Jump to content

Talk:Félix Trinidad: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reply
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(40 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{GAnominee|13:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=GA|listas=Trinidad, Felix|
{{FailedGA|07:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)}}
{{WikiProject Biography
{{talkheader}}
|sports-work-group=yes|sports-priority=low
{{PuertoRicoproj|class=B|importance=Low}}
{{WPBiography
|living=yes
|class=B
|priority=
|sports-work-group=yes
}}
}}
{{WikiProject Boxing|importance=}}
{{archive box|[[/Archive 1]]}}
{{WikiProject Puerto Rico|importance=Mid}}

}}
==Good Article nomination==
{{ArticleHistory| action1 = GAN
I will go ahead and nominate this, chances are that the review wil take place after the Roy Jones wave has died so that should be controlable. Thanks to all that have helped with this page, especially to Michael Devore for his great text cleanup, cheers. - [[User:Caribbean H.Q.|<b><font color="#0000DD"><font color="#0066FF">Ca<font color="#0099FF">ri<font color="#00CCFF">bb<font color="#00EEFF">e</font>a</font></font>n</font>~</font><font color="#FF3333">H.</font><font color="#FFCC00">Q.</font></b>]] 16:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
| action1date = 07:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
==Fail GA Review==
| action1link = Talk:Félix Trinidad#Good article nomination
1. Prose- Not Pass. [[Wikipedia:Lead section]] needs to me more general. It can include some fight details, but not all. The prose might us sum comma's before introductory phrases, depending on your interpretation of grammar rules. The detail of each fight makes the text a little unreadable at times as a fight shifts from round to round. It might suggest reducing the fight detail and adding more information about the setting, net profit, hype, or other outside matters concerning the fights.
| action1result = Failed

| action1oldid = 194849555
2. Verifiable- Not Pass. The part above "Winning and defending the world title" needs to be sourced. One citation at the end of a few sentences from one source only will suffice for having the same reference after each sentence.
| action2 = GAR

| action2date = 10:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
3. Coverage-Not Pass. Lots of details about fights but less so about early life or outside of boxing. What's the story with that produced the other child? When did he have his kids?
| action2link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Félix Trinidad/1
| action2result = Not listed
| action2oldid = 197529751
| action3 = GAN
| action3date = 22:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
| action3link = Talk:Félix Trinidad/GA1
| action3result = listed
| action3oldid = 234642697
| currentstatus = GA
| topic = Everydaylife
}}
{{Archive box|[[/Archive 1]]}}


==Good Article nomination, Mark II==
4. Neutral- Almost Pass-There are some instances of wording in the fight details that favor Trinidad. Examples: "Trinidad's eye was conspicuously swollen" and "Opening the final round Vargas pursued his adversary." Also, not much information mentioned about other fighters. There shouldn't be that much, but a little would help.
It has been some time since the last (now archived) nomination, I still think that the points that led to the last failure were trivial in nature and should have been at the very worst on-hold worthy. However, I asked Tony the Marine, a veteran user, to help me tie any loose knots. The adjusts proposed have been made and I can't see anything significant enough to prevent a new nomination. - [[User:Caribbean H.Q.|<b><span style="color:#0000DD;"><span style="color:#0066FF;">Ca<span style="color:#0099FF;">ri<span style="color:#00CCFF;">bb<span style="color:#00EEFF;">e</span>a</span></span>n</span>~</span><span style="color:#FF3333;">H.</span><span style="color:#FFCC00;">Q.</span></b>]] 17:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


{{Talk:Félix Trinidad/GA1}}
5. Stable- Check


== queries ==
6. Image- Check. It would be nice to have a picture of him boxing, but not required to pass.


Nav box: en dash needs to be spaced on both sides. ISO dates in refs—something funny going on; check syntax, coz I don't think the year should be separately bracketed. [[User:Tony1|<span style="color:darkgreen;">'''Tony'''</span>]] [[User talk:Tony1|<span style="color:darkgreen;">(talk)</span>]] 09:44, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
I hope these suggestions will help improve this article. As always, please feel free to write on this talk page if you have any questions. When you are finished addressing these issues, please feel free to renominate this article. I will try to review the article promptly. You can also seek a second opinion if you think I made a mistake in my evaluation. Good luck.[[User:Calbear22|User:calbear22]] ([[User talk:Calbear22|talk]]) 07:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


:I disagree with most of this review and will renominate, this at worst was "on-hold" worthy not just fail, the references there are covering the text provided and I can't see how adding more details about his childs (ie non notble people) is nessesary, the reference in "Winning and defending the world title" actually covers the entire section it was just a matter of placing it correctly, all issues that don't merit a direct fail. - [[User:Caribbean H.Q.|<b><font color="#0000DD"><font color="#0066FF">Ca<font color="#0099FF">ri<font color="#00CCFF">bb<font color="#00EEFF">e</font>a</font></font>n</font>~</font><font color="#FF3333">H.</font><font color="#FFCC00">Q.</font></b>]] 13:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
:Nav box? are you refering to the succession boxes? The dates have been corrected. - [[User:Caribbean H.Q.|<b><span style="color:#0000DD;"><span style="color:#0066FF;">Ca<span style="color:#0099FF;">ri<span style="color:#00CCFF;">bb<span style="color:#00EEFF;">e</span>a</span></span>n</span>~</span><span style="color:#FF3333;">H.</span><span style="color:#FFCC00;">Q.</span></b>]] 01:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
::My concern with the children wasn't that it was the most notable information. It was to fix a style problem at the end of the section Personal life. It is awkward to have one sentence about his fifth daughter as his its own paragraph. We don't need to go over every year his children were born, but a general snapshot would be nice. Was his fifth child an affair? As the text reads, I am not sure and am left wondering. What I meant about the sourcing was that, in places, you have a citation after almost every sentence even though you haven't changed sources. One citation after a group of sentence, if the source hasn't changed, looks stylistically better. Sometimes, you also don't source the last sentence of a paragraph. If you want second look, you can post the article under [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment]]. You will get feedback on the article much more quickly.
::As for the difference between hold and fail, it's really anyone's call between how long it will take to improve an article. I thought, for some of my suggestions under 1 and 3, that new content would have to be added and it would take a long time to do so. Regardless, I don't like to keep a person waiting. I wouldn't let the article have to wait another few months to gain approval. I would approve the article within a few days of its nomination if it addressed the problems listed in my review. You spent too much time waiting for this review and I wouldn't want you to wait that long again.[[User:Calbear22|User:calbear22]] ([[User talk:Calbear22|talk]]) 19:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


:::As I was the one who broke out that paragraph from the preceding paragraph, I will defend it. Single-line paragraphs are acceptable in writing if used sparingly, even celebrated literature will use them on occasion. Hard rules, such as no single or two-line paragraphs, should not universally apply without exception. The preceding paragraph related a story about his relationship with Sharon Santiago, how they met, and their relationship. Tacking on an end sentence about the fifth daughter not with Santiago is out of place for that paragraph; it simply does not belong there. It is more awkward to place it there than on its own. I don't feel that readability or flow is significantly affected the way it is written.
:::You might argue that the new paragraph should be expanded, but that is a content issue, and I'm not sure it is necessary. Caribbean H.Q. make a good point that further discussion of the daughter is not notable for the article.
:::If you feel that the awkwardness of the single-line paragraph exceeds the awkwardness of grafting it onto the previous paragraph, I would accept the opinion of one of the professional copy-editors on Wikipedia to that effect as more informed than my own. Perhaps one of them could be invited in for a brief consultation on the matter. I can suggest a few names if necessary. -- [[User:Michael Devore|Michael Devore]] ([[User talk:Michael Devore|talk]]) 06:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


==Edits by WikiSoldier86 seeking to specify "U.S." after place of birth==
::::More detail on how exactly he ended up with a fifth daughter is pretty much redundant, my point was that saying the article is lacking broadness based on that matter is erroneous, lets take [[Lee Smith (baseball)]] as a example, that article is featured and it contains less information about his early and personal life than this. - [[User:Caribbean H.Q.|<b><font color="#0000DD"><font color="#0066FF">Ca<font color="#0099FF">ri<font color="#00CCFF">bb<font color="#00EEFF">e</font>a</font></font>n</font>~</font><font color="#FF3333">H.</font><font color="#FFCC00">Q.</font></b>]] 06:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
This subject is under discussion at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alejandro_Garc%C3%ADa_Padilla#Specifying_US_in_birthplace_field_by_Jbabylon91_.2F_WikiSoldier86]. Please go [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alejandro_Garc%C3%ADa_Padilla#Specifying_US_in_birthplace_field_by_Jbabylon91_.2F_WikiSoldier86 THERE] if you wish to join the discussion. [[User:Mercy11|Mercy11]] ([[User talk:Mercy11|talk]]) 15:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
:::::That sounds good to me. You can ask a second opinion.[[User:Calbear22|User:calbear22]] ([[User talk:Calbear22|talk]]) 06:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:15, 9 February 2024

Good articleFélix Trinidad has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 29, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
March 30, 2008Good article reassessmentNot listed
August 28, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Good Article nomination, Mark II

[edit]

It has been some time since the last (now archived) nomination, I still think that the points that led to the last failure were trivial in nature and should have been at the very worst on-hold worthy. However, I asked Tony the Marine, a veteran user, to help me tie any loose knots. The adjusts proposed have been made and I can't see anything significant enough to prevent a new nomination. - Caribbean~H.Q. 17:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Félix Trinidad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Lead
Early years
  • "Félix Trinidad was born in Fajardo, Puerto Rico, to Irma García and Félix Trinidad Senior. During his childhood the family moved to Cupey Alto, a subdivision of San Juan, Puerto Rico, where he grew up." Do you have a reference for this?
  • "Trinidad compiled a record of fifty-one wins and six losses with twelve knockout victories." See above.
  • "The dispute between the boxer and the amateur federation began when the organization's president insisted that Trinidad move out of the 126 pound division in order to open a slot in the roster of the Puerto Rican National Team that was traveling to the Olympics games taking place in Barcelona, Spain." Needs a reference.
Professional career
  • "At this stage of his career Trinidad competed against with more experienced boxers." "against with" makes no sense.
  • "In the second round the champion's condition appeared" Phrases such as "in the second round" should be followed by a comma.
  • Scorelines should use endashes, per WP:DASH.
  • "In the second round Carr scored a knockdown, product of a quick right hand punch." Needs re-writing.
  • "On the morning of September 11, terrorists attacked the World Trade Center, following this incident the fight was postponed indefinitely." Run-on sentence.
  • A couple of dates aren't wikilinked. Currently policy states linking of dates isn't necessary. But it does need to be consistent.
    • I might be that its late and I'm sleepy, but my search didn't find any obvious dates unliked, there are standalone days or years (i.e. 1999 and September 11) but no complete ones, I believe only those are linked but with all the changes going around... If you can point me towards any I will fix them. - Caribbean~H.Q. 07:26, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Following this contest Trinidad announced his retirement, at the moment leaving the sport with a record of 41 wins, one defeat, and thirty-four wins by knockout." Reference?
  • "Early in the first round Mayorga was on the offensive connecting several combinations, later in the round Trinidad connected some punches to his opponent's face who reacted by displaying a defiant attitude and lowering his defense, which Trinidad used to connect several combinations in the round's closing seconds." Run-on sentence. Also very long. Consider re-writing.
  • "Trinidad announced a comeback on March 2, 2004." Why did he decide to come out of retirement?
    • None of the reports actually go into that detail, he most likely did it because a regional title was in play, making it easier to secure a better ranking following the fight. But I rather not enter in speculation. - Caribbean~H.Q. 07:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Following this fight, Trinidad retired temporarily." Again a reference? Why temporary? Why did he come out of retirement again?
    • Added some material covering why he retired; acording to his wife he returned due to his "passion" towards the sport, but Trinidad himself has only said that he wasn't returning for money. - Caribbean~H.Q. 07:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A bit to do, but I'll put it on hold. Peanut4 (talk) 22:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it. - Caribbean~H.Q. 06:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You also need to check the note on the talk page about the years in the references. Peanut4 (talk) 22:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Simplified the links, that fixed the date format in the references. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Number MOS

Another question. You've change "country" to "archipelago" twice? Is there any specific reason? I would suggest people would understand the former much better. Peanut4 (talk) 01:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Puerto Rico has dynamic politics, the current trends are suggesting that a change in status may be at hand. Parties are redefining their ideals, allying with independent movements, etc. Thus, to reduce the amount of articles needing revisionism if such a thing happens it may be better to keep politics out of articles dealing with sports. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

It meets all the GA critiera. I would suggest seeing what you could do to try and get it towards FAC. Beforehand though, I would suggest you put it through a peer review, and hopefully get some both boxing and non-boxing editors to ensure it doesn't have too much jargon or too many details in. I would also suggest some form of copy-edit, but it certainly meets the prose levels for GA. Also, maybe an image or two more might be a good idea, if you can find some.

Well done though, and all the best with the future of the article. Peanut4 (talk) 21:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I may try pushing it over the FA line once Tito retires (for real), in the meanwhile I will keep it updated and clean like its done with my other boxing GAs. Kudos to you for a fast and efficient work, finding that a review was underway less than a day after the nomination really surprised me, cheers. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

queries

[edit]

Nav box: en dash needs to be spaced on both sides. ISO dates in refs—something funny going on; check syntax, coz I don't think the year should be separately bracketed. Tony (talk) 09:44, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nav box? are you refering to the succession boxes? The dates have been corrected. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Edits by WikiSoldier86 seeking to specify "U.S." after place of birth

[edit]

This subject is under discussion at [1]. Please go THERE if you wish to join the discussion. Mercy11 (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]