Jump to content

Talk:Synthesis: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
deleted tag
Kya kar rahe ho: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=

{{WikiProject Disambiguation}}
== Purpose ==
{{WikiProject Systems|field=Systems theory}}
what it the purpose for synthesizing
}}


What is this user tryng to say? Asking the purpose of the name of this age?

OK this whole thing has been vandalised by some kid, I don't know enough about the subject to fix it but someone should.

Does anyone else think there should be direct mention of synthesis here as described in [[Bloom's Taxonomy]]? It is close to the description under philosophical synthesis, except in Bloom's synthesis, the two (or more) elements involved in producing the new element(s) are not necessarily antithetical to each other. [[User:M620sound|M620sound]] 05:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


== Suggestion: Change this to a disambiguation page ==
== Suggestion: Change this to a disambiguation page ==

I don't think these subjects are related, in any way. (Chemical synthesis, sound synthesis, philosophical synthesis).
I don't think these subjects are related, in any way. (Chemical synthesis, sound synthesis, philosophical synthesis).
I think what we're looking for here is a disambiguation page. ----[[User:CharlesGillingham|CharlesGillingham]] 04:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
I think what we're looking for here is a disambiguation page. ----[[User:CharlesGillingham|CharlesGillingham]] 04:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Line 18: Line 11:


This article has sat for over three months since CharlesGillingham's suggestion, with little work done to it and no further comment here on the Talk page. Whole sections of it (e.g., Chemical synthesis) are ''verbatim'' identical from other articles. It may well be abandoned. It certainly suffers from [[WP:CFORK]] and lack of focus. I will '''be bold''' and begin transforming this into a disambiguation page. [[User:Hult041956|Hult041956]] ([[User talk:Hult041956|talk]]) 23:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
This article has sat for over three months since CharlesGillingham's suggestion, with little work done to it and no further comment here on the Talk page. Whole sections of it (e.g., Chemical synthesis) are ''verbatim'' identical from other articles. It may well be abandoned. It certainly suffers from [[WP:CFORK]] and lack of focus. I will '''be bold''' and begin transforming this into a disambiguation page. [[User:Hult041956|Hult041956]] ([[User talk:Hult041956|talk]]) 23:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

what are the steps for synthesizing <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.74.173.179|99.74.173.179]] ([[User talk:99.74.173.179|talk]]) 04:02, 9 June 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Kya kar rahe ho ==

Kya kar rahe ho [[Special:Contributions/2409:4089:BE0A:7520:0:0:374B:5612|2409:4089:BE0A:7520:0:0:374B:5612]] ([[User talk:2409:4089:BE0A:7520:0:0:374B:5612|talk]]) 08:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:48, 11 December 2024

Suggestion: Change this to a disambiguation page

[edit]

I don't think these subjects are related, in any way. (Chemical synthesis, sound synthesis, philosophical synthesis). I think what we're looking for here is a disambiguation page. ----CharlesGillingham 04:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. The "other uses" tag at the top claims, This is an article about the philosophical concept. In fact, it is not. Only two sentences are about philosophy. The bulk of the article is about chemical synthesis and should probably be merged in to that article. This one should be chopped up and replaced with a disambiguation page. Hult041956 02:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article has sat for over three months since CharlesGillingham's suggestion, with little work done to it and no further comment here on the Talk page. Whole sections of it (e.g., Chemical synthesis) are verbatim identical from other articles. It may well be abandoned. It certainly suffers from WP:CFORK and lack of focus. I will be bold and begin transforming this into a disambiguation page. Hult041956 (talk) 23:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what are the steps for synthesizing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.74.173.179 (talk) 04:02, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kya kar rahe ho

[edit]

Kya kar rahe ho 2409:4089:BE0A:7520:0:0:374B:5612 (talk) 08:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]