Jump to content

Blue Dog Coalition: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Alethiareg (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m comma
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Caucus for centrist members of the Democratic Party}}
[[Image:bdoglogo.jpg|right]]
{{Redirect|Blue Dogs|the American band formed in 1987|The Blue Dogs (band)}}
'''Blue Dog Democrats''' are a group of 44 conservative Democratic Party members of the [[United States House of Representatives]]. <ref>http://www.house.gov/cardoza/BlueDogs/history.htm</ref> The Blue Dogs are a coalition of like-minded republican lites who seek to promote what they see as fiscally responsible budget reforms and accountability for taxpayer dollars. Many members come from conservative districts, where liberal Democrats comprise a decided minority. The [[reublican Party (United States) has become more supportive of Blue Dog candidates in recent times. This was especially true in the 2006 election, when Blue Dog candidates such as [[Heath Shuler]] and [[Brad Ellsworth]] were elected in conservative-leaning districts, adding years of [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] dominance in these districts.
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2024}}
{{Use American English|date=September 2024}}
{{Infobox political party
| name = Blue Dog Coalition
| logo = Blue Dog Coalition logo.svg
| logo_upright = 0.7
| colorcode = {{party color|Blue Dog Coalition}}
| leader1_title = Co-Chairs
| leader1_name = {{ubl|[[Jared Golden]] (administration)|[[Mary Peltola]] (policy)|[[Marie Gluesenkamp Perez]] (communications)}}
| foundation = {{Start date|1995|2|14}}
| ideology = {{ubl|class=nowrap
|[[Cultural liberalism|Social liberalism]]
|[[Fiscal conservatism]]
|[[Populism in the United States|Populism]]
|'''Historical:'''
|[[Social conservatism]]}}
| position = {{ubl|class=nowrap|
|[[Centrism|Center]] to [[Centre-left politics|center-left]]
|'''Historical:'''
|[[Centre-right politics|Center-right]]
}}
| national = [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]]
| colors = {{color box|{{party color|Blue Dog Coalition}}|border=silver}} Blue
| seats2_title = Seats in the [[House Democratic Caucus]]
| seats2 = {{composition bar|11|{{HouseDemocraticTally}}|{{party color|Blue Dog Coalition}}}}
| seats3_title = Seats in the [[United States House of Representatives|House]]
| seats3 = {{composition bar|11|435|{{party color|Blue Dog Coalition}}}}
| website = {{URL|https://bluedogcaucus-golden.house.gov/}}
| country = United States
}}


The '''Blue Dog Coalition''', commonly known as the '''Blue Dogs''' or '''Blue Dog Democrats''', is a [[Congressional caucus|caucus]] of [[Political moderate|moderate]] members from the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]] in the [[United States House of Representatives]].<ref name="U.S. House has fewer moderate Democrats">{{cite web|last1=Davis|first1=Susan|title=U.S. House has fewer moderate Democrats|url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-02-02/moderate-blue-dog-democrats-house/52992548/1 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141204165608/http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-02-02/moderate-blue-dog-democrats-house/52992548/1 |archive-date=December 4, 2014|website=[[USA Today]]|access-date=July 23, 2014}}</ref><ref name="auto1"/> The caucus was founded as a group of [[conservative Democrat]]s in 1995 in response to defeats in the [[1994 United States elections|1994 elections]]. Historically, the Blue Dog Coalition has been both [[Fiscal conservatism|fiscally]] and [[Social conservatism in the United States|socially]] [[Conservative Democrat|conservative]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Duncan |first1=Philip P. |last2=Nutting |first2=Brian |title=CQ's politics in America: 2000, the 106th Congress |date=1999 |publisher=Congressional Quarterly, Inc |location=Washington, DC |isbn=9781568024714 |page=18 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hPEpAQAAIAAJ}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Solomon |first1=Norman |title=When the Leaders Lead, the People Have Sorrow |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/when-the-leaders-lead-the_b_586911 |access-date=January 13, 2023 |work=HuffPost |date=May 24, 2010}}</ref><ref name="Elections A to Z"/> At its peak in 2009, the Blue Dog Coalition numbered 54 members.<ref name="auto2">{{cite news |last1=Miller |first1=Jonathan |title=The Blue Dogs Are Barking Again |url=https://rollcall.com/2018/05/23/the-blue-dogs-are-barking-again/ |access-date=October 26, 2023 |work=[[Roll Call]] |date=May 23, 2018}}</ref>
The term is a reference to the "Blue Dog" paintings of [[Cajun]] artist [[George Rodrigue]] of [[Lafayette, Louisiana]]; the original members of the coalition would regularly meet in the offices of Louisiana representatives [[Billy Tauzin]] and [[Jimmy Hayes]], both of whom had Rodrigue's paintings on their walls (and both of whom later switched to the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]]). It may also be meant as an ironic counterpoint to the traditional [[Yellow dog Democrat|"Yellow Dog"]] label, which is applied to those Southern Democrats said to be so loyal to the party that they would vote for a yellow dog before voting for a Republican.


In the late 2010s and early 2020s, the Coalition's focus shifted towards ideological [[centrism]] and pragmatic, constituency-based politics;<ref name="Mendoza"/><ref name="The Washington Post">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/08/blue-dog-democrats-congress-new-leaders/?pwapi_token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9 |title=Dwindling Blue Dog Democrats look to stage a comeback for moderates| newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=August 8, 2023}}</ref><ref name="auto">{{cite book|editor=Ruth Bloch Rubin |title=Building the Bloc: Intraparty Organization in the US Congress |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bLYrDwAAQBAJ&q=centrist+Blue+Dog+Coalition&pg=PA188 |quote= In contrast to the halting mobilization of Insurgent Republicans and southern Democrats, the Blue Dogs' adoption of ... ideological bonafides, the Coalition worked to establish a Blue Dog brand and associate it with support for centrist policies. |date=2017 |page=188 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|isbn=9781316510421 }}</ref> however, the Coalition maintained an emphasis on fiscal responsibility.<ref name="Brindisi"/> The Blue Dog Coalition remains the most conservative grouping of Democrats in the House.<ref name="auto2"/>
The Blue Dog Coalition was formed in [[1994]] during the [[104th United States Congress|104th Congress]] to give more conservative members from the Democratic party a unified voice. The Blue Dogs are viewed by some as a continuation of the socially conservative wing of the Democratic party prominent during the presidencies of [[Lyndon Johnson]] and [[Harry S. Truman]], whom many in the Blue-Dog movement consider to be the first two Blue Dog presidents. {{Fact|date=February 2007}}


As of 2024, the caucus has 11 members.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last1=Mutnick |first1=Ally |last2=Ferris |first2=Sarah |date=January 24, 2023 |title=Blue Dog Coalition Membership |url=https://bluedogdems.com/ |access-date=January 24, 2023 |website=Blue Dog Coalition}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=September 6, 2023 |title=Members {{!}} Blue Dog Coalition |url=http://bluedogcaucus-golden.house.gov/members |access-date=April 24, 2024 |website=bluedogcaucus-golden.house.gov |language=en}}</ref>
The coalition was notably successful in a special election of February 2004 in [[Kentucky]] to fill a vacant seat in the House of Representatives. They were also successful in the November 2004 elections, when three of the five races in which a Democrat won a formerly Republican House seat were won by Blue Dog Democrats. Freshman Blue Dogs in the House are sometimes known as '''Blue Pups.'''


== Electoral results ==
Often, the group is involved in finding a compromise between [[Real American liberalism|liberal]] and conservative positions. Despite Blue Dogs' differing degrees of economic and social conservatism, they share a strong orientation toward what they consider fiscal responsibility, and as a rule work to promote positions within the House of Representatives which bridge the gap between the two extremes. Blue Dogs are an important [[swing vote]] on spending bills and, as a result, have gained an influence in Congress out of proportion to their small numbers. They are frequently sought after to broker compromises between the Democratic and Republican leadership.
=== House of Representatives ===
{|class=wikitable
|-
! Congress
! Democratic seats
! ±
|-
! [[1994 United States House of Representatives elections|104th (1994)]]
| {{composition bar|29|204|hex=#01346E}}
| {{steady}}
|-
! [[1996 United States House of Representatives elections|105th (1996)]]
| {{composition bar|28|207|hex=#01346E}}
| {{decrease}} 1
|-
! [[1998 United States House of Representatives elections|106th (1998)]]
| {{composition bar|34|211|hex=#01346E}}
| {{increase}} 6
|-
! [[2000 United States House of Representatives elections|107th (2000)]]
| {{composition bar|35|212|hex=#01346E}}
| {{increase}} 1
|-
! [[2002 United States House of Representatives elections|108th (2002)]]
| {{composition bar|38|205|hex=#01346E}}
| {{increase}} 3
|-
! [[2004 United States House of Representatives elections|109th (2004)]]
| {{composition bar|38|202|hex=#01346E}}
| {{steady}}
|-
! [[2006 United States House of Representatives elections|110th (2006)]]
| {{composition bar|56|233|hex=#01346E}}
| {{increase}} 18
|-
! [[2008 United States House of Representatives elections|111th (2008)]]
| {{composition bar|54|257|hex=#01346E}}
| {{increase}} 8
|-
! [[2010 United States House of Representatives elections|112th (2010)]]
| {{composition bar|28|193|hex=#01346E}}
| {{decrease}} 36
|-
! [[2012 United States House of Representatives elections|113th (2012)]]
| {{composition bar|19|201|hex=#01346E}}
| {{decrease}} 9
|-
! [[2014 United States House of Representatives elections|114th (2014)]]
| {{composition bar|15|188|hex=#01346E}}
| {{decrease}} 4
|-
! [[2016 United States House of Representatives elections|115th (2016)]]
| {{composition bar|18|193|hex=#01346E}}
| {{increase}} 3
|-
! [[2018 United States House of Representatives elections|116th (2018)]]
| {{composition bar|27|235|hex=#01346E}}
| {{increase}} 9
|-
! [[2020 United States House of Representatives elections|117th (2020)]]
| {{composition bar|19|222|hex=#01346E}}
| {{decrease}} 8
|-
! [[2022 United States House of Representatives elections|118th (2022)]]
| {{composition bar|11|213|hex=#01346E}}
| {{decrease}} 8
|-
! [[2024 United States House of Representatives elections|119th (2024)]]
| {{composition bar|10|215|hex=#01346E}}
| {{decrease}} 1
|}


== Overview and history ==
==List of Blue Dog Coalition members==
[[File:President Obama meets with the Democratic Blue Dog coalition in the State Dining Room..jpg|thumb|250px|[[President of the United States|President]] [[Barack Obama]] meets with Blue Dog Democrats on February 10, 2009]]
* [[Mike Arcuri]] ([[New York]])
The Blue Dog Coalition was formed in 1995<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rollcall.com/news/blue-dogs|title=20&nbsp;years in, Blue Dogs not ready to roll over |first1=Emma |last1=Dumain |date=May 12, 2015 |website=rollcall.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://ross.house.gov/BlueDog/history.htm |archive-url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20120405021833/http://ross.house.gov/BlueDog/history.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 5, 2012 |title=History |publisher=Blue Dog Coalition |website=ross.house.gov/BlueDog/ |access-date=April 10, 2012}}</ref> during the [[104th United States Congress|104th Congress]] to give members from the Democratic Party representing conservative-leaning districts a unified voice after the Democrats' loss of Congress in the [[1994 United States House of Representatives elections|1994]] [[Republican Revolution]].<ref>{{cite news |first=Naftali |last=Bendavid |date=July 28, 2009 |title='Blue Dog' Democrats hold health care overhaul at bay |newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref>
* [[Joe Baca]] ([[California]])
* [[John Barrow (U.S. politician)|John Barrow]] ([[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]])
* [[Melissa Bean]] ([[Illinois]])
* [[Marion Berry]] ([[Arkansas]])
* [[Sanford Bishop]] ([[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]])
* [[Dan Boren]] ([[Oklahoma]])
* [[Leonard Boswell]] ([[Iowa]])
* [[Allen Boyd]] ([[Florida]]), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Administration
* [[Dennis Cardoza]] ([[California]])
* [[Christopher Carney]] ([[Pennsylvania]])
* [[Ben Chandler]] ([[Kentucky]])
* [[Jim Cooper]] ([[Tennessee]])
* [[Jim Costa]] ([[California]])
* [[Bud Cramer]] ([[Alabama]])
* [[Lincoln Davis]] ([[Tennessee]])
* [[Joe Donnelly]] ([[Indiana]])
* [[Brad Ellsworth]] ([[Indiana]])
* [[Gabrielle Giffords]] ([[Arizona]])
* [[Kirsten Gillibrand]] ([[New York]])
* [[Bart Gordon]] ([[Tennessee]])
* [[Jane Harman]] ([[California]])
* [[Stephanie Herseth Sandlin]] ([[South Dakota]]), Blue Dog Whip
* [[Baron Hill]] ([[Indiana]])
* [[Tim Holden]] ([[Pennsylvania]])
* [[Steve Israel]] ([[New York]])
* [[Nick Lampson]] ([[Texas]])
* [[Tim Mahoney]] ([[Florida]])
* [[Jim Marshall (U.S. politician)|Jim Marshall]] ([[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]])
* [[Jim Matheson]] ([[Utah]])
* [[Mike McIntyre]] ([[North Carolina]])
* [[Charlie Melancon]] ([[Louisiana]])
* [[Mike Michaud]] ([[Maine]])
* [[Dennis Moore]] ([[Kansas]]), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Policy
* [[Patrick Murphy (politician)|Patrick Murphy]] ([[Pennsylvania]])
* [[Collin Peterson]] ([[Minnesota]])
* [[Earl Pomeroy]] ([[North Dakota]])
* [[Mike Ross]] ([[Arkansas]]), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Communications
* [[John Salazar]] ([[Colorado]])
* [[Loretta Sanchez]] ([[California]])
* [[Adam Schiff]] ([[California]])
* [[David Scott (politician)|David Scott]] ([[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]])
* [[Heath Shuler|Heath Shuler]] ([[North Carolina]])
* [[Zack Space]] ([[Ohio]])
* [[John S. Tanner|John Tanner]] ([[Tennessee]])
* [[Gene Taylor]] ([[Mississippi]])
* [[Mike Thompson]] ([[California]])
* [[Charlie Wilson (Ohio politician)|Charlie Wilson]] ([[Ohio]])


The term "Blue Dog Democrat" is credited to [[Texas]] Democratic Representative [[Pete Geren]] (who later joined the [[George W. Bush administration]]). Geren opined that the members had been "choked blue" by Democrats on the left.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://wordcraft.infopop.cc/Archives/2004-11-Nov.htm |title=Wordcraft Archives, November 2004 |website=Wordcraft.infopop.cc |access-date=February 23, 2016}}</ref> It is related to the political term "[[Yellow Dog Democrat]]", a reference to [[Southern Democrats]] said to be "so loyal they would even vote for a yellow dog before they would vote for any Republican". The term also refers to the "Blue Dog" paintings of [[Cajun]] artist [[George Rodrigue]] of [[Lafayette, Louisiana]] as the original members of the coalition would regularly meet in the offices of Louisiana representatives [[Billy Tauzin]] and [[Jimmy Hayes]], both of whom later joined the Republican Party – both also had Rodrigue's paintings on their walls.<ref name="bluedog.time">{{cite news |last=Suddath |first=Claire |title=A Brief History of Blue Dog Democrats |magazine=Time |date=July 28, 2009 |url=http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1913057,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090731112633/http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1913057,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 31, 2009 |access-date=September 7, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Safire |first=William |title=On Language; Blue Dog Demo |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=April 23, 1995 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/23/magazine/on-language-blue-dog-demo.html |access-date=September 7, 2009}}</ref> An additional explanation for the term cited by members is "when dogs are not let into the house, they stay outside in the cold and turn blue", a reference to the Blue Dogs' belief they had been left out of a party that they believed had shifted to the political left.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bluedogs.us/index.htm |title=Blue Dog Democrats |publisher=Bluedogs.us |date=November 4, 2008 |access-date=March 17, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090714232550/http://bluedogs.us/index.htm|archive-date=July 14, 2009 |url-status=dead}}</ref> At one time, first-term Blue Dogs were nicknamed 'Blue Pups'.<ref name="bluedog.time" /> Starting in the twenty-first century, the caucus began shifting its ideology and began adopting more socially liberal stances in order to align more closely with mainstream Democratic Party political values.<ref name="Mendoza">{{cite web |last1=Mendoza |first1=Jessica |title=Centrist Democrats are back. But these are not your father's Blue Dogs. |url=https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2019/0604/Centrist-Democrats-are-back.-But-these-are-not-your-father-s-Blue-Dogs |website=[[Christian Science Monitor]] |date=June 4, 2019}}</ref>
Former members of Congress who were once prominent Blue Dog Coalition members include:


=== Disputes within the Democratic Party ===
* [[Brad Carson]] ([[Oklahoma]])
In 2007, 15&nbsp;Blue Dogs in safe seats rebelled, and refused to contribute party dues to the [[Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee]]. An additional 16&nbsp;Blue Dogs did not pay any money to the DCCC, but were exempt from party-mandated contributions because they were top GOP targets for defeat in 2008. One reason for the party-dues boycott was contained in remarks made by Rep. [[Lynn Woolsey]] of [[California]], encouraging leaders of [[anti-war]] groups to field primary challenges to any Democrat who did not vote to end the [[war in Iraq]]. Woolsey later stated that she was misunderstood, but the Blue Dogs continued the boycott. Donations to party congressional committees are an important source of funding for the party committees, permitting millions of dollars to be funneled back into close races.<ref>{{cite web |last=Bresnahan |first=John |title=Blue Dogs refuse to pony up for DCCC |publisher=[[The Politico]] |date=October 24, 2007 |url=http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=CF01E1BF-3048-5C12-00AB01E6FB9129B8 |access-date=November 1, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071026053746/http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=CF01E1BF-3048-5C12-00AB01E6FB9129B8 |archive-date=October 26, 2007 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
* [[Gary Condit]] ([[California]])
* [[Harold Ford Jr.]] ([[Tennessee]])
* [[Ralph Hall]] ([[Texas]]) (became a Republican and is still a member of the House)
* [[Bill Lipinski]] ([[Illinois]])
* [[David Minge]] ([[Minnesota]])
* [[Max Sandlin]] ([[Texas]])
* [[Charles Stenholm|Charlie Stenholm]] ([[Texas]])
* [[Billy Tauzin]] ([[Louisiana]]) (later became a Republican and served until 2005)
* [[Jim Turner (politician)|Jim Turner]] ([[Texas]])


==Differences between the Blue Dogs and the Democratic Leadership Council==
=== Role in the passage of the ACA ===
In the summer of 2009, ''[[The Economist]]'' said the following regarding the Blue Dog Coalition: "The debate over health care ... may be the pinnacle of the group's power so far." ''The Economist'' quoted Charlie Stenholm, a founding Blue Dog, as stating that "This is the first year for the new kennel in which their votes are really going to make a difference".<ref>{{cite news |title=The Democratic Party's centrists: Blue Dog days |magazine=The Economist|date=July 30, 2009 |url=https://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14140214}}</ref> In July 2009, Blue Dog members who were committee members of the [[House Energy and Commerce Committee]] successfully delayed the House vote on the Health Insurance Reform Bill (HR3200) until after the summer recess.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://silverbuzzcafe.com/?p=2649 |title=Are the Blue Dogs really working for you? |publisher=Silver Buzz Cafe |website=Silverbuzzcafe.com |date=August 20, 2009 |access-date=March 17, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cwla.org/advocacy/monitoronline-issueHL.asp?ISSUEID=244 |publisher=Child Welfare League of America |title=Two House Committees Approve Health Reform Bill|date=July 27, 2009 |access-date=February 26, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100616160410/http://cwla.org/advocacy/monitoronline-issueHL.asp?ISSUEID=244 |archive-date=June 16, 2010 |url-status=dead}}</ref> It was during this recess that the term 'Obamacare' was first derisively adopted by Republicans on Capitol Hill.<ref name="CNN20120625Obamacare">{{cite news |last=Wallace |first=Gregory |title='Obamacare': The word that defined the health care debate |url=https://www.cnn.com/2012/06/25/politics/obamacare-word-debate/index.html |publisher=CNN |access-date=February 26, 2013 |date=June 25, 2012 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120712181901/http://articles.cnn.com/2012-06-25/politics/politics_obamacare-word-debate_1_health-reform-law-health-care-affordable-care-act?_s=PM%3APOLITICS |archive-date=July 12, 2012}}</ref> Blue Dog opposition to a potential [[Public health insurance option|"public option"]] within Obamacare, together with the contentious town hall meetings faced by House members during the 2009 summer recess, gave the healthcare law's Republican opponents an opportunity to attack the "public option" and get it removed from the bill.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress-legacy/blue-dogs-are-dwindling-20121116 |last=Ball |first=Molly |title=Blue Dogs are dwindling |publisher=The Atlantic |date=November 16, 2012 |access-date=February 27, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130413201752/http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress-legacy/blue-dogs-are-dwindling-20121116 |archive-date=April 13, 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Stolberg |first=Sheryl Gay |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/health/policy/18talkshows.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 |title='Public Option' in Health Plan may be dropped |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=August 17, 2009 |access-date=February 26, 2013}}</ref><ref>[http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111538575 "Blue Dogs And The Health Care Debate" NPR: Talk of the Nation], August 4, 2009.</ref>
''The Washington Post'' stated that the Blue Dogs, with over 50 members, were the most influential voting bloc in the [[United States House of Representatives|U.S. House of Representatives]] in 2010.<ref name="blue-dog-regroup">{{cite news |last1=Kane |first1=Paul |date=January 15, 2014 |title=Blue Dog Democrats, whittled down in number, are trying to regroup |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/blue-dog-democrats-whittled-down-in-number-are-trying-to-regroup/2014/01/15/37d4e7e2-7dfd-11e3-95c6-0a7aa80874bc_story.html |url-status=live |access-date=July 23, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140116091758/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/blue-dog-democrats-whittled-down-in-number-are-trying-to-regroup/2014/01/15/37d4e7e2-7dfd-11e3-95c6-0a7aa80874bc_story.html |archive-date=January 16, 2014 |quote=Four years ago, they were the most influential voting bloc on Capitol Hill, more than 50 House Democrats pulling their liberal colleagues to a more centrist, fiscally conservative vision on issues such as health care and Wall Street reforms.}}</ref>


=== 2010s decline ===
The differences between the Blue Dogs, and the other prominent coalition of moderate Democrats, the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] (DLC), are sometimes subtle. The DLC describes itself as [[new Democrat]] and positions itself as [[Bush like]] while taking moderate or liberal positions on social issues and moderate positions on economic issues and [[trade]]. The [[DLC]] views the support of [[free trade]] as a traditionally liberal position, and similarly frames their support of an aggressive national defense as historically a Democratic Party position. Thus, despite several differences with modern liberals and progressives, most remain unabashedly partisan Democrats, with less of a tendency than the Blue Dogs to form coalitions across party lines. The two emphasize different goals; the DLC aims to revitalize and strengthen the Democratic party, while the Blue Dogs prefer to emphasize bipartisanship.
The Blue Dog Coalition suffered serious losses in the [[2010 United States elections|2010 midterm elections]], losing over half of its seats to Republican challengers. Its members, who were roughly one quarter of the Democratic Party's caucus in the 111th Congress, accounted for half of the party's midterm election losses.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nation.foxnews.com/blue-dog-democrats/2010/11/03/blue-dogs-shaved-half |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726103307/http://nation.foxnews.com/blue-dog-democrats/2010/11/03/blue-dogs-shaved-half |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 26, 2011 |publisher=Fox News |date=November 3, 2010 |title=Blue Dogs shaved in half – Blue Dog Democrats |series=Fox Nation}}</ref> Including retirements, Blue Dog numbers in the House were reduced from 59 members in 2009 to 26 members in 2011.<ref name="mcclatchydc.com"/> Two of the Coalition's four leaders ([[Stephanie Herseth Sandlin]] and [[Baron Hill (politician)|Baron Hill]]) failed to secure re-election.<ref>{{cite web |last=Allen |first=Jonathan |url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1110/Blue_Dog_wipeout_Half_of_caucus_gone.html?showall |title=Blue Dog wipeout: Half of caucus gone |date=November 3, 2010 |publisher=Politico |access-date=February 23, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2010/11/a-vanishing-breed-blue-dogs.html |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |title=A vanishing breed: Blue Dogs |date=November 3, 2010}}</ref>


The caucus shrank even more in the [[2012 United States House of Representatives elections|2012 House of Representatives elections]], decreasing in size from 27 to 14&nbsp;members. Speculation ensued that the centrist [[New Democrat Coalition]] would fill the power vacuum created by the Blue Dog Coalition's decline.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/house/134961-new-dems-hope-to-be-a-force-in-113th-congress/ |website=The Hill |title=New Dems hope to be a force in 113th Congress |date=November 17, 2012}}</ref> Opposition to the [[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]] and climate change legislation are believed to have contributed to the defeat of two conservative Democrats in the [[United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania, 2012|2012 House elections in Pennsylvania]] by more liberal opponents.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/why-the-blue-dogs-decline-was-inevitable/2012/04/25/gIQAhOw8gT_blog.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |title=Why the Blue Dogs' decline was inevitable |date=April 25, 2012}}</ref>
Democrats who identify with the Blue Dogs tend to be conservatives, but have more divergent positions on social issues than the DLC. Reflecting the group's Southern roots, many are strong supporters of [[gun rights]] and get high ratings from the [[National Rifle Association]], some have [[pro-life]] voting records, and some get high ratings from [[immigration reduction]] groups. As a caucus, however, the group has never agreed on or taken a position on these issues, and many members favor more socially liberal positions.


In the 2016 elections, future Blue Dogs accounted for over half of the Democrats' gains in the House.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/blue-dogs-map-congress-democrats-win/ |title=The Blue Dog map is changing. It may even help Democrats win Republican districts |date=2017 |publisher=[[The Politico]]}}</ref> In 2018, for the first time since 2006, the [[Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee]] partnered with the Blue Dog PAC (the Blue Dog Coalition's political organization) to recruit candidates in competitive districts across the country.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/24/democrats-blue-dogs-eye-2018-comeback-240813 |title=Blue Dogs eye comeback in 2018 |date=2017 |publisher=[[The Politico]]}}</ref> After the [[2018 United States House of Representatives elections|2018 House of Representatives elections]], the caucus grew from 18 members to 24.<ref name="mcclatchydc.com">{{cite web |url=https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article224896090.html |title=Shutdown, health care, budget: How moderate House Democrats will influence the party |website=mcclatchydc}}</ref> All incumbents were re-elected and Rep. [[Kyrsten Sinema]] was elected to the U.S. Senate from Arizona.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/progressive-caucus-new-dems-blue-dogs-prepare-growth|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181113144252/http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/progressive-caucus-new-dems-blue-dogs-prepare-growth|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 13, 2018|title=House Democratic Factions All See Gains After Midterms |date=November 13, 2018 |website=Roll Call}}</ref> The caucus also added 11 new members who defeated Republican incumbents in the 2018 election in districts that had voted for Donald Trump in 2016.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/blue-dog-democrats-are-poised-to-play-a-crucial-role-in-the-next-congress/2018/12/13/4d8168ae-ff1c-11e8-83c0-b06139e540e5_story.html|title=Blue Dog Democrats are poised to play a crucial role in the next Congress|last=Rogin|first=Josh|date=December 13, 2018|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=February 17, 2020}}</ref>
On economic issues, Blue Dogs tend to be pro-business and favor limiting public welfare spending, arguing instead for "individual responsibility". They have supported welfare reform, for example, as well as the Republican backed [[Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005]]. They do, however, have differing positions on trade issues, including some supporters of [[labor unions]], [[protectionism]], and other populist measures, while the DLC tends to favor [[free trade]].
A small number of newer Blue Dogs hold positions closer to those of the DLC, and some Blue Dog Coalition members are also DLC members. Blue Dogs share with the DLC a desire to keep the Democratic Party grounded in their view of the political center and to ensure that the party does not drift too far to the left of their own positions and no longer appeal to what they believe to be the majority of U.S. voters.


=== 2020s ===
==Differences between the Blue Dogs and liberal Democrats==
The Democratic Party lost seats in the [[2020 United States House of Representatives elections|2020]] and [[2022 United States House of Representatives elections|2022]] House of Representatives elections, including the Blue Dog Coalition. As of April 2024, during the [[118th United States Congress|118th Congress]], the Coalition had 10 members.<ref name="politico.com">{{cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/minutes/congress/05-24-2023/blue-dog-boost-centrists-house/|title=The Blue Dog Coalition is adding a new member to their centrist ranks, alongside a fresh "fishing states" leadership group.|first1=Sarah|last1=Ferris|date=May 24, 2023|via=[[POLITICO]]}}</ref>
The Blue Dogs' moderate-to-conservative agenda in Congress has upset many in the Democratic party, as it sometimes leads to voting with the more conservative Republicans. In 2005, the members of the Blue Dog Coalition voted 32 to 3 in favor of the bill to limit access to [[bankruptcy]] protection (S 256). Congressman [[Collin Peterson]] was subjected to a heated round of questioning from colleagues in the Democratic Party over several votes where he strayed from the party line before being nominated as the ranking member on the [[U.S. House Committee on Agriculture]], in what would otherwise have been a routine nomination.


At the start of the [[118th United States Congress|118th Congress]] in January 2023, six of the 15 members of the Coalition departed following a failed attempt to rename the group to the "Common Sense Coalition".<ref>{{Cite web |title=Blue Dogs Devour Themselves Over Effort to Rebrand as 'Common Sense Coalition' {{!}} Common Dreams |url=https://www.commondreams.org/news/blue-dog-democrats-leaving |access-date=April 21, 2024 |website=www.commondreams.org |language=en}}</ref> Freshman representative [[Don Davis (North Carolina politician)|Don Davis]], who was expected to join the Blue Dogs, also chose not to do so.<ref name=":0" /> After this split, the group reorganized and began an effort to stabilize, rebuild, and maintain influence on policy proposals in the closely divided 118th Congress.<ref>{{cite news |author=Mariana Sotomayor |date=August 8, 2023 |title=Dwindling Blue Dog Democrats look to stage a comeback for moderates in Congress |newspaper=[[Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/08/blue-dog-democrats-congress-new-leaders/}}</ref> The effort included a recruitment drive which prompted [[Mary Peltola]] (AK-AL), [[Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez]] (WA-03), and [[Wiley Nickel]] (NC-13) to join, bringing the number of members back up to 10.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Meyer |first1=Theodoric |last2=Caldwell |first2=Leigh Ann |date=August 8, 2023 |title=Analysis {{!}} Meet the new Blue Dogs |language=en-US |newspaper=Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/08/meet-new-blue-dogs/ |access-date=August 24, 2023 |issn=0190-8286}}</ref> Under the leadership of Peltola, Perez, and Representative [[Jared Golden]], the caucus shifted its focus towards ideological [[centrism]] and pragmatic, constituency-based (especially rural and working-class) politics.<ref name="The Washington Post"/>
On the other hand, some prominent Blue Dogs have also received strong support from [[liberalism in the United States|liberal]] activists within the party, most notably [[Brad Carson]] of [[Oklahoma]] in his unsuccessful 2004 run for the [[United States Senate|U.S. Senate]], [[John S. Tanner|John Tanner]] of [[Tennessee]] (whose Republican opponent in 2004, [[James L. Hart]], was a radical [[eugenics]] advocate denounced by his own party), [[Jim Matheson]] of [[Utah]], and [[Loretta Sanchez]] of [[California]] in her successful bid to unseat former Congressman [[Bob Dornan]]. Online fundraising efforts by liberal [[weblog]]s in 2004 named Brad Carson's campaign a top national priority. In some cases this support for Blue Dogs came about because the Republican opponent (former Representative, now Senator [[Tom Coburn]]) was seen as holding strong [[right-wing politics|right-wing]] views; in other cases the support is because in some states like Tennessee, Oklahoma, the Dakotas, and Utah, a conservative Democrat is seen as the only kind of Democrat who can be viable at the polls. Some progressive activists also view the Blue Dogs as an important part of a Democratic Party [[big tent]] coalition, which will give the party important credibility with [[rural]] voters and social conservatives, while viewing the Blue Dogs as perhaps easier to swing to the left on fiscal and trade issues than the [[Democratic Leadership Council|DLC]].


== Policy positions ==
Others in the party's left wing disagree, and have promoted the idea of running future primary challenges against both Blue Dog Coalition and DLC members in an effort to unseat Democratic Party members they view as unreliable or too conservative.
The Blue Dog Coalition's positions are [[Cultural liberalism|socially liberal]] and [[fiscally conservative]].<ref name="Mendoza" /><ref name="Brindisi"/> Historically, the grouping adhered to [[social conservatism]].<ref name="Mendoza" /><ref name="blue dog decline">{{cite news|last=Blake|first=Aaron|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/why-the-blue-dogs-decline-was-inevitable/2012/04/25/gIQAhOw8gT_blog.html|title=Why the Blue Dogs' decline was inevitable|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=April 25, 2012|accessdate=February 23, 2016}}</ref> Although its members have evolved on social issues over time,<ref name="mcclatchydc.com"/> the group has never taken a position on social issues as a caucus.<ref name="Mendoza" /> Scholars and journalists positioned the group as [[centrist]]<ref name="U.S. House has fewer moderate Democrats"/><ref name="auto">{{cite book|editor=Ruth Bloch Rubin |title=Building the Bloc: Intraparty Organization in the US Congress |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bLYrDwAAQBAJ&q=centrist+Blue+Dog+Coalition&pg=PA188 |quote= In contrast to the halting mobilization of Insurgent Republicans and southern Democrats, the Blue Dogs' adoption of ... ideological bonafides, the Coalition worked to establish a Blue Dog brand and associate it with support for centrist policies. |date=2017 |page=188 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|isbn=9781316510421 }}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{cite web|url=https://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/lobbyist-profiles/535835-lobbying-from-the-center |title=Lobbying from the center |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|date=January 26, 2021}}</ref> to [[centre-left]],<ref>{{cite web |last1=Caygle |first1=Heather |title=Centrist Democrats try new approach to Russia messaging |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/14/russia-messaging-democrats-409117 |website=[[POLITICO]] |access-date=July 19, 2022 |language=en |date=February 14, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Murad |first1=Yours |title=After a Year of Heated Debate, 'Medicare for All' Holds On to Voters' Majority Support |url=https://morningconsult.com/2020/01/31/after-year-heated-debate-medicare-for-all-holds-on-voters-majority-support/ |website=[[Morning Consult]] |access-date=July 19, 2022 |date=January 31, 2020}}</ref> and historically [[centre-right]].<ref name="Elections A to Z">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x1ai7Vtiiu0C&q=%22blue+dog+coalition%22+%22center-right%22&pg=PA33|title=Elections A to Z|publisher=SAGE|date=2012|isbn=9780872897694|access-date=August 14, 2014}}</ref>


The Blue Dog Coalition is the most conservative grouping of Democrats in the House. It "advocates for fiscal responsibility, a strong national defense and bipartisan consensus rather than conflict with Republicans". It acts as a check on legislation that its members perceive to be too far to the right or to the left on the political spectrum.<ref name="Brindisi">{{cite web|url=https://www.syracuse.com/politics/2019/02/anthony-brindisi-to-co-chair-blue-dogs-caucus-of-moderate-house-democrats.html|title=Anthony Brindisi to co-chair Blue Dogs, caucus of moderate House Democrats|first=Mark|last=Weiner|date=February 1, 2019|website=syracuse.com}}</ref> In the 2010s, the Blue Dogs became more demographically diverse and less conservative.<ref name="Mendoza"/>
==See also==

The Blue Dog Coalition is often involved in searching for a compromise between [[Modern liberalism in the United States|liberal]] and [[Conservatism in the United States|conservative]] positions, including [[Classical liberalism|classically liberal]] policies. Most of its members represent competitive [[Marginal seat|swing districts]], and are thus inclined to appeal to [[swing vote]]rs.<ref name="Mariana Sotomayor">{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/08/blue-dog-democrats-congress-new-leaders/ | author=Mariana Sotomayor | date=August 8, 2023 | title=Dwindling Blue Dog Democrats look to stage a comeback for moderates in Congress | newspaper=[[Washington Post]]}}</ref>

== Membership ==
{{see also|List of members of the Blue Dog Coalition}}
[[File:Blue Dog Coalition in the 118th Congress.svg|thumb|right |upright=2|Blue Dog Coalition in the [[118th United States Congress]]]]
In the early years of the caucus, the Blue Dogs were viewed by some as the political successors to Southern Democratic groups such as the [[Boll weevil (politics)|Boll Weevils]] or [[conservative coalition]].<ref>Parties, Rules, and the Evolution of Congressional Budgeting, Lance T. LeLoup, 2005, pp. 185</ref><ref>Encyclopedia of American Parties, Campaigns, and Elections, William C. Binning et al, 1999, pp. 307.</ref> The Boll Weevils may, in turn, be considered the descendants of the [[Dixiecrats]] and the "[[states' rights]]" Democrats of the 1940s through the 1960s, and even the [[Bourbon Democrats]] of the late 19th century.<ref name="glossary">{{cite book|last=Thomson|first=Alex|title=A Glossary of U.S. Politics and Government|publisher=Stanford University Press|year=2007|page=[https://archive.org/details/glossaryofuspoli0000thom/page/14 14]|isbn=978-0-8047-5730-0|url=https://archive.org/details/glossaryofuspoli0000thom/page/14}}</ref>

In 2014, there was no mention of social issues in the official Blue Dog materials.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/2014/11/12/bye_bye_blue_dog_democrats_what_the_end_of_conservative_dems_means_for_america/|title=Bye-bye, blue dog "Democrats": What the end of conservative Dems means for America|last=Parton|first=Heather Digby|website=Salon|date=November 12, 2014 |access-date=December 24, 2016|quote=Not that the members weren't traditional values types. Most were. And they surely ran for office on those issues as well. But there is not one word in the official Blue Dog materials about social issues.}}</ref> By January 2019, McClatchy reported a transformation of the Blue Dogs from a coalition of 'southern white men' to 'a multi-regional, multicultural group.' At that time, the coalition included two African-American members, one Vietnamese-American, one Mexican-American, and only five members from Southern states.<ref name="mcclatchydc.com"/>

As of April 2024, the Coalition included 10 members. At that point, the Coalition's membership was smaller than it had ever been since its formation.<ref name=":0" /><ref name="Mariana Sotomayor"/>

=== Co-chairs ===
The co-chairs of the Blue Dog Coalition for the 118th Congress are U.S. representatives [[Jared Golden]], [[Mary Peltola]], and [[Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez]].<ref name="politico.com"/>

{|class="wikitable"
|+Chairs of the Blue Dog Coalition
!scope="col"|Term start
!scope="col"|Term end
!scope="col"|Chair for Administration
!scope="col"|Chair for Communications
!scope="col"|Chair for Policy
|-
|February 1995
|April 1995
|rowspan=2|[[Gary Condit]]
|rowspan=2|[[John S. Tanner]]
|[[Nathan Deal]]
|-
|April 1995
|January 1999
|[[Collin Peterson]]
|-
|January 1999
|January 2001
|[[Robert E. Cramer]]
|[[Chris John (politician)|Chris John]]
|[[Charles Stenholm]]
|-
|January 2001
|January 2003
|[[Chris John (politician)|Chris John]]
|[[Jim Turner (politician)|Jim Turner]]
|[[Allen Boyd]]
|-
|January 2003
|January 2005
|[[Jim Turner (politician)|Jim Turner]]
|[[Baron Hill (politician)|Baron Hill]]
|[[Charles Stenholm]]
|-
|January 2005
|January 2007
|[[Jim Matheson]]
|[[Dennis Cardoza]]
|[[Jim Cooper]]
|-
|January 2007
|January 2009
|[[Allen Boyd]]
|[[Mike Ross (politician)|Mike Ross]]
|[[Dennis Moore (politician)|Dennis Moore]]
|-
|January 2009
|October 2009
|rowspan=2 |[[Stephanie Herseth Sandlin]]
|[[Charlie Melancon]]
|rowspan=2|[[Baron Hill (politician)|Baron Hill]]
|-
|October 2009
|January 2011
|[[Jim Matheson]]
|-
|January 2011
|January 2013
|[[Heath Shuler]]
|[[Mike Ross (politician)|Mike Ross]]
|[[John Barrow (U.S. politician)|John Barrow]]
|-
|January 2013
|January 2015
|[[John Barrow (U.S. politician)|John Barrow]]
|[[Kurt Schrader]]
|rowspan=2|[[Jim Cooper]]
|-
|January 2015
|January 2017
|[[Kurt Schrader]]
|[[Jim Costa]]
|-
|January 2017
|January 2019
|[[Jim Costa]]
|[[Henry Cuellar]]
|[[Dan Lipinski]]
|-
|January 2019
|January 2021
|rowspan=2 |[[Stephanie Murphy]]
|[[Lou Correa]]
|[[Tom O'Halleran]]
|-
|January 2021
|January 2023
|[[Tom O'Halleran]]
|[[Ed Case]]
|-
|January 2023
|May 2023
|colspan=2 align=center |[[Jared Golden]]
|[[Jim Costa]]
|-
|May 2023
|present<!-- January 2025 -->
|[[Jared Golden]]
|[[Marie Gluesenkamp Perez]]
|[[Mary Peltola]]
<!-- |-
|January 2025
|present
|
|
| -->
|}

== Current members ==
'''California'''
* [[Adam Gray]], Representative from [[CA-13]]
* [[Jim Costa]], Representative from [[California's 21st congressional district|CA-21]]
* [[Mike Thompson (California politician)|Mike Thompson]], Representative from [[CA-04]]
* [[Lou Correa]], Representative from [[CA-46]]

'''Georgia'''
* [[Sanford Bishop]], Representative from [[Georgia's 2nd congressional district|GA-02]]

'''Maine'''
* [[Jared Golden]], Representative from [[Maine's 2nd congressional district|ME-02]]

'''New Jersey'''
* [[Josh Gottheimer]], Representative from [[New Jersey's 5th congressional district|NJ-05]]

'''Texas'''
* [[Henry Cuellar]], Representative from [[Texas' 28th congressional district|TX-28]]
* [[Vicente Gonzalez (politician)|Vicente Gonzalez]], Representative from [[Texas' 34th congressional district|TX-34]]

'''Washington'''
* [[Marie Gluesenkamp Perez]], Representative from [[Washington's 3rd congressional district|WA-03]]
{{NoteFoot}}

== See also ==
* [[Congressional Progressive Caucus]]
* [[Congressional Progressive Caucus]]
* [[Factions in the Democratic Party (United States)|Factions in the Democratic Party]]
* [[New Democrat Coalition]]
* [[New Democrat Coalition]]
* [[Republican Main Street Partnership]]
* [[Republican Governance Group]]
* [[Problem Solvers Caucus]]


==References==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
{{Reflist}}


==External links==
== External links ==
*{{Official website}}
*[http://www.house.gov/ross/BlueDogs/ Blue Dog Coalition homepage]
*[http://www.bluedogdems.com/ Blue Dog PAC homepage]
*[http://www.house.gov/tanner/blue.htm Blue Dog Coalition list on U.S. Congressman John Tanner's website]
*[http://www.bluedogdemocrat.org/blog Blue Dog Blog]
*[http://usliberals.about.com/od/liberalleadership/a/BlueDogs.htm About.com's Meet the Blue Dog Coalition, Moderate Democratic Members of the House of Representatives ]
*[http://www.rightdemocrat.blogspot.com/ Right Democrat: a blog for conservative Democrats]
*[http://www.c-span.org/questions/weekly55.htm C-Span article by Ilona Nickels on Blue Dogs]
*[http://www.bluedogdemocrats.us Blue Dog Democrats Discussion Group]
*[http://www.txbluedogdems.org Texas Blue Dog Coalition]
*[http://www.futureofamericandemocracy.org Future of American Democracy: Academic site of Dr. Glen Browder, founding member of the Blue Dog Coalition]


[[Category:Caucuses of the United States Congress]]
{{Ideological caucuses in the U.S. Congress}}
{{Democratic Party (United States)}}

[[Category:Centrism in the United States]]
[[Category:Centrist political advocacy groups in the United States]]
[[Category:Centrist political advocacy groups in the United States]]
[[Category:Democratic Party (United States) organizations]]
[[Category:Democratic Party (United States) organizations]]
[[Category:Political party factions]]
[[Category:Factions in the Democratic Party (United States)]]
[[Category:Ideological caucuses of the United States Congress]]

[[Category:Political terminology of the United States]]
[[de:Blue Dog Democrat]]
[[fr:Blue Dogs]]

Latest revision as of 21:51, 11 December 2024

Blue Dog Coalition
Co-Chairs
FoundedFebruary 14, 1995 (1995-02-14)
Ideology
Political position
National affiliationDemocratic Party
Colors  Blue
Seats in the House Democratic Caucus
11 / 211
Seats in the House
11 / 435
Website
bluedogcaucus-golden.house.gov

The Blue Dog Coalition, commonly known as the Blue Dogs or Blue Dog Democrats, is a caucus of moderate members from the Democratic Party in the United States House of Representatives.[1][2] The caucus was founded as a group of conservative Democrats in 1995 in response to defeats in the 1994 elections. Historically, the Blue Dog Coalition has been both fiscally and socially conservative.[3][4][5] At its peak in 2009, the Blue Dog Coalition numbered 54 members.[6]

In the late 2010s and early 2020s, the Coalition's focus shifted towards ideological centrism and pragmatic, constituency-based politics;[7][8][9] however, the Coalition maintained an emphasis on fiscal responsibility.[10] The Blue Dog Coalition remains the most conservative grouping of Democrats in the House.[6]

As of 2024, the caucus has 11 members.[11][12]

Electoral results

[edit]

House of Representatives

[edit]
Congress Democratic seats ±
104th (1994)
29 / 204
Steady
105th (1996)
28 / 207
Decrease 1
106th (1998)
34 / 211
Increase 6
107th (2000)
35 / 212
Increase 1
108th (2002)
38 / 205
Increase 3
109th (2004)
38 / 202
Steady
110th (2006)
56 / 233
Increase 18
111th (2008)
54 / 257
Increase 8
112th (2010)
28 / 193
Decrease 36
113th (2012)
19 / 201
Decrease 9
114th (2014)
15 / 188
Decrease 4
115th (2016)
18 / 193
Increase 3
116th (2018)
27 / 235
Increase 9
117th (2020)
19 / 222
Decrease 8
118th (2022)
11 / 213
Decrease 8
119th (2024)
10 / 215
Decrease 1

Overview and history

[edit]
President Barack Obama meets with Blue Dog Democrats on February 10, 2009

The Blue Dog Coalition was formed in 1995[13][14] during the 104th Congress to give members from the Democratic Party representing conservative-leaning districts a unified voice after the Democrats' loss of Congress in the 1994 Republican Revolution.[15]

The term "Blue Dog Democrat" is credited to Texas Democratic Representative Pete Geren (who later joined the George W. Bush administration). Geren opined that the members had been "choked blue" by Democrats on the left.[16] It is related to the political term "Yellow Dog Democrat", a reference to Southern Democrats said to be "so loyal they would even vote for a yellow dog before they would vote for any Republican". The term also refers to the "Blue Dog" paintings of Cajun artist George Rodrigue of Lafayette, Louisiana as the original members of the coalition would regularly meet in the offices of Louisiana representatives Billy Tauzin and Jimmy Hayes, both of whom later joined the Republican Party – both also had Rodrigue's paintings on their walls.[17][18] An additional explanation for the term cited by members is "when dogs are not let into the house, they stay outside in the cold and turn blue", a reference to the Blue Dogs' belief they had been left out of a party that they believed had shifted to the political left.[19] At one time, first-term Blue Dogs were nicknamed 'Blue Pups'.[17] Starting in the twenty-first century, the caucus began shifting its ideology and began adopting more socially liberal stances in order to align more closely with mainstream Democratic Party political values.[7]

Disputes within the Democratic Party

[edit]

In 2007, 15 Blue Dogs in safe seats rebelled, and refused to contribute party dues to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. An additional 16 Blue Dogs did not pay any money to the DCCC, but were exempt from party-mandated contributions because they were top GOP targets for defeat in 2008. One reason for the party-dues boycott was contained in remarks made by Rep. Lynn Woolsey of California, encouraging leaders of anti-war groups to field primary challenges to any Democrat who did not vote to end the war in Iraq. Woolsey later stated that she was misunderstood, but the Blue Dogs continued the boycott. Donations to party congressional committees are an important source of funding for the party committees, permitting millions of dollars to be funneled back into close races.[20]

Role in the passage of the ACA

[edit]

In the summer of 2009, The Economist said the following regarding the Blue Dog Coalition: "The debate over health care ... may be the pinnacle of the group's power so far." The Economist quoted Charlie Stenholm, a founding Blue Dog, as stating that "This is the first year for the new kennel in which their votes are really going to make a difference".[21] In July 2009, Blue Dog members who were committee members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee successfully delayed the House vote on the Health Insurance Reform Bill (HR3200) until after the summer recess.[22][23] It was during this recess that the term 'Obamacare' was first derisively adopted by Republicans on Capitol Hill.[24] Blue Dog opposition to a potential "public option" within Obamacare, together with the contentious town hall meetings faced by House members during the 2009 summer recess, gave the healthcare law's Republican opponents an opportunity to attack the "public option" and get it removed from the bill.[25][26][27]

The Washington Post stated that the Blue Dogs, with over 50 members, were the most influential voting bloc in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2010.[28]

2010s decline

[edit]

The Blue Dog Coalition suffered serious losses in the 2010 midterm elections, losing over half of its seats to Republican challengers. Its members, who were roughly one quarter of the Democratic Party's caucus in the 111th Congress, accounted for half of the party's midterm election losses.[29] Including retirements, Blue Dog numbers in the House were reduced from 59 members in 2009 to 26 members in 2011.[30] Two of the Coalition's four leaders (Stephanie Herseth Sandlin and Baron Hill) failed to secure re-election.[31][32]

The caucus shrank even more in the 2012 House of Representatives elections, decreasing in size from 27 to 14 members. Speculation ensued that the centrist New Democrat Coalition would fill the power vacuum created by the Blue Dog Coalition's decline.[33] Opposition to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and climate change legislation are believed to have contributed to the defeat of two conservative Democrats in the 2012 House elections in Pennsylvania by more liberal opponents.[34]

In the 2016 elections, future Blue Dogs accounted for over half of the Democrats' gains in the House.[35] In 2018, for the first time since 2006, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee partnered with the Blue Dog PAC (the Blue Dog Coalition's political organization) to recruit candidates in competitive districts across the country.[36] After the 2018 House of Representatives elections, the caucus grew from 18 members to 24.[30] All incumbents were re-elected and Rep. Kyrsten Sinema was elected to the U.S. Senate from Arizona.[37] The caucus also added 11 new members who defeated Republican incumbents in the 2018 election in districts that had voted for Donald Trump in 2016.[38]

2020s

[edit]

The Democratic Party lost seats in the 2020 and 2022 House of Representatives elections, including the Blue Dog Coalition. As of April 2024, during the 118th Congress, the Coalition had 10 members.[39]

At the start of the 118th Congress in January 2023, six of the 15 members of the Coalition departed following a failed attempt to rename the group to the "Common Sense Coalition".[40] Freshman representative Don Davis, who was expected to join the Blue Dogs, also chose not to do so.[11] After this split, the group reorganized and began an effort to stabilize, rebuild, and maintain influence on policy proposals in the closely divided 118th Congress.[41] The effort included a recruitment drive which prompted Mary Peltola (AK-AL), Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez (WA-03), and Wiley Nickel (NC-13) to join, bringing the number of members back up to 10.[42] Under the leadership of Peltola, Perez, and Representative Jared Golden, the caucus shifted its focus towards ideological centrism and pragmatic, constituency-based (especially rural and working-class) politics.[8]

Policy positions

[edit]

The Blue Dog Coalition's positions are socially liberal and fiscally conservative.[7][10] Historically, the grouping adhered to social conservatism.[7][43] Although its members have evolved on social issues over time,[30] the group has never taken a position on social issues as a caucus.[7] Scholars and journalists positioned the group as centrist[1][9][2] to centre-left,[44][45] and historically centre-right.[5]

The Blue Dog Coalition is the most conservative grouping of Democrats in the House. It "advocates for fiscal responsibility, a strong national defense and bipartisan consensus rather than conflict with Republicans". It acts as a check on legislation that its members perceive to be too far to the right or to the left on the political spectrum.[10] In the 2010s, the Blue Dogs became more demographically diverse and less conservative.[7]

The Blue Dog Coalition is often involved in searching for a compromise between liberal and conservative positions, including classically liberal policies. Most of its members represent competitive swing districts, and are thus inclined to appeal to swing voters.[46]

Membership

[edit]
Blue Dog Coalition in the 118th United States Congress

In the early years of the caucus, the Blue Dogs were viewed by some as the political successors to Southern Democratic groups such as the Boll Weevils or conservative coalition.[47][48] The Boll Weevils may, in turn, be considered the descendants of the Dixiecrats and the "states' rights" Democrats of the 1940s through the 1960s, and even the Bourbon Democrats of the late 19th century.[49]

In 2014, there was no mention of social issues in the official Blue Dog materials.[50] By January 2019, McClatchy reported a transformation of the Blue Dogs from a coalition of 'southern white men' to 'a multi-regional, multicultural group.' At that time, the coalition included two African-American members, one Vietnamese-American, one Mexican-American, and only five members from Southern states.[30]

As of April 2024, the Coalition included 10 members. At that point, the Coalition's membership was smaller than it had ever been since its formation.[11][46]

Co-chairs

[edit]

The co-chairs of the Blue Dog Coalition for the 118th Congress are U.S. representatives Jared Golden, Mary Peltola, and Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez.[39]

Chairs of the Blue Dog Coalition
Term start Term end Chair for Administration Chair for Communications Chair for Policy
February 1995 April 1995 Gary Condit John S. Tanner Nathan Deal
April 1995 January 1999 Collin Peterson
January 1999 January 2001 Robert E. Cramer Chris John Charles Stenholm
January 2001 January 2003 Chris John Jim Turner Allen Boyd
January 2003 January 2005 Jim Turner Baron Hill Charles Stenholm
January 2005 January 2007 Jim Matheson Dennis Cardoza Jim Cooper
January 2007 January 2009 Allen Boyd Mike Ross Dennis Moore
January 2009 October 2009 Stephanie Herseth Sandlin Charlie Melancon Baron Hill
October 2009 January 2011 Jim Matheson
January 2011 January 2013 Heath Shuler Mike Ross John Barrow
January 2013 January 2015 John Barrow Kurt Schrader Jim Cooper
January 2015 January 2017 Kurt Schrader Jim Costa
January 2017 January 2019 Jim Costa Henry Cuellar Dan Lipinski
January 2019 January 2021 Stephanie Murphy Lou Correa Tom O'Halleran
January 2021 January 2023 Tom O'Halleran Ed Case
January 2023 May 2023 Jared Golden Jim Costa
May 2023 present Jared Golden Marie Gluesenkamp Perez Mary Peltola

Current members

[edit]

California

Georgia

Maine

New Jersey

Texas

Washington

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Davis, Susan. "U.S. House has fewer moderate Democrats". USA Today. Archived from the original on December 4, 2014. Retrieved July 23, 2014.
  2. ^ a b "Lobbying from the center". The Hill. January 26, 2021.
  3. ^ Duncan, Philip P.; Nutting, Brian (1999). CQ's politics in America: 2000, the 106th Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc. p. 18. ISBN 9781568024714.
  4. ^ Solomon, Norman (May 24, 2010). "When the Leaders Lead, the People Have Sorrow". HuffPost. Retrieved January 13, 2023.
  5. ^ a b Elections A to Z. SAGE. 2012. ISBN 9780872897694. Retrieved August 14, 2014.
  6. ^ a b Miller, Jonathan (May 23, 2018). "The Blue Dogs Are Barking Again". Roll Call. Retrieved October 26, 2023.
  7. ^ a b c d e f Mendoza, Jessica (June 4, 2019). "Centrist Democrats are back. But these are not your father's Blue Dogs". Christian Science Monitor.
  8. ^ a b "Dwindling Blue Dog Democrats look to stage a comeback for moderates". The Washington Post. August 8, 2023.
  9. ^ a b Ruth Bloch Rubin, ed. (2017). Building the Bloc: Intraparty Organization in the US Congress. Cambridge University Press. p. 188. ISBN 9781316510421. In contrast to the halting mobilization of Insurgent Republicans and southern Democrats, the Blue Dogs' adoption of ... ideological bonafides, the Coalition worked to establish a Blue Dog brand and associate it with support for centrist policies.
  10. ^ a b c Weiner, Mark (February 1, 2019). "Anthony Brindisi to co-chair Blue Dogs, caucus of moderate House Democrats". syracuse.com.
  11. ^ a b c Mutnick, Ally; Ferris, Sarah (January 24, 2023). "Blue Dog Coalition Membership". Blue Dog Coalition. Retrieved January 24, 2023.
  12. ^ "Members | Blue Dog Coalition". bluedogcaucus-golden.house.gov. September 6, 2023. Retrieved April 24, 2024.
  13. ^ Dumain, Emma (May 12, 2015). "20 years in, Blue Dogs not ready to roll over". rollcall.com.
  14. ^ "History". ross.house.gov/BlueDog/. Blue Dog Coalition. Archived from the original on April 5, 2012. Retrieved April 10, 2012.
  15. ^ Bendavid, Naftali (July 28, 2009). "'Blue Dog' Democrats hold health care overhaul at bay". The Wall Street Journal.
  16. ^ "Wordcraft Archives, November 2004". Wordcraft.infopop.cc. Retrieved February 23, 2016.
  17. ^ a b Suddath, Claire (July 28, 2009). "A Brief History of Blue Dog Democrats". Time. Archived from the original on July 31, 2009. Retrieved September 7, 2009.
  18. ^ Safire, William (April 23, 1995). "On Language; Blue Dog Demo". The New York Times. Retrieved September 7, 2009.
  19. ^ "Blue Dog Democrats". Bluedogs.us. November 4, 2008. Archived from the original on July 14, 2009. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
  20. ^ Bresnahan, John (October 24, 2007). "Blue Dogs refuse to pony up for DCCC". The Politico. Archived from the original on October 26, 2007. Retrieved November 1, 2007.
  21. ^ "The Democratic Party's centrists: Blue Dog days". The Economist. July 30, 2009.
  22. ^ "Are the Blue Dogs really working for you?". Silverbuzzcafe.com. Silver Buzz Cafe. August 20, 2009. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
  23. ^ "Two House Committees Approve Health Reform Bill". Child Welfare League of America. July 27, 2009. Archived from the original on June 16, 2010. Retrieved February 26, 2013.
  24. ^ Wallace, Gregory (June 25, 2012). "'Obamacare': The word that defined the health care debate". CNN. Archived from the original on July 12, 2012. Retrieved February 26, 2013.
  25. ^ Ball, Molly (November 16, 2012). "Blue Dogs are dwindling". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on April 13, 2013. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
  26. ^ Stolberg, Sheryl Gay (August 17, 2009). "'Public Option' in Health Plan may be dropped". The New York Times. Retrieved February 26, 2013.
  27. ^ "Blue Dogs And The Health Care Debate" NPR: Talk of the Nation, August 4, 2009.
  28. ^ Kane, Paul (January 15, 2014). "Blue Dog Democrats, whittled down in number, are trying to regroup". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 16, 2014. Retrieved July 23, 2014. Four years ago, they were the most influential voting bloc on Capitol Hill, more than 50 House Democrats pulling their liberal colleagues to a more centrist, fiscally conservative vision on issues such as health care and Wall Street reforms.
  29. ^ "Blue Dogs shaved in half – Blue Dog Democrats". Fox Nation. Fox News. November 3, 2010. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011.
  30. ^ a b c d "Shutdown, health care, budget: How moderate House Democrats will influence the party". mcclatchydc.
  31. ^ Allen, Jonathan (November 3, 2010). "Blue Dog wipeout: Half of caucus gone". Politico. Retrieved February 23, 2016.
  32. ^ "A vanishing breed: Blue Dogs". Los Angeles Times. November 3, 2010.
  33. ^ "New Dems hope to be a force in 113th Congress". The Hill. November 17, 2012.
  34. ^ "Why the Blue Dogs' decline was inevitable". The Washington Post. April 25, 2012.
  35. ^ "The Blue Dog map is changing. It may even help Democrats win Republican districts". The Politico. 2017.
  36. ^ "Blue Dogs eye comeback in 2018". The Politico. 2017.
  37. ^ "House Democratic Factions All See Gains After Midterms". Roll Call. November 13, 2018. Archived from the original on November 13, 2018.
  38. ^ Rogin, Josh (December 13, 2018). "Blue Dog Democrats are poised to play a crucial role in the next Congress". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 17, 2020.
  39. ^ a b Ferris, Sarah (May 24, 2023). "The Blue Dog Coalition is adding a new member to their centrist ranks, alongside a fresh "fishing states" leadership group" – via POLITICO.
  40. ^ "Blue Dogs Devour Themselves Over Effort to Rebrand as 'Common Sense Coalition' | Common Dreams". www.commondreams.org. Retrieved April 21, 2024.
  41. ^ Mariana Sotomayor (August 8, 2023). "Dwindling Blue Dog Democrats look to stage a comeback for moderates in Congress". Washington Post.
  42. ^ Meyer, Theodoric; Caldwell, Leigh Ann (August 8, 2023). "Analysis | Meet the new Blue Dogs". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
  43. ^ Blake, Aaron (April 25, 2012). "Why the Blue Dogs' decline was inevitable". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 23, 2016.
  44. ^ Caygle, Heather (February 14, 2018). "Centrist Democrats try new approach to Russia messaging". POLITICO. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
  45. ^ Murad, Yours (January 31, 2020). "After a Year of Heated Debate, 'Medicare for All' Holds On to Voters' Majority Support". Morning Consult. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
  46. ^ a b Mariana Sotomayor (August 8, 2023). "Dwindling Blue Dog Democrats look to stage a comeback for moderates in Congress". Washington Post.
  47. ^ Parties, Rules, and the Evolution of Congressional Budgeting, Lance T. LeLoup, 2005, pp. 185
  48. ^ Encyclopedia of American Parties, Campaigns, and Elections, William C. Binning et al, 1999, pp. 307.
  49. ^ Thomson, Alex (2007). A Glossary of U.S. Politics and Government. Stanford University Press. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-8047-5730-0.
  50. ^ Parton, Heather Digby (November 12, 2014). "Bye-bye, blue dog "Democrats": What the end of conservative Dems means for America". Salon. Retrieved December 24, 2016. Not that the members weren't traditional values types. Most were. And they surely ran for office on those issues as well. But there is not one word in the official Blue Dog materials about social issues.
[edit]