Jump to content

Musica enchiriadis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Quick-adding category "Polyphonic form" (using HotCat)
Improved for clarity
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Italic title}}
'''''Musica enchiriadis''''' is an [[Anonymity|anonymous]] musical [[treatise]] from the 9th century. It is the first surviving attempt to establish a system of rules for [[polyphony]] in [[western music]]. The treatise was once attributed to [[Hucbald]], but this is no longer accepted. <ref name=hoppin>Hoppin, Richard H. ''Medieval Music''. Norton, 1978, pp.188-193.</ref> Some historians attribute it to [[Odo of Cluny]] (879-942). <ref name=finney>Finney, Theodore M. A History of Music. Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1935, p. 61</ref>
'''''Musica enchiriadis''''' is an [[Anonymity|anonymous]] musical [[treatise]] of the 9th century. It is the first surviving attempt to set up a system of rules for [[polyphony]] in western art music. The treatise was once attributed to [[Hucbald]], but this is no longer accepted.<ref name=hoppin>Hoppin, Richard H. ''Medieval Music''. Norton, 1978, pp.188-193.</ref> Some historians once attributed it to [[Odo of Cluny]] (879-942).<ref name=finney>Finney, Theodore M. A History of Music. Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1935, p. 61</ref> It has also been attributed to Abbot [[Hoger (abbot)|Hoger]] (d. 906).<ref name=wright>Wright, Craig and Simms, Bryan. Music in Western Civilization. Schirmer Cengage Learning, 2010, p. 52</ref>


This [[music theory]] treatise, along with its companion commentary, ''[[Scolica enchiriadis]]'', were widely circulated in medieval [[manuscript]]s, typically coupled with [[Boethius]]' ''[[De Institutione Musica]]''.<ref name=grove>Erickson, Raymond. "Musica enchiriadis, Scholia enchiriadis". ''The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians''. London: Macmillan, 2001.</ref> It consists of nineteen chapters; the first nine are devoted to [[musical notation|notation]], [[mode (music)|mode]]s, and [[monophony|monophonic]] [[plainchant]].<ref name=grove/>
This [[music theory]] treatise, along with its companion text, ''[[Scolica enchiriadis]]'', was widely circulated in medieval [[manuscript]]s, often in association with [[Boethius]]' ''[[De Institutione Musica|De institutione musica]]''.<ref name=grove>Erickson, Raymond. "Musica enchiriadis, Scholia enchiriadis". ''The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians''. London: Macmillan, 2001.</ref> It consists of nineteen chapters; the first nine are devoted to [[musical notation|notation]], [[mode (music)|mode]]s, and [[monophony|monophonic]] [[plainchant]].<ref name=grove/>


Chapters 10-18 deal with [[polyphonic music]]. The author shows how [[Consonance and dissonance|consonant]] intervals should be used in order to compose or [[improvisation|improvise]] polyphonic music in early [[Middle Age]]s.<ref name=grove/> The consonant intervals identified by the treatise are the fourth, the fifth and the eighth, and sometimes the third and the sixth. A number of examples of [[organum]], an early style of note-against-note polyphony, are included in the treatise.<ref name=grove/> ''Musica Enchiriadis'' also shows rules for performing music and gives some early indications of character for some works, as the Latin words 'morosus' (sadly) or 'cum celeritate' (fast). The last, nineteenth, chapter relates the legend of [[Orpheus]].<ref name=grove/>
Chapters 10-18 deal with [[polyphonic music]]. The author here shows how [[Consonance and dissonance|consonant]] intervals should be used to compose or [[improvisation|improvise]] the type of early-medieval polyphonic music called <ref name=grove/> [[organum]], an early style of note-against-note polyphony; several examples of which are included in the treatise.<ref name=grove/> (''Scolica enchiriadis'' also observes that some melodies should be sung "more quickly" (''celerius''), others "more slowly" (''morosius'').) The nineteenth chapter of ''Musica enchiriadis'' relates the legend of [[Orpheus]].<ref name=grove/>


[[Image:DasiaNotation2.jpg|thumb|right|400px| The notation used in Musica enchiriadis. The scale comprises four tetrachords. The symbols indicating the notes are rotated and mirrored depending on the tetrachords. A modern transcription of the notes is below.]]
[[Image:DasiaNotation2.jpg|thumb|right|400px| The notation used in Musica enchiriadis. The scale comprises four tetrachords. The symbols indicating the notes are rotated and mirrored depending on the tetrachords. A modern transcription of the notes is below.]]
Line 9: Line 10:
The [[scale (music)|scale]] used in the work, which is based on a system of [[tetrachord]]s, appears to have been created solely for use in the work itself, rather than taken from actual musical practice.<ref name=hoppin/> The treatise also uses a very rare system of notation, known as [[Daseian]] notation. This notation has a number of figures which are rotated ninety degrees to represent different pitches.
The [[scale (music)|scale]] used in the work, which is based on a system of [[tetrachord]]s, appears to have been created solely for use in the work itself, rather than taken from actual musical practice.<ref name=hoppin/> The treatise also uses a very rare system of notation, known as [[Daseian]] notation. This notation has a number of figures which are rotated ninety degrees to represent different pitches.


A critical edition of the treatises was published in 1981, and an English translation in 1995.<ref name=grove/>
A critical edition of the treatises was published in 1981, and an English translation by Raymond Erickson in 1995.<ref name=grove/>

== See also ==
*[[Daseian notation]]
*[[Tonary]]


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
<references/>


==External links==
==External links==
*{{cite book
* [http://www.chmtl.indiana.edu/tml/9th-11th/MUSENCI_TEXT.html complete Latin text from the Critical Edition]
|last=Anonymous
|title=Musica et scolica enchiriadis una cum aliquibus tractatulis adiunctis
|series=Veröffentlichungen der Musikhistorischen Kommission
|volume=3
|publisher=Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften; C. H. Beck
|location=Munich
|pages=1–59
|url=http://boethius.music.indiana.edu/tml/9th-11th/MUSENCI
|accessdate=6 August 2013
|editor=Hans Schmid
|date=1981
|ref=MuE
}}
* Link to [http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/bav_pal_lat_1342/0213 colour images of the MS of the text ('''V-CVbav pal. lat. 1342''')] available via the University of Heidelberg's site.
* Link to [http://daten.digitale-sammlungen.de/bsb00046540/image_5 colour images of the MS of the text ('''D-Msb Clm 14372''')] available via the Bavarian State Library.

{{Authority control}}


[[Category:9th-century books]]
[[Category:9th-century books]]
[[Category:Music theorists]]
[[Category:Music theory]]
[[Category:Medieval music]]
[[Category:Musical scales]]
[[Category:Musical scales]]
[[Category:Polyphonic form]]
[[Category:Polyphonic form]]
[[Category:Medieval music manuscript sources]]

[[de:Musica enchiriadis]]
[[es:Música enchiriadis]]
[[pt:Musica enchiriadis]]

Latest revision as of 15:44, 8 June 2023

Musica enchiriadis is an anonymous musical treatise of the 9th century. It is the first surviving attempt to set up a system of rules for polyphony in western art music. The treatise was once attributed to Hucbald, but this is no longer accepted.[1] Some historians once attributed it to Odo of Cluny (879-942).[2] It has also been attributed to Abbot Hoger (d. 906).[3]

This music theory treatise, along with its companion text, Scolica enchiriadis, was widely circulated in medieval manuscripts, often in association with Boethius' De institutione musica.[4] It consists of nineteen chapters; the first nine are devoted to notation, modes, and monophonic plainchant.[4]

Chapters 10-18 deal with polyphonic music. The author here shows how consonant intervals should be used to compose or improvise the type of early-medieval polyphonic music called [4] organum, an early style of note-against-note polyphony; several examples of which are included in the treatise.[4] (Scolica enchiriadis also observes that some melodies should be sung "more quickly" (celerius), others "more slowly" (morosius).) The nineteenth chapter of Musica enchiriadis relates the legend of Orpheus.[4]

The notation used in Musica enchiriadis. The scale comprises four tetrachords. The symbols indicating the notes are rotated and mirrored depending on the tetrachords. A modern transcription of the notes is below.

The scale used in the work, which is based on a system of tetrachords, appears to have been created solely for use in the work itself, rather than taken from actual musical practice.[1] The treatise also uses a very rare system of notation, known as Daseian notation. This notation has a number of figures which are rotated ninety degrees to represent different pitches.

A critical edition of the treatises was published in 1981, and an English translation by Raymond Erickson in 1995.[4]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Hoppin, Richard H. Medieval Music. Norton, 1978, pp.188-193.
  2. ^ Finney, Theodore M. A History of Music. Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1935, p. 61
  3. ^ Wright, Craig and Simms, Bryan. Music in Western Civilization. Schirmer Cengage Learning, 2010, p. 52
  4. ^ a b c d e f Erickson, Raymond. "Musica enchiriadis, Scholia enchiriadis". The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. London: Macmillan, 2001.
[edit]
  • Anonymous (1981). Hans Schmid (ed.). Musica et scolica enchiriadis una cum aliquibus tractatulis adiunctis. Veröffentlichungen der Musikhistorischen Kommission. Vol. 3. Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften; C. H. Beck. pp. 1–59. Retrieved 6 August 2013.
  • Link to colour images of the MS of the text (V-CVbav pal. lat. 1342) available via the University of Heidelberg's site.
  • Link to colour images of the MS of the text (D-Msb Clm 14372) available via the Bavarian State Library.