User talk:Wiki alf: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 10:01, 15 June 2024

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Alf!

Checking in. Hope you are well. Just had a breeze of nostalgia. love b hotep. – – B.hotep •talk• 00:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aaah!

Come back! Pweez? Rory Re loaded 20:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC)<style>p {background-color: black; color: white; } </style> <body>[reply]

ahhe

Don't come back

now that you can see how damaged WP is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.202.159 (talk) 23:21, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shut up, boy. Rory Re loaded 10:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good effort Alfie. We had some good times, way back when. Enjoy one last orange crayon on me, mate. Ali K (talk) 11:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sad... :'( --Rory Re loaded 11:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Play in One Act

Fringe Policeman No1: Good evening, Sir

Editor: (Tries to ignore FP1)

FP1: I see you're writing about someone who has a view.

Ed: Am I?

FP1: Oh indeed, you are sir. You are aware of WP:FRINGE sir?

Ed: Erm, that's about in depth theories which refute mainstream "scientific" opinion, this piece is a Biography and I've only mentioned that he has notable views on this and that, but not in depth and the details of his stuff aren't actually refuted.

Fringe Policeman No2: I just added them.

FP1: So you see, sir... your subject is a bit of fringe artist.

Ed: But no reliable sources say he is, your just comparing his outcome and saying it doesn't agree, look you've even misquoted the sources when you added his views.

FP2: Please don't make personal attacks, sir.

Ed: I'm not making a personal attack, your edit is not representing the sources.

FP1: Well we say it is, so that's an end to that.

Ed: (spends two hours correcting the text to better represent the sources and finally presses "save")

FP1: (to FP2) Did you see that?

FP2: (to FP1) Yeah, if no one else reverts it in half an hour, I'll revert with "take to talk" or some shit.

FP1: (to FP2) Cool dude.

Ed: Look, your whole premise is wrong guys.

FP1 and FP2 in unison: No it's not.

Ed: If you hadn't added the views, there wouldn't have even been a problem.

FP2: So, you admit there's a problem then sir, well we are making progress.

Ed: No I didn't mean that, I meant you created the problem in the first place.

FP2: Look, sonny, I've told you before about making personal attacks.

Ed: You've found the subject saying this thing in one source alone and are making a big thing out of it, this is a Biography for goodness sake, the view isn't even important!

FP1: He's saying things that could damage people, that's important.

FP2: It's a reliable source, and a view that cannot be denied to be his.

Ed: So quote him fairly then.

FP1: We don't need all that detail, sir, a summary will do. (snickers)

Ed: So you're saying it's not got much detail, then how come your applying WP:FRINGE, that says it's about articles that go into detail and it doesn't by your own admission.

FP2: Don't get all semantic on us, sonny, or you'll find yourself blocked for edit warring.

FP1: I don't like your tone, and it sounds familiar, I'm filing a sock puppet report right now.

FP2: (to FP1) I'll report him for edit warring.

FP1: (into radio) Base, I've got another kook for the notice board, we've done the preliminaries but it might need watching in case any of his kooky friends show up and try taking out any of our official fringe policing stuff.

Wow

I'm sure that's a jab at someone and I don't know the whole situation, nor do I want to get involved but I must say, that play is really funny. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 14:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, that person should be writing (if they are not already). The satire is superb. The humor is fantastic. Really. It's absolutely hilarious. I would read stuff by that person. Even if I didn't agree with the message. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 14:13, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Wiki alf! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Derek Morris - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert Beddard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Charles (philosopher) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Derek Blake - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Glenn Black - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Pete Gill - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Hodgson (chemist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done - except #6. --Technopat (talk) 00:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please see [1] for discussion of your edit warring via IP socks. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 18:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slaves & Masters.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slaves & Masters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The House of Blue Light.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The House of Blue Light.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Battle Rages On.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Battle Rages On.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Deep Purple Come Taste.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deep Purple Come Taste.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:The Sky at Night.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Sky at Night.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dark Skies.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dark Skies.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Remembrance Sunday.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Remembrance Sunday.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Adambro (talk) 12:55, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Alexander the Great/GA1

Alexander the Great is being reviewed for Good Article listing. It has been put on hold for an initial 14 days to allow for minor issues related to coverage and authorial tone to be addressed. Any assistance would be welcomed. SilkTork *^YES! 23:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Inspector Morse.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Inspector Morse.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:11, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Daphne Guinness

Top of the mornin' my favourite Alien Life Form. I'm sorry, I can't marry you because you are a poor commoner so, therefore, unimportant. Can I have my dresses back. I hope your fat Oirish arse hasn't stretched them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.186.23.238 (talk) 14:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ivory statue of Khufu.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ivory statue of Khufu.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

How times have changed! Back in the days when guilders were still made of wood, messages like these still required some creativity ;-) I was torn between leaving you a cup of tea and stroopwafels, but I figured the tea might be cold by the time you get here. So anyway, here you go, have some stroopwafels! Joanne B 20:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picture 002.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 11:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Organ Recital.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Organ Recital.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Robin of Sherwood.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Robin of Sherwood.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tommy and Tuppence.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tommy and Tuppence.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I am the person who formally operated the User:Wiki alf account. I cannot ever see me wanting sysop status on this project again. Thanks.--86.6.187.246 (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Dam Youth Escort logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Green Dam Youth Escort logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Navboxes on author pages

Since you have over 50 edits at Edgar Allan Poe, you might want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates regarding including navigation boxes for adaptations of and related subjects to an authors works on the author's bio page.

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 22:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Wiki alf, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

-- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 22:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anton Bitel

The article Anton Bitel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This pretty much amounts to a vanity autobiography by an individual who was a Wikipedia Administrator back in the day. Fails WP:GNG by a mile. Not notable as an academic or as a film critic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:No Sleep At All.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:No Sleep At All.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Motörhead Beer Drinkers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motörhead Beer Drinkers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stand By Your Man.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stand By Your Man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Motorhead live (song).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motorhead live (song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:What's Wordsworth.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:What's Wordsworth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hammered (album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hammered (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Motorhead Everything Louder.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motorhead Everything Louder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Motörhead 92 Tour EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motörhead 92 Tour EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Overnight Sensation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Overnight Sensation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sacrifice (album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sacrifice (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Snake Bite Love.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snake Bite Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:We Are Motorhead.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We Are Motorhead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Motorhead LATBA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motorhead LATBA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Motörhead lineups

Template:Motörhead lineups has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pete Gill

The article Pete Gill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pete Gill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Gill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Gill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Running on Empty movie poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Running on Empty movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alan Burridge (writer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Burridge (writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Burridge (writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tacyarg (talk) 17:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oriel College, Oxford Featured article review

I have nominated Oriel College, Oxford for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:47, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nosher Powell.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nosher Powell.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Big Bang (1987 film)

The article The Big Bang (1987 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fortune Features

The article Fortune Features has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the notability guideline for companies. Doesn't appear to have notable filmography either: The Living Matrix has an article but the sourcing seems dubious and it does not mention Fortune Features, so I don't favour a redirect. Couldn't find any sources better than [2]. Some COI editing apparent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]