Jump to content

An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Removing from Category:Theoretical physics already in subcat using Cat-a-lot
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Fringe theory of physics}}
"'''An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything'''" is a proposed basis for a [[Unified field theory|unified field theory]], which attempts to describe all known [[Fundamental interaction|fundamental interactions]] in [[physics]], and to stand as a possible [[theory of everything]] (TOE). Posted to the physics [[arXiv]] by Dr. [[Antony Garrett Lisi]] in November 2007<ref name="paper">A. Garrett Lisi, [http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0770 An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything], Cornell University Library, Submitted on [[6 November]] [[2007]]</ref>, the theory quickly stirred public interest and drew a wide range of reactions from other physicists. The title is a [[pun]] on the algebra used for the model ([[E8 (mathematics)|E<sub>8</sub>]]), which is both a "[[simple group|simple]]" and an "[[exceptional group|exceptional]]" [[Lie group]].
[[File:E8theory.svg|thumb|300px|Elementary particle states assigned to [[E8 (mathematics)|E<sub>8</sub>]] roots corresponding to their spin, electroweak, and strong charges according to ''E<sub>8</sub> Theory'', with particles related by [[triality]]. This eight-dimensional root diagram is shown projected onto a [[Coxeter plane]].]]
"'''An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything'''"<ref name="Lisi1">{{cite arXiv |author=A. G. Lisi |eprint=0711.0770 |title=An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything |date=2007 |class=hep-th }}</ref> is a [[physics]] [[preprint]] proposing a basis for a [[unified field theory]], often referred to as "'''E<sub>8</sub> Theory'''",<ref name="SciAm">{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican1210-54 |author1=A. G. Lisi |author-link1=Antony Garrett Lisi |author2=J. O. Weatherall |date=2010 |title=A Geometric Theory of Everything|journal=[[Scientific American]] |volume=303 |issue=6 |pages=54–61 |url=http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/A_Geometric_Theory_of_Everything.pdf |pmid=21141358|bibcode = 2010SciAm.303f..54L }}</ref> which attempts to describe all known [[fundamental interaction]]s in physics and to stand as a possible [[theory of everything]]. The paper was posted to the physics [[arXiv]] by [[Antony Garrett Lisi]] on November 6, 2007, and was not submitted to a [[peer-review]]ed [[scientific journal]].<ref name="seed">{{cite news |author= Greg Boustead |title=Garrett Lisi's Exceptional Approach to Everything |url=http://seedmagazine.com/news/2008/11/garrett_lisis_exceptional_appr.php |work=SEED Magazine |date=2008-11-17 |url-status= unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417105221/http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/garrett_lisis_exceptional_approach_to_everything |archive-date= 17 April 2018}}</ref> The title is a [[pun]] on the algebra used, the [[Lie algebra]] of the largest "[[simple group|simple]]", "[[exceptional group|exceptional]]" [[Lie group]], [[E8 (mathematics)|E<sub>8</sub>]]. The paper's goal is to describe how the combined structure and dynamics of all [[gravitational]] and [[Standard Model]] particle fields are part of the E<sub>8</sub> Lie algebra.<ref name="SciAm" />

The theory is presented as an extension of the [[grand unified theory]] program, incorporating gravity and fermions. The theory received a flurry of media coverage, but was also met with widespread skepticism.<ref name="sym">{{cite news |author=Amber Dance |title=Outsider Science |url=http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/cms/?pid=1000607 |work=Symmetry Magazine |date=2008-04-01 |access-date=2008-06-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080705195339/http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/cms/?pid=1000607 |archive-date=5 July 2008 |url-status=dead }}</ref> ''[[Scientific American]]'' reported in March 2008 that the theory was being "largely but not entirely ignored" by the mainstream physics community, with a few physicists picking up the work to develop it further.<ref name="wipeout">{{cite journal |last=Collins |first=Graham P. |date=March 2008 |title=Wipeout? |journal=[[Scientific American]] |volume=298 |issue=4 |pages=30–32 |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0408-30b |pmid=18380135 }}</ref> In July 2009, [[Jacques Distler]] and [[Skip Garibaldi]] published a critical paper in ''[[Communications in Mathematical Physics]]'' called "There is no 'Theory of Everything' inside E<sub>8</sub>",<ref name="DistlerGaribaldi" /> arguing that Lisi's theory, and a large class of related models, cannot work. Distler and Garibaldi offer a direct proof that it is impossible to embed all three generations of [[fermion]]s in E<sub>8</sub>, or to obtain even one generation of the Standard Model without the presence of additional particles that do not exist in the physical world.


==Overview==
==Overview==
The goal of E<sub>8</sub> Theory is to describe all elementary particles and their interactions, including gravitation, as quantum excitations of a single [[Lie group]] geometry—specifically, excitations of the noncompact quaternionic real form of the largest simple exceptional Lie group, E<sub>8</sub>. A Lie group, such as a one-dimensional circle, may be understood as a smooth [[manifold]] with a fixed, highly symmetric geometry. Larger Lie groups, as higher-dimensional manifolds, may be imagined as smooth surfaces composed of many circles (and hyperbolas) twisting around one another. At each point in a N-dimensional Lie group there can be N different orthogonal circles, tangent to N different orthogonal directions in the Lie group, spanning the N-dimensional Lie algebra of the Lie group. For a Lie group of rank R, one can choose at most R orthogonal circles that do not twist around each other, and so form a ''maximal torus'' within the Lie group, corresponding to a collection of R mutually-commuting Lie algebra generators, spanning a ''Cartan subalgebra''. Each elementary particle state can be thought of as a different orthogonal direction, having an integral number of twists around each of the R directions of a chosen maximal torus. These R twist numbers (each multiplied by a scaling factor) are the R different kinds of elementary charge that each particle has. Mathematically, these charges are [[eigenvalues]] of the Cartan subalgebra generators, and are called [[Root system|roots]] or [[Weight (representation theory)|weights]] of a [[Lie algebra representation|representation]].
{{expert-subject|Physics}}


In the Standard Model of particle physics, each different kind of elementary particle has four different [[Charge (physics)|charges]], corresponding to twists along directions of a four-dimensional maximal torus in the twelve-dimensional Standard Model Lie group, SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1). In [[grand unified theories]] (GUTs), the Standard Model Lie group is considered as a subgroup of a higher-dimensional Lie group, such as of 24-dimensional [[SU(5)]] in the [[Georgi–Glashow model]] or of 45-dimensional [[Spin group|Spin(10)]] in the [[SO(10) (physics)|SO(10) model]]. Since there is a different elementary particle for each dimension of the Lie group, these theories contain additional particles beyond the content of the Standard Model.
[[Image:E8 graph.svg|thumb|A visual representation of [[E8 polytope|E<sub>8</sub> polytope]], a manifestation of the structure of E<sub>8</sub>.]]
Lisi's model is a classical [[gauge theory]] which has some similarities to [[Grand unification theory|grand unified theories (GUTs)]] such as [[Left-right symmetry|left-right]], [[Pati-Salam model|Pati-Salam]], [[Georgi-Glashow model|Georgi-Glashow]], [[SO(10) (physics)|SO(10)]], or [[E6_(mathematics)#Importance_in_physics|E<sub>6</sub>]] based approaches. The choice of [[E8 (mathematics)|E<sub>8</sub>]] structure by Dr. Lisi, representing the largest (and arguably, most beautiful<ref name="AIM_atlas">Hermann Nicolai, in [http://www.aimath.org/E8/ (AIM) Mathematicians Map E<sub>8</sub>] (retrieved [[30 December]] [[2007]])</ref>) [[Simple Lie group#Exceptional cases|exceptional Lie group]], was in part driven by the proposition: "The mathematics of the universe should be beautiful. A successful description of nature should be a concise, elegant, unified mathematical structure consistent with experience."<ref name="paper" />


In E<sub>8</sub> Theory's current state, it is not possible to calculate masses for the existing or predicted particles. Lisi states the theory is young and incomplete, requiring a better understanding of the three fermion generations and their masses, and places a low confidence in its predictions. However, the discovery of new particles that do not fit in Lisi's classification, such as [[superpartner]]s or new fermions, would fall outside the model and falsify the theory. As of 2021, none of the particles predicted by any version of E<sub>8</sub> Theory have been detected.
In order to form a [[theory of everything]], the model must eventually predict the exact number of [[Elementary particle|fundamental particles]], all of their properties, [[Mass|masses]], [[Fundamental interaction|forces between them]], the nature of [[Spacetime|space-time]], and the [[cosmological constant]]. Much of this work is still on the conceptual stage, in particular [[Quantization_%28physics%29|quantization]] and predictions of [[Particle_physics|particle masses]], and Lisi himself acknowledges it as a work-in-progress: "The theory is very young, and still in development. Right now, I'd assign a low (but not tiny) likelihood to this prediction."<ref name="telegraph">{{cite news
|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/earth/2007/11/14/scisurf114.xml
|title=Surfer dude stuns physicists with theory of everything |first=Roger |last=Highfield |date=2007-11-14 |accessdate = 2007-11-23 |publisher=''[[The Daily Telegraph]]''}}</ref> He further remarks: "This is an all-or-nothing kind of theory - it's either going to be exactly right, or spectacularly wrong."<ref name="newscientist">{{cite web |url=http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/dn12891-is-mathematical-pattern-the-theory-of-everything.html |title=Is mathematical pattern the theory of everything? - fundamentals - [[15 November]] [[2007]] - New Scientist |accessdate = 2007-11-18 |format= |work=}}</ref>


==Description==
==History==
Before writing his 2007 paper, Lisi discussed his work on a [[Foundational Questions Institute]] (FQXi) forum,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/68 |title=Pieces of E<sub>8</sub> |access-date=2008-06-15 |author=A. G. Lisi |date=2007-06-09 |work=FQXi forum | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080602101434/http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/68| archive-date= 2 June 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| url-status= live}}</ref> at an FQXi conference,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://fqxi.org/conference/talkslides.html |title=Standard model and gravity |access-date=2008-06-15 |author=A. G. Lisi |date=2007-07-21 |work=inaugural [[FQXi]] conference }}</ref> and for an FQXi article.<ref name="fq1">{{cite news |author=Scott Dodd |title=Surfing the Folds of Spacetime |url=http://fqxi.org/community/articles/download/__details/Lisi_Garrett.pdf |work=FQXi article |date=2007-10-26 |access-date=2008-06-15 }}</ref> Lisi gave his first talk on E<sub>8</sub> Theory at the Loops '07 conference in [[Morelia]], [[Mexico]],<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.matmor.unam.mx/eventos/loops07/cont_abs.html#lisi |title=Deferential Geometry |access-date=2008-06-15 |author=A. G. Lisi |date=2007-06-25 |work=Loops '07 conference }}</ref> soon followed by a talk at the [[Perimeter Institute]].<ref>{{cite web <!-- Deny citation bot--> |url=http://pirsa.org/07100001 |title=An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything |access-date=2008-06-15 |author=A. G. Lisi |date=2007-10-04 |work=Perimeter Institute talk}}</ref> [[John Baez]] commented on Lisi's work in his column ''This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics,'' finding the idea intriguing but ending on the cautionary note that it might not be "mathematically natural to use this method to combine bosons and fermions".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week253.html |title=This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 253) |access-date=2008-06-15 |author=John Baez |date=2007-06-27 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080630004425/http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week253.html| archive-date= 30 June 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| url-status= live}}</ref> Lisi's arXiv preprint, "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", appeared on November 6, 2007, and immediately attracted attention. Lisi made a further presentation for the International Loop Quantum Gravity Seminar on November 13, 2007,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://relativity.phys.lsu.edu/ilqgs/ |title=A Connection With Everything |access-date=2008-06-15 |author=A. G. Lisi |date=2007-11-13 |work=International Loop Quantum Gravity Seminar | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080522174702/http://relativity.phys.lsu.edu/ilqgs/| archive-date= 22 May 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| url-status= live}}</ref> and responded to press inquiries on an FQXi forum.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/107 |title=An Exceptionally Simple FAQ |access-date=2008-06-15 |author=A. G. Lisi |date=2007-11-20 |work=FQXi forum | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080602101459/http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/107| archive-date= 2 June 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| url-status= live}}</ref> He presented his work at the [[TED (conference)|TED Conference]] on February 28, 2008.<ref name="ted">{{cite web | url = http://www.ted.com/index.php/speakers/garrett_lisi.html |title=Garrett Lisi: A beautiful new theory of everything|work=TED talks|access-date=2008-10-17 |author=A. G. Lisi |date=2008-02-28 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081018041938/http://www.ted.com/index.php/speakers/garrett_lisi.html| archive-date= 18 October 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| url-status= live}}</ref>
Lisi proposes a decomposition of the the 248 dimensional [[Lie algebra]] of E<sub>8</sub> according to the following schema:


Numerous news sites reported on the new theory in 2007 and 2008, noting Lisi's personal history and the controversy in the physics community. The first mainstream and scientific press coverage began with articles in ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' and ''[[New Scientist]]'',<ref name="newscientist">{{cite news |author=Zeeya Merali |title=Is mathematical pattern the theory of everything? |url=https://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/dn12891-is-mathematical-pattern-the-theory-of-everything.html |work=New Scientist |date=2007-11-15 |access-date=2008-06-15 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080512055932/http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/dn12891-is-mathematical-pattern-the-theory-of-everything.html| archive-date= 12 May 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| url-status= live}}</ref> with articles soon following in many other newspapers and magazines.


Lisi's paper spawned a variety of reactions and debates across various physics [[blog]]s and online [[discussion groups]]. The first to comment was [[Sabine Hossenfelder]], summarizing the paper and noting the lack of a dynamical symmetry-breaking mechanism.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/11/theoretically-simple-exception-of.html |title=A Theoretically Simple Exception of Everything |access-date=2008-06-15 |author=Sabine Hossenfelder |date=2007-11-06 |work=Backreaction | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080526135422/http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/11/theoretically-simple-exception-of.html| archive-date= 26 May 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| url-status= live}}</ref> [[Peter Woit]] commented, "I'm glad to see someone pursuing these ideas, even if they haven't come up with solutions to the underlying problems".<ref>{{Cite web|last=Woit|first=Peter|date=November 9, 2007|title=An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything? {{!}} Not Even Wrong|url=https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=617|access-date=2020-10-12|website=Not Even Wrong|language=en-US}}</ref> The group blog ''The n-Category Café'' hosted some of the more technical discussions.<ref name="schreiber">{{cite web|author=Urs Schreiber|date=2008-05-10|title=E<sub>8</sub> Quillen Superconnection|url=http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/05/e8_quillen_superconnection.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080619050339/http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/05/e8_quillen_superconnection.html|archive-date=2008-06-19 <!--DASHBot-->|access-date=2008-06-15|work=The n-Category Cafe}}</ref><ref name="golem.ph.utexas.edu">{{cite web|title=The n-Category Café|url=http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/05/e8_quillen_superconnection.html#c016877|access-date=20 February 2017|work=utexas.edu}}</ref> Mathematician [[Bertram Kostant]] discussed the background of Lisi's work in a colloquium presentation at [[UC Riverside]].<ref>{{cite web|author=Bertram Kostant|date=2008-02-12|title=On Some Mathematics in Garrett Lisi's 'E<sub>8</sub> Theory of Everything'|url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/kostant/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080628040851/http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/kostant/|archive-date=28 June 2008 <!--DASHBot-->|access-date=2008-06-15|work=UC Riverside mathematics colloquium}}</ref>
{{familytree/start}}
{{familytree| | | | |TOE| | TOE=<math>\mathrm{E}_8 = \mathrm{F}_4 + \mathrm{G}_2 + (26 \times 7)</math> }}
{{familytree| | | | | |!| | }}
{{familytree| | |,|-|-|^|-|-|v|-|-|-|.| }}
{{familytree| | |!| | | | | |!| | | |!| }}
{{familytree| |Graviweak| | | |Strong| |26,7| | Graviweak=<math>\mathrm{F}_4~</math> (graviweak) | Strong=<math>\mathrm{G}_2~</math> (strong) | 26,7 =<math>( 26 \times 7 )</math> }}
{{familytree| | |!| | | | | |!| | | |!| }}
{{familytree| | |!| | | | | |!| | | |!| }}
{{familytree| |SO| | | |SU| |Etc| | SO=<math>\mathrm{SO}(7,1)~+~(8+8+8)</math> | SU=<math>\mathrm{SU}(3) + 3 + \bar{3}</math> | Etc=<math>(8+8+8~+~1+1)</math><br><math>~~\times (3 + \bar{3} + 1)</math> }}
{{familytree/end}}


On his blog, ''Musings'', Jacques Distler offered one of the strongest criticisms of Lisi's approach, claiming to demonstrate that, unlike in the Standard Model, Lisi's model is nonchiral&nbsp;— consisting of a generation and an anti-generation&nbsp;— and to prove that any alternative embedding in E<sub>8</sub> must be similarly nonchiral.<ref name="Distler1">{{cite web | url = http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001505.html |title=A Little Group Theory |access-date=2008-06-15 |author=Jacques Distler |date=2007-11-21 |work=Musings | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080512092837/http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001505.html| archive-date= 12 May 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| url-status= live}}</ref><ref name="Distler0">{{cite web | url = http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001532.html |title=A Little More Group Theory |access-date=2008-11-15 |author=Jacques Distler |date=2007-12-09 |work=Musings }}</ref><ref name="Distler3">{{cite web | url = http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001795.html |title=My Dinner with Garrett |access-date=2008-11-15 |author=Jacques Distler |date=2008-09-14 |work=Musings | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081119093646/http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001795.html| archive-date= 2008-11-19 <!--DASHBot-->| url-status= live}}</ref> These arguments were distilled in a paper written jointly with Skip Garibaldi, "There is no 'Theory of Everything' inside E<sub>8</sub>",<ref name="DistlerGaribaldi">{{cite journal | author1=Jacques Distler | author2=Skip Garibaldi |arxiv=0905.2658 |title=There is no 'Theory of Everything' inside E<sub>8</sub> |year=2010 | doi=10.1007/s00220-010-1006-y | volume=298 | issue=2 | journal=Communications in Mathematical Physics | pages=419–436|bibcode = 2010CMaPh.298..419D | s2cid=15074118 }}</ref> published in ''[[Communications in Mathematical Physics]]''. In this paper, Distler and Garibaldi offer a proof that it is impossible to embed all three generations of fermions in E<sub>8</sub>, or to obtain even the one-generation Standard Model. In response, Lisi argued that Distler and Garibaldi made unnecessary assumptions about how the embedding needs to happen.<ref name="criticism">{{cite web|author=A G Lisi|date=2011-05-11|title=Garrett Lisi Responds to Criticism of his Proposed Unified Theory of Physics|url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=garrett-lisi-responds-to-criticisms-2011-05-04|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110702105724/http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=garrett-lisi-responds-to-criticisms-2011-05-04|archive-date=2011-07-02 <!--DASHBot-->|access-date=2011-07-30|work=Scientific American}}</ref> Addressing the one generation case, in June 2010 Lisi posted a new paper on E<sub>8</sub> Theory, "An Explicit Embedding of Gravity and the Standard Model in E<sub>8</sub>",<ref name="Lisi2">{{cite arXiv|eprint=1006.4908|class=gr-qc|author=A. G. Lisi|title=An Explicit Embedding of Gravity and the Standard Model in E<sub>8</sub>|date=2010}}</ref> eventually published in a [[proceedings|conference proceedings]], describing how the algebra of gravity and the Standard Model with one generation of fermions embeds in the E<sub>8</sub> Lie algebra explicitly using matrix representations. When this embedding is done, Lisi agrees that there is an antigeneration of fermions (also known as "mirror fermions") remaining in E<sub>8</sub>; but while Distler and Garibaldi state that these mirror fermions make the theory nonchiral, Lisi states that these mirror fermions might have high masses, making the theory chiral, or that they might be related to the other generations.<ref name="criticism"/> "The explanation for the existence of three generations of fermions, all with the same apparent algebraic structure, remains largely a mystery," Lisi wrote.<ref name="Lisi2" />
Note that the '8's that appear in the above schematic can refer to different representations. Also, the above decomposition is only given for the complexified Lie algebra. Such a decomposition does not appear to be possible for the needed real form.<ref name="DistlerAlittleU6">[http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001505.html#AlittleU6 Musings] (Distler, [[24 December]]; retrieved [[30 December]] [[2007]])</ref><ref name="DistlerALittleMoreGT">[http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001532.html Musings] (Distler, [[9 December]] [[2007]]; retrieved [[30 December]] [[2007]])</ref>


Some follow-ups to Lisi's original preprint have been published in peer-reviewed journals. [[Lee Smolin]]'s "The Plebanski action extended to a unification of gravity and Yang–Mills theory" proposes a symmetry-breaking mechanism to go from an E<sub>8</sub> symmetric action to Lisi's action for the Standard Model and gravity.<ref name="Smolin">{{cite journal |author=Lee Smolin |arxiv=0712.0977 |title=The Plebanski action extended to a unification of gravity and Yang–Mills theory |year=2009 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.80.124017 |volume=80 |issue=12 |pages=124017 |journal=Physical Review D|bibcode = 2009PhRvD..80l4017S |s2cid=119238392 }}</ref> Roberto Percacci's "Mixing internal and spacetime transformations: some examples and counterexamples"<ref name="Roberto Percacci 2008">{{cite journal|author=Roberto Percacci|date=2008|title=Mixing internal and spacetime transformations: some examples and counterexamples|journal=Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical|volume=41|issue=33|page=335403|arxiv=0803.0303|bibcode=2008JPhA...41G5403P|doi=10.1088/1751-8113/41/33/335403|s2cid=1211477}}</ref> addresses a general loophole in the [[Coleman–Mandula theorem]] also thought to work in E<sub>8</sub> Theory.<ref name="criticism"/> Percacci and Fabrizio Nesti's "Chirality in unified theories of gravity" confirms the embedding of the algebra of gravitational and Standard Model forces acting on a generation of fermions in spin(3,11) + 64<sub>+</sub>, mentioning that Lisi's "ambitious attempt to unify all known fields into a single representation of E<sub>8</sub> stumbled into chirality issues".<ref name="n-p-chirality">{{cite journal|author1=R. Percacci|author2=F. Nesti|year=2010|title=Chirality in unified theories of gravity|journal=Physical Review D|volume=81|issue=2|pages=025010|arxiv=0909.4537|bibcode=2010PhRvD..81b5010N|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.81.025010|s2cid=119225258}}</ref> In a joint paper with Lee Smolin and Simone Speziale,<ref name="Lisi3">{{cite journal |author1=A. G. Lisi |author2=Lee Smolin |author3=Simone Speziale |arxiv=1004.4866 |title=Unification of gravity, gauge fields, and Higgs bosons |date=2010 |doi=10.1088/1751-8113/43/44/445401 |volume=43 |issue=44 |journal=Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical |page=445401|bibcode = 2010JPhA...43R5401L |s2cid=118507772 }}</ref> published in ''[[Journal of Physics A]]'', Lisi proposed a new action and symmetry-breaking mechanism.
The [[Strong interaction|strong force]] is embedded in the <math>\mathrm{SU}(3)</math> subalgebra, and gravity in a <math>\mathrm{SO}(3,1)</math> subalgebra of <math>\mathrm{SO}(7,1)</math>. The [[Electroweak interaction|electroweak force]] is mapped to a <math>\mathrm{SU}(2)_L + \mathrm{SU}(2)_R</math> subalgebra of <math>\mathrm{SO}(7,1)</math>, as in the [[Pati-Salam model]]. Notably, Lisi includes fermions along with bosons in the same representation, and also proposes that the [[Flavour (particle physics)|three generations of fermions]] of the standard model may be described by a [[triality]] rotation (relating to the three-fold symmetry of [[SO(8)|<math>\mathrm{SO}(8)</math>]]).


In 2008, [[FQXi]] awarded Lisi a grant for further development of E<sub>8</sub> Theory.<ref name="fq2">{{cite web |url=https://fqxi.org/grants/large/awardees/view/__details/2008/lisi |title=E<sub>8</sub> Theory |access-date=2021-10-09 |date=2008-08-04 |work=FQXi }}</ref>
In order to specify dynamics, Lisi postulates a modified [[BF model|BF theory]] action,
:<math>S = \int <\overset{.}\underset{=}{B}\underset{=.}{F}+\frac{\pi G}{4}\underset{=}{B}^G\underset{=}B^G\gamma-\underset{=}{B}'*\underset{=}{B}'></math>,
and decomposes it to [[MacDowell-Mansouri action]] for gravity, [[electroweak]] and [[graviweak]] parts, and an <math>\mathrm{SO}(8)</math> part that contains both "...gluons and a first guess at the action for the new fields." He also remarks that the actions for the second and third fermion generations are "... related by triality in a way that is not presently understood well enough to write down."<ref name="paper" /> It should be noted that this Lagrangian is not invariant under the E<sub>8</sub> symmetry. [[Lee Smolin]] has proposed a way to obtain the bosonic part of Lisi's action (plus higher-order terms) from a fully E<sub>8</sub>-symmetric theory.<ref name="arxivSmolinDec2008">[[Lee Smolin]]: [http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0977 The Plebanski action extended to a unification of gravity and Yang-Mills theory] on [[arXiv]]</ref>


In September 2010, ''Scientific American'' reported on a conference inspired by Lisi's work.<ref name="rummaging">{{cite journal |last=Merali |first=Zeeya |date=September 2010 |title=Rummaging for a Final Theory |journal=[[Scientific American]] |volume=303 |issue=3 |pages=14–17 |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0910-14 |pmid=20812465 |bibcode=2010SciAm.303c..14M }}</ref> Shortly thereafter, they published a feature article on E<sub>8</sub> Theory, "A Geometric Theory of Everything",<ref name="SciAm" /> written by Lisi and James Owen Weatherall.
With 'Graviweak F4' and 'Strong G2' as the two primary elements of E<sub>8</sub>, the following model is created:


In December 2011, in a paper for a special issue of the journal ''[[Foundations of Physics]]'', [[Michael Duff (physicist)|Michael Duff]] argued against Lisi's theory and the attention it has received in the popular press.<ref>{{cite journal|author=M. J. Duff|date=2011|title=String and M-theory: answering the critics|journal=Foundations of Physics|volume=43|issue=1|pages=182–200|arxiv=1112.0788|bibcode=2013FoPh...43..182D|doi=10.1007/s10701-011-9618-4|s2cid=55066230}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=4219 |title=String and M-theory: answering the critics |access-date=2011-12-21 |author=Peter Woit |date=2011-12-07 |work=Not Even Wrong }}</ref> Duff states that Lisi's paper was incorrect, citing Distler and Garibaldi's proof, and criticizes the press for giving Lisi uncritical attention simply because of his "outsider" image.

{{familytree/start}}
{{familytree| | | | |TOE| | TOE=Theory of Everything<br /> [[E8 (mathematics)|E8]] = [[F4 (mathematics)|F4]] + [[G2 (mathematics)|G2]] + (26X7)}}
{{familytree| | | | | |!| | }}
{{familytree| |REL|-|^|-|Graviweak| | REL=[[Strong interaction|Strong force]] [[G2 (mathematics)|G2]]: su(3) | Graviweak=Graviweak [[F4 (mathematics)|F4]]:<br />so(7,1)}}
{{familytree| | | | | | | | |!| | }}
{{familytree| | | | |Gravity|-|^|-|-|EWT| | Gravity=[[Gravity]]<br />[[Orthogonal group|D2: SO(3,1)]]|EWT=[[Electroweak force]]<br />
[[Special unitary group|D2: su(2)<sub>L</sub> + su(2)<sub>R</sub>]] }}
{{familytree| | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | }}
{{familytree| | | | | | | | |WNF|-|^|-|EMF|WNF=[[Weak force]]|EMF=[[Electromagnetism]]<br />[[Unitary group|u(1)]] }}
{{familytree| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | }}
{{familytree| | | | | | | | | | | |EF|-|^|-|MF|EF=[[Electric force]]|MF=[[Magnetic force]] }}
{{familytree/end}}


Note: the description provided above is just a brief summary. The full description is entailed in the paper in the physics [[arXiv]].

==Consequences==
Lisi's model aims at reproducing all known fundamental fields and dynamics in nature through pure geometry. Lisi's model has 20 elements out of the 248 basis elements of E<sub>8</sub> that do not correspond to known particles or forces. These may include new [[quantum numbers]], a new set of colored [[Higgs boson|Higgs scalars]], as well as fields that mix [[leptons]] and [[quarks]] and have forces that vary depending on [[Flavour (particle physics)|fermion family]]. Lisi remarked that: "The lack of extraneous structures and free parameters ensures testable predictions, so it will either succeed or fail spectacularly."<ref name="paper" />

It is generally agreed in public reviews that in its current form, the model by itself is not yet a complete theory of everything. Most importantly, it has not been [[Quantization (physics)|quantized]]. Quantization is the most difficult part in producing a theory of [[quantum gravity]]. Lisi acknowledges certain issues, but states: "I consider this to be a developing theory that is worth my time to work on, as a long shot."<ref name=distler_blog>Lisi on [[Jacques Distler]]'s blog "[http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001505.html#c013271 Musings]" ([[22 November]] [[2007]])</ref>

Wired.com reports<ref>http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/02/ted_lisi</ref>, "His theory met with enthusiastic media coverage, but to date, the scientific community has been far more skeptical about the validity of Lisi's model."

==Publicity and controversy==
Lisi's paper was quickly publicized after its release on [[6 November]] [[2007]], and spun-off a variety of mostly controversial debates across various [[Blog|blogs]] and online [[discussion groups]]. Numerous news sites from all over the world reported this new theory, noting the personal background of Dr. Lisi.

===Initial reception by the scientific community===
After addressing an international meeting on [[Loop quantum gravity|loop quantum gravity]] at the [[Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics]], [[Lee Smolin]], who sits on the advisory panel at FQXI (the institute that funded Lisi's research), remarked on Lisi's work as:{{cquote|One of the most compelling unification models I've seen in many, many years.}} Quickly publicized<ref name="telegraph">{{cite news
|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/earth/2007/11/14/scisurf114.xml
|title=Surfer dude stuns physicists with theory of everything |first=Roger |last=Highfield |date=2007-11-14 |accessdate = 2007-11-23 |publisher=''[[The Daily Telegraph]]''}}</ref>, Smolin had to clarify this as a spontaneous comment, and noted subsequent press coverage as premature.<ref name="SmolinCV306189">[[Lee Smolin]] on [http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/11/16/garrett-lisis-theory-of-everything/#comment-306189 Cosmic Variance]</ref>

[[Perimeter_Institute_for_Theoretical_Physics|Sabine Hossenfelder]], who helped arrange for Lisi's participation, also clarifies that while she believes "... Garrett's paper has the potential to become a very important contribution, and his approach is worth further examination", she also notes<ref name="HossenfelderNotToE">[http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/11/theoretically-simple-exception-of.html#c472892450267792708 Sabine Hossenfelder's blog] (retrieved [[1 January]] [[2008]])</ref>:

{{cquote|Given today's status, Garrett's model does ''not'' naturally lead to a unification of the [[Standard Model]] interactions with gravity (he has to choose the action by hand that contains both), it does ''not'' allow us to understand quantum gravity (since there's nothing said about quantization), it does ''not'' explain the parameters in the standard model (since there isn't yet a mechanism for symmetry breaking), it does ''not'' explain the cosmological constant or its value (as said above, to claim there has to be one, it would be necessary to show there's no way to do it without one), it does ''not'' explain the hierarchy problem (and I see no way to do so), it does ''not'' explain why we live in a spacetime with 3 spatial and 1 timelike dimensions, it does ''not'' in my very humble opinion yet qualify being called a Theory of Everything.}}

Other preliminary feedback was mixed: [[Carlo Rovelli]], a leading quantum gravity physicist, commented<ref>{{cite web |last=Baez|first=John |title=This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 253)|url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week253.html}}</ref>:
{{cquote|When I started to read the article I was a sceptic. When I'd finished it, I asked myself why I hadn't had the idea before.}}

[[John Baez]] described the theory as speculative. While stating that he felt it was more mathematically natural to combine bosons and fermions within a Z<sub>2</sub> grading of an [[E6 (mathematics)|E<sub>6</sub>]] Lie group rather than within a Z<sub>2</sub> grading of an E<sub>8</sub> Lie group, he added that only time will tell. He has recently said<ref>{{cite web |last=Baez|first=John|title=Comment on "The n-Category Cafe"|url=http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/02/kostant_on_e8.html#c015201}}</ref>, {{cquote|[Lisi] certainly makes no serious attempt to get the Standard Model Lagrangian in all its detail. Nor does it seem possible (without further feats of genius). For example, his Lagrangian has no place for the ∼25 adjustable constants contained in the Standard Model: particle masses, coupling constants, etc. Nor does he attempt to derive these constants.}}

[[David Finkelstein]], emeritus professor of the [[Georgia Institute of Technology]] said<ref name="newscientist">{{cite web |url=http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/dn12891-is-mathematical-pattern-the-theory-of-everything.html |title=Is mathematical pattern the theory of everything? - fundamentals - [[15 November]] [[2007]] - New Scientist |accessdate = 2007-11-18 |format= |work=}}</ref>:
{{cquote|Some incredibly beautiful stuff falls out of Lisi's theory, I think that this must be more than coincidence and he really is touching on something profound.}}

===Criticism===
[[Jacques Distler]] from the [[University of Texas at Austin]] demonstrated that it is not possible to embed the fermions of the Standard Model within E<sub>8</sub> and concludes<ref name="DistlerAlittleU6">[http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001505.html#AlittleU6 Musings] (Distler, [[24 December]]; retrieved [[30 December]] [[2007]])</ref><ref name="DistlerALittleMoreGT">[http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001532.html Musings] (Distler, [[9 December]] [[2007]]; retrieved [[30 December]] [[2007]])</ref>:
{{cquote|The overlap between the set of people who know some [[Group theory|group theory]] and those who are (still) interested in giving Lisi’s 'Theory of Everything' a passing thought is empty.}}

[[Luboš Motl]], former assistant professor at [[Harvard University]] (2004–2007) commented<ref name="motl"> {{cite web |first=Lubos |last=Motl | authorlink= Lubos Motl | url=http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/11/exceptionally-simple-theory-of.html |title=Garrett Lisi: An exceptionally simple theory of everything | date=2007-11-07 | accessdate = 2007-11-23}}</ref>:
{{cquote|Every high school senior excited about physics should be able to see that the paper is just a long sequence of childish misunderstandings.}}

Distler, Motl and others also argue<ref name="motl" /> that it is impossible to have a theory with internal and external symmetries unified in any non-trivial way, as this violates the [[Coleman-Mandula theorem]]. Lisi and Smolin have claimed that the Coleman-Mandula theorem is not applicable in this theory.

Dr. Lisi responded in Distler's blog on embedding the second and third generation fermions<ref name="LisiNoCM">[http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/11/theoretically-simple-exception-of.html#c6548242595619145251 Backreaction] (Hossenfelder; retrieved [[30 December]] [[2007]])</ref>:
{{cquote|I have discussed this inadequacy clearly in the paper, going so far as to explicitly state it is currently the main problem with the theory.}}

It has also been noted<ref>Comments at [http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/11/theoretically-simple-exception-of.html Backreaction]</ref><ref>[http://scienceblogs.com/catdynamics/2007/11/red_boson_blue_fermion.php Dynamics of Cats]</ref> that there are problems with the embedding of particles of different [[Spin (physics)|spin]] (spin 1/2 fermions, spin 1 gauge bosons, and spin 2 gravitons) and statistics in the same group representation, as proposed by Lisi. This is related to the [[Spin-statistics theorem]] that holds for all Lorentzian quantum theories.

[[Lee Smolin]] has further written <ref name="SmolinCM306890">[http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/11/16/garrett-lisis-theory-of-everything/#comment-306890 Lee Smolin on Cosmic Variance blog] ([[17 December]] [[2007]]; retrieved [[5 January]] [[2008]])</ref>:
{{cquote|Does Lisi’s proposal survive Distler’s second post? Even if there is some truth to Distler’s argument, is the result the end of Lisi-like proposals or are there alternatives which evade it? For example, by going to the complexification? Or might it be that Lisi’s proposal works for the Euclidean spacetimes but not for Lorentzian? Might it be that it only works if only part of the Lorentz algebra is gauged, as in the Ashtekar or Thiemann formulations? All these are interesting possibilities...}}

[[Marcus du Sautoy]] of the [[University of Oxford]] said: "There seem to be a lot of things still to fill in."<ref>[[Fox News Channel|Fox News]]: [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,311952,00.html Laid-Back Surfer Dude May Be Next Einstein]</ref> Sautoy continues in The Telegraph<ref>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/01/22/scieinstein122.xml</ref>: "Garrett Lisi: This surfer is no Einstein... the media went wild. However, in the last few weeks several physics blogs have uncovered a problem with Lisi's idea: it doesn't work".

==Putting the theory to the test==
{{Future scientific facility}}
Lisi has stated that his theory is testable, and might be put to the test by the [[Large Hadron Collider]] (LHC) particle accelerator, which is currently under construction near [[Geneva]], [[Switzerland]]. He states that the theory predicts the existence of new, [[color charge|colored]] [[Higgs boson|Higgs particles]], and the non-existence of [[superpartner|superpartners]] and other particles but at an undetermined mass scale. Without prescribed values for the masses of these particles, such predictions are not falsifiable.


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{Reflist|30em}}

==External links==
*[http://relativity.phys.lsu.edu/ilqgs/lisi111307.pdf "A Connection with Everything"] Slides for ILQGS seminar talk by Lisi, [[13 November]] [[2007]]. [http://relativity.phys.lsu.edu/ilqgs/ Audio available] in various formats. Slides also on [http://deferentialgeometry.org/ Lisi's wiki]
*[http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-xHw9zcCvRQ Animation of lattice E8 explaining the theory]
*Semi-technical [http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/dn12891-is-mathematical-pattern-the-theory-of-everything.html exposition] at the [[New Scientist]].
*[http://fqxi.org/community/forum.php?action=topic&id=107 (FQXi) An exceptionally simple FAQ] Lisi's answers to questions about his paper asked by newspaper reporters.
*[http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=617 Discussion] on the blog of [[Peter Woit]] of [[Columbia University]]
*[http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/11/theoretically-simple-exception-of.html#links Discussion] at the blog BackRe(Action)
*[http://www.advancedphysics.org/forum/showthread.php?t=8670 Discussion] and Q&A with Dr Lisi at advancedphysics.org
*[http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=202439 An Exceptionally Technical Discussion of AESToE] - a thread on PhysicsForums.com, started by Garrett Lisi, devoted to discuss mathematics used in the AESToE paper.
*[http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071117-upon-further-review-surfers-new-theory-of-everything-severely-deficient.html Review] at [[Ars Technica]]
*[http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001505.html A little group theory...] A critical blog by [[Jacques Distler]]
*Non-technical [http://www.economist.com/science/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=10170958 exposition] at [[The Economist]]


{{particles}}
{{Particles}}
{{Theories of gravitation}}
{{Theories of gravitation}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Exceptionally Simple Theory Of Everything}}
[[Category:Theories of gravitation]]
[[Category:Theoretical physics]]
[[Category:Theories of gravity]]
[[Category:Particle physics]]
[[Category:Loop quantum gravity]]
[[Category:Standard Model]]
[[Category:Standard Model]]
[[Category:Electroweak theory]]
[[Category:Lie groups]]
[[Category:Lie groups]]
[[Category:8-polytopes]]
[[Category:Hypothetical elementary particles]]
[[Category:Hypothetical elementary particles]]
[[Category:Physics articles needing expert attention]]
[[Category:Working papers]]


[[fr:Antony Garrett Lisi#Une théorie du tout exceptionnellement simple]]
[[cs:An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything]]
[[es:Una teoría del todo excepcionalmente simple]]
[[ko:예외적으로 단순한 모든 것의 이론]]
[[ja:An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything]]
[[ru:Исключительно простая теория всего]]

Latest revision as of 04:22, 12 February 2024

Elementary particle states assigned to E8 roots corresponding to their spin, electroweak, and strong charges according to E8 Theory, with particles related by triality. This eight-dimensional root diagram is shown projected onto a Coxeter plane.

"An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"[1] is a physics preprint proposing a basis for a unified field theory, often referred to as "E8 Theory",[2] which attempts to describe all known fundamental interactions in physics and to stand as a possible theory of everything. The paper was posted to the physics arXiv by Antony Garrett Lisi on November 6, 2007, and was not submitted to a peer-reviewed scientific journal.[3] The title is a pun on the algebra used, the Lie algebra of the largest "simple", "exceptional" Lie group, E8. The paper's goal is to describe how the combined structure and dynamics of all gravitational and Standard Model particle fields are part of the E8 Lie algebra.[2]

The theory is presented as an extension of the grand unified theory program, incorporating gravity and fermions. The theory received a flurry of media coverage, but was also met with widespread skepticism.[4] Scientific American reported in March 2008 that the theory was being "largely but not entirely ignored" by the mainstream physics community, with a few physicists picking up the work to develop it further.[5] In July 2009, Jacques Distler and Skip Garibaldi published a critical paper in Communications in Mathematical Physics called "There is no 'Theory of Everything' inside E8",[6] arguing that Lisi's theory, and a large class of related models, cannot work. Distler and Garibaldi offer a direct proof that it is impossible to embed all three generations of fermions in E8, or to obtain even one generation of the Standard Model without the presence of additional particles that do not exist in the physical world.

Overview

[edit]

The goal of E8 Theory is to describe all elementary particles and their interactions, including gravitation, as quantum excitations of a single Lie group geometry—specifically, excitations of the noncompact quaternionic real form of the largest simple exceptional Lie group, E8. A Lie group, such as a one-dimensional circle, may be understood as a smooth manifold with a fixed, highly symmetric geometry. Larger Lie groups, as higher-dimensional manifolds, may be imagined as smooth surfaces composed of many circles (and hyperbolas) twisting around one another. At each point in a N-dimensional Lie group there can be N different orthogonal circles, tangent to N different orthogonal directions in the Lie group, spanning the N-dimensional Lie algebra of the Lie group. For a Lie group of rank R, one can choose at most R orthogonal circles that do not twist around each other, and so form a maximal torus within the Lie group, corresponding to a collection of R mutually-commuting Lie algebra generators, spanning a Cartan subalgebra. Each elementary particle state can be thought of as a different orthogonal direction, having an integral number of twists around each of the R directions of a chosen maximal torus. These R twist numbers (each multiplied by a scaling factor) are the R different kinds of elementary charge that each particle has. Mathematically, these charges are eigenvalues of the Cartan subalgebra generators, and are called roots or weights of a representation.

In the Standard Model of particle physics, each different kind of elementary particle has four different charges, corresponding to twists along directions of a four-dimensional maximal torus in the twelve-dimensional Standard Model Lie group, SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1). In grand unified theories (GUTs), the Standard Model Lie group is considered as a subgroup of a higher-dimensional Lie group, such as of 24-dimensional SU(5) in the Georgi–Glashow model or of 45-dimensional Spin(10) in the SO(10) model. Since there is a different elementary particle for each dimension of the Lie group, these theories contain additional particles beyond the content of the Standard Model.

In E8 Theory's current state, it is not possible to calculate masses for the existing or predicted particles. Lisi states the theory is young and incomplete, requiring a better understanding of the three fermion generations and their masses, and places a low confidence in its predictions. However, the discovery of new particles that do not fit in Lisi's classification, such as superpartners or new fermions, would fall outside the model and falsify the theory. As of 2021, none of the particles predicted by any version of E8 Theory have been detected.

History

[edit]

Before writing his 2007 paper, Lisi discussed his work on a Foundational Questions Institute (FQXi) forum,[7] at an FQXi conference,[8] and for an FQXi article.[9] Lisi gave his first talk on E8 Theory at the Loops '07 conference in Morelia, Mexico,[10] soon followed by a talk at the Perimeter Institute.[11] John Baez commented on Lisi's work in his column This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics, finding the idea intriguing but ending on the cautionary note that it might not be "mathematically natural to use this method to combine bosons and fermions".[12] Lisi's arXiv preprint, "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", appeared on November 6, 2007, and immediately attracted attention. Lisi made a further presentation for the International Loop Quantum Gravity Seminar on November 13, 2007,[13] and responded to press inquiries on an FQXi forum.[14] He presented his work at the TED Conference on February 28, 2008.[15]

Numerous news sites reported on the new theory in 2007 and 2008, noting Lisi's personal history and the controversy in the physics community. The first mainstream and scientific press coverage began with articles in The Daily Telegraph and New Scientist,[16] with articles soon following in many other newspapers and magazines.

Lisi's paper spawned a variety of reactions and debates across various physics blogs and online discussion groups. The first to comment was Sabine Hossenfelder, summarizing the paper and noting the lack of a dynamical symmetry-breaking mechanism.[17] Peter Woit commented, "I'm glad to see someone pursuing these ideas, even if they haven't come up with solutions to the underlying problems".[18] The group blog The n-Category Café hosted some of the more technical discussions.[19][20] Mathematician Bertram Kostant discussed the background of Lisi's work in a colloquium presentation at UC Riverside.[21]

On his blog, Musings, Jacques Distler offered one of the strongest criticisms of Lisi's approach, claiming to demonstrate that, unlike in the Standard Model, Lisi's model is nonchiral — consisting of a generation and an anti-generation — and to prove that any alternative embedding in E8 must be similarly nonchiral.[22][23][24] These arguments were distilled in a paper written jointly with Skip Garibaldi, "There is no 'Theory of Everything' inside E8",[6] published in Communications in Mathematical Physics. In this paper, Distler and Garibaldi offer a proof that it is impossible to embed all three generations of fermions in E8, or to obtain even the one-generation Standard Model. In response, Lisi argued that Distler and Garibaldi made unnecessary assumptions about how the embedding needs to happen.[25] Addressing the one generation case, in June 2010 Lisi posted a new paper on E8 Theory, "An Explicit Embedding of Gravity and the Standard Model in E8",[26] eventually published in a conference proceedings, describing how the algebra of gravity and the Standard Model with one generation of fermions embeds in the E8 Lie algebra explicitly using matrix representations. When this embedding is done, Lisi agrees that there is an antigeneration of fermions (also known as "mirror fermions") remaining in E8; but while Distler and Garibaldi state that these mirror fermions make the theory nonchiral, Lisi states that these mirror fermions might have high masses, making the theory chiral, or that they might be related to the other generations.[25] "The explanation for the existence of three generations of fermions, all with the same apparent algebraic structure, remains largely a mystery," Lisi wrote.[26]

Some follow-ups to Lisi's original preprint have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Lee Smolin's "The Plebanski action extended to a unification of gravity and Yang–Mills theory" proposes a symmetry-breaking mechanism to go from an E8 symmetric action to Lisi's action for the Standard Model and gravity.[27] Roberto Percacci's "Mixing internal and spacetime transformations: some examples and counterexamples"[28] addresses a general loophole in the Coleman–Mandula theorem also thought to work in E8 Theory.[25] Percacci and Fabrizio Nesti's "Chirality in unified theories of gravity" confirms the embedding of the algebra of gravitational and Standard Model forces acting on a generation of fermions in spin(3,11) + 64+, mentioning that Lisi's "ambitious attempt to unify all known fields into a single representation of E8 stumbled into chirality issues".[29] In a joint paper with Lee Smolin and Simone Speziale,[30] published in Journal of Physics A, Lisi proposed a new action and symmetry-breaking mechanism.

In 2008, FQXi awarded Lisi a grant for further development of E8 Theory.[31]

In September 2010, Scientific American reported on a conference inspired by Lisi's work.[32] Shortly thereafter, they published a feature article on E8 Theory, "A Geometric Theory of Everything",[2] written by Lisi and James Owen Weatherall.

In December 2011, in a paper for a special issue of the journal Foundations of Physics, Michael Duff argued against Lisi's theory and the attention it has received in the popular press.[33][34] Duff states that Lisi's paper was incorrect, citing Distler and Garibaldi's proof, and criticizes the press for giving Lisi uncritical attention simply because of his "outsider" image.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ A. G. Lisi (2007). "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything". arXiv:0711.0770 [hep-th].
  2. ^ a b c A. G. Lisi; J. O. Weatherall (2010). "A Geometric Theory of Everything" (PDF). Scientific American. 303 (6): 54–61. Bibcode:2010SciAm.303f..54L. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1210-54. PMID 21141358.
  3. ^ Greg Boustead (2008-11-17). "Garrett Lisi's Exceptional Approach to Everything". SEED Magazine. Archived from the original on 17 April 2018.
  4. ^ Amber Dance (2008-04-01). "Outsider Science". Symmetry Magazine. Archived from the original on 5 July 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  5. ^ Collins, Graham P. (March 2008). "Wipeout?". Scientific American. 298 (4): 30–32. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0408-30b. PMID 18380135.
  6. ^ a b Jacques Distler; Skip Garibaldi (2010). "There is no 'Theory of Everything' inside E8". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 298 (2): 419–436. arXiv:0905.2658. Bibcode:2010CMaPh.298..419D. doi:10.1007/s00220-010-1006-y. S2CID 15074118.
  7. ^ A. G. Lisi (2007-06-09). "Pieces of E8". FQXi forum. Archived from the original on 2 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  8. ^ A. G. Lisi (2007-07-21). "Standard model and gravity". inaugural FQXi conference. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  9. ^ Scott Dodd (2007-10-26). "Surfing the Folds of Spacetime" (PDF). FQXi article. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  10. ^ A. G. Lisi (2007-06-25). "Deferential Geometry". Loops '07 conference. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  11. ^ A. G. Lisi (2007-10-04). "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything". Perimeter Institute talk. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  12. ^ John Baez (2007-06-27). "This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 253)". Archived from the original on 30 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  13. ^ A. G. Lisi (2007-11-13). "A Connection With Everything". International Loop Quantum Gravity Seminar. Archived from the original on 22 May 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  14. ^ A. G. Lisi (2007-11-20). "An Exceptionally Simple FAQ". FQXi forum. Archived from the original on 2 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  15. ^ A. G. Lisi (2008-02-28). "Garrett Lisi: A beautiful new theory of everything". TED talks. Archived from the original on 18 October 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-17.
  16. ^ Zeeya Merali (2007-11-15). "Is mathematical pattern the theory of everything?". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 12 May 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  17. ^ Sabine Hossenfelder (2007-11-06). "A Theoretically Simple Exception of Everything". Backreaction. Archived from the original on 26 May 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  18. ^ Woit, Peter (November 9, 2007). "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything? | Not Even Wrong". Not Even Wrong. Retrieved 2020-10-12.
  19. ^ Urs Schreiber (2008-05-10). "E8 Quillen Superconnection". The n-Category Cafe. Archived from the original on 2008-06-19. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  20. ^ "The n-Category Café". utexas.edu. Retrieved 20 February 2017.
  21. ^ Bertram Kostant (2008-02-12). "On Some Mathematics in Garrett Lisi's 'E8 Theory of Everything'". UC Riverside mathematics colloquium. Archived from the original on 28 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  22. ^ Jacques Distler (2007-11-21). "A Little Group Theory". Musings. Archived from the original on 12 May 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  23. ^ Jacques Distler (2007-12-09). "A Little More Group Theory". Musings. Retrieved 2008-11-15.
  24. ^ Jacques Distler (2008-09-14). "My Dinner with Garrett". Musings. Archived from the original on 2008-11-19. Retrieved 2008-11-15.
  25. ^ a b c A G Lisi (2011-05-11). "Garrett Lisi Responds to Criticism of his Proposed Unified Theory of Physics". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 2011-07-02. Retrieved 2011-07-30.
  26. ^ a b A. G. Lisi (2010). "An Explicit Embedding of Gravity and the Standard Model in E8". arXiv:1006.4908 [gr-qc].
  27. ^ Lee Smolin (2009). "The Plebanski action extended to a unification of gravity and Yang–Mills theory". Physical Review D. 80 (12): 124017. arXiv:0712.0977. Bibcode:2009PhRvD..80l4017S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.124017. S2CID 119238392.
  28. ^ Roberto Percacci (2008). "Mixing internal and spacetime transformations: some examples and counterexamples". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 41 (33): 335403. arXiv:0803.0303. Bibcode:2008JPhA...41G5403P. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/33/335403. S2CID 1211477.
  29. ^ R. Percacci; F. Nesti (2010). "Chirality in unified theories of gravity". Physical Review D. 81 (2): 025010. arXiv:0909.4537. Bibcode:2010PhRvD..81b5010N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.025010. S2CID 119225258.
  30. ^ A. G. Lisi; Lee Smolin; Simone Speziale (2010). "Unification of gravity, gauge fields, and Higgs bosons". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 43 (44): 445401. arXiv:1004.4866. Bibcode:2010JPhA...43R5401L. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/44/445401. S2CID 118507772.
  31. ^ "E8 Theory". FQXi. 2008-08-04. Retrieved 2021-10-09.
  32. ^ Merali, Zeeya (September 2010). "Rummaging for a Final Theory". Scientific American. 303 (3): 14–17. Bibcode:2010SciAm.303c..14M. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0910-14. PMID 20812465.
  33. ^ M. J. Duff (2011). "String and M-theory: answering the critics". Foundations of Physics. 43 (1): 182–200. arXiv:1112.0788. Bibcode:2013FoPh...43..182D. doi:10.1007/s10701-011-9618-4. S2CID 55066230.
  34. ^ Peter Woit (2011-12-07). "String and M-theory: answering the critics". Not Even Wrong. Retrieved 2011-12-21.