Talk:Pennsylvania's at-large congressional district: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Pvmoutside (talk | contribs) added wikiprojects |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Remove 2 deprecated parameters: importance, auto. Tag: |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}} |
||
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|importance=low|subject=place}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==1842 Apportion Bill== |
==1842 Apportion Bill== |
||
California elected at-large members in the nineteenth century, and Montana did at the beginning of the twentieth. [[Special:Contributions/99.165.93.122|99.165.93.122]] ([[User talk:99.165.93.122|talk]]) 07:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC) |
California elected at-large members in the nineteenth century, and Montana did at the beginning of the twentieth. [[Special:Contributions/99.165.93.122|99.165.93.122]] ([[User talk:99.165.93.122|talk]]) 07:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
:The 1842 Apportionment Bill did abolish at-large districts for multi-representative states and plural districts, however, it only applied during the 10-year period for which said apportionment was effective. Later apportionment bills did not always include that restriction [[User:XinaNicole|XinaNicole]] ([[User talk:XinaNicole|talk]]) 05:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:56, 8 March 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1842 Apportion Bill
[edit]California elected at-large members in the nineteenth century, and Montana did at the beginning of the twentieth. 99.165.93.122 (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- The 1842 Apportionment Bill did abolish at-large districts for multi-representative states and plural districts, however, it only applied during the 10-year period for which said apportionment was effective. Later apportionment bills did not always include that restriction XinaNicole (talk) 05:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)