Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciklum (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 12:15, 3 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciklum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted, immediately re-created by the same WP:SPA, Ciklum (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Claim to notability is a placing in a list by Red Herring magazine, which is currently unverifiable as the pages are 404. Almost entirely the work of an agent of the company. Sources are largely not independent (i.e. repeats of press releases). Needs deletion or a complete rewrite with new sources, IMO. Guy (Help!) 23:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no notability. Haakon (talk) 20:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt as repeatedly re-created deleted page. This is an IT outsourcing company. Inclusion on "top 100 business" lists is no claim of notability; creation of the list does not automatically confer notability on 100 otherwise unremarkable businesses. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Why wasn't is speedy deleted? Niteshift36 (talk) 02:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 03:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 ===[[Ciklum]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciklum}}</ul></div>
 :{{la|Ciklum}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciklum (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February 27#{{anchorencode:Ciklum}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciklum (2nd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}})
@@ Line 8: / Line 14: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 19:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' per nom, no notability. [[User:Haakon|Haakon]] ([[User talk:Haakon|talk]]) 20:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' and '''salt''' as repeatedly re-created deleted page.  This is an ''IT outsourcing'' company.  Inclusion on "top 100 business" lists is no claim of notability; creation of the list does not automatically confer notability on 100 otherwise unremarkable businesses. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 15:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
-*Was the version kept in the first afd any better than the current? &mdash;[[User:Korath|Korath]] ([[User talk:Korath|Talk]]) 01:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom. Why wasn't is speedy deleted? [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 02:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>