Jump to content

Talk:Ashley Olsen: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kgreg10 (talk | contribs)
Charity: new section
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
 
(53 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=C|priority=Mid|filmbio-work-group=yes|listas=Olsen, Ashley}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| blp=yes|listas=Olsen, Ashley|
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-priority=Mid|filmbio-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject California|importance=Low|southerncalifornia=yes|la=yes}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(90d)
| archive=Talk:Ashley Olsen/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=1
| maxarchivesize=150K
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive=13
| minthreadsleft=0
}}


== missing filmography ==
== Created Individual Article as discussed on [[Olsen Twins]] discussion page ==
Majority agreed to separate articles whilst keeping [[Olsen Twins]] article.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mary-Kate_and_Ashley_Olsen#separate_pages.3F
--[[User:RosarioMendez|Rosario]] 04:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


the filmography section only redirects to the joint page of the olsen twins. does ashley have her own individual filmography? [[Special:Contributions/2603:7000:6400:F165:40E9:D69C:705B:38B|2603:7000:6400:F165:40E9:D69C:705B:38B]] ([[User talk:2603:7000:6400:F165:40E9:D69C:705B:38B|talk]]) 20:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
==Fair use rationale for Image:Ashley Olsen 006.jpg==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]]
'''[[:Image:Ashley Olsen 006.jpg]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]].


== Citation 38 wrong ==
Please go to [[:Image:Ashley Olsen 006.jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline |fair use rationale]]. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.


Leads to a totally unrelated article [[Special:Contributions/2600:382:2B24:E013:7AAA:5F0C:5F5A:8855|2600:382:2B24:E013:7AAA:5F0C:5F5A:8855]] ([[User talk:2600:382:2B24:E013:7AAA:5F0C:5F5A:8855|talk]]) 16:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 -->
:Source updated by the OP. That old source in the Personal life section has been with the article for years, but had nothing to do with Ashley Olsen.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/CelebrityCafe/story?id=7618484&page=1 |last=Marikar|first=Sheila|title=The National Enquirer: Celebrity Enemy No. 1?|work=ABC News|date=May 19, 2009|access-date=March 17, 2016}}</ref> [[User:MPFitz1968|MPFitz1968]] ([[User talk:MPFitz1968|talk]]) 16:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

{{reftalk}}
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 12:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I just removed the image as it was not allowed for wiki. It was copyrighted.
[[User:Brycemoose|Brycemoose]] 19:10, April 2008 (UTC)

==Are they identical or fraternal twins?==
In Ashley's page, Mary-Kate is her fraternal twin, but in Mary-Kate's page, Ashley is her identical twin? So which is correct? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TimHowardII|TimHowardII]] ([[User talk:TimHowardII|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TimHowardII|contribs]]) 20:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

It was changed a short while ago to 'identical' twins and now it has been changed again to 'fraternal'. Can some one explain why. I mean only identical twins look (almost) identical.

Fraternal twins can also look very, very similar, just as non-twin siblings can. Semi-identical twins are now also thought possible (the egg splits before being fertilised). This definitely needs sorting out anyway. [[User:Salopian|Salopian]] ([[User talk:Salopian|talk]]) 15:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
:I think the confusion comes from differing sources. I changed it to fraternal twins and added a source (USA Today) which is generally accurate regarding such facts. Most of the identical twin mentions come from fan sites. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 00:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

They are definitely Fraternal twins. [[User:Brycemoose|Brycemoose]] ([[User talk:Brycemoose|talk]]) 18:12, 06 February 2008 (UTC)

Where is the evidence they are Fraternal?
The only differences I've seen described are freckles, and a centimeter or two in height - these seem to be misunderstandings of what an 'identical twin' is. Identical refers to genes, not actual expressed appearance - both freckles and slight height differences are probably environmental factors, not genetically determined.
The chances of them being apparantly-identical, but actually fraternal twins is much, much smaller than that of them just being identical twins.
- ~~

== NYU ==

Rather odd that the article doesn't mention her attending NYU at all, except in the categories section. I was checking the article because I couldn't remember whether it was her or Mary-Kate or both who dropped out. It's probably in the article about them as a duo (I don't care enough to check), but putting it there instead of here doesn't make sense. [[User:Propaniac|Propaniac]] ([[User talk:Propaniac|talk]]) 01:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

==Is it really controversal?==
Is it really controveral that she has worn fur? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.26.17.207|72.26.17.207]] ([[User talk:72.26.17.207|talk]]) 18:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I agree, I don't think it is - someone should remove that. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.52.131.56|70.52.131.56]] ([[User talk:70.52.131.56|talk]]) 06:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Filmography ==

Why is there no filmography? [[User:Nisior|Nisior]] ([[User talk:Nisior|talk]]) 19:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

==Twin article?==
*I realize Mary Kate and Ashley are twins, but is it really necessary for their respective articles to be almost the same, word for word? '''[[User:COMPFUNK2|THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL]]''' 04:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't forget the [[Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen]] article which is nearly word-for-word the same except plural. [[Special:Contributions/99.230.45.241|99.230.45.241]] ([[User talk:99.230.45.241|talk]]) 03:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

== Charity ==

Can someone please provide a source for the information saying that they do not give to charity? Thanks. Kgreg10

Latest revision as of 06:48, 17 November 2024

missing filmography

[edit]

the filmography section only redirects to the joint page of the olsen twins. does ashley have her own individual filmography? 2603:7000:6400:F165:40E9:D69C:705B:38B (talk) 20:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation 38 wrong

[edit]

Leads to a totally unrelated article 2600:382:2B24:E013:7AAA:5F0C:5F5A:8855 (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source updated by the OP. That old source in the Personal life section has been with the article for years, but had nothing to do with Ashley Olsen.[1] MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Marikar, Sheila (May 19, 2009). "The National Enquirer: Celebrity Enemy No. 1?". ABC News. Retrieved March 17, 2016.