Otto (1976). Concise History of Great Nations: History of Germany. New York: Leon Amiel Publisher. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-8148-0673-9. OCLC 3250405.
  202. ^ Michael Johnstone, The Freemasons, Arcturus, 2005, pp 73–75
  203. ^ a b c Hodapp, Christopher. Freemasons for Dummies. Indianapolis: Wiley, 2005. p. 86.
  204. ^ a b Bright, Martin (12 June 2005). "MPs told to declare links to Masons", The Guardian
  205. ^ Cusick, James (27 December 1996). Police want judges and MPs to reveal Masonic links too, The Independent
  206. ^ Sparrow, Andrew (5 November 2009). "Jack Straw scraps rule saying judges must declare if they are masons". guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  207. ^ Prescott, pp. 13–14, 30, 33.
  208. ^ "World War II Documents showing the persecution of Freemasonry". Mill Valley Lodge #356. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012. Retrieved 21 May 2006.
  209. ^ Freemasons for Dummies, by Christopher Hodapp, Wiley Publishing Inc., Indianapolis, 2005, p. 85, sec. "Hitler and the Nazi"
  210. ^ Katz (1990). "Jews and Freemasons in Europe". In Israel Gutman (ed.). The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. p. vol. 2, p. 531. ISBN 978-0-02-897166-7. OCLC 20594356.
  211. ^ "Freemasonry".
  212. ^ McKeown, Trevor W. "Hitler and Freemasonry".
  213. ^ "Das Vergißmeinnicht-Abzeichen und die Freimaurerei, Die wahre Geschichte" (in German). Internetloge.de. Retrieved 8 July 2006.
  214. ^ Bernheim, Alain (10 September 2004). "The Blue Forget-Me-Not: Another Side Of The Story". Pietre-Stones Review of Freemasonry. Retrieved 8 July 2006.
  215. ^ Francke, Karl Heinz; Ernst-Günther Geppert (1974). Die Freimaurer-Logen Deutschlands und deren Grosslogen 1737–1972 (in German) (Second rev. ed.). Bayreuth: Quatuor Coronati.Also in: Francke, Karl Heinz; Ernst-Günther Geppert (1988). Die Freimaurer-Logen Deutschlands und deren Grosslogen 1737–1985 : Matrikel und Stammbuch; Nachschlagewerk über 248 Jahre Geschichte der Freimaurerei in Deutschland (in German). Bayreuth: Quatuor Coronati. ISBN 978-3-925749-05-6. OCLC 75446479.
  216. ^ "The Story Behind Forget Me Not Emblem!". Masonic Network. 11 December 2009. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2013.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Belton, John L., et al. Freemasonry in context: history, ritual, controversy (Lexington Books, 2004) online.
  • Berger, Joachim. "The great divide: Transatlantic brothering and masonic internationalism, c. 1870–c. 1930." Atlantic Studies 16.3 (2019): 405–422.
  • Dickie, John. The Craft: How the Freemasons Made the Modern World (PublicAffairs, 2020).
  • Fozdar, Vahid. "'That Grand Primeval and Fundamental Religion': The Transformation of Freemasonry into a British Imperial Cult." Journal of World History 22#3 (2011), pp. 493–525. online
  • Hamill, John. The Craft: A History of English Freemasonry (1986)
  • Harland-Jacobs, Jessica L. Builders of Empire: Freemasons and British Imperialism, 1717–1927 (2007)
  • Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig. Freemasonry and German Civil Society, 1840–1918 (U of Michigan Press, 2007).
  • Jacob, Margaret C. Living the Enlightenment: Freemasonry and Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe (1991)
  • Jacob, Margaret C. The Origins of Freemasonry: Facts and Fictions (U of Pennsylvania Press, 2007).
  • Jacob, Margaret, and Matthew Crow. "Freemasonry and the Enlightenment." in Handbook of Freemasonry (Brill, 2014) pp. 100–116. online
  • Loiselle, Kenneth. "Freemasonry and the Catholic Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century France." Journal of Modern History 94.3 (2022): 499–536. online
  • Önnerfors, Andreas. Freemasonry: a very short introduction (Oxford University Press, 2017) excerpt.
  • Racine, Karen. "Freemasonry" in Michael S. Werner, ed. Encyclopedia of Mexico: History, Society, and Culture (Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997) 1:538–540.
  • Ridley, Jasper. The Freemasons (1999), wide-ranging global popular history.
  • Snoek Jan A.M. and Henrik Bogdan. "The History of Freemasonry: An Overview" in Bogdan and Snoek, eds. Handbook of Freemasonry (Brill, 2014) ch. 2 pp 13–32. online
  • Stevenson, David. "Four Hundred Years of Freemasonry in Scotland." Scottish Historical Review, 90#230 (2011), pp. 280–295. online
  • Stevenson, David. The First Freemasons. Scotland's Early Lodges and Their Members (1988)
  • Weisberger, R. William et al. Freemasonry on Both Sides of the Atlantic: Essays concerning the Craft in the British Isles, Europe, the United States, and Mexico (2002), 969 pp
  • Weisberger, R. William. Speculative Freemasonry and the Enlightenment: A Study of the Craft in London, Paris, Prague and Vienna (Columbia University Press, 1993) 243 pp.

United States

[edit]
  • Bullock, Steven C. Revolutionary brotherhood: Freemasonry and the transformation of the American social order, 1730–1840 (UNC Press Books, 2011).
  • Formisano, Ronald P., and Kathleen Smith Kutolowski. "Antimasonry and Masonry: The Genesis of Protest, 1826–1827." American Quarterly 29.2 (1977): 139–165. online
  • Hackett, David G. That Religion in Which All Men Agree : Freemasonry in American Culture (U of California Press, 2015)
  • Hinks, Peter P. et al. All Men Free and Brethren: Essays on the History of African American Freemasonry (Cornell UP, 2013).
  • Kantrowitz, Stephen. "'Intended for the Better Government of Man': The Political History of African American Freemasonry in the Era of Emancipation." Journal of American History 96#4, (2010), pp. 1001–1026. online.
  • Weisberger, R. William et al. Freemasonry on Both Sides of the Atlantic: Essays concerning the Craft in the British Isles, Europe, the United States, and Mexico (2002), 969pp
  • York, Neil L. "Freemasons and the American Revolution." Historian 55#2 (1993), pp. 315–330. online

Historiography and memory

[edit]
  • Jacob, Margaret. "The Radical Enlightenment and Freemasonry: where we are now." REHMLAC: Revista de Estudios Históricos de la Masonería Latinoamericana y Caribeña 1 (2013): 11–25.online.
[edit]