User talk:Miacek: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Notification: listing of Michael Darby at WP:Articles for deletion. |
|||
| (791 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(10d) |
||
|archive = User talk:Miacek/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s |
|archive = User talk:Miacek/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Nomination of [[:Populist Party (France)]] for deletion == |
|||
{{busy|For some months to come, Miacek}} |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Populist Party (France)]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
{{User Troll}} |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Populist Party (France)]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
<br> |
|||
<br> |
|||
<br> |
|||
</center> |
|||
<div style="height: 150px; width: 300px; overflow: auto; padding: 3px;text-align: left; border:solid 1px;" title="Contributions";> |
|||
''I have nearly 1,000 pages on my watchlist. I don't have enough time to address all the problems I may spot on Wikipedia. For my own reference, below I'm listing various active and constructive contributors. (Don't be offended if I forgot you! I only quickly skimmed my talk page and watchlist to refresh my memory in drafting this list.)'' |
|||
*{{User|Termer}} |
|||
*{{User|Martintg}} |
|||
*{{User|Digwuren}} |
|||
*{{User|Russavia}} |
|||
*{{User|ScienceApologist}} |
|||
*{{User|Folantin}} |
|||
*{{User|Hillock65}} |
|||
*{{User|Vecrumba}} |
|||
*{{User|Moreschi}} |
|||
*{{User|Checco}} |
|||
*{{User|Renata3}} |
|||
*{{User|Colchicum}} |
|||
*{{User|C mon}} |
|||
*{{User|Altenmann}} |
|||
*{{User|Alex Bakharev}} |
|||
*{{User|Piotrus}} |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> [[User:Nomen ad hoc|NAH]] 12:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC) |
|||
==Wrong name and information on Šveitsi Kommunistlik Partei on the Wikipedia Estonia== |
|||
Dear Miacek, I write you here because it's too difficult to find the discussion page on the Wikipedia of Estonia. I changed on the 22 of May the page that (I think) you created "Šveitsi Kommunistlik Partei", because I'm a member of the Party and I wanted to uniform all the information in all the languages. |
|||
</div> |
|||
<inputbox> |
|||
bgcolor=#f9f9f9 |
|||
default=User talk:Miacek |
|||
type=comment |
|||
break=no |
|||
width=0 |
|||
</inputbox> |
|||
Firstly, it is wrong to say Swiss Communist Party, because the name is Communist Party (Switzerland), and also the "Partito Comunista della Svizzera italiana" is wrong because that name can only be found on the facebook page, and relies to italian speaking part of Switzerland, but it is not the official name of the Party. I can give you the right information, if you want to make the article correct. Thank You. |
|||
== User notice: temporary 3RR block == |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Die Achse des Guten]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Die Achse des Guten]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Achse des Guten]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> |
|||
== Gnomsovet == |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> [[User:Masumrezarock100|<u style="color:#087643;font-face:arial;text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''''Masum Reza'''''</u>]][[User_talk:Masumrezarock100|<sup style="color:orange;">''📞''</sup>]] 16:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
I can't do much about the content disputes you are having, and I am sorry I cannot at this time offer myself in a mediator capability due to time constraints. I will, however, give this user a warning regarding unacceptability of copy-paste moves and will monitor his contributions for compliance. As you know, copy-paste moves are unacceptable in that they interfere with GFDL compliance, so continuing to do them without regards to proper procedures qualifies as disruptive editing, which is a blockable offense. On the same note, reverting such disruptive copy-paste moves would be exempt from the 3RR rule. Seeing how the rest of this user's contributions are written in an incomprehensible and illiterate English, I am inclined to classify them as disruptive editing as well, but would advise to seek further input, as the content dispute component is undoubtedly also present in your interactions. Best,—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]] • ([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); 13:19, March 16, 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Michael Darby]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Michael Darby]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Darby]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
== CPRF == |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:J2m5|J2m5]] ([[User talk:J2m5|talk]]) 09:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
I have removed part of your latest additions to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Communist_Party_of_the_Russian_Federation&diff=281877811&oldid=281871231 CPRF article] because it is weasally in wording and isn't attributed to those who hold the opinion. Just in case you were wondering why I did so, just letting you know here. Cheers, --[[User:Russavia|Russavia]] <sup>[[User talk:Russavia|Dialogue]]</sup> 12:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:It's all available on p. 51 of the books. There are simply too many people with such opinions to be listed, but I'll do it one day, as I was asked. --[[User:Miacek|<strong>Miacek</strong> and his crime-fighting dog]] ([[User talk:Miacek|<strong>woof!</strong>]]) 12:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::But are they notable opinions? An anti-fascist journal of dubious notability? And the other people? I dunno. But attribution of the opinions is the way to go on all articles for opinion IMO. --[[User:Russavia|Russavia]] <sup>[[User talk:Russavia|Dialogue]]</sup> 13:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::I hope you aren't implying that I am stalking anyone. As one can see, I have edited the article before as demonstrated by [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Communist_Party_of_the_Russian_Federation&diff=279130319&oldid=278112214 this only the other week]. Any articles I edit are automatically placed on my watch list, which has led to it being several thousand articles long. I will admit that seeing your removal of information from the other article, and then an edit to the "Criticism" section of this article straight afterwards did draw my attention to it. As I have said above, I don't have a problem with opinions being present on WP, so long as they are attributed to those who hold said opinion, rather then being presented as a matter of fact, etc. I hope you understand that. --[[User:Russavia|Russavia]] <sup>[[User talk:Russavia|Dialogue]]</sup> 13:20, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I'd say comparing criticism by Teinonen with criticism by Stephen Shenfield's works and certain Radzikhovskii (2000) and Proshechkin (1999) is creating false equivalencies, though, indeed, I couldn't get the corresponding bibliography page so I don't know yet who these two authors are. --[[User:Miacek|<strong>Miacek</strong> and his crime-fighting dog]] ([[User talk:Miacek|<strong>woof!</strong>]]) 13:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Well when I get back from my block, I will help you find this if you like. --[[User:Russavia|Russavia]] <sup>[[User talk:Russavia|Dialogue]]</sup> 13:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Thank you.--[[User:Miacek|<strong>Miacek</strong> and his crime-fighting dog]] ([[User talk:Miacek|<strong>woof!</strong>]]) 13:52, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== WP:SOUR == |
|||
Hi, |
|||
my graphomania kept poking me with a pointy stick until I wrote an brief essay about Wikipedia. You can find it at [[User:Digwuren/WP:SOUR]]. |
|||
Comments are welcome. [[User:Digwuren|Διγουρεν]]<sub>[[User talk:Digwuren|Εμπρος!]]</sub> 19:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Misuse of Twinkle == |
|||
Hello Miacek. I see that you've been using Twinkle to revert in content disputes, using the edit summary of reverting vandalism.[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template%3AMoldovan_elections&diff=286213807&oldid=286200303] This sort of behaviour has led to other editors losing the privelege of using Twinkle, so please don't do it again. Cheers, [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">пﮟოьεԻ</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 12:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah, it happens once in a while (out of absentmindedness) that one pushes the vandalism button right hand side instead of the revert button left hand side. As for 'losing the privilege', I don't know... It's just a setting in preferences menue, and honestly, I don't care too much, having seen how a sysop (!) passes with 3 RR violations with no action taken. --[[User:Miacek|<strong>Miacek</strong>]] [[User talk:Miacek|(t)]] 13:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Your warning constitues a subversive act against pro-Western Euro-Atlantic forces in Ukraine and Estonia == |
|||
Miacek: |
|||
regarding the warning that you left on my page. |
|||
As Wikipedia editors, we should work towards making the articles as NPOV and useful to Wikipedians as possible. Your systematic reverts of the articles on Ukrainian culture and Ukrainian pro-Western democratic struggle do not help the Wikipedia community to achieve this goal. |
|||
We, Wikipedians, should collaborate to make the articles better, and not revert them endlessly to excercise the anti-Western anti-Ukrainian and anti-Semitic censorship. |
|||
Please continue your contributions as a Wikipedia editor, and not anti-Ukrainian and anti-Estonian pro-Russian censor. |
|||
Thank you, |
|||
~~ |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:37, 8 May 2024
Nomination of Populist Party (France) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Populist Party (France) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Populist Party (France) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 12:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Wrong name and information on Šveitsi Kommunistlik Partei on the Wikipedia Estonia
[edit]Dear Miacek, I write you here because it's too difficult to find the discussion page on the Wikipedia of Estonia. I changed on the 22 of May the page that (I think) you created "Šveitsi Kommunistlik Partei", because I'm a member of the Party and I wanted to uniform all the information in all the languages.
Firstly, it is wrong to say Swiss Communist Party, because the name is Communist Party (Switzerland), and also the "Partito Comunista della Svizzera italiana" is wrong because that name can only be found on the facebook page, and relies to italian speaking part of Switzerland, but it is not the official name of the Party. I can give you the right information, if you want to make the article correct. Thank You.
Nomination of Die Achse des Guten for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Die Achse des Guten is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Achse des Guten until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Masum Reza📞 16:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael Darby for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Darby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.