User talk:Charmed36: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 04:55, 14 October 2023

This user may have left Wikipedia. Charmed36 has not edited Wikipedia since 7 December 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

Archive 1 • Archive 2

Why do you keep getting rid of "TBA"?

Please tell me why you keep removing the "TBA" on Britney Spears Break The Ice! They already confirmed that she's working on a new album! http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-britney17-2008jul17,0,5448901.story?track=rss So please stop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enanoj1111 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: Clarifying "notable single"

As a frequent contributor to articles related to music, you are invited to review this RfC and comment, if you see fit! Best regards, --Winger84 (talk) 18:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatcha Know About That

We DO know the credits, the promo CDS has leaked and a scan of the CD leaked along with it. The producer is Polow Da Don and the writers are Jim Jones, Missy Elliott, and Michael K. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen1108 (talk • contribs) 03:43, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edit summaries

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. These two edit summaries are inappropriate. Please ensure that you are polite in future interactions with editors - registered or otherwise. LessHeard vanU (talk) 14:58, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits such as the one you made here. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response to my talkpage. The warning refers to the edit summaries, as indicated by the section header and my comment dated 3 September. It is inappropriate to make another editor feel nervous, threatened or otherwise discomforted by means of an edit summary (or indeed on a talkpage). WP:CIVIL's nutshell, in the last sentence, says, "avoid upsetting other editors whenever possible." Please bear this in mind in your future interactions. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charmed36, the fact that you think this isn't disruptive shows how long you have managed to get away with doing what you like. It is very incivil. — Realist² 19:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please stop edit warring with User:Jamalar and her IP's. Jamalar often doesn't sign in, using IP's that begin 86.... to edit war. If you see these IP's tell me about it and I can pass it onto an admin who understands Jamalar's history. If Jamalar herself edit war's also report it to me. — Realist² 20:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, like I said please report Jamalar and any of her IP's to me. I got her account blocked for a week and I'm happy to keep on at her until it sinks in. Do not edit war back and stop with the incivility. — Realist² 20:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring. Please request page protection or report the individual editor instead. — Realist² 19:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And Go Girl. — Realist² 20:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring and actually help us

Charmed you are still edit warring with Jamalars IP's. You know full well that Jamalar uses IP's that begin 86.25 and 86.29 . Why are you still doing it? If you see one of Jamalars IP's let me know (I've said this already to you). Jamalars main account has been blocked indef but we can't stop Jamalar unless you help us. I'm currently trying to get a range block on Jamalars IP's but I need your help. Feel free to revert Jamalar's IP's but make it known in the edit summary that it is "User:Jamalar evading indef block using IP's". Then let me know and I can report it. Please respond to this message. — Realist² 18:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, you should report any of his IP's on spot, irrelevant of whether or not they are causing trouble. In the mean time have you considered asking for page protection? This would be a great way of stopping Jamalar editing those Gwen Stefani articles? — Realist² 18:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A one week range block was put on what we believe to be Jamalars Ip's. If and when you see more you know what to do. Hopefully things will calm down a bit now. Interestingly there is a new editor, MrPerfect who seems to have taken Jamalars place as a disruption. — Realist² 14:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This guy. — Realist² 20:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've got most of the singles by pink, Gwen and a few others on my watchlist now. I'm disappointed that yet again you failed to tell me of Jamalar's IP's. — Realist² 20:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Stefani, unfortunately I have to because I cannot trust you to report Jamalars socks, despite me pleading with you multiple times. According to this edit you knew Jamalar was back by 6pm and you had already reverted some of her edits before that. I am near convinced that you enjoy these little edit wars and will consider seeking admin advise on you behavior regarding this. — Realist² 20:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I would like to apologize for the comment above, it seems you did contact me about Jamalar's IP, but you put it in my archive (I don't watchlist my archives). I just happened to see it there. Thanx for making the effort to contact me, even if it was in the wrong place. Thanx, I hope you accept my apology and I hope you continue to report Jamalar's IP's to me. — Realist² 00:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Go Girl

I've given that IP a final warning. Any disruptive edits after that, I'll make sure to report it. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 03:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is now blocked. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 04:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About your edits.

Wind it up is considered a pop song that is backed up with a source..you have no reason to revert. This is your opinion obviously. Crash is a Pop song. "old school gold chained rapper" refers to the video. and what you waiting for, dance-pop +electo-rock= dance-punk, dance punk is also sourced, so there is no reason to remove it. I know you wont stop this annoying habbit of yours..but I thought i might aswell tell you. And please dont respond saying its because im an IP user. And stop reporting me just because your not getting your own way or you think im annoying. I'm not here to vandalise or to argue with you. Seriously..grow up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.245.181 (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doll Domination

3RR was violated about a million times. You weren't necessarily protecting it from vandalism, since no one was intentionally destroying the article. The page was being constantly reverted back and fourth between different versions. The page will be protected for a while. Violating 3rr is worthy of a block of both parties, but I find that simply protecting the article works best. Orane (talk) 04:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're not blocked. The article is protected for a couple hours, maybe a day, tops. Nothing big. Save all the changes you want to make to the article in your sandbox (if you have one), or on the article talk page until protection is lifted. Orane (talk) 04:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A note before I remove protection from the article: do not blindly revert the changes others have made. It's better to contact them on their talk page, or address issues on the article talk page and come to some sort of agreement. With that said, however, I realize that you keep writing that the album has received negative reviews. However, the other editor sourced the point that the album has received "mixed" reviews, and I think that point should stay. Orane (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Taremixvid3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Taremixvid3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Million_Moments (talk) 08:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatcha Think About That

The article doesn't appear to meet necessary criteria for notability under Wikipedia:MUSIC#Songs. See this quote especially: "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable." If you disagree however, feel free to remove the "prod" tag. And this can also be discussed on the talk page for the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raven1977 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Whatcha Think About That

An article that you have been involved in editing, Whatcha Think About That, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whatcha Think About That. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? raven1977 (talk) 23:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PCD

Please discuss on the talk page. The article is again protected. Orane (talk) 02:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Circus

Don't worry about it, my first reflex with any of the new Spears covers was to remove them, and most of the time it's correct. :)
Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 17:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go Girl

I am not a sockpuppet or anything like that. I cant believe wiki is accusing me of doing this. And i dont like how you are accusing me of wht i didnt do. I think its very wrong. Its not my fault that me and that other person have a very close user name. But im NOT a sock puppeter or anything like that.

You always remove my true contribution on the Circus page

This album was released by Jive, Zomba and Sony Music as the big label, i'm not writting something that it is not true! proof: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jive_Records, Zomba Music Group: US, Sony Music Entertainment, Elsewhere + US

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Fibvid1.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Fibvid1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy Ride

The genres come the Billboard article. You changed them for what. Charmed36 (talk) 05:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide me with a link, please? Also, an album can experiment with various styles but still be grounded in one genre. On Wikipedia, we are supposed to list the genre that the album reflects. So, if for example a couple songs on Ciara's album explored rock or even indie, you wouldn't say Fantasy Ride is an indie album (and you shouldn't put "indie" in the genre field). No, it would still be an R&B/Hip hop album. Secondly, genres like "Crunk&B" aren't standard popular music genres. It's just a catch phrase for a particular style of hip hop-influenced R&b, but it's still R&B/Hip hop nonetheless. Orane (talk) 05:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, the link didn't really prove anything at all. If anything, it reinforces what I stated above. The fact that she has a few "freestyle-leaning" songs doesn't mean that it go in the genre field. The album is still a R&B album. Orane (talk) 21:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube was a credible source. the reason i wrote those tracks on the confirmed list was more to do with what was happening in the videos. they were her wild fm promotions for fantasy ride in which she even says she's performing new songs!!! (Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Why do you keep changing the tracklisting format? Please Reply.TrEeMaNsHoE (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Sources say she released a mixtape. Why do you keep deleting it from the discography? Please reply. TrEeMaNsHoE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.21.45.54 (talk) 00:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Lwavid2.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Lwavid2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

E=MC²

Talk:E=MC²_(Mariah_Carey_album)#Concerns_Part_2 Reidlos (talk) 20:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful (whether you agree or not), if you could express your opinion, suggestions how to improve the article etc. Thanks! Reidlos (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GaGa

If you checked your 1st source first it did not even work. So how dare you attack me! First warning!!! Your second source is a blog and that cannot be used on wikipedia. So before you add comments on my user talk. Make sure your in the right. Kind regards. Dance-pop (talk) 09:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

hi charmed. I saw your edit summary here. I think its better to just say remove than say lol. It doesn't help to IPs. They will keep adding them. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 07:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Katy Perry

I don't understand why you keep removing The Matrix from Katy Perry's album chronology. She sings on almost every track on the album. That is a lot more than the backing vocals she provides on Goodbye for Now, which is listed in her single chronology. ~themonkeyofdoom —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Then why do you leave POD's single on her chronogly. POD is not her. With every other artist on the wikipedia their featured work is listed. In Madonna's chronology soundtracks that she's featured on are listed. This Matrix album contain seven tracks with Perry as a main vocalist, with her as backing vocals on most of the rest, as well as having co-written a majority of the songs. ~themonkeyofdoom —Preceding undated comment was added at 06:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

So since every artist has featured work in their chronology why does the The Matrix not fit into that? It is and album by The Matrix featuring Katy Perry and Adam Longlands. ~themonkeyofdoom —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

About your recent edits

Charmed36 will you please put my BDR article back up, you can take out the extra chron.Dance-pop (talk) 02:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BDR

I have recreated the article therefore new disscussion and here is the release> http:/www.ladygaga.com/discography —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dance-pop (talk • contribs) 03:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3rr warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Just Dance. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —Kww(talk) 03:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. Dance-pop has already been noticed.—Kww(talk) 03:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Rihanna appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Please stop adjusting genres on Rihanna related articles. All reliable sources credit her as primarily R&B/Reggae. per music article guidelines, Aim for generality. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 23:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 23:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:You cover3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:You cover3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BREAKING NEWS!

Charmed is returning this year. Only a rumour at this point though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.89.94 (talk) 04:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fantasy Ride. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Σ xplicit 01:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary on here

Please be kind when explaining to newcomers, even vandals, that some actions should not be taken for the best interest of the encyclopedia. All-CAPS is considered YELLING, and is contrary to WP:CIVIL. If the editor keeps restoring the old text it may be because 1) (s)he would like to see a history merge or 2) (s)he thinks the article may have a chance even without citations/sources. Regardless, an WP:AIV or WP:RPP may be the best option. Thank you for your edits. Cheers, —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 17:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Radar

Hi there. I just wanna let you know that I reverted the page back to your last revision. Now that I think about it, it is best that the original intro stays put, rather than it starting out as "the fourth single from circus", as the original song is from Blackout, and should read as such. Sorry for the edit war.

Percxyz (Call me Percy, it's easier) 16:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing![reply]
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Wikilinking

Hi. I noticed your editing comment on Ciara. There are a couple ways to answer. You can just go by the guidelines in WP:CONTEXT. But leaving those aside, the Wikilinks are rarely used, and make it more difficult for people to read. I was helping the article by removing them. I know this goes contrary to a lot of common wisdom, but I've been a professional Webmaster for a couple of large companies, and I know the statistics. After about 10 links in an article, the number of times readers click-though *doesn't increase*. I.e., You want to pick the 10 most important things to link. In Ciara? If I was her Webmaster? As in: she's paying me? I'd get rid of a lot more links! E.g., "Billboard", "mononym" "singer-songwriter", "Justin Timberlake", "Atlanta, Georgia", etc. (BTW, she isn't paying me.) Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 22:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Radar (pt. 2)

Hello once again, Charmed. I was wondering if you could add your opinion (unbiased, of course) to an issue that's being discussed on the Radar talk page regarding a second "Promotional single" info box on the article for the Blackout-release of the song.

Just for reference, here's what the article looks like with the second info box added: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Radar_(song)&oldid=292883153

The discussion is taking place here. Thanks in advance. Percxyz (Call me Percy, it's easier) 21:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goodieseurodvd.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goodieseurodvd.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 03:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Like A Surgeon

Check ciara's twitter, she says like a surgeon is fourth single. plus a clip from work's video is already on youtube. she hasnt even confirmed the video for like a surgeon is complete yet. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Can you confirm how and under what guidelines the intro is correct? which wikipedia guidelines are you refering to? (there are many you see...) (Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

The anon has a point

I tend to agree with you that Mariah Carey is "pop", but the anon has a point: once he's challenged that, you should provide a citation if you want to restore it.—Kww(talk) 17:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree, but even edit-warring sockpuppets can have a point. If you are so insistent that the songs be described as "pop", please don't just edit-war. Please find a source.—Kww(talk) 18:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested a range block, but it would have gone better if you hadn't blindly reverted in the last pass. Please remember: being right doesn't always help. By reverting without sources, people can point at you and call you an edit-warrior as well. If you reinsert the "pop" label, please put a source on it.—Kww(talk) 12:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

talk page vandalism

Beyond a warning, I can't do much.—Kww(talk) 00:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Fame, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 03:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Fame

I think Pokerdance's warning was inappropriate, and have told him so. However, the two of you need to start talking and stop reverting. Four reverts in a day will get you blocked (see WP:3RR), and a long slow edit-war probably will, too. Talk to him, and try to work out a compromise version.—Kww(talk) 03:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come to the talkpage of The Fame and lets discuss this huge change. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce

Leave beyonce's broken-hearted girl alone kk if u don't i will block u my self is that clear so don't mess with me k (Don;t make me catch you again)Ladgy (talk) 06:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to create malicious redirects, as you did with Ego, you will be blocked from editing. Don't u edit again understand .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.79.175.246 (talk) 18:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please stop. If you continue to create malicious redirects, as you did with Broken-Hearted Girl, you will be blocked from editing. Don't u edit again understand Ladgy (talk) 06:41, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's at WP:Articles for deletion/Broken-Hearted Girl now, so please don't restore the redirect until the issue is decided.—Kww(talk) 03:30, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lies you are telling about me

I see the lies you're whispering in Kww's ear about me. I DO NOT simply remove pop from the genre. I only remove pop from the genre IF THE SONG ISN'T POP, and I also removed sources that aren't legitimate sources, like the sources you tend to post. "The user believes that a music review is not a legit source and opinions are;" And just what do you think a music review is, genious? It's an OPINION. Get that? A music reviews from some non-notable person is an OPINION, not factual, and therefor a music review is no more and legit source for song genre's than I am. Just because the words are on a website does not make it a legitimate source. On top of that, not every genre you insist on putting up has a "source" there, and NONE of them have legitimate sources. The sweeping majority of ALL song article on Wikipedia do not have sources backing up the genre type(s). "Check the user's contribution;" Rofl, who do you think you and Kww are? Neither of you have any authoritative control over me. You can revert my edits and I can revert yours. I'll be checking your contributions also. 71.12.0.105 (talk) 23:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Carey edit warring

I've requested semi-protection. Hold back for a while, and stay out of trouble. Most of the problem was from socks of Changstafolife and AndreaCarax. Changstafolife is already blocked, and the AndreaCarax block will be in place soon.—Kww(talk) 01:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Fame

I re-added Cherrytree back to the chronology on The Fame, but I figured I'd leave a message here and explain so we can discuss instead of edit war. I re-added it because it is an album of hers. Non-studio albums are also included (see Invincible (Michael Jackson album), In the Zone, Like a Prayer, and many others), as they are part of the artist's chronology. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 01:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Girl Gone Bad

"Say It", "Sell Me Candy" and ""Question Existing" are SOUL and "Lemme Get That" has influences... Stop to revert! Vítor&R™ ^{(Run This F* Town!)} 20h45min de 28 de Agosto de 2009 (UTC)

Change the style of music as often as you want, it will be always reversed. Cordially. Vítor&R™ ^{(Run This F* Town!)} 11h22min de 20 de Setembro de 2009 (UTC)

Their sources are unreliable, such as blogs and so on. Russian Roulette is anything except pop. That his penchant for putting all the songs as pop, must stop. Understand that the songs were pop Rihanna by 2007. and Rihanna's main genre is R&B!!! Vitorvicentevalente (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tppvid12.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tppvid12.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:55, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ciaratheevolutionjapan.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ciaratheevolutionjapan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 03:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Witoyvid1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Witoyvid1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 03:10, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Emancipation of Mimi

Why did you undo my edit to The Emancipation of Mimi? E=MC² (Mariah Carey album) redirects to E=MC2 (Mariah Carey album). --Ameki (talk) 05:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Charmed36. You have new messages at A8UDI's talk page.
Message added 20:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A8 UDI 20:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Memoirs of an Imperfect Angel / Mariah Carey

Hi Just wanted to let you know that i have filed a WP:3R report for User: 93.149.194.161 who keeps changing the genre of Carey's songs/albums. Feel free to add any comments here (Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Songs produced by Darkchild

Hey

Thanks for adding the writers of "No Way". Do you have any idea how that song is obtained with the album? I have yet to find a source, though some claim it's a track they received on downloading it after purchasing. CycloneGU (talk) 02:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The song is digital bonus track, but i don't know where actually. The source has Zing. The song built on the same structure as Britney Spears's "Quicksand". Charmed36 (talk) 02:15, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I placed the Zing source, it was the first mention I saw of a bonus track. I went to ladygaga.com and their forums later and several mentioned receiving the track in posts, so I guess I have more research to do. CycloneGU (talk) 02:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rated R Edit

I looked through the sources for rock as a genre and I guess my eyes skipped over the "rock-orientated" part. I don't see how I was being bias and sorry for making a mistake.--24.205.50.121 (talk) 02:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Telephone(song)

Telephone by Lady Gaga feat. Beyoncé has actually been announced as a single. Please do not delete that again. Loveman334 —Preceding undated (talk) 6:36 5 December 2009

Re: Your edit comment in "Bad Romance" article at "Lady Gaga singles chronology" for "Telephone" that "Beyonce is NOT important".See the comment immediately above again showing the 'industry standard' or common usage description. The 'featured artist' is in the recording [what you hear], so they are important. Without them, the song does NOT exist as they are part of it. Then, how are you going to show credit to the 'featured artist'?—Iknow23 (talk) 22:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

82.43.119.44

Please be more specific. I did a quick check, and the edits looked reasonable. Vandalism correction, folding succession boxes together, things like that. Nothing problematic.—Kww(talk) 02:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If U Seek Amy genre

Hi
Could you come to Talk:If U Seek Amy#Genre and engage in discussion? I will renominate the article for GA and we need sources to establish the genre.
Thanks, Xwomanizerx 15:02, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Jackson article reverts.

I have cleaned up several articles related to the music of Janet Jackson, removing excessive and/or repetitive detail (most of which had been repeated more than once in said article.) Please take the time to read the edits before immediately reverting the articles to the way they were. If you have cause to revert them, please state it; otherwise it falls under the catagory of vandalism. Thank you. —The Real One Returns 21:41, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:224.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:224.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Rude Boy

What do you mean, "keep the genres simple without unnecessary add-ons"? It is just informative. Also, neither pop nor ragga are sub-genres of R&B, so it is necessary to include it. Adabow (talk) 22:08, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you.Candy o32 16:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all the warning did not indicate you as a new user, nor did it mention anything about the Ciara pages. It was about removing or adding unsourced genres without reason, which is against Wikipedia NPOV. And since you have to use personal attacks, the Ciara pages are not of good quality and I am slowly fixing them for GA status. Candy o32 15:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

E=MC2

Who said it was a rap appearance that made it Hip-Hop? Jayy008 (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for I've Just Begun (Having My Fun)

An article that you have been involved in editing, I've Just Begun (Having My Fun) , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Xwomanizerx (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ciaralikeaboy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ciaralikeaboy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Simple Girl.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Simple Girl.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Instructional dance songs

Category:Instructional dance songs, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Allforyoubonusdvd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Allforyoubonusdvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:20, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Janet-Jackson-Black-Cat-309971.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janet-Jackson-Black-Cat-309971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Designofadecadeinternational.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Designofadecadeinternational.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Designofadecadejapan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Designofadecadejapan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Janet Jackson - The Velvet Rope.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janet Jackson - The Velvet Rope.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Janet-Jackson-I-Get-Lonely-109007.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janet-Jackson-I-Get-Lonely-109007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Everytimecover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Everytimecover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thebestthingsinlifearefreesinglecover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thebestthingsinlifearefreesinglecover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Twenty Foreplay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Twenty Foreplay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whatllido.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whatllido.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whoopsnow cover7.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whoopsnow cover7.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Comeon jppro.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Comeon jppro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:State of the World (song).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:State of the World (song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whydfmlvid3.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Whydfmlvid3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diamondsvid2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Diamondsvid2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blackstreetgirlfriendboyfriendcover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blackstreetgirlfriendboyfriendcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]