British Indian Ocean Territory: Difference between revisions
// Edit via Wikiplus |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|British Overseas Territory in the Indian Ocean}} |
|||
{{redirect|BIOT||Biot}} |
|||
{{Redirect|BIOT}} |
|||
{{pp-move-vandalism|small=yes}} |
{{pp-move-vandalism|small=yes}} |
||
{{pp-move}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2024}} |
|||
{{Infobox Country |
|||
{{Use British English|date=October 2022}} |
|||
|native_name = |
|||
{{Infobox dependency |
|||
|conventional_long_name = British Indian Ocean Territory |
|||
| |
|name = British Indian Ocean Territory |
||
|motto = "[[Lemuria|Limuria is in our trust]]"<ref name="governance"/> |
|||
|anthem = "[[God Save the King]]"<br><div |
|||
style="display:inline-block;margin-top:0.4em">[[File:U.S. Navy Band - God Save the Queen.oga]]</div> |
|||
|settlement_type = [[British Overseas Territories|British Overseas Territory]] |
|||
|image_flag = Flag of the British Indian Ocean Territory.svg |
|image_flag = Flag of the British Indian Ocean Territory.svg |
||
| |
|flag_size = 130px |
||
| |
|flag_type = [[Flag of the British Indian Ocean Territory|Flag]] |
||
|image_map = British Indian Ocean Territory in United Kingdom.svg |
|||
|national_motto = ''"In tutela nostra Limuria"''{{spaces|2}}<small>([[Latin]])<br/>"[[Limuria]] is in our charge"</small> |
|||
| |
|image_seal = Coat of arms of the British Indian Ocean Territory.svg |
||
|seal_size = 85px |
|||
|seal_type = Coat of arms |
|||
|seal_link = Coat of arms of the British Indian Ocean Territory |
|||
|official_languages = [[English language|English]] |
|official_languages = [[English language|English]] |
||
|ethnic_groups = {{Unbulleted list|95.88% British{{\}}American|4.12% others{{citation needed|date=August 2020}}}} |
|||
|capital = [[Diego Garcia]] |
|||
|subdivision_type = [[List of sovereign states|Sovereign state]] |
|||
|ethnic_groups = 95.88% [[British people|British]] 4.12% other<ref>[http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Br_Indian_Ocean_Terr.html British Indian Ocean Territory Demographics/Ethnic groups stats]</ref> |
|||
|subdivision_name = {{Flag|United Kingdom}} |
|||
|latd= |latm= |latNS= |longd= |longm= |longEW= |
|||
| |
|ethnic_groups_year = 2001 |
||
| |
|capital = Administered from [[London]] <br> |
||
Local government from [[Camp Thunder Cove]] |
|||
|leader_title1 = [[Queen of the United Kingdom|Queen]] |
|||
| |
|coordinates = {{Coord|7|18|S|72|24|E|display=inline,title}} |
||
|largest_settlement = capital |
|||
|leader_title2 = [[Commissioner of the British Indian Ocean Territory|Commissioner]] |
|||
|largest_settlement_type = settlement |
|||
|leader_name2 = [[Colin Roberts]]<ref name="FCO">[http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-the-fco/country-profiles/asia-oceania/british-indian-ocean-territory?profile=all British Indian Ocean Territory (British Overseas Territory)], [[Foreign and Commonwealth Office]]. Retrieved 2008-10-05.</ref> |
|||
|government_type = [[Direct rule|Directly administered]] dependency under a [[constitutional monarchy]] |
|||
|leader_title3 = [[Administrator of the British Indian Ocean Territory|Administrator]] |
|||
| |
|leader_title1 = [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|Monarch]] |
||
| |
|leader_name1 = [[Charles III]] |
||
|leader_title2 = [[Commissioner for the British Indian Ocean Territory|Commissioner]] |
|||
|area_magnitude = 1 E6 |
|||
|leader_name2 = Nishi Dholakia<ref name="governance">{{Cite web |title=Governance|url=https://www.biot.gov.io/governance/ |access-date=2024-10-21 |website=British Indian Ocean Territory |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
|area_km2 = 60 |
|||
| |
|leader_title3 = |
||
| |
|leader_name3 = |
||
| |
|leader_title4 = Administrator |
||
|leader_name4 = Bob Fairweather<ref name="governance"/> |
|||
|population_estimate_rank = n/a |
|||
| national_representation = [[Government of the United Kingdom]] |
|||
|population_estimate_year = |
|||
| national_representation_type1 = [[Minister of State for Europe, North America and Overseas Territories|Minister]] |
|||
|population_census = |
|||
| national_representation1 = [[Stephen Doughty]] |
|||
|population_census_year = |
|||
|area_km2 = 54 |
|||
|population_density_km2 = 58.3 |
|||
|area_sq_mi = |
|||
|population_density_sq_mi = 160.0 |
|||
|area_label2 = Land |
|||
|population_density_rank = n/a |
|||
| |
|area_data2 = {{Convert|60|km2|abbr=on|lk=on}} |
||
| |
|percent_water = 99.89 |
||
|population_estimate = {{Increase}} {{circa}} 3,000 military personnel and contractors |
|||
|GDP_PPP_year = |
|||
| |
|population_change = |
||
|population_estimate_year = Non-permanent 2018 |
|||
|GDP_PPP_per_capita_rank = |
|||
| |
|population_label2 = Permanent |
||
| |
|population_data2 = 0 |
||
|population_density_km2 = 50.0 |
|||
|established_event1 = |
|||
|population_density_sq_mi = 80.4 |
|||
|established_date1 = |
|||
|currency = {{Unbulleted list|[[United States dollar]] {{Nowrap|([[ISO 4217|USD]]; ''de facto'')}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/country-profile/asia-oceania/british-indian-ocean-territory?profile=all|title=FCO country profile – British Indian Ocean Territory|access-date=27 March 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100610203832/http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/country-profile/asia-oceania/british-indian-ocean-territory?profile=all|archive-date=10 June 2010}}</ref><ref name=CIA/> |
|||
|HDI = |
|||
|[[Pound sterling]] {{nowrap|([[ISO 4217|GBP]]; ''de jure'')}}<ref name="gmt">{{Cite web|title=British Indian Ocean Territory Currency|url=http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/asia/british-indian-ocean-territory/currency-british-indian-ocean-territory/index.htm|publisher=GreenwichMeantime.com|access-date=5 April 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160722010720/http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/asia/british-indian-ocean-territory/currency-british-indian-ocean-territory/index.htm/|archive-date=22 July 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="coinnews">{{Cite web|title=Launch of first commemorative British Indian Ocean Territory coin|url=http://www.coinnews.net/2009/05/17/launch-of-first-commemorative-british-indian-ocean-territory-coin/|date=17 May 2009|website=coinnews.net|publisher=Pobjoy Mint Ltd|access-date=4 April 2014}}</ref>}} |
|||
|HDI_rank = |
|||
| |
|utc_offset = +06:00 |
||
| |
|drives_on = right |
||
| |
|calling_code = [[+246]] |
||
|postal_code_type = [[Postcodes in the United Kingdom#British Overseas Territories|UK postcode]] |
|||
|currency_code = USD |
|||
| |
|postal_code = BBND 1ZZ |
||
| |
|iso_code = [[ISO 3166-2:IO|IO]] |
||
|utc_offset = +6 |
|||
|time_zone_DST = |
|||
|utc_offset_DST = |
|||
|cctld = [[.io]] |
|cctld = [[.io]] |
||
| |
|electricity = 230 [[Volt]], 50 [[Hertz]] |
||
| |
|website = {{URL|https://www.biot.gov.io/|biot.gov.io}} |
||
|footnote1 = |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''British Indian Ocean Territory''' ('''BIOT''') or '''Chagos Islands''' is an [[British overseas territory|overseas territory]] of the [[United Kingdom]] situated in the [[Indian Ocean]], halfway between [[Africa]] and [[Indonesia]]. The territory comprises the six [[atoll]]s of the [[Chagos Archipelago]] with over 1,000 individual islands (many tiny) having a total land area of {{convert|60|km2|sqmi}}.<ref name=CIA>[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/io.html CIA World Factbook – British Indian Ocean Territory]</ref> |
|||
The '''British Indian Ocean Territory''' ('''BIOT''') is an [[British Overseas Territories|Overseas Territory]] of the [[United Kingdom]] situated in the [[Indian Ocean]], halfway between [[Tanzania]] and [[Indonesia]]. The territory comprises the seven [[atoll]]s of the [[Chagos Archipelago]] with over 1,000 individual islands, many very small, amounting to a total land area of {{Convert|60|km2|sqmi|abbr=off}}.<ref name=CIA>{{Cite web|title=British Indian Ocean Territory|url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/british-indian-ocean-territory/|publisher=[[Central Intelligence Agency]]|work=World Factbook|date=27 March 2013|access-date=16 June 2020}}</ref> The largest and most southerly island is [[Diego Garcia]], {{Convert|27|km2|sqmi|abbr=off}}, the site of a [[British Forces British Indian Ocean Territories|Joint Military Facility]] of the [[United Kingdom]] and the [[United States]].<ref name=thakkar>{{Cite web|author=Chirayu Thakkar|date=12 July 2021|url=https://WarOnTheRocks.com/2021/07/overcoming-the-diego-garcia-stalemate/|title=Overcoming the Diego Garcia stalemate|website=WarOnTheRocks.com}}</ref> Official administration is remote from [[London]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=British Indian Ocean Territory – GOV.UK |url=https://www.gov.uk/world/organisations/british-indian-ocean-territory |access-date=3 September 2023 |website=www.gov.uk |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=British Indian Ocean Territory |url=https://commonwealthchamber.com/associated-territories/british-indian-ocean-territory/ |access-date=3 September 2023 |website=Commonwealth Chamber of Commerce |language=en-US}}</ref> though the local capital is often regarded as being on Diego Garcia.<ref>{{Cite web |title=British Indian Ocean Territory Definition & Meaning |url=https://www.dictionary.com/browse/british-indian-ocean-territory |access-date=3 September 2023 |website=Dictionary.com |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
The largest island is [[Diego Garcia]] (area 44 km<sup>2</sup>), the site of a joint military facility of the [[United Kingdom]] and the [[United States]]. Following the eviction of the native population in the 1960s, the only inhabitants are US and UK military personnel and associated contractors, who collectively number around 4,000 (2004 figures).<ref name=CIA/> |
|||
The only inhabitants are British and United States [[military]] personnel, and associated [[Private military company|contractor]]s, who collectively number around 3,000 (2018 figures).<ref name=CIA/> The [[expulsion of the Chagossians|forced removal of Chagossians from the Chagos Archipelago]] occurred between 1968 and 1973. The [[Chagossians]], then numbering about 2,000 people, were expelled by the [[Government of the United Kingdom|British government]] to [[Mauritius]] and [[Seychelles]], even from the outlying islands far away from the military base on Diego Garcia. Today, the Chagossians are still trying to return, but the British government has repeatedly denied them the [[right of return]] despite calls from numerous human rights organisations to let them.<ref name="BBC">{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13882233|title=Mauritius profile|year=2011|publisher=[[BBC News]]|access-date=4 April 2012}}</ref><ref name="chagos">{{Cite web|url=http://www.chagosinternational.org/files/page_detail.php?id1=127&lang=1|title=Historical background – what happened to the Chagos Archipelago?|website=chagosinternational.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130208125452/http://www.chagosinternational.org/files/page_detail.php?id1=127&lang=1|archive-date=8 February 2013|access-date=4 April 2012}}</ref> The islands are off-limits to Chagossians, [[tourist]]s, and the media. |
|||
== History == |
|||
The ancient Sanskrit name ''[[Lakshadweepa]]'' referred to the Islands of [[Lakshadweep]], [[Maldives]], [[Suvadives]] and the Chagos Archipelago as well. They were ruled from India originally, although never settled. |
|||
Since the 1980s, the Government of [[Mauritius]] [[Chagos Archipelago sovereignty dispute|sought to gain control]] over the Chagos Archipelago, which was separated from the then [[British Mauritius|Crown Colony of Mauritius]] by the UK in 1965 to form the British Indian Ocean Territory. A February 2019 [[Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965|advisory opinion]] of the [[International Court of Justice]] called for the islands to be given to Mauritius. Afterward, both the [[United Nations General Assembly]] and the [[International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea]] reached similar decisions. Negotiations between the UK and Mauritius began in November 2022, and culminated in an October 2024 understanding that the UK would cede the territory to Mauritius for possible resettlement while retaining the joint US-UK military base on Diego Garcia.<ref name="UKGovStatement20241003"/> However, newly-elected Mauritius prime minister [[Navin Ramgoolam]] rejected the proposed agreement and asked for talks to reopen in December 2024.<ref name="DealReject">{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/starmer-mauritius-chagos-islands-diego-garcia-b2665804.html|title=Blow for Starmer as Mauritius PM rejects Chagos deal and demands talks reopen|work=The Independent|date=17 December 2024}}</ref> |
|||
Maldivian mariners knew the Chagos Islands well.<ref>Xavier Romero-Frias, ''The Maldive Islanders, A Study of the Popular Culture of an Ancient Ocean Kingdom.'' Barcelona 1999, ISBN 84 7254 801 5. Chapter 1 ''"A Seafaring Nation",'' page 19</ref> In Maldivian lore they are known as ''Fōlhavahi'' or ''Hollhavai'' (the latter name in the closer Southern Maldives). According to Southern Maldivian oral tradition, traders and fishermen were occasionally lost at sea and got stranded in one of the islands of the Chagos. Eventually they were rescued and brought back home. However, these islands were judged to be too far away from the [[Maldives]] to be settled permanently by them. Thus for many centuries the Chagos were ignored by their northern neighbors. |
|||
==History== |
|||
The Islands of [[Chagos Archipelago]] were charted by [[Vasco da Gama]] in the early sixteenth century, then claimed in the eighteenth century by [[France]] as a possession of [[Mauritius]]. They were first settled in the 18th century, by African slaves and Indian labourers brought by Franco-Mauritians to found coconut plantations.<ref>[http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/JD17Aa01.html "Introducing the other Guantanamo"], ''Asia Times'', Apr 17, 2008</ref> In 1810, Mauritius was captured by the United Kingdom, and France ceded the territory in the [[Treaty of Paris (1814)|Treaty of Paris]]. |
|||
[[Maldivians|Maldivian]] [[mariner]]s knew of the Chagos Islands, which were known as ''Fōlhavahi'' in the northern Maldives, and ''Hollhavai'' in the southern Maldives. ''Hollhavai'' also referred to other islands scattered throughout the Indian Ocean, such as the Seychelles. According to Southern Maldivian oral tradition, traders and fishermen were occasionally lost at sea and got stranded on one of the islands of the Chagos. Eventually they were rescued and brought back home. The [[coconut crab]]s of the islands may have inspired Maldivian folklore about giant hermit crabs. These islands were judged to be too far away from the seat of the [[Sultanate of the Maldive Islands|Maldivian crown]] to be settled permanently by them. Thus, for many centuries the Chagos were ignored by their northern neighbours.<ref name="xavier">{{Cite book|author=Xavier Romero-Frias|author-link=Xavier Romero-Frias|date=1999|title=The Maldive Islanders, A Study of the Popular Culture of an Ancient Ocean Kingdom|location=Barcelona|publisher=Nova Ethnographia Indica|isbn=84-7254-801-5|url=https://maritimeasiaheritage.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Xavier-Romero-Frias-The-Maldive-Islanders-Book.pdf|chapter=1 ''A Seafaring Nation''|pages=65–67}}</ref> |
|||
===Early settlement=== |
|||
In 1965, the United Kingdom split the Chagos Archipelago from [[Mauritius]], and the islands of [[Aldabra]], [[Farquhar Group|Farquhar]] and [[Desroches]] (Des Roches) from the [[Seychelles]], to form the British Indian Ocean Territory. The purpose was to allow the construction of military facilities for the mutual benefit of the United Kingdom and the [[United States]]. The islands were formally established as an overseas territory of the [[United Kingdom]] on 8 November 1965. On 23 June 1976, Aldabra, Farquhar and Desroches were returned to [[Seychelles]] as a result of it attaining independence. Subsequently, BIOT has consisted only of the six main island groups comprising the [[Chagos Archipelago]]. |
|||
The islands of [[Chagos Archipelago]] were charted by [[Vasco da Gama]] in the early 16th century, and then claimed in the 18th century by France as a possession of Mauritius. They were first settled in the 18th century by African slaves and Indian contractors brought by Franco-Mauritians to found coconut plantations.<ref name="vine">{{Cite news|last=Vine|first=David|date=17 April 2008|url=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/JD17Aa01.html|title=Introducing the other Guantanamo|website=atimes.com|publisher=Asia Times|access-date=5 April 2013|url-status=unfit|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080517061458/http://atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/JD17Aa01.html|archive-date=17 May 2008}}</ref> At some point Diego Garcia hosted a [[leper colony]] for patients from Mauritius, who were treated with turtle oil.<ref name="Grainger1985">{{cite journal |author1=C. R. Grainger |title=A Retrospective Estimate of Some Vital Statistics for British Indian Ocean Territory 1965–1973 |journal=Journal of the Royal Society of Health |volume=105 |issue=5 |pages=178–180 |date=October 1985 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/146642408510500508 |doi=10.1177/146642408510500508|pmid=3934379 }}</ref> In 1810, Mauritius was captured by the United Kingdom, and France subsequently ceded the territory in the [[Treaty of Paris (1814)|Treaty of Paris]] in 1814. |
|||
The United Kingdom [[Slavery Abolition Act 1833|abolished slavery in 1833]], although those on what would become the BIOT continued work as [[Indentured servitude|indentured labour]]. In 1883 the plantations were bought by the Société Huilière de Diego et Peros. As of 1900 there were 426 families on the islands, 60 percent descended from the original African-Malagasy slaves, and 40% descended from South Asians brought over as indentured labour. [[Chagossian creole]] developed as a common language.<ref name="HRW2023">{{cite web |url=https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/02/15/thats-when-nightmare-started/uk-and-us-forced-displacement-chagossians-and |title="That's When the Nightmare Started" UK and US Forced Displacement of the Chagossians and Ongoing Colonial Crimes |publisher=Human Rights Watch |date=15 February 2023 |access-date=4 October 2024}}</ref> The lives of the population remained effectively controlled by the company, a system which persisted until the 1960s.<ref name="Hardy2023">{{cite journal |author1=Dennis Hardy |title=Chagos and the British Indian Ocean Territory: A Colonial Anachronism in the Post-Colonial Era |journal=Seychelles Research Journal |volume=5 |issue=2 |date=August 2023 |url=https://seychellesresearchjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/chagos_and_the_british_indian_ocean_territory-a_colonial_anachronism_in_the_post-colonial_era-dennis_hardy-seychelles_research_journal-5-2.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|62}} |
|||
In 1966, the British Government purchased the privately owned copra plantations and closed them down. Over the next five years, the British authorities forcibly and clandestinely removed the entire population of about 2,000 people, known as the [[Chagossians]] (or Ilois), from Diego Garcia and two other Chagos atolls, Peros Banhos and Salomon, to Mauritius<ref>[http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2524531120070525 "The coral sea vista opened up by British judges"], Reuters, May 25, 2007</ref> (see [[Depopulation of Diego Garcia]]). In 1971, the United Kingdom and the United States signed a treaty, leasing the island of Diego Garcia to the [[Military of the United States|American military]] for the purposes of building a large air and naval base on the Island. The deal was important to the United Kingdom, as the United States agreed to give them a substantial discount on the purchase of [[Polaris missile|Polaris nuclear missiles]] in return for the use of the islands as a base{{Citation needed|date=July 2007}}. The strategic location of the island was also significant at the centre of the Indian Ocean, and to counter any [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] threat in the region. |
|||
An airstrip was built on Diego Garcia during the [[World War II|Second World War]] along with other military facilities. Military forces left once the war ended. In 1962 the plantations were bought by Chagos-Agalega Company, based in the Seychelles. At this time they covered {{convert|3000|ha}}.<ref name="HRW2023"/> |
|||
[[File:Diegogarcia.jpg|thumb|250px|left|View of [[Diego Garcia]], showing military base.]] |
|||
Work on the military base commenced in 1971, with a large airbase with several long range runways constructed, as well as a harbour suitable for large naval vessels. Although classed as a joint UK/US base, in practice it is mainly staffed by the American military, although a British garrison is maintained at all times, and [[Royal Air Force]] long range patrol aircraft are deployed there. The [[United States Air Force]] used the base during the 1991 [[Gulf War]] and the [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|2001 war in Afghanistan]], as well as the [[2003 invasion of Iraq|2003 Iraq War]]. |
|||
===Formation=== |
|||
During the 1980s, Mauritius asserted a claim to sovereignty for the territory, citing the 1965 separation as illegal under international law, despite their apparent agreement at the time. The UK does not recognise Mauritius' claim, but has agreed to cede the Territory to Mauritius when it is no longer required for defence purposes.<ref name=FAC-20080706-p125>{{citation|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmfaff/147/14708.htm#a39|title=Seventh Report - Overseas Territories|page=125|author=[[Foreign Affairs Committee]]|publisher=House of Commons|date=6 July 2008|accessdate=2009-08-06}}</ref> The Seychelles also launched a sovereignty claim on several of the islands. |
|||
The descendants of those brought to the islands to farm coconuts had [[Ethnogenesis|developed]] into the [[Chagossians|Chagossian]] people.<ref name="HRW2023"/> There are no official population figures, but an estimate from 1968 found 866 inhabitants: 336 in Diego Garcia, 162 in the Salomon islands, and 168 in Peros Banhos. The [[Vital statistics (government records)|vital statistics]] were likely similar to other Indian Ocean islands. The birth rate on the Chagos archipelago was probably around 48 in every 1000. The birth rate for the former Seychellois islands was nominally lower, likely due to inhabitants more easily able to travel to the Seychelles for medical needs. Mortality before the age of 1 was around 98 per 1,000 live births. The overall death rate probably averaged under 12 per 1,000 people. Housing was simple, mostly using local wood and coconut leaves, with some imported concrete and corrugated iron. Most water was captured from rain, although there were groundwater wells. The islands at this time produced not only [[copra]] from the plantations, but fish, and fruit in the case of the Chagos archipelago. Alcohol was produced for local consumption, from coconut, sugar cane, and other materials. It is likely there was some malnutrition.<ref name="Grainger1985"/> |
|||
Beginning in February 1964, the UK and US began secret talks about a military base in Diego Garcia. The US wanted a territory with no local population, and the islands were lightly inhabited compared to other potential locations.<ref name="HRW2023"/> The initial option of [[Aldabra]] was dropped due to international interest in its ecosystem.<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|65}} In 1965, the United Kingdom split the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius and the islands of [[Aldabra]], [[Farquhar Group|Farquhar]] and [[Desroches]] (Des Roches) from the [[Seychelles]] to form the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT). The purpose was to allow the construction of military facilities for the mutual benefit of the United Kingdom and the United States of America. The islands were formally established as an overseas territory of the United Kingdom on 8 November 1965.<ref name="Geographer1968">{{Cite book|author=United States Dept. of State. Office of the Geographer|year=1968|title=Commonwealth of Nations|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iq1IQ2yDsiYC|access-date=7 November 2013|publisher=U.S. Government Printing Office|page=15|via=Google Books}}</ref> While it initially sought for the base to be given on a lease, Mauritius was eventually paid £3 million to compensate for the territory's separation, under pressure due to then-ongoing independence negotiations.<ref name="HRW2023"/><ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|67}} (An additional £650,000 was given in 1972, for relocation costs.)<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|62}} |
|||
The islanders, who now reside in Mauritius and the Seychelles, have continually asserted their right to return to Diego Garcia, winning important legal victories in the English [[High Court of Justice|High Court]] in 2000, 2006 and 2007. However, in the High Court and Court of Appeal in 2003 and 2004, the islanders' application for further compensation on top of the £14.5 million value package of compensation they had already received was dismissed by the court. |
|||
A few weeks after the decision to detach the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius, the [[United Nations General Assembly]] passed Resolution 2066 on 16 December 1965, which stated that this detachment of part of the colonial territory of Mauritius was against customary international law as recorded earlier in the [[Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples]] of 14 December 1960. This stated that "Any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations".<ref name=ungar-2066>{{Cite web|url=https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/2066(XX)|title=United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2066 (XX) – Question of Mauritius|publisher=[[United Nations]]|date=16 December 1965|access-date=2 February 2021}}</ref><ref name=openuni-selfdet>{{Cite book|url=https://www.open.edu/openlearn/society-politics-law/exploring-the-boundaries-international-law/content-section-0?active-tab=content-tab|title=Exploring the boundaries of international law|publisher=[[The Open University]]|chapter-url=https://www.open.edu/openlearn/society-politics-law/exploring-the-boundaries-international-law/content-section-2.4|chapter=2.4 Self-determination|access-date=2 February 2021}}</ref> |
|||
On 11 May 2006 the High Court ruled that a 2004 Order in Council preventing the Chagossians's resettlement of the islands was unlawful, and consequently that the Chagossians were entitled to return to the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago.<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/11/uchagos.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/05/11/ixnews.html News - Telegraph<!-- Bot generated title -->]{{dead link|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/11/uchagos.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/05/11/ixnews.html|date=September 2009}}</ref><ref>[http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/judgmentsfiles/j501/queen_v_fco.htm This is a draft of the judgement to be handed down on ––––– 2000 at ––––– a.m. in Court No –––. It is confidential to Counsel and Solicitors, but the substance may be communicated to clients not more than one hour before the giving of judgement. The offi<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> On 23 May 2007, this was confirmed by the Court of Appeal. In a UK Government-sponsored visit, the islanders visited Diego Garcia and other islands on 3 April 2006 for humanitarian purposes, including the tending of the graves of their ancestors.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4852768.stm BBC NEWS | UK | Paradise regained - for a few days<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> On October 22, 2008, the British government won a case in the [[House of Lords]] regarding the [[royal prerogative]] used to continue excluding the Chagossians from their homeland.<ref>[http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hdjVkpT6_bzQxOkAQiXHQRIerOtw AFP: Britain wins appeal over Chagos islanders' return home<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> |
|||
Mauritius became an independent [[Commonwealth realm]] in March 1968, and subsequently became a republic, also within the [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]], in March 1992.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://1997-2001.state.gov/background_notes/mauritius_9912_bgn.html |title=Background Notes: Mauritius |publisher=U.S. Department of State |date=December 1999 |access-date=5 October 2024}}</ref> |
|||
== Politics and law == |
|||
[[File:DG Ariel Plantation.jpg|thumb|left|250px|View of East Point, [[Diego Garcia]] from air.]] |
|||
{{main|Government of British Indian Ocean Territory}} |
|||
As a territory of the [[United Kingdom]], the head of state is [[Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom|Queen Elizabeth II]]. There is no Governor appointed to represent the Queen on the territory, as there are no longer any native inhabitants. The head of government is the [[Commissioner of the British Indian Ocean Territory|Commissioner]], currently Colin Roberts (since July 2008,<ref name="FCO"/> replacing Leigh Turner) and Administrator Joanne Yeadon (since December 2007,<ref name="FCO"/> replacing Tony Humphries), all of whom reside in the UK. The Commissioner's representative in the Territory is the officer commanding the detachment of British forces. |
|||
===Expulsion of the Chagossians=== |
|||
The laws of the territory are based on the constitution, set out in the British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004, which gives the Commissioner full powers to make laws for the Territory.<ref name="FCO"/> Applicable treaties between the United Kingdom and the United States govern the use of the military base. The United States is required to ask permission of the United Kingdom to use the base for offensive military action. |
|||
{{Main|Expulsion of the Chagossians}} |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
[[File:Diplomatic Cable signed by D.A. Greenhill, dated August 24, 1966.jpg|thumb|British [[diplomatic cable]] signed by [[Denis Greenhill, Baron Greenhill of Harrow|D.A. Greenhill]], 1966, relating to the [[Expulsion of the Chagossians|depopulation of the Chagos Archipelago]].|alt=]] |
|||
In April 1967, the British government purchased the privately owned [[copra]] plantations for £600,000<ref name="HRW2023"/> and closed them. Over the next five years, the British authorities removed the entire population of about 2,000 people, known as [[Chagossians]] (or Ilois), from Diego Garcia and two other Chagos atolls, [[Peros Banhos]] and [[Salomon Islands]], to Mauritius<ref name="baker">{{Cite news|last=Baker|first=Luke|date=25 May 2007|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2524531120070525|title=The coral sea vista opened up by British judges|publisher=[[Reuters]]|access-date=5 April 2013}}</ref> and the Seychelles. The expulsion was carried out by preventing Chogossians who had left from returning from 1967, assisted by the Moulinie and Company (Seychelles), Limited company which the UK had set up to run the plantations. In 1968, when more workers were needed, non-Chagossian temporary workers were allowed in from the Seychelles. The remaining population was removed from Diego Garcia in January 1971, to meet a July 1971 deadline requested by the US. The populations of [[Peros Banhos]] and the [[Salomon Islands]] were removed starting from June 1972. The population as of 1965 was around 1,360 Chagossians, plus temporary workers from the Seychelles. Another few hundred Chagossians already lived outside of the islands. The UK informed the United Nations that BIOT had no indigenous population, meaning the UK would not have to [[United Nations list of non-self-governing territories|send reports on the territory]] to the UN.<ref name="HRW2023"/> |
|||
In 1971, the United Kingdom and the United States signed a treaty, leasing the island of Diego Garcia to the [[US military]] for the purposes of building a large air and naval base on the island. The deal was important to the British government, as the United States granted it a substantial discount on the purchase of [[Polaris missile|Polaris nuclear missiles]] in return for the use of the islands as a base.<ref name="knapton">{{Cite news|last=Knapton|first=Sarah|date=21 October 2008|title=Law Lords to rule on whether Chagos Islanders can finally return home|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/3237331/Law-Lords-to-rule-on-whether-Chagos-Islanders-can-finally-return-home.html|publisher=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|access-date=5 April 2013|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/3237331/Law-Lords-to-rule-on-whether-Chagos-Islanders-can-finally-return-home.html|archive-date=11 January 2022|url-access=subscription|url-status=live}}{{cbignore}}</ref> The island was strategically located near oil shipping routes, and Iran.<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|66}} It would counter any [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] threat in the region.<ref name="Harrison1989">{{cite book |author1=Selig S. Harrison |author2=K. Subrahmanyam |year=1989 |title=Superpower Rivalry in the Indian Ocean: Indian and American Perspectives |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780195363708 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RAuT896J0HcC |page=85}}</ref> |
|||
== Geography and communications == |
|||
[[File:SeychellesBIOT1970.jpg|280px|thumb|British Indian Ocean Territory (B.I.O.T.) prior to Seychelles independence in 1976. The land at bottom left is the northern tip of Madagascar. (Desroches is not labelled, but is a part of the [[Amirante Islands]].)]] |
|||
[[File:Biot-map.png|thumb|280px|Map of the British Indian Ocean Territory since 1976]] |
|||
{{main|Geography of British Indian Ocean Territory}} |
|||
The territory is an archipelago of 55 islands,<ref name="FCO"/> the largest being Diego Garcia, accounting for almost three-quarters of the total land area of the territory, which is 60 km². The terrain is flat and low, with most areas not exceeding 2 metres above sea level. The climate is tropical marine; hot, humid, and moderated by trade winds. |
|||
===Development=== |
|||
With the exception of one two-lane motorway,{{clarifyme}}<!-- (i) In BrE, a "motorway" is a wide, busy road, usually with six lanes. (ii) Is this the same road as is mentioned in the next sentence or a different one? --> most of the islands in the territory have no [[road]]s of any sort. Diego Garcia has a short stretch of paved road between the port and airfield; otherwise most [[transport]] is by [[bicycle]]. |
|||
[[File:Diegogarcia.jpg|thumb|250px|View of [[Diego Garcia]], showing military base.|alt=]] |
|||
As of 1971, the population of Aldabra, Farquhar, and Desroches was 246. This dropped to 155 in 1975, likely reflecting uncertainty about these islands' future status.<ref name="Grainger1985"/> On 23 June 1976, these islands were returned to the Seychelles, which became independent as a republic on 29 June 1976; the islands now form part of the [[Outer Islands (Seychelles)|Outer Islands]] district of the Seychelles. Subsequently, the territory has consisted only of the six main island groups comprising the [[Chagos Archipelago]]. |
|||
Work on the [[military]] base commenced in 1971, with a large [[airbase]] with several long range [[runway]]s constructed, as well as a harbour suitable for large naval vessels. Although classed as a joint UK/US base, in practice it is primarily staffed by the US military, although the UK maintains a garrison at all times, and [[Royal Air Force]] (RAF) long-range patrol aircraft are deployed there. |
|||
Diego Garcia's military base is home to the territory's only airport (one paved runway over 3000 metres long), capable of operating very heavy [[USAF]] bombers like the [[B-52]], and only one major seaport. |
|||
During the 1980s,{{Year needed|date=October 2011}} Mauritius asserted a claim to sovereignty for the territory, citing the 1965 separation as illegal under international law, despite their apparent agreement at the time. The UK did not agree with the legal argument, but agreed to cede the territory to Mauritius when it was no longer required for defence purposes.<ref name=FAC-20080706-p125>{{Cite web|author=Foreign Affairs Committee|author-link=Foreign Affairs Select Committee|date=6 July 2008|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmfaff/147/14708.htm#a39|title=Seventh Report – Overseas Territories|page=125|publisher=[[House of Commons]]|access-date=6 August 2009}}</ref> According to the CIA World Factbook, the Seychelles also had a sovereignty claim on the islands.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/about/archives/2021/countries/british-indian-ocean-territory/ |title=British Indian Ocean Territory |publisher=CIA |date=2021 |access-date=4 October 2024}}</ref> In 1982, the UK and US agreed waste would be shipped away from the territory.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|49}} On 27 December 1984, Mauritius established an [[exclusive economic zone]] (EEZ) which included the waters around the BIOT, an action protested by the UK.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|53–54}} |
|||
== Economy == |
|||
All economic activity is concentrated on [[Diego Garcia]], where joint UK-US defence facilities are located. Approximately 2,000 native inhabitants, known as the [[Chagossians]] or [[Ilois]], were forcibly [[Depopulation of Diego Garcia|relocated]] to Mauritius before construction of UK-US military facilities; in 1995, there were approximately 1,700 U.K. and U.S. military personnel and 1,500 civilian contractors living on the island. |
|||
In 1990, the first BIOT flag was unfurled. This flag, which also contains the [[Union Jack]], has depictions of the Indian Ocean, where the islands are located, in the form of white and blue wavy lines and also a palm tree rising above the British crown.<ref name=World>{{Cite web|url=http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/asia/biot.htm|title=British Indian Ocean Territory|access-date=23 June 2013|publisher=WorldAtlas.com}}</ref> During the [[Gulf War]], 20 nuclear-armed [[Boeing B-52 Stratofortress]] bombers were stationed at the base as a [[Deterrence theory|nuclear deterrent]].<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|42}} The base was also strategically positioned to support the 2001 [[War in Afghanistan (2001–2021)|War in Afganistan]] and the 2003 [[2003 invasion of Iraq|Iraq War]].<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|66}} |
|||
Construction projects and various services needed to support the military installations are carried out by military and contract employees from the U.K., [[Mauritius]], the [[Philippines]], and the U.S. There are no industrial or agricultural activities on the islands. |
|||
The licensing of [[fishing industry|commercial fishing]] provides an annual income of about $1 million for the territory.<ref>[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmhansrd/vo040621/text/40621w13.htm#40621w13.html_sbhd2 House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 21 Jun 2004 (pt 13)<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> |
|||
On 1 October 1991, the UK created the "BIOT Fisheries Conservation and Management Zone (FCMZ)" covering the [[territorial sea]]s of the BIOT.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|55–56}} On 4 December 1995, the UK signed the [[United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement]] on behalf of the BIOT, which was protested by Mauritius when it signed in 1997.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|55}} Both Mauritius and the United Kingdom agreed to the inclusion of the BIOT within the area covered by the [[Indian Ocean Tuna Commission]], which was formed in 1996.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|54}} In 1996 the Mauritius Marine Conservation Society unsuccessfully sought to have the archipelago declared a [[World Heritage Site]].<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|52}} Mauritius explicitly extended its ratification of the [[Nairobi Convention]] to the Chagos archipelago in 2000, although this had limited practical impact.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|53}} |
|||
Separate telephone facilities for military and public needs are available, providing all standard commercial telephone services, including connection to the Internet. International telephone service is carried by [[communications satellite]]. The territory has three radio broadcast stations, one AM and two FM, and one television broadcast station. Because of its extreme equatorial location, [[Diego Garcia]] can use [[geosynchronous]] satellites over the [[Indian Ocean]] and also some over the eastern [[Atlantic Ocean]]. Fairly active [[amateur radio]] operations occur from Diego Garcia, using the British [[callsign]] [[prefix]] VQ9. |
|||
The islanders, who now mainly reside in Mauritius and Seychelles, have continually asserted their right to return to Diego Garcia, winning important legal victories in the [[High Court of Justice|High Court]] of England and Wales in 2000, 2006, and 2007. In the High Court and Court of Appeal in 2003 and 2004, the islanders' application for further compensation on top of the £14.5 million value package of compensation they had already received was dismissed by the court.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/997.html|title=Chagos Islanders v Attorney General & Anor <nowiki>[2004]</nowiki> EWCA Civ 997 (22 July 2004)|website=bailii.org|publisher=[[BAILII]]|access-date=27 April 2021}}</ref> Following the 2000 ruling the British government announced that Chagossians would be permitted to return to the archipelago, aside from Diego Garcia. This position was reversed in 2004, before any had moved. The United Kingdom offered citizenship to some Chagossians starting in 2002.<ref name="HRW2023"/> |
|||
Postage stamps have been issued for British Indian Ocean Territory since January 17, 1968. |
|||
On 17 September 2003, the UK created the "BIOT Environmental Protection and Conservation Zone (EPCZ)" covering the BIOT's EEZ. This was opposed by Mauritius, which on 5 August 2005 reasserted their declared EEZ surrounding the territory.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|55–56}} |
|||
==See also== |
|||
<!--{{Main|Outline of the British Indian Ocean Territory}}--> |
|||
On 11 May 2006, the High Court ruled that a 2004 Order in Council preventing the Chagossians' resettlement of the islands was unlawful, and consequently that the Chagossians were entitled to return to the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago.<ref name="bancoult">{{Cite court|url=http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/1038.html|litigants=The Queen on the application of Louis Olivier Bancoult v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs|date=2006reporter=EWHC|opinion=1038 (Admin)|access-date=5 April 2013}}</ref> On 23 May 2007, this was confirmed by the Court of Appeal.<ref name="ssfca">{{Cite court|url=http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/498.html|litigants=Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs v The Queen (on the application of Bancoult)|date=2007|reporter=EWCA|opinion=Civ 498|access-date=5 April 2013}}</ref> In a visit sponsored by the British government, the islanders visited Diego Garcia and other islands on 3 April 2006 for humanitarian purposes, including the tending of the graves of their ancestors.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Reynolds|first=Paul|date=3 April 2006|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4852768.stm|title=Paradise regained – for a few days|work=[[BBC News]]|access-date=27 April 2010}}</ref> On 22 October 2008, the British government won an [[R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2)|appeal to the House of Lords]] regarding the [[royal prerogative]] used to continue excluding the Chagossians from their homeland.<ref name="afp">{{Cite news|url=http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hdjVkpT6_bzQxOkAQiXHQRIerOtw|title=Britain wins appeal over Chagos islanders' return home|agency=[[Agence France-Press]]|date=22 October 2008|access-date=5 April 2013|archive-date=29 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130529024235/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hdjVkpT6_bzQxOkAQiXHQRIerOtw|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="lords">{{Cite court|url=http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/uk/cases/UKHL/2008/61.htm|litigants=R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs|date=2008|reporter=UKHL|opinion=61|access-date=5 April 2013}}</ref> |
|||
*[[Chagos Archipelago]] |
|||
*[[Chagossians]] |
|||
In March 2007 Mauritian president [[Anerood Jugnauth]] declared a willingness to take the dispute to the ICJ, and for Mauritius to leave the Commonwealth. In November 2007 a line of communication was established between the Foreign & Commonwealth Office and the Mauritian High Commission for BIOT-related matters.<ref name=FAC-20080706-p125/> |
|||
*[[List of island countries and territories in the Indian Ocean]] |
|||
The British government established the BIOT Marine Protected Area in April 2010, to mixed reactions from Chagossians. While the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office claimed that it was an environmental move as well as a necessary move to improve the coral populations off east Africa, and therefore sub-Saharan marine supplies, some Chagossians claimed that the reserve would prevent any resettlement due to the inability to fish in protected areas. The Chagossian UK-based Diego Garcian Society stated that it welcomed the marine reserve, noting that it was in the interest of Chagossians to have the area protected while they were exiled and that it could be renegotiated upon resettlement. The Foreign Office claimed the reserve was made "without prejudice to the outcome of proceedings before the [[European Court of Human Rights]]".<ref name="Reserve">{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8599125.stm|title=UK sets up Chagos Islands marine reserve|work=[[BBC News]]|date=1 April 2010|access-date=25 November 2011}}</ref> (That court's 2012 decision was not in favour of the Islanders anyway.)<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-115714|title=Chagos Islanders against the United Kingdom: Decision.|publisher=[[European Court of Human Rights]]|date=11 December 2012}}</ref> The protected area covered the territory's EEZ, but not its territorial waters.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|58}} |
|||
===International opinion and rulings=== |
|||
In 2009 Mauritius began negotiating with the Maldives to jointly settle the borders of EEZs in the area. These were unsuccessful, and in 2010 the Maldives submitted a claim that overlapped with both British and Mauritian claims. The Maldives contended that as much of the northern Chagos archipelago was uninhabited, they should not be included in the determination of EEZ baselines.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|57}} Arbitration between the UK and Mauritius relating to the creation of the marine protected area began in 2010.<ref name="Sand2018">{{cite journal |author1=Peter H. Sand |title=The British Indian Ocean Territory: International Legal Black Hole? |journal=QIL, Zoom-out |volume=55 |pages=35–59 |year=2018 |url=https://www.qil-qdi.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/04_Chagos_SAND_FIN-1.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|36}} This arbitration was cited by Mauritius to halt an attempt by a coalition of NGOs to have the archipelago declared a World Heritage site in 2012.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|52}} In 2015 an UNCLOS tribunal ruled that the creation of a marine protected area violated British obligations.<ref name="HRW2023"/> The idea to create a formal protected area was dropped.<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|68}} |
|||
The US-UK arrangement which established the territory for defence purposes initially was in place from 1966 to 2016, and has subsequently been renewed to continue until 2036. The announcement was accompanied by a pledge of £40 million in compensation to former residents.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Mance|first=Henry|date=16 November 2016|title=Extended US lease blocks Chagossians' return home|url=https://www.ft.com/content/abbc879a-ac1d-11e6-ba7d-76378e4fef24|newspaper=Financial Times|access-date=18 June 2020}}</ref> The base was seen as important for managing growing Chinese influence in the region.<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|67}} |
|||
The formerly obscure sovereignty dispute gained more international recognition as Mauritius obtained the support of other African countries. [[Brexit]] deprived the United Kingdom of support from European allies.<ref name="BBCHarding2024"/> In May 2017, Mauritius challenged the presence of the UK at a meeting of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|55}} On 22 June 2017 the [[United Nations General Assembly]] (UNGA) voted to refer the issue to the [[International Court of Justice]] (ICJ) by 94 to 15. There were 65 abstentions, including British allies such as Canada, France, and Germany.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://press.un.org/en/2017/ga11924.doc.htm |title=General Assembly Adopts Resolution Seeking International Court's Advisory Opinion on Pre-independence Separation of Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius |publisher=United Nations |date=22 June 2017 |access-date=3 October 2024}}</ref><ref name="AMTIPant2019">{{cite web |url=https://amti.csis.org/a-ruling-from-the-hague/ |title=A Landmark Ruling on the Chagos Islands |author=Harsh Pant |publisher=Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative |date=15 April 2019 |access-date=3 October 2024}}</ref> In February 2019, the ICJ issued an [[Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965|advisory opinion]] by 13 votes to 1.<ref name="AMTIPant2019" /> In its advisory opinion, the Court concluded that "the process of decolonisation of Mauritius was not lawfully completed when that country acceded to independence", and that "the United Kingdom is under an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Advisory Opinion: Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965|url=https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/169/169-20190225-01-00-EN.pdf|publisher=[[International Court of Justice]]|date=25 February 2019|access-date=18 October 2022}}</ref><ref name=icj-cij-20190225>{{Cite web|url=https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/169|title=Legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 – overview of the case|website=[[International Court of Justice]]|date=25 February 2019|access-date=2 February 2021}}</ref> On 22 May 2019, the UNGA adopted a resolution citing the ICJ advisory opinion, affirming that "the Chagos Archipelago forms an integral part of the territory of Mauritius".<ref name="UN2019"/> The motion was approved by a majority vote with 116 member states voting for and 6 against.<ref name="UN2019">{{Cite web|title=General Assembly welcomes International Court of Justice opinion on Chagos Archipelago, adopts text calling for Mauritius' complete decolonisation|url=https://www.un.org/press/en/2019/ga12146.doc.htm|access-date=31 July 2020|website=www.un.org}}</ref> Votes against included the neighbouring Maldives, possibly concerned about the loss of maritime security benefits that emerge from the military base. The Seychelles benefits similarly, but voted for the resolution in solidarity with the African Union.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/diego-garcia-unnerving-neighbours-raising-ghosts |title=Diego Garcia: Unnerving neighbours and raising ghosts |author=Ashton Robinson |work=The Interpreter |date=18 December 2019 |access-date=4 October 2024}}</ref> |
|||
On 28 January 2021, the United Nation's [[International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea]] ruled, in a dispute between Mauritius and Maldives on their maritime boundary, that the United Kingdom has no sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago, and that Mauritius is sovereign there. The United Kingdom disputes and does not recognise the tribunal's decision.<ref name=bbc-20210128>{{Cite news|last=Harding|first=Andrew|date=28 January 2021|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-55848126|title=UN court rules UK has no sovereignty over Chagos islands|work=BBC News|access-date=1 February 2021}}</ref><ref name=InternationalTribunalfortheLawoftheSea-20210128>{{Cite press release|url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_313_EN.pdf|title=Dispute concerning delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)|id=ITLOS/Press 313|publisher=[[International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea]]|date=28 January 2021|access-date=1 February 2021}}</ref> As with the ICJ decision, this decision had no legal compulsion, although both contributed to international pressure on the UK.<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|61}} The [[Universal Postal Union]] (UPU), which has jurisdiction over international mail among treaty signatory states, voted in 2021 to ban the use of BIOT postage stamps on mail from BIOT, instead requiring Mauritian stamps to be used.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-58321580|title=British stamps banned from Chagos Islands in Indian Ocean|work=[[BBC News]]|date=25 August 2021}}</ref> |
|||
In February 2022, exiled islanders made their first unsupervised visit to an island in the Chagos Archipelago.<ref name=observer-20220213>{{Cite news|last1=Bowcott|first1=Owen|last2=Rinvolucri|first2=Bruno|date=13 February 2022|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/12/exiled-chagos-islanders-return-uk-disputed-archipelago-mauritius|title=Exiled Chagos Islanders bask in return 'as pilgrims to abandoned place'|newspaper=[[The Observer]]|access-date=13 February 2022}}</ref> The Permanent Representative of Mauritius to the United Nations, [[Jagdish Koonjul]], raised the Mauritian flag on [[Peros Banhos]].<ref name=guardian-20220214>{{Cite news|last1=Bowcott|first1=Owen|last2=Rinvolucri|first2=Bruno|date=14 February 2022|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/14/mauritius-formally-challenges-britains-ownership-of-chagos-islands|title=Mauritius formally challenges Britain's ownership of Chagos Islands|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=14 February 2022}}</ref><ref name=times-20220214>{{Cite news|last=Flanagan|first=Jane|date=14 February 2022|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mauritius-plants-flag-on-disputed-chagos-islands-xpzprm8jq|title=Mauritius plants flag on disputed Chagos islands|newspaper=The Times|location=London|url-access=subscription|access-date=14 February 2022}}</ref> The main purpose of the 15-day Mauritian expedition is to survey the unclaimed [[Blenheim Reef]], to discover for a forthcoming [[International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea]] hearing if it is exposed at high tide so is claimable.<ref name=guardian-20220213>{{Cite news|last1=Bowcott|first1=Owen|last2=Rinvolucri|first2=Bruno|date=13 February 2022|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/13/mauritius-measures-reef-hoping-to-lay-claim-on-chagos-islands|title=Mauritius measures reef hoping to lay claim on Chagos Islands|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=14 February 2022}}</ref><ref name=maritime-executive-20220213>{{Cite news|last1=Brewster|first1=David|last2=Bashfield|first2=Samuel|date=13 February 2022|url=https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/an-unclaimed-reef-adds-a-wrinkle-to-the-dispute-over-diego-garcia|title=An unclaimed reef adds a wrinkle to the dispute over Diego Garcia|publisher=The Maritime Executive|work=The Lowy Interpreter|access-date=14 February 2022}}</ref> The chartered ''[[IMO 7813913|Bleu De Nîmes]]'' was shadowed by a British fisheries protection vessel.<ref name=guardian-20220220>{{Cite news|last1=Bowcott|first1=Owen|last2=Rinvolucri|first2=Bruno|date=20 February 2022|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/20/chagossian-exiles-celebrate-emotional-return-as-uk-tries-to-justify-control|title=Chagossian exiles celebrate emotional return as UK tries to justify control|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=20 February 2022}}</ref> |
|||
In October 2021 [[Sri Lankan Tamils|Sri Lankan Tamil]] asylum seekers landed on Diego Garcia, and submitted asylum claims. The [[Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees]] does not apply to the BIOT. Around 173 arrived in 2021 and 2022. Some were moved to [[Rwanda]], with around 60 left as of January 2024.<ref name="HRW2023"/><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-67996408 |title=Diego Garcia: UN says UK military island not suitable for stranded migrants |author=Alice Cuddy |date=19 January 2024 |access-date=4 October 2024}}</ref> In 2022, a dispute arising from American defence contractor [[KBR (company)|KBR]] allegedly prohibiting holidays during a period of low flight demand during the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] led to 800 [[Overseas Filipino Workers]] being unable to leave Diego Garcia.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/philippine/philippines-filipino-workers-stuck-at-us-military-base-following-dispute-09162022124923.html |title=Philippines: Filipino workers stuck at US military base following dispute over vacation |author=Jojo Riñoza |work=Benar News |date=16 September 2022 |access-date=4 October 2024}}</ref> |
|||
===Post-ICJ negotiations=== |
|||
Comparisons between the BIOT and occupied areas of Ukraine hindered British diplomatic efforts to obtain Ukrainian support following the [[Russian invasion of Ukraine]]. Further pressure grew regarding Africa's "last colony", and in September 2022 British prime minister [[Liz Truss]] met with Mauritian prime minister [[Pravind Jugnauth]]<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.economist.com/britain/2023/02/13/britain-could-soon-give-up-its-last-african-colony |title=Britain could soon give up its last African colony |newspaper=The Economist |date=13 February 2023 |access-date=4 October 2024}}</ref><ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|60–61}} On 3 November 2022, the British Foreign Secretary [[James Cleverly]] announced that the UK and Mauritius had decided to begin negotiations on sovereignty over the British Indian Ocean Territory, taking into account international legal proceedings. Both states had agreed to ensure the continued operation of the joint UK/US military base on Diego Garcia.<ref name=guardian-20221103>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/03/uk-agrees-to-negotiate-with-mauritius-over-handover-of-chagos-islands |title=UK agrees to negotiate with Mauritius over handover of Chagos Islands |last=Wintour |first=Patrick |newspaper=The Guardian |date=3 November 2022 |access-date=3 November 2022}}</ref><ref name=hansard-20221103>{{cite web |url=https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2022-11-03/debates/22110340000007/ChagosArchipelago |title=Chagos Archipelago |last=Cleverly |first=James |publisher=UK Parliament |work=Hansard |id=HCWS354 |date=3 November 2022 |access-date=3 November 2022}}</ref> The [[Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]] has argued this change of approach is partly due to strategic shifts in US and UK foreign policies on Asia in response to China's growing power and influence, as disputes with former colonies encourage their deepening relationship with China.<ref name=hocl-20221122>{{cite web |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9673/CBP-9673.pdf |title=British Indian Ocean Territory: UK to negotiate sovereignty 2022/23 |last=Loft |first=Philip |publisher=UK Parliament |work=House of Commons Library |pages=22–23 |date=22 November 2022 |access-date=26 September 2023}}</ref> |
|||
On 3 November 2022, [[Patrick Wintour]] of ''[[the Guardian]]'' reported that the UK and Mauritius had begun negotiations on sovereignty over the British Indian Ocean Territory, taking into account the international legal proceedings.<ref name=guardian-20221103/> In December 2023, Tony Diver of ''[[the Daily Telegraph]]'' reported that the British government was planning to discontinue the talks.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |last=Diver |first=Tony |date=1 December 2023 |title=UK drops plans to hand Chagos Islands back to Mauritius |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/12/01/uk-drop-plan-to-hand-chagos-islands-back-mauritius/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20231202134437/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/12/01/uk-drop-plan-to-hand-chagos-islands-back-mauritius/ |archive-date=2 December 2023 |access-date=4 December 2023 |work=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]}}</ref> These negotiations ceased in late 2023 after the UK Defence Secretary blocked the agreement that had been negotiated by the Foreign Office.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |last=Diver |first=Tony |date=1 December 2023 |title=UK drops plans to hand Chagos Islands back to Mauritius |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/12/01/uk-drop-plan-to-hand-chagos-islands-back-mauritius/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20231202134437/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/12/01/uk-drop-plan-to-hand-chagos-islands-back-mauritius/ |archive-date=2 December 2023 |access-date=4 December 2023 |work=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]}}</ref> |
|||
On 3 October 2024, British prime minister [[Keir Starmer]] and Mauritian prime minister [[Pravind Jugnauth]] jointly announced that an agreement had been reached under which the UK would cede sovereignty over the territory. Under the deal, Diego Garcia will be excluded from any resettlement, and the UK will continue to administer the island for at least 99 years.<ref name="BBCHarding2024">{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98ynejg4l5o |title=UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius |author=Andrew Harding |work=BBC News |date=3 October 2024 |access-date=3 October 2024}}</ref><ref name="UKGovStatement20241003">{{Cite web |title=UK-Mauritius deal to protect national security – safeguarding the operation of strategic military base |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-mauritius-deal-to-protect-national-security-safeguarding-the-operation-of-strategic-military-base |date=3 October 2024 |access-date=3 October 2024 |website=GOV.UK}}</ref> Chagos Islanders would be allowed to return to the other islands and a fund will be established to support resettlement.<ref>{{Cite web |title=UK and Mauritius joint statement, 3 October 2024 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-between-uk-and-mauritius-3-october-2024 |date=3 October 2024 |access-date=3 October 2024 |website=GOV.UK}}</ref> |
|||
No debate on the deal had taken place in the [[Parliament of the United Kingdom]] due to it being in recess, and the deal attracted criticism from opposition politicians such as [[James Cleverly]],<ref name="Independent">{{Cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chagos-islands-james-cleverly-uk-mauritius-b2623242.html|title=James Cleverly condemns Chagos deal|year=2024|work=[[The Independent]]|access-date=3 October 2024}}</ref> who, as foreign secretary, had initiated the negotiations that took place from November 2022 until December 2023.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |last=Diver |first=Tony |date=1 December 2023 |title=UK drops plans to hand Chagos Islands back to Mauritius |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/12/01/uk-drop-plan-to-hand-chagos-islands-back-mauritius/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20231202134437/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/12/01/uk-drop-plan-to-hand-chagos-islands-back-mauritius/ |archive-date=2 December 2023 |access-date=4 December 2023 |work=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]}}</ref> The announcement was also criticised by the [[Speaker of the House of Commons]], [[Sir Lindsay Hoyle]], who criticised the government for ignoring the [[Constitutional conventions of the United Kingdom|constitutional convention]] that important matters should be announced in the House of Commons first.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Sparrow |first=Andrew |date=2024-10-07 |title=Lammy defends Chagos Islands deal as Tories claim it puts UK security at risk – as it happened |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2024/oct/07/labour-budget-starmer-sue-gray-tory-party-leadership-uk-politics-latest?filterKeyEvents=false&page=with:block-670405118f080291b5187793#block-670405118f080291b5187793 |access-date=2024-10-17 |work=the Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> Some Chagossians have also criticised the deal for not having included the Chagossian community in the decision-making process.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy78ejg71exo |title=Chagossians criticise lack of say in UK deal to hand over islands |date=3 October 2024 |website=BBC News |publisher=BBC |accessdate=6 October 2024|last1=Davies|first1=Maia|last2=Hagan|first2=Rachel }}</ref> |
|||
In November 2024 the Maldives staked a surprise claim to the Chagos Islands, challenging ongoing negotiations between the UK and Mauritius over the strategically vital territory.<ref>https://www.gbnews.com/politics/chagos-islands-under-threat-maldives-stakes-claim-strategic-territory</ref> |
|||
On 17 December 2024, newly-elected Mauritius prime minister [[Navin Ramgoolam]], rejected the proposed agreement and asked for talks to reopen.<ref name="DealReject">{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/starmer-mauritius-chagos-islands-diego-garcia-b2665804.html|title=Blow for Starmer as Mauritius PM rejects Chagos deal and demands talks reopen|work=The Independent|date=17 December 2024}}</ref> |
|||
==Government== |
|||
{{Main|Government of the British Indian Ocean Territory}} |
|||
[[File:King Charles III (July 2023).jpg|thumb|upright|[[King Charles III]] is the head of state of the British Indian Ocean Territory.|alt=]] |
|||
As a territory of the United Kingdom, the head of state is [[King Charles III]]. There is no Governor appointed to represent the King in the territory, as there are no permanent inhabitants (as is also the case in [[South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands]] and the [[British Antarctic Territory]]). The territory is one of eight dependencies in the Indian Ocean, alongside the [[Ashmore and Cartier Islands]], [[Christmas Island]], the [[Cocos (Keeling) Islands]], and [[Heard Island and McDonald Islands]], all Australian possessions; the [[French Southern and Antarctic Lands]], with the [[Scattered Islands in the Indian Ocean|French Scattered Islands in the Indian Ocean]] and its dependencies of [[Tromelin Island|Tromelin]] and the [[Glorioso Islands]]; along with French [[Mayotte]] and [[Réunion]]. |
|||
The head of government is the [[Commissioner of the British Indian Ocean Territory|Commissioner]], most recently Paul Candler until August 2024; the Deputy Commissioner is Nishi Dholakia, and the Administrator is Emily Ager, and all senior officials reside in the United Kingdom.<ref>{{Cite web |title=BIOT Administration – BIOT Administration |url=https://sites.google.com/site/biotgovernment/biot-administration |access-date=1 October 2024 |website=sites.google.com |language=en-US}}</ref> The Commissioner's Representative in the territory is the officer commanding the detachment of British forces.<ref name=BIOT-Governance>{{Cite web|title=Governance|url=https://biot.gov.io/governance/|website=BIOT|publisher=British Indian Ocean Territory Administration|access-date=16 June 2020}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:DG Ariel Plantation.jpg|thumb|left|View of [[East Point, British Indian Ocean Territory|East Point]], [[Diego Garcia]], from the air.|alt=]] |
|||
{{Wikisource|British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004}} |
|||
The laws of the territory are based on the constitution, currently set out in the British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004, which gives the Commissioner power to make laws for the [[peace, order and good government]] of the territory.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/british_indian_ocean_territory_c|title=British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004 – a Freedom of Information request to Privy Council Office|date=9 November 2012|website=WhatDoTheyKnow.com}}</ref><ref name=BIOT-Governance/><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Cormacain|first=Ronan|date=1 September 2013|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2013.822317|title=Prerogative legislation as the paradigm of bad law-making: the Chagos Islands|journal=Commonwealth Law Bulletin|volume=39|issue=3|pages=487–508|via=Taylor and Francis+NEJM|doi=10.1080/03050718.2013.822317|s2cid=131408841}}</ref> If the Commissioner has not made a law on a particular topic then, in most circumstances, the laws that apply in the territory are the same as those that apply in England and Wales under the terms of the Courts Ordinance 1983.<ref>British Indian Ocean Territory Ordinance No 3 of the 1983 ("the Courts Ordinance"), Article 3.1.</ref> There is no legislature (and no elections) as there are no permanent inhabitants, although a small legal system has been established for the jurisdiction. As almost all residents of the BIOT are members of the United States military, in practice, crimes are more commonly charged under [[Uniform Code of Military Justice|United States military law]]. |
|||
Applicable treaties between the United Kingdom and the United States govern the use of the military base. The first exchange of notes, signed on 30 December 1966, constituted an agreement concerning the availability for defence purposes of the British Indian Ocean Territory.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Exchange of notes constituting an agreement concerning the availability for defense purposes of the British Indian Ocean Territory|url=https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002801293eb&clang=_en|journal=UN Treaty Series|date=1967|volume=603|page=273|access-date=16 June 2020}}</ref> This was followed by agreements on the construction of a communications facility (1972), naval support facility (1976), [https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002800c052b&clang=_enoperations construction contracts]{{Dead link|date=October 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} (1987), and a [https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280091d6c&clang=_en monitoring facility] (1999). The United States is reportedly required to ask permission{{Citation needed|date=June 2020}} of the United Kingdom to use the base for offensive military action. |
|||
As the BIOT forms a separate legal jurisdiction to the United Kingdom under British law, many international conventions signed by the United Kingdom were not extended to the BIOT.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|39, 46}} These include humanitarian treaties, including the [[Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees|1951 Refugee Convention]] and the [[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]], which makes the legal situation difficult.<ref name=aljazeera-20220601>{{Cite news|last=Bashfield|first=Samuel|date=1 June 2022|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/6/1/tamil-asylum-seekers-diego-garcia|title=The BIOT: A judicial vacuum now consuming Tamil refugees|publisher=Al Jazeera|access-date=10 June 2022}}</ref><ref name=infomigrants-20221019/> While the UK has joint jurisdiction over the military base, the British government contends that US warships around the base are responsible solely to the US, and thus do not need to meet British treaty obligations.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|43}} |
|||
==Naval Party 1002 and MV ''Grampian Frontier''== |
|||
[[Naval Party]] 1002 (NP 1002) is directly present in the territory, and is composed of both [[Royal Navy]] and [[Royal Marines|Royal Marine]] personnel. NP 1002 is responsible for civil administration and enforcement. Its members are tasked with policing and carrying out customs duties. Royal Marines in the territory also reportedly form a security detachment.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/nctsfedetdg/Documents/WELCOME_ABOARD_JAN%202011_.pdf|title=Welcome to Diego Garcia|website=public.navy.mil|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161005191638/http://www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/nctsfedetdg/Documents/WELCOME_ABOARD_JAN%202011_.pdf|archive-date=5 October 2016|access-date=18 October 2022}}</ref> |
|||
Prior to 2017, the BIOT patrol vessel, MV ''Pacific Marlin'', was based in [[Diego Garcia]]. It was operated by the [[Swire Pacific]] Offshore Group. The ''Pacific Marlin'' patrolled the marine reserve all year, and since the marine reserve was designated in April 2010, the number of apprehensions of illegal vessels within the area has increased. The ship was built in 1978 as an ocean-going [[Tugboat|tug]]. It is {{Convert|57.7|m|ftin|0|abbr=off}} long, with a [[Draft (hull)|draught]] of {{Convert|3.8|m|ftin|abbr=off}}, and [[gross tonnage]] of 1,200 tons. It has a maximum speed of {{Convert|12.5|kn|abbr=off|lk=on}} with an economic speed of {{Convert|11|kn|abbr=off}}, permitting a range of about {{Convert|18000|nmi|abbr=off}} and fuel endurance of 68 days. It was the oldest vessel in the Swire fleet.<ref name=independent-20140328>{{Cite news|last=Milmo|first=Cahal|date=28 March 2014|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/exclusive-british-government-under-fire-for-pollution-of-pristine-lagoon-9222170.html|title=Exclusive: British Government under fire for pollution of pristine lagoon|newspaper=[[The Independent]]|access-date=29 March 2015}}</ref> ''Pacific Marlin'' reportedly spent about 54% of her taskings on fishery patrol duties, and a further 19% on military patrol duties.<ref name="sites.google.com">{{Cite web|url=https://sites.google.com/site/thechagosarchipelagofacts/eppz-mpa/patrol-vessel|title=Patrol Vessel|website=The Chagos Archipelago|access-date=18 October 2022}}</ref> |
|||
In 2016, a new contract was signed with [[Scotland|Scottish]]-based [[North Star Shipping]] for the use of the vessel MV ''Grampian Frontier''<ref name="sites.google.com"/> (also known as the ''Grampian Endurance'').<ref name="MaritimeExecutive2023">{{cite news |url=https://maritime-executive.com/article/the-disputed-chagos-islands-have-an-illegal-fishing-problem |title=The Disputed Chagos Islands Have an Illegal Fishing Problem |work=The Maritime Executive |date=9 March 2023 |access-date=4 October 2024}}</ref> She is a {{Convert|70|m|abbr=off}} vessel carrying up to 24 personnel, and fulfils both the patrol and research role.<ref name="sites.google.com"/> The vessel reportedly operates in conjunction with personnel from NP 1002 on both fisheries and military enforcement tasks / [[Military exercise|exercises]], and also carries scientists / researchers involved in a range of research work, particularly conservation.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sailingsteelsapphire.com/blog-1/2020/8/16/the-high-point-of-our-circumnavigation|title=The high point of our circumnavigation?|website=SailingSteelSapphire.com|date=10 July 2020|access-date=18 October 2022}}{{Unreliable source?|date=October 2022}}</ref> In 2022, ''Grampian Frontier'' tracked a Mauritian-charted vessel temporarily bringing Chagossian exiles to Blenheim Reef in the archipelago.<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Bowcutt|first1=Owen|last2=Rinvolucri|first2=Bruno|date=20 February 2022|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/20/chagossian-exiles-celebrate-emotional-return-as-uk-tries-to-justify-control|title=Chagossian exiles celebrate emotional return as UK tries to justify control|work=The Guardian|access-date=18 October 2022}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Royal Navy]] also maintains two [[offshore patrol vessel]]s in the Indo-Pacific region, {{HMS|Tamar|P233|6}} and {{HMS|Spey|P234|6}}. Either may be periodically employed for sovereignty protection and other duties in BIOT waters.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2022/march/04/220322-hms-spey-delivers-vaccines-and-patrols-for-illegal-fishing-in-pitcairn-islands |title=HMS Spey delivers vaccines and patrols for illegal fishing in Pitcairn Islands |publisher=Royal Navy |date=4 March 2022 |access-date=18 October 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2022/may/16/20220516-tamar-and-spey-underline-uks-renewed-commitment-to-the-indo-pacific |title=Tamar and Spey underline UK's renewed commitment to the Indo-Pacific |publisher=Royal Navy |date=16 May 2022 |access-date=18 October 2022}}</ref> HMS ''Tamar'' paid a rare visit to the islands in February/March 2023 conducting fisheries protection and other missions.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2023/march/09/20230309-hms-tamar-protects-paradise-in-rare-visit-to-uks-indian-ocean-territory |title=HMS Tamar protects paradise in rare visit to UK's Indian Ocean territory |publisher=Royal Navy |date=9 March 2023 |access-date=20 March 2023}}</ref> |
|||
==Geography== |
|||
{{Main|Geography of the British Indian Ocean Territory}} |
|||
[[File:SeychellesBIOT1970.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|The British Indian Ocean Territory prior to the Seychelles's independence in 1976. The land at bottom left is the northern tip of [[Madagascar]]. ([[Desroches Island|Desroches]] is not labelled, but is a part of the [[Amirante Islands]].)|alt=]] |
|||
[[File:Biot-map.png|thumb|upright=1.3|Map of the British Indian Ocean Territory since 1976.|alt=]] |
|||
The territory is an archipelago of 58 islands covering {{convert|56|km2|sqmi}}. The largest island is [[Diego Garcia]], which at {{convert|32.5|km2|sqmi}} accounts for about half of the territory's total land area. The rest of the island's are much smaller, with the second largest being just over {{convert|3.1|km2|sqmi}}.<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|65}} The terrain is flat and low,{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}} with an average elevation of {{Convert|1.33|m|ft}} above sea level.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|50}} In 2010, {{Convert|545000|km2|abbr=off}} of ocean around the islands was declared a marine reserve.<ref name="Reserve"/> |
|||
The [[s:British Indian Ocean Territory Constitution Order 2004|British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004]] defines the territory as comprising the following islands or groups of islands: |
|||
*[[Diego Garcia]] |
|||
*[[Three Brothers, Chagos|Three Brothers Islands]] |
|||
*[[Egmont Islands]] |
|||
*[[Nelsons Island|Nelson Island]] |
|||
*[[Peros Banhos]] |
|||
*[[Eagle Islands]] |
|||
*[[Salomon Islands]] |
|||
*[[Danger Island, Great Chagos Bank|Danger Island]] |
|||
These islands and associated coral reefs lie between 4°44 and 7°41 south and 70°47 and 72°47 east.<ref name="Grainger1985"/> |
|||
As indicated above, the territory also included [[Aldabra]], [[Farquhar Group|Farquhar]] and [[Desroches]] between 1965 and 1976; the latter group of islands is located north of [[Madagascar]] and were annexed from and returned to the [[Seychelles]]. |
|||
===Climate=== |
|||
The climate is [[tropical marine]]; hot, humid, and moderated by [[trade winds]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=HA08 – British Indian Ocean Territory|url=https://www.ctbto.org/verification-regime/featured-stations/types/hydroacoustic/ha08-british-indian-ocean-territory-biotchagos-archipelago-united-kingdom|website=ctbto.org|publisher=Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization|access-date=16 June 2020}}</ref> These winds originate from the southeast from May to November, reversing for the rest of the year. The average temperature is {{convert|27|C|F}}, and does not vary greatly throughout the year. While rain is common,<ref name="Grainger1985"/> the territory lies outside of cyclone paths that cross the Indian Ocean further south.<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|68}} The Diego Garcia military base is the United States military's overseas base most at risk from [[climate change]].<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|50}} |
|||
===Transport=== |
|||
In terms of transportation on Diego Garcia, the island has short stretches of paved road between the port and [[airfield]], and on its streets; transport is mostly by bicycle and on foot. The island had many [[wagonway]]s, which were donkey-hauled narrow gauge railways for the transport of coconut wagons. These are no longer in use and have deteriorated.<ref>{{Cite web|first=Ted|last=Morris|url=http://www.zianet.com/tedmorris/dg/tara.html|title=Diego Garcia – The Plantation|publisher=zianet.com}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Terminal BIOT.jpg|thumb|The airport passenger terminal in Diego Garcia, complete with red British telephone box.|alt=]] |
|||
Diego Garcia's military base is home to the territory's only [[airport]]. At {{Convert|3000|m|abbr=off}} long, the [[runway]] is capable of supporting heavy [[US Air Force]] bombers such as the [[B-52]], and would have been able to support the [[Space Shuttle]] in the event of a mission abort.<ref name=cnn-20190310>{{cite news |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/09/asia/chagos-islands-feature-intl/index.html |title=Is the United States about to lose control of its secretive Diego Garcia military base? |last=Marsh |first=Jenni |publisher=CNN |date=10 March 2019 |access-date=25 September 2023}}</ref> It also has a major naval seaport,<ref>{{Cite web|title=US Naval Support Facility, Diego Garcia|url=https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrj/installations/nsf_diego_garcia.html|website=www.cnic.navy.mil|publisher=[[US Navy]]|access-date=16 June 2020}}</ref> and there is also a marina bus service along the main road of the island.<ref name="baltimore">{{Cite web|title=On the Chop's visit to Diego Garcia|url=http://thebaltimorechop.com/2010/10/12/on-the-chops-visit-to-diego-garcia/|date=12 October 2010|website=TheBaltimoreChop.com|access-date=5 April 2013}}</ref> |
|||
Yacht crews seeking safe passage across the [[Indian Ocean]] may apply for a mooring permit for the uninhabited Outer Islands (beyond Diego Garcia),<ref>{{Cite web|title=How to apply for a mooring permit|url=https://biot.gov.io/visiting/mooring-permits/|website=www.biot.gov.io|publisher=BIOT Administration|access-date=16 June 2020}}</ref> but must not approach within {{Convert|3|nmi|abbr=off}}, land on, or anchor at islands designated as Strict Nature Reserves, or the nature reserve within the [[Peros Banhos]] atoll. Unauthorised vessels or persons are not permitted access to Diego Garcia, and no unauthorised vessel is permitted to approach within three nautical miles of the island.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Mooring site plots|url=https://biot.gov.io/visiting/mooring-permits/mooring-site-plots/|website=www.biot.gov.io|publisher=BIOT Administration|access-date=16 June 2020}}</ref> |
|||
===Conservation=== |
|||
[[File:Salomons Atoll in the Chagos.jpg|thumb|Salomons Atoll|alt=]] |
|||
The territory is part of the [[International Whaling Commission]]'s 1979 [[Indian Ocean Whale Sanctuary]].<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|47}} The [[Ramsar Convention]] was extended to the BIOT on 8 September 1998, and application for non-military areas of Diego Garcia began on 4 July 2001.<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|47–48}} BIOT is also subject to [[CITES]], the [[Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species]], and the [[Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer]].<ref name="Sand2018"/>{{rp|48}} |
|||
On 1 April 2010, the [[Chagos Marine Protected Area]] (MPA) was declared to cover the waters around the Chagos Archipelago. Mauritius objected, stating this was contrary to its legal rights, and on 18 March 2015, the [[Permanent Court of Arbitration]] ruled that the MPA was illegal under the [[United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea]], as Mauritius had legally binding rights to fish in the waters surrounding the archipelago, to an eventual return of the archipelago, and to the preservation of any minerals or oil discovered in or near the archipelago prior to its return.<ref name=guardian-20150319>{{Cite news|last1=Bowcott|first1=Owen|last2=Jones|first2=Sam|date=19 March 2015|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/19/un-ruling-raises-hope-of-return-for-exiled-chagos-islanders|title=UN ruling raises hope of return for exiled Chagos islanders|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=29 March 2015}}</ref><ref name=cga-pressrelease>{{Cite web|url=http://www.pca-cpa.org/showfile.asp?fil_id=2901|title=Chagos Marine Protected Area arbitration (Mauritius v. United Kingdom) (Press Release and Summary of Award)|publisher=[[Permanent Court of Arbitration]]|date=19 March 2015|access-date=29 March 2015|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402064110/http://www.pca-cpa.org/showfile.asp?fil_id=2901|archive-date=2 April 2015}}</ref> |
|||
The MPA's declaration doubled the total area of environmental no-take zones worldwide. The benefits of protecting this area are described as follows: |
|||
*Providing an [[Natural environment|environmental]] benchmark for other areas (unlike the rest of the world, the BIOT has been relatively untouched by man's actions); |
|||
*Providing a natural laboratory to help understand [[climate change]]; |
|||
*An opportunity for research related to [[marine science]], [[biodiversity]], and climate change; |
|||
*Acting as a reserve for species in danger in other areas; and |
|||
*Providing an export supply of surplus juveniles, larvae, seeds, and spores to help with output in neighbouring areas.<ref name="nsmc">{{Cite web|author=North Sea Marine Cluster|title=Managing Marine Protected Areas|url=http://nsmc.eu.com/Marine-Protected-Areas-Report-3.pdf|publisher=NSMC|date=2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130530213720/http://nsmc.eu.com/Marine-Protected-Areas-Report-3.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=30 May 2013|access-date=5 February 2013}}</ref> |
|||
The area had already been declared an Environmental (Preservation and Protection) Zone, but since the establishment of the MPA, fishing has no longer been permitted in the area. |
|||
The BIOT Administration has facilitated several visits to the territory by the eldest Chagossians, and environmental training for UK-based Chagossians that allows some to become involved in scientific work (alongside visiting scientists).<ref>{{Cite web|title=BIOT history|url=https://biot.gov.io/about/history/|website=biot.gov.io|publisher=BIOT Administration|access-date=16 June 2020}}</ref> |
|||
The islands are surrounded by very productive fisheries.<ref name="Hardy2023"/>{{rp|64}} As the BIOT EEZ is patrolled by only one dedicated vessel, the ''Grampian Frontier'', it is difficult to monitor [[Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing|illegal fishing]]. A rise in illegal fishing in the early 2020s led to a decrease in sharks, and the Royal Navy ship [[HMS Tamar (P233)|HMS ''Tamar'']] was sent to assist with monitoring efforts.<ref name="MaritimeExecutive2023"/> |
|||
==Demographics== |
|||
The British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004 states that "no person has the right of abode" in the territory as it "was constituted and is set aside to be available for the defence purposes of the [[Government of the United Kingdom]] and the [[federal government of the United States|Government of the United States of America]]", and accordingly, "no person is entitled to enter or be present in the Territory except as authorised" by its laws. |
|||
As there is no permanent population, or census, information on the demographics of the territory is limited; the size of the population is related to its offensive requirements. [[Diego Garcia]], with a land area of {{Convert|27|km2|abbr=off}}, is the only inhabited island in the territory, and therefore has an estimated average population density of around 110 persons per km<sup>2</sup>. |
|||
Diego Garcia's population is normally limited to official visitors and military-essential personnel only, and family members are not authorised to travel to Diego Garcia (the island therefore has no schools). Personnel may not travel to the island for leave, but they may transit through Diego Garcia to connect with follow-on flights.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Visitor information|url=https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrj/installations/nsf_diego_garcia/about/installation_guide/visitor_information.html|website=cnic.navy.mil|publisher=[[US Navy]]|access-date=18 June 2020}}</ref> The population in 1995 was estimated to be approximately 3,300; i.e. 1,700 UK and US military personnel and 1,500 civilian contractors. The total population was reportedly 4,000 persons in 2006, of whom 2,200 were US military personnel or contractors, 1,400 were [[Overseas Filipino Worker]] contract staff, 300 were Mauritian contract staff, and 100 were members of the [[British Armed Forces]].{{Citation needed|date=August 2020}} The population had decreased to around 3,000 persons in 2018.<ref name="CIA"/> [[List of countries by population (United Nations)|United Nations population statistics]] indicate that island's population is comparable to that of the Falkland Islands. The remainder of the archipelago is ordinarily uninhabited. |
|||
===Marooned asylum seekers=== |
|||
In October 2021, 89 [[Sri Lankan Tamils]], including 20 children, who were traveling from India to Canada in a vessel which ran into distress, were intercepted and escorted to Diego Garcia by the British military. After more than seven months without a resolution to their situation on the island, 42 of them started a hunger strike. London [[solicitor]]s for 81 of them say they have been given no information about how they may claim international protection, or how long they will be kept on Diego Garcia.<ref name=guardian-20220520>{{Cite news|last=Siddique|first=Haroon|date=20 May 2022|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/20/tamil-refugees-detained-by-uk-on-chagos-islands-go-on-hunger-strike|title=Tamil refugees detained by UK on Chagos Islands go on hunger strike|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=20 May 2022}}</ref> |
|||
On 10 April 2022, a further 30 asylum seekers rescued from a second vessel joined the 89 Sri Lankans, who are being kept in a tented fenced-in camp.<ref name=aljazeera-20220520>{{Cite news|last=Goldberg|first=Jacob|date=20 May 2022|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/5/20/asylum-seekers-stuck-on-diego-garcia-start-hunger-strike|title=Asylum seekers stuck on Diego Garcia start hunger strike|website=AlJazeera.com|access-date=10 June 2022}}</ref><ref name=c4n-20220610>{{Cite news|last=Israel|first=Simon|date=10 June 2022|url=https://www.channel4.com/news/sri-lankans-stranded-in-diego-garcia-after-rescue-from-sinking-boat|title=Sri Lankans stranded in Diego Garcia after rescue from sinking|publisher=[[Channel 4 News]]|location=London, England|access-date=10 June 2022}}</ref> On 25 October 2022, the British government stated it "remains committed to supporting their departure" and they "will not be permitted to make a claim for asylum in the UK".<ref name=parliament-20221025>{{cite web |url=https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-10-19/67039 |title=Diego Garcia: Asylum |last=Norman |first=Jesse |publisher=UK Parliament |id=UIN 67039 |date=25 October 2022 |access-date=1 November 2022}}</ref> |
|||
Further small boats with Tamil refugees that ran into difficulties were escorted to Diego Garcia, where repairs were made, and they were permitted to leave. One boat carrying 46 people went on to the French territory of [[Réunion]].<ref name=guardian-20221016>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/16/diego-garcia-uk-accused-tamil-refugees-at-risk-indian-ocean |title=UK accused of putting Tamil refugees at risk in Indian Ocean |last=Siddique |first=Haroon |newspaper=The Guardian |date=16 October 2022 |access-date=1 November 2022}}</ref><ref name=infomigrants-20221019>{{cite news |url=http://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/44098/uk-plans-to-deport-tamil-refugees-on-british-territory-in-rwandastyle-plan |title=UK plans to deport Tamil refugees on British territory in Rwanda-style plan |last=Mellersh |first=Natasha |website=InfoMigrants |date=19 October 2022 |access-date=1 November 2022}}</ref> |
|||
The BIOT commissioner ruled that the group that had arrived in October 2021 could be lawfully returned to [[Sri Lanka]]. Ten group members challenged this decision in the BIOT Supreme Court, on the basis that the decision-making process was flawed, and were granted a [[judicial review]] that was due to be heard in September 2023. Shortly before the judicial review hearing, lawyers representing the commissioner withdrew all the decisions, and the commissioner agreed to reassess each protection claim using reviewers not previously involved in the cases. The solicitor for eight of the group said: "Our clients are relieved that the BIOT commissioner has finally agreed to withdraw the unlawful decisions to forcibly return them to Sri Lanka where they face risk of torture and persecution."<ref name=guardian-20230925>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/sep/25/tamil-refugees-diego-garcia-win-fight-against-forcible-return-sri-lanka |title=Tamil refugees on Diego Garcia win fight against forcible return to Sri Lanka |last=Taylor |first=Diane |newspaper=The Guardian |date=25 September 2023 |access-date=25 September 2023}}</ref><ref name=biotsc-20230925>{{cite web |url=https://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/BIOT-SC-No1-2023_.pdf |title=The King v The Commissioner for the British Indian Ocean Territory – Consent Order |id=BIOT/SC/No.l/2023 and BIOT/SC/No.2/2023 |publisher=Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory |date=25 September 2023 |access-date=27 September 2023}}</ref> |
|||
The asylum seekers live in tents in a fenced camp of approximately 100 m × 140 m ({{convert|14000|sqm|ha|abbr=on|disp=or}}), which they cannot leave without a security escort. "Most of the children have never left the camp other than infrequent visits to the beach under security escort" a report by a UN agency says. There have been reports of sexual assault (by other asylum seekers), self-harm and suicide attempts. As of February 2024, there were 61 people in the camp.<ref>{{cite web |title=Diego Garcia: The tropical island 'hell' for dozens of stranded migrants |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65777863 |website=BBC |access-date=19 February 2024 |date=11 June 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Diego Garcia asylum seekers feel unsafe on remote British island territory |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-68326365 |website=BBC |access-date=19 February 2024 |date=18 February 2024}}</ref> |
|||
In December 2024, Judge Margaret Obi of the BIOT Supreme Court ruled that twelve of the asylum seekers had been unlawfully detained.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgpe7721qwo|title=UK unlawfully detained migrants on Diego Garcia, judge finds|first=Alice|last=Cuddy|publisher=BBC News|date=17 December 2024|access-date=18 December 2024}}</ref> |
|||
==Economy== |
|||
[[File:Street in Diego Garcia.jpg|thumb|Street in Diego Garcia. Traffic drives on the right, unlike other British territories, except for Gibraltar|alt=]] |
|||
All economic activity is concentrated on [[Diego Garcia]], where [[British Forces British Indian Ocean Territories|joint UK/US defence facilities]] are located. Construction projects and the operation of various services needed to support the military installations are carried out by military, and contract employees from Britain, Mauritius, the [[Philippines]], and the United States. There are no industrial or agricultural activities on the islands. Until the creation of the marine sanctuary, the licensing of [[Fishing industry|commercial fishing]] provided an annual income of about [[US$]]1 million for the territory.<ref name="hansard">{{Cite hansard|house=House of Commons|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmhansrd/vo040621/text/40621w13.htm#40621w13.html_sbhd2|title=British Indian Ocean Territories|date=21 June 2004|column=1219W}}</ref> |
|||
===Services=== |
|||
The Navy Morale, Welfare and Recreation (MWR) section provides several facilities on Diego Garcia, including a library, outdoor cinema, shops, and sports centres, with prices in [[US dollar]]s. The BIOT Post Office provides outbound postal services, and postage stamps have been issued for the territory since 17 January 1968. As the territory was originally part of Mauritius and the Seychelles, these stamps were denominated in [[Seychellois rupee|rupees]] until 1992, after which were issued in denominations of [[pound sterling]], the territory's official currency. Basic medical services are provided, with the option of [[medical evacuation]] where required, and the territory has no schools.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Feasibility study for the resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory, Volume 1|url=http://qna.files.parliament.uk/ws-attachments/178757/original/Feasibility%20study%20for%20the%20resettlement%20of%20the%20British%20Indian%20Ocean%20Territory%20Volume%201.pdf|website=Parliament.uk|publisher=KPMG|access-date=18 June 2020|date=31 January 2015}}</ref> |
|||
===Telecommunications=== |
|||
[[Cable & Wireless plc|Cable & Wireless]] started operating telecommunications services in 1982, under licence from the British government. In April 2013, the company was acquired by the [[Batelco]] Group, and Cable & Wireless (Diego Garcia) Ltd subsequently changed its name to Sure (Diego Garcia) Ltd; Sure International is the corporate division of the business. |
|||
Due to its geographic location in proximity to the [[Equator]], with unobstructed views to the horizon, Diego Garcia has access to a relatively large number of [[geosynchronous]] satellites over the Indian and eastern Atlantic Oceans, and the island is home to Diego Garcia Station (DGS), a remote tracking station making up part of the [[United States Space Force]]'s [[Satellite Control Network]] (SCN); the station has two sides to provide enhanced tracking capabilities for AFSCN users.<ref>{{Cite web|title=20th Space Control Squadron, Det 2|url=https://www.peterson.af.mil/About/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/1060320/20th-space-control-squadron-det-2/|website=Peterson.af.mil|publisher=[[US Air Force]]|access-date=17 June 2020}}</ref> |
|||
In spring 2022, Diego Garcia was connected to a fiber-optic [[submarine communications cable]], as a spur to the new commercial [[Oman Australia Cable]] connecting [[Perth]] to [[Muscat]], which ran near the island. The cable also has a spur to Australia's [[Cocos Islands]] which has an [[Cocos (Keeling) Islands Airport|airfield]] due to support maritime patrol aircraft. The cable cost $300 million, with the U.S. DOD contributing about a third of the cost.<ref name=reuters-20230706>{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/us-china-tech-subcom/ |title=Inside the subsea cable firm secretly helping America take on China |last=Brock |first=Joe |publisher=Reuters |url-access=limited |date=6 July 2023 |access-date=20 November 2023}}</ref> |
|||
===Broadcasting=== |
|||
The territory has three FM radio broadcast stations; provided by the [[American Forces Network]] (AFN) and [[British Forces Broadcasting Service]] (BFBS). [[Amateur radio]] operations occur from Diego Garcia, using the British callsign [[ITU prefix - amateur and experimental stations|prefix]] VQ9. An amateur club station, VQ9X, was sponsored by the US Navy for use by operators both licensed in their home country and possessing a VQ9 callsign issued by the local British Indian Ocean Territory representative.<ref>{{Cite web|author=Arneson, Larry (VQ9LA)|title=VQ9X Club Station|url=http://www.qsl.net/vq9la/2.htm|work=QSL.NET|access-date=20 September 2013}}</ref> The navy closed the station in early 2013, and any future licensed amateurs wishing to operate from the island would therefore have had to provide their own antenna and radio equipment.<ref>{{Cite web|title=(Post of) May 24, 2013|url=https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=653189054707236&id=148071511885662|work=Official VQ9X Facebook page|access-date=20 September 2013|author=Arneson, Larry (VQ9LA)}}</ref> |
|||
===.io domain name=== |
|||
The [[.io]] (Indian Ocean) [[country-code top-level domain]] was delegated by the [[Internet Assigned Numbers Authority]] (IANA) to British entrepreneur [[Paul Kane (entrepreneur)|Paul Kane]] in 1997, and was operated for private benefit under the trade name 'Internet Computer Bureau' from 1997 until 2017.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Bridle|first=James|title=.IO: British Indian Ocean Territory|url=http://citizen-ex.com/stories/io|publisher=Citizen Ex|access-date=2 August 2021}}</ref> In April 2017, Paul Kane sold the Internet Computer Bureau holding company to privately held domain name registry services provider [[Afilias]] for [[US$]]70 million in cash.<ref name=domainincite>{{Cite web|last=Murphy|first=Kevin|date=9 November 2018|title=Afilias bought .io for $70 million|url=http://domainincite.com/23650-afilias-bought-io-for-70-million|publisher=Domain Incite|access-date=13 August 2020}}</ref> |
|||
In July 2021, the [[Chagos Refugee Group|Chagos Refugees Group UK]] submitted a complaint to the Irish government against Paul Kane and Afilias, seeking repatriation of the .io domain, and payment of back royalties from the $7m per year in revenue generated by the domain.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Levy|first=Jonathan|title=Complaint filed against Afilias Ltd. (Ireland) including its subsidiaries 101domain GRS Limited (Ireland), Internet Computer Bureau Limited (England & British Indian Ocean Territory), in respect of OECD guidelines violations in operation of ccTLD .io, before the Ireland OECD national contact point|url=http://www.jlevy.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/OECD-July-28-2021-Afilias-Ltd.pdf|publisher=Chagos Refugees Group UK|access-date=2 August 2021}}</ref> |
|||
==Sports== |
|||
The [[Chagos Islands national football team]], started by the descendants of exiled Chagossians, has represented the islands in [[non-FIFA competitions]], including the [[2016 CONIFA World Football Cup]].<ref name="BBC Sport 2022">{{cite web | title=The team representing a lost homeland, 6,000 miles away | website=BBC Sport | date=6 July 2022 | url=https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/61998551 | access-date=5 April 2024}}</ref> |
|||
==See also== |
|||
{{Portal|Geography|Asia|<!--Indian Ocean-->|United Kingdom|<!--British Indian Ocean Territory-->}} |
|||
*[[British Overseas Territories]] |
|||
*[[Chagos Archipelago sovereignty dispute]] |
|||
*[[Index of United Kingdom–related articles]] |
|||
*''[[Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965]]'' |
|||
*[[List of sovereign states and dependent territories in the Indian Ocean]] |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
'''Citations''' |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
'''Further reading''' |
|||
*{{Cite book|last1=Wenban-Smith|first1=N|last2=Carter|first2= M.|date=2016|title=Chagos: A History, Exploration, Exploitation, Expulsion|location=[[London]], England|publisher=Chagos Conservation Trust|isbn=978-0-9954596-0-1}} |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{ |
{{Commons category|British Indian Ocean Territory}} |
||
{{ |
{{Wiktionary|British Indian Ocean Territory}} |
||
{{Wikivoyage|British Indian Ocean Territory}} |
|||
* [http://www.chagos-trust.org/ The Chagos Conservation Trust - A non political charity whose aims are to promote conservation, scientific and historical research, and to advance education concerning the archipelago.] |
|||
* [http://www.letthemreturn.com/ Let Them Return - The Chagos People's Homeland Campaign] |
|||
* [http://www.diegogarciaonline.com/ Diego Garcia Online: Information for the Diego Garcia, BIOT population.] |
|||
* [http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1007029394365&a=KCountryProfile&aid=1018952687077 UK Foreign Office- profile] |
|||
*{{CIA World Factbook link|io|British Indian Ocean Territory}} |
|||
* [http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=diego_garcia Diego Garcia] timeline posted at the History Commons |
|||
* [http://www.dg.navy.mil/ US Military Site on Diego Garcia] |
|||
*[http://www.law.northwestern.edu/journals/jihr/v5/n1/4/Nauvel.pdf A Return from Exile in Sight? The Chagossians and their Struggle, from the ''Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights''] |
|||
*[http://ec.europa.eu/development/geographical/regionscountries/countries/country_profile.cfm?cid=io&type=short&lng=en EU Relations with British Indian Ocean Territory] |
|||
;''Official websites'' |
|||
{{Template group |
|||
*[https://biot.gov.io British Indian Ocean Territory Administration] – official website |
|||
|title = Geographic locale |
|||
*[https://www.gov.uk/government/world/british-indian-ocean-territory/news British Indian Ocean Territory] – British government site |
|||
|list = |
|||
*[https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/british-indian-ocean-territory British Indian Ocean Territory] – British travel advice |
|||
{{Countries of Africa}} |
|||
*[https://biot.gov.io/wp-content/uploads/British_Indian_Ocean_Territory_Map.jpg British Indian Ocean Territory – official map] |
|||
*[https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrj/installations/nsf_diego_garcia.html Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia] – US Navy website |
|||
*[https://www.youtube.com/user/NSFDGPAO Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia] – YouTube |
|||
*[https://www.facebook.com/NSFDG Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia] – Facebook |
|||
*[https://www.ctbto.org/verification-regime/featured-stations/types/hydroacoustic/ha08-british-indian-ocean-territory-biotchagos-archipelago-united-kingdom Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty station, Diego Garcia] |
|||
*[http://www.biotpostoffice.com/index.asp BIOT Post Office] |
|||
;''Chagossian campaign'' |
|||
*[https://www.chagossupport.org.uk UK Chagos Support Association] |
|||
*[http://www.letusreturnusa.org Let Us Return USA – US Chagossian Support Group] |
|||
*[http://www.law.northwestern.edu/journals/jihr/v5/n1/4/Nauvel.pdf Christian Nauvel, "A Return from Exile in Sight? The Chagossians and their Struggle" (2006) 5 ''Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights'' 96–126] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110302222704/http://www.law.northwestern.edu/journals/jihr/v5/n1/4/Nauvel.pdf |date=2 March 2011 }} (retrieved 9 May 2011). |
|||
;''Others'' |
|||
*[https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/British_Indian_Ocean_Territory_(Constitution)_Order_2004 British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004] |
|||
*[http://www.chagos-trust.org Chagos Conservation Trust] – a non-political charity whose aims are to promote conservation, scientific and historical research, and to advance education concerning the archipelago |
|||
*[https://www.sure.io Sure Diego Garcia] – telecommunications company, Diego Garcia |
|||
*[http://www.diegogarciaonline.com Diego Garcia Online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190714193308/http://www.diegogarciaonline.com/ |date=14 July 2019 }} – information for Diego Garcia population |
|||
*[https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/british-indian-ocean-territory/ British Indian Ocean Territory] – ''[[The World Factbook]]'', [[Central Intelligence Agency]]. |
|||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20081229033328/http://ec.europa.eu/development/geographical/regionscountries/countries/country_profile.cfm?cid=io&type=short&lng=en EU relations with British Indian Ocean Territory] (archived) |
|||
*[http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=diego_garcia Diego Garcia] – timeline posted at the History Commons {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101230022139/http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=diego_garcia|date=30 December 2010}} |
|||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20090912153847/http://www.britlink.org/chagos.html Chagos Islands (BIOT) at Britlink] – British Islands & Territories (archived) |
|||
*[https://govmu.org/EN/Pages/AboutChagos.aspx About Chagos Archipelago in Governenment of Mauritius website] |
|||
{{Geographic location |
|||
|Centre = {{Flag|British Indian Ocean Territory}}, {{Flag|United Kingdom}} |
|||
|North = ''[[Indian Ocean]]''<br>[[Addu Atoll|Addu]], {{Flag|Maldives}} |
|||
|Northeast= ''[[Indian Ocean]]''<br>{{Flag|West Sumatra}}, {{Flag|Indonesia}} |
|||
|East = ''[[Indian Ocean]]''<br>{{Flag|Bengkulu}}, {{Flag|Indonesia}} |
|||
|Southeast= ''[[Indian Ocean]]''<br>{{Flag|Cocos (Keeling) Islands}}, {{Flag|Australia}} |
|||
|South = ''[[Indian Ocean]]''<br>{{Flag|French Southern and Antarctic Lands}}, {{Flag|France}} |
|||
|Southwest= ''[[Indian Ocean]]''<br>{{Flagicon image|Flag of Rodrigues.svg}} [[Rodrigues]], {{Flag|Mauritius}} |
|||
|West = ''[[Indian Ocean]]''<br>[[La Digue and Inner Islands]], {{Flag|Seychelles}} |
|||
|Northwest= ''[[Indian Ocean]]'' |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Navboxes |
|||
|title=Geographic locale |
|||
|list= |
|||
{{Countries and territories bordering the Indian Ocean}} |
{{Countries and territories bordering the Indian Ocean}} |
||
{{Countries of Asia}} |
|||
{{coord|6|00|S|71|30|E|display=title}} |
|||
{{Countries and Territories of South Asia}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Navboxes |
|||
{{Template group |
|||
|title |
|title=International membership |
||
|list |
|list= |
||
{{British dependencies}} |
{{British dependencies}} |
||
{{ |
{{British overseas territories}} |
||
{{Outlying territories of European countries}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Chagos Islands dispute}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:British Indian Ocean Territory| ]] |
[[Category:British Indian Ocean Territory| ]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Chagos Archipelago]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:British Overseas Territories|Indian Ocean]] |
||
[[Category:Indian Ocean |
[[Category:Island countries of the Indian Ocean]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Dependent territories in Asia]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Disputed islands]] |
||
[[Category:English-speaking countries and territories]] |
|||
[[Category:States and territories established in 1965]] |
|||
[[Category:Space Shuttle landing sites]] |
|||
[[Category:Disputed territories in Asia]] |
[[Category:Disputed territories in Asia]] |
||
[[Category:Territorial disputes of the United Kingdom]] |
[[Category:Territorial disputes of the United Kingdom]] |
||
[[Category:Territorial disputes of the Maldives]] |
|||
[[Category:Territorial disputes of Mauritius]] |
|||
<!--Other languages--> |
|||
[[Category:South Asian countries]] |
|||
[[Category:States and territories established in 1965]] |
|||
[[ace:Wilayah Inggréh di Samudra Hindia]] |
|||
[[Category:1965 establishments in Asia]] |
|||
[[af:Britse Indiese Oseaan Gebied]] |
|||
[[Category:1965 establishments in the United Kingdom]] |
|||
[[ar:إقليم المحيط الهندي البريطاني]] |
|||
[[Category:English-speaking countries and territories]] |
|||
[[an:Territorio Britanico de l'Ozián Indico]] |
|||
[[be-x-old:Брытанская тэрыторыя ў Індыйскім акіяне]] |
|||
[[bs:Britanski teritorij Indijskog okeana]] |
|||
[[bg:Британска индоокеанска територия]] |
|||
[[ca:Territori Britànic de l'Oceà Índic]] |
|||
[[cs:Britské indickooceánské území]] |
|||
[[de:Britisches Territorium im Indischen Ozean]] |
|||
[[et:Briti India ookeani ala]] |
|||
[[el:Βρετανικό Έδαφος Ινδικού Ωκεανού]] |
|||
[[es:Territorio Británico del Océano Índico]] |
|||
[[eo:Brita Hindoceana Teritorio]] |
|||
[[hif:British Indian Ocean Territory]] |
|||
[[fr:Territoire britannique de l'océan Indien]] |
|||
[[gl:Territorio Británico do Océano Índico]] |
|||
[[ko:영국령 인도양 지역]] |
|||
[[hi:ब्रिटिश हिंद महासागर क्षेत्र]] |
|||
[[hr:Britanski indijskooceanski teritoriji]] |
|||
[[id:Teritorial Britania di Samudra Hindia]] |
|||
[[is:Bresku Indlandshafseyjar]] |
|||
[[it:Territorio britannico dell'oceano Indiano]] |
|||
[[he:הטריטוריה הבריטית באוקיינוס ההודי]] |
|||
[[ka:ბრიტანეთის ინდოეთის ოკეანის ტერიტორია]] |
|||
[[sw:Eneo la Uingereza katika Bahari Hindi]] |
|||
[[lv:Britu Indijas Okeāna Teritorija]] |
|||
[[lt:Indijos Vandenyno Britų Sritis]] |
|||
[[hu:Brit Indiai-óceáni Terület]] |
|||
[[mr:ब्रिटीश हिंदी महासागर क्षेत्र]] |
|||
[[ms:Wilayah Lautan Hindi British]] |
|||
[[nl:Brits Territorium in de Indische Oceaan]] |
|||
[[ja:イギリス領インド洋地域]] |
|||
[[no:Det britiske territoriet i Indiahavet]] |
|||
[[pl:Brytyjskie Terytorium Oceanu Indyjskiego]] |
|||
[[pt:Território Britânico do Oceano Índico]] |
|||
[[ro:Teritoriul Britanic din Oceanul Indian]] |
|||
[[ru:Британская территория в Индийском океане]] |
|||
[[simple:British Indian Ocean Territory]] |
|||
[[sk:Britské indickooceánske územie]] |
|||
[[sl:Britansko ozemlje v Indijskem oceanu]] |
|||
[[sr:Британска територија Индијског океана]] |
|||
[[sh:Britanski teritorij Indijskog oceana]] |
|||
[[fi:Brittiläinen Intian valtameren alue]] |
|||
[[sv:Brittiska territoriet i Indiska oceanen]] |
|||
[[ta:பிரித்தானிய இந்தியப் பெருங்கடல் மண்டலம்]] |
|||
[[th:บริติชอินเดียนโอเชียนเทร์ริทอรี]] |
|||
[[tr:Britanya Hint Okyanusu Toprakları]] |
|||
[[uk:Британська територія в Індійському океані]] |
|||
[[vi:Lãnh thổ Ấn Độ Dương thuộc Anh]] |
|||
[[yo:British Indian Ocean Territory]] |
|||
[[zh:英屬印度洋領地]] |
Latest revision as of 11:10, 9 January 2025
British Indian Ocean Territory | |
---|---|
Motto: | |
Anthem: "God Save the King" | |
Sovereign state | United Kingdom |
Capital and settlement | Administered from London Local government from Camp Thunder Cove 7°18′S 72°24′E / 7.300°S 72.400°E |
Official languages | English |
Ethnic groups (2001) |
|
Government | Directly administered dependency under a constitutional monarchy |
• Monarch | Charles III |
Nishi Dholakia[1] | |
• Administrator | Bob Fairweather[1] |
Government of the United Kingdom | |
• Minister | Stephen Doughty |
Area | |
• Total | 54 km2 (21 sq mi) |
• Water (%) | 99.89 |
• Land | 60 km2 (23 sq mi) |
Population | |
• Non-permanent 2018 estimate | c. 3,000 military personnel and contractors |
• Permanent | 0 |
• Density | 50.0/km2 (129.5/sq mi) |
Currency |
|
Time zone | UTC+06:00 |
Mains electricity | 230 Volt, 50 Hertz |
Driving side | Right |
Calling code | +246 |
UK postcode | BBND 1ZZ |
ISO 3166 code | IO |
Internet TLD | .io |
Website | biot.gov.io |
The British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) is an Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom situated in the Indian Ocean, halfway between Tanzania and Indonesia. The territory comprises the seven atolls of the Chagos Archipelago with over 1,000 individual islands, many very small, amounting to a total land area of 60 square kilometres (23 square miles).[3] The largest and most southerly island is Diego Garcia, 27 square kilometres (10 square miles), the site of a Joint Military Facility of the United Kingdom and the United States.[6] Official administration is remote from London,[7][8] though the local capital is often regarded as being on Diego Garcia.[9]
The only inhabitants are British and United States military personnel, and associated contractors, who collectively number around 3,000 (2018 figures).[3] The forced removal of Chagossians from the Chagos Archipelago occurred between 1968 and 1973. The Chagossians, then numbering about 2,000 people, were expelled by the British government to Mauritius and Seychelles, even from the outlying islands far away from the military base on Diego Garcia. Today, the Chagossians are still trying to return, but the British government has repeatedly denied them the right of return despite calls from numerous human rights organisations to let them.[10][11] The islands are off-limits to Chagossians, tourists, and the media.
Since the 1980s, the Government of Mauritius sought to gain control over the Chagos Archipelago, which was separated from the then Crown Colony of Mauritius by the UK in 1965 to form the British Indian Ocean Territory. A February 2019 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice called for the islands to be given to Mauritius. Afterward, both the United Nations General Assembly and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea reached similar decisions. Negotiations between the UK and Mauritius began in November 2022, and culminated in an October 2024 understanding that the UK would cede the territory to Mauritius for possible resettlement while retaining the joint US-UK military base on Diego Garcia.[12] However, newly-elected Mauritius prime minister Navin Ramgoolam rejected the proposed agreement and asked for talks to reopen in December 2024.[13]
History
[edit]Maldivian mariners knew of the Chagos Islands, which were known as Fōlhavahi in the northern Maldives, and Hollhavai in the southern Maldives. Hollhavai also referred to other islands scattered throughout the Indian Ocean, such as the Seychelles. According to Southern Maldivian oral tradition, traders and fishermen were occasionally lost at sea and got stranded on one of the islands of the Chagos. Eventually they were rescued and brought back home. The coconut crabs of the islands may have inspired Maldivian folklore about giant hermit crabs. These islands were judged to be too far away from the seat of the Maldivian crown to be settled permanently by them. Thus, for many centuries the Chagos were ignored by their northern neighbours.[14]
Early settlement
[edit]The islands of Chagos Archipelago were charted by Vasco da Gama in the early 16th century, and then claimed in the 18th century by France as a possession of Mauritius. They were first settled in the 18th century by African slaves and Indian contractors brought by Franco-Mauritians to found coconut plantations.[15] At some point Diego Garcia hosted a leper colony for patients from Mauritius, who were treated with turtle oil.[16] In 1810, Mauritius was captured by the United Kingdom, and France subsequently ceded the territory in the Treaty of Paris in 1814.
The United Kingdom abolished slavery in 1833, although those on what would become the BIOT continued work as indentured labour. In 1883 the plantations were bought by the Société Huilière de Diego et Peros. As of 1900 there were 426 families on the islands, 60 percent descended from the original African-Malagasy slaves, and 40% descended from South Asians brought over as indentured labour. Chagossian creole developed as a common language.[17] The lives of the population remained effectively controlled by the company, a system which persisted until the 1960s.[18]: 62
An airstrip was built on Diego Garcia during the Second World War along with other military facilities. Military forces left once the war ended. In 1962 the plantations were bought by Chagos-Agalega Company, based in the Seychelles. At this time they covered 3,000 hectares (7,400 acres).[17]
Formation
[edit]The descendants of those brought to the islands to farm coconuts had developed into the Chagossian people.[17] There are no official population figures, but an estimate from 1968 found 866 inhabitants: 336 in Diego Garcia, 162 in the Salomon islands, and 168 in Peros Banhos. The vital statistics were likely similar to other Indian Ocean islands. The birth rate on the Chagos archipelago was probably around 48 in every 1000. The birth rate for the former Seychellois islands was nominally lower, likely due to inhabitants more easily able to travel to the Seychelles for medical needs. Mortality before the age of 1 was around 98 per 1,000 live births. The overall death rate probably averaged under 12 per 1,000 people. Housing was simple, mostly using local wood and coconut leaves, with some imported concrete and corrugated iron. Most water was captured from rain, although there were groundwater wells. The islands at this time produced not only copra from the plantations, but fish, and fruit in the case of the Chagos archipelago. Alcohol was produced for local consumption, from coconut, sugar cane, and other materials. It is likely there was some malnutrition.[16]
Beginning in February 1964, the UK and US began secret talks about a military base in Diego Garcia. The US wanted a territory with no local population, and the islands were lightly inhabited compared to other potential locations.[17] The initial option of Aldabra was dropped due to international interest in its ecosystem.[18]: 65 In 1965, the United Kingdom split the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius and the islands of Aldabra, Farquhar and Desroches (Des Roches) from the Seychelles to form the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT). The purpose was to allow the construction of military facilities for the mutual benefit of the United Kingdom and the United States of America. The islands were formally established as an overseas territory of the United Kingdom on 8 November 1965.[19] While it initially sought for the base to be given on a lease, Mauritius was eventually paid £3 million to compensate for the territory's separation, under pressure due to then-ongoing independence negotiations.[17][18]: 67 (An additional £650,000 was given in 1972, for relocation costs.)[18]: 62
A few weeks after the decision to detach the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 2066 on 16 December 1965, which stated that this detachment of part of the colonial territory of Mauritius was against customary international law as recorded earlier in the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples of 14 December 1960. This stated that "Any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations".[20][21]
Mauritius became an independent Commonwealth realm in March 1968, and subsequently became a republic, also within the Commonwealth, in March 1992.[22]
Expulsion of the Chagossians
[edit]In April 1967, the British government purchased the privately owned copra plantations for £600,000[17] and closed them. Over the next five years, the British authorities removed the entire population of about 2,000 people, known as Chagossians (or Ilois), from Diego Garcia and two other Chagos atolls, Peros Banhos and Salomon Islands, to Mauritius[23] and the Seychelles. The expulsion was carried out by preventing Chogossians who had left from returning from 1967, assisted by the Moulinie and Company (Seychelles), Limited company which the UK had set up to run the plantations. In 1968, when more workers were needed, non-Chagossian temporary workers were allowed in from the Seychelles. The remaining population was removed from Diego Garcia in January 1971, to meet a July 1971 deadline requested by the US. The populations of Peros Banhos and the Salomon Islands were removed starting from June 1972. The population as of 1965 was around 1,360 Chagossians, plus temporary workers from the Seychelles. Another few hundred Chagossians already lived outside of the islands. The UK informed the United Nations that BIOT had no indigenous population, meaning the UK would not have to send reports on the territory to the UN.[17]
In 1971, the United Kingdom and the United States signed a treaty, leasing the island of Diego Garcia to the US military for the purposes of building a large air and naval base on the island. The deal was important to the British government, as the United States granted it a substantial discount on the purchase of Polaris nuclear missiles in return for the use of the islands as a base.[24] The island was strategically located near oil shipping routes, and Iran.[18]: 66 It would counter any Soviet threat in the region.[25]
Development
[edit]As of 1971, the population of Aldabra, Farquhar, and Desroches was 246. This dropped to 155 in 1975, likely reflecting uncertainty about these islands' future status.[16] On 23 June 1976, these islands were returned to the Seychelles, which became independent as a republic on 29 June 1976; the islands now form part of the Outer Islands district of the Seychelles. Subsequently, the territory has consisted only of the six main island groups comprising the Chagos Archipelago.
Work on the military base commenced in 1971, with a large airbase with several long range runways constructed, as well as a harbour suitable for large naval vessels. Although classed as a joint UK/US base, in practice it is primarily staffed by the US military, although the UK maintains a garrison at all times, and Royal Air Force (RAF) long-range patrol aircraft are deployed there.
During the 1980s,[year needed] Mauritius asserted a claim to sovereignty for the territory, citing the 1965 separation as illegal under international law, despite their apparent agreement at the time. The UK did not agree with the legal argument, but agreed to cede the territory to Mauritius when it was no longer required for defence purposes.[26] According to the CIA World Factbook, the Seychelles also had a sovereignty claim on the islands.[27] In 1982, the UK and US agreed waste would be shipped away from the territory.[28]: 49 On 27 December 1984, Mauritius established an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) which included the waters around the BIOT, an action protested by the UK.[28]: 53–54
In 1990, the first BIOT flag was unfurled. This flag, which also contains the Union Jack, has depictions of the Indian Ocean, where the islands are located, in the form of white and blue wavy lines and also a palm tree rising above the British crown.[29] During the Gulf War, 20 nuclear-armed Boeing B-52 Stratofortress bombers were stationed at the base as a nuclear deterrent.[28]: 42 The base was also strategically positioned to support the 2001 War in Afganistan and the 2003 Iraq War.[18]: 66
On 1 October 1991, the UK created the "BIOT Fisheries Conservation and Management Zone (FCMZ)" covering the territorial seas of the BIOT.[28]: 55–56 On 4 December 1995, the UK signed the United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement on behalf of the BIOT, which was protested by Mauritius when it signed in 1997.[28]: 55 Both Mauritius and the United Kingdom agreed to the inclusion of the BIOT within the area covered by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, which was formed in 1996.[28]: 54 In 1996 the Mauritius Marine Conservation Society unsuccessfully sought to have the archipelago declared a World Heritage Site.[28]: 52 Mauritius explicitly extended its ratification of the Nairobi Convention to the Chagos archipelago in 2000, although this had limited practical impact.[28]: 53
The islanders, who now mainly reside in Mauritius and Seychelles, have continually asserted their right to return to Diego Garcia, winning important legal victories in the High Court of England and Wales in 2000, 2006, and 2007. In the High Court and Court of Appeal in 2003 and 2004, the islanders' application for further compensation on top of the £14.5 million value package of compensation they had already received was dismissed by the court.[30] Following the 2000 ruling the British government announced that Chagossians would be permitted to return to the archipelago, aside from Diego Garcia. This position was reversed in 2004, before any had moved. The United Kingdom offered citizenship to some Chagossians starting in 2002.[17]
On 17 September 2003, the UK created the "BIOT Environmental Protection and Conservation Zone (EPCZ)" covering the BIOT's EEZ. This was opposed by Mauritius, which on 5 August 2005 reasserted their declared EEZ surrounding the territory.[28]: 55–56
On 11 May 2006, the High Court ruled that a 2004 Order in Council preventing the Chagossians' resettlement of the islands was unlawful, and consequently that the Chagossians were entitled to return to the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago.[31] On 23 May 2007, this was confirmed by the Court of Appeal.[32] In a visit sponsored by the British government, the islanders visited Diego Garcia and other islands on 3 April 2006 for humanitarian purposes, including the tending of the graves of their ancestors.[33] On 22 October 2008, the British government won an appeal to the House of Lords regarding the royal prerogative used to continue excluding the Chagossians from their homeland.[34][35]
In March 2007 Mauritian president Anerood Jugnauth declared a willingness to take the dispute to the ICJ, and for Mauritius to leave the Commonwealth. In November 2007 a line of communication was established between the Foreign & Commonwealth Office and the Mauritian High Commission for BIOT-related matters.[26]
The British government established the BIOT Marine Protected Area in April 2010, to mixed reactions from Chagossians. While the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office claimed that it was an environmental move as well as a necessary move to improve the coral populations off east Africa, and therefore sub-Saharan marine supplies, some Chagossians claimed that the reserve would prevent any resettlement due to the inability to fish in protected areas. The Chagossian UK-based Diego Garcian Society stated that it welcomed the marine reserve, noting that it was in the interest of Chagossians to have the area protected while they were exiled and that it could be renegotiated upon resettlement. The Foreign Office claimed the reserve was made "without prejudice to the outcome of proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights".[36] (That court's 2012 decision was not in favour of the Islanders anyway.)[37] The protected area covered the territory's EEZ, but not its territorial waters.[28]: 58
International opinion and rulings
[edit]In 2009 Mauritius began negotiating with the Maldives to jointly settle the borders of EEZs in the area. These were unsuccessful, and in 2010 the Maldives submitted a claim that overlapped with both British and Mauritian claims. The Maldives contended that as much of the northern Chagos archipelago was uninhabited, they should not be included in the determination of EEZ baselines.[28]: 57 Arbitration between the UK and Mauritius relating to the creation of the marine protected area began in 2010.[28]: 36 This arbitration was cited by Mauritius to halt an attempt by a coalition of NGOs to have the archipelago declared a World Heritage site in 2012.[28]: 52 In 2015 an UNCLOS tribunal ruled that the creation of a marine protected area violated British obligations.[17] The idea to create a formal protected area was dropped.[18]: 68
The US-UK arrangement which established the territory for defence purposes initially was in place from 1966 to 2016, and has subsequently been renewed to continue until 2036. The announcement was accompanied by a pledge of £40 million in compensation to former residents.[38] The base was seen as important for managing growing Chinese influence in the region.[18]: 67
The formerly obscure sovereignty dispute gained more international recognition as Mauritius obtained the support of other African countries. Brexit deprived the United Kingdom of support from European allies.[39] In May 2017, Mauritius challenged the presence of the UK at a meeting of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission.[28]: 55 On 22 June 2017 the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) voted to refer the issue to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) by 94 to 15. There were 65 abstentions, including British allies such as Canada, France, and Germany.[40][41] In February 2019, the ICJ issued an advisory opinion by 13 votes to 1.[41] In its advisory opinion, the Court concluded that "the process of decolonisation of Mauritius was not lawfully completed when that country acceded to independence", and that "the United Kingdom is under an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible".[42][43] On 22 May 2019, the UNGA adopted a resolution citing the ICJ advisory opinion, affirming that "the Chagos Archipelago forms an integral part of the territory of Mauritius".[44] The motion was approved by a majority vote with 116 member states voting for and 6 against.[44] Votes against included the neighbouring Maldives, possibly concerned about the loss of maritime security benefits that emerge from the military base. The Seychelles benefits similarly, but voted for the resolution in solidarity with the African Union.[45]
On 28 January 2021, the United Nation's International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea ruled, in a dispute between Mauritius and Maldives on their maritime boundary, that the United Kingdom has no sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago, and that Mauritius is sovereign there. The United Kingdom disputes and does not recognise the tribunal's decision.[46][47] As with the ICJ decision, this decision had no legal compulsion, although both contributed to international pressure on the UK.[18]: 61 The Universal Postal Union (UPU), which has jurisdiction over international mail among treaty signatory states, voted in 2021 to ban the use of BIOT postage stamps on mail from BIOT, instead requiring Mauritian stamps to be used.[48]
In February 2022, exiled islanders made their first unsupervised visit to an island in the Chagos Archipelago.[49] The Permanent Representative of Mauritius to the United Nations, Jagdish Koonjul, raised the Mauritian flag on Peros Banhos.[50][51] The main purpose of the 15-day Mauritian expedition is to survey the unclaimed Blenheim Reef, to discover for a forthcoming International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea hearing if it is exposed at high tide so is claimable.[52][53] The chartered Bleu De Nîmes was shadowed by a British fisheries protection vessel.[54]
In October 2021 Sri Lankan Tamil asylum seekers landed on Diego Garcia, and submitted asylum claims. The Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees does not apply to the BIOT. Around 173 arrived in 2021 and 2022. Some were moved to Rwanda, with around 60 left as of January 2024.[17][55] In 2022, a dispute arising from American defence contractor KBR allegedly prohibiting holidays during a period of low flight demand during the COVID-19 pandemic led to 800 Overseas Filipino Workers being unable to leave Diego Garcia.[56]
Post-ICJ negotiations
[edit]Comparisons between the BIOT and occupied areas of Ukraine hindered British diplomatic efforts to obtain Ukrainian support following the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Further pressure grew regarding Africa's "last colony", and in September 2022 British prime minister Liz Truss met with Mauritian prime minister Pravind Jugnauth[57][18]: 60–61 On 3 November 2022, the British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly announced that the UK and Mauritius had decided to begin negotiations on sovereignty over the British Indian Ocean Territory, taking into account international legal proceedings. Both states had agreed to ensure the continued operation of the joint UK/US military base on Diego Garcia.[58][59] The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has argued this change of approach is partly due to strategic shifts in US and UK foreign policies on Asia in response to China's growing power and influence, as disputes with former colonies encourage their deepening relationship with China.[60]
On 3 November 2022, Patrick Wintour of the Guardian reported that the UK and Mauritius had begun negotiations on sovereignty over the British Indian Ocean Territory, taking into account the international legal proceedings.[58] In December 2023, Tony Diver of the Daily Telegraph reported that the British government was planning to discontinue the talks.[61] These negotiations ceased in late 2023 after the UK Defence Secretary blocked the agreement that had been negotiated by the Foreign Office.[61]
On 3 October 2024, British prime minister Keir Starmer and Mauritian prime minister Pravind Jugnauth jointly announced that an agreement had been reached under which the UK would cede sovereignty over the territory. Under the deal, Diego Garcia will be excluded from any resettlement, and the UK will continue to administer the island for at least 99 years.[39][12] Chagos Islanders would be allowed to return to the other islands and a fund will be established to support resettlement.[62]
No debate on the deal had taken place in the Parliament of the United Kingdom due to it being in recess, and the deal attracted criticism from opposition politicians such as James Cleverly,[63] who, as foreign secretary, had initiated the negotiations that took place from November 2022 until December 2023.[61] The announcement was also criticised by the Speaker of the House of Commons, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, who criticised the government for ignoring the constitutional convention that important matters should be announced in the House of Commons first.[64] Some Chagossians have also criticised the deal for not having included the Chagossian community in the decision-making process.[65]
In November 2024 the Maldives staked a surprise claim to the Chagos Islands, challenging ongoing negotiations between the UK and Mauritius over the strategically vital territory.[66]
On 17 December 2024, newly-elected Mauritius prime minister Navin Ramgoolam, rejected the proposed agreement and asked for talks to reopen.[13]
Government
[edit]As a territory of the United Kingdom, the head of state is King Charles III. There is no Governor appointed to represent the King in the territory, as there are no permanent inhabitants (as is also the case in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands and the British Antarctic Territory). The territory is one of eight dependencies in the Indian Ocean, alongside the Ashmore and Cartier Islands, Christmas Island, the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, and Heard Island and McDonald Islands, all Australian possessions; the French Southern and Antarctic Lands, with the French Scattered Islands in the Indian Ocean and its dependencies of Tromelin and the Glorioso Islands; along with French Mayotte and Réunion.
The head of government is the Commissioner, most recently Paul Candler until August 2024; the Deputy Commissioner is Nishi Dholakia, and the Administrator is Emily Ager, and all senior officials reside in the United Kingdom.[67] The Commissioner's Representative in the territory is the officer commanding the detachment of British forces.[68]
The laws of the territory are based on the constitution, currently set out in the British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004, which gives the Commissioner power to make laws for the peace, order and good government of the territory.[69][68][70] If the Commissioner has not made a law on a particular topic then, in most circumstances, the laws that apply in the territory are the same as those that apply in England and Wales under the terms of the Courts Ordinance 1983.[71] There is no legislature (and no elections) as there are no permanent inhabitants, although a small legal system has been established for the jurisdiction. As almost all residents of the BIOT are members of the United States military, in practice, crimes are more commonly charged under United States military law.
Applicable treaties between the United Kingdom and the United States govern the use of the military base. The first exchange of notes, signed on 30 December 1966, constituted an agreement concerning the availability for defence purposes of the British Indian Ocean Territory.[72] This was followed by agreements on the construction of a communications facility (1972), naval support facility (1976), construction contracts[permanent dead link ] (1987), and a monitoring facility (1999). The United States is reportedly required to ask permission[citation needed] of the United Kingdom to use the base for offensive military action.
As the BIOT forms a separate legal jurisdiction to the United Kingdom under British law, many international conventions signed by the United Kingdom were not extended to the BIOT.[28]: 39, 46 These include humanitarian treaties, including the 1951 Refugee Convention and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which makes the legal situation difficult.[73][74] While the UK has joint jurisdiction over the military base, the British government contends that US warships around the base are responsible solely to the US, and thus do not need to meet British treaty obligations.[28]: 43
Naval Party 1002 and MV Grampian Frontier
[edit]Naval Party 1002 (NP 1002) is directly present in the territory, and is composed of both Royal Navy and Royal Marine personnel. NP 1002 is responsible for civil administration and enforcement. Its members are tasked with policing and carrying out customs duties. Royal Marines in the territory also reportedly form a security detachment.[75]
Prior to 2017, the BIOT patrol vessel, MV Pacific Marlin, was based in Diego Garcia. It was operated by the Swire Pacific Offshore Group. The Pacific Marlin patrolled the marine reserve all year, and since the marine reserve was designated in April 2010, the number of apprehensions of illegal vessels within the area has increased. The ship was built in 1978 as an ocean-going tug. It is 57.7 metres (189 feet 4 inches) long, with a draught of 3.8 metres (12 feet 6 inches), and gross tonnage of 1,200 tons. It has a maximum speed of 12.5 knots (23.2 kilometres per hour; 14.4 miles per hour) with an economic speed of 11 knots (20 kilometres per hour; 13 miles per hour), permitting a range of about 18,000 nautical miles (33,000 kilometres; 21,000 miles) and fuel endurance of 68 days. It was the oldest vessel in the Swire fleet.[76] Pacific Marlin reportedly spent about 54% of her taskings on fishery patrol duties, and a further 19% on military patrol duties.[77]
In 2016, a new contract was signed with Scottish-based North Star Shipping for the use of the vessel MV Grampian Frontier[77] (also known as the Grampian Endurance).[78] She is a 70 metres (230 feet) vessel carrying up to 24 personnel, and fulfils both the patrol and research role.[77] The vessel reportedly operates in conjunction with personnel from NP 1002 on both fisheries and military enforcement tasks / exercises, and also carries scientists / researchers involved in a range of research work, particularly conservation.[79] In 2022, Grampian Frontier tracked a Mauritian-charted vessel temporarily bringing Chagossian exiles to Blenheim Reef in the archipelago.[80]
The Royal Navy also maintains two offshore patrol vessels in the Indo-Pacific region, HMS Tamar and HMS Spey. Either may be periodically employed for sovereignty protection and other duties in BIOT waters.[81][82] HMS Tamar paid a rare visit to the islands in February/March 2023 conducting fisheries protection and other missions.[83]
Geography
[edit]The territory is an archipelago of 58 islands covering 56 square kilometres (22 sq mi). The largest island is Diego Garcia, which at 32.5 square kilometres (12.5 sq mi) accounts for about half of the territory's total land area. The rest of the island's are much smaller, with the second largest being just over 3.1 square kilometres (1.2 sq mi).[18]: 65 The terrain is flat and low,[citation needed] with an average elevation of 1.33 metres (4.4 ft) above sea level.[28]: 50 In 2010, 545,000 square kilometres (210,000 square miles) of ocean around the islands was declared a marine reserve.[36]
The British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004 defines the territory as comprising the following islands or groups of islands:
- Diego Garcia
- Three Brothers Islands
- Egmont Islands
- Nelson Island
- Peros Banhos
- Eagle Islands
- Salomon Islands
- Danger Island
These islands and associated coral reefs lie between 4°44 and 7°41 south and 70°47 and 72°47 east.[16]
As indicated above, the territory also included Aldabra, Farquhar and Desroches between 1965 and 1976; the latter group of islands is located north of Madagascar and were annexed from and returned to the Seychelles.
Climate
[edit]The climate is tropical marine; hot, humid, and moderated by trade winds.[84] These winds originate from the southeast from May to November, reversing for the rest of the year. The average temperature is 27 °C (81 °F), and does not vary greatly throughout the year. While rain is common,[16] the territory lies outside of cyclone paths that cross the Indian Ocean further south.[18]: 68 The Diego Garcia military base is the United States military's overseas base most at risk from climate change.[28]: 50
Transport
[edit]In terms of transportation on Diego Garcia, the island has short stretches of paved road between the port and airfield, and on its streets; transport is mostly by bicycle and on foot. The island had many wagonways, which were donkey-hauled narrow gauge railways for the transport of coconut wagons. These are no longer in use and have deteriorated.[85]
Diego Garcia's military base is home to the territory's only airport. At 3,000 metres (9,800 feet) long, the runway is capable of supporting heavy US Air Force bombers such as the B-52, and would have been able to support the Space Shuttle in the event of a mission abort.[86] It also has a major naval seaport,[87] and there is also a marina bus service along the main road of the island.[88]
Yacht crews seeking safe passage across the Indian Ocean may apply for a mooring permit for the uninhabited Outer Islands (beyond Diego Garcia),[89] but must not approach within 3 nautical miles (5.6 kilometres; 3.5 miles), land on, or anchor at islands designated as Strict Nature Reserves, or the nature reserve within the Peros Banhos atoll. Unauthorised vessels or persons are not permitted access to Diego Garcia, and no unauthorised vessel is permitted to approach within three nautical miles of the island.[90]
Conservation
[edit]The territory is part of the International Whaling Commission's 1979 Indian Ocean Whale Sanctuary.[28]: 47 The Ramsar Convention was extended to the BIOT on 8 September 1998, and application for non-military areas of Diego Garcia began on 4 July 2001.[28]: 47–48 BIOT is also subject to CITES, the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species, and the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer.[28]: 48
On 1 April 2010, the Chagos Marine Protected Area (MPA) was declared to cover the waters around the Chagos Archipelago. Mauritius objected, stating this was contrary to its legal rights, and on 18 March 2015, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled that the MPA was illegal under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, as Mauritius had legally binding rights to fish in the waters surrounding the archipelago, to an eventual return of the archipelago, and to the preservation of any minerals or oil discovered in or near the archipelago prior to its return.[91][92]
The MPA's declaration doubled the total area of environmental no-take zones worldwide. The benefits of protecting this area are described as follows:
- Providing an environmental benchmark for other areas (unlike the rest of the world, the BIOT has been relatively untouched by man's actions);
- Providing a natural laboratory to help understand climate change;
- An opportunity for research related to marine science, biodiversity, and climate change;
- Acting as a reserve for species in danger in other areas; and
- Providing an export supply of surplus juveniles, larvae, seeds, and spores to help with output in neighbouring areas.[93]
The area had already been declared an Environmental (Preservation and Protection) Zone, but since the establishment of the MPA, fishing has no longer been permitted in the area.
The BIOT Administration has facilitated several visits to the territory by the eldest Chagossians, and environmental training for UK-based Chagossians that allows some to become involved in scientific work (alongside visiting scientists).[94]
The islands are surrounded by very productive fisheries.[18]: 64 As the BIOT EEZ is patrolled by only one dedicated vessel, the Grampian Frontier, it is difficult to monitor illegal fishing. A rise in illegal fishing in the early 2020s led to a decrease in sharks, and the Royal Navy ship HMS Tamar was sent to assist with monitoring efforts.[78]
Demographics
[edit]The British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004 states that "no person has the right of abode" in the territory as it "was constituted and is set aside to be available for the defence purposes of the Government of the United Kingdom and the Government of the United States of America", and accordingly, "no person is entitled to enter or be present in the Territory except as authorised" by its laws.
As there is no permanent population, or census, information on the demographics of the territory is limited; the size of the population is related to its offensive requirements. Diego Garcia, with a land area of 27 square kilometres (10 square miles), is the only inhabited island in the territory, and therefore has an estimated average population density of around 110 persons per km2. Diego Garcia's population is normally limited to official visitors and military-essential personnel only, and family members are not authorised to travel to Diego Garcia (the island therefore has no schools). Personnel may not travel to the island for leave, but they may transit through Diego Garcia to connect with follow-on flights.[95] The population in 1995 was estimated to be approximately 3,300; i.e. 1,700 UK and US military personnel and 1,500 civilian contractors. The total population was reportedly 4,000 persons in 2006, of whom 2,200 were US military personnel or contractors, 1,400 were Overseas Filipino Worker contract staff, 300 were Mauritian contract staff, and 100 were members of the British Armed Forces.[citation needed] The population had decreased to around 3,000 persons in 2018.[3] United Nations population statistics indicate that island's population is comparable to that of the Falkland Islands. The remainder of the archipelago is ordinarily uninhabited.
Marooned asylum seekers
[edit]In October 2021, 89 Sri Lankan Tamils, including 20 children, who were traveling from India to Canada in a vessel which ran into distress, were intercepted and escorted to Diego Garcia by the British military. After more than seven months without a resolution to their situation on the island, 42 of them started a hunger strike. London solicitors for 81 of them say they have been given no information about how they may claim international protection, or how long they will be kept on Diego Garcia.[96]
On 10 April 2022, a further 30 asylum seekers rescued from a second vessel joined the 89 Sri Lankans, who are being kept in a tented fenced-in camp.[97][98] On 25 October 2022, the British government stated it "remains committed to supporting their departure" and they "will not be permitted to make a claim for asylum in the UK".[99]
Further small boats with Tamil refugees that ran into difficulties were escorted to Diego Garcia, where repairs were made, and they were permitted to leave. One boat carrying 46 people went on to the French territory of Réunion.[100][74]
The BIOT commissioner ruled that the group that had arrived in October 2021 could be lawfully returned to Sri Lanka. Ten group members challenged this decision in the BIOT Supreme Court, on the basis that the decision-making process was flawed, and were granted a judicial review that was due to be heard in September 2023. Shortly before the judicial review hearing, lawyers representing the commissioner withdrew all the decisions, and the commissioner agreed to reassess each protection claim using reviewers not previously involved in the cases. The solicitor for eight of the group said: "Our clients are relieved that the BIOT commissioner has finally agreed to withdraw the unlawful decisions to forcibly return them to Sri Lanka where they face risk of torture and persecution."[101][102]
The asylum seekers live in tents in a fenced camp of approximately 100 m × 140 m (14,000 m2 or 1.4 ha), which they cannot leave without a security escort. "Most of the children have never left the camp other than infrequent visits to the beach under security escort" a report by a UN agency says. There have been reports of sexual assault (by other asylum seekers), self-harm and suicide attempts. As of February 2024, there were 61 people in the camp.[103][104]
In December 2024, Judge Margaret Obi of the BIOT Supreme Court ruled that twelve of the asylum seekers had been unlawfully detained.[105]
Economy
[edit]All economic activity is concentrated on Diego Garcia, where joint UK/US defence facilities are located. Construction projects and the operation of various services needed to support the military installations are carried out by military, and contract employees from Britain, Mauritius, the Philippines, and the United States. There are no industrial or agricultural activities on the islands. Until the creation of the marine sanctuary, the licensing of commercial fishing provided an annual income of about US$1 million for the territory.[106]
Services
[edit]The Navy Morale, Welfare and Recreation (MWR) section provides several facilities on Diego Garcia, including a library, outdoor cinema, shops, and sports centres, with prices in US dollars. The BIOT Post Office provides outbound postal services, and postage stamps have been issued for the territory since 17 January 1968. As the territory was originally part of Mauritius and the Seychelles, these stamps were denominated in rupees until 1992, after which were issued in denominations of pound sterling, the territory's official currency. Basic medical services are provided, with the option of medical evacuation where required, and the territory has no schools.[107]
Telecommunications
[edit]Cable & Wireless started operating telecommunications services in 1982, under licence from the British government. In April 2013, the company was acquired by the Batelco Group, and Cable & Wireless (Diego Garcia) Ltd subsequently changed its name to Sure (Diego Garcia) Ltd; Sure International is the corporate division of the business.
Due to its geographic location in proximity to the Equator, with unobstructed views to the horizon, Diego Garcia has access to a relatively large number of geosynchronous satellites over the Indian and eastern Atlantic Oceans, and the island is home to Diego Garcia Station (DGS), a remote tracking station making up part of the United States Space Force's Satellite Control Network (SCN); the station has two sides to provide enhanced tracking capabilities for AFSCN users.[108]
In spring 2022, Diego Garcia was connected to a fiber-optic submarine communications cable, as a spur to the new commercial Oman Australia Cable connecting Perth to Muscat, which ran near the island. The cable also has a spur to Australia's Cocos Islands which has an airfield due to support maritime patrol aircraft. The cable cost $300 million, with the U.S. DOD contributing about a third of the cost.[109]
Broadcasting
[edit]The territory has three FM radio broadcast stations; provided by the American Forces Network (AFN) and British Forces Broadcasting Service (BFBS). Amateur radio operations occur from Diego Garcia, using the British callsign prefix VQ9. An amateur club station, VQ9X, was sponsored by the US Navy for use by operators both licensed in their home country and possessing a VQ9 callsign issued by the local British Indian Ocean Territory representative.[110] The navy closed the station in early 2013, and any future licensed amateurs wishing to operate from the island would therefore have had to provide their own antenna and radio equipment.[111]
.io domain name
[edit]The .io (Indian Ocean) country-code top-level domain was delegated by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) to British entrepreneur Paul Kane in 1997, and was operated for private benefit under the trade name 'Internet Computer Bureau' from 1997 until 2017.[112] In April 2017, Paul Kane sold the Internet Computer Bureau holding company to privately held domain name registry services provider Afilias for US$70 million in cash.[113]
In July 2021, the Chagos Refugees Group UK submitted a complaint to the Irish government against Paul Kane and Afilias, seeking repatriation of the .io domain, and payment of back royalties from the $7m per year in revenue generated by the domain.[114]
Sports
[edit]The Chagos Islands national football team, started by the descendants of exiled Chagossians, has represented the islands in non-FIFA competitions, including the 2016 CONIFA World Football Cup.[115]
See also
[edit]- British Overseas Territories
- Chagos Archipelago sovereignty dispute
- Index of United Kingdom–related articles
- Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965
- List of sovereign states and dependent territories in the Indian Ocean
References
[edit]Citations
- ^ a b c "Governance". British Indian Ocean Territory. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
- ^ "FCO country profile – British Indian Ocean Territory". Archived from the original on 10 June 2010. Retrieved 27 March 2010.
- ^ a b c d "British Indian Ocean Territory". World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 27 March 2013. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- ^ "British Indian Ocean Territory Currency". GreenwichMeantime.com. Archived from the original on 22 July 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
- ^ "Launch of first commemorative British Indian Ocean Territory coin". coinnews.net. Pobjoy Mint Ltd. 17 May 2009. Retrieved 4 April 2014.
- ^ Chirayu Thakkar (12 July 2021). "Overcoming the Diego Garcia stalemate". WarOnTheRocks.com.
- ^ "British Indian Ocean Territory – GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 3 September 2023.
- ^ "British Indian Ocean Territory". Commonwealth Chamber of Commerce. Retrieved 3 September 2023.
- ^ "British Indian Ocean Territory Definition & Meaning". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 3 September 2023.
- ^ "Mauritius profile". BBC News. 2011. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
- ^ "Historical background – what happened to the Chagos Archipelago?". chagosinternational.org. Archived from the original on 8 February 2013. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
- ^ a b "UK-Mauritius deal to protect national security – safeguarding the operation of strategic military base". GOV.UK. 3 October 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2024.
- ^ a b "Blow for Starmer as Mauritius PM rejects Chagos deal and demands talks reopen". The Independent. 17 December 2024.
- ^ Xavier Romero-Frias (1999). "1 A Seafaring Nation". The Maldive Islanders, A Study of the Popular Culture of an Ancient Ocean Kingdom (PDF). Barcelona: Nova Ethnographia Indica. pp. 65–67. ISBN 84-7254-801-5.
- ^ Vine, David (17 April 2008). "Introducing the other Guantanamo". atimes.com. Asia Times. Archived from the original on 17 May 2008. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
- ^ a b c d e C. R. Grainger (October 1985). "A Retrospective Estimate of Some Vital Statistics for British Indian Ocean Territory 1965–1973". Journal of the Royal Society of Health. 105 (5): 178–180. doi:10.1177/146642408510500508. PMID 3934379.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j ""That's When the Nightmare Started" UK and US Forced Displacement of the Chagossians and Ongoing Colonial Crimes". Human Rights Watch. 15 February 2023. Retrieved 4 October 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Dennis Hardy (August 2023). "Chagos and the British Indian Ocean Territory: A Colonial Anachronism in the Post-Colonial Era" (PDF). Seychelles Research Journal. 5 (2).
- ^ United States Dept. of State. Office of the Geographer (1968). Commonwealth of Nations. U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 15. Retrieved 7 November 2013 – via Google Books.
- ^ "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2066 (XX) – Question of Mauritius". United Nations. 16 December 1965. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- ^ "2.4 Self-determination". Exploring the boundaries of international law. The Open University. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- ^ "Background Notes: Mauritius". U.S. Department of State. December 1999. Retrieved 5 October 2024.
- ^ Baker, Luke (25 May 2007). "The coral sea vista opened up by British judges". Reuters. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
- ^ Knapton, Sarah (21 October 2008). "Law Lords to rule on whether Chagos Islanders can finally return home". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
- ^ Selig S. Harrison; K. Subrahmanyam (1989). Superpower Rivalry in the Indian Ocean: Indian and American Perspectives. Oxford University Press. p. 85. ISBN 9780195363708.
- ^ a b Foreign Affairs Committee (6 July 2008). "Seventh Report – Overseas Territories". House of Commons. p. 125. Retrieved 6 August 2009.
- ^ "British Indian Ocean Territory". CIA. 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Peter H. Sand (2018). "The British Indian Ocean Territory: International Legal Black Hole?" (PDF). QIL, Zoom-out. 55: 35–59.
- ^ "British Indian Ocean Territory". WorldAtlas.com. Retrieved 23 June 2013.
- ^ "Chagos Islanders v Attorney General & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 997 (22 July 2004)". bailii.org. BAILII. Retrieved 27 April 2021.
- ^ The Queen on the application of Louis Olivier Bancoult v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, 1038 (Admin) (2006reporter=EWHC).
- ^ Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs v The Queen (on the application of Bancoult), EWCA Civ 498 (2007).
- ^ Reynolds, Paul (3 April 2006). "Paradise regained – for a few days". BBC News. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
- ^ "Britain wins appeal over Chagos islanders' return home". Agence France-Press. 22 October 2008. Archived from the original on 29 May 2013. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
- ^ R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, UKHL 61 (2008).
- ^ a b "UK sets up Chagos Islands marine reserve". BBC News. 1 April 2010. Retrieved 25 November 2011.
- ^ "Chagos Islanders against the United Kingdom: Decision". European Court of Human Rights. 11 December 2012.
- ^ Mance, Henry (16 November 2016). "Extended US lease blocks Chagossians' return home". Financial Times. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
- ^ a b Andrew Harding (3 October 2024). "UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius". BBC News. Retrieved 3 October 2024.
- ^ "General Assembly Adopts Resolution Seeking International Court's Advisory Opinion on Pre-independence Separation of Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius". United Nations. 22 June 2017. Retrieved 3 October 2024.
- ^ a b Harsh Pant (15 April 2019). "A Landmark Ruling on the Chagos Islands". Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. Retrieved 3 October 2024.
- ^ "Advisory Opinion: Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965" (PDF). International Court of Justice. 25 February 2019. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
- ^ "Legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 – overview of the case". International Court of Justice. 25 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- ^ a b "General Assembly welcomes International Court of Justice opinion on Chagos Archipelago, adopts text calling for Mauritius' complete decolonisation". www.un.org. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- ^ Ashton Robinson (18 December 2019). "Diego Garcia: Unnerving neighbours and raising ghosts". The Interpreter. Retrieved 4 October 2024.
- ^ Harding, Andrew (28 January 2021). "UN court rules UK has no sovereignty over Chagos islands". BBC News. Retrieved 1 February 2021.
- ^ "Dispute concerning delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)" (PDF) (Press release). International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. 28 January 2021. ITLOS/Press 313. Retrieved 1 February 2021.
- ^ "British stamps banned from Chagos Islands in Indian Ocean". BBC News. 25 August 2021.
- ^ Bowcott, Owen; Rinvolucri, Bruno (13 February 2022). "Exiled Chagos Islanders bask in return 'as pilgrims to abandoned place'". The Observer. Retrieved 13 February 2022.
- ^ Bowcott, Owen; Rinvolucri, Bruno (14 February 2022). "Mauritius formally challenges Britain's ownership of Chagos Islands". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
- ^ Flanagan, Jane (14 February 2022). "Mauritius plants flag on disputed Chagos islands". The Times. London. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
- ^ Bowcott, Owen; Rinvolucri, Bruno (13 February 2022). "Mauritius measures reef hoping to lay claim on Chagos Islands". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
- ^ Brewster, David; Bashfield, Samuel (13 February 2022). "An unclaimed reef adds a wrinkle to the dispute over Diego Garcia". The Lowy Interpreter. The Maritime Executive. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
- ^ Bowcott, Owen; Rinvolucri, Bruno (20 February 2022). "Chagossian exiles celebrate emotional return as UK tries to justify control". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 February 2022.
- ^ Alice Cuddy (19 January 2024). "Diego Garcia: UN says UK military island not suitable for stranded migrants". Retrieved 4 October 2024.
- ^ Jojo Riñoza (16 September 2022). "Philippines: Filipino workers stuck at US military base following dispute over vacation". Benar News. Retrieved 4 October 2024.
- ^ "Britain could soon give up its last African colony". The Economist. 13 February 2023. Retrieved 4 October 2024.
- ^ a b Wintour, Patrick (3 November 2022). "UK agrees to negotiate with Mauritius over handover of Chagos Islands". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
- ^ Cleverly, James (3 November 2022). "Chagos Archipelago". Hansard. UK Parliament. HCWS354. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
- ^ Loft, Philip (22 November 2022). "British Indian Ocean Territory: UK to negotiate sovereignty 2022/23" (PDF). House of Commons Library. UK Parliament. pp. 22–23. Retrieved 26 September 2023.
- ^ a b c Diver, Tony (1 December 2023). "UK drops plans to hand Chagos Islands back to Mauritius". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
- ^ "UK and Mauritius joint statement, 3 October 2024". GOV.UK. 3 October 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2024.
- ^ "James Cleverly condemns Chagos deal". The Independent. 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2024.
- ^ Sparrow, Andrew (7 October 2024). "Lammy defends Chagos Islands deal as Tories claim it puts UK security at risk – as it happened". the Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
- ^ Davies, Maia; Hagan, Rachel (3 October 2024). "Chagossians criticise lack of say in UK deal to hand over islands". BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 6 October 2024.
- ^ https://www.gbnews.com/politics/chagos-islands-under-threat-maldives-stakes-claim-strategic-territory
- ^ "BIOT Administration – BIOT Administration". sites.google.com. Retrieved 1 October 2024.
- ^ a b "Governance". BIOT. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- ^ "British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004 – a Freedom of Information request to Privy Council Office". WhatDoTheyKnow.com. 9 November 2012.
- ^ Cormacain, Ronan (1 September 2013). "Prerogative legislation as the paradigm of bad law-making: the Chagos Islands". Commonwealth Law Bulletin. 39 (3): 487–508. doi:10.1080/03050718.2013.822317. S2CID 131408841 – via Taylor and Francis+NEJM.
- ^ British Indian Ocean Territory Ordinance No 3 of the 1983 ("the Courts Ordinance"), Article 3.1.
- ^ "Exchange of notes constituting an agreement concerning the availability for defense purposes of the British Indian Ocean Territory". UN Treaty Series. 603: 273. 1967. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- ^ Bashfield, Samuel (1 June 2022). "The BIOT: A judicial vacuum now consuming Tamil refugees". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
- ^ a b Mellersh, Natasha (19 October 2022). "UK plans to deport Tamil refugees on British territory in Rwanda-style plan". InfoMigrants. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
- ^ "Welcome to Diego Garcia" (PDF). public.navy.mil. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 October 2016. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
- ^ Milmo, Cahal (28 March 2014). "Exclusive: British Government under fire for pollution of pristine lagoon". The Independent. Retrieved 29 March 2015.
- ^ a b c "Patrol Vessel". The Chagos Archipelago. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
- ^ a b "The Disputed Chagos Islands Have an Illegal Fishing Problem". The Maritime Executive. 9 March 2023. Retrieved 4 October 2024.
- ^ "The high point of our circumnavigation?". SailingSteelSapphire.com. 10 July 2020. Retrieved 18 October 2022.[unreliable source?]
- ^ Bowcutt, Owen; Rinvolucri, Bruno (20 February 2022). "Chagossian exiles celebrate emotional return as UK tries to justify control". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
- ^ "HMS Spey delivers vaccines and patrols for illegal fishing in Pitcairn Islands". Royal Navy. 4 March 2022. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
- ^ "Tamar and Spey underline UK's renewed commitment to the Indo-Pacific". Royal Navy. 16 May 2022. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
- ^ "HMS Tamar protects paradise in rare visit to UK's Indian Ocean territory". Royal Navy. 9 March 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2023.
- ^ "HA08 – British Indian Ocean Territory". ctbto.org. Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- ^ Morris, Ted. "Diego Garcia – The Plantation". zianet.com.
- ^ Marsh, Jenni (10 March 2019). "Is the United States about to lose control of its secretive Diego Garcia military base?". CNN. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
- ^ "US Naval Support Facility, Diego Garcia". www.cnic.navy.mil. US Navy. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- ^ "On the Chop's visit to Diego Garcia". TheBaltimoreChop.com. 12 October 2010. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
- ^ "How to apply for a mooring permit". www.biot.gov.io. BIOT Administration. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- ^ "Mooring site plots". www.biot.gov.io. BIOT Administration. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- ^ Bowcott, Owen; Jones, Sam (19 March 2015). "UN ruling raises hope of return for exiled Chagos islanders". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 March 2015.
- ^ "Chagos Marine Protected Area arbitration (Mauritius v. United Kingdom) (Press Release and Summary of Award)". Permanent Court of Arbitration. 19 March 2015. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 29 March 2015.
- ^ North Sea Marine Cluster (2012). "Managing Marine Protected Areas" (PDF). NSMC. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 May 2013. Retrieved 5 February 2013.
- ^ "BIOT history". biot.gov.io. BIOT Administration. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- ^ "Visitor information". cnic.navy.mil. US Navy. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
- ^ Siddique, Haroon (20 May 2022). "Tamil refugees detained by UK on Chagos Islands go on hunger strike". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
- ^ Goldberg, Jacob (20 May 2022). "Asylum seekers stuck on Diego Garcia start hunger strike". AlJazeera.com. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
- ^ Israel, Simon (10 June 2022). "Sri Lankans stranded in Diego Garcia after rescue from sinking". London, England: Channel 4 News. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
- ^ Norman, Jesse (25 October 2022). "Diego Garcia: Asylum". UK Parliament. UIN 67039. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
- ^ Siddique, Haroon (16 October 2022). "UK accused of putting Tamil refugees at risk in Indian Ocean". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
- ^ Taylor, Diane (25 September 2023). "Tamil refugees on Diego Garcia win fight against forcible return to Sri Lanka". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
- ^ "The King v The Commissioner for the British Indian Ocean Territory – Consent Order" (PDF). Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory. 25 September 2023. BIOT/SC/No.l/2023 and BIOT/SC/No.2/2023. Retrieved 27 September 2023.
- ^ "Diego Garcia: The tropical island 'hell' for dozens of stranded migrants". BBC. 11 June 2023. Retrieved 19 February 2024.
- ^ "Diego Garcia asylum seekers feel unsafe on remote British island territory". BBC. 18 February 2024. Retrieved 19 February 2024.
- ^ Cuddy, Alice (17 December 2024). "UK unlawfully detained migrants on Diego Garcia, judge finds". BBC News. Retrieved 18 December 2024.
- ^ "British Indian Ocean Territories". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Commons. 21 June 2004. col. 1219W.
- ^ "Feasibility study for the resettlement of the British Indian Ocean Territory, Volume 1" (PDF). Parliament.uk. KPMG. 31 January 2015. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
- ^ "20th Space Control Squadron, Det 2". Peterson.af.mil. US Air Force. Retrieved 17 June 2020.
- ^ Brock, Joe (6 July 2023). "Inside the subsea cable firm secretly helping America take on China". Reuters. Retrieved 20 November 2023.
- ^ Arneson, Larry (VQ9LA). "VQ9X Club Station". QSL.NET. Retrieved 20 September 2013.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Arneson, Larry (VQ9LA). "(Post of) May 24, 2013". Official VQ9X Facebook page. Retrieved 20 September 2013.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Bridle, James. ".IO: British Indian Ocean Territory". Citizen Ex. Retrieved 2 August 2021.
- ^ Murphy, Kevin (9 November 2018). "Afilias bought .io for $70 million". Domain Incite. Retrieved 13 August 2020.
- ^ Levy, Jonathan. "Complaint filed against Afilias Ltd. (Ireland) including its subsidiaries 101domain GRS Limited (Ireland), Internet Computer Bureau Limited (England & British Indian Ocean Territory), in respect of OECD guidelines violations in operation of ccTLD .io, before the Ireland OECD national contact point" (PDF). Chagos Refugees Group UK. Retrieved 2 August 2021.
- ^ "The team representing a lost homeland, 6,000 miles away". BBC Sport. 6 July 2022. Retrieved 5 April 2024.
Further reading
- Wenban-Smith, N; Carter, M. (2016). Chagos: A History, Exploration, Exploitation, Expulsion. London, England: Chagos Conservation Trust. ISBN 978-0-9954596-0-1.
External links
[edit]- Official websites
- British Indian Ocean Territory Administration – official website
- British Indian Ocean Territory – British government site
- British Indian Ocean Territory – British travel advice
- British Indian Ocean Territory – official map
- Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia – US Navy website
- Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia – YouTube
- Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia – Facebook
- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty station, Diego Garcia
- BIOT Post Office
- Chagossian campaign
- UK Chagos Support Association
- Let Us Return USA – US Chagossian Support Group
- Christian Nauvel, "A Return from Exile in Sight? The Chagossians and their Struggle" (2006) 5 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 96–126 Archived 2 March 2011 at the Wayback Machine (retrieved 9 May 2011).
- Others
- British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004
- Chagos Conservation Trust – a non-political charity whose aims are to promote conservation, scientific and historical research, and to advance education concerning the archipelago
- Sure Diego Garcia – telecommunications company, Diego Garcia
- Diego Garcia Online Archived 14 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine – information for Diego Garcia population
- British Indian Ocean Territory – The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency.
- EU relations with British Indian Ocean Territory (archived)
- Diego Garcia – timeline posted at the History Commons Archived 30 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- Chagos Islands (BIOT) at Britlink – British Islands & Territories (archived)
- About Chagos Archipelago in Governenment of Mauritius website
- British Indian Ocean Territory
- Chagos Archipelago
- British Overseas Territories
- Island countries of the Indian Ocean
- Dependent territories in Asia
- Disputed islands
- Disputed territories in Asia
- Territorial disputes of the United Kingdom
- Territorial disputes of the Maldives
- Territorial disputes of Mauritius
- South Asian countries
- States and territories established in 1965
- 1965 establishments in Asia
- 1965 establishments in the United Kingdom
- English-speaking countries and territories