Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Zubarah Fort: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ariovistus (talk | contribs) new |
m Fix Linter errors. |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* '''Support as nominator''' --[[User:Ariovistus|Ariovistus]] ([[User talk:Ariovistus|talk]]) 15:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
* '''Support as nominator''' --[[User:Ariovistus|Ariovistus]] ([[User talk:Ariovistus|talk]]) 15:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' Feels over-saturated. Given that this is a flickr image, would someone contact the author and ask for the unedited version? [[User:Papa Lima Whiskey|<span style="color:#ba0000;">Papa Lima Whiskey</span>]] ([[User talk:Papa Lima Whiskey|talk]]) 15:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
* |
|||
*'''Oppose'''. Looks over-saturated to me as well. If you look at the levels, the blue is blown out, for example. Also should probably be cropped tighter, although it probably wouldn't meet the size requirement if it was. [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 19:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Too much sky (artistic consideration) which left very little detail of the fort itself (limiting EV) --[[User:Fir0002|Fir0002]] 00:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Conditional Support''' I will support this once it's straightened (right side is higher than left - unless it there is actually a slight slope?). While it may show a lot of sky, what do you gain from lowering the camera - more sand? The fact that this incredible sky is incorporated so well in the photograph adds a lot of "wow" factor to an otherwise not-so-"wow" site. In this instance, the entire fort is shown, so no EV is lost by cropping off the building, so all other criteria are met. Very cool. ~ <b style="font-size:small;">[[User:Wadester16|<span style="color:darkred">ωαdεstεr</span><span style="color:darkblue">16</span>]]</b><sub>[[User talk:Wadester16|<span style="color:black">«talk</span>]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Wadester16|<span style="color:black">stalk»</span>]]</sup> 06:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
**Yes but for a building shot it should have more than 0.2MP (~700px wide * 300 px high) of actual building detail! |
|||
*'''Comment''' Could we contact the Flickr user and see if they'd release it a bit bigger? [[User:Shoemaker's Holiday|Shoemaker's Holiday]] ([[User talk:Shoemaker's Holiday|talk]]) 20:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
{{FPCresult|Not promoted|}} [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 04:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
|||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Latest revision as of 16:41, 15 February 2024
- Reason
- Illustrative, unique and beautiful
- Articles this image appears in
- Zubarah, Qatar, Madinat ash Shamal
- Creator
- Rafeek Manchayil
- Support as nominator --Ariovistus (talk) 15:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Feels over-saturated. Given that this is a flickr image, would someone contact the author and ask for the unedited version? Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Looks over-saturated to me as well. If you look at the levels, the blue is blown out, for example. Also should probably be cropped tighter, although it probably wouldn't meet the size requirement if it was. Kaldari (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much sky (artistic consideration) which left very little detail of the fort itself (limiting EV) --Fir0002 00:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Conditional Support I will support this once it's straightened (right side is higher than left - unless it there is actually a slight slope?). While it may show a lot of sky, what do you gain from lowering the camera - more sand? The fact that this incredible sky is incorporated so well in the photograph adds a lot of "wow" factor to an otherwise not-so-"wow" site. In this instance, the entire fort is shown, so no EV is lost by cropping off the building, so all other criteria are met. Very cool. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 06:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes but for a building shot it should have more than 0.2MP (~700px wide * 300 px high) of actual building detail!
- Comment Could we contact the Flickr user and see if they'd release it a bit bigger? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 04:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)