Talk:River Cherwell: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 19:18, 19 March 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the River Cherwell article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi.

This article seemed a little too long on its own... I hope the subsections are okay... if anyone wants to rename them (etc!) feel free to jump in right away!--NeilTarrant 21:24, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Fine by me.. I did go on rather! But you typed 'Shipman' instead of Shipton... well, the former has been in the news this week! Incidentally, can someone explain why the photo was removed? Andy F 02:32, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Perhaps somebody should add something about the great flood of 1998. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.225.1.161 (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ref parameters

@Redrose64 Re your admonition please be careful how you fill in ref params: I use Provelt. I think there are way more important lapses to be corrected on this WP , for example the glaring LACK of sources on this page, dont you think ? Wuerzele (talk) 19:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wuerzele: So there aren't enough sources - that doesn't give you an excuse to add malformed refs, as you did in this edit. Why on earth would you think that |last=Magazine|first=Smithsonian are sensible parameters? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64 "an excuse to add malformed refs"? Excuse me, Provelt did it. Adding a source needed flag is what anyone SHOULD do here. Now Thank you for your time and have a good day, esp finding sources, if you are so concerned about improving WP.--Wuerzele (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As shown at Wikipedia:User scripts, you take full responsibility for any action you perform using any user script. So please don't blame ProveIt. If there is a bug with ProveIt, it may be reported at Wikipedia talk:ProveIt. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{River}}
+{{Talk header}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
+{{WikiProject River Thames|importance=mid}}
+{{WikiProject England| importance=low }}
+{{WikiProject Rivers| importance=low }}
+{{WikiProject UK geography| importance=low }}
+}}
+==Untitled==
 Hi.
@@ Line 7: / Line 15: @@
 Perhaps somebody should add something about the great flood of 1998.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/134.225.1.161|134.225.1.161]] ([[User talk:134.225.1.161|talk]]) 16:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== ref parameters ==
+@[[User:Redrose64|Redrose64]] Re your admonition please be careful how you fill in ref params: I use Provelt. I think there are ''way'' more important lapses to be corrected on this WP , for example the glaring LACK of sources on this page, dont you think ? [[User:Wuerzele|Wuerzele]] ([[User talk:Wuerzele|talk]]) 19:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
+:{{replyto|Wuerzele}} So there aren't enough sources - that doesn't give you an excuse to add malformed refs, as you did in {{diff|River Cherwell|prev|1214349205|this edit}}. Why on earth would you think that {{para|last|Magazine}}{{para|first|Smithsonian}} are sensible parameters? --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 22:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
+::@[[User:Redrose64|Redrose64]] "an excuse to add malformed refs"? Excuse me, Provelt  did it. Adding a source needed  flag is what anyone SHOULD do here. Now Thank you for your time and have a good day, esp finding sources, if you are so concerned about improving WP.--[[User:Wuerzele|Wuerzele]] ([[User talk:Wuerzele|talk]]) 19:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
+:::As shown at [[Wikipedia:User scripts]], you take full responsibility for any action you perform using any user script. So please don't blame ProveIt. If there is a bug with ProveIt, it may be reported at [[Wikipedia talk:ProveIt]]. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 19:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)