Neolithic Revolution: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Transition in human history from hunter-gatherer to settled peoples}} |
|||
{{Neolithic}} |
|||
{{Use British English|date=September 2023}} |
|||
The '''Neolithic Revolution''' was the first [[agricultural revolution]]—the transition from [[hunter-gatherer|hunting and gathering]] communities and bands, to [[agriculture]] and settlement (settlement is currently being questioned). Archaeological data indicate that various forms of [[domestication]] of plants and animals arose independently in at least 7-8 separate locales worldwide, with the earliest known developments taking place in the [[Ancient Near East|Middle East]] around 10,000 BC (BCE) or earlier.<ref>[http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/jul102004/54.pdf "Origin of agriculture and domestication of plants and animals linked to early Holocene climate amelioration", Anil K. Gupta*, Current Science, Vol. 87, No. 1, 10 July 2004]</ref> |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}} |
|||
[[File:Fertile crescent Neolithic B circa 7500 BC.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Map of Southwest Asia showing the main archaeological sites of the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic]] period, {{circa|7500 BCE}}, in the "[[Fertile Crescent]]"]] |
|||
{{Human history}} |
|||
{{History of technology sidebar}} |
|||
The '''Neolithic Revolution''', also known as the '''First Agricultural Revolution''', was the wide-scale transition of many [[human culture]]s during the [[Neolithic]] period in [[Afro-Eurasia]] from a lifestyle of [[hunter-gatherer|hunting and gathering]] to one of [[agriculture]] and [[sedentism|settlement]], making an increasingly large population possible.<ref name=SCNDR>{{cite journal |title=When the World's Population Took Off: The Springboard of the Neolithic Demographic Transition |journal=Science |date=29 July 2011 |volume=333 |issue=6042 |pages=560–561 |doi=10.1126/science.1208880 |author=Jean-Pierre Bocquet-Appel |bibcode=2011Sci...333..560B |pmid=21798934 |s2cid=29655920}}</ref> These settled communities permitted humans to observe and experiment with plants, learning how they grew and developed.<ref name=":0">{{cite book |title=Worlds together, worlds apart |edition=concise |volume=1 |last1=Pollard |first1=Elizabeth |last2=Rosenberg |first2=Clifford |last3=Tigor |first3=Robert |publisher = W.W. Norton & Company |year = 2015 |isbn = 978-0-393-25093-0 |location= New York |page = 23}}</ref> This new knowledge led to the domestication of plants into [[crop]]s.<ref name=":0" /><ref>Compare:{{cite book| last1 = Lewin| first1 = Roger| author-link1 = Roger Lewin| orig-year = 1984| chapter = 35: The origin of agriculture and the first villagers| title = Human Evolution: An Illustrated Introduction| chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=xryuw8sqNsoC| edition = 5| location = Malden, Massachusetts| publisher = John Wiley & Sons| publication-date = 2009| page = 250| isbn = 978-1-4051-5614-1| access-date = 20 August 2017| quote = [...] The Neolithic transition involved increasing sedentism and social complexity, which was usually followed by the gradual adoption of plant and animal domestication. In some cases, however, plant domestication preceded sedentism, particularly in the New World.| date = 18 February 2009}}</ref> |
|||
Archaeological data indicate that the [[domestication]] of various types of [[plant]]s and animals happened in separate locations worldwide, starting in the [[Geologic time scale|geological epoch]] of the [[Holocene]] 11,700 years ago, after the end of the last Ice Age.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.westfalen-blatt.de/nachricht/2012-11-25-klimaschutz-die-ziele-schmelzen-dahin/613/ |
|||
However, the Neolithic Revolution involved far more than the adoption of a limited set of food-producing techniques. During the next millennia it would transform the small, mobile and fairly egalitarian groups of hunter-gatherers that had hitherto dominated human history, into sedentary [[society|societies]] based in built-up villages and [[town]]s, which radically modified their [[natural environment]] by means of specialized cultivation and storage [[technology|technologies]] (e.g. [[irrigation]]) that allowed extensive surplus production. These developments provided the basis for high [[population density|population densities]], complex [[division of labour|labor diversification]], [[trade|trading economies]], the development of non-portable [[art]], [[architecture]], and [[culture]], centralized administrations and political structures, hiearchical [[ideology|ideologies]] and depersonalized systems of knowledge (e.g. [[property|property regimes]] and [[history of writing|writing]]). The first full-blown manifestation of the entire '''[[Neolithic]]''' complex is seen in the Middle Eastern [[Sumer]]ian cities (ca. 5,300 BC), whose emergence also inaugurates the end of the prehistoric Neolithic and the beginning of historical time. |
|||
|archive-url= https://archive.today/20130212172350/http://www.westfalen-blatt.de/nachricht/2012-11-25-klimaschutz-die-ziele-schmelzen-dahin/613/ |url-status=dead |archive-date= 12 February 2013 |title= International Stratigraphic Chart |publisher= [[International Commission on Stratigraphy]] |access-date= 6 December 2012 }}</ref> It was humankind's first historically verifiable transition to agriculture. The Neolithic Revolution greatly narrowed the diversity of foods available, resulting in a decrease in the quality of human nutrition compared with that obtained previously from [[foraging]],<ref name=Armelagos2014>{{cite journal|last1= Armelagos|first1= George J.|title= Brain Evolution, the Determinates of Food Choice, and the Omnivore's Dilemma|journal= Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition|volume= 54|issue= 10|year= 2014|pages= 1330–1341|issn= 1040-8398|doi= 10.1080/10408398.2011.635817|pmid= 24564590|s2cid= 25488602}}</ref><ref name=":1" /><ref name=Larsen2006/> but because food production became more efficient, it released humans to invest their efforts in other activities and was thus "ultimately necessary to the rise of modern civilization by creating the foundation for the later process of industrialization and sustained economic growth".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Weisdorf |first1=Jacob L. |title=From Foraging To Farming: Explaining The Neolithic Revolution |journal=Journal of Economic Surveys |date=September 2005 |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=561–586 |doi=10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00259.x <!--|access-date=29 March 2023--> |s2cid=42777045 |url=https://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/32255640/0341.pdf |access-date=12 June 2023 |archive-date=20 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180720010122/https://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/32255640/0341.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
The Neolithic Revolution involved much more than the adoption of a limited set of food-producing techniques. During the next millennia, it transformed the small and mobile groups of hunter-gatherers that had hitherto dominated [[human history|human prehistory]] into [[sedentism|sedentary]] (non-[[nomad]]ic) [[society|societies]] based in built-up villages and towns. These societies radically modified their [[natural environment]] by means of specialized food-crop cultivation, with activities such as [[irrigation]] and [[deforestation]] which allowed the production of surplus food. Other developments that are found very widely during this era are the [[domestication of animals]], [[pottery]], polished stone tools, and rectangular houses. In many regions, the adoption of agriculture by prehistoric societies caused episodes of rapid population growth, a phenomenon known as the [[Neolithic demographic transition]]. |
|||
The relationship of the above-mentioned Neolithic characteristics to the onset of agriculture, their sequence of emergence and empirical relation to each other at various Neolithic sites remains the subject of academic debate, and seems to vary from place to place, rather than being the outcome of universal laws of social evolution.<ref>[http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/images/neolithic_agriculture.htm "The Slow Birth of Agriculture", Heather Pringle* ]</ref><ref>[http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/archaeology/sites/middle_east/zawichemishanidar.html |
|||
"Zawi Chemi Shanidar", EMuseum, Minnesota State University]</ref> |
|||
These developments, sometimes called the '''Neolithic package''',<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Nowak |first=Marek |date=2022 |title=Do We Finally Know What the Neolithic Is? |journal=Open Archaeology |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=332–342 |doi=10.1515/opar-2020-0204 |doi-access=free }}</ref> provided the basis for centralized administrations and political structures, hierarchical [[ideology|ideologies]],<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000043086 |access-date=2023-10-18 |title=Violence and its causes |website=unesdoc.unesco.org}}</ref> depersonalized systems of knowledge (e.g. [[history of writing|writing]]), [[population density|densely populated]] settlements, specialization and [[division of labour]], more [[trade]], the development of non-portable [[art]] and [[architecture]], and greater [[property]] ownership.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last=Childe |first=Vere Gordon |date=1950 |title=The Urban Revolution |journal=The Town Planning Review |publisher=[[Liverpool University Press]] |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=3–17 |doi=10.3828/tpr.21.1.k853061t614q42qh |issn=0041-0020 |jstor=40102108 |s2cid=39517784 }}</ref> The earliest known [[civilization]] developed in [[Sumer]] in southern [[Mesopotamia]] ({{circa| 6,500 [[Before Present|BP]]}}); its emergence also heralded the beginning of the [[Bronze Age]].<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|url= https://www.worldhistory.org/Neolithic/|title= Neolithic Period|encyclopedia= [[World History Encyclopedia]]|first = Cristian |last=Violatti|date=2 April 2018}}</ref> |
|||
The relationship of the aforementioned Neolithic characteristics to the onset of agriculture, their sequence of emergence, and their empirical relation to each other at various Neolithic sites remains the subject of academic debate. It is usually understood to vary from place to place, rather than being the outcome of universal laws of [[Sociocultural evolution|social evolution]].<ref>[http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/images/neolithic_agriculture.htm "The Slow Birth of Agriculture"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110101201656/http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/images/neolithic_agriculture.htm |date=1 January 2011 }}, [[Heather Pringle (writer)|Heather Pringle]]</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/archaeology/sites/middle_east/zawichemishanidar.html |title=Wizard Chemi Shanidar |work=EMuseum |publisher=[[Minnesota State University]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080618214404/http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/archaeology/sites/middle_east/zawichemishanidar.html |archive-date=18 June 2008}}</ref> |
|||
==Background== |
|||
Prehistoric [[hunter-gatherer]]s had different [[subsistence]] requirements and lifestyles from agriculturalists. Hunter-gatherers were often highly mobile and migratory, living in temporary shelters and in small tribal groups, and having limited contact with outsiders. Their diet was well-balanced though heavily dependent on what the environment could provide each season. In contrast, because the [[surplus product|surplus]] and [[food security|plannable supply]] of food provided by agriculture made it possible to support larger population groups, agriculturalists lived in more permanent dwellings in more densely populated [[human settlement|settlement]]s than what could be supported by a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. The agricultural communities' seasonal need to plan and coordinate [[resource management|resource]] and [[manpower]] encouraged [[division of labor|division of labour]], which gradually led to [[skilled worker|specialization of labourers]] and [[complex societies]]. The subsequent development of [[trading network]]s to exchange surplus commodities and services brought agriculturalists into contact with outside groups, which promoted [[cultural exchange]]s that led to the rise of [[civilization]]s and [[technological evolution]]s.<ref name=cambridge>{{cite book |title=The Cambridge World History of Food |publisher=Cambridge University Press |page=46}}</ref>{{Full citation needed|date=August 2024 <!--Need at least the publication year and the volume.-->}} |
|||
However, higher population and food abundance did not necessarily correlate with improved health. Reliance on a very limited variety of [[staple crop]]s can adversely affect health even while making it possible to feed more people. [[Maize]] is deficient in certain essential [[amino acids]] ([[lysine]] and [[tryptophan]]) and is a poor source of [[iron]]. The [[phytic acid]] it contains may inhibit [[digestion|nutrient absorption]]. Other factors that likely affected the health of early agriculturalists and their domesticated [[livestock]] would have been increased numbers of [[parasites]] and disease-bearing pests associated with human waste and contaminated food and water supplies. [[Fertilizer]]s and [[irrigation]] may have increased crop yields but also would have promoted proliferation of [[insect]]s and [[bacteria]] in the local environment while grain storage attracted additional insects and [[rodents]].<ref name=cambridge/> |
|||
==Agricultural transition== |
==Agricultural transition== |
||
{{See also|Ancient grains}} |
|||
[[Image:Knapp of Howar 2.jpg|thumb|right|[[Knap of Howar]] farmstead on a site occupied from 3500 BC to 3100 BC]]The term ''Neolithic Revolution'' was coined in the 1920s by [[Vere Gordon Childe]] to describe the first in a series of [[agricultural revolution]]s in Middle Eastern history. The period is described as a "revolution" to denote its importance, and the great significance and degree of change affecting the communities in which new agricultural practices were gradually adopted and refined. |
|||
{{stack| |
|||
[[File:Evolution of temperature in the Post-Glacial period according to Groeanland ice cores.jpg|thumb|upright=2|Evolution of temperatures in the Post-Glacial period after the [[Last Glacial Maximum]] (LGM) according to [[Greenland ice cores]]. The birth of agriculture corresponds to the period of quickly rising temperature at the end of the cold spell of the [[Younger Dryas]] and the beginning of the long and warm period of the [[Holocene]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Zalloua |first1=Pierre A. |last2=Matisoo-Smith |first2=Elizabeth |title=Mapping Post-Glacial expansions: The Peopling of Southwest Asia |journal=Scientific Reports |date=2017-01-06 |volume=7 |pages=40338 |doi=10.1038/srep40338 |pmid=28059138 |pmc=5216412 |language=en |issn=2045-2322|bibcode=2017NatSR...740338P }}</ref>]] |
|||
[[File:Centres of origin and spread of agriculture.svg|thumb|upright=2.0|Map of the world showing approximate centres of origin of agriculture and its spread in prehistory: the Fertile Crescent (11,000 BP), the Yangtze and Yellow River basins (9,000 BP) and the Papua New Guinea Highlands (9,000–6,000 BP), Central Mexico (5,000–4,000 BP), Northern South America (5,000–4,000 BP), sub-Saharan Africa (5,000–4,000 BP, exact location unknown), eastern North America (4,000–3,000 BP).<ref name="DiamondandBellwood2003">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1126/science.1078208 | last1 = Diamond | first1 = J.|author-link1=Jared Diamond | last2 = Bellwood | first2 = P. | title = Farmers and Their Languages: The First Expansions | journal = Science | volume = 300 | issue = 5619 | pages = 597–603 | year = 2003 | pmid = 12714734|bibcode = 2003Sci...300..597D | citeseerx = 10.1.1.1013.4523 | s2cid = 13350469 }}</ref>]] |
|||
[[File:Associations of wild cereals and other wild grasses in northern Israel.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Associations of wild cereals and other wild grasses in Israel.{{Explain|date=August 2024|reason=Which ones are cerals, which ones are grasses? They are obviously similar, but what is this supposed to explain?}}]] |
|||
}} |
|||
The term 'neolithic revolution' was invented by [[V. Gordon Childe]] in his book ''Man Makes Himself'' (1936).<ref name = ManChilde>{{Cite book|title=Man Makes Himself|last=Childe|first=Vere Gordon|publisher=Watts & Company|year=1936|location=London|language= en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Brami|first=Maxime N.|date=1 December 2019|title=The Invention of Prehistory and the Rediscovery of Europe: Exploring the Intellectual Roots of Gordon Childe's 'Neolithic Revolution' (1936)|journal=Journal of World Prehistory |language= en |volume=32|issue=4|pages=311–351|doi=10.1007/s10963-019-09135-y|s2cid=211663314|issn=1573-7802}}</ref> Childe introduced it as the first in a series of agricultural revolutions in [[Middle East]]ern history,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-04-28 |title=7.6: Neolithic Revolution |url=https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Anthropology/Cultural_Anthropology/Cultural_Anthropology_(Evans)/07%3A_Economic_Organization/7.06%3A_Neolithic_Revolution |access-date=2023-10-18 |website=Social Sci LibreTexts |language=en}}</ref> calling it a "revolution" to denote its significance, the degree of change to communities adopting and refining agricultural practices.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-04-28 |title=7.6: Neolithic Revolution |url=https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Anthropology/Cultural_Anthropology/Cultural_Anthropology_(Evans)/07%3A_Economic_Organization/7.06%3A_Neolithic_Revolution |access-date=2023-10-18 |website=Social Sci LibreTexts |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
The beginning of this process in different regions has been dated from |
The beginning of this process in different regions has been dated from 10,000 to 8,000 BCE in the [[Fertile Crescent]],<ref name=Barker2009 /><ref name=Thissen2002>Thissen, L. "Appendix I, The CANeW 14C databases, Anatolia 10,000–5000 cal. BC." in: F. Gérard and L. Thissen (eds.), '' The Neolithic of Central Anatolia. Internal developments and external relations during the 9th–6th millennia cal BC'', Proc. Int. CANeW Round Table, Istanbul 23–24 November 2001, (2002)</ref> and perhaps 8000 BCE in the [[Kuk Swamp|Kuk Early Agricultural Site]] of Papua New Guinea in [[Melanesia]].<ref name="Denham2003">{{cite journal |last1=Denham |first1=Tim P. |year=2003 |title=Origins of Agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the Highlands of New Guinea |journal=Science |volume=301 |issue=5630 |pages=189–193 |doi=10.1126/science.1085255 |pmid=12817084 |last2=Haberle |first2=S. G. |last3=Fullagar |first3=R |last4=Field |first4=J |last5=Therin |first5=M |last6=Porch |first6=N |last7=Winsborough |first7=B |s2cid=10644185 |url=https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:163692/HCA10UQ163692.pdf |access-date=4 December 2019 |archive-date=20 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211120221217/https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:163692/HCA10UQ163692.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url = https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/887|title = The Kuk Early Agricultural Site|website = UNESCO World Heritage Centre|access-date = 26 December 2019|archive-date = 22 January 2023|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230122191357/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/887/|url-status = live}}</ref> Everywhere, this transition is associated with a change from a largely [[nomadic]] [[hunter-gatherer]] way of life to a more [[settler|settled]], agrarian one, with the [[domestication]] of various plant and animal species – depending on the species locally available, and influenced by local culture. Archaeological research in 2003 suggests that in some regions, such as the Southeast Asian peninsula, the transition from hunter-gatherer to agriculturalist was not linear, but region-specific.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Kealhofer |first=Lisa |title=Looking into the gap: land use and the tropical forests of southern Thailand |journal=Asian Perspectives |date=2003 |volume=42 |issue=1|pages=72–95 |doi=10.1353/asi.2003.0022|hdl=10125/17181 |s2cid=162916204 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> |
||
* |
|||
==Domestication== |
|||
There are several competing (but not mutually exclusive) theories as to the factors which drove populations to take up agriculture. The most prominent of these are: |
|||
{{Main article|Domestication}} |
|||
*The '''Oasis Theory,''' originally proposed by [[Raphael Pumpelly]] in 1908, popularized by [[Vere Gordon Childe]] in 1928 and summarised in Childe's book ''Man Makes Himself''.<ref>{{cite book|title=Man Makes Himself|author=Gordon Childe|year=1936|publisher=Oxford university press}}</ref>, maintains that as the climate got drier, communities contracted to oases where they were forced into close association with animals, which were then domesticated together with planting of seeds. It has little support now because climate data for the time does not support the theory.{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} |
|||
*The '''Hilly Flanks''' hypothesis, proposed by [[Robert Braidwood]] in 1948, suggests that agriculture began in the hilly flanks of the Taurus and Zagros mountains, where the climate was not drier as Childe had believed, and fertile land supported a variety of plants and animals amenable to domestication.<ref>{{cite book|title=Rise of Civilization: From Early Hunters to Urban Society in the Ancient Near East|author=Charles E. Redman|year=1978|publisher=Freeman|location=San Francisco}}</ref> |
|||
*The '''Feasting''' model by [[Brian Hayden]]<ref>{{cite book|last=Hayden|first=Brian |
|||
|chapter=Models of Domestication|title=Transitions to Agriculture in Prehistory|editor=Anne Birgitte Gebauer and T. Douglas Price|location=Madison|publisher=Prehistory Press|year=1992|pages=11–18}}</ref> suggests that agriculture was driven by ostentatious displays of power, such as giving feasts, to exert dominance. This required assembling large quantities of food which drove agricultural technology. |
|||
*The '''Demographic theories''' proposed by [[Carl Sauer]]<ref>{{cite book |
|||
|last=Sauer|first=Carl, O|year=1952|title=Agricultural origins and dispersals|location=Cambridge, MA |
|||
|unused_data=|publisher-MIT Press}}</ref> and adapted by [[Lewis Binford]]<ref> |
|||
{{cite book|last=Binford|first=Lewis R.|year=1968|chapter=Post-Pleistocene Adaptations |
|||
|title=New Perspectives in Archaeology|editor=Sally R. Binford and Lewis R. Binford| |
|||
publisher=Aldine Publishing Company|location=Chicago|pages=313–342}}</ref> and [[Kent Flannery]] posit an increasingly sedentary population that expanded up to the carrying capacity of the local environment and required more food than could be gathered. Various social and economic factors helped drive the need for food. |
|||
*The '''evolutionary/intentionality theory''', developed by [[David Rindos]]<ref>{{cite book|title=The Origins of Agriculture: An Evolutionary Perspective|first=David|last=Rindos|publisher=Academic Press|month=December|year=1987|isbn=978-0125892810)}}</ref> and others, views agriculture as an evolutionary adaptation of plants and humans. Starting with domestication by protection of wild plants, it led to specialization of location and then full-fledged domestication. |
|||
*[[Ronald Wright]]'s book and Massey Lecture Series ''[[A Short History of Progress]]''<ref>{{cite book|title=A Short History of Progress first=Ronald|last=Wright|publisher=Anansi|year=2004|isbn=0-88784-706-4)}}</ref> makes a case for the development of agriculture coinciding with an increasingly stable climate. The case was extended to current issues of global warming/climate change presenting the thought that perhaps a major effect of increased CO<sup>2</sup> levels in the atmosphere could very well be a shift to a less stable and more unpredictable climate. Such a shift could impact agriculture in profound ways. |
|||
*The [[Younger Dryas event|Younger Dryas impact event]], which devastated life on earth ([[Quaternary extinction event|megafauna extinction]]) and ended the last [[ice age]], likely provided circumstances that required the evolution of agricultural societies for humanity to survive. The agrarian revolution itself is a reflection of typical overpopulation by certain species following initial events during extinction eras; this overpopulation itself ultimately propagates the extinction event. |
|||
In contrast to the [[Paleolithic]], in which (only as postulated in more than one hominid species existed, only one (Homo sapiens) reached the Neolithic. |
|||
=== Crops === |
|||
==Domestication of plants== |
|||
Once agriculture started gaining momentum, around 9000 BP, human activity resulted in the [[selective breeding]] of cereal grasses (beginning with [[emmer]], [[einkorn]] and [[barley]]), and not simply of those that favoured greater caloric returns through larger seeds. Plants with traits such as small seeds or bitter taste were seen as undesirable. Plants that rapidly shed their seeds on maturity tended not to be gathered at harvest, therefore not stored and not seeded the following season; successive years of harvesting spontaneously selected for strains that retained their edible seeds longer. |
|||
[[Image:Molino neolítico de vaivén.jpg|thumb|right|Neolithic grind stone for processing grain]] |
|||
Once agriculture started gaining momentum, cereal grasses (beginning with [[emmer]], [[einkorn]] and [[barley]]), and not simply those that would favour greater caloric returns through larger seeds, were selectively bred. Plants that possessed traits such as small seeds or bitter taste would have been seen as undesirable. Plants that rapidly shed their seeds on maturity tended not to be gathered at harvest, thus not stored and not seeded the following season; years of harvesting selected for strains that retained their edible seeds longer. Several plant species, the "pioneer crops" or [[Neolithic founder crops]], were the earliest plants successfully manipulated by humans. Some of these pioneering attempts failed at first and crops were abandoned, sometimes to be taken up again and successfully domesticated thousands of years later: [[rye]], tried and abandoned in Neolithic [[Anatolia]], made its way to Europe as weed seeds and was successfully domesticated in Europe, thousands of years after the earliest agriculture.<ref name="Weiss2006">{{ cite journal | last = Weiss | first = Ehud | authorlink = | coauthors = Kislev, Mordechai E.; Hartmann, Anat | year = 2006 | month = | title = Autonomous Cultivation Before Domestication | journal = [[Science (journal)|Science]] | volume = 312 | issue = 5780 | pages = 1608–1610 | doi = 10.1126/science.1127235 | url = | accessdate = | quote =| pmid = 16778044 }}</ref> Wild lentils present a different challenge that needed to be overcome: most of the wild seeds do not germinate in the first year; the first evidence of lentil domestication, breaking dormancy in their first year, was found in the early Neolithic at Jerf el-Ahmar, (in modern Syria), and quickly spread south to the [[Netiv HaGdud]] site in the [[Jordan Valley (Middle East)|Jordan Valley]].<ref name="Weiss2006" /> This process of [[domestication]] allowed the founder crops to adapt and eventually become larger, more easily harvested, more dependable in storage and more useful to the human population. |
|||
[[File:Orange slice1.jpg|250px|thumb|left|An "Orange slice" sickle blade element with inverse, discontinuous retouch on each side, not denticulated. Found in large quantities at Qaraoun II and often with [[Heavy Neolithic]] tools in the flint workshops of the [[Beqaa Valley]] in [[Lebanon]]. Suggested by [[James Mellaart]] to be older than the [[Pottery Neolithic]] of [[Byblos]] (around 8,400 cal. BP).]] |
|||
[[Image:ClaySumerianSickle.jpg|thumb|left|A [[Sumer]]ian Harvester's [[sickle]] dated to 3000 BC]] |
|||
[[Daniel Zohary]] identified several plant species as "pioneer crops" or [[Neolithic founder crops]]. He highlighted the importance of wheat, barley and rye, and suggested that domestication of [[flax]], [[pea]]s, [[chickpea]]s, [[Vicia ervilia|bitter vetch]] and [[lentil]]s came a little later. Based on analysis of the [[gene]]s of domesticated plants, he preferred theories of a single, or at most a very small number of domestication events for each [[taxon]] that spread in an arc from the [[Levantine corridor]] around the [[Fertile Crescent]] and later into Europe.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZRi1AAAAIAAJ&q=The+Origins+and+Spread+of+Agriculture+and+Pastoralism+in+Eurasia|title=ORIGINS & SPREAD AGRIC PAST|first=HARRIS DAVID|last=R|date=17 April 1996|publisher=Smithsonian|isbn=9781560986768 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008692912820|title=Monophyletic vs. polyphyletic origin of the crops on which agriculture was founded in the Near East|first=Daniel|last=Zohary|date=1 April 1999|journal=Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution|volume=46|issue=2|pages=133–142|via=Springer Link|doi=10.1023/A:1008692912820|s2cid=9529895 }}</ref> [[Gordon Hillman]] and Stuart Davies carried out experiments with varieties of wild wheat to show that the process of domestication would have occurred over a relatively short period of between 20 and 200 years.<ref>{{cite book | editor-last=Anderson | editor-first=PC | last1 = Hillman | first1 = G. C | last2 = Davies | first2 = M. S. | title=Préhistoire de l'agriculture: nouvelles approches expérimentales et ethnographiques | publisher=Editions du CNRS | publication-place=Paris | date=1992 | isbn=978-2-222-04546-5 | pages= 124–132 | chapter = Domestication rate in wild wheats and barley under primitive cultivation: preliminary results and archaeological implications of field measurements of selection coefficient | series = Monographie du CRA 6 }}</ref> |
|||
Some of the pioneering attempts failed at first and crops were abandoned, sometimes to be taken up again and successfully domesticated thousands of years later: [[rye]], tried and abandoned in Neolithic [[Anatolia]], made its way to Europe as weed seeds and was successfully domesticated in Europe, thousands of years after the earliest agriculture.<ref name="Weiss2006">{{cite journal |last1=Weiss |first1=Ehud |last2=Kislev |first2=Mordechai E. |last3=Hartmann |first3=Anat |year=2006 |title=Autonomous Cultivation Before Domestication |journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]] |volume=312 |issue=5780 |pages=1608–1610 |doi=10.1126/science.1127235 |pmid=16778044 |s2cid=83125044 }}</ref> Wild lentils presented a different problem: most of the wild seeds do not germinate in the first year; the first evidence of lentil domestication, breaking dormancy in their first year, appears in the early Neolithic at [[Jerf el Ahmar]] (in modern Syria), and lentils quickly spread south to the [[Netiv HaGdud]] site in the [[Jordan Valley (Middle East)|Jordan Valley]].<ref name="Weiss2006" /> The process of domestication allowed the founder crops to adapt and eventually become larger, more easily harvested, more dependable{{clarify|date= November 2016}} in storage and more useful to the human population. |
|||
[[Fig]]s, barley and, most likely, oats were cultivated in the Jordan Valley, represented by the early Neolithic site of [[Gilgal]], where in 2006<ref>{{citation|url=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060602074522.htm|title=Tamed 11,400 Years Ago, Figs Were Likely First Domesticated Crop}}</ref> archaeologists found caches of seeds of each in quantities too large to be accounted for even by [[intensive gathering]], at strata dateable c. 11,000 years ago. Some of the plants tried and then abandoned during the Neolithic period in the Ancient Near East, at sites like Gilgal, were later successfully domesticated in other parts of the world. |
|||
[[File:Molino neolítico de vaivén.jpg|thumb|Neolithic grindstone or [[quern-stone|quern]] for processing grain]] |
|||
Once early farmers perfected their agricultural techniques, their crops would [[Crop yield|yield]] surpluses which needed storage. Most hunter gatherers could not easily store food for long due to their migratory lifestyle, whereas those with a sedentary dwelling could store their surplus grain. Eventually [[granary|granaries]] were developed that allowed villages to store their seeds for longer periods of time. So with more food, the population expanded and communities developed specialized workers and more advanced tools. |
|||
Selectively propagated [[ficus|figs]], wild barley and wild oats were cultivated at the early Neolithic site of [[Gilgal I]], where in 2006<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060602074522.htm|title= Tamed 11,400 Years Ago, Figs Were Likely First Domesticated Crop|website= ScienceDaily|date= 4 June 2006|access-date= 28 February 2018|archive-date= 6 October 2019|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20191006225516/https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060602074522.htm|url-status= live}}</ref> archaeologists found caches of seeds of each in quantities too large to be accounted for even by [[intensive gathering]], at strata datable to {{circa}} 11,000 years ago. Some of the plants tried and then abandoned during the Neolithic period in the Ancient Near East, at sites like Gilgal, were later successfully domesticated in other parts of the world. |
|||
Once early farmers perfected their agricultural techniques like [[irrigation]] (traced as far back as the 6th millennium BCE in [[Khuzistan]]<ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
| last1 = Flannery |
|||
| first1 = Kent V. |
|||
| author-link1 = Kent V. Flannery |
|||
| year = 1969 |
|||
| chapter = Origins and ecological effects of early domestication in Iran and the Near East |
|||
| editor1-last = Ucko |
|||
| editor1-first = Peter John |
|||
| editor1-link = Peter John Ucko |
|||
| editor2-last = Dimbleby |
|||
| editor2-first = G. W. |
|||
| title = The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals |
|||
| chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=6lY9Q4vnrCEC |
|||
| location = New Brunswick, New Jersey |
|||
| publisher = Transaction Publishers |
|||
| publication-date = 2007 |
|||
| page = 89 |
|||
| isbn = 978-0-202-36557-2 |
|||
| access-date = 12 January 2019 |
|||
| quote = Our earliest evidence for this new technology comes [...] from the lowland steppe of Khuzistan. [...] Once irrigation appeared, the steppe greatly increased its carrying capacity and became, in fact, the dominant growth centre of the Zagros region between 5500 and 4000 B.C. |
|||
}} |
|||
</ref><ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
| last1 = Lawton |
|||
| first1 = H. W. |
|||
| last2 = Wilke |
|||
| first2 = P. J. |
|||
| year = 1979 |
|||
| chapter = Ancient Agricultural Systems in Dry Regions of the Old World |
|||
| editor1-last = Hall |
|||
| editor1-first = A. E. |
|||
| editor2-last = Cannell |
|||
| editor2-first = G. H. |
|||
| editor3-last = Lawton |
|||
| editor3-first = H.W. |
|||
| title = Agriculture in Semi-Arid Environments |
|||
| chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=e67tCAAAQBAJ |
|||
| series = Ecological Studies |
|||
| volume = 34 |
|||
| edition = reprint |
|||
| location = Berlin |
|||
| publisher = Springer Science & Business Media |
|||
| publication-date = 2012 |
|||
| page = 13 |
|||
| isbn = 978-3-642-67328-3 |
|||
| access-date = 12 January 2019 |
|||
| quote = Archeological investigations on the Deh Luran Plain of Iran have provided a model for the internal dynamics of the culture sequence of prehistoric Khuzistan [...]. Somewhere between 5500 and 5000 B.C. in the Sabz phase of the Deh Luran Plain, irrigation water was apparently diverted from stream channels in a fashion similar to that employed in early Mesopotamia. |
|||
}} |
|||
</ref>), their crops [[Crop yield|yielded]] surpluses that needed storage. Most hunter-gatherers could not easily store food for long due to their migratory lifestyle, whereas those with a sedentary dwelling could store their surplus grain. Eventually [[granary|granaries]] were developed that allowed villages to store their seeds longer. So with more food, the population expanded and communities developed specialized workers and more advanced tools. |
|||
The process was not as linear as was once thought, but a more complicated effort, which was undertaken by different human populations in different regions in many different ways. |
The process was not as linear as was once thought, but a more complicated effort, which was undertaken by different human populations in different regions in many different ways. |
||
[[File:Genetic analysis on the spread of barley from 9000 to 2000 BCE.jpg|thumb|Genetic analysis on the spread of barley from 9,000 to 2,000 BP<ref name="BHE" />]] |
|||
One of the world's most important crops, [[barley]], was domesticated in the Near East around 11,000 years ago (c. 9,000 BCE).<ref name="BHE" /> Barley is a highly resilient crop, able to grow in varied and marginal environments, such as in regions of high altitude and latitude.<ref name="BHE" /> Archaeobotanical evidence shows that barley had spread throughout Eurasia by 2,000 BCE.<ref name="BHE" /> To further elucidate the routes by which barley cultivation was spread through Eurasia, genetic analysis was used to determine genetic diversity and population structure in extant barley taxa.<ref name="BHE" /> Genetic analysis shows that cultivated barley spread through Eurasia via several different routes, which were most likely separated in both time and space.<ref name="BHE">[[File:CC-BY icon.svg|50px]] Material was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171016050101/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |date=16 October 2017 }} {{cite journal |last1=Jones |first1=Martin K. |last2=Kovaleva |first2=Olga |title=Barley heads east: Genetic analyses reveal routes of spread through diverse Eurasian landscapes |journal=PLOS ONE |date=18 July 2018 |volume=13 |issue=7 |pages=e0196652 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0196652 |pmid=30020920 |pmc=6051582 |language=en |issn=1932-6203|bibcode=2018PLoSO..1396652L |doi-access=free }}</ref> |
|||
===Agriculture in Asia=== |
|||
The Neolithic Revolution is believed to have become widespread in southwest [[Asia]] around 8000 BC–7000 BC, though earlier individual sites have been identified. Although archaeological evidence provides scant evidence as to which of the genders performed what task in Neolithic cultures, by comparison with historical and contemporary hunter-gatherer communities it is generally supposed that hunting was typically performed by the men, whereas women had a more significant role in the gathering. By extension, it may be theorised that women were largely responsible for the observations and initial activities which began the Neolithic Revolution, insofar as the gradual selection and refinement of edible plant species was concerned.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} |
|||
=== Livestock === |
|||
The precise nature of these initial observations and (later) purposeful activities which would give rise to the changes in [[subsistence agriculture|subsistence]] methods brought about by the Neolithic Revolution are not known; specific evidence is lacking. However, several reasonable speculations have been put forward; for example, it might be expected that the common practice of discarding food refuse in [[midden]]s would result in the regrowth of plants from the discarded seeds in the ([[fertilizer]]-enriched) soils. In all likelihood, there were a number of factors which contributed to the early onset of agriculture in Neolithic [[society|human societies]]. |
|||
{{Main|Domestication of animals}} |
|||
When hunter-gathering began to be replaced by sedentary food production it became more efficient to keep animals close at hand. Therefore, it became necessary to bring animals permanently to their settlements, although in many cases there was a distinction between relatively sedentary farmers and nomadic herders.<ref>{{Cite news |title=The Development of Agriculture |url=https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/development-of-agriculture/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160414142437/https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/development-of-agriculture/ |archive-date=14 April 2016 |access-date=21 July 2017 |work=Genographic Project |language=en-US}}</ref>{{original research inline|date=November 2016}} The animals' size, temperament, diet, mating patterns, and life span were factors in the desire and success in domesticating animals. Animals that provided milk, such as cows and goats, offered a source of protein that was renewable and therefore quite valuable. The animal's ability as a worker (for example ploughing or towing), as well as a food source, also had to be taken into account. Besides being a direct source of food, certain animals could provide leather, wool, hides, and fertilizer. Some of the earliest domesticated animals included [[Origin of the domestic dog|dogs]] ([[East Asia]], about 15,000 years ago),<ref>{{Cite news |last=McGourty |first=Christine |date=22 November 2002 |title=Origin of dogs traced |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2498669.stm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191102051347/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2498669.stm |archive-date=2 November 2019 |access-date=29 November 2006 |publisher=BBC News}}</ref> sheep, goats, cows, and pigs.[[File:Menare.jpg|Dromedary caravan in Algeria|thumb|right]] |
|||
West Asia was the source for many animals that could be domesticated, such as sheep, goats and pigs. This area was also the first region to [[domesticate]] the [[dromedary]]. [[Henri Fleisch]] discovered and termed the [[Shepherd Neolithic]] [[flint]] industry from the [[Bekaa Valley]] in [[Lebanon]] and suggested that it could have been used by the earliest [[nomad]]ic [[shepherd]]s. He dated this industry to the [[Epipaleolithic]] or [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic]] as it is evidently not [[Paleolithic]], [[Mesolithic]] or even [[Pottery]] [[Neolithic]].<ref name="CopelandWescombe1966" /><ref>Fleisch, Henri., Notes de Préhistoire Libanaise : 1) Ard es Saoude. 2) La Bekaa Nord. 3) Un polissoir en plein air. BSPF, vol. 63.</ref> |
|||
===Agriculture in the Fertile Crescent=== |
|||
Generalised agriculture apparently first arose in the [[Fertile Crescent]] because of many factors. The [[Mediterranean climate]] has a long dry season with a short period of rain, which made it suitable for small plants with large seeds, like wheat and barley. These were the most suitable for domestication because of the ease of harvest and storage and the wide availability. In addition, the domesticated plants had especially high [[protein]] content. The Fertile Crescent had a large area of varied geographical settings and altitudes. The variety given made agriculture more profitable for former hunter-gatherers. Other areas with a similar climate were less suitable for agriculture because of the lack of geographic variation within the region and the lack of availability of plants for domestication. |
|||
The presence of these animals gave the region a large advantage in cultural and economic development. As the climate in the Middle East changed and became drier, many of the farmers were forced to leave, taking their domesticated animals with them. It was this massive emigration from the Middle East that later helped distribute these animals to the rest of [[Afroeurasia]]. This emigration was mainly on an east–west axis of similar climates, as crops usually have a narrow optimal climatic range outside of which they cannot grow for reasons of light or rain changes. For instance, wheat does not normally grow in tropical climates, just like tropical crops such as bananas do not grow in colder climates. Some authors, like [[Jared Diamond]], have postulated that this east–west axis is the main reason why plant and animal domestication spread so quickly from the [[Fertile Crescent]] to the rest of Eurasia and North Africa, while it did not reach through the north–south axis of [[Africa]] to reach the Mediterranean climates of [[South Africa]], where temperate crops were successfully imported by ships in the last 500 years.<ref name="diamond" /> Similarly, the African [[Zebu]] of central Africa and the domesticated bovines of the fertile-crescent – separated by the dry sahara desert – were not introduced into each other's region. |
|||
===Agriculture in Africa=== |
|||
[[Image:Nile-River1.ogg|thumb|right|Nile River Valley, Egypt]] |
|||
The Revolution developed independently in different parts of the world, not just in the Fertile Crescent. On the African continent, three areas have been identified as independently developing agriculture: the [[Ethiopian Highlands|Ethiopian highlands]], the [[Sahel]] and [[West Africa]].<ref name="diamond">{{cite book |last=Diamond|first= Jared|authorlink=Jared Diamond| year=1999|title=[[Guns, Germs, and Steel]]|publisher= New York: Norton Press|isbn= 0-393-31755-2}}</ref> |
|||
==Centers of agricultural origin== |
|||
The most famous crop domesticated in the Ethiopian highlands is [[coffee]]. In addition, [[Khat]], [[Ensete]], [[Noog]], [[teff]] and [[finger millet]] were also domesticated in the Ethiopian highlands. Crops domesticated in the Sahel region include [[sorghum]] and [[pearl millet]]. The [[Kola nut]], extracts from which became an ingredient in [[Coca Cola]], was first domesticated in West Africa. Other crops domesticated in West Africa include [[African rice]], [[African yam]]s and the [[oil palm]].<ref name="diamond"/> |
|||
{{Main article|Vavilov center}} |
|||
===West Asia=== |
|||
A number of crops that have been cultivated in Africa for millennia came after their domestication elsewhere.It has been running for years. Agriculture in the [[Nile|Nile River Valley]] developed from crops domesticated in the [[Fertile Crescent]]. [[Bananas]] and [[plantain]]s which were first domesticated in [[Southeast Asia]], most likely [[Papua New Guinea]], were re-domesticated in Africa possibly as early as 5,000 years ago. Asian yams and [[taro]] were also cultivated in Africa.<ref name="diamond"/> |
|||
{{main|Origins of agriculture in West Asia}} |
|||
[[File:Asikli Hoyuk sarah c murray 6176.jpg|upright=1.5|thumb|The Neolithic is characterized by fixed human settlements and the [[invention of agriculture]] from c. 10,000 BP. Reconstitution of [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic B]] housing in [[Aşıklı Höyük]], modern [[Turkey]].]][[File:Composite Sickles for Cereal Harvesting at 23,000-Years-Old Ohalo II, Israel.jpg|thumb|Composite sickles for cereal harvesting at 23,000-Years-Old]] |
|||
Prof. [[Fred Wendorf]] and Dr. Romuald Schild, of the Department of Anthropology at Southern Methodist University, originally thought to have found evidence of early agriculture in Upper Paleolithic times at [[Wadi Kubbaniya]], on the [[Kom Ombos]] plateau, of Egypt, including a mortar and pestle, grinding stones, several harvesting implements and charred wheat and barley grains — which may have been introduced from outside the region. AMS dating since their first reports has invalidated their hypothesis.<ref>DR Harris, HE Gove, P Damon "The Impact on Archaeology of Radiocarbon Dating by Accelerator Mass Spectrometry" ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London'' A323, 23-43 1987 |
|||
[[Use-wear analysis]] of five [[Sickle-gloss|glossed]] flint blades found at [[Ohalo II]], a 23,000-years-old fisher-hunter-gatherers' camp on the shore of the [[Sea of Galilee]], Northern [[Israel]], provides the earliest evidence for the use of composite cereal harvesting tools.<ref name="CSCH">{{cite journal |last1=Nadel |first1=Dani |last2=Weiss |first2=Ehud |last3=Groman-Yaroslavski |first3=Iris |date=23 November 2016 |title=Composite Sickles and Cereal Harvesting Methods at 23,000-Years-Old Ohalo II, Israel |journal=PLOS ONE |language=en |volume=11 |issue=11 |pages=e0167151 |bibcode=2016PLoSO..1167151G |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0167151 |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=5120854 |pmid=27880839 |bibcode-access=free |doi-access=free}} [[File:CC-BY_icon.svg|50x50px]] Material was copied from this source, which is available under a [[creativecommons:by/4.0/|Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]].</ref> The Ohalo site is at the junction of the [[Upper Paleolithic]] and the Early [[Epipaleolithic]], and has been attributed to both periods.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Enzel |first1=Yehouda |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hhSVDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA335 |title=Quaternary of the Levant |last2=Bar-Yosef |first2=Ofer |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-09046-0 |page=335 |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
[http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/q41hm53kk451q861/fulltext.pdf]</ref> |
|||
The wear traces indicate that tools were used for harvesting near-ripe semi-green wild cereals, shortly before grains are ripe and disperse naturally.<ref name="CSCH" /> The studied tools were not used intensively, and they reflect two harvesting modes: flint knives held by hand and inserts hafted in a handle.<ref name="CSCH" /> The finds shed new light on cereal harvesting techniques some 8,000 years before the [[Natufian]] and 12,000 years before the establishment of sedentary farming communities in the Near East.<ref name="CSCH" /> Furthermore, the new finds accord well with evidence for the earliest ever cereal cultivation at the site and the use of stone-made grinding implements.<ref name="CSCH" /> |
|||
Many such grinding stones are found with the early Egyptian [[Sebilian]] and [[Mechian]] cultures and evidence has been found of a neolithic domesticated crop-based economy dating around 5000 BC.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=JAca1F3qG34C&pg=PA70&lpg=PA70&dq=Africa,+neolithic&source=web&ots=wWVGAvbwDC&sig=oLsfZADAq2fplcionxe5hXjBgXw&hl=en&ei=V8GKSaSbO9eitge6-eibBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=10&ct=result#PPA76,M1 The Cambridge History of Africa]</ref> Smith{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}} writes: "With the benefit of hindsight we can now see that many Late [[Paleolithic]] peoples in the Old World were poised on the brink of plant cultivation and animal husbandry as an alternative to the hunter-gatherer's way of life". Unlike the Middle East, this evidence appears as a "false dawn" to agriculture, as the sites were later abandoned, and permanent farming then was delayed until 4,500 BC with the [[Tasian]] and [[Badarian]] cultures and the arrival of crops and animals from the Near East. |
|||
Agriculture appeared first in [[West Asia]] about 2,000 years later,{{clarify|reason=Later than what?|date=October 2024}} around 10,000–9,000 years ago. The region was the centre of domestication for three cereals (einkorn wheat, emmer wheat and barley), four legumes (lentil, pea, bitter vetch and chickpea), and flax. Domestication was a slow process that unfolded across multiple regions, and was preceded by centuries if not [[millennia]] of pre-domestication cultivation.<ref>{{Cite journal | last1= Brown | first1= T. A. | last2= Jones | first2= M. K. | last3= Powell | first3= W. | last4= Allaby | first4= R. G. | title= The complex origins of domesticated crops in the Fertile Crescent | doi= 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.008 | pmid= 19100651 | journal= Trends in Ecology & Evolution | volume= 24 | issue= 2 | pages= 103–109 | year= 2009 | bibcode= 2009TEcoE..24..103B | url= http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/367/1/WRAP_Allaby_.pdf | access-date= 8 November 2018 | archive-date= 13 February 2016 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160213102347/http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/367/1/WRAP_Allaby_.pdf | url-status= live }}</ref> |
|||
===Agriculture in the Americas=== |
|||
{{Main|New World Crops}} |
|||
[[Maize|Corn]], [[beans]] and [[Squash (plant)|squash]] were domesticated in [[Mesoamerica]] around 3500 [[BCE]]. [[Potatoes]] and [[manioc]] were domesticated in [[South America]]. In what is now the eastern United States, Native Americans domesticated [[sunflower]], [[sumpweed]] and [[goosefoot]] around 2500 [[BCE]].<ref name="diamond"/> |
|||
Finds of large quantities of seeds and a grinding stone at the [[Epipalaeolithic]] site of [[Ohalo II]], dating to around 19,400 BP, has shown some of the earliest evidence for advanced planning of plants for food consumption and suggests that humans at Ohalo II processed the grain before consumption.<ref>{{cite book |last= Mithen |first= Steven |title= After the ice : a global human history, 20.000–5.000 BC |year= 2006 |publisher= Harvard Univ. Press |location= Cambridge, MA |isbn= 978-0-674-01570-8 |page= [https://archive.org/details/aftericeglobalhu00mith/page/517 517] |edition= 1. paperback |url= https://archive.org/details/aftericeglobalhu00mith/page/517 }}</ref><ref name="six">Compiled largely with reference to: {{cite journal | last1=Weiss | first1=Ehud | last2=Kislev | first2=Mordechai E. | last3=Simchoni | first3=Orit | last4=Nadel | first4=Dani | last5=Tschauner | first5=Hartmut | title=Plant-food preparation area on an Upper Paleolithic brush hut floor at Ohalo II, Israel | journal=Journal of Archaeological Science | volume=35 | issue=8 | date=2008 | doi=10.1016/j.jas.2008.03.012 | pages=2400–2414| bibcode=2008JArSc..35.2400W }}</ref> [[Tell Aswad]] is the oldest site of agriculture, with domesticated [[emmer]] [[wheat]] dated to 10,800 BP.<ref>{{cite journal | pmid= 12270906 | volume= 19 | issue= 10 | title= AFLP analysis of a collection of tetraploid wheats indicates the origin of emmer and hard wheat domestication in southeast Turkey |date= October 2002 | pages= 1797–801 | last1= Ozkan | first1= H. | last2= Brandolini | first2= A. | last3= Schäfer-Pregl | first3= R. | last4= Salamini | first4= F. | journal= Molecular Biology and Evolution | doi= 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004002| doi-access= free }}</ref><ref>van Zeist, W. Bakker-Heeres, J.A.H., Archaeobotanical Studies in the Levant 1. Neolithic Sites in the Damascus Basin: Aswad, Ghoraifé, Ramad., Palaeohistoria, 24, 165–256, 1982.</ref> Soon after came hulled, two-row barley – found domesticated earliest at [[Jericho]] in the [[Jordan Rift Valley|Jordan valley]] and at [[Iraq ed-Dubb]] in [[Jordan]].<ref>Hopf, Maria., "Jericho plant remains" in Kathleen M. Kenyon and T. A. Holland (eds.) Excavations at Jericho 5, pp. 576–621, British School of Archaeology at Jerusalem, London, 1983.</ref> |
|||
==Domestication of animals== |
|||
When hunter-gathering began to be replaced by sedentary food production it became more profitable to keep animals close at hand. Therefore, it became necessary to bring animals permanently to their settlements, although in many cases there was a distinction between relatively sedentary farmers and nomadic herders. The animals' size, temperament, diet, mating patterns, and life span were factors in the desire and success in domesticating animals. Animals that provided milk, such as cows and goats, offered a source of protein that was renewable and therefore quite valuable. The animal’s ability as a worker (for example ploughing or towing), as well as a food source, also had to be taken into account. Besides being a direct source of food, certain animals could provide leather, wool, hides, and fertilizer. Some of the earliest domesticated animals included dogs (about 15,000 years ago),<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2498669.stm |
|||
| title = Origin of dogs traced |
|||
| accessdate = 2006-11-29 |
|||
| last = McGourty |
|||
| first = Christine |
|||
| date = [[2002-11-22]] |
|||
| publisher = BBC News |
|||
}}</ref> sheep, goats, cows, and pigs.<ref name="diamond"/> |
|||
Other sites in the [[Levantine corridor]] that show early evidence of agriculture include [[Wadi Faynan 16]] and [[Netiv Hagdud]].<ref name="Barker2009">{{cite book |author=Graeme Barker |title=The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory: Why did Foragers become Farmers? |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fkifXu2gx4YC |date=2009 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-955995-4}}</ref> [[Jacques Cauvin]] noted that the settlers of Aswad did not domesticate on site, but ''"arrived, perhaps from the neighbouring [[Anti-Lebanon]], already equipped with the seed for planting"''.<ref name="Cauvin2000">{{cite book |author=Jacques Cauvin |title=The Birth of the Gods and the Origins of Agriculture, p. 53 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z4epGQpNyucC |access-date=15 August 2012 |year=2000 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-65135-6}}</ref> In the Eastern Fertile Crescent, evidence of cultivation of wild plants has been found in [[Chogha Golan|Choga Gholan]] in [[Iran]] dated to 12,000 BP, with domesticated emmer wheat appearing in 9,800 BP, suggesting there may have been multiple regions in the Fertile Crescent where cereal domestication evolved roughly contemporaneously.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Riehl|first1=Simone|last2=Zeidi|first2=Mohsen|last3=Conard|first3=Nicholas|date=5 July 2013|title=Emergence of Agriculture in the Foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245539035|journal=Science|volume=341|issue=6141|pages=65–7|doi=10.1126/science.1236743|pmid=23828939|bibcode=2013Sci...341...65R|s2cid=45375155|access-date=8 November 2018|archive-date=23 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200523072032/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245539035_Emergence_of_Agriculture_in_the_Foothills_of_the_Zagros_Mountains_of_Iran|url-status=live}}</ref> The [[Heavy Neolithic]] [[Qaraoun culture]] has been identified at around fifty sites in Lebanon around the source springs of the [[River Jordan]], but never reliably dated.<ref name="PeltenburgWasse2004">{{cite book |author1=Peltenburg, E.J. |author2=Wasse, Alexander |author3=Council for British Research in the Levant |title=Maya Haïdar Boustani, Flint workshops of the Southern Beqa' valley (Lebanon): preliminary results from Qar'oun* in Neolithic revolution: new perspectives on southwest Asia in light of recent discoveries on Cyprus |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6mKBAAAAMAAJ |year=2004 |publisher=Oxbow Books |isbn=978-1-84217-132-5}}</ref><ref name="CopelandWescombe1966">{{cite book |author1=L. Copeland |author2=P. Wescombe |title=Inventory of Stone-Age Sites in Lebanon: North, South and East-Central Lebanon |page=89 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qhPRQwAACAAJ |year=1966 |publisher=Imprimerie Catholique}}</ref> |
|||
===Domestication of animals in the Middle East=== |
|||
[[Image:Menare.jpg|Dromedary Camel caravan in Algeria|thumb|right]] |
|||
The Middle East served as the source for many animals that could be domesticated, such as goats and pigs. This area was also the first region to [[domesticate]] the [[Dromedary Camel]]. The presence of these animals gave the region a large advantage in cultural and economic development. As the climate in the Middle East changed, and became drier, many of the farmers were forced to leave, taking their domesticated animals with them. It was this massive emigration from the Middle East that would later help distribute these animals to the rest of Afroeurasia. This emigration was mainly on an east-west axis of similar climates, as crops usually have a narrow optimal climatic range outside of which they cannot grow for reasons of light or rain changes. For instance, wheat does not normally grow in tropical climates, just like tropical crops such as bananas do not grow in colder climates. Some authors like [[Jared Diamond]] postulated that this East-West axis is the main reason why plant and animal domestication spread so quickly from the [[Fertile Crescent]] to the rest of Eurasia and North Africa, while it did not reach through the North-South axis of [[Africa]] to reach the Mediterranean climates of [[South Africa]], where temperate crops were successfully imported by ships in the last 500 years.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} The African [[Zebu]] is a separate breed of cattle that was better suited to the hotter climates of central Africa than the fertile-crescent domesticated bovines. North and South America were similarly separated by the narrow tropical [[Isthmus of Panama]], that prevented the andes [[llama]] to be exported to the [[Mexican plateau]]. |
|||
In his book ''[[Guns, Germs, and Steel]]'', Jared Diamond argues that the vast continuous east–west stretch of temperate climatic zones of [[Eurasia]] and [[North Africa]] gave peoples living there a highly advantageous geographical location that afforded them a head start in the Neolithic Revolution. Both shared the temperate climate ideal for the first agricultural settings, and both were near a number of easily [[domestication|domesticable]] plant and animal species. In areas where continents aligned north–south such as the Americas and Africa, crops—and later domesticated animals—could not spread across tropical zones.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/british_prehistory/overview_british_prehistory_01.shtml|title=BBC – History – Ancient History in depth: Overview: From Neolithic to Bronze Age, 8000–800 BC|access-date=21 July 2017|archive-date=12 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512115703/http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/british_prehistory/overview_british_prehistory_01.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==Causes of the Neolithic Revolution== |
|||
===East Asia=== |
|||
Jack Harlan, examining the causes for the Neolithic Revolution, suggests 6 principal reasons which can be summarized to 3 principal categories: |
|||
{{See also|Rice domestication|Neolithic China|Domesticated plants and animals of Austronesia}} |
|||
[[File:Spatial distribution of rice, millet and mixed farming sites with a boundary of rice and millet and possible centers of agriculture.png|thumb|upright=1.3|Spatial distribution of rice, millet and mixed farming sites in [[Neolithic China]] (He ''et al.'', 2017)<ref name="He2017">{{cite journal |last1=He |first1=Keyang |last2=Lu |first2=Houyuan |last3=Zhang |first3=Jianping |last4=Wang |first4=Can |last5=Huan |first5=Xiujia |title=Prehistoric evolution of the dualistic structure mixed rice and millet farming in China |journal=The Holocene |date=7 June 2017 |volume=27 |issue=12 |pages=1885–1898 |doi=10.1177/0959683617708455 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317400332 |bibcode=2017Holoc..27.1885H |s2cid=133660098 |access-date=23 January 2019 |archive-date=20 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211120221221/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317400332_Prehistoric_evolution_of_the_dualistic_structure_mixed_rice_and_millet_farming_in_China |url-status=live }}</ref>]] |
|||
Agriculture in [[Neolithic China]] can be separated into two broad regions, Northern China and Southern China.<ref name="He2017" /><ref name="Bellwood2011" /> |
|||
#Domestication for religious reasons |
|||
#Domestication by crowding and as a consequence of stress |
|||
#Domestication resulting from discovery, based upon the perceptions of food gatherers |
|||
The agricultural centre in northern China is believed to be the homelands of the early [[Sino-Tibetan]]-speakers, associated with the [[Houli culture|Houli]], [[Peiligang culture|Peiligang]], [[Cishan culture|Cishan]], and [[Xinglongwa]] [[Archaeological culture|cultures]], clustered around the [[Yellow River]] basin.<ref name="He2017" /><ref name="Bellwood2011">{{cite journal |last1=Bellwood |first1=Peter |title=The Checkered Prehistory of Rice Movement Southwards as a Domesticated Cereal – from the Yangzi to the Equator |journal=Rice |date=9 December 2011 |volume=4 |issue=3–4 |pages=93–103 |doi=10.1007/s12284-011-9068-9 |s2cid=44675525 |url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81529950.pdf |doi-access=free |bibcode=2011Rice....4...93B |access-date=23 January 2019 |archive-date=24 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190124042141/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81529950.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> It was the domestication centre for [[foxtail millet]] (''Setaria italica'') and [[broomcorn millet]] (''Panicum miliaceum''), with early evidence of domestication approximately 8,000 years ago,<ref name="doi10.1093/aob/mcm048">{{Cite journal | last1=Fuller | first1=D. Q. | title=Contrasting Patterns in Crop Domestication and Domestication Rates: Recent Archaeobotanical Insights from the Old World | doi=10.1093/aob/mcm048 | journal=Annals of Botany | volume=100 | issue=5 | pages=903–924 | year=2007 | pmid=17495986| pmc=2759199 }}</ref> and widespread cultivation 7,500 years ago.<ref name="doi10.1093/aob/mcm048" /> ([[Soybean]] was also domesticated in northern China 4,500 years ago.<ref name="Siddiqi">{{cite book |last= Siddiqi |first= Mohammad Rafiq |title=Tylenchida: Parasites of Plants and Insects |publisher=CABI |pages=<!--389 - no of pages?--> |date=2001}}</ref> [[Orange (fruit)|Orange]] and [[peach]] also originated in China, being cultivated {{circa|2500 BCE}}.<ref>{{cite book|last=Thacker |first=Christopher|title=The history of gardens |year=1985 |publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley |isbn=978-0-520-05629-9|page=[https://archive.org/details/historyofgardens00chri/page/57 57] |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofgardens00chri|url-access=registration }}</ref><ref>Webber, Herbert John (1967–1989). [http://websites.lib.ucr.edu/agnic/webber/Vol1/Chapter1.htm Chapter I. History and Development of the Citrus Industry] {{webarchive|url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160523072403/http://websites.lib.ucr.edu/agnic/webber/Vol1/Chapter1.htm |date=23 May 2016 }} in ''Origin of Citrus'', Vol. 1. University of California</ref>) |
|||
With regard to the first explanation, [[Ian Hodder]], who directs the excavations at [[Çatalhöyük]] (Turkey), has said that the earliest settled communities, and the Neolithic revolution they represent, actually ''preceded'' the development of agriculture. He has been developing the ideas first expressed by [[Jacques Cauvin]], the excavator of the [[Natufian]] settlement at [[Mureybet]] in northern Syria. Hodder believes that the Neolithic revolution was the result of a revolutionary change in the human psychology, a "revolution of symbols" which led to new beliefs about the world and shared community rituals embodied in corpulent female figurines (see [[Venus of Willendorf]]) and the methodical assembly of [[aurochs]] horns. |
|||
[[File:Likely routes of early rice transfer, and possible language family homelands (archaeological sites in China and SE Asia shown).png|thumb|upright=1.3|left|Possible [[Urheimat|language family homelands]], and likely routes of early rice transfer (c. 3,500 to 500 BCE). The approximate coastlines during the early [[Holocene]] are shown in lighter blue. (Bellwood, 2011)<ref name="Bellwood2011" />]] |
|||
The agricultural centres in southern China are clustered around the [[Yangtze River]] basin. Rice was domesticated in this region, together with the development of [[paddy field]] cultivation, between 13,500 and 8,200 years ago.<ref name="He2017" /><ref name="pnas1">{{Cite journal|last1=Molina|first1=J.|last2=Sikora|first2=M.|last3=Garud|first3=N.|last4=Flowers|first4=J. M.|last5=Rubinstein|first5=S.|last6=Reynolds|first6=A.|last7=Huang|first7=P.|last8=Jackson|first8=S.|last9=Schaal|first9=B. A.|last10=Bustamante|doi=10.1073/pnas.1104686108|first10=C. D.|last11=Boyko|first11=A. R.|last12=Purugganan|first12=M. D.|title=Molecular evidence for a single evolutionary origin of domesticated rice|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=108|issue=20|pages=8351–83516|year=2011|pmid=21536870|pmc=3101000|bibcode=2011PNAS..108.8351M|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Zhang2012">{{cite journal |last1=Zhang |first1=Jianping |last2=Lu |first2=Houyuan |last3=Gu |first3=Wanfa |last4=Wu |first4=Naiqin |last5=Zhou |first5=Kunshu |last6=Hu |first6=Yayi |last7=Xin |first7=Yingjun |last8=Wang |first8=Can |last9=Kashkush |first9=Khalil |title=Early Mixed Farming of Millet and Rice 7800 Years Ago in the Middle Yellow River Region, China |journal=PLOS ONE |date=17 December 2012 |volume=7 |issue=12 |pages=e52146 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0052146|pmid=23284907 |pmc=3524165 |bibcode=2012PLoSO...752146Z |doi-access=free }}</ref> |
|||
There are two possible centres of domestication for rice. The first is in the lower [[Yangtze River]], believed to be the homelands of [[Austronesian peoples|pre-Austronesians]] and associated with the [[Kauhuqiao culture|Kauhuqiao]], [[Hemudu culture|Hemudu]], [[Majiabang culture|Majiabang]], and [[Songze culture|Songze]] [[Archaeological culture|cultures]]. It is characterized by typical pre-Austronesian features, including stilt houses, jade carving, and boat technologies. Their diet were also supplemented by [[acorn]]s, [[Eleocharis dulcis|water chestnuts]], [[foxnut]]s, and [[domesticated pig|pig]] domestication. The second is in the middle Yangtze River, believed to be the homelands of the early [[Hmong-Mien]]-speakers and associated with the [[Pengtoushan culture|Pengtoushan]] and [[Daxi culture|Daxi]] [[Archaeological culture|cultures]]. Both of these regions were heavily populated and had regular trade contacts with each other, as well as with early [[Austroasiatic]] speakers to the west, and early [[Kra-Dai]] speakers to the south, facilitating the spread of rice cultivation throughout southern China.<ref name="Zhang2012" /><ref name="He2017" /><ref name="Bellwood2011" /> |
|||
An alternative explanation for the origin of agriculture has been advanced by anthropologist [[Mark Nathan Cohen]]. Cohen believes that following the widespread extinctions of large mammals in the late Palaeolithic, the human population had expanded to the limits of the available territory and a population explosion led to a food crisis. Agriculture was the only way in which it was possible to support the increasing population on the available area of land. This view has come under criticism due to the obvious problem of how a population explosion would occur without already having a surplus of food.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} |
|||
[[File:Chronological dispersal of Austronesian people across the Pacific.svg|thumb|320px|Chronological dispersal of [[Austronesian peoples]] across the [[Indo-Pacific]] (Bellwood ''in'' Chambers, 2008)]] |
|||
Food gatherers (not the hunters) caring for children, keeping the fires alive, and foraging near the base camp, led the way in developing language and culture, in knowledge of plants, and increasingly semi-domesticated animals who travelled with the nomads from camp to camp. |
|||
The millet and rice-farming cultures also first came into contact with each other at around 9,000 to 7,000 BP, resulting in a corridor between the millet and rice cultivation centres where both rice and millet were cultivated.<ref name="He2017" /> At around 5,500 to 4,000 BP, there was increasing migration into [[Taiwan]] from the early Austronesian [[Dapenkeng culture]], bringing rice and millet cultivation technology with them. During this period, there is evidence of large settlements and intensive rice cultivation in Taiwan and the [[Penghu Islands]], which may have resulted in [[overexploitation]]. Bellwood (2011) proposes that this may have been the impetus of the [[Austronesian expansion]] which started with the migration of the Austronesian-speakers from Taiwan to the Philippines at around 5,000 BP.<ref name="Bellwood2011" /> |
|||
Austronesians carried rice cultivation technology to [[Island Southeast Asia]] along with other domesticated species. The new tropical island environments also had new food plants that they exploited. They carried useful [[Domesticated plants and animals of Austronesia|plants and animals]] during each colonization voyage, resulting in the rapid introduction of domesticated and semi-domesticated species throughout [[Oceania]]. They also came into contact with the early agricultural centres of [[Papuan languages|Papuan]]-speaking populations of [[New Guinea]] as well as the [[Dravidian languages|Dravidian]]-speaking regions of [[South India]] and [[Sri Lanka]] by around 3,500 BP. They acquired further cultivated food plants like bananas and pepper from them, and in turn introduced Austronesian technologies like wetland cultivation and [[outrigger canoe]]s.<ref name="Bellwood2011" /><ref name="Bayliss-Smith2017">{{cite book|first1=Tim|last1=Bayliss-Smith|first2=Jack|last2=Golson|first3=Philip|last3=Hughes|editor1-first=Jack |editor1-last=Golson |editor2-first=Tim |editor2-last=Denham|editor3-first=Philip |editor3-last=Hughes|editor4-first=Pamela|editor4-last= Swadling|editor5-first=John |editor5-last=Muke|title =Ten Thousand Years of Cultivation at Kuk Swamp in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea|chapter =Phase 4: Major Disposal Channels, Slot-Like Ditches and Grid-Patterned Fields|publisher =ANU Press|series =terra australis|volume=46|year =2017|pages=239–268|isbn = 978-1-76046-116-4|chapter-url =https://books.google.com/books?id=Hlk0DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA239}}</ref><ref name="Mahdi1999">{{cite book|last1=Mahdi|first1=Waruno|editor1-last =Blench|editor1-first=Roger|editor2-last=Spriggs|editor2-first= Matthew|title =Archaeology and Language III: Artefacts languages, and texts|chapter =The Dispersal of Austronesian boat forms in the Indian Ocean|volume = 34|publisher =Routledge|series =One World Archaeology |year =1999|pages=144–179|isbn =978-0-415-10054-0}}</ref><ref name="BlenchAnderson2010">{{cite book|first1=Roger|last1=Blench|editor1-first=Atholl|editor1-last=Anderson|editor1-link=Atholl Anderson|editor2-first=James H.|editor2-last=Barrett|editor3-first=Katherine V.|editor3-last=Boyle|title=The Global Origins and Development of Seafaring|chapter=Evidence for the Austronesian Voyages in the Indian Ocean|publisher=McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research|year=2010|pages=239–248|isbn=978-1-902937-52-6|chapter-url=http://www.rogerblench.info/Archaeology/Indian%20Ocean/Austronesians%20in%20East%20Africa%20offprint.pdf|access-date=23 January 2019|archive-date=28 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190728125533/http://www.rogerblench.info/Archaeology/Indian%20Ocean/Austronesians%20in%20East%20Africa%20offprint.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> During the 1st millennium CE, they also colonized [[Madagascar]] and the [[Comoros]], bringing Southeast Asian food plants, including rice, to [[East Africa]].<ref name="Beaujard2011">{{cite journal |last1=Beaujard |first1=Philippe |title=The first migrants to Madagascar and their introduction of plants: linguistic and ethnological evidence |journal=Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa |date=August 2011 |volume=46 |issue=2 |pages=169–189 |doi=10.1080/0067270X.2011.580142 |s2cid=55763047 |url=https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00706173/file/Beaujard.azania2.pdf |access-date=11 July 2019 |archive-date=21 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211121025752/https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00706173/file/Beaujard.azania2.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="WalterLebot2007">{{cite book |last1=Walter |first1=Annie |last2=Lebot |first2=Vincent |title=Gardens of Oceania |date=2007 |publisher=IRD Éditions-CIRAD |isbn=978-1-86320-470-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SMYkLkV4iyEC}}</ref> |
|||
===Africa=== |
|||
[[File:Nile-River1.ogv|thumb|right|Nile River Valley, Egypt]] |
|||
On the African continent, three areas have been identified as independently developing agriculture: the [[Ethiopian Highlands|Ethiopian highlands]], the [[Sahel]] and [[West Africa]].<ref name="diamond">{{cite book |last=Diamond|first= Jared|author-link=Jared Diamond| year=1997|title=Guns, Germs, and Steel|publisher= New York: Norton Press|isbn= 978-0-393-31755-8|title-link= Guns, Germs, and Steel}}</ref> By contrast, [[Ancient Egyptian agriculture|Agriculture in the Nile River Valley]] is thought to have developed from the original Neolithic Revolution in the [[Fertile Crescent]]. |
|||
Many grinding stones are found with the early Egyptian [[Sebilian]] and [[Mechian]] cultures and evidence has been found of a neolithic domesticated crop-based economy dating around 7,000 BP.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JAca1F3qG34C&dq=Africa,+neolithic&pg=PA70|title=The Cambridge History of Africa|first1=J. D.|last1=Fage|first2=John Desmond|last2=Clark|first3=Roland Anthony|last3=Oliver|date=29 August 1975|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9780521215923 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref name="smith">{{cite journal | last=Smith | first=Philip E. L. | title=Stone-Age Man on the Nile | journal=Scientific American | volume=235 | issue=2 | date=1976 | issn=0036-8733 | doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0876-30 | pages=30–41 | bibcode=1976SciAm.235b..30S | quote = With the benefit of hindsight we can now see that many Late Paleolithic peoples in the Old World were poised on the brink of plant cultivation and animal husbandry as an alternative to the hunter-gatherer's way of life}} </ref> |
|||
Unlike the Middle East, this evidence appears as a "false dawn" to agriculture, as the sites were later abandoned, and permanent farming then was delayed until 6,500 BP with the [[Tasian culture]] and [[Badarian]] culture and the arrival of crops and animals from the Near East. |
|||
[[Bananas]] and [[Plantain (cooking)|plantains]], which were first domesticated in [[Southeast Asia]], most likely [[Papua New Guinea]], were re-domesticated in Africa possibly as early as 5,000 years ago. Asian yams and [[taro]] were also cultivated in Africa.<ref name="diamond" /> |
|||
The most famous crop domesticated in the Ethiopian highlands is [[coffee]]. In addition, [[khat]], [[ensete]], [[noog]], [[teff]] and [[finger millet]] were also domesticated in the Ethiopian highlands. Crops domesticated in the Sahel region include [[sorghum]] and [[pearl millet]]. The [[kola nut]] was first domesticated in West Africa. Other crops domesticated in West Africa include [[African rice]], [[Yam (vegetable)|yams]] and the [[oil palm]].<ref name="diamond" /> |
|||
Agriculture spread to Central and Southern Africa in the [[Bantu expansion]] during the 1st millennium BCE to 1st millennium CE. |
|||
[[File:World in 2000 BC.svg|thumb|300px|Map of the world in 2000 BCE, just after the end of the [[3rd millennium BC]]E, colour coded by cultural stage. |
|||
{{legend|#90AD27|simple farming societies}} |
|||
{{legend|#F79321|complex farming societies ([[Ancient Near East|Near East]], [[Bronze Age Europe|Europe]], [[Prehistoric China|China]], [[Andean civilizations|Andes]])}} |
|||
{{legend|#1072BA|state societies ([[Fertile Crescent]], [[Ancient Egypt|Egypt]], [[Indus Valley civilization|Indus]], [[Minoans|Crete]], [[Norte Chico civilization|Caral/Norte Chico]])}}]] |
|||
===Americas=== |
|||
{{further|New World crops|Ancestral Puebloans|Oasisamerica|Proto-Uto-Aztecan}} |
|||
The term "Neolithic" is not customarily used in describing cultures in the Americas. However, a broad similarity exists between Eastern Hemisphere cultures of the Neolithic and cultures in the Americas. [[Maize]] (corn), [[beans]] and [[Squash (plant)|squash]] were among the earliest crops domesticated in [[Mesoamerica]]: squash as early as 6000 BCE, beans no later than 4000 BCE, and maize beginning about 7000 BCE.<ref>{{cite book |editor1=Johannessen, S. |editor2=Hastorf, C. A. |title=Corn and Culture in the Prehistoric New World |publisher=Westview Press}}</ref> [[Potatoes]] and [[manioc]] were domesticated in [[South America]]. In what is now the eastern United States, Native Americans domesticated [[sunflower]], [[sumpweed]] and [[goosefoot]] {{circa|2500 BCE}}. In the highlands of central Mexico, sedentary village life based on farming did not develop until the "formative period" in the second millennium BCE.<ref name="Barker2009p252">{{cite book|author=Graeme Barker|title=The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory: Why Did Foragers Become Farmers?|page= 252|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fkifXu2gx4YC|access-date=4 January 2012|year=2009|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-955995-4}}</ref> |
|||
===New Guinea=== |
|||
{{see also|Domesticated plants and animals of Austronesia}} |
|||
Evidence of drainage ditches at [[Kuk Swamp]] on the borders of the [[Western Highlands Province|Western]] and [[Southern Highlands Province|Southern Highlands]] of [[Papua New Guinea]] indicates cultivation of [[taro]] and a variety of other crops, dating back to 11,000 BP. Two potentially significant economic species, taro (''[[Colocasia esculenta]]'') and [[yam (vegetable)|yam]] (''[[Dioscorea]]'' sp.), have been identified dating at least to 10,200 calibrated years before present (cal BP). Further evidence of [[banana]]s and [[sugarcane]] dates to 6,950 to 6,440 BCE. This was at the altitudinal limits of these crops, and it has been suggested that cultivation in more favourable ranges in the lowlands may have been even earlier. [[Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation|CSIRO]] has found evidence that taro was introduced into the [[Solomon Islands (archipelago)|Solomon Islands]] for human use, from 28,000 years ago, making taro the earliest cultivated crop in the world.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Fullagar | first1=Richard | last2=Field | first2=Judith | last3=Denham | first3=Tim | last4=Lentfer | first4=Carol | title=Early and mid Holocene tool-use and processing of taro (Colocasia esculenta), yam (Dioscorea sp.) and other plants at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of Papua New Guinea | journal=Journal of Archaeological Science | volume=33 | issue=5 | date=2006 | doi=10.1016/j.jas.2005.07.020 | pages=595–614| bibcode=2006JArSc..33..595F }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Loy | first1=Thomas H. | last2=Spriggs | first2=Matthew | last3=Wickler | first3=Stephen | title=Direct evidence for human use of plants 28,000 years ago: starch residues on stone artefacts from the northern Solomon Islands | journal=Antiquity | volume=66 | issue=253 | date=1992 | issn=0003-598X | doi=10.1017/S0003598X00044811 | pages=898–912}}</ref> |
|||
It seems to have resulted in the spread of the [[Trans–New Guinea languages]] from New Guinea east into the Solomon Islands and west into [[Timor]] and adjacent areas of [[Indonesia]]. This seems to confirm the theories of [[Carl O. Sauer|Carl Sauer]] who, in "Agricultural Origins and Dispersals", suggested as early as 1952 that this region was a centre of early agriculture. |
|||
== Spread of agriculture == |
|||
===Europe=== |
|||
{{main|Neolithic Europe}} |
|||
[[File:Expansion of farming in western Eurasia, 9600–4000 BCE.png|thumb|upright=1.3|Spread of farming from Southwest Asia to Europe, between 9600 and 3800 BCE]] |
|||
Archaeologists trace the emergence of food-producing societies in the [[Levant]]ine region of southwest Asia at the close of the last glacial period around 12,000 BCE, and developed into a number of regionally distinctive cultures by the eighth millennium BCE. Remains of food-producing societies in the [[Aegean civilization|Aegean]] have been carbon-dated to {{circa|6500 BCE}} at [[Knossos]], [[Franchthi Cave]], and a number of mainland sites in [[Thessaly]]. Neolithic groups appear soon afterwards in the [[Balkans]] and south-central Europe. The Neolithic cultures of [[southeastern Europe]] (the [[Balkans]] and the [[Aegean civilization|Aegean]]) show some continuity with groups in southwest Asia and [[Anatolia]] (e.g., [[Çatalhöyük]]). |
|||
Current evidence suggests that Neolithic material culture was introduced to Europe via western Anatolia. All Neolithic sites in Europe contain [[pottery|ceramics]], and contain the plants and animals domesticated in Southwest Asia: [[einkorn]], [[emmer]], [[barley]], [[lentil]]s, [[pig]]s, [[goat]]s, [[sheep]], and [[cattle]]. Genetic data suggest that no independent domestication of animals took place in Neolithic Europe, and that all domesticated animals were originally domesticated in Southwest Asia.{{sfn|Bellwood|2004|pp=68–69}} The only domesticate not from Southwest Asia was [[broomcorn millet]], domesticated in East Asia.{{sfn|Bellwood|2004|pp=74, 118}}The earliest evidence of [[cheese]]-making dates to 5500 BCE in [[Kujawy]], [[Poland]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Subbaraman |first=Nidhi |date=12 December 2012 |title=Art of cheese-making is 7,500 years old |url=http://www.nature.com/news/art-of-cheese-making-is-7-500-years-old-1.12020 |url-status=live |journal=Nature News |doi=10.1038/nature.2012.12020 |s2cid=180646880 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210508085311/https://www.nature.com/news/art-of-cheese-making-is-7-500-years-old-1.12020 |archive-date=8 May 2021 |access-date=17 January 2020}}</ref> |
|||
The diffusion across Europe, from the Aegean to Britain, took about 2,500 years (8500–6000 BP). The Baltic region was penetrated a bit later, around 5500 BP, and there was also a delay in settling the [[Pannonian plain]]. In general, colonization shows a "saltatory" pattern, as the Neolithic advanced from one patch of fertile alluvial soil to another, bypassing mountainous areas. Analysis of [[radiocarbon]] dates show clearly that Mesolithic and Neolithic populations lived side by side for as much as a millennium in many parts of Europe, especially in the [[Iberian peninsula]] and along the Atlantic coast.{{sfn|Bellwood|2004|pp=68–72}} |
|||
====Carbon 14 evidence==== |
|||
[[File:Genetic matrilineal distances between European Neolithic Linear Pottery Culture populations (5,500–4,900 calibrated BC) and modern Western Eurasian populations.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Ancient European Neolithic farmers were genetically closest to modern Near-Eastern/ Anatolian populations. The map shows genetic matrilineal distances between European Neolithic [[Linear Pottery Culture]] populations (5,500–4,900 calibrated BP) and modern Western Eurasian populations.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Consortium |first1=the Genographic |last2=Cooper |first2=Alan |date=9 November 2010 |title=Ancient DNA from European Early Neolithic Farmers Reveals Their Near Eastern Affinities |journal=PLOS Biology |language=en |volume=8 |issue=11 |pages=e1000536 |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000536 |issn=1545-7885 |pmc=2976717 |pmid=21085689 |doi-access=free}}</ref>]] |
|||
The spread of the Neolithic from the [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic|Near East Neolithic]] to Europe was first studied quantitatively in the 1970s, when a sufficient number of [[Carbon 14]] age determinations for early Neolithic sites had become available.<ref name="AS1">Original text published under Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0: {{cite journal |last1=Shukurov |first1=Anvar |last2=Sarson |first2=Graeme R. |last3=Gangal |first3=Kavita |date=2014 |title=The Near-Eastern Roots of the Neolithic in South Asia |journal=PLOS ONE |language=en |volume=9 |issue=5 |pages=e95714 |bibcode=2014PLoSO...995714G |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0095714 |pmc=4012948 |pmid=24806472 |doi-access=free}} [[File:CC-BY_icon.svg|50x50px]] Material was copied from this source, which is available under a [[creativecommons:by/4.0/|Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171016050101/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|date=16 October 2017}}</ref> In 1973, Ammerman and [[Cavalli-Sforza]] discovered a linear relationship between the age of an Early Neolithic site and its distance from the conventional source in the Near East ([[Jericho]]), demonstrating that the Neolithic spread at an average speed of about 1 km/yr.<ref name="AS1" /> More recent studies (2005) confirm these results and yield the speed of 0.6–1.3 km/yr (at 95% confidence level).<ref name="AS1" /> |
|||
====Analysis of mitochondrial DNA==== |
|||
Since the original human [[Recent African origin of modern humans|expansions out of Africa]] 200,000 years ago, different prehistoric and historic migration events have taken place in Europe.<ref name="DT">[[File:CC-BY_icon.svg|50x50px]] Material was copied from this source, which is available under a [[creativecommons:by/4.0/|Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171016050101/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|date=16 October 2017}} {{cite journal |last1=Turbón |first1=Daniel |last2=Arroyo-Pardo |first2=Eduardo |date=5 June 2014 |title=Ancient DNA Analysis of 8000 B.C. Near Eastern Farmers Supports an Early Neolithic Pioneer Maritime Colonization of Mainland Europe through Cyprus and the Aegean Islands |journal=PLOS Genetics |volume=10 |issue=6 |pages=e1004401 |doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004401 |issn=1553-7404 |pmc=4046922 |pmid=24901650 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Considering that the movement of the people implies a consequent movement of their genes, it is possible to estimate the impact of these migrations through the genetic analysis of human populations.<ref name="DT" /> Agricultural and husbandry practices originated 10,000 years ago in a region of the Near East known as the Fertile Crescent.<ref name="DT" /> According to the archaeological record this phenomenon, known as "Neolithic", rapidly expanded from these territories into Europe.<ref name="DT" /> |
|||
However, whether this diffusion was accompanied or not by human migrations is greatly debated.<ref name="DT" /> [[Mitochondrial DNA]] – a type of maternally inherited DNA located in the cell cytoplasm – was recovered from the remains of [[Pre-Pottery Neolithic B]] (PPNB) farmers in the [[Near East]] and then compared to available data from other Neolithic populations in Europe and also to modern populations from South Eastern Europe and the Near East.<ref name="DT" /> The obtained results show that substantial human migrations were involved in the Neolithic spread and suggest that the first Neolithic farmers entered Europe following a maritime route through [[Cyprus]] and the [[Aegean Islands]].<ref name="DT" />{{Clear}} |
|||
<gallery class="center" mode="nolines" widths="300px" heights="300px"> |
|||
File:Map of the spread of Neolithic farming cultures in Europe.jpg|Map of the spread of Neolithic farming cultures from the Near-East to Europe, with dates in year BCE. |
|||
File:Modern distribution of the haplotypes of PPNB farmers.jpg|Modern distribution of the haplotypes of PPNB farmers |
|||
File:Genetic distance between PPNB farmers and modern populations.jpg|Genetic distance between PPNB farmers and modern populations |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
===South Asia=== |
|||
{{see also|South Asian Stone Age}} |
|||
{{multiple image |
|||
| align = right |
|||
| caption_align = center |
|||
| direction = vertical |
|||
| header = Expansion to South Asia |
|||
| total_width = 300 |
|||
| image1 = Early Neolithic sites in the Near East and South Asia 10,000-3,800 BCE.jpg |
|||
| caption1 = Early Neolithic sites in the Near East and South Asia 10,000–3,800 BP |
|||
| image2 = Establishment of Neolithic sites.jpg |
|||
| caption2 = Neolithic dispersal from the Near East to South Asia suggested by the time of establishment of [[Neolithic]] sites as a function of distance from [[Gesher (archaeological site)|Gesher]], [[Israel]]. The dispersal rate amounts to about 0.6 km per year<ref name="AS1" /> |
|||
| footer = |
|||
| alt1 = |
|||
}} |
|||
The earliest Neolithic sites in South Asia are [[Bhirrana]] in [[Haryana]] dated to {{BCE|7570–6200}},<ref>{{cite book |last1=Coningham |first1=Robin |title=The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c. 6500 BCE–200 CE |last2=Young |first2=Ruth |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-316-41898-7 |page=111}}</ref> and [[Mehrgarh]], dated to between 6500 and 5500 BP, in the [[Kacchi Plain|Kachi plain]] of [[Balochistan, Pakistan|Balochistan]], Pakistan; the site has evidence of farming (wheat and barley) and herding (cattle, sheep and goats). |
|||
There is strong evidence for causal connections between the Near-Eastern Neolithic and that further east, up to the Indus Valley.<ref name="AS1-6">[[File:CC-BY_icon.svg|50x50px]] Material was copied from this source, which is available under a [[creativecommons:by/4.0/|Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171016050101/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|date=16 October 2017}} {{cite journal |last1=Shukurov |first1=Anvar |last2=Sarson |first2=Graeme R. |last3=Gangal |first3=Kavita |date=7 May 2014 |title=The Near-Eastern Roots of the Neolithic in South Asia |journal=PLOS ONE |language=en |volume=9 |issue=5 |pages=e95714 |bibcode=2014PLoSO...995714G |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0095714 |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=4012948 |pmid=24806472 |doi-access=free}}</ref> There are several lines of evidence that support the idea of connection between the Neolithic in the Near East and in the Indian subcontinent.<ref name="AS1-6" /> The prehistoric site of Mehrgarh in Baluchistan (modern Pakistan) is the earliest Neolithic site in the north-west Indian subcontinent, dated as early as 8500 BCE.<ref name="AS1-6" /> |
|||
Neolithic domesticated crops in Mehrgarh include more than 90% barley and a small amount of wheat. There is good evidence for the local domestication of barley and the zebu cattle at Mehrgarh, but the wheat varieties are suggested to be of Near-Eastern origin, as the modern distribution of wild varieties of wheat is limited to Northern Levant and Southern Turkey.<ref name="AS1-6" /> |
|||
A detailed satellite map study of a few archaeological sites in the Baluchistan and Khybar Pakhtunkhwa regions also suggests similarities in early phases of farming with sites in Western Asia.<ref name="AS1-6" /> Pottery prepared by sequential slab construction, circular fire pits filled with burnt pebbles, and large granaries are common to both Mehrgarh and many Mesopotamian sites.<ref name="AS1-6" /> |
|||
The postures of the skeletal remains in graves at Mehrgarh bear strong resemblance to those at Ali Kosh in the Zagros Mountains of southern Iran.<ref name="AS1-6" /> Despite their scarcity, the Carbon-14 and archaeological age determinations for early Neolithic sites in Southern Asia exhibit remarkable continuity across the vast region from the Near East to the Indian Subcontinent, consistent with a systematic eastward spread at a speed of about 0.65 km/yr.<ref name="AS1-6" /> |
|||
== Causes == |
|||
{{Incomplete|section|more recent theories and includes some outdated/rejected theories|date=October 2024}} |
|||
The most prominent of several theories (not mutually exclusive) as to factors that caused populations to develop agriculture include: |
|||
* The Oasis Theory, originally proposed by [[Raphael Pumpelly]] in 1908, popularized by [[V. Gordon Childe]] in 1928 and summarised in Childe's book ''Man Makes Himself''.<ref name="ManChilde" /> This theory maintains that as the climate got drier due to the Atlantic depressions shifting northward, communities contracted to [[oases]] where they were forced into close association with animals, which were then domesticated together with planting of seeds. However, this theory now has little support amongst archaeologists because subsequent climate data suggests that the region was getting wetter rather than drier.<ref>{{cite book |last=Scarre |first=Christopher |title=The Human Past: World Prehistory and the Development of Human Societies |date=2005 |publisher=Thames & Hudson |isbn=0-500-28531-4 |publication-place=London |page=188 |chapter=The World Transformed: From Foragers and Farmers to States and Empires}}</ref> |
|||
* The [[Hilly Flanks]] hypothesis, proposed by [[Robert John Braidwood]] in 1948, suggests that agriculture began in the hilly flanks of the [[Taurus Mountains|Taurus]] and [[Zagros Mountains]], where the climate was not drier as Childe had believed, and fertile land supported a variety of plants and animals amenable to domestication.<ref>{{cite book |author=Charles E. Redman |title=Rise of Civilization: From Early Hunters to Urban Society in the Ancient Near East |publisher=Freeman |year=1978 |location=San Francisco}}</ref> |
|||
* The Feasting model by Brian Hayden<ref>{{cite book |last=Hayden |first=Brian |title=Transitions to Agriculture in Prehistory |publisher=Prehistory Press |year=1992 |editor=Anne Birgitte Gebauer and T. Douglas Price |location=Madison |pages=11–18 |chapter=Models of Domestication}}</ref> suggests that agriculture was driven by ostentatious displays of power, such as giving feasts, to exert dominance. This required assembling large quantities of food, which drove agricultural technology.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Neolithic Revolution {{!}} Early World Civilizations |url=https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-worldcivilization/chapter/the-neolithic-revolution/ |access-date=2023-10-18 |website=courses.lumenlearning.com}}</ref> |
|||
* The Demographic theories proposed by [[Carl Sauer]]<ref>{{cite book |last=Sauer |first=Carl O. |title=Agricultural origins and dispersals |publisher=MIT Press |year=1952 |location=Cambridge, MA}}</ref> and adapted by [[Lewis Binford]]<ref>{{cite book |last=Binford |first=Lewis R. |title=New Perspectives in Archaeology |publisher=Aldine Publishing Company |year=1968 |editor=Sally R. Binford and Lewis R. Binford |location=Chicago |pages=[https://archive.org/details/newperspectivesi0000binf/page/313 313–342] |chapter=Post-Pleistocene Adaptations |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/newperspectivesi0000binf |chapter-url-access=registration}}</ref> and [[Kent Flannery]] posit an increasingly sedentary population that expanded up to the [[carrying capacity]] of the local environment and required more food than could be gathered. Various social and economic factors helped drive the need for food. |
|||
* The evolutionary/intentionality theory, developed by [[David Rindos]]<ref>{{cite book |last=Rindos |first=David |title=The Origins of Agriculture: An Evolutionary Perspective |date=December 1987 |publisher=Academic Press |isbn=978-0-12-589281-0}}</ref> and others, considers agriculture as an evolutionary adaptation of plants and humans. Starting with domestication by protection of wild plants, it resulted specialization of location and then complete domestication.{{citation needed|date=August 2023}} |
|||
* [[Peter Richerson]], [[Robert Boyd (anthropologist)|Robert Boyd]], and [[Robert Bettinger]]<ref name="Richersonetal2001">{{cite journal |last1=Richerson |first1=Peter J. |last2=Boyd |first2=Robert |year=2001 |title=Was Agriculture Impossible during the Pleistocene but Mandatory during the Holocene? |journal=American Antiquity |volume=66 |issue=3 |pages=387–411 |doi=10.2307/2694241 |jstor=2694241 |s2cid=163474968}}</ref> make a case for the development of agriculture coinciding with an increasingly stable climate at the beginning of the [[Holocene]]. [[Ronald Wright]]'s book and Massey Lecture Series ''[[A Short History of Progress]]''<ref>{{cite book |last=Wright |first=Ronald |url=https://archive.org/details/shorthistoryofpr0000wrig |title=A Short History of Progress |publisher=Anansi |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-88784-706-6}}</ref> popularized this hypothesis. |
|||
* [[Leonid Grinin]] argues that whatever plants were cultivated, the independent invention of agriculture always occurred in special natural environments (e.g., South-East Asia). It is supposed that the cultivation of cereals started somewhere in the Near East: in the hills of Israel or Egypt. So Grinin dates the beginning of the agricultural revolution within the interval 12,000 to 9,000 BP, though in some cases the first cultivated plants or domesticated animals' bones are even of a more ancient age of 14–15 thousand years ago.<ref>Grinin L.E. "[http://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/129510/ Production Revolutions and Periodization of History: A Comparative and Theoretic-mathematical Approach]". Social Evolution & History. Volume 6, Number 2. September 2007. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120120230938/http://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/129510/|date=20 January 2012}}.</ref> |
|||
* [[Andrew M. T. Moore|Andrew Moore]] suggested that the Neolithic Revolution originated over long periods of development in the [[Levant]], possibly beginning during the [[Epipaleolithic]]. In ''"A Reassessment of the Neolithic Revolution"'', [[Frank Hole]] further expanded the relationship between plant and [[animal domestication]]. He suggested the events could have occurred independently during different periods of time, in as yet unexplored locations. He noted that no transition site had been found documenting the shift from what he termed immediate and delayed return social systems.{{Explain|date=September 2024}} He noted that the full range of domesticated animals ([[goat]]s, [[sheep]], [[cattle]] and [[pigs]]) were not found until the sixth millennium BCE at [[Tell Ramad]]. Hole concluded that "close attention should be paid in future investigations to the western margins of the [[Euphrates]] basin, perhaps as far south as the [[Arabian Peninsula]], especially where [[wadi]]s carrying Pleistocene rainfall runoff flowed."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hole |first=Frank |date=29 August 1984 |title=A Reassessment of the Neolithic Revolution |url=https://www.persee.fr/doc/paleo_0153-9345_1984_num_10_2_939 |url-status=live |journal=Paléorient |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=49–60 |doi=10.3406/paleo.1984.939 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220617210526/https://www.persee.fr/doc/paleo_0153-9345_1984_num_10_2_939 |archive-date=17 June 2022 |access-date=29 August 2022 |via=Persée |doi-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
== Consequences == |
|||
==Consequences of the Neolithic Revolution== |
|||
===Social change=== |
===Social change=== |
||
[[File:World population growth (lin-log scale).png|thumb|left|320px|World population (estimated) did not rise for a few millennia after the Neolithic revolution.]] |
|||
It is often argued that agriculture gave humans more control over their food supply, but this has been disputed by the finding that nutritional standards of Neolithic populations were generally inferior to that of hunter gatherers, and life expectancy may in fact have been shorter, in part due to diseases.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}} Average height, for example, went down from 5' 10" for men and 5' 6" for women to 5' 3" and 5' 1", respectively and it took until the twentieth century for average human height to come back to the pre-Neolithic Revolution levels.<ref>The Borderlands of Science by Michael Shermer. p. 250</ref> Actually, by reducing the necessity for the carrying of children, Neolithic societies had a major impact upon the spacing of children (carrying more than one child at a time is impossible for hunter-gatherers, which leads to children being spaced four or more years apart). This increase in the [[birth rate]] was required to offset increases in [[death rate]]s and required settled occupation of territory and encouraged larger social groups.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}} These sedentary groups were able to reproduce at a faster rate due to the possibilities of sharing the raising of children in such societies. The children accounted for a denser population, and encouraged the introduction of specialization by providing diverse forms of new labor. The development of larger societies seemed to have led to the development of different means of decision making and to governmental organization. Food surpluses made possible the development of a social elite who were not otherwise engaged in agriculture, industry or commerce, but dominated their communities by other means and monopolized decision-making. |
|||
Despite the significant technological advance and advancements in knowledge, arts and trade, the Neolithic revolution did not lead immediately to a rapid growth of population. Its benefits appear to have been offset by various adverse effects, mostly diseases and warfare.<ref>[[James C. Scott]],''Against the Grain: a Deep History of the Earliest States'', NJ: Yale UP, (2017), "The world's population in 10 000 BC, according to a careful estimate was roughly 4 million. A full five thousand years later it has risen only to 5 million...One likely explanation for this apparent human progress in subsistance techniques together with a long period of demographic stagnation is that epidemologically this was perhaps the most lethal period in human history".</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-04-05 |title=What was the Neolithic Revolution? |url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/neolithic-agricultural-revolution |access-date=2023-06-18 |website=National Geographic |language=en |archive-date=9 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221009132816/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/neolithic-agricultural-revolution |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
|||
The introduction of agriculture has not necessarily led to unequivocal progress. The nutritional standards of the growing Neolithic populations were inferior to that of hunter-gatherers. Several ethnological and archaeological studies conclude that the transition to cereal-based diets caused a reduction in life expectancy and stature, an increase in infant mortality and infectious diseases, the development of chronic, inflammatory or degenerative diseases (such as obesity, [[type 2 diabetes]] and cardiovascular diseases) and multiple nutritional deficiencies, including vitamin deficiencies, [[iron deficiency anemia]] and mineral disorders affecting bones (such as [[osteoporosis]] and [[rickets]]) and teeth.<ref name="SandsMorris2009">{{cite journal| vauthors=Sands DC, Morris CE, Dratz EA, Pilgeram A| title=Elevating optimal human nutrition to a central goal of plant breeding and production of plant-based foods. | journal=Plant Sci | year= 2009 | volume= 177 | issue= 5 | pages= 377–389 | pmid=20467463 | doi=10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.07.011 | pmc=2866137 | bibcode=2009PlnSc.177..377S | type=Review }}</ref><ref name="OKeefeCordain2004">{{cite journal| vauthors=O'Keefe JH, Cordain L| title=Cardiovascular disease resulting from a diet and lifestyle at odds with our Paleolithic genome: how to become a 21st-century hunter-gatherer. | journal=Mayo Clin Proc | year= 2004 | volume= 79 | issue= 1 | pages= 101–108 | pmid=14708953 | doi=10.4065/79.1.101 | type=Review | doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Shermer, Michael 2001 p.250">{{cite book |author=Shermer, Michael |author-link=Michael Shermer |year=2001 |title=The Borderlands of Science |url=https://archive.org/details/borderlandsofsci00mic_hoo |url-access=registration |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=[https://archive.org/details/borderlandsofsci00mic_hoo/page/250 250]}}</ref> Average height for Europeans went down from 178 cm (5'10") for men and 168 cm (5'6") for women to 165 cm (5'5") and 155 cm (5'1") respectively, and it took until the twentieth century for average height for Europeans to return to the pre-Neolithic Revolution levels.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Hermanussen | first1=Michael | last2=Poustka | first2=Fritz | title=Stature of early Europeans | journal=Hormones (Athens) | volume=2 | issue=3 | pages=175–178 | date=July–September 2003 | pmid=17003019 | doi=10.1159/000079404 | s2cid=85210429 | url=http://hormones.gr/preview.php?c_id=127 | access-date=12 June 2014 | archive-date=2 April 2012 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120402221148/http://hormones.gr/preview.php?c_id=127 | url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
The traditional view is that agricultural food production supported a denser population, which in turn supported larger sedentary communities, the accumulation of goods and tools, and specialization in diverse forms of new labor. Food surpluses made possible the development of a social elite who were not otherwise engaged in agriculture, industry or commerce, but dominated their communities by other means and monopolized decision-making. Nonetheless, larger societies made it more feasible for people to adopt diverse decision making and governance models.<ref name="Eagly99">{{cite journal |author1=Eagly, Alice H. |author2=Wood, Wendy |title=The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions Versus Social Roles |journal=American Psychologist |volume=54 |issue=6 |date=June 1999 |pages=408–423 |url=http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fiske/facets/eagly&wood.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000817071347/http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fiske/facets/eagly&wood.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=17 August 2000 |doi=10.1037/0003-066x.54.6.408}}</ref> Jared Diamond (in ''[[The World Until Yesterday]]'') identifies the availability of milk and cereal grains as permitting mothers to raise both an older (e.g. 3 or 4 year old) and a younger child concurrently. The result is that a population can increase more rapidly. Diamond, in agreement with feminist scholars such as [[V. Spike Peterson]], points out that agriculture brought about deep social divisions and encouraged [[gender inequality]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Diamond, Jared |author-link=Jared Diamond |url=https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/the-worst-mistake-in-the-history-of-the-human-race |title=The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race |journal=Discover Magazine |date=May 1987 |pages=64–66 |access-date=26 July 2021 |archive-date=10 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191110175217/http://discovermagazine.com/1987/may/02-the-worst-mistake-in-the-history-of-the-human-race |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Peterson|first=V. Spike|date=3 July 2014|title=Sex Matters|journal=International Feminist Journal of Politics|language=en|volume=16|issue=3|pages=389–409|doi=10.1080/14616742.2014.913384|s2cid=147633811|issn=1461-6742}}</ref> This social reshuffle is traced by historical theorists, like Veronica Strang, through developments in theological depictions.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Strang|first=Veronica|date=2014|title=Lording It over the Goddess: Water, Gender, and Human-Environmental Relations.|url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jfemistudreli.30.1.85.|journal=Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion|volume=30|issue=1|pages=85–109|doi=10.2979/jfemistudreli.30.1.85|jstor=10.2979/jfemistudreli.30.1.85|s2cid=143567275}}</ref> Strang supports her theory through a comparison of aquatic deities before and after the Neolithic Agricultural Revolution, most notably the [[Venus of Lespugue]] and the Greco-Roman deities such as [[Circe]] or [[Charybdis]]: the former venerated and respected, the latter dominated and conquered. The theory, supplemented by the widely accepted assumption from Parsons that "society is always the object of religious veneration",<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Parsons|first=Talcott|date=1944|title="The Theoretical Development of the Sociology of Religion: A Chapter in the History of Modern Social Science."|journal=Journal of the History of Ideas|volume=5|issue=2|pages=176–190|doi=10.2307/2707383|jstor=2707383}}</ref> argues that with the centralization of government and the dawn of the Anthropocene, roles within society became more restrictive and were rationalized through the conditioning effect of religion; a process that is crystallized in the progression from polytheism to monotheism. |
|||
===Subsequent revolutions=== |
===Subsequent revolutions=== |
||
[[ |
[[File:Egyptian Domesticated Animals.jpg|thumb|Domesticated cow being milked in [[Ancient Egypt]]]] |
||
[[Andrew Sherratt]] has argued that following upon the Neolithic Revolution was a second phase of discovery that he refers to as the [[secondary products revolution]]. Animals, it appears were first domesticated purely as a source of meat.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} The Secondary Products Revolution occurred when it was recognised that animals also provided a number of other useful products. These included: |
|||
* hides and skins (from no domesticated animals) |
|||
* manure for soil conditioning (from all domesticated animals) |
|||
* wool (from sheep, llamas, alpacas, and [[Angora goat]]s) |
|||
* milk (from goats, cattle, yaks, sheep, horses and camels) |
|||
* traction (from oxen, [[onagers]], donkeys, horses and camels) |
|||
[[Andrew Sherratt]] has argued that following upon the Neolithic Revolution was a second phase of discovery that he refers to as the [[secondary products revolution]]. Animals, it appears, were first domesticated purely as a source of meat.<ref name="Sherratt 1981">{{cite book | last=Sherratt | first=A | editor-last1=Hodder | editor-first1=Ian | editor-last2=Isaac | editor-first2=Glynn Llywelyn | editor-last3=Hammond | editor-first3=Norman | title=Pattern of the Past: Studies in honour of David Clarke | chapter = Plough and pastoralism: aspects of the secondary products revolution | publisher=Cambridge University Press | publication-place=Cambridge | year=1981 | isbn=978-0-521-22763-6 | pages=261–305}}</ref> The Secondary Products Revolution occurred when it was recognised that animals also provided a number of other useful products. These included: |
|||
Sherratt argues that this phase in agricultural development enabled humans to make use of the energy possibilities of their animals in new ways, and permitted permanent intensive subsistence farming and crop production, and the opening up heavier soils for farming. It also made possible [[nomadic pastoralism]] in semi arid areas, along the margins of deserts, and eventually led to the domestication of both the [[dromedary camel|dromedary]] and [[bactrian camel]]. Overgrazing of these areas, particularly by herds of goats, greatly extended the areal extent of deserts. Living in one spot would have more easily permitted the accrual of personal possessions and an attachment to certain areas of land. From such a position, it is argued, prehistoric people were able to stockpile food to survive lean times and trade unwanted surpluses with others. Once [[trade]] and a secure food supply were established, populations could grow, and society would have diversified into food producers and artisans, who could afford to develop their trade by virtue of the free time they enjoyed because of a surplus of food. The artisans, in turn, were able to develop technology such as metal weapons. Such relative complexity would have required some form of social organisation to work efficiently and so it is likely that populations which had such organisation, perhaps such as that provided by religion were better prepared and more successful. In addition, the denser populations could form and support legions of professional soldiers. Also, during this time property ownership became increasingly important to all people. Ultimately, Childe argued that this growing social complexity, all rooted in the original decision to settle, led to a second [[Urban Revolution]] in which the first cities were built.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} |
|||
* [[History of hide materials|hides and skins (from undomesticated animals)]] |
|||
* [[manure]] for soil conditioning (from all domesticated animals) |
|||
* [[wool]] (from sheep, llamas, alpacas, and [[Angora goat]]s) |
|||
* [[milk]] (from goats, cattle, yaks, sheep, horses, and camels) |
|||
* [[Working animal|traction]] (from oxen, [[onagers]], donkeys, horses, camels, and dogs) |
|||
* guarding and herding assistance (dogs) |
|||
Sherratt argued that this phase in agricultural development enabled humans to make use of the energy possibilities of their animals in new ways, and permitted permanent intensive subsistence farming and crop production, and the opening up of heavier soils for farming. It also made possible [[nomadic pastoralism]] in semi arid areas, along the margins of deserts, and eventually led to the domestication of both the [[dromedary]] and [[Bactrian camel]].<ref name="Sherratt 1981"/> Overgrazing of these areas, particularly by herds of goats, greatly extended the areal extent of deserts. |
|||
===Disease=== |
|||
[[Image:Llama, peru, machu picchu.jpg|thumb|upright|right|Llama overlooking the ruins of the Inca city of [[Machu Picchu]] ]] |
|||
Throughout the development of sedentary societies, disease spread more rapidly than it had during the time in which hunter-gatherer societies existed. Inadequate sanitary practices and the domestication of animals may explain the rise in deaths and sickness during the Neolithic Revolution, as diseases jumped from the animal to the human population. Some examples of diseases spread from animals to humans are [[influenza]], [[smallpox]], and [[measles]].{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} |
|||
In concordance with a process of [[natural selection]], the humans who first domesticated the big [[mammals]] quickly built up immunities to the diseases as within each generation the individuals with better immunities had better chances of survival. In their approximately 10,000 years of shared proximity with animals, Eurasians and Africans became more resistant to those diseases compared with the indigenous populations encountered outside [[Eurasia]] and [[Africa]].<ref>''[[Guns, Germs, and Steel|Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies]]'' - [[Jared Diamond]], 1997</ref> For instance, the population of most [[Caribbean]] and several [[Pacific Islands]] have been completely wiped out by diseases. According to the [[Population history of American indigenous peoples]], 90% of the population of certain regions of North and South America were wiped out long before direct contact with Europeans. Some cultures like the [[Inca Empire]] did have one big mammal domesticated, the [[Llama]], but the Inca did not drink its milk or live in a closed space with their herds, hence limiting the risk of contagion. |
|||
===Diet and health=== |
|||
The causal link between the type or lack of agricultural development, [[disease]] and [[colonisation]] is not supported by colonization in other parts of the world. Disease increased after the establishment of [[British Empire|British Colonial rule]] in [[Africa]] and [[India]] despite the areas having diseases that [[Europe]]ans had no [[natural immunity]] to. In India agriculture developed during the Neolithic period with a wide range of animals domesticated. During colonial rule an estimated 23 million people died from [[cholera]] between 1865 and 1949, and millions more died from [[Plague (disease)|plague]], [[malaria]], [[influenza]] and [[tuberculosis]]. In Africa European colonisation was accompanied by great epidemics, including malaria and [[African trypanosomiasis|sleeping sickness]] and despite parts of colonised Africa having little or no agriculture Europeans were more susceptible than these Africans. The increase of disease has been attributed to increased mobility of people, increased [[population density]], [[urbanisation]], [[Natural environment|environmental]] deterioration and [[irrigation]] schemes that helped to spread malaria rather than the development of agriculture.<ref>Marshall, P. J. Ed. (1996), ''Cambridge illustrated History: British Empire'', Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-00254-0, p. 142</ref> |
|||
Compared to foragers, Neolithic farmers' diets were higher in [[carbohydrate]]s but lower in [[Dietary fiber|fibre]], [[micronutrient]]s, and [[protein]]. This led to an increase in the frequency of [[Tooth decay|carious]] teeth<ref name=Larsen2006>{{Cite journal|last=Larsen|first=Clark Spencer|date=1 June 2006|title=The agricultural revolution as environmental catastrophe: Implications for health and lifestyle in the Holocene|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618206000334|journal=Quaternary International|series=Impact of rapid environmental changes on humans and ecosystems|language=en|volume=150|issue=1|pages=12–20|doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2006.01.004|bibcode=2006QuInt.150...12L|issn=1040-6182|access-date=10 July 2020|archive-date=5 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105150829/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618206000334|url-status=live}}</ref> and slower growth in childhood {{Clarify | text = and increased [[body fat]]| date = September 2024 | reason = Unclear if this is just for children or for the entire population.}}, and studies have consistently found that populations around the world became shorter after the transition to agriculture. This trend may have been exacerbated by the greater seasonality of farming diets and with it the increased risk of [[famine]] due to crop failure.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last1=Wells|first1=Jonathan C. K.|last2=Stock|first2=Jay T.|date=2020|title=Life History Transitions at the Origins of Agriculture: A Model for Understanding How Niche Construction Impacts Human Growth, Demography and Health|journal=Frontiers in Endocrinology|language=en|volume=11|page=325|doi=10.3389/fendo.2020.00325|pmid=32508752|pmc=7253633|issn=1664-2392|doi-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
===Technology=== |
|||
In his book ''[[Guns, Germs, and Steel]]'', [[Jared Diamond]] argues that Europeans and East Asians benefited from an advantageous geographical location which afforded them a head start in the Neolithic Revolution. Both shared the temperate climate ideal for the first agricultural settings, both were near a number of easily [[domestication|domesticable]] plant and animal species, and both were safer from attacks of other people than civilizations in the middle part of the Eurasian continent. Being among the first to adopt agriculture and sedentary lifestyles, and neighboring other early agricultural societies with whom they could compete and trade, both Europeans and East Asians were also among the first to benefit from technologies such as [[firearm]]s and steel [[sword]]s. In addition, they developed resistances to [[infectious disease]], such as [[smallpox]], due to their close relationship with domesticated animals. Groups of people who had not lived in proximity with other large [[mammal]]s, such as the [[Indigenous Australians|Australian Aborigines]] and [[Population history of American indigenous peoples|American indigenous peoples]] were more vulnerable to infection and largely wiped out by diseases. |
|||
Throughout the development of sedentary societies, disease spread more rapidly than it had during the time in which hunter-gatherer societies existed. Inadequate sanitary practices and the domestication of animals may explain the rise in deaths and sickness following the Neolithic Revolution, as diseases jumped from the animal to the human population. Some examples of [[infectious diseases]] spread from animals to humans are [[influenza]], [[smallpox]], and [[measles]].<ref>{{Cite journal | last1=Furuse | first1=Y. | last2=Suzuki | first2=A. | last3=Oshitani | first3=H. | title=Origin of measles virus: Divergence from rinderpest virus between the 11th and 12th centuries | doi=10.1186/1743-422X-7-52 | journal=Virology Journal | volume=7 | page=52 | year=2010 | pmc=2838858 | pmid=20202190 | doi-access=free }}</ref> Ancient microbial genomics has shown that progenitors to human-adapted strains of ''[[Salmonella enterica]]'' infected up to 5,500 year old agro-pastoralists throughout Western Eurasia, providing molecular evidence for the hypothesis that the Neolithization process facilitated the emergence of Salmonella entericia.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Key |first1=Felix M. |last2=Posth |first2=Cosimo |last3=Esquivel-Gomez |first3=Luis R. |last4=Hübler |first4=Ron |last5=Spyrou |first5=Maria A. |last6=Neumann |first6=Gunnar U. |last7=Furtwängler |first7=Anja |last8=Sabin |first8=Susanna |last9=Burri |first9=Marta |last10=Wissgott |first10=Antje |last11=Lankapalli |first11=Aditya Kumar |last12=Vågene |first12=Åshild J. |last13=Meyer |first13=Matthias |last14=Nagel |first14=Sarah |last15=Tukhbatova |first15=Rezeda |last16=Khokhlov |first16=Aleksandr |last17=Chizhevsky |first17=Andrey |last18=Hansen |first18=Svend |last19=Belinsky |first19=Andrey B. |last20=Kalmykov |first20=Alexey |last21=Kantorovich |first21=Anatoly R. |last22=Maslov |first22=Vladimir E. |last23=Stockhammer |first23=Philipp W. |last24=Vai |first24=Stefania |last25=Zavattaro |first25=Monica |last26=Riga |first26=Alessandro |last27=Caramelli |first27=David |last28=Skeates |first28=Robin |last29=Beckett |first29=Jessica |last30=Gradoli |first30=Maria Giuseppina |last31=Steuri |first31=Noah |last32=Hafner |first32=Albert |last33=Ramstein |first33=Marianne |last34=Siebke |first34=Inga |last35=Lösch |first35=Sandra |last36=Erdal |first36=Yilmaz Selim |last37=Alikhan |first37=Nabil-Fareed |last38=Zhou |first38=Zhemin |last39=Achtman |first39=Mark |last40=Bos |first40=Kirsten |last41=Reinhold |first41=Sabine |last42=Haak |first42=Wolfgang |last43=Kühnert |first43=Denise |last44=Herbig |first44=Alexander |last45=Krause |first45=Johannes |title=Emergence of human-adapted Salmonella enterica is linked to the Neolithization process |journal=Nature Ecology & Evolution |date=March 2020 |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=324–333 |doi=10.1038/s41559-020-1106-9 |pmid=32094538 |pmc=7186082 |bibcode=2020NatEE...4..324K |language=en |issn=2397-334X}}</ref> |
|||
During and after the [[Age of Discovery]], European explorers, such as the Spanish [[conquistador]]s, encountered other groups of people who had never or only recently adopted agriculture, such as in the [[Pacific Islands]], or lacked domesticated big mammals such as the highlands people of [[Papua New Guinea]]. |
|||
==Archeogenetics== |
|||
The dispersal of Neolithic culture from the Middle East has recently been associated with the distribution of human genetic markers. In Europe, the spread of the Neolithic technologies has been associated with distribution of the African haplogroup [[E1b1b]] lineages and the Middle Eastern [[Haplogroup J (Y-DNA)|Haplogroup J]].<ref name="semino2004">{{cite journal|last=Semino et al|year=2004|title=Origin, Diffusion, and Differentiation of Y-Chromosome Haplogroups E and J: Inferences on the Neolithization of Europe and Later Migratory Events in the Mediterranean Area|url=http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1181965&}}</ref><ref name="lancaster">{{Cite journal|last=Lancaster|first=Andrew|year=2009|url=http://www.jogg.info/51/files/Lancaster.pdf|journal=Journal of Genetic Genealogy|volume=5|issue=1|title=Y Haplogroups, Archaeological Cultures and Language Families: a Review of the Multidisciplinary Comparisons using the case of E-M35}}</ref>. In Africa, the spread of farming, and notably the [[Bantu expansion]], is associated with the dispersal of Y-chromosome haplogroup [[E1b1a]] from West Africa.<ref name="semino2004"/> |
|||
In concordance with a process of [[natural selection]], the humans who first domesticated the big [[mammals]] quickly built up immunities to the diseases as within each generation the individuals with better immunities had better chances of survival. In their approximately 10,000 years of shared proximity with animals, such as cows, Eurasians and Africans became more resistant to those diseases compared with the indigenous populations encountered outside [[Eurasia]] and [[Africa]].<ref name="diamond"/> For instance, the population of most [[Caribbean]] and several [[Pacific Islands]] have been completely wiped out by diseases. 90% or more of many populations of the Americas were [[Population history of indigenous peoples of the Americas|wiped out by European and African diseases]] before recorded contact with European explorers or colonists. Some cultures like the [[Inca Empire]] did have a large domestic mammal, the [[llama]], but llama milk was not drunk, nor did llamas live in a closed space with humans, so the risk of contagion was limited. According to bioarchaeological research, the effects of agriculture on dental health in Southeast Asian rice farming societies from 4000 to 1500 BP was not detrimental to the same extent as in other world regions.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Halcrow |first1=S. E. |last2=Harris |first2=N. J. |last3=Tayles |first3=N. |last4=Ikehara-Quebral |first4=R. |last5=Pietrusewsky |first5=M. |title=From the mouths of babes: Dental caries in infants and children and the intensification of agriculture in mainland Southeast Asia |journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology |date=2013 |volume=150 |issue=3 |pages=409–420 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.22215 |pmid=23359102}}</ref> |
|||
==See also== |
|||
*[[Çatalhöyük]], a Neolithic site in southern Anatolia |
|||
[[Jonathan C. K. Wells]] and [[Jay T. Stock]] have argued that the dietary changes and increased pathogen exposure associated with agriculture profoundly altered human biology and [[Life history theory|life history]], creating conditions where [[natural selection]] favoured the allocation of resources towards [[reproduction]] over [[somatic effort]].<ref name=":1" /> |
|||
*[[Natufian]]s, a settled culture preceding agriculture |
|||
*[[Original affluent society]] |
|||
==Comparative chronology== |
|||
*[[Haplogroup G (Y-DNA)]] |
|||
{{Neolithic Chronology}} |
|||
*[[Haplogroup J2 (Y-DNA)]] |
|||
*[[Haplogroup J (mtDNA)]] |
|||
== See also == |
|||
*[[Agricultural Revolution]] |
|||
* [[Upper Paleolithic revolution]] |
|||
*[[Neolithic tomb]] |
|||
* [[Broad spectrum revolution]] |
|||
*[[Surplus product]] |
|||
* [[Secondary products revolution]] |
|||
* [[Urban revolution]] |
|||
* [[Industrial revolution]] |
|||
* [[Green Revolution]] |
|||
==Further reading== |
|||
* Taiz, Lincoln. "[https://www.scielo.br/j/txpp/a/TWxQX34RrdtTmTPpDPtgNhS/?format=pdf&lang=en Agriculture, plant physiology, and human population growth: past, present, and future." Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology 25 (2013): 167-181]. |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
== |
==Bibliography== |
||
* Bailey, Douglass. ( |
* Bailey, Douglass. (2001). ''Balkan Prehistory: Exclusions, Incorporation and Identity.'' Routledge Publishers. {{ISBN|0-415-21598-6}}. |
||
* Bailey, Douglass. (2005). ''Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic.'' Routledge Publishers. ISBN |
* Bailey, Douglass. (2005). ''Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic.'' Routledge Publishers. {{ISBN|0-415-33152-8}}. |
||
* Balter, Michael (2005). ''The Goddess and the Bull: Catalhoyuk, An Archaeological Journey to the Dawn of Civilization.'' New York: Free Press. ISBN |
* Balter, Michael (2005). ''The Goddess and the Bull: Catalhoyuk, An Archaeological Journey to the Dawn of Civilization.'' New York: Free Press. {{ISBN|0-7432-4360-9}}. |
||
* Bellwood |
* {{cite book| last=Bellwood |first=Peter |year=2004 |title=First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies |publisher=Blackwell |isbn=0-631-20566-7 }} |
||
* Bocquet-Appel, Jean-Pierre, editor and [[Ofer Bar-Yosef]], editor, ''The Neolithic Demographic Transition and its Consequences'', Springer (21 October 2008), hardcover, 544 pages, {{ISBN|978-1-4020-8538-3}}, trade paperback and Kindle editions are also available. |
|||
* Cohen, Mark Nathan (1977)''The Food Crisis in Prehistory: Overpopulation and the Origins of Agriculture.'' New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-02016-3. |
|||
* |
* Cohen, Mark Nathan (1977)''The Food Crisis in Prehistory: Overpopulation and the Origins of Agriculture.'' New Haven and London: Yale University Press. {{ISBN|0-300-02016-3}}. |
||
* Diamond, Jared (2002) |
* Diamond, Jared (2002). "Evolution, Consequences and Future of Plant and Animal Domestication". ''Nature'', Vol 418. |
||
* Harlan, Jack R. (1992). ''Crops & Man: Views on Agricultural Origins'' ASA, CSA, Madison, WI. [https://web.archive.org/web/20060819110723/http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/history/lecture03/r_3-1.html Hort 306 - READING 3-1] |
|||
*[[Leonid Grinin|Grinin, L.]] 2007. Periodization of History: A theoretic-mathematical analysis. In: [http://urss.ru/cgi-bin/db.pl?cp=&page=Book&id=53184&lang=en&blang=en&list=1 ''History & Mathematics'']. Moscow: KomKniga/URSS. P.10-38. ISBN 9785484010011. |
|||
* Wright, Gary A. (1971). "Origins of Food Production in Southwestern Asia: A Survey of Ideas" Current Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 4/5 (Oct.–Dec. 1971), pp. 447–477 |
|||
* Harlan, Jack R. (1992) ''Crops & Man: Views on Agricultural Origins'' ASA, CSA, Madison, WI. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/history/lecture03/r_3-1.html |
|||
* Kuijt, Ian; Finlayson, Bill. (2009). [http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/06/19/0812764106.full.pdf "Evidence for food storage and predomestication granaries 11,000 years ago in the Jordan Valley"]. PNAS, Vol. 106, No. 27, pp. 10966–10970. |
|||
* Wright, Gary A. (1971) "Origins of Food Production in Southwestern Asia: A Survey of Ideas" Current Anthropology, Vol. 12, |
|||
No. 4/5 (Oct - Dec., 1971) , pp. 447–477 |
|||
* Bartmen, Jeff M. (2008) ''Disease. |
|||
*[http://www.anansi.ca/titles.cfm?pub_subid=237 House of Anansi Press page] for the book |
|||
*[http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/massey/massey2004.html CBC Radio, ''Ideas'', page on the Massey Lectures 2004] also includes streaming audio of Chapter 1 of 5 |
|||
*''[http://www.ucalgary.ca/~eslinger/crss/200/200_read/02.Wright,R._Gaugin'sQuestions_ShortHistoryOfProgress(2004)1-26.pdf Chapter I - Gauguin's Questions]'' |
|||
*[http://www.transportplanet.ca/Stu'sNotes11.pdf Stu’s Notes #11] a useful summary of many selected passages from the book |
|||
*''[http://www.awok.org/civilization-is-a-pyramid-scheme/ Civilization is a Pyramid Scheme]'' an online copy of Wright's earlier short article |
|||
*''[http://www.radio4all.net/pub/archive/04.01.05/anitya@graffiti.net/1400-1-20041124-Ronald_Wright_-_Short_History_of_Progress_-_1_-_Gauguin__s_Questions.mp3 Chapter I]'' podcast at http://www.radio4all.net (note this site is notoriously unreliable but it does come back up eventually) |
|||
*''[http://www.radio4all.net/pub/archive/04.01.05/anitya@graffiti.net/1400-1-20041125-Ronald_Wright_-_Short_History_of_Progress_-_2_-_The_Great_Experiment.mp3 Chapter II]'' podcast at http://www.radio4all.net |
|||
*[http://www.radio4all.net/pub/archive/09.01.05/philippe@bainbridge.net/1374-1-20050410-Ronald_Wright.mp3 An Interview with Ronald Wright], April 10, 2005, EcoTalk on Air America podcast at http://www.radio4all.net |
|||
*Evidence for food storage and predomestication granaries 11,000 years ago in the Jordan Valley [http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/06/19/0812764106.full.pdf]. |
|||
{{Agriculture footer}} |
|||
[[Category:History of agriculture]] |
|||
{{History of technology}} |
|||
[[Category:Archaeological theory]] |
|||
{{Big History}} |
|||
[[Category:Neolithic]] |
|||
{{Prehistoric Asia}} |
|||
[[Category:History of technology]] |
|||
{{Prehistoric technology}} |
|||
[[Category:Revolutions]] |
|||
[[Category:Theories of history]] |
|||
[[Category:Sociocultural evolution]] |
|||
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]] |
|||
[[Category:Fertile Crescent]] |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[ar:ثورة نيوليثية]] |
|||
[[cs:Neolitická revoluce]] |
|||
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]] |
|||
[[da:Den neolitiske revolution]] |
|||
[[Category:Prehistoric agriculture]] |
|||
[[de:Neolithische Revolution]] |
|||
[[Category:History of technology]] |
|||
[[et:Neoliitiline revolutsioon]] |
|||
[[Category:Neolithic|Revolution]] |
|||
[[el:Νεολιθική επανάσταση]] |
|||
[[Category:Agricultural revolutions]] |
|||
[[es:Revolución neolítica]] |
|||
[[Category:Stages of history]] |
|||
[[eo:Unuaj agrokulturistoj]] |
|||
[[Category:Historical eras]] |
|||
[[fr:Révolution néolithique]] |
|||
[[fy:Neolityske revolúsje]] |
|||
[[gan:新石器革命]] |
|||
[[it:Rivoluzione neolitica]] |
|||
[[he:המהפכה הניאוליתית]] |
|||
[[hu:Neolitikus forradalom]] |
|||
[[nl:Neolithische revolutie]] |
|||
[[no:Den neolittiske revolusjonen]] |
|||
[[pl:Rewolucja neolityczna]] |
|||
[[pt:Revolução neolítica]] |
|||
[[ru:Неолитическая революция]] |
|||
[[simple:Neolithic Revolution]] |
|||
[[sk:Neolitická revolúcia]] |
|||
[[fi:Maanviljelyn synty Lähi-idässä]] |
|||
[[sv:Neolitikum#Den neolitiska revolutionen]] |
|||
[[uk:Неолітична революція]] |
Latest revision as of 17:59, 28 November 2024
Part of a series on |
Human history |
---|
↑ Prehistory (Stone Age) (Pleistocene epoch) |
↓ Future |
History of technology |
---|
The Neolithic Revolution, also known as the First Agricultural Revolution, was the wide-scale transition of many human cultures during the Neolithic period in Afro-Eurasia from a lifestyle of hunting and gathering to one of agriculture and settlement, making an increasingly large population possible.[1] These settled communities permitted humans to observe and experiment with plants, learning how they grew and developed.[2] This new knowledge led to the domestication of plants into crops.[2][3]
Archaeological data indicate that the domestication of various types of plants and animals happened in separate locations worldwide, starting in the geological epoch of the Holocene 11,700 years ago, after the end of the last Ice Age.[4] It was humankind's first historically verifiable transition to agriculture. The Neolithic Revolution greatly narrowed the diversity of foods available, resulting in a decrease in the quality of human nutrition compared with that obtained previously from foraging,[5][6][7] but because food production became more efficient, it released humans to invest their efforts in other activities and was thus "ultimately necessary to the rise of modern civilization by creating the foundation for the later process of industrialization and sustained economic growth".[8]
The Neolithic Revolution involved much more than the adoption of a limited set of food-producing techniques. During the next millennia, it transformed the small and mobile groups of hunter-gatherers that had hitherto dominated human prehistory into sedentary (non-nomadic) societies based in built-up villages and towns. These societies radically modified their natural environment by means of specialized food-crop cultivation, with activities such as irrigation and deforestation which allowed the production of surplus food. Other developments that are found very widely during this era are the domestication of animals, pottery, polished stone tools, and rectangular houses. In many regions, the adoption of agriculture by prehistoric societies caused episodes of rapid population growth, a phenomenon known as the Neolithic demographic transition.
These developments, sometimes called the Neolithic package,[9] provided the basis for centralized administrations and political structures, hierarchical ideologies,[10] depersonalized systems of knowledge (e.g. writing), densely populated settlements, specialization and division of labour, more trade, the development of non-portable art and architecture, and greater property ownership.[11] The earliest known civilization developed in Sumer in southern Mesopotamia (c. 6,500 BP); its emergence also heralded the beginning of the Bronze Age.[12]
The relationship of the aforementioned Neolithic characteristics to the onset of agriculture, their sequence of emergence, and their empirical relation to each other at various Neolithic sites remains the subject of academic debate. It is usually understood to vary from place to place, rather than being the outcome of universal laws of social evolution.[13][14]
Background
[edit]Prehistoric hunter-gatherers had different subsistence requirements and lifestyles from agriculturalists. Hunter-gatherers were often highly mobile and migratory, living in temporary shelters and in small tribal groups, and having limited contact with outsiders. Their diet was well-balanced though heavily dependent on what the environment could provide each season. In contrast, because the surplus and plannable supply of food provided by agriculture made it possible to support larger population groups, agriculturalists lived in more permanent dwellings in more densely populated settlements than what could be supported by a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. The agricultural communities' seasonal need to plan and coordinate resource and manpower encouraged division of labour, which gradually led to specialization of labourers and complex societies. The subsequent development of trading networks to exchange surplus commodities and services brought agriculturalists into contact with outside groups, which promoted cultural exchanges that led to the rise of civilizations and technological evolutions.[15][full citation needed]
However, higher population and food abundance did not necessarily correlate with improved health. Reliance on a very limited variety of staple crops can adversely affect health even while making it possible to feed more people. Maize is deficient in certain essential amino acids (lysine and tryptophan) and is a poor source of iron. The phytic acid it contains may inhibit nutrient absorption. Other factors that likely affected the health of early agriculturalists and their domesticated livestock would have been increased numbers of parasites and disease-bearing pests associated with human waste and contaminated food and water supplies. Fertilizers and irrigation may have increased crop yields but also would have promoted proliferation of insects and bacteria in the local environment while grain storage attracted additional insects and rodents.[15]
Agricultural transition
[edit]The term 'neolithic revolution' was invented by V. Gordon Childe in his book Man Makes Himself (1936).[18][19] Childe introduced it as the first in a series of agricultural revolutions in Middle Eastern history,[20] calling it a "revolution" to denote its significance, the degree of change to communities adopting and refining agricultural practices.[21]
The beginning of this process in different regions has been dated from 10,000 to 8,000 BCE in the Fertile Crescent,[22][23] and perhaps 8000 BCE in the Kuk Early Agricultural Site of Papua New Guinea in Melanesia.[24][25] Everywhere, this transition is associated with a change from a largely nomadic hunter-gatherer way of life to a more settled, agrarian one, with the domestication of various plant and animal species – depending on the species locally available, and influenced by local culture. Archaeological research in 2003 suggests that in some regions, such as the Southeast Asian peninsula, the transition from hunter-gatherer to agriculturalist was not linear, but region-specific.[26]
Domestication
[edit]Crops
[edit]Once agriculture started gaining momentum, around 9000 BP, human activity resulted in the selective breeding of cereal grasses (beginning with emmer, einkorn and barley), and not simply of those that favoured greater caloric returns through larger seeds. Plants with traits such as small seeds or bitter taste were seen as undesirable. Plants that rapidly shed their seeds on maturity tended not to be gathered at harvest, therefore not stored and not seeded the following season; successive years of harvesting spontaneously selected for strains that retained their edible seeds longer.
Daniel Zohary identified several plant species as "pioneer crops" or Neolithic founder crops. He highlighted the importance of wheat, barley and rye, and suggested that domestication of flax, peas, chickpeas, bitter vetch and lentils came a little later. Based on analysis of the genes of domesticated plants, he preferred theories of a single, or at most a very small number of domestication events for each taxon that spread in an arc from the Levantine corridor around the Fertile Crescent and later into Europe.[27][28] Gordon Hillman and Stuart Davies carried out experiments with varieties of wild wheat to show that the process of domestication would have occurred over a relatively short period of between 20 and 200 years.[29]
Some of the pioneering attempts failed at first and crops were abandoned, sometimes to be taken up again and successfully domesticated thousands of years later: rye, tried and abandoned in Neolithic Anatolia, made its way to Europe as weed seeds and was successfully domesticated in Europe, thousands of years after the earliest agriculture.[30] Wild lentils presented a different problem: most of the wild seeds do not germinate in the first year; the first evidence of lentil domestication, breaking dormancy in their first year, appears in the early Neolithic at Jerf el Ahmar (in modern Syria), and lentils quickly spread south to the Netiv HaGdud site in the Jordan Valley.[30] The process of domestication allowed the founder crops to adapt and eventually become larger, more easily harvested, more dependable[clarification needed] in storage and more useful to the human population.
Selectively propagated figs, wild barley and wild oats were cultivated at the early Neolithic site of Gilgal I, where in 2006[31] archaeologists found caches of seeds of each in quantities too large to be accounted for even by intensive gathering, at strata datable to c. 11,000 years ago. Some of the plants tried and then abandoned during the Neolithic period in the Ancient Near East, at sites like Gilgal, were later successfully domesticated in other parts of the world.
Once early farmers perfected their agricultural techniques like irrigation (traced as far back as the 6th millennium BCE in Khuzistan[32][33]), their crops yielded surpluses that needed storage. Most hunter-gatherers could not easily store food for long due to their migratory lifestyle, whereas those with a sedentary dwelling could store their surplus grain. Eventually granaries were developed that allowed villages to store their seeds longer. So with more food, the population expanded and communities developed specialized workers and more advanced tools.
The process was not as linear as was once thought, but a more complicated effort, which was undertaken by different human populations in different regions in many different ways.
One of the world's most important crops, barley, was domesticated in the Near East around 11,000 years ago (c. 9,000 BCE).[34] Barley is a highly resilient crop, able to grow in varied and marginal environments, such as in regions of high altitude and latitude.[34] Archaeobotanical evidence shows that barley had spread throughout Eurasia by 2,000 BCE.[34] To further elucidate the routes by which barley cultivation was spread through Eurasia, genetic analysis was used to determine genetic diversity and population structure in extant barley taxa.[34] Genetic analysis shows that cultivated barley spread through Eurasia via several different routes, which were most likely separated in both time and space.[34]
Livestock
[edit]When hunter-gathering began to be replaced by sedentary food production it became more efficient to keep animals close at hand. Therefore, it became necessary to bring animals permanently to their settlements, although in many cases there was a distinction between relatively sedentary farmers and nomadic herders.[35][original research?] The animals' size, temperament, diet, mating patterns, and life span were factors in the desire and success in domesticating animals. Animals that provided milk, such as cows and goats, offered a source of protein that was renewable and therefore quite valuable. The animal's ability as a worker (for example ploughing or towing), as well as a food source, also had to be taken into account. Besides being a direct source of food, certain animals could provide leather, wool, hides, and fertilizer. Some of the earliest domesticated animals included dogs (East Asia, about 15,000 years ago),[36] sheep, goats, cows, and pigs.
West Asia was the source for many animals that could be domesticated, such as sheep, goats and pigs. This area was also the first region to domesticate the dromedary. Henri Fleisch discovered and termed the Shepherd Neolithic flint industry from the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon and suggested that it could have been used by the earliest nomadic shepherds. He dated this industry to the Epipaleolithic or Pre-Pottery Neolithic as it is evidently not Paleolithic, Mesolithic or even Pottery Neolithic.[37][38]
The presence of these animals gave the region a large advantage in cultural and economic development. As the climate in the Middle East changed and became drier, many of the farmers were forced to leave, taking their domesticated animals with them. It was this massive emigration from the Middle East that later helped distribute these animals to the rest of Afroeurasia. This emigration was mainly on an east–west axis of similar climates, as crops usually have a narrow optimal climatic range outside of which they cannot grow for reasons of light or rain changes. For instance, wheat does not normally grow in tropical climates, just like tropical crops such as bananas do not grow in colder climates. Some authors, like Jared Diamond, have postulated that this east–west axis is the main reason why plant and animal domestication spread so quickly from the Fertile Crescent to the rest of Eurasia and North Africa, while it did not reach through the north–south axis of Africa to reach the Mediterranean climates of South Africa, where temperate crops were successfully imported by ships in the last 500 years.[39] Similarly, the African Zebu of central Africa and the domesticated bovines of the fertile-crescent – separated by the dry sahara desert – were not introduced into each other's region.
Centers of agricultural origin
[edit]West Asia
[edit]Use-wear analysis of five glossed flint blades found at Ohalo II, a 23,000-years-old fisher-hunter-gatherers' camp on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, Northern Israel, provides the earliest evidence for the use of composite cereal harvesting tools.[40] The Ohalo site is at the junction of the Upper Paleolithic and the Early Epipaleolithic, and has been attributed to both periods.[41]
The wear traces indicate that tools were used for harvesting near-ripe semi-green wild cereals, shortly before grains are ripe and disperse naturally.[40] The studied tools were not used intensively, and they reflect two harvesting modes: flint knives held by hand and inserts hafted in a handle.[40] The finds shed new light on cereal harvesting techniques some 8,000 years before the Natufian and 12,000 years before the establishment of sedentary farming communities in the Near East.[40] Furthermore, the new finds accord well with evidence for the earliest ever cereal cultivation at the site and the use of stone-made grinding implements.[40]
Agriculture appeared first in West Asia about 2,000 years later,[clarification needed] around 10,000–9,000 years ago. The region was the centre of domestication for three cereals (einkorn wheat, emmer wheat and barley), four legumes (lentil, pea, bitter vetch and chickpea), and flax. Domestication was a slow process that unfolded across multiple regions, and was preceded by centuries if not millennia of pre-domestication cultivation.[42]
Finds of large quantities of seeds and a grinding stone at the Epipalaeolithic site of Ohalo II, dating to around 19,400 BP, has shown some of the earliest evidence for advanced planning of plants for food consumption and suggests that humans at Ohalo II processed the grain before consumption.[43][44] Tell Aswad is the oldest site of agriculture, with domesticated emmer wheat dated to 10,800 BP.[45][46] Soon after came hulled, two-row barley – found domesticated earliest at Jericho in the Jordan valley and at Iraq ed-Dubb in Jordan.[47]
Other sites in the Levantine corridor that show early evidence of agriculture include Wadi Faynan 16 and Netiv Hagdud.[22] Jacques Cauvin noted that the settlers of Aswad did not domesticate on site, but "arrived, perhaps from the neighbouring Anti-Lebanon, already equipped with the seed for planting".[48] In the Eastern Fertile Crescent, evidence of cultivation of wild plants has been found in Choga Gholan in Iran dated to 12,000 BP, with domesticated emmer wheat appearing in 9,800 BP, suggesting there may have been multiple regions in the Fertile Crescent where cereal domestication evolved roughly contemporaneously.[49] The Heavy Neolithic Qaraoun culture has been identified at around fifty sites in Lebanon around the source springs of the River Jordan, but never reliably dated.[50][37]
In his book Guns, Germs, and Steel, Jared Diamond argues that the vast continuous east–west stretch of temperate climatic zones of Eurasia and North Africa gave peoples living there a highly advantageous geographical location that afforded them a head start in the Neolithic Revolution. Both shared the temperate climate ideal for the first agricultural settings, and both were near a number of easily domesticable plant and animal species. In areas where continents aligned north–south such as the Americas and Africa, crops—and later domesticated animals—could not spread across tropical zones.[51]
East Asia
[edit]Agriculture in Neolithic China can be separated into two broad regions, Northern China and Southern China.[52][53]
The agricultural centre in northern China is believed to be the homelands of the early Sino-Tibetan-speakers, associated with the Houli, Peiligang, Cishan, and Xinglongwa cultures, clustered around the Yellow River basin.[52][53] It was the domestication centre for foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum), with early evidence of domestication approximately 8,000 years ago,[54] and widespread cultivation 7,500 years ago.[54] (Soybean was also domesticated in northern China 4,500 years ago.[55] Orange and peach also originated in China, being cultivated c. 2500 BCE.[56][57])
The agricultural centres in southern China are clustered around the Yangtze River basin. Rice was domesticated in this region, together with the development of paddy field cultivation, between 13,500 and 8,200 years ago.[52][58][59]
There are two possible centres of domestication for rice. The first is in the lower Yangtze River, believed to be the homelands of pre-Austronesians and associated with the Kauhuqiao, Hemudu, Majiabang, and Songze cultures. It is characterized by typical pre-Austronesian features, including stilt houses, jade carving, and boat technologies. Their diet were also supplemented by acorns, water chestnuts, foxnuts, and pig domestication. The second is in the middle Yangtze River, believed to be the homelands of the early Hmong-Mien-speakers and associated with the Pengtoushan and Daxi cultures. Both of these regions were heavily populated and had regular trade contacts with each other, as well as with early Austroasiatic speakers to the west, and early Kra-Dai speakers to the south, facilitating the spread of rice cultivation throughout southern China.[59][52][53]
The millet and rice-farming cultures also first came into contact with each other at around 9,000 to 7,000 BP, resulting in a corridor between the millet and rice cultivation centres where both rice and millet were cultivated.[52] At around 5,500 to 4,000 BP, there was increasing migration into Taiwan from the early Austronesian Dapenkeng culture, bringing rice and millet cultivation technology with them. During this period, there is evidence of large settlements and intensive rice cultivation in Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, which may have resulted in overexploitation. Bellwood (2011) proposes that this may have been the impetus of the Austronesian expansion which started with the migration of the Austronesian-speakers from Taiwan to the Philippines at around 5,000 BP.[53]
Austronesians carried rice cultivation technology to Island Southeast Asia along with other domesticated species. The new tropical island environments also had new food plants that they exploited. They carried useful plants and animals during each colonization voyage, resulting in the rapid introduction of domesticated and semi-domesticated species throughout Oceania. They also came into contact with the early agricultural centres of Papuan-speaking populations of New Guinea as well as the Dravidian-speaking regions of South India and Sri Lanka by around 3,500 BP. They acquired further cultivated food plants like bananas and pepper from them, and in turn introduced Austronesian technologies like wetland cultivation and outrigger canoes.[53][60][61][62] During the 1st millennium CE, they also colonized Madagascar and the Comoros, bringing Southeast Asian food plants, including rice, to East Africa.[63][64]
Africa
[edit]On the African continent, three areas have been identified as independently developing agriculture: the Ethiopian highlands, the Sahel and West Africa.[39] By contrast, Agriculture in the Nile River Valley is thought to have developed from the original Neolithic Revolution in the Fertile Crescent. Many grinding stones are found with the early Egyptian Sebilian and Mechian cultures and evidence has been found of a neolithic domesticated crop-based economy dating around 7,000 BP.[65][66] Unlike the Middle East, this evidence appears as a "false dawn" to agriculture, as the sites were later abandoned, and permanent farming then was delayed until 6,500 BP with the Tasian culture and Badarian culture and the arrival of crops and animals from the Near East.
Bananas and plantains, which were first domesticated in Southeast Asia, most likely Papua New Guinea, were re-domesticated in Africa possibly as early as 5,000 years ago. Asian yams and taro were also cultivated in Africa.[39]
The most famous crop domesticated in the Ethiopian highlands is coffee. In addition, khat, ensete, noog, teff and finger millet were also domesticated in the Ethiopian highlands. Crops domesticated in the Sahel region include sorghum and pearl millet. The kola nut was first domesticated in West Africa. Other crops domesticated in West Africa include African rice, yams and the oil palm.[39]
Agriculture spread to Central and Southern Africa in the Bantu expansion during the 1st millennium BCE to 1st millennium CE.
Americas
[edit]The term "Neolithic" is not customarily used in describing cultures in the Americas. However, a broad similarity exists between Eastern Hemisphere cultures of the Neolithic and cultures in the Americas. Maize (corn), beans and squash were among the earliest crops domesticated in Mesoamerica: squash as early as 6000 BCE, beans no later than 4000 BCE, and maize beginning about 7000 BCE.[67] Potatoes and manioc were domesticated in South America. In what is now the eastern United States, Native Americans domesticated sunflower, sumpweed and goosefoot c. 2500 BCE. In the highlands of central Mexico, sedentary village life based on farming did not develop until the "formative period" in the second millennium BCE.[68]
New Guinea
[edit]Evidence of drainage ditches at Kuk Swamp on the borders of the Western and Southern Highlands of Papua New Guinea indicates cultivation of taro and a variety of other crops, dating back to 11,000 BP. Two potentially significant economic species, taro (Colocasia esculenta) and yam (Dioscorea sp.), have been identified dating at least to 10,200 calibrated years before present (cal BP). Further evidence of bananas and sugarcane dates to 6,950 to 6,440 BCE. This was at the altitudinal limits of these crops, and it has been suggested that cultivation in more favourable ranges in the lowlands may have been even earlier. CSIRO has found evidence that taro was introduced into the Solomon Islands for human use, from 28,000 years ago, making taro the earliest cultivated crop in the world.[69][70] It seems to have resulted in the spread of the Trans–New Guinea languages from New Guinea east into the Solomon Islands and west into Timor and adjacent areas of Indonesia. This seems to confirm the theories of Carl Sauer who, in "Agricultural Origins and Dispersals", suggested as early as 1952 that this region was a centre of early agriculture.
Spread of agriculture
[edit]Europe
[edit]Archaeologists trace the emergence of food-producing societies in the Levantine region of southwest Asia at the close of the last glacial period around 12,000 BCE, and developed into a number of regionally distinctive cultures by the eighth millennium BCE. Remains of food-producing societies in the Aegean have been carbon-dated to c. 6500 BCE at Knossos, Franchthi Cave, and a number of mainland sites in Thessaly. Neolithic groups appear soon afterwards in the Balkans and south-central Europe. The Neolithic cultures of southeastern Europe (the Balkans and the Aegean) show some continuity with groups in southwest Asia and Anatolia (e.g., Çatalhöyük).
Current evidence suggests that Neolithic material culture was introduced to Europe via western Anatolia. All Neolithic sites in Europe contain ceramics, and contain the plants and animals domesticated in Southwest Asia: einkorn, emmer, barley, lentils, pigs, goats, sheep, and cattle. Genetic data suggest that no independent domestication of animals took place in Neolithic Europe, and that all domesticated animals were originally domesticated in Southwest Asia.[71] The only domesticate not from Southwest Asia was broomcorn millet, domesticated in East Asia.[72]The earliest evidence of cheese-making dates to 5500 BCE in Kujawy, Poland.[73]
The diffusion across Europe, from the Aegean to Britain, took about 2,500 years (8500–6000 BP). The Baltic region was penetrated a bit later, around 5500 BP, and there was also a delay in settling the Pannonian plain. In general, colonization shows a "saltatory" pattern, as the Neolithic advanced from one patch of fertile alluvial soil to another, bypassing mountainous areas. Analysis of radiocarbon dates show clearly that Mesolithic and Neolithic populations lived side by side for as much as a millennium in many parts of Europe, especially in the Iberian peninsula and along the Atlantic coast.[74]
Carbon 14 evidence
[edit]The spread of the Neolithic from the Near East Neolithic to Europe was first studied quantitatively in the 1970s, when a sufficient number of Carbon 14 age determinations for early Neolithic sites had become available.[76] In 1973, Ammerman and Cavalli-Sforza discovered a linear relationship between the age of an Early Neolithic site and its distance from the conventional source in the Near East (Jericho), demonstrating that the Neolithic spread at an average speed of about 1 km/yr.[76] More recent studies (2005) confirm these results and yield the speed of 0.6–1.3 km/yr (at 95% confidence level).[76]
Analysis of mitochondrial DNA
[edit]Since the original human expansions out of Africa 200,000 years ago, different prehistoric and historic migration events have taken place in Europe.[77] Considering that the movement of the people implies a consequent movement of their genes, it is possible to estimate the impact of these migrations through the genetic analysis of human populations.[77] Agricultural and husbandry practices originated 10,000 years ago in a region of the Near East known as the Fertile Crescent.[77] According to the archaeological record this phenomenon, known as "Neolithic", rapidly expanded from these territories into Europe.[77]
However, whether this diffusion was accompanied or not by human migrations is greatly debated.[77] Mitochondrial DNA – a type of maternally inherited DNA located in the cell cytoplasm – was recovered from the remains of Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) farmers in the Near East and then compared to available data from other Neolithic populations in Europe and also to modern populations from South Eastern Europe and the Near East.[77] The obtained results show that substantial human migrations were involved in the Neolithic spread and suggest that the first Neolithic farmers entered Europe following a maritime route through Cyprus and the Aegean Islands.[77]
-
Map of the spread of Neolithic farming cultures from the Near-East to Europe, with dates in year BCE.
-
Modern distribution of the haplotypes of PPNB farmers
-
Genetic distance between PPNB farmers and modern populations
South Asia
[edit]The earliest Neolithic sites in South Asia are Bhirrana in Haryana dated to 7570–6200 BCE,[78] and Mehrgarh, dated to between 6500 and 5500 BP, in the Kachi plain of Balochistan, Pakistan; the site has evidence of farming (wheat and barley) and herding (cattle, sheep and goats).
There is strong evidence for causal connections between the Near-Eastern Neolithic and that further east, up to the Indus Valley.[79] There are several lines of evidence that support the idea of connection between the Neolithic in the Near East and in the Indian subcontinent.[79] The prehistoric site of Mehrgarh in Baluchistan (modern Pakistan) is the earliest Neolithic site in the north-west Indian subcontinent, dated as early as 8500 BCE.[79]
Neolithic domesticated crops in Mehrgarh include more than 90% barley and a small amount of wheat. There is good evidence for the local domestication of barley and the zebu cattle at Mehrgarh, but the wheat varieties are suggested to be of Near-Eastern origin, as the modern distribution of wild varieties of wheat is limited to Northern Levant and Southern Turkey.[79]
A detailed satellite map study of a few archaeological sites in the Baluchistan and Khybar Pakhtunkhwa regions also suggests similarities in early phases of farming with sites in Western Asia.[79] Pottery prepared by sequential slab construction, circular fire pits filled with burnt pebbles, and large granaries are common to both Mehrgarh and many Mesopotamian sites.[79]
The postures of the skeletal remains in graves at Mehrgarh bear strong resemblance to those at Ali Kosh in the Zagros Mountains of southern Iran.[79] Despite their scarcity, the Carbon-14 and archaeological age determinations for early Neolithic sites in Southern Asia exhibit remarkable continuity across the vast region from the Near East to the Indian Subcontinent, consistent with a systematic eastward spread at a speed of about 0.65 km/yr.[79]
Causes
[edit]This section is missing information about more recent theories and includes some outdated/rejected theories.(October 2024) |
The most prominent of several theories (not mutually exclusive) as to factors that caused populations to develop agriculture include:
- The Oasis Theory, originally proposed by Raphael Pumpelly in 1908, popularized by V. Gordon Childe in 1928 and summarised in Childe's book Man Makes Himself.[18] This theory maintains that as the climate got drier due to the Atlantic depressions shifting northward, communities contracted to oases where they were forced into close association with animals, which were then domesticated together with planting of seeds. However, this theory now has little support amongst archaeologists because subsequent climate data suggests that the region was getting wetter rather than drier.[80]
- The Hilly Flanks hypothesis, proposed by Robert John Braidwood in 1948, suggests that agriculture began in the hilly flanks of the Taurus and Zagros Mountains, where the climate was not drier as Childe had believed, and fertile land supported a variety of plants and animals amenable to domestication.[81]
- The Feasting model by Brian Hayden[82] suggests that agriculture was driven by ostentatious displays of power, such as giving feasts, to exert dominance. This required assembling large quantities of food, which drove agricultural technology.[83]
- The Demographic theories proposed by Carl Sauer[84] and adapted by Lewis Binford[85] and Kent Flannery posit an increasingly sedentary population that expanded up to the carrying capacity of the local environment and required more food than could be gathered. Various social and economic factors helped drive the need for food.
- The evolutionary/intentionality theory, developed by David Rindos[86] and others, considers agriculture as an evolutionary adaptation of plants and humans. Starting with domestication by protection of wild plants, it resulted specialization of location and then complete domestication.[citation needed]
- Peter Richerson, Robert Boyd, and Robert Bettinger[87] make a case for the development of agriculture coinciding with an increasingly stable climate at the beginning of the Holocene. Ronald Wright's book and Massey Lecture Series A Short History of Progress[88] popularized this hypothesis.
- Leonid Grinin argues that whatever plants were cultivated, the independent invention of agriculture always occurred in special natural environments (e.g., South-East Asia). It is supposed that the cultivation of cereals started somewhere in the Near East: in the hills of Israel or Egypt. So Grinin dates the beginning of the agricultural revolution within the interval 12,000 to 9,000 BP, though in some cases the first cultivated plants or domesticated animals' bones are even of a more ancient age of 14–15 thousand years ago.[89]
- Andrew Moore suggested that the Neolithic Revolution originated over long periods of development in the Levant, possibly beginning during the Epipaleolithic. In "A Reassessment of the Neolithic Revolution", Frank Hole further expanded the relationship between plant and animal domestication. He suggested the events could have occurred independently during different periods of time, in as yet unexplored locations. He noted that no transition site had been found documenting the shift from what he termed immediate and delayed return social systems.[further explanation needed] He noted that the full range of domesticated animals (goats, sheep, cattle and pigs) were not found until the sixth millennium BCE at Tell Ramad. Hole concluded that "close attention should be paid in future investigations to the western margins of the Euphrates basin, perhaps as far south as the Arabian Peninsula, especially where wadis carrying Pleistocene rainfall runoff flowed."[90]
Consequences
[edit]Social change
[edit]Despite the significant technological advance and advancements in knowledge, arts and trade, the Neolithic revolution did not lead immediately to a rapid growth of population. Its benefits appear to have been offset by various adverse effects, mostly diseases and warfare.[91][92]
The introduction of agriculture has not necessarily led to unequivocal progress. The nutritional standards of the growing Neolithic populations were inferior to that of hunter-gatherers. Several ethnological and archaeological studies conclude that the transition to cereal-based diets caused a reduction in life expectancy and stature, an increase in infant mortality and infectious diseases, the development of chronic, inflammatory or degenerative diseases (such as obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases) and multiple nutritional deficiencies, including vitamin deficiencies, iron deficiency anemia and mineral disorders affecting bones (such as osteoporosis and rickets) and teeth.[93][94][95] Average height for Europeans went down from 178 cm (5'10") for men and 168 cm (5'6") for women to 165 cm (5'5") and 155 cm (5'1") respectively, and it took until the twentieth century for average height for Europeans to return to the pre-Neolithic Revolution levels.[96]
The traditional view is that agricultural food production supported a denser population, which in turn supported larger sedentary communities, the accumulation of goods and tools, and specialization in diverse forms of new labor. Food surpluses made possible the development of a social elite who were not otherwise engaged in agriculture, industry or commerce, but dominated their communities by other means and monopolized decision-making. Nonetheless, larger societies made it more feasible for people to adopt diverse decision making and governance models.[97] Jared Diamond (in The World Until Yesterday) identifies the availability of milk and cereal grains as permitting mothers to raise both an older (e.g. 3 or 4 year old) and a younger child concurrently. The result is that a population can increase more rapidly. Diamond, in agreement with feminist scholars such as V. Spike Peterson, points out that agriculture brought about deep social divisions and encouraged gender inequality.[98][99] This social reshuffle is traced by historical theorists, like Veronica Strang, through developments in theological depictions.[100] Strang supports her theory through a comparison of aquatic deities before and after the Neolithic Agricultural Revolution, most notably the Venus of Lespugue and the Greco-Roman deities such as Circe or Charybdis: the former venerated and respected, the latter dominated and conquered. The theory, supplemented by the widely accepted assumption from Parsons that "society is always the object of religious veneration",[101] argues that with the centralization of government and the dawn of the Anthropocene, roles within society became more restrictive and were rationalized through the conditioning effect of religion; a process that is crystallized in the progression from polytheism to monotheism.
Subsequent revolutions
[edit]Andrew Sherratt has argued that following upon the Neolithic Revolution was a second phase of discovery that he refers to as the secondary products revolution. Animals, it appears, were first domesticated purely as a source of meat.[102] The Secondary Products Revolution occurred when it was recognised that animals also provided a number of other useful products. These included:
- hides and skins (from undomesticated animals)
- manure for soil conditioning (from all domesticated animals)
- wool (from sheep, llamas, alpacas, and Angora goats)
- milk (from goats, cattle, yaks, sheep, horses, and camels)
- traction (from oxen, onagers, donkeys, horses, camels, and dogs)
- guarding and herding assistance (dogs)
Sherratt argued that this phase in agricultural development enabled humans to make use of the energy possibilities of their animals in new ways, and permitted permanent intensive subsistence farming and crop production, and the opening up of heavier soils for farming. It also made possible nomadic pastoralism in semi arid areas, along the margins of deserts, and eventually led to the domestication of both the dromedary and Bactrian camel.[102] Overgrazing of these areas, particularly by herds of goats, greatly extended the areal extent of deserts.
Diet and health
[edit]Compared to foragers, Neolithic farmers' diets were higher in carbohydrates but lower in fibre, micronutrients, and protein. This led to an increase in the frequency of carious teeth[7] and slower growth in childhood and increased body fat[clarification needed], and studies have consistently found that populations around the world became shorter after the transition to agriculture. This trend may have been exacerbated by the greater seasonality of farming diets and with it the increased risk of famine due to crop failure.[6]
Throughout the development of sedentary societies, disease spread more rapidly than it had during the time in which hunter-gatherer societies existed. Inadequate sanitary practices and the domestication of animals may explain the rise in deaths and sickness following the Neolithic Revolution, as diseases jumped from the animal to the human population. Some examples of infectious diseases spread from animals to humans are influenza, smallpox, and measles.[103] Ancient microbial genomics has shown that progenitors to human-adapted strains of Salmonella enterica infected up to 5,500 year old agro-pastoralists throughout Western Eurasia, providing molecular evidence for the hypothesis that the Neolithization process facilitated the emergence of Salmonella entericia.[104]
In concordance with a process of natural selection, the humans who first domesticated the big mammals quickly built up immunities to the diseases as within each generation the individuals with better immunities had better chances of survival. In their approximately 10,000 years of shared proximity with animals, such as cows, Eurasians and Africans became more resistant to those diseases compared with the indigenous populations encountered outside Eurasia and Africa.[39] For instance, the population of most Caribbean and several Pacific Islands have been completely wiped out by diseases. 90% or more of many populations of the Americas were wiped out by European and African diseases before recorded contact with European explorers or colonists. Some cultures like the Inca Empire did have a large domestic mammal, the llama, but llama milk was not drunk, nor did llamas live in a closed space with humans, so the risk of contagion was limited. According to bioarchaeological research, the effects of agriculture on dental health in Southeast Asian rice farming societies from 4000 to 1500 BP was not detrimental to the same extent as in other world regions.[105]
Jonathan C. K. Wells and Jay T. Stock have argued that the dietary changes and increased pathogen exposure associated with agriculture profoundly altered human biology and life history, creating conditions where natural selection favoured the allocation of resources towards reproduction over somatic effort.[6]
Comparative chronology
[edit]See also
[edit]- Upper Paleolithic revolution
- Broad spectrum revolution
- Secondary products revolution
- Urban revolution
- Industrial revolution
- Green Revolution
Further reading
[edit]- Taiz, Lincoln. "Agriculture, plant physiology, and human population growth: past, present, and future." Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology 25 (2013): 167-181.
References
[edit]- ^ Jean-Pierre Bocquet-Appel (29 July 2011). "When the World's Population Took Off: The Springboard of the Neolithic Demographic Transition". Science. 333 (6042): 560–561. Bibcode:2011Sci...333..560B. doi:10.1126/science.1208880. PMID 21798934. S2CID 29655920.
- ^ a b Pollard, Elizabeth; Rosenberg, Clifford; Tigor, Robert (2015). Worlds together, worlds apart. Vol. 1 (concise ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-393-25093-0.
- ^ Compare:Lewin, Roger (18 February 2009) [1984]. "35: The origin of agriculture and the first villagers". Human Evolution: An Illustrated Introduction (5 ed.). Malden, Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons (published 2009). p. 250. ISBN 978-1-4051-5614-1. Retrieved 20 August 2017.
[...] The Neolithic transition involved increasing sedentism and social complexity, which was usually followed by the gradual adoption of plant and animal domestication. In some cases, however, plant domestication preceded sedentism, particularly in the New World.
- ^ "International Stratigraphic Chart". International Commission on Stratigraphy. Archived from the original on 12 February 2013. Retrieved 6 December 2012.
- ^ Armelagos, George J. (2014). "Brain Evolution, the Determinates of Food Choice, and the Omnivore's Dilemma". Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 54 (10): 1330–1341. doi:10.1080/10408398.2011.635817. ISSN 1040-8398. PMID 24564590. S2CID 25488602.
- ^ a b c Wells, Jonathan C. K.; Stock, Jay T. (2020). "Life History Transitions at the Origins of Agriculture: A Model for Understanding How Niche Construction Impacts Human Growth, Demography and Health". Frontiers in Endocrinology. 11: 325. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00325. ISSN 1664-2392. PMC 7253633. PMID 32508752.
- ^ a b Larsen, Clark Spencer (1 June 2006). "The agricultural revolution as environmental catastrophe: Implications for health and lifestyle in the Holocene". Quaternary International. Impact of rapid environmental changes on humans and ecosystems. 150 (1): 12–20. Bibcode:2006QuInt.150...12L. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2006.01.004. ISSN 1040-6182. Archived from the original on 5 November 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2020.
- ^ Weisdorf, Jacob L. (September 2005). "From Foraging To Farming: Explaining The Neolithic Revolution" (PDF). Journal of Economic Surveys. 19 (4): 561–586. doi:10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00259.x. S2CID 42777045. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 July 2018. Retrieved 12 June 2023.
- ^ Nowak, Marek (2022). "Do We Finally Know What the Neolithic Is?". Open Archaeology. 8 (1): 332–342. doi:10.1515/opar-2020-0204.
- ^ "Violence and its causes". unesdoc.unesco.org. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
- ^ Childe, Vere Gordon (1950). "The Urban Revolution". The Town Planning Review. 21 (1). Liverpool University Press: 3–17. doi:10.3828/tpr.21.1.k853061t614q42qh. ISSN 0041-0020. JSTOR 40102108. S2CID 39517784.
- ^ Violatti, Cristian (2 April 2018). "Neolithic Period". World History Encyclopedia.
- ^ "The Slow Birth of Agriculture" Archived 1 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Heather Pringle
- ^ "Wizard Chemi Shanidar". EMuseum. Minnesota State University. Archived from the original on 18 June 2008.
- ^ a b The Cambridge World History of Food. Cambridge University Press. p. 46.
- ^ Zalloua, Pierre A.; Matisoo-Smith, Elizabeth (6 January 2017). "Mapping Post-Glacial expansions: The Peopling of Southwest Asia". Scientific Reports. 7: 40338. Bibcode:2017NatSR...740338P. doi:10.1038/srep40338. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5216412. PMID 28059138.
- ^ Diamond, J.; Bellwood, P. (2003). "Farmers and Their Languages: The First Expansions". Science. 300 (5619): 597–603. Bibcode:2003Sci...300..597D. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1013.4523. doi:10.1126/science.1078208. PMID 12714734. S2CID 13350469.
- ^ a b Childe, Vere Gordon (1936). Man Makes Himself. London: Watts & Company.
- ^ Brami, Maxime N. (1 December 2019). "The Invention of Prehistory and the Rediscovery of Europe: Exploring the Intellectual Roots of Gordon Childe's 'Neolithic Revolution' (1936)". Journal of World Prehistory. 32 (4): 311–351. doi:10.1007/s10963-019-09135-y. ISSN 1573-7802. S2CID 211663314.
- ^ "7.6: Neolithic Revolution". Social Sci LibreTexts. 28 April 2018. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
- ^ "7.6: Neolithic Revolution". Social Sci LibreTexts. 28 April 2018. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
- ^ a b Graeme Barker (2009). The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory: Why did Foragers become Farmers?. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-955995-4.
- ^ Thissen, L. "Appendix I, The CANeW 14C databases, Anatolia 10,000–5000 cal. BC." in: F. Gérard and L. Thissen (eds.), The Neolithic of Central Anatolia. Internal developments and external relations during the 9th–6th millennia cal BC, Proc. Int. CANeW Round Table, Istanbul 23–24 November 2001, (2002)
- ^ Denham, Tim P.; Haberle, S. G.; Fullagar, R; Field, J; Therin, M; Porch, N; Winsborough, B (2003). "Origins of Agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the Highlands of New Guinea" (PDF). Science. 301 (5630): 189–193. doi:10.1126/science.1085255. PMID 12817084. S2CID 10644185. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 November 2021. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ^ "The Kuk Early Agricultural Site". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 22 January 2023. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
- ^ Kealhofer, Lisa (2003). "Looking into the gap: land use and the tropical forests of southern Thailand". Asian Perspectives. 42 (1): 72–95. doi:10.1353/asi.2003.0022. hdl:10125/17181. S2CID 162916204.
- ^ R, HARRIS DAVID (17 April 1996). ORIGINS & SPREAD AGRIC PAST. Smithsonian. ISBN 9781560986768 – via Google Books.
- ^ Zohary, Daniel (1 April 1999). "Monophyletic vs. polyphyletic origin of the crops on which agriculture was founded in the Near East". Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 46 (2): 133–142. doi:10.1023/A:1008692912820. S2CID 9529895 – via Springer Link.
- ^ Hillman, G. C; Davies, M. S. (1992). "Domestication rate in wild wheats and barley under primitive cultivation: preliminary results and archaeological implications of field measurements of selection coefficient". In Anderson, PC (ed.). Préhistoire de l'agriculture: nouvelles approches expérimentales et ethnographiques. Monographie du CRA 6. Paris: Editions du CNRS. pp. 124–132. ISBN 978-2-222-04546-5.
- ^ a b Weiss, Ehud; Kislev, Mordechai E.; Hartmann, Anat (2006). "Autonomous Cultivation Before Domestication". Science. 312 (5780): 1608–1610. doi:10.1126/science.1127235. PMID 16778044. S2CID 83125044.
- ^ "Tamed 11,400 Years Ago, Figs Were Likely First Domesticated Crop". ScienceDaily. 4 June 2006. Archived from the original on 6 October 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2018.
- ^
Flannery, Kent V. (1969). "Origins and ecological effects of early domestication in Iran and the Near East". In Ucko, Peter John; Dimbleby, G. W. (eds.). The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers (published 2007). p. 89. ISBN 978-0-202-36557-2. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
Our earliest evidence for this new technology comes [...] from the lowland steppe of Khuzistan. [...] Once irrigation appeared, the steppe greatly increased its carrying capacity and became, in fact, the dominant growth centre of the Zagros region between 5500 and 4000 B.C.
- ^
Lawton, H. W.; Wilke, P. J. (1979). "Ancient Agricultural Systems in Dry Regions of the Old World". In Hall, A. E.; Cannell, G. H.; Lawton, H.W. (eds.). Agriculture in Semi-Arid Environments. Ecological Studies. Vol. 34 (reprint ed.). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media (published 2012). p. 13. ISBN 978-3-642-67328-3. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
Archeological investigations on the Deh Luran Plain of Iran have provided a model for the internal dynamics of the culture sequence of prehistoric Khuzistan [...]. Somewhere between 5500 and 5000 B.C. in the Sabz phase of the Deh Luran Plain, irrigation water was apparently diverted from stream channels in a fashion similar to that employed in early Mesopotamia.
- ^ a b c d e f Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Archived 16 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine Jones, Martin K.; Kovaleva, Olga (18 July 2018). "Barley heads east: Genetic analyses reveal routes of spread through diverse Eurasian landscapes". PLOS ONE. 13 (7): e0196652. Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1396652L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196652. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 6051582. PMID 30020920.
- ^ "The Development of Agriculture". Genographic Project. Archived from the original on 14 April 2016. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
- ^ McGourty, Christine (22 November 2002). "Origin of dogs traced". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2 November 2019. Retrieved 29 November 2006.
- ^ a b L. Copeland; P. Wescombe (1966). Inventory of Stone-Age Sites in Lebanon: North, South and East-Central Lebanon. Imprimerie Catholique. p. 89.
- ^ Fleisch, Henri., Notes de Préhistoire Libanaise : 1) Ard es Saoude. 2) La Bekaa Nord. 3) Un polissoir en plein air. BSPF, vol. 63.
- ^ a b c d e Diamond, Jared (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: Norton Press. ISBN 978-0-393-31755-8.
- ^ a b c d e Nadel, Dani; Weiss, Ehud; Groman-Yaroslavski, Iris (23 November 2016). "Composite Sickles and Cereal Harvesting Methods at 23,000-Years-Old Ohalo II, Israel". PLOS ONE. 11 (11): e0167151. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1167151G. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167151. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5120854. PMID 27880839. Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- ^ Enzel, Yehouda; Bar-Yosef, Ofer (2017). Quaternary of the Levant. Cambridge University Press. p. 335. ISBN 978-1-107-09046-0.
- ^ Brown, T. A.; Jones, M. K.; Powell, W.; Allaby, R. G. (2009). "The complex origins of domesticated crops in the Fertile Crescent" (PDF). Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 24 (2): 103–109. Bibcode:2009TEcoE..24..103B. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.008. PMID 19100651. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 February 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ^ Mithen, Steven (2006). After the ice : a global human history, 20.000–5.000 BC (1. paperback ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. p. 517. ISBN 978-0-674-01570-8.
- ^ Compiled largely with reference to: Weiss, Ehud; Kislev, Mordechai E.; Simchoni, Orit; Nadel, Dani; Tschauner, Hartmut (2008). "Plant-food preparation area on an Upper Paleolithic brush hut floor at Ohalo II, Israel". Journal of Archaeological Science. 35 (8): 2400–2414. Bibcode:2008JArSc..35.2400W. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.03.012.
- ^ Ozkan, H.; Brandolini, A.; Schäfer-Pregl, R.; Salamini, F. (October 2002). "AFLP analysis of a collection of tetraploid wheats indicates the origin of emmer and hard wheat domestication in southeast Turkey". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 19 (10): 1797–801. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004002. PMID 12270906.
- ^ van Zeist, W. Bakker-Heeres, J.A.H., Archaeobotanical Studies in the Levant 1. Neolithic Sites in the Damascus Basin: Aswad, Ghoraifé, Ramad., Palaeohistoria, 24, 165–256, 1982.
- ^ Hopf, Maria., "Jericho plant remains" in Kathleen M. Kenyon and T. A. Holland (eds.) Excavations at Jericho 5, pp. 576–621, British School of Archaeology at Jerusalem, London, 1983.
- ^ Jacques Cauvin (2000). The Birth of the Gods and the Origins of Agriculture, p. 53. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-65135-6. Retrieved 15 August 2012.
- ^ Riehl, Simone; Zeidi, Mohsen; Conard, Nicholas (5 July 2013). "Emergence of Agriculture in the Foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran". Science. 341 (6141): 65–7. Bibcode:2013Sci...341...65R. doi:10.1126/science.1236743. PMID 23828939. S2CID 45375155. Archived from the original on 23 May 2020. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ^ Peltenburg, E.J.; Wasse, Alexander; Council for British Research in the Levant (2004). Maya Haïdar Boustani, Flint workshops of the Southern Beqa' valley (Lebanon): preliminary results from Qar'oun* in Neolithic revolution: new perspectives on southwest Asia in light of recent discoveries on Cyprus. Oxbow Books. ISBN 978-1-84217-132-5.
- ^ "BBC – History – Ancient History in depth: Overview: From Neolithic to Bronze Age, 8000–800 BC". Archived from the original on 12 May 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
- ^ a b c d e f He, Keyang; Lu, Houyuan; Zhang, Jianping; Wang, Can; Huan, Xiujia (7 June 2017). "Prehistoric evolution of the dualistic structure mixed rice and millet farming in China". The Holocene. 27 (12): 1885–1898. Bibcode:2017Holoc..27.1885H. doi:10.1177/0959683617708455. S2CID 133660098. Archived from the original on 20 November 2021. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
- ^ a b c d e f Bellwood, Peter (9 December 2011). "The Checkered Prehistory of Rice Movement Southwards as a Domesticated Cereal – from the Yangzi to the Equator" (PDF). Rice. 4 (3–4): 93–103. Bibcode:2011Rice....4...93B. doi:10.1007/s12284-011-9068-9. S2CID 44675525. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 January 2019. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
- ^ a b Fuller, D. Q. (2007). "Contrasting Patterns in Crop Domestication and Domestication Rates: Recent Archaeobotanical Insights from the Old World". Annals of Botany. 100 (5): 903–924. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm048. PMC 2759199. PMID 17495986.
- ^ Siddiqi, Mohammad Rafiq (2001). Tylenchida: Parasites of Plants and Insects. CABI.
- ^ Thacker, Christopher (1985). The history of gardens. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-520-05629-9.
- ^ Webber, Herbert John (1967–1989). Chapter I. History and Development of the Citrus Industry Archived 23 May 2016 at the Portuguese Web Archive in Origin of Citrus, Vol. 1. University of California
- ^ Molina, J.; Sikora, M.; Garud, N.; Flowers, J. M.; Rubinstein, S.; Reynolds, A.; Huang, P.; Jackson, S.; Schaal, B. A.; Bustamante, C. D.; Boyko, A. R.; Purugganan, M. D. (2011). "Molecular evidence for a single evolutionary origin of domesticated rice". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (20): 8351–83516. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.8351M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104686108. PMC 3101000. PMID 21536870.
- ^ a b Zhang, Jianping; Lu, Houyuan; Gu, Wanfa; Wu, Naiqin; Zhou, Kunshu; Hu, Yayi; Xin, Yingjun; Wang, Can; Kashkush, Khalil (17 December 2012). "Early Mixed Farming of Millet and Rice 7800 Years Ago in the Middle Yellow River Region, China". PLOS ONE. 7 (12): e52146. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...752146Z. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052146. PMC 3524165. PMID 23284907.
- ^ Bayliss-Smith, Tim; Golson, Jack; Hughes, Philip (2017). "Phase 4: Major Disposal Channels, Slot-Like Ditches and Grid-Patterned Fields". In Golson, Jack; Denham, Tim; Hughes, Philip; Swadling, Pamela; Muke, John (eds.). Ten Thousand Years of Cultivation at Kuk Swamp in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea. terra australis. Vol. 46. ANU Press. pp. 239–268. ISBN 978-1-76046-116-4.
- ^ Mahdi, Waruno (1999). "The Dispersal of Austronesian boat forms in the Indian Ocean". In Blench, Roger; Spriggs, Matthew (eds.). Archaeology and Language III: Artefacts languages, and texts. One World Archaeology. Vol. 34. Routledge. pp. 144–179. ISBN 978-0-415-10054-0.
- ^ Blench, Roger (2010). "Evidence for the Austronesian Voyages in the Indian Ocean" (PDF). In Anderson, Atholl; Barrett, James H.; Boyle, Katherine V. (eds.). The Global Origins and Development of Seafaring. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. pp. 239–248. ISBN 978-1-902937-52-6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 July 2019. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
- ^ Beaujard, Philippe (August 2011). "The first migrants to Madagascar and their introduction of plants: linguistic and ethnological evidence" (PDF). Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa. 46 (2): 169–189. doi:10.1080/0067270X.2011.580142. S2CID 55763047. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 November 2021. Retrieved 11 July 2019.
- ^ Walter, Annie; Lebot, Vincent (2007). Gardens of Oceania. IRD Éditions-CIRAD. ISBN 978-1-86320-470-5.
- ^ Fage, J. D.; Clark, John Desmond; Oliver, Roland Anthony (29 August 1975). The Cambridge History of Africa. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521215923 – via Google Books.
- ^ Smith, Philip E. L. (1976). "Stone-Age Man on the Nile". Scientific American. 235 (2): 30–41. Bibcode:1976SciAm.235b..30S. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0876-30. ISSN 0036-8733.
With the benefit of hindsight we can now see that many Late Paleolithic peoples in the Old World were poised on the brink of plant cultivation and animal husbandry as an alternative to the hunter-gatherer's way of life
- ^ Johannessen, S.; Hastorf, C. A. (eds.). Corn and Culture in the Prehistoric New World. Westview Press.
- ^ Graeme Barker (2009). The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory: Why Did Foragers Become Farmers?. Oxford University Press. p. 252. ISBN 978-0-19-955995-4. Retrieved 4 January 2012.
- ^ Fullagar, Richard; Field, Judith; Denham, Tim; Lentfer, Carol (2006). "Early and mid Holocene tool-use and processing of taro (Colocasia esculenta), yam (Dioscorea sp.) and other plants at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of Papua New Guinea". Journal of Archaeological Science. 33 (5): 595–614. Bibcode:2006JArSc..33..595F. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2005.07.020.
- ^ Loy, Thomas H.; Spriggs, Matthew; Wickler, Stephen (1992). "Direct evidence for human use of plants 28,000 years ago: starch residues on stone artefacts from the northern Solomon Islands". Antiquity. 66 (253): 898–912. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00044811. ISSN 0003-598X.
- ^ Bellwood 2004, pp. 68–69.
- ^ Bellwood 2004, pp. 74, 118.
- ^ Subbaraman, Nidhi (12 December 2012). "Art of cheese-making is 7,500 years old". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.12020. S2CID 180646880. Archived from the original on 8 May 2021. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
- ^ Bellwood 2004, pp. 68–72.
- ^ Consortium, the Genographic; Cooper, Alan (9 November 2010). "Ancient DNA from European Early Neolithic Farmers Reveals Their Near Eastern Affinities". PLOS Biology. 8 (11): e1000536. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000536. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 2976717. PMID 21085689.
- ^ a b c d Original text published under Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0: Shukurov, Anvar; Sarson, Graeme R.; Gangal, Kavita (2014). "The Near-Eastern Roots of the Neolithic in South Asia". PLOS ONE. 9 (5): e95714. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...995714G. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095714. PMC 4012948. PMID 24806472. Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Archived 16 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b c d e f g Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Archived 16 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine Turbón, Daniel; Arroyo-Pardo, Eduardo (5 June 2014). "Ancient DNA Analysis of 8000 B.C. Near Eastern Farmers Supports an Early Neolithic Pioneer Maritime Colonization of Mainland Europe through Cyprus and the Aegean Islands". PLOS Genetics. 10 (6): e1004401. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004401. ISSN 1553-7404. PMC 4046922. PMID 24901650.
- ^ Coningham, Robin; Young, Ruth (2015). The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c. 6500 BCE–200 CE. Cambridge University Press. p. 111. ISBN 978-1-316-41898-7.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Archived 16 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine Shukurov, Anvar; Sarson, Graeme R.; Gangal, Kavita (7 May 2014). "The Near-Eastern Roots of the Neolithic in South Asia". PLOS ONE. 9 (5): e95714. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...995714G. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095714. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4012948. PMID 24806472.
- ^ Scarre, Christopher (2005). "The World Transformed: From Foragers and Farmers to States and Empires". The Human Past: World Prehistory and the Development of Human Societies. London: Thames & Hudson. p. 188. ISBN 0-500-28531-4.
- ^ Charles E. Redman (1978). Rise of Civilization: From Early Hunters to Urban Society in the Ancient Near East. San Francisco: Freeman.
- ^ Hayden, Brian (1992). "Models of Domestication". In Anne Birgitte Gebauer and T. Douglas Price (ed.). Transitions to Agriculture in Prehistory. Madison: Prehistory Press. pp. 11–18.
- ^ "The Neolithic Revolution | Early World Civilizations". courses.lumenlearning.com. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
- ^ Sauer, Carl O. (1952). Agricultural origins and dispersals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- ^ Binford, Lewis R. (1968). "Post-Pleistocene Adaptations". In Sally R. Binford and Lewis R. Binford (ed.). New Perspectives in Archaeology. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. pp. 313–342.
- ^ Rindos, David (December 1987). The Origins of Agriculture: An Evolutionary Perspective. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-589281-0.
- ^ Richerson, Peter J.; Boyd, Robert (2001). "Was Agriculture Impossible during the Pleistocene but Mandatory during the Holocene?". American Antiquity. 66 (3): 387–411. doi:10.2307/2694241. JSTOR 2694241. S2CID 163474968.
- ^ Wright, Ronald (2004). A Short History of Progress. Anansi. ISBN 978-0-88784-706-6.
- ^ Grinin L.E. "Production Revolutions and Periodization of History: A Comparative and Theoretic-mathematical Approach". Social Evolution & History. Volume 6, Number 2. September 2007. Archived 20 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Hole, Frank (29 August 1984). "A Reassessment of the Neolithic Revolution". Paléorient. 10 (2): 49–60. doi:10.3406/paleo.1984.939. Archived from the original on 17 June 2022. Retrieved 29 August 2022 – via Persée.
- ^ James C. Scott,Against the Grain: a Deep History of the Earliest States, NJ: Yale UP, (2017), "The world's population in 10 000 BC, according to a careful estimate was roughly 4 million. A full five thousand years later it has risen only to 5 million...One likely explanation for this apparent human progress in subsistance techniques together with a long period of demographic stagnation is that epidemologically this was perhaps the most lethal period in human history".
- ^ "What was the Neolithic Revolution?". National Geographic. 5 April 2019. Archived from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 18 June 2023.
- ^ Sands DC, Morris CE, Dratz EA, Pilgeram A (2009). "Elevating optimal human nutrition to a central goal of plant breeding and production of plant-based foods". Plant Sci (Review). 177 (5): 377–389. Bibcode:2009PlnSc.177..377S. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.07.011. PMC 2866137. PMID 20467463.
- ^ O'Keefe JH, Cordain L (2004). "Cardiovascular disease resulting from a diet and lifestyle at odds with our Paleolithic genome: how to become a 21st-century hunter-gatherer". Mayo Clin Proc (Review). 79 (1): 101–108. doi:10.4065/79.1.101. PMID 14708953.
- ^ Shermer, Michael (2001). The Borderlands of Science. Oxford University Press. p. 250.
- ^ Hermanussen, Michael; Poustka, Fritz (July–September 2003). "Stature of early Europeans". Hormones (Athens). 2 (3): 175–178. doi:10.1159/000079404. PMID 17003019. S2CID 85210429. Archived from the original on 2 April 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
- ^ Eagly, Alice H.; Wood, Wendy (June 1999). "The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions Versus Social Roles". American Psychologist. 54 (6): 408–423. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.6.408. Archived from the original on 17 August 2000.
- ^ Diamond, Jared (May 1987). "The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race". Discover Magazine: 64–66. Archived from the original on 10 November 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2021.
- ^ Peterson, V. Spike (3 July 2014). "Sex Matters". International Feminist Journal of Politics. 16 (3): 389–409. doi:10.1080/14616742.2014.913384. ISSN 1461-6742. S2CID 147633811.
- ^ Strang, Veronica (2014). "Lording It over the Goddess: Water, Gender, and Human-Environmental Relations". Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion. 30 (1): 85–109. doi:10.2979/jfemistudreli.30.1.85. JSTOR 10.2979/jfemistudreli.30.1.85. S2CID 143567275.
- ^ Parsons, Talcott (1944). ""The Theoretical Development of the Sociology of Religion: A Chapter in the History of Modern Social Science."". Journal of the History of Ideas. 5 (2): 176–190. doi:10.2307/2707383. JSTOR 2707383.
- ^ a b Sherratt, A (1981). "Plough and pastoralism: aspects of the secondary products revolution". In Hodder, Ian; Isaac, Glynn Llywelyn; Hammond, Norman (eds.). Pattern of the Past: Studies in honour of David Clarke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 261–305. ISBN 978-0-521-22763-6.
- ^ Furuse, Y.; Suzuki, A.; Oshitani, H. (2010). "Origin of measles virus: Divergence from rinderpest virus between the 11th and 12th centuries". Virology Journal. 7: 52. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-7-52. PMC 2838858. PMID 20202190.
- ^ Key, Felix M.; Posth, Cosimo; Esquivel-Gomez, Luis R.; Hübler, Ron; Spyrou, Maria A.; Neumann, Gunnar U.; Furtwängler, Anja; Sabin, Susanna; Burri, Marta; Wissgott, Antje; Lankapalli, Aditya Kumar; Vågene, Åshild J.; Meyer, Matthias; Nagel, Sarah; Tukhbatova, Rezeda; Khokhlov, Aleksandr; Chizhevsky, Andrey; Hansen, Svend; Belinsky, Andrey B.; Kalmykov, Alexey; Kantorovich, Anatoly R.; Maslov, Vladimir E.; Stockhammer, Philipp W.; Vai, Stefania; Zavattaro, Monica; Riga, Alessandro; Caramelli, David; Skeates, Robin; Beckett, Jessica; Gradoli, Maria Giuseppina; Steuri, Noah; Hafner, Albert; Ramstein, Marianne; Siebke, Inga; Lösch, Sandra; Erdal, Yilmaz Selim; Alikhan, Nabil-Fareed; Zhou, Zhemin; Achtman, Mark; Bos, Kirsten; Reinhold, Sabine; Haak, Wolfgang; Kühnert, Denise; Herbig, Alexander; Krause, Johannes (March 2020). "Emergence of human-adapted Salmonella enterica is linked to the Neolithization process". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4 (3): 324–333. Bibcode:2020NatEE...4..324K. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1106-9. ISSN 2397-334X. PMC 7186082. PMID 32094538.
- ^ Halcrow, S. E.; Harris, N. J.; Tayles, N.; Ikehara-Quebral, R.; Pietrusewsky, M. (2013). "From the mouths of babes: Dental caries in infants and children and the intensification of agriculture in mainland Southeast Asia". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 150 (3): 409–420. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22215. PMID 23359102.
Bibliography
[edit]- Bailey, Douglass. (2001). Balkan Prehistory: Exclusions, Incorporation and Identity. Routledge Publishers. ISBN 0-415-21598-6.
- Bailey, Douglass. (2005). Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic. Routledge Publishers. ISBN 0-415-33152-8.
- Balter, Michael (2005). The Goddess and the Bull: Catalhoyuk, An Archaeological Journey to the Dawn of Civilization. New York: Free Press. ISBN 0-7432-4360-9.
- Bellwood, Peter (2004). First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies. Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-20566-7.
- Bocquet-Appel, Jean-Pierre, editor and Ofer Bar-Yosef, editor, The Neolithic Demographic Transition and its Consequences, Springer (21 October 2008), hardcover, 544 pages, ISBN 978-1-4020-8538-3, trade paperback and Kindle editions are also available.
- Cohen, Mark Nathan (1977)The Food Crisis in Prehistory: Overpopulation and the Origins of Agriculture. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-02016-3.
- Diamond, Jared (2002). "Evolution, Consequences and Future of Plant and Animal Domestication". Nature, Vol 418.
- Harlan, Jack R. (1992). Crops & Man: Views on Agricultural Origins ASA, CSA, Madison, WI. Hort 306 - READING 3-1
- Wright, Gary A. (1971). "Origins of Food Production in Southwestern Asia: A Survey of Ideas" Current Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 4/5 (Oct.–Dec. 1971), pp. 447–477
- Kuijt, Ian; Finlayson, Bill. (2009). "Evidence for food storage and predomestication granaries 11,000 years ago in the Jordan Valley". PNAS, Vol. 106, No. 27, pp. 10966–10970.