User talk:X3210: Difference between revisions
→ArbCom elections are now open!: new section |
|||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{notice|Comments left here will be read and deleted per WP:DRRC.}} |
|||
==Tom Petty== |
|||
==AfD nomination of Patrick Syring== |
|||
I'm fairly sure you have the wrong user. I changed the offense language in the bar above the picture back to Tom Petty and then I took out "anally raped" from the biography. All I did was go to the page because I wanted to look up how old he was and while I was doing that I decided to correct some immature person's work. I'm sorry for trying to help out Wikipedia. I'll never do that again, especially since there is no chance to be innocent until proven guilty. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/136.165.0.6|136.165.0.6]] ([[User talk:136.165.0.6|talk]]) 01:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[Patrick Syring]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Syring  (2nd nomination)]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:THF|THF]] ([[User talk:THF|talk]]) 03:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
I also was fixing some vandalism, before the test above his picture read something like "is gay and has lil penis" or soemthing to that effect. There was also another line that read "he's on right now go watch" which while isn't offensive, is kinda pointless, and dosn't belong there. |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Clarify for me? == |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
X3210, maybe I'm not understanding you correctly. You seem to be objecting to the word "openly" being used for [[Jón Þór Birgisson]], though several sources do indeed use that word to describe him - including an excerpt from The Economist that Sigur Ros has on their own site. Why are you objecting to that word? -- <span style="background-color: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</span></span> 15:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
==Vandalism== |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691995604 --> |
|||
How is it vandalism when all i done was change something to past tense? 2007 is now last year in the majority of the world and the fact that UTC is now in 2008 which Wikipedia uses, the 2007 article should be in past tense. [[User:Pathfinder2006|Pathfinder2006]] 3:17, 1 January 2008 |
|||
== Homosexuals == |
|||
This is an offensive term now? I think not. —[[User:Nricardo|Nricardo]] ([[User talk:Nricardo|talk]]) 17:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:It does not explain why it is not "acceptable". It does not even use the word "acceptable" or "unaccaptable". They are simply guidelines, not set in stone. I find "homosexual" a perfectly acceptable term. Quite clinical, even. If I had to choose between "gay" or "homosexual" as being more inappropriate, I would select "gay". "Gay" means happy. Are we talking about happy people? Homosexual is less ambiguous. (And heaven help anyone who dares refer to me as an LGBT person. I am not a lesbian, nor bisexual, nor transgendered.) —[[User:Nricardo|Nricardo]] ([[User talk:Nricardo|talk]]) 01:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::The distinction I'm making here is that it violates the MOS to refer to someone as "a homosexual". Saying that they are "homosexual" is fine, if that is their preferred nomenclature. As far me, if someone called me "a gay" I'd have a big problem with it. But "gay" or "LGBT" is fine. That's just me though. [[User:X3210|X3210]] ([[User talk:X3210#top|talk]]) 02:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::"Violate" is a pretty strong word when referring to a mere "guideline". By the way, my preferred nomenclature is "the illustrious King Nelson". Please be sure to refer to me as such from now on. Failure to do so constitutes violation. ;-) —[[User:Nricardo|Nricardo]] ([[User talk:Nricardo|talk]]) 03:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== BLP Warning == |
|||
This is a warning not to add information that could be considered libelous, as you did to [[Eric the Midget]]. All information added to biographies of living persons must be verifiable. Continue to add libelous information to articles without proper attribution and you will be blocked from editing. <span style="font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; border:none; font-size:10pt; padding:2px; line-height:10pt; width:30em;">— [[User:Ocatecir|<font color="#660099">Ocat</font><font color="#333333">ecir]]</font>[[User talk:Ocatecir|<sup>T</sup>]]</span> 00:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Warning?? == |
|||
Excuse me, but I UNDID the vandalism to the page, so get off my case. And that's all I did was an "UNDO" because someone put something like "Liberal Commie Small Penis" on the page and changed Petty's birthplace to Indiana. |
|||
==Blanking== |
|||
Do not blank your talk page. You can [[Help:Archiving|archive it]] if it becomes full. [[User:Superm401|Superm401]] - [[User_talk:Superm401|Talk]] 03:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:33, 23 November 2015
 | Comments left here will be read and deleted per WP:DRRC. |
AfD nomination of Patrick Syring
[edit]
I have nominated Patrick Syring, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Syring (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. THF (talk) 03:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)