Gospel of Judas: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: newspaper, agency. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Smasongarrison | Category:2nd-century Christian texts | #UCB_Category 20/72 |
||
(829 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|2nd century Gnostic gospel}} |
|||
{{other uses}} |
|||
{{New Testament Apocrypha}} |
|||
{{Gnosticism}} |
|||
The '''Gospel of Judas''' is a [[Biblical canon|non-canonical]] [[Gnostic gospel]]. The content consists of conversations between [[Jesus]] and [[Judas Iscariot]]. Given that it includes late 2nd-century theology, it is widely thought to have been composed in the 2nd century (prior to 180 AD) by [[Gnosticism|Gnostic]] Christians.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Gospel of Judas in Context |publisher=Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. |year=2006 |isbn=9789004167216 |editor-last=Scopello |editor-first=Madeleine |pages=63–66 |language=English}}</ref> The only copy of it known to exist is a [[Coptic language]] text that has been [[Radiocarbon dating|carbon dated]] to [[280 AD]], plus or minus 60 years. It has been suggested that the text derives from an earlier manuscript in the [[Greek language]].<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Gospel of Judas in Context |year=2006 |isbn=9789004167216 |editor-last=Scopello |editor-first=Madeleine |chapter=Preface|publisher=BRILL }}</ref> An English translation was first published in early 2006 by the [[National Geographic Society]]. |
|||
==Significance== |
|||
According to ''[[Science Magazine]]'', the gospel of Judas, in contrast to the [[canonical gospels]] which paint Judas as a betrayer who delivered Jesus to the authorities for [[Crucifixion of Jesus|crucifixion]] in exchange for [[Thirty pieces of silver|money]], portrays Judas's actions as done in obedience to instructions given to him by Jesus. The gospel asserts that the other [[Disciple (Christianity)|disciples]] had not learned the true Gospel, which Jesus taught only to Judas, the sole follower belonging to (or set apart from) the "holy generation" among the disciples.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2006-04-06 |title=Lost Gospel of Judas Revealed |url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/lost-gospel-judas-revealed-jesus-archaeology |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210217194233/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/lost-gospel-judas-revealed-jesus-archaeology |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 17, 2021 |access-date=2022-11-29 |website=Science |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
[[April DeConick]] challenges this interpretation, contending instead that the text was written by a group of [[Sethianism|Sethians]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=De Conick |first=April D. |title=The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas really says |date=2009 |publisher=Continuum |isbn=978-1-84706-568-1 |edition=Rev |location=London |oclc=276226174}}</ref> |
|||
{{otheruses}} |
|||
[[Image:Judas.jpg|thumb|right|155px|[[Judas Iscariot]].]] |
|||
{{Early Christian Writings | |
|||
|title=Gospel of Judas |
|||
|attribution=no attribution |
|||
|sources=no academic consensus |
|||
|date=before 180, mentioned by Irenaeus |
|||
|location= El Minya, Egypt near Beni Masar, |
|||
|manuscripts=[[Codex Tchacos]], references in early Christian writings |
|||
|audience=[[Cainites]] / [[Sethians]] - [[Gnosticism|Gnostic sects]] |
|||
|theme=Judas as the chosen disciple, Gnostic [[cosmology]] |
|||
}} |
|||
The '''Gospel of Judas''' is a [[Gnostic gospel]] purported to document conversations between [[Twelve apostles|apostle]] [[Judas Iscariot]] and [[Jesus Christ]]. The document is not claimed to have been written by Judas himself, but rather by [[Gnosticism|Gnostic]] followers of Jesus. It exists in an early fourth-century [[Coptic language|Coptic]] text, though it has been proposed, but not proven, that the text is a translation of an earlier [[Greek language|Greek]] version. The Gospel of Judas is probably from no earlier than the second century, since it contains theology that is not represented before the second half of the second century, and since its introduction and epilogue assume the reader is familiar with the canonical Gospels. The original Coptic document has been [[carbon dating| carbon dated]] to 280 AD, plus or minus 60 years. |
|||
According to the [[Biblical canon|canonical]] Gospels of the [[New Testament]], ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]], [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]], [[Gospel of Luke|Luke]], and [[Gospel of John|John]]), Judas betrayed [[Jesus]] to Jerusalem's Temple authorities, which handed Jesus over to the prefect [[Pontius Pilate]], representative of the occupying [[Roman Empire]], for crucifixion. The Gospel of Judas, on the other hand, portrays Judas in a very different perspective than do the Gospels of the New Testament, according to a preliminary translation made in early 2006 by the [[National Geographic Society]]: the Gospel of Judas appears to interpret Judas's act not as betrayal, but rather as an act of obedience to the instructions of Jesus. This assumption is taken on the basis that Jesus required a second agent to set in motion a course of events which he had planned. In that sense Judas acted as a catalyst. The action of Judas, then, was a pivotal point which interconnected a series of simultaneous pre-orchestrated events. |
|||
This portrayal seems to conform to a notion, current in some forms of [[Gnosticism]], that the human form is a spiritual prison, and that Judas thus served Christ by helping to release Christ's spirit from its physical constraints. The action of Judas allowed him to do that which he could not do directly. The Gospel of Judas does not claim that the other [[Disciple (Christianity)|disciples]] knew gnostic teachings. On the contrary, it asserts that the disciples had not learned the true Gospel, which Jesus taught only to Judas Iscariot. |
|||
==Background== |
==Background== |
||
A leather-bound Coptic language papyrus document surfaced during the 1970s near [[Beni Mazar]], [[Egypt]].<ref name=":1">{{cite news |author=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4882420.stm |title=Judas 'helped Jesus save mankind' |work=[[BBC News]] |date=April 7, 2006 |access-date=2015-04-08}}</ref> It was named [[Codex Tchacos]] by its penultimate owner, antiquities dealer Frieda Nussberger-Tchacos, in honor of her father, Dimaratos Tchacos. She became concerned with the manuscript's deteriorating condition and transferred possession to the [[Maecenas Foundation for Ancient Art]] in [[Basel, Switzerland]], in 2000, to oversee its preservation, translation and hopeful sale.<ref name=":2" /><ref name="Schutten" /> On April 6, 2006, "the [[National Geographic Society]] in the US published the first translation of the text from Coptic to English ... and showed some of the papyrus pages for the first time."<ref name=":1" /> |
|||
The codex contains text that appears to be from the late 2nd century<ref>{{cite web |title=Time Line of Early Christianity: The Lost Gospel of Judas |url=http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/timeline.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060408052631/http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/timeline_nf.html |archive-date=8 April 2006 |access-date=2015-04-08 |work=NationalGeographic.com |publisher=National Geographic Society}}</ref> and includes the first known surviving copy of the self-titled "Gospel of Judas" ({{transliteration|grc|Euangelion Ioudas}}),{{efn|During the 2nd and 3rd centuries, various Christian sects composed texts which are loosely labeled [[New Testament Apocrypha]]; these texts, like those in the [[New Testament]], are usually but not always "pseudeponymous", i.e. falsely attributed to a notable figure, such as an apostle, of an earlier era.{{citation needed|date=April 2015}}}} which relates the story of [[Historical Jesus|Jesus]]'s death from the viewpoint of Judas.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Jenott |first1=Lance |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oTFg7rnEY3UC&pg=PA23 |title=The Gospel of Judas: Coptic Text, Translation, and Historical Interpretation of 'the Betrayer's Gospel' |date=2011 |publisher=Mohr Siebeck |isbn=978-3161509780 |page=23 |access-date=8 April 2016}}</ref> The manuscript was [[radiocarbon dating|radiocarbon dated]] and described by the ''[[National Geographic]]'' as showing a likely date between 220–340 AD.<ref>{{cite web |last=Favorite |first=Crowd |date=6 April 2006 |title=Ancient Text Titled 'Gospel Of Judas" Is Authenticated, Translated |url=http://press.nationalgeographic.com/2006/04/06/gospel-of-judas-is-authenticated-translated/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130702213230/http://press.nationalgeographic.com/2006/04/06/gospel-of-judas-is-authenticated-translated/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 2, 2013 |access-date=26 May 2018}}</ref> |
|||
{{Gnosticism}} |
|||
During the 1970s, a leather-bound Coptic papyrus <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4882420.stm "Judas 'helped Jesus save mankind',"] [[BBC News]] [http://news.bbc.co.uk/ website], April 7, 2006, accessed March 17, 2008</ref> was discovered near Beni Masah, [[Egypt]]. This has been translated and appears to be a text from the [http://www9.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/timeline.html 2nd] century A.D. describing the story of [[Historical Jesus|Jesus]]'s death from the viewpoint of Judas. The conclusion of the text refers (in [[Coptic language|Coptic]]) to the text as "the Gospel of Judas" (''Euangelion Ioudas''). |
|||
The manuscript disintegrated into over a thousand pieces. Numerous sections are missing as a result of poor handling and storage. Some passages are only scattered words; others contain many lines. According to Coptic scholar [[Rodolphe Kasser]], the [[codex]] originally contained 31 leaves, each written on both sides; by the time the codex came to the market in 1999, only 13 leaves survived. Individual leaves may have been removed and sold. The codex had been stored in a cardboard box for two decades as it was shopped around to potential buyers,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www9.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/timeline_22.html |title=Gospel of Judas Restored and Translated |publisher=National Geographic Society |access-date=6 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060408052603/http://www9.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/timeline_22.html |archive-date=8 April 2006}}</ref> and had, at various points, been stored in a freezer, a safety deposit box in Long Island, and folded in half.<ref name=":2">{{cite web |url=https://www.willsworld.org/judas.html |title=Christianity' Other Betrayal: The Gospel of Judas and the Origins of Christian Homophobia |last=Roscoe |first=Will |access-date=6 March 2022 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220306133031/https://www.willsworld.org/judas.html |archive-date=6 March 2022 |quote=Over the next two decades the fragile manuscript crisscrossed continents and oceans, and in the process was thoroughly manhandled—stored for a time a freezer, folded in half and stuffed into a safe deposit box where it languished through the humid summers of Long Island, and finally, its bindings disintegrated, its pages were reshuffled and sold off in hunks. }}</ref> |
|||
According to a 2006 translation of the manuscript of the text, it is apparently a [[Gnosticism|Gnostic]] account of an arrangement between Jesus and Judas, who in this telling are Gnostic enlightened beings, with Jesus asking Judas to turn him in to the Romans to help Jesus finish his appointed task from God. |
|||
It has also been speculated, on the basis of [[textual criticism|textual analysis]] concerning features of dialect and Greek [[Loanword|loan words]], that the Coptic text contained in the codex may be a translation from an older Greek manuscript dating, at the earliest, to {{circa|130–170 AD}}.<ref>{{cite book |editor1=Schneemelcher, Wilhelm |editor2= Wilson, Robert McLachlan |title=New Testament Apocrypha |volume=1 |publisher=Westminster John Knox Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-0664227210 |page=387}}</ref> Cited in support of this dating is the reference to a "Gospel of Judas" by the early Christian writer [[Irenaeus of Lyons]], who, in arguing against Gnosticism, described the text as "fictitious history"<ref>{{Citation |author=Irenaeus |title=Refutation of Gnosticism |volume=1 |number=31|author-link=Irenaeus }}.</ref> and "blasphemous heresies".<ref name="Schutten" /> However, it is uncertain whether the text mentioned by Irenaeus is in fact the same text as the Coptic "Gospel of Judas" found in the Codex Tchacos.<ref name="Witherington A">{{cite book |author-link=Ben Witherington III |first=Ben III |last=Witherington |title=What Have They Done with Jesus?: Beyond Strange Theories and Bad History – Why We Can Trust the Bible |location=San Francisco |publisher=Harper Collins |year=2006 |isbn=978-0061120015 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/whathavetheydone00with/page/7 7–8] |url=https://archive.org/details/whathavetheydone00with/page/7 }}</ref> |
|||
During the second and third centuries AD, various Christian sects composed texts which are loosely labeled [[New Testament Apocrypha]]; these texts are usually but not always “pseudeponymous”, i.e. falsely attributed to a notable figure, such as an apostle, of an earlier era. |
|||
==Content== |
|||
The text is extant in only one manuscript, a fourth-century Coptic manuscript known as the [[Codex Tchacos]], which surfaced in the 1970s, after about sixteen centuries in the desert of Egypt . The existing manuscript was [[radiocarbon dating|radiocarbon dated]] "between the third and fourth century", according to Timothy Jull, a carbon-dating expert at the [[University of Arizona]]'s physics centre. Only sections of papyrus containing no text were carbon-dated, because carbon dating is physically destructive. |
|||
===Overview=== |
|||
Today the manuscript is in over a thousand pieces, possibly due to poor handling and storage, with many sections missing. In some cases, there are only scattered words; in others, many lines. According to [[Rodolphe Kasser]], the [[codex]] originally contained 31 pages, with writing on front and back; when it came to the market in 1999, only 13 pages, with writing on front and back, remained. It is speculated that individual pages had been removed and sold. |
|||
The Gospel of Judas consists of 16 chapters which document Jesus' teaching about spiritual matters and cosmology. According to the text, Judas is the only one of Jesus' disciples who accurately understands the words of his master. This Gospel contains few narrative elements; essentially, the Gospel records how Judas was taught by Jesus the true meaning of his message. |
|||
The Gospel contains ideas which contradicted the [[doctrine]] of the [[Early Christianity|early Church]]. The author says that God is essentially a "luminous cloud of light" who exists in an imperishable realm.<ref>Pagels & King (2007), p. 78.</ref> Adamas, the spiritual father of all humanity, was created in God's image and dwelt in the imperishable realm. |
|||
It has been speculated, on the basis of [[textual criticism|textual analysis]] concerning features of dialect and Greek loan words, that the current Coptic fourth century text may be a translation from an older Greek manuscript dating to approximately AD 130–180.<ref>For example, see H.-C. Puech and Beate Blatz, ''New Testament Apocrypha'', vol. 1, p. 387.</ref> Cited in support is the reference to a “Gospel of Judas” by the early Christian writer [[Irenaeus of Lyons]], who, in arguing against Gnosticism, called the text a "fictitious history" (''Refutation of Gnosticism'', bk. 1 ch. 31). However, it is uncertain whether this text mentioned by Irenaeus is in fact the same text as the Coptic “Gospel of Judas” of the extant fourth century text, and there remains no solid evidence for an early Greek version.<ref name="Witherington A">[[Ben Witherington III]], ''What have they done with Jesus'' (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 2006), pp. 7-8.</ref> |
|||
At the beginning of time, God created [[Archon (Gnosticism)|a group of angels and lower gods]]. Twelve angels were willed to "come into being [to] rule over chaos and the [underworld]".<ref name=natgeo /> |
|||
A. J. Levine, who was on the team of scholars responsible for unveiling the work, emphatically stated that the Gospel of Judas contains no new historical information concerning Jesus or Judas.<ref name="Witherington A"/> However, the text is helpful in reconstructing the history of Gnosticism, especially in Coptic-speaking areas. |
|||
The angels of creation were tasked with creating a physical body for Adamas, which became known as the first man [[Adam]]. Gradually, humanity began to forget its divine origins and some of Adam's descendants ([[Cain and Abel]]) became embroiled in the world's first murder. Many humans came to think that the imperfect physical universe was the totality of creation, losing their knowledge of God and the imperishable realm. |
|||
Jesus was sent as the Son of the true God, not of one of the lesser gods. His mission was to show that salvation consists in connecting with the God within the [[Man (word)|man]]. Through embracing the internal God, the man can then return to the imperishable realm. |
|||
==Content== |
|||
===Ancient controversy=== |
|||
[[Irenaeus]] mentions a ''Gospel of Judas'' in his anti-Gnostic work ''[[On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis|Adversus Haereses]]'' (Against Heresies), written in about 180. He writes there are some who: |
|||
Eleven of the disciples Jesus chose to spread his message misunderstood the central tenets of his teaching. They were obsessed with the physical world of the senses. The author says that they continued to practice religious animal sacrifice, which pleased the lower gods but did not help to foster a connection with the true God. They wrongly taught that those martyred in the name of Christ would be [[Resurrection of the dead|bodily resurrected]]. |
|||
<blockquote>declare that [[Cain]] derived his being from the Power above, and acknowledge that [[Esau]], [[Korah]], the [[Sodom and Gomorrah|Sodomites]], and all such persons, are related to themselves. . .They declare that Judas the traitor was thoroughly acquainted with these things, and that he alone, knowing the truth as no others did, accomplished the mystery of the betrayal; by him all things, both earthly and heavenly, were thus thrown into confusion. They produce a fictional history of this kind, which they style the'' Gospel of Judas. <ref>[[Irenaeus]], [[On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis|Adversus Haereses (Against Heresies)]], [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.ii.xxxii.html I.31.1]</ref></blockquote> |
|||
In contrast, Jesus is able to teach Judas the true meaning of his life, ministry and death. Mankind can be divided into two races, or groups. Those who are furnished with the immortal [[soul]], like Judas, can come to know the God within and enter the imperishable realm when they die. Those among the same group as the other eleven disciples cannot enter the realm of God and will die both spiritually and physically at the end of their lives. As practices that are intertwined with the physical world, animal sacrifice and a communion ceremony involving "cannibalism" (the consumption of [[Eucharist|Jesus' flesh and blood]]) are condemned as abhorrent. |
|||
This is in reference to the [[Cainites]], an alleged sect of [[Gnosticism]] that especially worshipped Cain as a hero. Irenaeus alleged that the Cainites, like a large number of Gnostic groups, were semi-[[maltheism|maltheists]] believing that the god of the Old Testament — [[Yahweh]] — was evil, and a quite different and much lesser being to the deity that had created the universe, and who was responsible for sending Jesus. Such Gnostic groups worshipped as heroes all the Biblical figures which had sought to discover knowledge or challenge Yahweh's authority, while demonizing those who would have been seen as heroes in a more orthodox interpretation. |
|||
===As a Gnostic text=== |
|||
The Gospel of Judas belongs to a school of Gnosticism called [[Sethianism]], a group who looked to Adam's son [[Seth]] as their spiritual ancestor. As in other Sethian documents, Jesus is equated with Seth: "The first is Seth, who is called Christ" although this is in part of an [[Emanationism|emanationist]] mythology describing both positive and negative [[Aeons#In Gnosticism|aeons]]. |
|||
[[Amy-Jill Levine]], professor of New Testament Studies at [[Vanderbilt University Divinity School]], was on the team of scholars responsible for unveiling the work. She said that the Gospel of Judas contains no new historical information concerning Jesus or Judas.<ref name="Witherington A"/> |
|||
For [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] reasons, the Sethian Gnostics authors of this text maintained that Judas acted as he did in order that mankind might be redeemed by the death of Jesus' mortal body. For this reason, they regarded Judas as worthy of gratitude and veneration. The Gospel of Judas does not describe any events after the arrest of Jesus. |
|||
Historians [[Elaine Pagels]] and [[Karen Leigh King]] argue that a more nuanced, contextualized understanding of alternative interpretations of the Christian tradition should inform discussions of Gnosticism. In the centuries following Jesus's death, many differing views of the meaning of his life and death existed. [[Proto-orthodox Christianity]] (i.e. the views which came to be dominant in the fourth century AD, similar to the doctrines contained in the [[Nicene Creed]]) existed alongside various beliefs (one of which was labelled 'Gnosticism') for centuries, until proto-orthodox interpretations became accepted as "mainstream" Christianity.<ref>Pagels & King (2007).</ref> |
|||
By contrast, the canonical [[Gospel of John]], unlike the [[synoptic gospels]], asserts that Jesus said to Judas, as the latter left [[the Last Supper]] to set in motion the betrayal process, "Do quickly what you have to do." (John 13:27) (trans. ''The New English Bible''). Interpretations include: this was a direct command to Judas to do what he did; Jesus was speaking to Satan rather than to Judas (thus "Satan entered into Judas"); or Jesus knew what Judas was secretly plotting. |
|||
===Modern rediscovery=== |
|||
Some two centuries after Irenaeus' complaint, [[Epiphanius of Salamis]], bishop of [[Cyprus]], criticized the Gospel of Judas for treating as commendable the person whom he saw as the betrayer of Jesus, and as one who "performed a good work for our salvation." (''Haeres.'', xxxviii). |
|||
The initial translation of the Gospel of Judas was widely publicized but simply confirmed the account that was written in Irenaeus and known Gnostic beliefs, leading some scholars to simply summarize the discovery as nothing new. It is also argued that a closer reading of the existent text, as presented in October 2006, shows Christianity in a new light. According to Elaine Pagels, for instance, Judas is portrayed as having a mission to hand Jesus over to the soldiers. She says that Bible translators have mistranslated the Greek word for "handing over" to "betrayal".<ref>{{cite news |first=David Ian |last=Miller |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2007/04/02/findrelig.DTL |title=Finding My Religion / Religious scholar Elaine Pagels on how the newly discovered Gospel of Judas sheds new light on the dawn of Christianity |work=[[San Francisco Chronicle]] |date=April 2, 2007 |access-date=2015-04-08}}</ref> |
|||
==== The Gospel of Judas itself attacking other beliefs ==== |
|||
According to the Gospel, Judas was the only one of Jesus’ followers to fully understand the Gnostic teachings: "Knowing that Judas was reflecting upon something that was exalted, Jesus said to him: Step away from the others and I shall tell you the mysteries of the [[Kingdom of Heaven|Kingdom]]. It is possible for you to reach it, but you will grieve a great deal. For someone else will replace you, in order that the twelve disciples may again come to completion with their [[God]]." |
|||
Like many Gnostic works, the Gospel of Judas refers to itself as a secret account, specifically "The secret account of the revelation that Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot...."<ref name=natgeo>{{cite book |editor1=Kasser, Rodolphe |editor2=Meyer, Marvin Meyer |editor3=Wurst, Gregor |title=The Gospel of Judas |others=Commentary by Bart D. Ehrman |location=Washington D.C. |publisher=National Geographic Society |year=2006 |isbn=978-1426200427 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/gospelofjudasfro00kass/page/1 1, 4–5, 7, 43] |url=https://archive.org/details/gospelofjudasfro00kass/page/1 }}</ref> |
|||
The Gospel of Judas goes even further, showing Jesus in various instances criticizing the other disciples for their ignorance and their followers of immorality. |
|||
The Gospel of Judas states that Jesus told Judas "You shall be cursed for generations" and then added, "You will come to rule over them" and "You will exceed all of them, for you will sacrifice the man that clothes me."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/04/06/gospel.judas.ap/index.html |title=Text might be hidden 'Gospel of Judas' |work=[[CNN]] |date=April 6, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060408090737/http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/04/06/gospel.judas.ap/index.html |archive-date=2006-04-08}}</ref> |
|||
When they tell Jesus about a vision, he points out its true meaning as follows: "Those you have seen receiving the offerings at the altar — that is who you are. That is the God you serve, and you are those twelve men you have seen. The cattle you saw brought for sacrifice are the many people you lead astray before that altar. (. . .) will stand and make use of my name in this way, and generations of the pious will remain loyal to Him." |
|||
Unlike the four canonical gospels, which employ narrative accounts of the last year of Jesus's life and of his birth (in the case of Luke and Matthew), the Judas gospel takes the form of dialogues between Jesus and Judas, and Jesus and the twelve disciples, without being embedded in any narrative. Such "dialogue gospels" were popular during the early decades of Christianity and the New Testament apocrypha contains several examples, such as the [[Gospel of Mary]]. |
|||
===Modern rediscovery=== |
|||
{{update}} |
|||
The initial translation of the ''Gospel of Judas'' was widely publicized but simply confirmed the account that was written in Irenaeus and known Gnostic beliefs, leading some scholars to simply summarize the discovery as nothing new. |
|||
Like the canonical gospels, the Gospel of Judas portrays the scribes as approaching Jesus with the intention of arresting him, and Judas receiving money from them after handing Jesus over to them. However, unlike Judas in the canonical gospels, who is portrayed as a villain, and excoriated by Jesus ("Alas for that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed. It would be better for that man if he had never been born," Mark 14:21; Matthew 26:24),<ref>''The New English Bible'', {{bibleverse|Mark|14:21}}; {{bibleverse|Matthew|26:24}}</ref> the Judas gospel portrays Judas as a divinely appointed instrument of a grand and predetermined purpose. "In the last days they will curse your ascent to the holy (generation)."<ref name=natgeo /> |
|||
However, it is argued that a closer reading of the existent text, as presented in October 2006, shows that Judas may have been set up to actually betray Jesus out of wrath and anger: |
|||
Elsewhere in the manuscript, Jesus favours Judas above other disciples by saying, "Step away from the others and I shall tell you the mysteries of the kingdom," and "Look, you have been told everything. Lift up your eyes and look at the cloud and the light within it and the stars surrounding it. The star that leads the way is your star."<ref name=natgeo /> |
|||
<blockquote>Truly [I] say to you, Judas, [those who] offer sacrifices to Saklas [... ''exemplify'' ...] everything that is evil. But you will exceed all of them. For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me. Already your horn has been raised, your wrath has been kindled, your star has shone brightly, and your heart has [''been hardened''...]</blockquote> |
|||
==Rediscovery== |
|||
The initial translators might have been misled by Irenaeus' summary, which although an exciting idea was not necessarily accurate. Their theory is now in dispute. |
|||
[[File:Giotto - Scrovegni - -31- - Kiss of Judas.jpg|right|thumbnail|"The Kiss of Judas" is a traditional depiction of Judas by [[Giotto di Bondone]], {{c.|1306}}. Fresco in the [[Scrovegni Chapel]], [[Padua]].]] |
|||
The content of the gospel had been unknown until a [[Coptic language|Coptic]] Gospel of Judas turned up on the antiquities "[[grey market]]," in [[Geneva]] in May 1983, when it was found among a mixed group of [[Greek language|Greek]] and [[Coptic language|Coptic]] manuscripts offered to [[Stephen Emmel]], a [[Yale University|Yale]] Ph.D. candidate commissioned by [[Southern Methodist University]] to inspect the manuscripts. How the manuscript (named the [[Codex Tchacos]]) was found, possibly in the late 1970s, has not been clearly documented. It is believed that a now-deceased Egyptian "treasure-hunter" or prospector discovered the [[codex]] near [[El Minya]], [[Egypt]], in the neighbourhood of the village Beni Masar, and sold it to one Hanna, a dealer in antiquities resident in Cairo.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0406_060406_gospel.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060411043003/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0406_060406_gospel.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 11, 2006 |title=Gospel of Judas Pages Endured Long, Strange Journey |
|||
|first=Brian |last=Handwerk |work=National Geographic News |date=April 6, 2006 |publisher=National Geographic Society |access-date=2015-04-08}}</ref> |
|||
In the 1970s, the manuscript and most of the dealer's other artifacts were stolen by a Greek trader named Nikolas Koutoulakis, and smuggled into Geneva. Hanna, along with Swiss antiquity traders, paid Koutoulakis a sum rumoured to be between $3 million and $10 million, recovered the manuscript and introduced it to experts who recognized its significance. |
|||
According to [[Elaine Pagels]], Bible translators have mistranslated the Greek word for "handing over" to "betrayal".<ref>David Ian Miller, [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2007/04/02/findrelig.DTL "FINDING MY RELIGION: Religious scholar Elaine Pagels on how the newly discovered Gospel of Judas sheds new light on the dawn of Christianity,"] [[San Francisco Chronicle]] [http://www.sfgate.com/ website],April 2, 2007, accessed March 17, 2008</ref> There is a different Greek word for "betrayal", so the original "handing over" should have been applied to make the text read correctly. The Greek word for "handing over" is used in the original texts of the bible in the letters of [[Paul the Apostle|Paul]] and the [[Gospel of Mark]].{{Fact|date=April 2007}} |
|||
Some deterioration is due to long term storage in safe deposit box and from freezing. <ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna12317455 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241207210334/https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna12317455 |url-status=live |archive-date=December 7, 2024 |title=Adventure tale surrounds Gospel of Judas |first=Bradley |last= Klapper |agency=Associated Press |date=April 14, 2006 |publisher=NBCNEWS |access-date=December 7, 2024}}</ref> |
|||
Like many Gnostic works, the ''Gospel of Judas'' claims to be a secret account, specifically "the secret account of the revelation that Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot." |
|||
==Sale and study== |
|||
Over the ages many philosophers have contemplated the idea that Judas was required to have carried out his actions in order for Jesus to have died on the cross and hence fulfill theological obligations. The ''Gospel of Judas'', however, asserts clearly that Judas' action was in obedience to a direct command of Jesus himself. |
|||
During the two decades after the codex's discovery, the manuscript was quietly offered to prospective buyers, but neither Egypt nor any major library were prepared to purchase a manuscript with such questionable [[provenance]]. In 2003 [[Michel van Rijn]] started to publish material about these dubious negotiations, and eventually the 62-page leather-bound codex was donated to the [[Maecenas Foundation]] in [[Basel]]. The previous owners now reported that it had been uncovered at [[Minya, Egypt|Muhafazat al Minya]] in Egypt during the 1950s or 1960s, and that its significance had not been appreciated until recently. Various other locations had been alleged during previous negotiations. |
|||
The existence of the text was made public by former professor at the [[University of Geneva]] [[Rodolphe Kasser]] at a conference of Coptic specialists in Paris, July 2004. In a statement issued March 30, 2005, a spokesman for the Maecenas Foundation announced plans for edited translations into [[English language|English]], [[French language|French]], [[German language|German]], and [[Polish language|Polish]] once the fragile [[papyrus]] had undergone conservation by a team of specialists in Coptic history to be led by Kasser, and that their work would be published in about a year. A. J. Tim Jull, director of the [[National Science Foundation]] Arizona AMS laboratory, and Gregory Hodgins, assistant research scientist, announced that a radiocarbon dating procedure had dated five samples from the papyrus manuscript from 220 to 340 in January 2005 at the [[University of Arizona]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/daily/local/8619.php |title=UA team verifies age of Gospel of Judas |first=Paul L. |last=Allen |date=April 7, 2006 |work=Tucson Citizen |access-date=2015-04-08}}</ref> This puts the Coptic manuscript in the 3rd or 4th centuries, a century earlier than had originally been thought from analysis of the script. In January 2006, Gene A. Ware of the Papyrological Imaging Lab of [[Brigham Young University]] conducted a multi-spectral imaging process on the texts in Switzerland, and confirmed their authenticity.{{citation needed|date=April 2015}} Joseph Barabe presented the behind-the-scenes story of the role an analysis of the [[ink]] played in authenticating the book at an [[American Chemical Society]] meeting.<ref>{{cite web |last=Pappas |first=Stephanie |title=Truth Behind Gospel of Judas Revealed in Ancient Inks |url=http://www.livescience.com/28506-gospel-judas-ink-authenticity.html |work=LiveScience.com |publisher=LiveScience |date=April 8, 2013 |access-date=2015-04-08}}</ref> |
|||
The ''Gospel of Judas'' states that Jesus told Judas "You shall be cursed for generations" and then added, "You will come to rule over them" and "You will exceed all of them, for you will sacrifice the man that clothes me." <ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/04/06/gospel.judas.ap/index.html "Text might be hidden 'Gospel of Judas'"], [[CNN]], April 6, 2006</ref> |
|||
Over the decades, the manuscript had been handled with less than sympathetic care: some single pages may be loose on the antiquities market (parts of two pages turned up in January 2006, in [[New York City]]);<ref>{{cite book |last1=Churton |first1=Tobias |title=Kiss of Death: The True History of the Gospel of Judas |date=2008 |publisher=Watkins |location=London |isbn=978-1905857517}}</ref> the text is now in over a thousand pieces and fragments, and is believed to be less than three-quarters complete. "After concluding the research, everything will be returned to Egypt. The work belongs there and they will be conserved in the best way," Roberty has stated.<ref name="Schutten">{{cite web |first=Henk |last=Schutten |url=http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/manuscripts/gospel_of_judas/Parooltrans8-9.htm |title=The hunt for the Gospel of Judas |work=Tertullian.org |publisher=Roger Pearse |access-date=2015-04-07}}</ref> |
|||
Unlike the four canonical gospels, which employ narrative accounts of the last year of life of Jesus (in the case of John, three years) and of his birth (in the case of Luke and Matthew), the Judas gospel takes the form of dialogues between Jesus and Judas, and Jesus and the twelve disciples, without being embedded in any narrative or worked into any overt [[philosophical]] or [[rhetorical]] context. Such "dialogue gospels" were popular during the early decades of Christianity, and indeed the four canonical gospels are the only surviving gospels in narrative form. The New Testament apocrypha contains several examples of the dialogue form, an example being the [[Gospel of Mary Magdalene]]. |
|||
In April 2006, an Ohio bankruptcy lawyer stated that he possessed several papyrus fragments from the Gospel of Judas, but refused to have the fragments authenticated. His report was viewed with skepticism by experts.<ref name="NBCNews">{{cite news |first=M.R. |last=Kropko |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna12407083 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210810141614/https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna12407083 |url-status=dead |archive-date=August 10, 2021 |title=Papyrus bits add new twist to 'Judas' tale |work=NBCNews.com |date=April 20, 2006 |access-date=2021-08-10}}</ref><ref>Krosney, H. 2009. The Tchacos Fragment in Court. Paper Presented at the Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting. New Orleans, November.</ref>{{update inline|date=March 2022}} Photographs of the fragments were later made available to [[Marvin Meyer]] and Gregor Wurst. Meyer presented their preliminary translation<ref>{{cite web |last1=Meyer |first1=Marvin |last2=Wurst |first2=Gregor |title=Tchacos fragments, Gospel of Judas, preliminary translation |url=https://www.chapman.edu/wilkinson/religious-studies/_files/marv-meyer/judas-fragments-translated-context.pdf |date=November 2009 |website=Chaman.edu |access-date=2021-08-10}}</ref> at [[Society of Biblical Literature]] Annual Meeting in New Orleans in November 2009.<ref>{{cite web |last=Meyer |first=Marvin |title=The Tchacos Fragments of the Gospel of Judas |url=https://www.chapman.edu/wilkinson/religious-studies/_files/marv-meyer/announcement-of-the-tchacos-fragments-final.doc |date=November 2009 |website=Chapman.edu |access-date=2021-08-10}}</ref> |
|||
Like the canonical gospels, the Gospel of Judas portrays the scribes as approaching Judas with the intention of arresting him, and Judas receiving money from them after handing Jesus over to them. But unlike Judas in the canonical gospels, who is portrayed as a villain, and excoriated by Jesus ("Alas for that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed. It would be better for that man if he had never been born," Mark 14:21; Matthew 26:24, trans. ''The New English Bible''), the Judas gospel portrays Judas as a divinely appointed instrument of a grand and predetermined purpose. "In the last days they will curse your ascent to the holy (generation)." |
|||
In 2007, the National Geographic Society published the "Critical Edition" of the manuscript,<ref>{{cite book |title=The Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition: Together with the Letter of Peter to Philip, James, and a Book of Allogenes from Codex Tchacos |isbn=978-1-4262-0191-2 |editor1=Kasser, Rodolphe |editor2=Meyer, Marvin Meyer |editor3=Wurst, Gregor |editor4=François Gaudard |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=National Geographic Books |year=2007 |language=cop, en, fr }}</ref> which includes images of all the fragments, the reconstructed Coptic text, and English and French translations.<ref> |
|||
Elsewhere in the manuscript, Jesus favours Judas above other disciples by saying, "Step away from the others and I shall tell you the mysteries of the kingdom," and "Look, you have been told everything. Lift up your eyes and look at the cloud and the light within it and the stars surrounding it. The star that leads the way is your star." |
|||
{{cite web |url=https://press.nationalgeographic.com/2007/06/04/gospel-of-judas-critical-edition/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170610221250/http://press.nationalgeographic.com/2007/06/04/gospel-of-judas-critical-edition/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 10, 2017 |publisher=The National Geographic Society |date=June 4, 2007 |title=Press release: Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition |access-date=2018-06-19}}</ref> |
|||
==Responses and reactions== |
|||
In the New Testament, Judas is said to have died by hanging himself ({{bibleverse||Matthew|27:3-10|}}), or by bursting open after a fall ({{bibleverse||Acts|1:16-19|}}). The ''Gospel of Judas'' does not specify the fate of Judas, although in the gospel, Judas tells Jesus he has had a vision where he is stoned to death by the eleven remaining apostles. |
|||
In his 2006 Easter address, [[Rowan Williams]], then [[Archbishop of Canterbury]], strongly denied the historical credibility of the gospel, saying: |
|||
{{blockquote|This is a demonstrably late text which simply parallels a large number of quite well-known works from the more eccentric fringes of the early century Church.<ref name=Sermon>{{cite news |author=Archbishop of Canterbury |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4913634.stm |title=Archbishop of Canterbury's sermon |work=BBC News |date=April 16, 2006 |access-date=2015-04-08}}</ref>}} He went on to suggest that the book's publicity derived from a desire for [[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]].<ref name=Sermon/> |
|||
==Rediscovery== |
|||
===Origins=== |
|||
[[Image:Giotto - Scrovegni - -31- - Kiss of Judas.jpg|right|thumbnail|"The Kiss of Judas" is a traditional depiction of Judas by [[Giotto di Bondone]], c. 1306. Fresco in the [[Scrovegni Chapel]], [[Padua]].]] |
|||
The content of the gospel had been unknown until a [[Coptic language|Coptic]] ''Gospel of Judas'' turned up on the antiquities "[[grey market]]," in [[Geneva]] in May 1983, when it was found among a mixed group of [[Greek language|Greek]] and [[Coptic language|Coptic]] manuscripts offered to Stephen Emmel, a [[Yale University|Yale]] Ph.D. candidate commissioned by [[Southern Methodist University]] to inspect the manuscripts. How this manuscript, [[Codex Tchacos]], was found, in the late 1970s, has not been clearly documented. However, it is believed that a now-deceased Egyptian "treasure-hunter" or prospector discovered the [[codex]] near [[El Minya]], [[Egypt]], in the neighbourhood of the village Beni Masar, and sold it to one Hanna, a dealer in antiquities resident in Cairo. |
|||
===Scholarly debates=== |
|||
Around 1980, the manuscript and most of the dealer's other artifacts were stolen by a Greek trader named Nikolas Koutoulakis, and smuggled into Geneva. Hanna, in collusion with Swiss antiquity traders, recovered the manuscript and introduced it to experts who recognized its significance. |
|||
Kasser revealed a few details about the text in 2004, as reported by the Dutch paper {{lang|nl|[[Het Parool]]}}.{{citation needed|date=April 2015}} Its language is the same Sahidic dialect of [[Coptic language|Coptic]] in which Coptic texts of the [[Nag Hammadi Library]] are written. The codex has four parts: |
|||
* The ''[[Letter of Peter to Philip]]'', already known from the Nag Hammadi Library |
|||
* The ''[[First Apocalypse of James]]'', also known from the Nag Hammadi Library |
|||
* The first few pages of a work related to, but not the same as, the Nag Hammadi work ''[[Allogenes]]'' |
|||
* The ''Gospel of Judas'' |
|||
Up to a third of the codex is currently illegible. |
|||
==Sale and study== |
|||
During the following two decades the manuscript was quietly offered to prospective buyers, but no major library felt ready to purchase a manuscript that had such questionable [[provenance]]. In 2003 [[Michel van Rijn]] started to publish material about these dubious negotiations, and eventually the 62-page leather-bound [[codex]] was purchased by the [[Maecenas Foundation]] in [[Basel]], a private foundation directed by lawyer Mario Jean Roberty. The previous owners now claimed that it had been uncovered at [[Al Minya|Muhafazat al Minya]] in Egypt during the 1950s or 1960s, and that its significance had not been appreciated until recently. It is worth noting that various other locations had been alleged during previous negotiations. |
|||
A scientific paper was to be published in 2005 but was delayed. The completion of the restoration and translation was announced by the [[National Geographic Society]] at a news conference in [[Washington, D.C.]], on April 6, 2006, and the manuscript itself was unveiled then at the National Geographic Society headquarters, accompanied by a television special entitled ''The Gospel of Judas'' on April 9, 2006, which was aired on the [[National Geographic Channel]]. Terry Garcia, an executive vice president for Mission Programs of the National Geographic Society, asserted that the codex is considered by scholars and scientists to be the most significant ancient, non-biblical text to be found since the 1940s. |
|||
The existence of the text was made public by [[Rodolphe Kasser]] at a conference of Coptic specialists in Paris, July 2004. In a statement issued [[March 30]], [[2005]], a spokesman for the Maecenas Foundation announced plans for edited translations into [[English language|English]], [[French language|French]], [[German language|German]], and [[Polish language|Polish]] once the fragile [[papyrus]] has undergone conservation by a team of specialists in Coptic history to be led by a former professor at the [[University of Geneva]], [[Rodolphe Kasser]], and that their work would be published in about a year. A. J. Tim Jull, director of the [[National Science Foundation]] Arizona AMS laboratory, and Gregory Hodgins, assistant research scientist, announced that a radiocarbon dating procedure had dated five samples from the papyrus manuscript from 220 to 340 in January 2005 at the [[University of Arizona]].<ref>[http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/daily/local/8619.php UA team verifies age of Gospel of Judas]</ref> This puts the Coptic manuscript in the third or fourth centuries, a century earlier than had originally been thought from analysis of the script. In January 2006, Gene A. Ware of the Papyrological Imaging Lab of [[Brigham Young University]] conducted a multi-spectral imaging process on the texts in Switzerland, and confirmed their authenticity.<ref name="HeraldLeader">{{cite news|url=http://www.kentucky.com/mld/heraldleader/news/world/14284615.htm|title=Time line since discovery of Gospel of Judas|work=Lexington Herald-Leader|date=[[2006-04-07]]|accessdate=2006-04-09}}</ref> |
|||
Scholars are divided on the interpretation of the text. In particular, there is no consensus on how Judas is characterized in this gospel.<ref>DeConick, A.D., ed. 2009. The Codex Judas Papers: Proceedings of the International Congress on the Tchacos Codex held at Rice University, Houston, Texas, March 13–16, 2008. Leiden: Brill [NHMS 71], p. xxvii; Scopello, M., ed. 2008. The Gospel of Judas in Context: Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Gospel of Judas. Paris, Sorbonne, October 27th–28th Leiden: Brill [NHMS 62] 2008, p. xiii)</ref> The first modern publication of the gospel contended that the text portrays Judas in a positive light,<ref name=natgeo /> while other scholars have asserted that Judas is presented negatively.<ref>DeConick, A.D. 2009. The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says. Revised Edition. New York: Continuum.; Painchaud, L. 2008. Polemical Aspects of the Gospel of Judas. pp. 171–86 in Scopello (ed.), The Gospel of Judas in Context.; Pearson, P.A. 2009. Judas Iscariot in the Gospel of Judas. pp. 137–152 in DeConick (ed.), The Codex Judas Papers.; Rubio, F.B. Laughing at Judas: Conflicting Integrations of a New Gnostic Gospel. pp. 153–80 in DeConick (ed.), The Codex Judas Papers.; Sullivan, K. 2009. "You will become the Thirteenth": The Identity of Judas in the Gospel of Judas. pp. 181–99 in DeConick (ed.), The Codex Judas Papers.</ref> |
|||
Over the decades, the manuscript had been handled with less than sympathetic care: some single pages may be loose on the antiquities market (one half page turned up in Feb. 2006, in [[New York City]]<ref name="HeraldLeader" />); the text is now in over a thousand pieces and fragments, and is believed to be less than three-quarters complete. "After concluding the research, everything will be returned to Egypt. The work belongs there and they will be conserved in the best way," Roberty has stated.<ref>[http://www.michelvanrijn.nl/artnews/parooltrans6-7.htm The hunt for the Gospel of Judas]</ref> |
|||
[[James M. Robinson]], general editor of the Nag Hammadi Library, predicted the new book would offer no historical insights into the disciple who betrayed Jesus. Since the third-century document originates from an earlier 2nd-century document, Robinson suggested that the text would provide insights into the religious situation during the 2nd century, rather than into the historical events portrayed in the canonical gospels.<ref>Robinson (2006), p. 183.</ref> |
|||
In April 2006, an [[Ohio]] bankruptcy lawyer claimed to possess several small, brown bits of papyrus from the Gospel of Judas, but he refuses to have the fragments authenticated and his claim is being viewed with skepticism by experts.<ref name="FoxNews">{{cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192410,00.html|title=Lawyer Says He's Got 'Gospel of Judas' Papyrus Fragments|work=FoxNews.com (AP)|date=[[2006-04-20]]|accessdate=2006-04-21}}</ref> |
|||
One scholar on the National Geographic project, professor [[Craig A. Evans]], stated his belief that the document showed that Judas was "fooled" into believing he was helping Jesus.<ref>{{cite news |author=CBC News |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/judas-no-hero-scholars-say-1.630353 |title=Judas no hero, scholars say |work=[[CBC News]] |date=December 4, 2006 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070105212011/http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/12/04/judas-scholars.html |archive-date=2007-01-05}}</ref> Another scholar, [[April DeConick|April D. DeConick]], a professor of Biblical studies at [[Rice University]], opined in an op-ed in [[The New York Times]] that the National Geographic translation was critically faulty in many substantial respects, and that based on a corrected translation, Judas was actually a demon, truly betraying Jesus, rather than following his orders.<ref name="DeConick">{{cite news |first=April D. |last=DeConick |title=Gospel Truth |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html?_r=1&oref=slogin |work=The New York Times |date=December 1, 2007 |access-date=2015-04-08}}</ref> DeConick, after re-translating the text, published ''The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says'' to assert that Judas was not a ''[[daimon]]'' in the Greek sense, but that "the universally accepted word for 'spirit' is 'pneuma'{{snd}}in Gnostic literature 'daimon' is always taken to mean 'demon'".<ref name="DeConick"/> She further stated that "Judas is not set apart 'for' the holy generation, as the National Geographic translation says, he is separated 'from' it."<ref name="DeConick"/> DeConick went on to ask, "Were they genuine errors or was something more deliberate going on?"<ref name="DeConick"/> The National Geographic Society responded that "virtually all issues April D. DeConick raises about translation choices are addressed in footnotes in both the popular and critical editions."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://nationalgeographicpartners.com/press/?pageID=pressReleases_detail&siteID=1&cid=1196944434958 |title=Statement from National Geographic in Response to April DeConick's ''New York Times'' Op-Ed 'Gospel Truth' (Dec. 1, 2007) |work=NationalGeographic.com |access-date=2015-04-08 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120216070514/http://press.nationalgeographic.com/pressroom/index.jsp?pageID=pressReleases_detail&siteID=1&cid=1196944434958 |archive-date=2012-02-16 }}</ref> |
|||
==Responses and reactions== |
|||
===Scholarly debates=== |
|||
Professor Kasser revealed a few details about the text in 2004, the Dutch paper ''Het Parool'' reported.<ref>[http://www.grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?f=1&i=178928&t=178712 The Mysteries], The Official Graham Hancock Website</ref> Its language is the same Sahidic dialect of [[Coptic language|Coptic]] in which Coptic texts of the [[Nag Hammadi Library]] are written. The codex has four parts: the ''[[Letter of Peter to Philip]]'', already known from the Nag Hammadi Library; the ''[[First Apocalypse of James]]'', also known from the Nag Hammadi Library; the first few pages of a work related to, but not the same as, the Nag Hammadi work ''[[Allogenes]]''; and the ''Gospel of Judas.'' Up to a third of the codex is currently illegible. |
|||
[[André Gagné]], professor at [[Concordia University]] in [[Montreal]], also questioned how the experts of the [[National Geographic Society]] understood the role of [[Judas Iscariot]] in the Gospel of Judas.<ref>{{cite news |first=Tamara |last=Belkov |url=http://www.northernlife.ca/displayArticle.aspx?id=18573 |work=Northern Life |title=Religion Professor Disputes Translation of Judas Gospel |date=May 11, 2006 |access-date=2015-04-08}}</ref> His argument rests on the translation of the Greco-Coptic term ''[[Apophatic theology|apophasis]]'' as "denial". According to Gagné, the opening lines of the Judas Gospel should not be translated as "the secret word of ''declaration'' by which Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot" but rather as "the secret word of the ''denial'' by which Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot" (Gospel of Judas 33:1).<ref>{{cite journal |author-link=André Gagné |last=Gagné |first=André |title=A Critical Note on the Meaning of APOPHASIS in ''Gospel of Judas'' 33:1 |journal=Laval Théologique et Philosophique |volume=63 |number=2 |date=June 2007 |pages=377–83|doi=10.7202/016791ar |doi-access=free }}</ref> Gagné's conclusion is that this gospel is the story of the denial of true [[salvation]] for Judas. |
|||
A scientific paper was to be published in 2005, but was delayed. The completion of the restoration and translation was announced by the [[National Geographic Society]] at a news conference in [[Washington, D.C.]] on [[April 6]], [[2006]], and the manuscript itself was unveiled then at the National Geographic Society headquarters, accompanied by a television special entitled ''The Gospel of Judas'' on [[April 9]], [[2006]], which was aired on the [[National Geographic Channel]]. |
|||
In 2006 [[Géza Vermes]] commented the gospel was "a typical product of Greek (Platonic)-Christian speculation" representing Judas "assisting the Jewish authorities' arrest of Jesus and bringing about his liberation from the prison of his body".<ref>{{citation |author-link=Géza Vermes |first=Géza |last=Vermes |title=The great ''Da Vinci Code'' distraction |work=[[The Times]] |date=May 6, 2006}}, republished in {{cite book |first=Géza |last=Vermes |title=Searching For The Real Jesus: Jesus, The Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Religious Themes |publisher=SCM Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-334-04358-4}}. For a similar view, see James Martin "Why Did Judas Do It?" America: The National Catholic Review 194.19 (29 May 2006) <http://americamagazine.org/issue/574/article/why-did-judas-do-it></ref> This view is exemplified by a passage where Jesus says to Judas, "For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me." (Gospel of Judas 56.1820)<ref name=natgeo /> |
|||
[[Terry Garcia]], an executive vice president for Mission Programs of the National Geographic Society, asserted that the codex is considered by scholars and scientists to be the most significant ancient, non-biblical text to be found since the 1940s. However, [[James M. Robinson]], one of America's leading experts on ancient religious texts, predicted that the new book would offer no historical insights into the disciple who betrayed Jesus, since the third-century manuscript seems to derive from an older document. Robinson suggests that the text will provide insights into the religion situation during the second century rather than into the biblical narrative itself. |
|||
A CNN TV series entitled "Finding Jesus – Faith, Fact, Forgery" featured The Gospel of Judas in its 3rd episode, which was aired on March 15, 2015.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.augustineinstitute.org/cnn-finding-jesus |title=Dr. Tim Gray featured in CNN's Finding Jesus |access-date=2015-05-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150503103144/http://www.augustineinstitute.org/cnn-finding-jesus |archive-date=2015-05-03 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/shows/finding-jesus|title=FInding Jesus: Faith, fact and forgery|website=CNN}}</ref> |
|||
One scholar on the National Geographic project believes the document shows that Judas was "fooled" into believing he was helping Jesus.<ref>''[[CBC News]]''. [http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/12/04/judas-scholars.html Judas no hero, scholars say]. [[4 December]] [[2006]].</ref> |
|||
==Uniqueness of the codex== |
|||
Another scholar, April D. DeConick, a professor of Biblical studies at [[Rice University]], reports in the New York Times <ref>{{cite news |first=April D. |last=Deconick |title=Gospel Truth |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html?_r=1&oref=slogin |work=New York Times |date=[[December 1]], [[2007]] |accessdate=2007-12-01 }}</ref> that the National Geographic translation was critically faulty in many substantial respects, and that based on a corrected translation, Judas was actually a demon, truly betraying Jesus, rather than following his orders. |
|||
The president of the [[Maecenas Foundation]], Mario Roberty, suggested the possibility that the Maecenas Foundation had acquired not the only extant copy of the Gospel but rather the only known copy. Roberty went on to speculate that the [[Vatican City|Vatican]] probably had another copy locked away, saying: |
|||
{{blockquote|In those days the Church decided for political reasons to include the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John in the Bible. The other gospels were banned. It is highly logical that the Catholic Church would have kept a copy of the forbidden gospels. Sadly, the Vatican does not want to clarify further. Their policy has been the same for years; "no further comment".<ref name="Schutten"/>}} |
|||
DeConick, after re-translating the text, published ''The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says'' to assert that Judas was not a ''[[daimon]]'' in the Greek sense, but that "the universally accepted word for “spirit” is “pneuma ” — in Gnostic literature “daimon” is always taken to mean “demon”, as she wrote in presenting her conclusions in ''The New York Times'', 1 December 2007. "Judas is not set apart 'for' the holy generation, as the National Geographic translation says", DeConick asserted, "he is separated 'from' it." A negative that was dropped from a crucial sentence, an error ''National Geographic'' admits, changes the import. "Were they genuine errors or was something more deliberate going on?" DeConick asked in the Op-Ed page of the ''Times''.<ref>''[[New York Times]]''. [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html?_r=1&oref=slogin April D. DeConick, "Gospel Truth", Op-Ed page,] [[December 1]] [[2007]].</ref> |
|||
Roberty provided no evidence to suggest that the Vatican does, in fact, possess any additional copy. While the contents of one part of the Vatican library have been catalogued and have long been available to researchers and scholars, the remainder of the library is without a public catalogue, and though researchers may view any work within, they must first name the text they require, a serious problem for those who do not know what is contained by the library. [[Pope Benedict XVI|The Pope]] responded on April 13, 2006: |
|||
===Religious responses=== |
|||
In his 2006 Easter address, [[Rowan Williams]], the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]], strongly denied the historical credibility of the gospel, saying<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4913634.stm Archbishop of Canterbury's sermon] BBC News, April 16, 2006</ref> |
|||
{{blockquote|The Vatican, by word of Pope Benedict XVI, grants the recently surfaced Judas' Gospel no credit with regards to its apocryphal claims that Judas betrayed Jesus in compliance with the latter's own requests. According to the Pope, Judas freely chose to betray Jesus: "an open rejection of God's love." Judas, according to Pope Benedict XVI "viewed Jesus in terms of power and success: his only real interests lay in his power and success, there was no love involved. He was a greedy man: money was more important than communing with Jesus; money came before God and his love." According to the Pope it was these traits that led Judas to "turn liar, two-faced, indifferent to the truth", "losing any sense of God", "turning hard, incapable of converting, of being the prodigal son, hence throwing away a spent existence".<ref name="vatican1">{{cite news |url=http://www.agi.it/english/news.pl?doc=200604132030-1238-RT1-CRO-0-NF11&page=0&id=agionline-eng.oggitalia |title=Vatican: Pope Banishes Judas' Gospel |work=Agenzia Giornalistica Italia |date=April 13, 2006 |access-date=2006-04-21 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060415103027/http://www.agi.it/english/news.pl?doc=200604132030-1238-RT1-CRO-0-NF11&page=0&id=agionline-eng.oggitalia <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2006-04-15}}</ref>}} |
|||
<blockquote>This is a demonstrably late text which simply parallels a large number of quite well-known works from the more eccentric fringes of the early century Church.</blockquote> |
|||
Spokespersons say the Vatican does not wish to suppress the Gospel of Judas; rather, according to Monsignor [[Walter Brandmüller]], president of the Vatican's Committee for Historical Science, "We welcome the [manuscript] like we welcome the critical study of any text of ancient literature."<ref name="vatican2">{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/24/AR2006022401799.html |title=Another Take on Gospel Truth About Judas |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=February 25, 2006 |access-date=2015-04-08 |first=Stacy |last=Meichtry}}</ref> |
|||
He went on to suggest that the book's publicity derives from an insatiable desire for conspiracy theories: |
|||
Even more explicitly, Father Thomas D. Williams, Dean of Theology at the ''Regina Apostolorum'' university in [[Rome]], when asked, "Is it true that the Catholic Church has tried to cover up this text and other apocryphal texts?" answered, "These are myths circulated by [[Dan Brown]] and numerous conspiracy theorists. You can go to any Catholic bookstore and pick up a copy of the Gnostic gospels. Christians may not believe them to be true, but there is no attempt to hide them."<ref name="vatican3">{{cite news|url=http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=87247 |title=The "Gospel of Judas" Interview With Father Thomas Williams, Theology Dean |work=[[Zenit News Agency]] |publisher=Innovative Media Inc. |date=April 5, 2006 |access-date=2015-04-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061109144928/http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=87247 |archive-date=November 9, 2006 }}</ref> |
|||
<blockquote>We are instantly fascinated by the suggestion of conspiracies and cover-ups; this has become so much the stuff of our imagination these days that it is only natural, it seems, to expect it when we turn to ancient texts, especially biblical texts. We treat them as if they were unconvincing press releases from some official source, whose intention is to conceal the real story; and that real story waits for the intrepid investigator to uncover it and share it with the waiting world. Anything that looks like the official version is automatically suspect.</blockquote> |
|||
Later the same year, Biblical scholar Louis Painchaud argued that the text suggests Judas was actually [[demonic possession|possessed]] by a [[demon]].<ref>[http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/2006_10_01_paleojudaica_archive.html#115972417984290035 À PROPOS DE LA (RE)DÉCOUVERTE DE L’ÉVANGILE DE JUDAS]</ref> |
|||
==Works with similar themes== |
|||
==The uniqueness of the codex== |
|||
Prior to the modern discovery of the Gospel of Judas, a number of other works had independently conceived of the idea of Jesus having foreknowingly submitted himself to crucifixion. |
|||
The president of the Maecenas Foundation, Mario Roberty, suggested the possibility that the Maecenas Foundation had acquired not the only ''extant'' copy of the Gospel, but rather the only ''known'' copy. Roberty went on to make the suggestion that the [[Vatican City|Vatican]] probably had another copy locked away, saying: |
|||
*"[[Three Versions of Judas|Tres versiones de Judas]]" (1944) is a short story by [[Jorge Luis Borges]] (from the collection ''[[Ficciones]]'') in which a fictional Swedish theologian proposes that Judas is the actual savior of mankind.<ref>{{Citation |title=Jorge Luis Borges |date=2022-08-23 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199766581-0274 |work=Latin American Studies |publisher=Oxford University Press |doi=10.1093/obo/9780199766581-0274 |isbn=978-0-19-976658-1 |access-date=2022-11-29 }}</ref> |
|||
<blockquote>In those days the Church decided for political reasons to include the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John in the Bible. The other gospels were banned. It is highly logical that the Catholic Church would have kept a copy of the forbidden gospels. Sadly, the Vatican does not want to clarify further. Their policy has been the same for years – 'No further comment.'<ref name"Schutten">{{cite news|url=http://ds009.xs4all.nl/artnews/parooltrans6-7.htm|title=The hunt for the Gospel of Judas |date=unknown|accessdate=2006-04-22}}</ref> </blockquote> |
|||
*''[[Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson]]'' (1950), a long work by the mystic [[G. I. Gurdjieff]] which covers a wide range of topics, presents Judas in accordance with his depiction in the Gospel of Judas.<ref>{{Cite book |last=I. |first=Gurdjieff, G. |title=Beelzebub's tales to his grandson: all and everything |date=2014 |publisher=Penguin Books |isbn=978-1-101-15343-7 |oclc=883328529}}</ref> |
|||
Roberty provided no evidence to suggest that the Vatican does, in fact, possess any additional copy. While the contents of one part of the Vatican library have been catalogued and have long been available to researchers and scholars, the remainder of the library is, however, without a public catalogue, and though researchers may view any work within, they must first name the text they require, a serious problem for those who do not know what is contained by the library. The Pope responded on [[April 13]], [[2006]]<ref name"vatican1">{{cite news|url=http://www.agi.it/english/news.pl?doc=200604132030-1238-RT1-CRO-0-NF11&page=0&id=agionline-eng.oggitalia |title=Vatican: Pope Banishes Judas' Gospel|work=Agenzia Giornalistica Italia|date=[[2006-04-13]]|accessdate=2006-04-21}}</ref>- |
|||
*''[[The Last Temptation of Christ (novel)|The Last Temptation of Christ]]'' (1955) is a novel by [[Nikos Kazantzakis]] (and [[The Last Temptation of Christ (film)|1988 film]] by [[Martin Scorsese]]) that depicts Judas in a similar vein to the Gospel of Judas. The book was widely denounced by the [[Greek Orthodox Church]], and a movement was started for the [[excommunication]] of the author, which ultimately failed, though he would nevertheless be denied religious funeral rites.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Schwartz |first=Amy E. |date=July 30, 1988 |title=Taking Matters of Faith Seriously |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> |
|||
<blockquote>The Vatican, by word of Pope Benedict XVI, grants the recently surfaced Judas' Gospel no credit with regards to its apocryphal claims that Judas betrayed Jesus in compliance with the latter's own requests. According to the Pope, Judas freely chose to betray Jesus: "an open rejection of God's love". Judas, according to Pope Benedict XVI "viewed Jesus in terms of power and success: his only real interests lay in his power and success, there was no love involved. He was a greedy man: money was more important than communing with Jesus; money came before God and his love". According to the Pope it was due to these traits that led Judas to "turn liar, two-faced, indifferent to the truth", "losing any sense of God", "turning hard, incapable of converting, of being the prodigal son, hence throwing away a spent existence". </blockquote> |
|||
*''[[The Passover Plot]]'' (1965), a nonfiction book by the biblical scholar [[Hugh J. Schonfield]], presents the theory that Jesus had set out to ensure his execution in advance, enlisting the help of his apostles, including Judas.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Schonfield |first=Hugh J. |title=The passover plot |date=2005 |publisher=Disinformation Co. |isbn=978-1-932857-09-2 |oclc=646811569}}</ref> |
|||
Spokespersons say the Vatican does not wish to suppress the Gospel of Judas; rather, according to Monsignor [[Walter Brandmüller]], president of the Vatican's Committee for Historical Science, "We welcome the [manuscript] like we welcome the critical study of any text of ancient literature".<ref name="vatican2">{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/24/AR2006022401799.html|title=Another Take on Gospel Truth About Judas: Manuscript Could Add to Understanding of Gnostic Sect|work=Washington Post|date=[[2006-02-25]]|accessdate=2006-04-21}}</ref> Even more explicitly, Father [[Thomas D. Williams]], Dean of Theology at the ''Regina Apostolorum'' university in Rome, when asked: |
|||
*''[[Jesus Christ Superstar]]'' (1971) is a rock opera composed by [[Andrew Lloyd Webber]], lyrics by [[Tim Rice]]. It documents, from the perspective of Judas himself, as narrator, the life and death of Judas and his reasons for betraying Jesus—Judas says that Jesus himself wanted to die so his movement would carry on. The musical portrays Jesus as a human, full of self-doubt but able to predict the future accurately when he says, "One of you denies me, one of you betrays me." |
|||
<blockquote>Is it true that the Catholic Church has tried to cover up this text [Gospel of Judas] and other apocryphal texts?</blockquote> |
|||
*''[[A Time for Judas]]'' (1983), a novel by [[Morley Callaghan]], has a plot similar to that of the Gospel of Judas.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Callaghan |first=Morley |title=A time for Judas |date=2005 |publisher=Exile Editions |isbn=1-55096-637-5 |location=Toronto |oclc=62181454}}</ref> |
|||
answered as follows: |
|||
<blockquote>These are myths circulated by [[Dan Brown]] and other conspiracy theorists. You can go to any Catholic bookstore and pick up a copy of the Gnostic gospels. Christians may not believe them to be true, but there is no attempt to hide them.<ref name="vatican3">{{cite news|url=http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=87247|title=Interview With Father Thomas Williams|work=[[Zenit News Agency]]|date=[[2006-04-05]]|accessdate=2006-05-06}}</ref></blockquote> |
|||
In AD 367, the bishop of [[Alexandria]] did urge Christians to “cleanse the church from every defilement” and to reject “the hidden books.”<ref name="Athanasius">[[Athanasius of Alexandria|Athanasius]], ''Festal Epistles'', 39.</ref> It is possible that, in response to letters such as this one, some Christians destroyed non-canonical gospels. |
|||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |
||
{{ |
{{notelist}} |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
*[http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/_pdf/GospelofJudas.pdf?fs=www7.nationalgeographic.com&fs=magma.nationalgeographic.com ''The Gospel of Judas'']. Trans. and Eds. Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society, 2006. [English Translation], ISBN 1-4262-0042-0 |
|||
*[http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/_pdf/CopticGospelOfJudas.pdf?fs=www7.nationalgeographic.com&fs=magma.nationalgeographic.com ''The Gospel of Judas'']. Eds. Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society, 2006. [Coptic Transcription] |
|||
===English translation=== |
|||
* Brankaer, Joanna, and Hans Gebhard-Bethge. ''Codex Tchacos: Texte und Analysen''. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007. |
|||
* {{cite web |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060408153348/http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/_pdf/GospelofJudas.pdf |url=http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/_pdf/GospelofJudas.pdf |title=The Gospel of Judas |editor1=Kasser, Rodolphe |editor2=Meyer, Marvin |editor3=Wurst, Gregor |editor4=François Gaudard |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=National Geographic Society |year=2006 |language=en |access-date=2015-04-07 |archive-date=2006-04-08 |quote=From [the book] The Gospel of Judas ... published ... by The National Geographic Society}} |
|||
* Cockburn, Andrew. “The Judas Gospel.” ''National Geographic Magazine''. (May 2006): 78-95. |
|||
* DeConick, April D. ''The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says''. London: Continuum, 2007. |
|||
* Ehrman, Bart D. ''The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. |
|||
* [[Craig A. Evans|Evans, Craig A.]] ''Fabricating Jesus: How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels''. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 2006. ISBN 0830833188. |
|||
* Gagné, André. “A Critical Note on the Meaning of APOPHASIS in ''Gospel of Judas'' 33:1”, ''Laval théologique et philosophique'' 63.2 (June 2007): 377-383. |
|||
* Gathercole, Simon. “The Gospel of Judas.” ''Expository Times'' 118.5 (February 2007): 209-215. |
|||
* Gathercole, Simon. ''The Gospel of Judas: Rewriting Early Christianity''. Oxford University Press, 2007. |
|||
* Head Peter M. “The Gospel of Judas and the Qarara Codices: Some Preliminary Observations.” ''Tyndale Bulletin'' 58 (2007): 1-23. |
|||
* Kasser, Rudolphe, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst. ''The Gospel of Judas''. Commentary by Bart D. Ehrman. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2006. |
|||
* Kasser, Rudolphe, and Gregor Wurst. ''The Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition: Together with the Letter of Peter to Philip, James, and a Book of Allogenes from Codex Tchacos''. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2007. |
|||
* Krosney, Herbert. ''The Lost Gospel: The Quest for the Gospel of Judas Iscariot''. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2006. |
|||
* Meyer, Marvin, ed. ''The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The International Edition''. New York: HarperOne, 2007. |
|||
* Pagels, Elaine, [[Elaine Pagels]] and Karen L. King. ''Reading Judas: The Gospel of Judas and the Shaping of Christianity''. New York: Viking, 2007. ISBN 978-0670038459 |
|||
* Perrin, Nicholas. ''The Judas Gospel''. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 2006. |
|||
* Porter, Stanley E., and Gordon L. Heath. ''The Lost Gospel of Judas: Separating Fact from Fiction''. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007. |
|||
* Robinson, James M. ''The Secrets of Judas : The Story of the Misunderstood Disciple and His Lost Gospel''. San Francisco: Harper, 2006. |
|||
* Wright, N. T. ''Judas and the Gospel of Jesus: Have we Missed the Truth about Christianity?'' Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2006. |
|||
===Citations=== |
|||
*Gregory A. Page, ''Diary of Judas Iscariot of the Gospel According to Judas'' (1912, reprinted 1942, Kessinger Publishing) |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
*[[Lars Gyllensten]], ''Testament of Cain'' (1963 Bonnier, Stockholm, Sweden; English translation in 1982, Persea) |
|||
== |
===Sources cited=== |
||
* {{cite book |chapter-url=http://www.gnosis.org/library/advh1.htm |author=Irenaeus |chapter=Against Heresies |title=Ante-Nicene Fathers |volume=I |editor=Roberts, Alexander |publisher=Cosimo Classics |year=2007 |isbn=978-1602064690 |access-date=2015-04-07}} |
|||
* [[Lost work]] |
|||
* {{cite book |last1=Pagels |first1=Elaine |author-link=Elaine Pagels |first2=Karen L. |last2=King |title=Reading Judas: The Gospel of Judas and the Shaping of Christianity |location=New York |publisher=Viking Adult |year=2007 |isbn=978-0670038459 |url=https://archive.org/details/readingjudasgosp00page }} |
|||
* [[Nag Hammadi Library]] |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Robinson |first=James M. |title=The Secrets of Judas: The Story of the Misunderstood Disciple and His Lost Gospel |location=San Francisco |publisher=Harper |year=2006 |isbn=978-0061170638 |url=https://archive.org/details/secretsofjudast000robi }} |
|||
* [[Nag Hammadi]] |
|||
* ''[[The Passover Plot]]'' (1965), a book by the [[Bible|Biblical]] scholar [[Hugh J. Schonfield]] |
|||
==Further reading== |
|||
* ''Tres versiones de Judas'' (1944), a [[short story]] by [[Jorge Luis Borges]] (from the collection ''Ficciones'') in which a fictional [[Sweden|Swedish]] theologian claims that Judas is the real savior of mankind |
|||
* {{cite news |url=http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=13097 |first=Patrick |last=Baert |title=Gospel of Judas back in spotlight after 20 centuries |work=Middle East Online |date=March 30, 2005 |access-date=2015-04-07 |archive-date=2017-03-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170308200237/http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=13097 }} |
|||
* ''[[The Last Temptation of Christ]]'' (1951), a [[novel]] (and [[movie]]) by [[Nikos Kazantzakis]] that depicts Judas in a similar vein to the Gospel of Judas |
|||
* {{cite journal |first=Thomas |last=Bartlett |url=http://chronicle.com/free/v54/i38/38b00601.htm |title=The Betrayal of Judas: Did a 'dream team' of biblical scholars mislead millions? |journal=The Chronicle Review |volume=54 |number=38 |date=May 30, 2008 |page=B6 |access-date=2015-04-07}} |
|||
* ''[[Beelzebub's Tales To His Grandson]]'' (1950), by [[G. I. Gurdjieff]], presents Judas in accordance with his depiction in the Gospel of Judas |
|||
* {{cite book |title=The Gospel of Judas: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary |last=Brakke |first=David |publisher=Yale University Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-300-17326-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yDNZEAAAQBAJ |series=Anchor Yale Bible Commentaries}} |
|||
* ''[[The Way of Cross and Dragon]]'' (1979), a short story by [[George R. R. Martin]] that includes a fictional Gospel of Judas |
|||
*{{cite book |last =Brand |first =Arthur |author-link= Arthur Brand (investigator) |title=Het verboden Judas-evangelie en de schat van Carchemish |date=2006 |publisher=Aspekt |location=Soesterberg |isbn=9789059112445 |language=nl |trans-title=The Forbidden Gospel of Judas and the Treasure of Carchemish}} |
|||
* ''[[Judas Testament|The Judas Testament]]'' (1994), a novel by [[Daniel Easterman]] about the discovery of a Judas [[testament]] |
|||
* {{cite book |last1=Brankaer |first1=Joanna |first2=Hans |last2=Gebhard-Bethge |title=Codex Tchacos: Texte und Analysen |location=Berlin |publisher=de Gruyter |year=2007 |isbn=978-3110195705 |language=de}} |
|||
* ''[[The Gospel According to Judas]]'' (2007), a novel by [[Jeffrey Archer]] and [[Frank Moloney]] that presents the events of the New Testament through the eyes of Judas Iscariot |
|||
* {{cite news |author=Chadwick, Alex (host) |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5327692 |title=The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot? |work=NPR News |publisher=NPR |date=April 6, 2006 |access-date=2015-04-07}} |
|||
* ''[[Jedi Mind Tricks]]'' mentions the Gospel of Judas in their song Heavy Metal Kings. |
|||
* {{cite journal |last=Cockburn |first=Andrew |title=The Judas Gospel |journal=[[National Geographic (magazine)|National Geographic]] |publisher=National Geographic Society |date=May 2006 |pages=78–95}} |
|||
* ''[[A Time for Judas]]'' (1983), a novel by [[Morley Callaghan]] where plot is extremely similar to the content revealed in the Gospel of Judas |
|||
* {{cite book |last=DeConick |first=April D. |title=The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says |location=London |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |orig-date=2007 |edition=2nd |year=2009 |isbn=978-1847065681}} |
|||
* ''[[The Judas Apocalypse]]'' (2008), a novel by [[Dan McNeil]], in which a testament written by Judas reveals the true history of the [[Crucifixion_of_Jesus|Crucifixion]] |
|||
* {{cite news |url=http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060407-120642-3758r.htm |title=Judas stars as 'anti-hero' in gospel |first=Julia |last=Duin |work=The Washington Times |date=April 7, 2006 |access-date=2015-04-07}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Ehrman |first=Bart D. |title=The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0739483992}} |
|||
* {{cite book |author-link=Craig A. Evans |last=Evans |first=Craig A. |title=Fabricating Jesus: How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels |location=Downers Grove |publisher=IVP Books |year=2006 |isbn=0-8308-3318-8}} |
|||
* {{cite journal |author-link=Simon J. Gathercole |last=Gathercole |first=Simon J. |title=The Gospel of Judas |journal=[[Expository Times]] |volume=118 |number=5 |date=February 2007 |pages=209–15|doi=10.1177/0014524606075050 |s2cid=170108798 }} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Gathercole |first=Simon |title=The Gospel of Judas: Rewriting Early Christianity |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0199225842}} |
|||
* {{cite journal |last=Head |first=Peter M. |title=The Gospel of Judas and the Qarara Codices: Some Preliminary Observations |journal=[[Tyndale Bulletin]] |volume=58 |year=2007 |pages=1–23|doi=10.53751/001c.29226 |s2cid=239935851 |doi-access=free }} |
|||
* {{cite news |first1=Eduard |last1=Iricinschi |first2=Lance |last2=Jenott |first3=Philippa |last3=Townsend |url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19031 |title=The Betrayer's Gospel |work=The New York Review of Books |date=June 8, 2006 |access-date=2015-04-07}} |
|||
* {{cite book |editor1=Kasser, Rodolphe |editor2=Wurst, Gregor |title=The Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition: Together with the Letter of Peter to Phillip, James, and a Book of Allogenes from Codex Tchacos |location=Washington D.C. |publisher=National Geographic Society |year=2007 |isbn=978-1426201912}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Krosney |first=Herbert |title=The Lost Gospel: The Quest for the Gospel of Judas Iscariot |location=Washington D.C. |publisher=National Geographic Society |year=2006 |isbn=978-1426200410 |url=https://archive.org/details/lostgospelquestf00kros }} |
|||
* {{cite book |editor=Meyer, Marvin |title=The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The International Edition |location=New York |publisher=HarperOne |year=2007 |isbn=978-0060523787}} |
|||
* {{cite book |first=Gregory A. |last=Page |title=Diary of Judas Iscariot of the Gospel According to Judas |orig-date=1912 |edition=Reprint |year=1942 |publisher=Kessinger Publishing |isbn=978-0766100503}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Perrin |first=Nicholas |title=The Judas Gospel |series=IVP Booklets |location=Downers Grove |publisher=IVP Books |year=2006 |isbn=978-0877840398}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Rayner |first =William |title=The Knifeman:The Last Journal of Judas Iscariot | publisher= Michael Joseph |year=1969 |isbn= 9780718105556}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last1=Porter |first1=Stanley E. |first2=Gordon L. |last2=Heath |title=The Lost Gospel of Judas: Separating Fact from Fiction |location=Grand Rapids |publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. |year=2007 |isbn=978-0802824561}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Scopello |first=Maddalena |title=The Gospel of Judas in context: proceedings of the First International Conference on the Gospel of Judas, Paris, Sorbonne, October 27th-28th, 2006 |publisher=Brill |publication-place=Leiden |year=2008 |isbn=978-90-474-4285-1 |oclc=647871732}} |
|||
* {{cite web |first=Abraam D. |last=Sleman |url=http://copticchurch.net/topics/current_issues/Refuting_the_Gospel_of_Judas_english.pdf |title=Refuting the Gospel of Judas |work=CopticChurch.net |publisher=Coptic Orthodox Church of St. Mark |location=Jersey City, NJ |access-date=2015-04-07 |archive-date=2014-09-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140923014112/http://copticchurch.net/topics/current_issues/Refuting_the_Gospel_of_Judas_english.pdf }} |
|||
* {{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Tomkins |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4887222.stm |title=Not so secret gospels |work=BBC News |date=April 7, 2006 |access-date=2015-04-07}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Wright |first=N. T. |title=Judas and the Gospel of Jesus: Have we Missed the Truth about Christianity? |location=Grand Rapids |publisher=Baker Books |year=2006 |isbn= 978-0801012945}} |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{Commons}} |
|||
{{wikiquote}} |
{{wikiquote}} |
||
*[ |
* [https://www.gospels.net/judas The Judas Gospel] – full text English translation |
||
*[http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/ The Lost Gospel] - online feature from National Geographic |
|||
*[http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/gospeljudas.html Early Christian Writings:] ''Gospel of Judas'' |
|||
*[http://www.ezilon.com/information/article_3083.shtml Patrick Baert, "Gospel of Judas back in spotlight after 20 centuries"] |
|||
*[http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060407-120642-3758r.htm Judas stars as 'anti-hero' in gospel] - Julia Duin, ''Washington Times'' - April 7, 2006 |
|||
*[http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5327692 The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot?] - NPR |
|||
*[http://faculty.bbc.edu/rdecker/judas.htm Rodney J. Decker on the Gospel of Judas sensation (PDF, audio, and PowerPoint)] |
|||
*[http://www.michelvanrijn.nl/artnews/parooltrans6-7.htm Michel van Rijn, "The Hunt for the Gospel of Judas"] |
|||
*[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=19372 Gospel of Judas does not deserve name 'gospel,' Jesuit scholar says] |
|||
*[http://www.gnosis.org/library/advh1.htm Text of Irenaeus, ''Against Heresies'', regarding Gospel of Judas] |
|||
*[http://www.psyche.com/psyche/meta/gjudas_reaction.html Survey of Early Reaction to the Gospel of Judas - 100 citations] |
|||
*[http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19031 "The Betrayer's Gospel" -- Article from the ''New York Review of Books''] |
|||
*[http://chronicle.com/free/v54/i38/38b00601.htm The Betrayal of Judas - An overview of the translation controversy, from the Chronicle Review] |
|||
*[http://www.coptic.org.au/modules/resources_literature/article.php?page=1&articleid=254 Associations between the Gospel of Judas and the Coptic Orthodox Church] — the [[Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria|Coptic Orthodox Church's]] response to the alleged "Gospel" of Judas |
|||
{{Cain and Abel}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Judas}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Christian texts]] |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Judas, Gospel Of}} |
|||
[[Category:2nd-century Christian texts]] |
|||
[[Category:Cainite texts]] |
|||
[[Category:Gnostic Gospels]] |
[[Category:Gnostic Gospels]] |
||
[[Category:Judas Iscariot]] |
|||
[[Category:Sethian texts]] |
[[Category:Sethian texts]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Texts in Coptic]] |
||
[[Category:Rediscovered works]] |
|||
[[af:Evangelie volgens Judas]] |
|||
[[ar:إنجيل يهوذا]] |
|||
[[zh-min-nan:Iû-tāi Hok-im]] |
|||
[[bg:Евангелие от Юда]] |
|||
[[ca:Evangeli de Judes]] |
|||
[[cs:Evangelium podle Jidáše]] |
|||
[[da:Judasevangeliet]] |
|||
[[de:Judasevangelium]] |
|||
[[el:Ευαγγέλιο του Ιούδα]] |
|||
[[es:Evangelio de Judas]] |
|||
[[eo:Evangelio de Judaso]] |
|||
[[fr:Évangile de Judas]] |
|||
[[ko:유다복음]] |
|||
[[ilo:Evangelio ni Judas]] |
|||
[[id:Injil Yudas]] |
|||
[[it:Vangelo di Giuda]] |
|||
[[he:הבשורה של יהודה]] |
|||
[[ka:იუდას სახარება]] |
|||
[[la:Evangelium Iudae]] |
|||
[[lt:Judo Evangelija]] |
|||
[[hu:Júdás evangéliuma]] |
|||
[[ml:യൂദാസിന്റെ സുവിശേഷം]] |
|||
[[nl:Evangelie naar Judas]] |
|||
[[ja:ユダの福音書]] |
|||
[[no:Judasevangeliet]] |
|||
[[pl:Ewangelia Judasza]] |
|||
[[pt:Evangelho de Judas]] |
|||
[[ru:Евангелие Иуды]] |
|||
[[sl:Evangelij po Judu Iškarijotu]] |
|||
[[fi:Juudaksen evankeliumi]] |
|||
[[sv:Judasevangeliet]] |
|||
[[tl:Ebanghelyo ni Judas]] |
|||
[[tr:Yahuda'nın Müjdesi]] |
|||
[[uk:Євангеліє Юди]] |
|||
[[zh:猶大福音]] |
Latest revision as of 00:46, 17 December 2024
Part of a series on |
New Testament apocrypha |
---|
Christianity portal |
The Gospel of Judas is a non-canonical Gnostic gospel. The content consists of conversations between Jesus and Judas Iscariot. Given that it includes late 2nd-century theology, it is widely thought to have been composed in the 2nd century (prior to 180 AD) by Gnostic Christians.[1] The only copy of it known to exist is a Coptic language text that has been carbon dated to 280 AD, plus or minus 60 years. It has been suggested that the text derives from an earlier manuscript in the Greek language.[2] An English translation was first published in early 2006 by the National Geographic Society.
Significance
[edit]According to Science Magazine, the gospel of Judas, in contrast to the canonical gospels which paint Judas as a betrayer who delivered Jesus to the authorities for crucifixion in exchange for money, portrays Judas's actions as done in obedience to instructions given to him by Jesus. The gospel asserts that the other disciples had not learned the true Gospel, which Jesus taught only to Judas, the sole follower belonging to (or set apart from) the "holy generation" among the disciples.[3]
April DeConick challenges this interpretation, contending instead that the text was written by a group of Sethians.[4]
Background
[edit]A leather-bound Coptic language papyrus document surfaced during the 1970s near Beni Mazar, Egypt.[5] It was named Codex Tchacos by its penultimate owner, antiquities dealer Frieda Nussberger-Tchacos, in honor of her father, Dimaratos Tchacos. She became concerned with the manuscript's deteriorating condition and transferred possession to the Maecenas Foundation for Ancient Art in Basel, Switzerland, in 2000, to oversee its preservation, translation and hopeful sale.[6][7] On April 6, 2006, "the National Geographic Society in the US published the first translation of the text from Coptic to English ... and showed some of the papyrus pages for the first time."[5]
The codex contains text that appears to be from the late 2nd century[8] and includes the first known surviving copy of the self-titled "Gospel of Judas" (Euangelion Ioudas),[a] which relates the story of Jesus's death from the viewpoint of Judas.[9] The manuscript was radiocarbon dated and described by the National Geographic as showing a likely date between 220–340 AD.[10]
The manuscript disintegrated into over a thousand pieces. Numerous sections are missing as a result of poor handling and storage. Some passages are only scattered words; others contain many lines. According to Coptic scholar Rodolphe Kasser, the codex originally contained 31 leaves, each written on both sides; by the time the codex came to the market in 1999, only 13 leaves survived. Individual leaves may have been removed and sold. The codex had been stored in a cardboard box for two decades as it was shopped around to potential buyers,[11] and had, at various points, been stored in a freezer, a safety deposit box in Long Island, and folded in half.[6]
It has also been speculated, on the basis of textual analysis concerning features of dialect and Greek loan words, that the Coptic text contained in the codex may be a translation from an older Greek manuscript dating, at the earliest, to c. 130–170 AD.[12] Cited in support of this dating is the reference to a "Gospel of Judas" by the early Christian writer Irenaeus of Lyons, who, in arguing against Gnosticism, described the text as "fictitious history"[13] and "blasphemous heresies".[7] However, it is uncertain whether the text mentioned by Irenaeus is in fact the same text as the Coptic "Gospel of Judas" found in the Codex Tchacos.[14]
Content
[edit]Overview
[edit]The Gospel of Judas consists of 16 chapters which document Jesus' teaching about spiritual matters and cosmology. According to the text, Judas is the only one of Jesus' disciples who accurately understands the words of his master. This Gospel contains few narrative elements; essentially, the Gospel records how Judas was taught by Jesus the true meaning of his message.
The Gospel contains ideas which contradicted the doctrine of the early Church. The author says that God is essentially a "luminous cloud of light" who exists in an imperishable realm.[15] Adamas, the spiritual father of all humanity, was created in God's image and dwelt in the imperishable realm.
At the beginning of time, God created a group of angels and lower gods. Twelve angels were willed to "come into being [to] rule over chaos and the [underworld]".[16] The angels of creation were tasked with creating a physical body for Adamas, which became known as the first man Adam. Gradually, humanity began to forget its divine origins and some of Adam's descendants (Cain and Abel) became embroiled in the world's first murder. Many humans came to think that the imperfect physical universe was the totality of creation, losing their knowledge of God and the imperishable realm.
Jesus was sent as the Son of the true God, not of one of the lesser gods. His mission was to show that salvation consists in connecting with the God within the man. Through embracing the internal God, the man can then return to the imperishable realm.
Eleven of the disciples Jesus chose to spread his message misunderstood the central tenets of his teaching. They were obsessed with the physical world of the senses. The author says that they continued to practice religious animal sacrifice, which pleased the lower gods but did not help to foster a connection with the true God. They wrongly taught that those martyred in the name of Christ would be bodily resurrected.
In contrast, Jesus is able to teach Judas the true meaning of his life, ministry and death. Mankind can be divided into two races, or groups. Those who are furnished with the immortal soul, like Judas, can come to know the God within and enter the imperishable realm when they die. Those among the same group as the other eleven disciples cannot enter the realm of God and will die both spiritually and physically at the end of their lives. As practices that are intertwined with the physical world, animal sacrifice and a communion ceremony involving "cannibalism" (the consumption of Jesus' flesh and blood) are condemned as abhorrent.
As a Gnostic text
[edit]Amy-Jill Levine, professor of New Testament Studies at Vanderbilt University Divinity School, was on the team of scholars responsible for unveiling the work. She said that the Gospel of Judas contains no new historical information concerning Jesus or Judas.[14]
Historians Elaine Pagels and Karen Leigh King argue that a more nuanced, contextualized understanding of alternative interpretations of the Christian tradition should inform discussions of Gnosticism. In the centuries following Jesus's death, many differing views of the meaning of his life and death existed. Proto-orthodox Christianity (i.e. the views which came to be dominant in the fourth century AD, similar to the doctrines contained in the Nicene Creed) existed alongside various beliefs (one of which was labelled 'Gnosticism') for centuries, until proto-orthodox interpretations became accepted as "mainstream" Christianity.[17]
Modern rediscovery
[edit]The initial translation of the Gospel of Judas was widely publicized but simply confirmed the account that was written in Irenaeus and known Gnostic beliefs, leading some scholars to simply summarize the discovery as nothing new. It is also argued that a closer reading of the existent text, as presented in October 2006, shows Christianity in a new light. According to Elaine Pagels, for instance, Judas is portrayed as having a mission to hand Jesus over to the soldiers. She says that Bible translators have mistranslated the Greek word for "handing over" to "betrayal".[18]
Like many Gnostic works, the Gospel of Judas refers to itself as a secret account, specifically "The secret account of the revelation that Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot...."[16]
The Gospel of Judas states that Jesus told Judas "You shall be cursed for generations" and then added, "You will come to rule over them" and "You will exceed all of them, for you will sacrifice the man that clothes me."[19]
Unlike the four canonical gospels, which employ narrative accounts of the last year of Jesus's life and of his birth (in the case of Luke and Matthew), the Judas gospel takes the form of dialogues between Jesus and Judas, and Jesus and the twelve disciples, without being embedded in any narrative. Such "dialogue gospels" were popular during the early decades of Christianity and the New Testament apocrypha contains several examples, such as the Gospel of Mary.
Like the canonical gospels, the Gospel of Judas portrays the scribes as approaching Jesus with the intention of arresting him, and Judas receiving money from them after handing Jesus over to them. However, unlike Judas in the canonical gospels, who is portrayed as a villain, and excoriated by Jesus ("Alas for that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed. It would be better for that man if he had never been born," Mark 14:21; Matthew 26:24),[20] the Judas gospel portrays Judas as a divinely appointed instrument of a grand and predetermined purpose. "In the last days they will curse your ascent to the holy (generation)."[16]
Elsewhere in the manuscript, Jesus favours Judas above other disciples by saying, "Step away from the others and I shall tell you the mysteries of the kingdom," and "Look, you have been told everything. Lift up your eyes and look at the cloud and the light within it and the stars surrounding it. The star that leads the way is your star."[16]
Rediscovery
[edit]The content of the gospel had been unknown until a Coptic Gospel of Judas turned up on the antiquities "grey market," in Geneva in May 1983, when it was found among a mixed group of Greek and Coptic manuscripts offered to Stephen Emmel, a Yale Ph.D. candidate commissioned by Southern Methodist University to inspect the manuscripts. How the manuscript (named the Codex Tchacos) was found, possibly in the late 1970s, has not been clearly documented. It is believed that a now-deceased Egyptian "treasure-hunter" or prospector discovered the codex near El Minya, Egypt, in the neighbourhood of the village Beni Masar, and sold it to one Hanna, a dealer in antiquities resident in Cairo.[21]
In the 1970s, the manuscript and most of the dealer's other artifacts were stolen by a Greek trader named Nikolas Koutoulakis, and smuggled into Geneva. Hanna, along with Swiss antiquity traders, paid Koutoulakis a sum rumoured to be between $3 million and $10 million, recovered the manuscript and introduced it to experts who recognized its significance.
Some deterioration is due to long term storage in safe deposit box and from freezing. [22]
Sale and study
[edit]During the two decades after the codex's discovery, the manuscript was quietly offered to prospective buyers, but neither Egypt nor any major library were prepared to purchase a manuscript with such questionable provenance. In 2003 Michel van Rijn started to publish material about these dubious negotiations, and eventually the 62-page leather-bound codex was donated to the Maecenas Foundation in Basel. The previous owners now reported that it had been uncovered at Muhafazat al Minya in Egypt during the 1950s or 1960s, and that its significance had not been appreciated until recently. Various other locations had been alleged during previous negotiations.
The existence of the text was made public by former professor at the University of Geneva Rodolphe Kasser at a conference of Coptic specialists in Paris, July 2004. In a statement issued March 30, 2005, a spokesman for the Maecenas Foundation announced plans for edited translations into English, French, German, and Polish once the fragile papyrus had undergone conservation by a team of specialists in Coptic history to be led by Kasser, and that their work would be published in about a year. A. J. Tim Jull, director of the National Science Foundation Arizona AMS laboratory, and Gregory Hodgins, assistant research scientist, announced that a radiocarbon dating procedure had dated five samples from the papyrus manuscript from 220 to 340 in January 2005 at the University of Arizona.[23] This puts the Coptic manuscript in the 3rd or 4th centuries, a century earlier than had originally been thought from analysis of the script. In January 2006, Gene A. Ware of the Papyrological Imaging Lab of Brigham Young University conducted a multi-spectral imaging process on the texts in Switzerland, and confirmed their authenticity.[citation needed] Joseph Barabe presented the behind-the-scenes story of the role an analysis of the ink played in authenticating the book at an American Chemical Society meeting.[24]
Over the decades, the manuscript had been handled with less than sympathetic care: some single pages may be loose on the antiquities market (parts of two pages turned up in January 2006, in New York City);[25] the text is now in over a thousand pieces and fragments, and is believed to be less than three-quarters complete. "After concluding the research, everything will be returned to Egypt. The work belongs there and they will be conserved in the best way," Roberty has stated.[7]
In April 2006, an Ohio bankruptcy lawyer stated that he possessed several papyrus fragments from the Gospel of Judas, but refused to have the fragments authenticated. His report was viewed with skepticism by experts.[26][27][needs update] Photographs of the fragments were later made available to Marvin Meyer and Gregor Wurst. Meyer presented their preliminary translation[28] at Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting in New Orleans in November 2009.[29]
In 2007, the National Geographic Society published the "Critical Edition" of the manuscript,[30] which includes images of all the fragments, the reconstructed Coptic text, and English and French translations.[31]
Responses and reactions
[edit]In his 2006 Easter address, Rowan Williams, then Archbishop of Canterbury, strongly denied the historical credibility of the gospel, saying:
This is a demonstrably late text which simply parallels a large number of quite well-known works from the more eccentric fringes of the early century Church.[32]
He went on to suggest that the book's publicity derived from a desire for conspiracy theories.[32]
Scholarly debates
[edit]Kasser revealed a few details about the text in 2004, as reported by the Dutch paper Het Parool.[citation needed] Its language is the same Sahidic dialect of Coptic in which Coptic texts of the Nag Hammadi Library are written. The codex has four parts:
- The Letter of Peter to Philip, already known from the Nag Hammadi Library
- The First Apocalypse of James, also known from the Nag Hammadi Library
- The first few pages of a work related to, but not the same as, the Nag Hammadi work Allogenes
- The Gospel of Judas
Up to a third of the codex is currently illegible.
A scientific paper was to be published in 2005 but was delayed. The completion of the restoration and translation was announced by the National Geographic Society at a news conference in Washington, D.C., on April 6, 2006, and the manuscript itself was unveiled then at the National Geographic Society headquarters, accompanied by a television special entitled The Gospel of Judas on April 9, 2006, which was aired on the National Geographic Channel. Terry Garcia, an executive vice president for Mission Programs of the National Geographic Society, asserted that the codex is considered by scholars and scientists to be the most significant ancient, non-biblical text to be found since the 1940s.
Scholars are divided on the interpretation of the text. In particular, there is no consensus on how Judas is characterized in this gospel.[33] The first modern publication of the gospel contended that the text portrays Judas in a positive light,[16] while other scholars have asserted that Judas is presented negatively.[34]
James M. Robinson, general editor of the Nag Hammadi Library, predicted the new book would offer no historical insights into the disciple who betrayed Jesus. Since the third-century document originates from an earlier 2nd-century document, Robinson suggested that the text would provide insights into the religious situation during the 2nd century, rather than into the historical events portrayed in the canonical gospels.[35]
One scholar on the National Geographic project, professor Craig A. Evans, stated his belief that the document showed that Judas was "fooled" into believing he was helping Jesus.[36] Another scholar, April D. DeConick, a professor of Biblical studies at Rice University, opined in an op-ed in The New York Times that the National Geographic translation was critically faulty in many substantial respects, and that based on a corrected translation, Judas was actually a demon, truly betraying Jesus, rather than following his orders.[37] DeConick, after re-translating the text, published The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says to assert that Judas was not a daimon in the Greek sense, but that "the universally accepted word for 'spirit' is 'pneuma' – in Gnostic literature 'daimon' is always taken to mean 'demon'".[37] She further stated that "Judas is not set apart 'for' the holy generation, as the National Geographic translation says, he is separated 'from' it."[37] DeConick went on to ask, "Were they genuine errors or was something more deliberate going on?"[37] The National Geographic Society responded that "virtually all issues April D. DeConick raises about translation choices are addressed in footnotes in both the popular and critical editions."[38]
André Gagné, professor at Concordia University in Montreal, also questioned how the experts of the National Geographic Society understood the role of Judas Iscariot in the Gospel of Judas.[39] His argument rests on the translation of the Greco-Coptic term apophasis as "denial". According to Gagné, the opening lines of the Judas Gospel should not be translated as "the secret word of declaration by which Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot" but rather as "the secret word of the denial by which Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot" (Gospel of Judas 33:1).[40] Gagné's conclusion is that this gospel is the story of the denial of true salvation for Judas.
In 2006 Géza Vermes commented the gospel was "a typical product of Greek (Platonic)-Christian speculation" representing Judas "assisting the Jewish authorities' arrest of Jesus and bringing about his liberation from the prison of his body".[41] This view is exemplified by a passage where Jesus says to Judas, "For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me." (Gospel of Judas 56.1820)[16]
A CNN TV series entitled "Finding Jesus – Faith, Fact, Forgery" featured The Gospel of Judas in its 3rd episode, which was aired on March 15, 2015.[42][43]
Uniqueness of the codex
[edit]The president of the Maecenas Foundation, Mario Roberty, suggested the possibility that the Maecenas Foundation had acquired not the only extant copy of the Gospel but rather the only known copy. Roberty went on to speculate that the Vatican probably had another copy locked away, saying:
In those days the Church decided for political reasons to include the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John in the Bible. The other gospels were banned. It is highly logical that the Catholic Church would have kept a copy of the forbidden gospels. Sadly, the Vatican does not want to clarify further. Their policy has been the same for years; "no further comment".[7]
Roberty provided no evidence to suggest that the Vatican does, in fact, possess any additional copy. While the contents of one part of the Vatican library have been catalogued and have long been available to researchers and scholars, the remainder of the library is without a public catalogue, and though researchers may view any work within, they must first name the text they require, a serious problem for those who do not know what is contained by the library. The Pope responded on April 13, 2006:
The Vatican, by word of Pope Benedict XVI, grants the recently surfaced Judas' Gospel no credit with regards to its apocryphal claims that Judas betrayed Jesus in compliance with the latter's own requests. According to the Pope, Judas freely chose to betray Jesus: "an open rejection of God's love." Judas, according to Pope Benedict XVI "viewed Jesus in terms of power and success: his only real interests lay in his power and success, there was no love involved. He was a greedy man: money was more important than communing with Jesus; money came before God and his love." According to the Pope it was these traits that led Judas to "turn liar, two-faced, indifferent to the truth", "losing any sense of God", "turning hard, incapable of converting, of being the prodigal son, hence throwing away a spent existence".[44]
Spokespersons say the Vatican does not wish to suppress the Gospel of Judas; rather, according to Monsignor Walter Brandmüller, president of the Vatican's Committee for Historical Science, "We welcome the [manuscript] like we welcome the critical study of any text of ancient literature."[45]
Even more explicitly, Father Thomas D. Williams, Dean of Theology at the Regina Apostolorum university in Rome, when asked, "Is it true that the Catholic Church has tried to cover up this text and other apocryphal texts?" answered, "These are myths circulated by Dan Brown and numerous conspiracy theorists. You can go to any Catholic bookstore and pick up a copy of the Gnostic gospels. Christians may not believe them to be true, but there is no attempt to hide them."[46]
Works with similar themes
[edit]Prior to the modern discovery of the Gospel of Judas, a number of other works had independently conceived of the idea of Jesus having foreknowingly submitted himself to crucifixion.
- "Tres versiones de Judas" (1944) is a short story by Jorge Luis Borges (from the collection Ficciones) in which a fictional Swedish theologian proposes that Judas is the actual savior of mankind.[47]
- Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson (1950), a long work by the mystic G. I. Gurdjieff which covers a wide range of topics, presents Judas in accordance with his depiction in the Gospel of Judas.[48]
- The Last Temptation of Christ (1955) is a novel by Nikos Kazantzakis (and 1988 film by Martin Scorsese) that depicts Judas in a similar vein to the Gospel of Judas. The book was widely denounced by the Greek Orthodox Church, and a movement was started for the excommunication of the author, which ultimately failed, though he would nevertheless be denied religious funeral rites.[49]
- The Passover Plot (1965), a nonfiction book by the biblical scholar Hugh J. Schonfield, presents the theory that Jesus had set out to ensure his execution in advance, enlisting the help of his apostles, including Judas.[50]
- Jesus Christ Superstar (1971) is a rock opera composed by Andrew Lloyd Webber, lyrics by Tim Rice. It documents, from the perspective of Judas himself, as narrator, the life and death of Judas and his reasons for betraying Jesus—Judas says that Jesus himself wanted to die so his movement would carry on. The musical portrays Jesus as a human, full of self-doubt but able to predict the future accurately when he says, "One of you denies me, one of you betrays me."
- A Time for Judas (1983), a novel by Morley Callaghan, has a plot similar to that of the Gospel of Judas.[51]
Notes
[edit]- ^ During the 2nd and 3rd centuries, various Christian sects composed texts which are loosely labeled New Testament Apocrypha; these texts, like those in the New Testament, are usually but not always "pseudeponymous", i.e. falsely attributed to a notable figure, such as an apostle, of an earlier era.[citation needed]
References
[edit]English translation
[edit]- Kasser, Rodolphe; Meyer, Marvin; Wurst, Gregor; François Gaudard, eds. (2006). "The Gospel of Judas" (PDF). Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-04-08. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
From [the book] The Gospel of Judas ... published ... by The National Geographic Society
Citations
[edit]- ^ Scopello, Madeleine, ed. (2006). The Gospel of Judas in Context. Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. pp. 63–66. ISBN 9789004167216.
- ^ Scopello, Madeleine, ed. (2006). "Preface". The Gospel of Judas in Context. BRILL. ISBN 9789004167216.
- ^ "Lost Gospel of Judas Revealed". Science. 2006-04-06. Archived from the original on February 17, 2021. Retrieved 2022-11-29.
- ^ De Conick, April D. (2009). The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas really says (Rev ed.). London: Continuum. ISBN 978-1-84706-568-1. OCLC 276226174.
- ^ a b BBC News (April 7, 2006). "Judas 'helped Jesus save mankind'". BBC News. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ a b Roscoe, Will. "Christianity' Other Betrayal: The Gospel of Judas and the Origins of Christian Homophobia". Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
Over the next two decades the fragile manuscript crisscrossed continents and oceans, and in the process was thoroughly manhandled—stored for a time a freezer, folded in half and stuffed into a safe deposit box where it languished through the humid summers of Long Island, and finally, its bindings disintegrated, its pages were reshuffled and sold off in hunks.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ a b c d Schutten, Henk. "The hunt for the Gospel of Judas". Tertullian.org. Roger Pearse. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
- ^ "Time Line of Early Christianity: The Lost Gospel of Judas". NationalGeographic.com. National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on 8 April 2006. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ Jenott, Lance (2011). The Gospel of Judas: Coptic Text, Translation, and Historical Interpretation of 'the Betrayer's Gospel'. Mohr Siebeck. p. 23. ISBN 978-3161509780. Retrieved 8 April 2016.
- ^ Favorite, Crowd (6 April 2006). "Ancient Text Titled 'Gospel Of Judas" Is Authenticated, Translated". Archived from the original on July 2, 2013. Retrieved 26 May 2018.
- ^ "Gospel of Judas Restored and Translated". National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on 8 April 2006. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
- ^ Schneemelcher, Wilhelm; Wilson, Robert McLachlan, eds. (2005). New Testament Apocrypha. Vol. 1. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 387. ISBN 978-0664227210.
- ^ Irenaeus, Refutation of Gnosticism, vol. 1.
- ^ a b Witherington, Ben III (2006). What Have They Done with Jesus?: Beyond Strange Theories and Bad History – Why We Can Trust the Bible. San Francisco: Harper Collins. pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-0061120015.
- ^ Pagels & King (2007), p. 78.
- ^ a b c d e f Kasser, Rodolphe; Meyer, Marvin Meyer; Wurst, Gregor, eds. (2006). The Gospel of Judas. Commentary by Bart D. Ehrman. Washington D.C.: National Geographic Society. pp. 1, 4–5, 7, 43. ISBN 978-1426200427.
- ^ Pagels & King (2007).
- ^ Miller, David Ian (April 2, 2007). "Finding My Religion / Religious scholar Elaine Pagels on how the newly discovered Gospel of Judas sheds new light on the dawn of Christianity". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ "Text might be hidden 'Gospel of Judas'". CNN. April 6, 2006. Archived from the original on 2006-04-08.
- ^ The New English Bible, Mark 14:21; Matthew 26:24
- ^ Handwerk, Brian (April 6, 2006). "Gospel of Judas Pages Endured Long, Strange Journey". National Geographic News. National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on April 11, 2006. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ Klapper, Bradley (April 14, 2006). "Adventure tale surrounds Gospel of Judas". NBCNEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 7, 2024. Retrieved December 7, 2024.
- ^ Allen, Paul L. (April 7, 2006). "UA team verifies age of Gospel of Judas". Tucson Citizen. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ Pappas, Stephanie (April 8, 2013). "Truth Behind Gospel of Judas Revealed in Ancient Inks". LiveScience.com. LiveScience. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ Churton, Tobias (2008). Kiss of Death: The True History of the Gospel of Judas. London: Watkins. ISBN 978-1905857517.
- ^ Kropko, M.R. (April 20, 2006). "Papyrus bits add new twist to 'Judas' tale". NBCNews.com. Archived from the original on August 10, 2021. Retrieved 2021-08-10.
- ^ Krosney, H. 2009. The Tchacos Fragment in Court. Paper Presented at the Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting. New Orleans, November.
- ^ Meyer, Marvin; Wurst, Gregor (November 2009). "Tchacos fragments, Gospel of Judas, preliminary translation" (PDF). Chaman.edu. Retrieved 2021-08-10.
- ^ Meyer, Marvin (November 2009). "The Tchacos Fragments of the Gospel of Judas". Chapman.edu. Retrieved 2021-08-10.
- ^ Kasser, Rodolphe; Meyer, Marvin Meyer; Wurst, Gregor; François Gaudard, eds. (2007). The Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition: Together with the Letter of Peter to Philip, James, and a Book of Allogenes from Codex Tchacos (in Coptic, English, and French). Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Books. ISBN 978-1-4262-0191-2.
- ^ "Press release: Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition". The National Geographic Society. June 4, 2007. Archived from the original on June 10, 2017. Retrieved 2018-06-19.
- ^ a b Archbishop of Canterbury (April 16, 2006). "Archbishop of Canterbury's sermon". BBC News. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ DeConick, A.D., ed. 2009. The Codex Judas Papers: Proceedings of the International Congress on the Tchacos Codex held at Rice University, Houston, Texas, March 13–16, 2008. Leiden: Brill [NHMS 71], p. xxvii; Scopello, M., ed. 2008. The Gospel of Judas in Context: Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Gospel of Judas. Paris, Sorbonne, October 27th–28th Leiden: Brill [NHMS 62] 2008, p. xiii)
- ^ DeConick, A.D. 2009. The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says. Revised Edition. New York: Continuum.; Painchaud, L. 2008. Polemical Aspects of the Gospel of Judas. pp. 171–86 in Scopello (ed.), The Gospel of Judas in Context.; Pearson, P.A. 2009. Judas Iscariot in the Gospel of Judas. pp. 137–152 in DeConick (ed.), The Codex Judas Papers.; Rubio, F.B. Laughing at Judas: Conflicting Integrations of a New Gnostic Gospel. pp. 153–80 in DeConick (ed.), The Codex Judas Papers.; Sullivan, K. 2009. "You will become the Thirteenth": The Identity of Judas in the Gospel of Judas. pp. 181–99 in DeConick (ed.), The Codex Judas Papers.
- ^ Robinson (2006), p. 183.
- ^ CBC News (December 4, 2006). "Judas no hero, scholars say". CBC News. Archived from the original on 2007-01-05.
- ^ a b c d DeConick, April D. (December 1, 2007). "Gospel Truth". The New York Times. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ "Statement from National Geographic in Response to April DeConick's New York Times Op-Ed 'Gospel Truth' (Dec. 1, 2007)". NationalGeographic.com. Archived from the original on 2012-02-16. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ Belkov, Tamara (May 11, 2006). "Religion Professor Disputes Translation of Judas Gospel". Northern Life. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ Gagné, André (June 2007). "A Critical Note on the Meaning of APOPHASIS in Gospel of Judas 33:1". Laval Théologique et Philosophique. 63 (2): 377–83. doi:10.7202/016791ar.
- ^ Vermes, Géza (May 6, 2006), "The great Da Vinci Code distraction", The Times, republished in Vermes, Géza (2009). Searching For The Real Jesus: Jesus, The Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Religious Themes. SCM Press. ISBN 978-0-334-04358-4.. For a similar view, see James Martin "Why Did Judas Do It?" America: The National Catholic Review 194.19 (29 May 2006) <http://americamagazine.org/issue/574/article/why-did-judas-do-it>
- ^ "Dr. Tim Gray featured in CNN's Finding Jesus". Archived from the original on 2015-05-03. Retrieved 2015-05-05.
- ^ "FInding Jesus: Faith, fact and forgery". CNN.
- ^ "Vatican: Pope Banishes Judas' Gospel". Agenzia Giornalistica Italia. April 13, 2006. Archived from the original on 2006-04-15. Retrieved 2006-04-21.
- ^ Meichtry, Stacy (February 25, 2006). "Another Take on Gospel Truth About Judas". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ "The "Gospel of Judas" Interview With Father Thomas Williams, Theology Dean". Zenit News Agency. Innovative Media Inc. April 5, 2006. Archived from the original on November 9, 2006. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
- ^ "Jorge Luis Borges", Latin American Studies, Oxford University Press, 2022-08-23, doi:10.1093/obo/9780199766581-0274, ISBN 978-0-19-976658-1, retrieved 2022-11-29
- ^ I., Gurdjieff, G. (2014). Beelzebub's tales to his grandson: all and everything. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-1-101-15343-7. OCLC 883328529.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Schwartz, Amy E. (July 30, 1988). "Taking Matters of Faith Seriously". The Washington Post.
- ^ Schonfield, Hugh J. (2005). The passover plot. Disinformation Co. ISBN 978-1-932857-09-2. OCLC 646811569.
- ^ Callaghan, Morley (2005). A time for Judas. Toronto: Exile Editions. ISBN 1-55096-637-5. OCLC 62181454.
Sources cited
[edit]- Irenaeus (2007). "Against Heresies". In Roberts, Alexander (ed.). Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. I. Cosimo Classics. ISBN 978-1602064690. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
- Pagels, Elaine; King, Karen L. (2007). Reading Judas: The Gospel of Judas and the Shaping of Christianity. New York: Viking Adult. ISBN 978-0670038459.
- Robinson, James M. (2006). The Secrets of Judas: The Story of the Misunderstood Disciple and His Lost Gospel. San Francisco: Harper. ISBN 978-0061170638.
Further reading
[edit]- Baert, Patrick (March 30, 2005). "Gospel of Judas back in spotlight after 20 centuries". Middle East Online. Archived from the original on 2017-03-08. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
- Bartlett, Thomas (May 30, 2008). "The Betrayal of Judas: Did a 'dream team' of biblical scholars mislead millions?". The Chronicle Review. 54 (38): B6. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
- Brakke, David (2022). The Gospel of Judas: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Yale Bible Commentaries. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-17326-0.
- Brand, Arthur (2006). Het verboden Judas-evangelie en de schat van Carchemish [The Forbidden Gospel of Judas and the Treasure of Carchemish] (in Dutch). Soesterberg: Aspekt. ISBN 9789059112445.
- Brankaer, Joanna; Gebhard-Bethge, Hans (2007). Codex Tchacos: Texte und Analysen (in German). Berlin: de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3110195705.
- Chadwick, Alex (host) (April 6, 2006). "The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot?". NPR News. NPR. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
- Cockburn, Andrew (May 2006). "The Judas Gospel". National Geographic. National Geographic Society: 78–95.
- DeConick, April D. (2009) [2007]. The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1847065681.
- Duin, Julia (April 7, 2006). "Judas stars as 'anti-hero' in gospel". The Washington Times. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
- Ehrman, Bart D. (2006). The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0739483992.
- Evans, Craig A. (2006). Fabricating Jesus: How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels. Downers Grove: IVP Books. ISBN 0-8308-3318-8.
- Gathercole, Simon J. (February 2007). "The Gospel of Judas". Expository Times. 118 (5): 209–15. doi:10.1177/0014524606075050. S2CID 170108798.
- Gathercole, Simon (2007). The Gospel of Judas: Rewriting Early Christianity. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199225842.
- Head, Peter M. (2007). "The Gospel of Judas and the Qarara Codices: Some Preliminary Observations". Tyndale Bulletin. 58: 1–23. doi:10.53751/001c.29226. S2CID 239935851.
- Iricinschi, Eduard; Jenott, Lance; Townsend, Philippa (June 8, 2006). "The Betrayer's Gospel". The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
- Kasser, Rodolphe; Wurst, Gregor, eds. (2007). The Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition: Together with the Letter of Peter to Phillip, James, and a Book of Allogenes from Codex Tchacos. Washington D.C.: National Geographic Society. ISBN 978-1426201912.
- Krosney, Herbert (2006). The Lost Gospel: The Quest for the Gospel of Judas Iscariot. Washington D.C.: National Geographic Society. ISBN 978-1426200410.
- Meyer, Marvin, ed. (2007). The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The International Edition. New York: HarperOne. ISBN 978-0060523787.
- Page, Gregory A. (1942) [1912]. Diary of Judas Iscariot of the Gospel According to Judas (Reprint ed.). Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-0766100503.
- Perrin, Nicholas (2006). The Judas Gospel. IVP Booklets. Downers Grove: IVP Books. ISBN 978-0877840398.
- Rayner, William (1969). The Knifeman:The Last Journal of Judas Iscariot. Michael Joseph. ISBN 9780718105556.
- Porter, Stanley E.; Heath, Gordon L. (2007). The Lost Gospel of Judas: Separating Fact from Fiction. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. ISBN 978-0802824561.
- Scopello, Maddalena (2008). The Gospel of Judas in context: proceedings of the First International Conference on the Gospel of Judas, Paris, Sorbonne, October 27th-28th, 2006. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-474-4285-1. OCLC 647871732.
- Sleman, Abraam D. "Refuting the Gospel of Judas" (PDF). CopticChurch.net. Jersey City, NJ: Coptic Orthodox Church of St. Mark. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-09-23. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
- Tomkins, Stephen (April 7, 2006). "Not so secret gospels". BBC News. Retrieved 2015-04-07.
- Wright, N. T. (2006). Judas and the Gospel of Jesus: Have we Missed the Truth about Christianity?. Grand Rapids: Baker Books. ISBN 978-0801012945.
External links
[edit]- The Judas Gospel – full text English translation