Jump to content

Talk:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by 103.109.92.86 (talk) to last revision by Rhain
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
== GTA Myths ==
{{Article history
|action1=PR
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/archive1
|action1date=01:41, 17 March 2006
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=44134552


|action2=GAN
The article is missing a new feature SA brought in. The myths. The first serious had a little detail into myths with blue hell, but it was hard to explore, the VC had helicopters which allowed a lot more exploration, but it never picked off in the mainstream, SA on the other hand has sprung a huge arena of myth related topics.
|action2date=20:06, 19 January 2007
|action2link=Talk:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/Archive 2#Good Article Nomination
|action2result=listed
|action2oldid=101821536


|action3=FAC
I'm going to add some edits to myth related features, as well as some old myth related sites that I can grab.
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/archive1
|action3date=19:42, 20 January 2007
|action3result=failed
|action3oldid=101821536


|action4=GAR
If anyone has a problem with it being on the main page[though I do feel this is where it belongs], I can put it on a seperate sheet and just put up a link exchange.
|action4link=Talk:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/Archive 3#Sweeps delist
|action4date=23:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
|action4result=delisted
|action4oldid=200371814


~capi crimm.


|action5 = GAN
::'''Myths'''
|action5date = 08:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
::* Bigfoot
|action5link = Talk:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/GA1
::* Serial Killer, face him on jungle
|action5result = listed
::* Big creature in deep sea
|action5oldid = 1213137102
::* Mama's CJ ghost
|currentstatus = GA
::* ET contact
|dykdate=10 April 2024
|dykentry=... that the developers of '''''[[Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas]]''''' walked out of the [[Game Developers Choice Awards]] after winning nothing?
|dyknom=Template:Did you know nominations/Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
|topic = Video games
|otd1date=2024-10-26|otd1oldid=1253193361
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|1=
{{WikiProject Video games |importance=High}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(555d)
| archive = Talk:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 5
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Aan}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 3
}}
{{refideas|[https://archive.org/details/san-andreas-articles_20220927 177 articles from American, British, and Australian gaming magazines about Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas]}}
{{translated page|pt|Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas|section=Development}}


== Big Smoke ==
::'''Real'''
::* Random writings in Los Santos cemetery at night.
::* Light balls passing in the sky
::* Ghostcar (an car nobody inside descend a mount)
::* Liberty City (with cheats)


Are the big smoke memes notable enough to be in this article? Like in a section titled "In Pop culture" or something? [[User:NintendoTTTEfan2005|NintendoTTTEfan2005]] ([[User talk:NintendoTTTEfan2005|talk]]) 00:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
:Are there any reliable sources (see [[WP:VG/RS]] that discuss those memes? [[User:Soetermans|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">soetermans</span>]]. [[User talk: Soetermans|<sup>↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A <span style="font-variant:small-caps">'''TALK'''</span></sup>]] 05:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
::None that I have currently found. I probably ought to look really hard for them, cause they got to be out there somewhere. Cause I remember when those Big Smoke memes were all over the place in like 2017-2018. How do I remember those memes yet I don't really remember many others that were probably more popular, besides like fidget spinner memes and "We are number one" from Lazy Town? [[User:NintendoTTTEfan2005|NintendoTTTEfan2005]] ([[User talk:NintendoTTTEfan2005|talk]]) 00:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
::Like are osgamers or sportskeeda reliable sources? [[User:NintendoTTTEfan2005|NintendoTTTEfan2005]] ([[User talk:NintendoTTTEfan2005|talk]]) 07:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
:::No. You can find a list of reliable (and unreliable) sources at [[WP:VG/S]]. <span style="nowrap">– [[User:Rhain|<span style="color: #008;">'''''Rhain'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Rhain|☔]] <small>([[he/him]])</small></span> 07:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
::::Ok. But I am honestly surprised this stuff hadn't been mentioned long ago like 2017 or 2016 since Big Smoke was one of the biggest internet memes of that time. Or at least, as far as I am concerned. [[User:NintendoTTTEfan2005|NintendoTTTEfan2005]] ([[User talk:NintendoTTTEfan2005|talk]]) 17:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2023 ==


{{edit semi-protected|Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas|answered=yes}}
----
Just add a link for San Francisco [[Special:Contributions/150.195.171.3|150.195.171.3]] ([[User talk:150.195.171.3|talk]]) 17:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> <span class="nowrap">—[[User:TechnoSquirrel69|TechnoSquirrel69]]</span> ([[User talk:TechnoSquirrel69|sigh]]) 00:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
== "[[:All we had to do was follow the damn train, CJ!]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=All_we_had_to_do_was_follow_the_damn_train,_CJ!&redirect=no All we had to do was follow the damn train, CJ!]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3#All we had to do was follow the damn train, CJ!}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Utopes|Utopes]] <sub>('''[[User talk:Utopes|talk]]''' / '''[[Special:Contributions/Utopes|cont]]''')</sub></span> 16:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
== Pimping and Burglary ==
We should include some unique GTA SA exclusive features like pimping and burglary, stuff like taxi, paramedic, etc aren't exclusive to SA but all 3D GTAs, not saying to include all side stuff, but the [[WP:Notable]] ones like that, (Burglary introduced in Home Invasion, rewards infinite stamina, Pimping introduced in Jizzy, at least the features unlocked during story missions), there are sufficient [[WP:RS]] for them and as a matter of fact stuff like taxi, paramedic which exists in all 3D GTAs can go, but Pimping and Burglary were prominent features and I linked [[WP:RS]], but thats just my opinion, choice is yours, won't comment any further leaving a consensus, its upto you guys to vote and add, I end with a support. [[User:Dilbaggg|Dilbaggg]] ([[User talk:Dilbaggg|talk]]) 13:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
:Both are included, and I don't think they need any expansion. <span class="nowrap">– [[User:Rhain|<span style="color: #008;">'''''Rhain'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Rhain|☔]] <small>([[he/him]])</small></span> 13:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


== Some generally high-level thoughts on the article at present ==
I cleaned stuff up a lot and added more info. Let me know what you think! <br /> Oh, and I think maybe the box art ought to be deleted - it's copyrighted. --[[User:Twinxor|Twinxor]] 08:15, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
:I think the box art is released into the public domain. [[User:Cun|cun]] 16:16, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
::Why would the box art be in the public domain? I'm removing it. --[[User:Twinxor|Twinxor]] 17:29, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
:::But you have a fine case for [[wikipedia:fair use|fair use]], so I've changed the status on the image. --[[User:Twinxor|Twinxor]] 17:40, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
::::Yeah, cd covers are all around this place and are even instigated by Wikipedia, so why wouldn't ps2 covers be legal too?


RetroCosmos asked me to take a look at the article with the eye of eventually getting it to FA. I thought I'd offer some general thoughts.
:: * They are legal, it's fair use. It doesn't diminish the owner's ability to sell, and is not a work of art meant to be sold as is.
*<u>General stuff</u>:
**This is probably obvious, but the prose is going to need a major workover for FA standards. I would recommend exercises like going through [[User:Tony1/How to improve your writing]] to tighten things up.
**I think in terms of comprehensiveness, it doesn't feel like we're missing anything at a broad level.
*{{xt|It is the seventh title in the Grand Theft Auto series and the first main entry since 2002's Grand Theft Auto: Vice City.}} Mentioning it as the first "main entry" (how do you define that) feels a bit inessential to mention up top, especially since it's all of 2 years later, not a huge gap.
*{{xt|fast travel is available at airports}} I think for people who don't know what fast travel is a little more clarity would be useful here (it's basically teleportation not a quicker form of transit, etc.)
**Same thing for auto-aim.
*{{xt|Several stealth elements were introduced in the game}} The gameplay shifts tenses here.
*{{xt|burglary, fire fighting, pimping, taxi cab,}} taxi cab isn't an activity, it's a thing.
*{{xt|Balancing food and physical activity impacts CJ's appearance and physical attributes; eating and exercising maintains health.}} Does this have any impact on actual gameplay, or just appearances? It's not made clear.
*The end of the gameplay section gets a bit repetitive. Lots of similar "Players ''can''/something ''can''" constructions.
*Video game articles don't follow film standards of having the voice actor names in the plot section.
*<u>Development</u>:
**Way too much "The team felt"-type repetition throughout.
**{{xt|San Andreas consists of three cities inspired by real locations: Los Santos (based on Los Angeles), San Fierro (San Francisco), and Las Venturas (Las Vegas)}} This is largely duplicative with the previous mention of the cities and can be shortened.
**{{xt|The exterior map is 36,000 square kilometres}} what does "exterior map" mean?
**{{xt|In-game locations were based on real areas, such as Los Santos by Compton, California}} this sounds like Los Santos is real?
**Don't think the quote is really useful.
**{{xt|The team borrowed the "sense of physicality" from the gun gameplay in Manhunt (2003) and adapted it the open world formula of Grand Theft Auto;}} I don't know what that means. Also should probably make it clear ''Manhunt'' was Rockstar's own game.
*<u>Controversies</u>:
**In general, we want to avoid controversy sections, and I'm not entirely sure we should have one here. The Hot Coffee thing is certainly notable to be covered, but the baseless suit by a random guy seems irrelevant (was it really such a big news of a lawsuit that it deserves a full paragraph?) What's left is the discussion of racial stereotypes in the game, which gets discussed briefly in the reception section, and I think might be better integrated with that discussion.
*<u>Reception</u>/Legacy:
**There's [[MOS:SANDWICH|sandwiching]] issues with the image in the reception section and the table.
**{{xt|Dan Houser felt the incorporation of three cities in San Andreas had limited the emulation of Los Angeles, making it more prevalent in Grand Theft Auto V}} unclear what this means.
*I've never seen a {{tl|refideas}} table that just lists ''everything'' off Archive.org, but before FA you should be sure you've exhausted all quality reliable sources.
--[[User:David Fuchs|<span style="color: #ad3e00;">Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs</span>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:David Fuchs|<span style="color: #ad3e00;">talk</span>]]</small></sup> 21:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
:In case anybody sees that last point and feels tempted to read through all 177 Archive.org documents: feel free, of course, but please note that I've already done so, and there's unlikely to be anything major remaining. <span class="nowrap">– [[User:Rhain|<span style="color: #008;">'''''Rhain'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Rhain|☔]] <small>([[he/him]])</small></span> 06:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
:Hi David, thank you for your suggestions. Looks like Rhain already beat me to it, but I will have another look at the article, noting your points, and improve it best I can.
: Good day—<span style="font-family:Ink Free">[[User:RetroCosmos|<span style="color:navy">RetroCosmos</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:RetroCosmos|<span style="color:black">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 07:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
{{Talk:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/GA1}}


== Table ==
==Did you know nomination==
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas}}


== Redirects for discussion ==
I see in the table the person has listed players 1-2. That's kinda mean. The people who haven't seen the leaked covers yet (all 1 of them) will be shocked. --[[User:The Inedible Bulk|TIB]] [[User_talk:The_Inedible_Bulk|(talk)]] 02:09, Oct 20, 2004 (UTC)
{{collapse top|title=Collapsed notifications}}
::Why is it mean? The release is only a few days away. I wonder if it's even real, I doubt San Andreas will have multiplayer abilities. -- [[User:ZanderZ|Sander]] 09:02, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
:::Players of the leaked version claim that it will. See [http://www.gta2playerleak.tk/]. --[[User:GatesPlusPlus|GatesPlusPlus]] 14:07, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Blastin_Fools_Records&redirect=no Blastin Fools Records]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Blastin Fools Records}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[Special:Contribs/1234qwer1234qwer4|4]] 21:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
::::Yeah, I read it on [[http://www.gtagaming.com]] yesterday. Sounds like an interesting idea. -- [[User:ZanderZ|Sander]] 17:32, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
:::Not officially confirmed, but there's co-op in a couple places. --[[User:Twinxor|Twinxor]] 18:10, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
:::Well now it's out and it's in the game there's no need to change it is there? --[[User:Vanguard|Vanguard]] 20:07, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)


[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
== Release Date Dispute ==
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Area_69&redirect=no Area 69]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Area 69}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[Special:Contribs/1234qwer1234qwer4|4]] 22:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)


[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
It's Oct 26, stop changing it phillip. [http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/gta4/index.html gamespot] still says 26. --[[User:The Inedible Bulk|TIB]] [[User_talk:The_Inedible_Bulk|(talk)]] 05:09, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC)
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Brown_Streak_Railroad&redirect=no Brown Streak Railroad]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Brown Streak Railroad}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[Special:Contribs/1234qwer1234qwer4|4]] 22:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)


[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
And the Australian release date is 29, who changed that? I've put it back. [[User:Edgeworth|edgeworth]] 10:49, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_Grand_Theft_Auto:_San_Andreas_characters&redirect=no List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[Special:Contribs/1234qwer1234qwer4|4]] 01:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
{{collapse bottom}}


[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
== DVD Size ==
Several redirects have been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether their use and function meet the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on these redirects until a consensus is reached:

{{div col}}
I dispute the dvd is a DVD9. Reports from everyone tell me its a DVD5. If someone has the dvd and can toss it in their DVD-ROM, right click/properties, and screenshot the size, that would help greatly. --[[User:69.92.23.31|69.92.23.31]] 02:18, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
* {{-r|Blastin Fools Records}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Blastin Fools Records|here]]'''
::I'm sure I've read people (on www.gtaforums.com) having older PS2's who have trouble playing it, because it's dual-layer, meaning it's DVD9. Also, in one of the older interviews with Rockstar, they said San Andreas would he too big to fit on one side, so they expanded it even more to fit a dual-layer disc. -- [[User:ZanderZ|Sander]] 08:59, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
* {{-r|Muholland Intersection}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Muholland Intersection|here]]'''
::::[http://members.shaw.ca/r-ottley/images/san_an_dvd.png DVD properties screenshot] -[[User:Rjo|Rjo]] 09:26, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
* {{-r|TransFender}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#TransFender|here]]'''
::::: It's a DVD5, contains 4.3 GB of data --[[User:Mateusc|Mateusc]] 00:09, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
* {{-r|Area 69}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Area 69|here]]'''
:::::: It's a dual-layer one, they said so in about a million interviews [[User:Ian Moody|Ian Moody]] 18:26, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
* {{-r|Brown Streak Railroad}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Brown Streak Railroad|here]]'''
::::::: No. It's DVD5. --[[User:Mateusc|Mateusc]] 05:10, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
* {{-r|Whetstone County, San Andreas}}, {{-r|Whetstone (Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas)}}, and {{-r|Whetstone County}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Whetstone County, San Andreas|here]]'''

* {{-r|Tierra Robada}} and {{-r|Tierra Robada County}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Tierra Robada|here]]'''
; Please state scources prooving your point! [[User:Hakusa|Hakusa - Wiki addict:]] 01:32, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
* {{-r|Blueberry (Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas)}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Blueberry (Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas)|here]]'''
: While I don't have it for the PC, so I can't, I do recognise that it is probably a DVD9. But if you think otherwise proove it either by linking a site or any other creative idea; because right now it sounds like a bunch of uninformed opinions.
* {{-r|Hashburry}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Hashburry|here]]'''

* {{-r|Juniper Hollow}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Juniper Hollow|here]]'''
== Cable cars ==
* {{-r|Easter Basin}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Easter Basin|here]]'''

* {{-r|Palomino Creek}} and {{-r|Palomino Creek, San Andreas}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Palomino Creek|here]]'''
I'm removing the reference to being able to steal the cable car in SF. So far I've found no confirmation that it can be stolen. -[[User:Gtrmp|Sean Curtin]] 03:19, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
* {{-r|Angel Pine}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Angel Pine|here]]'''

* {{-r|Mt. Chiliad}} and {{-r|Mount Chillad}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Mt. Chiliad|here]]'''
:::Your right about that, it just goes around in a loop never stopping and is impossible to steal.--[[User:Vanguard|Vanguard]] 20:11, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
* {{-r|Las Payasadas}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Las Payasadas|here]]'''

* {{-r|Sherman Dam}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Sherman Dam|here]]'''
Trolleys can't be jacked. Trains is what was being reffered to.
* {{-r|T Bone Mendez}} and {{-r|T-Bone Mendez}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#T Bone Mendez|here]]'''

* {{-r|Pirates pants casino}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Pirates pants casino|here]]'''
:The original reference was: ''San Fierro features Rockstar's interpretations of the [[Haight-Ashbury|Haight-Ashbury district]], [[Chinatown]], and the [[Golden Gate Bridge]], as well as [[cable car]]s which can be stolen.'' No reference to trains here, and the stealable trains are already mentioned in the article. -[[User:Gtrmp|Sean Curtin]] 23:59, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
* {{-r|Caligula's Casino}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Caligula's Casino|here]]'''

* {{-r|Melvin "Big Smoke" Harris}}, {{-r|Melvin Harris (character)}}, and {{-r|Melvin Harris (Grand Theft Auto)}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Melvin "Big Smoke" Harris|here]]'''
No what I ment was that Trolleys got mixed up with Trains in some of message boards. A few other things got exagerated like that as well
* {{-r|Didier Sachs}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Didier Sachs|here]]'''

* {{-r|Johnny Sindacco}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Johnny Sindacco|here]]'''
:Yeah, a lot of things got conflated like that in the older versions of the article - even a few weeks after the game came out, there were still claims here that CJ could go up to any person on the street and talk to them, etc. -[[User:Gtrmp|Sean Curtin]] 06:30, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
* {{-r|Lance Wilson}} and {{-r|Lance "Ryder" Wilson}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Lance Wilson|here]]'''

* {{-r|B-Dup}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#B-Dup|here]]'''
But isn't that true, in a manner of speaking? Anyone you bump into can talk to you, and you can respond. [[User:137.148.52.254|137.148.52.254]] 20:19, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
* {{-r|Las Venturas Airport}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Las Venturas Airport|here]]'''

* {{-r|Flint County, San Andreas}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11#Flint County, San Andreas|here]]'''

* {{-r|Red County, San Andreas}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Red County, San Andreas|here]]'''
:: Is impossible to steal and stop these cable cars and the appears it is pure randomly.
* {{-r|Zero (Grand Theft Auto)}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Zero (Grand Theft Auto)|here]]'''

* {{-r|Four Dragons Casino}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Four Dragons Casino|here]]'''
== Votes for deletion results ==
* {{-r|Jimmy Hernandez}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Jimmy Hernandez|here]]'''
The article, [[Glory Hole Theme Park]], was listed on [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] in accordance with the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] on 03:16, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)[[Template:Postvfd|.]] The result of this nomination was '''merge and redirect'''. Please see [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Glory Hole Theme Park|this page's entry]] for archive of the debate. --[[User:AllyUnion| AllyUnion]] [[User talk:AllyUnion|(talk)]] 22:33, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
* {{-r|Market Station}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Market Station|here]]'''

* {{-r|Yellow Bell Station}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Yellow Bell Station|here]]'''
== Links to Gamespot ==
* {{-r|Cluckin' bell}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Cluckin' bell|here]]'''

* {{-r|Vinewood}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Vinewood|here]]'''
Is it just me, or are half of the links about stuff to Gamespot? Seems wrong / unrequired. [[User:Scumbag|Scumbag]] June 29, 2005 08:26 (UTC)
* {{-r|Ran Fa Li}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Ran Fa Li|here]]'''

* {{-r|Jizzy B.}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Jizzy B.|here]]'''
::Not only that, but the images linked to don't work. All those links need to be taken out of the article. --[[User:Marcg106|Marcg106]] 18:49, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
* {{-r|List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters}} and {{-r|List of characters in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters|here]]'''

* {{-r|Back O' Beyond}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Back O' Beyond|here]]'''
== Walkthrough ==
* {{-r|Santa Maria Beach}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Santa Maria Beach|here]]'''

* {{-r|Cranberry Station}} – discussion '''[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12#Cranberry Station|here]]'''
I think we should write a walkthrough for San Andreas on the Wiki. It would be an interesting project seeing everyones ideas for completing each mission one by one. Perhaps even put each mission on seperate pages and let people add their own ways of completing the mission.
{{div col end}}
[[User:Moitio|Moitio]] 22:08, 02 July 2005 (UTC)
<span class="nowrap">– [[User:Rhain|<span style="color: #008;">'''''Rhain'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Rhain|☔]] <small>([[he/him]])</small></span> 23:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC) <small>(updated [[User:Rhain|{{abbr|☔| – Rhain ☔ 04:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)}}]])</small>
:Are you aware that [[Wikibooks]] is well underway into this very thing. Walkthroughs don't belong on Wikipedia, but Wikibooks is perfect for them. [[wikibooks:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas|Check it out!]] --[[User:TheDotGamer|TheDotGamer]] <sup>[[User talk:TheDotGamer|Talk]]</sup> July 3, 2005 00:23 (UTC)
::Ah right, thanks, I wasn't aware of that. --[[User:Moitio|Moitio]] July 4, 2005 23:18 (UTC)

== Character Criticisms ==

I was going to add the following text to "Criticisms", but it occurred to me that it might not be a neutral POV. Opinions?

{| align="center" cellspacing="0" class="toccolours" style="clear:both"
|-
|| Another criticized aspect of the game is Carl Johnson (the playable character) himself. In previous GTA games (except [[Vice City]]), the playable character was mute with little to no character development. As such, a person could kill random people in the game without compromising their own morals, stating that such actions would be done by the character anyway. In Vice City, the main character had dialogue and an established personality. Tommy Vercetti (the character) was portrayed as a brutal killer, being released from prison shortly before the game's events. However, Johnson is portrayed as a nice guy who's caught up with the wrong crowd; who only does what's necessary. Certainly, killing innocent people on the street isn't necessary. In essence, when one is playing the game (and not doing missions), anything one does cannot be credited to CJ, but to the player.
|}

--[[User:Zeromaru|Zeromaru]] 5 July 2005 21:46 (UTC)

:Meh, seems OK to me. --[[User:Jacj|Jacj]] 06:57, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

:I'm not quite sure what this section is trying to say. Is the criticism of the fact that CJ is a more developed character than the playable characters in other GTA games, which makes it harder to reconcile the player's (possibly, but likely) amoral tendencies with his "good guy" nature? Or is the criticism of Carl's personality and character itself? It just isn't quite registering for me. -[[User:DynSkeet|DynSkeet]] [[User talk:DynSkeet|(talk)]] 21:01, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

::It's the former. CJ doesn't seem like the kind of guy that would do have the stuff you do when not on a mission. --[[User:Zeromaru|Zeromaru]] 00:56, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

:::Then don't do the stuff when not on a mission... --[[User:84.173.243.25|84.173.243.25]] 01:23, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

:Well, I don't think ANY of the characters from GTA III, VC or SA would just go up to someone in the streets and shoot them in the head (stress relief, perhaps?) If CJ had principles, he wouldn't have killed hundreds of people during missions. The game seems to contradict itself, no?

== Hot Coffee ==
(The below coments have been copied and pasted from the above topic, where they did not belong.)
I'm an avid fan of the GTA games and don't consider myself a prude, but there's a screenshot of the hot coffee mod which I reckon should be removed. I'm not usually one for censorship but it just looks tacky or childish to have it there. I'm sure if someone wants to know what it looks like they can find screenshots by a link or something, not have it shoved in their face like that.

:Normally, I'd agree, if I didn't have to look closely at the picture in order to pick out what's going on. Really, it's crude, but leaves much to the imagination of children. Really makes you wonder how THAT scene gave it AO. --[[User:Zeromaru|Zeromaru]] 01:34, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

::I also think that the link to the "Hot coffee cheats" should be removed too. -- [[User:24.90.128.71 00:47|24.90.128.71 00:47]] 00:47, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

[[User:Hakusa|Hakusa - Wiki addict:]] 01:45, September 8, 2005 (UTC) - Do I think Rockstar should have done hot coffee to begin with? No. But does that make the game deserve an AO rating? I don't think so.In risk of having a POV, I think had hotcoffe been conciously available by rockstar, then AO would have been OK, but the fact that only a hacker (To hack: an ILEGAL event unwich usualy a programer gets into a program and changes it.), or a moder could have accesed it. The fact is, someone could have just as easily put that in the game anyways. I do, however agree it should have been taken out of the game, and don't think the AO rating should have been on the console version because having a moded Xbox or PS2 is far more illegal that game hacking, and the only way to access the content on a console is owning a moded one.

:Pretty stupid, but this is an encyclopedia, so we can't deconstruct the arguments that the fact that it was even considered means the game should have an AO. Way I see it is if it isn't accessable in an unmodified release copy, it is user created content. Hackers or no. -- [[User:Fergdude33|Fergdude33]] 22:44, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:39, 18 December 2024

Good articleGrand Theft Auto: San Andreas has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 17, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
January 19, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 20, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 23, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
March 11, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 10, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the developers of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas walked out of the Game Developers Choice Awards after winning nothing?
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 26, 2024.
Current status: Good article

Big Smoke

[edit]

Are the big smoke memes notable enough to be in this article? Like in a section titled "In Pop culture" or something? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 00:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any reliable sources (see WP:VG/RS that discuss those memes? soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
None that I have currently found. I probably ought to look really hard for them, cause they got to be out there somewhere. Cause I remember when those Big Smoke memes were all over the place in like 2017-2018. How do I remember those memes yet I don't really remember many others that were probably more popular, besides like fidget spinner memes and "We are number one" from Lazy Town? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 00:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Like are osgamers or sportskeeda reliable sources? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 07:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No. You can find a list of reliable (and unreliable) sources at WP:VG/S. Rhain (he/him) 07:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. But I am honestly surprised this stuff hadn't been mentioned long ago like 2017 or 2016 since Big Smoke was one of the biggest internet memes of that time. Or at least, as far as I am concerned. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 17:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2023

[edit]

Just add a link for San Francisco 150.195.171.3 (talk) 17:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect All we had to do was follow the damn train, CJ! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § All we had to do was follow the damn train, CJ! until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pimping and Burglary

[edit]

We should include some unique GTA SA exclusive features like pimping and burglary, stuff like taxi, paramedic, etc aren't exclusive to SA but all 3D GTAs, not saying to include all side stuff, but the WP:Notable ones like that, (Burglary introduced in Home Invasion, rewards infinite stamina, Pimping introduced in Jizzy, at least the features unlocked during story missions), there are sufficient WP:RS for them and as a matter of fact stuff like taxi, paramedic which exists in all 3D GTAs can go, but Pimping and Burglary were prominent features and I linked WP:RS, but thats just my opinion, choice is yours, won't comment any further leaving a consensus, its upto you guys to vote and add, I end with a support. Dilbaggg (talk) 13:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both are included, and I don't think they need any expansion. Rhain (he/him) 13:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some generally high-level thoughts on the article at present

[edit]

RetroCosmos asked me to take a look at the article with the eye of eventually getting it to FA. I thought I'd offer some general thoughts.

  • General stuff:
    • This is probably obvious, but the prose is going to need a major workover for FA standards. I would recommend exercises like going through User:Tony1/How to improve your writing to tighten things up.
    • I think in terms of comprehensiveness, it doesn't feel like we're missing anything at a broad level.
  • It is the seventh title in the Grand Theft Auto series and the first main entry since 2002's Grand Theft Auto: Vice City. Mentioning it as the first "main entry" (how do you define that) feels a bit inessential to mention up top, especially since it's all of 2 years later, not a huge gap.
  • fast travel is available at airports I think for people who don't know what fast travel is a little more clarity would be useful here (it's basically teleportation not a quicker form of transit, etc.)
    • Same thing for auto-aim.
  • Several stealth elements were introduced in the game The gameplay shifts tenses here.
  • burglary, fire fighting, pimping, taxi cab, taxi cab isn't an activity, it's a thing.
  • Balancing food and physical activity impacts CJ's appearance and physical attributes; eating and exercising maintains health. Does this have any impact on actual gameplay, or just appearances? It's not made clear.
  • The end of the gameplay section gets a bit repetitive. Lots of similar "Players can/something can" constructions.
  • Video game articles don't follow film standards of having the voice actor names in the plot section.
  • Development:
    • Way too much "The team felt"-type repetition throughout.
    • San Andreas consists of three cities inspired by real locations: Los Santos (based on Los Angeles), San Fierro (San Francisco), and Las Venturas (Las Vegas) This is largely duplicative with the previous mention of the cities and can be shortened.
    • The exterior map is 36,000 square kilometres what does "exterior map" mean?
    • In-game locations were based on real areas, such as Los Santos by Compton, California this sounds like Los Santos is real?
    • Don't think the quote is really useful.
    • The team borrowed the "sense of physicality" from the gun gameplay in Manhunt (2003) and adapted it the open world formula of Grand Theft Auto; I don't know what that means. Also should probably make it clear Manhunt was Rockstar's own game.
  • Controversies:
    • In general, we want to avoid controversy sections, and I'm not entirely sure we should have one here. The Hot Coffee thing is certainly notable to be covered, but the baseless suit by a random guy seems irrelevant (was it really such a big news of a lawsuit that it deserves a full paragraph?) What's left is the discussion of racial stereotypes in the game, which gets discussed briefly in the reception section, and I think might be better integrated with that discussion.
  • Reception/Legacy:
    • There's sandwiching issues with the image in the reception section and the table.
    • Dan Houser felt the incorporation of three cities in San Andreas had limited the emulation of Los Angeles, making it more prevalent in Grand Theft Auto V unclear what this means.
  • I've never seen a {{refideas}} table that just lists everything off Archive.org, but before FA you should be sure you've exhausted all quality reliable sources.

--Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In case anybody sees that last point and feels tempted to read through all 177 Archive.org documents: feel free, of course, but please note that I've already done so, and there's unlikely to be anything major remaining. Rhain (he/him) 06:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi David, thank you for your suggestions. Looks like Rhain already beat me to it, but I will have another look at the article, noting your points, and improve it best I can.
Good day—RetroCosmos talk 07:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 17:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I'll have a review posted within a week. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rhain, I've posted the review below. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written

General

  • This is just a suggestion, but there's no dedicated section about themes, motifs, etc. If you think it would help with presentation, you could move "story and characters" along with the last paragraph of "critical reception" into their own dedicated themes section.
  • The article is pretty heavy on semicolons.

Lead

  • who returns home after his mother's murder and finds his old friends and family in disarray – This makes it sound like petty drama, not gang wars.
  • The lead doesn't need to mention California and Nevada if it then gives the more specific cities in the next paragraph.
  • It generated controversy when the discovery of the "Hot Coffee" minigame unlocked a previously hidden sexual scene. – "Previously hidden" could mean it was eventually intended to be discovered.

Gameplay

  • The fictional state of San Andreas comprises three metropolitan cities – This is provided without context. It should be made clear that San Andreas is the open world and that these three cities are all explorable areas. It might also be worth mentioning the open road and undeveloped areas between the three cities.
  • Safehouses can be purchased to save the game – Specify that these are scattered throughout the map
  • Players may run, jump, swim, or use vehicles to navigate the world – This is strangely worded. I'm picturing players hopping around the game world like a kangaroo and swimming all the way from Los Santos to Las Venturas.
  • Several stealth elements are introduced in the game. – This doesn't add anything without context. I'd say either elaborate or remove this. I'd lean toward removal since burglary and evading the police are both mentioned below.
  • police helicopters and military swarm to lethally dispatch players – This implies that police don't use lethal force in the other wanted levels. Also, the police are the ones being dispatched, not the player.
  • The game tracks respect among CJ's friends, which varies according to his actions and appearance, and acquired skills such as driving... – This makes it sound like acquired skills are just measures of respect instead of progression bars in their own right.

Plot

  • to reunite the various GSF sets who had splintered – Is this supposed to be "sects"?

Development

  • allowed them to refine their craft – This feels slightly WP:PEACOCK-ish.
  • Some had disagreements with Rockstar president Sam Houser, causing them to step away from development. – What disagreements? About the work hours?

Technical and open world design

  • the developer's relationship with Estevan Oriol, Mister Cartoon, and DJ Pooh assisted imitation of 1990s Los Angeles street culture – How? Just by virtue of knowing them?
  • In-game locations were inspired by real areas, such as Los Santos by Compton, California, and a bridge in San Fierro by the Golden Gate Bridge – It's confusing to say that Los Santos is inspired by Compton and to say it's inspired by Los Angeles. The article should be consistent or reconcile these. This also has parallelism (grammar) issues in the way it compares a city to the bridge in a city.
  • and the open countryside driving was inspired technically by Rockstar's Smuggler's Run (2002) – What does "technically" mean in this context?
  • allowing them to be loaded as the player traverses the map instead of in one instance and interrupted by a loading screen when moving between islands like in Vice City – The wording here is a little clunky.
  • Textures were created at the highest resolution – Highest of what?
  • Remodelled lighting systems allowed different sets during day and night. – Sets of what?

Story and characters

  • Some of this section, especially the first paragraph, feels like a list of unrelated bullet points. It needs a little reorganization so the sentences flow a little better. It's also divided up strangely: there's a lot of info about the inspirations, and there's a lot of info about CJ, but they're scattered throughout the section.
  • San Andreas concluded a trilogy – On it's own, this makes it sound like the three games all follow a single story. Ideally, it should be made clear somewhere that the connections between them are limited to a few recurring characters and passing mentions.
  • he found Ray Liotta's performance as Tommy Vercetti in Vice City "conflicting" – What does "conflicting" mean in this context?

Music

  • The in-game radio features eleven radio stations with twenty DJs, and more than three times as many songs and in-universe advertisements as Grand Theft Auto III – A sentence explaining what these songs and advertisements are would be helpful. Right now it sounds like these are all original songs created for the game.

Release and promotion

  • The timeline in this section is confusing. It goes from a delay being announced to the game being leaked to a special edition being release. This section might need some reorganizing, and it should explicitly say what day the game was released on.
  • to reinstate its Mature 17+ rating – There's no context here. The reader shouldn't have to go later into the article to understand what they read higher up.
  • featuring the documentary film Sunday Driver – What is this, and what's its relevance to GTA?

Critical response

  • Most of this section is just a list of quotes and random opinions instead of a summary of the reception. WP:RECEPTION provides some tips on this. This Kotaku article is a good example of the sources you might look for (though a higher quality source would be better). It can be used to support that the RC plane mission had negative reception generally by players instead of just quoting one reviewer's personal opinion. There's probably something similar for the train mission and maybe a few other aspects of the game where there's a consensus on what people like or disliked about it.
  • Some reviewers compared the story to Hollywood and similar popular culture – What does it mean to compare a story to a place?

Accolades

  • No issues.

Sales

  • and boosting overall industry revenue – This is redundant to when it says the game increased revenue along with Halo 2 a few sentences later.
  • In the United Kingdom, it sold an estimated 677,000 copies... – There are a lot of statistics in this sentence, making it hard to follow. It might be worth breaking it up.

Controversy

  • "Controversy" might not be the best heading for this section. Since it's just about Hot Coffee, it would be more precise to call it "Hot Coffee controversy" or "Hot Coffee minigame".
  • curtailed planned nudity and sexual content to obtain a "Mature" rating from the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) – To someone who doesn't know much about video game ratings, they might be confused why removing sexual content makes it "mature". It should clarify that it would have been too explicit for the mature rating.
  • and modder Patrick Wildenborg enabled the code after the Windows release – This makes it sound like he enabled it remotely for everyone's version of the game.
  • "Hot Coffee" impacted the video game industry – This doesn't really say anything.

Legacy

  • This section should be more focused on how the series was affected by San Andreas specifically. The info about seventh generation GTA games goes a little out of scope. If possible, it should explain what specific problems with San Andreas the changes were meant to address—the part of GTA V's setting does a good job of this.

Ports

  • It's redundant to describe the Xbox, Windows, and mobile versions under both "release" and "ports".
  • A remastered version of The Trilogy subtitled The Definitive Edition, including Vice City – Didn't the Trilogy already include Vice City?
Verifiable with no original research

The sourcing here isn't very strong, being mostly dependent on video game news websites and contemporary sources instead of analytic/academic coverage, but it's good enough for GA. If this were to go to FA, I'd expect more use of books and journal articles.

Source checks:

  • [6] GamesRadar – The source doesn't say co-op is open roam, it only says anything about minigames and certain missions.
  • [17] Dumham (2004) – Good.
  • [31] Sulic (2004) – Good.
  • [60] Penney (2020) – Thumbs up.
  • [79] Boyer, Hsu & Davison (2004) – Good.
  • [88] Parish (2004) – Good.
  • [105] Hutchinson (2017) – Good.
  • [138] Krotosk (2005) – Good.
  • [173] Neumeister (2005) – Good.
  • [198] Snow (2008) – This says it "will" be launched on Xbox Originals. Using this source, we don't know whether it ended up happening.
Broad in its coverage
  • Not much coverage of the vehicular aspects of the game. It's touched on a few times, but the article doesn't convey how central to the game it is or how much variety there is in vehicle use.
Neutral

The article is neutral in tone. No one aspect is given undue weight.

Stable

No recent disputes

Illustrated

@Thebiguglyalien: Thanks for the review. I've gone through and addressed most of your concerns. To clarify, the "Critical response" section's paragraphs are grouped by thematic element and generally summarise the reception overall. Please let me know if you have other questions or concerns. Rhain (he/him) 03:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Rhain (talk). Self-nominated at 23:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]


Redirects for discussion

[edit]
Collapsed notifications

The redirect Blastin Fools Records has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11 § Blastin Fools Records until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Area 69 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11 § Area 69 until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Brown Streak Railroad has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11 § Brown Streak Railroad until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12 § List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Several redirects have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether their use and function meet the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on these redirects until a consensus is reached:

Rhain (he/him) 23:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC) (updated )[reply]