World government: Difference between revisions
→External links: Removed dead link: http://www.datesofhistory.com |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Notion of a single common political authority for all of humanity}} |
|||
{{Original research|date=May 2008}} |
|||
{{Basic forms of government}} |
|||
{{Morefootnotes|date=August 2008}} |
|||
{{About|the notion of a single common political authority for all of humanity}} |
|||
{{Redirect|World empire|the computer game|World Empire}} |
|||
{{Redirect|World State|The World State in Aldous Huxley's novel 'Brave New World'|The World State}} |
|||
{{dablink|This article describes the political concept. For conspiracy theories about world government see [[New World Order (conspiracy)]]}} |
|||
'''World government''' is the concept of a single political authority with jurisdiction over all of Earth and humanity. It is conceived in a variety of forms, from [[tyrannical]] to [[democracy|democratic]], which reflects its wide array of proponents and detractors.{{sfn|Lu|2021}} |
|||
'''World government''' is the concept of a political body that would make, interpret and enforce [[international law]]. Inherent to the concept of a world government is the idea that nations would be required to pool or surrender (depending on point of view) [[sovereignty]] over some areas. In effect, a world government would add another level of administration above the existing national governments or provide coordination over areas national governments are not capable of adequately addressing as independent polities. The authority granted this level and how it relates to national governments and/or citizens is debated by both proponents and opponents of world government. |
|||
A world [[government]] with executive, legislative, and judicial functions and an administrative apparatus has never existed. The inception of the [[United Nations]] (UN) in the mid-20th century remains the closest approximation to a world government, as it is by far the largest and most powerful [[International organization|international institution]].{{sfn|Rawls|1999|p=36}} The UN is mostly limited to an advisory role, with the stated purpose of fostering cooperation between existing [[state (polity)|national government]]s, rather than exerting authority over them. Nevertheless, the organization is commonly viewed as either a model for, or preliminary step towards, a global government.{{sfn|Clark|Sohn|1962}}{{sfn|Falk|1995|p=207}} |
|||
Some people see international institutions (such as the [[International Criminal Court]], [[United Nations]] and [[International Monetary Fund]]) and various supranational and continental unions (such as [[Organization of American States]], [[European Union]], [[African Union]], [[Union of South American Nations]] and [[Association of Southeast Asian Nations]]) as the beginning elements of a world government system. An organization comprising legislators from various nations known as [[Parliamentarians for Global Action]] have promoted ideas of [[democracy|democratic]] [[global governance]], though such promotion has varied in its scope and intensity during the organization's history. |
|||
The concept of universal governance has existed since antiquity and been the subject of discussion, debate, and even advocacy by some kings, philosophers, religious leaders, and secular humanists.{{sfn|Lu|2021}} Some of these have discussed it as a natural and inevitable outcome of human social evolution, and interest in it has coincided with the trends of [[globalization]].{{sfn|Archibugi|2008|}} Opponents of world government, who come from a broad political spectrum, view the concept as a tool for violent totalitarianism, unfeasible, or simply unnecessary,{{sfn|Lu|2021}}<ref>Kennedy, Paul. (2006.) ''The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations.'' New York: Harper Collins. {{ISBN|978-0-375-50165-4}}</ref>{{sfn|Wight|1991|pp=7–24}} and in the case of some sectors of [[fundamentalist Christianity]], as a vehicle for the [[Antichrist]] to bring about the [[Eschatology|end-times]]. |
|||
==History of the world government idea== |
|||
===Early concepts=== |
|||
The need for a global government to preserve the peace between nations was discussed in ancient [[ancient Greece|Greek]] and [[ancient Rome|Roman]] times, and, in modern times the idea has been recognized since the early 14th century ([[Dante]], for example, discusses it in his book ''Monarchia'', 1329). In 1625, the Dutch jurist [[Hugo Grotius]] wrote ''[[De Jure Belli ac Pacis]]'' (The Laws of War and Peace), which is commonly taken as the starting-point of modern [[international law]]. The idea of a federation gained much momentum during the late 18th century, a period in which the first modern democratic federation, the [[United States|U.S.]], was established (1788), and in which [[Immanuel Kant]] wrote the essay "[[Perpetual Peace]]: a philosophical sketch" (1795). In his essay, Kant describes three basic requirements for organizing human affairs to permanently abolish the threat of a future war: |
|||
* The civil constitution of each state shall be [[republic]]an. |
|||
* The law of nations shall be founded on a federation of free states. |
|||
* The rights of people, as citizens of the world, shall be limited to the conditions of universal hospitality (i.e., people would be allowed to visit other countries, but not to stay unless invited). |
|||
==Definition== |
|||
====The 19th century==== |
|||
[[Alexander Wendt]] defines a state as an "organization possessing a monopoly on the legitimate use of organized violence within a society."<ref name="Wendt 491–542">{{Cite journal|last=Wendt|first=Alexander|date=December 2003|title=Why a World State is Inevitable|journal=European Journal of International Relations|volume=9|issue=4|pages=491–542|doi=10.1177/135406610394001|s2cid=18670783|issn=1354-0661}}</ref> According to Wendt, a world state would need to fulfill the following requirements: |
|||
In 1811, a German philosopher [[Karl Krause]], suggested, in an essay titled "The Archetype of Humanity", the formation of five regional federations: Europe, Asia, Africa, America and Australia, aggregated under a world [[republic]]. In 1842, the English poet Lord [[Alfred Tennyson]], published the oft-quoted lines ("Locksley Hall"): ''For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see / Saw a Vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be /... / Till the war-drum throbb'd no longer / and the battle-flags were furled / In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world. / There the common sense of most shall hold / a fretful realm in awe / And the kindly earth shall slumber / lapt in universal law''. |
|||
# [[Monopoly on violence|Monopoly on organized violence]] – states have exclusive use of legitimate force within their own territory. |
|||
Between 1852 and 1892 [[Bahá'u'lláh]] founded the [[Bahá'í Faith]], and identified the establishment of a global commonwealth of nations as a key principle of his new religion. He envisioned a [[Bahá'í administration|set of new social structures]] based on participation and consultation among the world's peoples, including a world legislature, an international court, and an international executive empowered to carry out the decisions of these legislative and judicial bodies. [[Bahá'í Faith#Social principles|Connected principles of the Bahá'í religion]] include universal systems of weights and measures, currency unification, and the adoption of a global auxiliary language.<ref>{{cite book |last = Smith |first = P. |year = 1999 |title = A Concise Encyclopedia of the Bahá'í Faith |publisher = Oneworld Publications |location = Oxford, UK |isbn = 1851681841 |pages = 363–364 }}</ref> The Bahá'í Faith currently counts in excess of 5 million members spread across the globe. |
|||
# [[Legitimacy (political)|Legitimacy]] – perceived as right by their populations, and possibly the global community. |
|||
# [[Sovereignty]] – possessing common power and legitimacy. |
|||
# [[Corporate action]] – a collection of individuals who act together in a systematic way.<ref name="Wendt 491–542"/> |
|||
Wendt argues that a world government would not require a centrally controlled army or a central decision-making body, as long as the four conditions are fulfilled.<ref name="Wendt 491–542" /> In order to develop a world state, three changes must occur in the world system: |
|||
Following the U.S. experiment, [[Switzerland]] (1848) and [[Canada]] (1867) formed the first multi-state federations, uniting distinct ethnic/cultural/lingual regions under a common government. |
|||
# Universal security community – a peaceful system of binding [[conflict resolution|dispute resolution]] without threat of interstate violence. |
|||
[[Ulysses S. Grant]] commented, "I believe at some future day, the nations of the earth will agree on some sort of congress which will take cognizance of international questions of difficulty and whose decisions will be as binding as the decisions of the Supreme Court are upon us."<ref>{{cite book |last= Schwartzberg |first= Joseph E. |authorlink= Joseph E. Schwartzberg |title= Revitalizing the United Nations : Reform Through Weighted Voting |origyear= 2004 |origmonth= |url= http://oldsite.globalsolutions.org/programs/intl_instit/UN_ref/Schwartzberg_Weighted_Voting.pdf |format= PDF |accessdate= 2005-12-14 |publisher= Institute For Global Policy, [[World Federalist Movement]] |location= New York and The Hague |isbn= 0-9710727-4-4 |oclc= 56124473 |pages= 3 |chapter= Reform of the General Assembly }}</ref> |
|||
# Universal [[collective security]] – unified response to crimes and threats. |
|||
# [[Supranational union|Supranational authority]] – binding decisions are made that apply to each and every state. |
|||
The development of a world government is conceptualized by Wendt as a process through five stages: |
|||
[[International Peace Congress]]es were held in [[Europe]] every two years starting in 1843, but lost their momentum after 1853 due to the renewed outbreak of wars in Europe ([[Crimea]]) and North America ([[American Civil War]]). International organizations started forming in the late 19th century – the [[International Red Cross]] in 1863, the [[Telegraphic Union]] in 1865 and the [[Universal Postal Union]] in 1874. The increase in international trade at the turn of the 20th century accelerated the formation of international organizations, and, by the start of [[World War I]] in 1914, there were approximately 450 of them. Support for the idea of establishing international law grew during that period as well. The [[Institute of International Law]] was formed in 1873 by the Belgian Jurist [[Gustave Rolin-Jaequemyns]], leading to the creation of concrete legal drafts, for example by the Swiss [[Johaan Bluntschli]] in 1866{{Fact|date=September 2008}}. In 1883, [[James Lorimer]] published "The Institutes of the Law of Nations" in which he explored the idea of a world government establishing the global rule of law. The first embryonic world [[parliament]], called the [[Inter-Parliamentary Union]], was organized in 1886 by Cremer and Passy, composed of legislators from many countries. In 1904 the Union formally proposed "an international congress which should meet periodically to discuss international questions". |
|||
# System of states; |
|||
====Previous attempts==== |
|||
# Society of states; |
|||
No complete world government has ever existed, but over human history there have been several empires or dictatorships that encompassed substantial portions of the then known [[world]]. Famous examples are [[Alexander the Great]] and his empire, the [[Roman Empire]], the [[Mongol Empire]], and the [[British Empire]]. In the case of the British, a quarter of the world's land surface and approximately a third of the world's population was part of the Empire. This is the single closest time that the world has come to a total political unification. |
|||
# World society; |
|||
# Collective security; |
|||
# World state.<ref name="Wendt 491–542"/> |
|||
Wendt argues that a struggle among sovereign individuals results in the formation of a collective identity and eventually a state. The same forces are present within the international system and could possibly, and potentially inevitably lead to the development of a world state through this five-stage process. When the world state would emerge, the traditional expression of states would become localized expressions of the world state. This process occurs within the default state of anarchy present in the world system. |
|||
Forms of [[Communism]] see it necessary to disestablish all states by means of a [[world revolution]]. The result being is a society void of states and leaders. |
|||
[[Immanuel Kant]] conceptualized the state as sovereign individuals formed out of conflict.<ref name="Wendt 491–542"/> Part of the traditional philosophical objections to a world state (Kant, Hegel)<ref name="Wendt 491–542" /> are overcome by modern technological innovations. Wendt argues that new methods of communication and coordination can overcome these challenges. |
|||
Since then, unsuccessful attempts were made throughout the first half of the 20th century to establish global institutions to resolve international disputes peacefully, or, when these fail, to establish laws in the conduct of wars between nations. The most remarkable ones include the [[Hague Conferences]] of 1899 and 1907, which failed to prevent [[World War I]], and the [[League of Nations]] (1919-1938), which failed to prevent [[World War II]]. |
|||
A colleague of Wendt in the field of International Relations, Max Ostrovsky, conceptualized the development of a world government as a process in one stage: The world will be divided on two rival blocs, one based on North America and another on Eurasia, which clash in [[World War III]] and, "if civilization survives," the victorious power conquers the rest of the world, annexes and establishes world state.<ref>Ostrovsky, Max, (2007). ''The Hyperbola of the World Order'', (Lanham: University Press of America), pp 320–321, 362, https://books.google.com/books?id=9b0gn89Ep0gC&q=annexation</ref> Remarkably, Wendt also supposes the alternative of universal conquest leading to world state, provided the conquering power recognizes "its victims as full subjects." In such case, the mission is accomplished "without intermediate stages of development."<ref>Wendt, Alexander, (2003). "Why the World State is Inevitable: Teleology and the Logic of Anarchy," ''European Journal of International Relations''. 9 (4): p 41, https://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/03wendt.pdf.</ref> |
|||
===Post-World War II=== |
|||
[[World War II]], 1939-1945, resulted in an unprecedented scale of destruction of lives (60 million dead, most of them civilians), and the availability of city-destroying atomic weaponry. Some of the acts committed against civilians during the war were on such a massive scale of savagery, they came to be widely considered as crimes against humanity itself. As the war's conclusion drew near, many shocked voices called for the establishment of institutions able to permanently prevent deadly international conflicts. This led to the founding of the [[United Nations]] in 1945, which adopted the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]] in 1948. Many, however, felt that the UN, essentially a forum for discussion and coordination between [[sovereignty|sovereign]] governments, was insufficiently empowered for the task. A number of prominent persons, such as [[Albert Einstein]], [[Winston Churchill]], [[Bertrand Russell]] and [[Mahatma Gandhi]], called on governments to proceed further by taking gradual steps towards forming an effectual federal world government. |
|||
==Pre-industrialized philosophy== |
|||
===="The Golden Age"==== |
|||
===Antiquity=== |
|||
The years between the conclusion of World War II and 1950, when the [[Korean War]] started and the [[Cold War]] mindset became dominant in international politics, were the "golden age" of the world federalist movement. [[Wendell Wilkie]]'s book [[One World (book)|"One World"]], first published in 1943, sold over 2 million copies. Another book, [[Emery Reves]]' "The Anatomy of Peace" (1945) laid out the arguments for replacing the UN with a federal world government and quickly became the "bible" of world federalists. The grassroots world federalist movement in the US, led by people such as [[Grenville Clark]], [[Norman Cousins]], [[Alan Cranston]] and [[Robert Hutchins]], organized itself into increasingly larger structures, finally forming, in 1947, the [[United World Federalists]] (later renamed to World Federalist Association, then [[Citizens for Global Solutions]]), claiming membership of 47,000 in 1949. |
|||
World government was an aspiration of ancient rulers as early as the [[Bronze Age]] (3300 to 1200 BCE); [[Ancient Egypt|ancient Egyptian]] kings aimed to rule "All That the Sun Encircles", [[Ancient Mesopotamian religion|Mesopotamian]] kings "All from the Sunrise to the Sunset", and [[Ancient China|ancient Chinese]] and [[Ancient Japan|Japanese]] emperors "All under Heaven". |
|||
The Chinese had a particularly well-developed notion of world government in the form of [[Great Unity]], or {{Lang|zh-latn|Da Yitong}} ({{Lang|zh|大同}}), a historical model for a united and just society bound by moral virtue and principles of [[good governance]]. The [[Han dynasty]], which successfully united much of China for over four centuries, evidently aspired to this vision by erecting an Altar of the Great Unity in 113 BCE.<ref>[[Sima Qian]] II:38–40</ref> |
|||
Similar movements concurrently formed in many other countries, leading to the formation, at a 1947 meeting in Montreux, Switzerland, of a global coalition, now called [[World Federalist Movement]]. By 1950, the movement claimed 56 member groups in 22 countries, with some 156,000 members. In France, 1948, [[Garry Davis]] began an unauthorized speech calling for a world government from the balcony of the UN General Assembly, until he was dragged away by the guards. Mr. Davis renounced his American citizenship and started a [[Registry of World Citizens]], which claimed to have registered over 750,000 people in less than two years. Opinion polls carried out by [[UNESCO]] in 1948-1949 found world government favored by a majority of respondents in six European countries and rejected in three other countries (Australia, Mexico and the United States){{Fact|date=September 2008}}. On September 4, 1953, Davis, from the City Hall of Ellsworth, Maine, announced the formation of the "World Government of World Citizens" based on 3 "World Laws" — One God (or Absolute Value), One World, and One Humanity<ref>www.worldservice.org/ells.html</ref>. Following this declaration mandated he claimed by article 21(3) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, he formed the United World Service Authority in New York City as the administrative agency of the new government. Its first task was to design and issue a "World Passport" based on article 13(2) of the UDHR. To date, over 800,000 of these documents have been issued to individuals worldwide. They have been recognized de facto by over 150 countries{{Fact|date=September 2008}}. |
|||
Contemporaneously, the [[Ancient Greece|ancient Greek]] historian [[Polybius]] described [[Roman Empire|Roman]] rule over much of [[Mediterranean World|the known world]] at the time as a "marvelous" achievement worthy of consideration by future historians.<ref>{{cite web |author=Polybius |author-link=Polybius |year=1889 |title=The Histories of Polybius |url=http://www.humanistictexts.org/polybius.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160328103700/http://www.humanistictexts.org/polybius.htm |archive-date=2016-03-28 |access-date=March 24, 2016 |publisher=Macmillan and Co |volume=1 |translator=Evelyn S. Shuckburg from the text of F. Hultsch |location=London and New York}}</ref> The ''[[Pax Romana]]'', a roughly two-century period of stable Roman hegemony across three continents, reflected the positive aspirations of a world government, as it was deemed to have brought prosperity and security to what was once a politically and culturally fractious region. The [[Adamites]] were a Christian sect who desired to organize an early form of world government.<ref name="Navarro-Genie 2002 p. 144">{{cite book | last=Navarro-Genie | first=M.A. | title=Augusto "César" Sandino: Messiah of Light and Truth | publisher=Syracuse University Press | series=Religion and Politics | year=2002 | isbn=978-0-8156-2949-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PVmiyLUTVgYC&pg=PA144 | access-date=2023-06-12 | page=144}}</ref> |
|||
====The 1950s call for Legal Realism==== |
|||
Legal anthropologist E. Adamson [[Hoebel]] concluded his treatise on broadening the legal realist tradition to include non-Western nations<ref>'''The Law of Primitive Man''' (1954:331-333)</ref>: “Whatever the idealist may desire, force and the threat of force are the ultimate power in the determination of international behavior, as in the law within the nation or tribe. But until force and the threat of force in international relations are brought under social control by the world community, by and for the world society, they remain the instruments of social anarchy and not the sanctions of world law. The creation in clear-cut terms of the corpus of world law cries for the doing. If world law, however, is to be realized at all, there will have to be minimum of general agreement as to the nature of the physical and ideational world and the relation of men in society to it. An important and valuable next step will be found in deep-cutting analysis of the major law systems of the contemporary world in order to lay bare their basic postulates – postulates that are too generally hidden; postulates felt, perhaps, by those who live by them, but so much taken for granted that they are rarely expressed or exposed for examination. When this is done – and it will take the efforts of many keen intellects steeped in the law of at least a dozen lands and also aware of the social nexus of the law – then mankind will be able to see clearly for the first time and clearly where the common consensus of the great living social and law systems lies. Here will be found the common postulates and values upon which the world community can build. At the same time the truly basic points of conflict that will have to be worked upon for resolution will be revealed. Law is inherently purposive. |
|||
=== |
===Dante's Universal Monarchy=== |
||
The idea of world government outlived the [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|fall of Rome]] for centuries, particularly in its former heartland of Italy. Medieval peace movements such as the [[Waldensians]] gave impetus to utopian philosophers like [[Marsilius of Padua]] to envision a world without war.<ref name="Duffey 1995 p. 101">{{cite book | last=Duffey | first=M.K. | title=Peacemaking Christians: The Future of Just Wars, Pacifism, and Nonviolent Resistance | publisher=Sheed & Ward | series=G – Reference,Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series | year=1995 | isbn=978-1-55612-764-9 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sOa1amxfMY0C&pg=PA101 | access-date=2023-05-04 | page=101}}</ref> In his fourteenth-century work ''[[De Monarchia]]'', Florentine poet and philosopher [[Dante Alighieri]], considered by some English Protestants to be a proto-Protestant,<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zfyxtVZVI_sC&dq=dante+proto+protestant&pg=PP21 |title=Dante's Fame in England: References in Printed British Books, 1477–1640 |isbn=9780874136050 |last1=Boswell |first1=Jackson Campbell |year=1999 |publisher=University of Delaware Press }}</ref> appealed for a [[universal monarchy]] that would work separate from<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wkScBQAAQBAJ&dq=de+monarchia+church+separate+pope&pg=PA166 | isbn=9781317606307 | title=Europe: A Cultural History | date=27 November 2014 | publisher=Routledge }}</ref> and uninfluenced<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n77z4tabLXcC&dq=de+monarchia+church+separate+pope&pg=PA67 | isbn=9788126900732 | title=Comprehensive History of Political Thought | year=2001 | publisher=Atlantic Publishers & Dist }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_vGzDwAAQBAJ&dq=de+monarchia+church+separate&pg=PT17 | isbn=9783849653538 | title=De Monarchia: Of Monarchy | year=2019 | publisher=Jazzybee Verlag }}</ref> by the [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholic Church]] to establish peace in humanity's lifetime and the afterlife, respectively: |
|||
While enthusiasm for multinational federalism in Europe incrementally led, over the following decades, to the formation of the [[European Union]], the onset of the [[Cold War]] (1950-1990) eliminated the prospects of any progress towards federation with a more global scope. The movement quickly shrunk in size to a much smaller core of activists, and the FWG idea all but disappeared from wide public discourse. |
|||
<blockquote>But what has been the condition of the world since that day the seamless robe [of Pax Romana] first suffered mutilation by the claws of avarice, we can read—would that we could not also see! O human race! what tempests must need toss thee, what treasure be thrown into the sea, what shipwrecks must be endured, so long as thou, like a beast of many heads, strivest after diverse ends! Thou art sick in either intellect, or sick likewise in thy affection. Thou healest not thy high understanding by argument irrefutable, nor thy lower by the countenance of experience. Nor dost thou heal thy affection by the sweetness of divine persuasion, when the voice of the [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]] breathes upon thee, 'Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!'<ref>''[[De Monarchia]]'', 16:1</ref></blockquote> |
|||
Following the dissolution of the [[Soviet Union]] in 1991, interest in a federal world government and, more generally, in the global protection of human rights, was renewed. The most visible achievement of the world federalism movement during the 1990s is the [[Rome Statute]] of 1998, which led to the establishment of the [[International Criminal Court]] in 2002. In [[Europe]], progress towards forming a federal union of European states gained much momentum, starting in 1952 as a trade deal between the German and French people lead, in 1992, to the [[Maastricht Treaty]] that established the name and enlarged the agreement that the [[European Union]] (EU) is based upon. The EU expanded (1995, 2004, 2007) to encompass, in 2007, nearly half a billion people in 27 member states. Following EU's example, the [[African Union]] was founded in 2002 and the [[Union of South American Nations]] in 2004. |
|||
[[Mercurino di Gattinara|Di Gattinara]] was an Italian diplomat who widely promoted Dante's ''De Monarchia'' and its call for a universal monarchy. An advisor of [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor]], and the chancellor of [[Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor]], he conceived global government as uniting all [[Christendom|Christian nations]] under a [[Respublica Christiana]], which was the only political entity able to establish [[world peace]]. |
|||
==Existing regional unions of nations== |
|||
===European Union=== |
|||
The most relevant model for the incremental establishment of a global federation may be the [[European Union]], which politically unites a large group of widely diverse, some formerly hostile, nations spread over a large geographical area and 500 million people. Though the EU is still evolving, it already has many attributes of a federal government, such as open internal borders, a directly elected parliament, a court system and a centralized economic policy. |
|||
===Francisco de Vitoria (1483–1546)=== |
|||
The EU's lead is being followed by the [[African Union]], the [[Union of South American Nations]], the [[Organization of Central American States]], and the [[Association of Southeast Asian Nations]]. A multitude of [[trade bloc|regional associations]], aggregating most nations of the world, are at different stages of development towards a growing extent of economic, and sometimes political, integration. |
|||
The [[Spain|Spanish]] philosopher [[Francisco de Vitoria]] is considered an author of "global political philosophy" and international law, along with [[Alberico Gentili]] and [[Hugo Grotius]]. This came at a time when the [[University of Salamanca]] was engaged in unprecedented thought concerning [[human rights]], [[international law]], and early economics based on the experiences of the [[Spanish Empire]]. De Vitoria conceived of the {{Lang|la|res publica totius orbis}}, or the "republic of the whole world". |
|||
===Hugo Grotius (1583–1645)=== |
|||
===African Union=== |
|||
[[File:381px-Grotius de jure 1631.jpg|thumb|150px|Title page of the 1631 second edition of ''[[De jure belli ac pacis]]'']] |
|||
The [[African union|African Union]] (AU) is an organisation consisting of fifty-three [[Africa]]n [[state]]s. Established on July 9th 2002, the AU was formed as a successor to the amalgamated [[African Economic Community]] (AEC) and the [[Organisation of African Unity]] (OAU). Eventually, the AU aims to have a single currency and a single integrated defence force, as well as other institutions of state, including a cabinet for the AU Head of State. The purpose of the union is to help secure Africa's [[democracy]], [[human rights]], and a [[Economy of Africa|sustainable economy]], especially by bringing an end to intra-African conflict and creating an effective common market. |
|||
The Dutch philosopher and jurist Hugo Grotius, widely regarded as a founder of international law, believed in the eventual formation of a world government to enforce it.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KVoaBwAAQBAJ&dq=dante+founder+world+government&pg=PA90 | isbn=9781443823029 | title=World Governance: Do We Need It, is It Possible, What Could It (All) Mean? | date=9 June 2010 | publisher=Cambridge Scholars }}</ref> His book, ''[[De jure belli ac pacis]]'' (''On the Law of War and Peace''), published in Paris in 1625, is still cited as a foundational work in the field.<ref>[http://www.library.usyd.edu.au/libraries/rare/modernity/grotius.html USYD.edu.au] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081220195422/http://www.library.usyd.edu.au/libraries/rare/modernity/grotius.html|date=2008-12-20}}</ref> Though he does not advocate for world government ''per se,'' Grotius argues that a "common law among nations", consisting of a framework of principles of natural law, bind all people and societies regardless of local custom. |
|||
===ASEAN=== |
|||
[[ASEAN]], {{pronEng|ˈɑːsiːɑːn}} ''AH-see-ahn'' in English, or the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, is a geo-[[political]] and [[economic]] organization of 10 countries located in [[Southeast Asia]], which was formed on August 8, 1967 by [[Indonesia]], [[Malaysia]], the [[Philippines]], [[Singapore]], and [[Thailand]]<ref> [[wikisource:Bangkok Declaration|Bangkok Declaration]]. Wikisource. Retrieved March 14, 2007</ref> as a display of solidarity toward [[communism|communist]] expansion in [[Vietnam]] and [[insurgency]] within their own borders. Its claimed aims include the acceleration of economic growth, social progress, cultural development among its members, and the promotion of regional peace.<ref>[http://www.aseansec.org/64.htm Overview], [http://www.aseansec.org/ ASEAN Secretariat official website]. Retrieved June 12, 2006</ref> All members later founded the [[Asia Cooperation Dialogue]], which aims to unite the entire continent. |
|||
===Immanuel Kant (1724–1804)=== |
|||
===Shanghai Cooperation Organisation=== |
|||
[[File:Immanuel Kant portrait c1790.jpg|thumb|right|Writing in 1795, [[Immanuel Kant]] considered World Citizenship to be a necessary step in establishing world peace.]] |
|||
The [[Shanghai Cooperation Organisation]] (SCO) is an [[intergovernmental]] organization which was founded on June 14, 2001 by the leaders of the [[People's Republic of China]], [[Russia]], [[Kazakhstan]], [[Kyrgyzstan]], [[Tajikistan]] and [[Uzbekistan]]. Except for Uzbekistan, these countries had been members of the Shanghai Five; after the inclusion of Uzbekistan in 2001, the members renamed the organization. |
|||
In his essay "[[Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch]]" (1795), [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]] describes three basic requirements for organizing human affairs to permanently abolish the threat of present and future war, and, thereby, help establish a new era of lasting peace throughout the world. Kant described his proposed peace program as containing two steps. |
|||
The "Preliminary Articles" described the steps that should be taken immediately, or with all deliberate speed: |
|||
===Union of South American Nations=== |
|||
The [[Union of South American Nations]] was founded in 2006-2008 and is modeled on the European Union. It incorporates all the independent states of [[South America]]. These states are [[Argentina]] , [[Bolivia]], [[Brazil]], [[Chile]], [[Colombia]], [[Ecuador]], [[Guyana]], [[Paraguay]], [[Peru]], [[Suriname]], [[Uruguay]], and [[Venezuela]]. |
|||
# "No Secret Treaty of Peace Shall Be Held Valid in Which There Is Tacitly Reserved Matter for a Future War" |
|||
===South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation=== |
|||
# "No Independent States, Large or Small, Shall Come under the Dominion of Another State by Inheritance, Exchange, Purchase, or Donation" |
|||
The [[South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation]] ('''SAARC''') is an economic and political organization of eight countries in [[South Asia|Southern Asia]]. In terms of population, its [[sphere of influence]] is the largest of any [[regional organization]]: almost 1.5 billion people, the combined population of its member states. It was established on [[December 8]], [[1985]] by [[India]], [[Pakistan]], [[Bangladesh]], [[Sri Lanka]], [[Nepal]], [[Maldives]] and [[Bhutan]]. In April 2007, at the Association's 14th summit, [[Afghanistan]] became its eighth member. |
|||
# "[[Standing army|Standing Armies]] Shall in Time Be Totally Abolished" |
|||
# "[[Government debt|National Debts]] Shall Not Be Contracted with a View to the External Friction of States" |
|||
# "No State Shall by Force Interfere with the [[Constitution]] or [[Government]] of Another State, |
|||
# "No State Shall, during War, Permit Such Acts of Hostility Which Would Make Mutual Confidence in the Subsequent Peace Impossible: Such Are the Employment of Assassins ({{Lang|la|percussores}}), Poisoners ({{Lang|la|venefici}}), Breach of Capitulation, and Incitement to Treason ({{Lang|la|perduellio}}) in the Opposing State" |
|||
Three Definitive Articles would provide not merely a cessation of hostilities, but a foundation on which to build a peace. |
|||
==The current global governance system== |
|||
There is today no functioning global international [[military]], [[Executive (government)|executive]], [[legislature]], [[judiciary]], or [[constitution]], with jurisdiction over the entire planet. |
|||
# "The Civil Constitution of Every State Should Be Republican" |
|||
The earth is divided geographically and demographically into mutually-exclusive territories and political structures called [[nation]]s which are [[Independence|independent]] and [[sovereignty|sovereign]] in most cases. One may also make the case that political and economical independence although related are not the same and even though former colonies have acquired political independence since World War II, they have become more dependent financially upon each other. There are numerous bodies, institutions, unions, coalitions, agreements and contracts between these units of [[authority]], but except in cases where a nation is under military occupation by another ''all'' such arrangements depend on the continued consent of the participant nations. Thus the use of [[violence]] is unprohibited throughout the realm and is only checked by the threat of retaliatory violence or nonviolent sanctions (see [[Gene Sharp]]), so where no such threat exists a nation may use violence against another. |
|||
# "The Law of Nations Shall be Founded on a Federation of Free States" |
|||
# "The Law of [[Global citizenship|World Citizenship]] Shall Be Limited to Conditions of Universal Hospitality" |
|||
Kant argued against a world government on the grounds that it would be prone to tyranny.{{sfn|Deudney|2007|pp=10,155–6}} He instead advocated for league of independent republican states akin to the intergovernmental organizations that would emerge over a century and a half later.{{sfn|Deudney|2007|pp=10,155–6}} |
|||
===Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814)=== |
|||
Among the voluntary organizations and international arrangements the following are: |
|||
The year of the [[Battle of Jena–Auerstedt|battle at Jena]] (1806), when [[Napoleon]] overwhelmed [[Kingdom of Prussia|Prussia]], [[Johann Gottlieb Fichte]] in ''[[Characteristics of the Present Age]]'' described what he perceived to be a very deep and dominant historical trend: |
|||
{{blockquote|There is necessary tendency in every cultivated State to extend itself generally... Such is the case in Ancient History ... As the States become stronger in themselves and cast off that [Papal] foreign power, the tendency towards a Universal Monarchy over the whole Christian World necessarily comes to light... This tendency ... has shown itself successively in several States which could make pretensions to such a dominion, and since the fall of the Papacy, it has become the sole animating principle of our History... Whether clearly or not—it may be obscurely—yet has this tendency lain at the root of the undertakings of many States in Modern Times... Although no individual Epoch may have contemplated this purpose, yet is this the spirit which runs through all these individual Epochs, and invisibly urges them onward.<ref>Fichte, (1806). "Characteristics of the Present Age," ''Theory and Practice of the Balance of Power, 1486–1914: Selected European Writings'', (ed. Moorhead Wright, London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1975, pp. 87–89).</ref>}} |
|||
* The [[United Nations]] (UN) is the primary formal organization coordinating activities between states on a global scale and the only inter-governmental organization with a truly universal membership (192 governments). In addition to the main organs and various humanitarian programs and commissions of the UN itself, there are about 20 functional organizations affiliated with the UN's Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), such as the [[World Health Organization]], the [[International Labour Organization]], and [[International Telecommunications Union]].<ref>[http://www.un.org/aboutun/chartlg.html Chart]</ref> Of particular interest politically are the [[World Bank]], the [[International Monetary Fund]] and the [[World Trade Organization]]. |
|||
==Supranational movements== |
|||
* The [[World Bank]] and the [[International Monetary Fund]] (IMF), were [[United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference|formed]] together at the [[Mount Washington Hotel]] in [[Bretton Woods, New Hampshire]], [[United States]] in July of 1944, to foster global monetary cooperation and to fight poverty by financially assisting states in need. The [[World Trade Organization]] (WTO) sets the rules of international trade. It already has a semi-legislative body (The General Council, reaching decisions by consensus), and a judicial body (The Dispute Settlement Body). Another influential economical international organization is the [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]] (OECD), with membership of 30 democratic members. |
|||
{{Main|International organizations}} |
|||
International organizations started forming in the late 19th century, among the earliest being the [[International Committee of the Red Cross]] in 1863, the [[Telegraphic Union]] in 1865 and the [[Universal Postal Union]] in 1874. The increase in international trade at the turn of the 20th century accelerated the formation of international organizations, and, by the start of [[World War I]] in 1914, there were approximately 450 of them. |
|||
Some notable philosophers and political leaders were also promoting the value of world government during the post-industrial, pre-World War era. [[Ulysses S. Grant]], US President, was convinced that rapid advances in technology and industry would result in greater unity and eventually "one nation, so that armies and navies are no longer necessary."<ref>Cited in [[Clarence Streit]], [[Union Now|Union Now: The Proposal for Inter-Democracy Federal Union]], (London & New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1940), p 31.</ref> In China, political reformer [[Kang Youwei]] viewed human political organization growing into fewer, larger units, eventually into "one world".{{sfn|K'ang Yu-wei|1958|p=85}} [[Bahá'u'lláh]] founded the [[Baháʼí Faith]] teaching that the establishment of world unity and a global federation of nations was a [[New world order (Baháʼí)|key principle]] of the religion.<ref>Danesh, Roshan (2008). [https://bahai-library.com/danesh_church_state_bahai Church and State in the Bahá'í Faith:An Epistemic Approach], in Journal of Law and Religion, 24:1, pages 21–63.</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Baháʼí International Community|url=http://bahai-library.com/uhj_turning_point_nations#II|title=Turning Point for All Nations|date=1995|access-date=2023-03-12}}</ref> Author [[H. G. Wells]] was a strong proponent of the creation of a world state, arguing that such a state would ensure world peace and justice.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bell|first=Duncan|date=2018-12-01|title=Founding the World State: H. G. Wells on Empire and the English-Speaking Peoples|journal=International Studies Quarterly|volume=62|issue=4|pages=867–879|doi=10.1093/isq/sqy041|issn=0020-8833}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Earle|first=Edward Mead|date=1950|title=H. G. Wells, British Patriot in Search of a World State*|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/abs/h-g-wells-british-patriot-in-search-of-a-world-state/8853FBEF94E2968D9E3CD62D09B3E328|journal=World Politics|language=en|volume=2|issue=2|pages=181–208|doi=10.2307/2009188|jstor=2009188|s2cid=154346069 |issn=1086-3338}}</ref> |
|||
*[[G8]], an association of eight of the richest and most technologically advanced democracies. The leaders of the G8 countries meet annually in person to coordinate their policies in confronting global issues, such as poverty, terrorism, infectious diseases, climate change and anti Islamic oil troubles. |
|||
[[Karl Marx]], the traditional founder of communism, predicted a socialist epoch in which the working class throughout the world will unite to render nationalism meaningless. Anti-Communists believed world government was a goal of [[World Communism]].<ref name="Nordström 2020 p. 7">{{cite book | last=Nordström | first=T. | title=A World Government in Action: A New Pragmatic Ideology for Global Politics | publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing | year=2020 | isbn=978-1-5275-4619-6 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BGDNDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA7 | access-date=2023-03-10 | page=7}}</ref><ref name="Newton 2019 p. 95">{{cite book | last=Newton | first=K. | title=International Relations and World Politics | publisher=EDTECH | year=2019 | isbn=978-1-83947-393-7 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NOTEDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA95 | access-date=2023-03-10 | page=95}}</ref> |
|||
Support for the idea of establishing international law grew during this period as well. The [[Institute of International Law]] was formed in 1873 by Belgian jurist [[Gustave Rolin-Jaequemyns]], leading to the creation of concrete legal drafts, for example by the Swiss Johaan Bluntschli in 1866.{{Citation needed|date=September 2008}} In 1883, [[James Lorimer (jurist)|James Lorimer]] published "The Institutes of the Law of Nations" in which he explored the idea of a world government establishing the global rule of law. The first embryonic world [[parliament]], called the [[Inter-Parliamentary Union]], was organized in 1886 by Cremer and Passy, composed of legislators from many countries. In 1904 the Union formally proposed "an international congress which should meet periodically to discuss international questions". |
|||
* Militarily, the UN deploys [[peacekeeping]] forces, usually to build and maintain post-conflict peace and stability. When a more aggressive international military action is undertaken, either ad-hoc coalitions (e.g., [[multinational force in Iraq]]), or regional [[military alliance]]s (eg, [[NATO]]) are used. |
|||
=== Theodore Roosevelt === |
|||
*[[International law]] encompasses international treaties, customs, and globally acceptable legal principles. With the exceptions of cases brought before the ICC and ICJ (see below), the laws are interpreted by national courts. Many violations of treaty or customary law obligations are overlooked. |
|||
As early as his 1905 statement to Congress,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=poE8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA96 The American Way of Strategy], [[Michael Lind]]</ref> U.S. president [[Theodore Roosevelt]] highlighted the need for "an organization of the civilized nations" and cited the international arbitration tribunal at The Hague as a role model to be advanced further.<ref>[http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/presidents/theodore-roosevelt/state-of-the-union-1905.php State of the Union 1905]</ref> During his acceptance speech for the [[Nobel Peace Prize|1906 Nobel Peace Prize]], Roosevelt described a world federation as a "master stroke" and advocated for some form of international police power to maintain peace.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=1fjIAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA135 Theodore Roosevelt Abroad]</ref> Historian [[William Roscoe Thayer]] observed that the speech "foreshadowed many of the terms which have since been preached by the advocates of a League of Nations", which would not be established for another 14 years.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=nK0aAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA324 Theodore Roosevelt – An Intimate Biography], [[William Roscoe Thayer]]</ref> [[Hamilton Holt]] of ''The Independent'' lauded Roosevelt's plan for a "Federation of the World",<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=FLEyAQAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA432 The Survey], Volume 24, page 432</ref> writing that not since the "Great Design" of Henry IV has "so comprehensive a plan" for universal peace been proposed.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=WQyxAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA77 Never Call Retreat – Theodore Roosevelt and the Great War]</ref> |
|||
Although Roosevelt supported global government conceptually, he was critical of specific proposals and of leaders of organizations promoting the cause of international governance. According to historian [[John Milton Cooper]], Roosevelt praised the plan of his presidential successor, [[William Howard Taft]], for "a league under existing conditions and with such wisdom in refusing to let adherence to the principle be clouded by insistence upon improper or unimportant methods of enforcement that we can speak of the league as a practical matter."<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=X43uHzjM_GIC&pg=PA333 The Warrior and the Priest: Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt], pp. 332–334, by [[John Milton Cooper]]</ref> |
|||
* The [[International Court of Justice]] (ICJ) (also known as World Court) is the judiciary organ of the [[United Nations]]. It settles disputes submitted to it voluntarily by states (only), and gives advisory opinions on legal questions submitted to it by other organs of the UN, such as the General Assembly or Security Council. |
|||
In a 1907 letter to [[Andrew Carnegie]], Roosevelt expressed his hope "to see The Hague Court greatly increased in power and permanency",<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=w_2tDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA107 In the Words of Theodore Roosevelt], Patricia O'Toole</ref> and in one of his very last public speeches he said: "Let us support any reasonable plan whether in the form of a League of Nations or in any other shape, which bids fair to lessen the probable number of future wars and to limit their scope."<ref>[https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Lafayette-Marne-Day_Address Lafayette-Marne-Day Address]</ref> |
|||
A recent development in [[international law]] is the [[International Criminal Court]] (ICC), the first ever permanent international criminal court, which was established to ensure that the gravest international crimes do not go unpunished. The [[Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court|ICC treaty]] was signed by 139 national governments, of which 100 ratified it into law by October 2005. |
|||
===Founding of the League of Nations=== |
|||
In addition to the formal, or semi-formal, international organizations and laws mentioned above, many other mechanisms act to regulate human activities across national borders. In particular, international trade in goods, services and currencies (the "[[global market]]") has a tremendous impact on the lives of people in almost all parts of the world, creating deep interdependency amongst nations (see [[globalization]]). Trans-national (or multi-national) [[corporations]], some with resources exceeding those available to most governments, govern activities of people on a global scale. The rapid increase in the volume of trans-border digital communications and mass-media distribution (e.g., [[Internet]], [[satellite television]]) has allowed information, ideas, and opinions to rapidly spread across the world, creating a complex web of international coordination and influence, mostly outside the control of any formal organizations or laws. |
|||
{{Main|League of Nations}} |
|||
The [[League of Nations]] (LoN) was an intergovernmental organization founded as a result of the [[Treaty of Versailles]] in 1919–1920. At its largest size from 28 September 1934 to 23 February 1935, it had 58 members. The League's goals included upholding the [[Human rights|Rights of Man]], such as the rights of non-whites, women, and soldiers; [[arms control|disarmament]], preventing war through [[collective security]], settling disputes between countries through negotiation, [[diplomacy]], and improving global [[quality of life]]. The diplomatic philosophy behind the League represented a fundamental shift in thought from the preceding hundred years. The League lacked its own armed force and so depended on the [[Great power|Great Powers]] to enforce its resolutions and economic sanctions and provide an army, when needed. However, these powers proved reluctant to do so. Lacking many of the key elements necessary to maintain world peace, the League failed to prevent World War II. [[Adolf Hitler]] withdrew [[Nazi Germany|Germany]] from the League of Nations once he planned to take over Europe. The rest of the [[Axis powers|Axis Powers]] soon followed him. Having failed its primary goal, the League of Nations fell apart. The League of Nations consisted of the Assembly, the council, and the Permanent Secretariat. Below these were many agencies. The Assembly was where delegates from all member states conferred. Each country was allowed three representatives and one vote. |
|||
===Competing visions during World War II=== |
|||
{{see also|United Nations|United Nations Parliamentary Assembly}} |
|||
{{Further|New Order (Nazism)|Lebensraum|Atlantic Charter}} |
|||
The [[Nazi Party]] of Germany envisaged the establishment of a world government under the complete [[hegemony]] of the [[Nazi Germany|Third Reich]].<ref name="Weinberg">Weinberg, Gerhard L. (1995) ''Germany, Hitler, and World War II: Essays in modern German and world history''. [[Cambridge University Press]], [https://books.google.com/books?id=9OfrTvu7CNYC&q=world+peace&pg=PA28 p. 36].</ref> In its move to overthrow the post-[[World War I]] [[Treaty of Versailles]], Germany had already withdrawn itself from the [[League of Nations]], and it did not intend to join a similar [[Internationalism (politics)|internationalist]] organization ever again.<ref>Weinberg 1995, p. 37.</ref> In his stated political aim of expanding the living space (''[[Lebensraum]]'') of the [[Germanic peoples|Germanic people]] by destroying or driving out "lesser-deserving races" in and from other territories, dictator [[Adolf Hitler]] devised an ideological system of self-perpetuating [[expansionism]], in which the growth of a state's population would require the conquest of more territory which would, in turn, lead to a further growth in population which would then require even more conquests.<ref name="Weinberg"/> In 1927, [[Rudolf Hess]] relayed to [[Walther Hewel]] Hitler's belief that [[world peace]] could only be acquired "when one power, the [[Racial supremacism|racially best one]], has attained uncontested supremacy". When this control would be achieved, this power could then set up for itself a world police and assure itself "the necessary living space.... The lower races will have to restrict themselves accordingly".<ref name="Weinberg"/> |
|||
==Conspiracy== |
|||
{{Expand section|date=January 2009}} |
|||
World Government also refers to a conspiracy theory called [[New World Order (conspiracy theory)|New World Order]], a term rooted in President H. W. Bush's choice of words at his speech at the United Nations,[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g] and in Tom Beck's later inaugural address.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Impact_(film)] |
|||
In this theory a powerful and secretive group is plotting to aggregate powers in order to eventually rule the world via an autonomous world government, which would replace sovereign states. According to this theory, an extremely powerful and secretive group or collection of interrelated interests strongly affects world events. [[Jon Stewart|The International Thong Cartel of Honolulu (ITCH)]] is an example. Historical and current events are seen as steps in an on-going plot to rule the world primarily through a combination of political finance, social engineering, mind control, induced wars, and fear-based propaganda. |
|||
During its imperial period (1868–1947), the [[Empire of Japan|Japanese Empire]] elaborated a worldview, {{Lang|ja-latn|[[Hakkō ichiu]]}}, translated as "eight corners of the world under one roof". This was the idea behind the attempt to establish a [[Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere]] and behind the struggle for world domination. The British Empire, the largest in history, was viewed by some historians as a form of world government.<ref name="Barth Hobson 2020 p. 184">{{cite book | last1=Barth | first1=B. | last2=Hobson | first2=R. | title=Civilizing Missions in the Twentieth Century | publisher=Brill | series=Studies in Global Social History | year=2020 | isbn=978-90-04-43812-5 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PfT_DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA184 | access-date=2023-03-10 | page=184}}</ref><ref name="Brendon 2010 p. 229">{{cite book | last=Brendon | first=P. | title=The Decline and Fall of the British Empire, 1781-1997 | publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group | series=Vintage Series | year=2010 | isbn=978-0-307-38841-4 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Z_3wbwj4OjsC&pg=PA229 | access-date=2023-03-10 | page=229}}</ref>[[File:Atlanticcharter2.png|thumb|right|150px|[[Winston Churchill]]'s edited copy of the final draft of the [[Atlantic Charter]] ]] |
|||
Suggested interests include the [[military industrial complex]], the [[Council on Foreign Relations]], the [[International Monetary Fund]], private bankers, and others. |
|||
The [[Atlantic Charter]] was a published statement agreed between the [[United Kingdom]] and the [[United States]]. It was intended as the blueprint for the postwar world after [[World War II]], and turned out to be the foundation for many of the international agreements that currently shape the world. The [[General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade]] (GATT), the [[Decolonization|post-war independence of British and French possessions]], and much more are derived from the Atlantic Charter. The Atlantic charter was made to show the goals of the allied powers during World War II. It first started with the United States and Great Britain, and later all the allies would follow the charter. Some goals include access to raw materials, reduction of trade restrictions, and freedom from fear and wants. The name, The Atlantic Charter, came from a newspaper that coined the title. However, [[Winston Churchill]] would use it, and from then on the Atlantic Charter was the official name. In retaliation, the Axis powers would raise their morale and try to work their way into Great Britain. The Atlantic Charter was a stepping stone into the creation of the United Nations. |
|||
==Criticism== |
|||
Depending on one's point of view, a world government would erase traditional notions of sovereignty, a construct that is presently under intense debate. Many critics contend that the establishment of a world government would be essentially meaningless without an event or conflict that poses a serious threat to the planet or individual member states. The argument that intergovernmental organisations such as the [[United Nations]] could be a basis for world government is often criticised by [[realists]] who contend that such organisations have little or no real ability to affect global events and constitute only a ''[[de jure]]'' world government and not the ''[[de facto]]'' institutions needed. This is based on [[nationalist]] ideals or the experience of world-governmental candidates such as the [[European Union]] (EU) or the [[United Nations]] in addressing situations like the [[War in Darfur|crisis in Darfur]] or other such conflicts. |
|||
On June 5, 1948, at the dedication of the [[Memorial Park (Omaha)|War Memorial]] in [[Omaha, Nebraska]], U.S. President [[Harry S. Truman]] remarked, "We must make the United Nations continue to work, and to be a going concern, to see that difficulties between nations may be settled just as we settle difficulties between [[U.S. state|States]] here in the United States. When [[Kansas]] and [[Colorado]] fall out over the waters in the [[Arkansas River]], they don't go to war over it; they go to the [[Supreme Court of the United States]], and the matter is settled in a just and honorable way. There is not a difficulty in the whole world that cannot be settled in exactly the same way in a world court".<ref>{{cite web |title=Public Papers Harry S. Truman 1945–1953 |url=http://trumanlibrary.org/publicpapers/viewpapers.php?pid=1647 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304072304/http://trumanlibrary.org/publicpapers/viewpapers.php?pid=1647 |archive-date=2016-03-04 |access-date=27 March 2018 |website=trumanlibrary.org}}</ref> The cultural moment of the late 1940s was the peak of [[#World Federalist Movement|World Federalism]] among Americans. |
|||
Furthermore, conflicts such as the [[World War II|Second World War]] involving a number of the planet's major powers led to the breakup of near global entities such as the [[British Empire]] and others; this suggests to critics that such extended organisations and regimes are not immune from global catastrophes. As another example, critics point to the the [[League of Nations]], established to prevent a re-occurrence of the [[World War I|First World War]] and the closest express of global government then to date, which nonetheless could not in fact prevent the Second World War as intended. |
|||
===Founding of the United Nations=== |
|||
Another common criticism is how a world government might reflect the worse aspects of nationalism, such as [[imperialism]], in its imposition of cultural values. The concern is that a [[dictatorship]] would be formed to enforce a world government, whether beneficial (see [[H.G. Wells]]' ''[[The Shape of Things to Come]]'') or detrimental. These concerns arises from the contrary view of nationalism as consistent with the compulsion for self-determination. Proponents of world government, however, counter that a federated approach to world government would instead respect the member cultures and encourage greater recognition of multiculturalism than individual nation-states. |
|||
{{Main|United Nations}} |
|||
[[File:Emblem of the United Nations.svg|thumb|Emblem of the [[United Nations]] ]] |
|||
[[World War II]] (1939–1945) resulted in an unprecedented scale of destruction of lives (over 60 million dead, most of them civilians), and the use of [[weapons of mass destruction]]. Some of the acts committed against civilians during the war were on such a massive scale of savagery, they came to be widely considered as [[crimes against humanity]] itself. As the war's conclusion drew near, many shocked voices called for the establishment of institutions able to permanently prevent deadly international conflicts. This led to the founding of the [[United Nations]] (UN) in 1945, which adopted the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]] in 1948. |
|||
A perceived disappearance of individual or national autonomy is perhaps the most widely cited reason for the current disdain for the idea of world government. [[Euroscepticism]] is popular in the [[United Kingdom]] for example, where parties like UK Independence Party oppose the European Union because of the emerging possibility of it becoming a superstate rather than a free trade organisation as the original [[European Economic Community]] was established. Such Euroskeptics also see the European Union as being run by its more dominant members and not as a true democratic union. Similar notions are shared elsewhere in the world, based on the expectation that supranational government would necessarily entail populations of other countries controlling one's own government. The more extreme critics of world government suggest the formation of similar institutions as the global level, if indeed undemocratic, would provide dissidents "nowhere to run." |
|||
Many, however, felt that the UN, essentially a forum for discussion and coordination between [[sovereignty|sovereign]] governments, was insufficiently empowered for the task. A number of prominent persons, such as [[Albert Einstein]], [[Winston Churchill]], [[Bertrand Russell]], [[Mahatma Gandhi]] and [[Jawaharlal Nehru]], called on governments to proceed further by taking gradual steps towards forming an effectual federal world government. |
|||
==Resources== |
|||
===Published works=== |
|||
* Stark, Jim. [http://www.amazon.com/Rescue-Plan-Planet-Earth-Democratic/dp/0978252659 Rescue Plan for Planet Earth: Democratic World Government through a Global Referendum] (Toronto: Key Publishing House Inc, 2008) |
|||
* Baratta, Joseph. [http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbninquiry.asp?userid=fz1bMYaAv9&page=%2Foopbooks%2FUsedBook%2Easp&ean=9780275980665 The Politics of World Federation] (Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003). Introduction available [http://www.globalsolutions.org/wfi/documents/Baratta_Introduction.pdf on line]. |
|||
* Hamer, Chistopher. [http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/COURSES/GENS4008/book.html A Global Parliament - Principles of World Federation] (Oyster Bay, NSW: Oyster Bay Books, 1998.) Full text available [http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/COURSES/GENS4008/book.html online]. |
|||
* Monbiot, George. [http://www.thenewpress.com/index.php?option=com_title&task=view_title&metaproductid=1149 Manifesto for a New World Order] (New York: New Press, 2005). Published in the United Kingdom as [http://www.amazon.co.uk/Age-Consent-George-Monbiot/dp/0007150431 Age of Consent]. |
|||
* Strauss, Andrew. [http://www.oneworldtrust.org/documents/taking%20democracy%20global.pdf Taking Democracy Global: Assessing the Benefits and Challenges of a Global Parliamentary Assembly]. (London: One World Trust, 2005). |
|||
* Dervis, Kermal. [http://www.cgdev.org/Publications/?PubID=199 A Better Globalization: Legitimacy, Governance, and Reform]. (Washington: Center for Global Development, 2005.) Selections available [http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/2808 online]. |
|||
* Rajan, Chella. [http://www.gtinitiative.org/documents/PDFFINALS/3Politics.pdf Global Politics and Institutions]. GTI Paper 3#. (Boston: Tellus Institute, 2006). Additional papers in the GTI series available [http://www.gtinitiative.org/resources/paperseries.html here]. |
|||
* Cabrera, Luis. Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State (London: Routledge, 2004;2006). |
|||
* Craig, Campbell. Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003). |
|||
* Deudney, Daniel. Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006). |
|||
* Etzioni, Amitai. From Empire to Community: A New Approach to International Relations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004) |
|||
* Marchetti, Raffaele. Global Democracy: For and Against. Ethical Theory, Institutional Design and Social Struggles (London: Routledge, 2008). |
|||
* Tamir, Yael. "Who's Afraid of a Global State?" in Kjell Goldman, Ulf Hannerz, and Charles Westin, eds., Nationalism and Internationalism in the Post-Cold War Era (London: Routledge, 2000). |
|||
* Tannsjo, Torbjorn. Global Democracy: The Case for a World Government (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008). Argues that not only is world government necessary if we want to deal successfully with global problems it is also, pace Immanuel Kant and John Rawls, desirable in its own right. |
|||
* Wendt, Alexander. “Why a World State is Inevitable,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2003), pp. 491-542 |
|||
* Yunker, James A. Rethinking World Government: A New Approach (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2005). |
|||
* Yunker, James A. Political Globalization: A New Vision of Federal World Government (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2007). |
|||
*Allida Black, June Hopkins, "League of Nations." 2003.http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/league-of-nations.htm (accessed 4/9/2008) |
|||
*Bruner Michael, Melissa Green, Lawrence McBride, The NYSTROM Atlas of World History, Edition 1, The NYSTROM Atlas, Volume 1, World History, Chicago, NYSTROM, 2004. |
|||
*Carr, Karen. "The Roman Republic." March 11,2008. http://www.historyforkids.org/learn/romans/history/earlyrepublic.htm (accessed 3/11/2008). |
|||
*Daniel Chu and Elliot Skinner, A Glorious Age in Africa, Edition 1, None, Volume 1, A Glorious Age in Africa, Tenton, Africa World Press, 2000. |
|||
*Hooker, Richard, “The Mongolian Empire: The Yuan”, 6/6/1999, http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/CHEMPIRE/YUAN.HTM, 2/14/2008 |
|||
*MSN Encarta, "World Government." 2007.http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761586535/world_government.html (accessed 5/4/2008). |
|||
*Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "World Government." December 4, 2006.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/world-government/#ConPowResRes (accessed 4/13/2008). |
|||
*Trueman, Chris. "League of Nations." http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/leagueofnations.htm (accessed 4/9/2008). |
|||
*United Nations Staff, "History of the UN." 2000.http://www.un.org/aboutun/history.htm (accessed 4/10/2008). |
|||
*We the People, The Roxbury Latin School. |
|||
The United Nations main goal is to work on international law, international security, economic development, human rights, social progress, and eventually world peace. The United Nations replaced the League of Nations in 1945, after World War II. Almost every internationally recognized country is in the U.N.; as it contains 193 member states out of the 196 total nations of the world. The United Nations gather regularly in order to solve big problems throughout the world. There are six official languages: [[Arabic]], [[Chinese language|Chinese]], [[English language|English]], [[French language|French]], [[Russian language|Russian]] and [[Spanish language|Spanish]]. |
|||
===Organizations=== |
|||
* The [[World Federalist Movement]] (WFM) is a global citizens movement with 23 member and 16 associated organizations around the globe working towards the establishment of a federated world government. The U.S. member organization is [http://www.globalsolutions.org/ Citizens for Global Solutions], and the Canadian organization is [http://www.worldfederalistscanada.org World Federalist Movement - Canada] |
|||
* The [[Centre for International Governance Innovation]] (CIGI) is a well-funded research and education center in Canada dedicated to the subject. It is preparing to launch IGLOO: "a global online research community focused solely on strengthening governance around the world." |
|||
* [[One World Trust]] (OWT) is a charity based in the United Kingdom and member of the World Federalist Movement. Its current work aims to promote reforms of existing global organizations leading to greater accountability. |
|||
*[[Civitatis International]] is a non-governmental organization based in the United Kingdom that produces legal research promoting increased systems of global governance to policymakers. |
|||
* The [[Committee for a Democratic UN]] is a network of parliamentarians and non-governmental organizations from Germany, Switzerland and Austria which is based on world federalist philosophy. |
|||
*[[Democratic World Federalists]] is a San-Francisco-based civil society organization with supporters worldwide, advocates a democratic federal system of world government. |
|||
The United Nations is also financed by some of the wealthiest nations. The flag shows the Earth from a map that shows all of the populated continents. |
|||
===Initiatives=== |
|||
*[http://www.voteworldgovernment.org/ Vote World Government (VWG)] is a Canadian NGO which has independently begun a global referendum posing the following question : Do you support the creation of a directly-elected, representative and democratic world government? |
|||
==== United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) ==== |
|||
== See also == |
|||
{{Main|United Nations Parliamentary Assembly}} |
|||
{{Columns-start|num=4}} |
|||
[[File:Uno unpalogo.svg|thumb|Emblem of the [[United Nations Parliamentary Assembly]] ]] |
|||
*[[Anti-nationalism]] |
|||
A [[United Nations Parliamentary Assembly]] (UNPA) is a proposed addition to the [[United Nations System]] that would allow for participation of member nations' legislators and, eventually, [[direct election]] of UN parliament members by citizens worldwide. The idea of a world parliament was raised at the founding of the [[League of Nations]] in the 1920s and again following the end of World War II in 1945, but remained dormant throughout the [[Cold War]].<ref>See a detailed history in: Jo Leinen/Andreas Bummel, [https://www.democracywithoutborders.org/world-parliament-book/ A World Parliament: Governance and Democracy in the 21st Century], Democracy Without Borders, 2018</ref> |
|||
*[[Cosmopolitanism]] |
|||
*[[New World Order (conspiracy theory)]] |
|||
*[[Democratic globalization]] |
|||
*[[Democratic World Federalists]] |
|||
*[[Federalism]] |
|||
*[[Global Citizens Movement]] |
|||
{{Column}} |
|||
*[[Global Justice]] |
|||
*[[Globalization]] |
|||
*[[Humanism]] |
|||
*[[Internationalism (politics)]] |
|||
*[[International organization]] |
|||
*[[International auxiliary language]] |
|||
*[[League of Nations]] |
|||
{{Column}} |
|||
*[[Lunar government]] |
|||
*[[Millennialism]] |
|||
*[[New World Order]] |
|||
*[[Pax Americana]] |
|||
*[[Planetary Phase of Civilization]] |
|||
*[[Superclass (book)|Superclass]] |
|||
*[[Supranationalism]] |
|||
{{Column}} |
|||
*[[Trade bloc]] |
|||
*[[World citizen]] |
|||
*[[World domination]] |
|||
*[[World Federalist Movement]] |
|||
*[[World Service Authority]] |
|||
*[[World Union]] |
|||
*[[World government in science fiction]] |
|||
{{Columns-end}} |
|||
In the 1990s and 2000s, the rise of global trade and the power of world organizations that govern it led to calls for a [[International parliament|parliamentary assembly]] to scrutinize their activity. The [[Campaign for a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly]] was formed in 2007 by [[Democracy Without Borders]] to coordinate pro-UNPA efforts, which as of January 2019 has received the support of over 1,500 [[Member of Parliament|Members of Parliament]] from over 100 countries worldwide, in addition to numerous non-governmental organizations, [[Nobel Prize|Nobel]] and [[Right Livelihood Award|Right Livelihood]] laureates and heads or former heads of state or government and foreign ministers.<ref>[https://en.unpacampaign.org/supporters/ unpacampaign.org], Supporters, accessed January 2, 2019</ref> |
|||
==References== |
|||
*{{cite book|last= Ankerl |first= Guy |title= Global communication without universal civilization |origyear= 2000 |series= INU societal research |volume= Vol.1: Coexisting contemporary civilizations : Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western |publisher= INU Press |location= Geneva |isbn= 2-88155-004-5 |pages= }} |
|||
==== Garry Davis ==== |
|||
{{Main|Garry Davis}} |
|||
In France, 1948, [[Garry Davis]] began an unauthorized speech calling for a world government from the balcony of the [[United Nations General Assembly|UN General Assembly]], until he was dragged away by the guards. Davis [[renunciation of United States citizenship|renounced his American citizenship]] and started a [[Registry of World Citizens]]. On September 4, 1953, Davis announced from the city hall of [[Ellsworth, Maine]], the formation of the "World Government of World Citizens" based on three "World Laws": One God (or Absolute Value), One World, and One Humanity.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.worldservice.org/ells.html |title=Worldservice.org |access-date=2010-02-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100205043653/http://www.worldservice.org/ells.html |archive-date=2010-02-05 |url-status=live }}</ref> Following this declaration, mandated, he claimed, by Article twenty one, Section three of the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]], he formed the United World Service Authority in [[New York City]] as the administrative agency of the new government. Its first task was to design and begin selling "World Passports", which the organisation argues is legitimatised by on Article 13, Section 2 of the UDHR. |
|||
===World Federalist Movement=== |
|||
{{Main|World Federalism}} |
|||
The years between the end of World War II and the start of the [[Korean War]]—which roughly marked the entrenchment of [[Cold War]] polarity—saw a flourishing of the nascent world federalist movement.{{sfn|Nicaise|2019}}<ref name="History & Members">{{Cite web |title=History & Members |url=https://www.wfm-igp.org/about-us/history-members/ |url-status=live |access-date=2021-12-10 |website=WFM/IGP |language=en}}</ref> [[Wendell Willkie]]'s 1943 book ''[[One World (Willkie book)|One World]]'' sold over 2 million copies, laying out many of the argument and principles that would inspire global federalism.<ref>[[John Bear (educator)|John Bear]], ''The #1 New York Times Best Seller: intriguing facts about the 484 books that have been #1 New York Times bestsellers since the first list, 50 years ago'', Berkeley: Ten Speed Press, 1992, p. 8.</ref> A contemporaneous work, [[Emery Reves]]' ''[[The Anatomy of Peace]]'' (1945), argued for replacing the UN with a federal world government. The world Federalist movement in the U.S., led by diverse figures such as [[Lola Maverick Lloyd]], [[Grenville Clark]], [[Norman Cousins]], and [[Alan Cranston]], grew larger and more prominent: in 1947, several grassroots organizations merged to form the [[United World Federalists]]—later renamed the World Federalist Association, then [[Citizens for Global Solutions]][[United World Federalists|—]]<nowiki/>claiming 47,000 members by 1949.<ref name="History & Members"/><ref>{{Cite web |title=Who's Afraid of World Government? {{!}} History News Network |url=https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/119987 |url-status=live |access-date=2021-12-10 |website=historynewsnetwork.org}}</ref> |
|||
Similar movements concurrently formed in many other countries, culminating in a 1947 meeting in [[Montreux|Montreux, Switzerland]] that formed a global coalition called the [[World Federalist Movement/Institute for Global Policy|World Federalist Movement (WFM)]]. By 1950, the movement claimed 56 member groups in 22 countries, with some 156,000 members.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Nicaise |first=Alexander |date=2019-10-01 |title=Cosmocracy, We Hardly Knew Ye {{!}} Free Inquiry |url=https://secularhumanism.org/2019/10/cosmocracy-we-hardly-knew-ye/ |url-status=live |access-date=2021-12-10 |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
==== Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution ==== |
|||
In 1949, six U.S. states—California, Connecticut, Florida, Maine, New Jersey, and North Carolina—applied for an [[Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution|Article V convention]] to propose an amendment “to enable the participation of the United States in a world federal government.”<ref name="The Article V Library">{{cite web |title=Article V Convention Application Analysis — World Federal Government |url=http://article5library.org/analyze.php?topic=World+federal+government&res=1&gen=0&ylimit=0 |url-status=live |access-date=June 1, 2022 |website=The Article V Library}}</ref> Multiple other state legislatures introduced or debated the same proposal.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Davenport |first1=John |date=1949 |title=The Approach to World Government Through the Technique of the World Constitutional Convention: American Experience |url=https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4293&context=umlr |journal=University of Miami Law Review |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=528–530 |access-date=June 1, 2022}}</ref> These resolutions were part of this effort.<ref>Davenport, 500–503.</ref> |
|||
During the [[81st United States Congress]] (1949–1951), multiple resolutions were introduced favoring a world federation.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dean |first1=William Tucker |date=1950 |title=World Government and the Constitution of the United States |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3478183 |journal=California Law Review |volume=38 |issue=3 |pages=452–477 |doi=10.2307/3478183 |jstor=3478183 |access-date=December 20, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
==== Chicago World Constitution draft ==== |
|||
A committee of academics and intellectuals formed by [[Robert Maynard Hutchins]] of the [[University of Chicago]] published a ''Preliminary Draft of a World Constitution'' and from 1947 to 1951 published a magazine edited by the daughter of [[Thomas Mann]], [[Elisabeth Mann Borgese]], which was devoted to world government; its title was ''[[Common Cause (magazine)|Common Cause]]''.<ref>[[Mortimer J. Adler]], ''Philosopher at Large: An Intellectual Biography'' (New York: Macmillan, 1977), pp. 221–28.</ref> |
|||
==== Albert Einstein and World Constitution ==== |
|||
[[File:Albert Einstein Head.jpg|right|thumb|Einstein, 1947 (aged 68)]] |
|||
[[Albert Einstein|Einstein]] grew increasingly convinced that the world was veering off course. He arrived at the conclusion that the gravity of the situation demanded more profound actions and the establishment of a "world government" was the only logical solution.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last=Feld |first=Bernard T. |date= March 1979|orig-date=March 1979 |title=Einstein and the politics of nuclear weapons |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7goAAAAAMBAJ |journal=[[Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists]] |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=11–15 |doi=10.1080/00963402.1979.11458591 |bibcode=1979BuAtS..35c...5F |access-date=2023-08-24 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=A policy for survival: A Statement by the Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists |url=https://thebulletin.org/archive/a-policy-for-survival-a-statement-by-the-emergency-committee-of-atomic-scientists/ |url-status=live |access-date=2023-08-24 |website=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |language=en-US}}</ref> In his "Open Letter to the General Assembly of the United Nations" of October 1947, Einstein emphasized the urgent need for international cooperation and the establishment of a world government.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Einstein |first1=Albert |url=http://archive.org/details/einsteinonpeace00eins |title=Einstein on peace |last2=Nathan |first2=Otto |last3=Norden |first3=Heinz |date=1968 |publisher=New York, Schocken Books |others=Internet Archive |pages=440–443}}</ref> In the year 1948, Einstein invited [[United World Federalists|United World Federalists, Inc.]] (UWF) president [[Cord Meyer]] to a meeting of the [[Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists]] (ECAS)<ref>{{Cite web |year=1948 |title=LIFE – Hosted by Google |url=https://images.google.com/hosted/life/5995548573839d10.html |url-status=live |access-date=2023-08-24 |website=images.google.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |year=1948 |title=LIFE – Hosted by Google |url=https://images.google.com/hosted/life/9bf19f221511e092.html |url-status=live |access-date=2023-08-24 |website=images.google.com}}</ref> and joined UWF as a member of the Advisory Board.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Einstein |first1=Albert |url=http://archive.org/details/einsteinonpeace00eins |title=Einstein on peace |last2=Nathan |first2=Otto |last3=Norden |first3=Heinz |date=1968 |publisher=New York, Schocken Books |others=Internet Archive |pages=405}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite book |last=Meyer |first=Cord |url=http://archive.org/details/facingrealityfro00meye |title=Facing reality : from world federalism to the CIA |date=1980 |publisher=New York : Harper & Row |others=Internet Archive |isbn=978-0-06-013032-9 |page=47}}</ref> Einstein and ECAS assisted UEF in fundraising<ref name=":2" /> and provided supporting material.<ref>{{Citation |title=Meares, L.M., August 9, 1947. |url=https://scarc.library.oregonstate.edu/omeka/items/show/21071 |access-date=2023-08-24}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |title=Kirstein, William A., July 11, 1947. |url=https://scarc.library.oregonstate.edu/omeka/items/show/27971 |access-date=2023-08-24}}</ref> Einstein described [[United World Federalists]] as: "the group nearest to our aspirations".<ref name=":4">{{Cite book |last1=Einstein |first1=Albert |url=http://archive.org/details/einsteinonpeace00eins |title=Einstein on peace |last2=Nathan |first2=Otto |last3=Norden |first3=Heinz |date=1968 |publisher=New York, Schocken Books |others=Internet Archive |page=558}}</ref> Einstein and other prominent figures sponsored the [[Peoples' World Convention]] (PWC), which took place in 1950–51<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Einstein |first1=Albert |url=http://archive.org/details/einsteinonpeace00eins |title=Einstein on peace |last2=Nathan |first2=Otto |last3=Norden |first3=Heinz |date=1968 |publisher=New York, Schocken Books |others=Internet Archive |pages=539, 670, 676}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=[Carta] 1950 oct. 12, Genève, [Suiza] [a] Gabriela Mistral, Santiago, Chile [manuscrito] Gerry Kraus. |url=http://www.bibliotecanacionaldigital.gob.cl/bnd/623/w3-article-137193.html |url-status=live |access-date=2023-10-19 |website=BND: Archivo del Escritor}}</ref> and later continued in the form of [[World Constituent Assembly|world constituent assemblies]] in 1968, 1977, 1978-79, and 1991.<ref name=":11">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Global Strategies & Solutions : Preparing earth constitution |url=http://encyclopedia.uia.org/en/strategy/193465 |url-status= |access-date=2023-07-15 |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of World Problems |publisher=Union of International Associations |via=uia.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=PANDIT |first=M. P. |url=http://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.20544 |title=WORLD UNION (JANUARY-DECEMBER) 1979 |date=1979 |publisher=WORLD UNION INTERNATIONAL, INDIA |pages=107}}</ref> This effort was successful in creating a [[world constitution]] and a [[Provisional World Government]].<ref name=":112">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Global Strategies & Solutions : Preparing earth constitution |url=http://encyclopedia.uia.org/en/strategy/193465 |url-status= |access-date=2023-07-15 |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of World Problems |publisher=Union of International Associations |via=uia.org}}</ref> |
|||
[[Constitution for the Federation of Earth]] drafted by international legal experts during [[World Constituent Assembly|world constituent assemblies]] in 1968<ref>{{Cite web |title=Letters from Thane Read asking Helen Keller to sign the World Constitution for world peace. 1961 |url=https://www.afb.org/HelenKellerArchive?a=d&d=A-HK01-07-B149-F04-022.1.8 |url-status=live |access-date=2023-07-01 |website=Helen Keller Archive |publisher=American Foundation for the Blind}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Letter from World Constitution Coordinating Committee to Helen, enclosing current materials |url=https://www.afb.org/HelenKellerArchive?a=d&d=A-HK01-07-B154-F05-028.1.6 |url-status=live |access-date=2023-07-03 |website=Helen Keller Archive |publisher=American Foundation for the Blind}}</ref> and finalized in 1991,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Preparing earth constitution {{!}} Global Strategies & Solutions {{!}} The Encyclopedia of World Problems |url=http://encyclopedia.uia.org/en/strategy/193465 |url-status=dead |access-date=2023-07-15 |website=The Encyclopedia of World Problems {{!}} Union of International Associations (UIA)}}</ref> is a framework of a world federalist government. A Provisional World Government consisting of a [[Provisional World Parliament]] (PWP), a transitional international legislative body, operates under the framework of this world constitution.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Provisional World Parliament {{!}} UIA Yearbook Profile {{!}} Union of International Associations |url=https://uia.org/s/or/en/1100012539 |url-status=live |access-date=2023-07-18 |website=uia.org}}</ref> This parliament convenes to work on global issues, gathering delegates from different countries.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2004-08-15 |title=World Parliament a necessity: CM |work=The Times of India |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/world-parliament-a-necessity-cm/articleshow/815591.cms |access-date=2023-07-18 |issn=0971-8257}}</ref> |
|||
==Cold War== |
|||
By 1950, the [[Cold War]] began to dominate international politics and the UN Security Council became effectively paralyzed by its permanent members' ability to exercise [[United Nations Security Council veto power|veto power]]. The [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 82]] and [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 83|83]] backed the defense of South Korea, although the Soviets were then boycotting meetings in protest. |
|||
While enthusiasm for multinational federalism in Europe incrementally led, over the following decades, to the formation of the [[European Union]], the Cold War eliminated the prospects of any progress towards federation with a more global scope. Global integration became stagnant during the Cold War, and the conflict became the driver behind one-third of all wars during the period.{{sfn|Mack|2005}} The idea of world government all but disappeared from wide public discourse.<ref>{{cite book | chapter-url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/world-government/ | title=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | chapter=World Government | year=2021 | publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University }}</ref> |
|||
===Post–Cold War=== |
|||
As the Cold War dwindled in 1991, interest in a federal world government was renewed. When the conflict ended by 1992, without the external assistance, many proxy wars petered out or ended by negotiated settlements. This kicked off a period in the 1990s of unprecedented international activism and an expansion of international institutions. According to the ''[[Human Security Report 2005]]'', this was the first effective functioning of the United Nations as it was designed to operate.{{sfn|Mack|2005}} |
|||
The most visible achievement of the world federalism movement during the 1990s is the [[Rome Statute]] of 1998, which led to the establishment of the [[International Criminal Court]] in 2002. In [[Europe]], progress towards forming a federal union of European states gained much momentum, starting in 1952 as a trade deal between the German and French people led, in 1992, to the [[Maastricht Treaty]] that established the name and enlarged the agreement that the European Union is based upon. The EU expanded (1995, 2004, 2007, 2013) to encompass, in 2013, over half a billion people in 28 member states (27 after [[Brexit]]). Following the EU's example, other [[supranational union]]s were established, including the [[African Union]] in 2002, the [[Union of South American Nations]] in 2008, and the [[Eurasian Economic Union]] in 2015. |
|||
== Current system of global governance == |
|||
{{As of|{{CURRENTYEAR}}}}, there is no functioning global international [[military]], [[Executive (government)|executive]], [[legislature]], [[judiciary]], or [[constitution]] with jurisdiction over the entire planet. |
|||
=== No world government === |
|||
The world is divided geographically and demographically into mutually exclusive territories and political structures called [[Sovereign state|states]] which are [[Independence|independent]] and [[sovereignty|sovereign]] in most cases. There are numerous bodies, institutions, unions, coalitions, agreements and contracts between these units of [[authority]], but, except in cases where one nation is under [[military occupation]] by another, ''all'' such arrangements depend on the continued consent of the participant nations.{{Citation needed|date=August 2015}} Countries that violate or do not enforce international laws may be subject to penalty or coercion, often in the form of economic limitations such as [[embargo]]s by cooperating countries, even if the violating country is not part of the United Nations. In this way a country's cooperation in international affairs is voluntary, but non-cooperation still has [[diplomacy|diplomatic]] consequences. |
|||
=== International criminal courts === |
|||
A functioning system of [[International law]] encompasses international treaties, customs and globally accepted legal principles. With the exceptions of cases brought before the [[International Criminal Court|ICC]] and [[International Court of Justice|ICJ]], the laws are interpreted by national courts. Many violations of treaty or customary law obligations are overlooked. [[International Criminal Court]] (ICC) was a relatively recent development in international law, it is the first permanent international criminal court established to ensure that the gravest international crimes ([[war crime]]s, [[genocide]], other [[crimes against humanity]], etc.) do not go unpunished. The [[Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court]] establishing the ICC and its jurisdiction was signed by 139 national governments, of which 100 ratified it by October 2005. |
|||
=== Inter-governmental organizations === |
|||
[[File:Flag of the United Nations.svg|thumb|250px|right|Flag of the [[United Nations]]]] |
|||
The [[United Nations]] (UN) is the primary formal organization coordinating activities between states on a global scale and the only inter-governmental organization with near-universal membership (193 governments). In addition to the main organs and various humanitarian programs and commissions of the UN itself, there are about 20 functional organizations affiliated with the [[United Nations Economic and Social Council]] (ECOSOC), such as the [[World Health Organization]], the [[International Labour Organization]], and [[International Telecommunication Union]].<ref>[https://www.un.org/aboutun/chartlg.html UN.org] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120113054148/http://www.un.org/aboutun/chartlg.html |date=2012-01-13 }}, Chart</ref> Of particular interest politically are the [[World Bank]], the [[International Monetary Fund]] and the [[World Trade Organization]]. |
|||
=== International militaries === |
|||
Militarily, [[United Nations peacekeeping|the UN deploys peacekeeping forces]], usually to build and maintain post-conflict peace and stability. When a more aggressive international military action is undertaken, either ''[[ad hoc]]'' coalitions (for example, the [[Multi-National Force – Iraq]]) or regional [[military alliance]]s (for example, [[NATO]]) are used. |
|||
=== International monetary system === |
|||
The [[World Bank]] and the [[International Monetary Fund]] (IMF) formed together in July 1944 at the [[Mount Washington Hotel]] in [[Bretton Woods, New Hampshire]], United States, to foster global monetary cooperation and to fight poverty by financially assisting states in need. These institutions have been criticized as simply oligarchic hegemonies of the Great Powers, most notably the United States, which maintains the only veto, for instance, in the International Monetary Fund. |
|||
=== International trade === |
|||
The [[World Trade Organization]] (WTO) sets the rules of international trade. It has a semi-legislative body (the General Council, reaching decisions by consensus) and a judicial body (the Dispute Settlement Body). Another influential economical international organization is the [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]] (OECD), with membership of 30 democratic members. |
|||
===Informal global influences=== |
|||
In addition to the formal, or semi-formal, international organizations and laws mentioned above, many other mechanisms act to regulate human activities across national borders. International trade has the effect of requiring cooperation and interdependency between nations without a political body. Trans-national (or multi-national) corporations, some with resources exceeding those available to most governments, govern activities of people on a global scale. The rapid increase in the volume of trans-border digital communications and mass-media distribution (e.g., [[Internet]], [[satellite television]]) has allowed information, ideas, and opinions to rapidly spread across the world, creating a complex web of international coordination and influence, mostly outside the control of any formal organizations or laws. |
|||
==Examples of regional integration of states== |
|||
{{Main|Regional organization|Supranational union}} |
|||
There are a number of regional organizations that, while not supranational unions, have adopted or intend to adopt policies that may lead to a similar sort of integration in some respects. The [[European Union]] is generally recognized as the most integrated among these.<ref name="Bauböck-2007">{{cite journal|last=Bauböck|first=Rainer|date=2007|title=Why European Citizenship? Normative Approaches to Supranational Union|journal=[[Theoretical Inquiries in Law]]|volume=8|issue=2, Article 5|publisher=[[Berkeley Electronic Press]]|issn=1565-3404|url=http://www.bepress.com/til/default/vol8/iss2/art5|doi=10.2202/1565-3404.1157|access-date=2009-08-01|quote=A normative theory of supranational citizenship will necessarily be informed by the EU as the only present case and will be addressed to the EU in most of its prescriptions|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100127190025/http://www.bepress.com/til/default/vol8/iss2/art5/|archive-date=2010-01-27|hdl=1814/7314|s2cid=32911981|hdl-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
{{columns-list|colwidth=30em| |
|||
* [[African Union]] (AU) |
|||
* [[Arab League]] |
|||
* [[Association of Southeast Asian Nations]] (ASEAN) |
|||
* [[Caribbean Community]] (CARICOM) |
|||
* [[Central American Integration System]] (SICA) |
|||
* [[Commonwealth of Independent States]] (CIS) |
|||
* [[Commonwealth of Nations]] |
|||
* [[Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf]] (CCASG) |
|||
* [[East African Community]] (EAC) |
|||
* [[Eurasian Economic Union]] (EAEU) |
|||
* [[European Union]] (EU) |
|||
* [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] (NATO) |
|||
* [[Organization of American States]] (OAS) |
|||
* [[South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation]] (SAARC) |
|||
* [[Turkic Council]] (TurkKon) |
|||
* [[Union of South American Nations]] (UNASUR) |
|||
* [[Union State]] |
|||
}} |
|||
Other organisations that have also discussed greater integration include: |
|||
* [[Arab League]] into an "[[Arab Union]]" |
|||
* [[Caribbean Community]] (CARICOM) into a "Caribbean Federation" |
|||
* [[North American Free Trade Agreement]] (NAFTA) into a "[[North American Union]]" |
|||
* [[Pacific Islands Forum]] into a "[[Pacific Union]]" |
|||
== In fiction == |
|||
World government for Earth is frequently featured in fiction, particularly within the [[science fiction]] genre; well-known examples include the "World State" in Aldous Huxley's ''[[Brave New World]]'', the "Dictatorship of the Air" in [[H. G. Wells]]' ''[[The Shape of Things to Come]]'', the United Nations in [[James S. A. Corey|James S. A Corey]]'s ''[[The Expanse (novel series)|The Expanse]]'', and United Earth (amongst other planetary sovereignties and even larger polities) in the [[United Federation of Planets|''Star Trek'']] franchise. This concept also applies to other genres, while not as commonly, including well-known examples such as ''[[One Piece]]''. |
|||
==See also== |
|||
{{Portal|Politics|World}} |
|||
* [[Global civics]] |
|||
* [[Global governance]] |
|||
* [[Internationalism (politics)|Internationalism]] |
|||
* [[Cosmopolitanism]] |
|||
* [[World community]] |
|||
* [[World Constitution and Parliament Association]] |
|||
* [[Spaceship Earth]] |
|||
* [[New world order (Baháʼí)]] |
|||
* [[New world order (politics)]] |
|||
* [[Flag of Earth]] |
|||
* [[New World Order (conspiracy theory)]] |
|||
* [[World domination]] |
|||
==Notes== |
|||
{{reflist|2}} |
{{reflist|2}} |
||
==References== |
|||
{{refbegin}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Ankerl |first=Guy |date=2000 |title=Global communication without universal civilization |series=INU societal research |volume=1: Coexisting contemporary civilizations: Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western |publisher=INU Press |location=Geneva |isbn=978-2-88155-004-1 }} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Archibugi |first=Daniele |date=2008 |title=The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy |publisher=Princeton University Press |location=Princeton}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last1=Clark |first1=Grenville |last2=Sohn |first2=Louis B. |date=1962 |orig-date=Copyright 1958 |title=World Peace Through World Law |location=Cambridge, MA |publisher=Harvard University Press}} |
|||
*{{cite web |last=Cox |first=Chelsey |title=Fact check: U.N. Agenda 21/2030 'New World Order' is not a real document |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/07/23/fact-check-uns-agenda-21-2030-agenda-wont-create-new-world-order/5474884002/ |access-date=2021-11-24 |website=USA TODAY |language=en-US}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Deudney |first=Daniel H. |date=2007 |title=Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NalIdFN65e8C |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-1-4008-3727-4 |language=en}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Falk |first=Richard A. |date=1995 |title=On Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics |location=University Park, PA |publisher=Pennsylvania State University Press}} |
|||
*{{cite book |author=K'ang Yu-wei |author-link=K'ang Yu-wei |date=1958 |orig-date=composed 1885 |title=The One World Philosophy |translator=Lawrence G. Thompson |location=London}} |
|||
*{{cite encyclopedia |last=Lu |first=Catherine |date=2021 |title=World Government |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/world-government/ |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |edition=Spring 2021 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=2021-11-24}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=McMullen |first=Mike |date=2009 |title=World Religions in America |publisher=Westminster John Knox Press |isbn=978-0-664-23320-4 |editor=Neusner, Jacob |editor-link=Jacob Neusner |edition=4th |location=Louisville, Ky |chapter=The Bahá'í Faith}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Rawls |first=John |date=1999 |title=The Law of Peoples |location=Cambridge, MA |publisher=Harvard University Press}} |
|||
*{{cite book |last=Wight |first=Martin |date=1991 |title=The Three Traditions of International Theory |location=Leicester, UK |publisher=Leicester University Press}} |
|||
*{{cite web |last=Yglesias |first=Matthew |date=2013-05-15 |title=Why the Star Trek Franchise Is Great—and Meant for TV |url=https://slate.com/culture/2013/05/star-trek-movies-and-tv-series-which-are-the-best-why.html |access-date=2021-01-22 |website=Slate Magazine |language=en}} |
|||
*{{cite journal |last=Mack |first=Andrew |date=2005 |title=Human Security Report 2005: War and Peace in the 21st Century. |journal=Die Friedens-Warte |volume=80 |issue=1/2 |pages=177–91 |jstor=23773842 |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23773842 |access-date=2022-07-12}} |
|||
{{refend}} |
|||
==Further reading== |
|||
* Cabrera, Luis. Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State (London: Routledge, 2004;2006). |
|||
* [[Rafael Domingo Osle|Domingo, Rafael]], The New Global Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010). |
|||
* Marchetti, Raffaele. Global Democracy: For and Against. Ethical Theory, Institutional Design and Social Struggles (London: Routledge, 2008) Amazon.com, . {{ISBN|978-0-415-55495-4}} |
|||
* Tamir, Yael. "Who's Afraid of a Global State?" in Kjell Goldman, Ulf Hannerz, and Charles Westin, eds., Nationalism and Internationalism in the post–Cold War Era (London: Routledge, 2000). |
|||
* Wendt, Alexander. "Why a World State is Inevitable," European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2003), pp. 491–542 |
|||
*{{cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |title=World Government |date=December 4, 2006 |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/world-government/#ConPowResRes |access-date=2016-01-18}} |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{Wikiquote|world government}} |
|||
* [http://benkalt.blogspot.com/2006/02/world-democracy-manifesto.html World Democracy Manifesto] |
|||
{{Commons category|World government}} |
|||
* [http://www.opendemocracy.net openDemocracy.net] is an online global magazine of politics and culture, including discussion forums, with large sections dedicated to global governance |
|||
*{{cite SEP |url-id=world-government |title=World government |last=Lu |first=Catherine |date=December 4, 2006 }} |
|||
* Immanuel Kant: [http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm "Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch"] (English translation of "''Zum ewigen Frieden''") |
|||
* [[Immanuel Kant]]: [http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm "Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080514211750/http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm |date=2008-05-14 }} (English translation of "''Zum ewigen Frieden''") |
|||
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/world-government/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy] December, 2006 entry on world government. |
|||
* [https://worldgovernment.info World Government Movement] |
|||
* [http://globalities.blogspot.com The Jacobs Elements of Sovereignty] |
|||
* [http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=D477A2B2D899F0D0 Global Governance on YouTube] theModestagnostic is a prolific YouTuber, and has produced extensive videos on the subject of global governance. |
|||
{{-}} |
|||
{{Supranationalism/World government topics}} |
|||
{{Government}} |
|||
{{World government}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:World Government}} |
|||
[[Category:World government| ]] |
[[Category:World government| ]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Globalism]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Global politics]] |
||
[[Category:International law]] |
|||
[[Category:International relations]] |
|||
[[Category:Globalization]] |
|||
{{Link FA|ms}} |
|||
[[ar:حكومة عالمية]] |
|||
[[de:Weltregierung]] |
|||
[[es:Gobierno mundial]] |
|||
[[eo:Monda registaro]] |
|||
[[fr:Gouvernement mondial]] |
|||
[[id:Pemerintahan dunia]] |
|||
[[lt:Pasaulio vyriausybė]] |
|||
[[he:ממשלה עולמית]] |
|||
[[hu:Világkormány]] |
|||
[[ms:Kerajaan dunia]] |
|||
[[nl:Wereldregering]] |
|||
[[pl:Rząd światowy]] |
|||
[[pt:Governo mundial]] |
|||
[[ru:Мировое правительство]] |
|||
[[sv:Världssamhälle]] |
Latest revision as of 16:35, 20 December 2024
Part of the Politics series |
Basic forms of government |
---|
List of countries by system of government |
Politics portal |
World government is the concept of a single political authority with jurisdiction over all of Earth and humanity. It is conceived in a variety of forms, from tyrannical to democratic, which reflects its wide array of proponents and detractors.[1]
A world government with executive, legislative, and judicial functions and an administrative apparatus has never existed. The inception of the United Nations (UN) in the mid-20th century remains the closest approximation to a world government, as it is by far the largest and most powerful international institution.[2] The UN is mostly limited to an advisory role, with the stated purpose of fostering cooperation between existing national governments, rather than exerting authority over them. Nevertheless, the organization is commonly viewed as either a model for, or preliminary step towards, a global government.[3][4]
The concept of universal governance has existed since antiquity and been the subject of discussion, debate, and even advocacy by some kings, philosophers, religious leaders, and secular humanists.[1] Some of these have discussed it as a natural and inevitable outcome of human social evolution, and interest in it has coincided with the trends of globalization.[5] Opponents of world government, who come from a broad political spectrum, view the concept as a tool for violent totalitarianism, unfeasible, or simply unnecessary,[1][6][7] and in the case of some sectors of fundamentalist Christianity, as a vehicle for the Antichrist to bring about the end-times.
Definition
[edit]Alexander Wendt defines a state as an "organization possessing a monopoly on the legitimate use of organized violence within a society."[8] According to Wendt, a world state would need to fulfill the following requirements:
- Monopoly on organized violence – states have exclusive use of legitimate force within their own territory.
- Legitimacy – perceived as right by their populations, and possibly the global community.
- Sovereignty – possessing common power and legitimacy.
- Corporate action – a collection of individuals who act together in a systematic way.[8]
Wendt argues that a world government would not require a centrally controlled army or a central decision-making body, as long as the four conditions are fulfilled.[8] In order to develop a world state, three changes must occur in the world system:
- Universal security community – a peaceful system of binding dispute resolution without threat of interstate violence.
- Universal collective security – unified response to crimes and threats.
- Supranational authority – binding decisions are made that apply to each and every state.
The development of a world government is conceptualized by Wendt as a process through five stages:
- System of states;
- Society of states;
- World society;
- Collective security;
- World state.[8]
Wendt argues that a struggle among sovereign individuals results in the formation of a collective identity and eventually a state. The same forces are present within the international system and could possibly, and potentially inevitably lead to the development of a world state through this five-stage process. When the world state would emerge, the traditional expression of states would become localized expressions of the world state. This process occurs within the default state of anarchy present in the world system.
Immanuel Kant conceptualized the state as sovereign individuals formed out of conflict.[8] Part of the traditional philosophical objections to a world state (Kant, Hegel)[8] are overcome by modern technological innovations. Wendt argues that new methods of communication and coordination can overcome these challenges.
A colleague of Wendt in the field of International Relations, Max Ostrovsky, conceptualized the development of a world government as a process in one stage: The world will be divided on two rival blocs, one based on North America and another on Eurasia, which clash in World War III and, "if civilization survives," the victorious power conquers the rest of the world, annexes and establishes world state.[9] Remarkably, Wendt also supposes the alternative of universal conquest leading to world state, provided the conquering power recognizes "its victims as full subjects." In such case, the mission is accomplished "without intermediate stages of development."[10]
Pre-industrialized philosophy
[edit]Antiquity
[edit]World government was an aspiration of ancient rulers as early as the Bronze Age (3300 to 1200 BCE); ancient Egyptian kings aimed to rule "All That the Sun Encircles", Mesopotamian kings "All from the Sunrise to the Sunset", and ancient Chinese and Japanese emperors "All under Heaven".
The Chinese had a particularly well-developed notion of world government in the form of Great Unity, or Da Yitong (大同), a historical model for a united and just society bound by moral virtue and principles of good governance. The Han dynasty, which successfully united much of China for over four centuries, evidently aspired to this vision by erecting an Altar of the Great Unity in 113 BCE.[11]
Contemporaneously, the ancient Greek historian Polybius described Roman rule over much of the known world at the time as a "marvelous" achievement worthy of consideration by future historians.[12] The Pax Romana, a roughly two-century period of stable Roman hegemony across three continents, reflected the positive aspirations of a world government, as it was deemed to have brought prosperity and security to what was once a politically and culturally fractious region. The Adamites were a Christian sect who desired to organize an early form of world government.[13]
Dante's Universal Monarchy
[edit]The idea of world government outlived the fall of Rome for centuries, particularly in its former heartland of Italy. Medieval peace movements such as the Waldensians gave impetus to utopian philosophers like Marsilius of Padua to envision a world without war.[14] In his fourteenth-century work De Monarchia, Florentine poet and philosopher Dante Alighieri, considered by some English Protestants to be a proto-Protestant,[15] appealed for a universal monarchy that would work separate from[16] and uninfluenced[17][18] by the Roman Catholic Church to establish peace in humanity's lifetime and the afterlife, respectively:
But what has been the condition of the world since that day the seamless robe [of Pax Romana] first suffered mutilation by the claws of avarice, we can read—would that we could not also see! O human race! what tempests must need toss thee, what treasure be thrown into the sea, what shipwrecks must be endured, so long as thou, like a beast of many heads, strivest after diverse ends! Thou art sick in either intellect, or sick likewise in thy affection. Thou healest not thy high understanding by argument irrefutable, nor thy lower by the countenance of experience. Nor dost thou heal thy affection by the sweetness of divine persuasion, when the voice of the Holy Spirit breathes upon thee, 'Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!'[19]
Di Gattinara was an Italian diplomat who widely promoted Dante's De Monarchia and its call for a universal monarchy. An advisor of Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, and the chancellor of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, he conceived global government as uniting all Christian nations under a Respublica Christiana, which was the only political entity able to establish world peace.
Francisco de Vitoria (1483–1546)
[edit]The Spanish philosopher Francisco de Vitoria is considered an author of "global political philosophy" and international law, along with Alberico Gentili and Hugo Grotius. This came at a time when the University of Salamanca was engaged in unprecedented thought concerning human rights, international law, and early economics based on the experiences of the Spanish Empire. De Vitoria conceived of the res publica totius orbis, or the "republic of the whole world".
Hugo Grotius (1583–1645)
[edit]The Dutch philosopher and jurist Hugo Grotius, widely regarded as a founder of international law, believed in the eventual formation of a world government to enforce it.[20] His book, De jure belli ac pacis (On the Law of War and Peace), published in Paris in 1625, is still cited as a foundational work in the field.[21] Though he does not advocate for world government per se, Grotius argues that a "common law among nations", consisting of a framework of principles of natural law, bind all people and societies regardless of local custom.
Immanuel Kant (1724–1804)
[edit]In his essay "Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch" (1795), Kant describes three basic requirements for organizing human affairs to permanently abolish the threat of present and future war, and, thereby, help establish a new era of lasting peace throughout the world. Kant described his proposed peace program as containing two steps.
The "Preliminary Articles" described the steps that should be taken immediately, or with all deliberate speed:
- "No Secret Treaty of Peace Shall Be Held Valid in Which There Is Tacitly Reserved Matter for a Future War"
- "No Independent States, Large or Small, Shall Come under the Dominion of Another State by Inheritance, Exchange, Purchase, or Donation"
- "Standing Armies Shall in Time Be Totally Abolished"
- "National Debts Shall Not Be Contracted with a View to the External Friction of States"
- "No State Shall by Force Interfere with the Constitution or Government of Another State,
- "No State Shall, during War, Permit Such Acts of Hostility Which Would Make Mutual Confidence in the Subsequent Peace Impossible: Such Are the Employment of Assassins (percussores), Poisoners (venefici), Breach of Capitulation, and Incitement to Treason (perduellio) in the Opposing State"
Three Definitive Articles would provide not merely a cessation of hostilities, but a foundation on which to build a peace.
- "The Civil Constitution of Every State Should Be Republican"
- "The Law of Nations Shall be Founded on a Federation of Free States"
- "The Law of World Citizenship Shall Be Limited to Conditions of Universal Hospitality"
Kant argued against a world government on the grounds that it would be prone to tyranny.[22] He instead advocated for league of independent republican states akin to the intergovernmental organizations that would emerge over a century and a half later.[22]
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814)
[edit]The year of the battle at Jena (1806), when Napoleon overwhelmed Prussia, Johann Gottlieb Fichte in Characteristics of the Present Age described what he perceived to be a very deep and dominant historical trend:
There is necessary tendency in every cultivated State to extend itself generally... Such is the case in Ancient History ... As the States become stronger in themselves and cast off that [Papal] foreign power, the tendency towards a Universal Monarchy over the whole Christian World necessarily comes to light... This tendency ... has shown itself successively in several States which could make pretensions to such a dominion, and since the fall of the Papacy, it has become the sole animating principle of our History... Whether clearly or not—it may be obscurely—yet has this tendency lain at the root of the undertakings of many States in Modern Times... Although no individual Epoch may have contemplated this purpose, yet is this the spirit which runs through all these individual Epochs, and invisibly urges them onward.[23]
Supranational movements
[edit]International organizations started forming in the late 19th century, among the earliest being the International Committee of the Red Cross in 1863, the Telegraphic Union in 1865 and the Universal Postal Union in 1874. The increase in international trade at the turn of the 20th century accelerated the formation of international organizations, and, by the start of World War I in 1914, there were approximately 450 of them.
Some notable philosophers and political leaders were also promoting the value of world government during the post-industrial, pre-World War era. Ulysses S. Grant, US President, was convinced that rapid advances in technology and industry would result in greater unity and eventually "one nation, so that armies and navies are no longer necessary."[24] In China, political reformer Kang Youwei viewed human political organization growing into fewer, larger units, eventually into "one world".[25] Bahá'u'lláh founded the Baháʼí Faith teaching that the establishment of world unity and a global federation of nations was a key principle of the religion.[26][27] Author H. G. Wells was a strong proponent of the creation of a world state, arguing that such a state would ensure world peace and justice.[28][29] Karl Marx, the traditional founder of communism, predicted a socialist epoch in which the working class throughout the world will unite to render nationalism meaningless. Anti-Communists believed world government was a goal of World Communism.[30][31]
Support for the idea of establishing international law grew during this period as well. The Institute of International Law was formed in 1873 by Belgian jurist Gustave Rolin-Jaequemyns, leading to the creation of concrete legal drafts, for example by the Swiss Johaan Bluntschli in 1866.[citation needed] In 1883, James Lorimer published "The Institutes of the Law of Nations" in which he explored the idea of a world government establishing the global rule of law. The first embryonic world parliament, called the Inter-Parliamentary Union, was organized in 1886 by Cremer and Passy, composed of legislators from many countries. In 1904 the Union formally proposed "an international congress which should meet periodically to discuss international questions".
Theodore Roosevelt
[edit]As early as his 1905 statement to Congress,[32] U.S. president Theodore Roosevelt highlighted the need for "an organization of the civilized nations" and cited the international arbitration tribunal at The Hague as a role model to be advanced further.[33] During his acceptance speech for the 1906 Nobel Peace Prize, Roosevelt described a world federation as a "master stroke" and advocated for some form of international police power to maintain peace.[34] Historian William Roscoe Thayer observed that the speech "foreshadowed many of the terms which have since been preached by the advocates of a League of Nations", which would not be established for another 14 years.[35] Hamilton Holt of The Independent lauded Roosevelt's plan for a "Federation of the World",[36] writing that not since the "Great Design" of Henry IV has "so comprehensive a plan" for universal peace been proposed.[37]
Although Roosevelt supported global government conceptually, he was critical of specific proposals and of leaders of organizations promoting the cause of international governance. According to historian John Milton Cooper, Roosevelt praised the plan of his presidential successor, William Howard Taft, for "a league under existing conditions and with such wisdom in refusing to let adherence to the principle be clouded by insistence upon improper or unimportant methods of enforcement that we can speak of the league as a practical matter."[38]
In a 1907 letter to Andrew Carnegie, Roosevelt expressed his hope "to see The Hague Court greatly increased in power and permanency",[39] and in one of his very last public speeches he said: "Let us support any reasonable plan whether in the form of a League of Nations or in any other shape, which bids fair to lessen the probable number of future wars and to limit their scope."[40]
Founding of the League of Nations
[edit]The League of Nations (LoN) was an intergovernmental organization founded as a result of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919–1920. At its largest size from 28 September 1934 to 23 February 1935, it had 58 members. The League's goals included upholding the Rights of Man, such as the rights of non-whites, women, and soldiers; disarmament, preventing war through collective security, settling disputes between countries through negotiation, diplomacy, and improving global quality of life. The diplomatic philosophy behind the League represented a fundamental shift in thought from the preceding hundred years. The League lacked its own armed force and so depended on the Great Powers to enforce its resolutions and economic sanctions and provide an army, when needed. However, these powers proved reluctant to do so. Lacking many of the key elements necessary to maintain world peace, the League failed to prevent World War II. Adolf Hitler withdrew Germany from the League of Nations once he planned to take over Europe. The rest of the Axis Powers soon followed him. Having failed its primary goal, the League of Nations fell apart. The League of Nations consisted of the Assembly, the council, and the Permanent Secretariat. Below these were many agencies. The Assembly was where delegates from all member states conferred. Each country was allowed three representatives and one vote.
Competing visions during World War II
[edit]The Nazi Party of Germany envisaged the establishment of a world government under the complete hegemony of the Third Reich.[41] In its move to overthrow the post-World War I Treaty of Versailles, Germany had already withdrawn itself from the League of Nations, and it did not intend to join a similar internationalist organization ever again.[42] In his stated political aim of expanding the living space (Lebensraum) of the Germanic people by destroying or driving out "lesser-deserving races" in and from other territories, dictator Adolf Hitler devised an ideological system of self-perpetuating expansionism, in which the growth of a state's population would require the conquest of more territory which would, in turn, lead to a further growth in population which would then require even more conquests.[41] In 1927, Rudolf Hess relayed to Walther Hewel Hitler's belief that world peace could only be acquired "when one power, the racially best one, has attained uncontested supremacy". When this control would be achieved, this power could then set up for itself a world police and assure itself "the necessary living space.... The lower races will have to restrict themselves accordingly".[41]
During its imperial period (1868–1947), the Japanese Empire elaborated a worldview, Hakkō ichiu, translated as "eight corners of the world under one roof". This was the idea behind the attempt to establish a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere and behind the struggle for world domination. The British Empire, the largest in history, was viewed by some historians as a form of world government.[43][44]
The Atlantic Charter was a published statement agreed between the United Kingdom and the United States. It was intended as the blueprint for the postwar world after World War II, and turned out to be the foundation for many of the international agreements that currently shape the world. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the post-war independence of British and French possessions, and much more are derived from the Atlantic Charter. The Atlantic charter was made to show the goals of the allied powers during World War II. It first started with the United States and Great Britain, and later all the allies would follow the charter. Some goals include access to raw materials, reduction of trade restrictions, and freedom from fear and wants. The name, The Atlantic Charter, came from a newspaper that coined the title. However, Winston Churchill would use it, and from then on the Atlantic Charter was the official name. In retaliation, the Axis powers would raise their morale and try to work their way into Great Britain. The Atlantic Charter was a stepping stone into the creation of the United Nations.
On June 5, 1948, at the dedication of the War Memorial in Omaha, Nebraska, U.S. President Harry S. Truman remarked, "We must make the United Nations continue to work, and to be a going concern, to see that difficulties between nations may be settled just as we settle difficulties between States here in the United States. When Kansas and Colorado fall out over the waters in the Arkansas River, they don't go to war over it; they go to the Supreme Court of the United States, and the matter is settled in a just and honorable way. There is not a difficulty in the whole world that cannot be settled in exactly the same way in a world court".[45] The cultural moment of the late 1940s was the peak of World Federalism among Americans.
Founding of the United Nations
[edit]World War II (1939–1945) resulted in an unprecedented scale of destruction of lives (over 60 million dead, most of them civilians), and the use of weapons of mass destruction. Some of the acts committed against civilians during the war were on such a massive scale of savagery, they came to be widely considered as crimes against humanity itself. As the war's conclusion drew near, many shocked voices called for the establishment of institutions able to permanently prevent deadly international conflicts. This led to the founding of the United Nations (UN) in 1945, which adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.
Many, however, felt that the UN, essentially a forum for discussion and coordination between sovereign governments, was insufficiently empowered for the task. A number of prominent persons, such as Albert Einstein, Winston Churchill, Bertrand Russell, Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, called on governments to proceed further by taking gradual steps towards forming an effectual federal world government.
The United Nations main goal is to work on international law, international security, economic development, human rights, social progress, and eventually world peace. The United Nations replaced the League of Nations in 1945, after World War II. Almost every internationally recognized country is in the U.N.; as it contains 193 member states out of the 196 total nations of the world. The United Nations gather regularly in order to solve big problems throughout the world. There are six official languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish.
The United Nations is also financed by some of the wealthiest nations. The flag shows the Earth from a map that shows all of the populated continents.
United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA)
[edit]A United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) is a proposed addition to the United Nations System that would allow for participation of member nations' legislators and, eventually, direct election of UN parliament members by citizens worldwide. The idea of a world parliament was raised at the founding of the League of Nations in the 1920s and again following the end of World War II in 1945, but remained dormant throughout the Cold War.[46]
In the 1990s and 2000s, the rise of global trade and the power of world organizations that govern it led to calls for a parliamentary assembly to scrutinize their activity. The Campaign for a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly was formed in 2007 by Democracy Without Borders to coordinate pro-UNPA efforts, which as of January 2019 has received the support of over 1,500 Members of Parliament from over 100 countries worldwide, in addition to numerous non-governmental organizations, Nobel and Right Livelihood laureates and heads or former heads of state or government and foreign ministers.[47]
Garry Davis
[edit]In France, 1948, Garry Davis began an unauthorized speech calling for a world government from the balcony of the UN General Assembly, until he was dragged away by the guards. Davis renounced his American citizenship and started a Registry of World Citizens. On September 4, 1953, Davis announced from the city hall of Ellsworth, Maine, the formation of the "World Government of World Citizens" based on three "World Laws": One God (or Absolute Value), One World, and One Humanity.[48] Following this declaration, mandated, he claimed, by Article twenty one, Section three of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, he formed the United World Service Authority in New York City as the administrative agency of the new government. Its first task was to design and begin selling "World Passports", which the organisation argues is legitimatised by on Article 13, Section 2 of the UDHR.
World Federalist Movement
[edit]The years between the end of World War II and the start of the Korean War—which roughly marked the entrenchment of Cold War polarity—saw a flourishing of the nascent world federalist movement.[49][50] Wendell Willkie's 1943 book One World sold over 2 million copies, laying out many of the argument and principles that would inspire global federalism.[51] A contemporaneous work, Emery Reves' The Anatomy of Peace (1945), argued for replacing the UN with a federal world government. The world Federalist movement in the U.S., led by diverse figures such as Lola Maverick Lloyd, Grenville Clark, Norman Cousins, and Alan Cranston, grew larger and more prominent: in 1947, several grassroots organizations merged to form the United World Federalists—later renamed the World Federalist Association, then Citizens for Global Solutions—claiming 47,000 members by 1949.[50][52]
Similar movements concurrently formed in many other countries, culminating in a 1947 meeting in Montreux, Switzerland that formed a global coalition called the World Federalist Movement (WFM). By 1950, the movement claimed 56 member groups in 22 countries, with some 156,000 members.[53]
Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution
[edit]In 1949, six U.S. states—California, Connecticut, Florida, Maine, New Jersey, and North Carolina—applied for an Article V convention to propose an amendment “to enable the participation of the United States in a world federal government.”[54] Multiple other state legislatures introduced or debated the same proposal.[55] These resolutions were part of this effort.[56]
During the 81st United States Congress (1949–1951), multiple resolutions were introduced favoring a world federation.[57]
Chicago World Constitution draft
[edit]A committee of academics and intellectuals formed by Robert Maynard Hutchins of the University of Chicago published a Preliminary Draft of a World Constitution and from 1947 to 1951 published a magazine edited by the daughter of Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Mann Borgese, which was devoted to world government; its title was Common Cause.[58]
Albert Einstein and World Constitution
[edit]Einstein grew increasingly convinced that the world was veering off course. He arrived at the conclusion that the gravity of the situation demanded more profound actions and the establishment of a "world government" was the only logical solution.[59][60] In his "Open Letter to the General Assembly of the United Nations" of October 1947, Einstein emphasized the urgent need for international cooperation and the establishment of a world government.[61] In the year 1948, Einstein invited United World Federalists, Inc. (UWF) president Cord Meyer to a meeting of the Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists (ECAS)[62][63] and joined UWF as a member of the Advisory Board.[64][65] Einstein and ECAS assisted UEF in fundraising[65] and provided supporting material.[66][67] Einstein described United World Federalists as: "the group nearest to our aspirations".[68] Einstein and other prominent figures sponsored the Peoples' World Convention (PWC), which took place in 1950–51[69][70] and later continued in the form of world constituent assemblies in 1968, 1977, 1978-79, and 1991.[71][72] This effort was successful in creating a world constitution and a Provisional World Government.[73]
Constitution for the Federation of Earth drafted by international legal experts during world constituent assemblies in 1968[74][75] and finalized in 1991,[76] is a framework of a world federalist government. A Provisional World Government consisting of a Provisional World Parliament (PWP), a transitional international legislative body, operates under the framework of this world constitution.[76][77] This parliament convenes to work on global issues, gathering delegates from different countries.[78]
Cold War
[edit]By 1950, the Cold War began to dominate international politics and the UN Security Council became effectively paralyzed by its permanent members' ability to exercise veto power. The United Nations Security Council Resolution 82 and 83 backed the defense of South Korea, although the Soviets were then boycotting meetings in protest.
While enthusiasm for multinational federalism in Europe incrementally led, over the following decades, to the formation of the European Union, the Cold War eliminated the prospects of any progress towards federation with a more global scope. Global integration became stagnant during the Cold War, and the conflict became the driver behind one-third of all wars during the period.[79] The idea of world government all but disappeared from wide public discourse.[80]
Post–Cold War
[edit]As the Cold War dwindled in 1991, interest in a federal world government was renewed. When the conflict ended by 1992, without the external assistance, many proxy wars petered out or ended by negotiated settlements. This kicked off a period in the 1990s of unprecedented international activism and an expansion of international institutions. According to the Human Security Report 2005, this was the first effective functioning of the United Nations as it was designed to operate.[79]
The most visible achievement of the world federalism movement during the 1990s is the Rome Statute of 1998, which led to the establishment of the International Criminal Court in 2002. In Europe, progress towards forming a federal union of European states gained much momentum, starting in 1952 as a trade deal between the German and French people led, in 1992, to the Maastricht Treaty that established the name and enlarged the agreement that the European Union is based upon. The EU expanded (1995, 2004, 2007, 2013) to encompass, in 2013, over half a billion people in 28 member states (27 after Brexit). Following the EU's example, other supranational unions were established, including the African Union in 2002, the Union of South American Nations in 2008, and the Eurasian Economic Union in 2015.
Current system of global governance
[edit]As of 2024[update], there is no functioning global international military, executive, legislature, judiciary, or constitution with jurisdiction over the entire planet.
No world government
[edit]The world is divided geographically and demographically into mutually exclusive territories and political structures called states which are independent and sovereign in most cases. There are numerous bodies, institutions, unions, coalitions, agreements and contracts between these units of authority, but, except in cases where one nation is under military occupation by another, all such arrangements depend on the continued consent of the participant nations.[citation needed] Countries that violate or do not enforce international laws may be subject to penalty or coercion, often in the form of economic limitations such as embargos by cooperating countries, even if the violating country is not part of the United Nations. In this way a country's cooperation in international affairs is voluntary, but non-cooperation still has diplomatic consequences.
International criminal courts
[edit]A functioning system of International law encompasses international treaties, customs and globally accepted legal principles. With the exceptions of cases brought before the ICC and ICJ, the laws are interpreted by national courts. Many violations of treaty or customary law obligations are overlooked. International Criminal Court (ICC) was a relatively recent development in international law, it is the first permanent international criminal court established to ensure that the gravest international crimes (war crimes, genocide, other crimes against humanity, etc.) do not go unpunished. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court establishing the ICC and its jurisdiction was signed by 139 national governments, of which 100 ratified it by October 2005.
Inter-governmental organizations
[edit]The United Nations (UN) is the primary formal organization coordinating activities between states on a global scale and the only inter-governmental organization with near-universal membership (193 governments). In addition to the main organs and various humanitarian programs and commissions of the UN itself, there are about 20 functional organizations affiliated with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), such as the World Health Organization, the International Labour Organization, and International Telecommunication Union.[81] Of particular interest politically are the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization.
International militaries
[edit]Militarily, the UN deploys peacekeeping forces, usually to build and maintain post-conflict peace and stability. When a more aggressive international military action is undertaken, either ad hoc coalitions (for example, the Multi-National Force – Iraq) or regional military alliances (for example, NATO) are used.
International monetary system
[edit]The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) formed together in July 1944 at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, United States, to foster global monetary cooperation and to fight poverty by financially assisting states in need. These institutions have been criticized as simply oligarchic hegemonies of the Great Powers, most notably the United States, which maintains the only veto, for instance, in the International Monetary Fund.
International trade
[edit]The World Trade Organization (WTO) sets the rules of international trade. It has a semi-legislative body (the General Council, reaching decisions by consensus) and a judicial body (the Dispute Settlement Body). Another influential economical international organization is the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), with membership of 30 democratic members.
Informal global influences
[edit]In addition to the formal, or semi-formal, international organizations and laws mentioned above, many other mechanisms act to regulate human activities across national borders. International trade has the effect of requiring cooperation and interdependency between nations without a political body. Trans-national (or multi-national) corporations, some with resources exceeding those available to most governments, govern activities of people on a global scale. The rapid increase in the volume of trans-border digital communications and mass-media distribution (e.g., Internet, satellite television) has allowed information, ideas, and opinions to rapidly spread across the world, creating a complex web of international coordination and influence, mostly outside the control of any formal organizations or laws.
Examples of regional integration of states
[edit]There are a number of regional organizations that, while not supranational unions, have adopted or intend to adopt policies that may lead to a similar sort of integration in some respects. The European Union is generally recognized as the most integrated among these.[82]
- African Union (AU)
- Arab League
- Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
- Caribbean Community (CARICOM)
- Central American Integration System (SICA)
- Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)
- Commonwealth of Nations
- Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (CCASG)
- East African Community (EAC)
- Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)
- European Union (EU)
- North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
- Organization of American States (OAS)
- South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)
- Turkic Council (TurkKon)
- Union of South American Nations (UNASUR)
- Union State
Other organisations that have also discussed greater integration include:
- Arab League into an "Arab Union"
- Caribbean Community (CARICOM) into a "Caribbean Federation"
- North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) into a "North American Union"
- Pacific Islands Forum into a "Pacific Union"
In fiction
[edit]World government for Earth is frequently featured in fiction, particularly within the science fiction genre; well-known examples include the "World State" in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, the "Dictatorship of the Air" in H. G. Wells' The Shape of Things to Come, the United Nations in James S. A Corey's The Expanse, and United Earth (amongst other planetary sovereignties and even larger polities) in the Star Trek franchise. This concept also applies to other genres, while not as commonly, including well-known examples such as One Piece.
See also
[edit]- Global civics
- Global governance
- Internationalism
- Cosmopolitanism
- World community
- World Constitution and Parliament Association
- Spaceship Earth
- New world order (Baháʼí)
- New world order (politics)
- Flag of Earth
- New World Order (conspiracy theory)
- World domination
Notes
[edit]- ^ a b c Lu 2021.
- ^ Rawls 1999, p. 36.
- ^ Clark & Sohn 1962.
- ^ Falk 1995, p. 207.
- ^ Archibugi 2008.
- ^ Kennedy, Paul. (2006.) The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations. New York: Harper Collins. ISBN 978-0-375-50165-4
- ^ Wight 1991, pp. 7–24.
- ^ a b c d e f Wendt, Alexander (December 2003). "Why a World State is Inevitable". European Journal of International Relations. 9 (4): 491–542. doi:10.1177/135406610394001. ISSN 1354-0661. S2CID 18670783.
- ^ Ostrovsky, Max, (2007). The Hyperbola of the World Order, (Lanham: University Press of America), pp 320–321, 362, https://books.google.com/books?id=9b0gn89Ep0gC&q=annexation
- ^ Wendt, Alexander, (2003). "Why the World State is Inevitable: Teleology and the Logic of Anarchy," European Journal of International Relations. 9 (4): p 41, https://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/03wendt.pdf.
- ^ Sima Qian II:38–40
- ^ Polybius (1889). "The Histories of Polybius". Translated by Evelyn S. Shuckburg from the text of F. Hultsch. London and New York: Macmillan and Co. Archived from the original on 2016-03-28. Retrieved March 24, 2016.
- ^ Duffey, M.K. (1995). Peacemaking Christians: The Future of Just Wars, Pacifism, and Nonviolent Resistance. G – Reference,Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series. Sheed & Ward. p. 101. ISBN 978-1-55612-764-9. Retrieved 2023-05-04.
- ^ Boswell, Jackson Campbell (1999). Dante's Fame in England: References in Printed British Books, 1477–1640. University of Delaware Press. ISBN 9780874136050.
- ^ Europe: A Cultural History. Routledge. 27 November 2014. ISBN 9781317606307.
- ^ Comprehensive History of Political Thought. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. 2001. ISBN 9788126900732.
- ^ De Monarchia: Of Monarchy. Jazzybee Verlag. 2019. ISBN 9783849653538.
- ^ De Monarchia, 16:1
- ^ World Governance: Do We Need It, is It Possible, What Could It (All) Mean?. Cambridge Scholars. 9 June 2010. ISBN 9781443823029.
- ^ USYD.edu.au Archived 2008-12-20 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b Deudney 2007, pp. 10, 155–6.
- ^ Fichte, (1806). "Characteristics of the Present Age," Theory and Practice of the Balance of Power, 1486–1914: Selected European Writings, (ed. Moorhead Wright, London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1975, pp. 87–89).
- ^ Cited in Clarence Streit, Union Now: The Proposal for Inter-Democracy Federal Union, (London & New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1940), p 31.
- ^ K'ang Yu-wei 1958, p. 85.
- ^ Danesh, Roshan (2008). Church and State in the Bahá'í Faith:An Epistemic Approach, in Journal of Law and Religion, 24:1, pages 21–63.
- ^ Baháʼí International Community (1995). Turning Point for All Nations. Retrieved 2023-03-12.
- ^ Bell, Duncan (2018-12-01). "Founding the World State: H. G. Wells on Empire and the English-Speaking Peoples". International Studies Quarterly. 62 (4): 867–879. doi:10.1093/isq/sqy041. ISSN 0020-8833.
- ^ Earle, Edward Mead (1950). "H. G. Wells, British Patriot in Search of a World State*". World Politics. 2 (2): 181–208. doi:10.2307/2009188. ISSN 1086-3338. JSTOR 2009188. S2CID 154346069.
- ^ Nordström, T. (2020). A World Government in Action: A New Pragmatic Ideology for Global Politics. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-5275-4619-6. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
- ^ Newton, K. (2019). International Relations and World Politics. EDTECH. p. 95. ISBN 978-1-83947-393-7. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
- ^ The American Way of Strategy, Michael Lind
- ^ State of the Union 1905
- ^ Theodore Roosevelt Abroad
- ^ Theodore Roosevelt – An Intimate Biography, William Roscoe Thayer
- ^ The Survey, Volume 24, page 432
- ^ Never Call Retreat – Theodore Roosevelt and the Great War
- ^ The Warrior and the Priest: Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt, pp. 332–334, by John Milton Cooper
- ^ In the Words of Theodore Roosevelt, Patricia O'Toole
- ^ Lafayette-Marne-Day Address
- ^ a b c Weinberg, Gerhard L. (1995) Germany, Hitler, and World War II: Essays in modern German and world history. Cambridge University Press, p. 36.
- ^ Weinberg 1995, p. 37.
- ^ Barth, B.; Hobson, R. (2020). Civilizing Missions in the Twentieth Century. Studies in Global Social History. Brill. p. 184. ISBN 978-90-04-43812-5. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
- ^ Brendon, P. (2010). The Decline and Fall of the British Empire, 1781-1997. Vintage Series. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 229. ISBN 978-0-307-38841-4. Retrieved 2023-03-10.
- ^ "Public Papers Harry S. Truman 1945–1953". trumanlibrary.org. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 27 March 2018.
- ^ See a detailed history in: Jo Leinen/Andreas Bummel, A World Parliament: Governance and Democracy in the 21st Century, Democracy Without Borders, 2018
- ^ unpacampaign.org, Supporters, accessed January 2, 2019
- ^ "Worldservice.org". Archived from the original on 2010-02-05. Retrieved 2010-02-09.
- ^ Nicaise 2019.
- ^ a b "History & Members". WFM/IGP. Retrieved 2021-12-10.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ John Bear, The #1 New York Times Best Seller: intriguing facts about the 484 books that have been #1 New York Times bestsellers since the first list, 50 years ago, Berkeley: Ten Speed Press, 1992, p. 8.
- ^ "Who's Afraid of World Government? | History News Network". historynewsnetwork.org. Retrieved 2021-12-10.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Nicaise, Alexander (2019-10-01). "Cosmocracy, We Hardly Knew Ye | Free Inquiry". Retrieved 2021-12-10.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Article V Convention Application Analysis — World Federal Government". The Article V Library. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Davenport, John (1949). "The Approach to World Government Through the Technique of the World Constitutional Convention: American Experience". University of Miami Law Review. 3 (4): 528–530. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
- ^ Davenport, 500–503.
- ^ Dean, William Tucker (1950). "World Government and the Constitution of the United States". California Law Review. 38 (3): 452–477. doi:10.2307/3478183. JSTOR 3478183. Retrieved December 20, 2022.
- ^ Mortimer J. Adler, Philosopher at Large: An Intellectual Biography (New York: Macmillan, 1977), pp. 221–28.
- ^ Feld, Bernard T. (March 1979) [March 1979]. "Einstein and the politics of nuclear weapons". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 35 (3): 11–15. Bibcode:1979BuAtS..35c...5F. doi:10.1080/00963402.1979.11458591. Retrieved 2023-08-24 – via Google Books.
- ^ "A policy for survival: A Statement by the Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 2023-08-24.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Einstein, Albert; Nathan, Otto; Norden, Heinz (1968). Einstein on peace. Internet Archive. New York, Schocken Books. pp. 440–443.
- ^ "LIFE – Hosted by Google". images.google.com. 1948. Retrieved 2023-08-24.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "LIFE – Hosted by Google". images.google.com. 1948. Retrieved 2023-08-24.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Einstein, Albert; Nathan, Otto; Norden, Heinz (1968). Einstein on peace. Internet Archive. New York, Schocken Books. p. 405.
- ^ a b Meyer, Cord (1980). Facing reality : from world federalism to the CIA. Internet Archive. New York : Harper & Row. p. 47. ISBN 978-0-06-013032-9.
- ^ Meares, L.M., August 9, 1947., retrieved 2023-08-24
- ^ Kirstein, William A., July 11, 1947., retrieved 2023-08-24
- ^ Einstein, Albert; Nathan, Otto; Norden, Heinz (1968). Einstein on peace. Internet Archive. New York, Schocken Books. p. 558.
- ^ Einstein, Albert; Nathan, Otto; Norden, Heinz (1968). Einstein on peace. Internet Archive. New York, Schocken Books. pp. 539, 670, 676.
- ^ "[Carta] 1950 oct. 12, Genève, [Suiza] [a] Gabriela Mistral, Santiago, Chile [manuscrito] Gerry Kraus". BND: Archivo del Escritor. Retrieved 2023-10-19.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Global Strategies & Solutions : Preparing earth constitution". The Encyclopedia of World Problems. Union of International Associations. Retrieved 2023-07-15 – via uia.org.
- ^ PANDIT, M. P. (1979). WORLD UNION (JANUARY-DECEMBER) 1979. WORLD UNION INTERNATIONAL, INDIA. p. 107.
- ^ "Global Strategies & Solutions : Preparing earth constitution". The Encyclopedia of World Problems. Union of International Associations. Retrieved 2023-07-15 – via uia.org.
- ^ "Letters from Thane Read asking Helen Keller to sign the World Constitution for world peace. 1961". Helen Keller Archive. American Foundation for the Blind. Retrieved 2023-07-01.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Letter from World Constitution Coordinating Committee to Helen, enclosing current materials". Helen Keller Archive. American Foundation for the Blind. Retrieved 2023-07-03.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b "Preparing earth constitution | Global Strategies & Solutions | The Encyclopedia of World Problems". The Encyclopedia of World Problems | Union of International Associations (UIA). Retrieved 2023-07-15.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Provisional World Parliament | UIA Yearbook Profile | Union of International Associations". uia.org. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "World Parliament a necessity: CM". The Times of India. 2004-08-15. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
- ^ a b Mack 2005.
- ^ "World Government". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2021.
- ^ UN.org Archived 2012-01-13 at the Wayback Machine, Chart
- ^ Bauböck, Rainer (2007). "Why European Citizenship? Normative Approaches to Supranational Union". Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 8 (2, Article 5). Berkeley Electronic Press. doi:10.2202/1565-3404.1157. hdl:1814/7314. ISSN 1565-3404. S2CID 32911981. Archived from the original on 2010-01-27. Retrieved 2009-08-01.
A normative theory of supranational citizenship will necessarily be informed by the EU as the only present case and will be addressed to the EU in most of its prescriptions
References
[edit]- Ankerl, Guy (2000). Global communication without universal civilization. INU societal research. Vol. 1: Coexisting contemporary civilizations: Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western. Geneva: INU Press. ISBN 978-2-88155-004-1.
- Archibugi, Daniele (2008). The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Clark, Grenville; Sohn, Louis B. (1962) [Copyright 1958]. World Peace Through World Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Cox, Chelsey. "Fact check: U.N. Agenda 21/2030 'New World Order' is not a real document". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2021-11-24.
- Deudney, Daniel H. (2007). Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-3727-4.
- Falk, Richard A. (1995). On Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- K'ang Yu-wei (1958) [composed 1885]. The One World Philosophy. Translated by Lawrence G. Thompson. London.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Lu, Catherine (2021). "World Government". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 2021-11-24.
- McMullen, Mike (2009). "The Bahá'í Faith". In Neusner, Jacob (ed.). World Religions in America (4th ed.). Louisville, Ky: Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-23320-4.
- Rawls, John (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wight, Martin (1991). The Three Traditions of International Theory. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.
- Yglesias, Matthew (2013-05-15). "Why the Star Trek Franchise Is Great—and Meant for TV". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 2021-01-22.
- Mack, Andrew (2005). "Human Security Report 2005: War and Peace in the 21st Century". Die Friedens-Warte. 80 (1/2): 177–91. JSTOR 23773842. Retrieved 2022-07-12.
Further reading
[edit]- Cabrera, Luis. Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State (London: Routledge, 2004;2006).
- Domingo, Rafael, The New Global Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
- Marchetti, Raffaele. Global Democracy: For and Against. Ethical Theory, Institutional Design and Social Struggles (London: Routledge, 2008) Amazon.com, . ISBN 978-0-415-55495-4
- Tamir, Yael. "Who's Afraid of a Global State?" in Kjell Goldman, Ulf Hannerz, and Charles Westin, eds., Nationalism and Internationalism in the post–Cold War Era (London: Routledge, 2000).
- Wendt, Alexander. "Why a World State is Inevitable," European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2003), pp. 491–542
- "World Government". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. December 4, 2006. Retrieved 2016-01-18.
External links
[edit]- Lu, Catherine (December 4, 2006). "World government". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Immanuel Kant: "Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch" Archived 2008-05-14 at the Wayback Machine (English translation of "Zum ewigen Frieden")
- World Government Movement