Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment: Difference between revisions
edited by robot: adding date header(s) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude> |
|||
[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]]<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Reference desk/header|WP:RD/E}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Reference desk/header|WP:RD/E}} |
|||
[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]] |
|||
[[Category:Pages automatically checked for incorrect links]] |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia resources for researchers]] |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia help forums]] |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia reference desk|Entertainment]] |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia help pages with dated sections]] |
|||
</noinclude> |
</noinclude> |
||
[[Category:Wikipedia resources for researchers]] |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2010 February 5}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2010 February 6}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2010 February 7}} |
|||
= February 8 = |
|||
== Name this music? == |
|||
The soundtrack to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfdstkIEnKw , a YouTube video called "Guide: Download hulu videos to your PC for offline enjoyment". It may be classical, or just lift or elevator music. Or all three. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/92.29.142.75|92.29.142.75]] ([[User talk:92.29.142.75|talk]]) 13:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I hate it when this happens. It's from the soundtrack of a film (the film's main theme kicks in around 1:59), but the name of the film is eluding my memory. Now I'll be thinking about this until the name pops up in my mind or someone comes up with the answer. [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 14:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
: It's the romantic theme from this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(1968_film) by Nino Rota --[[User:Frumpo|Frumpo]] ([[User talk:Frumpo|talk]]) 15:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Thank you, Frumpo. You've freed my brain from trying to remember. [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 15:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::Without listening, let me guess: "A Time for Us". A major soft-pop hit in the wake of that film. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 16:20, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::::Yep.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(1968_film)#Love_theme] If that's from the album, I would guess it's the "overture" or "opening credits music". I've never actually seen it, as it was already done up pretty well in ''West Side Story''. The 1968 version of ''Romeo and Juliet'' was what we would call a "chick flick" nowadays. Tragic love, as with ''Titanic''. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 16:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== NCIS == |
|||
In what episode in season 3 or 4 does Tony meet Br. Benoit? I think I have watched all the episodes in that season, but that plot line still compeletly confuses me. |
|||
:According to [[List of NCIS characters#Jeanne Benoit]], she first appeared in Season 4, Episode 7, titled "Sandblast". However, we don't see them meet; the story with Tony and Jeanne starts in the middle, in order to conceal the true nature of their relationship as revealed at the end of the season. --Anonymous, 23:44 UTC, February 8, 2010. |
|||
== mark coleman == |
|||
whong did he come out to yesterday? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.246.254.35|67.246.254.35]] ([[User talk:67.246.254.35|talk]]) 22:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Hmmm. If you'd lke to: |
|||
:* (a) use English - what, for example, is "whong"? |
|||
:* (b) identify whether it's [[Mark Coleman|this guy]] or some other Mark Coleman you're talking about, and |
|||
:* (c) explain what your question is really about - "come out" could mean different things in different contexts |
|||
: then we'd be happy to try and help you. -- [[Special:Contributions/202.142.129.66|202.142.129.66]] ([[User talk:202.142.129.66|talk]]) 00:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:: My guess is "What song..."--[[User:Frumpo|Frumpo]] ([[User talk:Frumpo|talk]]) 07:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::OK. But what does "What song did he come out to yesterday" mean? Did he acknowledge his homosexuality in song? -- [[User:JackofOz|<font face="Papyrus">Jack of Oz</font>]] [[User talk:JackofOz#top|<font face="Papyrus">'' ... speak! ... ''</font>]] 07:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::: A search of news via google indicates that Coleman was involved in a UFC wrestling bout on Sunday - ''"In the second round after a takedown Randy went for his own patented ground and pound that forced Coleman to give up his back and allowed for Couture to secure a rear naked choke."''. I believe that means he lost. I think the OP is probably asking what music was playing when Coleman entered the ring.--[[User:Frumpo|Frumpo]] ([[User talk:Frumpo|talk]]) 08:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Mark Coleman entered to ''[[Drop the World]]''. I just googled the lyrics; I have no idea if that was the original Eminem/Lil Wayne version or some cover. [[User:Matt Deres|Matt Deres]] ([[User talk:Matt Deres|talk]]) 11:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
= February 9 = |
|||
== Need help finding a song that seems "voodoo/bayou blues/metal" == |
|||
I'd heard a very heavy song i heard a while back, kinda sounded like it was bayou metal, if that makes sense...i dont remember much except it was low tempo and the voice of the vocalist was deep and low and the song was pretty heavy. I think it was under the blues genre, and the lyrics may have included talk of "bones". Anyhow, if anybody could help point me to the direction of possible names of the song I need to find, or even possible artists, I would appreciate it greatly. |
|||
Thank you. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/96.232.199.12|96.232.199.12]] ([[User talk:96.232.199.12|talk]]) 02:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Wild guess... "Voodoo" from Godsmack? [[Special:Contributions/75.157.57.12|75.157.57.12]] ([[User talk:75.157.57.12|talk]]) 03:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
I tried that one and it wasnt what i had encountered whenever that was. i think it was more bluesy than metal. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/96.232.199.12|96.232.199.12]] ([[User talk:96.232.199.12|talk]]) 03:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:The theme tune from the TV show [[True Blood]]? - "Bad Things" by Jace Everett... [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxINMuOgAu8 here's a video]. [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 04:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
That wasn't it...I think it was something older. This one is good for comparison though. The voice in what I'm looking for was much lower/deeper and the tempo may have been slower. Also the bass was much louder. Thank you though. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/96.232.199.12|96.232.199.12]] ([[User talk:96.232.199.12|talk]]) 01:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Something by [[Dr.John the night tripper]] perhaps?[[User:Hotclaws**==|hotclaws]] 14:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I bet this is "[[Bad to the Bone]]" by [[George Thorogood]]. --[[User:Richardrj|Richardrj]] [[User talk:Richardrj|<sup>talk </sup>]][[Special:Emailuser/Richardrj|<sup>email</sup>]] 14:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Maybe "Swamp" by [[Talking Heads]]? Bones are mentioned. [[User:ReverendWayne|ReverendWayne]] ([[User talk:ReverendWayne|talk]]) 22:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Looking For A TV Show== |
|||
I recall some tv show where people took pills that changed their skin color for a week to experience how other races lived, but I can't remember what it was called. [[User:Doc Quintana|Doc Quintana]] ([[User talk:Doc Quintana|talk]]) 03:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Well there was [[Watermelon Man (film)]], and I'm sure there have been many others with the same premise. (No pills in that though.)--[[User:Shantavira|Shantavira]]|[[User talk:Shantavira|<sup>feed me</sup>]] 10:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:A lengthier self-experiment of this kind was described in his 1961 book [[Black Like Me]] by journalist [[John Howard Griffin]]. It was [[Black Like Me (film)|filmed]] under the same title in 1964. [[Special:Contributions/87.81.230.195|87.81.230.195]] ([[User talk:87.81.230.195|talk]]) 11:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::German journalist [[Guenter Wallraff]] did the same in 2009, I saw a tv documentary about this. [[Special:Contributions/195.35.160.133|195.35.160.133]] ([[User talk:195.35.160.133|talk]]) 11:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC) Martin. |
|||
:You might also be interested in Lois Lane comics issue # 106, which has a very similar plot. Details here: [[http://milehighcomics.com/cgi-bin/backissue.cgi?action=fullsize&issue=48838240124%20106]]. [[Special:Contributions/195.35.160.133|195.35.160.133]] ([[User talk:195.35.160.133|talk]]) 11:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC) Martin. |
|||
== Neighborhood hole == |
|||
There is a line in the [[Switchfoot]] song "Free" (from ''[[Hello Hurricane]]'', 2009) which goes "There’s a hole in the neighborhood/Where the shadows fall". When I heard it, it reminded me of the line in the [[Elbow (band)|Elbow]] song "[[Grounds for Divorce (song)|Grounds for Divorce]]" (from ''[[The Seldom Seen Kid]]'', 2008) that goes "There's a hole in my neighbourhood down which of late I cannot help but fall". Is the Switchfoot line an allusion to the Elbow song, or are they both drawing from a separate phrase that I am unfamiliar with? —'''[[User:Akrabbim|Akrabbim]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Akrabbim|talk]]</sup> 03:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Question regarding article Billy Garland( exblack panther) == |
|||
Hello,Im a researcher and i read an article on the wikipedia website about ex black panther/ tupac's father Billy Garland.Im doing a research project on Tupac,now there is something interesting in the article about tupac's biological father Billy Garland that he is a decendant of the african tribe tuareg.Now I don't know the credibility of this information about billy garland's orgins which is stated on the wikipedia website.Please let me know where the information about tupac's father billy garlands heritage was obtained.I cannot find much information about billy garland, if the information about him being of tuareg heritage is credible. Then i can use it for the research paper im writing. |
|||
Thank you |
|||
Kops <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Zolani7|Zolani7]] ([[User talk:Zolani7|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zolani7|contribs]]) 08:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:That information on [[Billy Garland (Ex-Black Panther)]] seems not to be reliably referenced at present. [[User:Charles Matthews|Charles Matthews]] ([[User talk:Charles Matthews|talk]]) 13:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Which means, Kops, while researching your paper, if you can find a [[WP:REFERENCES|reliable reference]] that confirms the claim, or confirms a different story, please [[WP:BOLD|be bold]] and correct that article yourself. [[User:Comet Tuttle|Comet Tuttle]] ([[User talk:Comet Tuttle|talk]]) 17:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Australian radio show: Kyle & Jackie O == |
|||
= November 26 = |
|||
Hi guys.. Could anyone please tell me where I can download an audio clip of the infamous lie detector episode (where a teenage girl confessed being raped) |
|||
from the australian radio show "Kyle And Jackie O Show"? I've looked everywhere but couldn't find it. Thanks in advance...[[User:Johnnyboi7|Johnnyboi7]] ([[User talk:Johnnyboi7|talk]]) 09:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== First male to win a women’s sports title? == |
|||
== Super Bowl XLIV == |
|||
Hi, I was hoping someone could point me to where I might find the first male to win a women’s sports title? It can be any sport, it doesn’t matter, it’s just that I’m doing a school report and I want to find something inspirational. [[User:Degurumcqueen|Degurumcqueen]] ([[User talk:Degurumcqueen|talk]]) 04:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
This question is about [[Super Bowl XLIV]]. I was surprised to see how many people — above and beyond the "normal" Super Bowl audience — watched this particular Super Bowl game on TV. Apparently, it was the highest rated Super Bowl ever. And, apparently, it was also [[List of most-watched television broadcasts|the highest rated TV show ever]] ... even beating the 27-year-old record held by [[Goodbye, Farewell and Amen|the final episode of ''M*A*S*H'']] back in 1983. So, my question is ... what was the big draw to this particular Super Bowl game? How was this particular game different from any other ordinary, run-of-the-mill Super Bowl games? In all honesty, this year's match-up seemed relatively low-key, without an inordinate amount of pre-game hype. So, I was shocked to see the TV ratings records being broken. Any insights? Thank you. ([[Special:Contributions/64.252.68.102|64.252.68.102]] ([[User talk:64.252.68.102|talk]]) 14:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)) |
|||
:@[[User:Degurumcqueen|Degurumcqueen]] I assume you mean a [[Trans woman]]? If so, I don't appreciate the transphobia. [[User:Sandcat555|Sandcat555]] ([[User talk:Sandcat555|talk]]) 04:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Perhaps because the team from New Orleans was playing? It seems ''all'' of New Orleans was watching. And people love an '[[Underdog (competition)|underdog]]'. They certainly needed a bit of a morale boost after [[Cyclone Katrina]] (Just a bit of a guess from Australia). [[Special:Contributions/220.101.28.25|220.101.28.25]] ([[User talk:220.101.28.25|talk]]) 15:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
{{od}}If you mean transgender athletes a good place to start would be our article on [[Transgender people in sports]]. -- [[User:Euryalus|Euryalus]] ([[User talk:Euryalus|talk]]) 04:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Can someone please remove this bigotry? [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 02:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Seconded. I hate transphobia [[User:Sandcat555|Sandcat555]] ([[User talk:Sandcat555|talk]]) 05:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:[[Heinrich Ratjen]] won the ''women's'' high jump at the 1937 [[German Athletics Championships]] and the [[1938 European Athletics Championships]] (as well as finishing 4th at the 1936 Summer Olympics). [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 09:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::It is a New Orleans thing. For the next 30 years, the media will keep pushing for help for New Orleans because of Hurricane Katrina (which happened in 2005). They gave up on Homestead, Florida after a month or so, even though it hadn't recovered from Hurricane Andrew yet. They never suggested anyone should help Charleston, SC after Hurricane Hugo. The whole Haiti thing will dissipate in a month or so, but we'll still hear that New Orleans needs help to recover from Hurricane Katrina. The New Orleans bias is very clear. I don't personally understand it. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|™]] 15:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Ratjen is/was [[intersex]]. [[User:Sandcat555|Sandcat555]] ([[User talk:Sandcat555|talk]]) 05:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::The article says male or intersex. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 23:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Regarding the earliest circle of 5ths in Western Europe == |
|||
::: Even if all of New Orleans was indeed watching ... doesn't that one small city represent only a tiny miniscule percentage of the entire USA population as a whole? The New Orleans theory doesn't "add up" ... does it? Even if every single New Orleans citizen were watching, aren't they all collectively still a tiny drop in the bucket? ([[Special:Contributions/64.252.68.102|64.252.68.102]] ([[User talk:64.252.68.102|talk]]) 15:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)) |
|||
My question needs a little bit of an introduction (apologies for that) but it finally arrives... Be patient. |
|||
::::He was saying that because it is New Orleans, the media was pressuring everyone else to watch (not just New Orleans). -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|™]] 15:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
The first time the circle of 5ths appears in Western Europe (it had already made its appearance in Russia some decades before) was in the theoretical works of [[Johann David Heinichen]] as a circle of major and minor keys. But there is something odd in the way Heinichen presents the circle of 5ths: he gives the major and minor keys interlaced (so his circle, which he doesn't call "circle of 5ths" but "musical circle", is in effect two circles of 5ths interlaced) and, most bizarrely, Heinichen puts the relative minor key *after* its relative major (in the direction of the sharps): ... F > d > C > a > G > e > ... If you want to interlace major and minor keys (or major and minor perfect chords which amounts to the same thing), a practice that was shortly thereafter abandoned, then logic would dictate that you put the relative minor *before* its relative major (in the direction of the sharps): ... d > F > a > C > e > G ... so that a lower root appears before a higher root. Also in this way every root is a 3rd apart and two adjacent chords in the "musical circle" always have two common tones, the 3rd and 5th of the 1st chord (the root and 3rd of the 2nd chord). |
|||
::::: Well, yes ... that "pressure" goes exactly to my point. Where was that pressure? I missed it completely. As my original post said ... ''"this year's match-up seemed relatively low-key, without an inordinate amount of pre-game hype"''. What did I miss? ([[Special:Contributions/64.252.68.102|64.252.68.102]] ([[User talk:64.252.68.102|talk]]) 15:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)) |
|||
Now (finally) my question: Can anyone see *any* rationale to Heinichen's arrangement that I couldn't see? |
|||
::::::The pre-game hype was, in my opinion, more about New Orleans than the game. This is the type of news that I saw (what you saw may have well been very different): Will New Orleans win? New Orleans needs a win. How will New Orleans handle a loss on top of Katrina? Imagine the party if New Orleans wins! ... on and on, it was a media blitz to guilt everyone into watching to see how New Orleans would do. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|™]] 15:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/178.51.16.158|178.51.16.158]] ([[User talk:178.51.16.158|talk]]) 11:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Just now, on [[First Take]] on [[ESPN2]], they just discussed this. They brought up two very good points: |
|||
:*The American population is 31% higher today than it was in 1983, when the M*A*S*H last episode aired. |
|||
:*The % of households tuned in to the game was 45% for this game. For [[Super Bowl XVI]] in 1982, a year before the M*A*S*H final episode, had a 49% rating. That M*A*S*H last episode? 60.2%. |
|||
:Given the rising American population, having the last M*A*S*H episode defeated in terms of overall number of viewers was inevitable. In terms of a % of the American TV owning public, which is the vital stat here, it wasn't even the best rated Super Bowl, let alone the best rated show. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 15:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I can't speak for everyone else, but I couldn't think of a reason. It always appeared to me that in teaching the theory of Western harmony, an approach based on a progression of alternating major and minor thirds would be easier to understand and also more convenient to learn from, thus: |
|||
::"Figures don't lie, but liars do figure!" Still, the numbers are pretty good. I would like to think that it being about New Orleans gave it a boost (New Orleans has a special popularity in the U.S. as cities go), but another couple of considerations are that the Super Bowl typically draws well anyway, and a lot of folks were snowed in and had "nothing else to do." ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 16:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
A♭ E♭ B♭ F C G D A |
|||
/-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ |
|||
A♭ C E♭ G B♭ D F A C E G B D F♯ A C♯ E G♯ |
|||
\-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ |
|||
c g d a e b f♯ c♯ |
|||
:The top line names major triads, the bottom line names minor triads, and the middle line gives the names of the individual notes of which the triads are comprised. In this chart, where the direction of the sharps is from left to right, a is between F and C, and not between C and G as in Heinichen's circle. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 22:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::This is without doubt the only sane arrangement in my opinion. In fact schemes like the [[Tonnetz]] are arranged according to this very principle because, well, there is no alternative. Incidentally if you take the Tonnetz and construct a dual "Akkordnetz" by making every face (triangle) of the Tonnetz a vertex you get an extended version of what you have drawn above. But to get back to trying to understand Heinichen's reasoning, is it true that some theorists in the 17th c. and/or 18 c. took the diatonic scale of D (white keys from D to D, or in other words the "dorian" scale) as the prototype of the minor mode (instead of the scale of A, so called "aeolian", which is what is done nowadays)? I seem to remember statements to that effect, maybe when discussing incomplete key signatures used for the minor mode at that time. If that is indeed the case (and I'm not certain it is) could it be that Heinichen's "musical circle" which is a circle of keys would have d minor before C major, a minor before G major, etc. simply because to him the relative minor of C major is actually d dorian, and so on? [[Special:Contributions/178.51.16.158|178.51.16.158]] ([[User talk:178.51.16.158|talk]]) 10:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
= November 27 = |
|||
:::Also, see [[List_of_most-watched_television_broadcasts#Top_network_primetime_telecasts_since_2000]]. Notice the raw number of viewers for the Super Bowls since 2000. WIth a few minor inversions, it has generally been true that the trend is that the number of viewers for each Super Bowl since 2000 has gone up incrementally. No Super Bowl did worse than the one two years before it; only two Super Bowls did worse than the one immediately preceding it, and most Super Bowls simple marginally beat out the one right before it. Its been a trend for some time now. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 16:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Statistics of the main film and television awards by genre == |
|||
:::Also - the press made sure to tell everyone that President Obama was throwing a Super Bowl party. If you want to be cool like the President, you had to have a party yourself, right? -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|™]] 16:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I believe how they calculate viewership numbers is different now (vs. MASH) and results in higher figures. I'll go and find a ref. -- [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]] [[User talk:Flyguy649|<sup>talk]]</sup> 16:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::::It should be noted that back in 1983, television viewers were severely limited in programming choices compared to today.[[User:10draftsdeep|10draftsdeep]] ([[User talk:10draftsdeep|talk]]) 17:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Are there any statistical sources regarding film and television awards such as the Oscars, Golden Globes and Emmys that highlight the distribution of nominations and winners based on narrative genre? In particular, I would need information regarding statistics on historical genre films and TV series. Sources regarding the general trend of historical cinema over the decades would also be good. Thank you |
|||
: This goes to Jayron32's point above. On this table --> [[List_of_most-watched_television_broadcasts#Top 46 network primetime telecasts of all time (1964–2010)]] ... the ''M*A*S*H'' finale is ranked #1 and the 2010 Super Bowl is ranked #26, when ranked by percent of households watching the broadcast. Interesting. ([[Special:Contributions/64.252.68.102|64.252.68.102]] ([[User talk:64.252.68.102|talk]]) 00:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)) |
|||
[[User:Sira Aspera|Sira Aspera]] ([[User talk:Sira Aspera|talk]]) 18:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Don't forget that much of the East Coast was home-bound because of a record snowfall. With no where to go, more "Nielsen families" watched the game on their home TV rather than at a friend's house or restaurant. The Super Bowl got a higher rating in the Washington area than anywhere else in the country save New Orleans. That shouldn't affect total viewership, but Nielsen does a better job of "capturing" home viewers than people at sports bars. The fact that the Super Bowl always airs in at least 40% of American households is even more amazing when you consider that so many people are watching at other people's houses. It is possibly the biggest shared national experience there is in America. -- [[User:Mwalcoff|Mwalcoff]] ([[User talk:Mwalcoff|talk]]) 01:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::I didn't notice any Presidential elections on there, but maybe news events coverage is a separate category somewhere. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 01:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::::Well more Americans watched at least some of the Super Bowl (153.4 million) than voted in the last presidential election (131.2 million), so who knows whether as many people were watching Obama vs. McCain as Brees vs. Manning. Plus the election coverage is split between all the different networks while the Super Bowl is only on one network. -- [[User:Mwalcoff|Mwalcoff]] ([[User talk:Mwalcoff|talk]]) 01:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Well, one might expect that there are a fair number of people under the age 18 watching the game who would obviously not be able to vote, not to mention those felons watching from their ultra plush prison cells. [[User:Googlemeister|Googlemeister]] ([[User talk:Googlemeister|talk]]) 21:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I do not know of a source that does exactly what you want. The best that I can think of is to search Google for IMDB lists of winners and nominees in various categories. For example, you can search "IMDB list best picture nominees" (without the quotation marks). You can then click on a page. There will be a blue oval icon to the left of where the page says, "Sort by." This should call up a window that will break the list down by genre among other things. You will have to check to see if the list is accurate and up to date. [[User:FreeKresge|FreeKresge]] ([[User talk:FreeKresge|talk]]) 16:28, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
As a Brit,I like to feel it was [[The Who]] on the half time show.[[User:Hotclaws**==|hotclaws]] 14:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
= November 28 = |
|||
== TV show with cold open that ends with cut off curse word == |
|||
My above Super Bowl question also brought to mind this question about the TV show ''M*A*S*H''. Does anyone know why they use the three asterisks in the title? I could not seem to find out any information about this. I know that the M, A, S, and H stand for "Mobile Army Surgical Hospital" (or some such) ... but that still does not explain the odd use of three — not four — asterisks. Any insights? Thanks. ([[Special:Contributions/64.252.68.102|64.252.68.102]] ([[User talk:64.252.68.102|talk]]) 15:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)) |
|||
I saw this question today and while I can't find the answer, I do remember that it exists. A recent television show always started with a cold open that ended with a curse word being cut off as the title was shown. What is the name of the series? [[Special:Contributions/68.187.174.155|68.187.174.155]] ([[User talk:68.187.174.155|talk]]) 01:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:It will be difficult to find a reference for this, but this is my memory... MASH, the movie, did not use asterisks. The movie poster did at the suggestion of producers/executive types who wanted people to understand that MASH was an acronym. This was a movie about mashed potatoes or something similar. The artist used asterisks instead of periods because it looked prettier. People seemed to like M*A*S*H as it was written on the poster as opposed to MASH as it was written on the film. So, the television series kept the asterisks. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|™]] 15:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Was it ''[[Zoey's Extraordinary Playlist]]'' (2020–2021)? --[[User:Canley|Canley]] ([[User talk:Canley|talk]]) 03:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::TV Tropes mentions this as a running gag: {{tq|The Cold Open for each episode ends with Zoey about to blurt out something like "What the..." and "Holy..." when the title appears, blocking over her mouth with the theme song.}}<sup>[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Series/ZoeysExtraordinaryPlaylist]</sup> --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 04:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::I finally had a chance to check it and yes, that is the show I remember seeing. Now, if I could just remember where I saw the original question... [[Special:Contributions/68.187.174.155|68.187.174.155]] ([[User talk:68.187.174.155|talk]]) 00:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==Across a Crowded Room available to watch on DVD or available online to watch== |
|||
:: OK ... that is as I thought. So, you're saying that the asterisks are replacing conventional periods ... and that they simply omitted the final (fourth) asterisk/period? That is more or less what I assumed had transpired. Even though, of course, most acronyms do not even use periods anyway (radar, sonar, NOW, ERA, etc.). Thanks. ([[Special:Contributions/64.252.68.102|64.252.68.102]] ([[User talk:64.252.68.102|talk]]) 15:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)) |
|||
I'm trying to find out if the 1978 TV play Across a Crowded Room produced by [[ITV Yorkshire]] has been released on DVD or available to watch online. The full movie is fully intact and has survived but I just don’t know where I can watch it. [[User:Matthew John Drummond|Matthew John Drummond]] ([[User talk:Matthew John Drummond|talk]]) 15:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::That is just a memory from way back in the early 80's (possibly even late 70's). Since it was long before the Internet, I'm not finding much of anything to back that memory. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|™]] 15:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::<small>And yes, for you geeks, I mean "web" when I say "Internet". Heehee! -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|™]] 15:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)</small> |
|||
= December 4 = |
|||
:Hate to sound like a broken record, but did you read the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M*A*S*H_(TV_series) M*A*S*H*] article? The "synopsis" section addresses the question. [[User:Kingsfold|Kingsfold]] ([[User talk:Kingsfold|talk]]) 16:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Kitty Clive 1956 (TV play) Critics Response == |
|||
::That synopsis doesn't make much sense. The novel is spelled "MASH". The movie is spelled "MASH". The movie poster is spelled "M*A*S*H". How does the use of asterisks come from the novel? -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|™]] 16:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
I'm looking to try and find what critics thought about the 1956 TV play Kitty Clive but struggling to find any newspaper articles about the TV play. So can any of you try and find out what critics thought about the TV play as well as a link so then I can include in a draft I'm making about the TV play/TV movie. [[User:Matthew John Drummond|Matthew John Drummond]] ([[User talk:Matthew John Drummond|talk]]) 00:07, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::You're right, the original novel was ''MASH'', as is evident even just from google-imaging [mash novel]. I'm thinking that the ''re-issued'' novel had the movie poster as its cover, and maybe that compounds the confusion. I also saw that in the original illustration with the stars, they were much smaller, almost like dots, which is a convention sometimes used with acronyms. Later, the stars were made much larger. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 16:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== The Kids International Show 1982 plot == |
|||
== Accordion/Techno song in Italy, Help! == |
|||
can any of my guys try and find out what the plot is of the 1982 tv mini series ''The Kids International Show'' produced by the [[BBC]]. [[User:Matthew John Drummond|Matthew John Drummond]] ([[User talk:Matthew John Drummond|talk]]) 00:32, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
I'm currently in Italy, and just the other day in Palermo, on 5 separate occasions I heard a song that had a really catchy accordion tune. I don't know if it was Italian or not, and I don't think the song had lyrics, but it was sort of techno-y and really happy sounding. I wish I could describe it more, but I really only heard snippets of it. I would know it if I heard it. Someone help! Thanks!! [[User:Jared|<font color="#0084C9">Jared</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Jared|<font color="#009E49">(''t'')</font>]]</small>  18:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Does this help? https://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/07d22f93bc2f44158381f8934b9584c0 [[User:TrogWoolley|TrogWoolley]] ([[User talk:TrogWoolley|talk]]) 07:43, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== iPod Touch camera == |
|||
::Yes [[User:Matthew John Drummond|Matthew John Drummond]] ([[User talk:Matthew John Drummond|talk]]) 15:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
= December 5 = |
|||
Are there any plans/rumors for a future generation of the [[iPod Touch]] to have a built-in camera like the iPhone or iPod Nano? <font style="font-size:92%">—[[User:C Teng|C Teng]][[User talk:C Teng|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 21:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Strange Experiences (1955-1962) made by which company == |
|||
There are a number of Apple rumour sites out there, here's a link to just one of no doubt many articles suggesting the touch will be getting a camera (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/12/leaked-ipod-touch-with-camera-photos-were-real/). As with all rumours around Apple take them with a pinch of salt as they're so many of them. [[User:Ny156uk|ny156uk]] ([[User talk:Ny156uk|talk]]) 22:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Rumors suggest the iPod touch was going to get a camera on par with the camera in the iPhone 3GS, but it didn't fit in the iPod touch form factor so it was dropped until it could be miniaturized enough to fit. If that is true, it suggests that some future generation of the iPod touch will receive a camera, but speculation on when that might happen would be best found by watching the market on auto-focusing cell phone camera components. [[User:Caltsar|Caltsar]] ([[User talk:Caltsar|talk]]) 17:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Strange Experiences was a series that ran from 1955-1962 however on [[IMDB]] it's not been confirmed which company produced the series so can any of you guys try and find out which company produced the series. [[User:Matthew John Drummond|Matthew John Drummond]] ([[User talk:Matthew John Drummond|talk]]) 17:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
= February 10 = |
|||
:"Mysterious tales introduced by '''Peter Williams''', and produced by Derick Williams, that were screened on ATV London from the very first week it was broadcasting."<sup>[https://www.78rpm.co.uk/tvw.htm#stex]</sup> ([[Associated Television|ATV London]] was part of the [[ITV (TV network)|ITV network]].) Look up Derick Williams on IMDb: [https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0930431]. --[[User talk:Lambiam#top|Lambiam]] 03:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Bach's St. John's Passion recording == |
|||
::That doesn't answer the question. It names the individual producer and the distribution company, but not the production company, which may or may not be the same as the <del>production</del> distribution company. (For example, for ''[[Star Trek: The Original Series|Star Trek]]'' during at least part of its original run, [[NBC]] was the distribution company, [[Gene Roddenberry]] was the executive producer and other people were also producers, but the production company was [[Desilu]]. The question asks for the company corresponding to the latter. In the IMDB it would be under "company credits", but as Matthew said, it isn't.) --[[Special:Contributions/142.112.149.206|142.112.149.206]] ([[User talk:142.112.149.206|talk]]) 03:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC) (edited later) |
|||
In your article on this Passion, you provide a link to a video performance of the opening piece -- Herr, unser Herrscher, dessen Ruhm -- but no info about conductor, choir, album number, etc., so one can purchase it. Anyone know the answer? [[User:Quinqua|Quinqua]] ([[User talk:Quinqua|talk]]) 00:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::But Derick Williams' IMDb entry says "Headed his own production company in the 1950's", which is suggestive. |
|||
:The conductor seems to be ''György Vashegyi'' (no article on English or even Hungarian Wikipedia). [http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=Gy%C3%B6rgy%20Vashegyi&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi See here] for visual comparison. I guess it might well be "his" ''Purcell Choir'' ("Purcell Kórus") and ''Orfeo Orchestra'' ("Orfeo Zenekar"). To make it easier for other volunteers: Article is [[Johannes Passion]], YouTube clip is [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1yQk_cFNDw here]. [[Special:Contributions/80.219.8.3|80.219.8.3]] ([[User talk:80.219.8.3|talk]]) 01:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::The Series' entry has a link "See production info at IMDbPro": I am not signed up to IMDBPro, but is the querant and has he followed this up? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} [[Special:Contributions/94.1.211.243|94.1.211.243]] ([[User talk:94.1.211.243|talk]]) 17:39, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: "This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards." They're not kidding - I'm surprised such a major work has such a poorly-written article. Added to my watchlist to remind me to have a go at it. [[User:AndrewWTaylor|AndrewWTaylor]] ([[User talk:AndrewWTaylor|talk]]) 09:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:: Actually on looking again I see it's not that bad, but it could still do with some TLC. [[User:AndrewWTaylor|AndrewWTaylor]] ([[User talk:AndrewWTaylor|talk]]) 10:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::: One of the older comments on the YouTube video is from a person who says he participated in this performance, as a bass in the chorus. He identifies Vashegyi, the Purcell Choir, and Orfeo Orchestra, the performance having taken place in 2004 at the [[Franz Liszt Academy of Music|Music Academy]] in Budapest. The logo seen in the video is that of the Hungarian television channel [[m2 (TV channel)|m2]]. I could not find any information about a CD or DVD release, so it may be that it has never been made available for purchase. [[User:ReverendWayne|ReverendWayne]] ([[User talk:ReverendWayne|talk]]) 01:30, 11 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
= December 6 = |
|||
== ultra in sports rivalry == |
|||
== "The Boxer" == |
|||
In the big 4 US sports (baseball, basketball, football, hockey), how many championships have been played where both teams are from the same city (or very close like Oakland-SanFran)? [[User:Googlemeister|Googlemeister]] ([[User talk:Googlemeister|talk]]) 21:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:It's never happened in the NHL, although the Stanley Cup was contested between two teams from Winnipeg in 1901. Montreal-Ottawa would be the next closest, also pre-NHL. In the NHL era the closest teams are New York-Philadelphia in 1980. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 21:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Well, the sport with the most crosstown rivalries will be baseball, since at one point, there were three teams inhabiting the greater New York area (Yankees, Dodgers and Giants) and have been two teams in New York since the 60s with the introduction of the Mets. So, you may want to look at [[Subway Series]]. Philly had two teams, the Phillies and the Athletics up until A's moved to Kansas City in 1955, and they had the [[City Series]]. Both Chicago teams, the Cubs and White Sox, have never played in a World Series together, but their interleague games are called the [[Crosstown Classic]]. The only teams in football that are fairly close to one another are the Giants/Jets and, like you mentioned, the Raiders/49ers. Both combinations of teams have never played each other in the [[list of Super Bowl champions|Super Bowl]]. For [[List of NBA champions|NBA]], the Rochester Royals played the New York Knicks in 1951. As for [[List of Stanley Cup champions|hockey]], the closest two teams I can think of would be the Buffalo Sabres/Toronto Maple Leafs, who have never played against each other. Hope that helps! [[User:Livewireo|Livewireo]] ([[User talk:Livewireo|talk]]) 21:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Well NHL has closer teams but I guess putting the Islanders, the Devils and the Rangers all in the same division would preempt my scenario. [[User:Googlemeister|Googlemeister]] ([[User talk:Googlemeister|talk]]) 21:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah, the Devils and Rangers are only 20 minutes apart, but they can't play against each other in the current setup. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 21:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Starting ~0:36, [[The Boxer|that song]] features a raspy, low-pitched reed (?) instrument; what is it? Bassoon? The sources that I find only mention guitars and the piccolo trumpet (that's not it). -- [[Special:Contributions/136.56.165.118|136.56.165.118]] ([[User talk:136.56.165.118|talk]]) 19:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Ahem. The Chicago Cubs and White Sox played each other in the [[1906 World Series]]. The New York Giants and Yankees played in 1921, then again in 1922 and 1923, and again in 1936 and 1937. The Yankees and the Brooklyn Dodgers played in 1941, and again in 1947 and 1949. The Yankees and Giants played in 1951, the Yankees and Dodgers in 1952 and 1953, and again in 1955 and 1956. The Oakland Athletics and San Francisco Giants played each other in 1989 (the earthquake series). The New York Yankees and New York Mets played in 2000. [[User:Woogee|Woogee]] ([[User talk:Woogee|talk]]) 22:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
: Our [[The_Boxer#Creation_and_recording|article]] mentions a [[bass harmonica]], and judging from, e.g., [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NuEumHWC-Q this video] I don't see any reason to doubt that. --[[User:Wrongfilter|Wrongfilter]] ([[User talk:Wrongfilter|talk]]) 19:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::The New York Giants and Buffalo Bills played in [[Super Bowl XXV]], that may be the two closest teams to play each other, the San Francisco 49ers and San Diego Chargers played each other, that's another intrastate Super Bowl, though not that close geographically. The Giants and New England Patriots, though not in the same state, are not that far apart. [[User:Woogee|Woogee]] ([[User talk:Woogee|talk]]) 22:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::That sounds like it; thanks! --[[Special:Contributions/136.56.165.118|136.56.165.118]] ([[User talk:136.56.165.118|talk]]) 19:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIP8qx5J4L0 Here] is an interview with the fellow who played it on the record. --[[User:Wrongfilter|Wrongfilter]] ([[User talk:Wrongfilter|talk]]) 19:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Thanks again! --[[Special:Contributions/136.56.165.118|136.56.165.118]] ([[User talk:136.56.165.118|talk]]) 20:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== ITV 60 DVD episodes == |
|||
:As mentioned, the NY Giants and Jets are NFL's only pair in the same city. However, there was another pair from 82-94, the LA Raiders and LA Rams. They never played in the Super Bowl against each other. If you want to go into the AFL (pre NFL), Houston and Dallas played in the AFL's championship in 1962. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|™]] 22:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::The Rams actually played in Anaheim the last 14 years of their time in Southern California. [[User:Woogee|Woogee]] ([[User talk:Woogee|talk]]) 23:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::Giants-Yankees in 1921-22 (Polo Grounds), and Browns-Cardinals in 1944 (Sportsman's Park), shared home field. And Yankee Stadium (opened 1923) was just across the river from the Polo Grounds. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 02:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
I've been wanting to know what ITV episodes from which shows are on the ''ITV 60 DVD''. [[User:Matthew John Drummond|Matthew John Drummond]] ([[User talk:Matthew John Drummond|talk]]) 19:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Summary: |
|||
:[https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/itv-at-60-box-set-review/ This] has a listing. Is that good enough? --[[User:Wrongfilter|Wrongfilter]] ([[User talk:Wrongfilter|talk]]) 20:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*MLB: 1906 (Cubs-Sox), 1921, 22, 23, 36, 37, 51 (Giants-Yankees), 1941, 47, 49, 52, 53, 55, 56 (Yankees-Dodgers), 1944 (Cardinals-Browns), 1989 (Giants-A's), 2000 (Yankees-Mets) -- The Giants and Dodgers played in an early "World Series" in 1889, when Brooklyn was in the American Association. |
|||
*NFL: None. Closest is probably the 1952-4 NFL championships between the Browns and Lions (96 miles) |
|||
*NBA: None, and unlikely due to the East-West set-up. Closest would probably be the 1948 BAA Finals between Baltimore and Philadelphia if we're counting the BAA years and the 1951 Finals between Rochester and New York if we're not. |
|||
*NHL: None, and unlikely due to the East-West set-up. Closest would be the 1980 Finals between the Islanders and Flyers. |
|||
*Honorable mentions: Ohio State and Cincinnati met in the finals of the 1961 and 1962 NCAA men's basketball tournament. #3 Florida played #1 Florida State in the 1997 Sugar Bowl (#2 Arizona State was obligated to play in the Rose Bowl). -- [[User:Mwalcoff|Mwalcoff]] ([[User talk:Mwalcoff|talk]]) 00:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::It also happened once in the 19th century National League/American Association World Series. See [[List of pre-World Series baseball champions]]. In 1886 the NL New York Giants defeated the AA Brooklyn Bridegrooms. If the series ''had'' been held in 1891, then it would have paired the Boston teams from both leagues. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 03:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
= |
= December 8 = |
Latest revision as of 00:06, 8 December 2024
of the Wikipedia reference desk.
Main page: Help searching Wikipedia
How can I get my question answered?
- Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
- Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
- Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
- Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
- Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
- Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.
How do I answer a question?
Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines
- The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.
November 26
[edit]First male to win a women’s sports title?
[edit]Hi, I was hoping someone could point me to where I might find the first male to win a women’s sports title? It can be any sport, it doesn’t matter, it’s just that I’m doing a school report and I want to find something inspirational. Degurumcqueen (talk) 04:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Degurumcqueen I assume you mean a Trans woman? If so, I don't appreciate the transphobia. Sandcat555 (talk) 04:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
If you mean transgender athletes a good place to start would be our article on Transgender people in sports. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can someone please remove this bigotry? HiLo48 (talk) 02:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Seconded. I hate transphobia Sandcat555 (talk) 05:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can someone please remove this bigotry? HiLo48 (talk) 02:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Heinrich Ratjen won the women's high jump at the 1937 German Athletics Championships and the 1938 European Athletics Championships (as well as finishing 4th at the 1936 Summer Olympics). Clarityfiend (talk) 09:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ratjen is/was intersex. Sandcat555 (talk) 05:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- The article says male or intersex. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ratjen is/was intersex. Sandcat555 (talk) 05:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Regarding the earliest circle of 5ths in Western Europe
[edit]My question needs a little bit of an introduction (apologies for that) but it finally arrives... Be patient.
The first time the circle of 5ths appears in Western Europe (it had already made its appearance in Russia some decades before) was in the theoretical works of Johann David Heinichen as a circle of major and minor keys. But there is something odd in the way Heinichen presents the circle of 5ths: he gives the major and minor keys interlaced (so his circle, which he doesn't call "circle of 5ths" but "musical circle", is in effect two circles of 5ths interlaced) and, most bizarrely, Heinichen puts the relative minor key *after* its relative major (in the direction of the sharps): ... F > d > C > a > G > e > ... If you want to interlace major and minor keys (or major and minor perfect chords which amounts to the same thing), a practice that was shortly thereafter abandoned, then logic would dictate that you put the relative minor *before* its relative major (in the direction of the sharps): ... d > F > a > C > e > G ... so that a lower root appears before a higher root. Also in this way every root is a 3rd apart and two adjacent chords in the "musical circle" always have two common tones, the 3rd and 5th of the 1st chord (the root and 3rd of the 2nd chord).
Now (finally) my question: Can anyone see *any* rationale to Heinichen's arrangement that I couldn't see?
178.51.16.158 (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- I can't speak for everyone else, but I couldn't think of a reason. It always appeared to me that in teaching the theory of Western harmony, an approach based on a progression of alternating major and minor thirds would be easier to understand and also more convenient to learn from, thus:
A♭ E♭ B♭ F C G D A /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ A♭ C E♭ G B♭ D F A C E G B D F♯ A C♯ E G♯ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ c g d a e b f♯ c♯
- The top line names major triads, the bottom line names minor triads, and the middle line gives the names of the individual notes of which the triads are comprised. In this chart, where the direction of the sharps is from left to right, a is between F and C, and not between C and G as in Heinichen's circle. --Lambiam 22:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is without doubt the only sane arrangement in my opinion. In fact schemes like the Tonnetz are arranged according to this very principle because, well, there is no alternative. Incidentally if you take the Tonnetz and construct a dual "Akkordnetz" by making every face (triangle) of the Tonnetz a vertex you get an extended version of what you have drawn above. But to get back to trying to understand Heinichen's reasoning, is it true that some theorists in the 17th c. and/or 18 c. took the diatonic scale of D (white keys from D to D, or in other words the "dorian" scale) as the prototype of the minor mode (instead of the scale of A, so called "aeolian", which is what is done nowadays)? I seem to remember statements to that effect, maybe when discussing incomplete key signatures used for the minor mode at that time. If that is indeed the case (and I'm not certain it is) could it be that Heinichen's "musical circle" which is a circle of keys would have d minor before C major, a minor before G major, etc. simply because to him the relative minor of C major is actually d dorian, and so on? 178.51.16.158 (talk) 10:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
November 27
[edit]Statistics of the main film and television awards by genre
[edit]Are there any statistical sources regarding film and television awards such as the Oscars, Golden Globes and Emmys that highlight the distribution of nominations and winners based on narrative genre? In particular, I would need information regarding statistics on historical genre films and TV series. Sources regarding the general trend of historical cinema over the decades would also be good. Thank you Sira Aspera (talk) 18:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- I do not know of a source that does exactly what you want. The best that I can think of is to search Google for IMDB lists of winners and nominees in various categories. For example, you can search "IMDB list best picture nominees" (without the quotation marks). You can then click on a page. There will be a blue oval icon to the left of where the page says, "Sort by." This should call up a window that will break the list down by genre among other things. You will have to check to see if the list is accurate and up to date. FreeKresge (talk) 16:28, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
November 28
[edit]TV show with cold open that ends with cut off curse word
[edit]I saw this question today and while I can't find the answer, I do remember that it exists. A recent television show always started with a cold open that ended with a curse word being cut off as the title was shown. What is the name of the series? 68.187.174.155 (talk) 01:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Was it Zoey's Extraordinary Playlist (2020–2021)? --Canley (talk) 03:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- TV Tropes mentions this as a running gag:
The Cold Open for each episode ends with Zoey about to blurt out something like "What the..." and "Holy..." when the title appears, blocking over her mouth with the theme song.
[1] --Lambiam 04:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC)- I finally had a chance to check it and yes, that is the show I remember seeing. Now, if I could just remember where I saw the original question... 68.187.174.155 (talk) 00:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- TV Tropes mentions this as a running gag:
Across a Crowded Room available to watch on DVD or available online to watch
[edit]I'm trying to find out if the 1978 TV play Across a Crowded Room produced by ITV Yorkshire has been released on DVD or available to watch online. The full movie is fully intact and has survived but I just don’t know where I can watch it. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
December 4
[edit]Kitty Clive 1956 (TV play) Critics Response
[edit]I'm looking to try and find what critics thought about the 1956 TV play Kitty Clive but struggling to find any newspaper articles about the TV play. So can any of you try and find out what critics thought about the TV play as well as a link so then I can include in a draft I'm making about the TV play/TV movie. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 00:07, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
The Kids International Show 1982 plot
[edit]can any of my guys try and find out what the plot is of the 1982 tv mini series The Kids International Show produced by the BBC. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 00:32, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Does this help? https://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/07d22f93bc2f44158381f8934b9584c0 TrogWoolley (talk) 07:43, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
December 5
[edit]Strange Experiences (1955-1962) made by which company
[edit]Strange Experiences was a series that ran from 1955-1962 however on IMDB it's not been confirmed which company produced the series so can any of you guys try and find out which company produced the series. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 17:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Mysterious tales introduced by Peter Williams, and produced by Derick Williams, that were screened on ATV London from the very first week it was broadcasting."[2] (ATV London was part of the ITV network.) Look up Derick Williams on IMDb: [3]. --Lambiam 03:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- That doesn't answer the question. It names the individual producer and the distribution company, but not the production company, which may or may not be the same as the
productiondistribution company. (For example, for Star Trek during at least part of its original run, NBC was the distribution company, Gene Roddenberry was the executive producer and other people were also producers, but the production company was Desilu. The question asks for the company corresponding to the latter. In the IMDB it would be under "company credits", but as Matthew said, it isn't.) --142.112.149.206 (talk) 03:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC) (edited later)- But Derick Williams' IMDb entry says "Headed his own production company in the 1950's", which is suggestive.
- The Series' entry has a link "See production info at IMDbPro": I am not signed up to IMDBPro, but is the querant and has he followed this up? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.1.211.243 (talk) 17:39, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- That doesn't answer the question. It names the individual producer and the distribution company, but not the production company, which may or may not be the same as the
December 6
[edit]"The Boxer"
[edit]Starting ~0:36, that song features a raspy, low-pitched reed (?) instrument; what is it? Bassoon? The sources that I find only mention guitars and the piccolo trumpet (that's not it). -- 136.56.165.118 (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Our article mentions a bass harmonica, and judging from, e.g., this video I don't see any reason to doubt that. --Wrongfilter (talk) 19:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- That sounds like it; thanks! --136.56.165.118 (talk) 19:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Here is an interview with the fellow who played it on the record. --Wrongfilter (talk) 19:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks again! --136.56.165.118 (talk) 20:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Here is an interview with the fellow who played it on the record. --Wrongfilter (talk) 19:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- That sounds like it; thanks! --136.56.165.118 (talk) 19:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
ITV 60 DVD episodes
[edit]I've been wanting to know what ITV episodes from which shows are on the ITV 60 DVD. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 19:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- This has a listing. Is that good enough? --Wrongfilter (talk) 20:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC)