Talk:American Revolution: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 02:34, 19 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American Revolution article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 3 months

American Revolution was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 29, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
January 11, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
January 20, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
March 7, 2007	Good article reassessment	Kept
March 5, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

United States: History Top‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Top-importance).

United Kingdom High‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Empire High‑importance

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Top‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Politics: American / Libertarianism High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as High-importance).

Military history: British / European / French / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change "1765–1791" to "1775–1791"

The American Revolution did not start in 1765, it started on April 19, 1775. This is according to the University of Rochester.^[1], and The Library Of Congress^[2], along with many others. Watwily (talk) 00:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Might be a bug but the citations doesn't show anything. Weird... ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 11:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the two links:

"Three things you didn’t know about the American Revolution" (University of Rochester)

"The American Revolution, 1763 - 1783: Overview" (Library of Congress) TFD (talk) 01:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Cite error: The named reference https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/three-things-you-didnt-know-about-the-american-revolution/#:~:text=The%20American%20Revolution%20started%20on,Lexington%20and%20Concord%20in%20Massachusetts. was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/american-revolution-1763-1783/overview/#:~:text=The%20first%20shots%20of%20what,British%20if%20that%20became%20necessary. was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

Date inaccuracy and suggestion of rephrasing

I noticed that in the Independence and Union section it says “the articles were fully ratified on March 1, 1781… and a new government of the United States in Congress Assembled took its place the following day, on March 2, 1782…” This must be a typo since the next day would be in 1781. Also, the way it’s worded implies that the Congress began on March 2nd. There seems to be a consensus when I look it up and even when I click on the link about the United States in Congress Assembled within this article, that it is March 1st. The first assembly did take place on the 2nd, though, which might be the source of confusion. So, I would suggest phrasing it something along the lines of: The articles were fully ratified on March 1, 1781. At that point, the Continental Congress was dissolved and a new government of the United States in Congress Assembled took its place. It convened the following day, on March 2, 1781, with Samuel Huntington leading as the presiding officer. It’s just a minor change but I think it avoids the confusion that I felt when I read it. I hope that helps but either way, the 1782 year date is something I think definitely needs to be fixed. Annalyssia (talk) 07:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I have never heard of the American Revolution used in this way

Usually the American Revolution and the American Revolutionary War are used synonymously. Every other encyclopedias "American Revolution" article refers to the war. See say https://www.britannica.com/event/American-Revolution. I've never heard the term American Revolution to mean a "political movement" and I don't see any sources in this article referring it to as such.

This should be split into two articles. One which is the "Build up to the American Revolution" or "Origins of the American Revolution" and another about its aftermath Earlsofsandwich (talk) 02:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Earlsofsandwich, I think its probably a matter of convenience. If the military aspects of the revolution were included, the article would be way too long. Ltwin (talk) 00:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not suggesting they include military aspects of the revolution. But that the article is renamed to better align with what it coveres Earlsofsandwich (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Splitting, "If an article becomes too large...it may be appropriate for some or all of the article to be split into new articles." This article contains greater detail on the military conflict than would be appropriate for the main article, which has a restriction on length. TFD (talk) 01:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree that "American Revolution" and "American Revolutionary War" are basically synonymous terms in American English which makes the naming of these two articles a bit confusing, although I don't know what the best solution would be (or if there's a better one than the current status quo). I'm trying to think of other historical parallels, in the sense that the political revolution is almost considered identical to the associated independence/civil war itself, but I'm kind of drawing a blank. My first thought would be the Haitian Revolution, but that article has all the information on one page and is pretty close to being worthy of a split itself. The American Civil War is also a potential parallel in terms of a political revolution (so to speak) having such direct ties to the military conflict, but that article is very focused on the war itself (understandably so given the title) and lacks a lot of detail on the political changes tied to it, so it's not a great example either. Anyone able to think of other examples that might be useful here?

I do agree with your main point though -- I think the other two comments are missing that you aren't suggesting fully combining these two articles, just reconsidering how we handle the split. Rovenrat (talk) 22:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe look at textbooks for title inspiration? One that I see is "American Revolution Era." Or Britannica has an article "American Revolution: Causes, Battles, Aftermath, and Facts" which could be a source of inspiration here. Earlsofsandwich (talk) 00:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually looking at this article a bit more, I think we could (should?) basically follow the structure present in the Template:American_Revolution_sidebar already used on this page. Currently the "Origins" section on there just leads back to the "Origins" subsection of the American Revolution article, but that could probably be split out into it's own article to save space on this one, leaving more room to pull in info from the American Revolutionary War article. Realistically there wouldn't be that much to pull in -- the American Revolution article already loosely covers the war, and in my opinion the American Revolutionary War article has way too much detail on things that are better covered in separate articles (and often already are, anyways). Rovenrat (talk) 23:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And what would this article be renamed to? Or is the idea that with a lesser emphasis on the origins and effects the article would now match the title Earlsofsandwich (talk) 03:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appendices

The way this article handles sources and citations is messy. We have a "References" section that includes full references and short footnotes. We then have a "General Sources" and a "Bibliography" divided up into subsections. The Bibliography appears to be functioning as a "Further reading" section. However, it's probably too long and could be trimmed. I think the "General Sources" section is supposed to function as a place to list sources that are actually cited in the article. To clear up confusion, I think we should rename the "General Sources" section to simply "Sources" and the "Bibliography" to "Further reading". Ltwin (talk) 02:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ltwin: Yes, it's a terrible mess. I've just restored some sources which had recently been removed for no apparent reason causing no-target errors, and moved some sources out of Further reading into the Sources section. There are several undefined short form references as well. DuncanHill (talk) 21:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nature of the USA in 1783.

"About 60,000 Loyalists migrated to other British territories in Canada and elsewhere, but the great majority remained in the United States. With its victory in the American Revolution, the United States became the first constitutional republic in world history founded on the consent of the governed and the rule of law."

1. Sentence 1 contradicts sentence 2. 2. Women "governed" by the USA did not get the vote to "consent" until 1920. 3. Slaves had to wait until the 1965 Voting Rights Act. 4. In 1783 Native Americans did not have the vote. 5. Democracy was invented in ancient Athens circa 508 BCE, not in the USA. 6. Sentence 2 is not backed-up by giving any references. 80.47.215.23 (talk) 23:03, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consent of the governed does not mean one person one vote. While you may question the concept, it is correctly applied here. Athens was not founded as a democracy. Loyalists who remained in the U.S. consented to the new republic and their British nationality was eventually deemed to have been revoked. TFD (talk) 00:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronisms under Class and psychology of the factions - Role of women

A line in the "role of women" subheading mentions "Some of these camp followers even participated in combat, such as Madam John Turchin who led her husband's regiment into battle," which cites the source "Roles of Women in the American Revolution and the Civil War." But as best as I can tell, barring some very strange historical coincidence, that comes from the "Civil War" part of the text and refers to Union Brigadier General John B. Turchin and his wife "Madame" Nadine Turchin, who were both born well over 40 years after the end of the Revolution. 141.156.138.204 (talk) 02:34, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/three-things-you-didnt-know-about-the-american-revolution/#:~:text=The%20American%20Revolution%20started%20on,Lexington%20and%20Concord%20in%20Massachusetts.-1] Cite error: The named reference https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/three-things-you-didnt-know-about-the-american-revolution/#:~:text=The%20American%20Revolution%20started%20on,Lexington%20and%20Concord%20in%20Massachusetts. was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/american-revolution-1763-1783/overview/#:~:text=The%20first%20shots%20of%20what,British%20if%20that%20became%20necessary.-2] Cite error: The named reference https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/american-revolution-1763-1783/overview/#:~:text=The%20first%20shots%20of%20what,British%20if%20that%20became%20necessary. was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]

[2]