Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atma Singh: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:22, 28 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep No delete votes--JForget 00:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Atma Singh

Vanity article, almost entirely written by subject. Only link also added by subject. RolandR (talk) 16:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the sources are reliable, and the article reeks of vanispamicantspell. Delete the pics too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Relata refero's sources, seems to be notable indeed. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. TenPoundHammer's likely right, but I don't feel I can truly judge this one myself - I don't see anything that stands out as true encyclopedic notability. Certainly the tone of it is promotional.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep The article needs massive rewriting, but the man is very very notable. Relata refero (talk) 19:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If he were truly notable, then an article about him would have been started and edited by someone other than himself. Whether or not there is an article about Singh, the entire content of the current article should go. RolandR (talk) 20:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. The fact that he started the article is independent of whether he is truly notable. In this case, he is truly notable, and feel free to cut in down drastically.. But he's notable, and there is content there that is salvageable. Relata refero (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rewrite if need be to maintain neutrality. Pichpich (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY ^talk _contribs 02:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The accomplishments and references add up to notability. Note that the article has been cut back to a stub; earlier versions give a better idea of his achievements. --Eastmain (talk) 03:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources identified establish his notability. Has been stubbed so a NPOV/non COI version can be written. Davewild (talk) 08:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article is notable, good amount of sources, but needs to be totally rewritten. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was  '''Keep''' No delete votes--[[User:JForget|<span style="color:orange;">'''JForget''' </span>]] 00:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 ===[[Atma Singh]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Atma Singh}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atma Singh|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 January 29#{{anchorencode:Atma Singh}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 15: / Line 21: @@
 *'''Keep'''. The accomplishments and references add up to notability. Note that the article has been cut back to a stub; earlier versions give a better idea of his achievements. --[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] ([[User talk:Eastmain|talk]]) 03:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' Sources identified establish his notability. Has been stubbed so a NPOV/non COI version can be written. [[User:Davewild|Davewild]] ([[User talk:Davewild|talk]]) 08:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' This article is notable, good amount of sources, but needs to be totally rewritten. - [[User:Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<span style="font-family:Papyrus; font-size:small; color:#4D0100;">Milk's</span>''''']] [[User talk:Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<span style="font-family:Papyrus; font-size:small; color:#4D0100;">Favorite</span>''''']] [[Special:Contributions/Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<span style="font-family:Papyrus; font-size:small; color:#4D0100;">Cookie</span>''''']] 21:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>