Talk:Lakota people: Difference between revisions
→Bad Links?: new section |
|||
(86 intermediate revisions by 51 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{NorthAmNative|class=B}}{{WikiProject South Dakota|class=B}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|||
{{talkheader}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America|importance=high}} |
|||
{{WikiProject South Dakota|importance=high}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Archive box| |
|||
* [[Talk:{{PAGENAME}}/Archive_1|Archive 1]] - February 08, 2009 |
|||
}} |
|||
== Free Lakota Bank == |
|||
==More information needed, Nezumi== |
|||
The Lakota have opened a bank that is billed as "the world's first non-reserve, non-fractional bank that issues, accepts for deposit, and circulates REAL money...silver and gold." [http://press.freelakotabank.com/index.php Free Lakota Bank Website] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/208.188.113.180|208.188.113.180]] ([[User talk:208.188.113.180|talk]]) 21:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:To avoid confusion: An admin at the ROL forums states... "[http://www.republicoflakotah.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=196&start=0 The Republic of Lakotah is in NO way associated with the Lakota Free Bank. Caveat emptor!]" White Elk 08:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:AWhiteElk|AWhiteElk]] ([[User talk:AWhiteElk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AWhiteElk|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== [[Touch the Clouds]] == |
|||
I think there should be more talk about the values of the lakota people. |
|||
I just included an image of [[Touch the Clouds]] and included his name in the list of notable native american Sioux people. <span style="font-family: Arial Black;"> [[User:Jouke Bersma|<span style="color:#728B22;">Jouke</span>]] [[User talk:Jouke Bersma|<span style="color:#FF8000;">Bersma</span>]] <sub>''[[Special:Contributions/Jouke Bersma|<span style="color:#1B11EE;">Contributions</span>]]''</sub></span> 12:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Such as: |
|||
== Crazy Horse Miniconjou or Oglala == |
|||
# Wacantognaka "Generosity" |
|||
"Recently, a body of evidence has shown that Tašunka Witko may have been Miniconjou.[citation needed]" |
|||
# Wowacintanka "Respect" |
|||
# Wokscape "Wisdom" |
|||
# Woohitika "Courage" |
|||
This should be deleted, as Tašunka Witko was an Oglala chief. [[User:Bikepunk|Bikepunk]] ([[User talk:Bikepunk|talk]]) 13:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Not only these things but how the buffalo was such an important part of life to them. |
|||
The Mother of Crazy Horse "Gathers Her Berries" was the Sister of Chief Spotted Tail. His adopted Father was Old Man Crazy Horse "Worm" who was Oglala. He 'Worm" was married to both of Spotted Tails Sisters. The first of which was "Meadow Lark". Spotted Tail was not Oglala. |
|||
Even talk about the 4 directions would be helpful. |
|||
Mykl Sams. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/162.245.61.33|162.245.61.33]] ([[User talk:162.245.61.33|talk]]) 17:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Redlinked notable Lakota people== |
|||
==Myths and Legends== |
|||
*[[Bearded Face]] (Robert Jarvenpa), Professor of Anthropology at SUNY Albany |
|||
*[[Pete Catches]] (Pȟetáǧa Yuhá Máni), medicine man and Sun Dance chief |
|||
*[[James V. Fenelon]], Sociologist and author |
|||
*[[Little Spoon]], director |
|||
*[[Tatanka Means]], Oglala actor, comedian, designer |
|||
*[[Tomahawk Funk (Tyrone Pacheco)]], rapper, with Hip Hop group [[Funkdoobiest]] |
|||
Moved these here, just in case anyone wants to write articles for these people. -[[User:Uyvsdi|Uyvsdi]] ([[User talk:Uyvsdi|talk]]) 17:07, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Uyvsdi |
|||
Shouldn't there be something on Native American myths and legends here? Like the White Buffalo Woman [http://www.merceronline.com/Native/native05.htm]...? |
|||
== Clan to Tribe == |
|||
==Lakota, Dakota, Nakota== |
|||
{{hat|Personal story telling}} |
|||
From Clan to Tribe – The Story of a Celtic Lakota Family |
|||
The Watters family, the name meaning “They that dwell by loch and sea”, originally lived on the western islands and the highlands of Scotland. Belonging to a sept (smaller family group) of Clan Forbes, the families were farmers and fishermen under the protection and leadership the clan chief. Being in the upper highlands and islands afforded some security during the 18th and 19th centuries, the land and climate being somewhat inhospitable and troublesome for travelers. These people subsisted on a diet largely of potatoes and whatever vegetables might grow in the rocky soil, as well as whatever the sea would begrudgingly give up. Life was extremely simple and often just plain “extreme.” |
|||
Faith had always been a mainstay of strength and community for our family and others. The old Celtic church established by monks, (Patrick, Columba and others), was critical to the life being and morale of people who struggled to eke out a living in this country. As time and seasons would pass, this faith would play a continual role in the life of the family. Especially, as oppression and tyranny caused the family to uproot themselves and journey to other lands and places. |
|||
Lakota, Dakota and Nakota are the language groups of the "sioux". redirection of sioux to lakota neglects the other two. plus: there are at least seven tribes (see german entry). anyone but me volunteering to improve this page? [[User:Kku|Kku]] |
|||
The 18th century finally brought insecurity to our family in the form of the notorious and often barbaric Highland Clearances. Without going into detail in this brief history, the Clearances were England’s answer to dealing with troublesome clans, and also, to introduce sheep to the highlands to bolster their woolen industry. Lowland clansmen were even utilized by the government to drive out, burn out and brutally displace the highland families and clans. There are many general accounts of all this mayhem and where all the surviving families fled to, but there are always exceptions to generalities throughout history. |
|||
But they're more than just the language group; they are also cultural groupings. However, please be warned that "Dakota" are two very different divisions, so instead of three, it is really four. However, if the term Sioux is used, it encompasses these four plus several smaller groups as well. [[User:CJLippert|CJLippert]] 00:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
For the most part, the Watters family fled the highlands to either the outer islands or across the sea to Ireland, settling on the north shores in what is known as County Antrim. James Watters (this author’s great, great grandfather) and Ann Lowery were wed there and started their family, continuing in the pattern established by generations before them; farming and fishing. Dates and details of the Watters family are very difficult, if not impossible, to find. Ship’s manifests and the occasional recorded birth, death or marriage document are often the only evidence of where and when the family turned up in places. |
|||
==Talk by Anon, moved from article== |
|||
It wasn’t long before another “clearance” of sorts would cause the Watters to once again seek freedom and safety from oppression. The English weren’t satisfied with colonizing just the highlands, but now wanted to displace troublesome Gaelic peoples in favor of bringing industry and colonists to the Ulster regions of Ireland. These actions once again included military operations in what is now Northern Ireland. Suffice to say, James Watters did not want to stick around for the potential destruction and death that seemed to be coming once again. Making their way to a port, the family secured steerage on a ship bound for Philadelphia in the hopes of connecting with other Celtic families that fled earlier to America. |
|||
This page is obviously tainted by Lakota revisionist propaganda. |
|||
James and Ann settled in Alleghany County Pennsylvania after a short stay in Philadelphia. Farming was good and the family prospered. During this time, my great grandfather, Samuel, was born. Again, there is not much in the way of detail about our particular family in Pennsylvania, but other histories give a very good indication of how life looked during this time in the history of the United States. Samuel apparently thrived in this new world environment, and developed an also apparent penchant for exploration and adventure. He eventually left Pennsylvania and traveled northwest to Minnesota, where he became employed as a fur trapper for either the Hudson Bay or Northwest companies, again, details are sketchy but those were the two major companies employing trappers. French, Irish, and Scots made up the bulk of the work force at that time. Like many other trappers, Samuel “took up with” a Native American woman, which was not only convenient for surviving in the land, but also brought valuable connections with the native population in terms of business propositions. Eventually, Samuel and Isabel Marshall (her English name) were wed and started their own family. At this time, (early 1800’s,) the Lakota people were happily entrenched as a woodland people, enjoying hunting, fishing and gathering, while also engaging in the occasional skirmish with the neighboring Ojibwe tribe. |
|||
Get your facts straight. |
|||
It wouldn’t be long, however, before yet another sort of “clearance” would threaten the Watters family. Now, a little cultural history on Lakota family is probably necessary here? The Lakota people had a somewhat matriarchal society, not so much that women were in charge, but that whenever a man married, he became part of the wife’s tribe/family. Tribes usually consisted of several family groups led by a chief, hence the “clan to tribe” transition of my family. During this time, settlers were pushing westward seeking their own “manifest destiny”. And, often the settlers were accompanied by government military forces who would establish forts in the frontier. The forts provided protection and a sort of town where people could gather, obtain goods and services, and in general maintain a sense of community. Needless to say, the native population was often a hindrance to this new colonization westward. All sorts of “arrangements” and coalitions were established between various people groups; unfortunately for the Lakota these coalitions didn’t include them. Eventually, the Lakota people sought another place to live in peace, and this saw them leave Minnesota traveling southwest into the Dakota territories. Samuel and his family were part of this migration, at least what little evidence that exists seems to lend credence to that movement? (Later evidence such as death certificates and gravestones would provide further hints to the movement of the family.) |
|||
Here is what you said: |
|||
During the time of life on the Great Plains, the Lakota nation thrived. The new lifestyle of hunting and moving with the great Buffalo herds seemed to suit them well. Horses added another advantage to the growing nation of tribes, and the often glamorized life of the Indians began to be developed among white America. Sadly, the “good days” of the Buffalo and plains life would also be short-lived for the Lakota and our Watters family. Further westward movement of settlers and forts (cavalry) continued to desecrate both the land and the indigenous people; disease, massacre of the North American Bison (Buffalo), and environmental damage (yes, believe it or not it had already started,) among other things. The government felt compelled to intervene on behalf of settlers and deal with the “Indian uprisings”. Again, I won’t belabor that history here, but suffice to say our family was once again feeling the need to move. |
|||
"Four years later, gold was discovered there, and an influx of prospectors descended upon the area, abetted by army commanders like General George Armstrong Custer." |
|||
Establishment of reservations (areas of isolation for the various tribes) by the government heralded a clear signal to Lakota leaders that something must be done. Several skirmishes among cavalry and Indians alarmed Washington and prompted further escalating military intervention. Notable among these campaigns was Custer’s debacle at the Little Bighorn River (the Greasy Grass our people call it.) While Lakota people did have some effective efforts against the government troops, it was clear to all Native American leaders that they could never outlast the numbers and force of the government. Most leaders chose to comply with treaties and move their people to reservations, (which sadly was the beginning of “social genocide” of Native American culture and people.) Our family chose to flee to Canada with other Lakota, accompanied by Cheyenne tribes. Sitting Bull, chief of the Hunkpapa tribe of Lakota, had made this choice while Crazy Horse (a relative and also chief of the Oglala tribe) finally decided to stop fighting and return to the reservation, (he was later tragically murdered there.) |
|||
The word "abetted" implies criminal activity, and betrays your bias. Custer was following orders from the federal government and was obeying a directive to explore the Black Hills, legally, because according to the treaty with the Sioux the U.S. had a right to build a military road through the area. The objective of his expedition was to survey land, not to promote an influx of illegal white gold-seekers. Only the year before, Custer had led a survey expedition into the Yellowstone area, so he was a logical candidate for the Black Hills region. Just because gold seekers invaded the Black Hills after Custer was there, he gets the blame for the problem, just as he does now for everything else bad that ever happened to the Lakota. You've made him into a symbolic scapegoat, but the truth remains despite your revisionist propaganda. |
|||
In Canada, the government had taken a much more amicable approach to native populations, ceding large tracts of land and granting citizenship to their indigenous tribes. This looked like a very good choice for the Lakota, but the Canadian government took the position that only existing indigenous Canadian tribes could be granted this status. Once again, my family was a people without a country. Staying in Canada was useful for a time, but Lakota people wanted to be with other families (tribes), and eventually Sitting Bull decided to return to the reservations, and many different tribes followed. Sadly, this choice would also end Sitting Bull’s life in similar fashion to Crazy Horse. This became a critical turning point for my family. |
|||
Here is what you said: |
|||
My young grandfather, James, chose to return with some Lakota back to the U.S. via Montana (west of the path of other tribes.) Those Lakota joined cousins of the Assiniboine tribe at the Fort Peck Agency in northeastern Montana. This was also a time of deeply emotional decisions by members of our family. Samuel Watters chose to take his family and separately move back to Minnesota. Details of that move and whatever happened to he and his family are once again scarce, except for a death record of Samuel in Ottertail, Minnesota. His son, James, on the other hand decided that he must begin to hide his Lakota heritage if he wanted to own land and have a future in America. James met and married Eliza Coffey, an Irish woman whose family lived in that area of Montana at the time. James homesteaded near the intersection of the Missouri River (Big Muddy) and Milk River. There they raised their family of eleven children, farming and hunting (but all the while being very careful to hide any Lakota connections.) The children were an interesting mix of clearly Lakota looking people (much like James), but also with fair skinned and even some red-headed ones! When asked about the darker character of some members of the family, James explained that we were descended from “black Irish” lineage. The ruse worked and my family thrived in the Fort Peck area, but never associated with relatives on the reservation there. Some of my uncles even went so far as to deride “the lazy Indians on that reservation.” |
|||
"The latter attempted to administer a lesson of noninterference with white policies." |
|||
Anyway, fast forward to all of my father’s family getting older, going away to college, starting their own families and moving to one coast or the other, (Montana winters had taken their toll on their collective psyches.) Many of us ended up in Sacramento, California, and life went on for the Watters, the Irish Watters. The only conflicts of note were the occasional bout between the Protestant and Catholic sides of the family, but those usually boiled over harmlessly, (unlike things back in Ireland.) Most of the families gathered every summer back in Montana to visit the grandparents and Uncle Arvie (the sole member who stayed on to ranch and farm.) Us kids spent those summers hunting, riding horses, learning how to drive the farm trucks, working the harvest and more. I always recall the “tack room” my Uncle Arvie had on his farm. It was loaded with the most wonderful collection of leather goods; saddles, bridles and more. And, there were many handcrafted bows and arrows among the weaponry in that room. I suppose I should have suspected some Indian connection in my family, what with all the prowess in hunting and horseback skills, but again, no one in the family ever brought up Indians in conversation. Then, one summer when we were much older, and apparently with the blessing of my now very old grandfather (James), my own father pulled out an old sepia tone photograph of a Lakota woman. The resemblance to my grandfather and my own father and a couple of his brothers was uncanny. It was then that I first knew of our Lakota heritage, and yet still it was a secret between my father and me. Sadly, the family still harbored fears of being “found out”, even though at this point it would not have mattered. I guess my father felt a deep need to recognize this heritage with me? We had done Boy Scouts for many years, and my father always emphasized the Indian lore aspect of Scouting. In fact, we both joined the Order of the Arrow, a subgroup of Boy Scouts dedicated to Native American culture. His own skills as a Lakota warrior became very apparent; horse whisperer, wonderful worker of leather and natural materials, an amazing hunting eye and skill. That time passed too quickly for me, and especially for him. I went on to playing football and forgot all about those Order of the Arrow days. |
|||
Again, you distort history. The Lakota in question had been declared enemy combatants by the U.S. War department for failing to remain on their reservations, and for committing depradations on white settlers. They'd been given time to return but had refused. The federal government declared war on them. Custer and his men were only one small part of a three-pronged attack planned at the highest levels. He wasn't even in charge of one of the three columns, just a piece of one. And he was not attempting to teach any kind of lesson, he was following his orders to find and attack the enemy. |
|||
Fast forward again, I have raised my own family and “retired” from regular work. All the years of being a park ranger, environmental biologist and father now seemed to be speaking to me of something deeper in my spirit. I had also become a Christian in the truest sense, a disciple of Jesus. That new identity seemed to be calling me to look back, to seek my roots. This new journey led to expanding our family tree, which had been mistakenly “altered” at the point of Samuel and his alleged wife in that tree. Thus this story was born, and it has given me a deeper understanding of who I am, not only as a Lakota Celtic, but as a follower of Jesus, and through Him of the Great Mystery, the Holy Trinity. It has given me a loving and compassionate attitude for other people groups and religions; it has made me a better person. I realize I am on a journey with still more seasons to experience, but now the journey has a destination, even if I don’t know where the next step leads. I have found purpose, God’s purpose, in my life as a disciple. I have found identity in my heritage as a holy man (shaman, priest, etc.) but also as a heyoka (clown in the Lakota sense.) Henri Nouwen would call it “wounded healer”, or one who takes his own story and struggles, and uses them to give comfort and healing to others. Not that I have “arrived”, but I have a more clear path . . . the Narrow Road, the Good Red Road of Jesus Christ. From Patrick and Columcille, to Nicholas Black Elk and Crazy Horse, I have found relatives and spiritual mentors from the past who continue to “speak” to me today. They point me to the Way, they affirm my path and guidebook, the Bible, and they join me in the Journey. |
|||
Here is what you said: |
|||
Mitakuye Oyasin, Bennacht De Ort, (“All My Relatives” in Lakota and “God Bless You” in Gaelic, the language of the Celtic peoples) |
|||
"Instead, the Lakota with their allies, the Arapaho and the Cheyenne, defeated the 7th U.S. Cavalry in 1876 at the Battle of the Little Big Horn, known also as Custer's Last Stand, since he and 300 of his troopers perished there." |
|||
Patrick Perching Eagle Watters, Lakota and Celtic |
|||
The Lakota did not defeat the 7th U.S. Cavalry. It inflicted severe damage, but again you exaggerate the known facts. Custer split his small command into three components for the attack, and it was only his own component that was wiped out. And that was only 219 men, not 300. More than half of the rest of the command survived and went into immediate pursuit. |
|||
[Among resources that have provided both physical and spiritual “evidence” for this story are; Nicholas Black Elk – Medicine Man, Missionary, Mystic by Michael F. Steltenkamp, and Stories of the Celtic Soul Friends – Their Meaning for Today by Edward C. Sellner. These two books, among other written forms, have been instrumental in seeing my family history in a spiritual light, as well as providing some vital physical history.] |
|||
Here is what you said: |
|||
Footnote August 2011: My cousin Michael Watters has been researching our family, especially the lost Lakota connections. This past year he contacted relatives on reservations in the Dakotas who did indeed recall their grandparents talking about ancestors from County Antrim, Ireland. At this time we are pursuing better understanding of how and what happened in the 1800’s when our family and other Lakota fled to Canada and then later scattered throughout Montana and the Dakotas. Michael also seemed to find information concerning Isabel Marshall that may have linked her to a French trapper, she may have been half French and half Lakota? There are Watters living on the Lower Brule reservation in South Dakota, which also affirms a thought that we may be Sicangu (Brule or burnt thigh) in part? |
|||
"Less well known is the history of the eastern Dakota people, in Minnesota. Unlike their plains cousins, the Lakota, they lived in agricultural communities. They accepted white settlements and seizure of their lands in exchange for grain shipments guaranteed by treaty." |
|||
[[User:Patwatters|Patwatters]] ([[User talk:Patwatters|talk]]) 23:24, 14 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
This is absolutely not true. A small percentage of MN Dakota accepted farming, and they were ridiculed by the vast majority of their fellow-tribesmen. A few were even murdered. The Lower Agency Dakota were especially resistant to any attempt to convince them to start farming. Too bad for them. So sad. The reservation they lived on had enough land to provide hundreds of acres for every man and his family in the tribes, yet they complained they were starving. How is it then that white settlers, with far less land and with nobody offering to help them, were quite capable of supporting themselves? It was only because the "braves" in the Lower Agency felt that honest work in the field was beneath them. In other words, they were lazy, and they expected to have everything handed to them on a silver plate without working for it. The fact is that the Dakota had been living on some of the world's richest farm land for two hundred years, and were barely able to eke out a subsistance living, having fertilized the land with only the blood of their innocent victims, while -- in less than 40 years -- white settlers turned the fields of Minnesota into the the world's largest grain source. |
|||
{{hab}} |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Here is what you said: |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
"In 1862, the grain failed to arrive, and the local federal agent told the Dakota that they were free to eat grass." |
|||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Lakota people]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=678285080 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: |
|||
Totally off, again. It wasn't the grain that failed to arrive, it was the annuity payment, and it didn't fail to arrive, either. It was just late. The admittedly stupid and insensitive comment regarding the eating of grass is true, but it wasn't the federal agent who said it. And in any event the words of the idiot who spoke them cannot justify the murder, rape, pillage and torture that followed. |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081106172400/http://www.rosebudsiouxtribe-nsn.gov:80/constitution.htm to http://www.rosebudsiouxtribe-nsn.gov/constitution.htm |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080704052850/http://www.sioux.org/our_const_by_laws.html to http://www.sioux.org/our_const_by_laws.html |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. |
|||
Here is what you said: |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
"Instead, they scalped him, looted his warehouse, and rampaged through the area, killing perhaps a dozen whites." |
|||
Cheers. —[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 12:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
A dozen? Your math is as bad as your history. The Dakota "braves" butchered between 400 and 800 innocent men, women and children, who had absolutely nothing to do with their grievances against the federal government. If any disgruntled political group committed such mass murder today, they would be called terrorists, and there would be an immediate and massive manhunt to track them all down and kill them, like vermin. |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Here is what you said: |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
"Although this was in the middle of the American Civil War, enough troops were gathered to put down the "rebellion", and more than 300 Dakota were sentenced by local courts to die for the crimes of murder or rape." |
|||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Lakota people]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=703576863 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: |
|||
Again, you can't even get your basic facts straight. It wasn't the middle of the Civil War, but the very first year of it. The "troops" gathered were mainly settlers on the frontier who banded together for common defense of their homes and families against unwarranted murder, pillage and rape. And the 300 Dakota captured and tried were not sentenced by local courts, but by a military tribunal charged with investigating and prosecuting war criminals. |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20160129174317/http://infca.org/tribes/IRA.htm to http://www.infca.org/tribes/IRA.htm |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. |
|||
The whole tone of your paragraph regarding the uprising implies that you think it was justified and admirable. Typical Dakota thinking. Warriors to the end, truth be damned, and play the victim to the hilt. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
But there are plenty of us out here who aren't falling for your ignorant brand of historical revisionism. You would have us thinking that the Dakota were just sitting there smelling flowers in the field, and along came the evil white man to perpetrate injustices and take away your land. The fact is, you were losing the land already, to the Ojibwe, for two-hundred years, and even without the white incursion the Lakota were already being pushed out of the forests and on to the prairie by other Indians. I notice the Dakota haven't been asking the Ojibwe to compensate them for taking away the Mille Lacs Lake area, which was once a 'sacred' Dakota homeland. I also notice that the Dakota never offered to compensate the Indian tribes which they pushed out of Minnesota themselves when they first came in. Instead, you seem to think that gullible white people are the best targets for sympathetic pleas, just like common panhandlers in the street, who are perfectly capable of working and supporting themselves, but won't try as long as somebody is willing to listen to their sob story. |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 09:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
::In the case of [[Lake Mille Lacs]], the Mdewakantonwan and the [[Mississippi Chippewa]] did have a formal land cession agreement. It was around 1780 (give or take a decade), according to oral history. The condition was for the Chippewa to stay on the north side of the lake and the Sioux on the south side of the lake. In 1825, the [[United States]] forced the Chippewa and the Sioux to sign the [[Treaty of Prairie du Chien]], which forced the Sioux south of the "Prairie du Chien" line and Chippewa to the north. The Chippewa south of the line were adopted as Sioux and the Sioux north of the line were adopted as Chippewa. Also, the Mdewakanton were divided between those who agreed to move south and those who refused relocation. All Mdewakantonwan taught all the Sacred Rites of the Mde Wakan to the Anishinaabe so that they can be carried out. Consequently, [[Mille Lacs Indians]] have a high degree of Wolf Clan in their midst, all drums held by the [[Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe]] are all Mdewakanton drums, and all ceremonies associated with the lake are performed by the Wolf Clan members in the [[Ojibwe language]] but they are verbatum translation from the Dakota, and everyone who grew up around [[Lake Mille Lacs]] are familiar with these Sacred Rites. With this said, if anyone questions any of this, I personally invite you to the beautiful shores of [[Lake Mille Lacs]] and you to ask anyone with the Wolf as their [[Totem|Doodem]]. If Santee Sioux, come and rekindle with your ancestors at near-by Knife Lake. If Mdewakanton, come join in one of the four Pow wows held at the [[Mille Lacs Reservation]]! Don't let the ''Ojibwe'' in the name "Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe" fool you because the core tribe of the "Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe" is the [[Mille Lacs Indians]], who are the Mdewakanton adopted as Ojibwe, the Mdewakantonwan who stayed. In addition, it was because of the Mdewakantonwan that during the "Sioux Uprise" many of the Mdewakantonwan did not support the uprise and the Mille Lacs Indians, in support of the Mdewakanton, instead help defend the holding of the United States. Because of this, the Mdewakantonwan were not moved westward and the Mille Lacs Indians remained at the lake. However, because of suspicion toward Indians by the non-Indians, the Mdewakanton Sioux communities and the Mille Lacs Indians were pressured westward, many went; many returned with little or no resistance from the United States, forming the contemporary [[Prairie Island Indian Community]], [[Shakopee-Mdewakanton Indian Reservation]], the Federally non-recognized Mendota Mdewakanton Community, [[Lower Sioux Indian Reservation]] and the ''Ma'iingan Doodem'' of the [[Mille Lacs Reservation]]. [[User:CJLippert|CJLippert]] 01:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Why don't you face the fact that the Dakota lost, and get over it. |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
And wake up to the fact that nowhere else in history, in any part of the globe, has an advanced culture run up against a primitive one that didn't exterminate them, enslave them, or at the very least push them off the land. This country is the one shining example in all of human history where the advanced culture attempted to permit the primitive culture to co-exist. The reservation system was admittedly flawed, but it was born of a noble idea. What did you expect them to do? Just pack up and go back to Europe? Get real. Read history and you'll find thousands of years worth of conflicts all over the world that were far worse than what happened to the so-called "native Americans". |
|||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Lakota people]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=707242619 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: |
|||
: "And wake up to the fact that nowhere else in history, in any part of the globe, has an advanced culture run up against a primitive one that didn't exterminate them, enslave them, or at the very least push them off the land." |
|||
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150801101021/http://dakotablues.nl/ to http://www.dakotablues.nl |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. |
|||
: That's nonsense. Africa is still ruled by the Africans. The current inhabitants of Mexico are largely descended from the pre-Columbus mexicans. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
: "This country is the one shining example in all of human history where the advanced culture attempted to permit the primitive culture to co-exist." |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 18:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
: Give me a break. The Cherokee were forced off thier land, so their churchs and libraries could be turned into bars. Irquois corn farmers had to deal with pigs running through their crops, and would prosecuted for killing the tresspassing pigs. Again, in many other places in the world, the original people still live on thier land, and in Africa with thier original cultures and religions. This country's behavior is not unique, but is far from a "shining example". |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
: "What did you expect them to do? Just pack up and go back to Europe?" |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
: Um, yes? You can't casually justify invasion like that; it's just [[lebensraum]] all over again. We told the Germans to just pack up and go back to Germany, even though they wanted to live in Poland and France. If aliens traveled from Alpha Centurai to Earth and planned to colonize, we'd tell to them to "just pack up and go back to Alpha Centurai". We sure as hell wouldn't accept it as a valid excuse to displace us from our homes. |
|||
I have just modified 4 external links on [[Lakota people]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=779784853 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
: ''Your'' revisionism is quite blatant. Try putting yourself in someone else's shoes for once. --[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 02:03, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
|||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.infca.org/tribes/IRA.htm |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150904060736/http://findarticles.com/p/news-articles/brandon-sun-the/mi_8087/is_20080626/dakota-nations-reject-603-settlement/ai_n50742556/ to http://findarticles.com/p/news-articles/brandon-sun-the/mi_8087/is_20080626/dakota-nations-reject-603-settlement/ai_n50742556/ |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609092458/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iVC1KMTOgwiSoMQyT2LwZc9HyAgA to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iVC1KMTOgwiSoMQyT2LwZc9HyAgA |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225063324/https://curtis.library.northwestern.edu/viewPage.cgi?showp=1&size=2&id=nai.03.book.00000019&volume=3 to http://curtis.library.northwestern.edu/viewPage.cgi?showp=1&size=2&id=nai.03.book.00000019&volume=3 |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
==X-SAMPA== |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
"pronounced "Lakxóta" by the Lakota people"? Please use [[X-SAMPA]] for this; it seems to be common for phonetic spellings and it's related to the standard IPA. Lakxóta doesn't help me figure out the pronounciation anymore than Lakhota does. --[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 02:03, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 23:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC) |
|||
*Put it back, please. I'll convert the pronunciation to IPA this weekend when I have more time. [[User:Cbdorsett|Cbdorsett]] 19:00, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
:: So it finally motivated someone to fix it? I don't see any reason to put it back; it's even right here on the Talk page. When it gets converted, then you can put it on the main page. Until then, I stand by my argument that it's useless and confusing to put on the page. --[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 23:37, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
==Seperate or move?== |
|||
I have just modified 2 external links on [[Lakota people]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=781969501 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
I was on the verge of splitting this page up into separate "Lakota" and "Sioux" articles, but then I had another think. What does the word "Lakota" really mean? When actual Sioux people say "Lakota" do they just mean the Lakota (i.e. Teton) branch, or do they mean Sioux people in general? The fact that there seems to already be a name for each of the dialects (Santee, Yankton, Teton) implies the latter. I won't split the page unless someone can speak more conclusively on what Lakota means. But maybe we should move the whole thing to [[Sioux]] in order to be less confusing? - [[User:Nat Krause|Nat Kraus]][[User_Talk:Nat Krause|e]] 14:55, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130321200219/http://indianz.com/News/2004/005762.asp to http://www.indianz.com/News/2004/005762.asp |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821112631/http://www.afp.com/ to http://afp.com/ |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20071220%2FNEWS%2F712200347%2F1001 |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.unaturk.org/index.php/dergi-magazine/54-say-17-number-17-spring-2008/172-the-lakota-sioux-indians-declare-independence.html |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
*Leave it alone, and put a #REDIRECT on the [[Sioux]] page so that people can find all the information on one page. [[User:Cbdorsett|Cbdorsett]] 18:56, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
|||
: Separate and move. However, before taking that step, just as the [[Lakota people|Lakota people|akota]] article is fairly well developed, the [[Dakota Sioux]], [[Yankton Sioux]] and [[Nakota Sioux]] articles should be started. Currently, the the [[Yankton Sioux]] redirects to [[Sioux]], no designated page for [[Dakota Sioux]] other than the [[Mdewakanton]] sub-tribe of the [[Dakota Sioux]], and [[Algonquian]]-dominated [[Assiniboine]] article that needs to discuss more about the people and not their name. [[User:CJLippert|CJLippert]] 22:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
==correction== |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 07:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC) |
|||
only 20,000 Lakota lived during the mid 18th century . |
|||
== proper meaning of the name == |
|||
source : centennial campaign by John S.Gray |
|||
The name "sioux" is short for Nadowessioux, meaning "little snakes", which was a spiteful nickname given to them by the Ojibwe, their longtime foe. |
|||
www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/tbacig/studproj/a1041/mnansx1800/sioux.htm |
|||
:But... but.... but..... I distinctly remember my teachers telling me that the evil europeans slaughtered the indians to near extinction, and that there only a few of them left! Are you suggesting my teachers lied to me? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 18:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
The "Nadewisou" were recorded in 1654 by Jesuit missionary, Pierre Radisson. The Ojibwa (Chippewa) and Huron also lived in the same areas. The Ojibwa had great fear of the Nadewisou and told horrible tales to the French fur trader Radisson. As it happened, with a stroke of a pen by Radisson in his explorers diary, the best known Indian inhabitants of the United States upper Midwest suffered an unwanted nickname. |
|||
== US Government == |
|||
The French called these people "Sioux" which originally derived from a Chippewa word, Nadewisou. The Chippewa were their sworn enemies. Nadewisou means "treacherous snake." Naturally, the Sioux prefer their proper ancient traditional name of Dakota. |
|||
There fails to be reasonable proof that the US wants revenge against any native nation. |
|||
http://www.sicc.sk.ca/archive/saskindian/a93aug03.htm |
|||
I have marked the article NPOV. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:DA68:2600:ADDF:3AAE:2D58:18D4|2A02:C7F:DA68:2600:ADDF:3AAE:2D58:18D4]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7F:DA68:2600:ADDF:3AAE:2D58:18D4|talk]]) 21:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
: That's not the right way to handle things. NPOV is when there's an argument over the page, not when some idiot comes in and puts a bunch of trash on the page. Just revert it. --[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 22:18, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:DA68:2600:ADDF:3AAE:2D58:18D4|2A02:C7F:DA68:2600:ADDF:3AAE:2D58:18D4]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7F:DA68:2600:ADDF:3AAE:2D58:18D4|talk]]) 21:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== US Government == |
|||
== "In popular culture" heading proposed == |
|||
How do I revert a page? I'm new. |
|||
And I'm sorry I didn't know that was proper ettiquette. I just didn't want to change the article too significantly. |
|||
:Go to the History tab and click "undo" for the edit that you want to undo, and it'll revert it to the version prior to that edit. [[User:SteveSims|SteveSims]] ([[User talk:SteveSims|talk]]) 00:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I suggest adding "in popular culture" heading to refer to a 6-books saga Die Söhne der Großen Bärin ("Sons of the Great Bear") (1951-1963) by East German author Liselotte_Welskopf-Henrich. Saga depicts Lakota and Dakota in general struggles against the American settlers in the 2nd half of 19th century and it was very popular in former East European communist countries. However, I am not sure whether at any time it was published and/or known in the anglophone world. There might be other references of course which may seem appropriate to include under suggested heading. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Zilvinasmaigys|Zilvinasmaigys]] ([[User talk:Zilvinasmaigys#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zilvinasmaigys|contribs]]) </small> |
|||
== Social History/Political History == |
|||
:No. We already have [[Native Americans in German popular culture]] for that stuff. - [[User:CorbieVreccan|CorbieVreccan]] <sup>[[User_talk:CorbieVreccan|☊]]</sup> [[WP:SPIDER|☼]] 23:57, 20 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
This article is a little scattered. I was hoping to find something on the society and history of the Sioux, including current information about the distribution and groupings. The article satisfied some of my interests but is also full of a hode podge of massacres etc instead of any real history. |
|||
== sentence under picture January 17 == |
|||
I've moved the former second paragraph of the introduction down following the bit about the Little Big Horn. this paragraph detailed a massacre and some trials in the 1860's and seemed kind of odd as a general introduction tot he topic of the Sioux - who after all are a lot more than murderers and rapists! |
|||
Last sentence is not clear / correct Teun Spaans ([[User_talk:TeunSpaans|talk]]) 21:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
S-Slater |
|||
== |
== What are the three "subcultures"? == |
||
The lede states: one of the three prominent subcultures of the Sioux people |
|||
I agree with nearly every response given here concerning this entry on the Sioux. I am appalled that a history of my ancestors comprises largely of military conflicts with the United States Government in the nineteenth century. From what I read here, Sioux history preceding c.1862 is irrelevant. It also implies that a more expansive history on the subject is almost non-existent--another great misconception. It is obvious that non-white American histories are still treated as unnecessary. More attention tends to be paid to genocides that occur across the ocean rather than the mass-exterminations that occurred at the hands of our own supposedly beneficent republic. |
|||
However, the Sioux article's lede states there are two, the Dakota and the Lakota. |
|||
As such, I move to the often-ridiculous comments presented in, "Talk by Anon: moved from response." I agree that Sioux history is often told to benefit the one telling the story. However, I find the author’s use of the word "revisionism" misused. Accordingly, I should assume anyone who opens his or her mouth these days is a "revisionist" (including myself). Okay, fine with me. |
|||
What is the third and why is it not mentioned in either article? [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 18:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
History is dependent on memory: something that varies from person to person. For an academic or for the college-educated elite, reliable history is learned from textbooks, literature, and even word-of-mouth. History is rarely seen as a story or as a retelling but as FACT. Today, any historical source is in danger of becoming inaccurate. I've read textbooks that generate the same level of misinformation that television news sources or presidential memos produce. For example, the author(s) of "Talk by Anon..." said that America "is the one shining example in all of human history where the advanced culture attempted to permit the primitive culture to co-exist." Now who is the revisionist? |
|||
:If you read the full lead at [[Sioux]], it mentions the (1) Eastern Dakota (Santee or Sisseton, Wahpeton, Wahpekute, Mdewakanton); (2) Western Dakota (Yankton, Yanktonai, erroneously referred to as Nakota, who are instead the [[Assiniboine]] people); and (3) the Lakota (Titonwon, broken down into seven bands such as the Oglala, Hunkpapa et al). [[User:Oncamera|<span style="color:#e0e0e0; font-family:georgia; background:#785673; letter-spacing: 1px;"> oncamera </span>]] <sub>[[User_Talk:Oncamera|<i style="color:#ad0076; font-family:georgia">(talk page)</i>]]</sub> 18:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
I do not believe that an “advanced culture” would shove a bar of lye soap into my grandfather’s mouth whenever he spoke the Dakota language. Scrubbing out the culturally unclean is not anyone’s idea of co-existence: ask the recently deposed mayor of Baghdad. Anyone who is arrogant enough to refer to her/himself as “advanced” is surely as primitive as the rest of us. |
|||
::Well the " The modern Sioux consist of two major divisions based on language divisions: the Dakota and Lakota" right at the top seems confusing to me then. In any event, is there any reason we are not being specific in the lede here? [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 18:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
In times of war blatant propaganda tends to rule as THE history. The information presented by "Talk by Anon..." is hamstrung by blind patriotism--the most unpatriotic sensibility of all. {{unsigned|24.8.171.104|20:47, August 12, 2005}} |
|||
:::Dakota and Lakota are the two major divisions based on languages. Eastern Dakota (Santee), Western Dakota (Wičhíyena) (both speak dialects of Dakota) and Lakota (northern and southern dialects exist) are also based on geographical locations. I don't understand what you mean by it's not being specific, but you could add "Eastern Dakota (Santee), Western Dakota (Wičhíyena) and Lakota" if you need it defined on this article. [[User:Oncamera|<span style="color:#e0e0e0; font-family:georgia; background:#785673; letter-spacing: 1px;"> oncamera </span>]] <sub>[[User_Talk:Oncamera|<i style="color:#ad0076; font-family:georgia">(talk page)</i>]]</sub> 19:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Etymology == |
|||
: "I am appalled that a history of my ancestors comprises largely of military conflicts with the United States Government in the nineteenth century." There's no point in being appalled. If you don't like the way the article is written, then change it. Most of the slant is not revisionism; it's just the side of article that more people are familiar. --[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 23:00, 12 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
As far as I understand, the terms Lakota and Dakota mean Ally in [[Lakota language]] and [[Dakota language]], respectively. The article [[Dakota]] mentions this meaning; I think the present article should too. (And both might additionally mention that the terms mean the same, except when referring to people and languages). [[User:Nø|Nø]] ([[User talk:Nø|talk]]) 16:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
==Terminology== |
|||
:It mentions the meaning of Lakota in the Ethnonyms section? [[User:Oncamera|<span style="color:#e0e0e0; font-family:georgia; background:#785673; letter-spacing: 1px;"> oncamera </span>]] <sub>[[User_Talk:Oncamera|<i style="color:#ad0076; font-family:georgia">(talk page)</i>]]</sub> 17:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
The way this article describes the subdivisions of the people in question is really confusing, and, in places I would go so far as to say it is incorrect. Does Lakota = Sioux or is it a subdivision of Sioux? If Lakota = Sioux, then, would it be appropriate to refer to "Dakota Lakota" or "Nakoda Lakota" (even if those phrases are wrong, would it be correct to say "the Dakota are a branch of Lakota"?) If Lakota is a subdivision of Sioux, then where is the article about the Sioux as a whole, and why does this article discuss other Sioux groups? |
|||
== Laramie == |
|||
It's pretty clear that the Eastern Subdivision of Sioux is sometimes called "Lakota" specifically; therefore, the question is whether Lakota can ''also'' mean the Sioux as a whole. That's certainly what the article says now: "The Lakota ... are a Native American tribe, also known as the Sioux" The article proceeds to say, "The Lakota are the western most of the three groups" which strongly implies that the Dakota and the Nakoda are not Sioux, which I don't think is correct. |
|||
Re [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Lakota_people&oldid=prev&diff=1263703095] the treaty may have been signed on Lakota land but at the time the fort was built it was Cheyenne or Crow land. If I’m wrong, please provide a source for the claim.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<span style="color:orange;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</span>]]</span></small> 04:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
To correct this situation, we should: a) be certain what the scope of this article is; b) be really clear about what terminology we are using in which sense, so that our readers understand; and c) preferably we should avoid using "Lakota" in more than one sense. Fortunately, the Lakota are the only "branch" of Sioux which corresponds precisely to a traditional name, to wit "Teton", so I prefer that—unless we decide that Lakota ''only'' means the subgroup—we should refer to the subgroup exclusively as "Teton" and/or "western branch". Comments? - [[User:Nat Krause|Nat Kraus]][[User_Talk:Nat Krause|e]] 17:54, 28 September 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:Where are your sources for your claims? [[User:Oncamera|<span style="color:#e0e0e0; font-family:georgia; background:#785673; letter-spacing: 1px;"> oncamera </span>]] <sub>[[User_Talk:Oncamera|<i style="color:#ad0076; font-family:georgia">(talk page)</i>]]</sub> 14:33, 18 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, I went through and made some tentative changes. Basically, I substitued ''titonwan'' for each instance where ''Lakota'' was being used to mean that specific branch. Not sure this is the best way, but it should do for the moment. - [[User:Nat Krause|Nat Kraus]][[User_Talk:Nat Krause|e]] 08:45, 6 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
::I’m not making any claims in the text of the article. The current text makes an unsourced claim. It needs to be sourced.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<span style="color:orange;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</span>]]</span></small> 16:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:: This article should be under ''Sioux'' instead of ''Lakota''. Lakota is a division of Sioux. peace – [[User:Ish_ishwar|ishwar]] [[User_talk:Ish_ishwar|<small>(speak)</small>]] 05:06, 2 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:::So then shouldn't [[Ohlone]] be at [[Costanoan]]? (See talk page) --[[User:Hottentot|Hottentot]] |
|||
:::: i dont really know about Ohlone. Linguistically, Costanoan is a small language family of 5 languages. I understand that the Lakota usually just call themselves ''Sioux''. – [[User:Ish_ishwar|ishwar]] [[User_talk:Ish_ishwar|<small>(speak)</small>]] 06:48, 2 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:: This article should be called ''Lakota Sioux'' since among the Sioux, this is how they would identify themselves. The information in this article about the ''Dakota Sioux'' (both Santee and Yankton-Yanktonai) and the ''Nakota Sioux'' should be moved to their own pages or consolidated with the main [[Sioux]] article. If we do this, similar considerations would need to be made on the [[Anishinaabe]] page to distinguish [[Ojibwa]], [[Mississauga]], [[Algonquin]], [[Nipissing]], [[Odawa]], [[Saulteaux]] and [[Potawatomi]]. [[User:CJLippert|CJLippert]] 17:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Requested Move== |
|||
[[Lakota people|Lakota]] → [[Sioux]]. Wrong name. – [[User:Ish_ishwar|ishwar]] [[User_talk:Ish_ishwar|<small>(speak)</small>]] 05:55, 2 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''Add *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''' followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>'' |
|||
* '''Support'''. I agree with ishwar. --[[User:Hottentot|Hottentot]] 01:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Weak oppose'''. The text is not yet consistent about the division; and the page would probably do better to have that straightened out before moving. Also consider that Lakota and Dakota are dialect forms of the same word. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 02:53, 6 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Split and Consolidate'''. The article for ''Lakota'' should be that... the Lakota Sioux. Similarly, the article for ''Dakota'' ought to be that... the Dakota Sioux. In addition, there should be a similar article on the Nakota Sioux. For the more general article that encompasses these three major divisions as well as several other smaller divisions, they should be in the Sioux article with a main article link to each of their appropriate major divisions. For example, the discussion on the Sioux Reservations in the Lakota article would be inappropriate, but it would be appropriate in the Sioux article, or have a list of just the Lakota reservations with their appropriate Lakota names, with similar listing in the Dakota and Nakota pages. [[User:CJLippert|CJLippert]] 23:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:In addition, the [[Anishinaabe]]g do distinguish them. The "Santee" Sioux (Dakota) are the ''Naadawensiw'', "Teton" and "Yankton" Sioux (Lakota and Dakota) are ''Bwaan'', "Assiniboine" Sioux (Nakota) are the ''Asiniibwaan'', while the Ioway are the ''Naadawensiw-mashkodens''. At one time the term ''Naadawensiw'' was the general term, thus the French adopted that exonym to apply to the Sioux and from the "...siw" giving us the "Sioux", but today, ''Bwaan'' is the general term. [[User:CJLippert|CJLippert]] 00:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
===Discussion=== |
|||
:''Add any additional comments'' |
|||
===Outcome=== |
|||
*Move request not fulfilled due to lack of consensus. [[User:Robchurch|Rob Church]] <sup>''[[User_talk:Robchurch|Talk]]''</sup> 02:55, 7 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== Redirect? == |
|||
It seems kind of strange that Oglala and Sans Arcs both redirect here, seeing as there are direct links to those pages from this one. [[User:Luosiji|Luosiji]] 23:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Dakota Wikilink == |
|||
the Dakota wikilink goes to a disambiguation page. There were a couple that this article may go under. Could someone familiar with the article update the wikilink so that it directs to one of the articles on the the dab page. Thanks [[User:Lmielke359|Lmielke359]] 21:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Surrender== |
|||
My US Histories teacher told me the US has only surrendered once, to the Lakota Sioux. If this is incorrect, please edit as necessary. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:N734LQ|N734LQ]] ([[User talk:N734LQ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/N734LQ|contribs]]){{#if:01:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)| 01:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|||
:Interesting. But we need a more substantial reference than your history teacher. --[[User:Ezeu|Ezeu]] 11:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::A lot would hinge on how you define "surrender." Does it mean the leadership of the entire nation, in the way that the Japanese empire surrendered on board the ''Missouri?'' I'm doubtful that the United States government as a whole ever surrendered to the Sioux or any other native peoples. Does "surrender" mean capitulation by some military unit or units? In World War II, for example, one example to counter the statement above would be Wainwright's surrender in the Philippines. -- [[User:OtherDave|OtherDave]] 13:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Independence == |
|||
Apparently some of the Lakota people have declared their withdrawal from the treaties with the US and declared an independent nation. http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iVC1KMTOgwiSoMQyT2LwZc9HyAgA http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071220/NEWS/712200347/1001 Does anybody know who this group is, and if it has widespread support amongst the Lakota ppl? The article seems to suggest that they are not mainstream, but being on the other side of the world, I don't really know. [[User:The bellman|The bellman]] ([[User talk:The bellman|talk]]) 12:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't know how much support they have but AFP describes the activists as "Lakota leaders" so I'm reverting to that term until more information is made public [[User:Trachys|Trachys]] ([[User talk:Trachys|talk]]) 15:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::The Wiki page for Mr. Means describes him as an activist, as do several news stories. He has never been elected. He lost electin bids in 200 and 2004. To claim that Mr. Means is a "leader" of the Lakota people is both false and presumptuous. He tried to be a leader and was rejected by the Sioux at the polls. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 16:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:::The AFP article mentions leaders, plural, so it's not just Means that issued the statement to the State Department. [[User:Mrintel|Mrintel]] ([[User talk:Mrintel|talk]]) 16:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::well Fox News (!?) calls them "activists" so I guess Agence France-Presse should back off! [[User:Trachys|Trachys]] ([[User talk:Trachys|talk]]) 17:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::It should be noted that none of the "leaders" mentioned here were tribal presidents, or even anyone from the upper ranks of the tribes (according to the Rapid City Journal). It would be like a group of self-important Californians (maybe even a mayor or two) declaring the state independent without any support from the state government. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.66.171.213|75.66.171.213]] ([[User talk:75.66.171.213|talk]]) 06:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::Kindly clarify what you mean by "(!?)" in reference to Fox News. Whatever the journalistic standards of this or that newspaper, Wiki guidelines are pretty clear about the use of language and titles. If you say, "A" then "A" should be a fact, not an "interpretation" by you or anyone else, including AFP. I am resident in Oregon. I am not therefor a "leader" or a "representative" of Oregon, no matter what my ambition or desire may be. If and when Means is confirmed in an official capacity as speaking on behalf of the elected officials of the Sioux Nation (and therefor the larger group as a whole), then the story can be weighted to represent that he is representing the Lakota as a whole - rather than a group of activists within the Sioux Nation who speak for no one but themselves. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 17:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:::Given that it's Faux News saying that they are activists, you can pretty much gaurentee they are not. When was the last time "Fair(ly) (Un)Balance(d)" News got anything accurate and unspun? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/147.202.23.71|147.202.23.71]] ([[User talk:147.202.23.71|talk]]) 20:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::To follow up on the previous: Means attempted twice and failed twice to gain election as President of the Oglala Sioux. I think that failure sheds significant doubt upon the mantle of "leader" which is placed on him. They have duly elec ted leaders who legitimately wear that title. Sans an endorsement by the various Sioux governments, he cannot speak for the Sioux people any more than I can stand up as an activist citizen of Oregon and declare Oregon an independent nation. It makes for good press and a splashy headline, but Wikipedia is not about flash in the pan headlines and propaganda ploys, but substantive reality. Mention of the drama is appropriate in the article, but forced - and false - attempts to legitimize it as an "official" action of the Sioux people is wrong. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 18:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::This can only end poorly. Either the US ignore them, and show the impotence of their leaders, the US will arrest them possibly sparking violence or the US will simply point out the fact the area is conquered territory and extinguish all treaty rights. I can't see any advantage to this. It was extremely poorly thought out.[[User:Manic-pedant|Manic-pedant]] ([[User talk:Manic-pedant|talk]]) 19:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::It has some interesting ramifications though, IF... IF... IF.... enough legitimate elected Sioux leaders endorse it. Not likely..... BUT as an intellectual exercise, it is interesting to play out the idea of Indian secession. From a constitutional perspective, it would be very interesting to see the exercise played out. Dangerous. But interesting. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 20:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I just want to know why this hasn't been covered by any major news outlets so far? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.68.51.113|71.68.51.113]] ([[User talk:71.68.51.113|talk]]) 22:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: Possibly because a lot of people at the news agencies are gone for the holidays. Same thing happened for the [[2004 Tsunami]]. Not to compare this Lakota story with the devastation of the Tsunami, but it shows how even if there's a big story during the holidays, it may not get the usual in-depth coverage until after Christmas. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 00:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and Fox all carried it on their web sites, then dropped it - although the stories are still there if you have the link. I think they realized that Russell Means is making a lot of noise but in reality doesn't actually represent anybody but himself and his group of fringe nutjobs. When he lost the election to a woman, he lost all credibility by going off into a sexist rant, stating outright that Indian women are not fit to govern. The vast majority of American Indians are proud Americans and would not seriously consider endorsing such an absurd movement. Russel Means is a sad shadow of his former popularity. This sad story will fade and disappear just as Russel Means is doing. In the long run, he has embarrassed himself.....again. It would be like some random gay activist in San Francisco declaring that California has "officially" seceded from the union. Oh, really? Says who... LMAO. [[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 01:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::We just did an article at WN: [[wikinews:Lakota Indian tribe secedes from US]]. [[User:DragonFire1024|DragonFire1024]] ([[User talk:DragonFire1024|talk]]) 01:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::Why is EVERYBODY on this discussion page assuming things and trying to discredit this endeavor in any way they can? What makes you think the rest of the Lakotas won't endorse this move? They'd be crazy not to. Who cares if he's elected or not. Who says their society works like ours!?!? Instead of trying to discredit him and this, why don't you wait for the facts and just stick to those? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.149.118.146|69.149.118.146]] ([[User talk:69.149.118.146|talk]]) 03:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I hope this is the beginning of the end of the evil empire that is the United States! I wonder if America's founding fathers were "fringe nutjobs" and "activists" as well? Was it an "absurd movement" for the 13 colonies to seek independence from England? It will be interesting to see if the United States grants self determination to these people like England eventually did to the traitors in the 13 colonies but I doubt the freedom hating United States will take any notice. [[User:YourPTR!|YourPTR!]] ([[User talk:YourPTR!|talk]]) 08:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Ha, someone who wants Ireland to be retaken by the British and fully supports monarchy and old tired traditions talking about freedom hating. [[Special:Contributions/65.12.253.21|65.12.253.21]] ([[User talk:65.12.253.21|talk]]) 00:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Unsourced == |
|||
From the Independence movement section: ''Furthermore, they have attributed their high teen suicide rate and low life expectancy to the conditions forced on them by the United States.'' |
|||
Is there a source to back that claim up? Sounds awfully POVish. [[User:DragonFire1024|DragonFire1024]] ([[User talk:DragonFire1024|talk]]) 01:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I would agree. I considered posting a POV question regarding the word "furthermore." Words such as "however" "but" "nevertheless" and such add weight to a particular debate point of view, and are inappropriate to Wiki entries. A minor edit with attribution would be in order. [[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 01:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I mean attribute the whole thing. I don't see anywhere where the tribe makes these claims. [[User:DragonFire1024|DragonFire1024]] ([[User talk:DragonFire1024|talk]]) 05:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::It's not quoted properly because, and I'm just guessing, there are similarities to the language of the AGP wire article.[http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22954249-1702,00.html] Here is a direct source for context and editing if someone wishes to make a correction: [http://www.lakotafreedom.com/why.html Declaration of Continuing Independence] |
|||
::::I removed that bit before I saw this thread, didn't mean to act unilaterally when there was discussion going on. However, the sentence was highly POV and unsourced, and wiki policy calls for removal of stuff like that immediately. -₪-''[[User:Hemidemisemiquaver|Hemidemisemiquaver]]'' ([[User talk:Hemidemisemiquaver|talk]]) 11:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== About the independence movement == |
|||
If the lakota do manage to obtain officialy recognised independence, would they still get any support from the US, i ask this because I cannot think of any micronation that has managed to obtain official recognition as a soveriegn nation, and the lakota people from what they are saying, seem to already be in need of monetary support to assit with some of the problems that they are having. I am sorry if this doesnt make sense, because this whole movment realy seems like either a cry for attention, or a movment that is doomed to make their situation even worse. --[[User:Alphamone|Alphamone]] ([[User talk:Alphamone|talk]]) 01:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Sorry, but [[WP:FORUM|Wikipedia is not a forum]] for discussion not related to improving the article, e.g. speculation about the US' response. There's lots of interesting stuff to say about this issue, but this isn't the place for it. If you want to converse broadly about the topic on this site, policy recommends that you keep the discussion confined to user talk pages and IRC, and use these pages for their intended purpose, discussing how to better the article. I apologize if that sounded rude. -₪-''[[User:Hemidemisemiquaver|Hemidemisemiquaver]]'' ([[User talk:Hemidemisemiquaver|talk]]) 11:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Micronation? == |
|||
Is this really an appropriate term? It seems heavily biased against their conception as a nation, not to mention they almost certainly are not seeking to be, as the micronation article stats "unrecognized" and "ephemeral", but in fact quite the opposite. |
|||
== List of treaty violations == |
|||
News articles following the Lakota's declaration of independence refer to numerous violations of treaties between the United States and the Lakota, but I have been unable to find specific claims. |
|||
A list of treaty violations, as alleged by the Lakota, would be a very valuable contribution to this article, if someone can gather that information. In fact, it appears to be at the heart of their independence movement, which is the most significant development in their history since the massacre at Wounded Knee. |
|||
I recommend that the list should be as specific as possible, to avoid ambiguity. For example, "They have taken our children" is not a specific claim; if this is an issue in the minds of the Lakota leaders, how have their children been taken and what terms from which treaties were violated by those actions? [[User:Jdlambert|JD Lambert]]<sup>([[User_talk:Jdlambert|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Jdlambert|C]])</sup> 06:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:A copy of the declaration would be absolutely fantastic to get ahold of. To the best of my knowledge, however, one is not available atm. -₪-''[[User:Hemidemisemiquaver|Hemidemisemiquaver]]'' ([[User talk:Hemidemisemiquaver|talk]]) 11:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Some documents available here: http://www.lakotafreedom.com/portfolio.html [[User:Trachys|Trachys]] ([[User talk:Trachys|talk]]) 06:21, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::thanks!-₪-''[[User:Hemidemisemiquaver|Hemidemisemiquaver]]'' ([[User talk:Hemidemisemiquaver|talk]]) 19:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Just added this to the article from the declaration. It's a little colloquial, especially the use of etcetera, but it's the only specific list of accusations in the statement:{{Template:Quotation| |
|||
* Homestead Acts |
|||
* Allotment Acts |
|||
* Citizenship Act forcing United States citizenship upon all American Indians |
|||
* Indian Reorganization Act a.k.a. Howard Wheeler Act (the first Apartheid Act) |
|||
* Forced relocation during the decades of the 1950's over the 1960's. |
|||
* Supreme Court decision disallowing our religions. |
|||
* Even though we are citizens of the United States of America, we are denied protections of the United States Constitution while living on Indian reservations, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.|Lakota Freedom Delegation||''Lakota Withdrawal Letter'', December 17, 2007}} |
|||
-₪-''[[User:Hemidemisemiquaver|Hemidemisemiquaver]]'' ([[User talk:Hemidemisemiquaver|talk]]) 19:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Declaration Should Be Removed from Lead Paragraph == |
|||
The news "non-event" regarding separation from the United States should be removed from the lead paragraph, as it is a political stunt and has no real-world impact. |
|||
The Lakota councils have not endorsed the declaration made by a few reactionary activists, and the event has generated little more than a yawn on the reservations supposedly affected. |
|||
There appears to be little, if any justification for it to be included in the lead paragraph for the Lakota people. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 20:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:It may be a non-event locally, but it has attracted international news coverage and is a likely reason many people will be looking this article up. If you have [[WP:RS|sources]] that you can [[WP:CITE|cite]] regarding the local reaction to the declaration, please [[WP:BB|feel free]] to add it! —[[User:Elipongo|Elipongo]] <small>([[User talk:Elipongo|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Elipongo|contribs]])</small> 20:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
It appears that the only Indians who endorse the thing - other than Russell Means and his cronies - are Ward Churchill and Jesse Jackson. This whole thing does not even rise to "flash in the pan" status. To call it a "tempest in a tea pot" would be a gross exaggeration. The organizers are growing angry and denouncing as traitors those indians (almost all of them) who refuse to get on board, calling them "IRA Indians" and people who don't want freedom. The grapes appear to be getting sour in the Means camp as Indian stampede AWAY from him. The whole pathetic episode does not merit mention in the lead paragraph. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 21:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Here's<ref>http://www.indianz.com/News/2007/006470.asp</ref> a sample of the American Indian response to this joke: "As I sat and pondered the possibilities of American Indian independence, my first thought was, “Yikes, I'd need a green card to live in Grand Forks!” |
|||
:"Of the people who called or e-mailed me, most are chuckling at the absurdity of it. Means and his group, of course, would be speaking for themselves and not tribes, whose tribal councils speak for them." |
|||
:This is from a column by Doreen Yellow Bird at indianz.com, which announced the secession "event" in a tersely worded piece which barely concealed the low regard it held for the story. |
|||
:It should be OUT of the lead paragraph, and relegated to one or at MOST 2 paragraphs in the "independence" section. '''Wikipedia is NOT a vehicle for Russell Means' propaganda machine, no matter how much some wish it were and try to make it be.''' [[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 03:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::indeed. ''this'' is what the article on Russell Means himself has to say about it: |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
On December 20, 2007, Means announced the withdrawal of a small group of Lakota Sioux from all treaties with the United States government.[7] Means and a delegation of activists declared - without significant tribal support - the Lakota a sovereign nation with property rights over thousands of square miles in South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming and Montana.[8] He admits that his declaration has no legal or official standing and is not supported by Lakota tribal governments, which he compared to Nazi collaborators in Nazi concentration camps even though he has repeatedly tried to be elected to those governments[9] |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
thats a much better summary than the longer unnecessary one that exists here [[User:SJMNY|SJMNY]] ([[User talk:SJMNY|talk]]) 05:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Although I completely agree that this article gives undue weight to the incipient independence movement, which has certainly not yet shown that it is an important event in the history of the Lakota, the passage from the Russell Means article shows unnecessary bias in the other direction. First of all, it's incorrect that "Means announced the withdrawal of a small group of Lakota Sioux" from the United States—this was an announcement which purported to speak on behalf of Lakota people in general. Regardless of whether they had any right to do that, they didn't make the announcement on their own behalf. The [http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/12/388480.html letter of withdrawal] makes this clear: "Lakotah, formally and unilaterally withdraws from all agreements and treaties imposed by the United States Government on the Lakotah People ... Lakotah, and the population therein, have waited for at least 155 years for the United States of America to adhere to the provisions of the above referenced treaties." |
|||
:Second, where are the sources that say these people don't have significant tribal support? |
|||
:What's up with the sentence, "He [Means] admits that his declaration has no legal or official standing"? I sincerely doubt that Means or anyone involved with this would agree to that. Means was quoted as saying "We are legally within our rights to be free and independent". |
|||
:Regarding the phrase "which he compared to Nazi collaborators in Nazi concentration camps even though he has repeatedly tried to be elected to those governments", I don't understand why the phrase "even though" is in there. Presumably, Means would try to use those governments for some other purpose if he were elected to power in them.—[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 21:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Means and his group state clearly that they do not represent the elected tribal governments, nor any other Lakota who disagree wilth the action, whom he calls Nazi collaborators. This statement negates his earlier claim that the declaration represents all Lakota. [[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 22:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Hmmm, that's an interesting point. Still, in context of the previous statement, one can assume that these people believe "the freedom loving Lakota" to be a substantial number of people, not "a small group of Lakota Sioux".—[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 22:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
His 15 minutes of fame are up. Time to return the Lakota People article to a sense of sanity. As others agree, I am taking the secession stuff out of the lead, and paring down the entry in the "independence" section to a reasonable size.If people are curious, there are links aplenty to lead them to detail.[[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 00:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Duschamps removed half a paragraph and replaced it with one-sided arguments in favor of a particular POV. Ironically, he cited "POV" as reason to remove relevant quotes WITH attribution AND references. The FACT that these publicity hounds state in no uncertain terms that they DO NOT REPRESENT the Lakota people and hold a majority of them in contempt as Nazi collaborators is absulutely 100% germaine to the event in relation to this article. Furthermore, if a reader wishes to research the affair further, there are MORE THAN ENOUGH links to fulfill that need. There is no reason to turn this article into a propaganda vehicle for this fringe group who admit that they do not represent anybody but their small faction of publicity hounds.[[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 22:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== "independence" junk == |
|||
its starting to look more and more like this whole "independence" thing is much-ado-about-nothing. Means and his small group clearly don't speak for the Lakota (as evidenced by his 3 time failure to win their elections) I think it's time this entire incident were given a much lower prominence on the Lakota page, it could be more extensively discussed on a page about Means' group. [[User:SJMNY|SJMNY]] ([[User talk:SJMNY|talk]]) 23:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I concur. The media jumped waaaaaaaay past it's journalistic bounds in reporting this thing on it's face value. It's just another in a long line of attention grabbing stunts by a distinct fringe minority. The tribal governments are lining up to distance themselves from this joke. Shame on the MSM for it's lack of journaistic skepticism in the face of claims by a person of low or no credibility.[[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 03:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::You gave a POV title to this descussion "independence junk"! First off you guys have hacked that section to almost nothing. And it should be stated that Russell Means and Phyllis Young are not acting for the elected tribal governments. But not to list all the refrenced [[notable]] information and NPOV facts only show your onw biast. I am willing to compermise but will not agree to the section as you had it.--[[User:Duchamps_comb|Ducha]][[User talk:Duchamps_comb|mps_]][[Special:Contributions/Duchamps_comb|comb]][[Master of Fine Arts| MFA]] 16:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::: i labelled it junk because its just that, it would be the same thing as me and a bunch of friends "declaring independence" on behalf of Staten Island. Its already receiving more attention on this page than it deserves given that it is in in no way representative of the Lakota.[[User:SJMNY|SJMNY]] ([[User talk:SJMNY|talk]]) 19:48, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:If one wishes to create an "American Indian Independence Movement" subject, then they should do so and I would applaud that. To shoe-horn the actions of this fringe group of reactionaries into the larger subject of the Lakota People is an abuse of both Wikipedia and the Lakota People, in my opinion. A paragraph is MORE THAN FAIR treatment for this pathetic attempt at usurping the Sioux Nation's elected governments. Advocates for transforming this article into a "Free the Lakota" propaganda piece are plainly acting from a fringe partisan POV and giving their mightiest effort to making this non-event seem like a fate accompli. As if it means anything more than a hollow political statement by a has-been political activist which in reality means nothing and changes nothing. [[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 22:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Duschamps removed half a paragraph and replaced it with one-sided arguments in favor of a particular POV. Ironically, he cited "POV" as reason to remove relevant quotes WITH attribution AND references. The FACT that these publicity hounds state in no uncertain terms that they DO NOT REPRESENT the Lakota people and hold a majority of them in contempt as Nazi collaborators is absulutely 100% germaine to the event in relation to this article. Furthermore, if a reader wishes to research the affair further, there are MORE THAN ENOUGH links to fulfill that need. There is no reason to turn this article into a propaganda vehicle for this fringe group who admit that they do not represent anybody but their small faction of publicity hounds.[[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 22:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::What the section needs is balance. Can anyone find the reactions of the elected tribal leaders and of the tribal members as a group? The fact that this guy has stood for election several times and failed is telling all by itself, but [[WP:V|evidence]] of whether or not this is taken seriously at the local level is needed to achieve [[WP:NPOV]]. —[[User:Elipongo|Elipongo]] <small>([[User talk:Elipongo|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Elipongo|contribs]])</small> 20:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::i've looked and found no reaction from the State Department or from the real Lakota leaders, apparently this isn't even taken seriously enough to merit a response.[[User:SJMNY|SJMNY]] ([[User talk:SJMNY|talk]]) 21:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Here's<ref>http://www.indianz.com/News/2007/006470.asp</ref> a sample of the American Indian response to this joke: "As I sat and pondered the possibilities of American Indian independence, my first thought was, “Yikes, I'd need a green card to live in Grand Forks!” Of the people who called or e-mailed me, most are chuckling at the absurdity of it. Means and his group, of course, would be speaking for themselves and not tribes, whose tribal councils speak for them." This is from a column by Doreen Yellow Bird at indianz.com, which announced the secession "event" in a tersely worded piece which barely concealed the low regard it held for the publicity stunt.[[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 22:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
The fact is that what I removed had your POV. I read all of your references, And that is what I put in the paragraph not your one sided twisted notions. I am not putting in any of my opinions just WHAT HAS BEEN REPORTED, almost verbatim. “Nazi collaborators” is so Neo-Conservative mombo jumbo, and charged. I will try to fix the paragraph to neutrality.--[[User:Duchamps_comb|Ducha]][[User talk:Duchamps_comb|mps_]][[Special:Contributions/Duchamps_comb|comb]][[Master of Fine Arts| MFA]] 04:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Duchamps keeps removing Russell Means' comments comparing Lakota who disagree with him to Nazi collaborators, feeling that it is "neocon mumbo jumbo." Well, they are the words of Mr. Means and are 100% relevant. If he doesn't like the comment, Duchamps should take the issue up with Russell Means. They are back in because the comments are FACTUAL QUOTES and have great bearing on his view of the LAKOTA PEOPLE - whom this article is about, and whom he pretends to represent.[[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 15:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:the article is fine right now with the link that someone just added to an entire page about this fictional nation that Means' groups claims to have created, go check out that article, it suffers from some serious NPOV issues. [[User:SJMNY|SJMNY]] ([[User talk:SJMNY|talk]]) 04:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I hope the current section is to everyone liking, I did the very best I could, Tring to be neural. It still may need some tweeking. But I think it is accurate and fair.--[[User:Duchamps_comb|Ducha]][[User talk:Duchamps_comb|mps_]][[Special:Contributions/Duchamps_comb|comb]][[Master of Fine Arts| MFA]] 05:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::PS. For what it's worth I still believe the list of grievances are valid and neutral.--[[User:Duchamps_comb|Ducha]][[User talk:Duchamps_comb|mps_]][[Special:Contributions/Duchamps_comb|comb]][[Master of Fine Arts| MFA]] 05:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::i think it looks fine as is. i think the list of grievances is too much, it properly belongs on another page about Russell Means' movement. considering their lack of support this is nothing more than a flash in the pan that deserves no more coverage within this article. what i'd love to see is more information about the Lakota, particularly about their government (that section is too short imo) and treaties with the U.S. [[User:SJMNY|SJMNY]] ([[User talk:SJMNY|talk]]) 06:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Thanks SJMNY, I too would like to see a page about the Lakota goverment.--[[User:Duchamps_comb|Ducha]][[User talk:Duchamps_comb|mps_]][[Special:Contributions/Duchamps_comb|comb]][[Master of Fine Arts| MFA]] 16:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Removing line about UN declaration of indiginouss rights. It is non-sequitur to the topic.[[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 15:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Here is an excerpt from the Argus Leader (the reference Duchamps keeps removing for ideological reasons): ''"I want to emphasize, we do not represent the collaborators, the Vichy Indians and those tribal governments set up by the United States of America to ensure our poverty, to ensure the theft of our land and resources," Means said, comparing elected tribal governments to Nazi collaborators in France during World War II.'' Duchamps wants this hidden and keeps removing it and calling it "neocon mumbo jumbo" as if it is not a factual quote. Aat the same time, he inserts non-sequitur UN declarations about indiginous rights whihc have little or nothing to do with the topic of the groups' declaration, except in an argumentive fashion used to justify the action. This article is not a debate or an opportunity to present justifications for this or that POV, it is a recitation of FACTS. The FACT is that there is no indication that the Lakota people support this action, and Mr. Means' response to that lack of support demonstrates the expansive divide between this small fringe group and the Lakota people. Duchamps has a transparent agenda here - to CENSOR anything that reflects negatively on this group's actions and views,and to INSERT anything that gives it credence.[[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 15:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
: Look I'm in NO way saying he did not say it , as I believe he DID and it IS reported in several sorces, hovever WP is not the place for such quotes, as it add biast and a negative light. It's as if going to [[George Washington]] and addind he used the "N-word" to refer to his cotton workers, it simply is uncalled for. You can give an accurate quote that is biast, I hope you understand. As for the UN resoultions they effect all native peoples, and this freedom movement is a recent-reaction to thoes resoultions. So basicly you want to defame Means and not put in the FACTS about the new laws of the UN. It Is only all too clear "your not so hidden agenda. |
|||
PS. soon this page will be "Semi-protected" so YOU will not be able to edit it anymore just thought you should know...--[[User:Duchamps_comb|Ducha]][[User talk:Duchamps_comb|mps_]][[Special:Contributions/Duchamps_comb|comb]][[Master of Fine Arts| MFA]] 16:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::You're comparing Russell Means to George Washington? LMAO. Look, if Means' words about the MAJORITY of of Lakota people are inflammatory, SO BE IT..... They ACCURATELY shows a REAL and bitter divide within the Lakota people on the subject. You simply want it removed because it sheds a bad light on YOUR desired POV. [[Special:Contributions/72.11.124.226|72.11.124.226]] ([[User talk:72.11.124.226|talk]]) 16:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Means is no were close to George Washington, --however it can be argued that |
|||
George Washington, Paul Revere, Samuel Adams, and Benjamin Franklin were a “fringe group” back in 1775, and spawned the American Revolution. So neither you nor I know where the Rights of Indigenous Peoples will take society in 50-100 years their may be a "State of Lakota". Lets get some outside editors to look and see whos version is more up to WP standards. (which I know will be mine; as one other user "SJMNY" seems to think so.)--[[User:Duchamps_comb|Ducha]][[User talk:Duchamps_comb|mps_]][[Special:Contributions/Duchamps_comb|comb]][[Master of Fine Arts| MFA]] 17:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Please read [[WP:SYN]] in [[WP:OR]] and [[WP:V]]. Also If you look in the text from the Argus Leader, "comparing elected tribal governments to Nazi collaborators in France during World War II." this is the reporters voice, OUT of CONTEXT, and not a quote. If it said Means said, "elected tribal governments are Nazi collaborators." From a reliable source THEN you could put that in the section (maybe). --[[User:Duchamps_comb|Ducha]][[User talk:Duchamps_comb|mps_]][[Special:Contributions/Duchamps_comb|comb]][[Master of Fine Arts| MFA]] 19:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: the sentence ''Italic text''"A 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision awarded the tribes $122 million as compensation, but the court did not award land. The Lakota have refused the settlement. (As interest accrues, the unclaimed award is approaching $1 billion.)" is pretty meaningless without context, who sued and why? [[User:SJMNY|SJMNY]] ([[User talk:SJMNY|talk]]) 19:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::I agree, SJMNY, that the Supreme Court (and UN) notations are either irrelevant or so far down the list of minor relevancies that they belong in an in depth article about American Indian seperatist movements in general, not in an article about the Lakota people. Duschamps seems to feel that this article needs to be, first and foremost, an indictment of the United States. He appears to hold that view so firmly that he thinks his opinion on the matter is fact rather than POV. This article is not the place to argue one POV versus another. Paring it down to FACTS that bear on the Lakota people is the key. '''One-side citations of arguments in favor of Means' group are POV.''' [[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 21:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Russell Means compared the Lakota people who disagree with him (the majority it appears) to the Vichy French, who were Nazi collaborators, and used the word "collaborators." Whether he uttered the word "Nazi" or not, he is unquestionably comparing those Lakota to Nazi collaborators. The term "collaborators" is in quotes in the article, not the word "Nazi". That Russell Means compared those who disagree with him to Nazi collaborators is undeniable. Duschamp's continued attempts to delete that relevant information - because he doesn't like the fact that it exists - is growing old. Please stop it. Furthermore, his stubborn insistence that POV advocacy arguments (irrelevant UN declarations) be placed in the article reveal that he wishes to create a biased article. The UN does not make law in the US. Their toothless declarations of human rights are irrelevant to this issue, and are only included to add weight to a certain POV, in violation of Wikipedia neutrality policy.[[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 21:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== POV Arguments Not Appropriate in Article == |
|||
Arguments in favor of the secessionists are available through the wiki link in the article. If one wishes to engage in agruing in favor of the secessionists,s then we must then have rebuttals from the other POV. This clearly is not the model that Wikipedia has for such articles. Certain persons should stop inserting POV arguments (past UN and Supreme Court items supporting secession) and simply leave the article alone. The fact that a group of activists has declared the Lakota a sovereign nation is THERE in the article, and there are many links to where more information and POV arguments can be seen. Now, can we leave this alone for a while? This is getting old fast.[[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 21:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Bad Links? == |
|||
The following link is bad. Assumably, it will be set right soon, but an eye should be kept on it. |
|||
http://www.lakotafreedom.com/portfolio.html |
|||
Presumably there are more links to their proclamations, but I think we should give it time, or we may be going back and forth chasing links. [[User:VanBrigglePottery|VanBrigglePottery]] ([[User talk:VanBrigglePottery|talk]]) 22:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:10, 19 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lakota people article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Free Lakota Bank
[edit]The Lakota have opened a bank that is billed as "the world's first non-reserve, non-fractional bank that issues, accepts for deposit, and circulates REAL money...silver and gold." Free Lakota Bank Website —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.188.113.180 (talk) 21:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- To avoid confusion: An admin at the ROL forums states... "The Republic of Lakotah is in NO way associated with the Lakota Free Bank. Caveat emptor!" White Elk 08:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by AWhiteElk (talk • contribs)
I just included an image of Touch the Clouds and included his name in the list of notable native american Sioux people. Jouke Bersma Contributions 12:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Crazy Horse Miniconjou or Oglala
[edit]"Recently, a body of evidence has shown that Tašunka Witko may have been Miniconjou.[citation needed]"
This should be deleted, as Tašunka Witko was an Oglala chief. Bikepunk (talk) 13:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
The Mother of Crazy Horse "Gathers Her Berries" was the Sister of Chief Spotted Tail. His adopted Father was Old Man Crazy Horse "Worm" who was Oglala. He 'Worm" was married to both of Spotted Tails Sisters. The first of which was "Meadow Lark". Spotted Tail was not Oglala. Mykl Sams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.245.61.33 (talk) 17:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Redlinked notable Lakota people
[edit]- Bearded Face (Robert Jarvenpa), Professor of Anthropology at SUNY Albany
- Pete Catches (Pȟetáǧa Yuhá Máni), medicine man and Sun Dance chief
- James V. Fenelon, Sociologist and author
- Little Spoon, director
- Tatanka Means, Oglala actor, comedian, designer
- Tomahawk Funk (Tyrone Pacheco), rapper, with Hip Hop group Funkdoobiest
Moved these here, just in case anyone wants to write articles for these people. -Uyvsdi (talk) 17:07, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Uyvsdi
Clan to Tribe
[edit]Personal story telling |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
From Clan to Tribe – The Story of a Celtic Lakota Family The Watters family, the name meaning “They that dwell by loch and sea”, originally lived on the western islands and the highlands of Scotland. Belonging to a sept (smaller family group) of Clan Forbes, the families were farmers and fishermen under the protection and leadership the clan chief. Being in the upper highlands and islands afforded some security during the 18th and 19th centuries, the land and climate being somewhat inhospitable and troublesome for travelers. These people subsisted on a diet largely of potatoes and whatever vegetables might grow in the rocky soil, as well as whatever the sea would begrudgingly give up. Life was extremely simple and often just plain “extreme.” Faith had always been a mainstay of strength and community for our family and others. The old Celtic church established by monks, (Patrick, Columba and others), was critical to the life being and morale of people who struggled to eke out a living in this country. As time and seasons would pass, this faith would play a continual role in the life of the family. Especially, as oppression and tyranny caused the family to uproot themselves and journey to other lands and places. The 18th century finally brought insecurity to our family in the form of the notorious and often barbaric Highland Clearances. Without going into detail in this brief history, the Clearances were England’s answer to dealing with troublesome clans, and also, to introduce sheep to the highlands to bolster their woolen industry. Lowland clansmen were even utilized by the government to drive out, burn out and brutally displace the highland families and clans. There are many general accounts of all this mayhem and where all the surviving families fled to, but there are always exceptions to generalities throughout history. For the most part, the Watters family fled the highlands to either the outer islands or across the sea to Ireland, settling on the north shores in what is known as County Antrim. James Watters (this author’s great, great grandfather) and Ann Lowery were wed there and started their family, continuing in the pattern established by generations before them; farming and fishing. Dates and details of the Watters family are very difficult, if not impossible, to find. Ship’s manifests and the occasional recorded birth, death or marriage document are often the only evidence of where and when the family turned up in places. It wasn’t long before another “clearance” of sorts would cause the Watters to once again seek freedom and safety from oppression. The English weren’t satisfied with colonizing just the highlands, but now wanted to displace troublesome Gaelic peoples in favor of bringing industry and colonists to the Ulster regions of Ireland. These actions once again included military operations in what is now Northern Ireland. Suffice to say, James Watters did not want to stick around for the potential destruction and death that seemed to be coming once again. Making their way to a port, the family secured steerage on a ship bound for Philadelphia in the hopes of connecting with other Celtic families that fled earlier to America. James and Ann settled in Alleghany County Pennsylvania after a short stay in Philadelphia. Farming was good and the family prospered. During this time, my great grandfather, Samuel, was born. Again, there is not much in the way of detail about our particular family in Pennsylvania, but other histories give a very good indication of how life looked during this time in the history of the United States. Samuel apparently thrived in this new world environment, and developed an also apparent penchant for exploration and adventure. He eventually left Pennsylvania and traveled northwest to Minnesota, where he became employed as a fur trapper for either the Hudson Bay or Northwest companies, again, details are sketchy but those were the two major companies employing trappers. French, Irish, and Scots made up the bulk of the work force at that time. Like many other trappers, Samuel “took up with” a Native American woman, which was not only convenient for surviving in the land, but also brought valuable connections with the native population in terms of business propositions. Eventually, Samuel and Isabel Marshall (her English name) were wed and started their own family. At this time, (early 1800’s,) the Lakota people were happily entrenched as a woodland people, enjoying hunting, fishing and gathering, while also engaging in the occasional skirmish with the neighboring Ojibwe tribe. It wouldn’t be long, however, before yet another sort of “clearance” would threaten the Watters family. Now, a little cultural history on Lakota family is probably necessary here? The Lakota people had a somewhat matriarchal society, not so much that women were in charge, but that whenever a man married, he became part of the wife’s tribe/family. Tribes usually consisted of several family groups led by a chief, hence the “clan to tribe” transition of my family. During this time, settlers were pushing westward seeking their own “manifest destiny”. And, often the settlers were accompanied by government military forces who would establish forts in the frontier. The forts provided protection and a sort of town where people could gather, obtain goods and services, and in general maintain a sense of community. Needless to say, the native population was often a hindrance to this new colonization westward. All sorts of “arrangements” and coalitions were established between various people groups; unfortunately for the Lakota these coalitions didn’t include them. Eventually, the Lakota people sought another place to live in peace, and this saw them leave Minnesota traveling southwest into the Dakota territories. Samuel and his family were part of this migration, at least what little evidence that exists seems to lend credence to that movement? (Later evidence such as death certificates and gravestones would provide further hints to the movement of the family.) During the time of life on the Great Plains, the Lakota nation thrived. The new lifestyle of hunting and moving with the great Buffalo herds seemed to suit them well. Horses added another advantage to the growing nation of tribes, and the often glamorized life of the Indians began to be developed among white America. Sadly, the “good days” of the Buffalo and plains life would also be short-lived for the Lakota and our Watters family. Further westward movement of settlers and forts (cavalry) continued to desecrate both the land and the indigenous people; disease, massacre of the North American Bison (Buffalo), and environmental damage (yes, believe it or not it had already started,) among other things. The government felt compelled to intervene on behalf of settlers and deal with the “Indian uprisings”. Again, I won’t belabor that history here, but suffice to say our family was once again feeling the need to move. Establishment of reservations (areas of isolation for the various tribes) by the government heralded a clear signal to Lakota leaders that something must be done. Several skirmishes among cavalry and Indians alarmed Washington and prompted further escalating military intervention. Notable among these campaigns was Custer’s debacle at the Little Bighorn River (the Greasy Grass our people call it.) While Lakota people did have some effective efforts against the government troops, it was clear to all Native American leaders that they could never outlast the numbers and force of the government. Most leaders chose to comply with treaties and move their people to reservations, (which sadly was the beginning of “social genocide” of Native American culture and people.) Our family chose to flee to Canada with other Lakota, accompanied by Cheyenne tribes. Sitting Bull, chief of the Hunkpapa tribe of Lakota, had made this choice while Crazy Horse (a relative and also chief of the Oglala tribe) finally decided to stop fighting and return to the reservation, (he was later tragically murdered there.) In Canada, the government had taken a much more amicable approach to native populations, ceding large tracts of land and granting citizenship to their indigenous tribes. This looked like a very good choice for the Lakota, but the Canadian government took the position that only existing indigenous Canadian tribes could be granted this status. Once again, my family was a people without a country. Staying in Canada was useful for a time, but Lakota people wanted to be with other families (tribes), and eventually Sitting Bull decided to return to the reservations, and many different tribes followed. Sadly, this choice would also end Sitting Bull’s life in similar fashion to Crazy Horse. This became a critical turning point for my family. My young grandfather, James, chose to return with some Lakota back to the U.S. via Montana (west of the path of other tribes.) Those Lakota joined cousins of the Assiniboine tribe at the Fort Peck Agency in northeastern Montana. This was also a time of deeply emotional decisions by members of our family. Samuel Watters chose to take his family and separately move back to Minnesota. Details of that move and whatever happened to he and his family are once again scarce, except for a death record of Samuel in Ottertail, Minnesota. His son, James, on the other hand decided that he must begin to hide his Lakota heritage if he wanted to own land and have a future in America. James met and married Eliza Coffey, an Irish woman whose family lived in that area of Montana at the time. James homesteaded near the intersection of the Missouri River (Big Muddy) and Milk River. There they raised their family of eleven children, farming and hunting (but all the while being very careful to hide any Lakota connections.) The children were an interesting mix of clearly Lakota looking people (much like James), but also with fair skinned and even some red-headed ones! When asked about the darker character of some members of the family, James explained that we were descended from “black Irish” lineage. The ruse worked and my family thrived in the Fort Peck area, but never associated with relatives on the reservation there. Some of my uncles even went so far as to deride “the lazy Indians on that reservation.” Anyway, fast forward to all of my father’s family getting older, going away to college, starting their own families and moving to one coast or the other, (Montana winters had taken their toll on their collective psyches.) Many of us ended up in Sacramento, California, and life went on for the Watters, the Irish Watters. The only conflicts of note were the occasional bout between the Protestant and Catholic sides of the family, but those usually boiled over harmlessly, (unlike things back in Ireland.) Most of the families gathered every summer back in Montana to visit the grandparents and Uncle Arvie (the sole member who stayed on to ranch and farm.) Us kids spent those summers hunting, riding horses, learning how to drive the farm trucks, working the harvest and more. I always recall the “tack room” my Uncle Arvie had on his farm. It was loaded with the most wonderful collection of leather goods; saddles, bridles and more. And, there were many handcrafted bows and arrows among the weaponry in that room. I suppose I should have suspected some Indian connection in my family, what with all the prowess in hunting and horseback skills, but again, no one in the family ever brought up Indians in conversation. Then, one summer when we were much older, and apparently with the blessing of my now very old grandfather (James), my own father pulled out an old sepia tone photograph of a Lakota woman. The resemblance to my grandfather and my own father and a couple of his brothers was uncanny. It was then that I first knew of our Lakota heritage, and yet still it was a secret between my father and me. Sadly, the family still harbored fears of being “found out”, even though at this point it would not have mattered. I guess my father felt a deep need to recognize this heritage with me? We had done Boy Scouts for many years, and my father always emphasized the Indian lore aspect of Scouting. In fact, we both joined the Order of the Arrow, a subgroup of Boy Scouts dedicated to Native American culture. His own skills as a Lakota warrior became very apparent; horse whisperer, wonderful worker of leather and natural materials, an amazing hunting eye and skill. That time passed too quickly for me, and especially for him. I went on to playing football and forgot all about those Order of the Arrow days. Fast forward again, I have raised my own family and “retired” from regular work. All the years of being a park ranger, environmental biologist and father now seemed to be speaking to me of something deeper in my spirit. I had also become a Christian in the truest sense, a disciple of Jesus. That new identity seemed to be calling me to look back, to seek my roots. This new journey led to expanding our family tree, which had been mistakenly “altered” at the point of Samuel and his alleged wife in that tree. Thus this story was born, and it has given me a deeper understanding of who I am, not only as a Lakota Celtic, but as a follower of Jesus, and through Him of the Great Mystery, the Holy Trinity. It has given me a loving and compassionate attitude for other people groups and religions; it has made me a better person. I realize I am on a journey with still more seasons to experience, but now the journey has a destination, even if I don’t know where the next step leads. I have found purpose, God’s purpose, in my life as a disciple. I have found identity in my heritage as a holy man (shaman, priest, etc.) but also as a heyoka (clown in the Lakota sense.) Henri Nouwen would call it “wounded healer”, or one who takes his own story and struggles, and uses them to give comfort and healing to others. Not that I have “arrived”, but I have a more clear path . . . the Narrow Road, the Good Red Road of Jesus Christ. From Patrick and Columcille, to Nicholas Black Elk and Crazy Horse, I have found relatives and spiritual mentors from the past who continue to “speak” to me today. They point me to the Way, they affirm my path and guidebook, the Bible, and they join me in the Journey. Mitakuye Oyasin, Bennacht De Ort, (“All My Relatives” in Lakota and “God Bless You” in Gaelic, the language of the Celtic peoples) Patrick Perching Eagle Watters, Lakota and Celtic [Among resources that have provided both physical and spiritual “evidence” for this story are; Nicholas Black Elk – Medicine Man, Missionary, Mystic by Michael F. Steltenkamp, and Stories of the Celtic Soul Friends – Their Meaning for Today by Edward C. Sellner. These two books, among other written forms, have been instrumental in seeing my family history in a spiritual light, as well as providing some vital physical history.] Footnote August 2011: My cousin Michael Watters has been researching our family, especially the lost Lakota connections. This past year he contacted relatives on reservations in the Dakotas who did indeed recall their grandparents talking about ancestors from County Antrim, Ireland. At this time we are pursuing better understanding of how and what happened in the 1800’s when our family and other Lakota fled to Canada and then later scattered throughout Montana and the Dakotas. Michael also seemed to find information concerning Isabel Marshall that may have linked her to a French trapper, she may have been half French and half Lakota? There are Watters living on the Lower Brule reservation in South Dakota, which also affirms a thought that we may be Sicangu (Brule or burnt thigh) in part? |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Lakota people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081106172400/http://www.rosebudsiouxtribe-nsn.gov:80/constitution.htm to http://www.rosebudsiouxtribe-nsn.gov/constitution.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080704052850/http://www.sioux.org/our_const_by_laws.html to http://www.sioux.org/our_const_by_laws.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Lakota people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20160129174317/http://infca.org/tribes/IRA.htm to http://www.infca.org/tribes/IRA.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Lakota people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150801101021/http://dakotablues.nl/ to http://www.dakotablues.nl
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Lakota people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.infca.org/tribes/IRA.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150904060736/http://findarticles.com/p/news-articles/brandon-sun-the/mi_8087/is_20080626/dakota-nations-reject-603-settlement/ai_n50742556/ to http://findarticles.com/p/news-articles/brandon-sun-the/mi_8087/is_20080626/dakota-nations-reject-603-settlement/ai_n50742556/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609092458/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iVC1KMTOgwiSoMQyT2LwZc9HyAgA to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iVC1KMTOgwiSoMQyT2LwZc9HyAgA
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225063324/https://curtis.library.northwestern.edu/viewPage.cgi?showp=1&size=2&id=nai.03.book.00000019&volume=3 to http://curtis.library.northwestern.edu/viewPage.cgi?showp=1&size=2&id=nai.03.book.00000019&volume=3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lakota people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130321200219/http://indianz.com/News/2004/005762.asp to http://www.indianz.com/News/2004/005762.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821112631/http://www.afp.com/ to http://afp.com/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20071220%2FNEWS%2F712200347%2F1001 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.unaturk.org/index.php/dergi-magazine/54-say-17-number-17-spring-2008/172-the-lakota-sioux-indians-declare-independence.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
proper meaning of the name
[edit]The name "sioux" is short for Nadowessioux, meaning "little snakes", which was a spiteful nickname given to them by the Ojibwe, their longtime foe.
www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/tbacig/studproj/a1041/mnansx1800/sioux.htm
The "Nadewisou" were recorded in 1654 by Jesuit missionary, Pierre Radisson. The Ojibwa (Chippewa) and Huron also lived in the same areas. The Ojibwa had great fear of the Nadewisou and told horrible tales to the French fur trader Radisson. As it happened, with a stroke of a pen by Radisson in his explorers diary, the best known Indian inhabitants of the United States upper Midwest suffered an unwanted nickname.
The French called these people "Sioux" which originally derived from a Chippewa word, Nadewisou. The Chippewa were their sworn enemies. Nadewisou means "treacherous snake." Naturally, the Sioux prefer their proper ancient traditional name of Dakota.
http://www.sicc.sk.ca/archive/saskindian/a93aug03.htm
2A02:C7F:DA68:2600:ADDF:3AAE:2D58:18D4 (talk) 21:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
2A02:C7F:DA68:2600:ADDF:3AAE:2D58:18D4 (talk) 21:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
"In popular culture" heading proposed
[edit]I suggest adding "in popular culture" heading to refer to a 6-books saga Die Söhne der Großen Bärin ("Sons of the Great Bear") (1951-1963) by East German author Liselotte_Welskopf-Henrich. Saga depicts Lakota and Dakota in general struggles against the American settlers in the 2nd half of 19th century and it was very popular in former East European communist countries. However, I am not sure whether at any time it was published and/or known in the anglophone world. There might be other references of course which may seem appropriate to include under suggested heading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zilvinasmaigys (talk • contribs)
- No. We already have Native Americans in German popular culture for that stuff. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:57, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
sentence under picture January 17
[edit]Last sentence is not clear / correct Teun Spaans (talk) 21:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
What are the three "subcultures"?
[edit]The lede states: one of the three prominent subcultures of the Sioux people
However, the Sioux article's lede states there are two, the Dakota and the Lakota.
What is the third and why is it not mentioned in either article? Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- If you read the full lead at Sioux, it mentions the (1) Eastern Dakota (Santee or Sisseton, Wahpeton, Wahpekute, Mdewakanton); (2) Western Dakota (Yankton, Yanktonai, erroneously referred to as Nakota, who are instead the Assiniboine people); and (3) the Lakota (Titonwon, broken down into seven bands such as the Oglala, Hunkpapa et al). oncamera (talk page) 18:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well the " The modern Sioux consist of two major divisions based on language divisions: the Dakota and Lakota" right at the top seems confusing to me then. In any event, is there any reason we are not being specific in the lede here? Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Dakota and Lakota are the two major divisions based on languages. Eastern Dakota (Santee), Western Dakota (Wičhíyena) (both speak dialects of Dakota) and Lakota (northern and southern dialects exist) are also based on geographical locations. I don't understand what you mean by it's not being specific, but you could add "Eastern Dakota (Santee), Western Dakota (Wičhíyena) and Lakota" if you need it defined on this article. oncamera (talk page) 19:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well the " The modern Sioux consist of two major divisions based on language divisions: the Dakota and Lakota" right at the top seems confusing to me then. In any event, is there any reason we are not being specific in the lede here? Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Etymology
[edit]As far as I understand, the terms Lakota and Dakota mean Ally in Lakota language and Dakota language, respectively. The article Dakota mentions this meaning; I think the present article should too. (And both might additionally mention that the terms mean the same, except when referring to people and languages). Nø (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- It mentions the meaning of Lakota in the Ethnonyms section? oncamera (talk page) 17:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Laramie
[edit]Re [1] the treaty may have been signed on Lakota land but at the time the fort was built it was Cheyenne or Crow land. If I’m wrong, please provide a source for the claim. Volunteer Marek 04:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Where are your sources for your claims? oncamera (talk page) 14:33, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- I’m not making any claims in the text of the article. The current text makes an unsourced claim. It needs to be sourced. Volunteer Marek 16:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- High-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- B-Class South Dakota articles
- High-importance South Dakota articles
- B-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Unknown-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles