User talk:Kgwu24

CM & DA

Please note my redirecting of Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy EJohn59 (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC)EJohn59

Series for Chemists

Yo, KG ole buddy, see my latest series of contributions. How 'bout you do similar feats to the chemists. ;-)--EJohn59 (talk) 14:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)EJohn59

iGoogle

One more topic -- what about that iGoogle upload matter?--EJohn59 (talk) 04:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)EJohn59

On bolding nobel prize wins

Not that I claim to be an expert on Wikipedia formatting conventions, but I'm fairly sure that edits like this one don't conform to the Manual of Style. Usually, only the article title (and sometimes not even that) is boldfaced in the article prose, save for a very few exceptions. Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (text formatting)#Boldface. 87.79.170.93 (talk) 18:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Apology

Sorry gave you bad suggestion on the chemist stuff.--EJohn59 (talk) 23:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)EJohn

Re: N C Yeh

OK, see my talk page. DGG has fixed that ref. but no hyperlink, only print ref.--EJohn59 (talk) 23:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)EJohn

Hey, you can eliminate the stub status, but personally, I like that Einstein picture on the stub page, especially for a female scientist.--EJohn59 (talk) 22:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)EJohn

Studies in Applied Mathematics

Hey, look at this article. There is that editor-in-chief Benney who has no Wiki entry. See if you can find more info. It bugs me that some big guy like this has a kind of missing link. It feels incomplete. ;-(--EJohn59 (talk) 23:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)EJohn

Obama page rank

See this question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Henrik#Most_frequented_pages I'm dying to know which 478 pages rank above Obama. I'd have guessed that he should rank at least in the top 50 ;-) Maybe we in the US are too Ameriko-centric. ;-)--EJohn59 (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)EJ

The most expensive kiss

Yikes! Is this kiss for real?--EJohn59 (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)EJ

Bravo to Jayron

Thanks for blocking that Duchamp guy. He's disruptive and always looking for arguments. If you look at the section on "personal attacks" in his talk page, you'll see how he talked down to a young lady, even putting her picture there. He's the type that gives Wiki a bad name, and turns away people. --Kgwu24 (talk) 22:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Richard Lindzen

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Richard Lindzen, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 16:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Lindzen AMWS bio

Hi there, based on your edit to Lindzen's biography, it appears you may have access to this volume. My library doesn't have it, so I'm wondering if you would have time to answer a couple of questions about the source? I'll await your response here before writing up the questions. Alex Harvey (talk) 07:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm traveling these 10 days so won't have a chance to access local college lib (I have no online privilege), Feel free to give questions and await answers, but if you go to any local college lib, most have a subscription.KG--Kgwu24 (talk) 14:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Pls help on Chinese page for Benjamin Wah

Pls take a look. I rewrote page in /temp file. I'd like to delete my original entry and let you re-submit my /temp file for me. Thx --QES girl (talk) 04:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Needham

Joseph Needham considered bridge between west & China. Pls see my list of refs at User_talk:Daikang59--Daikang59 (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)DK59; also this link on the Chinese side, talk on zh side--Daikang59 (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2016

Your recent editing history at Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr. K. 00:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kgwu24. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kgwu24. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)