Talk:Decolonisation of Africa: Difference between revisions
Jasperthejas (talk | contribs) →Anti-soviet bias: new section |
|||
(164 intermediate revisions by 67 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=Top}} |
|||
{{AfricaProject |
|||
{{WikiProject History|importance=high}} |
|||
|class=start |
|||
{{WikiProject Cold War|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject British Empire|importance=high}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Spoken Wikipedia request|[[User:GVnayR|GVnayR]] ([[User talk:GVnayR|talk]])|important topic about a event in modern African history}} |
|||
{{find}} |
{{find}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_North_Georgia/HISTORIOGRAPHY_(SPRING) | assignments = [[User:W1914|W1914]] | start_date = 2022-01-11 | end_date = 2022-05-06 }} |
|||
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== |
|||
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-08-18">18 August 2020</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-11-25">25 November 2020</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/La_Salle_University/Modern_African_History_(Fall_2020)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Johnsw3|Johnsw3]]. |
|||
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 19:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== |
|||
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/SUNY_Genesee_Community_College/World_Civilizations_2_(Spring_2018)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:MLoson20|MLoson20]]. Peer reviewers: [[User:HISTORYLEARNER2018|HISTORYLEARNER2018]], [[User:ChristianDelano|ChristianDelano]]. |
|||
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 19:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
== [[Resistance to colonial rule in Africa]] == |
|||
FYI, this is a requested article. [[User:Staszek Lem|Staszek Lem]] ([[User talk:Staszek Lem|talk]]) 20:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified one external link on [[Decolonisation of Africa]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=799456101 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121211060056/http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/11/winds-of-change-or-hot-air-decolonization-and-the-salt-water-test/ to http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/11/winds-of-change-or-hot-air-decolonization-and-the-salt-water-test/ |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Under Causes: Paragraph on Ghana == |
|||
Is the paragraph specifically concerning the decolonization of Ghana necessary? Since the article is in reference to the decolonization of the entire continent I think including such specific details on Ghana and no other nation is unusual. |
|||
== Inclusion of Ethiopia == |
|||
I would like to dispute the inclusion of Ethiopia on this list. The general consensus among many is that Ethiopia is the only Africa country that was never colonized, except for that very brief period of Italian control. Considering that the [[Ethiopian Empire|Ethiopian imperial structure]] was [[East African Campaign (World War II)|restored]] only a few years after the [[Second Italo-Ethiopian War]], complete with the [[Haile Selassie|same Emperor]], it feels like we're robbing Ethiopia of its status as the only African country to successfully resist colonialism by including it on this list. [[User:Rjrya395|Rjrya395]] ([[User talk:Rjrya395|talk]]) 01:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:I do not have particularly strong feelings about this, but I would ask you to be more willing to look for [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] in future. You attempted to remove a long-standing bit of this article and got dangerously close to an [[WP:Edit war|edit war]]. [[WP:BRD]] is a good rule, and very useful in situations like this. So please wait for a consensus to develop here before attempting to make the same edit for a fourth time. |
|||
:On the particular merits of this discussion, I'm not sure what you mean about "robbing" Ethiopian status. As you [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Decolonisation_of_Africa&type=revision&diff=887918360&oldid=887861374 yourself noted], "the Italians did treat their occupation of Ethiopia as a colony". Colonisation is, by definition, defined by the outside force rather than the people ruled by it. Its duration is irrelevant. Given that this list looks at the end of colonial rule, the dismantling of [[Italian Ethiopia]] should be in it.—''[[User:Brigade Piron|Brigade Piron]]'' ([[User talk:Brigade Piron|talk]]) 08:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::I've also pointed out in that edit that [[Haile Selassie]] returned to the throne only a few years later. My main point is that, due to how extremely short the period of Italian-rule was, most people usually treat [[Italian Ethiopia]] on par with [[Anschluss]] or other annexation/occupation that occurred just prior to World War II. And by treating the [[East African Campaign (World War II)|East African Campaign]] as an equivalent to [[Algerian War|Algeria]] or [[Angolan War of Independence|Angola]] fighting for their independence, we ''are'' ignoring the general consensus, which [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/et.html includes the CIA] and [[Pan-African colors|other African countries]], that Ethiopia is the only country in Africa to have never been colonized. [[User:Rjrya395|Rjrya395]] ([[User talk:Rjrya395|talk]]) 20:58, 16 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|Rjrya395}} {{ping|Brigade Piron}} please stop edit warring over this issue. The talk page is the correct place to discuss this, and if there is a serious dispute then perhaps an RFC may be required to come to a conclusion. For the record though, the assertion that the inclusion of Ethiopia is long-standing is not correct. The longterm situation is that Ethiopia is not included, and a note was in place to that effect, which I have now restored. The change to have it in the list was only made very recently :[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Decolonisation_of_Africa&diff=883911991&oldid=883032552] and apparently without discussion. Thanks — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 22:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thank you. [[User:Rjrya395|Rjrya395]] ([[User talk:Rjrya395|talk]]) 22:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::::I think Ethiopia should not be included. It was a military occupation that was condemned by the world and the "de-" part = reversed by British military force. [[User:Rjensen|Rjensen]] ([[User talk:Rjensen|talk]]) 00:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Actually Ethiopia was administered as a colony. Italians built building, roads, etc. and there were about 100,000 settlers. It wasn't a military occupation [[User:LucaGaletti95|LucaGaletti95]] ([[User talk:LucaGaletti95|talk]]) 12:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
I'm not done with this article, I'll wikify it and copyedit progressively. It'll be done in three weeks. So it doesn't need to be in the community portal. We already have enough articles there that noone works on. [[User:Vincent Gray|Vincent Gray]] 02:59, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:So? It doesn't changed the fact that it lasted only five years with [[Haile Selassie]] returning to the throne. [[User:Rjrya395|Rjrya395]] ([[User talk:Rjrya395|talk]]) 20:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
What has the number of years got to do with it? [[User:LucaGaletti95|LucaGaletti95]] ([[User talk:LucaGaletti95|talk]]) 22:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:It's been almost a year since the above note was written, and it appears as though this article was never finished. There are long paragraphs that need to be wikified and broken up into smaller sections. Furthermore, I don't think a lengthy discussion on the decolonization of Latin America has much place in the page for the decolonization of Africa. Is [[User:Vincent Gray]] who apears to now be [[User:Gicheru]] still planning on working on this, or has it been forgotten? I see a couple people have contributed recently; are you taking care of the article at large? --[[User:Romarin|Romarin]] 23:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::the article is not about colonization it's about something else. Ethiopia was not actually decolonized in the usual sense. The Italians were expelled by Brits and the emperor resumed his old role. The RS on decolonization exclude it and so should Wikipedia. [[User:Rjensen|Rjensen]] ([[User talk:Rjensen|talk]]) 01:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==Major problems== |
|||
I dont understand, how can you differ so much from the subject on wikipedia? There are long paragraphs about Latin America solely on a article about Africa. Can someone fix this article, it has not helped me much for my essay with a deadline tomorrow, maybe if it is fixed preceding persons might be saved the pain derived from reading this confucing article. --[[User:Pharod|Pharod]] 20 April 2006 |
|||
the useful part of the article is the well-done chart showing all the colonies involved the main text is not well done it all, and does not closely follow the the reliable sources. I will try to fix that, starting with the French overseas empire. I deleted several sections that look at the late 20th early 21st centuries, long after decolonization took place. [[User:Rjensen|Rjensen]] ([[User talk:Rjensen|talk]]) 03:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:I'll be honest, for a top-importance article, I'm kind of shock how... empty this is. [[User:Rjrya395|Rjrya395]] ([[User talk:Rjrya395|talk]]) 02:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Is it accurate to describe the United States as a colonial power for Liberia? == |
|||
There's nothing on Algeria/France, and the article doesn't talk about any war. |
|||
The government of the United States never officially ruled over Liberia. Liberia was founded by the [[American Colonization Society]], which was a private organization unaffiliated with the U.S. government. [[User:Jaqoc|Jaqoc]] ([[User talk:Jaqoc|talk]]) 21:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: I've taken out most of the Latin American stuff. It looks like this article was cribbed verbatim from a piece originally intended to compare decolonization in the two continents. What is left doesn't tell what happened, it describes the before and after and repeats itself quite a bit. Much more improvements needed. [[User:Tyronen|Tyronen]] 22:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::yes but the US government took a special protective interest in Liberia well into the 20th century --it helped finance and defend the colony. Worldwide course many colonies began as private company operations (including the 13 american colonies and most of the German colonies)[[User:Rjensen|Rjensen]] ([[User talk:Rjensen|talk]]) 00:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC) |
|||
==Wiki Education assignment: African Politics=={{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_California,_Berkeley/African_Politics_(Spring_2022) | assignments = [[User:MathewLJohnson|MathewLJohnson]] | reviewers = [[User:GnatLec|GnatLec]], [[User:Dmr415|Dmr415]], [[User:SleepDrifter|SleepDrifter]] | start_date = 2022-01-17 | end_date = 2022-05-11 }} |
|||
==Namibia== |
|||
Why is the independence of Namibia considered the end of decolonization? Namibia was part of South Africa, which was already an independent African nation. Perhaps the author believes that South Africa wasn't really African since it had a government dominated by Europeans. Nonetheless Namibia certainly wasn't a ''colony''. [[User:Isomorphic|Isomorphic]] 04:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Economic legacy == |
|||
It was a colony of South Africa[[User:RaveenS|RaveenS]] |
|||
...Despite <u>this continued reliance and unfair trading terms</u>, a [[meta-analysis]] of 18 African countries found that a third of countries experienced increased economic growth post-independence... |
|||
It was a [[League of Nations]] mandate, so yeah, effectively a colony. [[User:WilyD|WilyD]] 21:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I am not sure what the author was trying to say. Continues reliance on the export of raw materials ? |
|||
== Neutrality dispute == |
|||
Unfair trading terms - what exactly is this referring to ? Have looked through the source cited but cannot find details [[User:דןברקת|דןברקת]] ([[User talk:דןברקת|talk]]) 14:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
From the article: "As a result of colonialism and imperialism, Africa suffered long term effects, such as the loss of important natural resources like gold and rubber, economic devastation, cultural confusion, geopolitical division, and political subjugation." |
|||
While it is a common belief that Western colonization of Africa was harmful, it is by no means an undisputed position, nor is it the most widely-held. In ''Dissent on Development,'' for example, developmental economist P.T. Bauer offered a whole volume solid and thoroughly evidenced arguments against this view. |
|||
===Why=== |
|||
The "loss of natural resources" argument is completely bogus; to this day, the African continent is rich with untapped natural resources. |
|||
Are we discussing Newfoundland (and exactly how is that a "short-term opportunity" anyway? Same question for Massachusetts and Georgia. I concur with the lack of focus banner. Article needs surgery. Adding refimprove |
|||
The concepts in the article contradict themselves; from the start, the article implies that the process of colonization was bad for Africa. It then goes on to argue that the period of decolonization was also bad. Both of these cannot be true at the same time; decolonization resulted in economic hardship precisely because ''things were better'' under Western management. The areas of Africa that had the greatest amount of contact with the West had the highest and most modern standards of living due to the capital, technology, and skills that Westerners brought. |
|||
[[User:Elinruby|Elinruby]] ([[User talk:Elinruby|talk]]) 10:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== This article should be reorganized chronologically == |
|||
To the point, the writer of this article is poorly informed with an obvious bias against the West. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/75.71.136.99|75.71.136.99]] ([[User talk:75.71.136.99|talk]]) 20:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
|||
The layout of it is out of order which makes it very confusing and hard to read. I think it should be modeled on the [[:bs:Dekolonizacija Afrike|one]] from Bosnian Wikipedia which, while severely lacking in sources is far better organized. |
|||
: Sounds like would rather see the article without bias towards the West? You can't have it both ways. You can quantify ''things being better'' monetarily under the management of the West... MONETARILY. Having '''Africa was therefore forced to compensate for this shortage and greatly benefited from this change.''' is completely against Wikipedia's NPOV policy. The colonizers may have benefitted from the marketing boards and from forcing Africans to grow cash crops, but Africans in their entirety did not benefit from being exploited, sorry. |
|||
Also, there appears to be two tables that basically do the same thing. [[User:Charles Essie|Charles Essie]] ([[User talk:Charles Essie|talk]]) 01:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==Last Statement== |
|||
the way that this article states that the colonies Got independence during 1930 contradicts its own statement that the decolonization started during the end of WWII.[[User:68.4.42.99|68.4.42.99]] 15:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Anti-soviet bias == |
|||
==Requested move== |
|||
this article seems to skip over the soviet union's contributions to the decolonization of africa. The USSR sent financial, military, and intellectual aid (source: https://academic.oup.com/book/35127/chapter-abstract/299280406?redirectedFrom=fulltext). [[User:Jasperthejas|Jasperthejas]] ([[User talk:Jasperthejas|talk]]) 20:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
The article should be moved from [[Decolonization of Africa]] back to [[Decolonisation of Africa]] due to strong national ties to the topic, as per the [[Manual of Style]]. An article on a topic that has strong ties to particular English-speaking nations should use the appropriate variety of English for those nations. Spelling in the article should therefore reflect the AU/Commonwealth/EU/UK spelling conventions most commonly used in Africa and Europe. [[Special:Contributions/89.240.197.164|89.240.197.164]] ([[User talk:89.240.197.164|talk]]) 17:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strongly oppose'''. This is not what the Manual of Style says nor intends, nor is it a correct statement of English usage; not only is the ''OED''<nowiki>'s</nowiki> first citation ''decolonization'', that is their spelling of the word. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 19:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Just a correction to the above remark. Actually Oxford spelling is only used by Oxford University publications and The Times Literary Supplement. The -ize form doesn't reflect common usage outside North America, so the objection that the suggestion isn't consistent with the Manual of Style isn't correct. The -ise spelling is the norm in Commonwealth English, which is the form of English overwhelmingly used by English speakers in Europe and Africa, so it's not a materially valid objection. [[Special:Contributions/129.67.174.46|129.67.174.46]] ([[User talk:129.67.174.46|talk]]) 11:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:32, 15 August 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Decolonisation of Africa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a request, submitted by GVnayR (talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "important topic about a event in modern African history". |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): W1914 (article contribs).
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2020 and 25 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Johnsw3.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MLoson20. Peer reviewers: HISTORYLEARNER2018, ChristianDelano.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
FYI, this is a requested article. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Decolonisation of Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121211060056/http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/11/winds-of-change-or-hot-air-decolonization-and-the-salt-water-test/ to http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/11/winds-of-change-or-hot-air-decolonization-and-the-salt-water-test/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Under Causes: Paragraph on Ghana
[edit]Is the paragraph specifically concerning the decolonization of Ghana necessary? Since the article is in reference to the decolonization of the entire continent I think including such specific details on Ghana and no other nation is unusual.
Inclusion of Ethiopia
[edit]I would like to dispute the inclusion of Ethiopia on this list. The general consensus among many is that Ethiopia is the only Africa country that was never colonized, except for that very brief period of Italian control. Considering that the Ethiopian imperial structure was restored only a few years after the Second Italo-Ethiopian War, complete with the same Emperor, it feels like we're robbing Ethiopia of its status as the only African country to successfully resist colonialism by including it on this list. Rjrya395 (talk) 01:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- I do not have particularly strong feelings about this, but I would ask you to be more willing to look for consensus in future. You attempted to remove a long-standing bit of this article and got dangerously close to an edit war. WP:BRD is a good rule, and very useful in situations like this. So please wait for a consensus to develop here before attempting to make the same edit for a fourth time.
- On the particular merits of this discussion, I'm not sure what you mean about "robbing" Ethiopian status. As you yourself noted, "the Italians did treat their occupation of Ethiopia as a colony". Colonisation is, by definition, defined by the outside force rather than the people ruled by it. Its duration is irrelevant. Given that this list looks at the end of colonial rule, the dismantling of Italian Ethiopia should be in it.—Brigade Piron (talk) 08:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- I've also pointed out in that edit that Haile Selassie returned to the throne only a few years later. My main point is that, due to how extremely short the period of Italian-rule was, most people usually treat Italian Ethiopia on par with Anschluss or other annexation/occupation that occurred just prior to World War II. And by treating the East African Campaign as an equivalent to Algeria or Angola fighting for their independence, we are ignoring the general consensus, which includes the CIA and other African countries, that Ethiopia is the only country in Africa to have never been colonized. Rjrya395 (talk) 20:58, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Rjrya395: @Brigade Piron: please stop edit warring over this issue. The talk page is the correct place to discuss this, and if there is a serious dispute then perhaps an RFC may be required to come to a conclusion. For the record though, the assertion that the inclusion of Ethiopia is long-standing is not correct. The longterm situation is that Ethiopia is not included, and a note was in place to that effect, which I have now restored. The change to have it in the list was only made very recently :[1] and apparently without discussion. Thanks — Amakuru (talk) 22:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. Rjrya395 (talk) 22:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- I think Ethiopia should not be included. It was a military occupation that was condemned by the world and the "de-" part = reversed by British military force. Rjensen (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. Rjrya395 (talk) 22:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Actually Ethiopia was administered as a colony. Italians built building, roads, etc. and there were about 100,000 settlers. It wasn't a military occupation LucaGaletti95 (talk) 12:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- So? It doesn't changed the fact that it lasted only five years with Haile Selassie returning to the throne. Rjrya395 (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
What has the number of years got to do with it? LucaGaletti95 (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- the article is not about colonization it's about something else. Ethiopia was not actually decolonized in the usual sense. The Italians were expelled by Brits and the emperor resumed his old role. The RS on decolonization exclude it and so should Wikipedia. Rjensen (talk) 01:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Major problems
[edit]the useful part of the article is the well-done chart showing all the colonies involved the main text is not well done it all, and does not closely follow the the reliable sources. I will try to fix that, starting with the French overseas empire. I deleted several sections that look at the late 20th early 21st centuries, long after decolonization took place. Rjensen (talk) 03:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'll be honest, for a top-importance article, I'm kind of shock how... empty this is. Rjrya395 (talk) 02:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Is it accurate to describe the United States as a colonial power for Liberia?
[edit]The government of the United States never officially ruled over Liberia. Liberia was founded by the American Colonization Society, which was a private organization unaffiliated with the U.S. government. Jaqoc (talk) 21:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- yes but the US government took a special protective interest in Liberia well into the 20th century --it helped finance and defend the colony. Worldwide course many colonies began as private company operations (including the 13 american colonies and most of the German colonies)Rjensen (talk) 00:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
==Wiki Education assignment: African Politics== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2022 and 11 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MathewLJohnson (article contribs). Peer reviewers: GnatLec, Dmr415, SleepDrifter.
Economic legacy
[edit]...Despite this continued reliance and unfair trading terms, a meta-analysis of 18 African countries found that a third of countries experienced increased economic growth post-independence...
I am not sure what the author was trying to say. Continues reliance on the export of raw materials ?
Unfair trading terms - what exactly is this referring to ? Have looked through the source cited but cannot find details דןברקת (talk) 14:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Why
[edit]Are we discussing Newfoundland (and exactly how is that a "short-term opportunity" anyway? Same question for Massachusetts and Georgia. I concur with the lack of focus banner. Article needs surgery. Adding refimprove Elinruby (talk) 10:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
This article should be reorganized chronologically
[edit]The layout of it is out of order which makes it very confusing and hard to read. I think it should be modeled on the one from Bosnian Wikipedia which, while severely lacking in sources is far better organized.
Also, there appears to be two tables that basically do the same thing. Charles Essie (talk) 01:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Anti-soviet bias
[edit]this article seems to skip over the soviet union's contributions to the decolonization of africa. The USSR sent financial, military, and intellectual aid (source: https://academic.oup.com/book/35127/chapter-abstract/299280406?redirectedFrom=fulltext). Jasperthejas (talk) 20:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in History
- Start-Class vital articles in History
- Start-Class Africa articles
- Top-importance Africa articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- Start-Class history articles
- High-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Low-importance Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class British Empire articles
- High-importance British Empire articles
- All WikiProject British Empire pages
- Spoken Wikipedia requests