Jump to content

David Vitter: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sardanaphalus (talk | contribs)
m updating link, possibly some formatting, using AWB
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American politician (born 1961)}}
{{Infobox Senator | name=David Vitter
{{distinguish|David Vetter}}
|image name=David Vitter official portrait.jpg
{{redirect|Senator Vitter|the South Dakota state senate member|Drue Vitter}}
|jr/sr=Junior Senator
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2022}}
|state=[[Louisiana]]
{{Infobox officeholder
|party=[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
|name = David Vitter
|term_start=[[January 3]], [[2005]]
|image = DVitterOfficial.jpg
|alongside=[[Mary Landrieu]]
|caption = Official portrait, 2005
|preceded=[[John B. Breaux]]
|jr/sr = United States Senator
|succeeded= ''Incumbent'' (2011)
|state2=Louisiana
|state = [[Louisiana]]
|term_start = January 3, 2005
|district2=[[Louisiana's 1st congressional district|1st]]
|term2=[[May 29]], [[1999]] [[January 3]], [[2005]]
|term_end = January 3, 2017
|predecessor = [[John Breaux]]
|preceded2=[[Bob Livingston]]
|successor = [[John Kennedy (Louisiana politician)|John Kennedy]]
|succeeded2=[[Bobby Jindal]]
|office1 = Chair of the [[United States Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship|Senate Small Business Committee]]
|term_start1 = January 3, 2015
|term_end1 = January 3, 2017
|predecessor1 = [[Maria Cantwell]]
|successor1 = [[Jim Risch]]
|state2 = [[Louisiana]]
|district2 = {{ushr|LA|1|1st}}
|term_start2 = May 29, 1999
|term_end2 = January 3, 2005
|predecessor2 = [[Bob Livingston]]
|successor2 = [[Bobby Jindal]]
|state_house3 = Louisiana
|state_house3 = Louisiana
|district3 = 81
|district3 = 81st
|term_start3 = 1992
|term_start3 = 1992
|term_end3 = 1999
|term_end3 = 1999
|preceded3 = [[David Duke]]
|predecessor3 = [[David Duke]]
|succeeded3 = [[Jennifer Sneed]]
|successor3 = Jennifer Sneed Heebe
|birth_name = David Bruce Vitter
|date of birth={{birth date and age|1961|05|03}}
|birth_date = {{birth date and age|1961|5|3}}
|place of birth=[[New Orleans, Louisiana|New Orleans]], [[Louisiana]]
|birth_place = [[New Orleans]], Louisiana, U.S.
|dead=alive
|death_date =
|residence= [[Metairie, Louisiana]]
|death_place =
|occupation= attorney
|party = [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
|law school=[[Tulane University]], 1988
|spouse=Wendy Baldwin Vitter
|spouse = {{marriage|[[Wendy Vitter|Wendy Baldwin]]|1990}}
|children = 4
|children=Sophie Vitter<br>Lise Vitter<br>Airey Vitter<br>Jack Vitter
|relations = [[Jeffrey Vitter]] (brother)
|alma_mater=[[Harvard University]]; [[Oxford University]]; [[Tulane Law School]]
|education = [[Harvard University]] ([[Bachelor of Arts|BA]])<br />{{nowrap|[[Magdalen College, Oxford]] ([[Bachelor of Arts|BA]])}}<br />[[Tulane University]] ([[Juris Doctor|JD]])
|religion=[[Roman Catholic]]
|signature = David Vitter Signature.svg
|module = {{Listen|pos=center|embed=yes|filename=Sen. David Vitter on the Fifth Anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.ogg|title=David Vitter's voice|type=speech|description=David Vitter highlights the fifth anniversary of the [[Deepwater Horizon oil spill]]<br/>Recorded April 20, 2015}}
}}
}}
'''David Bruce Vitter''' (born [[May 3]], [[1961]]) is the [[Junior Senator|junior]] [[United States Senate|United States Senator]] from [[Louisiana]] and a member of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]]. Formerly a member of the [[United States House of Representatives]], first elected in 1999, representing the [[suburbs|suburban]] [[Louisiana's 1st congressional district]], Vitter was elected to the Senate in 2004.
'''David Bruce Vitter''' (born May 3, 1961) is an American politician who served as a [[United States Senate|United States Senator]] from [[Louisiana]] from 2005 to 2017. A member of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]], Vitter served in the [[Louisiana House of Representatives]] from 1992 to 1999 and in the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] from 1999 to 2005.


Vitter was first elected to the U.S. Senate in [[2004 United States Senate election in Louisiana|2004]]. He was the first [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] to represent Louisiana in the Senate since the [[Reconstruction Era]], and the first ever Republican to be popularly elected. In 2007, Vitter admitted to and apologized for past involvement with prostitution as part of a Washington, D.C. [[escort service]] which gained much notoriety<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Murray|first1=Shailagh|title=Senator's Number on 'Madam' Phone List|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/09/AR2007070902030.html|access-date=October 13, 2014|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=July 10, 2007}}</ref> and while not affecting his 2010 election, is believed to have played a part in his loss of the [[Louisiana gubernatorial election, 2015|2015 gubernatorial election]]. In [[2010 United States Senate election in Louisiana|2010]], Vitter won a second Senate term by defeating [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] [[United States Representative|U.S. Representative]] [[Charlie Melançon]].
Vitter was born and raised in [[New Orleans]]. He attended [[Harvard University]] for his undergraduate studies and [[Tulane University]] for [[Tulane University Law School|law school]] in addition to winning a [[Rhodes Scholarship]] to [[University College, Oxford]]. He served as a member of the [[Louisiana House of Representatives]] before entering the U.S. House.


Vitter unsuccessfully ran for [[Governor of Louisiana|governor]] to succeed the [[Term limits|term-limited]] [[Bobby Jindal]] in the [[Louisiana gubernatorial election, 2015|2015 gubernatorial election]]. He lost the general election to Democrat [[John Bel Edwards]]. While conceding defeat to Edwards, Vitter announced that he would not seek reelection to his Senate seat in [[United States Senate election in Louisiana, 2016|2016]] and would retire from office at the completion of his term. Following the conclusion of his second Senate term, Vitter became a lobbyist.
Vitter is a staunch supporter of conservative political views. His legislative agenda includes positions ranging from [[pro-life]] to [[Gun politics in the United States|pro-gun rights]] while legislating against gambling, [[same-sex marriage]], funding for abortion providers, increases in the [[State Children's Health Insurance Program]], the [[United Nations]], and [[amnesty]] for America's [[undocumented workers]].


==Early life and education==
Vitter's stated positions include a [[Balanced Budget Amendment|balanced budget constitutional amendment]],<ref>{{cite web
[[File:Vitter Family meets with Vice President Cheney.gif|thumb|David Vitter and his family with Vice President [[Dick Cheney]]]]
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58
David Bruce Vitter<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/elections/2004/candidates/294890/ | newspaper=The Washington Post| title=David Bruce Vitter (R)| year=2004 }}</ref> was born on May 3, 1961,<ref>{{CongLinks |congbio=v000127 |votesmart=4615 |fec=S4LA00057 |congress=david-vitter/1609}}</ref> in New Orleans, Louisiana. He is the son of Audrey Malvina (née St. Raymond) and Albert Leopold Vitter. Vitter graduated in 1979 from [[De La Salle High School (New Orleans, Louisiana)|De La Salle High School]] in New Orleans.<ref>{{cite web|year= 1998|url= http://www.delasallenola.com/content.cfm?id=148|title= De La Salle High School 1990–1999 Award Recipients|publisher= [[De La Salle High School (New Orleans, Louisiana)|De La Salle High School]]|access-date= November 6, 2009|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110709011339/http://www.delasallenola.com/content.cfm?id=148|archive-date= July 9, 2011}}</ref> While a student at De La Salle, Vitter participated in the [[Close Up Foundation|Close Up Washington]] civic education program. He received a Bachelor of Arts from [[Harvard College]] in 1983; a second B.A. from [[Magdalen College, Oxford]] in 1985, as a [[Rhodes Scholar]]; and a [[Juris Doctor]] degree in 1988 from the [[Tulane University Law School]] in New Orleans. He was a practicing lawyer,<ref>{{cite news|url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/elections/2004/candidates/294890/|title= David Bruce Vitter (R)|newspaper= The Washington Post|access-date= March 19, 2009}}</ref><ref name="SLU042701" /> and [[adjunct professor|adjunct law professor]] at Tulane and [[Loyola University New Orleans]].<ref name="SLU042701">{{cite web|date= April 27, 2001|url= http://www2.selu.edu/NewsEvents/PublicInfoOffice/vitter-sp01commencement.htm|title= U.S. Rep. David Vitter To Present SLU Commencement Address|publisher= [[Southeastern Louisiana University]] [[Public Information Officer|Public Information Office]]|access-date= March 19, 2009|quote= While serving in the state legislature, Vitter was a business attorney as well as an adjunct law professor at Tulane and Loyola Universities.}}</ref>
|title=David Vitter Issues: Budget
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> abolishing the federal and state [[estate tax]],<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58
|title=David Vitter Issues: Agriculture & Seafood
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> increasing local police forces,<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=79348266-f09a-4494-a2eb-2bd397b9eab9
|title=David Vitter Issues: Crime and Drugs
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> and an assortment of health care, tax and national defense reforms.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issues
|title=David Vitter Issues
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref>


Vitter and his wife [[Wendy Vitter|Wendy]], a former prosecutor,<ref name="WP-07-10-07"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nola.com/national_politics/2018/01/wendy_vitter_federal_judge.html |title=Wendy Vitter, with one exception, might have what it takes to be federal judge|date=January 27, 2018 }}</ref> have four children. Vitter's brother [[Jeffrey Vitter|Jeffrey]] is a computer scientist who has served as chancellor of the [[University of Mississippi]] from January 2016 to January 2019.
In the aftermath of the disastrous [[Hurricane Katrina]], Vitter worked with the Louisiana congressional delegation to bring disaster relief to the region for rebuilding and aiding the victims disagreeing primarily over the issue of public housing.


==Early political career==
In July 2007, Vitter was identified as a client of "D.C. Madam" [[Deborah Jeane Palfrey]]'s prostitution service in [[Washington, D.C.]]<ref name="CNN071007">{{cite web
===Louisiana House of Representatives===
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
Vitter was a member of the [[Louisiana House of Representatives]] from 1992 to 1999.
|url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/10/vitter.madam/index.html
|title=Hustler says it revealed senator's link to escort service
|publisher=[[CNN]]
|accessdate=2007-07-14}}</ref>


Vitter has argued for ethics reform and [[term limits]] since he was in the Louisiana Legislature in the early 1990s.<ref>{{cite news|date=July 12, 2007|last=Crouere|first=Jeff|url=http://blog.nola.com/jeff_crouere/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_david_vit.html|title=The Rise and Fall of David Vitter|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=May 8, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080506213646/http://blog.nola.com/jeff_crouere/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_david_vit.html|archive-date=May 6, 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> As a Louisiana state legislator, Vitter successfully pushed through a term limits amendment to the state constitution to oust the largely Democratic legislature.<ref name="NYT071408">{{cite news|date=April 29, 1999|last=Sack|first=Kevin|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/29/us/louisiana-gop-facing-david-duke-again.html?pagewanted=2|title=Louisiana G.O.P. Facing David Duke, Again|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=July 14, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=July 11, 2007|last=Nossiter|first=Adam|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/us/11vitter.html?fta=y|title=A Senator's Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=July 14, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=September 9, 2007|last=Hasten|first=Mike|url=http://www.thetowntalk.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070909/NEWS01/709090347|title=Republicans set sights on control of La. House|newspaper=The Town Talk|access-date=July 14, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130204221735/http://www.thetowntalk.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070909/NEWS01/709090347|archive-date=February 4, 2013}}</ref><ref name="LC" /> The first election legislators affected by the reform [[Louisiana state elections, 2007|occurred in 2007]].<ref>{{cite news|date=October 30, 2007|last=Barrow|first=Bill|url=http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2007/09/term_limits_arent_gop_bonanza.html|title=Term limits aren't GOP bonanza|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=July 14, 2008}}</ref> In order to leverage the term limits advantage in that election, Vitter formed a [[Political Action Committee]] with the goal of winning a legislative Republican majority.<ref>{{cite news|date=August 5, 2007|last=Barrow|first=Bill|url=http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/47395/54420.html|title=Quest for La. House will look past Vitter|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=July 14, 2008|quote=Vitter's effectiveness for raising the profile of Republican candidates in state legislative races has dissolved|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723112911/http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/47395/54420.html|archive-date=July 23, 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=December 6, 2007|url=http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361|title=The 2007 Elections – Effect of Term Limits (Part I)|publisher=LouisianaConservative.com|access-date=July 14, 2008|quote=The LCRM also suffered somewhat of a setback ... when stories arose regarding Senator Vitter's involvement with prostitutes....|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071219110131/http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361|archive-date=December 19, 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref> While the Republicans saw gains, the Democrats maintained majority control.<ref name="LC">{{cite web|date=December 6, 2007|url=http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361|title=The 2007 Elections – Effect of Term Limits (Part I)|publisher=LouisianaConservative.com|access-date=July 14, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071219110131/http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361|archive-date=December 19, 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref>
==Early life, career, and family==
Vitter was born in [[New Orleans]] to Audrey Malvina St. Raymond and Albert Leopold Vitter.<ref>[http://gw1.geneanet.org/index.php3?b=vitter&lang=en;p=david+bruce;n=vitter "David Bruce Vitter"], GeneaNet.com, accessed July 10, 2007</ref> He received a B.A. from [[Harvard University]] in [[Cambridge, Massachusetts]], in 1983; a B.A. from [[Oxford University]] in 1985, as a [[Rhodes Scholar]]; and a [[Juris Doctor]] from the [[Tulane University Law School]] in New Orleans in 1988. He was a [[lawyer]] and a member of the [[Louisiana House of Representatives]] from 1992 to 1999, when he entered the U.S. House.


Vitter opposed gambling during his tenure in the Louisiana House.<ref>{{cite news |last=Applebome |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Applebome |date=June 12, 1994 |title=Legal Gambling Bedevils Louisiana |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/12/us/legal-gambling-bedevils-louisiana.html |access-date=April 21, 2008 |newspaper=The New York Times}} Louisiana has long experience with gambling as a political issue''';''' see, e.g., [[Francis Grevemberg]].</ref>
Vitter and his wife Wendy, a former prosecutor,<ref name="WP-07-10-07"/> have three daughters, Sophie, Lise, and Airey, and a son, Jack. Vitter's brother [[Jeffrey Vitter]] is a notable academic, the provost of [[Texas A&M University]].


==House of Representatives==
===United States House of Representatives===
Vitter won a special election to [[Louisiana's 1st congressional district special election, 1999|Louisiana's 1st congressional district in 1999]], succeeding Republican U.S. Representative [[Bob Livingston]], who resigned after disclosure that he had committed [[adultery]]. In the initial vote on May 1, 1999,<ref>Stuart Rothenberg, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/analysis/rothenberg/1999/04/13/ "Hot race for Livingston's Louisiana House seat"], ''CNN'', April 13, 1999</ref> former Congressman and Governor [[David C. Treen]] finished first with 36,719 votes (25 percent). Vitter was second, with 31,741 (22 percent), and [[white nationalism|white nationalist]] [[David Duke]] finished third with 28,055 votes (19 percent). Monica L. Monica, a Republican [[ophthalmologist]], had 16 percent; State Representative [[Bill Strain]], a [[conservative Democrat]], finished fifth with 11 percent; and [[Rob Couhig]], a Republican lawyer and the owner of New Orleans's minor league baseball team, garnered 6 percent.<ref>Kevin Sack, [https://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/03/us/david-duke-misses-louisiana-runoff-but-has-strong-showing.html "David Duke Misses Louisiana Runoff but Has Strong Showing"], ''The New York Times'', May 3, 1999</ref> In the runoff, Vitter defeated Treen 51–49 percent.<ref name="Almanac of American Politics-2005"/>
=== Elections ===
Vitter won a special election to Louisiana's 1st Congressional District in 1999, succeeding Republican Congressman [[Bob Livingston]], who resigned after an adultery scandal. In the initial vote on May 1, 1999,<ref>Stuart Rothenberg, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/analysis/rothenberg/1999/04/13/ "Hot race for Livingston's Louisiana House seat"], ''CNN'', April 13, 1999</ref> former Congressman and Governor [[David Treen]] finished first with 36,719 votes (25 percent). Vitter was second, with 31,741 (22 percent), and self-styled "white nationalist" [[David Duke]] finished third with 28,055 votes (19 percent). Monica L. Monica, a Republican [[ophthalmologist]], had 16 percent; State Representative Bill Strain, a conservative Democrat, finished fifth with 11 percent; and [[Rob Couhig]], a Republican lawyer and the owner of New Orleans's minor league baseball team, had 6 percent.<ref>Kevin Sack, [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02EEDA173CF930A35756C0A96F958260 "David Duke Misses Louisiana Runoff but Has Strong Showing"], ''New York Times'', May 3, 1999</ref> In the special election runoff on May 29, Vitter defeated Treen, 61,661 votes (51 percent) to 59,849 (49 percent).<ref name="Almanac of American Politics-2005"/>


In 2000 and 2002, Vitter won re-election with over 80 percent of the vote in what has become a safe Republican district.<ref name="Almanac of American Politics-2005">{{cite web
In 2000 and 2002, Vitter was re-elected with more than 80 percent of the vote in what had become a safe Republican district.<ref name="Almanac of American Politics-2005">{{cite web|date=June 25, 2005|url=http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/almanac/2006/people/la/las2.htm|title=Almanac of American Politics|access-date=December 7, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110614023100/http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/almanac/2006/people/la/las2.htm|archive-date=June 14, 2011}}</ref>
|date=[[June 25]], [[2005]]
|author=Jacoby, Mary
|url=http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/almanac/2006/people/la/las2.htm
|title=Almanac of American Politics
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref>


In 2001, Vitter co-authored legislation to restrict the number of physicians allowed to prescribe [[RU-486]], a drug used in medical abortions. The bill died in committee.<ref>{{cite web|date=February 7, 2001|url=http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=2709|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020301140327/http://www.kaisernetwork.org/Daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=2709|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 1, 2002|title=Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy|publisher=[[Kaiser Permanente]]|access-date=December 10, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h107-482|title=H.R. 482 [107th]: RU-486 Patient Health and Safety Protection Act|publisher=GovTrack|access-date=December 10, 2007}}</ref>
=== 2002 gubernatorial race ===
In 2002, Vitter was preparing to run for governor in 2003, with the incumbent, Republican [[Murphy J. Foster, Jr.|Mike Foster]] prevented by term limits from running again. But in June 2002, shortly before the [[Louisiana Weekly]] ran a story about Vitter's alleged relationship with a [[prostitute]], Vitter dropped out of the governor's race,<ref>Christopher Tidmore, [http://www.louisianaweekly.com/weekly/news/articlegate.pl?20040329m "The Weekly's inside political track"], ''Louisiana Weekly'', March 29, 2004</ref> saying he and his wife were dealing with marital problems.<ref>Schor, Elana and Sam Youngman, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/vitter-hides-as-the-senate-gop-circles-its-wagons-2007-07-11.html "Vitter hides as the Senate GOP circles its wagons"], ''The Hill'', July 11, 2007</ref>


In 2003, Vitter proposed to amend the [[U.S. Constitution]] to ban [[same-sex marriage]].<ref>[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.J.RES.56.IH: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. (Introduced in House), HJ 56 IH, 108th CONGRESS, H. J. RES. 56] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151019003738/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.J.RES.56.IH: |date=October 19, 2015 }} May 21, 2003, Mrs. MUSGRAVE (for herself, Mr. HALL, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, and Mr. VITTER)</ref> In 2004, he said, "This is a real outrage. The [[Cinema of the United States|Hollywood]] [[political left|left]] is redefining the most basic institution in human history...We need a U.S. Senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not [[Massachusetts liberal|Massachusetts values]]."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vitter2004.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=20|title=Vitter Statement on Protecting the Sanctity of Marriage|publisher=Vitter2004.com|access-date=July 12, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070715022708/http://www.vitter2004.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=20|archive-date=July 15, 2007}}</ref>
==United States Senate==
===2004 election===
In 2004, Vitter ran to replace Democrat [[John Breaux]] in the U.S. Senate. Former state Senator [[Dan Richey|Daniel Wesley Richey]], a Baton Rouge political consultant, directed Vitter's grassroots organization in the race, with assistance from Richey's longtime ally, former state Representative [[Woody Jenkins|Louis E. "Woody" Jenkins]] of Baton Rouge, himself a defeated U.S. Senate candidate in 1978, 1980, and 1996.


===2003 gubernatorial election===
During the campaign, Vitter was accused by a member of the Louisiana Republican State Central Committee of having had a lengthy [[affair]] with a [[prostitute]] in New Orleans. Vitter responded that the allegation was "absolutely and completely untrue" and that it was "just crass Louisiana politics."<ref name="WP-07-10-07">Shailagh Murray, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/09/AR2007070902030.html "Senator's Number on 'Madam' Phone List"], ''Washington Post'', July 10, 2007</ref>
In 2002, Vitter was preparing to run for governor in 2003, with the incumbent, Republican [[Murphy J. Foster, Jr.|Mike Foster]], prevented by [[term limits]] from running again. But in June 2002, shortly before the ''[[Louisiana Weekly]]'' reported on a claim from Vincent Bruno, a campaign worker for Treen in 1999, about Vitter's alleged relationship with a prostitute, Vitter dropped out of the governor's race,<ref>Christopher Tidmore, [http://www.louisianaweekly.com/weekly/news/articlegate.pl?20040329m "The Weekly's inside political track"], ''Louisiana Weekly'', March 29, 2004</ref> saying he and his wife were dealing with marital problems.


Bruno said on a New Orleans–based radio show that he had been told by a prostitute that she had interactions with Vitter. However, Treen and his campaign decided to not publicize this information during the election.<ref>Bridges, Tyler, [http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/article_fb9e14ff-5f2d-5ef8-8c80-4840606d444d.html "David Vitter murky past with prostitution focus of campaign behind campaign"], ''The Advocate'', September 25, 2015</ref>
On [[November 2]], [[2004]], Vitter won the Louisiana senatorial [[jungle primary]] with 51.0 percent of the vote. The field of opponents including two major Democrats, then Seventh Congressional District Congressman [[Chris John|Christopher John]], who got 29.4 percent of the vote, and state Treasurer [[John N. Kennedy]] (no relation to the Massachusetts Kennedys), who got 15.1 percent.


==United States Senate==
Vitter was the first Republican in Louisiana to be popularly elected as a U.S. Senator. The previous Republican Senator, [[William Pitt Kellogg]], was chosen by the state legislature in 1876, in accordance with the process used before the [[Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution]] went into effect in 1914.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2004-11-01
===2004 election===
{{main|2004 United States Senate election in Louisiana}}
|last=Rudin
In 2004, Vitter ran to replace Democrat [[John Breaux]] in the U.S. Senate.
|first=Ken
|authorlink=Ken Rudin
|url=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4136425
|title=Final Call: Kerry Wins Narrow Electoral Margin; GOP Gains in House, Senate
|publisher=[[NPR]]
|accessdate=2008-04-30
}}</ref>


During the campaign, Vitter was accused by a member of the Louisiana Republican State Central Committee of having had a lengthy affair with a prostitute in New Orleans. Vitter responded that the allegation was "absolutely and completely untrue" and that it was "just crass Louisiana politics."<ref name="WP-07-10-07">Shailagh Murray, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/09/AR2007070902030.html "Senator's Number on 'Madam' Phone List"], ''The Washington Post'', July 10, 2007</ref>
===Committees===
* [[United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works]]
**[[United States Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health|Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health]]
**[[United States Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Transportation Safety, Infrastructure Security, and Water Quality|Subcommittee on Transportation Safety, Infrastructure Security, and Water Quality]] ([[Ranking Member]])
**[[United States Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure|Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure]]
* [[United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations]]
**[[United States Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on African Affairs|Subcommittee on African Affairs]]
**[[United States Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs|Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs]]
**[[United States Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations, Democracy and Human Rights|Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations, Democracy and Human Rights]] (Ranking Member)
* [[United States Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship]]
* [[United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation]]
**[[United States Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, Safety, and Security|Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, Safety, and Security]]
**[[United States Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Affairs, Insurance, and Automotive Safety|Subcommittee on Consumer Affairs, Insurance, and Automotive Safety]]
**[[United States Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries, and Coast Guard|Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries, and Coast Guard]]
**[[United States Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Space, Aeronautics, and Related Sciences|Subcommittee on Space, Aeronautics, and Related Agencies]] (Ranking Member)
**[[United States Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Surface Transportation and Merchant Marine Infrastructure, Safety, and Security|Subcommittee on Surface Transportation and Merchant Marine Infrastructure, Safety and Security]]
* [[United States Senate Special Committee on Aging]]


On November 2, 2004, Vitter won the [[jungle primary]], garnering a majority of the vote, while the rest of the vote was mostly split among the Democratic contenders.
==Political actions and positions ==
===Illegal immigration===


Vitter was the first Republican in Louisiana to be popularly elected as a U.S. Senator. The previous Republican Senator, [[William Pitt Kellogg]], was chosen by the state legislature in 1876, in accordance with the process used before the [[Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution]] went into effect in 1914.<ref>{{cite web|date=November 1, 2004|last=Rudin|first=Ken|author-link=Ken Rudin|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4136425|title=Final Call: Kerry Wins Narrow Electoral Margin; GOP Gains in House, Senate|publisher=[[NPR]]|access-date=April 30, 2008}}</ref>
Vitter has been actively involved with legislation concerning [[Illegal immigration|illegal immigrants]]. In June 2007, he led a group of conservative Senators in blocking the [[Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007]] that would have granted legal status to 12 million undocumented workers coupled with increased border enforcement. The bill's defeat won Vitter national attention as it was supported by President [[George W. Bush]], [[John McCain]], and [[Ted Kennedy]], among others. Vitter characterized the bill as amnesty which supporters denied. Bush accused the bill's opponents of [[fear mongering]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 22]], [[2007]]
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/06/vitter_leads_opposition_to_imm.html
|title=Vitter leads opposition to immigration bill
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 18]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21150
|title=Are Rational Immigration Laws a ‘Job American Politicians Won’t Do’?
|publisher=[[Human Events]]
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[May 30]], [[2007]]
|author=Rutenberg, Jim
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/30/washington/30immig.html
|title=Bush Takes On Conservatives Over Immigration
|publisher=[[New York Times]]
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref>


===2010 election===
In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment withholding [[Community Oriented Policing Services]] funds from any [[sanctuary city]] which bans city employees and police officers from asking people about their immigration status in violation of the [[Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996|Illegal Immigration Act]]. Democratic Senator [[Dick Durbin]], in opposition to the amendment, said these cities do not want to inquire about someone's status if they report a crime, are a victim of [[domestic violence]] or get vaccinations for their children. According to [[Fox News]], one senator remarked that the amendment would withhold funds for prostitution enforcement which was a problem for Vitter because of the D.C. Madam controversy. The amendment failed to pass.<ref>{{cite web
{{main|2010 United States Senate election in Louisiana}}
|date=[[October 16]], [[2007]]
[[File:David Vitter yard sign IMG 0018.JPG|175px|right|thumb|Vitter yard sign (2010)]]
|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,302464,00.html
Vitter began fundraising for his 2010 reelection run in December 2008.<ref>{{cite news|date= December 5, 2008|url= http://www.katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=9460332|title= Scandal-plagued Vitter gets La. fundraising help|agency= Associated Press|access-date= December 5, 2008}}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> He raised $731,000 in the first quarter of 2009 and $2.5 million for his 2010 campaign.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-3/1240378230147980.xml&coll=1 |title=Vitter's re-election campaign stash swelling for 2010 |newspaper=NOLA.com |date=April 22, 2009 |access-date=August 29, 2010 }}{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> He had wide leads against potential Democratic opponents in aggregate general election polling.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/louisiana/election_2010_louisiana_senate |title=Election 2010: Louisiana Senate – Rasmussen Reports |publisher=Rasmussenreports.com |access-date=August 29, 2010}}</ref> He faced intraparty opposition from [[Chet D. Traylor]] of [[Monroe, Louisiana|Monroe]], a former associate justice of the [[Louisiana Supreme Court]], in the August 28 Republican [[Partisan primary|primary election]] and defeated him.
|title=Plan to Crack Down on 'Sanctuary Cities' Killed in Senate
|publisher=[[FOX News]]
|accessdate=2007-10-16}}</ref>


He faced the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] [[U.S. Representative]] [[Charlie Melançon]] of [[Napoleonville, Louisiana|Napoleonville]] in the November 2 general election. [[Louisiana State Legislature|State Representative]] [[Ernest Wooton]] of [[Belle Chasse, Louisiana|Belle Chasse]] in [[Plaquemines Parish]], an [[Independent (politics)|Independent]], also ran.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thenewsstar.com/article/20100710/NEWS01/7100335/Monroe-s-Traylor-to-challenge-Vitter |title=Monroe's Traylor to challenge Vitter |publisher=[[Monroe News Star]], July 10, 2010 |access-date=July 10, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100715192926/http://www.thenewsstar.com/article/20100710/NEWS01/7100335/Monroe-s-Traylor-to-challenge-Vitter |archive-date=July 15, 2010 }}</ref> On November 4, 2010, Vitter was re-elected as Louisiana Senator, defeating his Democratic rival, Melancon. Vitter got 715,304 votes while Melancon got 476,423 votes. Vitter received about 57% of the total vote while Melancon got 38%. The Independent candidate Wooton finished with 8,167 votes, or 1 percent of the total cast.
In November 2007, Vitter introduced a bill requiring banks to confirm that customers were not illegal immigrants before providing them with banking or credit cards. [[As of May 2008]], no action is planned for the bill.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 26]], [[2007]]
|author=Shields, Gerald
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/11805796.html
|title=Washington Watch for November 26, 2007
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]
|accessdate=2007-11-26}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2393
|title=S. 2393: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards...
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|accessdate=2008-01-15}}</ref>


===Tenure===
In March 2008, Vitter reintroduced the latter two proposals<ref>{{cite web
Vitter has identified himself as a [[political conservative]] throughout his political career. His legislative agenda includes positions ranging from [[anti-abortion]] to [[Gun politics in the United States|pro-gun rights]] while legislating against gambling, [[same-sex marriage]], civil unions, federal funding for abortion providers, increases in the [[State Children's Health Insurance Program]], the United Nations, and [[amnesty]] for America's [[illegal immigrants]]. Vitter's stated positions include a [[Balanced Budget Amendment|balanced budget constitutional amendment]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58|title=David Vitter Issues: Budget|publisher=David Vitter|access-date=April 21, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080422160559/http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation%2Fissue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58|archive-date=April 22, 2008}}</ref> abolishing the federal and state [[estate tax]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58|title=David Vitter Issues: Agriculture & Seafood|publisher=David Vitter|access-date=April 21, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080422160559/http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation%2Fissue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58|archive-date=April 22, 2008}}</ref> increasing local police forces,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=79348266-f09a-4494-a2eb-2bd397b9eab9|title=David Vitter Issues: Crime and Drugs|publisher=David Vitter|access-date=April 21, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080422160549/http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation%2Fissue&ID=79348266-f09a-4494-a2eb-2bd397b9eab9|archive-date=April 22, 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> and an assortment of health care, tax and national defense reforms.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issues|title=David Vitter Issues|publisher=David Vitter|access-date=April 21, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080430235427/http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=Legislation%2FIssues|archive-date=April 30, 2008}}</ref>{{better source needed|date=March 2020}}
|date=2008-03-05
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2713
|title=S. 2713--110th Congress (2008): A bill to prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of section...
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-05-06
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-03-05
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2714
|title=S. 2714: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards...
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-05-06
}}</ref> and cosponsored ten of eleven other bills<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-03-06
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20080306-6&bill=s110-2713
|title=Measures Placed on the Calendar
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-05-06
|quote=
}}</ref> in a Republican package of tough immigration enforcement measures including jail time for [[Illegal immigration to the United States#Border crossing|illegal border]] crossing, [[deportation]] for any immigrant (legal or illegal) for a single [[driving while intoxicated]], declaration of [[National language#United States|English as the official language]] (thereby terminating language assistance at voting booths and federal agencies), additional construction of a [[United States–Mexico barrier|border fence]], permission for local and state police to enforce immigration laws and penalties for states who issue drivers licenses to illegals. This package has little chance of being debated because the Democratic-controlled Senate prefers a comprehensive approach which would include a guest worker program and a path to citizenship for the current population more akin to the package defeated by Vitter in 2007.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-03-05
|last=Gaouette
|first=Nicole
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-immig5mar05,1,5849195.story
|title=GOP senators to introduce toughest-yet immigration package
|publisher=[[The Los Angeles Times]]
|accessdate=2008-05-06
}}</ref>


After conceding defeat to John Bel Edwards in the 2015 Louisiana gubernatorial election, Vitter announced that he would not seek reelection to his Senate seat in [[United States Senate election in Louisiana, 2016|2016]] and would retire from office at the completion of his term.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/edwards-beats-vitter-louisiana-governor-216127|title=Edwards beats Vitter in Louisiana governor's race|date=November 21, 2015|access-date=November 21, 2015|work=Politico}}</ref>
In April 2008, Vitter introduced a [[joint resolution]] proposing a [[constitutional amendment]] that a child born in the United States is not a citizen unless a parent is a citizen, lawful [[permanent resident]], or [[Alien (law)|alien]] serving in the military.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h107-482
|title=S.J.RES.31 [110th]: RA joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to United States citizenship.
|publisher=GovTrack
|accessdate=2008-04-09}}</ref> Currently the Constitution [[Citizenship Clause|grants citizenship]] to [[Birthright citizenship in the United States of America|children born within the U.S.]] regardless of the legal status of the parents.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-03-10
|last=Ho
|first=James C.
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-ho10mar10,1,3646198.story?coll=la-news-comment
|title=Can Congress repeal birthright citizenship?
|publisher=[[Los Angeles Times]]
|accessdate=2008-05-05
}}</ref> [[As of May 2008]], the resolution has no cosponsors.


===Gulf Coast recovery===
====Abortion====
In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00379|title=On the Amendment (Vitter Amdt. No.3330 )|publisher=[[United States Senate]]|access-date=November 17, 2007}}</ref> barring all federal public funds to health care providers and [[Planned Parenthood]] that provide services that include abortion. Federal law bars any funding to directly finance elective abortions in accordance with the Hyde amendment. Vitter argued that the funds are used for [[Overhead (business)|overhead costs]] that benefit the abortion services. The amendment failed to pass.<ref>{{cite news|date=October 19, 2007|author=Alpert, Bruce|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1192804244133220.xml&coll=1|title=Abortion plan is defeated in Senate|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=October 19, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120222152851/http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews-2%2F1192804244133220.xml&coll=1|archive-date=February 22, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=October 28, 2007|author=Taylor, Andrew|url=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iSj9rQxYovv7EP4uGrPZ_dAqaoDgD8SBUTBG0|title=No Cut in Money for Abortion Providers|agency=Associated Press|access-date=October 19, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071024141408/http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iSj9rQxYovv7EP4uGrPZ_dAqaoDgD8SBUTBG0|archive-date=October 24, 2007}}</ref> Following the rejection, Vitter and others urged
====Hurricane Katrina====
the Senate to pass a similar bill introduced by Vitter in
January 2007. The bill failed to pass.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-351|title=S. 351: Title X Family Planning Act|publisher=GovTrack|access-date=November 17, 2007}}</ref>


In January 2008, Vitter proposed an amendment to prohibit the funding of abortions with [[Indian Health Service]] funds except in the case of rape, [[incest]], or when the life of the woman is at risk.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s3896|title=S.Amdt. 3896: To modify a section relating to limitation on use of funds...|publisher=GovTrack.us|access-date=January 23, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080830025429/http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s3896|archive-date=August 30, 2008}}</ref> The amendment would have held future presidential administrations to an executive principle first crafted in 1982 by the [[Ronald Reagan]] White House.<ref>{{cite web|date=February 26, 2008|author=KALB News Channel 5|url=http://www.kalb.com/index.php/news/article/senate-passes-vitter-amendment-to-prohibit-federal-funding-of-abortions/4025/|title=Senate Passes Vitter Amendment to Prohibit Federal Funding of Abortions|publisher=KALB.com|access-date=February 27, 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080314154452/http://www.kalb.com/index.php/news/article/senate-passes-vitter-amendment-to-prohibit-federal-funding-of-abortions/4025/ |archive-date = March 14, 2008}}</ref> Vitter's amendment passed the Senate but later was stalled in the House.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1200|title=S. 1200|access-date=April 29, 2009|author=110th Congress (2007)|date=April 24, 2007|work=Legislation|publisher=GovTrack.us|quote=Indian Health Care Improvement Act Amendments of 2008}}</ref>
In the aftermath of the disastrous [[Hurricane Katrina]] that devastated New Orleans in 2005, Vitter along with the entire Louisiana congressional delegation worked to bring aid to the Gulf Coast region to rebuild broken levees, schools and hospitals, restore coastal wetlands, and provide assistance for its many victims.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2005-10-05
|last=Hernandez
|first=Raymond
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/05/national/nationalspecial/05rebuild.html
|title=Gulf Coast Lawmakers in Spotlight as Aid Requests Pour In
|publisher=[[The New York Times]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref>


Later that year, Vitter co-sponsored the Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act which – along with other oversight regulations – required doctors performing abortions to have the authority granted by a nearby hospital to admit patients. The bill was never reported to committee.<ref>{{cite news|date=April 20, 2008|last=Alpert|first=Bruce|author2=Walsh, Bill|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1208669675248010.xml&coll=1|title=On The Hill: Bill tightens abortion penalties|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=April 21, 2008}}{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=March 31, 2008|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2788|title=S. 2788 – 110th Congress (2008): Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=May 6, 2008}}</ref>
In early September, Vitter said that he would give "the entire big government organized relief effort a failing grade, across the board." He said that state and local governments shared in the blame as well.<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9270364/ "Louisiana senior senator turns up heat on Bush: Democrat Landrieu escalates rhetoric against president on Katrina response"], ''Associated Press'', September 11, 2005</ref> Vitter's actions during Hurricane Katrina are described in historian [[Douglas Brinkley]]'s May 2006 book, ''The Great Deluge''.


====Abstinence education====
In September 2007, Vitter announced that he got "a critical concession" from the White House that decreased Louisiana's obligations for hurricane recovery by $1 billion. However, the White House said that was false.<ref name="TP092907" />
Vitter advocated [[abstinence-only sex education]], emphasizing abstinence over sex education that includes information about [[birth control]], drawing criticism from [[Planned Parenthood]].<ref>{{cite web|date=June 25, 2007|author=Vitter, David|url=http://www.vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=76b86c7e-a51a-4d11-92e7-de11d999f313|title=Vitter Pushes for Reauthorization of Abstinence Education Program|publisher=David Vitter press release|access-date=July 12, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070713232211/http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom%2FPressItem&ID=76b86c7e-a51a-4d11-92e7-de11d999f313|archive-date=July 13, 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref> He said, "Abstinence education is a public health strategy focused on risk avoidance that aims to help young people avoid exposure to harm...by teaching teenagers that saving sex until marriage and remaining faithful afterwards is the best choice for health and happiness."<ref>{{cite web|date=June 21, 2007|author1=Vitter, David|author2=Bunning, Jim|url=http://www.vitter.senate.gov/forms/abstinenceLetter.pdf|title=Letter to the chairman and ranking member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee|access-date=July 10, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070627190123/http://www.vitter.senate.gov/forms/abstinenceLetter.pdf|archive-date=June 27, 2007}}</ref>


==== Federal Water Bill ====
====Automotive industry bailout====
Vitter was one of 35 Senators to vote against the [[Big 3 Bailout]] bill.<ref>{{cite news|date=December 12, 2008 |url=http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-senate-rollvote-autosc0,0,1279040.story |title=How they voted: Senate roll vote on $14B auto bailout |agency=Associated Press |access-date=December 17, 2008 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> The financial bailout package was for [[General Motors|GM]], [[Chrysler]], and [[Ford Motor Company|Ford]], but failed to pass on December 11, 2008. During the Senate debate Vitter referred to the approach of giving the automotive industry a financial package before they restructured as "ass-backwards".<ref>{{cite news|date= December 10, 2008|last= Puzzanghera|first= Jim |url= http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-121008-auto-bailout-webdec11,0,1744409.story|title= White House, Democrats reach accord on auto bailout|newspaper= Chicago Tribune|access-date= December 17, 2008}}</ref> He soon apologized for the phrasing of the comment, which did not appear in the ''[[Congressional Record]]''.<ref>{{cite news|date= December 17, 2008|last= Alpert|first= Bruce|url= http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1229292647222650.xml&coll=1|title= Vitter regrets salty language|newspaper= [[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date= December 17, 2008|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090107080533/http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews-2%2F1229292647222650.xml&coll=1|archive-date= January 7, 2009}}</ref>
Vitter helped write the Water Resources and Development Act for flood-control, hurricane-protection and coastal-restoration projects including $3.6 billion for Louisiana. He called it the "single most important" legislation for assisting Louisiana with its recovery from hurricane Katrina. President [[George W. Bush|Bush]] vetoed the act, objecting to its cost.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 27]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/10059676.html
|title=Our Views: State needs flood projects
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]
|accessdate=2007-09-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 27]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070927/OPINION01/709270329/1014/OPINION
|title=Federal water bill critical to state
|publisher=The Daily Advertiser
|accessdate=2007-09-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 2]], [[2007]]
|author=Alpert, Bruce
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/11/bush_vetoes_massive_water_bill.html
|title=Bush vetoes massive water resources bill
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-11-02}}</ref> Congress overrode his veto, enacting the bill.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 8]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Congress-Veto.html?hp
|title=Senate Overrides Bush Veto on Water Bill
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-11-08}}</ref>


==== New Orleans public housing ====
====BP Horizon oil spill====
In response to the April 2010 [[Deepwater Horizon oil spill]] at an offshore [[drilling rig]] in the [[Gulf of Mexico]] threatening the coast of Louisiana, Vitter introduced legislation along with [[Jeff Sessions]] of [[Alabama]] to increase the liability cap of an oil company from $75 million to its most recent annual profits (or $150 million if greater).<ref name="TDA052610">{{cite web|date=May 26, 2010 |last=Berry |first=Deborah Barfield |url=http://www.theadvertiser.com/article/20100526/NEWS18/5260340 |title=Lawmakers weigh liability cap |publisher=[[The Daily Advertiser (Lafayette)|The Daily Advertiser]] |access-date=May 27, 2010 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> In the case of [[BP]], the owner of the oil lease, its liability would be $20 billion.<ref name="TBN052710">{{cite news|date= May 27, 2010|last= Orndorff|first= Mary|url= http://blog.al.com/sweethome/2010/05/us_sen_jeff_sessions_wants_to.html|title= U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions wants to raise BP's liability to $20 billion|newspaper= [[The Birmingham News]]|access-date= May 27, 2010}}</ref> Vitter later introduced an amendment that would remove the cap entirely for this particular spill.<ref name="TDA052610" /> Competing Democratic proposals would have raised the liability to $10 billion regardless of profits or removed the cap altogether.<ref name="TDA052610" /> Sessions argued that large caps unrelated to company profits would harm smaller companies.<ref name="TBN052710" />


====Chemical safety====
In September 2007, ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' reported that Vitter and the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration opposed a provision of The Gulf Coast Housing Recovery bill which required that every [[public housing]] apartment torn down be replaced with another form of low-income housing on a one-for-one basis. The administration testified that there was not sufficient demand for public housing units, a position contested by several senators. Vitter stated it would recreate "housing projects exactly as they were", isolated and riddled with crime. However, [[Mary Landrieu]], the Louisiana Democratic Senator, said the intent was to make certain there were affordable places for working class people who returned. The bill requires that demolished housing projects be replaced with mixed income communities which local housing advocates say is different from the massive public housing developments that Vitter is referring to. However, the bill does not include a ban on large-scale projects.<ref>{{cite web
In May 2013, Vitter introduced the [[Chemical Safety Improvement Act]], a bipartisan bill to reform the [[Toxic Substances Control Act]], which would have regulated the introduction of new or already existing chemicals. The bill would have given additional authority to the [[Environmental Protection Agency]] to regulate chemicals and streamline the patchwork of state laws on chemicals under federal authority.<ref>{{cite web|date=June 11, 2013|url=http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=34fa2573-f043-8d8f-5329-962e227ccea7|title=Vitter: Support for Chemical Safety Improvement Act Grows}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://theadvocate.com/home/7576429-125/vitter-takes-his-chemical-safety |title=Vitter takes his Chemical Safety bill to House committee hearing |publisher=The Advocate |access-date=March 3, 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140306123418/http://theadvocate.com/home/7576429-125/vitter-takes-his-chemical-safety |archive-date=March 6, 2014 }}</ref>
|date=[[September 26]], [[2007]]
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1190786785155740.xml&coll=1
|title=Feds oppose full replacement of N.O. public housing units
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-27}}</ref><ref name="NOCB120307">{{cite web
|date=[[December 3]], [[2007]]
|author=Webster, Richard A.
|url=http://www.neworleanscitybusiness.com/viewStory.cfm?recID=24990
|title=Razing a ruckus
|publisher=New Orleans City Business
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> The [[Housing Authority of New Orleans|city housing authority]] is planning on replacing 4,000 low-income units with mixed-income projects providing a smaller inventory of low-income units.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[December 3]], [[2007]]
|author=Saluny, Susan
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/us/nationalspecial/03renters.html?pagewanted=1
|title=New Orleans Hurt by Acute Rental Shortage
|publisher=[[New York Times]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> In November, 2007, more than two dozen political action, faith-based and human rights organizations delivered a petition with more than 130,000 signatures asking that Vitter reconsider his position.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 21]], [[2007]]
|author=Bronston, Barri
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/11/dont_be_a_turkey_housing_advoc.html
|title=Don't be a turkey, housing advocates tell Vitter
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-11-21}}</ref> In December 2007, Vitter killed the bill in committee.<ref name="NOCB120307" /> Some housing advocates charge that Vitter is stalling the bill in order to keep Landrieu from claiming a legislative victory one year in advance of her reelection, a charge Vitter denies, saying Landrieu was refusing to negotiate.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[December 13]], [[2007]]
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1197536913159340.xml&coll=1
|title=Quarrel stalls bill for public housing
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-12-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-04-02
|last=Raju
|first=Manu
|url=http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/landrieus-reelection-bid-made-difficult-by-vitter-2008-04-02.html
|title=Landrieu’s reelection bid made difficult by Vitter
|publisher=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref>


===Pro-life stance===
====Child protection====
In April 2008, Vitter introduced an amendment to continue funding the [[Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act]] which was excluded from the 2008/2009 budget. The federal program maintains a national [[Sex offender registries in the United States|sex offender registry]], provides resources for tracking down unregistered [[sex offender]]s and increases penalties for the [[sexual assault]] of children. His amendment received bipartisan support.<ref>{{cite news|date=May 1, 2008|last=Alpert|first=Bruce|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/library-146/1209619943213470.xml&coll=1|title=Vitter seeks funding for child-safety act|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=May 1, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120222151447/http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Flibrary-146%2F1209619943213470.xml&coll=1|archive-date=February 22, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=419f0956-0443-4291-8a55-90adcdf48483|title=Vitter Offers Amendment to Fund Adam Walsh Act|publisher=David Vitter|access-date=May 1, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080430231225/http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom%2FPressItem&ID=419f0956-0443-4291-8a55-90adcdf48483|archive-date=April 30, 2008}}</ref>


====Children's health insurance program====
Vitter has won praise from [[pro-life]] groups for his stance against [[abortion]].<ref>{{cite web
In September 2007, Vitter opposed an increase of $35 billion for the [[State Children's Health Insurance Program]] (SCHIP), the national program to provide health care for children from families who earn too much to qualify for [[Medicaid]] but cannot afford private health insurance. He said he preferred that private health insurance provide the needed care and deemed the bill as "Hillarycare", a reference to the [[1993 Clinton health care plan]] created by [[Hillary Clinton]] which proposed [[universal health care]].<ref>{{cite news|date=September 28, 2007|author=Walsh, Bill|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1190962325232900.xml&coll=1|title=Senate OKs child health expansion|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=September 29, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120222153758/http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews-2%2F1190962325232900.xml&coll=1|archive-date=February 22, 2012}}</ref>
|date=[[February 1]], [[2001]]
|url=http://www.nrlc.org/RU486/safegardbill.html
|title=Proposed Bill Would Reinstate Safeguards for Women Taking RU486
|publisher=Randall K. O'Bannon, Ph.D.
|accessdate=2007-12-11}}</ref> In 2001, he co-authored legislation to restrict the number of physicians allowed to prescribe [[RU-486]], a drug used in medical abortions. Vitter said, "The legislation is about protecting women's health" and criticized the FDA for "hurriedly" approving the drug. Several Democratic politicians and [[pro-choice]] groups condemned the bill, characterizing Vitter as an "antichoice extremist". The bill died in committee.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[February 7]], [[2001]]
|url=http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=2709
|title=Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy
|publisher=[[Kaiser Permanente]]
|accessdate=2007-12-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h107-482
|title=H.R. 482 [107th]: RU-486 Patient Health and Safety Protection Act
|publisher=GovTrack
|accessdate=2007-12-10}}</ref>


====Ethics and term limits====
In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment<ref>{{cite web
Vitter refused to pledge to a voluntary term limit when running for the U.S. Congress in 1999. His opponent characterized this stance as hypocritical, and Vitter countered that unless it were universally applied, the loss of seniority would disadvantage his district.<ref name="NYT071408" /><ref>{{cite news |last=Aynesworth |first=Hugh |title=Morality is no issue in race for Livingston's seat; Term limit, Klansman dominate crowded campaign |pages=C4 |newspaper=[[The Washington Times]] |date=April 18, 1999}}</ref> As a Senator, he has proposed term limit constitutional amendments for members of Congress three times.<ref>{{cite web|date=January 17, 2007|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-2|title=S. J. Res. 2 – 110th Congress (2007): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States...|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=July 15, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=January 17, 2007|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj109-3|title=S. J. Res. 3 – 109th Congress (2005): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States...|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=July 15, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2788|title=S. 2788|access-date=April 29, 2009|author=110th Congress (2008)|date=March 31, 2008|work=Legislation|publisher=GovTrack.us|quote=Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act}}</ref> Vitter eventually decided to retire from the Senate in 2016 after serving two terms.
|url=http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00379
|title=On the Amendment (Vitter Amdt. No.3330 )
|publisher=[[United States Senate]]
|accessdate=2007-11-17}}</ref> barring all funds to health care providers and [[Planned Parenthood]] that provide health services (such as [[birth control|contraceptives]], [[Pap smear]]s, breast exams and tests for [[STDs]]) in addition to abortions. Federal law bars any funding to directly finance abortions. Vitter argued that the funds are used for [[Overhead (business)|overhead costs]] that benefit the abortion services. The amendment failed to pass.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 19]], [[2007]]
|author=Alpert, Bruce
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1192804244133220.xml&coll=1
|title=Abortion plan is defeated in Senate
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-10-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 28]], [[2007]]
|author=Taylor, Andrew
|url=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iSj9rQxYovv7EP4uGrPZ_dAqaoDgD8SBUTBG0
|title=No Cut in Money for Abortion Providers
|publisher=[[Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-10-19}}</ref> Following the rejection, Vitter and others urged
the Senate to pass a similar bill introduced by Vitter in
January 2007. [[As of May 2008]], the bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-351
|title=S. 351: Title X Family Planning Act
|publisher=GovTrack
|accessdate=2007-11-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 12]], [[2007]]
|author=Ertelt, Steven
|url=http://www.lifenews.com/nat3448.html
|title=Senators Ask Democrats for Amendment Revoking Abortion Center Funding
|publisher=LifeNews.com
|accessdate=2007-11-17}}</ref>


In 2007, in response to lobbying scandals involving, among others, [[Jack Abramoff]] and [[Duke Cunningham]], Congress passed a [[Honest Leadership and Open Government Act|lobbying and ethics reform package]] to which Vitter proposed a package of five amendments.<ref name="WP091507">{{cite news|date=September 15, 2007|last=Babington|first=Charles|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/15/AR2007091500589.html|title=Bush Signs Lobby-Ethics Bill|agency=Associated Press|access-date=May 9, 2008| newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=January 4, 2007|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=s110-1|title=S. 1 – 110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=May 9, 2008}}</ref><ref name="amendments">{{cite web|date=January 4, 2007|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=amendments&bill=s110-1|title=Amendments to S. 1 – 110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=May 9, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=January 4, 2008|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=98040c40-4d94-43cb-a56b-768a50da3bee|title=Vitter Introduces Extensive Ethics Reform Package|publisher=David Vitter|access-date=May 9, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080501034445/http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom%2FPressItem&ID=98040c40-4d94-43cb-a56b-768a50da3bee|archive-date=May 1, 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> The Senate approved three that limited which legislators' spouses could lobby the Senate,<ref>{{cite web|date=February 9, 2007|url=http://citizensforethics.org/node/19553|title=Proposed lobbying limits apply to only one senator|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]|access-date=May 9, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070711230202/http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/19553|archive-date=July 11, 2007}}</ref> created criminal penalties for legislators and [[executive branch]] officials who falsify financial reports,<ref>{{cite web|date=January 10, 2007|url=http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/20272|archive-url=https://archive.today/20071020003128/http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/20272|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 20, 2007|title=Senate cracks down on financial fraud|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]|access-date=May 9, 2008}}</ref> and doubled the penalties for lobbyists who failed to comply with [[Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995|disclosure requirements]].<ref>{{cite web|date=January 10, 2007|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s10|title=S.Amdt. 10: To increase the penalty for failure to comply with lobbying...|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=May 9, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080830024822/http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s10|archive-date=August 30, 2008}}</ref> The Senate rejected prohibiting legislators from paying their families with campaign funds with some saying it was unrelated to the current legislation and others that the payments were not a problem.<ref name="CREW011107">{{cite web|date=January 11, 2007|url=http://citizensforethics.org/node/20247|title=Campaigns Still A Family Affair|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]|access-date=May 9, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20071020003128/http://citizensforethics.org/node/20247|archive-date=October 20, 2007}}</ref><ref name="GT011007SR" /> Additionally, they [[Table (parliamentary)|tabled]] his proposal to define [[Tribe (Native American)|Indian tribes]] as corporations and its members as [[shareholder]]s so that they are required to contribute to candidates through [[political action committee]]s instead of their tribal treasury.<ref>{{cite web|date=January 10, 2007|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s5|title=S.Amdt. 5: To modify the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of...|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=May 9, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080830024926/http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s5|archive-date=August 30, 2008}}</ref> Senators objected saying that they are already subjected to campaign laws for [[Unincorporated entity|unincorporated entities]] and individuals and that the proposal was singling them out unfairly.<ref name="GT011007SR">{{cite web|date=January 10, 2007|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20070110-14&person=300065|title=Senate Record: Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=May 9, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080830025020/http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20070110-14&person=300065|archive-date=August 30, 2008}}</ref> The reform package became law in September 2007.<ref name="WP091507" />
In January 2008, Vitter proposed an amendment to prohibit the funding of abortions with [[Indian Health Service]] funds except in the case of rape, incest, or the life of the mother is at risk.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[January 17]], [[2008]]
|author=Ertelt, Steven
|url=http://www.lifenews.com/nat3629.html
|title=Senator to Ensure Indian American Health Care Bill Doesn't Fund Abortions
|publisher=LifeNews.com
|accessdate=2008-01-23}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s3896
|title=S.Amdt. 3896: To modify a section relating to limitation on use of funds...
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|accessdate=2008-01-23}}</ref> Vitter's amendment passed the Senate. If enacted into law, it will hold future presidential administrations to an executive principle first crafted in 1982 by the [[Ronald Reagan]] White House.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[February 26]], [[2008]]
|author=KALB News Channel 5
|url=http://www.kalb.com/index.php/news/article/senate-passes-vitter-amendment-to-prohibit-federal-funding-of-abortions/4025/
|title=Senate Passes Vitter Amendment to Prohibit Federal Funding of Abortions
|publisher=KALB.com
|accessdate=2008-02-27}}</ref>


In 2009, Vitter and Democratic former Senator [[Russ Feingold]] announced an effort to end automatic pay raises for members of Congress.<ref>{{cite web|date= April 14, 2009|last= Feingold|first= Russ|author-link= Russ Feingold |author2=David Vitter|url= http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/14/__congress_does_not_deserve_any_special_treatment_48903.html|title= Congress Does Not Deserve Any Special Treatment|publisher= [[RealClearPolitics]]|access-date= November 4, 2009}}</ref>
Later that year, Vitter co-sponsored the Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act which required doctors performing abortions to have the authority granted by a nearby hospital to admit patients along with other oversight regulations. [[As of May 2008]], the bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-04-20
|last=Alpert
|first=Bruce
|authorlink=
|coauthors=Walsh, Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1208669675248010.xml&coll=1
|title=On The Hill: Bill tightens abortion penalties
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-03-31
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2788
|title=S. 2788--110th Congress (2008): Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act,
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-05-06
}}</ref>


===Gun politics===
====Franken Amendment====
[[File: DVitterOfficial.jpg|thumb|Vitter in 2005]]
In October 2009, the Senate passed Democratic Senator [[Al Franken]]'s amendment to the 2010 Defense Appropriations bill that would forbid federal contractors from forcing victims of [[sexual assault]], [[Battery (tort)|battery]] and discrimination to submit to [[binding arbitration]] (where a third-party typically chosen by the contractor adjudicates) and thereby prohibiting them from going to court.<ref name="MP100609">{{cite web|date= October 6, 2009|last= Dizikes|first= Cynthia|url= http://www.minnpost.com/stories/2009/10/06/12247/senate_passes_franken_amendment_aimed_at_defense_contractors|title= Senate passes Franken amendment aimed at defense contractors|publisher= [[MinnPost.com]]|access-date= November 3, 2009|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20091010001712/http://www.minnpost.com/stories/2009/10/06/12247/senate_passes_franken_amendment_aimed_at_defense_contractors|archive-date= October 10, 2009|url-status= dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date= October 1, 2009|url= http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:SP2588:|title= S.amdt.2588|publisher= [[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database|access-date= November 3, 2009|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20101208182258/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:SP2588:|archive-date= December 8, 2010|url-status= dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date= October 1, 2009|pages= S10069–S10070|url= http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?position=all&page=S10069&dbname=2009_record|title= SA 2588|publisher= [[Congressional Record]]|access-date= November 3, 2009}}</ref> The impetus for the amendment came from the story of [[Jamie Leigh Jones]] who alleged that she was drugged and [[gang rape|gang-raped]] by employees of [[Halliburton]]/[[KBR (company)|KBR]], a federal contractor.<ref name="MP100609" /><ref name="WP102509" /><ref name="DW110209" />


The amendment passed 68 to 30 with all opposition coming from Republicans including Vitter (all four female Republicans, six other Republicans and all present Democrats voted for passage).<ref name="MP100609" /><ref>{{cite web|date= October 6, 2009|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2009-308|title= S.Amdt. 2588: To prohibit the use of funds for any Federal... to H.R. 3326: Department of Defense Appropriations... (Vote On Amendment)|publisher= [[Govtrack]].us|access-date= November 3, 2009}}</ref> Vitter's [[United States Senate election in Louisiana, 2010|2010 Democratic Senatorial]] opponent [[Charlie Melancon]] criticized Vitter for his vote saying, "David Vitter has refused to explain why he voted to allow taxpayer-funded companies to sweep rape charges under the rug. We can only guess what his reasons were."<ref name="DW110209">{{cite web|date= November 2, 2009|url= http://www.dailyworld.com/article/20091102/OPINION/911020310|title= A case to make anyone ashamed|publisher= [[Daily World (Opelousas)|Daily World]]|access-date= November 3, 2009}}{{dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date= October 26, 2009|last= Fabian|first= Jordan|url= https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/53233-melancon-hits-at-vitters-rape-amendment-vote/|title= Melancon hits at Vitter's rape amendment vote|newspaper= [[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|access-date= November 3, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date= October 26, 2009|last= Moller|first= Jan|url= http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/10/melancon_enters_online_campaig.html|archive-url= https://archive.today/20130130074447/http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/10/melancon_enters_online_campaig.html|url-status= dead|archive-date= January 30, 2013|title= Melancon enters online campaign fray|newspaper= [[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date= November 3, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date= October 2009|last= Melancon|first= Charlie|author-link= Charlie Melancon|url= http://action.charliemelancon.com/blastContent.jsp?email_blast_KEY=11202|title= Charlie Melancon for Senate|publisher= [[Charlie Melancon]] Campaign Committee, Inc.|access-date= November 3, 2009|archive-date= July 8, 2011|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110708135501/http://action.charliemelancon.com/blastContent.jsp?email_blast_KEY=11202|url-status= dead}}</ref> However, ''[[The Washington Post]]'' columnist [[Kathleen Parker]] argued that the 30 senators were being "unfairly smeared for doing the harder thing, maybe even for the right reasons."<ref name="WP102509">{{cite news|date= October 25, 2009|last= Parker|first= Kathleen|author-link= Kathleen Parker|url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/23/AR2009102303191.html|title= The 'rape supporter' ploy|newspaper= The Washington Post|access-date= November 3, 2009}}</ref>
Rated A by the [[National Rifle Association]], Vitter has been a consistent champion of gun rights.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/David_Vitter.htm#Gun_Control
|title=David Vitter on the issues
|publisher=On The Issues
|accessdate=2008-02-16}}</ref> In April, 2006, in response to firearm confiscations in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Vitter was the Senate sponsor of the [[Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act]], to prohibit federal funding for the confiscation of legally held firearms during a disaster.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02599:@@@D&summ2=m&|title=S.AMDT.S.2599 |publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database}}</ref> Later, Vitter included the provisions of the act in an amendment to an [[appropriation bill]] for the [[United States Department of Homeland Security|Department Of Homeland Security]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SP4615: |title=S.AMDT.4615|publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database}}</ref> The bill became law in September, 2006 with the amendment modified to allow for the temporary surrender of a firearm as a condition for entering a rescue or evacuation vehicle.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR05441:@@@R|title=H.R.5441
|publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database}}</ref>


Republican senators said they voted against it because it was unenforceable, a position also taken by the [[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]] (DOD) and the [[Obama administration]].<ref name="MP100609" /><ref name="WP102509" /><ref name="DW110209" /> However, the DOD and the White House stated they agreed with the intent of the legislation and suggested it would be better if it was broadened to prohibit the use of arbitration in cases of sexual assault for any business contract, not just federal contractors.<ref name="WP102509" /> Senators explained their vote against the legislation by saying it was a political attack on [[Halliburton]] and that the Senate shouldn't regulate contracts.<ref name="WP102509" /> The latter argument is countered with many examples of similar restrictions on contractors such as discrimination, bonuses and health care.<ref name="MP100609" /><ref name="DW110209" /> Others felt it was unconstitutional and that arbitration is useful in resolving disputes, often faster, privately and cheaper.<ref name="MP100609" />
In February 2008, Vitter, along with Senators [[Larry Craig]] and [[Mike Crapo]], blocked the [[Advice and consent|confirmation]] of [[Michael Sullivan (US Attorney)|Michael J. Sullivan]] as head of the [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives]] saying Sullivan supports "burdensome regulations" on gun owners and dealers and is "overly aggressive" enforcing gun laws. An editorial writer for ''[[The Boston Globe]]'' wrote that Vitter's position was "unreasonable" because the guns Sullivan sought to control are those commonly used in crimes: those stolen or purchased on the black market.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-02-14
|last=Saltzman
|first=Jonathan
|url=http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/02/14/sullivan_atf_confirmation_blocked/
|title=Sullivan ATF confirmation blocked
|publisher=[[The Boston Globe]]
|accessdate=2008-02-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-02-16
|url=http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2008/02/16/held_up_by_gun_lobby_radicals/
|title=Held up by gun-lobby radicals
|publisher=[[The Boston Globe]]
|accessdate=2008-02-06}}</ref> On the other hand, gun rights advocates say that many gun dealers have lost their licenses for harmless bureaucratic errors.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-02-25
|last=Schmitt
|first=Richard B.
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-atf25feb25,1,4119857.story?ctrack=2&cset=true
|title=ATF nominee in the crossfire
|publisher=[[Los Angeles Times]]
|accessdate=2008-02-25}}</ref>


Later, a [[Baton Rouge]] rape survivor confronted Vitter at a [[town hall meeting]] saying, "[it] meant everything to me that I was able to put the person who attacked me behind bars ... How can you support a law that tells a rape victim that she does not have the right to defend herself?" Vitter replied, "The language in question did not say that in any way shape or form."<ref>{{cite news|date= November 4, 2009|last= Shields|first= Gerard|url= http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/69037217.html|title= Survivor of rape confronts Vitter|newspaper= [[The Advocate (Louisiana)]]|access-date= November 5, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date= November 4, 2009|last= Tilove|first= Jonathan|url= http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/11/sen_david_vitter_defends_vote.html|archive-url= https://archive.today/20130130043606/http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/11/sen_david_vitter_defends_vote.html|url-status= dead|archive-date= January 30, 2013|title= When confronted by rape victim, Vitter defends vote against 'Franken amendment'|newspaper= [[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date= November 5, 2009}}</ref>
===Ethics reform and term limits===


====Gambling====
Vitter has argued for ethics reform and [[term limits]] since he was in the Louisiana Legislature in the early 1990s.<ref>{{cite web
Vitter opposed a bid by the [[Jena Band of Choctaw Indians]] to build a casino in Louisiana, arguing that the build site was not historically part of their tribal lands. He lobbied the [[United States Department of the Interior|Interior Department]] and included language in an appropriations bill to stop the casino. Although the Interior Department gave its approval, the casino has not yet been approved by the state.<ref>{{cite news |first=Schmidt |last=Susan |author-link=Susan Schmidt |title=Casino Bid Prompted High-Stakes Lobbying |newspaper=The Washington Post |page=A01 |date=March 13, 2005 }}</ref> The Jena chief accused Vitter of ties with disgraced lobbyist [[Jack Abramoff]], who simultaneously lobbied against the casino. The chairman of the Senate committee investigating the lobbyist said, "The committee has seen absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Senator Vitter's opposition to (the proposed casino) had to do with anything other than his long-standing opposition to gambling."<ref>{{cite news|date=July 28, 2005|last=Walsh|first=Bill|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-1/112253289179960.xml|archive-url=https://archive.today/20050907221410/http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-1/112253289179960.xml|archive-date=September 7, 2005|title=McCain defends Vitter as tribe cries foul|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=April 21, 2008}}</ref> In 2007 and 2008, Vitter introduced a bill to prohibit Indian casinos such as Jena's. Neither bill became law.<ref>{{cite web|date=April 14, 2008|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/17646874.html|title=Our View: Tribal casinos win big bucks|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]|access-date=April 21, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=ff9b744f-cdc5-4b3a-bd56-03830a906218|title=Vitter Introduces Indian Gambling Reform Act|publisher=David Vitter|access-date=April 21, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080501010613/http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom%2FPressItem&ID=ff9b744f-cdc5-4b3a-bd56-03830a906218|archive-date=May 1, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2676|title=S. 2676: A bill to make technical corrections to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and for other purposes|publisher=GovTrack|access-date=April 21, 2008}}</ref>
|date=2007-07-12
|last=Crouere
|first=Jeff
|url=http://blog.nola.com/jeff_crouere/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_david_vit.html
|title=The Rise and Fall of David Vitter
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-05-08
}}</ref> As a Louisiana state legislator, Vitter successfully pushed through a term limits amendment to the state constitution to oust the largely Democratically controlled legislature.<ref name="NYT071408">{{cite web
|date=1999-04-29
|last=Sack
|first=Kevin
|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9504EFDE133DF93AA15757C0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2
|title=Louisiana G.O.P. Facing David Duke, Again
|publisher=[[The New York Times]]
|accessdate=2008-07-14
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-07-11
|last=Nossiter
|first=Adam
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/us/11vitter.html?fta=y
|title=A Senator’s Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky
|publisher=[[The New York Times]]
|accessdate=2008-07-14
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-09-09
|last=Hasten
|first=Mike
|url=http://www.thetowntalk.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070909/NEWS01/709090347
|title=Republicans set sights on control of La. House
|publisher=The Town Talk
|accessdate=2008-07-14
|quote=
}}</ref><ref name="LC" /> The first election legislators were affected by the reform [[Louisiana state elections, 2007|occurred in 2007]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-10-30
|last=Barrow
|first=Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2007/09/term_limits_arent_gop_bonanza.html
|title=Term limits aren't GOP bonanza
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-07-14
}}</ref> In order to leverage the term limits advantage in that election, Vitter formed a [[Political Action Committee]] with the goal of winning a legislative Republican majority. Although it was well financed, Vitter's connection with prostitution may have decreased its effectiveness.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-08-05
|last=Barrow
|first=Bill
|url=http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/47395/54420.html
|title=Quest for La. House will look past Vitter
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-07-14
|quote=Vitter's effectiveness for raising the profile of Republican candidates in state legislative races has dissolved
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-12-06
|url=http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361
|title=The 2007 Elections - Effect of Term Limits (Part I)
|publisher=LousianaConservative.com
|accessdate=2008-07-14
|quote=The LCRM also suffered somewhat of a setback ... when stories arose regarding Senator Vitter’s involvement with prostitutes....
}}</ref> While the Republicans saw gains, the Democrats maintained majority control.<ref name="LC">{{cite web
|date=2007-12-06
|url=http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361
|title=The 2007 Elections - Effect of Term Limits (Part I)
|publisher=LousianaConservative.com
|accessdate=2008-07-14
}}</ref>


====Gun rights====
In spite of his state legislative efforts, Vitter refused to pledge to a voluntary term limit when running for the U.S. Congress in 1999 which his opponent characterized as hypocritical. Vitter countered that unless it was universally applied, the loss of seniority would disadvantage his district.<ref name="NYT071408" /><ref>{{cite news
Rated "A" by the [[NRA Political Victory Fund]],<ref>{{cite web |title=NRA-PVF Endorses David Vitter for U.S. Senate |url=https://www.nrapvf.org/articles/20100913/nra-pvf-endorses-david-vitter-for-us-senate |website=nrapvf.org |publisher=NRA-PVF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140812195847/https://www.nrapvf.org/articles/20100913/nra-pvf-endorses-david-vitter-for-us-senate |archive-date=August 12, 2014 |language=en-us |date=September 13, 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref> Vitter has been a consistent defender of [[Gun politics in the United States|gun rights]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/David_Vitter.htm#Gun_Control|title=David Vitter on the issues|publisher=On The Issues|access-date=February 16, 2008}}</ref> In April 2006, in response to firearm confiscations in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Vitter was the Senate sponsor of the [[Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act]], to prohibit federal funding for the confiscation of legally held firearms during a disaster.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02599:@@@D&summ2=m&|title=S.AMDT.S.2599|publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database|date=September 19, 2006|access-date=December 4, 2007|archive-date=October 19, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151019003738/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02599:@@@D&summ2=m&|url-status=dead}}</ref> Later, Vitter included the provisions of the act in an amendment to an [[appropriation bill]] for the [[United States Department of Homeland Security|Department Of Homeland Security]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SP4615:|title=S.AMDT.4615|publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database|access-date=December 10, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151019003738/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SP4615:|archive-date=October 19, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> The bill became law in September 2006, with the amendment modified to allow for the temporary surrender of a firearm as a condition for entering a rescue or evacuation vehicle.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR05441:@@@R|title=H.R.5441|publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database|year=2006|access-date=December 4, 2007|archive-date=November 12, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081112122045/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR05441:@@@R|url-status=dead}}</ref>
|last=Aynesworth
|first=Hugh
|title=Morality is no issue in race for Livingston's seat; Term limit, Klansman dominate crowded campaign
|pages=C4
|publisher=[[The Washington Times]]
|date=[[April 18]], [[1999]]
}}</ref> As a Senator, he has twice proposed term limit constitutional amendments for members of Congress.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-01-17
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-2
|title=S. J. Res. 2--110th Congress (2007): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States...
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-07-15
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-01-17
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj109-3
|title=S. J. Res. 3--109th Congress (2005): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States...
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-07-15
}}</ref>


On April 17, 2013, Vitter voted against the Toomey-Manchin Gun Control Amendment. The amendment failed to reach the sixty senatorial votes necessary to overcome a Republican-led filibuster. The Toomey-Manchin Gun Control Amendment is a bipartisan deal on gun background checks. Under the proposal, federal background checks would be expanded to include gun shows and online sales. All such sales would be channeled through licensed firearm dealers who would be charged for keeping record of transactions. The proposal does not require background checks for private sales between individuals.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20130419090744/http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/04/senate_rejects_effort_to_expan.html "Senate rejects effort to expand gun background checks; Vitter votes no, Landrieu yes"], Associated Press via ''nola.com'', April 17, 2013.</ref>
In 2007, in response to lobbying scandals involving, among others, [[Jack Abramoff]] and [[Duke Cunningham]], Congress passed a [[Honest Leadership and Open Government Act|lobbying and ethics reform package]] to which Vitter proposed a package of five amendments.<ref name="WP091507">{{cite web
|date=2007-09-15
|last=Babington
|first=Charles
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/15/AR2007091500589.html
|title=Bush Signs Lobby-Ethics Bill
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-01-04
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=s110-1
|title=S. 1--110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref><ref name="amendments">{{cite web
|date=2007-01-04
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=amendments&bill=s110-1
|title=Amendments to S. 1--110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-01-04
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=98040c40-4d94-43cb-a56b-768a50da3bee
|title=Vitter Introduces Extensive Ethics Reform Package
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> The Senate approved three that limited which legislators' spouses could lobby the Senate,<ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-02-09
|url=http://citizensforethics.org/node/19553
|title=Proposed lobbying limits apply to only one senator
|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> created criminal penalties for legislators and [[executive branch]] officials who falsify financial reports,<ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-01-10
|url=http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/20272
|title=Senate cracks down on financial fraud
|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|accessdate=2008-05-09
|quote=
}}</ref> and doubled the penalties for lobbyists who failed to comply with [[Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995|disclosure requirements]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-01-10
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s10
|title=S.Amdt. 10: To increase the penalty for failure to comply with lobbying...
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> The Senate rejected prohibiting legislators from paying their families with campaign funds with some saying it was unrelated to the current legislation and others that the payments were not a problem.<ref name="CREW011107">{{cite web
|date=2007-01-11
|url=http://citizensforethics.org/node/20247
|title=Campaigns Still A Family Affair
|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref><ref name="GT011007SR" /> Additionally, they [[Table (parliamentary)|tabled]] his proposal to define [[Indian tribes]] as [[corporations]] and its members as [[stockholders]] so that they are required to contribute to candidates through [[political action committees]] instead of their tribal treasury.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2007-01-10
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s5
|title=S.Amdt. 5: To modify the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of...
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> Senators objected saying that they are already subjected to campaign laws for [[Unincorporated entity|unincorporated entities]] and individuals and that the proposal was singling them out unfairly.<ref name="GT011007SR">{{cite web
|date=2007-01-10
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20070110-14&person=300065
|title=Senate Record: Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> The reform package became law in September 2007.<ref name="WP091507" />


In February 2008, Vitter – along with Senators [[Larry Craig]] and [[Mike Crapo]] of [[Idaho]] – blocked the [[Advice and consent|confirmation]] of [[Michael Sullivan (US Attorney)|Michael J. Sullivan]] as head of the [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives]] (ATF) saying Sullivan supports "burdensome regulations" on gun owners and dealers and is "overly aggressive" enforcing gun laws. An editorial writer for ''[[The Boston Globe]]'' wrote that Vitter's position was "unreasonable" because the guns Sullivan sought to control are those commonly used in crimes: those stolen or purchased on the black market.<ref>{{cite news|date=February 14, 2008|last=Saltzman|first=Jonathan|url=https://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/02/14/sullivan_atf_confirmation_blocked/|title=Sullivan ATF confirmation blocked|newspaper=The Boston Globe|access-date=February 16, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=February 16, 2008|url=https://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2008/02/16/held_up_by_gun_lobby_radicals/|title=Held up by gun-lobby radicals|newspaper=The Boston Globe|access-date=February 6, 2008}}</ref> On the other hand, gun rights advocates say that many gun dealers have lost their licenses for harmless bureaucratic errors.<ref>{{cite news|date=February 25, 2008|last=Schmitt|first=Richard B.|url=https://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-atf25feb25,1,4119857.story?ctrack=2&cset=true|title=ATF nominee in the crossfire|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]]|access-date=February 25, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080414022738/http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-atf25feb25%2C1%2C4119857.story?ctrack=2&cset=true|archive-date=April 14, 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> Sullivan stayed on as acting head of the ATF until January 2009 to make way for President [[Barack Obama]] to name his own nominee.<ref>{{cite web|date= January 20, 2009|url= http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/US_Attorney_Sullivan_resigns_041509|title= US Attorney Sullivan resigns|publisher= [[WFXT]]|access-date= April 29, 2009}}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
===Children's health insurance program===
In September 2007, Vitter opposed an increase of $35 billion for the [[State Children's Health Insurance Program]] (SCHIP), the national program to provide health care for children from families who earn too much to qualify for [[Medicaid]] but cannot afford private health insurance. He said he preferred that private health insurance provide the needed care and deemed the bill as "Hillarycare", a reference to the [[1993 Clinton health care plan]] created by [[Hillary Clinton]] which proposed [[universal health care]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 28]], [[2007]]
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1190962325232900.xml&coll=1
|title=Senate OKs child health expansion
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-29}}</ref> The increase passed the Senate, 67 to 29 but was later [[veto]]ed by President [[George W. Bush|Bush]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 6]], [[2007]]
|author=Pear, Robert
|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE7DE1130F935A35753C1A9619C8B63
|title=A Battle Foreshadowing a Larger Health Care War
|publisher=[[New York Times]]
|accessdate=2007-10-24}}</ref>


====Hurricane Katrina====
===United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea===
[[File:VitterRumsfeld05.jpg|thumb|Senator Vitter discussing relief efforts with Defense Secretary [[Donald Rumsfeld]]]]
In September 2007, during hearings of the [[Senate Foreign Relations Committee]], Vitter expressed serious doubts about the [[United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea]] treaty concerning issues of U.S. [[sovereignty]]<ref name="WT">{{cite web
In the aftermath of [[Hurricane Katrina]], Vitter and the rest of the Louisiana congressional delegation worked to bring aid to the Gulf Coast region to rebuild broken levees, schools and hospitals, restore coastal wetlands, and provide assistance for its many victims.<ref>{{cite news|date=October 5, 2005|last=Hernandez|first=Raymond|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/05/national/nationalspecial/05rebuild.html|title=Gulf Coast Lawmakers in Spotlight as Aid Requests Pour In|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=April 21, 2008}}</ref>
|date=[[September 28]], [[2007]]
|author=Sands, David R.
|url=http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070928/FOREIGN/109280058/1003
|title=White House pushes sea treaty
|publisher=[[The Washington Times]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> echoing an array of anti-UN conservative groups against the treaty<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[May 16]], [[2004]]
|url=http://lugar.senate.gov/sfrc/opeds.html
|title=Pass the sea treaty
|publisher=[[Omaha World Herald]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref><ref name="WT" /> including [[The National Center for Public Policy Research]],<ref>{{cite web
|date=August, 2006
|author=Ridenour, David A.
|url=http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA542LawoftheSeaTreaty.html
|title=Ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty: A Not-So-Innocent Passage
|publisher=[[The National Center for Public Policy Research]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> the [[Heritage Foundation]]<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 25]], [[2007]]
|author=Spring, Baker and Steven Groves and Brett D. Schaefer
|url=http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/wm1638.cfm
|title=The Top Five Reasons Why Conservatives Should Oppose the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea
|publisher=the [[Heritage Foundation]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> and the [[Center for Security Policy]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[May 18]], [[2004]]
|author=[[Frank Gaffney|Gaffney Jr., Frank J.]]
|url=http://www.nationalreview.com/gaffney/gaffney200403181156.asp
|title=Don't Get LOST
|publisher=[[National Review]] Online
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> The treaty, which sets up countries' jurisdiction over their coasts and ocean including exploration and navigation rights,<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 24]], [[2007]]
|author=Scally, William
|url=http://public.cq.com/docs/gs/greensheets110-000002591199.html
|title=Law of Sea Treaty Revived With Senate Hearings
|publisher=[[Congressional Quarterly]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> is supported by the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration, a majority of the United States Senate, the [[United States Department of Defense|Pentagon]], the [[United States Department of State|State Department]] and [[United States Navy|Navy]]<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 6]], [[2007]]
|author=Kraus, Don
|url=http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4286
|title=Time to Ratify the Law of the Sea
|publisher=[[Institute for Policy Studies]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> as do a coalition of business and environmental groups.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 27]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpsea275391172sep27,0,1614204.story
|title=Editorial: U.S. should join Law of the Sea alliance
|publisher=[[Newsday]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> The committee approved the treaty 17-4, with Vitter voting no.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 1]], [[2007]]
|author=Dinan, Stephen
|url=http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071101/NATION/111010044/1001
|title=Senate panel OKs sea treaty, but fight looms
|publisher=[[The Washington Times]]
|accessdate=2007-11-02}}</ref>


In early September, Vitter said that he would give "the entire big government organized relief effort a failing grade, across the board." He said that state and local governments shared in the blame as well.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20151019003739/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/9270364/ "Louisiana senior senator turns up heat on Bush: Democrat Landrieu escalates rhetoric against president on Katrina response"], ''Associated Press'', September 11, 2005</ref> Vitter's actions during Hurricane Katrina are described in historian [[Douglas Brinkley]]'s May 2006 book, ''The Great Deluge''.
===Gambling===


In September 2007, Vitter announced that he got "a critical concession" from the White House that decreased Louisiana's obligations for hurricane recovery by $1 billion. However, the White House said that was false.<ref name="TP092907">{{cite news|date=September 29, 2007|author=Walsh, Bill|url=http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2007/09/louisiana_looks_like_a_state_o.html|title=Louisiana looks like a state of denial|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=September 29, 2007}}</ref>
Ever since his days in the Louisiana State Legislature, Vitter has been a longtime foe of gambling.<ref>{{cite web
|date=1994-06-12
|last=Applebome
|first=Peter
|authorlink=Peter Applebome
|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9901E6DD113AF931A25755C0A962958260
|title= Legal Gambling Bedevils Louisiana
|publisher=[[The New York Times]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> Beginning in 2002, Vitter opposed the Indian group [[Jena Band of Choctaw Indians|Jena Band's]] bid to build a casino in Louisiana arguing that the build site was not historically part of their tribal lands. He lobbied the [[United States Department of the Interior|Interior Department]] and included language in an appropriations bill to stop the casino. Although the Interior Department gave its approval, the casino has not yet been approved by the state.<ref>{{cite news
|first=Schmidt
|last=Susan
|authorlink=Susan Schmidt
|title=Casino Bid Prompted High-Stakes Lobbying
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
|page=A01
|date=2005-03-13
}}</ref> The Jena chief accused Vitter of ties with disgraced lobbyist [[Jack Abramoff]] who simultaneously lobbied against the casino. The chairman of the Senate committee investigating the lobbyist said, "The committee has seen absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Senator Vitter's opposition to (the proposed casino) had to do with anything other than his long-standing opposition to gambling.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2005-07-28
|last=Walsh
|first=Bill
|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20050907221410/http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-1/112253289179960.xml
|title=McCain defends Vitter as tribe cries foul
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> In 2007 and 2008, Vitter introduced a bill to prohibit Indian casinos such as Jena's. [[As of May 2008]], Vitter's bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-04-14
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/17646874.html
|title=Our View: Tribal casinos win big bucks
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=ff9b744f-cdc5-4b3a-bd56-03830a906218
|title=Vitter Introduces Indian Gambling Reform Act
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2676
|title=S. 2676: A bill to make technical corrections to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and for other purposes
|publisher=GovTrack
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref>


===Military===
====Immigration====
Vitter has been actively involved with legislation concerning [[Illegal immigration to the United States|illegal immigrants]]. In June 2007, he led a group of conservative Senators in blocking the [[Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007|Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act]], a piece of federal legislation that would have granted a pathway to legal residence to 12 million illegal immigrants coupled with increased border enforcement. The bill's defeat won Vitter national attention as the bill was supported by President [[George W. Bush]], [[John McCain]], and [[Ted Kennedy]], among others. Vitter characterized the bill as [[amnesty]], which supporters denied. Bush accused the bill's opponents of [[fear mongering]].<ref>{{cite news|date=June 22, 2007|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/06/vitter_leads_opposition_to_imm.html|title=Vitter leads opposition to immigration bill|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=December 7, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070824163940/http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/06/vitter_leads_opposition_to_imm.html|archive-date=August 24, 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=June 18, 2007|url=http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21150|title=Are Rational Immigration Laws a 'Job American Politicians Won't Do'?|newspaper=[[Human Events]]|access-date=December 7, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080115105213/http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21150|archive-date=January 15, 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=May 30, 2007|author=Rutenberg, Jim|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/30/washington/30immig.html|title=Bush Takes On Conservatives Over Immigration|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=December 7, 2007}}</ref>
In May 2001, Vitter authored an amendment to the [[No Child Left Behind Act]], a reauthorization of the [[Elementary and Secondary Education Act]], which required all secondary schools receiving federal funding to permit US military recruitment on school grounds and to provide the name, home phone number and address of every student enrolled to military recruiters, unless the student (or the student's parent) specifically opts out.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 17]], [[2005]]
|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159915,00.html
|title=Parents Blast Military Recruiters at Schools
|publisher=[[Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[April 23]], [[2003]]
|author=Cavanagh, Sean
|url=http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2003/04/23/32recruit.h22.html
|title=Military Recruiters Meet Pockets of Resistance
|publisher=[[Education Week]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.dod.mil/prhome/docs/no_child_act.pdf
|title=Section 9528 of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Section on Military recruitment (PDF - English)
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> In February, 2007, Democratic Representative [[Michael M. Honda]] proposed the Student Privacy Protection Act of 2007 to change [[David Vitter#Military recruitment in high schools|Vitter's amendment]] from requiring high schools to provide [[military recruiters]] with students' personal information unless they explicitly [[opt-out]] to requiring the student's explicit consent first.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR01346:@@@L&summ2=m&
|title=H.R.1346
|publisher=[[The Library of Congress]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[March 6]], [[2007]]
|author=Honda, Mike
|url=http://mikehonda.blogspot.com/2007/03/military-recruiters-have-access-to-our.html
|title=Military recruiters have access to our children's personal information
|publisher=[[Michael M. Honda|Mike M. Honda]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> According to the [[Congressional Quarterly]], Vitter stands behind the current provision. He stated, if changed, families who supported military recruiting may miss out if required to opt-in.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 9]], [[2007]]
|author=Zeller, Shawn
|url=http://public.cq.com/docs/cqw/weeklyreport110-000002546488.html
|title=Revisiting the No-Child Recruitment Plan
|publisher=[[Congressional Quarterly]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref>


In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment withholding [[Community Oriented Policing Services]] funds from any [[sanctuary city]] which bans city employees and police officers from asking people about their immigration status in violation of the [[Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996|Illegal Immigration Act]]. Democratic Senator [[Dick Durbin]], in opposition to the amendment, said these cities do not want to inquire about someone's status if they report a crime, are a victim of [[domestic violence]] or get vaccinations for their children. The amendment was defeated.<ref>{{cite news|date=October 16, 2007|url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/plan-to-crack-down-on-sanctuary-cities-killed-in-senate|title=Plan to Crack Down on 'Sanctuary Cities' Killed in Senate|publisher=[[Fox News]]|access-date=October 16, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071017175146/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,302464,00.html|archive-date=October 17, 2007|url-status=live}}</ref>
In May 2008, Vitter voted with the majority, despite President Bush's and other conservative Republican's opposition, for the passage of the [[Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008]] which expanded educational benefits for veterans similar to the level provided for returning [[World War II]] veterans in the [[G.I. Bill]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=
|year=
|month=
|last=Lerman
|first=David
|url=http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-now-webbgi.m22,0,5797943.story
|title=Senate approves Jim Webb's new GI Bill
|publisher=[[Daily Press (Virginia)|Daily Press]]
|accessdate=2008-05-22
|quote=
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-05-22
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Congress-Iraq-Funding.html
|title=Senate Passes Iraq War Funding Bill
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2008-05-22
|quote=
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-05-22
|url=http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00137
|title=Vote Summary
|publisher=[[United States Senate]]
|accessdate=2008-05-22
}}</ref>


In November 2007, Vitter introduced a bill requiring banks to verify that no customer was an illegal immigrant before issuing banking or credit cards. The bill never made it out of committee.<ref>{{cite web|date=November 26, 2007|author=Shields, Gerald|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/11805796.html|title=Washington Watch for November 26, 2007|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]|access-date=November 26, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2393|title=S. 2393: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards...|publisher=GovTrack.us|access-date=January 15, 2008}}</ref>
===School board prayers===
In 2005 Vitter introduced a resolution supporting prayer at [[Board of education|school board]] meetings in response to an earlier [[United States district court|district court]] decision that the Louisiana's [[Tangipahoa Parish]] practice of opening meetings with Christian prayers was [[unconstitutional]]. The bill died in [[United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions|committee]].<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr109-132
|title=S. Res. 132 (109th): A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|accessdate=2008-01-16}}</ref><ref name="advocate012007">{{cite web
|date=[[January 20]], [[2007]]
|author=Mitchell, David J.
|url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/theadvocate/access/1198586681.html?dids=1198586681:1198586681&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jan+20%2C+2007&author=DAVID+J.+MITCHELL&pub=Advocate&edition=&startpage=3&desc=Prayer+decision+appealed+***+Tangipahoa+parties+say+ruling+unclear
|title=Tangipahoa parties say ruling unclear
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]
|accessdate=2008-01-16
|archiveurl=http://indianalawblog.com/archives/2007/01/courts_motion_t.html
|archivedate=2007-01-20
}}</ref> Vitter later reintroduced the resolution in January 2007 after a [[panel]] of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|Fifth Circuit Court]] concluded that Christian prayers were unconstitutional but was undecided whether [[nonsectarian]] prayers were allowed. In July 2007, the full Fifth Circuit dismissed the case because of a lack of [[Standing (law)|standing]]. The school board subsequently resumed prayer evocations but opened it to diverse community religions. [[As of May 2008]], Vitter's bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=sr110-35
|title=S. Res. 35: A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|accessdate=2008-01-16}}</ref><ref name="advocate012007" /><ref>{{cite web
|date=December, 2006
|url=http://www.nsba.org/site/doc_cosa.asp?TRACKID=&CID=468&DID=39876
|title=
Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch. Bd., No. 05-30294 (5th Cir. Dec. 15, 2006)
|publisher=[[National School Boards Association]]
|accessdate=2008-01-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[August 22]], [[2007]]
|author=Mitchell, David J.
|url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/theadvocate/access/1324471571.html?dids=1324471571:1324471571&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Aug+22%2C+2007&author=DAVID+J.+MITCHELL&pub=Advocate&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Tangipahoa+board+OKs+prayer+policy
|title=Tangipahoa board OKs prayer policy
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]
|accessdate=2008-01-16
|archiveurl=http://melissarogers.typepad.com/melissa_rogers/2007/08/the-tangipahoa-.html
|archivedate=2007-08-22}}</ref>


In March 2008, Vitter reintroduced the latter two proposals<ref>{{cite web|date=March 5, 2008|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2713|title=S. 2713 – 110th Congress (2008): A bill to prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of section...|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=May 6, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=March 5, 2008|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2714|title=S. 2714: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards...|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=May 6, 2008}}</ref> and cosponsored ten of eleven other bills<ref>{{cite web|date=March 6, 2008|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20080306-6&bill=s110-2713|title=Measures Placed on the Calendar|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)|access-date=May 6, 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080830025411/http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20080306-6&bill=s110-2713|archive-date=August 30, 2008}}</ref> in a Republican package of tough immigration enforcement measures including jail time for [[Illegal immigration to the United States#Illegal entry|illegal border]] crossing; [[deportation]] for any immigrant (legal or illegal) for a single [[driving while intoxicated]]; declaration of [[National language#United States|English as the official language]] (thereby terminating language assistance at voting booths and federal agencies); additional construction of a [[United States–Mexico barrier|border fence]]; permission for local and state police to enforce immigration laws and penalties for states who issue drivers licenses to illegals. None of these proposals passed, partially because the Democratic-controlled Senate preferred a comprehensive approach which would include a guest-worker program and a path to citizenship for the current population more akin to the package defeated by Vitter in 2007.<ref>{{cite news|date=March 5, 2008 |last=Gaouette |first=Nicole |url=https://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-immig5mar05,1,5849195.story |title=GOP senators to introduce toughest-yet immigration package |newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]] |access-date=May 6, 2008 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
===Abstinence education ===
Vitter advocated [[abstinence-only sex education]], emphasizing abstinence while excluding issues involving [[birth control]] and [[safe sex]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 25]], [[2007]]
|author=Vitter, David
|url=http://www.vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=76b86c7e-a51a-4d11-92e7-de11d999f313
|title=Vitter Pushes for Reauthorization of Abstinence Education Program
|publisher=David Vitter press release
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref> He said, "Abstinence education is a public health strategy focused on risk avoidance that aims to help young people avoid exposure to harm...by teaching teenagers that saving sex until marriage and remaining faithful afterwards is the best choice for health and happiness."<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 21]], [[2007]]
|author=Vitter, David and Bunning, Jim
|url=http://www.vitter.senate.gov/forms/abstinenceLetter.pdf
|title=Letter to the chairman and ranking member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref> According to [[Focus on the Family]], Vitter was one of three conservative senators that convinced Democratic Senator [[Frank Lautenberg]] to withdraw an amendment that would have restricted abstinence education to programs deemed to be "medically accurate".<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 24]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000005766.cfm
|title=Federal Abstinence Funding Safe for Another Year
|publisher=[[Focus on the Family]]
|accessdate=2007-10-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 24]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2007/10/lautenberg_gives_on_fight_abou.html
|title=Lautenberg gives up on fight about 'abstinence-only' sex education
|publisher=[[The Star-Ledger]]
|accessdate=2007-10-24}}</ref>


In April 2008, Vitter introduced a [[joint resolution]] proposing a [[constitutional amendment]] that a child born in the United States is not a citizen unless a parent is a citizen, lawful [[permanent resident]], or [[Alien (law)|alien]] serving in the military.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h107-482|title=S.J.RES.31 [110th]: RA joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to United States citizenship.|publisher=GovTrack|access-date=April 9, 2008}}</ref> Currently the Constitution [[Citizenship Clause|grants citizenship]] to [[Birthright citizenship in the United States of America|children born within the U.S.]] regardless of the legal status of the parents.<ref>{{cite news|date=March 10, 2007|last=Ho|first=James C.|url=https://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-ho10mar10,1,3646198.story?coll=la-news-comment|title=Can Congress repeal birthright citizenship?|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]]|access-date=May 5, 2008}}</ref> The bill never made it out of the Democratic-led committee.
===Same-sex marriage ===
Vitter professes that marriage is a sacred vow between a man and a woman. In 2003, Vitter proposed to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban same sex marriages.<ref>[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.J.RES.56.IH: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. (Introduced in House), HJ 56 IH, 108th CONGRESS, H. J. RES. 56] May 21, 2003, Mrs. MUSGRAVE (for herself, Mr. HALL, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, and Mr. VITTER)</ref> In 2004, he said, "This is a real outrage. The Hollywood left is redefining the most basic institution in human history...We need a U.S. Senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not Massachusetts’s values."<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.vitter2004.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=20
|title=Vitter Statement on Protecting the Sanctity of Marriage
|publisher=Vitter2004.com
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref> In June 2006, he said "I don't believe there's any issue that's more important than this one ... I think this debate is very healthy, and it's winning a lot of hearts and minds. I think we're going to show real progress."<ref>[http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/06/same.sex.marriage/ "Senate set to reject gay marriage ban: Backers see 'important debate'; critics blast effort to 'misdirect'"], ''CNN'', June 7, 2006</ref> In 2006, he told ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'', “I’m a conservative who opposes radically redefining marriage, the most important social institution in human history.”<ref name="NYT071107">{{cite web
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|author=Norrister, Adam
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/us/11vitter.html
|title=A Senator’s Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky
|publisher=[[New York Times]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref>

In October 2005, at a [[Lafayette Parish]] Republican Executive Committee luncheon, Vitter compared gay marriage to hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which came through the same geographical areas. Vitter said "It's the crossroads where Katrina meets Rita. I always knew I was against same-sex unions."<ref>[http://www.gayapolis.com/news/artdisplay.php?artid=535 "Louisiana Senator Compares Hurricanes to Gay Marriage"], gayapolis.com, ''News'', posted October 18, 2005; accessed July 10, 2007</ref>

=== Louisiana Family Forum earmark ===


==== Louisiana Family Forum earmark ====
{{wikinews|Senator David Vitter to earmark $100,000 for creationist group}}
{{wikinews|Senator David Vitter to earmark $100,000 for creationist group}}
In September 2007, Vitter [[Earmark (politics)|earmarked]] $100,000 in federal money for a Christian group, the [[Louisiana Family Forum]],<ref name="T-P092207">{{cite news|date=September 22, 2007|author=Walsh, David|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/09/vitter_earmarked_federal_money.html|title=Vitter earmarked federal money for creationist group|newspaper=[[Times-Picayune]]|access-date=September 24, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071213150447/http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/09/vitter_earmarked_federal_money.html|archive-date=December 13, 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref> known for challenging [[evolution]] by means of "[[Teach the Controversy|teaching the controversy]]" which promotes [[intelligent design]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lafamilyforum.org/explore.cfm/forumnotes/originsscience |title=Origins Science |publisher=[[Louisiana Family Forum]] |access-date=November 10, 2007 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> According to Vitter, the earmark was "to develop a plan to promote better science education".<ref name="T-P092207" /> ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' alleged the group had close ties with Vitter.<ref name="T-P092207" /> However, they have criticized Vitter for his support of [[Rudy Giuliani]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lafamilyforum.us/FFarchives/v9i11.htm |title=Vitter Sends Shockwaves |publisher=[[Louisiana Family Forum]] |access-date=November 10, 2007 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
In September, 2007, Vitter [[earmarking|earmarked]] $100,000 in federal money for a Christian group, the [[Louisiana Family Forum]],<ref name="T-P092207">{{cite web
|date=[[September 22]], [[2007]]
|author=Walsh, David
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/09/vitter_earmarked_federal_money.html
|title=Vitter earmarked federal money for creationist group
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-24}}</ref> known for challenging [[evolution]] by means of "[[Teach the Controversy|teaching the controversy]]" which promotes [[intelligent design]] while discrediting evolution.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.lafamilyforum.org/explore.cfm/forumnotes/originsscience
|title=Origins Science
|publisher=[[Louisiana Family Forum]]
|accessdate=2007-11-10}}</ref> According to Vitter, the earmark was "to develop a plan to promote better science education".<ref name="T-P092207" /> Though the Louisiana Family Forum is largely forbidden from political activity due to its non-profit status,<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=163395,00.html
|title=Political Campaign Activity
|publisher=[[Internal Revenue Service]]
|accessdate=2007-11-10}}</ref> ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' alleged the group had close ties with Vitter.<ref name="T-P092207" /> However, they have criticized Vitter for his support of [[Rudy Giuliani]].<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.lafamilyforum.us/FFarchives/v9i11.htm
|title=Vitter Sends Shockwaves
|publisher=[[Louisiana Family Forum]]
|accessdate=2007-11-10}}</ref>


On October 17, 2007, the liberal organization [[People For the American Way]], along with several other groups asked the Senate to remove the earmark.<ref>{{cite web|date=October 17, 2007|url=http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/1017-09.htm|title=Groups Ask Senate To Remove Earmark Promoting Creationism From Spending Bill|publisher=[[Common Dreams NewsCenter]]|access-date=October 17, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071020062637/http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/1017-09.htm|archive-date=October 20, 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=October 17, 2007 |url=http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=24825 |archive-url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20080828095118/http%3A//site.pfaw.org/site/PageServer?pagename%3Dhomepagenew |url-status=dead |archive-date=August 28, 2008 |title=Earmark for Anti-Science Creationist Group Must Be Removed |publisher=[[People For the American Way]] |access-date=October 17, 2007 }}</ref> Vitter later withdrew it.<ref>{{cite news|date=October 19, 2007|author=Walsh, Bill|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-9/1192776477212740.xml&coll=1|title=Vitter shifts $100,000 from religious group|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=November 2, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071026171714/http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews-9%2F1192776477212740.xml&coll=1|archive-date=October 26, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=October 18, 2007|url=http://ncse.com/news/2007/10/vitter-earmark-withdrawn-001311|title=Vitter earmark withdrawn|publisher=[[National Center for Science Education]]|access-date=November 18, 2009}}</ref>
On October 17, 2007, the liberal organization [[People For the American Way]], along with several other groups asked the Senate to remove the earmark.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 17]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/1017-09.htm
|title=Groups Ask Senate To Remove Earmark Promoting Creationism From Spending Bill
|publisher=[[Common Dreams NewsCenter]]
|accessdate=2007-10-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 17]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=24825
|title=Earmark for Anti-Science Creationist Group Must Be Removed
|publisher=[[People For the American Way]]
|accessdate=2007-10-17}}</ref> Vitter later withdrew it.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 19]], [[2007]]
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-9/1192776477212740.xml&coll=1
|title=Vitter shifts $100,000 from religious group
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-11-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 18]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/news/2007/US/216_vitter_earmark_withdrawn_10_18_2007.asp
|title=Vitter earmark withdrawn
|publisher=[[National Center for Science Education]]
|accessdate=2007-10-18}}</ref>


===Child protection===
====Military====
In May 2008, Vitter voted with the majority, despite the opposition of Bush and other Republicans, for the passage of the [[Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008]] to expand educational benefits for veterans similar to the level provided for returning [[World War II]] veterans in the [[G.I. Bill]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Lerman|first=David|url=http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-now-webbgi.m22,0,5797943.story|title=Senate approves Jim Webb's new GI Bill|publisher=[[Daily Press (Virginia)|Daily Press]]|access-date=May 22, 2008}}{{Dead link|date=September 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=May 22, 2008|url=https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Congress-Iraq-Funding.html|title=Senate Passes Iraq War Funding Bill|agency=Associated Press|access-date=May 22, 2008| work=The New York Times}} {{Dead link|date=August 2010|bot=RjwilmsiBot}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=May 22, 2008|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00137|title=Vote Summary|publisher=[[United States Senate]]|access-date=May 22, 2008}}</ref>


====Network neutrality====
In April 2008, Vitter introduced an amendment to continue funding the [[Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act]] which was excluded from the 2008/2009 budget. The federal program maintains a national [[sex offender registry]], provides resources for tracking down unregistered offenders and increases penalties for the sexual assault of children. His amendment received bi-partisan support.<ref>{{cite web
Vitter was one of six senate Republicans to propose an amendment to a bill which would stop the [[Federal Communications Commission]] (FCC) from enforcing [[network neutrality]] which they allege is a violation of the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/50766-amendment-would-block-fcc-regulation-of-net-neutrality/ |title=Amendment would block FCC regulation of net neutrality |first=Tony |last=Romm |date=September 22, 2009|access-date=September 22, 2009}}</ref>
|date=2008-05-01
|last=Alpert
|first=Bruce
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/library-146/1209619943213470.xml&coll=1
|title=Vitter seeks funding for child-safety act
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-05-01
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=419f0956-0443-4291-8a55-90adcdf48483
|title=Vitter Offers Amendment to Fund Adam Walsh Act
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate=2008-05-01
}}</ref>


==== New Orleans public housing ====
===Republican Party reputation===
In September 2007, ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' reported that Vitter and the [[Presidency of George W. Bush|Bush administration]] opposed a provision of The Gulf Coast Housing Recovery bill which required that every public housing apartment torn down be replaced with another form of low-income housing on a one-for-one basis. The administration testified that there was not sufficient demand for public housing units, a position contested by several senators. Vitter stated it would recreate "housing projects exactly as they were", isolated and riddled with crime. However, [[Mary Landrieu]], the Louisiana Democratic Senator, said the intent was to make certain there were affordable places for working-class people who returned. The bill requires that demolished housing projects be replaced with mixed income communities which local housing advocates say is different from the massive public housing developments that Vitter is referring to. However, the bill does not include a ban on large-scale projects.<ref>{{cite news|date=September 26, 2007|author=Walsh, Bill|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1190786785155740.xml&coll=1|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071017202201/http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fnews-2%2F1190786785155740.xml&coll=1|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 17, 2007|title=Feds oppose full replacement of N.O. public housing units|newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]]|access-date=September 27, 2007}}</ref><ref name="NOCB120307">{{cite web|date=December 3, 2007|author=Webster, Richard A.|url=http://www.neworleanscitybusiness.com/viewStory.cfm?recID=24990|title=Razing a ruckus|publisher=New Orleans City Business|access-date=December 3, 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071211162750/http://www.neworleanscitybusiness.com/viewStory.cfm?recID=24990 |archive-date = December 11, 2007}}</ref> The [[Housing Authority of New Orleans|city housing authority]] is planning on replacing 4,000 low-income units with mixed-income projects providing a smaller inventory of low-income units.<ref>{{cite news|date=December 3, 2007|author=Saluny, Susan|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/us/nationalspecial/03renters.html?pagewanted=1|title=New Orleans Hurt by Acute Rental Shortage|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=December 3, 2007}}</ref> In December 2007, Vitter prevented the bill from leaving the committee.<ref name="NOCB120307" />
With concerns being raised about the Republican Party's prospects in the [[United States general elections, 2008|2008 election]], Vitter said, "[I]t's certainly true that national Republicans need to improve their brand. Perhaps folks should actually take some cues from Republicans in Louisiana. At home, we're the party of reform and positive changes versus failed past and the good ol' boys."<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-05-22
|last=Alpert
|first=Bruce
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-2/121134783819620.xml&coll=1
|title=Republicans fret about fate this fall
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-05-22
}}</ref>


====Obama nominations====
== Prostitution scandal==
Vitter and [[Jim DeMint]] were the only two Senators that voted against [[Hillary Clinton]]'s [[Advice and consent|confirmation]] for the position of [[United States Secretary of State|Secretary of State]] under the new [[Obama administration]], on January 21, 2009.<ref>{{cite news|date= January 21, 2009|url= https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-01-21-clintonconfirmation_N.htm|title= Senate confirms Clinton as secretary of State|agency= Associated Press|access-date= April 29, 2009|work= USA Today|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090505174449/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-01-21-clintonconfirmation_N.htm|archive-date= May 5, 2009}}</ref>
===D.C. Madam===


He blocked President Obama's nominee for the new [[Federal Emergency Management Agency]] (FEMA) administrator until he received a written commitment on flood control issues from the nominee and FEMA. ''[[The New York Times]]'', along with some Republican Senators, criticized Vitter for what it characterized as political posturing, given that the hurricane season was quickly approaching. He lifted his hold on May 12, 2009.<ref>{{cite news|date= May 9, 2009|url= https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/10/opinion/10sun4.html?_r=1&ref=opinion|title= Doin' a Heck of a Job, Senator|newspaper= The New York Times|access-date= May 14, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date= May 13, 2009 |url= https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/13/us/politics/13brfs-SENATORTOSTO_BRF.html|title= Senator to Stop Blocking Choice to Head FEMA |agency= Associated Press|access-date= May 14, 2009| work=The New York Times}}</ref>
In early July 2007, Vitter's phone number was included in a published list of phone records of Pamela Martin and Associates, a company owned and run by [[Deborah Jeane Palfrey]], also known as the "D.C. [[pimp|Madam]]", convicted by the U.S. government for running a [[prostitution]] service. ''[[Hustler]]'' magazine identified the phone number and contacted Vitter's office to ask about his connection to Palfrey.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|author=Rood, Justin
|url=http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/07/hustler-call-pr.html
|title='Hustler' Call May Have Prompted Vitter Admission
|publisher=[[ABC News]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-04-16
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/us/16escort.html?ref=us
|title=Woman Convicted in Washington Escort Case
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> The following day, Vitter issued a written statement:


====Affordable Care Act====
<blockquote>This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible. Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counseling. Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there - with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way.<ref>Douglass K. Daniel, [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070710/ap_on_go_co/vitter_dc_madam "Senator's number on escort service list"], Associated Press, July 10, 2007</ref></blockquote>
Vitter opposed President Barack Obama's health reform legislation; he voted against the [[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]] in December 2009,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00396|title=U.S. Senate: Roll Call Vote|date=January 27, 2015|work=senate.gov}}</ref> and he voted against the [[Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00105 |title=U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home &gt; Votes &gt; Roll Call Vote |publisher=Senate.gov |access-date=August 29, 2010}}</ref>


====Same-sex marriage====
The statement containing Vitter's apology said his telephone number was included in phone records dating from his days as a member of the House of Representatives.<ref name="WP-07-10-07"/> Phone records show that Vitter's number was called by Palfrey's service five times, the first on [[October 12]], [[1999]], and the last on [[February 27]], [[2001]].<ref> Keith I. Marszalek, [http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/vitter_had_five_calls_with_dc.html "Vitter had five calls with D.C. Madam"], ''New Orleans Times-Picayune'', [[July 11]], [[2007]]</ref> Two calls were placed while House roll call votes were in progress.<ref> Charles Babington, [http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2007/07/escort_service_called_lawmaker.php "Escort service called lawmaker 5 times"], AP News, [[July 12]], [[2007]]</ref>
Vitter opposes both same-sex marriage and civil unions. In June 2006, he said "I don't believe there's any issue that's more important than this one ... I think this debate is very healthy, and it's winning a lot of hearts and minds. I think we're going to show real progress."<ref>[http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/06/same.sex.marriage/ "Senate set to reject gay marriage ban: Backers see 'important debate'; critics blast effort to 'misdirect'"], ''CNN'', June 7, 2006</ref> In 2006, he told ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'', "I'm a conservative who opposes radically redefining marriage, the most important social institution in human history."<ref name="NYT071107">{{cite news|date=July 11, 2007|author=Norrister, Adam|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/us/11vitter.html|title=A Senator's Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=July 10, 2007}}</ref>


In October 2005, at a [[Lafayette Parish]] Republican Executive Committee luncheon, Vitter compared gay marriage to hurricanes [[Hurricane Katrina|Katrina]] and [[Hurricane Rita|Rita]], which came through the same geographical areas. Vitter said "It's the crossroads where Katrina meets Rita. I always knew I was against same-sex unions."<ref>{{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20051217104511/http://gayapolis.com/news/artdisplay.php?artid=535 "Louisiana Senator Compares Hurricanes to Gay Marriage"]}}, gayapolis.com, ''News'', posted October 18, 2005. Retrieved July 10, 2007.</ref>
On [[July 16]], [[2007]], after a week of self imposed seclusion, Vitter emerged and called a [[press conference]]. Standing next to his wife, Vitter asked the public for forgiveness. Following Vitter's remarks, Wendy Vitter, his wife, spoke. Both refused to answer any questions.<ref>{{cite news
|title=Scandal-linked senator breaks a week of silence
|publisher=[[CNN.com]]
|date=[[July 17]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/16/vitter/index.html
|accessdate=2008-08-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
|title=Vitter comes out of seclusion, claims New Orleans prostitutes don't exist; some say otherwise
|publisher=[[Louisiana Weekly]]
|date=[[July 23]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.louisianaweekly.com/read/PDF/July_23_2007.pdf
|accessdate=2008-08-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
|last=Moran
|first=Kate
|last=Walsh
|first=Bill
|last=McCarthy
|first=Brendan
|coauthors=
|title=Vitter re-emerges and asks again for forgiveness
|publisher=[[The Times Picayune|The Times Picayune]]
|date=[[July 16]], [[2007]]
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/07/vitter_reemerges_and_again_ask.html
|accessdate=2008-08-24}}</ref>


====School board prayer====
As background, several news outlets reported that in May 1999, Vitter replaced Congressman [[Bob Livingston]] after Livingston resigned due to an adultery scandal.<ref name="CNN071007" /><ref name="AP071007" /><ref name="NYT071107" /> Vitter said about Livingston's decision to resign, "It's obviously a tremendous loss for the state. I think Livingston's stepping down makes a very powerful argument that Clinton should resign as well and move beyond this mess", referring to the [[Lewinsky scandal|Monica Lewinsky scandal]] of President [[Bill Clinton]].<ref>{{cite news
In 2005 Vitter introduced a resolution supporting prayer at [[Board of education|school board]] meetings in response to an earlier [[United States district court|district court]] decision that the Louisiana's [[Tangipahoa Parish]] practice of opening meetings with Christian prayers was [[unconstitutional]]. The bill died in [[United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions|committee]] after receiving little support from colleagues on both sides of the aisle.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr109-132|title=S. Res. 132 (109th): A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings|publisher=GovTrack.us|access-date=January 16, 2008}}</ref><ref name="advocate012007">{{cite news|date=January 20, 2007|author=Mitchell, David J.|url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/theadvocate/access/1198586681.html?dids=1198586681:1198586681&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jan+20%2C+2007&author=DAVID+J.+MITCHELL&pub=Advocate&edition=&startpage=3&desc=Prayer+decision+appealed+***+Tangipahoa+parties+say+ruling+unclear|title=Tangipahoa parties say ruling unclear|newspaper=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]|access-date=January 16, 2008}}{{dead link|date=July 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}} [http://indianalawblog.com/archives/2007/01/courts_motion_t.html Alt URL] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080103222038/http://indianalawblog.com/archives/2007/01/courts_motion_t.html |date=January 3, 2008 }}</ref> Vitter later reintroduced the resolution in January 2007 after a [[Judicial panel|panel]] of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|Fifth Circuit Court]] concluded that Christian prayers were unconstitutional but was undecided whether [[nonsectarian]] prayers were allowed. In July 2007, the full Fifth Circuit dismissed the case because of a lack of [[Standing (law)|standing]]. The school board subsequently resumed prayer evocations but opened it to diverse community religions. Vitter's bill died in committee.<ref name="advocate012007" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=sr110-35|title=S. Res. 35: A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings|publisher=GovTrack.us|access-date=January 16, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=December 2006|url=http://www.nsba.org/site/doc_cosa.asp?TRACKID=&CID=468&DID=39876|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110101191204/http://www.nsba.org/site/doc_cosa.asp?TRACKID=&CID=468&DID=39876|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 1, 2011|title=Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch. Bd., No. 05-30294 (5th Cir. Dec. 15, 2006)|publisher=[[National School Boards Association]]|access-date=January 16, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=August 22, 2007|author=Mitchell, David J.|url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/theadvocate/access/1324471571.html?dids=1324471571:1324471571&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Aug+22%2C+2007&author=DAVID+J.+MITCHELL&pub=Advocate&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Tangipahoa+board+OKs+prayer+policy|title=Tangipahoa board OKs prayer policy|newspaper=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]|access-date=January 16, 2008}}{{dead link|date=July 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}} [http://melissarogers.typepad.com/melissa_rogers/2007/08/the-tangipahoa-.html Alt URL]</ref>
|last=Konigsmark
|first=Anne Rochell
|coauthors=
|title=A Week Of Crisis Impeachment: The Speakership Livingston's Constituents Decision to resign jolts home district
|pages=D4
|publisher=[[The Atlanta Journal-Constitution|The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution]]
|date=[[December 20]], [[1998]]
|url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid=0EADA4168D35692C
|accessdate=2007-07-10 }}</ref> In 2000, his wife, Wendy Vitter, commenting on the same scandal, said, "I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary. If he [Vitter] does something like that, I'm walking away with one thing, and it's not [[alimony]], trust me," referring to the [[John and Lorena Bobbitt|incident of Lorena Bobbitt]] severing the [[penis]] of her husband and to Clinton's wife, [[Hillary Rodham Clinton|Hillary Clinton]].<ref name="AP071007">{{cite web
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Vitter-DC-Madam.html
|title=Senator's Link to 'D.C. Madam' Exposed
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref>


====Tea Party movement====
Vitter is unlikely to face criminal charges due to the [[statute of limitations]].<ref>{{cite web
In recognition of the [[Tea Party protests]] opposing President [[Barack Obama]]'s policies, Vitter proposed Senate Resolution 98, which would designate April 15 in years both 2009 and 2010 as "National TEA Party Day". As of April 2009, the bill has no cosponsors and has been referred to the [[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|Committee on the Judiciary]] with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr111-98|title=S. Res. 98|access-date=May 19, 2009|author=111th Congress (2009)|date=April 2, 2009|work=Legislation|publisher=GovTrack.us|quote=A resolution designating each of April 15, 2009, and April 15, 2010, as "National TEA Party Day"}}</ref>
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|author=Alpert, Bruce
|url=http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/vitter_unlikely_to_face_crimin.html
|title=Vitter unlikely to face criminal charges
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-11}}</ref> Vitter apologized to GOP senate colleagues but avoided the press who repeatedly attempted to talk to him.<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/17/AR2007071700754.html "Vitter Returns to Senate"] ''Washington Post'', [[July 17]], [[2007]]</ref>


In September 2010, Vitter signed a candidate pledge from the North Central Louisiana TEA Party Patriots. It included a promise to "Conduct myself personally and professionally in a moral and socially appropriate manner."<ref>{{Cite web| last = Beutler| first = Brian| title = Vitter Pledge To Tea Party: 'I Will Conduct Myself...In A Morally And Socially Appropriate Manner'| publisher = [[Talking Points Memo]]| date = September 16, 2010| url = http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/09/vitter-pledge-to-tea-party-i-will-conduct-myselfin-a-morally-and-socially-appropriate-manner.php|access-date = September 24, 2010}}</ref>
On [[November 13]], [[2007]], the attorney for Palfrey served Vitter with a [[subpoena]] to force him to testify at a [[November 28]], [[2007]] hearing about whether an act of prostitution occurred with a Palfrey escort and when.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 14]], [[2007]]
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1195021839260630.xml&coll=1
|title=Senator receives subpoena to testify about escort use
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-11-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 15]], [[2007]]
|author=Shields, Gerald
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/politics/11334446.html
|title=Attorney doesn’t answer queries on Vitter plans
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]
|accessdate=2007-11-15}}</ref> The following week, the judge in the case canceled the hearing.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 22]], [[2007]]
|url=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g0GRboB6AYFOiN7iJ5pjjWUJbyXAD8T2BBR80
|title=Senator Spared Testimony in Escort Case
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-11-22}}</ref> Palfrey's attorney indicated he planned to subpoena Vitter to testify at her 2008 criminal trial,<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[December 2]], [[2007]]
|author=Alpert, Bruce and Walsh, Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1196578651143040.xml&coll=1
|title=Vitter avoids talking about escort for now
|publisher=[[New Orleans Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> even though Vitter might have [[Pleading the Fifth|pled the Fifth]] [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Amendment]] to avoid [[self-incrimination]]<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-04-05
|last=Alpert
|first=Bruce
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1207374643201790.xml&coll=1
|title=Vitter might take the Fifth
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref> but in the end he wasn't called to testify.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-04-14
|last=Crabtree
|first=Susan
|url=http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/vitter-wont-testify-in-d.c.-madam-case-2008-04-14.html
|title=Vitter won’t testify in D.C. Madam case
|publisher=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]
|accessdate=2008-04-14
}}</ref> Vitter refused to comment on the matter.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-04-07
|url=http://www.wafb.com/Global/story.asp?S=8127890
|title=Sen. David Vitter Placed on Witness List in Prostitution Trial; Driver Backs into "No Parking" Sign
|publisher=[[WAFB]]
|accessdate=2008-04-14
}}</ref>


====United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea====
After Senator [[Larry Craig]] was admonished by the [[United States Senate Select Committee on Ethics|Senate Ethics Committee]] for acting improperly after his arrest for lewd contact toward another man in an airport bathroom in February 2008, the [[Watchdog journalism|watchdog group]] [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]] questioned why the committee had not taken similar action against Vitter.<ref>{{cite web
In September 2007, during hearings of the [[Senate Foreign Relations Committee]], Vitter expressed serious doubts about the [[United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea]] treaty concerning issues of U.S. [[sovereignty]]<ref name="WT">{{cite news|date=September 28, 2007|author=Sands, David R.|url=http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070928/FOREIGN/109280058/1003|title=White House pushes sea treaty|newspaper=[[The Washington Times]]|access-date=September 28, 2007}}</ref> echoing an array of conservative groups against the treaty<ref name="WT" /><ref>{{cite web|date=May 16, 2004|url=http://lugar.senate.gov/sfrc/opeds.html|title=Pass the sea treaty|publisher=[[Omaha World Herald]]|access-date=September 28, 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070926212224/http://lugar.senate.gov/sfrc/opeds.html |archive-date = September 26, 2007}}</ref> including the [[National Center for Public Policy Research]],<ref>{{cite web|date=August 2006|author=Ridenour, David A.|url=http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA542LawoftheSeaTreaty.html|title=Ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty: A Not-So-Innocent Passage|publisher=[[National Center for Public Policy Research]]|access-date=September 28, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223935/http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA542LawoftheSeaTreaty.html|archive-date=September 27, 2007}}</ref> [[The Heritage Foundation]]<ref>{{cite web|date=September 25, 2007|author=Spring, Baker and Steven Groves and Brett D. Schaefer|url=http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/wm1638.cfm|title=The Top Five Reasons Why Conservatives Should Oppose the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea|publisher=[[The Heritage Foundation]]|access-date=September 28, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071015215023/http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/wm1638.cfm|archive-date=October 15, 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref> and the [[Center for Security Policy]].<ref>{{cite magazine|date=May 18, 2004|author1=Gaffney Jr. |author2=Frank J. |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/gaffney/gaffney200403181156.asp|title=Don't Get LOST|magazine=[[National Review]] Online|access-date=September 28, 2007|author-link=Frank Gaffney}}</ref> The treaty, which sets up countries' jurisdiction over their coasts and ocean including exploration and navigation rights,<ref>{{cite web|date=September 24, 2007|author=Scally, William|url=http://public.cq.com/docs/gs/greensheets110-000002591199.html|title=Law of Sea Treaty Revived With Senate Hearings|publisher=[[Congressional Quarterly]]|access-date=September 28, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071013195905/http://public.cq.com/docs/gs/greensheets110-000002591199.html|archive-date=October 13, 2007}}</ref> was supported by the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration, a majority of the United States Senate, the [[United States Department of Defense|Pentagon]], the [[United States Department of State|State Department]] and [[United States Navy|Navy]]<ref>{{cite web|date=June 6, 2007|author=Kraus, Don|url=http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4286|title=Time to Ratify the Law of the Sea|publisher=[[Institute for Policy Studies]]|access-date=September 28, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070926221151/http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4286|archive-date=September 26, 2007}}</ref> as do a coalition of business and environmental groups.<ref>{{cite news|date=September 27, 2007 |url=http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpsea275391172sep27,0,1614204.story |archive-url=https://archive.today/20070703224103/http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpsea275391172sep27,0,1614204.story |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 3, 2007 |title=Editorial: U.S. should join Law of the Sea alliance |newspaper=[[Newsday]] |access-date=September 28, 2007 }}</ref> The committee approved the treaty 17–4, with Vitter voting no.<ref>{{cite news|date=November 1, 2007|author=Dinan, Stephen|url=http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071101/NATION/111010044/1001|title=Senate panel OKs sea treaty, but fight looms|newspaper=[[The Washington Times]]|access-date=November 2, 2007}}</ref>
|date=2008-02-14
|url=http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/0214-07.htm
|title=CREW Asks Why Senate Ethics Committee Admonished Senator Craig and Not Sen. Vitter
|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|accessdate=2008-02-16}}</ref> The committee later dismissed the complaint.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-05-08
|last=Pershing
|first=Ben
|url=http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2008/05/senate_ethics_dismisses_vitter.html
|title=Senate Ethics Dismisses Vitter Complaint
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
|accessdate=2008-05-08
}}</ref>


==== Water Resources and Development Act ====
Vitter incurred significant legal and [[public relations]] expenses in his efforts to avoid giving testimony in the Palfrey trial and to respond to the ethics complaint. Consequently, his attorneys sought permission from the [[Federal Election Commission]] to use campaign funds to pay for these expenses.<ref>{{cite web
Vitter helped write the Water Resources and Development Act for flood-control, hurricane-protection and coastal-restoration projects including $3.6 billion for Louisiana. He called it the "single most important" legislation for assisting Louisiana with its recovery from hurricane Katrina. President [[George W. Bush]] vetoed the act, objecting to its cost.<ref>{{cite web|date=September 27, 2007|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/10059676.html|title=Our Views: State needs flood projects|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]|access-date=September 27, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=September 27, 2007 |url=http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070927/OPINION01/709270329/1014/OPINION |archive-url=https://archive.today/20070716173537/http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070927/OPINION01/709270329/1014/OPINION |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 16, 2007 |title=Federal water bill critical to state |newspaper=The Daily Advertiser |access-date=September 27, 2007 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=November 2, 2007 |author=Alpert, Bruce |url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/11/bush_vetoes_massive_water_bill.html |title=Bush vetoes massive water resources bill |newspaper=[[The Times-Picayune]] |access-date=November 2, 2007 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> Congress overrode his veto, enacting the bill.<ref>{{cite news|date=November 8, 2007|url=https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Congress-Veto.html?hp|title=Senate Overrides Bush Veto on Water Bill|agency=Associated Press|access-date=November 8, 2007| work=The New York Times}} {{Dead link|date=August 2010|bot=RjwilmsiBot}}</ref>
|date=2008-08-20
|last=Alpert
|first=Bruce
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/08/dc_madam_case_could_hit_vitter.html
|title='D.C. Madam' case could hit Vitter in his wallet
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-08-24
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-08-21
|last=Duncan
|first=Thomasenia P., et. al.
|url=http://fec.gov/agenda/2008/mtgdoc08-20.pdf
|title=Agenda Document No. 08-20
|publisher=[[Federal Elections Commission]]
|accessdate=2008-08-24
|format=PDF
}}</ref> The Commission, along partisan lines, couldn't agree whether funds could be used for reimbursing costs related to the Palfrey trial but did allow them to pay for expenses connected to the Ethics Committee complaint.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-08-21
|last=Cadei
|first=Emily
|url=http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=news-000002939949
|title=FEC Punts on McCain and Vitter
|publisher=[[Congressional Quarterly]]
|accessdate=2008-08-24
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-08-21
|last=Holland
|first=Jesse J.
|url=http://www.examiner.com/a-1548463~Vitter_can_use_some_campaign_funds_for_legal_fees.html
|title=Vitter can use some campaign funds for legal fees
|publisher=[[Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2008-08-24
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-08-22
|last=Alpert
|first=Bruce
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base//news-0/121938309047030.xml&coll=1
|title=FEC split in Vitter's push for legal fees - Bills top $200,000 in D.C. Madam case
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-08-24
}}</ref>


===Canal Street Madam===
===Committee assignments===
* '''[[United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs|Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs]]'''
On [[July 10]], [[2007]], Jeanette Maier, the "Canal Street Madam", alleged that Vitter was a customer on more than one occasion in the 1990s, when Maier was identified by federal prosecutors as operating a $300 per hour brothel.<ref>{{cite web
** [[United States Senate Banking Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation, and Community Development|Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation, and Community Development]]
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
** [[United States Senate Banking Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Protection|Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Protection]]
|author=
** [[United States Senate Banking Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investment|Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investment]]
|url=http://www.wdsu.com/news/13657113/detail.html
* '''[[United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works|Committee on Environment and Public Works]]'''
|title=Canal Street Madam Says Vitter Was Client
** [[United States Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety|Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety]]
|publisher=[[WDSU]]
** [[United States Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Oversight|Subcommittee on Oversight]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref> ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' reported that "Maier offered no evidence or documents to support her claim."<ref>{{cite web
** [[United States Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure|Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure]] (Chairman)
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
* '''[[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|Committee on the Judiciary]]'''
|author=Moran, Kate and Carr, Martha
** [[United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism|Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism]]
|url=http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/madam_vitter_a_client_at_canal.html
** [[United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration and The National Interest|Subcommittee on Immigration and The National Interest]]
|title=Madam: Vitter a client at Canal Street brothel
** [[United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts|Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts]]
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
** [[United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution|Subcommittee on the Constitution]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref> Maier said that Vitter "was not a freak. He was not into anything unusual or kinky or weird," and that he favored one prostitute in particular, Wendy Cortez,<ref>{{cite web
* '''[[United States Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship|Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship]]''' (Chairman)
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|author=Moran, Kate
|url=http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/no_madam_ids_vitter_as_client.html
|title=Former madam says Vitter was a client at Canal Street brothel
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 12]], [[2007]]
|author=Alpert, Bruce
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-8/1184227544207940.xml&coll=1
|title=Legal trouble unlikely for Vitter
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 12]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-vitter12jul12,1,7600239.story?coll=la-news-a_section&ctrack=2&cset=true
|title=Madam links Sen. Vitter to brothel
|publisher=[[LA Times]]
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|author=Burdeau, Cain
|url=http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070711/NEWS01/707110347/1060/NEWS01
|title=Vitter was client of a New Orleans brothel, madam claims
|publisher=[[The Shreveport Times]]
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref> the name of the prostitute with whom Vitter had been accused, during his 2004 campaign, of having had a lengthy affair. Vitter denied that allegation during the campaign.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[March 29]], [[2004]]
|author=Tidmore, Christopher
|url=http://www.louisianaweekly.com/weekly/news/articlegate.pl?20040329m
|title=Congressman Denies Affair With Prostitute
|publisher=[[The Louisiana Weekly]]
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref> On July 12, Cortez told the ''Times-Picayune'' that Vitter was "a regular customer" during his time in the state legislature, but that they "did not have a romantic relationship."
<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 13]], [[2007]]
|author=Moran, Kate
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-8/118430971563640.xml&coll=1
|title=Prostitute describes Vitter affair
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref> On September 12, 2007, ''The Times-Picayune'' reported that the woman, whose real name was Wendy Ellis, had passed a [[polygraph|lie detector]] exam.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 12]], [[2007]]
|author=Moran, Kate
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-9/1189602069117880.xml&coll=1
|title=Ex-call girl, Flynt keep pressure on Vitter
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-29}}</ref>


==2007 prostitution scandal==
===Reaction===
In early July 2007, Vitter's phone number was included in a published list of phone records of Pamela Martin and Associates, a company owned and run by [[Deborah Jeane Palfrey]], also known as the "D.C. [[pimp|Madam]]", who was convicted by the U.S. government for running a prostitution service. ''[[Hustler (magazine)|Hustler]]'' identified the phone number and contacted Vitter's office to ask about his connection to Palfrey.<ref>{{cite web|date=July 10, 2007|author=Rood, Justin|url=http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/07/hustler-call-pr.html|title='Hustler' Call May Have Prompted Vitter Admission|work=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]|access-date=July 10, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070712144207/http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/07/hustler-call-pr.html|archive-date=July 12, 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=April 16, 2008|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/us/16escort.html?ref=us|title=Woman Convicted in Washington Escort Case|agency=Associated Press|access-date=April 21, 2008| work=The New York Times}}</ref> The following day, Vitter issued a written statement in which he took responsibility for his "sin" and asked for forgiveness.<ref>Douglass K. Daniel, [https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070710/ap_on_go_co/vitter_dc_madam "Senator's number on escort service list"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070713100913/http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070710/ap_on_go_co/vitter_dc_madam |date=July 13, 2007 }}, Associated Press, July 10, 2007</ref> On July 16, 2007, after a week of self-imposed seclusion, Vitter emerged and called a [[news conference]]. As his wife stood next to him, Vitter asked the public for forgiveness. Following Vitter's remarks, his wife Wendy Vitter spoke, but both refused to answer any questions.<ref>{{cite news |title=Scandal-linked senator breaks a week of silence|publisher=[[CNN.com]]|date=July 17, 2007 |url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/16/vitter/index.html|access-date=August 24, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Vitter comes out of seclusion, claims New Orleans prostitutes don't exist; some say otherwise |newspaper=[[Louisiana Weekly]] |date=July 23, 2007 |url=http://www.louisianaweekly.com/read/PDF/July_23_2007.pdf |access-date=August 24, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080515104436/http://www.louisianaweekly.com/read/PDF/July_23_2007.pdf |archive-date=May 15, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Moran|first1=Kate|last2=Walsh|first2=Bill|last3=McCarthy|first3=Brendan|title=Vitter re-emerges and asks again for forgiveness|publisher=[[The Times Picayune]]|date=July 16, 2007|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/07/vitter_reemerges_and_again_ask.html|access-date=August 24, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081007051318/http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/07/vitter_reemerges_and_again_ask.html|archive-date=October 7, 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2004, Vitter had denied allegations that he had patronized prostitutes.<ref name="WP-07-10-07" />
While the Louisiana state [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] offered guarded support,<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 13]], [[2007]]
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url=http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/louisiana_republicans_offer_gu.html
|title=Louisiana Republicans offer guarded support for Vitter
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-22}}</ref> national Republicans offered forgiveness.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 19]], [[2007]]
|author=Radelat, Ana
|url=http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007707180306
|title=Vitter tries to move forward
|publisher=[[Gannett News Service]]
|accessdate=2007-07-22}}</ref> The liberal magazine the [[The Nation|''Nation'']] predicted that the Republican Party would be in a "forgiving mood" pointing out if Vitter did step down, then governor of Louisiana, [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] [[Kathleen Blanco]] would likely appoint a Democrat to take Vitter's place until a special election took place, thus increasing Democratic control over the Senate.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 17]], [[2007]]
|author=Nichols, John
|url=http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/1212761
|title=A "Family Values" Headache for Senate GOP
|publisher=[[The Nation]]
|accessdate=2007-07-22}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 30]], [[2007]]
|author=Lipman, Larry
|url=http://www.palmbeachpost.com/politics/content/nation/epaper/2007/09/30/m1a_FOLEYnew_0930.html
|title=A year later, Foley fallout lingers
|publisher=[[Palm Beach Post]]
|accessdate=2007-09-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 30]], [[2007]]
|author=Blumner, Robyn
|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2007/09/30/Opinion/Republicans_and_their.shtml
|title=Republicans and their big Greenspan gap
|publisher=[[St. Petersburg Times]]
|accessdate=2007-09-30}}</ref> [[Margaret Carlson]] of [[Bloomberg Television|Bloomberg News]] agreed, saying that since there is a Democratic governor in [[Louisiana]], "they were afraid if they slapped around Vitter too much, that seat would go Democratic."<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 7]], [[2007]]
|author=Kuraitis, Jill
|url=http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/novak_senate_rs_knew_craig_had_this_problem/C37/L37/
|title=Novak: Senate R’s Knew Craig 'Had This Problem'
|publisher=New West
|accessdate=2007-10-08}}</ref>


While the Louisiana state [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] offered guarded support,<ref>{{cite news|date=July 13, 2007|author=Walsh, Bill|url=http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/louisiana_republicans_offer_gu.html|title=Louisiana Republicans offer guarded support for Vitter|newspaper=[[Times-Picayune]]|access-date=July 22, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070716151609/http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/louisiana_republicans_offer_gu.html|archive-date=July 16, 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref> national Republicans offered forgiveness.<ref>{{cite web|date=July 19, 2007|author=Radelat, Ana|url=http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007707180306|title=Vitter tries to move forward|publisher=[[Gannett News Service]]|access-date=July 22, 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070928063132/http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007707180306 |archive-date = September 28, 2007}}</ref> ''[[The Nation]]'' predicted that the Republican Party would be in a "forgiving mood", because if he were to resign, [[Governor of Louisiana]] [[Kathleen Blanco]], a Democrat, would likely appoint a Democrat to take Vitter's place until a special election could be held, thus increasing Democratic control over the US Senate.<ref>{{cite magazine|date=July 17, 2007 |author=Nichols, John |url=https://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/1212761 |title=A "Family Values" Headache for Senate GOP |magazine=[[The Nation]] |access-date=July 22, 2007 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=September 30, 2007 |author=Lipman, Larry |url=http://www.palmbeachpost.com/politics/content/nation/epaper/2007/09/30/m1a_FOLEYnew_0930.html |archive-url=https://archive.today/20070618125114/http://www.palmbeachpost.com/politics/content/nation/epaper/2007/09/30/m1a_FOLEYnew_0930.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 18, 2007 |title=A year later, Foley fallout lingers |newspaper=[[Palm Beach Post]] |access-date=September 30, 2007 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=September 30, 2007|author=Blumner, Robyn|author-link=Robyn Blumner|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2007/09/30/Opinion/Republicans_and_their.shtml|title=Republicans and their big Greenspan gap|newspaper=[[St. Petersburg Times]]|access-date=September 30, 2007}}</ref>
Marianne Means, a [[syndicated columnist]] for [[Hearst Corporation|Hearst Newspapers]], reported that Republican senators gave Vitter a "loud standing ovation" which she characterized as hypocritical by contrasting this with the Republican attitude toward President Clinton's marital infidelity.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 23]], [[2007]]
|author=Means, Marianne
|url=http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070723/OPINION/707230311
|title=Republicans celebrate hypocrisy
|publisher=[[Times Herald-Record]]
|accessdate=2007-07-23}}</ref> The applause came after Vitter privately apologized to his colleagues.<ref name="TP092907" />


On September 8, 2015, reporter Derek Myers was fired from [[WVLA-TV]] after asking Vitter, who was running for governor, about allegations that the senator had frequented prostitutes.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20150911194313/http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/09/tv_reporter_fired_vitter.html TV reporter fired after asking David Vitter about prostitutes, newspaper reports]</ref> After Myers's question, Myers said an unnamed coworker overheard a conversation about the Vitter campaign's ad spending at the station, possibly with a threat from the campaign to pull the ads.<ref>[http://gawker.com/reporter-claims-he-was-fired-for-asking-louisiana-senat-1729686956 "Reporter Claims He Was Fired for Asking Louisiana Senator David Vitter About His History With Prostitutes"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151124220109/http://gawker.com/reporter-claims-he-was-fired-for-asking-louisiana-senat-1729686956 |date=November 24, 2015 }}, Gawker</ref> Democrat John Bel Edwards released an ad about the prostitution scandal two weeks before the run-off election and won by more than 12%.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/elections/article_e4dd2ddd-518a-5a8e-85f6-a13717f8c0c5.html|title='You're crazy if you believe that': John Bel Edwards takes remarkable journey to improbable landslide in governor's race|last=Bridges|first=Tyler|date=December 15, 2015|work=The Advocate|access-date=November 19, 2017}}</ref>
Republican Senator [[Sam Brownback]] told [[Bloomberg Television]] on [[October 5]], [[2007]] that Vitter should be [[censure]]d by the Senate. He said, "I think you could see something like that taking place. If you look at the actual crime itself and the discussion across the country{{ndash}} and as a Republican{{ndash}} this is bad."<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 5]], [[2007]]
|author=Goldman, Julianna
|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a1eg59WEkBL4&refer=us
|title=Craig Faces U.S. Senate Censure, Not Expulsion, Brownback Says
|publisher=[[Bloomberg Television]]
|accessdate=2007-10-06}}</ref>


==2015 gubernatorial election==
In July 2007, ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported that the Vitter's chairmanship of [[Rudy Giuliani]]'s presidential bid was in doubt due to the controversy<ref name="NYT071107" /> but his job was ultimately secure<ref>{{cite web
{{main|2015 Louisiana gubernatorial election}}
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
Vitter announced on January 21, 2014, that he would run for governor of Louisiana in the 2015 election.<ref name="atr.rollcall.com">{{cite web|url=http://atr.rollcall.com/david-vitter-announces-run-for-governor/|title=David Vitter Announces Run for Governor|date=January 21, 2014|access-date=January 21, 2014|work=Roll Call|archive-date=January 22, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140122045915/http://atr.rollcall.com/david-vitter-announces-run-for-governor/|url-status=dead}}</ref> Then-Governor [[Bobby Jindal]] was ineligible to seek re-election due to [[term limits]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/11/louisiana_governor_democrat.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151123025956/http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/11/louisiana_governor_democrat.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 23, 2015|title=John Bel Edwards beats David Vitter to become Louisiana's next governor|date=November 21, 2015|access-date=November 21, 2015|work=NOLA}}</ref> Vitter was the first sitting or ex-U.S. Senator to launch a gubernatorial bid in Louisiana since 1904, when Democrat [[Newton C. Blanchard|Newton Blanchard]] was elected.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://editions.lib.umn.edu/smartpolitics/2014/01/24/david-vitter-launches-historic/ |title= David Vitter Launches Historic Gubernatorial Bid in Louisiana |work=Smart Politics |first=Eric |last=Ostermeier |date= January 24, 2014}}</ref> Vitter's major opponents were Republicans [[Scott Angelle]], Louisiana Public Service Commissioner and former lieutenant governor,<ref name=bel_gambit/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/10/scott_angelle_to_run_for_gover.html|archive-url=https://archive.today/20141002182429/http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/10/scott_angelle_to_run_for_gover.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 2, 2014|title=Scott Angelle to run for governor in 2015|date=October 2, 2014|access-date=October 2, 2014|work=[[The Times-Picayune]]|first=Cole|last=Avery}}</ref> and [[Jay Dardenne]], the current lieutenant governor;<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/03/lt_gov_jay_dardenne_intends_to.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130325000652/http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/03/lt_gov_jay_dardenne_intends_to.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 25, 2013|title=Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne 'intends' to run for governor in 2015|date=March 20, 2013|access-date=May 13, 2013|work=[[The Times-Picayune]]|first=Jeff|last=Adelson}}</ref> and Democrat [[John Bel Edwards]], Minority Leader of the Louisiana House of Representatives.<ref name=bel_gambit>{{cite web|url=http://www.bestofneworleans.com/gambit/saved-by-the-bel/Content?oid=2193333|title=Saved by the Bel?|date=May 6, 2013|access-date=May 13, 2013|work=[[Gambit (newspaper)|Gambit]]|first=Jeremy|last=Alford|archive-date=February 3, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140203133739/http://www.bestofneworleans.com/gambit/saved-by-the-bel/Content?oid=2193333|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/02/john_bel_edwards_announces_he.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130223022323/http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/02/john_bel_edwards_announces_he.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=February 23, 2013|title=John Bel Edwards announces he is running for governor in 2015|first=Jeff|last=Adelson|work=The New Orleans Times-Picayune|date=February 10, 2013|access-date=February 21, 2013}}</ref>
|author=Radelat, Ana
|url=http://www.jconline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070711/NEWS09/70711038
|title=Flynt says New Orleans prostitutes told on senator
|publisher=[[Gannett News Service]]
|accessdate=2007-07-11}}</ref> though "quietly marginalized".<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 23]], [[2007]]
|author=Crouere, Jeff
|url=http://www.neworleanscitybusiness.com/viewStory.cfm?recID=19667
|title=Sex scandal dissipates Vitter’s political power
|publisher=New Orleans City Business
|accessdate=2007-07-23}}</ref><ref name="TP092907">{{cite web
|date=[[September 29]], [[2007]]
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2007/09/louisiana_looks_like_a_state_o.html
|title=Louisiana looks like a state of denial
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-29}}</ref>


In the [[Louisiana gubernatorial election, 2015#Runoff|November 21 runoff election]], Edwards defeated Vitter by 56% to 44%.<ref name="noladotcom">{{cite web|url=http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/11/louisiana_election_results_201.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151123153232/http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/11/louisiana_election_results_201.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 23, 2015|title=Louisiana election results 2015: Live updates|work=NOLA.com|date=June 14, 2023 }}</ref>
In December, 2007, an [[editorial]] in ''[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)|The Advocate]]'' of [[Baton Rouge, Louisiana]] claimed that Vitter had lost influence due to the controversy.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[December 15]], [[2007]]
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/12525621.html
|title=Our Views: Delegation suffers loss
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)|The Advocate]]
|accessdate=2007-12-14}}</ref> In the same month, ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' magazine listed the controversy as one of the top ten awkward moments of 2007.<ref>{{cite web
|date=December, 2007
|author=Salamme, Elisabeth
|url=http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/top10/article/0,30583,1686204_1686303_1690302,00.html
|title=Top 10 Awkward Moments
|publisher=[[Time Magazine]]
|accessdate=2007-12-17}}</ref>


==Other political involvement==
In a similar vein when the [[Eliott Spitzer prostitution scandal]], then governor of New York, hit the headlines, commentators contrasted the end-results: Spitzer resigned while Vitter stayed on.<ref>{{cite web
In 2016, Vitter succeeded after a five-year battle in passing through the Senate landmark legislation to reform the country's chemical safety laws. Vitter called the legislation a "big accomplishment. This is an area of federal law that everybody, every stakeholder, every group, whether it's some far-left environmental group or industry, said needed to be updated. The trick was getting agreement on doing that." Democratic colleague [[Dick Durbin|Richard Durbin]] of [[Illinois]], a frequent critic of Vitter, said that if the bill is enacted with President Obama's signature "it's quite an accomplishment for him and for Congress to pass historic legislation."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thetowntalk.com/story/news/2016/06/12/retirement-nears-vitter-relishes-win-chemical-bill/85711138/|title=As retirement nears, Vitter relishes win on chemical bill|publisher=The Alexandria Town Talk|date=June 12, 2016|author=Deborah Barfield Berry|access-date=June 14, 2016}}</ref>
|date=2008-03-18
|last=Kurtz
|first=Howard
|authorlink=Howard Kurtz
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/03/14/DI2008031402992.html
|title=Media Backtalk
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-03-19
|last=Akers
|first=Mary Ann
|authorlink=Mary Ann Akers
|url=http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/03/sen_david_vitter_on_prostituti.html
|title=Sen. Vitter Resents Comparisons with Ex-Gov. Spitzer
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-04-21
|last=Bleifuss
|first=Joel
|authorlink=Joel Bleifuss
|url=http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3600/political_vice_squad/
|title=Political Vice Squad
|publisher=[[In These Times]]
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref> In response, [[Jeff Crouere]], a New Orleans [[conservativism|conservative]] [[political commentator]], called on Vitter to resign saying he was an ineffective representative and reflected poorly on the state.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-03-14
|last=Crouere
|first=Jeff
|authorlink=Jeff Crouere
|url=http://blog.nola.com/jeff_crouere/2008/03/spitzer_sex_scandal_reminds_na.html
|title=Spitzer Sex Scandal Reminds Nation of Vitter's Sins
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref> Other local political figures differed with Crouere. Democratic [[political consultant]] [[James Carville]] said the two cases were entirely different: Spitzer's situation developed from an active investigation and as a former prosecutor and governor he had powerful enemies. In contrast, Carville described Vitter as "Louisiana’s junior senator and nobody really knows him or cares that much about him," but concluded that, "if they paid with their own money, I don’t think either one should resign." The Louisiana Republican governor [[Bobby Jindal]] said, "Senator Vitter has already addressed this.... The people of New York can deal with the Governor of New York.”<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-03-14
|url=http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080311/NEWS01/80311017/1002
|title=Spitzer, Vitter spark different reactions to scandal accusations
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref> Additionally, one gauge of the scandal's impact, local fundraising, indicated that Vitter has weathered the controversy well: first quarter 2008 finance reports show that he made, according to ''The Times-Picayune'', an "impressive haul".<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-04-23
|last=Walsh
|first=Bill
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/04/kennedy_senate_run_gets_financ.html
|title=Kennedy Senate run gets financial push
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2008-04-26
|quote=Vitter's impressive haul suggests that despite his involvement in the "D.C. Madam" scandal as one-time client of the escort service, his political support remains strong among rank-and-file Republicans in Louisiana.
}}</ref> Another gauge, voter approval, indicates Vitter is, [[as of June 2008]], still popular with Louisiana voters.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-07-01
|last=Wilson
|first=Reid
|url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2008/07/la_race_tightens.html
|title=LA Race Tightens
|publisher=[[Real Clear Politics]]
|accessdate=2008-07-01
|quote=Given Vitter's recent troubles, one might expect a low favorable rating. Instead, the junior senator is seen positively by 55% of voters in Louisiana, compared with just 38% who view him unfavorably.
}}</ref>


==Post-Senate career==
Vitter once again received unwanted attention after the suicide of Palfrey in May 2008.<ref>{{cite web
After his Senate term ended, Vitter joined the Washington, D.C. [[lobbying]] firm, [[Mercury LLC]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/article/David-Vitter-joins-Washington-based-lobbying-firm-10904635.php|title=David Vitter joins Washington-based lobbying firm|date=February 2, 2017|newspaper=[[Beaumont Enterprise]]|location=[[Beaumont, Texas|Beaumont]], Texas|access-date=February 25, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170226214242/http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/article/David-Vitter-joins-Washington-based-lobbying-firm-10904635.php|archive-date=February 26, 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref> As of October 2019, Vitter had lobbied for sanctioned Chinese surveillance company [[Hikvision]]<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/what-lobbyists-remarks-behind-closed-doors-tell-you-about-chinese-money-washington/|title=What a lobbyist's remarks behind closed doors tell you about Chinese money in Washington|last=Allen-Ebrahimian|first=Bethany|date=October 29, 2019|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=October 30, 2019}}</ref> as well as for the Libyan [[Government of National Accord]] and the Zimbabwean [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Zimbabwe)|Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ipvm.com/reports/vitter-hikvision |title=Senator Vitter Becomes "Proud Member Of The Hikvision Team", Calls Out "Anti-China" Rubio |last=Honovich |first=John |date=October 29, 2019 |website=IPVM |access-date=July 12, 2021}}</ref> He also lobbied for the sanctioned Russian bank [[Sovcombank]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Casey |first1=Tolan |last2=Devine |first2=Curt |title=US lobbying firms rush to cut ties with Russian businesses hit with sanctions |url=https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/26/politics/lobbying-firms-russian-businesses-sanctions-invs/index.html |access-date=April 22, 2022 |publisher=CNN}}</ref>
|date=2008-05-02
|last=Hesse
|first=Monica
|page=C01
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/01/AR2008050103763.html?hpid=topnews
|title=The Scandal Story With a Most Unhappy Ending
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
|accessdate=2008-05-02
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-05-02
|last=Sauer
|first=Maddy
|url=http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4768815&page=1
|title=Madams Fall While Their Johns Prosper
|publisher=[[ABC News]]
|accessdate=2008-05-02
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=2008-05-01
|last=Zagorin
|first=Adam
|url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1736687,00.html?imw=Y
|title=D.C. Madam: Suicide Before Prison
|publisher=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]
|accessdate=2008-05-02
}}</ref>


==Electoral history==
==Electoral history==
'''[[Louisiana gubernatorial election, 2015|2015 Louisiana gubernatorial election]]'''
{| class=wikitable
! colspan = 6 | Blanket primary
|-
! colspan=2 | Party
! Candidate
! Votes
! %
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
| '''[[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]'''
| '''[[John Bel Edwards]]'''
| align=center | '''444,517'''
| align=center | '''39.89%'''
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| '''[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]'''
| '''David Vitter'''
| align=center | '''256,300'''
| align=center | '''23.00%'''
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| [[Scott Angelle]]
| align=center | 214,982
| align=center | 19.29%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| [[Jay Dardenne]]
| align=center | 166,656
| align=center | 14.96%
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
| Cary Deaton
| align=center | 11,763
| align=center | 1.06%
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
| S. L. Simpson
| align=center | 7,420
| align=center | 0.67%
|-
| {{party color cell|Independent (politician)}}
| [[Independent (politician)|No party]]
| Beryl Billiot
| align=center | 5,694
| align=center | 0.51%
|-
| {{party color cell|Other}}
| [[Independent (politician)|Other]]
| Jeremy Odom
| align=center | 4,756
| align=center | 0.43%
|-
| {{party color cell|Other}}
| [[Independent (politician)|Other]]
| Eric Paul Orgeron
| align=center | 2,248
| align=center | 0.20%
|-
! colspan=3; style="text-align:right;"| Total
! align=center | 1,114,336
! align=center | 100%
|-
! colspan = 6 | Runoff
|-
! colspan=2 | Party
! Candidate
! Votes
! %
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
| '''[[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]'''
| '''[[John Bel Edwards]]'''
| align=center | '''646,924'''
| align=center | '''56.1%'''
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| David Vitter
| align=center | 505,940
| align=center | 43.9%
|-
! colspan=3; style="text-align:right;"| Total
! align=center | 1,152,864
! align=center | 100%
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
| colspan=6; style="text-align:left;"| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] '''gain''' from [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
|}


'''2004 Louisiana United States Senatorial Election'''
'''[[United States Senate election in Louisiana, 2010|2010 Louisiana United States Senatorial Election]]'''
{| class=wikitable
! colspan=2 | Party
! Candidate
! Votes
! %
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| '''[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]'''
| '''David Vitter ([[incumbent|inc.]])'''
| align=center | '''715,304'''
| align=center | '''56.56%'''
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
| Charlie Melancon
| align=center | 476,423
| align=center | 37.67%
|-
| {{party color cell|Libertarian Party (United States)}}
| [[Libertarian Party (United States)|Libertarian]]
| Randall Hayes
| align=center | 13,952
| align=center | 1.10%
|-
| {{party color cell|Independent (politician)}}
| [[Independent (politician)|No party]]
| Michael Brown
| align=center | 9,970
| align=center | 0.79%
|-
| {{party color cell|Other}}
| [[Independent (politician)|Other]]
| Mike Spears
| align=center | 9,188
| align=center | 0.73%
|-
| {{party color cell|Other}}
| [[Independent (politician)|Other]]
| Ernest Wooton
| align=center | 8,164
| align=center | 0.65%
|-
| {{party color cell|Independent (politician)}}
| [[Independent (politician)|No party]]
| Skip Galan
| align=center | 7,471
| align=center | 0.59%
|-
| {{party color cell|Reform Party (United States)}}
| [[Reform Party (United States)|Reform]]
| William McShan
| align=center | 5,879
| align=center | 0.46%
|-
| {{party color cell|Other}}
| [[Independent (politician)|Other]]
| Bob Lang
| align=center | 5,732
| align=center | 0.45%
|-
| {{party color cell|Independent (politician)}}
| [[Independent (politician)|No party]]
| Milton Gordon
| align=center | 4,806
| align=center | 0.38%
|-
| {{party color cell|Other}}
| [[Independent (politician)|Other]]
| Tommy LaFargue
| align=center | 4,042
| align=center | 0.32%
|-
| {{party color cell|Independent (politician)}}
| [[Independent (politician)|No party]]
| Sam Melton
| align=center | 3,779
| align=center | 0.30%
|-
! colspan=3; style="text-align:right;"| Total
! align=center | 1,264,710
! align=center | 100%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| colspan=6; style="text-align:left;"| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] '''hold'''
|}


'''[[United States Senate election in Louisiana, 2004|2004 Louisiana United States Senatorial Election]]'''
{|
{| class=wikitable
|'''David Vitter (R) 51%'''
! colspan=2 | Party
! Candidate
! Votes
! %
|-
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
|[[Chris John]] (D) 29%
| '''[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]'''
| '''David Vitter'''
| align=center | '''943,014'''
| align=center | '''51.03%'''
|-
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
|John N. Kennedy (D) 15%
| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
| Chris John
| align=center | 542,150
| align=center | 29.34%
|-
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
|Arthur Morrell (D) 3%
| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
| [[John Neely Kennedy]]
| align=center | 275,821
| align=center | 14.92%
|-
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
|Richard Fontanesi (I) 1%
| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
| Arthur A. Morrell
| align=center | 47,222
| align=center | 2.56%
|-
|-
| {{party color cell|Other}}
|R.A. Galan (I) 1%
| [[Independent (politician)|Other]]
| Richard M. Fontanesi
| align=center | 15,097
| align=center | 0.82%
|-
|-
| {{party color cell|Other}}
|Sam Melton (D) 1%
| [[Independent (politician)|Other]]
| R. A. "Skip" Galan
| align=center | 12,463
| align=center | 0.67%
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
| Sam Houston Melton, Jr.
| align=center | 12,289
| align=center | 0.66%
|-
! colspan=3; style="text-align:right;"| Total
! align=center | 1,848,056
! align=center | 100%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| colspan=6; style="text-align:left;"| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] '''gain''' from [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
|}
|}



'''1999 Louisiana 1st District United States Congressional Election'''
'''1999 Louisiana 1st District United States Congressional Election'''
{| class=wikitable
! colspan = 6 | Blanket primary
|-
! colspan=2 | Party
! Candidate
! Votes
! %
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| '''[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]'''
| '''[[David C. Treen]]'''
| align=center | '''36,719'''
| align=center | '''25.06%'''
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| '''[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]'''
| '''David Vitter'''
| align=center | '''31,741'''
| align=center | '''21.67%'''
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| [[David Duke]]
| align=center | 28,059
| align=center | 19.15%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| Monica Monica
| align=center | 22,928
| align=center | 15.65%
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
| Bill Strain
| align=center | 16,446
| align=center | 11.23%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| [[Rob Couhig]]
| align=center | 9,295
| align=center | 6.34%
|-
| {{party color cell|Democratic Party (United States)}}
| [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
| Darryl P. Ward
| align=center | 720
| align=center | 0.49%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| Patrick E. Landry
| align=center | 344
| align=center | 0.23%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| S. J. LoCoco
| align=center | 246
| align=center | 0.17%
|-
! colspan=3; style="text-align:right;"| Total
! align=center | 146,498
! align=center | 100%
|-
! colspan = 6 | Runoff
|-
! colspan=2 | Party
! Candidate
! Votes
! %
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| '''[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]'''
| '''David Vitter'''
| align=center | '''61,661'''
| align=center | '''50.75%'''
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| [[David C. Treen]]
| align=center | 59,849
| align=center | 49.25%
|-
! colspan=3; style="text-align:right;"| Total
! align=center | 121,510
! align=center | 100%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| colspan=6; style="text-align:left;"| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] '''hold'''
|}


'''1995 Louisiana 81st District State House of Representatives Election'''
{|
{| class="wikitable"
|'''David Vitter (R) 51%'''
! colspan=2 | Party
! Candidate
! %
|-
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
|[[David C. Treen]] (R) 49%
| '''[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]'''
| '''David Vitter ([[incumbent|inc.]])'''
| align=center | '''100%'''
|-
! colspan=3; style="text-align:right;"| Total
! align=center | 100%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| colspan=6; style="text-align:left;"| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] '''hold'''
|}
|}

'''1991 Louisiana 81st District State House of Representatives Election'''
{| class="wikitable"
! colspan=2 | Party
! Candidate
! %
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| '''[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]'''
| '''David Vitter'''
| align=center | '''68%'''
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| Mike Reynolds
| align=center | 24%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| Mercedes Hernandez
| align=center | 8%
|-
! colspan=3; style="text-align:right;"| Total
! align=center | 100%
|-
| {{party color cell|Republican Party (United States)}}
| colspan=6; style="text-align:left;"| [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] '''hold'''
|}

==See also==
*[[List of federal political sex scandals in the United States]]


==Footnotes==
==Footnotes==
{{reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|30em}}


==External links==
==External links==
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20161228140549/https://www.vitter.senate.gov/ United States Senator David Vitter] official U.S. Senate website {{small|(Archived)}}
{{Commonscat}}
{{Commons category}}
{{sisterlinks}}
{{sister project links}}
*[http://vitter.senate.gov/ United States Senator David Vitter], Senate site
{{CongLinks | congbio = v000127 | fec = S4LA00057 | opensecrets = N00009659 | votesmart = BS022639 | ontheissuespath = Senate/David_Vitter.htm }}
* {{CongLinks | congbio=v000127 | votesmart=4615 | fec=S4LA00057 | congress=david-vitter/1609 }}
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20140716060629/http://btr360.com/2014/06/18/david-vitter-my-last-political-job/ Senator Vitter at BR Press Club]
*[http://vitter.org/ Vitter.org - website of the Vitter family] Maintained by David Vitter's brother [[Jeffrey Vitter]]
* {{C-SPAN|60672}}
*[http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=David_Vitter SourceWatch Congresspedia{{ndash}} David Vitter] profile
* [http://vitter.org/ Vitter.org] Vitter family website maintained by brother [[Jeffrey Vitter]]


{{s-start}}
{{s-start}}
{{s-par|us-la-hs}}
{{s-bef|before=[[David Duke]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Member of the [[Louisiana House of Representatives]]<br />from the 81st district|years=1992–1999}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Jennifer Sneed Heebe]]}}
|-
{{s-par|us-hs}}
{{s-par|us-hs}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Bob Livingston]]}}
{{USRepSuccessionBox
{{s-ttl|title=Member of the [[United States House of Representatives|U.S. House of Representatives]]<br />from [[Louisiana's 1st congressional district]]|years=1999–2005}}
|state=Louisiana
{{s-aft|after=[[Bobby Jindal]]}}
|district=1
|-
|before=[[Bob Livingston]]
{{s-ppo}}
|years=1999 – 2005
|after=[[Bobby Jindal]]}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Jim Donelon]]}}
{{s-ttl|title={{nowrap|[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] nominee for [[List of United States Senators from Louisiana|U.S. Senator]] from [[Louisiana]]}}<br />([[Classes of United States Senators|Class 3]])|years=[[2004 United States Senate election in Louisiana|2004]], [[2010 United States Senate election in Louisiana|2010]]}}
{{s-aft|after=[[John Kennedy (Louisiana politician)|John Neely Kennedy]]}}
|-
{{s-bef|before=Bobby Jindal}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] nominee for [[List of Governors of Louisiana|Governor of Louisiana]]|years=[[2015 Louisiana gubernatorial election|2015]]}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Eddie Rispone]]}}
|-
{{s-par|us-sen}}
{{s-par|us-sen}}
{{s-bef|before=[[John Breaux]]}}
{{U.S. Senator box
{{s-ttl|title=[[List of United States Senators from Louisiana|U.S. Senator (Class 3) from Louisiana]]|years=2005–2017|alongside=[[Mary Landrieu]], [[Bill Cassidy]]}}
|before=[[John Breaux]]
{{s-aft|after=John Neely Kennedy}}
|state=Louisiana
|-
|class=3
{{s-bef|before=[[Jim Inhofe]]}}
|start=2005
{{s-ttl|title=Ranking Member of the [[United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works|Senate Environment Committee]]|years=2013–2015}}
|alongside=[[Mary Landrieu]]}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Barbara Boxer]]}}
|-
{{s-bef|before=[[Maria Cantwell]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Chair of the [[United States Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship|Senate Small Business Committee]]|years=2015–2017}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Jim Risch]]}}
|-
{{s-prec|usa}}
{{s-prec|usa}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Johnny Isakson]]<br><small>R-[[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]]}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Rob Portman]]|as=Former US Senator}}
{{s-ttl|title=''[[List of current United States Senators by seniority|United States Senators by seniority]]''|years=83rd}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[United States order of precedence|Order of precedence of the United States]]<br>''{{small|as Former US Senator }}''|years=}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Mel Martinez]]<br><small>R-[[Florida]]</small>}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Evan Bayh]]|as=Former US Senator}}
{{end}}
{{s-end}}

{{USSenLA}}
{{USSenLA}}
{{U.S. Senate Small Business Committee Chairs}}
{{LA-FedRep}}
{{LARepresentatives}}
{{Current U.S. Senators}}
{{USCongRep-start|congresses= 106th–114th [[United States Congress]]es |state=[[Louisiana]]}}
{{Current statewide political officials of Louisiana}}
{{USCongRep/LA/106}}
<!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]] -->
{{USCongRep/LA/107}}
{{USCongRep/LA/108}}
{{USCongRep/LA/109}}
{{USCongRep/LA/110}}
{{USCongRep/LA/111}}
{{USCongRep/LA/112}}
{{USCongRep/LA/113}}
{{USCongRep/LA/114}}
{{USCongRep-end}}
{{Portal bar|Biography|United States|Law|Education|Politics|Christianity}}
{{authority control}}


{{Persondata
|NAME= Vitter, David Bruce
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES=
|SHORT DESCRIPTION=[[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from [[Louisiana]]
|DATE OF BIRTH=[[May 3]], [[1961]]
|PLACE OF BIRTH=[[New Orleans, Louisiana|New Orleans]], [[Louisiana]]
|DATE OF DEATH=
|PLACE OF DEATH=
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Vitter, David}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Vitter, David}}
[[Category:1961 births]]
[[Category:1961 births]]
[[Category:20th-century American lawyers]]
[[Category:21st-century Louisiana politicians]]
[[Category:Alumni of Magdalen College, Oxford]]
[[Category:American gun rights activists]]
[[Category:American Rhodes Scholars]]
[[Category:American legal scholars]]
[[Category:American lobbyists]]
[[Category:Candidates in the 2015 United States elections]]
[[Category:De La Salle High School (New Orleans, Louisiana) alumni]]
[[Category:Harvard College alumni]]
[[Category:Lawyers from New Orleans]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Republican Party members of the Louisiana House of Representatives]]
[[Category:American legal academics]]
[[Category:American Rhodes scholars]]
[[Category:People from Jefferson Parish, Louisiana]]
[[Category:American Roman Catholics]]
[[Category:Politicians from New Orleans]]
[[Category:Alumni of University College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Republican Party United States senators from Louisiana]]
[[Category:Republican Party members of the United States House of Representatives from Louisiana]]
[[Category:Congressional scandals]]
[[Category:Harvard University alumni]]
[[Category:Tea Party movement activists]]
[[Category:Tulane University alumni]]
[[Category:Tulane University Law School alumni]]
[[Category:Louisiana lawyers]]
[[Category:Tulane University Law School faculty]]
[[Category:Louisiana Republicans]]
[[Category:21st-century United States senators]]
[[Category:Members of the Louisiana House of Representatives]]
[[Category:20th-century members of the United States House of Representatives]]
[[Category:Members of the United States House of Representatives from Louisiana]]
[[Category:21st-century members of the United States House of Representatives]]
[[Category:People from New Orleans, Louisiana]]
[[Category:20th-century members of the Louisiana State Legislature]]
[[Category:United States Senators from Louisiana]]
[[Category:Conservatives]]
[[Category:Sex scandal figures]]
[[Category:Current members of the United States Senate]]

[[da:David Vitter]]
[[de:David Vitter]]
[[eo:David Vitter]]
[[fr:David Vitter]]
[[it:David Vitter]]
[[pl:David Vitter]]
[[ru:Виттер, Дэвид]]
[[fi:David Vitter]]
[[sv:David Vitter]]

Latest revision as of 09:14, 29 December 2024

David Vitter
Official portrait, 2005
United States Senator
from Louisiana
In office
January 3, 2005 – January 3, 2017
Preceded byJohn Breaux
Succeeded byJohn Kennedy
Chair of the Senate Small Business Committee
In office
January 3, 2015 – January 3, 2017
Preceded byMaria Cantwell
Succeeded byJim Risch
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Louisiana's 1st district
In office
May 29, 1999 – January 3, 2005
Preceded byBob Livingston
Succeeded byBobby Jindal
Member of the Louisiana House of Representatives
from the 81st district
In office
1992–1999
Preceded byDavid Duke
Succeeded byJennifer Sneed Heebe
Personal details
Born
David Bruce Vitter

(1961-05-03) May 3, 1961 (age 63)
New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.
Political partyRepublican
Spouse
(m. 1990)
RelationsJeffrey Vitter (brother)
Children4
EducationHarvard University (BA)
Magdalen College, Oxford (BA)
Tulane University (JD)
Signature

David Bruce Vitter (born May 3, 1961) is an American politician who served as a United States Senator from Louisiana from 2005 to 2017. A member of the Republican Party, Vitter served in the Louisiana House of Representatives from 1992 to 1999 and in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1999 to 2005.

Vitter was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 2004. He was the first Republican to represent Louisiana in the Senate since the Reconstruction Era, and the first ever Republican to be popularly elected. In 2007, Vitter admitted to and apologized for past involvement with prostitution as part of a Washington, D.C. escort service which gained much notoriety[1] and while not affecting his 2010 election, is believed to have played a part in his loss of the 2015 gubernatorial election. In 2010, Vitter won a second Senate term by defeating Democratic U.S. Representative Charlie Melançon.

Vitter unsuccessfully ran for governor to succeed the term-limited Bobby Jindal in the 2015 gubernatorial election. He lost the general election to Democrat John Bel Edwards. While conceding defeat to Edwards, Vitter announced that he would not seek reelection to his Senate seat in 2016 and would retire from office at the completion of his term. Following the conclusion of his second Senate term, Vitter became a lobbyist.

Early life and education

[edit]
David Vitter and his family with Vice President Dick Cheney

David Bruce Vitter[2] was born on May 3, 1961,[3] in New Orleans, Louisiana. He is the son of Audrey Malvina (née St. Raymond) and Albert Leopold Vitter. Vitter graduated in 1979 from De La Salle High School in New Orleans.[4] While a student at De La Salle, Vitter participated in the Close Up Washington civic education program. He received a Bachelor of Arts from Harvard College in 1983; a second B.A. from Magdalen College, Oxford in 1985, as a Rhodes Scholar; and a Juris Doctor degree in 1988 from the Tulane University Law School in New Orleans. He was a practicing lawyer,[5][6] and adjunct law professor at Tulane and Loyola University New Orleans.[6]

Vitter and his wife Wendy, a former prosecutor,[7][8] have four children. Vitter's brother Jeffrey is a computer scientist who has served as chancellor of the University of Mississippi from January 2016 to January 2019.

Early political career

[edit]

Louisiana House of Representatives

[edit]

Vitter was a member of the Louisiana House of Representatives from 1992 to 1999.

Vitter has argued for ethics reform and term limits since he was in the Louisiana Legislature in the early 1990s.[9] As a Louisiana state legislator, Vitter successfully pushed through a term limits amendment to the state constitution to oust the largely Democratic legislature.[10][11][12][13] The first election legislators affected by the reform occurred in 2007.[14] In order to leverage the term limits advantage in that election, Vitter formed a Political Action Committee with the goal of winning a legislative Republican majority.[15][16] While the Republicans saw gains, the Democrats maintained majority control.[13]

Vitter opposed gambling during his tenure in the Louisiana House.[17]

United States House of Representatives

[edit]

Vitter won a special election to Louisiana's 1st congressional district in 1999, succeeding Republican U.S. Representative Bob Livingston, who resigned after disclosure that he had committed adultery. In the initial vote on May 1, 1999,[18] former Congressman and Governor David C. Treen finished first with 36,719 votes (25 percent). Vitter was second, with 31,741 (22 percent), and white nationalist David Duke finished third with 28,055 votes (19 percent). Monica L. Monica, a Republican ophthalmologist, had 16 percent; State Representative Bill Strain, a conservative Democrat, finished fifth with 11 percent; and Rob Couhig, a Republican lawyer and the owner of New Orleans's minor league baseball team, garnered 6 percent.[19] In the runoff, Vitter defeated Treen 51–49 percent.[20]

In 2000 and 2002, Vitter was re-elected with more than 80 percent of the vote in what had become a safe Republican district.[20]

In 2001, Vitter co-authored legislation to restrict the number of physicians allowed to prescribe RU-486, a drug used in medical abortions. The bill died in committee.[21][22]

In 2003, Vitter proposed to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.[23] In 2004, he said, "This is a real outrage. The Hollywood left is redefining the most basic institution in human history...We need a U.S. Senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not Massachusetts values."[24]

2003 gubernatorial election

[edit]

In 2002, Vitter was preparing to run for governor in 2003, with the incumbent, Republican Mike Foster, prevented by term limits from running again. But in June 2002, shortly before the Louisiana Weekly reported on a claim from Vincent Bruno, a campaign worker for Treen in 1999, about Vitter's alleged relationship with a prostitute, Vitter dropped out of the governor's race,[25] saying he and his wife were dealing with marital problems.

Bruno said on a New Orleans–based radio show that he had been told by a prostitute that she had interactions with Vitter. However, Treen and his campaign decided to not publicize this information during the election.[26]

United States Senate

[edit]

2004 election

[edit]

In 2004, Vitter ran to replace Democrat John Breaux in the U.S. Senate.

During the campaign, Vitter was accused by a member of the Louisiana Republican State Central Committee of having had a lengthy affair with a prostitute in New Orleans. Vitter responded that the allegation was "absolutely and completely untrue" and that it was "just crass Louisiana politics."[7]

On November 2, 2004, Vitter won the jungle primary, garnering a majority of the vote, while the rest of the vote was mostly split among the Democratic contenders.

Vitter was the first Republican in Louisiana to be popularly elected as a U.S. Senator. The previous Republican Senator, William Pitt Kellogg, was chosen by the state legislature in 1876, in accordance with the process used before the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution went into effect in 1914.[27]

2010 election

[edit]
Vitter yard sign (2010)

Vitter began fundraising for his 2010 reelection run in December 2008.[28] He raised $731,000 in the first quarter of 2009 and $2.5 million for his 2010 campaign.[29] He had wide leads against potential Democratic opponents in aggregate general election polling.[30] He faced intraparty opposition from Chet D. Traylor of Monroe, a former associate justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court, in the August 28 Republican primary election and defeated him.

He faced the Democratic U.S. Representative Charlie Melançon of Napoleonville in the November 2 general election. State Representative Ernest Wooton of Belle Chasse in Plaquemines Parish, an Independent, also ran.[31] On November 4, 2010, Vitter was re-elected as Louisiana Senator, defeating his Democratic rival, Melancon. Vitter got 715,304 votes while Melancon got 476,423 votes. Vitter received about 57% of the total vote while Melancon got 38%. The Independent candidate Wooton finished with 8,167 votes, or 1 percent of the total cast.

Tenure

[edit]

Vitter has identified himself as a political conservative throughout his political career. His legislative agenda includes positions ranging from anti-abortion to pro-gun rights while legislating against gambling, same-sex marriage, civil unions, federal funding for abortion providers, increases in the State Children's Health Insurance Program, the United Nations, and amnesty for America's illegal immigrants. Vitter's stated positions include a balanced budget constitutional amendment,[32] abolishing the federal and state estate tax,[33] increasing local police forces,[34] and an assortment of health care, tax and national defense reforms.[35][better source needed]

After conceding defeat to John Bel Edwards in the 2015 Louisiana gubernatorial election, Vitter announced that he would not seek reelection to his Senate seat in 2016 and would retire from office at the completion of his term.[36]

Abortion

[edit]

In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment[37] barring all federal public funds to health care providers and Planned Parenthood that provide services that include abortion. Federal law bars any funding to directly finance elective abortions in accordance with the Hyde amendment. Vitter argued that the funds are used for overhead costs that benefit the abortion services. The amendment failed to pass.[38][39] Following the rejection, Vitter and others urged the Senate to pass a similar bill introduced by Vitter in January 2007. The bill failed to pass.[40]

In January 2008, Vitter proposed an amendment to prohibit the funding of abortions with Indian Health Service funds except in the case of rape, incest, or when the life of the woman is at risk.[41] The amendment would have held future presidential administrations to an executive principle first crafted in 1982 by the Ronald Reagan White House.[42] Vitter's amendment passed the Senate but later was stalled in the House.[43]

Later that year, Vitter co-sponsored the Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act which – along with other oversight regulations – required doctors performing abortions to have the authority granted by a nearby hospital to admit patients. The bill was never reported to committee.[44][45]

Abstinence education

[edit]

Vitter advocated abstinence-only sex education, emphasizing abstinence over sex education that includes information about birth control, drawing criticism from Planned Parenthood.[46] He said, "Abstinence education is a public health strategy focused on risk avoidance that aims to help young people avoid exposure to harm...by teaching teenagers that saving sex until marriage and remaining faithful afterwards is the best choice for health and happiness."[47]

Automotive industry bailout

[edit]

Vitter was one of 35 Senators to vote against the Big 3 Bailout bill.[48] The financial bailout package was for GM, Chrysler, and Ford, but failed to pass on December 11, 2008. During the Senate debate Vitter referred to the approach of giving the automotive industry a financial package before they restructured as "ass-backwards".[49] He soon apologized for the phrasing of the comment, which did not appear in the Congressional Record.[50]

BP Horizon oil spill

[edit]

In response to the April 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill at an offshore drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico threatening the coast of Louisiana, Vitter introduced legislation along with Jeff Sessions of Alabama to increase the liability cap of an oil company from $75 million to its most recent annual profits (or $150 million if greater).[51] In the case of BP, the owner of the oil lease, its liability would be $20 billion.[52] Vitter later introduced an amendment that would remove the cap entirely for this particular spill.[51] Competing Democratic proposals would have raised the liability to $10 billion regardless of profits or removed the cap altogether.[51] Sessions argued that large caps unrelated to company profits would harm smaller companies.[52]

Chemical safety

[edit]

In May 2013, Vitter introduced the Chemical Safety Improvement Act, a bipartisan bill to reform the Toxic Substances Control Act, which would have regulated the introduction of new or already existing chemicals. The bill would have given additional authority to the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate chemicals and streamline the patchwork of state laws on chemicals under federal authority.[53][54]

Child protection

[edit]

In April 2008, Vitter introduced an amendment to continue funding the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act which was excluded from the 2008/2009 budget. The federal program maintains a national sex offender registry, provides resources for tracking down unregistered sex offenders and increases penalties for the sexual assault of children. His amendment received bipartisan support.[55][56]

Children's health insurance program

[edit]

In September 2007, Vitter opposed an increase of $35 billion for the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), the national program to provide health care for children from families who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but cannot afford private health insurance. He said he preferred that private health insurance provide the needed care and deemed the bill as "Hillarycare", a reference to the 1993 Clinton health care plan created by Hillary Clinton which proposed universal health care.[57]

Ethics and term limits

[edit]

Vitter refused to pledge to a voluntary term limit when running for the U.S. Congress in 1999. His opponent characterized this stance as hypocritical, and Vitter countered that unless it were universally applied, the loss of seniority would disadvantage his district.[10][58] As a Senator, he has proposed term limit constitutional amendments for members of Congress three times.[59][60][61] Vitter eventually decided to retire from the Senate in 2016 after serving two terms.

In 2007, in response to lobbying scandals involving, among others, Jack Abramoff and Duke Cunningham, Congress passed a lobbying and ethics reform package to which Vitter proposed a package of five amendments.[62][63][64][65] The Senate approved three that limited which legislators' spouses could lobby the Senate,[66] created criminal penalties for legislators and executive branch officials who falsify financial reports,[67] and doubled the penalties for lobbyists who failed to comply with disclosure requirements.[68] The Senate rejected prohibiting legislators from paying their families with campaign funds with some saying it was unrelated to the current legislation and others that the payments were not a problem.[69][70] Additionally, they tabled his proposal to define Indian tribes as corporations and its members as shareholders so that they are required to contribute to candidates through political action committees instead of their tribal treasury.[71] Senators objected saying that they are already subjected to campaign laws for unincorporated entities and individuals and that the proposal was singling them out unfairly.[70] The reform package became law in September 2007.[62]

In 2009, Vitter and Democratic former Senator Russ Feingold announced an effort to end automatic pay raises for members of Congress.[72]

Franken Amendment

[edit]
Vitter in 2005

In October 2009, the Senate passed Democratic Senator Al Franken's amendment to the 2010 Defense Appropriations bill that would forbid federal contractors from forcing victims of sexual assault, battery and discrimination to submit to binding arbitration (where a third-party typically chosen by the contractor adjudicates) and thereby prohibiting them from going to court.[73][74][75] The impetus for the amendment came from the story of Jamie Leigh Jones who alleged that she was drugged and gang-raped by employees of Halliburton/KBR, a federal contractor.[73][76][77]

The amendment passed 68 to 30 with all opposition coming from Republicans including Vitter (all four female Republicans, six other Republicans and all present Democrats voted for passage).[73][78] Vitter's 2010 Democratic Senatorial opponent Charlie Melancon criticized Vitter for his vote saying, "David Vitter has refused to explain why he voted to allow taxpayer-funded companies to sweep rape charges under the rug. We can only guess what his reasons were."[77][79][80][81] However, The Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker argued that the 30 senators were being "unfairly smeared for doing the harder thing, maybe even for the right reasons."[76]

Republican senators said they voted against it because it was unenforceable, a position also taken by the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Obama administration.[73][76][77] However, the DOD and the White House stated they agreed with the intent of the legislation and suggested it would be better if it was broadened to prohibit the use of arbitration in cases of sexual assault for any business contract, not just federal contractors.[76] Senators explained their vote against the legislation by saying it was a political attack on Halliburton and that the Senate shouldn't regulate contracts.[76] The latter argument is countered with many examples of similar restrictions on contractors such as discrimination, bonuses and health care.[73][77] Others felt it was unconstitutional and that arbitration is useful in resolving disputes, often faster, privately and cheaper.[73]

Later, a Baton Rouge rape survivor confronted Vitter at a town hall meeting saying, "[it] meant everything to me that I was able to put the person who attacked me behind bars ... How can you support a law that tells a rape victim that she does not have the right to defend herself?" Vitter replied, "The language in question did not say that in any way shape or form."[82][83]

Gambling

[edit]

Vitter opposed a bid by the Jena Band of Choctaw Indians to build a casino in Louisiana, arguing that the build site was not historically part of their tribal lands. He lobbied the Interior Department and included language in an appropriations bill to stop the casino. Although the Interior Department gave its approval, the casino has not yet been approved by the state.[84] The Jena chief accused Vitter of ties with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who simultaneously lobbied against the casino. The chairman of the Senate committee investigating the lobbyist said, "The committee has seen absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Senator Vitter's opposition to (the proposed casino) had to do with anything other than his long-standing opposition to gambling."[85] In 2007 and 2008, Vitter introduced a bill to prohibit Indian casinos such as Jena's. Neither bill became law.[86][87][88]

Gun rights

[edit]

Rated "A" by the NRA Political Victory Fund,[89] Vitter has been a consistent defender of gun rights.[90] In April 2006, in response to firearm confiscations in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Vitter was the Senate sponsor of the Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act, to prohibit federal funding for the confiscation of legally held firearms during a disaster.[91] Later, Vitter included the provisions of the act in an amendment to an appropriation bill for the Department Of Homeland Security.[92] The bill became law in September 2006, with the amendment modified to allow for the temporary surrender of a firearm as a condition for entering a rescue or evacuation vehicle.[93]

On April 17, 2013, Vitter voted against the Toomey-Manchin Gun Control Amendment. The amendment failed to reach the sixty senatorial votes necessary to overcome a Republican-led filibuster. The Toomey-Manchin Gun Control Amendment is a bipartisan deal on gun background checks. Under the proposal, federal background checks would be expanded to include gun shows and online sales. All such sales would be channeled through licensed firearm dealers who would be charged for keeping record of transactions. The proposal does not require background checks for private sales between individuals.[94]

In February 2008, Vitter – along with Senators Larry Craig and Mike Crapo of Idaho – blocked the confirmation of Michael J. Sullivan as head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) saying Sullivan supports "burdensome regulations" on gun owners and dealers and is "overly aggressive" enforcing gun laws. An editorial writer for The Boston Globe wrote that Vitter's position was "unreasonable" because the guns Sullivan sought to control are those commonly used in crimes: those stolen or purchased on the black market.[95][96] On the other hand, gun rights advocates say that many gun dealers have lost their licenses for harmless bureaucratic errors.[97] Sullivan stayed on as acting head of the ATF until January 2009 to make way for President Barack Obama to name his own nominee.[98]

Hurricane Katrina

[edit]
Senator Vitter discussing relief efforts with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Vitter and the rest of the Louisiana congressional delegation worked to bring aid to the Gulf Coast region to rebuild broken levees, schools and hospitals, restore coastal wetlands, and provide assistance for its many victims.[99]

In early September, Vitter said that he would give "the entire big government organized relief effort a failing grade, across the board." He said that state and local governments shared in the blame as well.[100] Vitter's actions during Hurricane Katrina are described in historian Douglas Brinkley's May 2006 book, The Great Deluge.

In September 2007, Vitter announced that he got "a critical concession" from the White House that decreased Louisiana's obligations for hurricane recovery by $1 billion. However, the White House said that was false.[101]

Immigration

[edit]

Vitter has been actively involved with legislation concerning illegal immigrants. In June 2007, he led a group of conservative Senators in blocking the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, a piece of federal legislation that would have granted a pathway to legal residence to 12 million illegal immigrants coupled with increased border enforcement. The bill's defeat won Vitter national attention as the bill was supported by President George W. Bush, John McCain, and Ted Kennedy, among others. Vitter characterized the bill as amnesty, which supporters denied. Bush accused the bill's opponents of fear mongering.[102][103][104]

In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment withholding Community Oriented Policing Services funds from any sanctuary city which bans city employees and police officers from asking people about their immigration status in violation of the Illegal Immigration Act. Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, in opposition to the amendment, said these cities do not want to inquire about someone's status if they report a crime, are a victim of domestic violence or get vaccinations for their children. The amendment was defeated.[105]

In November 2007, Vitter introduced a bill requiring banks to verify that no customer was an illegal immigrant before issuing banking or credit cards. The bill never made it out of committee.[106][107]

In March 2008, Vitter reintroduced the latter two proposals[108][109] and cosponsored ten of eleven other bills[110] in a Republican package of tough immigration enforcement measures including jail time for illegal border crossing; deportation for any immigrant (legal or illegal) for a single driving while intoxicated; declaration of English as the official language (thereby terminating language assistance at voting booths and federal agencies); additional construction of a border fence; permission for local and state police to enforce immigration laws and penalties for states who issue drivers licenses to illegals. None of these proposals passed, partially because the Democratic-controlled Senate preferred a comprehensive approach which would include a guest-worker program and a path to citizenship for the current population more akin to the package defeated by Vitter in 2007.[111]

In April 2008, Vitter introduced a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that a child born in the United States is not a citizen unless a parent is a citizen, lawful permanent resident, or alien serving in the military.[112] Currently the Constitution grants citizenship to children born within the U.S. regardless of the legal status of the parents.[113] The bill never made it out of the Democratic-led committee.

Louisiana Family Forum earmark

[edit]

In September 2007, Vitter earmarked $100,000 in federal money for a Christian group, the Louisiana Family Forum,[114] known for challenging evolution by means of "teaching the controversy" which promotes intelligent design.[115] According to Vitter, the earmark was "to develop a plan to promote better science education".[114] The Times-Picayune alleged the group had close ties with Vitter.[114] However, they have criticized Vitter for his support of Rudy Giuliani.[116]

On October 17, 2007, the liberal organization People For the American Way, along with several other groups asked the Senate to remove the earmark.[117][118] Vitter later withdrew it.[119][120]

Military

[edit]

In May 2008, Vitter voted with the majority, despite the opposition of Bush and other Republicans, for the passage of the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 to expand educational benefits for veterans similar to the level provided for returning World War II veterans in the G.I. Bill.[121][122][123]

Network neutrality

[edit]

Vitter was one of six senate Republicans to propose an amendment to a bill which would stop the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from enforcing network neutrality which they allege is a violation of the First Amendment.[124]

New Orleans public housing

[edit]

In September 2007, The Times-Picayune reported that Vitter and the Bush administration opposed a provision of The Gulf Coast Housing Recovery bill which required that every public housing apartment torn down be replaced with another form of low-income housing on a one-for-one basis. The administration testified that there was not sufficient demand for public housing units, a position contested by several senators. Vitter stated it would recreate "housing projects exactly as they were", isolated and riddled with crime. However, Mary Landrieu, the Louisiana Democratic Senator, said the intent was to make certain there were affordable places for working-class people who returned. The bill requires that demolished housing projects be replaced with mixed income communities which local housing advocates say is different from the massive public housing developments that Vitter is referring to. However, the bill does not include a ban on large-scale projects.[125][126] The city housing authority is planning on replacing 4,000 low-income units with mixed-income projects providing a smaller inventory of low-income units.[127] In December 2007, Vitter prevented the bill from leaving the committee.[126]

Obama nominations

[edit]

Vitter and Jim DeMint were the only two Senators that voted against Hillary Clinton's confirmation for the position of Secretary of State under the new Obama administration, on January 21, 2009.[128]

He blocked President Obama's nominee for the new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) administrator until he received a written commitment on flood control issues from the nominee and FEMA. The New York Times, along with some Republican Senators, criticized Vitter for what it characterized as political posturing, given that the hurricane season was quickly approaching. He lifted his hold on May 12, 2009.[129][130]

Affordable Care Act

[edit]

Vitter opposed President Barack Obama's health reform legislation; he voted against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in December 2009,[131] and he voted against the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.[132]

Same-sex marriage

[edit]

Vitter opposes both same-sex marriage and civil unions. In June 2006, he said "I don't believe there's any issue that's more important than this one ... I think this debate is very healthy, and it's winning a lot of hearts and minds. I think we're going to show real progress."[133] In 2006, he told The Times-Picayune, "I'm a conservative who opposes radically redefining marriage, the most important social institution in human history."[134]

In October 2005, at a Lafayette Parish Republican Executive Committee luncheon, Vitter compared gay marriage to hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which came through the same geographical areas. Vitter said "It's the crossroads where Katrina meets Rita. I always knew I was against same-sex unions."[135]

School board prayer

[edit]

In 2005 Vitter introduced a resolution supporting prayer at school board meetings in response to an earlier district court decision that the Louisiana's Tangipahoa Parish practice of opening meetings with Christian prayers was unconstitutional. The bill died in committee after receiving little support from colleagues on both sides of the aisle.[136][137] Vitter later reintroduced the resolution in January 2007 after a panel of the Fifth Circuit Court concluded that Christian prayers were unconstitutional but was undecided whether nonsectarian prayers were allowed. In July 2007, the full Fifth Circuit dismissed the case because of a lack of standing. The school board subsequently resumed prayer evocations but opened it to diverse community religions. Vitter's bill died in committee.[137][138][139][140]

Tea Party movement

[edit]

In recognition of the Tea Party protests opposing President Barack Obama's policies, Vitter proposed Senate Resolution 98, which would designate April 15 in years both 2009 and 2010 as "National TEA Party Day". As of April 2009, the bill has no cosponsors and has been referred to the Committee on the Judiciary with no scheduled action.[141]

In September 2010, Vitter signed a candidate pledge from the North Central Louisiana TEA Party Patriots. It included a promise to "Conduct myself personally and professionally in a moral and socially appropriate manner."[142]

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

[edit]

In September 2007, during hearings of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Vitter expressed serious doubts about the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea treaty concerning issues of U.S. sovereignty[143] echoing an array of conservative groups against the treaty[143][144] including the National Center for Public Policy Research,[145] The Heritage Foundation[146] and the Center for Security Policy.[147] The treaty, which sets up countries' jurisdiction over their coasts and ocean including exploration and navigation rights,[148] was supported by the Bush administration, a majority of the United States Senate, the Pentagon, the State Department and Navy[149] as do a coalition of business and environmental groups.[150] The committee approved the treaty 17–4, with Vitter voting no.[151]

Water Resources and Development Act

[edit]

Vitter helped write the Water Resources and Development Act for flood-control, hurricane-protection and coastal-restoration projects including $3.6 billion for Louisiana. He called it the "single most important" legislation for assisting Louisiana with its recovery from hurricane Katrina. President George W. Bush vetoed the act, objecting to its cost.[152][153][154] Congress overrode his veto, enacting the bill.[155]

Committee assignments

[edit]

2007 prostitution scandal

[edit]

In early July 2007, Vitter's phone number was included in a published list of phone records of Pamela Martin and Associates, a company owned and run by Deborah Jeane Palfrey, also known as the "D.C. Madam", who was convicted by the U.S. government for running a prostitution service. Hustler identified the phone number and contacted Vitter's office to ask about his connection to Palfrey.[156][157] The following day, Vitter issued a written statement in which he took responsibility for his "sin" and asked for forgiveness.[158] On July 16, 2007, after a week of self-imposed seclusion, Vitter emerged and called a news conference. As his wife stood next to him, Vitter asked the public for forgiveness. Following Vitter's remarks, his wife Wendy Vitter spoke, but both refused to answer any questions.[159][160][161] In 2004, Vitter had denied allegations that he had patronized prostitutes.[7]

While the Louisiana state Republican Party offered guarded support,[162] national Republicans offered forgiveness.[163] The Nation predicted that the Republican Party would be in a "forgiving mood", because if he were to resign, Governor of Louisiana Kathleen Blanco, a Democrat, would likely appoint a Democrat to take Vitter's place until a special election could be held, thus increasing Democratic control over the US Senate.[164][165][166]

On September 8, 2015, reporter Derek Myers was fired from WVLA-TV after asking Vitter, who was running for governor, about allegations that the senator had frequented prostitutes.[167] After Myers's question, Myers said an unnamed coworker overheard a conversation about the Vitter campaign's ad spending at the station, possibly with a threat from the campaign to pull the ads.[168] Democrat John Bel Edwards released an ad about the prostitution scandal two weeks before the run-off election and won by more than 12%.[169]

2015 gubernatorial election

[edit]

Vitter announced on January 21, 2014, that he would run for governor of Louisiana in the 2015 election.[170] Then-Governor Bobby Jindal was ineligible to seek re-election due to term limits.[171] Vitter was the first sitting or ex-U.S. Senator to launch a gubernatorial bid in Louisiana since 1904, when Democrat Newton Blanchard was elected.[172] Vitter's major opponents were Republicans Scott Angelle, Louisiana Public Service Commissioner and former lieutenant governor,[173][174] and Jay Dardenne, the current lieutenant governor;[175] and Democrat John Bel Edwards, Minority Leader of the Louisiana House of Representatives.[173][176]

In the November 21 runoff election, Edwards defeated Vitter by 56% to 44%.[177]

Other political involvement

[edit]

In 2016, Vitter succeeded after a five-year battle in passing through the Senate landmark legislation to reform the country's chemical safety laws. Vitter called the legislation a "big accomplishment. This is an area of federal law that everybody, every stakeholder, every group, whether it's some far-left environmental group or industry, said needed to be updated. The trick was getting agreement on doing that." Democratic colleague Richard Durbin of Illinois, a frequent critic of Vitter, said that if the bill is enacted with President Obama's signature "it's quite an accomplishment for him and for Congress to pass historic legislation."[178]

Post-Senate career

[edit]

After his Senate term ended, Vitter joined the Washington, D.C. lobbying firm, Mercury LLC.[179] As of October 2019, Vitter had lobbied for sanctioned Chinese surveillance company Hikvision[180] as well as for the Libyan Government of National Accord and the Zimbabwean Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade.[181] He also lobbied for the sanctioned Russian bank Sovcombank.[182]

Electoral history

[edit]

2015 Louisiana gubernatorial election

Blanket primary
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic John Bel Edwards 444,517 39.89%
Republican David Vitter 256,300 23.00%
Republican Scott Angelle 214,982 19.29%
Republican Jay Dardenne 166,656 14.96%
Democratic Cary Deaton 11,763 1.06%
Democratic S. L. Simpson 7,420 0.67%
No party Beryl Billiot 5,694 0.51%
Other Jeremy Odom 4,756 0.43%
Other Eric Paul Orgeron 2,248 0.20%
Total 1,114,336 100%
Runoff
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic John Bel Edwards 646,924 56.1%
Republican David Vitter 505,940 43.9%
Total 1,152,864 100%
Democratic gain from Republican

2010 Louisiana United States Senatorial Election

Party Candidate Votes %
Republican David Vitter (inc.) 715,304 56.56%
Democratic Charlie Melancon 476,423 37.67%
Libertarian Randall Hayes 13,952 1.10%
No party Michael Brown 9,970 0.79%
Other Mike Spears 9,188 0.73%
Other Ernest Wooton 8,164 0.65%
No party Skip Galan 7,471 0.59%
Reform William McShan 5,879 0.46%
Other Bob Lang 5,732 0.45%
No party Milton Gordon 4,806 0.38%
Other Tommy LaFargue 4,042 0.32%
No party Sam Melton 3,779 0.30%
Total 1,264,710 100%
Republican hold

2004 Louisiana United States Senatorial Election

Party Candidate Votes %
Republican David Vitter 943,014 51.03%
Democratic Chris John 542,150 29.34%
Democratic John Neely Kennedy 275,821 14.92%
Democratic Arthur A. Morrell 47,222 2.56%
Other Richard M. Fontanesi 15,097 0.82%
Other R. A. "Skip" Galan 12,463 0.67%
Democratic Sam Houston Melton, Jr. 12,289 0.66%
Total 1,848,056 100%
Republican gain from Democratic

1999 Louisiana 1st District United States Congressional Election

Blanket primary
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican David C. Treen 36,719 25.06%
Republican David Vitter 31,741 21.67%
Republican David Duke 28,059 19.15%
Republican Monica Monica 22,928 15.65%
Democratic Bill Strain 16,446 11.23%
Republican Rob Couhig 9,295 6.34%
Democratic Darryl P. Ward 720 0.49%
Republican Patrick E. Landry 344 0.23%
Republican S. J. LoCoco 246 0.17%
Total 146,498 100%
Runoff
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican David Vitter 61,661 50.75%
Republican David C. Treen 59,849 49.25%
Total 121,510 100%
Republican hold

1995 Louisiana 81st District State House of Representatives Election

Party Candidate %
Republican David Vitter (inc.) 100%
Total 100%
Republican hold

1991 Louisiana 81st District State House of Representatives Election

Party Candidate %
Republican David Vitter 68%
Republican Mike Reynolds 24%
Republican Mercedes Hernandez 8%
Total 100%
Republican hold

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ Murray, Shailagh (July 10, 2007). "Senator's Number on 'Madam' Phone List". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 13, 2014.
  2. ^ "David Bruce Vitter (R)". The Washington Post. 2004.
  3. ^
  4. ^ "De La Salle High School 1990–1999 Award Recipients". De La Salle High School. 1998. Archived from the original on July 9, 2011. Retrieved November 6, 2009.
  5. ^ "David Bruce Vitter (R)". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 19, 2009.
  6. ^ a b "U.S. Rep. David Vitter To Present SLU Commencement Address". Southeastern Louisiana University Public Information Office. April 27, 2001. Retrieved March 19, 2009. While serving in the state legislature, Vitter was a business attorney as well as an adjunct law professor at Tulane and Loyola Universities.
  7. ^ a b c Shailagh Murray, "Senator's Number on 'Madam' Phone List", The Washington Post, July 10, 2007
  8. ^ "Wendy Vitter, with one exception, might have what it takes to be federal judge". January 27, 2018.
  9. ^ Crouere, Jeff (July 12, 2007). "The Rise and Fall of David Vitter". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on May 6, 2008. Retrieved May 8, 2008.
  10. ^ a b Sack, Kevin (April 29, 1999). "Louisiana G.O.P. Facing David Duke, Again". The New York Times. Retrieved July 14, 2008.
  11. ^ Nossiter, Adam (July 11, 2007). "A Senator's Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky". The New York Times. Retrieved July 14, 2008.
  12. ^ Hasten, Mike (September 9, 2007). "Republicans set sights on control of La. House". The Town Talk. Archived from the original on February 4, 2013. Retrieved July 14, 2008.
  13. ^ a b "The 2007 Elections – Effect of Term Limits (Part I)". LouisianaConservative.com. December 6, 2007. Archived from the original on December 19, 2007. Retrieved July 14, 2008.
  14. ^ Barrow, Bill (October 30, 2007). "Term limits aren't GOP bonanza". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved July 14, 2008.
  15. ^ Barrow, Bill (August 5, 2007). "Quest for La. House will look past Vitter". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 14, 2008. Vitter's effectiveness for raising the profile of Republican candidates in state legislative races has dissolved
  16. ^ "The 2007 Elections – Effect of Term Limits (Part I)". LouisianaConservative.com. December 6, 2007. Archived from the original on December 19, 2007. Retrieved July 14, 2008. The LCRM also suffered somewhat of a setback ... when stories arose regarding Senator Vitter's involvement with prostitutes....
  17. ^ Applebome, Peter (June 12, 1994). "Legal Gambling Bedevils Louisiana". The New York Times. Retrieved April 21, 2008. Louisiana has long experience with gambling as a political issue; see, e.g., Francis Grevemberg.
  18. ^ Stuart Rothenberg, "Hot race for Livingston's Louisiana House seat", CNN, April 13, 1999
  19. ^ Kevin Sack, "David Duke Misses Louisiana Runoff but Has Strong Showing", The New York Times, May 3, 1999
  20. ^ a b "Almanac of American Politics". June 25, 2005. Archived from the original on June 14, 2011. Retrieved December 7, 2007.
  21. ^ "Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy". Kaiser Permanente. February 7, 2001. Archived from the original on March 1, 2002. Retrieved December 10, 2007.
  22. ^ "H.R. 482 [107th]: RU-486 Patient Health and Safety Protection Act". GovTrack. Retrieved December 10, 2007.
  23. ^ Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. (Introduced in House), HJ 56 IH, 108th CONGRESS, H. J. RES. 56 Archived October 19, 2015, at the Wayback Machine May 21, 2003, Mrs. MUSGRAVE (for herself, Mr. HALL, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, and Mr. VITTER)
  24. ^ "Vitter Statement on Protecting the Sanctity of Marriage". Vitter2004.com. Archived from the original on July 15, 2007. Retrieved July 12, 2007.
  25. ^ Christopher Tidmore, "The Weekly's inside political track", Louisiana Weekly, March 29, 2004
  26. ^ Bridges, Tyler, "David Vitter murky past with prostitution focus of campaign behind campaign", The Advocate, September 25, 2015
  27. ^ Rudin, Ken (November 1, 2004). "Final Call: Kerry Wins Narrow Electoral Margin; GOP Gains in House, Senate". NPR. Retrieved April 30, 2008.
  28. ^ "Scandal-plagued Vitter gets La. fundraising help". Associated Press. December 5, 2008. Retrieved December 5, 2008.[permanent dead link]
  29. ^ "Vitter's re-election campaign stash swelling for 2010". NOLA.com. April 22, 2009. Retrieved August 29, 2010.[permanent dead link]
  30. ^ "Election 2010: Louisiana Senate – Rasmussen Reports". Rasmussenreports.com. Retrieved August 29, 2010.
  31. ^ "Monroe's Traylor to challenge Vitter". Monroe News Star, July 10, 2010. Archived from the original on July 15, 2010. Retrieved July 10, 2010.
  32. ^ "David Vitter Issues: Budget". David Vitter. Archived from the original on April 22, 2008. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  33. ^ "David Vitter Issues: Agriculture & Seafood". David Vitter. Archived from the original on April 22, 2008. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  34. ^ "David Vitter Issues: Crime and Drugs". David Vitter. Archived from the original on April 22, 2008. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  35. ^ "David Vitter Issues". David Vitter. Archived from the original on April 30, 2008. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  36. ^ "Edwards beats Vitter in Louisiana governor's race". Politico. November 21, 2015. Retrieved November 21, 2015.
  37. ^ "On the Amendment (Vitter Amdt. No.3330 )". United States Senate. Retrieved November 17, 2007.
  38. ^ Alpert, Bruce (October 19, 2007). "Abortion plan is defeated in Senate". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on February 22, 2012. Retrieved October 19, 2007.
  39. ^ Taylor, Andrew (October 28, 2007). "No Cut in Money for Abortion Providers". Associated Press. Archived from the original on October 24, 2007. Retrieved October 19, 2007.
  40. ^ "S. 351: Title X Family Planning Act". GovTrack. Retrieved November 17, 2007.
  41. ^ "S.Amdt. 3896: To modify a section relating to limitation on use of funds..." GovTrack.us. Archived from the original on August 30, 2008. Retrieved January 23, 2008.
  42. ^ KALB News Channel 5 (February 26, 2008). "Senate Passes Vitter Amendment to Prohibit Federal Funding of Abortions". KALB.com. Archived from the original on March 14, 2008. Retrieved February 27, 2008.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  43. ^ 110th Congress (2007) (April 24, 2007). "S. 1200". Legislation. GovTrack.us. Retrieved April 29, 2009. Indian Health Care Improvement Act Amendments of 2008{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  44. ^ Alpert, Bruce; Walsh, Bill (April 20, 2008). "On The Hill: Bill tightens abortion penalties". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved April 21, 2008.[permanent dead link]
  45. ^ "S. 2788 – 110th Congress (2008): Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). March 31, 2008. Retrieved May 6, 2008.
  46. ^ Vitter, David (June 25, 2007). "Vitter Pushes for Reauthorization of Abstinence Education Program". David Vitter press release. Archived from the original on July 13, 2007. Retrieved July 12, 2007.
  47. ^ Vitter, David; Bunning, Jim (June 21, 2007). "Letter to the chairman and ranking member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2007. Retrieved July 10, 2007.
  48. ^ "How they voted: Senate roll vote on $14B auto bailout". Associated Press. December 12, 2008. Retrieved December 17, 2008.[dead link]
  49. ^ Puzzanghera, Jim (December 10, 2008). "White House, Democrats reach accord on auto bailout". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved December 17, 2008.
  50. ^ Alpert, Bruce (December 17, 2008). "Vitter regrets salty language". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on January 7, 2009. Retrieved December 17, 2008.
  51. ^ a b c Berry, Deborah Barfield (May 26, 2010). "Lawmakers weigh liability cap". The Daily Advertiser. Retrieved May 27, 2010.[dead link]
  52. ^ a b Orndorff, Mary (May 27, 2010). "U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions wants to raise BP's liability to $20 billion". The Birmingham News. Retrieved May 27, 2010.
  53. ^ "Vitter: Support for Chemical Safety Improvement Act Grows". June 11, 2013.
  54. ^ "Vitter takes his Chemical Safety bill to House committee hearing". The Advocate. Archived from the original on March 6, 2014. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  55. ^ Alpert, Bruce (May 1, 2008). "Vitter seeks funding for child-safety act". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on February 22, 2012. Retrieved May 1, 2008.
  56. ^ "Vitter Offers Amendment to Fund Adam Walsh Act". David Vitter. Archived from the original on April 30, 2008. Retrieved May 1, 2008.
  57. ^ Walsh, Bill (September 28, 2007). "Senate OKs child health expansion". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on February 22, 2012. Retrieved September 29, 2007.
  58. ^ Aynesworth, Hugh (April 18, 1999). "Morality is no issue in race for Livingston's seat; Term limit, Klansman dominate crowded campaign". The Washington Times. pp. C4.
  59. ^ "S. J. Res. 2 – 110th Congress (2007): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). January 17, 2007. Retrieved July 15, 2008.
  60. ^ "S. J. Res. 3 – 109th Congress (2005): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). January 17, 2007. Retrieved July 15, 2008.
  61. ^ 110th Congress (2008) (March 31, 2008). "S. 2788". Legislation. GovTrack.us. Retrieved April 29, 2009. Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  62. ^ a b Babington, Charles (September 15, 2007). "Bush Signs Lobby-Ethics Bill". The Washington Post. Associated Press. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  63. ^ "S. 1 – 110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). January 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  64. ^ "Amendments to S. 1 – 110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). January 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  65. ^ "Vitter Introduces Extensive Ethics Reform Package". David Vitter. January 4, 2008. Archived from the original on May 1, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  66. ^ "Proposed lobbying limits apply to only one senator". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. February 9, 2007. Archived from the original on July 11, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  67. ^ "Senate cracks down on financial fraud". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. January 10, 2007. Archived from the original on October 20, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  68. ^ "S.Amdt. 10: To increase the penalty for failure to comply with lobbying..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). January 10, 2007. Archived from the original on August 30, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  69. ^ "Campaigns Still A Family Affair". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. January 11, 2007. Archived from the original on October 20, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  70. ^ a b "Senate Record: Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). January 10, 2007. Archived from the original on August 30, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  71. ^ "S.Amdt. 5: To modify the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). January 10, 2007. Archived from the original on August 30, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  72. ^ Feingold, Russ; David Vitter (April 14, 2009). "Congress Does Not Deserve Any Special Treatment". RealClearPolitics. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
  73. ^ a b c d e f Dizikes, Cynthia (October 6, 2009). "Senate passes Franken amendment aimed at defense contractors". MinnPost.com. Archived from the original on October 10, 2009. Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  74. ^ "S.amdt.2588". US Library of Congress THOMAS database. October 1, 2009. Archived from the original on December 8, 2010. Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  75. ^ "SA 2588". Congressional Record. October 1, 2009. pp. S10069 – S10070. Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  76. ^ a b c d e Parker, Kathleen (October 25, 2009). "The 'rape supporter' ploy". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  77. ^ a b c d "A case to make anyone ashamed". Daily World. November 2, 2009. Retrieved November 3, 2009.[dead link]
  78. ^ "S.Amdt. 2588: To prohibit the use of funds for any Federal... to H.R. 3326: Department of Defense Appropriations... (Vote On Amendment)". Govtrack.us. October 6, 2009. Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  79. ^ Fabian, Jordan (October 26, 2009). "Melancon hits at Vitter's rape amendment vote". The Hill. Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  80. ^ Moller, Jan (October 26, 2009). "Melancon enters online campaign fray". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on January 30, 2013. Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  81. ^ Melancon, Charlie (October 2009). "Charlie Melancon for Senate". Charlie Melancon Campaign Committee, Inc. Archived from the original on July 8, 2011. Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  82. ^ Shields, Gerard (November 4, 2009). "Survivor of rape confronts Vitter". The Advocate (Louisiana). Retrieved November 5, 2009.
  83. ^ Tilove, Jonathan (November 4, 2009). "When confronted by rape victim, Vitter defends vote against 'Franken amendment'". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on January 30, 2013. Retrieved November 5, 2009.
  84. ^ Susan, Schmidt (March 13, 2005). "Casino Bid Prompted High-Stakes Lobbying". The Washington Post. p. A01.
  85. ^ Walsh, Bill (July 28, 2005). "McCain defends Vitter as tribe cries foul". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on September 7, 2005. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  86. ^ "Our View: Tribal casinos win big bucks". The Advocate (Baton Rouge) and WBRZ-TV. April 14, 2008. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  87. ^ "Vitter Introduces Indian Gambling Reform Act". David Vitter. Archived from the original on May 1, 2008. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  88. ^ "S. 2676: A bill to make technical corrections to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and for other purposes". GovTrack. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  89. ^ "NRA-PVF Endorses David Vitter for U.S. Senate". nrapvf.org. NRA-PVF. September 13, 2010. Archived from the original on August 12, 2014.
  90. ^ "David Vitter on the issues". On The Issues. Retrieved February 16, 2008.
  91. ^ "S.AMDT.S.2599". US Library of Congress THOMAS database. September 19, 2006. Archived from the original on October 19, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2007.
  92. ^ "S.AMDT.4615". US Library of Congress THOMAS database. Archived from the original on October 19, 2015. Retrieved December 10, 2018.
  93. ^ "H.R.5441". US Library of Congress THOMAS database. 2006. Archived from the original on November 12, 2008. Retrieved December 4, 2007.
  94. ^ "Senate rejects effort to expand gun background checks; Vitter votes no, Landrieu yes", Associated Press via nola.com, April 17, 2013.
  95. ^ Saltzman, Jonathan (February 14, 2008). "Sullivan ATF confirmation blocked". The Boston Globe. Retrieved February 16, 2008.
  96. ^ "Held up by gun-lobby radicals". The Boston Globe. February 16, 2008. Retrieved February 6, 2008.
  97. ^ Schmitt, Richard B. (February 25, 2008). "ATF nominee in the crossfire". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on April 14, 2008. Retrieved February 25, 2008.
  98. ^ "US Attorney Sullivan resigns". WFXT. January 20, 2009. Retrieved April 29, 2009.[permanent dead link]
  99. ^ Hernandez, Raymond (October 5, 2005). "Gulf Coast Lawmakers in Spotlight as Aid Requests Pour In". The New York Times. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  100. ^ "Louisiana senior senator turns up heat on Bush: Democrat Landrieu escalates rhetoric against president on Katrina response", Associated Press, September 11, 2005
  101. ^ Walsh, Bill (September 29, 2007). "Louisiana looks like a state of denial". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved September 29, 2007.
  102. ^ "Vitter leads opposition to immigration bill". The Times-Picayune. June 22, 2007. Archived from the original on August 24, 2007. Retrieved December 7, 2007.
  103. ^ "Are Rational Immigration Laws a 'Job American Politicians Won't Do'?". Human Events. June 18, 2007. Archived from the original on January 15, 2008. Retrieved December 7, 2007.
  104. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (May 30, 2007). "Bush Takes On Conservatives Over Immigration". The New York Times. Retrieved December 7, 2007.
  105. ^ "Plan to Crack Down on 'Sanctuary Cities' Killed in Senate". Fox News. October 16, 2007. Archived from the original on October 17, 2007. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
  106. ^ Shields, Gerald (November 26, 2007). "Washington Watch for November 26, 2007". The Advocate (Baton Rouge) and WBRZ-TV. Retrieved November 26, 2007.
  107. ^ "S. 2393: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards..." GovTrack.us. Retrieved January 15, 2008.
  108. ^ "S. 2713 – 110th Congress (2008): A bill to prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of section..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). March 5, 2008. Retrieved May 6, 2008.
  109. ^ "S. 2714: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). March 5, 2008. Retrieved May 6, 2008.
  110. ^ "Measures Placed on the Calendar". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). March 6, 2008. Archived from the original on August 30, 2008. Retrieved May 6, 2008.
  111. ^ Gaouette, Nicole (March 5, 2008). "GOP senators to introduce toughest-yet immigration package". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 6, 2008.[dead link]
  112. ^ "S.J.RES.31 [110th]: RA joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to United States citizenship". GovTrack. Retrieved April 9, 2008.
  113. ^ Ho, James C. (March 10, 2007). "Can Congress repeal birthright citizenship?". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 5, 2008.
  114. ^ a b c Walsh, David (September 22, 2007). "Vitter earmarked federal money for creationist group". Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on December 13, 2007. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  115. ^ "Origins Science". Louisiana Family Forum. Retrieved November 10, 2007.[dead link]
  116. ^ "Vitter Sends Shockwaves". Louisiana Family Forum. Retrieved November 10, 2007.[dead link]
  117. ^ "Groups Ask Senate To Remove Earmark Promoting Creationism From Spending Bill". Common Dreams NewsCenter. October 17, 2007. Archived from the original on October 20, 2007. Retrieved October 17, 2007.
  118. ^ "Earmark for Anti-Science Creationist Group Must Be Removed". People For the American Way. October 17, 2007. Archived from the original on August 28, 2008. Retrieved October 17, 2007.
  119. ^ Walsh, Bill (October 19, 2007). "Vitter shifts $100,000 from religious group". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on October 26, 2007. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  120. ^ "Vitter earmark withdrawn". National Center for Science Education. October 18, 2007. Retrieved November 18, 2009.
  121. ^ Lerman, David. "Senate approves Jim Webb's new GI Bill". Daily Press. Retrieved May 22, 2008.[permanent dead link]
  122. ^ "Senate Passes Iraq War Funding Bill". The New York Times. Associated Press. May 22, 2008. Retrieved May 22, 2008. [dead link]
  123. ^ "Vote Summary". United States Senate. May 22, 2008. Retrieved May 22, 2008.
  124. ^ Romm, Tony (September 22, 2009). "Amendment would block FCC regulation of net neutrality". Retrieved September 22, 2009.
  125. ^ Walsh, Bill (September 26, 2007). "Feds oppose full replacement of N.O. public housing units". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on October 17, 2007. Retrieved September 27, 2007.
  126. ^ a b Webster, Richard A. (December 3, 2007). "Razing a ruckus". New Orleans City Business. Archived from the original on December 11, 2007. Retrieved December 3, 2007.
  127. ^ Saluny, Susan (December 3, 2007). "New Orleans Hurt by Acute Rental Shortage". The New York Times. Retrieved December 3, 2007.
  128. ^ "Senate confirms Clinton as secretary of State". USA Today. Associated Press. January 21, 2009. Archived from the original on May 5, 2009. Retrieved April 29, 2009.
  129. ^ "Doin' a Heck of a Job, Senator". The New York Times. May 9, 2009. Retrieved May 14, 2009.
  130. ^ "Senator to Stop Blocking Choice to Head FEMA". The New York Times. Associated Press. May 13, 2009. Retrieved May 14, 2009.
  131. ^ "U.S. Senate: Roll Call Vote". senate.gov. January 27, 2015.
  132. ^ "U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote". Senate.gov. Retrieved August 29, 2010.
  133. ^ "Senate set to reject gay marriage ban: Backers see 'important debate'; critics blast effort to 'misdirect'", CNN, June 7, 2006
  134. ^ Norrister, Adam (July 11, 2007). "A Senator's Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky". The New York Times. Retrieved July 10, 2007.
  135. ^ "Louisiana Senator Compares Hurricanes to Gay Marriage"[usurped], gayapolis.com, News, posted October 18, 2005. Retrieved July 10, 2007.
  136. ^ "S. Res. 132 (109th): A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings". GovTrack.us. Retrieved January 16, 2008.
  137. ^ a b Mitchell, David J. (January 20, 2007). "Tangipahoa parties say ruling unclear". The Advocate (Baton Rouge). Retrieved January 16, 2008.[dead link] Alt URL Archived January 3, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  138. ^ "S. Res. 35: A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings". GovTrack.us. Retrieved January 16, 2008.
  139. ^ "Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch. Bd., No. 05-30294 (5th Cir. Dec. 15, 2006)". National School Boards Association. December 2006. Archived from the original on January 1, 2011. Retrieved January 16, 2008.
  140. ^ Mitchell, David J. (August 22, 2007). "Tangipahoa board OKs prayer policy". The Advocate (Baton Rouge). Retrieved January 16, 2008.[dead link] Alt URL
  141. ^ 111th Congress (2009) (April 2, 2009). "S. Res. 98". Legislation. GovTrack.us. Retrieved May 19, 2009. A resolution designating each of April 15, 2009, and April 15, 2010, as "National TEA Party Day"{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  142. ^ Beutler, Brian (September 16, 2010). "Vitter Pledge To Tea Party: 'I Will Conduct Myself...In A Morally And Socially Appropriate Manner'". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved September 24, 2010.
  143. ^ a b Sands, David R. (September 28, 2007). "White House pushes sea treaty". The Washington Times. Retrieved September 28, 2007.
  144. ^ "Pass the sea treaty". Omaha World Herald. May 16, 2004. Archived from the original on September 26, 2007. Retrieved September 28, 2007.
  145. ^ Ridenour, David A. (August 2006). "Ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty: A Not-So-Innocent Passage". National Center for Public Policy Research. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved September 28, 2007.
  146. ^ Spring, Baker and Steven Groves and Brett D. Schaefer (September 25, 2007). "The Top Five Reasons Why Conservatives Should Oppose the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea". The Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on October 15, 2007. Retrieved September 28, 2007.
  147. ^ Gaffney Jr.; Frank J. (May 18, 2004). "Don't Get LOST". National Review Online. Retrieved September 28, 2007.
  148. ^ Scally, William (September 24, 2007). "Law of Sea Treaty Revived With Senate Hearings". Congressional Quarterly. Archived from the original on October 13, 2007. Retrieved September 28, 2007.
  149. ^ Kraus, Don (June 6, 2007). "Time to Ratify the Law of the Sea". Institute for Policy Studies. Archived from the original on September 26, 2007. Retrieved September 28, 2007.
  150. ^ "Editorial: U.S. should join Law of the Sea alliance". Newsday. September 27, 2007. Archived from the original on July 3, 2007. Retrieved September 28, 2007.
  151. ^ Dinan, Stephen (November 1, 2007). "Senate panel OKs sea treaty, but fight looms". The Washington Times. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  152. ^ "Our Views: State needs flood projects". The Advocate (Baton Rouge) and WBRZ-TV. September 27, 2007. Retrieved September 27, 2007.
  153. ^ "Federal water bill critical to state". The Daily Advertiser. September 27, 2007. Archived from the original on July 16, 2007. Retrieved September 27, 2007.
  154. ^ Alpert, Bruce (November 2, 2007). "Bush vetoes massive water resources bill". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved November 2, 2007.[dead link]
  155. ^ "Senate Overrides Bush Veto on Water Bill". The New York Times. Associated Press. November 8, 2007. Retrieved November 8, 2007. [dead link]
  156. ^ Rood, Justin (July 10, 2007). "'Hustler' Call May Have Prompted Vitter Admission". ABC News. Archived from the original on July 12, 2007. Retrieved July 10, 2007.
  157. ^ "Woman Convicted in Washington Escort Case". The New York Times. Associated Press. April 16, 2008. Retrieved April 21, 2008.
  158. ^ Douglass K. Daniel, "Senator's number on escort service list" Archived July 13, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, July 10, 2007
  159. ^ "Scandal-linked senator breaks a week of silence". CNN.com. July 17, 2007. Retrieved August 24, 2008.
  160. ^ "Vitter comes out of seclusion, claims New Orleans prostitutes don't exist; some say otherwise" (PDF). Louisiana Weekly. July 23, 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 15, 2008. Retrieved August 24, 2008.
  161. ^ Moran, Kate; Walsh, Bill; McCarthy, Brendan (July 16, 2007). "Vitter re-emerges and asks again for forgiveness". The Times Picayune. Archived from the original on October 7, 2008. Retrieved August 24, 2008.
  162. ^ Walsh, Bill (July 13, 2007). "Louisiana Republicans offer guarded support for Vitter". Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on July 16, 2007. Retrieved July 22, 2007.
  163. ^ Radelat, Ana (July 19, 2007). "Vitter tries to move forward". Gannett News Service. Archived from the original on September 28, 2007. Retrieved July 22, 2007.
  164. ^ Nichols, John (July 17, 2007). "A "Family Values" Headache for Senate GOP". The Nation. Retrieved July 22, 2007.[dead link]
  165. ^ Lipman, Larry (September 30, 2007). "A year later, Foley fallout lingers". Palm Beach Post. Archived from the original on June 18, 2007. Retrieved September 30, 2007.
  166. ^ Blumner, Robyn (September 30, 2007). "Republicans and their big Greenspan gap". St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved September 30, 2007.
  167. ^ TV reporter fired after asking David Vitter about prostitutes, newspaper reports
  168. ^ "Reporter Claims He Was Fired for Asking Louisiana Senator David Vitter About His History With Prostitutes" Archived November 24, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Gawker
  169. ^ Bridges, Tyler (December 15, 2015). "'You're crazy if you believe that': John Bel Edwards takes remarkable journey to improbable landslide in governor's race". The Advocate. Retrieved November 19, 2017.
  170. ^ "David Vitter Announces Run for Governor". Roll Call. January 21, 2014. Archived from the original on January 22, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
  171. ^ "John Bel Edwards beats David Vitter to become Louisiana's next governor". NOLA. November 21, 2015. Archived from the original on November 23, 2015. Retrieved November 21, 2015.
  172. ^ Ostermeier, Eric (January 24, 2014). "David Vitter Launches Historic Gubernatorial Bid in Louisiana". Smart Politics.
  173. ^ a b Alford, Jeremy (May 6, 2013). "Saved by the Bel?". Gambit. Archived from the original on February 3, 2014. Retrieved May 13, 2013.
  174. ^ Avery, Cole (October 2, 2014). "Scott Angelle to run for governor in 2015". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on October 2, 2014. Retrieved October 2, 2014.
  175. ^ Adelson, Jeff (March 20, 2013). "Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne 'intends' to run for governor in 2015". The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2013. Retrieved May 13, 2013.
  176. ^ Adelson, Jeff (February 10, 2013). "John Bel Edwards announces he is running for governor in 2015". The New Orleans Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on February 23, 2013. Retrieved February 21, 2013.
  177. ^ "Louisiana election results 2015: Live updates". NOLA.com. June 14, 2023. Archived from the original on November 23, 2015.
  178. ^ Deborah Barfield Berry (June 12, 2016). "As retirement nears, Vitter relishes win on chemical bill". The Alexandria Town Talk. Retrieved June 14, 2016.
  179. ^ "David Vitter joins Washington-based lobbying firm". Beaumont Enterprise. Beaumont, Texas. February 2, 2017. Archived from the original on February 26, 2017. Retrieved February 25, 2017.
  180. ^ Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany (October 29, 2019). "What a lobbyist's remarks behind closed doors tell you about Chinese money in Washington". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 30, 2019.
  181. ^ Honovich, John (October 29, 2019). "Senator Vitter Becomes "Proud Member Of The Hikvision Team", Calls Out "Anti-China" Rubio". IPVM. Retrieved July 12, 2021.
  182. ^ Casey, Tolan; Devine, Curt. "US lobbying firms rush to cut ties with Russian businesses hit with sanctions". CNN. Retrieved April 22, 2022.
[edit]
Louisiana House of Representatives
Preceded by Member of the Louisiana House of Representatives
from the 81st district

1992–1999
Succeeded by
U.S. House of Representatives
Preceded by Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Louisiana's 1st congressional district

1999–2005
Succeeded by
Party political offices
Preceded by Republican nominee for U.S. Senator from Louisiana
(Class 3)

2004, 2010
Succeeded by
Preceded by
Bobby Jindal
Republican nominee for Governor of Louisiana
2015
Succeeded by
U.S. Senate
Preceded by U.S. Senator (Class 3) from Louisiana
2005–2017
Served alongside: Mary Landrieu, Bill Cassidy
Succeeded by
John Neely Kennedy
Preceded by Ranking Member of the Senate Environment Committee
2013–2015
Succeeded by
Preceded by Chair of the Senate Small Business Committee
2015–2017
Succeeded by
U.S. order of precedence (ceremonial)
Preceded byas Former US Senator Order of precedence of the United States
as Former US Senator
Succeeded byas Former US Senator