Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous: Difference between revisions
Rockpocket (talk | contribs) →British Lions: its all about politics |
edited by robot: adding date header(s) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Wikimedia Project Page}} |
|||
[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]]<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Reference desk/header|WP:RD/M}} |
|||
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Reference desk/header|WP:RD/M}} |
|||
[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]] |
|||
[[Category:Pages automatically checked for incorrect links]] |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia resources for researchers]] |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia help forums]] |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia reference desk|Miscellaneous]] |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia help pages with dated sections]]</noinclude> |
|||
= December 21 = |
|||
== Britannica == |
|||
</noinclude> |
|||
Why [[Encyclopaedia Britannica]] uses imperial units in its articles, ever for things that are measured in metric in UK such as temperatures, if it is based in UK and read by people in metric countries? --[[User:40bus|40bus]] ([[User talk:40bus|talk]]) 07:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2009 May 24}} |
|||
:{{u|40bus}}, it is not based in the UK despite its British sounding name. The Encyclopaedia Britannica has been published in the United States since 1901. That's two years before the first human piloted airplane flight. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 07:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Why it is not based in the UK? And if it is read and edited by people in metric countries, why many of its articles use imperial units first? It even uses British English spelling. And are there any similar UK-based online encyclopedias? --[[User:40bus|40bus]] ([[User talk:40bus|talk]]) 08:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::No. Go be bored somewhere else. [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]] ([[User talk:Nanonic|talk]]) 09:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::If all else fails, you could try ''asking them''. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 16:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2009 May 25}} |
|||
::::Can't you do that for me??? [[User:Tamfang|—Tamfang]] ([[User talk:Tamfang|talk]]) 21:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Webpages == |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2009 May 26}} |
|||
Are there any web pages from late 1980s and early 1990s that are still in their original address, rather than on Internet Archive? Was it common for a company or person to have website in early 1990s? --[[User:40bus|40bus]] ([[User talk:40bus|talk]]) 07:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
= May 27 = |
|||
== [[Résumé]] question == |
|||
Years ago, I authored an [[op-ed]] for a software development magazine. Since then, the publication has changed its name. Is it acceptable to use the new name of the magazine on your résumé? [[User:A Quest For Knowledge|A Quest For Knowledge]] ([[User talk:A Quest For Knowledge|talk]]) 01:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Why not indicate both names? Just say "Authored op-ed piece for Awesome Magazine (known since 2002 as Coolness Journal)" or something like that. No need to be obfuscatory... --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 01:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::To be frank, I'd rather use the new name of the publication as this is the current name and the name that most people would be familiar with. Anyway, here's some background information. I have a list of publications on my resume. The name of each publication is in bold-face and in a slightly larger font. An explanatory description is provided underneath with a regular font and without bold-faceing. Somewhat attempting to follow your advice, here's how my résumé currently looks: |
|||
'''MAGAZINE'S NEW NAME''' |
|||
I authored an op-ed on TOPIC A for MAGAZINE'S NEW NAME <s>then known</s> (formally <s>known as</s> MAGAZINE'S OLD NAME). My two main areas of focus were on the importance of SUB-TOPIC-1 and SUB-TOPIC-2." |
|||
::Is this acceptable? [[User:A Quest For Knowledge|A Quest For Knowledge]] ([[User talk:A Quest For Knowledge|talk]]) 02:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::I don't see why not. Look, no one is going to bust you on having this one entry formatted right. The purpose of a resume is not to check you adherance to some "resume format" and you get docked "points" if you don't do it exactly right. The purpose of a resume is to get you an interview. That's it. If the information sets you apart enough to get someone to notice you enough to call you in for an interview, then it has served its purpose 100%. It doesn't matter a whole lot whether you list the old name first or the new name first. Whatever makes you more comfortable, and whatever you think does the best job of getting someone to put you in the "interview this guy" pile rather than the "recycle bin". --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 02:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::A word to the wise: make sure you use the right word. In the example you give, the word is "'''formerly'''". "Formally" implies it has a formal name. For example, my ''nickname'' is TammyMoet, but I am ''formally'' known as Mrs Pampling. I was ''formerly'' known by my maiden name of Barratt. --[[Special:Contributions/88.108.222.231|88.108.222.231]] ([[User talk:88.108.222.231|talk]]) 11:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:We have a [[List of websites founded before 1995]]. The IN2P3 site from 1992 can still be visited, where you may enjoy seeing the French National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Particle Physics's contact details, a small picture of the building, and five hyperlinks. The article says there were {{tq|2,879 websites established before 1995}}, so no, it wasn't common. [[User:Card_Zero|<span style=" background-color:#fffff0; border:1px #995; border-style:dotted solid solid dotted;"> Card Zero </span>]] [[User_talk:Card_Zero|(talk)]] 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::How about just "formally MAGAZINE'S OLD NAME"? [[User:A Quest For Knowledge|A Quest For Knowledge]] ([[User talk:A Quest For Knowledge|talk]]) 13:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Were there any websites around in 1990? This year feels still relatively recent. And are there any saved TV broadcasts from that time in the web, from any country? --[[User:40bus|40bus]] ([[User talk:40bus|talk]]) 11:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Are you just randomly asking questions? [[User:Polygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talk:Polygnotus|talk]]) 12:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Take the effort to read the first sentence of [[List of websites founded before 1995]] and you will have the answer to your question. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 10:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Did [[Donald Trump]]'s father, == |
|||
::::: I don't think you should use formally at all. If you used formally it would mean that the magazine has two current names, one formal and one informal (for example the [[US]] is formally known as the [[United States of America]]). What you mean is that the magazine changed its name, so it was '''formerly''' know by another name. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Eiad77|Eiad77]] ([[User talk:Eiad77|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Eiad77|contribs]]) 13:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::::: "Formally" is not the right word at all. You're looking for "Formerly". Two Rs. One L. [[User:APL|APL]] ([[User talk:APL|talk]]) 14:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Fred, know [[Rudy Giuliani]]'s father, who is said to have been a mob contract killer? I'm asking because I've heard rumors somewhere that both Donald and Fred had mob contacts in New York City.[[User:Richard L. Peterson|Rich]] ([[User talk:Richard L. Peterson|talk]]) 22:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Doh! Thanks. [[User:A Quest For Knowledge|A Quest For Knowledge]] ([[User talk:A Quest For Knowledge|talk]]) 14:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:"Said to have been"; is there a reliable source that claims this? It has also been said that Donald Trump is a shape shifting lizard.<sup>[https://globalnews.ca/tag/donald-trump-is-a-shape-shifting-lizard/]</sup> Harold Giuliani was at the bottom of the low end of shady dealings in the Italian immigrant community. It seems extremely unlikely that Fred Trump, a high-profile successful real-estate developer from the German immigrant community, would have a reason to meet him. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 10:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::I would say "New Name (then Old Name)". "Formerly" doesn't tell you if the name change was before or after you wrote for it. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 22:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Well, that's what the OP is asking. You're just repeating the OP's question using different words. --[[User:Viennese Waltz|Viennese Waltz]] 10:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::The OP did not ask whether it was plausible but whether it was true. Even if the mob contract killer story should prove more than randomly created innuendo, there is still nothing to suggest the two fathers ever met. The suggested mob contacts would not make this more likely than two random New Yorkers (like Henri who sometimes ordered pizza and Freddy who sometimes delivered pizza) knowing each other. It is very difficult to prove a negative, but the question implied the OP thought it was at least plausible, which, as I tried to point out, it is not. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 01:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::{{small|No insult intended to shape-shifting lizards. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 10:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
::(it's easy for you to google that the rumors are out there, Lambiam.[[User:Richard L. Peterson|Rich]] ([[User talk:Richard L. Peterson|talk]]) 18:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::I did not dispute the rumours exist, but IMO they are irrelevant to the question whether the two fathers knew each other, so I ignored them. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 01:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Giuliani gave a eulogy and he probably would have mentioned it if they knew eachother, but it doesn't seem like he did. https://nypost.com/1999/06/30/trump-patriarch-eulogized-as-great-builder/ [[User:Polygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talk:Polygnotus|talk]]) 18:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:https://stevevillano.medium.com/the-trumps-an-incestuous-intertwining-with-organized-crime-ab65316c2b48 |
|||
:[[User:Richard L. Peterson|Rich]] ([[User talk:Richard L. Peterson|talk]]) 19:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks for finding this, Polygnotus. But are you sure Rudy would have mentioned it in his eulogy, being possibly embarrassed about his father's occupation? And mentioning an acquaintance with his father would not make Fred seem more illustrious, which eulogies are meant to do. [[User:Richard L. Peterson|Rich]] ([[User talk:Richard L. Peterson|talk]]) 19:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::No, I haven't found definitive proof. [[User:Polygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talk:Polygnotus|talk]]) 12:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
= December 22 = |
|||
:::::OK, thanks Tango. I'm trying to avoid any appearance of impropriety. [[User:A Quest For Knowledge|A Quest For Knowledge]] ([[User talk:A Quest For Knowledge|talk]]) 15:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== Policy related to places == |
||
Hello, |
|||
So I did my road test the other day and my instructor told me that when approaching a stop sign or a red light, say I'm on 4th gear, I need to downshift gear-by-gear until I reach 1st gear before coming to a complete stop. Seriously? Does anybody actually do this? What I did was what she called "coasting", where I hit the brake and once my engine begins to lug, I pop it into neutral. [[User:Jamesino|Jamesino]] ([[User talk:Jamesino|talk]]) 02:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
I want to add an article for a place in delhi cantonment. However, i am unsure about the relevant Wikipedia policies on this topic. I tried searching on DuckDuckGo to no avail And the results of Wikipedia search gave unrelated things. What are the relevant policies? [[User:KhubsuratInsaan|KhubsuratInsaan]] ([[User talk:KhubsuratInsaan|talk]]) 11:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I just put the foot down on both pedals until reaching a complete stop. I generally will shift down into the appropriate gear based on my speed, ''without engaging it'', so I coast with the car completely disengaged via the clutch pedal, but I keep the gearshift lever in the appropriate gear, should I have to suddenly engage. I generally don't like using the transmission to slow down the car instead of the brakes, which is what you seem to be implying is being recommended here. Why? Worn out brake pads: $50.00 plus 1 hour labor. Worn out transmission: $1000.00 plus 4 hours labor. You do the math. --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 02:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:You may find [[Help:Your first article|this guide]] a good starting point. Be sure in particular to study the section on notability. You may also want to look up articles about similar places (if those articles exist) and review them to get a sense of what does and does not go into such an article. |
|||
:(ec)I undertook driving lessons in the UK recently and this was actively discouraged both by my instructor and later by the examiner when I took the test. The reasons they gave me were |
|||
:It looks like you're new to Wikipedia. (Welcome!) You may find it easier to write an article from scratch and get it past article review or new pages patrol if you spend some time here first editing other pages and getting to understand the culture. That's not a strict requirement, just something a lot of people benefit from when they first arrive! -- [[User:Avocado|Avocado]] ([[User talk:Avocado|talk]]) 14:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:# By moving from the current gear down to 1st; I would be keeping the car straight or moving between lanes with the one hand whilst braking with one foot and depressing the clutch with the other, using the gear stick to select each gear and also looking ahead for hazards and slowing traffic. That's a bit much for anyone to do in the 1-200 yards approach to a junction or roundabout with the car's centre of gravity moving forward evermore as the vehicle decelerates. It's even worse if there ''is'' an unexpected hazard or if the road is slippery. I was taught to approach the junction in whatever gear is safe at that time, usually downshifting to 2nd (as you may only have to slow down momentarily before pulling away again) if there is time and selecting 1st when stopped if necessary. |
|||
:# Disc brakes work a lot better than the old drum brakes, are more reliable and are very effective at stopping a car. Some road authorities used to recommend engine braking to offset the 'sponginess' of drums back in the day, it's just not necessary now. |
|||
:As to coasting, I got a big black mark for that as it's not the done thing to be moving without being in gear. I experienced an acceleration in some cases when moving in neutral (especially downhill) and was thus deemed to not be in full control of the vehicle. |
|||
:Of course this is mostly "somebody told me.." info and from a different country but still... [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]] ([[User talk:Nanonic|talk]]) 02:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)` |
|||
::Oh and by 'approach in whatever gear is safe at that time' I do mean if you're in 4th, stop in 4th - the thing that matters is that you ''pull away'' in the correct gear. [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]] ([[User talk:Nanonic|talk]]) 03:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::And the place for new editors to ask questions is the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse]] (although we're happy to help here too, especially with references). [[User:Alansplodge|Alansplodge]] ([[User talk:Alansplodge|talk]]) 15:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:You certainly shouldn't slow down in a high gear with your foot off of the clutch until the engine revs are so low that you have to put your foot on the clutch. As the engine RPM drops, below about 2000 rpm - you are "lugging" - which is damaging the engine...very bad indeed...don't ever do that! |
|||
:::thank you. i will keep this in mind next time i want to ask a question. [[User:KhubsuratInsaan|KhubsuratInsaan]] ([[User talk:KhubsuratInsaan|talk]]) 12:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::thank you for the detailed reply ❤️ [[User:KhubsuratInsaan|KhubsuratInsaan]] ([[User talk:KhubsuratInsaan|talk]]) 12:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Indian city classification == |
|||
: On the other hand, if you stay in a high gear and put your foot on the clutch while the revs are still reasonably high to prevent the RPM's from dropping then you are indeed coasting - and that's also bad because you have no control over the car's engine - in the event of some kind of problem, you can't easily drop into the right gear to accellerate away because you'll have no clear idea of the right gear for the current RPM's. Coasting is dangerous...so that's out too. |
|||
I was looking at [[Classification of Indian cities]]. In tier Y, there are more than 100 cities listed. But in the reference given there are only 88. I even looked what appears to be official website, there's no new circular of new list. [https://doe.gov.in/orders-circulars/32] Are there any other circulars or should I just remove extra cities. Also, as my main purpose to look for a tier classification, was to use it as approximation for urban (Tier X and Y) and rural districts (Tier Z). Is there any other department which does this kind of classification, please let me know. -- [[User:Parnaval|Parnaval]] ([[User talk:Parnaval|talk]]) 17:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: Hence, downshifting is ''DEFINITELY'' needed - it's safer and it prolongs the life of your engine. There should be no debate about this - and your driving tester was 100% correct in complaining about your failure to do that. |
|||
:That circular by the [[Ministry of Finance (India)|Department of Expenditure]] indicates that classification of cities depends on the latest census. Entities using the classification after yearly update seemingly are easy to find ( https://7thpaycommissionnews.in/classification-of-indian-cities/), regarding a specific source explicitly mentioning their is an update the department link to look for has to be related to the census. --[[User:Askedonty|Askedonty]] ([[User talk:Askedonty|talk]]) 21:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
= December 27 = |
|||
: However, when I slow down, I don't go through every gear - and I '''never''' wind up in 1st gear. The reason for not winding up in first is somewhat quirky. It's because I drive a lot of old British cars (from the 1960's) and they don't have synchromesh on 1st gear. If you try to downshift a classic Mini or MG into 1st while it's still in motion, you'll wreck the gearbox! But on modern cars, this isn't a problem. So unless you plan on getting hooked on small British cars from the 50's and 60's - don't worry about it! But shifting down from (say) 6th through 5th, 4th, 3rd, 2nd and into 1st in a 6-speed transmission is a lot of work - and it's distracting at a time when your attention is needed - and it takes your hand off of the steering wheel more than is necessary at a time when you might well have to manouver suddenly. So I tend to use alternate gears when downshifting. 6th/4th/2nd/neutral. But even that is somewhat misleading. On a fast road, in 6th gear - I'll downshift into 5th or 4th as I pull off onto the slip-road. So long before I have to stop - I'm probably already in 4th. So in truth, I stay in gear - let the RPM drop off - and when they get close to 2000 RPM - I drop into 2nd gear - and stay there until the revs are again - close to 2000 - then (if I've gotten it right) - I can apply brake and clutch for the last 10 to 15 feet up to the line. Doing it smoothely is a matter of planning...after a while it becomes instinctive - but sadly, you have to take your test before you've gotten that off pat. |
|||
== [[Black Cube]], Melissa Nathan,&U.S. presidential candidates == |
|||
:HOWEVER - how you drive on your test is how you have to drive to pass it. A good driving instructor will tell you that you need to do such-and-such in order to pass the test - but in normal driving, you'd do some other thing. A great example is the three point turn and the reversing around a corner thing - those are about convincing the tester that you have control of the car - it has nothing to do with manouvers you commonly have to do in daily driving. It sounds like this is another example of that. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 04:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Black Cube has a wikipedia article, Melissa Nathan is mentioned in the article [[It Ends with Us]]. Both are googleable. My question is if either Black Cube or Melissa Nathan were ever hired to discredit [[John Kerry]] or [[Hillary Clinton]]? I realize that in Melissa Nathan's case, if she had been hired for that, it would probably have been before she formed The Agency Group PR.[[User:Richard L. Peterson|Rich]] ([[User talk:Richard L. Peterson|talk]]) 06:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Steve, you drive small british cars, so I understand that you'd rarely need to do a three point turn. I learned to drive in [[Toyota Landcruiser]] Troop Carrier 4WD. Vehicles like can't often do a U-turn. --[[User:Polysylabic Pseudonym|Polysylabic Pseudonym]] ([[User talk:Polysylabic Pseudonym|talk]]) 06:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Even in a 'standard' length of car, you can usually turn around in a road that's too narrow to U-turn by '''first''' reversing '''then''' driving forwards and away...a '2-point turn'. But the UK drivers test specifically requires that you start the manouver by going forwards - and that ends up forcing you to do a 3-point turn. Lots of people never learn to do a 2-point turn and continue to do it the inefficient way. But the test isn't making sure you know how to turn the car around in the road - it's making sure you have the skills to keep control of the car and not hit the curb as you move back and forth across the cambered road. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 18:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::Of course the first point is free as you're generally traveling forward anyway. --[[Special:Contributions/203.22.236.14|203.22.236.14]] ([[User talk:203.22.236.14|talk]]) 12:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
I think it's been renamed to a "turn in the road" rather than 3 point (since you can do more than 3 points to your turn). I do find it an odd-one. In my 8 years driving I don't think i've ever done a 3-point turn. I virtually always just drive to the next road and make a turn at the next junction (reverse round a corner I think they call it on the test). Anyhoo like SteveBaker says, it's all about what the examiner wants you to do to show you can control the car and are a safe road user. Once you have your test you can't just ignore the rules, but some things (e.g. parralel parking) people will never want to do again after they get a license. [[Special:Contributions/194.221.133.226|194.221.133.226]] ([[User talk:194.221.133.226|talk]]) 10:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah - I think it was formally called that since the beginning - but 'three point turn' was always the colloquial name for it. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 18:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:The link should have been to [[It Ends with Us (film)|''It Ends with Us'' (film)]]. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 19:16, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:It probably depends where you live (size of roads and whether they have good places to turn around) and the type of car. I've done a million of them. Ditto parallel paring — if you live in high-density, very urban areas you have to know how to do that without even thinking about it. --[[Special:Contributions/98.217.14.211|98.217.14.211]] ([[User talk:98.217.14.211|talk]]) 14:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:You don't normally do parallel parking? Really? Good luck driving in KL or Auckland them... I also believe you'd general fail if you need to do more then 3 points for your turn here in NZ. They may give you an exception with a very large car and narrow road but I wouldn't count on it (more likely they'd choose a road when they feel you should be able to manage it). I don't drive much but I can see the need for a 3 point turn in some NZ roads particularly with larger cars. (Well obviously no one cares if it takes more then 3 points when your actually driving.) Driving to the end to find a place to turn, on a quiet road, particularly if you do it every day seems a fairly pointless waste of time to me. In reply to the question, I was thought to downshift and so you end up in 2nd gear when stopping, not first. [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 15:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::You were probably taught to drive in an era before synchomesh-on-1st-gear was commonplace too. It really is necessary to be utterly stationary before shifting into 1st with such older cars - I do hope the driving testers and instructors know to teach that if people are still taking their tests in beat-up old 1970's or older Mini's because it makes a god-awful grinding noise if you '''do''' try to downshift into 1st while moving. When I got my 1963 Mini - the very first time my wife drove it she did that very thing before even getting out of our driveway! She's never driven it since (her choice - not mine). Some people can use the double-declutch trick to get the car into 1st while moving - but I don't like to risk my poor babies' 46 year old gearbox by practicing it! 18:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I believe in the UK driving test a "turn in the road" is allowed to take as many points as is necessary for the width of the road and the length of the car. I can't see an examiner asking you to do one somewhere that wasn't wide enough to do it in 3 points, though (unless, for some reason, you decided to do your test in a stretch limo, which you are probably allowed to do). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 22:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Griggsville, Missouri? == |
|||
:I seem to remember hearing (terrible start to a ref desk answer, I apologise!) that the official guidance in the UK has recently (last 10 years) changed and you are no longer expected to work your way down through all the gears, but were before. I think you are now taught to change straight down into second (which, to be honest, in most cases would only involve skipping 3rd, as Steve says above) as you approach the junction, then put the clutch down as you stop (if you need to stop - you stay in 2nd if you don't) and immeadiately (before stopping) change into first (so you are ready to pull away again straight away). I haven't actually gotten around to learning to drive yet, though - I got half way there last year and then stopped for exams and didn't take it up again. I intend to do so this summer, so remind me and I will let you know the official advice! --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 22:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
The [[Robert Fiske (actor)]] article claims (without a source) that he was born in [[Griggsville, Missouri]]. I can find no evidence whatever that such a place has ever existed. There is a [[Griggsville, Illinois]], which is about 20 miles northeast of the IL/MO border (which I think is the river, and presumably was in 1889). Was there really a Griggsville in Missouri, or is this a simple mistake? The only substantive author (to the biographical part of the article) is long departed Wikipedia. -- [[User:Finlay McWalter|Finlay McWalter]]'''··–·'''[[User talk:Finlay McWalter|Talk]] 20:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== architect and anthropologist == |
|||
:I can't find an obit for Fiske in Newspapers.com, and the Findagrave entry [https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/11467/robert-fiske] simply says he was born in Missouri. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 21:37, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:[Edit Conflict] I wondered if it might be something to do with the Mississippi changing its course, but it seems not. However, if Griggsville, Illinois is correct, he could be added to that article's '''Notable person''' [''sic''] section, doubling its complement! |
|||
:The 'Missouri' inclusion was (as you may have noted) in the article as created in 2005, so at least we know it's not the result of vandalism. |
|||
:I notice that the <u>Un</u>reliable sources IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes and the Internet Broadway Database also state Griggsville, Missouri, which may of course have been taken from Wikipedia, and Find a Grave gives merely Missouri. However, The Movie Database does give Griggsville, Illinois. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} [[Special:Contributions/94.1.223.204|94.1.223.204]] ([[User talk:94.1.223.204|talk]]) 21:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Indications in Ancestry.com are that he was merely born "in Missouri", not a specific city that I've found. Even though the original article writer has been offline for over 9 years, maybe his email still works? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 21:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:: I'm wondering if there is some circular [[WP:CITOGENESIS]] between ourselves, Findagrave, and IMDb. I too considered the "moving river" hypothesis, but it's much too far away. -- [[User:Finlay McWalter|Finlay McWalter]]'''··–·'''[[User talk:Finlay McWalter|Talk]] 22:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
hi, i want to be an architect and i am from india. so please could anyone tell me whether i should pursue studying science or humanities?? |
|||
::: ''[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=irZmAAAAMAAJ&q=%22griggsville+missouri%22 Who Was Who on Screen]'' (1977) confirms he was born in Griggsville, Missouri. No danger of citogenesis there. The search term "Griggsville, MO" throws up a few non-Fiske results on Google and Google Books, but I can't find precisely where it is. --[[User:Antiquary|Antiquary]] ([[User talk:Antiquary|talk]]) 09:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC) Ah, here we are, it's in [[Pike County, Missouri]] [https://www.ciclt.net/sn/clt/capitolimpact/gw_ziplist.aspx?ClientCode=capitolimpact&State=il&StName=missouri&StFIPS=&FIPS=17149]. --[[User:Antiquary|Antiquary]] ([[User talk:Antiquary|talk]]) 10:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::Griggsville, IL, is also in [[Pike County, Illinois]] and if you [https://www.unitedstateszipcodes.org/62340/ look up the zip code (62340)] given on that web site you also land in Illinois. The two Pike Counties are direct neighbours, but there's no indication of any common history or even a shift in the state border. --[[User:Wrongfilter|Wrongfilter]] ([[User talk:Wrongfilter|talk]]) 10:15, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::That sounds ominous. Also, the more of my Google and Google Books hits I follow up, the fewer check out. The evidence that this place ever existed outside of Fiske's say-so looks rather slight. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DNRMAQAAMAAJ&q=%22griggsville,+mo%22&dq=%22griggsville,+mo%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj5_93SocqKAxUNXkEAHSw2Mzo4ChDoAXoECAUQAg Here] is one cite from 1907, and there are one or two more from the 19th century, but confusion with Griggsville, IL can't be ruled out. --[[User:Antiquary|Antiquary]] ([[User talk:Antiquary|talk]]) 10:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: Thanks everyone. I'll flag the birthplace in the article is questionable (and the whole article as poorly sourced), but I think there's enough uncertainty for me to not "fix" it. And I'll refer to this discussion on the talk page, for the (probably very unlikely event) that some future person cares enough about this rather minor actor to do more thorough research. Thank you. -- [[User:Finlay McWalter|Finlay McWalter]]'''··–·'''[[User talk:Finlay McWalter|Talk]] 08:04, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
my friend here wants to be an anthropologist. so it would be nice of you tell him what he should pursue. |
|||
::One thing I noticed in Newspapers.com is that Missouri papers that referred to Griggsville usually made it clear that they were talking about the one in Illinois. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 14:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
= December 28 = |
|||
thanx <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/117.197.250.135|117.197.250.135]] ([[User talk:117.197.250.135|talk]]) 05:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Why do news reporters name the programme they are reporting for? == |
|||
:Both require a bit of both. To ask such a question probably implies that you should not already have made up your minds on your eventual careers. That is my short answer.[[User:Julzes|Julzes]] ([[User talk:Julzes|talk]]) 07:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4jRLTPBiDI&t=147s This] is an example by BBC News. ―<span style="font-family:Poppins, Helvetica, Sans-serif;">[[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]]</span> [[User_talk:Panamitsu|(talk)]] 05:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I largely agree with Julzes. Since I have a degree in anthropology, I'll try to handle that part. The answer really depends on two things - the kind of anthropology you want to do and how your potential university(ies) consider it. Most anthropology is geared heavily toward the humanities, but there are sub-disciplines that are much more science oriented (archaeology, physical anthropology, palaeo-anthropology). In very generic terms, the question you need to ask yourself is whether you want to study people physically (which requires more science) or whether you're more interesting in understanding what people do (which requires a background in humanities). [[User:Matt Deres|Matt Deres]] ([[User talk:Matt Deres|talk]]) 13:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:You have linked to a BBC TV program where at 0:40 the presenter introduces "''Our science correspondent [[Pallab Ghosh]]"'' who signs off his report "''Pallab Ghosh, BBC News''". His report includes statements by two experts each identified by name and affiliation. The video typifies the high standard of journalism where BBC emphasize distinction between source and editorial content. Incidentally, a good BBC TV reporter tends to become a [[Celebrity|"household name"]] (the likes of [[Clive Myrie]], [[Fiona Bruce]], [[Sophie Raworth]], [[Reeta Chakrabarti]], [[Steve Rosenberg]], Michael Buchanan and more). <small>Edit: I apologise to Pallab Ghosh for initially misspelling his name and thank Antiquary for correcting me.</small> [[User:Philvoids|Philvoids]] ([[User talk:Philvoids|talk]]) 11:19, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Are there not courses for both subjects in India? Very few undergraduate teaching departments for archeology or anthropology would be so specialised as to prevent postponing a decision about which sub-area to specialise in. eg. Any general anthropology degree should qualify you for further study in the areas you find more interesting. If you want to know about what to study in school, university departments usually specify which subjects they prefer, but this is not especially stringent - few courses mandate more than 2 subjects, and are always flexible. eg. A physics degree may demand school-level physics and maths, but the 3rd and 4th subjects are then not important (although grades still count!) |
|||
::[[Pallab Ghosh]], but I'm sure he's used to it. --[[User:Antiquary|Antiquary]] ([[User talk:Antiquary|talk]]) 11:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::As I understand the question, it is not why reporters identify <u>themselves</u>, but why for instance Ghosh does not sign off by simply saying "''Pallab Ghosh''", full stop. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 10:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::It's a standard practice, which might even be in their contracts. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 11:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::I seem to recall American channels using clips from the BBC. Such sign offs would serve to identify the source in these cases.--[[User:Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Khajidha|contributions]]) 17:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::: THat was my thinking, too. These days they tend to have on-screen watermarks, but reporters still sign off with "Jennifer Superior Bitch, Infinity News. Alex". -- [[User:JackofOz|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Jack of Oz</span>]] [[User talk:JackofOz#top|<span style="font-size:85%; font-family: Verdana;"><sup>[pleasantries]</sup></span>]] 20:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== Navigation lights == |
|||
A quick search find for example in UK, [http://www.dundee.ac.uk/undergraduate/courses/forensic_anthropology.htm this anthropology course], which is very science orientated, but doesn't care whether you have chemistry or biology, as long as you have one. And [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/prospective/undergradentry.htm this], which does not specify any subject, but prefers a "mix of arts and sciences". From those i checked, biology is the most asked for school subject, followed by chemistry - but this may only reflect the lack of good sociology/anthopology education at UK schools ("core" subjects are generally more common and better regarded there.[[User:Yobmod|<b><font color="#0000CD">Yob</font></b>]][[User talk:Yobmod|<b><font color="008000">Mod</font></b>]] 13:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Does the fact that aeroplane/ship navigation lights are green and red cause problems for pilots who are red-green colour blind? How do they deal with that? Can they even become pilots? ―<span style="font-family:Poppins, Helvetica, Sans-serif;">[[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]]</span> [[User_talk:Panamitsu|(talk)]] 22:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*To the original poster: Can you specify what grade of schooling, and state you are currently in ? Do you have any specific architecture institutes or programs in mind ? |
|||
*To others: India (generally) follows a [[10+2+3 plan]] for most fields of study (10+2+5 for B.Arch, although there are post-graduate alternatives too) and students usually have to decide the "stream of study" they wish to choose at both the +2 (i.e., equivalent to Junior year in highschool in US) and the +3 (i.e., entry into undergraduate degree programs) level. At either stages one cannot (again generally) choose from an ''a la carte'' menu, but needs to decide on a stream of study (eg, science, commerce arts etc), and the choice one makes at each of these stages limits the courses of study one can undertake later. The system is much less flexible that the US/European model, and therefore one does need to plan on a course of education well in advance - especially if one desires admission in one of the premier institutions, which have strict eligibility requirements and (often) competitive entrance exams. The specifics vary from state-to-state and some premier institutions set their own admission policy. That is the reason it is important to know what level of schooling the OP is at and what (state/national) institutes they are considering, in order to provide a specific answer to the question. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 02:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks for the info! So school students choosing a scientific stream would not be able to study languages or music? I can think of a lot of university programs that require a mixture (eg. studying the Physics of musical instruments). The 2 asked for above fit into this area - both science knowledge and language skills would be very useful. But more specialisation also has advantages (I far prefer the UK model than countries that would have required i continue to study some arts through my whole education (the US?)).[[User:Yobmod|<b><font color="#0000CD">Yob</font></b>]][[User talk:Yobmod|<b><font color="008000">Mod</font></b>]] 13:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I couldn't be a pilot because of my red-green colour blindness, but people with a mild version can apparently - [https://www.caa.co.uk/aeromedical-examiners/medical-standards/pilots/medical-conditions/visual/colour-vision-guidance-material-gm/ this] is a link to the UK's Civil Aviation Authority's guidance on colour vision requirements. [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]) 23:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== UK Driving License == |
|||
::How fascinating. Thanks. ―<span style="font-family:Poppins, Helvetica, Sans-serif;">[[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]]</span> [[User_talk:Panamitsu|(talk)]] 00:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Similarly, red-green colourblind people may not be able to become helmsmen. |
|||
:You might think it would have been more convenient to make those lights red and cyan, as far fewer people are red-blue colourblind, but when navigation lights on ships were introduced, bright blueish lights couldn't be made. That only became possible with [[gas discharge lamp]]s. Traffic lights and railway signals these days (often using [[LED]]s) use a slightly blueish green, so that most colourblind people can see the difference between red and green. [[User:PiusImpavidus|PiusImpavidus]] ([[User talk:PiusImpavidus|talk]]) 11:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::They could have agreed (and still could agree) on assigning distinct flashing patterns, like •••'''——''' and '''—'''••'''—'''• . --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 20:48, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Flashing patterns would be a very poor method for aircraft and probably ships also. Navigation lights are meant to give a quick indication of the relative position and heading of another aircraft/vessel. When seeing navigation lights a pilot instantly has an indication of the relative flight direction of the other aircraft based on which red/green/white lights are visible. Also there are already the [[anti-collision light]]s, red flashing beacon on the tail at least and white flashing strobes on the wingtips and tail. How could a pilot possibly decode flashing lights reliably enough and quickly enough to determine relative heading? [[User:Fiveby|fiveby]]([[User talk:Fiveby|zero]]) 18:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Wouldn't that be a problem because the sky/ocean is blue? I understand that the lights are used at night so it shouldn't be too much of a problem. ―<span style="font-family:Poppins, Helvetica, Sans-serif;">[[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]]</span> [[User_talk:Panamitsu|(talk)]] 22:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::It would involve more complex lighting circuits/equipment and massive world-wide retrofitting, which (I suggest) would be prohibitively expensive, to solve a relatively minor 'problem' more easily answered by simply not employing colour-blind people in the relevant positions. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} [[Special:Contributions/94.1.223.204|94.1.223.204]] ([[User talk:94.1.223.204|talk]]) 13:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::Flashing lights have been used on lighthouses for a long time. They use an assembly of lenses and shutters rotating around a fixed light, using a low-friction bearing. This works fine for stationary lighthouses, but is more problematic on moving ships. There's more wear and the lens assembly could jam or rotate at variable speed. Better to use an electric light, switched repeatedly by a rotating switch powered by an electric motor (all available late 19th century), but both switch and lamp have to switch reliably at least a million times. No problem today, but there's still the issue of recognising a flashing pattern if it's intermittently obscured. It's considered acceptable for lighthouses and buoys, which are usually more or less where you expect them to be, but a moving ship may be a different matter. [[User:PiusImpavidus|PiusImpavidus]] ([[User talk:PiusImpavidus|talk]]) 14:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:When I answered telephones and sold passenger tickets for Eurostar I had to pass an [[Ishihara test]], the same as [[signalmen]] and [[train drivers]]. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 21:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Depending on the signalling system, train drivers may also have to discriminate red from yellow/amber. This is less important for road users. And states of tracks and signals are colour-coded on the computer monitors of signalmen, but it should only take a simple software update to accommodate colourblind signalmen. (Yes, there're still some old-fashioned signal boxes in some countries; I've passed the one at [[Severn Bridge Junction]] on my way to Wales.) I don't see the objection against colourblind ticket sellers. [[User:PiusImpavidus|PiusImpavidus]] ([[User talk:PiusImpavidus|talk]]) 11:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
= December 29 = |
|||
Is it legal for someone to drive solo on private land in the UK without a license? I hear about this all the time in news from the US, about kids as young as 7 driving cars on their parents' ranch and so on. What is the situation in the UK? Specifically, what about factory workers in car factories driving cars off the trim line and into the depot? I'm asking this because that was part of my father's job and he has never had a driver's license. --[[User:KageTora|KageTora - (영호 (影虎))]] ([[User talk:KageTora|talk]]) 07:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Domains == |
|||
:Yes it is legal and [[Driving licence in the United Kingdom|our article]] says "As a licence is required to drive on a public road, any person may drive on private land with the consent of the landowner, but it is illegal - regardless of any licence - to drive on any common public land, such as moorland." This is especially useful for farmers who have many people using their machinery etc and as you suggest - car factory workers. Most car parks are also owned privately by companies or stores and deemed to not be "public roadways" as well as any road not maintained by the [[Highways Agency]] or local authorities. [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]] ([[User talk:Nanonic|talk]]) 10:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::There is a further exception for farmers, I think - an agricultural vehicle being driven a short way along a road to get from one field to another (I'm not sure of the exact limitations) doesn't fall under the usual rules. They don't have to pay fuel duty, they don't need MOTs, etc. and, I think, they don't need a drivers license (although I wouldn't swear by that one). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 11:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Are Eritrea's .er and Belarus's .by ever used in domain hacks? .er could be used in shortcut to Blogger, blogg.er, like goo.gl and youtu.be, and .by could be used in domains such as drive.by and in Nordic place namesmas ''by'' means "village" in Swedish and "city" in Norwegian and Danish. And can South Africa's .za and India's .in be used directly after the main part, such as in piz.za and drive.in? Also, can .pl, .cz, .sk and .hu addresses contain diacritics, such as gdańsk.pl, česko.cz, košice.sk and magyarország.hu? --[[User:40bus|40bus]] ([[User talk:40bus|talk]]) 10:10, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::So does that mean I can give my niece some driving experience before she has even applied for a licence, by letting her drive my car round a supermarket carpark (long after the store has closed, on Sunday evenings for example)? [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 16:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::It said "with the consent of the landowner". [[User:DJ Clayworth|DJ Clayworth]] ([[User talk:DJ Clayworth|talk]]) 17:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::You might also want to check the terms of your insurance policy. It probably covers you for teaching another person to drive - but probably not if they don't have a provisional license. Either way...CHECK IT CAREFULLY! [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 17:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Do you need insurance to drive on private land? If so does that render illegal all those 10 year olds being given a 1 minute drive on the front driveway? [[User:Prokhorovka|Prokhorovka]] ([[User talk:Prokhorovka|talk]]) 22:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::You only need insurance if they crash your car (at which point you, of course, claim you were driving and the insurance company is none the wiser <small>The Wikipedia reference desk does not condone insurance fraud.</small>). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 22:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::No way that you can let her drive round a Tesco car park. [[User:CottonGrass|CottonGrass]] ([[User talk:CottonGrass|talk]]) 22:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:See [[URL#Internationalized URL]]. [[User:PiusImpavidus|PiusImpavidus]] ([[User talk:PiusImpavidus|talk]]) 11:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Tango should note that a woman in Scotland was recently fined for doing just that, a short drive on public roads, from a field to another, without a licence.--[[Special:Contributions/81.170.40.155|81.170.40.155]] ([[User talk:81.170.40.155|talk]]) 06:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Plusimpavidus has only answered the last sentencee. |
|||
::::::It is entirely possible that Scottish law is different from English and Welsh law in that respect. Do you have the details (or a link to the story)? What vehicle was she driving? --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 07:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:The answer to the first part is entirely dependent on the policy of the controller of the ccTLD in question, and that controller may or may not publish a policy. Technically, of course they could be used: the government of Tonga sells [[.to]] domains to any interested party, as I presume you know. |
|||
:According to our article [[.by]] {{tq|The Operations and Analysis Centre under the President of the Republic of Belarus allows for anyone (not only for those who reside in Belarus) to register a second level domain such as something.by}}, and it also says {{tq|he .by code is used for domain hack by institutions from the German state of Bavaria (German: Bayern), such as bayern.by, the Bavarian Tourism Agency. Since "by" means "town" or "city" in Norwegian, it's also used by some Norwegian newspapers, such as osl.by for an Oslo newspaper, and trd.by for a Trondheim newspaper}}, however, neither of these statements appear to be sourced. When I just tried it, trd.by seems to redirect to a Norwegian casino site. |
|||
:Our articles [[.er]] and [[.za]] say nothing about whether the ccTLDs are available to anybody outside Eritrea and South Africa respectively. [[.in]] doesn't explicitly address the question, but in talking about the use of subdomains it repeats "in India" several times. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 20:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Colored asphalt markings == |
|||
:In Australia, certain privately owned car-parks maintained for the use of the public are considered to be public roads -- eg shopping centre, sporting field or college visitors' car-parks. A staff-only park at a business is regarded as private. There are numerous cases of people being booked for driving without seat-belts, or using a mobile phone while driving, in supermarket car-parks. The tractors which trawl the car-parks and nearby streets to pick up abandoned shopping trolleys have restricted registrations (allowing them to operate only within 500 metres of the car-park). They may be driven by 16-year-olds, a year too young for a driver's licence, but just old enough to operate dangerous machinery under labour laws. [[User:KoolerStill|KoolerStill]] ([[User talk:KoolerStill|talk]]) 20:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I thought this was true in the UK too - a law student told me. A supermarket's carpark is "semi-public", and if it has standard road markings, they have to be obeyed. So speeding is still illegal on carparks, and a liscence and insurance is still needed, etc. Anyone know for sure? Is it just lack of landowner consent, or are there agreements between local councils and carparks?[[User:Yobmod|<b><font color="#0000CD">Yob</font></b>]][[User talk:Yobmod|<b><font color="008000">Mod</font></b>]] 13:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
What's the purpose of [https://imgur.com/a/jkQ4i40 such blue, green, pink marks] on street grounds? I've seen them in multiple places in [[Warsaw]] (typically in non-traffic places, such as sidewalks) where they've stayed for several months or even years without being erased. From what I've read, those marks can be made for some roadworks, but I'm not sure. [[User:Brandmeister|Brandmeister]]<sup>[[User talk:Brandmeister|talk]]</sup> 20:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:: Heck, where I live, you can't drive a car until you are 16, but you are allowed to operate a 5 ton tractor at 12, without a license. You can also be booked for DUI while sitting in your car in your driveway with the keys in it (but the engine off). [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 20:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I've seen them used for several purposes, mostly for marking the course of some underground pipe or cable, but also for marking a distance such as 500m from a given spot. In the first case, there is a sequence of similar markings, not too far apart from each other. In the second case the marking is usually accompanied by a number or some code. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 20:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Wartime crossdressers == |
|||
::See [[utility location]]. --[[Special:Contributions/142.112.149.206|142.112.149.206]] ([[User talk:142.112.149.206|talk]]) 22:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:In my experience (UK) they appear in preparation for invasive ground works, most recently in our road prior to the installation of the third set of broadband cables under our pavement. Apparently, existing suppliers and their customers get sniffy if new upstart suppliers not only add their own cables, but put a shovel through the existing cables in the process! Different colours may denote gas, water and telecommunication lines. |
|||
What is a catchy title I can call my English essay about women who pretended to be men to join the army?? I know I'm supposed to think of it myself but I decided "[[Dude Looks Like A Lady]]" was in bad taste... --[[Special:Contributions/124.254.77.148|124.254.77.148]] ([[User talk:124.254.77.148|talk]]) 07:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:There is also an occasional rash of markings that outline potholes; whether this is done to guide the repairers of potholes, or as a placebo to pacify local road users, is not always clear. It is possible that the process accompanies the calculation of a cost for the work; the expenditure may not be forthcoming.{{cn}} <span class="nowrap">[[User:Verbarson|-- Verbarson ]] <sup>[[User talk:Verbarson|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Verbarson|edits]]</sub></span> 21:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks all. [[User:Brandmeister|Brandmeister]]<sup>[[User talk:Brandmeister|talk]]</sup> 11:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
= January 1 = |
|||
"Real Life [[Mulan]]s"? (As in the basic story that the film is based on is a girl pretending to be a boy to join the army). [[Special:Contributions/194.221.133.226|194.221.133.226]] ([[User talk:194.221.133.226|talk]]) 09:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Peugeot's rivalry == |
|||
:[[Dressed to Kill (1980 film)|"Dressed to Kill"]]? Maybe [[list of wartime crossdressers]] can be of assistance. ---[[User:Sluzzelin|Sluzzelin]] [[User talk:Sluzzelin|<small>talk</small>]] 09:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Did Peugeot have any rivalry with other auto manufacturer that became famous or was famous but forgotten, like Lancia and Audi in 1983 and Ford and Ferrari in the 1960s? --Donmust90-- [[User:Donmust90|Donmust90]] ([[User talk:Donmust90|talk]]) 19:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Sluzzelin's first answer is the best title by far - use that. [[Special:Contributions/194.221.133.226|194.221.133.226]] ([[User talk:194.221.133.226|talk]]) 09:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:When does competition rise to the level of rivalry? [[Peugeot]] was unexpectedly beaten in speed by [[Panhard et Levassor]] in the [[Paris–Bordeaux–Paris]] race of June 1895. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 00:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Love it, thank you! :) --[[Special:Contributions/124.254.77.148|124.254.77.148]] ([[User talk:124.254.77.148|talk]]) 10:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Peugeot, Citroën, Renault and [[Simca]] were the big four French automakers post World War II - and therefore rivals. The first two have merged, Renault is still around, but Simca has disappeared. [[User:Xuxl|Xuxl]] ([[User talk:Xuxl|talk]]) 11:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Which war? Don't forget about [[Joan of Arc]]. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 11:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::While the Simca brand, after having been acquired first by Chrysler and then PSA Peugeot Citroën, has disappeared, the factory in [[Poissy]] that Simca acquired from Ford France in 1954 is still in full operation. |
|||
:::The Lancia–Audi and Ford–Ferrari rivalries alluded to in the question were not about rivalry between companies, but rivalry between racing teams; see ''[[Race for Glory: Audi vs. Lancia]]'' and ''[[Ford v Ferrari]]''. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 16:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
= January 3 = |
|||
: One that's been done is [[Monstrous Regiment]]. --[[User:PalaceGuard008|PalaceGuard008]] ([[User_Talk:PalaceGuard008|Talk]]) 11:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== British weather website == |
|||
:[[Sweet Polly Oliver]] is a handy example, but Sluzzelin's is probably the best ;) [[Special:Contributions/80.41.18.94|80.41.18.94]] ([[User talk:80.41.18.94|talk]]) 18:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Is there any British weather website which has daily data for stations in the United Kingdom? The starlingroot.ddns.net is not working anymore, it worked a few months ago. The "Historic station data" page on MetOffice's website has only monthly data, and the MetOffice WOW - Weather Observations Website has only hourly data. And is there any English-language website having weather observations for different cities and countries in Europe, similar to e.g. Infoclimat? --[[User:40bus|40bus]] ([[User talk:40bus|talk]]) 13:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Since women wanting to be soldiers in long bygone wars had to conceal their boobs by wrapping something tight around them, how about "Bound for Glory?" [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 04:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
= January 4 = |
|||
::Or, on the same theme, 'Berlin Or Bust'? --[[User:KageTora|KageTora - (영호 (影虎))]] ([[User talk:KageTora|talk]]) 08:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Free as in FREE ringtones == |
|||
If you Google "free ringtones" you get lots of sites, but as far as I can tell, they're all bait and switch, or they want your email and other personal info so they can sell you to mailing lists and so on. Does anyone have any links for actually free ringtones in the true sense of the word? —[[Special:Contributions/173.68.38.218|173.68.38.218]] ([[User talk:173.68.38.218|talk]]) 18:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Depending on your phone model and carrier, you should be able to email mp3s to your phone. If you don't know your phone's email address, you can send an email from your phone to your personal email account. (my phones email is: mynumber@mms.att.net) Send an email to your phone with the mp3 as an attachment, save the contents to wherever ringtones are stored, and voila. This also works for pictures (phone wallpapers) and video. Again, this will depend on your phone and carrier, but everyone I've used over the past 10 years or so has had this option. [[Special:Contributions/96.227.82.128|96.227.82.128]] ([[User talk:96.227.82.128|talk]]) 18:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Although you appear to live in the US so this may be fine for you, this may not be possible in quite a number of places (it also requires your phone supports MMS obviously). Here in NZ, with Vodafone you can send MMS to email addresses, but you can't send mail in the reverse (well you may be able to subscribe to an MMS gateway). I believe this is quite common in a lot of the world, since you do not pay to receive MMS (or similar things) it makes sense that they will not want to allow you to email your phone so easily. You can of course use an email client or webbrowser but that would likely include data charges, and so it may simply be more effective/easier to download the file from somewhere with your phone. Depending on how you carrier charges for casual data, it may be a better idea to just stick with a midi presuming you don't mind how it sounds, which will be a lot smaller. Presuming your phone does not have a lot of memory, this will save space too. Alternatively a data cable may be more effective. (This may also be the only way if your phone is an older one without MP3, MMS or WAP.) Many phones support them although perhaps only in Windows, perhaps even only Windows XP x86-32 and 2k depending on the age of the phone. I don't know what the situation is like in the US, but you may find it cheaper to buy one from eBay (generic obviously) whether from the US or from HK. I'm presuming of course your phone doesn't have infrared or bluetooth support nor a removable memory card. [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 19:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I have found links (though I don't have them handy) for tutorials on creating one's own ringtone. Generally, it's a pretty simple matter to sample a song and adjust the bitrate down to whatever the phone requires (free software such as [[Audacity]] can do this). A valid file can then be transferred to the phone in various ways -- USB, memory card, MMS message, etc. It's worth noting that I am completely unaware of the legal ramifications of this -- I'd like to imagine that it's fair use (at least for songs for which I've paid), but I don't really know. — [[User talk:Lomn|Lomn]] 19:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Most modern phones (say, less than 3 years old) come with the ability to play MP3s, bluetooth and a data cable. Use the data cable or bluetooth (if your PC can use bluetooth) to get your chosen MP3 onto your phone. As far as I can tell, all those Ringtone sites (whether free or not) are a complete rip-off. If anything there is free, it is most likely poor quality and requires you to give your phone number or email address, or tie you in to some expensive subscription based service you don't want. Avoid at all costs is my best advice. [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 16:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Some new phones allow you to make a voice recording to use as a ringtone. You could have a caller's own voice set to be the ringtone for their calls. What's to stop you recording a snippet of (your or their) favourite music? [[User:KoolerStill|KoolerStill]] ([[User talk:KoolerStill|talk]]) 20:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Public debt and deficit across all levels: US vs. Canada == |
|||
How do Canada and the US compare in terms of public debt and deficit relative to GDP, if states, provinces, territories and municipalities are included? [[User:NeonMerlin|<span style="background:#000;color:red;border:#0f0 solid;border-width:1px 0">Neon</span>]][[User talk:NeonMerlin|<span style="background:#0f0;color:#000;border:red solid;border-width:1px 0">Merlin</span>]] 20:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: Most US States are not permitted to run a deficit for the fiscal year. [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 20:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Does anyone keep track of these numbers? In the U.S., the federal government typically runs a deficit. State governments, as noted, generally cannot run a deficit, so they typically contribute a surplus (since some states are positive and almost none are negative). Municipalities can and do run large deficits, financed by municipal bonds. In economic terms, it's the sum of all these that matters, but we almost never hear anything about that number. [[User:John M Baker|John M Baker]] ([[User talk:John M Baker|talk]]) 23:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Actually, most state governments can and do run deficits. "At least 46 states have looked ahead and anticipate deficits for fiscal year 2010 and beyond."[http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=711] —[[User:D Monack|D. Monack]] [[User talk:D Monack|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 03:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::: No, they are anticipating a deficit, which means they need to find a way to increase revenues or decrease spending by then. Ask California how that works. [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 13:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::California does it with debt.[http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/jtf/JTF_PublicDebtJTF.pdf] How did they accumulate over $60 billion of debt without ever running a budget deficit? —[[User:D Monack|D. Monack]] [[User talk:D Monack|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 23:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
I haven't found the numbers for all levels of government, but Canadian federal debt is about C$458.7 billion and [[United States public debt|US federal debt]] about US$11.3 trillion, given as 36.8% of GDP in 2007. So it really depends on the exchange rate, if you use today's exchange rate of 1US:1.11Cad and the [[economy of Canada|GDP of Canada]] you get a Canadian percentage of 32%, somewhat lower. Of course since the end of last year both countries look set to balloon their federal debts, the US perhaps more so. [[User:TastyCakes|TastyCakes]] ([[User talk:TastyCakes|talk]]) 19:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Also, it's probably worth noting that Canada has had federal surpluses (ie is paying down its debt) every year since the 1997. I don't know the exact numbers, but this is not the case for the US federal government. [[User:TastyCakes|TastyCakes]] ([[User talk:TastyCakes|talk]]) 19:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:If you are comparing them as percentages of GDP then exchange rates should cancel out. Each country will have both its debt and its GDP denominated in local currency. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 21:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I had to use exchange rate because I had the debt in Canadian dollars and the Canadian economy in US dollars. [[User:TastyCakes|TastyCakes]] ([[User talk:TastyCakes|talk]]) 17:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:You may find the information at [[List of countries by public debt]] useful. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 23:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
= May 28 = |
|||
==Really obvious candidates for articles that don't exist yet== |
|||
The question above about how long it would take to reach our 10 millionth and 1 billionth article got me thinking about subjects that should have articles but don't yet. |
|||
Can anyone suggest some subjects for articles that would cause a lot of people to say ''"Good Lord! How come nobody got around to writing <u>this</u> article before now?"''. I'm talking about major, significant, widely known people or events, not just footnotes to history or whatever. |
|||
The best answers will qualify for my personal '''GLHCNGATWTABN Award'''. -- [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 01:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:The article which I'm still surprised no-one has written is [[road numbering scheme]]. It's been a redlink under [[numbering scheme]] since January 2004, and we have articles on road numbering schemes in various countries, but nothing summarising the various systems. And while perhaps not "major", and certainly not exciting, it's a fairly significant, everyday thing for many people. [[User:Warofdreams|Warofdreams]] ''[[User talk:Warofdreams|talk]]'' 02:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::One are where I think that wikipedia is really lacking is in its coverage of legal issues. There are tonnes of cases/concepts that don't have an article (e.g. Gordon v. Goertz, Housen v.Nikolaisen). [[User:Eiad77|Eiad77]] ([[User talk:Eiad77|talk]]) 03:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Some candidates for '''GLHCNGATWTABN Award''': |
|||
* [[Cardiovascular system]] (currently redirects to a non-synonymous [[Circulatory system]]) |
|||
** {{find|Cardiovascular system}} |
|||
* [[Cardiovascular imaging]] or [[Cardiac imaging]] |
|||
** {{find|Cardiovascular imaging}} or {{find|Cardiac imaging}} |
|||
* <s>[[Cardiovascular MRI]] or [[Cardiac MRI]]</s> |
|||
** <s>{{find|Cardiovascular MRI}} or {{find|Cardiac MRI}}</s> |
|||
* [[Cardiovascular CT]] or [[Cardiac CT]] |
|||
** {{find|Cardiovascular CT}} or {{find|Cardiac CT}} |
|||
Obviously, not many cardiologists or radiologists are editing wikipedia... although they seem to have the time to write 100s of books and 1000s of papers on the subject. Twisted priorities. :-) [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 03:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Nice ones. I'm not at all surprised that I haven't been flooded with ideas. In years to come, there'll be thousands of articles that will be on thousands of editors' watchlists, that don't exist yet. They may be on various people's To Do lists, but in most cases they're probably not. This question is like asking about the fantastic ideas that you're going have in the future but haven't thought of yet. If you could think of them in order to answer the question, you'd probably have thought of them already (which I appreciate is a logical absurdity). Anyway, I hope it's prodded some thinking processes. -- [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 21:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Please take a look at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles]], which has a bunch of subprojects. If you think we need an additional subproject for '''GLHCNGATWTABN''', please suggest it there. We could use your help. I work on the Project Gutenberg authora subproject and on the DNB subproject, and occasinally on others. -[[User:Arch dude|Arch dude]] ([[User talk:Arch dude|talk]]) 01:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: There are plenty of resources to assist this search: [[Wikipedia:Most wanted articles]], [[Wikipedia:Most missed articles]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles requested for more than a year]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles]]. What never fails to amaze me is how few [[academic journals]] have articles (see [[Wikipedia:List of missing journals/A-C]] for just a sample). For example of we are missing [[Developmental Biology (journal)]] and [[Developmental Cell]], both among the top journals in their field by [[impact factor]]. [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 01:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
A list of the many surveillance, centralisated record keeping, and other anti-privacy government measures that have been piling up in the past few years in the UK, the fourth or fifth most monitored country in the world. I'm not sure what the title would be. This really ought to be made easily available to the public, so that people can see how things are insidiously getting worse. [[Special:Contributions/89.240.40.4|89.240.40.4]] ([[User talk:89.240.40.4|talk]]) 09:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Hmm. You'd have to word that article in such a way that didn't make it appear we have an axe to grind. -- [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 22:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== 80s movie concerining the African Bushmen == |
|||
I'm trying to think of this movie I watched a couple of months ago. It was like, the Gods were Fools, or something like that. It dealt with an African bushman trying to get rid of a Coke bottle he thought the gods sent them and then a story of some South African (?) schoolteacher. Anyway, it's a rather poorly produced movie but I'm trying to think of the title. Any help? [[Special:Contributions/75.169.197.132|75.169.197.132]] ([[User talk:75.169.197.132|talk]]) 04:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:[[The Gods Must Be Crazy]] sounds like the one you're looking for. [[User:AlexiusHoratius|<span style="font-size:14px;font-family:times new roman;color:navy;">'''Alexius'''</span>]][[User talk:AlexiusHoratius|<span style="font-size:14px;font-family:times new roman;color:darkred;">'''Horatius''']]</span> 04:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes! Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/75.169.208.114|75.169.208.114]] ([[User talk:75.169.208.114|talk]]) 05:00, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::The bit with the land rover is hilarious. It's a great movie. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 05:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::I for one liked the helicopter scene. --[[User:Blue387|Blue387]] ([[User talk:Blue387|talk]]) 21:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::: I love that movie too, in some ways [[Nǃxau]]'s real life was even more surreal than his movie role, as a consequence of being in it. [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 00:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Worldwide population of Stuffed Animals ? == |
|||
In my house the ratio of stuffed animals to humans is at least 20 to 1. Furthermore, stuffed animals generally do not die like humans; most of the stuffed animals ever made still exist. I expect the total to be in the billions if not tens of billions. Any more accurate estimates out there? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.36.216.34|75.36.216.34]] ([[User talk:75.36.216.34|talk]]) 04:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I can see two problems with your thesis: |
|||
:# Not everyone in the world can afford stuffed animals - you might find some large ratio of stuffed animals to humans in (say) North America - but would you find anything like that number in the more populous countries like India and China? I suspect not. |
|||
:# You haven't met my dog have you? If you think stuffed animals are immortal - just put them up against a real animal! Sarah can eviscerate a teddy bear in about 2 minutes flat. Not a pretty sight! |
|||
:[[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 05:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Not an ad but [[Vermont Teddy Bear]]s are guaranteed so that if your dog chews it up, they'll fix or replace it. Free. <span style="font-family:monospace;">[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</span>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 02:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Actually due to the Japanese [[kawaii]]-culture influence the ratio might be higher than you'd think in China (and other East Asian countries), perhaps even higher than what you'd find in North America. --[[User: Antilived|antilived]]<sup>[[User_talk:Antilived|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Antilived|C]] | [[User:Antilived/Gallery|G]]</sup> 08:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Do you mean stuffed as in once-was-alive-but-now-stuffed ([[Taxidermy]]?) or stuffed as in 'cuddly toy'? I can imagine that there probably exists more cuddly-toys in the world than people, but no way will there be more stuffed-animals (Taxidermy) as it's expensive, not exactly the most popular ornament and, well, i just can't imagine it's true. Cuddly toys, however, will be being produced by the millions every year - that grey one that every girl in the entire world loves (you know the one that looks like it's been beaten up) probably out-numbers humans on its own! At least it feels that way whenever I go to a card shop [[Special:Contributions/194.221.133.226|194.221.133.226]] ([[User talk:194.221.133.226|talk]]) 07:33, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:What grey one? [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 15:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I think 194.221.133.226 is talking about [[Me_to_You_Bears]].[[User:Last Polar Bear|Last Polar Bear]] ([[User talk:Last Polar Bear|talk]]) 16:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Indeed, I have over 100, most of whom are around 30 or older, and the ones I kept are in pretty decent shape. While most people don't keep all of their as adults, nor collect so many (I had about 170), it does seem that children in the United States, at least where I'm from, really enjoy them. I'd say the ratio of stuffed animals to people in the U.S. is about 1:1.[[User:DTF955|Somebody or his brother]] ([[User talk:DTF955|talk]]) 23:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I don't know about that. [http://divingbirder.com/kalostrader/BarneyVsBear_files/a.htm There are those who are working to improve the ratio.] [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] ([[User talk:Tempshill|talk]]) 06:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== A question about ePSXe... == |
|||
I downloaded the Playstation emulator, ePSXe. I was about to get the utility BIOS for the emulator when I saw that I coan downloaded it if I have the legal right to do so, that is, if I owned a Playstation, then I can download the BIOS. I do own a Playstation, but it's in ny house somewhere and it's not working. So, would owning a Playstation that does not work still count in the legal right to download the utility BIOS? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sirdrink13309622|Sirdrink13309622]] ([[User talk:Sirdrink13309622|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sirdrink13309622|contribs]]) 10:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: The real question is "It is Ever OK to download the BIOS?". This is very disputed. It depends on a lot of nuance of copyright law. The answer is probably "no.", especially in the USA, but you'd need a high priced lawyer to hash out the details. |
|||
: If this worries you, then you really should not download it. |
|||
: However, I don't remember which one, but isn't there a PS emulator that doesn't need a separate bios download? (I may be imagining that. I haven't needed a PS emulator since I bought a PS2 years ago.) [[User:APL|APL]] ([[User talk:APL|talk]]) 13:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:It is a tricky question - and we're straying into the realms of offering legal advice - which the Ref.Desks are not allowed to do. However, in broad terms - and in the USA: If you buy (for example) a music CD - you have the right to make a copy of it (eg to listen to on an MP3 player). If the CD gets scratched or broken - that's OK, your copy is still legit. If you sell the CD (or perhaps if you toss it into the trash), you're required to erase all of the copies you ever made because you no longer own the original CD. Even if you have the original CD, you can't sell your copies and you can't even give them away for free to your friends - and you certainly can't put your copies up on your website for other people to download. |
|||
: That much seems well established in US law. But: |
|||
:* It's not clear that the rights to the software in a BIOS ROM are conveyed in the same way as the music on a CD. Certainly the license terms for (say) a copy of Windows do not permit you to make copies for running on other computers in your house - although you may make a copy for backup purposes. So you might be allowed to make a backup copy of your BIOS ROM - but not run that software on your PC. However, you didn't sign a 'EULA' when you turned on your Playstation - so you didn't agree to any special licensing terms. |
|||
:* Even if it's legal to copy your own BIOS ROM for use on your PC, it's not clear that downloading a copy from someone else is legal...even though the data might be utterly identical - the fact that you didn't copy it from your original ROM might make that illegal. That was the issue with the original Napster lawsuit. Napster claimed that only people who'd bought the music on CD were allowed to download it...but the courts didn't buy that argument. |
|||
:* I don't think it matters whether your Playstation still works or not...that's not the issue. |
|||
: So it seems likely that the people who are offering to let you download the BIOS ROM are breaking the law. It's not clear whether you'd be breaking the law by downloading it from them. The fact that this is a tricky matter underscores why we're not allowed to tell you "It's OK" or "It's not OK". If this is important to you - you should take advice from a qualified lawyer. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 14:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Walking from London to Edinburgh== |
|||
Can anybody please tell me if it is actually possibly for an able bodied person (with only an average level of fitness and physically dexterity, and without any specialised training), to walk from London to Edinburgh, without having to use any other means of transport and without trespassing or otherwise breaking the law? If it is possible, are there any resources to assist with planning a route efficiently? Just in case there are any other Londons and Edinburghs on the same land mass, I am talking about London (England) to Edinburgh (Scotland)! :) Any help would be very appreciated. Thanks [[User:Chuny Beetroot|Chuny Beetroot]] ([[User talk:Chuny Beetroot|talk]]) 10:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes it is possible, [[Janet Street-Porter]] even managed it in 1998 by walking in [http://www.amazon.co.uk/As-Crow-Flies-Edinburgh-Straight/dp/1900512718 a straight line] but walking 350 miles or more isn't anything to be taken lightly. [[Ramblers]] may be able to help you with routes but nothing beats the OS maps (you can even get [http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/getamap/ small scale ones online] now too) and other websites have other information such as [http://www.withnature.co.uk/lifestyle/walking/britain_footpaths_map.php the national footpath map] ([[Long-distance footpaths in the United Kingdom|our article]]) and even [http://www.walkandstay.com/england.htm accommodation near to popular walking routes]. All I can really recommend is lots and lots and lots and lots of planning. [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]] ([[User talk:Nanonic|talk]]) 11:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::That map only refers to some long distance footpaths. In my area, at least, there are several named footpaths that are not mentioned on that map. And there is a dense network of interconnected footpaths all over the countryside, something which no other country seems to have and thus a national treasure. [[Special:Contributions/78.146.211.210|78.146.211.210]] ([[User talk:78.146.211.210|talk]]) 21:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks Nanonic. That is incredibly helpful, especially the footpath map. As you say, this needs a huge amount of planning, but I am hoping that somebody can give me a headstart (which you have certainly helped with!). Am I being too simplistic in thinking that a good route might be one planned around the major footpaths (for example, on the footpath map you linked to, planning around the following route 30 -> 22 -> 19 -> 8 -> 15 - using numbers for clarity). Obviously it would be longer than a more direct route (a very rough estimate on Google Earth seems to be 400-450 miles), but it would seem that I have a much better chance of not getting stuck somewhere and/or misreading the terrain, because those paths are a better known quantity? Thanks again [[User:Chuny Beetroot|Chuny Beetroot]] ([[User talk:Chuny Beetroot|talk]]) 11:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::That makes sense. You also probably want to try and walk along pleasant roots. You could probably do it pretty quickly by walking straight along the route of the M1, but it wouldn't be very enjoyable (I don't think you are allowed to walk directly along the edge of a motorway, but you could follow it at a slight distance). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 12:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::<small>I'll leaf it to the other editors to make jokes about your pleasant "roots". :) [[User:Matt Deres|Matt Deres]] ([[User talk:Matt Deres|talk]]) 13:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC) </small> |
|||
:::::<small>Have you got enough roots to get water to those leaves? ;) --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 14:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:::::<small>Depending on whom you meet along the way, you might have some pleasant [[Sexual intercourse|roots]] to tell your friends about. :) -- [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 21:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC) </small> |
|||
::::::Doing a walk (trek?) of that distance seems like something that would best be attempted with company in my opinion, would make a decent camping holiday for you and a friend maybe. Also, at the end will you walk back or fly or something? [[User:Prokhorovka|Prokhorovka]] ([[User talk:Prokhorovka|talk]]) 20:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::I think you are right, it would make a lot of sense to go with somebody else, although I have had no luck recruiting anybody, especially as I plan to maybe do this in the next few weeks so it is short notice. If I go on my own, I am hoping that planning, overdoing the safety, navigation and communication equipment and making sure that I do not go over terrain that is overly risky, should keep me safe. As for getting back, I was thinking that I would get the train back to London. [[User:Chuny Beetroot|Chuny Beetroot]] ([[User talk:Chuny Beetroot|talk]]) 08:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Every year there are brave souls who walk from [[Land's End]] to [[John O'Groats]]. It can all be done along long-distance footpaths (or bridleways, etc.), or across open land where there is no legal need to keep to the path, and anyway there probably isn't a path per se (see [[Right to Roam]]). Planning is key, as stated. I recommend you join the [[Ramblers]], for £25 or whatever, and they will be delighted to help you plan your route, complete with B&Bs or [[youth hostel]]s or campsites. [[User:BrainyBabe|BrainyBabe]] ([[User talk:BrainyBabe|talk]]) 22:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks, I had a look at the Ramblers website last night and will definitely join them. Thanks for the advice. [[User:Chuny Beetroot|Chuny Beetroot]] ([[User talk:Chuny Beetroot|talk]]) 08:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::More specifically, we have an article titled [[Land's End to John o' Groats]], and it actually has routes. The "London to Edinburgh" route would likely take up most of the middle third of the LE-JOG route... --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 00:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thanks, I will study this in detail. Having read the article, I am now wondering what is a realistic pace. I am 30, and probably of "average" fitness, but certainly this walk would be far more exercise than I normally do (although I am planning to spend a few weeks doing longer and longer walks within London, to see if I am up to it). Thanks again [[User:Chuny Beetroot|Chuny Beetroot]] ([[User talk:Chuny Beetroot|talk]]) 08:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::It is possible to walk 30 miles or more in a day, but I doubt that you could sustain a pace of more than about 20 miles a day. That would still be an athletic challenge, in my opinion. If you want the walk to be an enjoyable experience, I would aim to walk no more than 16 miles a day. Personally, I'd want to average no more than 12 miles. That would let you walk 16–20 miles when the weather is good and the terrain is not too tough but fewer when the weather or terrain are challenging. If I were you, I would also plan to take a day for rest and relaxation once every week or ten days. [[User:Marco polo|Marco polo]] ([[User talk:Marco polo|talk]]) 15:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::And plan in extra time for contingencies, eg. injuries (or blisters!) that keep you from walking for a day or two, extremely bad weather that means you lose a day, etc. Nothing ever goes to plan. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 21:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::You want to get some experience of walking along muddy footpaths - so different from walking alonmg the pavement. I suggest having a weekend in the countryside, perhaps try camping overnight too. Its very important to get the right footwear. When I've done trips like this, the main problem has always been getting drinking water. [[Special:Contributions/78.146.211.210|78.146.211.210]] ([[User talk:78.146.211.210|talk]]) 21:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::So I think the message is, take a sabbatical. [[User:Prokhorovka|Prokhorovka]] ([[User talk:Prokhorovka|talk]]) 22:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Thanks for all the above advice. To be honest, I had been hoping that I could maybe do 30 miles a day and wanted to be away for no more than two weeks (which would just about fit with an estimated 450 miles using the main footpaths). From what is being said here, that now seems unrealistic, although could maybe be almost workable with a far more direct line route and a pace of 20 miles per day. Having said that, I don't mind if I fall short of Edinburgh. I do have concerns that I would fall foul of blisters or chaffing (without being too graphic, I do tend to get chaffing on my thighs when walking more than a few miles at a decent pace in warm weather) that would slow be down considerably. I think that a mini-trek is in order, to iron these things out and to also iron out any issues with the camping. The idea of heading off down the Thames Path for a couple of days (starting around Westminster and heading west) seems like it could be a good idea. I also had an idea that I could take all of the food I would need with me from the start, but obviously carrying the necessary amount of water would be impossible. As 78.146... mentions, getting fresh water can be a problem, so I am now wondering how I would go about that. Thanks again for all your help, and any further advice would be very appreciated. Thanks [[User:Chuny Beetroot|Chuny Beetroot]] ([[User talk:Chuny Beetroot|talk]]) 16:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::Water can be obtained by buying large bottles of mineral water in supermarkets or shops, taps sometimes found in churchyards, public toilets, filling up when you depart from the B&B. You can buy sterilization tables for water from streams, but due to the carcinogenic agricultural fertilizers dissolved in them, it may still not be advisable to drink it. The worst thing about camping is not being able to shower or wash your hair. [[Special:Contributions/89.240.58.231|89.240.58.231]] ([[User talk:89.240.58.231|talk]]) 20:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::This is why planning - with detailed maps - is so important. Clearly you aren't going to be able to carry food and water AND camping gear on 30 mile hikes, day after day for weeks. It's just not realistic unless you've been doing this kind of thing for years and are very sure of your capabilities. Failing that, you need to travel light and pre-plan where you'll be able to stop for food, water (and ointment!)...you need to map out where the little villages are along your route - realise that shops may be shut on Sundays or if you arrive unexpectedly late. You need a day by day plan for the entire route - with rest days built into the schedule and to know where the 'hard' days will be (eg when the terrain is rought) and where the easier stretches are. I think it would be unwise to aim for more than 20 miles per day or more than 5 days hiking per week. I think you shouldn't even consider being more than 1 day away from someplace where you can buy food and water...so you only have to carry at most 2 days of supplies. You should also be sure to take a cellphone and a spare, charged battery that you keep in reserve for emergencies - and plan to spend at least your 'rest days' in some kind of proper accomodation so you can fully recover before the next few days of activity. I agree that you should try a few practice hikes of four to five day duration to be sure your body will hold out without shredding itself(!). [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 17:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::If you have problems with chaffing, then wear some very loose trousers. Tight jeans are uncomfortable to walk in. The advice I had was to buy some boots a size bigger than your normal size. I prefer leather boots that rise up over the ankle, that can be secured around the ankle and leave your feet fairly loose inside. The modern trainer-type boots might fall off if you tried that. If you are buying new boots, then work up to wearing them all the time to get fully comfortable in them before you go hiking. With a rucksac to carry, and no previous experience, I would plan on doing only 10 miles a day. Try to keep the weight down as much as possible - the worst part can be the pain from sore shoulders. The rucksac will feel heavier and heavier and more and more uncomfortable as time goes on. It may be worth not having a rucksac and just staying at B&Bs and Youth Hostels, 10 or 12 miles apart. You could walk along the coast for example, where places to stay and drinking water is easier to find. But I'd definately recommend a trial run(s) at least one weekend. [[Special:Contributions/89.240.58.231|89.240.58.231]] ([[User talk:89.240.58.231|talk]]) 19:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== How many are there television stations in the world == |
|||
A dumb pondering had befallen us today: How many television channels could there be in the world? My ballpark figure and first guess would be something close to 20000, including different channels of the same provider (like BBC 1, BBC 2 or BBC Sport, or BBC Poland if there are such things - consider these an example, I just read the news on BBC Online) and regional channels, but not covering direct translations (i. e. should BBC be aired in Poland just with a voiceover). Anyone have too much free time - feel free to ponder. Cheers, [[User:Ouro|Ouro]] <small>([[User_talk:Ouro|blah blah]])</small> 13:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Are there any cases of a channel being broadcast in another country just with everything dubbed? Dubbing is a time consuming process and you wouldn't use real-time translation for pre-recorded broadcasts. When content is dubbed it is usually selected and broadcast separately (and much later) than the channel it was originally on. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 15:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::: I seem to remember seeing [[CNN]] being broadcast, dubbed, in Japan. But not certain. --[[User:PalaceGuard008|PalaceGuard008]] ([[User_Talk:PalaceGuard008|Talk]]) 00:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:The [http://www.wrth.com/ World Radio TV Handbook] (a real book on paper) would be a good place to start counting.--[[Special:Contributions/81.136.174.160|81.136.174.160]] ([[User talk:81.136.174.160|talk]]) 16:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: One complicating factor to find your answer is the difference between the e.g. European idea of a tv channel, e.g. [[BBC2]], [[ZDF]] as one channel broadcast from many locations (with local content at times, still considered BBC2), and the Network model used in e.g. the US and Australia, where say [[NBC]] is a ''network'', broadcast by a number of ''channels'' throughout the country: [[KING-TV]],[[KALB-TV]] and the other 200 or so in Category:NBC_network_affiliates. /[[User:Coffeeshivers|Coffeeshivers]] ([[User talk:Coffeeshivers|talk]]) 21:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::And one more thing to consider: there are schools that have their own local school/student TV station. When I watched German TV there used to be quite a few channels that broadcast dubbed programs; almost exclusively except for the news. Voiceovers are used for some interviews. They buy their series and movie rights from various sources. Don't forget armed forces TV and radio like AFN and BFBS. [[Special:Contributions/71.236.24.129|71.236.24.129]] ([[User talk:71.236.24.129|talk]]) 01:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks, guys. These are points to consider. I get the feeling nobody's gonna want to venture a guess? --[[User:Ouro|Ouro]] <small>([[User_talk:Ouro|blah blah]])</small> 06:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::I'd guess 3356. If you want an estimate, however, that's a different story... [[User:Aaadddaaammm|Aaadddaaammm]] ([[User talk:Aaadddaaammm|talk]]) 21:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== airplane pilots == |
|||
In the US, the pilot generally sits in the left seat, same as the driver on American cars, with the backup pilot on the right (for larger planes). Is this the configuration also used for countries with their cars having a right side driver such as the UK, or is it reversed? [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 13:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:That´s why - travelling from Paris to London - you have to switch planes in the middle of [[English Channel|the Channel]], hopping from wingtip to wingtip :) --[[User:Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM|Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM]] ([[User talk:Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM|talk]]) 14:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:No - that's a worldwide standard...except for helicopters, which are reversed. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 14:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: I noticed that helicopter thing in the new terminator movie. [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 14:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::The movie was so bad you were noticing details such as helicopter pilot positions? I'll steer clear of it then. [[User:Prokhorovka|Prokhorovka]] ([[User talk:Prokhorovka|talk]]) 20:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Oh, come on, the Terminator movies are set in the future in a time of chaos. Things can change. [[User:Who then was a gentleman?|Who then was a gentleman?]] ([[User talk:Who then was a gentleman?|talk]]) 20:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::: I actually thought it was entertaining. I am just a detail oriented person, and like finding fault with the science in movies. [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 20:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Kancamagus Highway == |
|||
I have been unable to find any explanation as to why the Kancamagus Highway in New Hampshire is said to extend from Conway to Lincoln, when Route 112 ends in Bath. Is this just the result of someone's marketing effort, or is there some reason why they chose not to include the rest of the road? Route 112 is just as scenic the rest of the way past Lost River, over Kinsman Notch, then down the other side along the Wild Ammonoosuc River. [[User:Nlusby|Nlusby]] ([[User talk:Nlusby|talk]]) 15:47, 28 May 2009 |
|||
:Certainly on my map, the western section of route 112 is identified as "Lost River Rd", while only the eastern section of 112 is identified as the "Kancamagus Highway". You should remember that the road naming process is different from the road numbering process - the names are often traditional and the numbers are often added later for the convenience of ... (who? state/county/mapmakers/?) when the road is upgraded from dirt track to a properly maintained highway. IIRC (though it was a few years ago), nothing on the big sign in Conway suggests the Kancamagus Highway extends beyond Lincoln. If it is simply marketing, it worked on me when I drove from Conway to Lincoln in blizzard, rather than take the safe way back to Boston! [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 16:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::As a New Hampshire native, who has driven the Kancamangus many times, I can confirm that it does end at Rte 3. in Lincoln, and Rte. 112 continues on to Bath. Yes, Rte 112 is quite pretty on the west side of Lincoln. But it's just not called the Kancamangus Highway. The Kancamangus opened in 1959, and was specifically built as a single road. The other portion of 112 may be quite older, and may predate the Kancamangus by some time. See [[Kancamagus Highway]] and [[New Hampshire Route 112]]. Having the same route number traverse different road names is very common, and not just in New Hampshire... --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 17:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Book Title == |
|||
{{resolved}} |
|||
I recall reading a book probably 15 years or so, it is a very well known book possibly a modern classic, set around World War 2, Burma if I am not mistaken, I think it follows a girl, I recall a solicitors maybe the reading of a will, I think maybe the will is read out and it contains the story about the girl in Burma and escaping or capture (not sure) from Japanese soldiers, any ideas thanks. <strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span></sup>]] 17:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:[[A Town Like Alice]]? [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]] ([[User talk:Nanonic|talk]]) 18:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: Thats the one thanks I was really starting to annoy me that I couldn't recall the title. <strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span></sup>]] 18:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== short selling and hurting == |
|||
If I make $1000 profit in short selling a company's shares, does this mean, I made that company loose $1000. --[[User:V4vijayakumar|V4vijayakumar]] ([[User talk:V4vijayakumar|talk]]) 17:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:No, the company has been valued by the market as being less than what it was. You have made the $1000 off of someone that thought the opposite was going to happen. [[User:TastyCakes|TastyCakes]] ([[User talk:TastyCakes|talk]]) 17:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:The vast majority of share trading happen on the "secondary market". That means the company has already sold the shares and now it is other people buying and selling those same shares to each other. The company has nothing to do with it. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 17:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Indeed, unless the company itself bought the shares from you and then sold them back. The ''only'' time a company makes or loses money in the stock market is when it buys or sells shares of itself; such as at a [[Share repurchase]] or at an [[Initial public offering]], and these sorts of things do not happen very often. Otherwise, the company itself makes or loses no money on its own shares. Under normal operations, the only people who make or lose money on a company's stock are the people who are buying and selling the stocks. Now, what can happen is if the company performs poorly, and starts losing money, the people who own the stock can fire the [[board of directors]]. Thus, the people running the company have the motive to maintain a high stock value for its [[shareholder]]s, since their job depends on it; but the company itself does not make or lose money based on stock value. --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 17:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:The above answers are correct. See [[Short (finance)]] for a more precise explanation of what exactly occurs when you short a stock. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] ([[User talk:Tempshill|talk]]) 18:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: Further to Tango's answer, see [[primary market]] and [[secondary market]]. --[[User:PalaceGuard008|PalaceGuard008]] ([[User_Talk:PalaceGuard008|Talk]]) 01:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[National Spelling Bee]] == |
|||
Has this event ever been won by a student not in eighth grade? One of the rules is that if you win this event you are no longer eligible to compete. It would be cool to be in eighth grade and not be able to enter your school spelling bee because you are the defending national champion. Also, has a contestant ever missed their championship word and ended up losing? |
|||
*Are we talking a US national spelling bee? - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 09:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Presumably the bee linked in the section header, which is held in the United States, but which (according to the article) is now international in scope. -- [[User:Coneslayer|Coneslayer]] ([[User talk:Coneslayer|talk]]) 11:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== pits of gold == |
|||
I recall watching a TV program that mentioned that the Aztecs or Mayas or some old culture that would throw gold artifacts into some very deep pits that had water in them. I would imagine that these are protected sites. What are they called, and where are they? Is there a specific museum that holds artifacts from these pits? [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 20:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Are you thinking of something like the [[Sacred Cenote]], the [[pre-Columbian]] [[Maya]] archaeological site of [[Chichen Itza]], in the northern [[Yucatán Peninsula]] in [[Mexico]]? [[User:BrainyBabe|BrainyBabe]] ([[User talk:BrainyBabe|talk]]) 22:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: That sounds like the legend of [[el Dorado]]? --[[User:PalaceGuard008|PalaceGuard008]] ([[User_Talk:PalaceGuard008|Talk]]) 01:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:See also [[Cenote#Cenotes and the Maya]]. [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 02:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
These Cenote things sound about right. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 13:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== How do you download "Whip it good" by Devo as a ring tone == |
|||
I live in South Africa and am unable to find a site to download the song "whip it good" by Devo as a mobile ringtone. I am prepared to pay for the download. Usually You can sms a reference code to a short mobile number at specified sms rate and recieve the ring tone. |
|||
Please advise[[Special:Contributions/41.240.134.34|41.240.134.34]] ([[User talk:41.240.134.34|talk]]) 22:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:If you use the right title it may help. The song is called [[Whip It]] and a google search titled [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Whip+it+devo+ringtone&aq=f&oq=&aqi= Whip It Devo Ringtone] yielded dozens of free options. Crack that whip! --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 00:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Or if you have [[Freedom of Choice|the album]] on CD, you could rip that track using you favourite MP3 ripper (or download it from an online store), then copy it to your phone using one of the methods [[#Free as in FREE ringtones|suggested above]]. [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 17:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== 241 South Tollway extension? == |
|||
Is 241 South Tollway likely to be complete someday. From sources found only say EPA is so upset about the 241 South, because it destroys most precious lands in orange-San Diego County Line. From 2008 votes like on [[California State Route 241]] article said 8-2 votes say to STOP 241 extension. But the magazine I got mail home say by 2025, the 5 San Diego Fwy will totally SUCK without 241 extension, and Antonio Pkwy will become a parking lot, with deficient traffic (meaning waiting for 5 green lights to even move), that's even worse. So finally, will we ever extend the 241 Tollway sometime in our life? This will not bother me though will upset many of the folks out, I still support this extension.--[[Special:Contributions/69.229.240.187|69.229.240.187]] ([[User talk:69.229.240.187|talk]]) 23:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I think you answered your own question; if the EPA has removed their approval the the road is likely dead. For the record, it would not be the first needed bypass route to be stopped in this way (it may not be a bad thing, sometimes the net good of a new road is outweighed by the net bad of the damage it does to an area). See [[Circumferential Highway (Nashua)]] for another road with similar problems. It has been in the planning stages for over 50 years. --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 00:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::But those is a different story. Numerous of route extensions in orange county have be planne extension for over 40 years when trying to extend (118, 91, 605, 57, 47 and many naive ones) and one major issue is [[Interstate 710]] building from Alhambra all the way to I-210 in Pasadena. Those are far unlikely than 241 extension, however 241, 261, 133, 73 is much younger, and hasn't last >14 years. --[[Special:Contributions/69.229.240.187|69.229.240.187]] ([[User talk:69.229.240.187|talk]]) 03:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:By the way, there is an argument that adding lanes to [[freeway]]s does not help with traffic in the long term. When you expand your 8-lane freeway to 12 lanes, after the 2 years of construction are done, traffic congestion is improved along the stretch that has been widened (until you reach the end when everyone crams back into fewer lanes, but that's another story). But this is temporary because many people who are considering moving to the area will choose where to move, in part, based on their commute time. With lowered traffic congestion and shorter commutes, it can be expected that demand will rise for housing in the area; apartment buildings will replace some single-family residences, the population will rise, until you're back to traffic being congested again. This is all via indirect reward systems so it's easy to disagree with me — I don't see a Wikipedia article on this hypothesis, and our [[Transportation planning]] article is surprisingly almost a stub. [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] ([[User talk:Tempshill|talk]]) 06:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::The feeling here in the UK, is that widening/extending/building a motorway tends to attract more even traffic and soon the road is once again stuffed beyond capacity with slow moving vehicles. This concern, coupled with [[Green politics|green protests]] and rampant [[NIMBY|nimbyism]] has brought a halt to major road building in the UK (and even if a project does get through all that, it is mired in many years of planning inquiries). [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 17:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*With [http://www.ftcsouth.com/home/faqs.asp#b6 this site] said 241 South extension should start construction by 2011, and they even be in bold if nothing is done, then traffic jam on I5 in south orange county will skyrocket by 60%. I don't know when is this site update.--[[Special:Contributions/69.229.240.187|69.229.240.187]] ([[User talk:69.229.240.187|talk]]) 02:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
= May 29 = |
|||
== Diana Buttu Email Address == |
|||
Anyone know where I can find Diana Buttu's email address? For those who are wondering she is a Palestinian-Canadian who was (is?) the PLO spokeswoman and legal advisor. [[User:Eiad77|Eiad77]] ([[User talk:Eiad77|talk]]) 00:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:To interview Diana Buttu contact the IMEU at 714-368-0300 or info@imeu.net . From [http://imeu.net/news/article005754.shtml IMEU]. Hope that helps. [[User:Bioskope|Bioskope]] ([[User talk:Bioskope|talk]]) 04:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Hills in Ireland == |
|||
Are most of the hills in Ireland man made? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.146.124.35|99.146.124.35]] ([[User talk:99.146.124.35|talk]]) 02:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:[[List of mountains in Ireland]] would indicate not. [[Carrauntoohil]], the highest peak on both the island and in the Republic of Ireland, is entirely natural. --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 02:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:We have virtually no man made hills here. In fact, none that I can think of. I'd be interested to know where you heard the suggestion? [[User:Fribbler|Fribbler]] ([[User talk:Fribbler|talk]]) 13:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:AFAIK, all [[Hill (surname)|Hills]], Irish or otherwise, are "man-made". [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 03:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== architect == |
|||
hi, i'm the one who posted the "architect and anthropologist" question and i'm the one who wants to be an architect. my friend, after reading your responses decided he would take up science. he sends his thanks. u asked me which grade i'm studying in. well, i'm currently in 11th grade and studying science. thanx for the help u have already given me and i would appreciate some more. also, it would be great if you tell me what specific subjects should an architect be well-versed in, like, for example, whether it's physics, chemistry, mathematics...... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/122.50.129.159|122.50.129.159]] ([[User talk:122.50.129.159|talk]]) 02:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I would think that physics and mathematics would be the most useful to an architect. An anthropologist would probably benefit more from some biology and mathematics. However, I always advise people who are picking college course to pick the ones they have the most interest in - a good grade in a less-relevant subject is generally worth more to future employers than a poor grade in a more-relevant subject. You'll probably only have one shot at college - and it's very important for the time to be be a happy one for you. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 02:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
As Steve notes, typically you will be required to have studied mathematics and physics at the 10+2 level in order to be eligible to gain admission into the 5 year [[Bachelor of Architecture|B. Arch]] programs in India. In addition the schools will also evaluate you for your drawing and [[engineering drawing]] skills. You should read up the information at the following websites ''carefully'' for specific information and requirements: |
|||
* [http://aieee.nic.in/welcome.html All India Engineering Entrance Exam] |
|||
* [http://www.nata.in/cms/default.aspx National Aptitude Test in Architecture] |
|||
* [http://jee.iitd.ac.in IIT JEE] for admission into B Arch programs at [[IIT Kharagpur]] and [[IIT Roorkee]]. In particular take a look at the [http://jee.iitd.ac.in/aptitude.htm Aptitute test] information for the type of skills most architecture programs will look for. |
|||
* The ''Directorate of Technical Education'' website for your state. (Just google for it.) |
|||
Also check the websites of some of the premier architecture programs to orient yourself better with what studying to be an architect will actually involve: |
|||
* [http://www.spa.ernet.in/ School of Planning and Architecture (SPA), New Delhi] |
|||
* [http://www.sirjjarchitecture.org/ Sir J.J College of Architecture, Mumbai] |
|||
* [http://www.cept.ac.in/ Centre for Environmental Planning and Technology (CEPT), Ahmedabad] |
|||
* [http://www.annauniv.edu/sap/ School of Architecture and Planning (SAP), Chennai] |
|||
* Any other institutions you are particularly interested in. |
|||
Finally and perhaps most importantly, try to get in touch with current students and/or qualified architects ''in real life'', since they will be able to provide you with specific guidance tailored to your particular education, aptitude and circumstances. All the best. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 03:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Firstly, let me say that I agree wholeheartedly with Abecedare - check the required qualifications and speak to current student and architects. But I also agree with Steve's suggestion that, once you have ensured that you are studying the required subjects, it is wise to consider where your interests and aptitudes lie. Having studied architecture, I agree that mathematics is extremely useful - even if you find a course for which it is not a prerequisite, knowledge of mathematics will be essential for the degree. Physics is useful, but less so - only the materials aspect of the subject, and to a small extent studies of light and sound, really come in to it. Some institutions (at least in the UK) want an art portfolio or qualification, and this is also very useful. Finally, humanities subjects can also be useful - history will give useful background for your study of [[architectural history]], and psychology is useful for considering issues around [[environmental psychology]]. [[User:Warofdreams|Warofdreams]] ''[[User talk:Warofdreams|talk]]'' 13:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:It's best to prepare yourself well with mathematics - a good knowledge of calculus will form the basis for structural design courses. However, the emphasis in architecture school is on ''design'', and any art courses you can take that will increase your facility with hand drawing and computer-aided drawing will be helpful. Architecture schools tend to assume that you can already draw, both technically and artistically, when you arrive. You can expect to spend more than half your time in design studio, and any skills that you can bring to make yourself more productive, or less preoccupied with making up ground in presentation skills, will be of benefit. Likewise, whatever you can do to prepare for the technical subjects, such as having a good grounding in math, will allow you to focus on the design portion of the program. A by-product of art courses will be a portfolio showcasing your design abilities. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 20:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Also, it's a good idea to see if an architect will let you help around the office. These are lots of semi-skilled tasks, and you can pick up some skills along the way. It can be a good way to see what really happens in an architectural practice. My firm generally has high school interns around; some are now architects themselves, and some decided that architecture wasn't for them, saving them wasted time finding that out through other means. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 20:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== King Kong sized Anime == |
|||
Anyone know how [http://pictureisunrelated.com/2009/05/28/take-the-l-train-to-loli-land/ this King Kong sized anime character] was made? Is it inflatable? Is it an ad? <span style="font-family:monospace;">[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</span>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 10:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Probably just photoshopped. --[[Special:Contributions/98.217.14.211|98.217.14.211]] ([[User talk:98.217.14.211|talk]]) 11:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Here are some [http://i.gizmodo.com/photogallery/whyjapanwhy/1007549480 other] [http://i.gizmodo.com/photogallery/whyjapanwhy/1007549485 images]. They also look fake to me, and the fact that there's no news about it supports the 'shop theory. --[[User:TotoBaggins|Sean]] 14:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: Looks like some small figurines photoshoped into a picture of the city. [[User:APL|APL]] ([[User talk:APL|talk]]) 16:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::The photoshop theory is also supported by the fact that ''for gods' sake, how crazy do you think they are?'' Aside from the subject matter, which would already be enough to prevent any city from approving this, the thing is a fatal accident waiting to happen. Look at the power lines. Your perception of Japan is pretty warped if you took this seriously for even a moment. -- [[User:BenRG|BenRG]] ([[User talk:BenRG|talk]]) 18:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Any country that vends schoolgirl saliva is one you can suspend your disbelief about. The only unbelievable thing about that picture is that there aren't octopus tentacles shoved in all the orifices. [[User:Matt Deres|Matt Deres]] ([[User talk:Matt Deres|talk]]) 05:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: It's very clear that these are faked. Take a close look at the left foot from [http://i.gizmodo.com/photogallery/whyjapanwhy/1007549485 Sean's second link] - I've made a blow-up of it [http://sjbaker.org/fake.png here] - notice how the person who photoshopped it didn't bother to make the region inside the loop of the shoe-lace transparent? And there is a blue 'glow' at the edge of the tongue of the shoe. This is perhaps the most obvious mistake - but all of these pictures exhibit similar errors. It's a dead giveaway. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 17:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== relay setting calculation for spaj 140 c == |
|||
<!--Can any one give me an example for relay setting calculation of abb spaj 140 c relay?????????? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Parthi2020|Parthi2020]] ([[User talk:Parthi2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Parthi2020|contribs]]) 11:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Please do not post the same question in multiple places. This one is also on the Science Ref Desk and answers should be posted there. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 14:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== I'm looking for roleplaying chat site for omni-roleplayers... == |
|||
Well, I've been a member of some roleplaying sites. I like to add buddies on messengers (like AIM, Yahoo!, Windows Live, etc.) so I can do roleplays on messengers/ I consider myself an "omni-roleplayer" -- I like to roleplay about anything. I ;ole to roleplay any genre, and I like to play with fictional or fan-made characters. Not to be cocky or anything. I searched for other omni-roleplayers like me on the roleplaying sites I joined, but there were quite a few. Mostof the roleplayers in the sites can roleplay in only one genre of another preference, like they can only roleplay in a fantasy world or only in a sci-fi world. So, anyone, are there any roleplaying chat sites with a thorough amount of omni-roleplayers, like many of them? And would those sites have some of the users with messenger address on AIM, Yahoo, Windows Live, etc. so I can add them? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sirdrink13309622|Sirdrink13309622]] ([[User talk:Sirdrink13309622|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sirdrink13309622|contribs]]) 12:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Bridal Shower Gift Amount == |
|||
I have been invited to a bridal shower in Canada and the invitation suggests a money gift. What is the rule of thumb for an appropriate amount for a bridal shower (monetary) gift? What is the rule of thumb for the gift amounts for the bridal shower vs. the wedding present? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/209.82.105.12|209.82.105.12]] ([[User talk:209.82.105.12|talk]]) 15:30, 29 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Monetary gifts are a terrible invention, they make the gift-exchange system fall-down. That said I would suggest that a bridal-shower gift should be (value wise) reasonably small. I don't think i'd personally spend anything more than 1/4 of what i'd spend on the wedding present. This site (http://www.favorideas.com/learn-about/etiquette/bridal-shower-etiquette/) or a search for 'bridal shower etiquette' may be worth a look too. [[User:Ny156uk|ny156uk]] ([[User talk:Ny156uk|talk]]) 15:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
The amount you give the broad should reflect how well u know her. If its just some chick you work with, not much. Best friend, more. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wikivanda199|Wikivanda199]] ([[User talk:Wikivanda199|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wikivanda199|contribs]]) 15:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I'm sorry, I really don't get the point of money gifts for a bridal shower. For a wedding present, maybe - they are supposed to get the couple set up in their new house and money can be helpful there, but a bridal shower is about having some fun, pampering the bride a bit and showing how much everyone loves her. You don't do that with money, you do that with gifts that have some thought behind them. Unless you think the bride will be offended by you not following the instructions on the invite, I would advise against giving money. Find something fairly cheap (compared to the wedding present) that is somehow relevant to the bride or, even better, relevant to your relationship with the bride. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 16:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== max speeding == |
|||
What is the most over the speed limit that someone has been cited for? I have heard of someone doing 120mph in a 30mph zone, which is 90mph over. How much over is the record? [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 16:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:The fastest speeding ticket ever was for...242mph, I think, in a 75 zone. That's 167 over. [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 16:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::[[Speeding ticket]], at the bottom, has the relevant info. [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 16:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: I think the guy qualified simultaneously for the "Dickhead of the Decade" award. [[User:Richard Avery|Richard Avery]] ([[User talk:Richard Avery|talk]]) 16:45, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::<small>Forgive my ignorance, I don't drive and I'm familiar with this occurence only inasfar as it was described as Top Gear - so based on that information: what's the problem with driving quickly on a very long, very straight, very empty road? [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 00:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:::::Well, one problem is that at that speed, few roads are "long"! At 240mph - you're covering a mile in 15 seconds. Small problems (debris in the road perhaps) that is too small to see at half a mile away - are only 7 seconds from being under your car. People who have driven for a while have reaction times that are tuned to the 30mph to 70mph range. At twice that speed, you're quite unprepared for how fast things happen. The tendancy to twitch the steering to avoid a pothole or something is just lethally dangerous at those speeds - and you're just not used to looking a quarter mile ahead of your car for potholes that you must avoid with less than four seconds of warning in a car that's probably horribly unmanouverable at that speed. But people rarely have that expertise. The guy in the [[Koenigsegg]] was going three times faster than his reactions and experience were attuned to. That is definitely dangerous. The one (and only) time I took my tricked out MINI Cooper'S to 140mph - I was scared out of my wits!...Only too happy to drop back to 70! [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 02:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::::There's also the fact that you can't know the road up ahead is empty. If someone pulls out of a side road in front of you when you're doing those kinds of speeds, you don't stand a chance of stopping in time. Yes, they were wrong to pull out in front of you, but that doesn't make either of you any more alive. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 16:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Indeed - the person pulling out isn't mentally attuned to the closing speed of a 240mph car! When you see another car a quarter mile away, it's a little speck - you're very likely to pull out figuring you have fifteen seconds to get up to highway speeds - which is plenty. You don't expect it to be right next to you going probably 10 to 20 times faster than you just four seconds later! [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 16:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::Okay. [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 10:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::There have been others that would rival that record but many tickets at this level are successfully appealed on the grounds that the prosecution can't prove the car is physically capable of the speed recorded. It is perfectly possible that a higher speed was achieved but only because the driver of the car worked it in mysterious ways. [[User:Prokhorovka|Prokhorovka]] ([[User talk:Prokhorovka|talk]]) 21:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::Why would the prosecution have to prove the car physically capable of that? You have the evidence from the radar gun and if you need it - the manufacturer's specification for the car showing that it can do that kind of speed...what else do you need? You go to the [http://www.koenigsegg.com/models.php?model=ccx&model_submenu=info Koenigsegg web site] - and right there it says that the car is capable of 245+ mph. (Note the '+'!) The car was clocked at 242mph. Case closed. The primary evidence here is the record from the radar gun and the testimony of the cop. The defense has to find a way to disprove that evidence - and it's going to be difficult. It might be a different matter if the car (as purchased) was only capable of much lower speeds - but that the owner had modified it to go faster...but that's very unlikely to be the case and it could easily be shown that the car had been modified. In this case, it could also be shown that the driver was participating the [[Gumball 3000]] rally (yes - just like in the movie "[[The Gumball Rally]]"!) - and racing on public highways is illegal at any speed. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 16:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::<small>I took the liberty of fixing your link. [[User:Matt Deres|Matt Deres]] ([[User talk:Matt Deres|talk]]) 21:59, 30 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:::::In the cases I've heard about where people have got off of tickets by claiming the car couldn't do that speed have been cases where the measured speed was faster than the manufacturer's specs said it could do. Whether that was because the measurement was wrong, the specs were wrong or the car was modified, I don't know, but the burden is on the prosecution to prove it wasn't the former, and that is rather difficult to prove beyond reasonable doubt. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 13:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Well, the manufacturers specifications are sometimes on the safe side. Engines produce more power in cold weather than in hot - and air resistance changes with temperature and humidity. Also, two individual engines off the same production line but build six months apart have different engineering tolerances and will produce slightly different performance numbers. So if the manufacturer provides a conservative figure for top speed - it's certainly possible to exceed that number. Although, in many modern cars, there is a speed limiter fitted to the car to ensure that it won't go faster than the specification - but such things can be removed. It seems to me though that you'd have to be going a LOT faster than the car is theoretically able to go in order to cast sufficient doubt on the radar gun's readout. Speed guns are known to have an error range of +/- several percent...so if the gun said "240mph" and the car manufacturer said it could only go up to 235mph - you'd probably still be convicted for speeding...but just by a lesser amount. |
|||
::::::There was a case in the UK many years ago when radar speed guns were new - of one of those [[dumper|front-end dumper trucks]] (which had a maximum speed of 25mph) being clocked by police as 120mph - but that turned out to be because the vibration of the vehicles' body was enough to fool the radar gun into thinking it was going 120. Clearly that was cause for dismissal (presumably, the police never even charged the driver because it's so obvious). [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 19:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Torch the streets == |
|||
Just now I started watching an episode of ''Doctor Who'' and it showed a quick clip of workmen using a blow torch on the pavement of the street. It wasn't new construction, it looked to be repair work. Why were they doing this? I've never seen this happen in the States... <span style="font-family:monospace;">[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</span>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 19:00, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Was this the episode with the 2012 Olympics (that's the only one I remember having any roadworks in it)? If so, they were filling in pot holes, I guess the blow torch was to heat the tar up again if it hadn't set level (which was a problem described in the episode). Alternatively, it could be to burn off something that was covering the road (as a by-product of the repairs, presumably). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 19:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::That is indeed the episode. The tar doesn't ignite? <span style="font-family:monospace;">[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</span>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 19:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::[[Bitumen]] boils at 525c, I would imagine you'd have to get it a bit hotter than that to burn it. [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]] ([[User talk:Nanonic|talk]]) 19:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Asphalt doesn't burn without a great deal of help - it's hard to heat the mass of the street and keep it hot long enough . They may have been softening the surface to allow adhesion of new asphalt. Also, there are some kinds of thermoplastic markings that have to be torched down, like crosswalk lines. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 19:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::I haven't seen the episode in question, but I've seen workmen using blow torches to remove lines from the road. [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 20:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::One should remember that at the end of that episode it is revealed that the alien homed in on that point for it's heat, so the blowtorch may just be to highlight the heat there. Would be a bloody subtle hint though. [[User:Prokhorovka|Prokhorovka]] ([[User talk:Prokhorovka|talk]]) 21:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== US bank safe deposit boxes == |
|||
Are the contents of safe deposit boxes in banks of the US insured in the event of a natural disaster or robbery? How is that handled since only the renter of the box knows the contents? [[Special:Contributions/65.121.141.34|65.121.141.34]] ([[User talk:65.121.141.34|talk]]) 19:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:As [http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Banking/FinancialPrivacy/P41893.asp this article] notes, the [[FDIC]] does not cover the contents of safe deposit boxes. Under certain circumstances, the bank's liability insurance should apply (such as if a robbery is committed by a bank employee) but generally SDB contents fall under the remit of the renter's own insurance policies -- which nicely solves the issue of knowing the contents. — [[User talk:Lomn|Lomn]] 19:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Sports car vs truck engine == |
|||
I believe this question was asked maybe a year ago, but I felt that it did not receive a sufficient response. |
|||
What is inherently different about the engine of a fast sports car and a pick-up truck that allows the former to drive very quickly and the latter to tow a lot of weight? |
|||
Suppose if I was to take the engine of a Ferrari F430 and drop it into a Ford F-150, would the truck suddenly be able to accelerate very quickly (of course slower than the Ferrari because its heavier)? Similarly, why do sports cars with, say 500HP, have such low towing capacities, when trucks such as the F-150 have a much max lower HP rating, but a high towing capacity? |
|||
Is it because the engine of trucks are producing more torque at a lower RPM? |
|||
[[User:Acceptable|Acceptable]] ([[User talk:Acceptable|talk]]) 22:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:There may not be very much difference at all - the difference is in the weight and streamlining of the body and (crucially) in the gearbox and suspension. It's the gearing that distinguishes high speed versus pulling ability - and the suspension that provides better cornering (at the cost of ride comfort, ground-clearance and off-road ability). However at low speeds, a sports car needs "pulling power" ([[torque]] - to give it a proper name) just as much as a truck does - so the gearing may be kinda similar in the lower gears...that's why weight is also so important. F=ma - Force (or torque in this case) equals mass times acceleration. If you can halve the mass - you get twice the acceleration. Consider that a farm tractor can easily out-pull a truck - and may well have a relatively puny 100hp engine...it's all in the gearing. Perhaps the most clear example is the [[Dodge Viper]] - undeniably a sports car - with a Dodge's V10 truck engine (See: [[Chrysler LA engine]]). The only concession to 'sportiness' in the engine was a switch from iron to aluminum for the engine block in order to save weight - the Viper weighs 3,400lbs - but the Dodge RAM 2500 (which you can buy with the iron version of exact same engine as the Viper) weighs in at 12,000lbs and can tow twice that. At four times the weight - it's going to be four times slower off the line. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 02:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::But in the case with the Viper, why can't it tow 24,000 lbs as well? Surely the difference between the frame and structural integrity of the two vehicles won't make that much of a difference? [[User:Acceptable|Acceptable]] ([[User talk:Acceptable|talk]]) 17:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::I doubt that the Viper could - primarily because the gearbox isn't set up that way - but also, the clutch is unlikely to be able to hold that much. Also, the Viper is so light (relative to a truck), that it's not going to have enough traction. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 19:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
What exactly is the difference between a gearbox geared for high-speed vs a gearbox geared for pulling ability? If one uses a large gear ratio, hence a larger overall transmission output torque, won't that maximize both speed ''and'' pulling ability? [[User:Acceptable|Acceptable]] ([[User talk:Acceptable|talk]]) 01:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:No - think about it - if one turn of the engine moves the wheels only a small amount - then you have lots of torque - but not much speed. If you gear the same engine to move the wheels a large amount for every revolution of the engine - then the vehicle will go faster - but have less torque. Hence the needs for trucks and sports cars are very different. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 02:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Perhaps I was being unclear. By speed, I was referring to the car's acceleration. A large transmission output torque equals large towing capacity ''and'' acceleration. [[User:Acceptable|Acceptable]] ([[User talk:Acceptable|talk]]) 18:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: Well, for acceleration - you're right, you need lots of torque. The design of gearboxes for good acceleration is a subtle business. Too much torque in a light, front-engined/rear-wheel-drive vehicle - and you'll just get wheel-spin and not much acceleration - so it may be completely pointless to provide a really low first-gear ratio only to find that the traction control pulls off the power to avoid wheel spin. Also, the peak torque generally only happens over a fairly small range of RPM's - so you need gears that are sufficiently closely spaced to allow the driver (or the automatic transmission) to keep the engine in the middle of it's optimum RPM band. But if you use too many finely-spaced gears, the gearbox gets large and heavy and the car becomes hard to drive...so there are a lot of trade-offs there. So you might maybe find that the lower gears (which are for acceleration) are similar in a truck and a sports car - but the higher gears certainly won't be. |
|||
: But acceleration depends hugely on the mass of the vehicle...and not so much the gearbox. As I pointed out before, the weight of the Viper and the Dodge RAM 2500 differs by a factor of four...so with even with identical gear ratios and identical engines - you'd expect the Viper to have about four times the acceleration - which means that the Viper's fairly impressive 4.6 second 0-60 time probably translates into a painfully lumbering 18 second 0-60 time for the RAM 2500 pickup. |
|||
: At top speed, weight doesn't hardly matter at all - it's down to overcoming the air resistance and (to a much smaller extent), the rolling resistance. Getting the highest possible top speed means having a gear ratio that'll let the wheels turn fast enough at an engine RPM at which it delivers sufficient torque to overcome that resistance. The Dodge RAM's aerodynamics are sure to be a hell of a lot worse than the Viper - and given the heavy-duty transmission, differential, axles, etc - it probably has a much higher rolling resistance too. So pushing the pickup through the air requires more torque than the Viper - so even in the topmost gear, the pickup truck needs more torque so it can't possibly go as fast as the Viper because it needs that lower gear ratio. |
|||
: It's also possible for the top speed of the car to be limited by the available gears. In my 2003 MINI Cooper'S (which has six forward gears) - you couldn't get up to it's top speed of 135mph in 6th gear because the engine's RPM at 135mph was just a bit lower than the peak of it's torque curve. To get to the car's maximum speed, you actually had to drop down to 5th gear to get that extra RPM and higher torque to push it through the air - but because the engine's RPM's are limited, the car wouldn't go any faster than 135 because 5th gear wasn't a high enough ratio. In the 2005 version of the exact same car/engine, they changed the gear ratios and thereby enabled the car to reach 140mph in 6th gear. However, that too was a compromise because by lowering the 6th gear ratio to provide that extra torque, they risked getting lower fuel consumption at more sane highway speeds because the engine would not be in it's optimum fuel efficiency band. |
|||
: This is why car design is so complicated - and why cars differ widely in performance between types and manufacturers. Even something as seemingly simple as picking gear ratios ends up being a complicated trade-off between cost, reliability, weight, drivability, fuel-efficiency, acceleration and top speed. The difference between a good car and a great one lies in how those kinds of trade-offs are made. |
|||
: [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 19:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Backgrounds specifically for Photoshopping == |
|||
Hello. Is there anyplace online that specializes in photos of locations specifically to be Photoshopped as a background? Let me make myself clearer: It is very simple to do a Google search and find scenic photos of just about anywhere. But almost always, those shots are composed to feature the locale itself. What I am looking for are photos that are composed and framed specifically so that someone could place a person in that photo and it would be at the right angle, distance, etc. (For example, in New York City a photo of the Empire State Building with the building a little off-center in the background, but looking straight down an adjacent sidewalk as if someone were standing there, but there isn't really anyone there. With that, I could take a photo of someone just standing anywhere, remove the background and align them with the background photo.) If such a site existed, it probably wouldn't be free, but I'm just wondering if anyone has heard of such things. — [[User:Michael J|<font face="Arial" color="#003366"> '''''Michael J''''' </font>]] 22:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I doubt there is any web site like that - but WikiCommons is an amazing resource for photos - I'd be quite surprised if you couldn't find something suitable. One big issue though is that you need to find a picture that has the same lighting as the picture you are trying to blend into it. It's really quite difficult to correct lighting differences - so picking two pictures that are close is a huge benefit. I wouldn't fret too much about the framing of the background image - you can always take one of the really high res images on Commons and crop it to make it look like the subject was off-center. Alternatively - find a photo that already has someone in the foreground and replace them. Then you have a photo that was posed completely naturally as a portrait. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 02:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Do keep in mind that many, perhaps most, of these images are copyright, though licensed under GFDL or CC-by-SA. With either of those licenses, you will have to release your work under the same license, and give credit to the author of the original photo. If you don't want to do that you'll have to look for photos that have specifically been released into the public domain. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 08:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Ahmadinejad vs. Mousavi == |
|||
I'm a non-Persian trying to figure out the state of play in the upcoming presidential election in Iran. [[Iranian presidential election, 2009|Our article]] quotes widely divergent poll results, and I'm wondering if there is anyone here in the know who can tell me what the realistic probabilities of victory the leading candidates Mr. Ahmadinejad and Mr. Mousavi have of winning, or point me to sources with some authority on the issue. Any help appreciated, [[user:Skomorokh|<span style="background: #222; color: #fff;"><font face="Goudy Old Style"> Skomorokh </font></span>]] 22:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: The BBC radio 4 news interviewed an Iran expert (sorry, I didn't catch his name) today. He said that if asked two weeks ago he'd have been convinced Ahmadinejad was going to win, but that recently Mousavi (who he said had the support of intellectuals and students, and who he credited as being a particularly thorough organiser) had made great strides. They didn't ask for a prediction or odds, but the way he spoke it seems he thought Mousavi had a very realistic chance (although still with Ahmadinejad as the favourite, maybe). [[Special:Contributions/87.114.167.162|87.114.167.162]] ([[User talk:87.114.167.162|talk]]) 17:59, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: Ah, it was the ''PM'' program (the news before the news), which had a lengthy interview with Sadegh Ziba Kalam (a professor of politics at the University of Tehran). I'm listening again now on iPlayer - he says Mousavi enjoys support among women (in addition to those groups I mentioned above), and in general among more educated Iranians. [[Special:Contributions/87.114.167.162|87.114.167.162]] ([[User talk:87.114.167.162|talk]]) 18:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thanks very much, that is very helpful indeed, I'll be sure to look up the program! Mahalo, [[user:Skomorokh|<span style="background: #222; color: #fff;"><font face="Goudy Old Style"> Skomorokh </font></span>]] 17:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
= May 30 = |
|||
== How is a photo like this taken? == |
|||
How is a photo like [[:File:Shotgun microphone.jpg|this]] taken? That is, with the solid white background and no evidence of a sheet or anything (except a little shadow)? [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 00:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, there are really three possibilities - one is that they really are using a very flat, white surface and very bright lighting. Another is that they used a fairly normal white background and then went in with a computer and painted out all of the imperfections - the third is that this is a computer model. It's really almost impossible to tell which of those things it is. However - because this is Wikipedia - we can scroll down a little and discover that: "''(w:Audio-Technica w:shotgun microphone from the 1990's. Camera: Canon EOS 300D with Tamron 28-75 mm f/2.8 lens. Created by [[User:PJ]] and [http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Användare:Piko User:Piko].)''" - so we know it's not computer graphics. We even know what camera and lens were used! However, the picture was 'created' by two people? That suggests that one person photographed it and the other cleaned up the image on a computer. But you don't have to guess - you can leave a question on [[User:PJ]]'s talk page and just ask! [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 02:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: Thanks - PJ hasn't edited for more than 6 months, so may not be around anymore. I think PJ and Piko are likely to be the same person. [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 02:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Why do you think there isn't a sheet? A lot of photos like these are shot with a similar set-up to [http://yanikphotoschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/lightingsetup.jpg this], with a diffuse light and maybe slight over-exposure to blow out the background. With a small enough object you can even do it with a piece of A3 and a bounced flash. --[[User: Antilived|antilived]]<sup>[[User_talk:Antilived|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Antilived|C]] | [[User:Antilived/Gallery|G]]</sup> 03:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: When I said "sheet" I meant "bed sheet". If I tried that with a bed sheet, it wouldn't come out that way. The type of setup you linked to was probably used. [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 03:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: The image says it was taken with an [[f-number]] of 2.8, now I'm not much of a photographer but I think that is on the low side, meaning there would be a low [[depth of field]]. Whatever was used for the background is going to be completely out of focus, so as long as it is mostly white and well lit, it's going to look like a completely white field. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 13:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Using a [[Light box]]. I made one myself - you just need the right type of bulb and paper/fabric. [[Bristol board]] is what I was told to use. [[User:Ny156uk|ny156uk]] ([[User talk:Ny156uk|talk]]) 08:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:My wife, a professional photographer, confirmed that was indeed done with diffused lighting and a seamless sheet or piece of paper. <span style="font-family:monospace;">[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</span>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 15:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: Thanks. [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 15:30, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I think the trick is not to use cloth because at these magnifications it's fluffy and textured. Good quality paper or art board is probably the best bet. But you can fix a lot of imperfections with GIMP/Photoshop/whatever after the fact. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 16:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Buying a Bike == |
|||
Where would be a likely place to buy a cheap adult bike (50 dollars or less)? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.45.232.112|216.45.232.112]] ([[User talk:216.45.232.112|talk]]) 03:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:A [[garage sale]] [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 03:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:A police auction? [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 03:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:[[Craigslist]]? [[The Freecycle Network|Freecycle]]? [[Thrift store]] ([[Goodwill Industries|Goodwill]]/[[Society of Saint Vincent de Paul|St. Vincent de Paul's]]/[[Salvation Army]])? A local used bike shop?-- [[Special:Contributions/76.204.101.11|76.204.101.11]] ([[User talk:76.204.101.11|talk]]) 04:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== 6E (triple wide) steel-toed leather work boots == |
|||
My husband has had no success searching for this product, no longer in stock from [http://www.nbwebexpress.com/category.asp?type=DNMFWB Dunham (acquired by New Balance)] and apparently unavailable through any other vendor found via Google. It's hard to believe there's no market for such a standard item in triple width. (He wears an 11-1/2, hardly a giant size.) Any advice on where to seek further? --'' Thanks, [[User:Deborahjay|Deborahjay]] ([[User talk:Deborahjay|talk]]) 10:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)'' |
|||
:Would [http://www.wideshoes.com/catalog.cfm?page=work-footwear_safety-shoes these] work? They come in 6E. [[User:Bielle|// BL \\]] ([[User talk:Bielle|talk]]) 11:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::<small>Fixed link. [[User:Jørgen|Jørgen]] ([[User talk:Jørgen|talk]]) 23:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== self-discipline for the lazy and uninspired? == |
|||
I am a procastinator to the core. Sometimes I don't get things |
|||
done due to the lack of mental energy or resources. Sometimes i am |
|||
just lazy. Websites that help such individuals teach different |
|||
methods. To be honest I have not tried any of them. Do you know any |
|||
solution that is universally applicable to lazy people such as myself?. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/131.220.46.22|131.220.46.22]] ([[User talk:131.220.46.22|talk]]) 10:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:There is no one solution that works for everyone, but some that work for lots of people include working/studying/whatevering with others, so that you have a peer pressure to continue and not let them down. For example if you sign up to a gym, and agree to meet a friend there every week to work out statistically you will have a better chance of keeping joining. Also you could try making lists of jobs you have to do, and not allowing yourself certain privaledges until you have finished the list (this requires personal self-discipline though). Good luck. [[User:Prokhorovka|Prokhorovka]] ([[User talk:Prokhorovka|talk]]) 11:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::My old studio master said, when I was faced with something that I was reluctant to do, "DO IT, get on with it, it's GOT to be done, do it NOW!" It worked for me 50 years ago and I still remember it and get it done, if it has to be done, whether I like it or not. Lovely feeling when its done too!--[[Special:Contributions/88.109.68.129|88.109.68.129]] ([[User talk:88.109.68.129|talk]]) 12:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: I can personally speak for the effectiveness of "just do a little bit". Procrastination (at least for me) is inertia; it's the reluctance to start something (and the bigger the something, the greater the reluctance. The procrastinator part of me says "you can put this all off until tomorrow; it's not due for ages". The solution is to say to yourself "just do a little bit now, and put the ''rest'' off until tomorrow". So say I have to prepare my taxes, which involves sorting and inputting lots of receipts, calculating which (and to what extent) are valid business expenses, collecting a bunch of other info, and then filling out the forms. I'll say "I'll just put the receipts into month twelve envelopes, one per month, and stop then". That little task only takes maybe 20 or 30 minutes. Some of the time I really do stop then, but often that's gotten me into doing the task (and I remind myself that it's actually not that unpleasant a task, or that daunting) and I do a bunch more then and there. [[Special:Contributions/87.114.167.162|87.114.167.162]] ([[User talk:87.114.167.162|talk]]) 16:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I agree. Promise yourself to do say 20 minutes work on something a day. Use a timer. Then when the 20 minutes are up, you can enjoy the remainder of the day without guilt. Or more likely you will continue what you are doing for longer. When reluctantly studying, such as revising for exams, at first do a cycle of ten minutes work then 10 minutes break, repeat. Then when you are accustomed to this do 20/10 and repeat. You can also give yourself a pre-planned reward of some kind in return for yourself doing X amount of work. What I find difficult is to start some large detailed project which is not urgent, which may have unhappy associations for me - which in fact if I was prepared to be a feckless person I would never even start or think about. [[Special:Contributions/78.144.254.133|78.144.254.133]] ([[User talk:78.144.254.133|talk]]) 19:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
<small>I was going to write a really good answer - but...Meh...maybe tomorrow. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 18:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:'Tomorrow' never comes.--[[Special:Contributions/88.109.68.129|88.109.68.129]] ([[User talk:88.109.68.129|talk]]) 19:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[MySpace]] == |
|||
Does someone know how I can add [[Amy Winehouse]] ([http://www.myspace.com/amywinehouse official profile]) on MySpace? I tried to add her but I have to put in the last name or the e-mail address. Does someone know the word(s) for “last name” which I have to put in? — [[User:PsY.cHo|PsY.cHo]], 13:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I know next to nothing about MySpace, but does the last name "Winehouse" not work? That ''is'' her last name... --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 17:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:<small>somehow advising anyone whose user name is "psycho" how to add a celebrity on MySpace rings loud bells with me...--[[Special:Contributions/88.108.222.231|88.108.222.231]] ([[User talk:88.108.222.231|talk]]) 19:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
::<small>I was assuming it was short for 'psychotherapist'...WP:AGF and all! [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 01:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
::: @Tango: “Winehouse” is not correct.<br />@88.108.222.231 and SteveBaker: I do not understand your messages. — [[User:PsY.cHo|PsY.cHo]], 08:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::They're just joking about psychopaths stalking celebrities, don't worry about it! You're probably better off asking your question on MySpace, I don't think we have many MySpace experts here. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 13:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Mostly, when Ref Desk folks write things in <small>small letters</small> - we are joking in some way. Don't worry about it - it keeps us sane! <small>Well, as sane as any group of people who answer questions from random strangers for no reward!</small> [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 18:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::::<small>It is rewarding in itself! --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 19:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC) </small> |
|||
== Privacy of A-Level module results == |
|||
Just wondering if British A-Level results for non-certificated modules (results from individual exams, '''not''' cashed in as part of a full qualification) can be looked up by third parties. Most importantly universities, and prospective employers. I failed several modules a few years ago which I am now repeating, and if possible I'd rather not mention in future that I ever took the failed exams. I am a mature student, taking exams as a private candidate, and it wouldn't be obvious from my employment history that I took exams before. |
|||
Will universities ask for my UCI number when I apply, so they can check previous results? |
|||
Can I also choose not to mention exams that I passed and certificated, but with a bad grade? Many thanks. [[Special:Contributions/81.132.218.238|81.132.218.238]] ([[User talk:81.132.218.238|talk]]) 14:48, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
In terms of what you mention on the forms, you don't have to put down your UCI number or any qualifications/exams taken which you don't want to disclose. Whether they can find out individual marks through some name search, however, I'm not sure - they couldn't until a couple of years ago, but some universities. I'm not sure whether: |
|||
*They ask you for them, or whether they can find out without your permission. |
|||
*Since they couldn't until a couple of years ago, whether they can find out the results of modules taken before this restriction was lifted, as yours seem to be. |
|||
--[[User:Joth|Joth]] ([[User talk:Joth|talk]]) 18:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:If you are applying for an undergraduate course in the UK, you will need to apply through UCAS, who state that you "must include all schools, colleges and universities that you have attended since the age of 11, even if you withdrew from your course" and that you must include "All qualifications for which you are currently studying or for which you are awaiting results". UCAS will check your qualifications with the awarding body - I don't know whether they will search to see whether you have omitted anything. Universities rely on the information which they receive from UCAS, and will not check these details themselves. |
|||
:But bear in mind that almost any university will be interested in your latest grades (and your employment history), and will put little or no weight on grades from some years ago, provided you've made the grades now. If you're still concerned that previous poor marks may reflect badly on you, you can put a positive spin on it in your personal statement (you've decided this course is your future, you've shown the drive to retake these qualifications as a mature student, and your results/predicted results in them show your potential). [[User:Warofdreams|Warofdreams]] ''[[User talk:Warofdreams|talk]]'' 20:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Eaten by boa constrictor == |
|||
Are there any documented cases of a person being attacked and killed by a [[boa constrictor]]? Would a person of normal physical strength be able to fight off a boa, or would they likely be crushed to death? If the latter, would the boa be able to consume the unfortunate individual? --[[User:Richardrj|Richardrj]] [[User talk:Richardrj|<sup>talk </sup>]][[Special:Emailuser/Richardrj|<sup>email</sup>]] 15:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:[http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:7pMXZUPtQOIJ:www.kingsnake.com/boapage/caresheets/boaconstrictorcare.html+boa+constrictor+killing+humans&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=u] says that an 8 to 10 foot Boa can kill an adult human. They don't so much crush as suffocate by wrapping tightly around neck, stomach and rib-cage. Every time you exhale - it tightens so you can't inhale again - so bit by bit you suffocate and don't have breath to shout for help...nasty! [http://animals.howstuffworks.com/snakes/boa-constrictor-info.htm (for example)] Many other sites say that there is no record of a human being eaten by a boa because their jaws are not large enough to accomodate our shoulders. But they certainly can and do kill people. There are a couple of sites that purport to show people who've been cut out of Boa's stomachs - but as far as I can tell, they are all faked. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 16:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I think adults being killed by boas is rare, but I've heard plenty of stories of children being killed by them. The advice I've heard regarding being attacked by a constrictor is to try and grab hold of either the head or the tail and uncoil them. Just pushing outwards isn't going to work, they are too strong, you have to start at one end and gradually free yourself. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 17:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::This farm labourer fought off a [[python]] with his phone [http://www.voanews.com/english/Africa/2009-04-17-voa54.cfm]! [[User:BrainyBabe|BrainyBabe]] ([[User talk:BrainyBabe|talk]]) 22:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
= May 31 = |
|||
== Checkmate. == |
|||
Why is it that a chess game ends when it's ''possible'' for a player's king to be captured - rather than when it's actually captured? They are clearly equivalent in concept. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 01:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, it's equivalent for perfect players, at least if you discount the clock. But it's not equivalent for real players — if you accidentally hang your king, you don't lose; you just have to take it back. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 01:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Oh, also, don't forget the [[stalemate]] rule — if your king is ''not'' under attack, but you have to move, and any move you make would hang him, you also don't lose. It's a draw. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 01:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:The question came about because I'm a notoriously terrible chess player - and I was teaching a neighbours' kid to play. I get him in 'discovered' check - but fail to notice - so I don't say "Check". He doesn't notice on his turn either...now it's my turn again and I finally notice that I can now take his king...but I can't because of the weird way the rules are written. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 02:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Well, I think that's the intent. Hanging the king is an uninteresting way for the game to end, so it was disallowed. |
|||
::Another possibility that I may have heard somewhere is that it was considered disrespectful, or maybe politically dangerous, to actually ''capture'' the king. Don't know whether that's true or just one of those factoids that floats around in my head sometimes. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 02:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Oh, given that you don't play that much chess, maybe I should explain the term: To ''hang'' a piece is to leave it vulnerable to capture without adequate compensation (of course there's no adequate compensation for the king). --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 04:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
I thought it was because it would be deeply unwise for the creator of the game to give a king a game in which the objective is to kill the king, but our [[checkmate|article]] says the actual term means "the king is ambushed," not "the king is killed." [[User:DOR (HK)|DOR (HK)]] ([[User talk:DOR (HK)|talk]]) 06:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: I wondered about that - whether there was some subtle political-correctness thing going on there. But I couldn't find a reference for that as a fact...and it's quite OK to kill the Queen. That's one reason I wanted to ask the question here. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 19:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
It's more realistic this way - in a real battle once the King's death is inevitable the King will surrender. There is no point playing that final turn, so why do it? As for forgetting to say "check", apparently there is no rule requiring you to, and experts often don't ([[Rules of chess#Check]]), so the rules were violated when your opponent didn't move out of check. I'm not sure what happens then in a formal match, but in a friendly match you would roll the game back and let them make a legal move. <small>I'm glad I'm not the only one that is terrible at chess - I have an excellent record of teaching people to play by playing a game with them and them beating me in that game, it has happened several times!</small> --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 13:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::In a formal game there is a time penalty applied to any illegal move, and touch-move means that if an illegal move was made with a piece that can be moved somewhere else legally it must be (or for opponent's pieces being captured).[[User:Julzes|Julzes]] ([[User talk:Julzes|talk]]) 21:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Ouch! That hasn't happened to me yet - but it's usually not more than two or three games later that the newbie kills me. I don't know what it is about chess...I can usually beat most causal players at other games like that - I'm pretty good at "Go" for example (which I regard as a vastly superior game...perhaps for obvious reasons). [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 19:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Whatever the original reason is, the rule has important and arguably interesting consequences. At the very low level, do you really want to beat the neighbor kid because he hung his king? Can't you wait until he doesn't notice a mate in one? |
|||
::More interestingly, we have such things as that a player who has two knights cannot force a win against a player who has just his king, not because there is no checkmate, but because the disadvantaged player can arrange to be stalemated instead. Whereas if you have two knights and your opponent has his king ''and a pawn'', you may be able to checkmate him, because in what would otherwise be the stalemate position, he can move his pawn. See [[two knights endgame]]. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 20:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== British Lions == |
|||
Something I've wondered about, and I'd like the opinions of British people about this; is there some kind of local thinking or politics about the issue? The question applies to both rugby and soccer. Why do the British send individual teams to World Cup events? When the British Lions play, they are so much stronger. Surely a Lions team will have a better chance of winning a world cup? This applies even more so to soccer, where in the past so many talented players would have made a Lions team, instead of the stronger England team accompanied by the minnows Scotland, Wales, etc. [[User:Sandman30s|Sandman30s]] ([[User talk:Sandman30s|talk]]) 11:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:There is a ''lot'' of politics and posturing involved. It is rooted in each of the [[Home Nations]] individuality, even though England, Scotland, Wales and NI are not countries per se under the United Nations - we like to think we are and will fight to a certain extent to keep it that way. By forming a united UK or GB team for these sports, there is a perceived to be a high chance the ruling bodies would dissolve the individual national teams and force the fielding of a united team from then on, see for example [[United Kingdom national football team#London 2012]]. Hopefully someone may come along and give a better and more rounded answer. [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]] ([[User talk:Nanonic|talk]]) 12:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I think part of the problem is that England is such a large portion of the UK than a UK team would basically be the England team with maybe one or two players changed and the smaller Home Nations would end up without a team. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 13:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::If that's the case, someone is not thinking straight. It's not the numbers that count, it's individual brilliance. I can think of some Welsh superstars in soccer (Ian Rush, Ryan Giggs), or really good Scottish or Irish rugby players that would have bolstered the English majority in a Lions team. [[User:Sandman30s|Sandman30s]] ([[User talk:Sandman30s|talk]]) 16:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::All else being equal (which, within the UK, it pretty much is), a larger country will, on average, have more brilliant players than a smaller country. If 1 in 100,000 people make good top level footballers, say, then England would have about 500 while the rest of the UK would have about 100. Chances are good that more players would be chosen from the former pot than the latter. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 19:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Well historically Wales and Scotland have had some fantastic individuals, but beyond a handful of players per generation the full squad would still likely be an 'England + a few others' squad. Based on [[Wales_national_football_team#Senior_squad]] there are 7 'Premiership' players - with only 3 of those being regular starters for the Premiership team they play in. Compare that to the [[England_national_football_team#England_squad]] where all but 1 (Beckham) play in the Premiership and most of them are regular starters for their Premiership club. [[Scotland_national_football_team#Current_squad]] is a bit harder to compare due to their top-flight division, but they only have 4 Premiership players in their squad. This doesn't mean that these countries don't produce great talent, but another telling factor is...the population of the entirety of Scotland and Wales is barely that of [[London]]. England has a much bigger 'pot' to choose from in general (obviously not all individuals in a country are eligible but you get the idea). I don't think there'd be much fan-based support of the idea, given the rivalry and tribalistic nature of football. [[User:Ny156uk|ny156uk]] ([[User talk:Ny156uk|talk]]) 17:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: I'm a little surprised that the international sporting authorities allow it. We don't compete in the Olympics as separate countries...why the World Cup football people would allow it, I have no idea. As for the relative strengths of (say) an "England" team versus a "British" team - I suspect that we'd do best of all if we sent a Manchester United team (or whoever are doing best this year) instead. The fact that the guys all know each other so much better, have trained and played together for years and there would be no internal rivalries from players of different teams who's been playing as mortal enemies a month earlier...I think they'd do much better than a team put together from many separate teams just a short time before the important games. But I'm not a "sports person"...so I probably shouldn't be answering this at all! [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 18:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I think we were kind of grandfathered in. It helps that we have separate domestic leagues as well (although I'm not sure Wales does). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 19:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Well obviously the difficulty with Man U would be that their team is made up of multi-nationalities (along with all clubs just about - save for [[Atletico Bilbao]] who I think still play only Basque players). [[User:Ny156uk|ny156uk]] ([[User talk:Ny156uk|talk]]) 18:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:In all of these answers, one word jumped out at me: tribalistic. As an outsider, it's hard to believe that sports unity is that hard to achieve given that the once terrible political problem with the IRA/Sinn Fein has been over for years now. All UK nations accept the same queen, do they not? So surely the 'Home Nations' should see the light and unify sport? We South Africans need a challenge in the next Rugby world cup ;) [[User:Sandman30s|Sandman30s]] ([[User talk:Sandman30s|talk]]) 19:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Even at the Olympics, where there's a single team, the name of the team is a worry. It's not "United Kingdom", but "Great Britain", which as we all know is a geographic term for the large island that includes England, Wales and Scotland (but not Northern Ireland). People from NI can choose to play for the "Great Britain" team (even though they don't live in Great Britain), or the "Ireland" team (even though they're not necessarily citizens of the republic called Ireland). -- [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 22:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::And thus, hopefully, nobody kills anybody else. [[Special:Contributions/80.41.31.27|80.41.31.27]] ([[User talk:80.41.31.27|talk]]) 22:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Its actually a bit more complicated that all that, and not really to do with the disparity of talent in each of the nations. Its really all about political power. The Home Nations have a disproportionate amount of influence at [[FIFA]] for the following reason: Together in 1947, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales were made "special" members of FIFA as a direct result of saving the federation from bankruptcy after the war. Part of the deal was that the 4 nations automatically hold 4 of the 8 votes on [[International Football Association Board]] - the powerful committee that pretty much decides the [[Laws of the Game]] - as well as automatic Vice-Presidency of FIFA (currently, [[Geoff Thompson (football)|Geoff Thompson]]). Since IFAB needs a majority of 6 to change anything, it means that the Home Nation, together, hold a veto over the will of the rest of the footballing world. |
|||
This influence, together with the simmering legacy of colonialism, pisses off quite a few of the other national associations at FIFA, and there has been moves afoot for a long time to remove the special status of the four nations. That hasn't proved successful (yet), but another tactic of those seeking change, has been to argue that the four national associations should be merged into one (thereby reducing their number of votes to just one). The four associations have been very careful to keep themselves distanced from each other as much as possible, and they fear that merging together for the Olympics would seriously undermine that effort. This is particularly concerning for Scotland, Ireland and Wales, which lack the financial power and influence that the [[English Premier League]] lends the (English) FA. Scotland, particularly, has a record of influence in football administration (consider influential people such as [[Andy Roxburgh]], and [http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympics/football/7071200.stm David Will]), so its no coincidence they are particularly opposed to the idea. Expecting otherwise from the administrators would be like expecting turkey's to vote for Christmas. [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 23:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== UK Trains == |
|||
I've been noticing recently that in smaller stations - those with only two platforms and two tracks, not large stations with multiple platforms and tracks - trains ''always'' approach the platform from the right-hand side. This means that the trains are essentially driving on the left-hand-side, as on UK roads. What happens on the continent? --[[User:KageTora|KageTora - (영호 (影虎))]] ([[User talk:KageTora|talk]]) 12:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:They drive on the right. I've noticed before that trains seem to follow the left/right rule of the road of the country they are in. [[User:Fribbler|Fribbler]] ([[User talk:Fribbler|talk]]) 12:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Hmm. Actually it's a bit more complicated. See [[Drive_on_the_left#Trains|here]]. [[User:Fribbler|Fribbler]] ([[User talk:Fribbler|talk]]) 12:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::Interesting link, thanks. It also reminded me that on the [[Liverpool Underground]] (UK), the trains approach from the left, making them essentially driving on the right-hand-side. --[[User:KageTora|KageTora - (영호 (影虎))]] ([[User talk:KageTora|talk]]) 14:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== verifying ISSN == |
|||
I would like to verify the ISSN code of an online magazine. How can I do this? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mosquitoyer|Mosquitoyer]] ([[User talk:Mosquitoyer|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mosquitoyer|contribs]]) 17:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:The ISSN Register is available online through the [http://www.issn.org/ ISSN International Centre]. I'm unconvinced that access is necessarily free, however: see [http://www.issn.org/2-22654-The-ISSN-products.php their products page]. ''[[User:Angus Lepper|Angus Lepper]]<sup>([[User talk:Angus Lepper|T]], [[Special:Contributions/Angus Lepper|C]])</sup>'' 17:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== brightness of LED flashlights == |
|||
How does the brightness of LED flashlights compare to traditional flashlights? (I know they use less battery power.) [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 17:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: The white LED variety seem much brighter - I have both the single-LED 'pen-light' AA-battery variety and also a massive aluminium-cased, four-D-cell monster with about 20 LED's in it. Both seem to out-perform the incandescant bulb variety - although the LED light is much whiter than the incandescents - and that makes it tough to do comparisons 'by eye'. Also, it may depend on the manufacturer and cost...clearly the larger kind have a trade-off between more LED's or fewer LED's - giving more light or longer battery life respectively. However, I think that the convenience of never having to change another bulb means that I'll never buy another incandescent flashlight...that era is over. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 18:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: I bought a new regular Maglight two days ago and I was looking at the LEDs. They are a lot more expensive. Brightness matters to me but battery life is not much of a factor. [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 18:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::They are certainly more expensive...but for me, reliability was the main thing. When I need a flashlight, it's generally because the power is out - or I'm stuck beside the road with a broken car at night or something. Replacing batteries is generally easy - but I find that the bulbs in incandescent flashlights don't last long - even if they aren't being used much - and vibration (such as when I keep the thing in the trunk of my car) kills them very quickly. So that's why I use the LED kind. The price difference seems much greater in the smaller flashlights - the big ones, not so much so. [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 19:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Corporations in the US == |
|||
Can a company in the US be a corporation if just one person is in control, eg. the founder has all control no employees or members of the company can kick him out and there are no stockholders? --[[User:Melab-1|Melab±1]] [[User_talk:Melab-1|☎]] 21:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: Sure. It varies by type of incorporation, and by state, but in general a corporation needs a small number of directors who take legal responsibility for the company. They're appointed by the stockholder(s); if a single party owns all the stock then they appoint all the directors. While they control the company, they're creatures of the stockholders, Things get much more complex when the founder sells a significant state to others, particularly venture capitalists. Some such experienced (some might say tricksy) players are occasionally accused of manoeuvring to dilute the stock controlled by the founder, sieze majority control over the board, fire the founder, and then run the business for themselves. [[Sand Hill Road]] has more than its share of folks who'll do this for you, help you avoid it being done to you, and fight the legal cases when it's done. [[Special:Contributions/87.114.167.162|87.114.167.162]] ([[User talk:87.114.167.162|talk]]) 22:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I know you asked about the US, but if anyone is interested - In the UK such companies are called "single member companies" and the law makes special provisions for them. They can certainly exist, though. Strictly, there would be a stockholder, somebody has to own the company (assuming it is "limited by shares", there is an alternative generally used by non-profits), but you can have just the one shareholder. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 23:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== National Graduate School (U.S.) ? == |
|||
What about [[National Graduate School]] about? To be exact, what does the USCG refer to in the [bio or Thad W. Allen] ("In 2007, Admiral Allen was awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Science from the National Graduate School.")? --21:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't know how reliable it is, but the [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=National%20Graduate%20School Urban Dictionary] has a definition. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 23:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
[http://www.ngs.edu/ The National Graduate School of Quality Management.] According to their promotional literature, Admiral [[Thad Allen]], Commandant of the USCG, endorses it: ''[http://www.slideshare.net/pastinson/national-graduate-school-coast-guard-programs "I not only support this program, I encourage it."]'' |
|||
:[[USCG]]. [[Special:Contributions/152.16.16.75|152.16.16.75]] ([[User talk:152.16.16.75|talk]]) 23:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== What country has the world's largest fishing fleet? == |
|||
What country has the world's largest fishing fleet? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.233.192.226|72.233.192.226]] ([[User talk:72.233.192.226|talk]]) 23:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Latest revision as of 00:06, 4 January 2025
of the Wikipedia reference desk.
Main page: Help searching Wikipedia
How can I get my question answered?
- Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
- Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
- Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
- Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
- Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
- Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.
How do I answer a question?
Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines
- The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.
December 21
[edit]Britannica
[edit]Why Encyclopaedia Britannica uses imperial units in its articles, ever for things that are measured in metric in UK such as temperatures, if it is based in UK and read by people in metric countries? --40bus (talk) 07:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- 40bus, it is not based in the UK despite its British sounding name. The Encyclopaedia Britannica has been published in the United States since 1901. That's two years before the first human piloted airplane flight. Cullen328 (talk) 07:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Why it is not based in the UK? And if it is read and edited by people in metric countries, why many of its articles use imperial units first? It even uses British English spelling. And are there any similar UK-based online encyclopedias? --40bus (talk) 08:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. Go be bored somewhere else. Nanonic (talk) 09:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Why it is not based in the UK? And if it is read and edited by people in metric countries, why many of its articles use imperial units first? It even uses British English spelling. And are there any similar UK-based online encyclopedias? --40bus (talk) 08:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- If all else fails, you could try asking them. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Can't you do that for me??? —Tamfang (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- If all else fails, you could try asking them. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Webpages
[edit]Are there any web pages from late 1980s and early 1990s that are still in their original address, rather than on Internet Archive? Was it common for a company or person to have website in early 1990s? --40bus (talk) 07:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- We have a List of websites founded before 1995. The IN2P3 site from 1992 can still be visited, where you may enjoy seeing the French National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Particle Physics's contact details, a small picture of the building, and five hyperlinks. The article says there were
2,879 websites established before 1995
, so no, it wasn't common. Card Zero (talk) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)- Were there any websites around in 1990? This year feels still relatively recent. And are there any saved TV broadcasts from that time in the web, from any country? --40bus (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are you just randomly asking questions? Polygnotus (talk) 12:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Take the effort to read the first sentence of List of websites founded before 1995 and you will have the answer to your question. --Lambiam 10:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Were there any websites around in 1990? This year feels still relatively recent. And are there any saved TV broadcasts from that time in the web, from any country? --40bus (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Did Donald Trump's father,
[edit]Fred, know Rudy Giuliani's father, who is said to have been a mob contract killer? I'm asking because I've heard rumors somewhere that both Donald and Fred had mob contacts in New York City.Rich (talk) 22:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Said to have been"; is there a reliable source that claims this? It has also been said that Donald Trump is a shape shifting lizard.[1] Harold Giuliani was at the bottom of the low end of shady dealings in the Italian immigrant community. It seems extremely unlikely that Fred Trump, a high-profile successful real-estate developer from the German immigrant community, would have a reason to meet him. --Lambiam 10:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, that's what the OP is asking. You're just repeating the OP's question using different words. --Viennese Waltz 10:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- The OP did not ask whether it was plausible but whether it was true. Even if the mob contract killer story should prove more than randomly created innuendo, there is still nothing to suggest the two fathers ever met. The suggested mob contacts would not make this more likely than two random New Yorkers (like Henri who sometimes ordered pizza and Freddy who sometimes delivered pizza) knowing each other. It is very difficult to prove a negative, but the question implied the OP thought it was at least plausible, which, as I tried to point out, it is not. --Lambiam 01:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, that's what the OP is asking. You're just repeating the OP's question using different words. --Viennese Waltz 10:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- No insult intended to shape-shifting lizards. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- (it's easy for you to google that the rumors are out there, Lambiam.Rich (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I did not dispute the rumours exist, but IMO they are irrelevant to the question whether the two fathers knew each other, so I ignored them. --Lambiam 01:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Giuliani gave a eulogy and he probably would have mentioned it if they knew eachother, but it doesn't seem like he did. https://nypost.com/1999/06/30/trump-patriarch-eulogized-as-great-builder/ Polygnotus (talk) 18:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- https://stevevillano.medium.com/the-trumps-an-incestuous-intertwining-with-organized-crime-ab65316c2b48
- Rich (talk) 19:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for finding this, Polygnotus. But are you sure Rudy would have mentioned it in his eulogy, being possibly embarrassed about his father's occupation? And mentioning an acquaintance with his father would not make Fred seem more illustrious, which eulogies are meant to do. Rich (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, I haven't found definitive proof. Polygnotus (talk) 12:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for finding this, Polygnotus. But are you sure Rudy would have mentioned it in his eulogy, being possibly embarrassed about his father's occupation? And mentioning an acquaintance with his father would not make Fred seem more illustrious, which eulogies are meant to do. Rich (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
December 22
[edit]Policy related to places
[edit]Hello,
I want to add an article for a place in delhi cantonment. However, i am unsure about the relevant Wikipedia policies on this topic. I tried searching on DuckDuckGo to no avail And the results of Wikipedia search gave unrelated things. What are the relevant policies? KhubsuratInsaan (talk) 11:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- You may find this guide a good starting point. Be sure in particular to study the section on notability. You may also want to look up articles about similar places (if those articles exist) and review them to get a sense of what does and does not go into such an article.
- It looks like you're new to Wikipedia. (Welcome!) You may find it easier to write an article from scratch and get it past article review or new pages patrol if you spend some time here first editing other pages and getting to understand the culture. That's not a strict requirement, just something a lot of people benefit from when they first arrive! -- Avocado (talk) 14:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- And the place for new editors to ask questions is the Wikipedia:Teahouse (although we're happy to help here too, especially with references). Alansplodge (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- thank you. i will keep this in mind next time i want to ask a question. KhubsuratInsaan (talk) 12:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- thank you for the detailed reply ❤️ KhubsuratInsaan (talk) 12:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- And the place for new editors to ask questions is the Wikipedia:Teahouse (although we're happy to help here too, especially with references). Alansplodge (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Indian city classification
[edit]I was looking at Classification of Indian cities. In tier Y, there are more than 100 cities listed. But in the reference given there are only 88. I even looked what appears to be official website, there's no new circular of new list. [2] Are there any other circulars or should I just remove extra cities. Also, as my main purpose to look for a tier classification, was to use it as approximation for urban (Tier X and Y) and rural districts (Tier Z). Is there any other department which does this kind of classification, please let me know. -- Parnaval (talk) 17:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- That circular by the Department of Expenditure indicates that classification of cities depends on the latest census. Entities using the classification after yearly update seemingly are easy to find ( https://7thpaycommissionnews.in/classification-of-indian-cities/), regarding a specific source explicitly mentioning their is an update the department link to look for has to be related to the census. --Askedonty (talk) 21:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
December 27
[edit]Black Cube, Melissa Nathan,&U.S. presidential candidates
[edit]Black Cube has a wikipedia article, Melissa Nathan is mentioned in the article It Ends with Us. Both are googleable. My question is if either Black Cube or Melissa Nathan were ever hired to discredit John Kerry or Hillary Clinton? I realize that in Melissa Nathan's case, if she had been hired for that, it would probably have been before she formed The Agency Group PR.Rich (talk) 06:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The link should have been to It Ends with Us (film). --Lambiam 19:16, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Griggsville, Missouri?
[edit]The Robert Fiske (actor) article claims (without a source) that he was born in Griggsville, Missouri. I can find no evidence whatever that such a place has ever existed. There is a Griggsville, Illinois, which is about 20 miles northeast of the IL/MO border (which I think is the river, and presumably was in 1889). Was there really a Griggsville in Missouri, or is this a simple mistake? The only substantive author (to the biographical part of the article) is long departed Wikipedia. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 20:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I can't find an obit for Fiske in Newspapers.com, and the Findagrave entry [3] simply says he was born in Missouri. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:37, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- [Edit Conflict] I wondered if it might be something to do with the Mississippi changing its course, but it seems not. However, if Griggsville, Illinois is correct, he could be added to that article's Notable person [sic] section, doubling its complement!
- The 'Missouri' inclusion was (as you may have noted) in the article as created in 2005, so at least we know it's not the result of vandalism.
- I notice that the Unreliable sources IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes and the Internet Broadway Database also state Griggsville, Missouri, which may of course have been taken from Wikipedia, and Find a Grave gives merely Missouri. However, The Movie Database does give Griggsville, Illinois. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 21:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Indications in Ancestry.com are that he was merely born "in Missouri", not a specific city that I've found. Even though the original article writer has been offline for over 9 years, maybe his email still works? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm wondering if there is some circular WP:CITOGENESIS between ourselves, Findagrave, and IMDb. I too considered the "moving river" hypothesis, but it's much too far away. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 22:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Who Was Who on Screen (1977) confirms he was born in Griggsville, Missouri. No danger of citogenesis there. The search term "Griggsville, MO" throws up a few non-Fiske results on Google and Google Books, but I can't find precisely where it is. --Antiquary (talk) 09:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC) Ah, here we are, it's in Pike County, Missouri [4]. --Antiquary (talk) 10:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Griggsville, IL, is also in Pike County, Illinois and if you look up the zip code (62340) given on that web site you also land in Illinois. The two Pike Counties are direct neighbours, but there's no indication of any common history or even a shift in the state border. --Wrongfilter (talk) 10:15, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- That sounds ominous. Also, the more of my Google and Google Books hits I follow up, the fewer check out. The evidence that this place ever existed outside of Fiske's say-so looks rather slight. Here is one cite from 1907, and there are one or two more from the 19th century, but confusion with Griggsville, IL can't be ruled out. --Antiquary (talk) 10:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Griggsville, IL, is also in Pike County, Illinois and if you look up the zip code (62340) given on that web site you also land in Illinois. The two Pike Counties are direct neighbours, but there's no indication of any common history or even a shift in the state border. --Wrongfilter (talk) 10:15, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Who Was Who on Screen (1977) confirms he was born in Griggsville, Missouri. No danger of citogenesis there. The search term "Griggsville, MO" throws up a few non-Fiske results on Google and Google Books, but I can't find precisely where it is. --Antiquary (talk) 09:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC) Ah, here we are, it's in Pike County, Missouri [4]. --Antiquary (talk) 10:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm wondering if there is some circular WP:CITOGENESIS between ourselves, Findagrave, and IMDb. I too considered the "moving river" hypothesis, but it's much too far away. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 22:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks everyone. I'll flag the birthplace in the article is questionable (and the whole article as poorly sourced), but I think there's enough uncertainty for me to not "fix" it. And I'll refer to this discussion on the talk page, for the (probably very unlikely event) that some future person cares enough about this rather minor actor to do more thorough research. Thank you. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 08:04, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- One thing I noticed in Newspapers.com is that Missouri papers that referred to Griggsville usually made it clear that they were talking about the one in Illinois. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 14:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
December 28
[edit]Why do news reporters name the programme they are reporting for?
[edit]This is an example by BBC News. ―Panamitsu (talk) 05:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- You have linked to a BBC TV program where at 0:40 the presenter introduces "Our science correspondent Pallab Ghosh" who signs off his report "Pallab Ghosh, BBC News". His report includes statements by two experts each identified by name and affiliation. The video typifies the high standard of journalism where BBC emphasize distinction between source and editorial content. Incidentally, a good BBC TV reporter tends to become a "household name" (the likes of Clive Myrie, Fiona Bruce, Sophie Raworth, Reeta Chakrabarti, Steve Rosenberg, Michael Buchanan and more). Edit: I apologise to Pallab Ghosh for initially misspelling his name and thank Antiquary for correcting me. Philvoids (talk) 11:19, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pallab Ghosh, but I'm sure he's used to it. --Antiquary (talk) 11:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- As I understand the question, it is not why reporters identify themselves, but why for instance Ghosh does not sign off by simply saying "Pallab Ghosh", full stop. --Lambiam 10:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's a standard practice, which might even be in their contracts. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 11:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I seem to recall American channels using clips from the BBC. Such sign offs would serve to identify the source in these cases.--User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 17:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- THat was my thinking, too. These days they tend to have on-screen watermarks, but reporters still sign off with "Jennifer Superior Bitch, Infinity News. Alex". -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 20:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I seem to recall American channels using clips from the BBC. Such sign offs would serve to identify the source in these cases.--User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 17:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's a standard practice, which might even be in their contracts. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 11:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Navigation lights
[edit]Does the fact that aeroplane/ship navigation lights are green and red cause problems for pilots who are red-green colour blind? How do they deal with that? Can they even become pilots? ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- I couldn't be a pilot because of my red-green colour blindness, but people with a mild version can apparently - this is a link to the UK's Civil Aviation Authority's guidance on colour vision requirements. Mikenorton (talk) 23:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- How fascinating. Thanks. ―Panamitsu (talk) 00:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Similarly, red-green colourblind people may not be able to become helmsmen.
- You might think it would have been more convenient to make those lights red and cyan, as far fewer people are red-blue colourblind, but when navigation lights on ships were introduced, bright blueish lights couldn't be made. That only became possible with gas discharge lamps. Traffic lights and railway signals these days (often using LEDs) use a slightly blueish green, so that most colourblind people can see the difference between red and green. PiusImpavidus (talk) 11:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- They could have agreed (and still could agree) on assigning distinct flashing patterns, like •••—— and —••—• . --Lambiam 20:48, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Flashing patterns would be a very poor method for aircraft and probably ships also. Navigation lights are meant to give a quick indication of the relative position and heading of another aircraft/vessel. When seeing navigation lights a pilot instantly has an indication of the relative flight direction of the other aircraft based on which red/green/white lights are visible. Also there are already the anti-collision lights, red flashing beacon on the tail at least and white flashing strobes on the wingtips and tail. How could a pilot possibly decode flashing lights reliably enough and quickly enough to determine relative heading? fiveby(zero) 18:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wouldn't that be a problem because the sky/ocean is blue? I understand that the lights are used at night so it shouldn't be too much of a problem. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- It would involve more complex lighting circuits/equipment and massive world-wide retrofitting, which (I suggest) would be prohibitively expensive, to solve a relatively minor 'problem' more easily answered by simply not employing colour-blind people in the relevant positions. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 13:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Flashing lights have been used on lighthouses for a long time. They use an assembly of lenses and shutters rotating around a fixed light, using a low-friction bearing. This works fine for stationary lighthouses, but is more problematic on moving ships. There's more wear and the lens assembly could jam or rotate at variable speed. Better to use an electric light, switched repeatedly by a rotating switch powered by an electric motor (all available late 19th century), but both switch and lamp have to switch reliably at least a million times. No problem today, but there's still the issue of recognising a flashing pattern if it's intermittently obscured. It's considered acceptable for lighthouses and buoys, which are usually more or less where you expect them to be, but a moving ship may be a different matter. PiusImpavidus (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- It would involve more complex lighting circuits/equipment and massive world-wide retrofitting, which (I suggest) would be prohibitively expensive, to solve a relatively minor 'problem' more easily answered by simply not employing colour-blind people in the relevant positions. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.223.204 (talk) 13:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- They could have agreed (and still could agree) on assigning distinct flashing patterns, like •••—— and —••—• . --Lambiam 20:48, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- When I answered telephones and sold passenger tickets for Eurostar I had to pass an Ishihara test, the same as signalmen and train drivers. DuncanHill (talk) 21:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Depending on the signalling system, train drivers may also have to discriminate red from yellow/amber. This is less important for road users. And states of tracks and signals are colour-coded on the computer monitors of signalmen, but it should only take a simple software update to accommodate colourblind signalmen. (Yes, there're still some old-fashioned signal boxes in some countries; I've passed the one at Severn Bridge Junction on my way to Wales.) I don't see the objection against colourblind ticket sellers. PiusImpavidus (talk) 11:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
December 29
[edit]Domains
[edit]Are Eritrea's .er and Belarus's .by ever used in domain hacks? .er could be used in shortcut to Blogger, blogg.er, like goo.gl and youtu.be, and .by could be used in domains such as drive.by and in Nordic place namesmas by means "village" in Swedish and "city" in Norwegian and Danish. And can South Africa's .za and India's .in be used directly after the main part, such as in piz.za and drive.in? Also, can .pl, .cz, .sk and .hu addresses contain diacritics, such as gdańsk.pl, česko.cz, košice.sk and magyarország.hu? --40bus (talk) 10:10, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- See URL#Internationalized URL. PiusImpavidus (talk) 11:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Plusimpavidus has only answered the last sentencee.
- The answer to the first part is entirely dependent on the policy of the controller of the ccTLD in question, and that controller may or may not publish a policy. Technically, of course they could be used: the government of Tonga sells .to domains to any interested party, as I presume you know.
- According to our article .by
The Operations and Analysis Centre under the President of the Republic of Belarus allows for anyone (not only for those who reside in Belarus) to register a second level domain such as something.by
, and it also sayshe .by code is used for domain hack by institutions from the German state of Bavaria (German: Bayern), such as bayern.by, the Bavarian Tourism Agency. Since "by" means "town" or "city" in Norwegian, it's also used by some Norwegian newspapers, such as osl.by for an Oslo newspaper, and trd.by for a Trondheim newspaper
, however, neither of these statements appear to be sourced. When I just tried it, trd.by seems to redirect to a Norwegian casino site. - Our articles .er and .za say nothing about whether the ccTLDs are available to anybody outside Eritrea and South Africa respectively. .in doesn't explicitly address the question, but in talking about the use of subdomains it repeats "in India" several times. ColinFine (talk) 20:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Colored asphalt markings
[edit]What's the purpose of such blue, green, pink marks on street grounds? I've seen them in multiple places in Warsaw (typically in non-traffic places, such as sidewalks) where they've stayed for several months or even years without being erased. From what I've read, those marks can be made for some roadworks, but I'm not sure. Brandmeistertalk 20:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've seen them used for several purposes, mostly for marking the course of some underground pipe or cable, but also for marking a distance such as 500m from a given spot. In the first case, there is a sequence of similar markings, not too far apart from each other. In the second case the marking is usually accompanied by a number or some code. --Lambiam 20:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- In my experience (UK) they appear in preparation for invasive ground works, most recently in our road prior to the installation of the third set of broadband cables under our pavement. Apparently, existing suppliers and their customers get sniffy if new upstart suppliers not only add their own cables, but put a shovel through the existing cables in the process! Different colours may denote gas, water and telecommunication lines.
- There is also an occasional rash of markings that outline potholes; whether this is done to guide the repairers of potholes, or as a placebo to pacify local road users, is not always clear. It is possible that the process accompanies the calculation of a cost for the work; the expenditure may not be forthcoming.[citation needed] -- Verbarson talkedits 21:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks all. Brandmeistertalk 11:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
January 1
[edit]Peugeot's rivalry
[edit]Did Peugeot have any rivalry with other auto manufacturer that became famous or was famous but forgotten, like Lancia and Audi in 1983 and Ford and Ferrari in the 1960s? --Donmust90-- Donmust90 (talk) 19:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- When does competition rise to the level of rivalry? Peugeot was unexpectedly beaten in speed by Panhard et Levassor in the Paris–Bordeaux–Paris race of June 1895. --Lambiam 00:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Peugeot, Citroën, Renault and Simca were the big four French automakers post World War II - and therefore rivals. The first two have merged, Renault is still around, but Simca has disappeared. Xuxl (talk) 11:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- While the Simca brand, after having been acquired first by Chrysler and then PSA Peugeot Citroën, has disappeared, the factory in Poissy that Simca acquired from Ford France in 1954 is still in full operation.
- The Lancia–Audi and Ford–Ferrari rivalries alluded to in the question were not about rivalry between companies, but rivalry between racing teams; see Race for Glory: Audi vs. Lancia and Ford v Ferrari. --Lambiam 16:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Peugeot, Citroën, Renault and Simca were the big four French automakers post World War II - and therefore rivals. The first two have merged, Renault is still around, but Simca has disappeared. Xuxl (talk) 11:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
January 3
[edit]British weather website
[edit]Is there any British weather website which has daily data for stations in the United Kingdom? The starlingroot.ddns.net is not working anymore, it worked a few months ago. The "Historic station data" page on MetOffice's website has only monthly data, and the MetOffice WOW - Weather Observations Website has only hourly data. And is there any English-language website having weather observations for different cities and countries in Europe, similar to e.g. Infoclimat? --40bus (talk) 13:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC)