User talk:BP322

Template:Song infobox

Heya template artist :] ! Interesting idea this:

{{#if: {{{Caption<includeonly>|</includeonly>}}} |

(I mean to package the pipe inside <includeonly>..</includeonly>). This makes a nice display on the template page itself of how the template will look like. Yet another idea I can steal...

Just beware of Wikipedia:Template limits, as this inflates the pre-expand-include-size. But that's not a problem for a template like Template:Song infobox. Cheers! --Ligulem 09:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Pearl Jam genres

I posted this on the talk page, but I'm sending it to you because I want your opinion on this. Please post your response on the pearl jam talk page.

pearl jam "hard rock" gets 831,000 hits on google. " "Grunge" gets 971,000. Meanwhile "alternative rock" has only 363,000. By comparison if you search for genre's that the band has done some songs in the style of like punk rock, you get 465,000, more than 100,000 hits than alternative rock, one of the genres that is listed. I don't see why this category is listed. It seems only because pearl jam came from the same place as Nirvana, and were lumped into the same category as them. Hoponpop69 21:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Question about image removal

I deleted Image:PearlJam1.jpg by mistake. I restored that image to the article. The other is referenced here -Nv8200p talk 15:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Pearl Jam soundclips

Hi, we need you to add fair use rationales to the Pearl Jam soundclips you have uploaded. An example of an audio clip fair use rationale can be found here: [1]. Also, please included the clip length. Thanks. WesleyDodds 03:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Given_to_Fly.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Given_to_Fly.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 13:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Rationale now asserted. Thanks :) ShakespeareFan00 16:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:I_Am_Mine.ogg

I have tagged Image:I_Am_Mine.ogg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 14:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Rationale now asserted - Thanks :-) ShakespeareFan00 16:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

File:PJ-Ten2.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PJ-Ten2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)