Talk:King of Hearts (Cassie album): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Tag: |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{talk header}} |
||
{{Old AfD multi|page=Electro Love|date=October 4th, 2010|result='''Keep'''}} |
|||
{{album|class=start|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|||
{{WikiProject Albums}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== article title needs to be changed == |
|||
=="Let's Get Crazy" now on iTunes!"== |
|||
The second official single from the album is now on iTunes. (Sept 1, 2009.) |
|||
The title needs to be changed to "TBA".. Having the article names "Cassie's second album", seems very unprofessional.In my opinion. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tj1224|Tj1224]] ([[User talk:Tj1224|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tj1224|contribs]]) 20:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:And the acronym "TBA" as an article title sounds professional to you? The currect title is fine as a placeholder title. It's short and descriptive. Calling it TBA is stupid and doesn't make any sense.--[[User:Atlan|Atlan]] ([[User talk:Atlan|talk]]) 14:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:04, 31 January 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the King of Hearts (Cassie album) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on October 4th, 2010. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
article title needs to be changed
[edit]The title needs to be changed to "TBA".. Having the article names "Cassie's second album", seems very unprofessional.In my opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tj1224 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- And the acronym "TBA" as an article title sounds professional to you? The currect title is fine as a placeholder title. It's short and descriptive. Calling it TBA is stupid and doesn't make any sense.--Atlan (talk) 14:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)