Dicotyledon: Difference between revisions

Dicotyledon
	Lamium album (white dead nettle)
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Plantae
Clade:	Tracheophytes
Clade:	Spermatophytes
Clade:	Angiosperms
Groups included
	Eudicots; Magnoliids; Amborella; Nymphaeales; Austrobaileyales; Chloranthales; Ceratophyllum;
Cladistically included but traditionally excluded taxa
	Monocots;
Synonyms
	Dicotyledoneae; Magnoliatae Takht.;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:32, 22 September 2024

The dicotyledons, also known as dicots (or, more rarely, dicotyls),^[2] are one of the two groups into which all the flowering plants (angiosperms) were formerly divided. The name refers to one of the typical characteristics of the group: namely, that the seed has two embryonic leaves or cotyledons. There are around 200,000 species within this group.^[3] The other group of flowering plants were called monocotyledons (or monocots), typically each having one cotyledon. Historically, these two groups formed the two divisions of the flowering plants.

Largely from the 1990s onwards, molecular phylogenetic research confirmed what had already been suspected: that dicotyledons are not a group made up of all the descendants of a common ancestor (i.e., they are not a monophyletic group). Rather, a number of lineages, such as the magnoliids and groups now collectively known as the basal angiosperms, diverged earlier than the monocots did; in other words, monocots evolved from within the dicots, as traditionally defined. The traditional dicots are thus a paraphyletic group.^[4]

The eudicots are the largest monophyletic group within the dicotyledons. They are distinguished from all other flowering plants by the structure of their pollen. Other dicotyledons and the monocotyledons have monosulcate pollen (or derived forms): grains with a single sulcus. Contrastingly, eudicots have tricolpate pollen (or derived forms): grains with three or more pores set in furrows called colpi.

Comparison with monocotyledons

Aside from cotyledon number, other broad differences have been noted between monocots and dicots, although these have proven to be differences primarily between monocots and eudicots. Many early-diverging dicot groups have monocot characteristics such as scattered vascular bundles, trimerous flowers, and non-tricolpate pollen.^[5] In addition, some monocots have dicot characteristics such as reticulated leaf veins.^[5]

Feature	In monocots	In dicots
Number of parts of each flower	In threes (flowers are trimerous)	In fours or fives (tetramerous or pentamerous)
Number of furrows or pores in pollen	One	Three
Number of cotyledons (leaves in the seed)	One	Two
Arrangement of vascular bundles in the stem	Scattered	In concentric circles
Roots	Are adventitious	Develop from the radicle
Arrangement of major leaf veins	Parallel	Reticulate
Secondary growth	Absent	Often present
Stomata	Present on both the upper and lower epidermis of leaves	More common on the lower epidermis of leaves

Comparison of monocots and dicots

Classification

Phylogeny

The consensus phylogenetic tree used in the APG IV system shows that the group traditionally treated as the dicots is paraphyletic to the monocots:^[6]^[7]

	Ceratophyllales

	eudicots

monocots

traditional dicots

Historical

Traditionally, the dicots have been called the Dicotyledones (or Dicotyledoneae), at any rank. If treated as a class, as they are within the Cronquist system, they could be called the Magnoliopsida after the type genus Magnolia. In some schemes, the eudicots were either treated as a separate class, the Rosopsida (type genus Rosa), or as several separate classes. The remaining dicots (palaeodicots or basal angiosperms) may be kept in a single paraphyletic class, called Magnoliopsida, or further divided. Some botanists prefer to retain the dicotyledons as a valid class, arguing its practicality and that it makes evolutionary sense.^[8]

APG vs. Cronquist

The following lists show the orders in the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group APG IV system traditionally called dicots,^[7] together with the older Cronquist system.

APG IV (paraphyletic)	Cronquist system (classis Magnoliopsida)
Amborellales Austrobaileyales Nymphaeales ; magnoliids Canellales Laurales Magnoliales Piperales ; unplaced independent lineage Chloranthales ; probable sister of eudicots Ceratophyllales ; eudicots Buxales Proteales Ranunculales Trochodendrales ; core eudicots Dilleniales Gunnerales ; superrosids Brassicales Celastrales Crossosomatales Cucurbitales Fabales Fagales Geraniales Huerteales Malpighiales Malvales Myrtales Oxalidales Picramniales Rosales Sapindales Saxifragales Vitales Zygophyllales ; superasterids Apiales Aquifoliales Asterales Berberidopsidales Boraginales Bruniales Caryophyllales Cornales Dipsacales Ericales Escalloniales Garryales Gentianales Icacinales Lamiales Metteniusales Paracryphiales Santalales Solanales Vahliales	Magnoliidae (mostly basal dicots) Magnoliales Laurales Piperales Aristolochiales Illiciales Nymphaeales Ranunculales Papaverales Hamamelidae Trochodendrales Hamamelidales Daphniphyllales Didymelales Eucommiales Urticales Leitneriales Juglandales Myricales Fagales Casuarinales Caryophyllidae Caryophyllales Polygonales Plumbaginales Dilleniidae Dilleniales Theales Malvales Lecythidales Nepenthales Violales Salicales Capparales Batales Ericales Diapensiales Ebenales Primulales Rosidae Rosales Fabales Proteales Podostemales Haloragales Myrtales Rhizophorales Cornales Santalales Rafflesiales Celastrales Euphorbiales Rhamnales Linales Polygalales Sapindales Geraniales Apiales Asteridae Gentianales Solanales Lamiales Callitrichales Plantaginales Scrophulariales Campanulales Rubiales Dipsacales Calycerales Asterales

Dahlgren and Thorne systems

Under the Dahlgren and Thorne systems, the subclass name Magnoliidae was used for the dicotyledons. This is also the case in some of the systems derived from the Cronquist system.^{[citation needed]} These two systems are contrasted in the table below in terms of how each categorises by superorder; note that the sequence within each system has been altered in order to pair corresponding taxa

The Thorne system (1992) as depicted by Reveal is:

Dahlgren system	Thorne system
Magnolianae Ranunculanae	Magnolianae Rafflesianae
Nymphaeanae	Nymphaeanae
Caryophyllanae	Caryophyllanae
Theanae Plumbaginanae Polygonanae Primulanae Ericanae	Theanae
Malvanae	Malvanae
Violanae	Violanae
Rosanae	Rosanae
Proteanae	Proteanae
Myrtanae	Myrtanae
Rutanae	Rutanae Celastranae Geranianae
Santalanae	Santalanae
Balanophoranae	Santalanae
Asteranae	Asteranae
Solananae	Solananae
Cornanae Vitanae	Cornanae Aralianae
Loasanae	Loasanae
Gentiananae Lamianae	Gentiananae

There exist variances between the superorders circumscribed from each system. Namely, although the systems share common names for many of the listed superorders, the specific list orders classified within each varies. For example, Thorne's Theanae corresponds to five distinct superorders under Dahlgren's system, only one of which is called Theanae.

References

^ Takhtajan, A. (June 1964), "The Taxa of the Higher Plants above the Rank of Order", Taxon, 13 (5): 160–164, doi:10.2307/1216134, JSTOR 1216134
^ "Dicotyl", The Free Dictionary, retrieved 2 January 2016
^ Hamilton, Alan; Hamilton, Patrick (2006), Plant conservation: An ecosystem approach, London: Earthscan, p. 2, ISBN 978-1-84407-083-1
^ Simpson, Michael G. (2011), "Chapter 7: Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants", Plant Systematics, Elsevier, p. 139, ISBN 978-0-0805-1404-8
^ ^a ^b Monocots versus Dicots, University of California Museum of Paleontology, retrieved 25 January 2012
^ Cole, Theodor C.H.; Hilger, Hartmut H. & Stevens, Peter F. (2017), Angiosperm Phylogeny Poster - Flowering Plant Systematics (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-17, retrieved 2017-07-13
^ ^a ^b Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016), "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV", Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 181 (1): 1–20, doi:10.1111/boj.12385
^ Stuessy, Tod F. (2010), "Paraphyly and the origin and classification of angiosperms." (PDF), Taxon, 59 (3): 689–693, doi:10.1002/tax.593001

External links

[Takh64-1] Takhtajan, A. (June 1964), "The Taxa of the Higher Plants above the Rank of Order", Taxon, 13 (5): 160–164, doi:10.2307/1216134, JSTOR 1216134

[TFD-2] "Dicotyl", The Free Dictionary, retrieved 2 January 2016

[Hamilton2006-3] Hamilton, Alan; Hamilton, Patrick (2006), Plant conservation: An ecosystem approach, London: Earthscan, p. 2, ISBN 978-1-84407-083-1

[Simp11-4] Simpson, Michael G. (2011), "Chapter 7: Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants", Plant Systematics, Elsevier, p. 139, ISBN 978-0-0805-1404-8

[UCB-5] Monocots versus Dicots, University of California Museum of Paleontology, retrieved 25 January 2012

[Cole17-6] Cole, Theodor C.H.; Hilger, Hartmut H. & Stevens, Peter F. (2017), Angiosperm Phylogeny Poster - Flowering Plant Systematics (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-17, retrieved 2017-07-13

[APGIV-7] Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016), "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV", Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 181 (1): 1–20, doi:10.1111/boj.12385

[Stuessy10-8] Stuessy, Tod F. (2010), "Paraphyly and the origin and classification of angiosperms." (PDF), Taxon, 59 (3): 689–693, doi:10.1002/tax.593001

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

Authority control databases
International	FAST
National	Germany United States France BnF data Japan Czech Republic Spain Latvia Israel